HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 8 GEOTECHNICAL SVCS 6-20-88- CONSENT CALENDAR
....-
APPROVED STAFF
TO:
WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES -
JAMBOREE ROAD BETWEEN IRVINE BLVD. AND SANTIAGO CANYON ROAD
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Tustin City council at their meeting of June 20, 1988
approve'tke Drofessional services agreement designating Geo-Goils,
Inc. of Santa Ana to provide geotechncial services along Jamboree
Road between Irvine Boulevard and Santiago Canyon Road in the City
of Orange, and authorize the Mayor to execute said agreement.
BACKGROUND:
The Jamboree Road project limits extend from Irvine Boulevard on
the south side to Santiago Canyon Road (realigned) in the City of
Orange on the north. This project will be totally funded by
Assessment District No. 86-2 for all design, constrUction and
inspection services. During the mass grading operations and
construction of street improvements, it will be necessary to employ
the cons~±¢ing services of a soils engineering fi~m to perform
certain grading inspections and compaction testing functions related
to the Jamboree Road improvements.
DISCUSSIOM-
.®
Request f,,r proposals to perform the necessary geotechnical services
were solicited from three consultant firms as follows:
Geo-Soils, Inc., Santa Ana, CA ............ $339,021.00
Zeiser Geotechnical, Inc., Costs Mesa ...... $365,590.00
The 'Earth Technology Corp., Long Beach ..... $378,545.00
Each of the above-mentioned firms adequately proposed on all items
of work listed within the scope of work. Geo-Soils, Inc. has
previously performed work within the City, more specifically in the
Tustin Ranch area.
Staff requests the City Council to approve the attached Professional
Services Agreement with Geo-Soils, Inc. for Geotechnical Services
for Jamboree Road between Irvine Boulevard and Santiago Canyon Road,
and authorize the Mayor to execute said agreement. All costs for
these consultant services will be funded by Assessment District No.
86-2 with no cost impacts to the City's General Fund.
Bob Ledendecker
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
, 1988, by and between CITY OF TUSTIN, a municipal
·
corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"); and GEOSOILS, Inc., 1446
East Chestnut Avenue, Santa Aha, CA 92701 (hereinafter called
"Consultant").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, City desires to employ Consultant to furnish the nece~;sary
engineering services for providing geotechnical services inclusiw, of
testinq and grading observation/inspection for Jamboree Road between
Irvine Boulevard and Santiago Canyon Road in the Cities of Tustin and
.Orange, and in the County of Orange, hereinafter referred to as
"Project"; and
WHEREAS, Consultant is qualified to provide the necessary service in
connec'alon with said Project and has agreea to provide the necessary
geotechnical set;ices; and
W~EREAS, Consultant has submitted to City a proposal dated February
16, 1~88 and Letter of Clarification dated March 9, 1988, copies of which
are attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", respectively, and
are by this reference incorporated herein as though set forth in full
herein ("the Proposal").
NOW, THEREFORE, City agrees to employ and does hereby employ
Consultant to provide for the professional services for the Project, and
City and Consultant for the consideration hereinafter set forth agree as
follows:
Section 1: Scope of Consultant's Services. Consultant agrees to
furnish to the City consulting services for the Project. These services
shall include all of the geotechnical services to be performed as
directed by the City Engineer.
Section 2: ~ for d_c.mDletion. I is hereby Understood and
mutually agreed that the time f,~r completion of the work to be performed
b~ C6nsultant is an essential condition of this Agreement. Consultant
agrees that it shall prosecute regul%rly and.diligently the work of this
agreement accordingly to reasonable schedules established by City.
Consultant shall not be accountable for delays in the progress of its
work caused by any condition beyond his control and without the fault or
negligence of Consultant.
SectioR 3.- compensation. The compensation to be paid under this
· greement shall be set forth in Exhibit "A" and monthly payments for work
completed will be paid as the work progresses. '~
Section 4: Statement of COsts. Pursuant to the provisions of
California Government Section 7550, the total amount expended by City
relating to the preparation of the report and documents prescribed herein
shall be set forth within the final edition thereof, in a separate
section, in a statement substantially as follows: "Pursuant to California
Government Code Section 7550, the City of Tustin' expended the total
amount of $ for the preparation of this report and/or
documents."
Section 5: Miscellaneous Provisions.
A. City and Consultant further agree to the following conditions:
(1) City, by notifying consultant in writing, shall have the
right to terminate any or all of the services and work covered by this
Agreement at any time.
(2) Consultant agrees that it shall proceed immediately and
diligently to perform the services provided for in this Agreement upon
receipt of notice from City to proceed therewith.
(3) The terms and provisions of this Agreement shall extend to
and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns of the respective parties thereto.
(4) ~onsul~ ~ shall perform the ~rvices hereunder as an
~ndependent contractor an,~ under no circumstances or conditions shall
Consultant and .any of its agents, servants and employees, ~e considered
as an employee or agent of the Cit~.
(5) Consultant shall perform all services required under this
Agreement in a careful, diligent, professional manner, and shall be
responsible for all errors and omissions for services performed by
Consultant under the terms of this Agreement. Consultant, as a material
part of the consideration of this Agreement, hereby waives, on its behalf
and on behalf of all others claiming through Consultant, all claims and
demands against City, its agents, employees, successors' and assigns, for
all loss, damage, injury, sickness, or death of any person resulting from
the negligent performance of this Agreement, and agrees to indemnify,
defend and hold City, its agents, employees, successors and assigns,
harmless from any loss, damage, injury, .sickness, death, or other claim
made by other persons and from 'all costs, expenses and charges arising
therefrom. Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect during the
term of this Agreement, its existing policies of insurance for which
certificates of insurance have heretofore been delivered to City.
(6) Consultant shall carry and pay for such compensation
insurance as is necessary to fully protect Consultant and its employees
under California Worker's Compensation Insurance and Safety laws, to
relieve City from all responsibility under said laws in connection with
the performance of this Agreement, and upon the execution of this
Agreement, to file with City a certificate certifying to said protection.
(7) Consultant certifies that there shall be no discrimination
against any employee who is employed in the work'covered by this
Agreement,or against any application for such employment, because of
race, religion, color, sex,or national origin including, but not limited
to, the following:
(3)
a. Bm yment, upgrading, demo a or transfer,
.
recruitment or'recruitment advertising, lay-off or termination,
rates of paY or other forms of compensation, and selection for
. training, including apprenticeship.
(8) Consultant shall provide City monthly with a detailed
itemization of all work performed, and the fees accrued thereon, in
complete and sufficient detail, to fully apprise City thereof.
IN WI.TNESS 'WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed by the parties on
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TUSTIN, a municipal corporation
.ATTEST:
Cit. y Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
By
Mayor
GEOSOILS, INC.
By.
President
(4)
Geo$oils, Inc.
Soil Mechanics · Geology · Foundation Engineering
PROPOSAL FOR E~GINEERING SERVICES
JAMBOREE ROAD .- IRVINE BOULEVARD
TO SANTIAGO CANYON ROAD
CITIES OF. TUSTIN AND ORANGE AND
COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA
Proposal Presented to
Irvine Community Development Company
February 16, 1988
PR ~ 1884-A-OC
Soil Mechanics · Gediogy · Foundntion Engineering
1448 EostChegnutAvenue · SantaAna, California 92701 · (714) 647-0277 · FAX (714) 647.0745
·
Irvine Community Development Company
500 Newport Center Drive
Fifth Floor
Newport Beach, California 92660
Attention:
M~. Gil Nielsen
Vice-President, Land Development
February 16, 1988
PR #1884-A-OC
Subject:
Proposal for Engineering Services
Jamboree Road - Irvine Boulevard to Santiago Canyon-Road
Citie~ of Tustin and Orange, and County of Orange,
California -
G~'~I amen ~
·
In accordance with your request,
proposal and estimate of costs
Jamboree Road - Irvine BouleVard
we are pleased to submit' this
for geotechnical services for
to Santiago Canyon Road in t~he
Cities of Tustin and Orange and ~he County of Orange~. California.
Basis of Proposal
This proposal is based upon ~he Request for Professional Services
(RFPS) that was provided on February 1, 1988, and the information
provided at ~he pre-proposal meeting at The Irvine Company on
February 8, ' 1988.
Prior Doctmen~
During the course of proposal preparation, the following
geotechnical documents, provided by The Irvine Company, were
reviewed:
(~iYON ROAD
'PROdE L&IIT$
, .
D~SPOSAL-81TE-
~$AI. SITE
'A"
· mi~oree Road- Irvine Blvd. to Irvine Park Entrance
~mtt~go Canyon Road - City Limits to J~oree Road
.OCATION MAP
JAMBOREE ROAD
PROJECT
ICDC
Page 2
FebL~lary 16, 1988
PR ~1884-A-OC
ae
b.
c·
Mass Grading Soils Compaction Report, Tentative Tract. 12763,
Lots 1-14 and Lot 16, and Lots 15, 16, and 20 of Sector 12,
Tustin Ranch, City of Tustin, California, by GeoSoils, Inc.,
W.O. 1538-B-OC, dated May 18, 1987.
Grading Plan Review, Jamboree Road (Southern Sector) from
Irvi'ne Boulevard, the Northerly Boundary of the City of Tustin,
Station 123+31 to Station 309+80 in the City of Tustin,
California~ by Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc., W.O. 101348-J,
dated November 2, 1987.
Preliminary Grading Plan Review, Proposed Jamboree Road, City
of Orange, California, by Pacific Soils-Engineering, Inc., Work
Order 101348-J, dated December 29, 19.87.
Prior reports referred to in Items b and c above were not provided·
In addition, ~e have
Hunsaker and .Associates.
reviewed the following plans prepared by
·
·
Improvement Plans for Assessment District 86-2, Tentative Tract
I2870 (Sheets 1-46) for Jamboree Road, dated March 20,-1987.
Rough Grading Plan for Jamboree R~ad (Sheets 1-13), dated
November 19, 1987.
Rough Grading Plan, Assessment District 86-2, Tentative Tract
12870 for Jamboree Road (Sheets 1-23), dated October 6, 1987
and January 7, 1988.
Oualification~
GeoSoils, Inc. is uniquely qualified to perform the requested
services. The company maintains a professional and technical staff
of approximately 135 people (45 in Santa Aha) which provide these
services throughout Southern California. Descriptions of similar
projects and references are Provided in a later section of this
proposal.
Geo$oils, Inc.
