HomeMy WebLinkAboutPH 1 TUSTIN AUTO CTR 07-18-88AGENDA
7/187~_
II I
PUBLIC HEARINGS
NO. 1
7-18-88
DATE:
JULY 18, 1988
Inter
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ADDENDUM 88-01 TO EIR 84-2, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-01, ZONE
CHANGE 88-01 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP 87-201 FOR THE PROPOSED
APPLICANT/PROPERTY
OWNER: THE IRVINE COMPANY
550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
LOCATION'
FREEWAY ACCESS RESERVATION AREA JUST SOUTH OF THE EXISTING
BOUNDARY OF THE TUSTIN AUTO CENTER BETI/EEN THE EL MODENA FLOOD
CONTROL CHANNEL AND TUSTIN RANCH ROAD.
REQUEST'.
(1) RECENTIFICATION OF EIR 84-2 WITH ADDENDUM 88-01;
(2) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-01: TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIrdlATION FROM PLANNED CONMUNI~ TO PLANNED
CO~NTIY COMItERCZAL;
(3) ZONE CHANGE 88-01: TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM
PLANNEO COMMUNITY TO PLANNEO COMMUNITY CO~RCIAL; ANO
(4) TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP 87-201: TO RECONFIGURE TWO EXISTING
PARCELS INTO TMO NUMBEREO ANO THREE LETTEREO LOTS.
RECOMMDAT I ON:
(1) M.O. - It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution 88-73
recerttfying EIR 84-2 with Addendum 88-01.
(2) M.O. - It is recommended that the City COuncil adopt ReSolution 88-72
approving General Plan Amendment 88-01.
(3) M.O. - It is recommended that Ordinance 1010 for Zone Change 88-01 have
first reading by tttle only.
(4) M.O. - It is recommended that Ordinance 1010 for Zone Change 88-01 be
introduced.
(5) M.O. - It is recommended that City Council adopt Resolution 88-79 approving
Tentative Parcel Map 87-201.
Ci ty Counci 1 Report
Draft Addendum 88-0[ to EIR 84-2
July 18, 1988
Page two
BACKGROUND:
In January of 1985, the City Council approved the Tustin Auto Center project by
certifying Environmental Impact Report 84-2 (EIR 84-2), adoption of a General
Plan Amendment (85-01), a Zone Change (85-01) and approval of Parcel Map
84-1032. This project created a 12 parcel Auto Center for 11 dealer sites and a
joint use parking facil i ry.
Included in this project was an 8.27 acre reservation area for the I-5 freeway
widening and a full cloverleaf interchange for Tustin Ranch Road and the I-5
freeway. Since the time that the Auto Center project was approved, the City of
Tusttn and Caltrans has determined that the design of this interchange should be
a partial cloverleaf design (see Exhibits 4 and 5 in Draft Addendum 88-01
attached to this report.)
Upon review of the documents on file for the initial Auto Center project, staff
has found that the area held for the freeway access reservation retained its
original designation of Planned Community on the General Plan and Zoning Maps.
This designation is actually a residential classification. In order to develop
the property for commercial use, the Tustin Municipal Code and State Law require
that the property be recla=sified on the General Plan and Zoning Maps.
-.
SIJIItARY AND ANALYSIS:
The property owner has filed an application requesting authorization to create
an additional dealer site which will accommodate Santa Aha Lincoln Mercury on
the unused portion of the freeway access reservation area. The processing of
this request requires review of the original environmental documentation. The
General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Parcel Map require special consideration
and the approval of findings as required by State Law. This review and the
necessary findings are contained in the Planning Commission report and draft
resolutions attached hereto.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review of all the environmental, legal and land use issues, staff has
determined that the proposed project is in conformance with the policies of the
City of Tustin and that the proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and
Tentati.ve Parcel Map are appropriate for the project area. All necessary
environmental documentation required by the California Environmental Quality Act
Comrnunity DeveloPment Depart'rnent
City Council Report
Draft Addendum 88-01 to EIR 84-2
July 18, 1988
Page three
(CEQA) is contained in Attachment I in the July 11, 1988 Planning Commission
report.
LCP: CAS: ts
'Christine A. Shingleton~
Director of Community DL~elopment
Attachments:
Planning Commission Report
and Resolutions - July 11, 1988
Resolutions 88-73, 88-72 and 88-79
Ordinance 1010
Community Development Deparlmenl
Report'to the
Planning Commission
TTpm ~ln
DATE:
SUBJECT: _
APPLICANT/
ObllER:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
dULY 11, 1988
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-01, ZONE CHANGE 88-01 AND TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP 87-201
THE IRVINE COMPANY
550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
FREE#AY ACCESS RESERVATION AREA SOUTH OF TUSTIN AUTO CENTER
PLANNED COISIJNITY RESIDENTIAL
1) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-01 AND ZONE CHANGE 88-01: AN
ADDENDUM (NO. 88-01) TO EIR 84-2 HAS BEEN PREPARED.
2) TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP 87-201: CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT CLASS 15.
1) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-01: TO RECLASSIFY THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION ON THE GENERAL PLAN HAP FROM PLANNED COMMUNITY
TO PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FOR THE PROJECT AREA.
2) ZONE CHANGE 88--01: TO REZONE THE PROJECT AREA FROM PLANNED
COMMUNITY RESTDENTIAL TO PLANNED COMMUNTTY COMMERCIAL.
3) TENTATIVE MAP: TO RECONFIGURE TWO EXISTING PARCELS TO
·
CREATE TWO NUMBERED AND THREE LETTERED LOTS.
RECOI~ENDAT!ON:
It is recommended that the' Planning Commission recommend approval to the City
Council of:
®
2.
Draft Addendum No. 88-01 tO Tustin Auto Center EIR 84-2 by adoption of
Resolution 2510;
General Plan Amendment 88-01 by adoption of Resolution 2511;
Zone Change 88-01 by adoption of Resolution 2512; and
·
Tentative Parcel Map 87-201 by adoption of Resolution 2513.
SIJI~ARY:
The original Auto Center land use plan called for a 8.27 acre freeway access
reservation area for the purposes of installing a full cloverleaf interchange at
Planning Commission Report
General Plan Amendment 88-01,
Zone Change 88-01 and TPM 87-201
July 11, 1988
·
Page two
the .I-S Freeway and Tustin Ranch Road. The final design of this interchange has
resulted in an excess parcel of land (5.05 acres in size) in the original
reservation area which is adjacent to the Tusttn Auto Center.
Since the property is no longer needed by Caltrans, the property owner wishes to
revise the Auto Center ,layout by creating one additional dealer site in this
area. The property however, was not properly reclassified to commercial use at
the time the Auto Center was approved. Therefore, the Tustin Municipal Code and
State Law requires processing of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and
Tentative Parcel Map along with the necessary environmental documentation.
The subject project area is bounded by the I-5 freeway to the south, the
existing Auto Center boundary to the north, the Mixed Use Center of the East
Tustin Specific Plan area to the east and Tustin Ranch Road to the west. The
project area is identified on Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
BACKGROUND:
In December of 1984 the Tusttn Planning Commission approved EIR 84-2, Zone
Change 85-1, 'General Plan Amendment 85-1 and Tentative Parcel Map 84-1{)32 for
the Tustin Auto Center. This project created 11 dealer sites, a joint use
parking facility, public streets and a 8.27 acre freeway access reservation
area.
The previously approved Zone Change and General Plan Amendment covered the 11
developable lots created by Parcel 'Map 84-1032. The freeway reservation area
retained its original General Plan designation of Planned Community and Zoning
Code classification of Planned Community Residential. Therefore, the property
must be reclassified to Planned Community Commercial and a Parcel ~lap must be
processed to create any new developable lot.
ANALYSIS:
Staff have reviewed the proposed project and have addressed each of the
requested applications to ensure conformance with City and State requirements.
Each of the project elements is discussed separately below'
.
Draft Addendum No. 88-01 to EIR 84-2' The initial Auto Center project and
related I'str~el~ .... improvements were-considered in an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) which was prepared in 1984. This EIR includes a project
description, identification of environmental impacts and project
mitigation measures. The nature of the proposed expansion is such that
the previous program EIR can serve as the EIR for this project.
Section 15184-2 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
authorizes preparation of an addendum to an EIR when only minor technical
Corn rnunity Development Depar~mem
Planning Commission Report
General Plan Rmendment 88'01,
Zone Change 88-01 and T. PM 87-20!
July 11, 1988
Page three
.
changes or additions are necessary to make the EIR under consideration
adequate under CEQA. An addendum pursuant to this requirement has 'been
prepared and is attached to this report for review (Attachment I). Prior
to approval of this project, the Pla~ntng Commission must recertify the
original EIR with the addendum. Thlis addendum makes minor technical
changes to the original EIR.
General Plan Amendment 88-01:
ii ii m m i iii i iii ii i i
As previously mentioned, the freeway reservation area was not reclassified
to a commercial designation when the Auto Center project was approved.
The current zoning is Planned Com~nity which is considered a residential
classification.
Prior to approval of a General Plan Land Use reclassification, the
implications of the proposed use must be considered. The existing and
proposed project area is surrounded by commercial uses to the north and
east. Major roadway improvements are located to the south and west. By
nature of the properties location, it would only be accessible through one
of the existing commercial uses and is subject to a high ambient noise
level (traffic from I-5 freeway and Tustin Ranch Road) which makes
residential development both unlikely and un.desireable from. an
envtronmental perspective. ·
Exhibit "B" shes the proposed lot ~layout which would facilitate one
additional dealership site. Any proposed development would be subject to
the same Zoning Regulations and development criteria required of all
projects in the Tustin Auto Center.
Considering the project location, accessibility and proposed zoning
restrictions (discussed in ~re detail in Section 3 of this report) staff
considers the General Plan reclassification appropriate for this area.
The necessary findings for this amendmnt are identified in Resolution
2511 attached to this report.
3. Zone Change 88.-01:
The freeway access reservation site ~s currently classified as Planned
Community Residential on the Zoning Map. The existing Auto Center parcels
are z.oned. Planned Community Commercial which requires approval' of a
development plan prior to construction.
The Planning Comission approved the Tustin Auto Center Planned Community
Corn rnunity DeveloPment Depar~rnen~ ~
Planning Commission Report
General Plan Amendment 88-01,
Zone Change 88-01 and TPM 87-201
July 11, 1988
Page four
Zoning Regulations and development plan for the Auto Center in 1984. To
ensure uniformity in site development and land use consistency, staff
suggests that these regulations also be adopted for the expansion area.
These Zoning Regulations are included in Resolution 2512 attached hereto.
The Auto Center Zoning Regulations establish development and use
criteria. The uses include new auto dealerships with accessory sales of
parts, used cars, recreation vehicles, service and related uses. The-
regulations also require that all development conform with the Auto Center
Development Guidelines.
The Auto Center Development Guidelines establish criteria for
architectural style, landscaping, lighting, signs, and loudspeakers. All
parcels are also subject to participation in a Dealer Association. These
development guidelines and the membership requirements are described in
the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (CC & R's) which are recorded on the
deed to all parcels in the Auto Center. Staff suggests that the CC & R's
be updated to include the new expansion area and that they also be
recorded on the deed to the new parcel created by Parcel Map 87-201
discussed below.
-.
.4. Tentative. Parcel... Map 187-201.
Exhibit "B" shows the proposed lot layout for the project area.
Essentially, this new configuration creates one additional dealer site for
a total of eleven dealer sites in the Auto Center {three lots were
consolidated into two sites for the middle island of the Auto Center).
The proposed map includes:
Parcel 1: 4.843
Parcel 2: 4.689
Parcel A,B,C: 1.250
Total Area: 1{). 782
Parcels 1 and 2 are proposed dealership sites. Parcels A,B,C are' located
along the perimeter of Parcels 1 and 2 for landscaping and maintenance
access purposes. These lots ensure that the landscaped perimeter facing
the 1-5 freeway and Tustin Ranch Road is maintained.
Both proposed dealer sites can be accessed by Auto Center Drive. The
actual sfte design for Parcels 1 and 2 is subject to the Auto Center
Development Guidelines. The site design and architecture would be
reviewed by the Community Development as part of the Design Review
process.
Corn rnunity Development Department
Planning Commission Report
General Plan Amendment 88-01,
Zone Change 88-01 and TPH 87-201
July 11, 1988
Page five
CONCLUSION:
Draft Addendum 88-01 to EIR 84-2 includes minor technical changes to the
original EIR 84-2 for the Auto Center. The recertification of EIR 84-2 with
Addendum 88-01 is considered adequate under CEQA. The proposed General Plan
Amendment, Zone Change and Tentative Parcel Map have been reviewed for
conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State
Subdivision and Planning Law and the Tustin Municipal Code. Staff considers
this project compatible with the area and suggests that the Planning Commission
recommend approval of the Draft Addendum 88-01 to EIR 84-2, General Plan
Amendment 88-01, Zone Change 88-01 and Tentative Parcel Map 87-201 to the City
Council.
Lalira Cay Pi cku~
Senior Planner
LCP: CAS: ts
Christine A. Shifigleton ~/
Director of Community Development -.
~ttachments:
Exhibits A and B
Attachment I: Addendum No. 88-01 to EIR 84-2
Resolutions 2510, 2511, 2512 and 2513
Corn rnunity Development Depanrnent ~
' TUSTIN A~.'TO CENTER E:,PANSION
SANTA ANA
I'~ ~~-- PROPOSED EXPANSION 'AREA
FREEWAY ..~
EXHIBIT A
Z
x
I,,i.I
1.1.1
Z
I,,i.i
EXHIBIT B
DRAFT ADDENDUM TO
TUSTIN AUTO CENTER EIR NO. 84-02
TUSTIN
AUTO CENTER
.EXPANSION
PREPARED BY:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, CITY OF TUSTIN
JULY 1988
ATTACHMENT !
Ie
II.
1II.
IV.
TABLE OF CO#TENTS
Center Expansion
SECTION
ii i
Introduction
Project Description
2.1 Location
2.2 Project Characteristics
2.3 Discretionary Actions
Impacts Associated with Auto
3.1 Cu~lattve Impacts
Appendices
A. Initial Study
B. Resolution 85-10 Certifying EIR 84-2
PAGE
NO.
A-1
B-1
-i -
LIST OF EXHIBITS
2.
3.
4.
e
NUMBER
Regtonal Locati on
Project Vicinity
Project Site '
Original Freeway Interchange Design
(full cloverleaf)
Approved Freeway Interchange Design
(partial cloverleaf)
Proposed Lot Configuration
for Auto Center Expansion
-ii -
S£c'rION 1
INTRODUCTION
On January 21, 1985 the Tusttn City Counctl certified as complete the
Tusttn Auto Center Ftnal Environmental Impact Report 84-2 (EIR 84-2). ETR
84-2 addressed the potential envtronmenta] tmpacts assoclated with the
development of a 59.81 acre auto center In the Ctty of TustJn. On page 10
of EIR 84-2, a 8.27 freeway access reservation area Is Identified as part
of the Auto Center project. Thts reservation area ts the subject of this
addendum.
EIR 84-2 was adopted as a program EIR ~n accordanCe with the CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15168. Pursuant to Sectlon 15168 (c) of these
guldeltnes, all "subsequent activities tn the program must be examined in
ltght of the program EIR to determine whether an additional environmental
document must be prepared". An Inittal Study (Appendix A) was prepared
for consideration of any new or Increased tmpacts from thts project.
On Page 10 of EIR 84-2, the components of the Auto Center land uses are
discussed. The project tncluded a 8.27 acre freeway access reservation
site for the purposes of constructing a 'free~ay Interchange wtth a full
cloverleaf deslgn.
Caltrans has worked wtth the Ctty on this Interchange design and the
approved plan eliminates the need for a 5.05 acre portion of the
reservation stte. The _ProPerty locatton and accesstblllty have
established the neeu to re-design the extsting lot configuration of the
southwest stde of the Auto Center. Thts addttton of land area and the
project components are discussed tn Sectlon 2 of thts document. .The
Inclusion of thts reservation area as a potential dealership stte ts not a
substantial change tn the project description as contalned tn EIR 84-2.
In conformance wtth Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, this document is
an addendum to EIR 84-2. An addendum can be prepared when changes are
made to a proposed project and such changes do not create any new
significant tmpacts, substantially worsen any significant impacts, or
substantially lessen any significant tmpacts already addressed in the EIR
prepared for the project. Thts ts the case with the addition to the
Auto Center, as described tn Section 3 of thts document. Per Section
15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, this addendum will be attached to the
certified ftnal EIR 84-2 for consideration by the decision-making body in
its review of the proposed Auto Center expansion which requires a General
Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Parcel ~4ap.
_! -
'SECT! ON 2
PRO~IECT DESCR!PTION
2.1 Project Location
The project site ts located Jn the City of Tustin, California, just south
of the East Tustin Specific Plan area, as shown in Exhibits 1 and 2.
As described on Page 7 of EIR 84-2 the project site is located in an area
bounded by E1 Camtno Real to the north, Tustin Ranch Road to the west, the
I-5 freeway to the south and the E1 Modena Flood Control Channel to the
east. The freeway reservation site lies to the southeast, south of the
existing Auto Center parcels and just east of Tustin Ranch Road as shown
on Exhibit 3.
2.2 Project Characteristt cs
As described In Section 2.2 of E[R 84-2, the planned land uses for the
area are described in the Tusttn Auto Center Planned Community
Regulations. These regulations are incorporated into Resolution 2512 for
Zone Change 88-01 and will be applied uniformly on the expansion area.
Therefore, the land use and on-site improvements will be substantially the
same as the project considered in E[R 84-2.
A freeway access reservation area of 8.27 .acres was proposed with the plan
for construction of_l,5/Tustin Ranch Road interchange. The design of this
interchange, lncluded'*a-'full cloverleaf design, a part of which was to be
located on the reservation area. Since the time of approval of.EIR 84-2,
the-City has prepared an environmental assessment and design of the
interchange.
The original full cloverleaf design has been revised to a partial
cloverleaf design, thereby, eliminating the need for the freeway
reservation area (see Exhibits. 4 and 5). City staff has reviewed the
potential land uses for the area in view of the current residential
designation on the property on the General Plan and Zoning Maps. The site
size, location and accessibility make residential development
environmentally as well as economically infeasible.
Exhibit 4 identifies the existing Auto Center lot configuration. As
discussed in EIR 84-2 all parcels are accessed by an internal looped
system called Auto Center Drive. The proposed lot configuration
facilitates the existing access design (Exhibit 6). The expansion project
therefore, will not change the access and circulation pattern.
2.3 Di screti onary. Acti OhS
This addendum addresses the-discretionary actions proposed with the Auto
Center expansion.. As discussed in EIR 84-2 on pages 8-10, certain formal
actions to reclassify the zoning and general plan designations on the
-2-
LOS
ANGELES COUNTY
FULLERTON
SAN NARDINO
.~ c o ~.~" .
· %% I
SEA
BEACH'
HUNTIN(
BEACH
ANAH1
SANTA
ANA
.,EWPO
dohn
Airport
COSTA
ME8A
TU8TIN
Site
IRVINI
I~ne
Lake
RIVERSIDE
Lake
Mission
Viejo
MI8810N
VIEJO
COUNTY
PACIFIC OCEAN
BEACH
J #
N JUAN
CAPIBTRANO
.J
I SAN DIEGO
I COUNTY
CLEMENTE
REGIONAL LOCATION
CITY OF TUSTIN
/\
EXHIBIT I
il
0 3 6 MILE8
CITY
BRYAN AVE
I I
')
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF TUSTIN
EXHIBIT 2
II
0 1300 2600 FEET
TUSTIN AUTO CENTER EXPANSION
SANTA ANA
--PROPOSED EXPANSION AREA
FREEWAY .~
EXHIBIT 3
EXHIBIT 4
I11
I{:
RANCH
·
i
k
f,
ROAD
·
EXHIBIT 5
0
0
m
Z
Z
/
./
IJ.I
EXHIBIT 6
property were processed with. the -initial Auto Center 'project. Additionally
a Parcel Map (No. 84-1032) for-the proposed lot configuration was
required. The expansion project also requires certain discretionary
actions' such as: ,
1. Amendment of the Tustin General Plan Land Use Map designation.
.
A zone change in conformance wi th the proposed general plan
re-c lassi fi ca ti on.
3. Approval of the tentative parcel map.
Each of the proposed actions is discussed in greater detail below.
The Tustin General Plan Land Use Map designates the site as Planned
Community. As defined in the Tustin General Plan Land Use Element, the
Planned Community designation is both a land use and a zoning
classification. This designation assures compatible land uses by requiring
precise development plans and regulations for any area designated planned
community by the general plan.
The project site is part of a 1,988-acre parcel which was annexed to the
City of Tustin in 1977. At that time, the annexation area was pre-2oned
Planned Community-Residential in conformance with the general plan
designation for the area. The Planned Community pre-zone ordinance
requt.res the adoption of a specific plan prior to the issuance of any
bui 1 ding permi ts. ~_
The proposed General Plan re-classification and Zone Change would change
the General Plan and Zoning designation from Planned Community to Planned
Community-Commercial; planned community regulations as adopted for the Auto
Center with the initial Auto Center project would be applied to the
expansion area as a part of the Zone Change. The planned community
regulations include site development and performance standards for the
Tustin Auto Center. As such, the planned community regulations reflect the
requirements of a specific plan in accordance with Section 65450 of the
Government Code and meet the requirements of the city's pre-zone ordinance.
The Planned Community (PC) Regulations list the permitted and conditionally
allowed uses for the Auto Center and. sets forth the applicable development
standards (i.e., building heights, setbacks, required landscaping and
parking). The PC regulations also contain performance standards for
lighting, signs, landscaping and. sound attenuation.
The proposed parcel map reconfigures lot 9 of the original Auto Center plan
and the freeway reservation area for a total area of 10.782 acres. This
area is proposed for two numbered dealer lots, one 4.843 acres and the
other 4.689 acres and three lettered lots for landscaping and maintenance
access purposes.
- 3-
SECTION 3
II. ACTS ASSOCIATED WITH AUTO CENTER .EXPANSION
3.1 Cumula1:tve Impacts
As discussed tn Appendtx A - Au1:o Cent:er. Expansion ]:n~1:~al S1:udy, all
developmen, t r.elated ~mpacts such as dr.ainage, sur.face r.unoff, notse, ltght
and glar.e, tr.anspor.1:a1:ton and clr.cula1:~on have been mt1:~ga1:ed 1:o a level of
~ns~gn~ftcance. The r.ema~n~ng ~ssues r.ela1:ed to 1:he Auto Cent:er. expansion
ar.e cumula1:tve tn natur.e. Sectton 4.0 of ETR 84-2 ~denl:~ftes 1:he
cumulative ~mpacts assoc~a1:ed ~v~th the Auto Center. pr.ojec1:. All f~ndlngs
of s~gn~f~cance and conditions ar.e made tn Appendix B which con1:ains the
Resolution appr.ovtng E:I:R 84-2.
Of speclftc Impor.tance 1:o 1:he pr.oposed expansion pr.ojec'c is 1:o del:er.mine
adequacy of the pr.evtous E]:R and amend any 1:echntcal da1:a specific to 1:he
new pr.oject ar.ea. ]:n thts r.egar.d, 1:he expansion ar.ea will not, as
tdenttfled tn Appendtx A cr.ea1:e any non-mtttga1:ed envtr.onmen1:al impac1:s tn
ttself. However., the cumulative tmpact of the Auto Center' as a ~vhole may
have tmpac1:s. Thts discussion of cumula1:tve tmpacts tn E:[R 84-2 Identifies
1:he mt1'.tgal:ton measur'es and flndtngs necessary 1:o ensur.e 1:hat no
significant, unmitigated tmpacts associated wi1:h 1:he pr.ojec1: will occur.
wtthout pr'oper' conslder'atton.
spectftc lmpac1:s associated wtth 1:he tnt1:tal Au1:o Cent:er' project: ar'e
discussed tn E:]:R 84-2, The mtttga1:ed tmpacts as discussed tn Appe-.d~.x A
ar'e also pr'oper'ly addr'essed tn E:]:R 84-2, The discussion tn E:I:R 84-2 Is
adequate under' 'CEQA for' the expansion ar'ea,
As a r'efer'ence to thts document, ETP~ 84-2, as on file ~vt1:h 1:he Depar'1:men1:
Of Community Development. ser'ves as 1:he base document for' del:ailed
tnfor'ma1:ton and l:echntcal da1:a. All r.ela1:ed 1:echntcal r.epor'1:s, condt1:ions
of appr.oval and r.esponses 1:o commen1:s on E:]:I~ 84-2 ar'e also on file ~vi1:h 1:he
C11:y of Tusttn, Community Development Depar'1:ment.
-4-
APPENDIX A
ENVIRONMENTAL INIT'IAL STUDY FOR AUTO :CENTER EXPANSION
II.
CITY .OF TUSTI-N
Com._,~ity Development Depa~'tment
ENVIRONMENTAL iNITIAL STUDY FORM
i
.