ICDC
Page-3
Pebr%~ary 16, 1988 .
PR. % 1884-A-OC
· i ·
GeoSoils, Inc. has performed these similar servxces for 'the recently
completed TUSTIN RANCH TRACT ~O. 12763. This project was Completed
within the budget of the RFPS and requests for additional services.
The project flowed smoothly and was completed ahead of schedule.
GeoSoils, Inc. is currently performing the geotechnical
investigation for the PETERS CANYON DAM AND RETENTION BASIN project,
which lies southerly of the proposed grading project.
GeoSoils, Inc. is currently providing similar services during the
grading for TUSTIN RANCH TRACT NO. 1~870.
GeoSoils, Inc. maintains a good working relationship with Mr.. Mary
Harwood, Project Engineer; Mr. Robert Hall and Mr. Dick Hess of the
Construction Division. We have worked well with these gentlemen,
not only on The irvine Company projects: but
they were employed by other developers.
-.
We thank you
Jamboree Road.
very best in 'geotechnical consulting
questions pertaining to our proposal,
over the years when
for the opportunity to submit this proposal for
We look forward to, continuing to provide with the
services. Should you have any
please call upon us.
Very truly yours,
GeoSoils, Inc. '
President
ARK/k
Distribution'.
( 3 ) Addressee
Geo$oils, Inc.
ICDC
February 16, 1988
PR #1884-A-OC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paae
I. PROPOSAL STATEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
.
III. METHODOLOGY FOR SCOPE OF SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
IV. PROJECT SCHEDULE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
V. SUMMARY OF SERVICES, PRODUC%'S AND COSTS .......... 7
PROJECT COST SUMMARY SHEET (EXHIBIT "C")
SCHEDU?.~ "A # ................... 24
SCHEDULE #B.# · · · · · · · · · · · ~ · · · · · . .. 25
SCHEDULE ~C . . . . . .... . .... . . . . . . 26
SCHE~ "D# · · · · · · .. · · · · · · · · · · · · 27
SCHEDULE "E# · · · · · · · · · · · · .. · · · · · . 28
VI. ADDENDUM (Itams by Consultant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
vii. PERSONNEL AND PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS'" . . . . . .... . . 32
VIII. HOURLY RATE SCHEDUI~ · · · · · · · · · · · · · ...... 33
IX. INSURANCE/CONFLICT OF INTEREST INFORMATION FORMS ..... 33
GRADING PLAN REVIEW-
LETTER OF PRIOR REPORT ACCEPTANCE
Geo$oils, Inc.
ICDC
Page 1
Feb~uary 16, 1988
PR # 1884-A-0C
IO
PROPOSAL STATEME2~
Consultant acknowledges that he has made himself aware of the
services, schedules, and products according to the project
schedule in Section IV and on a time and materials fee contract
basis, not to exceed the total listed in the 'cost summary given
in Section V.
Consultant: GeoSoils, Inc.
President
Date: February 16, 1988
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
BACI~GRO--~D AND PREFIOUS CONSULTING SERVICES
The Irvine Company, in cooperation with the CitY~'0f Tustin,
City of Orange, and County of 'Orange, is proposing.to construct
Jamboree Road from. Irvine Boulevard to Irvine' Park entrance and
realign Santiago ~ Canyon Road from Orange city limits to
Jamboree Road. The southern segment is within the City of
Tustin. The northern segment is in the unincorporated County
of 0range~ howeve=, falls within the City of Orange sphere of
· influence. The City of Tustin i~ acting as lead agency for
this project and may administer the construction contract. The
project area is shown on the following "Location Map".
A ENC CLASSIF CATm0N
The Orange-County Master Plan of Arterial Highways designates
Jamboree Road as a major highway from Irvine Boulevard to
Tustin Ranch Road and a primary highway from Tustin Ranch Road
to Santiago Canyon Road. Santiago Canyon Road is classified as
a primary highway also. Major highways are six-lane divided
roadways, while primary highways are four-lane.
Geo$oils, Inc.
ICDC
Page 2
FebL~/aL-y 16, 1988
PR #1884-A-OC
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The roadway alignment goes ~hrough existing agricultural and
open space areas of ~he Irvine Ranch; however, a shor~ segment
of the roadway has been graded in ~he Orange area. The segment
of jamboree Road between Irvine Boulevard and Tustin Ranch Road
is be/~lg mass graded with adjacent development.
PREVIOUS CONSULTING SERVICE~
HunSaker and Associates prepared final design documents for the
subject projec~ and retained Pacific So ils to conduct the
geotechnical investigation to suppor~ that design. The plans
are currently in plan check with the Cities of Tustin and
Orange.
Onsite developments that impact the design of Jamboree Road
include Tustin Ranch development in the southern segment and
Santiago Ranch in the northern portion.
IRwD .has prepared a sub-area master plan for the Tustin area
that shows s~wer, water and reclaimed pipelines in this
roadway. Construction-has commenced on some of these projects.
.
Coordination with ~hese ongoing and future projects is
considered par~ of the scope of work.
PROPOSED ACTIONS
The objective of this project is to construct an arterial
highway that satisfies entitlement conditions for the Tustin
and Orange projects. The roadway is needed for delivery of
land for development. A target date of June 1, 1989 has been
established to have Jamboree Road open to traffic and is
essential for The Irvine company to meet its commitments for
delivery of ~hese lands. The target date of having the road
complete is November 1, 1989.
FROJ~CT TEAM
The Irvine Community DeveloDment Team includeS:
Senior Vice .President Mike Ellis
Vice President Gilbert Nielsen
Project Manager, Orange Brian Austin
GeoSoils, Inc.
ICDC
Page 3
February 16, 1988'
PR ~ 1884-A-OC
ProJ .ct Manager, Tustin
ProJ ec~ Manager, Tustin
Managing Engineer
Jay Pierce
Tosh Neminsky
Mary Harwood
The City of Tustin Team' includes:
Director of Public Works
Engineering Service Manager
The City of Oran=e Team includes:
Director of Public 'Works
City Engineer
The Coun~v 9f Oranae Team includes:
Director of Transportation
Transportation Planning Chief,
F~hill Section
Bob Ledendecker
Ron Wolf. rd
Frank Paige
Gary Johnson
Bill Zaun
Max Anderson
III. .W~THO~T~ FOR.SCOPE OF
We have reviewed ~he scope of work provided with the RFPS and
we a~:ept ~his scope of work as appropriate for the project. A
letter of acceptance of the previous ge.technical work is
appended to ~his proposal. The scope of services is repeated
here for completeness:
A. Data Review
.
Review the grading
soils/ge.technical data
investigations as follows:
plan and pertinent
from prior and current
a.
Mass Grading Soils Compaction Report, Tentative
Tract 12763, Lots 1-14 and Lot 16, and Lots 15, 16,
and 20 of Sector 12, Tustin Ranch, City of'Tustin,
California, by Ge. Soils, Inc., W.O. 1538-B-OC,
dated May 18, 1987.
Grading Plan Review, Jamboree Road. (Southern
Sector) from Irvine Boulevard, the Northerl~
Boundary of the City of Tustin, Station 123+31 to
Station 309+80 in the City of Tustin, California,
GeoSoils, Inc.
ICDC
Page 4
February .16, 1988'
PR # 18-84 -A-OC
C.
!
by PaCific Soils Engineering, Ibc., W.O. 101348-J,
dated November 2, 1987.
Preliminary Grading Plan Review, Proposed Jamboree
Road, City of Orange, California, by Pacific Soils
Engineering, Inc., Work Order 101348-J, dated
December 29, 1987.
2. Grading Plan review services have been provided
Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc. With s.ubmittal of th~'s
proposal, consultant shall include written accepta~e
of the findings and recommendations therein.
3. Consultant is to prepare a repor~ if additional field,
laboratory, or office work is needed.
B. 0~ERVATION AND TESTING
a~
Rough Grading. P~rform field observation during
rough grading to confirm that suitable materials
are being used and placed according to plans and
specifica~ions and agency standards. Observation
and testing will include, bu~ not be limited to,
the following:
Rough grading ( i. e., cu~s, fills, over
excava=i OhS, Ag i ine relocations, disposal
sites, IRWD Reservoir Site, protection of
exis=ing water line and facilities, etc.). The
earthwork volume is given as 2,500,000 cubic
yards.
b.
Substructure and Roadway Construction. Perform
field observation during construction to confirm
tha~ suitable materials are being used and placed
according to plans and specifications and agency
s~andards. Observation and testing during
cons=ruction will include, bu= not be limited to,
the following:
o Substructure (i. e., waterlines, sewerlines,
storm drain, reclaimed water, common trench,
retests, etc. ).
Geo$oils, Inc.
ICDC
Page 5
February 16, 1988
PR #lSS4-A-OC
Roadway (i.e., subbase, curb and gutter.', paving
and base course, etc.). Specific length and
depths of trench are not provided for the trench
backfill work· Specific lengths of roadway
components are not provided.
2. Ro~ah Gradi~a
In general, t.he rough grading services shall include,
but not be limited to, the following services:
Rouah Gradina Inspections.
_
Testina and Supervision
a. Supervision of all technical field personnel.
b. Two technicians full-time for duration of project.
c. Attendance at pre-grade meeting by Project Manager
and Supervisory Technician.
d. Observation _and _ documentation
grubbing operations.
of site clearing and
Observation of processing and moisture conditioning
prior to fill placement.
·
f. -~ testing of alluvial soils.
g. Soil engineering approval of ares to receive'fill.
h. Observation and testing
adequate fill lifts,
compaction.
of fill placement for
moisture content, and
i. Observations of subdrain placement for adequate
percent fall and amount of filter material (.if
necessary).
J ·
Review of recom-endations, testing and observations
regarding disposition of existing buildings,
cesspools, seepage pits, pipelines, etc.
Provision of daily
superintendent.
field reports to onsite
G4oSoils,
ICDC
Page 6
February 1-6, 1988
PR # 1884-A-OC
·
Laboratory Testing
a. Maximum density/optimum moisture content
Expansion Index
¢. Gradations
d. Sand Equivalent
e. ResistivityValue
f. Soluble Sulfates~ chlorides, pH
g. Soil fertility tests
Phosphate-Phosphorus,
h. Soil Toxicity tests
·
(Boron, Nitrate-Nitrogen,
Potassium salinity)
Report PreDara~i~
Provide two geo~echnical reports; one at the completion
of the mass grading= and one at the completion of
substructure and roadway construction which include the
following=
a. Earthwork operations summary.