I. Nc.ne ~ ~t
the Irvina Com~,~n~
2..
Addmm c~l Phone Number of Pmm~mnt
550 Newport Canter Drive
New~ort Beach, CA 92660
e
Dam'of Cheaklist Submi~ i 6-22-88
Agen~ Requiring ChecklL~
Cit7 of Tustin
$. ~ame of Propo~l, if ~p~lk=ble Tustin Auto Center Expansion
(Ex~lanatlam of ~ll ~ taxi ~ m~em are required on attached sheets.)
·
Yes ~Fb- Ne
I. Em~h. Will the I~r~ result ins
em-th conditi=m or in .chmge, '
Oim~l~ams dl~l~~, cmmmttm
or evenings'lng of lf~ mil?
x
x
I
c. ~ in mgagra~h~ ar graund surfa~
relief fe~fu~?
cl. The daa~tm, cavering ar madificcrtion
of cry unique geologic or ptvsic, l re,fur.?
e. Any increase in wind ar w,zter erosion of
mils, either on or off the .site?
f. Chaxjm in dam~ition ar erosion of bec.:h
~d~, ar-change~ in siltation, dep<~ition or
erosion which may modify the channel of a
river or stream ar the bed of ~e oca~ or
c~ bay~ inlet ar lake?
3.
~re of pecq)le or I)r~erty to geolo.
hazards '~uch ~s ~., Ic.xlsll~
mucisl!clm, ground failure, a' similar hazcrm?
Air. Will th. p~l rmutt ir.
a. Sd011mtlal air emiuiom ~r detericMml~n
of c~bi~ air quality?
The oreatlan of di|srl'iaxlile rain?
Alteraticn of air movsment, moisture, or
tenl)~ or my chaxje In ctim~te,
either lex:ally or' regia~lly?
·
Water. Wlll the p~l rmult Im
fe
Changes In a~ren~ or the caurm of all-
term, or the rm'e and amount of .urface
Alteratlcra to the ~Jm or flow of
ID~ Into ~urface ~tem, .ar in my
altefmIcn of ~face Wmer quality, in-
eluding but nat limited to-~~t~re,
dluo~ ~ or mrbiclity?
Alteqitim of the directian or rate of flow
of ground waters?
~ in the quantity of graund waters,
either through direct addltiam or with-
drm~ls, or ~ intercmtian of m
aquifer by cuts or ~mcavatiam?
Subst~ial reductian in tl~ amaunt of
~ter ott~er~ise available far Ix~li¢ water
sul~lim?
~l:)C~Um of peOl)le or property to w~ter re-
Icrted h~zcrds such ~ flaod~ncj or tidal winces?
I. ifa. Will tl~ pml~mt ~ult im
C~ in the div~rsity Of sixties, ar
mmb~ of my ~eci.. of plam~.(includlng
trees, dx, ubs, ~ ~ ~ amxrtic
b, RId~ctl~ d tl~ ~ of ~ uniqu.,
ram a~ emlamjered sl~cim of plants?
~l~n of ne~ ~ll~:ie of p~ Into
area, ~r in a barrier m the normal
r. pl.niivn.~ of .~isti~j ~e:i..?
d. IR~im In acreage of ~ agricultural
cmp?. ·
Clx.xje in the dlvem~lty of ~:ie., ~
~ of my .l~:i-- of animals (bird~,
land animal, including reptlle~ fl~h mci
b. Reductlan of th. numbem of my unique,
rare ~r ..,.,.~.,-- .l~ciee of mimeh?
r. Intrmh~ian of nm, N~:ie. of mimab into
m ~ ar rmul? in a tx~i~ _.to the
migratim w m~ement' of mira ab?
'd, Oetertmmlan to ~xiatlng fish a~ wildlife
hab~t?
Will the p~l sit im
a. Inemm~ in ~irting raise le~eL~?
b. ~m of peat)le to ~vem noIN levels?
Light ~1 Glum. Wlll the 'pmpa~l ~ocluc:e
ne~ light a~ glare?
I.md Uae. Will the pmlx~ai ~uult in a sub-
starrtlal alteratiafl of the preM. :t or ptanfled
I~r~ u~e of ~n ama?.
Will the prc~cw:l r~ult in:
Increase in the r~e of use of criy nmural
,.×
A-3
b.. Sd~tmttal degletlan of any
nd~ral resaurc,?
risk of m~ mmlaeJan ar the rmtemm
hazmdmm subetarmm (Irmtuding, but not
Pagulaflen. Will the prat)¢~l alter the Ic.:atfan,
dlstrbJtim, dnmity, ar growl~ rate of 1he
Fumm IXCulatim of m area?
12. Hmming. Wlll the p~l affect existing hous-
ing, or a'eate a 6ma~ far ackiitlexd hotnincj?
13. Tra1~~~~ia~ Will the ~1
rmult ir.
a. Gene~ of m,d~tantlal acictitiQnal
~hicutar. m~vement?
·
·
b. Effeel~ an existing Ix~king factlitle~ ar
clmnm~ far
cl. Alteratlma t~ prma'tt IXrrterm of ¢imule.
'tian ar mmmment of I:)eagle and/ar goods?
e. Alteratlam to wat~, mil ar air.
traffh:?
f. Incr~a.~ in traffic heZerds to rnotar
vehicle~, bicyclists ar peclestri~?
Public Set--am, Will the I~ragczml hcwe an
effect ugan, ar rmuit in a need far new ar
altered gavemmental 'services in my of the
following area~
Fire protection?
b. Police protectian?
Schools?
YI
,,mm,mm
X.
A-4
cl. Pcrt~ ~r other rec~ac~onal fcmiiltles?
f. ~ governmental sarY~?
15. ~mrgy. Will tht p~l i'll, lit inl
Use of ~?ial amaJn?S of ~1 of ~
b. Subst~tlal Irm~ease in ~ ul)an exist°
lng mur~m of a~ergy, or r~luim the
cbve~ of new saurcm~,of energy?
Il. Uflliti~. Will ?he I)rc~ mit In a need
far new s~ltEm~ or ~d)ltantlal alterations to
the following ufllitlem
..
a. ~ or mxluml gas? ·
b. C~nun~k~ syStam?
d. Sewer ar s~tic, tarda?
e. Storm Wa~ drainage?
f. Sold wast~ and 'dIca~?
18. ~ic~ Will the p~l msJlt in the-
~icn of ~ scm'~ic vista or view cq~n to
the publi~ ar will the pral)Gsat result in the
cmmt~n of an aesthetic=lly offensive site open
tE public view?
19. R~icm. Will the pratxJs=l' mit in an
irnpc~-t ulx~ me ClU~lity or quantity of existing
recre~ianal c~¢~rtunities?
2Q. OJlW~d Rmaurgm.
Will tim ~ result in the alteratic~
· of ar the dJ~tr~ian of a prehi~aric or
historic cn'chamtagicai site?
II
21.
Qr .re:md u... within th~ p~ impQrl'
IDae~ the pmjeu-t ha~ the p~tentlal to
degrade the Cluallty ,of the enviranment,
~l~R~tlally mcluce the hab~ of a fish
ar wildlife ~ie~ ea~se a fi.h ar. wild-
life IX~uiatlan to ~ bela~ self
mining lev~i~ threaten t~ elimin~te a
pkmt or animal cammunity, reduce the
mmb~' ar mswlgt the range of ~ ram ar
endmgm~l pictor ar animal ar eliminate
of CaiifQrnia hi~tary ar prehbtory?
Dam. the project' have the potential
achieve shaft-term, to the dLsadvmtage of
lang-term, envirmmenfal goals? (A short-..
which aggur~ in a relatively brief, definitive
periad of time while lang-t~ irt¢)c~z
will endure well into tim
~ the project have irmacl~ which am
individually limited, but cumulatively can-
siclerable? (A project may irmact an
ar mare set.rate remurc~ where the imgact
an em=h resaurce i~ relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of
impa~l~ an the enviranrnent is significant,)
d. Oae~ the project have enviranmental effects
which will cause sut~stan~icll adverse effects
an humc~ beinc~, either directly ar indirectly?
X.
X
X
III. Dlacu~km of Envi~t~l E~lu~i~
See ac~ached Exhibit A for clarification of all answers.
IV. ~~~i~
~o be ~let~ ~ t~ L~d Ag~)
·
On the bo~ of .thb initk evalu~lam
I fled that the P~ project ¢O~.D NOT have o signjfic~rrt effect
oft the eflviramTmflt, and cz NEGATIVE IDE~ATION will be prepared.
I find that altJxxxjh the ImXX~id I:m*°joct could Jxzve cz signiflctmt .effect
--I
the eflv~, there will not be a signifk:ant effect in this case ___
hecta# the mitigatlm memure~ clmcri~ed an m attached sheet have
been added tO the project.. A NEGATIVE D~D. ARATION WIlL BE PF~I~ARED. ..
I find the prapaeed .project MAY hav~ cz signiflemt effegt an the enviran-
meet, and an ENVI~ONM~~ IMPACT ~I=,T Is required. Ill
· Laura Ca~, Pickup ,
Senior Planner
pursuant to Section. 15153 of the California Environmental Quality' Act
Guidelines, an environmental document'has already been prepared and
an addendum to describe mi~or technicial changes has been prepared,
however, no further environmen~al documentation is.required.
A-7
EXHIBIT A
1:hi rial Study.
Auto Cent, er .£xpanston
-£:l:R 84-2 - Addendum
I ·
Earth
a-g: The proposed expansion area is in a reserve area ortg.tnally intended
for an T-5 freeway off-ramp. The site was rough graded and a portion
beamed and landscaped with the initial Auto Center development project,.
All compaction, soil and gradtng tssues are adequately addressed In
84-2. No new impacts are anticipated since the expansion is intended for
the same types of land uses and development as discussed in the Previous
£IR.
II. Air
a-c: The expansion area would accommodate one additional dealer site.
This addition in itself would not substancially increase emissions or
degrade air quality. The project EIR however, discusses the air impacts of
the project as a whole. This discussion identifies impacts and mitigation
measures considered adequate under C£QA.
III. Water
a, c-l: No. impacts are anticipated on water resources or issues as a
result of one additional dealership in the'Auto Center. All conditions,
t.mpacts 'and mt. tigatton of L;,~se issues are adequately discusro"
84-2.
b: The development of the proposed expansion of the Auto Center will alter
drainage patterns and surface run-off· However, modern grading and site
design techniques will be implemented to properly drain all surface run-off
into the nearby E1 Modena Flood Control' Channel. This impact, with the
aforementioned conditions on development, has been mitigated to a level of
insignificance.
IV. Plant Life
a-d: The expansion area has been rough graded and a 10' foot wide berm With
landscaping has been installed in the area. Study of the site and
landscape plan shows that there are no rare, endangered or mature plant
species located in the project area. The existing landscape pattern will
be moved further south towards the I-5 freeway in order to maintain the
landscape buffer along the southerly line of the Auto.. Center. No
significant impacts are anticipated.
V. Animal Life
a-d' The project area Was thoroughly inspected by a professional
environmental planning firm at the time EIR 84-2 was prepared. This
inspection, and review of all updated records and information on file at
the City of Tustin, has determined that no rare or endangered species have
been si ted on the property. No significant impact on animal life is
anticipated with the proposed expansion.
-Addendum'
,~:]: R 84-2
t~age two
V!. Notse
a-b: EIR 84-2 identifies specific noise related impacts of the Auto Center
development. The EIR incorporated mitigation measures for potential long
term impacts from the 'use of loud speakers. Specific regulations imposed
on all Auto Center dealers have been adopted to mitigate noise i~acts to a
level of insignificance. These regulations will be required for all
development proposed in the expansion area, thereby mitigating any long
term impacts to a level of insignificance.
Short term noise impacts as a result of construction activities may occur
tf unchecked. However, as a condition of approval, all construction
activities will be regulated to conform to the requirements of the Tustin
Noise Ordinance. l~ese requirements regulate construction activities
during specified time limits and days of operation. Also, overall noise
levels are limited to a .level considered acceptable to the Orange County
Health Department. All noise related impacts have been mitigated to a
level of insignificance.
~[. Ltg?+. and Glare
The proposed expansion area will accommodate an additional dealer site
which will eventually be developed and outdoor lighting installed. The
light impact was addressed and mitigated through [IR 84-2. These same
conditions apply to the expansion area, therefore, the adopted lighting
regulations for the Auto Center will be applied on all development in the
expansion area. This lighting program reduces any light and glare impacts
to a level of insignificance.
VIII. Land Use
The project area is currently designated Planned Community Residential in
the General Plan and on the Zoning Map.. However, the proposed use of the
property was for a freeway off-ramp from the I-5 freeway from Tustin Ranch
Road. The off-ramp has been redesigned to eliminate the need for this
reserve area. The accessibility to the property, its size, shape and
location made it infeasible to develop the property for residential use.
The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change for the project area
would redesignate -the property from Planned Community Residential to
Planned Community Commercial. This.redesignation is for a land area 5.05
acres in size. When compared to the Auto Center .as a whole (60 acres) the
land use change proposed is considered insignificant.
-~ddendum
IR 84-2
~age three
IX. Natural Resources
X.
a-b: The pr,pos.ed development in the expansion area will accommodate one
additional auto dealership. This development will )nv, lye typical
construction materials and landscaping which will not significantly impact
any natural resource.
Risk of Upset ~
·
a-b- The proposed land uses do not involve storage or use of large
quantities of any hazardous or flammable chemicals. Also the project
location is off local streets as opposed to a major throughfare, therefore,
no significant risk of upset is anticipated with this project.
XI.
Population
The proposed project is on vacant land and lwill not displace any existing
residents.. However, employees working at any new facility may come to the
area. The one additional site, however, is insignificant in terms of its
population impact in that one new facility would employ less than 75
persons. Therefore no significant impacts on'population are anticipated.
XII. Housing
The anticipated 'development in the expansion area wi'll accon~nodate one
additional dealership. As discussed in Section XI above no significant
increase in population is anticipated with this project. However, the City
is currently processing numerous .subdivision maps in the surrounding area
for new housing, therefore, additional housing is being provided in the
area.
XIII. Transportation/Circulation
a, c-f: The additional, site created by the expansion project, in itself,
will not create a significant impact on the transportation and circulation
facilities in the area. However, impacts resulting, from the Auto Center as
a whole have been addressed in EIR 84-2. The discussion and mitigation of
these impacts are considered adequate to cover this project.
b' Any new development o~ an auto dealership will 'create a demand for
parking. However, the Auto Center Development Regulations require adequate
on-site parking facilities in conjunction with a centrally located joint
use parking facility. The expansion area will become a party to the
Development Regulations and will also enjoy its pro rata share of use of
the joint parking facility. With these elements, the parking demand
impacts will be mitigated to a level of insignificance.
A-10
A_~ddendum
84-2
~ge four'
TV. Publlc Servtces
X¥.
a-f: All publlc servtce needs have been discussed in the previous
84-2. These servtces have been Installed and are operational for the
extsttng dealers In the Auto Center. The addltton of the project area,
therefore, does not significantly impact the servtces in the area.
Energy
a-g: The project area ts currently served by gas 'and electrtc utilities,
the addttlon of one dealer stte wtll not create a significant impact on the
use of substanctal amounts of fuel or energy or creatton of new energy
sources.
XY[. Utilities
a-f: The Auto 'Center EIR 84-2 sets forth conditions and mitigation
measures for providing proper access to utilities. All utilities have been
installed and the proposed area has access to stub into these facilities.
Therefore, no significant tmpact on utilities ts anticipated.
,~VI I. Human
a-b: The development of the Auto Center, as well as the eXpansion area has
been reviewed for potential impacts on human health. All construction *and
operation of facilities in the Auto Center will be inl accordance with
modern safety guidelines as required by the State of California. No
significant impact on human health is anticipated.
XVII I.Aesthetics
The Auto Center Development Regulations set forth an architectural and
landscape program for consistency and quality of' projects in the Auto
Center. These regulations will be applied uniformly to all dealers in the
Auto Center, including the proposed expansion area, therefore, no aesthetic
impacts are anticipated.
IXX. Recreati on
The Auto Center project does not incorporate residential uses, therefore,
the project does not require recreation facilities.
×X.
Cul rural Resources
a-d: EIR 84-2 reviewed the project area and the proposed land uses for the
projects impact on cultural resources. This analysis covers the same
conditions as the expansion and is adequate discussion for this project.
This analysis identified no significant impacts on cultural resources.
A-Il
-~ddendum
,R 84-~
~'age five
XXI. Mandator7 Findings of Significance
a, b, d: £IR 84-2 addresses the mandator7 findings of significance of the
Tustin Auto Center. The proposed expansion is similar and the discussion
in the previous EIR is considered adequate for this project.
c: With the expansion area and the existing Auto Center Development, some
cumulative impacts are imminent. These impacts are identified, discussed
and mitigated in £IR 84-2. This discussion is adequate to cover the
expansion project. All mitigation measures and conditions of approval for
£IR 84-2 will be applied tO this addendum and are incorporated into the
resolutions of approval by reference.
LP:pef
A-12
APPENDIX B
RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL FOR EIR 84-2
APPENDIX B
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
2t
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 85-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN CERTIFYING FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT {EIR).84-2 FOR THE TUSTIN AUTO CENTER
The City Council of th~ City of Tustin, California does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. A. Draft EIR 84-2 and amendments 'were noticed, prepared, and
processed in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act, State Guidelines, and the policies of the City of
Tustin for the proposed Tustin Auto Center to be located
northerly of the Santa Aha Freeway and easterly of Jamboree
Road.
The Planning Commission, by adoption of Resolution No. 2204 on
January 14, 1985, recommends that the City Council certify EIR
84-2, as amended.
II.
Ce
Exhibit A, attached and a part hereof, and EIR Text identifys
mitigation measures that avoid or substantially mitigate adverse
impacts of the project; adverse' impacts .which cannot be feasibly
mitigated; ~nd overriding considerations justifying the proposed
project.
The City Council of the citY of Tustin..does hereby certify the final
EIR 84-2 for the proposed Tustin Auto Center to consist of the Draft
EIR 84-2; amendments thereto, staff's technical report, written
comments and responses, testimon'y received at public hearings, before
the Planning Commission and City Council and responses as contained
within the minutes, and the mitigating measures and overriding
considerations as contained herein.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council held on
the 21st day of January .. 1985.
URSULA E. KENNEDY
Mayor
City clerk
B_i
~XHIBIT A
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Art of' 1970, as amended, and in
accordance with the City of Tustin guidelines, as amended, this document presents
the flndinl~ and a brief explanation of the rationale for each flnclin~ required for
approval of the proposed project.
1. The Cit~.. Council Of the Cit7. of... Tustin. does'hereb, y find that. elan_ ~es or
alterations have been required ir~ or incorporated into, the orojeet whieh
avoid ct' substantiall~ m.iti~,ate the si~mifi~mt adverse'impa~ts"identified
in.the., final BLtt as si)eeiflea~ll~, itemized below. '
A. Water Resources
Imparts:
The site is currently subject to floodir~ rangtn~ in depth from
one to three feet resuttint~ from the" inability of regional
drainag~ facilities to convey 100-year flood flows.
The. project i~eludes the construction of an earthen berm
extendfn~ from an existirq berm to the west of the project
site and wrappin~ around the project site to protect the
project from floedin~. This berm will protect the site without
si~fieant2~' alterin& existin& drainage and floodint~ patterns
tn the vietntty of the project. No increased floodin~ imparts
will result to adjacent properties.
Imparts:
Short-term deBTadation of surface water quality will occur
durin~ ~radin~ and initial construction activities.
A plan for control of onstte storm runoff from the property
durir~ construction will be prepared and submitted to the City
of Tustin prior to the fsstmnee of any gradin~ permits.
Imparts:
On-site runoff volumes and velocities will increase and the
on-site drainage pattern will be altered.
Finclin~:
An on-site drainage plan will be submitted to the City of
Tustin for approval prior to the recordation of the final parcel
map. Methods for eontrollin~ the velocity and direction of
runoff will be incorporated into the project design.
Imparts:
Development of the site will effect a long-term change in
runoff quality from a~'ieuttural pollutants to urban pollutants.
Fincl~:
This impart will be partially reduced by the implementation
of appropriate stormwater pollution control plans and periodic
eleanin~ of storm drains.
B-2
· Resolution No. ~';-~.
Page 2
0
B. Land Use and Aesthetics
Impacts:
Ftndin
Impacts:
The pro,Ieee is not consistent with the existing general plan
and zoning designations for the site and Surrounding aveaa.
A general plan amendment and zone change ave proposed aa
pet of the project. The project design and pevfoemanee
standaeds included in the Ttmtin Auto Center Planned
Community Regulations will ensure that the proposed pvo~eet
is compatible with land uses planned foe aveaa adjacent to and
nea~ the pro~eet site.
Implementation of the proposed project would result in the
introdueUon of high intensity night lighting in the East Tustin
The Tustin Auto Center Planned Community Regulations
contain lighting paefoemanee stan~ stipulating the type of
lighting which may be used, the maximum heigt~t of each
flxttwe, and the allowable wattage pe~ square foot. Only
sharp cut-off flxttwes at a maximum height of 9.0 feet ave
allowed, thereby loeaUzing light and glare impacts.
C. _Transoortation/CLeeu!aUon
Impacts:
The proposed project will contribute a small increment to an
existing and projected cumulative traffic impact at several
inteeseetions in the ave~. The project will generate 8,205
ADT and 845 p.m. peak hotw trips. Traffic from the project
will incrementally woesen t~affie conditions at the Red Hill
Avenue/I-$ ramps and the intersections of Red Hill Avenue
and I~vine Boulevavd and Red Hill Avenue and Laguna Road.
Consteuetion of the Jamboree Road/I-$ interchange will
provide substantial mitigation of project related traffic
impacts by di~eting project related and other traffic from
Red ~ A?.nu.e: The .Jamboree Road/I-5 interehanl~e has
been commntea roe construction by the City of Tustin aa a
locally funded project (Tustin City Council Resolution No. 84-
a~).
Noise
Impacts:
Activities at the auto center facilities wU/ inereaae overall
ambient noise leveJa in. the avea by a few decibels. The
numbee of individually audible and potentially intrusive traffic
noise events will increase aa a result of the auto center
development.
B-3
Resolutio~ No. f~/o
· Page 3
Yindings:
The Tustin Center Planned Community Regulations contain
operational Performance stan~ which will mitigate noise
impacts to an insignificant level. Other recommended
operational and site plannin~ meastu, es will A1~ reduce
project impacts. --
Short-term noise impacts will oeeu~ dm'lng project
eonsttmetion.
-4
Compliance with city noise standards regaecling hours of
operafl, on and the use of muffled censtruetion equipment will
minimxze construction noise impacts.
The project site is exposed to noise impa~ts from the Santa
Aha Y~eeway. Over one-half of the proJ.e.e...t site is exposed to
freeway noise levels in excess of the City of Tustin~ noise
objective of 65 CNEL fo~ commercial land uses.
The project design ineoeporates a wall of at least eight feet in
height along this edge. This wall will serve to attenuate noise
from the freeway and will reduce on-site noise levels to
acceptable levels.
Short-te~m tne~es in dust and exhaust emission will occur
in the vicinity of the project .during censtruetion.
Compliance with Rule 403 of the SCAQMD Rules~ and
~Regula'~o .ns and wetting of graded areas will mitigate fugitive
oust emmstons dut, ing eonstruetion.
Long-te~m regional increases in mobile and stationary-source
emissions will result due to the ineroase in motor vehicie and
enet. gy usage.
The proposed project includes bicycle and pedestrian faeilities
provided to reduce motoe vehicle usage. Sidewalks will be
provided along Jamboree and Latpma Road and on all internal
roads. All roadways being constructed as a part of the project
have sufficient width to allow fo~ bicycle lanes. No further
mitigation measures are feasible to reduce motor vehicle air
quality emissions.
B_4
· Resolution No. ~-/~
Pa~e 4
B~
..The City Council of the City of TUstin further finds that al.tho.-~h e_~_nges,
_ai.tet~ati?~.~ or conditions have been incorporated into the pro~ect, which will
SUl~t.. antlaliy mitil~ate .or avoid...si~mifieant effects identified in the fi"_-n-! _~__TR~
retrain of the sihv~ffieant effects cannot be mitil~ated to f-l!y aeeeptabl~
levels. The remaining imparts ,identified_ below may continue to be of
sig=nifieant adverse impart even when al~_ known fen_~ble and identified
mitigation measures are. applied.
A. Project implementation will result in the termination of on-site
a~ei~t~ production and the loss of 80 acres of "Farmland of Statewide
Importance" as identified by the California State Department of
Conservation.
The project is currently committed to non-agricultural use.
The TUstin General Plan Land Use Element currently
designates the site toe urban (restdentiai) land use. The
existence of an ~'vtne Ranch Water District improvement
finance district and the issuance of bonds to finance-~ban
level wate~ and sewe~ improvements for the project site and
sureoundin~ areas further indicates the existin~ commitment
to ut'ban development of this area. There are no economically
oe physieaily feasible measures available to mitigate this
impart.