. .
Analysis of data as required.
c. Documentation of geotechnical conditions
encountered and summarization of soil engineering
and geologic conditions.
d. As-graded geotechnical map.
e. Appropriate illustrations.
f. Laboratory test data.
g. Summary and locations plotted on copy of grading
plan of field density tests.
h. Conclusions.
Geo$oils, Inc.
ICDC
Page 7
February 16, 1988
PR # 1884-A-OC
Recommendations.
References.
Meetinas and CoordinatiQ~
_
Weekly Jobsite meetings are requested and should be
estimated at one hour per week ~hrough the duration of
rough grading.
Additional meetings for coordination with ICDC, City
staff, and OCEMA would be necessary.
GeoSoils, Inc. is prepared 'to star~ work
Scheduling for this project is as follows:
Pre-Bid Meet~g
Proposal Due
Interviews
Consultant Selection
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
when selected.
February 8, 1988
February 19, 1988
February 24, 1988
March 1, 1988
April 1, 1988
October 31, 1989
These work schedules may be modified by you due to weather
conditions, contractor ' s pace, and performance or other
circumstances beyond consultant ' s control. Ex~ra costs, if
any, would be authorized by negotiated change order.
su o Y oF s v'IcEs. PRODUCTS, AND COSTS
This summary .is prepared based on the deletions and additions
to RFPS services that were detailed at the Pre-Bid meeting on
February 8, 1988.
Geo$oils, Inc.
ICDC
Page 8
February 16, 1988
PR # 1884-A-0C
We .expect our geotechn'ical services to be utilized during the
project in accordance with ~he scope of services.. The
an~icipated charges, for the above scope of services are shown
on the following tabulation. These fees are based on the
enclosed Schedule of Fees.
GeoSoils, Inc.
Io
Page 9
February 16, 1988
PR # 1884-A-0C
S~~.~ #A"
JAM~O~E ROAD - IRVTNE BOU?.~VARD TO TUSTIN RANCH ROAD
ROUGH GRADE
Under construction with
GeoSoils. Inc.
geotechnical
services provided by
(No manhours required. )
II. ROADWAY AND SUBSTRUCTURE
IRWD will test sewer, water, and reclaimed water lines. Per
Flaten/Harwood at pre-bid meeting, A.C. lay down and plant
inspections and presaturation, testing of sidewalk subgrade are
not included.
Data Review
. S~aff Engineer 4 hrs. x $65.00/hr. $
Principal Engineer 2 hrs. x $85.00/hr. $
(6 hours ~
260.00
170,90
$
B. Observation and Testina
1. Substructure (Trench backfills]
a. Electrical/TV (14. 157 1. f. ) (Tests at 200' ~
Technician
70 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00/hr. $ 2,047.50
b. Gas (9,407 t-f.) (Tests at 200')
Technician
47 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00/hr. $ .1,374.75
Geo$oils, Inc.
ICDC
Page 10
Febzl/ary 16, -1988
PR # 1884-A-OC
c. Tel~Dhg~9 (9.407 1.f.) ~Tests at 200')
e
·
Technician
47 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00/hr. $ .1,374.75
d. S~orm Drain (8.543 1.f.) (Tests at 200')
Tec~mician
42 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00/hr. $ 1.228.50
(1~5 hours
9_. Roadway
a. Cur~ ~Hd Gu~ter (20.565 1.f.~ (Tests at 500')..
Technician
41 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00
$ 1,199.25
314 1.f.~ (Tests at 300'~
Technician
58 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39,00
$ 1,696.50
¢. Base ¢17.314 1.f~ (Tests at 300'~
Technician
58 2es~s x 3/4 hr./tes~: x $39.00
s 3..69s. o
( 118 hours
$ 4.592.2~
C. LABORATORY TESTING
'Tec/mician ("R#-Values) 28 hrs. X $45.00/hr.
Technician 36 hrs. x $45.00/hr.
(64 hours%
1,2'60.00
1.620.00
S ~-. 880.00
·
(Corrosive, fertility, toxicity tests not included per
Flat.n/Harwood. )
C, eo$otls, Inc.
ICDC
Page 11
February 16, 1988'
PR # lSS4-.A.-OC
D.' ~UPERVISION '
Staff Engineer
Principal Engineer
24 hrs. X $65.00/hr.
S 'hrs. X $SS.00/hr.
hours
E. REPORT PREPARATION ¢1 Final Report)
_
Staff Engineer
Principal Engineer
Drafting
16 hrs. X $65.00/hr.
4 hrs. X $85.00/hr.
40 hrs. X $40.00/hr.
(.60 hours
·
1,560.00
o.oo
2.240.00
1,040.00
340.00
, oo.oo
2.980.00
F. ~ETINGS AND COORDINATION
Staff. Engineer 10 hrs. X $65,00/hr.
Geo$oils, Inc.
· Page 12
Febr%zary Z6, · 1988
PR 91884-A-OC
I.
SCH~DUI~ mBW
JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE AT PETERS CHANNEL
BOUGH GRADE
Area under Oonstruction
GeoSoils. Inc.
with geotechnical
services provided by
(No man hours required)
II. BRIDGE AND SUBSTRUCTURE
The following estimate taken from incomplete
November 13, 1987, by McLean and Schultz.
DATA REVIEW
Principal Engineer
2 hrs. x $85.00/hr;
B. OBSERVATION AND TESTING
1. Pile Installation ¢152 Pile~) ~nsDecti0~
S~aff Engineer 64 hrs. x $65.00/hr.
2. Footina Inspections
Staff Engineer 8 hrs. x $65.00/hr.
3. Structural Backfill Testina
_
Technician.
C. LABORATORY TESTING
Per Flaten/Harwood, testing of
materials, not included.
Technician
56 hrs. x $39.00/hr.
· plans dated
170.00
4.160.00
·
$ 520.00
2.184.00
concrete, steel, and other
8 hrs. x $45.00/hr.
360.00
GeoSoils, Inc.
ICDC
Page 13
February ~6, 1988
PR # 1884-A-OC
D. ~UPERVISION
Principal Engineer
S~aff Engineer
E. ~EPORT PREPARATION
St&fl Engineer
Pr~ncipal Engineer
Dr~fting
4 hrs. x $85.00/hr.
8 hrs. x $65.00/hr.
[12 hours %
12 hrs. x $65.00/hr.
2 hrs. x $85.00/hr.
16 hrs. x $40.00/hr.
340.00
s~_o. oo
86,0. O0
780.00
17o.oo
640.00
1.590.00
F. ~EETINGS AND COORDINATION
Staff Engineer 10 hrS- x $65.00/hr.
650.00
Geo$oils, Inc.
ICDC
Page 14
Febz~/ary 16, 1988
PR # 1884-A-0C
I.
SCg~.DUT.~ m~
JAMBOREE ROAD - TUSTIN RANCH ROAD TO TUSTIN ~0UND~RY
~fhe grading quantities
are as follows=
Raw Volume=
Removals=
Disposal Area=
~unsaker and Associates (10/7/87.)
978,440 c.y.
549,950 c.y.
375. 300 c.y.
1,903,690 c.y..
Mr. Hess indicated ~hat the contractor would take five days for
s~ar~-up and ten days for 'finish work. The contractor will
average 25,000 cubic yards per day and will work five days per
week, 10 hours per day.
A. DATA REVIEW
S~aff Engineer
Senior Technician
4 hrs. x $65.00/_hr. $ 260.00
8 hrs. x$45.00/~r. $ 360.00
(12 bourse_ $ 620.00
B-D OBSERVATION AND TESTING
The major cost for this type of project is technician' time
during grading and, due to the difficulties of the project,
geologic inspection. :The time span required for these
services is variable and depends upon the contractor's pace
and performance. --
1. Sta~c-Up
Technician
5 days x 8 hfs/day x $45.00/hr.
1.800.00
,
Oeo$oils, Inc.
ICDC
Page. 15
Pebruary 16, '1988
PR' # 1884-A-OC
2. Gradina Contr91
EarthWork Volume:
Time Estimate:
Work Schedule:
1,903,690 cubic yards
76 days (15 wks-25,000 c.y. per day)
5 days/week, '10 hrs./day
a. Senior Technician.
61 days x 8 hrs./day x $45.00/hr.
61 days x 2 hrs./day x $56.25/hr.
15 days x 10 hrs/day x $56.25/hr.
21,960.00
6,862.50
8,437.50
61.days x 8 hrs./day x $39.00/hr.
61 days x 2 hrs./day x $48.75/hr.
15 days x 10 hfs/day x $48.75/hr.
19,032.00
5,974.50
7,312.50
b. Geoloaist ·
Principal
4 hrs./wk x 15 wks x $85.0'0/hr.
$ 5,100.00
Staff
10 h~s./wk x 15 wks x $65.00/hr..
Enaineer
Principal
4 hrs./wk x 15 wkS x $85.00/hr.
Staff
~ hrs./wk x 15 wks x $65.00/hr.
9,750.00
$ 5,100.00
5,850.00
Laboratory
Technician
12 hrs./wks x 15 wks x $45.00/hr.
$ 8.%00.00
S103,479,00
, ,
3. Finish Worx
Technician
10 days x 8 hrs./day X $45.00/hr.
$ 3:600.0Q
4. Final-Soils and Geoloqic Report
Principal,Engineer 2 hrs. x $85.00/hr.
Principal Geologist 2 hrs. x $85.00/hr.
$ 170.00
$ 170.00
Seo$oils, Inc.
ICDC
Page 16
February 16, 1988
PR # 1884-A-OC
Staff Engineer
Staff Geologist
Drafting
16 hrs. x $65.00/hr.
12 hrs. x $65.00/hr.
40 hrs. x $40.00/hr.
1,040.00
780.00
1. 600.00
$ 3.760.00
If ~he projec~ takes longer than the anticipated 76 working
days, or design changes that require additional work are
made either in your office , by governmental agencies, or
by the design engineer, the estimated costs would increase.
This additional work will be billed at our fee schedule
rates, as authorized by your written change order.
E. MEETINGS AND COORDINATION
Staff. Engineer 10 hrs. X $65.00/hr.
S 650.00
II. ROADWAY AND SUBSTRUCTUR~
IRWD will test sewer, .. water, reclaimed water lines. Per
-Flaten/Harwood at pre-bid meeting, A.C. lay down and plan
insp~ions and presaturation of sidewalk subgrade are not
included.