The proposed project will I~ene~ate approximately 8,205 ADT and 845 PiM.
peak hou~ trips. Traffic from the project will incrementally women traffic
conditions at the Red Hill Avenue/I-5 ramps and the intersections of Red
Hill Avenue and Irvine Boulevard, and Red Hill Avenue and Laguna Road.
Finding: Construction of the Jamboree Road/I-5 interchange will
provide substantial mitigation of project related traffic
imparts by diverting project related and other traffic from
Red Hill Avenue. The Jamboree Road/I-5 interchange has
been committed by the-City of Tustin as a locally funded
project (Tustin City Council Resolution No. 84-65). Prior to
constt'uetion of the interchange, the State Department of
Trensportation must approve connection of the interchange to
the state freeway system and the City of Tustin must select
and institute a mechanism to flnanco construction of the
interchange. Until such time as these approvals and actions
are taken and the interchange /s constructed, traffic
8~,.nerated by the project will adversely impart operating
conditions at the 'Red Hill Avenue/I-5 ramps and the'-
intersections of Red Hill Avenue and Irvine Boulevard, and
Red Hm Avenue and Laguna Road.
B-5
Resolution 1~o..~-'~
Page 5
3~
Co
The project site is located within the Eastern Corridor study area and
approval and construction of the auto center project prior to completion of
the route location study could influence the study by eliminating some
potential alternative aUgnments of the corridor.
The City of Tustin will participate in the Eastern
Transportation Corridor Study and cooperate with the County
of Orange and the other local agencies involved and affected
by the study. It is not considered economically feasible to
delay approval and implementation of the project until the
corridor study is completed.
Do
Short-term construction equipment emissions and long-term mobile and
stationary emissions will oeeu~ with project implementation creating an
adverse impart on the air quality of the South Coast Air Basin.
Yindngs:
As with any urban development project, air qua/ity imparts
cannot be completely mitigated. In approving the project,
subject to the conditions and mitigation measures set forth,
the city has done a11 that is technically and reasonably
possible at the municipal level
E. Increased demand for Umited regional water resources.
.
The project necessitates increased water use and, therefore,
increased demand for regional imported water. This impart.
cannot be mitigated on an individual project basis although
the city will require implementation of all feasible
conservation measures.
F. Increased long-term demand for finite fossil fuel resources resulting from
project electrical and natural gas requirements.
Findings:
The project necessitates an increased cumulative demand for
finite fuel resources. Although servicing agencies anticipate
adequate fuel suppUes for the project, the long-term demand
for fossil fuel resources will be unavoidably increased.
The City Council of the Cit7 of Tustin does hereby find that certain changes or
alterations (e.[~.~ mitigation measures) required in or ineorL~orated into the
Dro~eet are within the resDonsibi,Ut¥ and jurisdiction of a Dublie a~eney other
than the City of Tustin and ran qr should be adopted by the respective agency
as itemized below: ' '
A. California Department of Transportation: Approval of the connection of
the Jamboree Road/I-5 int. erehange to the state freeway system.
Resolution lqo.
Page $
The City Council of the City of Tustin has. weighed the benefits, of the proposed
pro~ect, against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining, whether to
approve said pro~ect. The City 'Council does 'hereby' further find~ determine~
and state, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15093 o.f the state CBQA
GuideU,nes,, that the occurrence of the ee~ain sil~nffieant environmental,
effects identified in the final EIR and set forth in I~ara~raph 2 above, have been
evaluated a~ainst the folloWin[~ overridin~ considerations:
A. The project will result in the following substantial economic, social, and
environmental benefits to the City of Tustin and surrounding areas:
At build-out, the project is anticipated to yield a positive annual
fiscal surplus of $1,306,200 to the city~ general fund. Total annual
revenues are projected at $1,414,700 and total costs at $108,500.
The consolidation of auto dealerships in one location will result in less
vehicle miles traveled than would be typical of a strip pattern of auto
dealerships. This fart is reflected in the trip generation rates for the
Irvine Auto Center, a similar type of 'development, which are
considerably lower per acre than the observed rates for individual
auto dealers.
(3)
The proposed' project will provide improvements to the local
circulation system consisting ot the extension of Laguna and
Jamboree Roa~.
B. The following eeonomie and social considerations make the project
alternatives identified in the final ~ infeasible.
The nNo Project° alternative is rejected because it fails to meet the
objectives set forth for the project, particularly the objectives of
providing an increased revenue base to the city and creating a
development which provides for a range of auto. elated uses to serve
the City of Tustin and surrounding communities:
The "Exis~g General Plan" alternative is rejected because it fails to
meet the objectives set forth for the project, particularly the
objectives of providing an increased revenue base to the city and
ereatip~ a development which provides foe a range of auto-related
uses to serve the City of Tustin and surrounding communities.
Residential use of the site is considered less desirable than the
proposed commercial use ~iven the site*s proximity to the I-5 freeway.
(3)
The 'Residential Development at Ten Dwelling Units to the Acre"
alternative is rejected because it fails to meet the objectives set
forth for the project, particularly the objectives of providing an
increased revenue base to the city and creating a development which
provides for a range of auto-~elated uses to serve the City of Tustin
and surrounding communities. Residential use of the site is
Resolution
Page ?
~onsidered less desirable than the proposed commercial use l~iven the
mitek proximity to the I-5 freeway.
(4)
The "Alternative Loeations" alternative is rejected because
development of the proposed project on the other available sites in
the city would result in ~eater environmental impacts than would
development of the project on the proposed site. The potential
alternative sites would result in ~eater impacts to ex~tin~ residents
ct. would require substantially increased site improvement costs than
would the euz~ently proposed site. The proposed site offers the best
combination of distance of existin~ residents, freeway visibility, and
freeway access.
B-7
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) §
CITY OF TUSTIN )
HARY E. WYNN, Ctty Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Ctty Counctl of the Ctty of
Tusttn, California, does hereby certtfy that the whole number of the members of
the Ctty Counctl of the Ctty of Tusttn is ftve; that the above and foregoing
Resolution No. 85-1_0 was duly and regularly Introduced, passed and adopted at. a
regular meet.lng of the City Counctl held on the 2!st_ day of JanuarT, [985, by the
following vote:
AYES :
NOES :
~-ABSENT:
COUNCILPERSONS: Edgar,. Gretnke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarellt
COUNCILPERSONS: None
COUNCILPERSONS: None
MARY £. WYNN~'~Cl ty C1 erk
City of Tustl~, Californ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
161·
l,
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2510
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
CERTIFY FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EIR 84-2 AND
ADDENDUM NO. 88-01 AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows'
I ·
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That an initial study questionnaire was prepared for General
Plan Amendment 88-01 and Zone Change 88-01 (the "Project"), and
it was determined that Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No.
84-2 (Tustin Auto Center), with an Addendum (No. 88-01), could
be employed to describe this project, in accordance with Section
15153 of the CEQA Guidelines.
Be
That the environmental documentation was prepared by City of
Tustin and Michael' Brandman Associates.
C. That the subject EIR and Addendum No. 88-01, including comments,
have ~--en reviewed and considered by the City nf Tustin.
D. That the EIR (84-2) was prepared in compliance with the
-California Environmental Quality Act, and CEQA Guidelines, and
the policies of the City of Tustin.
E. That pursuant to Section 15153 of the CEQA Guidelines, EIR
84-2 has previously been prepared and certified and adequately
addresses the general environmental setting of the project, its
significant environmental impacts, and the alternatives and
mitigation measures related to each significant environmental
effect, and that no additional environmental documentation need
be prepared.
F. That the addendum prepared for the project addresses only minor
technical changes or additions and none . of the conditions
described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines have occurred.
G. That the findings- and mitigation measures described in
Resolution No. 85-10 and 2204 are hereby incorporated into this
resolution by reference.
1
2
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
21
22
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2510
page ~o
II.
The Planntng Commission of the City of Tusttn does hereby recommend
to the City Council certification of Final EIR 84-2 with Addendum
No. 88-01, which has been completed tn compliance with the California
Envtronmen:al Quality Act and adequately addresses the project.
PASSED,~ AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning
Commission on the day of , 1988.
Chairman
pEr,ii' FOLEYI ·
Recordtne S~.cretary
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
RESOLUTION NO. 2511
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION O~ THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
AMEND THE LAND USE MAP OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE
TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN FOR AN AREA BOUNDED BY THE
1-5 FREEWAY, TUSTIN RANCH ROAD, THE EXISTING SOUTHERLY
BORDER OF THE AUTO CENTER, AND WEST OF THE EL MODENA
CHANNEL.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A®
Section 65356.1 of the Government Code of the State of
California provides that when lit is deemed to be in the public
tnteres, t, the legislative body may amend a part of the General
Plan.
Be
That in accordance with Section 65356.1 of the Government Code
of the State of California, a public hearing was duly called,
noticed, and held on the application of the Irvine Company to
reclassify the land use from Residential/Single Family to
Planned Community/Commercial for an area bounded by the 1-5
Freeway, Tustin Ranch Road, the existing southerly border of the
Auto Center and west of the E1 Modena Channel
aS.l showq in
Exhibit "A".
C. That Environmental Impact Report No. 84-2 (Tustin Auto Center)
as amended by Addendum No. 88,01 has been prepared for the
subject project, and has been recommended for certification to
the City Council, by the adoption of Resolution No. 2510.
D. That a change in classification would be in the public interest
and not detrimental to the welfare of the public or the
surrounding property owners.
II.
The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that
General Plan Amendment 88-01 be adopted, amending the Land Use Map of
the Land Use Element of the Tustin Area General Plan from
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
.8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1-6
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution N~. 2511
Page two
Residential/Single Family to Planned Commnity/Co~rcial for an area
bounded by the I-5 Freeway, Tustin Ranch Road, the existing southerly
border of the Auto Center and west of the E1 Modena Channel as sh~n
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular ,meting of the Tusttn Planning Comisston
held on the day of.... 1988.
Chatrnmn
PE~IN~ FOLEY ' '
Recordtng Secretary'
9
LJJ L...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12!
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION 'NO. ;~512
'A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING REZONING OF A AREA BOUNDED BY THE
I-S FREEWAY, TUSTIN RANCH ROAD, THE EXISTING SOUTHERLY
BORDER OF THE AUTO CENTER AND WEST OF THE EL 'MODENA
CHANNEL, FROM PLANNED COMMUNITY TO PLANNED
COMMUNITY/COMMERCIAL AND INCLUOING THE INCORPORATION
OF PLANNED COMMUNITY REGULATIONS KNOWN AS THE EAST
TUSTIN AUTO CENTER.
The Planntng Commission of the Ctty of Tusttn does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper application, (Zone Change No. 88-01) has been
filed by the Irvine Company, to change the zone for an area
bounded by the 1-5 Freeway, Tustin Ranch Road, the existing
southerly border of the Auto Center and west of the E1 Modena
Channel, from Planned Community to Planned Community/Commercial
as shown in Exhibit "A", and incorporating planned community
regulations known as the East Tustin Auto Center.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
C. That a zone change should be granted for the following reasons'
1. That the proposed change Would not be 'detrimental to the
public health, safety, and welfare of the surrounding
property owners.
.
That the inclusion of a Planned Community zone and
incorporation of development regulations will ensure that
the proposed use will be compatible with future and
existing developments.
3. The proposed zone designation is in conformance with the
Land Use Element of the Tustin Area General Plan.
De
An Environmental Impact Report (EIR 84-2) as amended by Addendum
No. 88-01 has been prepared for this project, and has been
recommended for certification to the City Council by the
adoption of. Resolution No. '2510.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
25'
28
Resolul;lon No. 2512
page ~o
II.
The Planntng Commission hereby recommends to the City Council
approval of Zone Change No. 88-0! from Planned Community to Planned
Community/Commercial for an area bounded by the I-5 Freeway, Tusttn
Ranch Road, the existing southerly border of the Auto Center, and
west of the E1 Hodena Channel, as shown In Exhtbtt "A", and
incorporates Planned Community Regulations known as the East Tusttn
Auto Center (Exhibit "B" attached hereto).
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meting of the Planning Co~lsston, held on
the _ day of ,i ,, _, 1988.
Chairmn
PENNI FOLEY-" '
Recording Secretary
l.U
ONIN/~OUg "
Resoh~tinn
EXHIBIT a
I
L
L
EAST TUSTIN AUTO CENTER
CITY O F TUSTIN
PLANNED. COMMUNITY REGULATIONS
NOVEMBER. 1984
THE IRVINE COMPANY
Amended by the Plahning Commission
January 14, 1985
EXHIBIT B
RESOLUTION NO. 2512
TUSTIN A2TO CENTER
FE,~n~D ~IT~ ttEGULA~IONS
November 1984
~ZON ZZZ
SEC"~ZON VZ
Subsec"t:ion A.
Subsection ~.
Subsection C.
SubsecCion O,
·
SubsecC£on E.
Landscag£ng
~ig~Cinq
Subsection F. Walls and Fences
Subsection G.
Subsection H..
Subsection I.
Subsection J.
Sound Attenuation
$~ocage and Loading
ReEuse Collection Area
~aqe
'1
8
9
11
11
11
11
14
16
17
·
·
, · e
·
1"
T~
1'"
The Planned Community Regulations ate intended Co gui~e
CAe planning an~ design o~ ~ auto. s~es, leas~n~ an~ :~
~C~ se~ce cenCe=. ~e ~~aCions pco~Ce C~e ~alicy
si~e pl~iaV, a~iC~Cu~al design, and ~Cecials ~o= all
sC~uces v~i~ will be~ a pact off ~e CenCe=.
~nC in ~e c~iC~.
F.
~_~_CTION II.
The TusCin AuCo CanOe= Planned Community has been esCa~-
lisAe~ Is one ( 1 ) Basic' g=oup.'
Net Ac~: es,.
40.00
This g=oup shall be se=ve~ by:
..
F, Amdscape b,.~e~' a~ea
i ~,o.~ ~aoss AC~S
I
·
B --2--
, e
SECTION III. GENERAL NOTES
0
s~ecC Co ~e a~li~le zoning codes
~sCin.
2. Water service ~nd sewage disposal facili=ies w£Chin CAe
Planned C~mm~ty area shall be furnished by =he Zrvine
· Ranc~ Water Dist=ic=. However, temporary services by
o~e= agencies may be necessary.
.
no ~C=uc=ion' s~l'be all~ within CAe ~o~~=ies
~lies wi~ all provisions of .applic~le building
~des. and ~e various ~e~nical ~des :elated Che=e=o.
.
Any land use p=Oposal o= ~evelopmemt standard ~ot speci-
TusCin zonin, g codes.
Wheneve~ =he repulations contained herein conflic= wi=h
regulations of Tus=in zoning codes, CAe regula=ions
contained herein shall take precedence.
plan for 'silt control for all s,:or~ runoff from CAe
=o ~e iss~cl of a grading ~e~C. The plan s~all be
in ef~C during ini=ial operation o~ C~e =race =o ~in-
n~l o~e=aCion.
7. AH=oval by' CAe Air Quali=y Managemen= Dis~=ic= of any
pla~ts, devices, or ~aciliCies ~cr CAe con==ol o~ any
pollutants which ~a~ be generated, shall ~e requi=ed.
8. Grading within CAe zone shall be subject =o =he approval
9. Ene=9~ conserve=ion provisions shall be considered w~an
building orientation, ~aCerials and design are bein~
developed ·
r
!
10.
12.
13.
~ndiCion any l~nger than =easo~ly necessa=y =or
s~l ~e sc=een~ ~=~ v~e~ ~=~ .ad~acen= ~ublic
CC&~ ~o~ the subject 9~o~ect, to ~,c]ude 9~ov~s~o,s ~o~.the
~nte,ance and cep]aceme,t o~ ]a,dsca~ng, s~a]~ be submitted
to and approved by t~e C~ty Atto~,ey pc~o~ to t~e ~ssua,ce
of building pe~its.
Prior to the issuance of building pe~its for subject project,
a Master ~velopment'Plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Co~ission and approved by ~solution. Said plan shall
incorproate by text, diagram and illustration the following
e 1 ements ·
a®
ee
building materials and colors
landscape.plan, ,.to include theme, plant materials,
irrigation system and fixtures
wall plans to show elevations, materials, and location
signing., to include locations, size,'height, materials,
and intensity of l ighl~ing
performance standards for noise control
perimeter li.ghting fixtures, location, and intensity.
SECTION ~. DEFINITIONS
1. Adver=isin~ Surface-. The '=oral area of the face of any
signing sCruc=ure.
·
· .
2. Ccmmon'.Area: A~eas designated ~y Parcel ~ ~o= land-
l~ly ~o~ Au=o Cch=e= Marchers' ~socia=ion.
.
o~ay wiC~in C~is o=din~ce shall =e~ dedica=ed veAi-
.~a= =igh=s~f~ay, including any =edian paving o=
4.
Gross Acreage: T~e entire land area within CAe boundary
~uCCing a==e=ial ~ig~way o= CAe cmnCe=line o~ any
NeC Acreage: The Coral land a:ea of CAe land ~escribed
-.
Any ~arcel's frontage which faces onto an
loo9 =cad o= ~acing .Coward an entrance
Side - Those property lines which sepa=aca one
subdivided pa:cel which has been designa=ed
fo= re=ail use from eno=he= such subdi=ided
parcel o= ~=om a designa=ed co.on
~loyees' pa=~ing Loc.
7. Sm=vice & S~o=ape auildin~s: All sC=ucCu:es on any
display, sale o= lease o~ au=cmc~iles and =ela=ed
=e=c~andise ·
AuCo, Cr~c~, and rec~eacion~-z vehicle sales, leas£n~
Service ~nd~c~ies n~ ~ncZ~de, buc are nsc l~iced
a. Repair, maintenance and serv£cin~ o~ appliances
o~ ccmq~onenc pa~=s ~or m~cor vehicles.
·
c. Tss=inq. ahops '(excZudinq noise producin~ o~
noxious pe~oL-mance CesCim~).
Repa£=, sainCsnancs and servicin9 ol above-
lis=ed items p~ovide~ CAac said industries a~e
not: CAe poin= o~ cus=omer delivery or collec-
~. F. xperimea=al au=.mobile assembly and
g. ?eAicula= sro=age areas (exclusive o~ impound
2a=ds ).
mo
~ses 9ec~_!CCed Sub~ecc co ~ranc!n~ o~ a ~ ~_y ~e.
Pla_~.-_in~ Commission £~ ~oC, ZnclUded £n Auto uea~e~sni~
l. Tire, battery and accessory shops and accessory
£ndoc= installation ~acili=ies.
2. Auto and vehicle glass shops.
3. Au=o and truck =eh=als.
4. Pain= and rest.raCism shops (independent of dealer-
ships ).
· 5. Body Shops (independen= o~ dealers~£ps).
6. Se:vice £ndust:£es w~i~ p~cv£de a se:.vice co ~ses
lis~a~ in Section A., a~ove.
Usea Per~_~!tted Subject' t:o G=antin~; oE a ,CU~ b~' the
Plannln~ C~mmisaion
1. Ca= was~.
2. Se=vice station.
B --7"
-f
-T
It
~uil~nq pe~ p~ocessinq. ~is :avia~ s~ll ~e conduc~
~y ~e ~~~2 ~evelo~en~ ~e~a~en~
~lAcies o~ ~e ~lCy o~ ~sCtn. A~ovals s~Zl
valid ~or a period o~ la monC~s. Decisions ~y ~he Co~uniCy
Develo~enC D~=~en= s~all ~e ~i~l u~ess appeal~
Plying Co~ssion wi=bin seven
Develop. n= Depart. he'S decision.
The A~pli=anC s~all submi= six (6) sees of si Ce plans
a~d elevations Co Ch. Community Development Depa==men= cAaC
include ~e following inf0'rmaCion as applicable:
l. Nor~ Arrow.
2. Title Bloc~:
a. Scale of M. ap~
Name and A~xess of Applicant;
c. DaCe. of pc.pace=ion.
3. All ~un~a=.2 lanes on the subject property fully dimen-
sione~ and Ci~ ~n with cae cenCe~line ~ ad~acenC o~
4. The name, location and widC~ of any ad,ac.n= public
p=ivaCe SC'ce. Cs. Widths should include any =equi=ed
street widening·
The name, location and width of any wa=e= ¢ou=ses,
sC=uctures, i=rigaCiom di=¢~es, and any ocher pe=manent
easements.
7. All p=oposed improvements properly dimensioned.
.
All packing spaces an~ aisles drawn and dimensioned
=he flow o~ =ra~i¢ noted ~y .a=rows and calcula=ions
B --9--
T
!
· o
9. The 1ocs=ion and widen o~ all =ehicula~ and pedesc=ian
All p=o~osed walls and ~ences, Lncluding height and
11. All p=opose~ landscaping in as muc~ detail as possible.
and propeccies contiguous co its ~oundaries.
13. Location of nearest walls and sC=ucCu=es and ad~acenc
14.
pcopecCy, bouts o~ opecaCion, n~e= o~ e~loyees, and
Indicate all existing ~i:e .hyd=anCs and waCe= main
sizes.
Indicate building size,
building elevation.
·
· C,?po of consCrucCion, and
Indicate all existing sc=eeC lights, utility poles,
and signs wi=bin =he public' right-of-way adjacent
~s. Such =es~onse ~y cons=i=u=e app=oval, app=oval wi=h
sa~e=~ ~d wel~a=e, o= disa~=oval o~ Applican='s size
91~. I~ no ac=ion is ~aken wi=bin =he allot=ed =ime, =he
size plan s~ll be de~ app=oved, unless =he =ime limi= ~s
waiv~ ~y =he A~plican=.
B -LO-
T
.[
A.
Buildin~ Setbacks ~
1. No structure o£ any ~ind, an~ no parc Chereof~ shall
be p~c~ on ~y sire closer :=o :a prope==y line =hah
~=ov~enCs are specifi~lly exclud~ ~=om =~ese
se=~ac~ provisions:
a. ~of over~ng.
Steps and walks.
c. Paving and associated curbing in relation Co the
landscape area, except c~ac customer par~ing
property lanes.
d. Fences, except =Aac no fence shall be placed
w2~nin the sc=eec setback area for service or
· storage buildings. ..
e. Landscaping.
~'. -Signs and displays
or occupant.
owner, lessee
2. No setback is requir~ ~rcm interior prcper=y lines.
3. SeCbac~ from sC=eeC proper=y lines:
a. Sales or display buildings shall ~e se= back a
minimum of 10' from .=he in=erior loop road and a
minimum of 60' from =~e entrance streets. ~oo~
proper=y line.
Service and storage buildings shall ~e se= ~ac~
a ~inimum o~ 60' from =he fron= proper=y lines
and a minimum of 65' from =~e rea~ proper=y.
lines. However, a service or s=orage ~uilding
B
describe~ in Section 7IZI.F., paragraphs 2 and 3
og ~h£s document,'sub~ec~ to Planning Commission
approval.
~. ~u£1d£ncj Ke£c~hts
'Buildings shall be a ~aximum o~ 30' 'in height to Cop
of ridge line.
2. Automobile display and signage shall ncc be allowed
on top of any building.
3. Au=~m~bile storage in ~he second level o~ a building
s~mll be allowed only if ~ully screened ~rom view,
including CAe line o~ sight from the second story o~
any s==u~cures which =ay be built across Jamboree
and ~~ Roa~."
Parkin~
l. Eac~ auto dealer shall provide a ~inimum o~ eleven
(11) offs~ee= parking spaces per mit buildable acre'
w~ic~ shall' be reserved ~or employee parking only·
·
-.
2. In ~e even= =ha= ~loyee par~ing is provided in a
~n parking lo=, eac~ dealer s~all provide
separa=e par~ing space on his/her premises ~or any
d~~==a=or'au=o~biles w~ic~ are driven ~y a
c~y ~loyee.
3. Ig employee parking is provided in a common [acili=y
shaved by several mercaanCs, a recorded document
s~l be ~iled wi~h =he Building and Planning
Depar%ments and s~ll be signed by =he Owner
c~on si=e, scapula=lng =o =~e per, hen= reserva-
purposes.
4. Eac~ automobile dealer shall provide a minimum of
six onsiCe parking spaces reserved exclusively
customers' use. Addi=ional customer ~arking shall
be allowed a= cut,side where appropria=ely
Onsi=e handicapped par~ing shall be provided as
required ~y =~e governing agencies.
B -12-
r
r
.
0. Landscape
1. Every site on which a'building is placed shall be
landscaped according to plans approved as specified
herein and .~aintained thereafter in a sightly and
well-kept condition pursuant to the standards agreed
u~on by the Auto Center AercAants' Association.
Suc~ ~aintenance shall include regular irrigation,
fer=ilization, cultivation and tree pruning.
·
2. The property owner, lessee or occupant shall land-
scape a 5' strip immediatel~ behind the property
line adjacent to any £nterior street of the Auto
excepting walkways and driveway areas. The Auto
Center Hero, ants' Association shall maintain this
landscape in compliance wi~A the Declaration of
Covenants, Condit£ons and Restrictions of this Auto
Center.