A. DATA
Staff Engineer
Principal Engineer
4 hrs. x $65.00/hr.
2 hrs. x $85.00/hr.
$ 260.00
$ %7o,oo
hours ~ $. 430. OO
B. OBSERVATION AND TESTING
1. ~ubstructure (Trench backfi%ls)
a. .Electrical/TV [16,073 1.f.) [Tests at 200')
Technician
80 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00/hr. $ 2,340.00
Geo$oils, Inc.
ICDC
Pa~e 17
Febr~lary 16, 1988
PR # 1884-A-OC
!
b. Gas (10.448 1.
Technician
52 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00/hr. $ 1,521.00
c. Telephone (10.323 1.f.% (Tests at 200'~
Technician
51 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00/hr. $ 1,491.75
d. 3~Qrm Drain (10.364 1.f.~ (Tests at 200'}
Technician
52 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00/hr. $ 1. 521.0.0.
(176 hQ.uts% $ 6. 873.7.5
·
a. ~urb ~n~ Gutter
Technician
77 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00 $ 2,252.25
b. S~~e (19..896 1.f.~ (Tests at 300'}
Technician
66 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00 $ 1,930.50
c. Base (19. 896 1. f~ (Tests at
Technician
66 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00 $ 1.930.50
(1~7 hours} $. 6:113.25
C. LABORATORY TESTING
Technician ("R#-Values) 31 hrs. X $45.00/hr.
Technician 36 hrs. x $45.00/hr.
hours
1,395.00
1.620.00
$ 3:015.00
(Corrosive, fertility, toxicity tests not included per
Flaten/Harwood. )
GeoSoils, Inc.
ICDC
P. age 19
February 16, 1988
PR # 1884-A-OC
JAMBOREE ROAD - TUSTIN BOUNDARY to IRVINE PARK C Entrance~
SANTTAGO BOU~JRVARD - NEWPORT BOU?.~VARD TO JAMBOB_EE ROAD
IRWD DISPOSAL SIT~
I.
~.'OUGH GRADE
The grading quantities
are as follows:
per
Hunsaker and Associates (1/28/88)
Raw Volume:
Removals:
S~ility Slopes:
Keyways
1,056,690 ¢.y.
143,040 ¢.y.
247,950 c.y.
8.7'40 c.y.
1,456,420 c.y.
Mr. Hess..indicated that the contractor would take five days for
star~-up, and ten days for finish work. The contractor will
average 25,000 cubic yards per day and will work five days per
week, 10 hours per day.
A. DATA REVIEW
Staff Engineer 4 hrs. x $65.00/hr.
Senior Technician 8 hrs. x $45.00/hr.
$ 260.00
$ 360.00
620.0O
B-D OBSERVATION AND TESTING
The major cost for .this type of project is technician time
during grading and, due to the difficulties of the project,
geologic inspection. The time span required for these
services is variable and depends upon the contractor's pace
and performance.
GeoSoils, Inc.
ICDC
Page 20
February 16, 1988
PR # 1884-A-O¢
1. Start-Up
_
Technician
5 days x 8 hfs/day x $45.00/hr.
1.800.00
2. Gradina Control
'Earthwork Volume: 1,456,420 cubic yards
Time Es~.imate: 58 days (11 wks-25,000c.y, per day)
.Work Schedule: 5 days/week, 10 hrs./day
Senior Technician
47 days x 8 hrs./day x $45.00/hr.
47 days x 2 hrs./day x $56.25/hr.
11 days x 10 hfs/day x $56.25/hr.
Technician
47 days x 8 hrs./day x $39.00/hr.
47 days x 2 hrs./day x $48.75/hr.
11 days x 10 hfs/day x $48.75/hr.
Geologist
Principal
4 hrs./wk, x-11- wks x SSS.00/hr.
16,920.00
5,287.50
6,187.50
14,664.00
4,582.50
5,362.50
3,740.00
S~aff
16 hrS./wk x 11 wks x $65.00/hr.
$ 11,440.00
Enaineer
Principal
4 hrs./wk x 11 wks x $85.00/hr.
Staff
6 hrs./wk x 11 wks x $65.00/hr.
$ 3,740.00
$ 4,290.00
d.' Laboratory
Techniciah
12 hrs./wks x 11 wks x $45.00/hr.
$ 5.940.00
$ 82~154.0Q
3. Finish Wor~
Technician
10 days x 8 hrs./day X $45.00/hr.
$ 3.600.0Q
GeoSoils, Inc.
ICDC
Page 21
February 16, 1988
PR # 1884-A-OC
4. Final Soils and Geolo=ic Report
Principal Engineer-2 hrs. x .$85.00/hr.
Principal Geologist 2 hrs. x $S$.00/hr.
Staff Engineer 16 hrs. x $65.00/hr.
Staff Geologist 12 hrs. x $65.00/hr'.
Drafting 40 hrs. x $40.00/hr.
.'
$ 170.00
$ 170.00
$ 1,040.00
$ 780.00
$ 1.600.00
760.00
If the project takes longer than the anticipated 58 working
days, or design changes that require additional work are
made either in your office , by governmental agencies, or
by the design engineer, the estimated costs would increase.
This additional work will be billed at our fee schedule
rates, as authorized by your written change order.
E. MEETINGS AND COORDINATION
Staff Engineer 10 hrs. X $65.00/hr. S
. .
Should more than 10 hours or meetings be necessary, these
costs will be bille~ at our fee schedule rates..
II. ROADWAY AND SUBSTRUCTURE
IRWD will test sewer, water, reclaimed water lines. Per '
Flaten/Harwood at pre-bid meeting, A.C. lay down and plan
inspections and' presaturation of sidewalk subgrade are not
included.
Ao
Staff Engineer
Principal Engineer
4 hrs. x $65.00/hr.
2 hrs. x $85.00/hr.
(~6 rhours ):
260.00
3,70.00
$ 430.00
GeoSoils, Inc.
ICDC
Page 22
February 16,' 1988
PR # 1884-A-OC
B. OBSERVATION AND TESTING
1. Substructure (Trench backfills
a. Electrical/TV (13. 498 1. f. ) (Tests at 200' )
Technician
67 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00/hr. $ 1,959.75
b. Gas (9. 120 1.f.) (Tests ~% 200')
Techni0ian
45 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00/hr. $ 1,316.25
'c. Telephone (9.120 1.f.~ {Tests at 200'}
_
Technician
45 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00/hr. $ 1,316.25
d. Storm Drain (6.075 1.f.~ (Tests at 20Q'}
Technician
30 tes~s x 3/4 hr./test x $39.o0/hr. $ 8'17.50
. -.
·
a. Curb and Gutter (35.172 1.f.) (TeStS at 500'}
Technician
70 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00
b-. Suborade (15. 643 1. f. ~ (Test~ a~ 300' }
'Technician
52 tests x 3/4 hr./test x 539.00
c. Base (15. 643 1. f) (Tests at 300' )
Technician
52 tests x '3/4-hr./test x $39.00
· r_~30 hoursL
5.469.75
$ 2,047.50
$ 1,521.00
1.521.00
5,089.50
!
_
Oeo$oils, Inc.
ICDC
Paqe 23
February 16, 1988
PR # 1884-A-OC
C. LABORATORY TESTIN~
Technician ("R#-Values) 28 hrs. X $45.00/hr.
Technician 36 hrs. x $45.00/hr.
$ 1,260.00
$ 1.620.00
2.880.00
D. SUPERVISION
Staff Engineer 24 hrs. X $65.00/hr.
Principal Engineer 8 hrs. X $85.00/hr.
(32 hours ~
$ 1,560,, 00
$ ~So,oo
2:240.00
E. REPORT PREPARATION ¢ 1 Final
S~aff Engineer 16 hrs. X $65.00/hr.
PrinciPal. Engineer 4 hrs. X $85.00/hr.
Drafting 40 hrs. X $40.00/hr.
,
¢ 60 hours ~
040.00
340.0¢
1.S00.0O
S 2 :,.,,!),8 o., 00
F. MEETINGS AND COORDINATION
Staff Engineer 10 hrs. X $65.00/hr.
$ 65o.o0
Geo$oils, Inc.
EXHIBIT
SCHEDULE A
SCHED~ OF FEES
CONSTi~UCTION SERVICES - GEOTECHNICAL
Page 24
Reach ! Jamboree Road-I~ine Boulevard co Tus~in Ranch Road
lo
e
ltou~h Grade
Roadway &
Observ&ciou & Tesc~n$
RouSh Grade
Roadway & Subscruc~=e
Labor&cory Tosein$
Roadway & Subst'rucL'ure
Super~ison
Roush Grade
Roadway & SuboerUct~Lre
Roporc l~oparaciou
.
Heectaf~ a~A Coordination
Rough Grade
Roadway & Subseruct~re
Toca~ l~ofesolon~l Services
Reinbursablea - Specialized
l~incinS & Roproducciou
To~a~ BudseC
Lump Sum
Cost Noc
Exceed
$ NA
NA
10.617.75
$ NA
$_ ~.~0.00
$ N&
~ 2.2,t0.~_
__
$ 19,797.~0
$.. 1.fYlO.~
705121-Ii
5-2
1/22/88
SCHEDULE OF. FEEb
CONSTRUCTXON SE~VXCES - GEOT~CHNZCAL
Page 25
Jamboree Road Bridge aC Pecers Channel
B~te DaCe Reviev
Rough Grade
Bridge & Subs~L~=e
· Obse~'vacion & TesCin$
Rough Grade
Bridge & Subac~ue~ure
Laboracor~ ~esCing '
lough Grade
Bridge & SubeCrueL~L~e
$~per~iaou
Rough Grade
· Bridge & S~bsc~A~e
Repoz~ ~TeparaCiou
Rough Grade
Bridge & Subsc~L~LTO
HeeCinp and Coordination
Ioush Grade
BrAdp &
Total l~ofesatoual Set-Aces
Rotmb~LTaablee - Specialized
l~inCtng & ReproducCiou
Total Budget
Cost Nec
NA MH $ NA
_. 2 HH $ ~_~
NA Kif
~A I,IH
12 lm
Lump Sum
$ NA
$ NA'
$ NA
$ I0,894.00
iii
705121-5
DOI~
5-3
1/22/88
SCHEDULE
SCHEDUL~ OF
CONST~UCTZON SnVZC~S
Page 26
Resch II Jamboree Road - Tuscin Ranch Road co Tuscin Boundary lncl~dln$
disposal sites ~ .
'
.,
&' Cost Noc
-1.
o
Baae Data Review
· ou~h ~zade
~oadw&y & Subacruccure
ObservacAon & Tescin6
Roadway & Substructure
Laboratory Testing
Rough Grade
Roadway & S~bscru~ure
S~pervison
Rough Grada
Roadva7 & S~bsc~A~e
__
Repot= P~epa~aciou
~.oush ~rade
P. oadwa7 &
and CoordAnaCtou
~~ e~ade ,10
Roadway & Subs~cure .10,_ =
Total ~To£essAonal SeEvtces
Reimbursables . Specialized Equinencf,
~incinS & Reprodu~ciou
Lump Sun
Total Budgec
_
705121-5
DOI~
1/22/88
$CHED~ OF FEF~-
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES .~
EC~ICAL
Page 27
Rasch -III
J.mnboree Road - TUs.cin Boundary co Iz"vine Park F-ncrance
Sancia$o Canyon Road-Hevporc Bouleva,rd Co Jamboree Rao~r
lncludin$ Disposal' Sl.~es
2.
o
Observation & Tescin$
Roadvay & 3ubs~rua~ure
Liberator7 Tescin$
l~oush Gradd
Roadva7 & Substructure
Supervisou
Roush Grade
Roadva7 & Subscruc~=e
RepoL'~ l~ep&raCiou
Roadway & Substructure
lfeectnls .end CoordtrmCtou
Roush Grade
Roadvay & Subscruet~tre
Roinbuz'sebles . Specialized Equinenc,s,
P'rincins & Raproducciou
Total BudseC
_ 12 mi
1,522 HH
att
:LUmp Sum
co Exceed
$._ 74,134.CD
$ 10~559.25
$,,, 5,940.00
9, 2,880.00_
9,
__
$
_
3,760.00
__
_
$ 112~323.25
$_114,323.25
705121-$
1)015
5-5
1/22/88
SCHED~ OF FEE~ ~
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES -'~
Page 28
Jamboree Road Bridge ac Pecers Ch&rmel '
Jm~boree Road - Irvine Boulevard co Irvine Park Entrance t
Santiago Canyon Road - C~y Boundary co Jamboree Road ~ncludin$ D~sposal S£ces
,-
- Cost Nec
t:o Exceed
o
Base Da~a Review
Rough Gr&de
Roadvay, ,~Bridge & SubeCruct~Lre
Observation & Test:in[
Rma~h trade '
Re&alway, Bridge & Substructure
Rough Grade
Roadway, Bridge & Substructure
312 HH
$164,713.00
$ 41,028.00
$ 14,.0'I0. (D
$ 9, I~.(X)
Supervisou
Rough Grade
Roadway, Bridge & Subsr~-uccure
$
Ropor~ l~eparaciou
Roadway, Brtdse & Substructure
Hoectn~s mad Coordinaciou
Rough Grade
Roadway, Br~dse & Subecruct~Lre
144HH
210 ~
10,, 0.00
$
51695 HH
Lump Sum
$.
Toe&]. Budget
705121-5
DOI~
5-6
]./22/88
ICDC
Page 29
February 16, 1988
PR #1.884-A-OC
.
VI. ADDENDUM ( Item_s by Consuftan%)
_
A. RFPS WORK ITeM DET.~TIQNS
As per ~he pre-bid meeting of February. 8, 1988, the
following items were deleted from ~he .. proposal request:
0
Sewer, water, and reclaimed water trench backfill
inspection testing (provided by IRWD).
Corrosive, soil fertility, and soil toxicity tests.
Inspectional · testing
materials.
steel, concrete or other
4. Presaturation or other tests in relation to
sidewalks or other flat. work.
Inspection
placement,
and testing of asphaltic concrete
and plant inspection and testing.
B. SUBDRAIN INSPECTION
Based on a review of ?he referenced plan review reports, .we
'estimate ~hat approximately 4,000 lineal feet of subdrain
would be installed during the grading.. The estimated costs
of inspecting this placement is as follows:
Staff Geologist
48. hrs. x $65.00/hr. $ 3.120.00
,
C. ADDITIONAL TECHNICIANS
During the course of grading, the contractor may split his
spread and work in more than one area at a time, resulting
in additional inspection and testing time.
Also, due to the large areal extent of the project and the
distance between numerous smaller-type fill areas,
additional technicians may be necessary.
1. Schedule "C"
Tech~%c%an No. 3 [60% time[
44 days x. 8 h~s./day x $39.00
44 days x 2 hrs./day x $48.75
$ 13,728.00
$ 4,290.00
GeoSoils, Inc.
ICDC
February 16, 1988
PR # 1884-A-OC
Technician No. 4 ¢40% ti~9)
30 days x 8 hr,./day x $39.00
30 days x 2 hrs./day x $48.75
Total Ex~ra Technicians
Schedule "C#
$ .'9,360.00
$ 2,925.00
30.303.00
2. Schedule "D#
Technician No. 3 (60% time)
34 days x 8 hrs./day x $39.00
34 days x 24 hrs./day x $48.75
Technician No. 4 ¢40% timg)
22 days x 8 hrs./day x $39.00
22 days x 2' hrs./day x $48.75
Total Ex~ra Technicians
Schedule.
$ 10,608.00
$ 3,315.00
$ 6,864.00
$ 2.145.00
$ 22. 932.00
Geo$oils, Inc.
Page 31
ADDENDUN NO. 1
PROJ~GT TITLE
JAMBOREE ROAD i~VINE BOULEVARD TO ~RVINE PARK
SANTIAGO CANY0~ ROAD, CITY BOUNDARY TO JAMBOREE ROAD
!
V~ President:, Land Developnent:
?ha Xrv~ne Comau~ Development: ~o,spany
705121-6
D01~
6,-2
]./22/88
Page 33
February 16,. 1988
PR # 1884-A-OC
VII. PERSONNEL AND PROJECT OUALIFICATION~
At ~he end of ~his proposal we have included a list of
personnel and resumes for each person~ These are expected to
be ~he key personnel to be involved wi~h ~he work.
Other Commitments of Personnp1
Whereas our personnel are currently working on other projects,
we intend to release ~hem from o~her responsibilities in order
that they can devote sufficient time to concentrate on their
specific aspects of the project and to maintain or exceed the
time schedule. Mr. Alber~ Kleist, Mr. Skip Pouncey, and Mr.
Sheldon Medall intend to lead and coordinate the personnel to
maintain continuity and to provide expertise to the project, as
well as to be available for interaction with Irvine Community
Development Company.
Note that Tustin Tract 12870 will finish grading at ~he same
time this projec~ begins; '~hereby allowing the same field team
to continue to work with Mr.. Hess and Mr. Buckner.
Subconsqltants
..
.GeoSoils, Inc. and its personnel are
every geotechnical aspect of the project
qualified to
as proposed.
evaluate
Pro~e~Wc Oualifications
In addition to ~he recently complete Tustin T=tct No. ~76~ for
Irvine Community Development Company, Geosoil s, Inc. has
· participated in numerous large development projects over our 14
years in business. These include numerous similar projects in
the communities of Deerfield, Woodbridge, Westpark, and ~he
cities of Irvine, Orange and Tustin. Services for these
projects have included data review, rough grading and post-
grading services. A partial list of projects in the
Tustin/Irvine area is attached at the end of this proposal.
GeoSoils, Inc. is currently· providing similar geotechnical
services for Tustin Ranqh T~act No. %28'70.
Geo$oils, Inc.
ICDC
Page 33
February 16, 198S
'PR # 1884-A-OC
References
..
The following are ~hree current clients wi~h which we work
closely on similar projects:
Irvine Pacif[c
.#1 Park Plaza Drive
Suite 1000
Irvine, California
(714) 553-5900
Bill Fishel,
Dave McAllister
The Irvine Company
#1 Park Plaza Drive
Suite 1000
Irvine, California
(714) 5s -59oo
Roland Osgood, Jay Pierce
Mary Harwood, Bob Hall
Dick Hess
Barratt Irvine
18022 Cowan Street
Suite 203
Irvine, California
(714~ 474-0440
Sonny Geary.
Fieldstone Company
14 Corporate Plaza
Newpor~ Beach, California
Rick Peters, Frank Foster
viii.
IX.
HOURLY RATE SCI~ED~
Our current fee schedule is attached a= the end of this
proposal.
INSURANCE/CONFLZCT OF INTEREST INFORMATION FORMS
Insurance and conflict of interest forms are attached at
t_he end of this proposal.
ICDC
Page 34
February 16, 1988
PR # 1884-A-OC
!
We appreciat· ~he opportunity to submit ~his proposal, and if there
are any questions, or if you need any clarifications, please, contact
me at (714) 647-0277.
Very ~ruly yours,
~eoSoils, Ino.
ARK/K1
Enc:
List of Personnel Form
Sub¢onsultant and Insurance Form
Conflic~ of Interest Form
GeoSoils, Inc. Insurance Information Form
Resumes of Key Personnel
Fee Schedule
Pa~cial Lis~ of' Tus~in/Irvi~e Area Projects
Grading Plan Review - Letter of Prior Repoz~c Acceptance
( 3 ) Addressee
GeoSoils, Inc.
EXHIBIT 'D'
KEY PERSONNEL
Page 1 of t
Date ~-/16/88
This form must ~e used to list all key personnel to be assigned to this
proJecc~ Please include telephone numbers for principa! pos£tion~..-
A. Principal of firm assiSned co project:
Name: Alber~ R. Xlei~
Poeicion with firm: President - Chief Soils Engineer
Office Phone: ~1~ 647-0277
Hone Phone: ( ),,
Bo
Project Engineer(s)/Gaolo$isc(s)/L"ndscape Architect(s) assigned to
project:
Name: Albert R. lleist
·
P~siC:l.~n with firm: P~'~_~'i~'l~n~ - Ch~_ef Soils Enqiner
Task(s) assigned: Rvalnat~ --oil enaine~rinq aspects of
-- -- i
NauePrincipal ' Eng'%ne.ering Geologist
: H.D. (Skip} Pounce7
Posici0n with firm: Principal Engineering Geologist
Task(s) assi~ned: ' Evaluate ~eolo~ic and technical conditions
CO
bsis;n' Ensinoe=(e)/Geolo$isC(s)/Landscape Architect(s) assigned to
project:
N~me: Sheldon E- Medal1
i I i
Position w~eh firm: Principal Consultant
Dasi~n Task(s) Responsibilities assismed: Analysis of project
9A~meeer-q. as ~essar~
705121- 7
]301.5
Name: n~v~ AlBum/ Robert Gran~
Posielon with firm: Staff Enqineer
Design Task(s) ResponsiBilities assigned: Perform. and evaluate
laborator~ tests. Supervise rough grading
operation, reporting.