-4.
The property owner, lessee or occupant shall provide
irrigation and ~aintenance facilities for the land-
scaued areas, and shall keep said ~acilities in good
wor~ing order at ail times.
d
Landscaping shall be installed within thirty (30)
~ays of occupan~ or com~ietion of *:he building,
wAi~ever cumes first.
5. Site landscaping shall be compatible with ,:he land-
scape master plan w~ich, has been developed as a
guide to coordinate the species of planc'~ate=ials,
~hus providing con=inui=y o~ landscape within =he
CenCe=.
The project developer shall provide a continuous
landscape buffer between *:he Auto Center and
Jamboree and Laguna Roads. Addi=ionally, Land-
scaping shall be provided £n =he =edian of Jamboree
Road.
7. Undeveloped areas :eserved ~or ~uture expansion,
suc~t as the freeway interchange or any parcel ncc
p~omptly ~uilt out, shall be ~aintained in a weed-
~=ee condition ~uC need nc= ~e Landscaped.
B -].3-
~
· o
ir
T.
't
[.
r'
1..
E. Li~htin~
each auto dealer.
fixtures ecfual to Elsco Manu~ac=uring Co. 's Auto
King TI t:o di.~eci: lighting downward only.
..
displa~ lig~=s. T~es.e =ixCures shall be on
sCan~=~ no highe= C~n 20', s~ll ~e spac~ no
Ave=age wattage for the entire display area shall
not excae~ 1.5 wat=s/scfua=e foot. Display areas
within 125' of Jam~o=ee Road or ~aguna Road shall
not excae~ 1 watt Der square ~oot.
7. Se=vice and storage parking areas shall Be lighted
by stands=ds no higher than 24' which shall contain
enCi~e sro=age area shall no= exceed 0.2 wa=rs per
8. Crea=ive lighting ~esign and re£n~orcemen= o~
light intensity =or merchandising and hig~ligh=ing
purposes are encouraged as Long as =he overall
avemage wa=rage ~ no= exceeded.
B -~4-
· .o
*d
T'
*r
T'
r'
except.aC spo= display lore=ions along
perimeter walls.
10. Strings of inca~descen= fixtures shall ncc be
allowed in any exterior area.
F. Walls and Fences
1. ;,11 service, storage and trash areas shall be
screened from view from any street by a wall. Land-
scape screening alone sA,all not be deemed suf~i-
cien=.
2. Walls cons=fur=ed on =he perimeter of =he Auto
CanCer shall be in keeping wi=h =~e pro jar=' s Design
Criteria. These walls shall be no less =Aah 8' and
order Co acne, Ce a building back~ agains= CAe
pr~e==~ line. ~is increase in height shall be
prope=C~. The pcope=Cy owner s~ll ~=ovide addi-
cio~l Landscaping ~o =in~ize Che v~sual i~acC o~
C~is wall height on adjacent sc=ears.
3. If a. building is cons=fur=ed as permit=ed in =he
&~ove paragraph, no sloping roofs ~aall be used on
such a s=ruc=ure, and any drainage shall be away
fromm the wall into =he sire. No ~.acias, gu=Vets, or
oOZe= roof ~ge =reagents s~all be visible above
=~e 14' ~eig~C o~ =he wall.
4. Offsets in =he perimeter walls are encouraged w~en
. adjacent =o a 1¢' high strut=ute. Such closers
shall be compatible with CAe projec='s design
cci=avia.
G. Sound A=Cenua=ion
1. Ail body repair work and all compressor wcr~ shall
be performed in an enclosed area only· Access doors
=o such enclosures shall ~ace away from Jamboree
~oad.
2. Auto dealers ad~acen= =o Jamboree Road ~ay ncc .open
service bay doors Coward Jamboree ~oad.
B -].5-
/
y.
4. hi: =mmprasso= exhaust stao~s shall contain a
maffling device.
Air ~nditioning units ~ay no= be mounte~ on top
any building w~i~ is less than 65' from a rear
K. Siamese
1. Signs s~ali be allowe~ sub~ecC to' the-provisions
~e City of Tus=in Planning Commission.
2. P~'o~ec= developer shall supply signage ad.~ace.= to
=Aa develope= s~ll supply ~=eeway dj=et=lanai
3. Roof-~ounta~ signs shall eot be allowed.
4. Billboard signage shall not be allowed.
I. Storage and ~oadin{ Areas
1. No ~ate=ials, supplies om equipment, including
area on a sire excep= inside a closed building or
behind a visual harrier o= se=vice area
screens =he equipmen= ~rom view o~ all public
s=ree=s. The singular exception s~all ~e any
ve~i¢les w~i¢~ are a par= o~ =he =e=c~an='s
display.
~. Neither ~he loading doc~ nor =he o~floading opera-
=ions ~or automo=ive parrs and o=~e= supplies s~all
be visible ~=om 'any public screens.
· o
#e
r'T
~e~e ~.olle~iom A~eas
l. AL1 ~uCdo~r refuse collection .areas sA,ail ~e
vis~l~ s==~n~ ~=~ ac=ess scr~=s, ~=ee~ay, and
ad~acsn= p=o~e==~ ~ ~ o~~e screen.
B -L7-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14I
15
17
18
19
~0
21
23
2~
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2513
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP 87-201 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
FREEWAY, EAST OF TUSTIN RANCH ROAD, SOUTH OF THE
EXISTING SOUTHERLY BORDER OF THE AUTO CENTER AND WEST
OF THE EL MODENA CHANNEL.
The Planntng Commission of the City of Tustln does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That Tentative Parcel Map No; 87-201 was submitted to the
Planning Commission pursuant to Ordinance No. 847 by the Irvine
Company requesting authorization to reconfigure two (2) existing
lots into two (.2) parcels and three (3) lettered lots for
Parcels 9, C and D of Parcel Map 84-1032 as shown on a map filed
in Book 200, pages 19-24 of Parcel Maps and a portion of lots 26
and 27 of Book 44 of Irvine's subdivision per a map filed in
Book 1, page 88 of miscellaneous record maps, both filed in the
office of the Orange County Recorder.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held for said
map on July 11, 1988.
C. This project is Categorically Exempt, Class 15 from the"
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act for the
subject project area.
D.
That the proposed subdivision is in conformance with the Tustin
Area General Plan, Tustin Zoning Code and Subdivision Map Act.
E.
That the site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed.
F®
That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
development.
G®
That the design of the subUivision or the proposed improvements
are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife in their
habitat.
H. That the design' of the subdivision or the type of improvements
proposed will not conflict with easements acquired by the
public-~t-large, for access through or use of the property
within the proposed subdivision.
I.
That the design of the subdivision or the types of improvements
proposed are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
i
11
12
1'3
14
1,5
IG
17
18
20
21
23
2~
25
27
28
Resolution No. 2513
Page two
II. The Planntng Commission hereby recommends :o the City Council
approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 87-201 subject to the conditions
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tusttn Planning Commission,
held on the ,i day of ....... , 1988.
Chairman
Penni' Foley
Secretary
Exhibit A
td Resolution No. 2513
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 87-201
PUBLIC/PRIVAll~ INFRASTRUCllJRE IMPROVEMENTS
(1) 1.1 Any damage done to existing street improvements and utilities shall be
(6) repaired before acceptance of the tract and/or issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy for development on any parcel within the subdivision.
(1) 1.2 Prior to any work in the public right-of-way, an Excavation Permit must be
(6) obtained (and applicable fees paid) from the Public Works Department.
(1) 1.3 All construction within a public right-of-way and or public easement must be
(6) shown on a separate 24" X 36" plan with all construction referenced to
applicable City and County drawing numbers.
(1) 1.4 All changes in existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks and other public
(6) improvements shall be the responsibility of subdivider.
(1). 1.5 Applicant. shall post all required subdivision bonds and agreements prior to
(6) Final Map.
GRADING/DRAINAG~
(1) 2.1 Prior to issuance of grJding permits:
(2)
(6)
A.
A detailed soil engineering report' shall be submitted to and approved by
the Building Official conforming to the requirements of the Uniform
Building Code, City Grading Requirements, and all other applicable state
and local laws, regulations and requirements.
(1) 2.2 B.
(2)
(3)
Preparation and submittal of a grading plan subject to approval of the
Department of Community Development delineating the following
information:
Methods of drainage in accordance with all applicable City
Standards.
.
A note shall be placed on the grading plan requiring Community
Development Department approval of rough grading prior to final
clearance of foundations. The Department will inspect the site for
SOURCE CODES
· STANDARD CONDITION
EIR MITIGATION
(3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODES
(4) DESIGN REVIEW
*** *EXCEPTION
(5) SPECIFIC PLAN
(6) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT
(7) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES
(8) PC/CC POLICY
(9) OTHER MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIREMENT
R~' ,~tton No. 2513
EX,,.ul t A
Page two
accuracy of elevations, slope gradients, etc. and may require
certification of .any grading related matter.
3. Ftnal street elevations at key locations.
4. Final pad/finished floor elevations and-key elevations for all site
gradtng. -
S. All flood hazards o.f record.
(1) c.
(2)
(1) D.
(6)
Preparation of a sedimentation and erosion control plan for all
construction work related to the subject Tract including a method of
control to prevent dust and windblown earth problems.
Submittal of a construction traffic routing plan to be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Public Works.
(1)
E. Written approval must be obtained from adjacent property owners for
rights-of-entry for construction activity across, lot lines.
(k 2.2 Preparation of a sedimentation and erosion control plan for all construction
(2) work related to the subject Tract including a method of control tv ,,event
dust and windblown earth problems.
(1) 2.3 A precise grading permit shall 'be issued priOr to issuance of any building
permits within the subject Tract.
(1) 2.4 All earthwork shall be performed in accordance with the City of Tustin
Municipal Codes and grading requirements.
FIRE DEPARI~ENT
'(1) 3.1 The subdivider shall co~ly with all requirements of the. Orange County Fire
(6) Marshal, including required fire flow, installation where required of fire
{2) hydrants subject to approval as to location by the Fire Department, City of
Tustin Public Works Department and Irvine Ranch Water District, and co~liance
wi th al 1 requirements pertai ni ng to construction.
(1) 3.2 Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence
(6) that adequate water supply and operational fire. hydrants are available for
(2) fire protection shall be submitted and. approved by the Orange County Fire
.. Marshal. The subdivider shall also submit water improvement plans for
approval of Fire Marshal.
,lution No. 2513.
~..~bit A
Page three
NOISE
(1) 4.! All construction operations including engine warm up shall be subject to the
(2) provisions of the City of Tustin Noise Ordinance and shall take place only
(6) during the hours of 7:00 a.m..until 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday unless
the Building Official determi'n'es that said activity will be in substantial
conformance with the Noise Ordtnance and the publtc heal th and safety wi 11 not
be impaired subject to application being made at the time the permit for the
work is awarded or during progress of the work.
FEES
(1) $.! Prior to issuance of any building permits, payment shall be made of all
required fees including:
A. Major thoroughfare and bridge fees to Tustin Public Works Department.
B. Sanitary sewer connection fee to Orange County Sanitation District.
Ce
Grading planchecks and permit fees to the Community Development
Oe.~r~nt.
De
All~ applicable Building plancheck and permit fees to the Community
Development Department.
£. New development fees to the Community Development Department.
F. School facilities fee to the Tustin Unified School District subject to
any agreement reached and executed between the District and the Irvine
Company.
GENERAL
i
(1) 6.! Within twenty four months from Tentative Parcel Map approval, the Subdivider
shall file with appropriate agencies, a Final Map prepared in accordance with
subdivision requirements of the Tustin Municipal Code, the State Subdivision
Map Act, and applicable conditions contained herein.
(2) 6.2 Prior to Final Map approval:
A. Subdivider shall submit a current title report.
Subdivider shall conform to all applicable provisions of the City Code.
All requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act, the City's Subdivision
Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance .shall be satisfied.
P~olutton No. 2513
fbi t A
Page four
C. Subdivider shall submit a duplicate mylar of the Final Map, or 8 1/2 inch
by 1! inch transparency of each map sheet prior to final map approval and
"as built" grading, .landscape and improvement plans prior to certificate
of acceptance.
O. Show on the Final Map all easements of record.
E.
The CC & R's for the Tustin Auto Center parcels shall be amended to
include the expansion area and filed on all parcels created in this
subdt vi si on.
F..
The amended CC & R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney
and Community Development Director prior to recordation.
*** 6.3 All development on Parcels I and 2 shall be in accordance with the Tustin Auto
Center Development Guidelines.