Name: Peter Tartaalino. Charles Roberts
Position with f~rm: Staff Enqineer
Design Task(s) Hesponsibil.ities assi~ned: Field in~Dection,
evaluate ~radin~, supervision, reporting
7-2
1/22/88
.EXHIBIT
~CONSULTA~$ AND INSURAN¢
LIST OF SUBCONSITLTANTS. AND INSURANCE F0~ Pa'ge..1_. of _]._
A. Our~ide consultants Co be used in pzovidins se~ices reques~e~ by .proJec:
(a~ach copy of r. heir proposal for se~-~ices). Please fill ou~ chis form
for each subconsul~anc used.
1. Name of firm: NONE
l~y Personnel of fir~ assigned =o proJec=:
Office Phone: ( ),, ,
Tuk(·) assigned:
Ocher s~:aff usi~ned t:o p~oJec~::
Naqle Pos
Home Phone: ( )
Task(s)
If no eubcormulcancs are used, or. ace '"None" on r. his sheet.
705121-7
DO15
~/22/88
'EXHIBIT
CONFLICT OF
~?hen providin~ ~he ln~or~acion requested in chis Exhibit, please consider the
Cern 'public 'official' co mean every member, officer, employee 0rtconsuluan~
of a scaCe or local ase~cy.
A. Compl~ea ~his pare i£ Consultant is an. individual, whether comduc~ing:
business under his or her own name or a £ic~i~ious business name, ra~her
r. han a corporation, partnership, trus~, Joint venrare, syndicate,
association or o~her form of business en:erprise. A~ach additional
ahee~8 if necessary.
1. Lisc ~he title of-public office, Ju~isdiction and r~rm of office of
each public office ~hac you hold, ~e~er by elecci~ or appoin~enc.
~ Jurisdiccio~ ~
None
illll
2. If you are married, or if you' have plaus Co marry ~hat are su£fi.
cien~ly definite Co enable you co respond co ~his request, list '~he
elele of public office, Jurisdiction, and cern of office of each
public of£ice ~hae yotLv epo~se or intended spouse holde whe~Ber by
election or appoinuaeue. '
~ Jur~sdlc~:t~;m?
None
--
· .
3. Li,~ ~he name, aisle of public office, Jurisdic~ion and uerm of office
of each public official who will receive any Per,ion of. ~he Fee or any
or. her cor~ideratiou you receive under ~his Agreement.
~ ~ Surisdtculo,
None
705121-8
D015
8-2
1/22/88
1. I~LsC ~he name, cicle of public office, and cerm of office o£ each
public official, spouse of a public official, and' dependen~ ch£1d of a
public official who. owns a 10t or greater inceresc or inv~scmenc ~n
Consulcanc or any ocher Business Entity owned or operated ,in whole or
in parc by Cormulcanc.
N~a ~ Jurisdtcctgp Term
None
2. L~sc the name, cicle of public office, Jurisdiction and term of office
of each public official who viii receive any poccion o~f the Fee or any
ocher cormideracion you receive under chis Agreement.
Name Title Jurisdiction Term
None
iii
70§121-8
DO15
8-3
Dace F,~brtary 16~ 1988.
Broke~' s Name and Address
Leyy, .r4intz & ~osephsoa,
14~1 ~lver~t.~ ~.o. Box ~17
Van Nu~s~ ~ 91~4 ,
A. General Liability
.B. Aur. omobJ, le Liability
¢. gxcess Liability
Ds
Ilmbeella Form
O-.her than Umbrella Fern
gorker' s Compensation
& Eaployers Liability
Consultant GeoSoils, lpc.-
Companies. A££ordtn&.. . Coverage
A Counercq and Industry ·
B ' Cmmer~e a.nd..Industry
O General Ins. CO. (~AFECO)
L~abiltLT limits 1,000-000
Deductible 5.000 Exp. Dace
Mabizl Liaits 1,000.00O
Dedu~r. tblo. q) ., Exp. Dace3-29-88
X
x
iiii
Liability Limits -0-
Exp. Dace
i
Li ab il icy Limi cs 100,000
Exp. Dace 5-1-88
70§121-8
0015
8-4
1/22/88
Ocher I~Labillcy Llm//:s None
?~o£osaional g & 0 '
~zcra~ ~ab~lX~ ' ~p. Dace
_ ~ab~lX~ LXmtcs None
' ~p. Dace
705121-8
DO1.5
./22/88
February 16, 1988
W.O. 1884-A-OC
Irvine Community Development Company
500 Newport Center Drive
Fifth Floor
Ne'~ort Beach, California 92660
Ataention:
Mr. Duane R. Flaten
Senior Project Engineer
Subject:
Grading Plan Review Acceptance, Jamboree Road
Irvine Boulevard to Santiago Canyon Road
County of Orange, California
Gentlemen:
GeoSoils, Inc. has reviewed the following geotechnical reports
prepared by the indicated geo~e-chnical consultants.
Mass Grading Soils Compaction Report, Tentative Tract 12763,
Lots 1-14 and Lot 16, and Lots 15, 16, and 20 of Sector 12,
Tustin Ranch, City of Tustin, California, by GeoSoils, Inc.,
W.O. 1538-B-0C, dated May 18, 1987.
Grading Plan Review, Jamboree Road ·(Southern Sector) from
Irvine Boulevard, the Northerly Boundary of the City of Tustin,
Station 123+31 to Station 309+80 in the City of Tustin,
California, by Pacific Soils .Engineering, Inc., W.O. 101348-J,
dated November 2, 1987.
Preliminary Grading Plan Review, Proposed Jamboree Road, City
of Orange, California, by Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc., Work
Order 101348-J, dated December 29, 1987.
In addition, we have reviewed the following plans prepared by
Hunsaker and Associates.
1·
Improvement Plans for Assessment District 86-2, Tentative Tract
12870 (Sheets 1-46) for Jamboree Road, dated March 20, 1987.
·
Rough Grading Plan for Jamboree Road (Sheets 1-13) , dated
November 19, 1987.
- ICDC -
Page 2
February 16, 1988
PR # 1884-A-OC
·
Rough Grading Plan, Assessment District 86-2, Tentative Tract
12870 for Jamboree Road (Sheets 1-23), dated October .6, 1987
and January 7, 1988.
GeoSoils, Inc. accepts the reports as written and' approved by the
appropriate governing agencies. Any changes in recommendations
necessary due to changed field conditions or contractor operations
would be cleared through The Irvine Community Development Company
and the governing agency, prior to implementation.
Very truly yours,
GeoSoils, Inc.
A erroR. ~£eist
President
ARK/
Dist: (3) Addressee
Geo$oils, Inc.
Soil Mechanicse Geology ·
24890 ]ef~rson Avenue · P.O. Box 490 · Murrieta, California 92362 · (714)677.9651 · FAX (714) 677.9301
March 9,- 1988
PR 1884-A-OC ·
Irvine Community Development Company
500 Newport Center Drive, Fifth Floor
Newport Beach, California. 92660
Attention: Mr Gil Nielson
Vice President, Land Development
Sub3ect:
Clarification of February 16, 1988 Proposal for
Engineering Services: Jamboree Road - Irvine
Boulevard to Santiago Canyon Road, Cities of
Tustin and Orange, and County of Orange, California
Gent 1 emen:
At our recent interview, March 8, 1988, at the City of Tustin,
four issues requiring addi%ional clarification were raised
regarding GeoSolls, Inc. 's proposal for services on the sub3ect
site.
This letter is presented to clarify these issues. The issues are
listed below with an accompanying statement. Ail of the issues
pertain to the GeoSoils, Inc. February 16, 1988 proposal.
Issue I
Is the inspection of the subdrains covered under the proposed
contract price or as an extra addendum item?
Under Methodology for Scope of Services: Section B - Observation
and Testing; Item 2, Rough Grading, paragraph "i" states that the
subdrain inspection is part of the scope of services. However,
under the Addendum Table, Section VI-B (page .29), the subdrain
inspection is listed as an extra cost item.
Los Angeles Co. (818) 785-2158 · Orange'Co. (714) 647-0277 · San Diego Co. (619~ 438-3155
Irvine Community [ ~lopment Company
Jamboree Ro_ad - Irvine Boulevard
to Santiago Canyon Road
Pa 2
March 9, 1988
PR 1884-A,0C
At the pre-bid meeting Mr. Dick Hess requested that the subdrain
inspection services be placed as an addendum item for an extra
cost. In preparing our proposal, paragraph "i" on Page 5
including subdrain inspection was incorrectly inserted.
The answer to the question as to whether subdrain inspections are
part of the contract cost, would be "No ". The costs for t~%e
'inspection of the assumed length of subdrain is provided on the
Addendum Table, located on Page 29. '~
Issue II
Schedule D on Pages 19-23 and 27 combines the costs for services
for 'Jamboree Road - Tustin Boundary to Irvine Park (Entrance),.
Santiago Boulevard - Newport Boulevard to Jamboree Road, and IRWD
Disposal Site. You have requested'that these three areas be
presented as separate cost items.
During our revision of these schedules, additional information was
provided to us indicating that the length of' Santiago Canyon Road
was increased ' from 400 feet to 2,500 feet. In addition, the
utility services were also 'increased. Our revised 'schedule
includes these amended lengths in the scope of our services.
A re~.~ision to Schedules .D and E are attached.
.-
Issue III
Is the inspection of the aSbestos irrigation pipe (ACP) included
in the proposed contract costs?
Since no assumed or known lengths of asbestos pipe were noted as
part of the bid package, inspe.ction of the removal and
documentation of the stockpiling and site removal was not part of
GeoSoils, Inc. 's 'original proposal. These services, if requested,
would be provided, as an extra cost item.
Geo$oils, Inc.
Irvine Community 5 ;lopment ComPany
Jamboree Road - Irvine
to Santiago. Canyon Road
March 9, 1988
PR 1884-A-0C
Issue IV
At the Jamboree Road Bridge at Peter's Channel, how was GeoSoils,
Inc. 's pile inspection costs (Page 12, Schedule B, Section II,
Bridge and Substructure, Item B-l, Pile Installation) determined
since the plans GeoSoils, Inc. reviewed were incomplete?
The incomplete plans GeoSoils, .Inc. reviewed were prepared by
McLean and Schultz and were dated November 13, 1987. The plans
showed 152 piles. GeoSoils, Inc. assumed that the contractor
would be able to drive 19 piles per day. Also assumed was that
the piles would be approximately 40 feet in depth. Based '~pon the
piles shown, 152 at 19 piles per day, and 8 hours of inspection
per day, an overall time of 64 hours of inspection, time _was
determined. If updated plans indicate additional piles, or longer
driving times, GeoSoils Inc. would revise their inspectibn time
accordingly.
We hope that the above explanations clarified the items in
question. If you have any additional questions, please call me at
(714) 647-0277.
Very truly yours,
GeoSolls, Inc.
By:
Albert R. Kleist
President
Enclosures:
Schedules D and E
Distribution:
(2) Addressee
(1) Bob Ledendecker - City of Tustin
(1) Marv Harwood ' ICDC
Geo$oils, Inc.
SCHEDULE D, PAGE 1
JAMBOREE ROAD - TUST!N BOUNDARY TO iRVINE PARK (_~ntrance)
SANTIAGO BOULEVARD - NEWPORT BOULEVARD TO JAMBORF. E ROAD
IRWD DISPOSAL SITE
General
As requested, the following Schedule D has been broken down into
three categories: Jamboree Road, Santiago Boulevard, and the IRWD
Disposal Site. Parameters of the most updated information
provided to GeoSoils, Inc. has been incorporated for the purpose
of this proposal.
JAMBOREE ROAD - TUSTIN BOUNDARY .~0 IRVINE PARK ( Fntrance )
I ·
ROUGH GRADE
·
The grading quantities per Hunsaker & Associates are as
follows·.
Raw Volume
Removals
Stability Slopes
Keyways
706,690 c.y.
143,040 c.y.
247,-950 c.y.
.. 8,740 c.¥.
1,106,420 c.y.
Mr. Hess indicated that the contractor would take three
days, for start-up and eight and a half days for finish
work. The contractor will average 25,000 cubic yards
per day and will work six days per week, 10 hours per
day.
A. Data Review
Staff Engineer 3 Hrs. x S6§.00/Hr.
Senior Technician 6 Hrs. x S45.00/Hr.
S195. O0
270.00
S465.00
(, g ours )
GeoSoils, Inc.
Irvine Community D
lopment Company
Ma: 10, 1988
PR 1884-0C .
SCHEDULE D, PAGE 2
B-D ·
0bservat~on and Testing
The major .cost for this type of project is
technician time during grading and, due to the
difficulties of the pro3ect and geologic
conditions, the time span required for these
services is variable and depends upon the
contractor's pace and performance.
1. StarteUp
Senior Technician
3 days x 8 hrs/_day x $45.00/hr.
S 1,080.00
2. Grading Control
Earthwork Volume: 1,106,420 cubic yards
Time Estimate: 44 days (25,000 c.y. per day.)
Work Schedule: 6 days/week, 10 hrs./day
a. Senior Technician
35 days x 8 hrs./day x $45.00/hr.
35 days x 2 hrs,/day x $56.25/hr.
9 days x 10-hrs./day x S56.25/hr.
S12,600.00
S 3,937.50
$ 5,062.50
Technician
35 days x 8 hrs./day x S39.00/hr.
35 days x 2 hrs./day x $48.75/hr.
9 days x 10 hrs/day x $48.75/hr.
Sl0,920.00
S 3,412.50
S 4,387.50
b. Geologist
Principal
36 Hours x S85.00/hr.
Staff
144 Hours x S65.00/hr.
S 3,060.00
$ 9,360.00
c. Engineer
Principal
36 Hours x S85.00/hr.
Staff
54 HOurs x S65.00/hr.
S 3,060.00
S 3,510.00
'd. Laboratory
Technician
108 Hours x S45.00/hr.
$ 4,860.00
S64,170.00
Inc.
Irvine Community D lopm'ent Company
Mai 10, 1988
PR 1884-0C
SCHEDULE D, PAGE
Finish Work
Senior Technician-
68 Hours x S45.00/hr.
S 3,060.00
Final Soils and Geologic Report
Principal Engineer i hr. Tx $85.00/hr. $
Principal Geologist I hr. x $85.00/hr. S
Staff Engineer 10 hrs, x~ S65.00/hr. $
Staff Geologist 7 hrs. x S65.00/hr. S
Drafting 24 hrs. x S40.00/hr. S
85.00
85.00
650.00
455.00
960.00
2,235.00
If the pro3ect takes longer than the anticipated 44 working
days, or design changes that require additional work are
made either in your office, by governmental agencies, Or by
the design engineer, the estimated costs would increase.
This additional work will be billed at our fee schedule
rates~ as authorized by'your written change order.
E. MEETINGS AND COORDINATION
Staff Engineer
8 hrs. X S65.00/hr.
$ 520.00
Should more than 8 hours of meetings be necessary, these
costs will be billed at our fee schedule rates.
II.
ROADWAY AND SUBSTRUCTURE
IRWD will test sewer, water, reclaimed water lines.
Per Flaten/Harwood at pre-bid meeting, A.C. lay down
and plant plus inspections and presaturation of
sidewalk subgrade are not included.
Geo$oils, Inc.
Irvine Community
lopment Company
Ma1 10, 1988
PR 1884-0C
SCHEDULE D, PAGE 4
A. DATA REVIEW
Principal Engineer
Staff Engineer
hr. x $85.00/hr.
hfs. x $ 55.00/hr.
hours ! ~
S 85.00
195.00
S 280.00
B. OBSERVATION AND TESTING
1. Substructure (Trench backfills )
a. Electrical/TV (13,498 1.f. ) (Tests at 200' )
Technician
67 tests x 3/4 hr./test x S39.00/.hr. S 1,959.75
b. Gas %9,120 1.f. ) (Tests at 200')
Technician
45 tests x 3/4 hr./test x S39.00/hr. S 1,316.25
·
c. Telephone (9r120 1.f.) (TeSts at 200')
Technician
4§ tests x 3/4 hr,/test x S39.00/hr. S 1,316.25
d. Storm Drain (5,645 1.f.) (Tests at 200' )
Technician
28 tests x 3/4 hr./test x S39.00/hr. S 819.00
( 139 hours
$ 5 ~ 411.25
IrVine Community D,
loDment Company
Ma: 10, 1988
PR 1884-' OC
SCHEDULE D, PAGE
2. Roadway
a. Curb and Gutter (34,822 .l-f-) (Tests at 500'
Technician
70 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00
b. Subgrade (14,206 1.f.) (Tests at 300')
--
Technician
47 tests x 3/4 hr./test x S39.00
c. Base (14,206 1.f) (Tests .at 300')
Technician
47 tests x 3/4 hr./test X S39.00
{123 hours!
S 2,047.50
S 1,374.75
S 1,374.75
S 4,797.00
C. LABORATORY TESTING
Technician ("R"-Values) 21 hrs. X $45.00/hr.
Technician 30 hrs. x S45.00/hr.
( 51 hours
945.00
1,350.00
2,295.00
D. SUPERVISION
Staff Engineer 20 hrs. X S65.00/hr.
Principal Engineer.6 hrs. X $85.00/hr.
( 26 hours..
S 1,300.00
S 510.O0
$ lr 810.00
Geo$oils, Inc.
Irvine Community D~
lopment Company
$ .
Mal 10, 1988
PR 1884-OC
SCHEDULE D, PAGE
E. REPORT PREPARATION ( 1 Final Repor~
Staff Engineer 12 hrs. X S65.00/hr.
Principal Engineer $ hrs. X S85.00/hr.
Draf%ing 34 hrs. X S40.00/hr.
{ 49 hours
$ 780.00
$ 255.00
$ 1,360.00
$ 2,395.00
F. MEETINGS AND COORDINATION
_
Staff Engineer 6 hrs. X S65.00/hr.
S 390.00
Should more than 6 hours of meetings be necessary, these
costs will be billed at our fee schedule rates.
SANTIAGO BOULEVARD - NEWPORT BOULEVARD TO JAMBOREE ROAD
I ·
ROUGH GRADE
No rough grading is planned for the existing Santiago
Boulevard. ~
(No Manhours Required}
II.
ROADWAY AND SUBSTRUCTURE
Per Flaten/Harwood at pre-bid meeting, A. C. laydown
and plant inspections and presaturation of sidewalk
subgrade are not included. It is also GeoSoils,
Inc. ' s understanding that there is no reclaimed
water lines proposed for Santiago Boulevard.
A. Data Review
Principal Engineer
Staff Engineer
1 Hr. X S85.00/Hr.
1 Hr. X S65.00/Hr.
$ 85.00
65.00
S 150.00
( 2 Hours
Geo$oils, Inc.
·
- Irvine 'Community D~ loDment Company~
Maz 10, 1988
PR 1884-0C
SCHEDULE D, PAGE 7
B. OBSERVATION AND TESTING
lo
Substructure
( Trench 'backfills )
a. E_.lectric.al/TV (2,500 1.f. } (Tests at 200'
Technician
13 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00/hr. S
380.25
b. Gas (2,500 1.f. ) (Tests at 200')
Technician
13 tests x 3/4 hr./test x S39.00/hr. $
380.25
c. Telephone (2,500 1.f. ) (Tests at 200').
Technician
13 tests x 3/4 hr./test x S39.00/hr. S
d. Storm Drain (1,000: 1.f.) (Tests at 200')
Technician
5 tests x 3/4 hr./test x S39.00/hr. S
e. Sewer (2,500 1.f) (Tests at 200')
Technician
13 tests x 3/4' hr./test x S39.00/hr. S
f. Water (2,500 1.f.) (Tests at 200' )
Technician
13 tests x 3/4 hr./test X S39.00/hr. S
380.25'
146.25
380.25
380.25
(52.5 hours
S 2,047.50
eo$oi15, Inc.
Irvine Community D~ lopment Company
Maz 10, 1988
PR 18.84-0C
~CHEDULE D, PAGE
2. Roadway
a. Curb and Gutter (5,000 1.f.)
Technician
10 tests x 3/4 hr./test x S39.00
U. Subgrade (2,500 1.f.) (Tests at 300')
Technician
8 tests x 3/4 hr./test x $39.00
c. Base (2,500 1.f) (Tests at 300')
Technician
8 tests x 3/4 hr./test x S39.00
{,19.5 hours
(Tests at 500' )
C. LABORATORY TESTING
Technician ("R"-Values) '7 hrs. X S45.00/hr.
Technician 6 hrs. x $45.00/hr.
{13 hours}
D. SUPERVISION
Principal Engineer 2 hrs. X S85.00/hr.
Staff Engineer 4 hrs. X S65.00/hr.
( 6 hours
E. REPORT PREPARATION (1 Final Report)
Principal Engineer 1 hrs. X S85.00/hr.
Staff Engineer 4 hrs. X S65.00/.hr.
Drafting 6 hrs. X S40.00/hr.
( 11 hours )
292.50
234.00
234.00
760.00
315.00
270.00
585.00
170.00
260.00
430.00
85.00
260.00
240.00
585.00
G o$oils, Inc.
Irvine Community D~
£opment Company
Maz 10, 1988
PR 1884-OC
SCHEDULE D, PAGE 9
F. MEETINGS AND COORDINATION
Staff Engineer 4 hrs. X S65.00/hr. S 260.00
Should more than 4 hours of meetings be necessary, these
costs will be billed at our fee schedule rates·
I ·
IRWD DISPOSAL SITE
ROUGH GRADE
The grading quantities-per Hunsaker and kssociates are
fol lows:
Raw Volume
350,000 c.. y.
Mr. Hess indicated that the contractor would .take
two days to start.up and a day and a half for finish
work. The contractor will average 25,000 cubic
yards per day and will work six days per week, 10'
hours per day.
Data Review.
Staff Engineer 1 hr. x $65.00/hr.
Senior Technician 2 hrs. x. S45.00/hr.
Hours
$ 65.00
90.00
$ 155.00
as
B-D·
Observation and Testing
The major cost for this type of project is
technician time during grading and, due to
the difficulties of the project and
geologic conditions, the time span
required for these services is variable
and depends upon the c®ntractor's pace and
performance.
Start-Up
Senior Technician
2 Days x 8 hrs./day x S45.00/hr.
S 720.00
Inc.
Irvine Community D~
lopment Company
Ma~ 10, 1988
PR 1884-0C
SCHEDULE D, PAGE 10
.
Grading Control
Earthwork Volume: 350,000 cubic yards
T/me Estimate: 14 days (25,000 c.y. per day)
Work Schedule: 6 days/week, 10 hrs./day
a. Senior Technician
12 days x 8 hrs./day x S45.00/hr.
12 days x 2 hrs./day x S56.25/hr.
2 days x 10 hrs./day x S56.2§/hr.
S 4,320.00
S 1,350.00
S 1,125.00
Technician
12 da~s x 8 hrs./day x S39.00/hr.
12 days x 2 hrs./day x $48.75/hr.
2 days x 10 hrs./day x $48.75/hr.
S 3,744.00
S 1,170.00
S 975.00
b.
Geologist
Principal
8 hours x S85.00/hr.
· $ 680.00
Staff
32 'hours x S65.00/hr.
$ 2,080.00
C. Engineer.
Principal '
8 hours x S85.00/hr.
$ 680.00
Staff
12 hour~ x $65.00/hr.
$ 780.00
d. Laboratoz-F
Technician
24 hours x S45.00/hr.
$ 1~080.00
$17,984.00
3. Finish Work
Senior Technician
12 Hours X S45.00/hr.
S 540.00
ileo$oils, Inc.
Irvine Community D~ £opment Company
Maz 10, 1988
PR 1884-0C
SCHEDULE D, PAGE 1].
4. Final Soils and Geologic Report
Principal Engineer i hr. x S85.00/hr.
Principal Geologist i hr. x S85.00/hr.
Staff Engineer 6 hrs. x S65.00/hr.
Staff Geologist 5 hrs. x S65.00/hr.
Drafting 16 hrs. x $40.00/hr.
85.00
85.00
390.00
325.00
640'.00
S 1,525.00
If the pro~ect takes longer than the anticipated 14 working
days, or design changes that require additional work are
made either in your office by governmental agencies, or
by the design engineer, the ~stimated costs would increase.
This additional work will be billed at our fee schedule
rates, as authorized by your written change order.
II.
E. MEETINGS AND COORDINATION
Staff Engineer 2 hrs. X $65.00/hr. .S 130.00
Should more than 2 hours or .meetings be necessary, these
costs will be billed at our fee schedule rates.
ROADWAY AND SUBSTRUCTURE
There are no roadway and substructures currently
planned for the IRWD disposal site.
(No Manhours Required)
Irvine Community D~ lopment Company
.
.
Ma~ 10, 1988
PR 1884-OC
,SCHEDULE D, PAGE 12
SCHEDULE D SUMMARY
Schedule of Fees
Construction Services - Geotechnical
Jamboree Road - Tustin Boundary to Irvine Park (Entrance)
Santiago 'Canyon Road - Newport to Jamboree Road including Disposal
Site.
Jamboree Road - Tustin Boundary to Irvine Park (Entrance)
1. Base Data Review
Rough Grade
Roadway & Substructure
Manhours
9MH
4 MH
Cost Not
To Exceed
$ 465.00
$ 280.00
2. Observation and Testing
Rough Grade
Roadway& Substructure
·
Laboratory Testing
Rough Grade
Roadway & Substructure
1,162 MH
262 MH
108 MH
51 MH
$57,530.00
S10,'208.25
S 4,860.00
S 2,295.00
4. Supervision
Rough Grade
Roadway & Substructure
80 MH
26 MH
$ 5,920.00
$ 1,810.00
5. Report Preparation
Rough Grade
Roadway & Substructure
43 MH
49 MH
S 2,235.00
S 2,395.00
6. Meetings and Coordination
Rough Grade
Roadway & Substructure
8 MH
S 520.00
S 390.00
TOTAL. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,808 MIX
$88,908.25
REIMBURSABLES-SPECIALIZED EQUIPMENT,
PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION, Lump Sum
$ 1,500.00
JAMBOREE ROAD TOTAL BUDGET
$90,408.25
Geo$oils, Inc.
Irvine Community D, .lopment Company
-Ma~ 10, -1988
SCHEDULE D, PAGE 13
SANTIAGO BOULEVARD - NEWPORT BOULEVARD TO JAMBOREE ROAD'
1. Base Data Review
Rough Grade
Roadway & Substructure
2.
Observation and Testing
ROugh Grade
Roadway & Substructure
3. Laboratory Testing
Rough Grade
Roadway & Substructure
Supervision
Rough Grade
Roadway & Substructure
5. Report Preparation
Rough Grade .
Roadway & Substructure
6. Meetings and Coordination
. Rough Grade
Roadway & Substructure
Manhours
Cost Not
to Exceed
0 MH $ 0.00
2 MH $ 150.00
0 MH $ 0.00
72 MH 2,808.00
0 MH $ 0.00
13 MI{ $ 585.00
0 Mil $ 0.00
6 MH $ 430.00
0 MH $ 0.00
11 MH $ 585.00
0 MH $ 0.00
4 MH $ 260.00
TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
108 MH
$ 4,818.00
REIMBURSABLES - SPECIALIZED EQUIPMENT,
PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION, LUMP SUM
S 250.00
SANTIAGO CANYON BOULEVARD TOTAL BUDGET
S 5,068.00
Geo$oils, Inc.
Irvine Community Dc
.opment Company
Mar 10, 1988
PR x~d4-OC
SCHEDULE D, PAGE 14
IRWD DISPOSAL SITE
1. Base Data Review
Rough Grade
Roadway & Substructure
2. Observation and _Testing
Rough Grade
Roadway & Substructure
3. Laboratory Tasting
Rough Grade
Roadway & Substructure
4. Supervision
Rough Grade
Roadway & Substructure
Rough Grade
Roadway & Substructure
Meetings and Coordination
Rough Grade
Roadway & Substructure
Manhours
3 MH
0 MH
350 MH
0 MH
24 Mil
0 Mil
I8 MH
9 ~
Cost Not
To Exceed
$ 155.00
$ 0.00
$16,914.C. 0
0.00
S 1,080.00
0.00
$ 1,250.00
0.00
29 M/-I $ 1,525.00
0 MH S 0.00
2 MH
0 MH
$ 130.00
S 0.00
TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
426 MH
$21,054.00
REIMBURSABLES - SPECIALIZED EQUIPMENT,
PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION, LUMP SUM
$ 250.00
IRWD DISPOSAL SITE - TOTAL BUDGET
S21,304.00
.Geo$oils, 'Inc.
Irvine Community De'
opment' Company
Mar, 10, 1988
PR l~41OC.
SCHEDULE D, PAGE '15
SUMMARY
Jamboree Road
Santiago Boulevard
IRWD Disposal Site
TOTALS
MANHO~S
1,808
108
426
,,,2r342
costs
$ 90,408.25
$ 4 118.00
S 2!i 04.00
$116r 530.25
Geo$oils, Inc.
Irvine Community D,e .opment Company-
.
Maru 10, 1988
PR 1884-OC
SCHEDULE
Schedule of .Fees
Cons'cruction Services - Geotechnical
SUMMARY
1. Base Data Review
Rough Grade
Roadway, Bridge & Substructure
Manhours
24 MH
2O Mil
2. Observation and Testing
Rough Grade 3,392 MH
Roadway, Bridge & Substructure .1,068 MH
3. Laboratory Testing
Rough Grade
· P,.~adway, Bridge & Substructure
312 MH
203 MH
4. Supervision
Rough Grade
Roadway, Bridge & Substructure
5. Report Preparation
Rough Grade
Roadway, Bridge & Substructure
218 MH
108 MH
144 MH
210 MH
6. Meetings and Coordination
Rough Grade
Roadway, .Bridge & Substructure
20 MH
40 MH
TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5,759 MH
REIMBURSABLES - SPECIALIZED EQUIPMENT,
PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION, LUMP SUM
TOTAL BUDGET
Cost Not
To Exceed
$ 1,240.00
S 1,460.00
$165,023.00
S 43,485.00
040.00
135.00
S 17; 370.00
S 6,020.00
$ 7,520.00
$ 10,530.00
$ 1,300.00
$ 2', 6O0.00
$279,723.00
S 5,400.00
S285,123.00
Geo$oils, Inc.