6.4 Parcels A, B, and .C are for landscape and maintenance access. These 'lots
shall be landscaped and maintained as specified for all perimeter landscaped'
lots in the existing Auto Center area. This landscaping shall be per the
adopted landscape guidelines and 'Auto Center Guidelines for the City of
,'usti n.
*** 6.5 A block wall shall be installed along Lots A, B and C per the Auto Center
Development Guidelines. The location, design and construction shall be
consistent with existing walls and shall meet all required design criteria.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24~
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 88-73
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF' TUSTIN
CALIFORNIA, RECERTIFYING FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT EIR 84-2 AND ADDENDUM NO. 88-01 AS REQUIRED BY
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
The City Council of the City ~f Tustin does hereby resolve as follows:
I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. That an initial study questionnaire was prepared for General
Plan Amendment 88-01 and Zone Change 88-01 (the "Project"), and
it was determined that Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No.
84-2 (Tustin Auto Center), with an Addendum (No. 88-01), could
be employed to describe this project, in accordance with Section
15153 of the CEQA Guidelines.
B. That the environmental documentation was prepared by City of
Tusttn and Mtchael Brandman Associates.
C. That the subject EIR and Addendum No. 88-01, including comments,
have been reviewed and considered by the City of Tustin.
De
E®
That'the EIR (84-2) was 'prepared in compliance with the
California Envi~-~ntal Quality Act, and CEQA Guidelines,
the policies of the City of Tustin.
That pursuant to Section 15153 of the CEQA Guidelines', EIR
84-2 has previously been prepared and certified and adequately
addresses the general environmental setting of the project, its
significant environmental impacts, and the alternatives and
mitigation measures related to each significant environmental
effect, and that no additional environmental documentation need
be prepared.
F.
That the addendum prepared for the project addresses only minor
technical changes or additions and none of the conditions
described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Gui delines have occurred.
G. That the findings and mi tigation measures described in
Resolution No. 85-10 and 2204 are hereby incorporated into this
resolution by reference.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
23
25
27
28
Resolution No. 88-73
Page two
II.
The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby find that EIR 84-2
as amended by addendum 88-01 is adequate and complete and recertify
the Final EIR 84-2 with Addendum No. 88-01, as being in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the
day of , 1988.
Ronald B. ~oesterey,
Mayor
~lary Wynn,
City Clerk
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 88-72
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
88-01 AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP OF THE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN FOR AN AREA
BOUNDED BY THE I-5 FREEWAY, TUSTIN RANCH ROAD, THE
EXISTING SOUTHERLY BORDER OF THE AUTO CENTER, AND WEST
OF THE EL MODENA CHANNEL.
The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows:
I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A.
Section 65356.1 of the Government Code of the State of
California provides that when it is deemed to be in the public
interest, the legislative body may amend a part of the General
Plan.
B. That in accordance with Section 65356.1 of the Government Code
of the State of California, a public hearing was duly called,
noticed, and held on the application of the Irvine Company to
reclassify the land use from Residential/Single Family to
Planned Community/Commercial for an area bounded by the 1-5
Freeway, Tustin Ranch Road, the existing southerly border of the
Auto Center and west of the E1 Modena Channel as ~h-,~n in
Exhibit "A".
-.
C. That~Envtronmental Impact Report No. 84-2 (Tustin Auto Center)
as amended by Addendum No. 88-01 has been prepared for the
subject project, and has been recommended for certification to
the City Council, by the adoption of Resolution No. 2510.
D. That a change in classification would be in the public interest
and not detrimental to the welfare of the public or the
surrounding property owners.
II. The City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment 88-01
amending the Land Use Map of the Land Use Element of the Tustin Area
General Plan from Residential/Single Family to Planned
Community/Commercial for an area bounded by the 1-5 Freeway, Tustin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
Resolution No. 88-72
Page two
Tusttn Ranch Road, the existtng southerly border of the Auto Center
and west of the E1 Modena Channel as shown tn Exhibit "A" attached
hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council held on
the . day of ..... 1988.
Ronald B. Hoesterey,
Mayor
Mary wy6'nj
City Clerk
)NIN/W:)N8
RESOLUTION NO. 88-73
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
~13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO. 1010
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 88-01 FOR AN AREA
BOUNDED BY THE I-5 FREEWAY, TUSTIN RANCH ROAD, THE
EXISTING SOUTHERLY BORDER OF THE AUTO CENTER AND WEST
OF THE EL MODENA CHANNEL, FROM PLANNED COMMUNITY TO
PLANNED COMMUNITY/COMMERCIAL AND INCLUDING THE
INCORPORATION OF PLANNED COMMUNITY REGULATIONS KNOWN
AS THE EAST TUSTIN AUTO CENTER.
The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby ordains as follows:
I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. 'That a proper application, (Zone Change No. 88-01) has been
filed by the Irvine Company, to change the zone for an area
bounded by the I-5 Freeway, Tustin Ranch Road, the existing
southerly border of the Auto Center and west of the E1 Modena
Channel, from Planned Community to Planned Community/Commercial
as shown In Exhibit "A", and incorporating planned community
regulations known as the East Tustin Auto Center.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application by the Planning Commission on July 11, 1988 and
subsequently by_ the City Council o~ July 18, 1988.
C. That a zone change should be granted for the following reasons:
.
That ~the proposed change would not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, and welfare of the surrounding
property owners.
2. That the Inclusion of a Planned Community zone and
Incorporation of development regulations will ensure that
the proposed use will be compatible with future and
ex1 stlng developments.
3. The proposed zone designation ts tn conformance with the
Land Use Element of the Tustin Area General Plan.
D. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR 84-2) as amended by Addendum
No. 88-01 has been prepared for this project, and has been
recerti fi ed by the City Council by the adoption of Resolution
No. 88-73.
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1(;
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ordinance No. 1010
page two
'II.
The City Council hereby approves Ordinance 1010, Zone Change No.
88-01 an area bounded by the I-5 Freeway, Tustin Ranch Road, the
existing southerly border of the Auto Center, and west of the E1
Modena Channel as shown in Exhibit "A", from Planned Community-
Residential to 'Planned Community Com~nercial and incorporating Planned
Community Regulations known as the East Tustin Auto Center (Exhibit
"B" attached hereto).
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council, held on the
day of , 1988.
Ronald'~. Hoesterey,
Mayor
Mary Wynn,
City Clerk
E
LU i...
Z
LU
Z
Z
0
)NIN/W:)Ug
ORDINANCE 1010
.
o
L
·
o
EAST TUST~N AUTO ¢~NTER
CITY O F TUST~
PLANNE~ COMMUNITY ~GU~~ON$
NOVEM~E~ 1984
THE IRVINE COMPANY
Amended by the Planning Commission
January 14, 1985
EXHIBIT B
ORDINANCE NO. 1010
SECTZO~q
S,EC~ZOIf V']:
subeec~cn ~.
subeecc~cn K.
Subeec~on Z.
8
9
L3
i.
i.
.
· " .,, · ' o
?
L
f,
!
II
~C~caCm ~s Cancer ~nCo C~e surro~d~nq co~n~C~ ~n a
~e: ~C ~s ~C~ble vita ~sC~nq ~d ~ucure develop-
NeC Acres
¢0.00
I I
~5.46
B --2'~
,
[. -
]-.
i.
codes o~ cae C~C7 o~
.
.
c~lies vici all provisions of .applicable building
codes and CAe various ~mc3anical codes related theretO.
4.. Any Land use proposal or develolment standard ~ot s~eci-
~ically covered by ~is ~l~n ~d L~s suppl~en~a~ CexC
s~'be s~J~C Co ~e t~Cions of CAe City of
~Cin zen&Ag ~des.
5. w~enevec CAe =equl&cions contained herein conflict vita
CAe regulations of: T~stin zoning codes, the :egulaCions
contained herein s~all ta~e precedence.
Co ~e iss~ce o~ a g:ading pe~C. The 91an shall be
~in C~e LnC~ciCy ce silt cunt:el eacilicies during
noml operation.
7. Approval by' CAe Air Quality Management District ce any
plans, devices, o: ~acilities ~ot C~e cent:el o~ any
8. Grading wi'cAin CAe zone shall be subject c.c~ the approval
9. Energ7 conservation provisions s~all be conside=ed when
building orientation, ~aCecials and design ace being
developed ..
r
r
12.
CC&Rs for the subject project, to include provisions for the
maintenance and replacement of landscaping, shall be submitted
to and approved by the Ctty Attorney prior to the issuance
of building permits.
13.
Prior to the issuance of building permits for subject project,
a Master Development-Plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Comission and approved by resolution. Said plan shall
incorproate by text, diagram and illustration the following
el ements:
ae
Ce
e®
building materiels and colors
landscape.plan, to include theme, plant materials,
irrigation system and' fixtures
wall plans to show elevations, materials, and location
signing to include locations, size,'height, materials,
and intensity of lighl~ing '-
performance standards for noise control
perimeter lighting fixtures, location, and intensity.'
SECTION
·
scape ~r employee par~£ng purposes and deeded to a
legally ~OCled&uCo CanCer Herc~anCs' Association.
.~a~ rig~cs~f~ay, inclu~nq ~y median paving or
4. Gross Acreage: The entire land area wiCAin CAe boundary
eAu=ring arterial highway or the cents=line of any
NeC Acreage: The Co,al !and area of ~e land described
in cae use or ocher permit. Nec acreage shall
Cure ~e =oc~ buil~le area.
. .
-.
Pro~erc~ Lines: ·
.From= - ~y ~rcel's ~ronCaqe wAic~ ~aces ones an
inCecior sCr~C s~ll be de~~ a ~ronC
pc~ecCy lane, whe~er ~acing CAe ~nCerior
l~ road or ~acinq .toward an eflcrance
street.
-The property lane of any parcel which is
adjacent Co CAe perimeter streets of
J=m~cree Road, ~aguna Road, ~y~ord Road, or
=~e I-5 ~reeway.
Side - Those property lines w~icA separate one
subdivided parcel w~ich has ~een des£gnated
~or retail use from.another suc~ su~div£ded
~=cel o= ~rom a designated co.on
~loyees' par~ing LoC.
7. Service & S~or..a~e ~uildin~s: All struc=ures on any
recall parcel w~ose primary purpose
display, sale or lease o~ automobiles and =els=ed
me= c~.andise.
T
f.
.USES P~ZT~ED
Au~o, t=uc~, and rec=eatio~ 'veA£cle sales, leasing
and seL*v~-c. ( dealerships and/or ~ndepeaden~s) ·
.Se~ce iad~C~es ny ~=c~ude, buc a~e nsc ~ced
~o ~ ~e ~o~ovin~:
Repair, maintenance and servicing of appliances
or component pa=Cs ~or motor vehicles.
·
b. Tooling.
dO
salntenancs and servicing o~ above-
items provided ~at said ~ndusCr~es are
~. Experimental auCoembile assembly and ~abr£ca-
g. VeA£cula~ storage areas (excl~sive og impound
Uses Permi~ed Sub~ec,,~ to ~rantin~ o~ a CUP ~y the
Plannin Commission i~ No= InCluded in Auto Oealershi
1. Tire, ba=tery and accessory shops and accessory
£ndoor ins=allacion ~acili=ies.
2. Au=o and vehicle glass shops.
3. Auto and truc~ rentals.
4. Pain= and res=ora=ion shops (~ndependen= o~ dealer-
snips ).
-5. RGdy Shops (£ndependen= o{ dealers~£ps).
1'
a ~ bv
l. ~a~ was~.
T
T
L
I II II i I II
by ~e ~~ ~evelo~enC Oe~mnC in acco~nce ~iC~
~licies o~ ~e CiO2 o~ ~Cin. ~ov~s s~ll r~in
valid ~o~ a period o~ La ~nc~. Oecisio~ ~y c~e Co.unit2
~e A~li~C s~ s~C six (6) sets o~ si~e plans
~ elevaCio~ Co ~e C~,iCy Develo~enC Oepar~nC C~C
~clude ~e ~oll~vinq in~0'~Cion as applic~le:
2. Title BZock:
c. Date.
All ~u~.~T lines on the subject property fully dimen-
sioned and'cia~ in wi~ cae cencerline of adjacent or
aea~ s.Cceets.
The name, location and vid~J~ of any adjacent public or
p~ivate SC'reefs. Wides should include any re~i~ed
street 'widening.
The name, location and width of any water courses,
structures, irrigation di=c~es, and any ocher permanent
public or private easements.
All proPOsed .improvements properly dimensioned.
All pa=king spaces and sis.les drawn and dimensioned
~e ~low o.f traffic noted by arrows and calcula=ions
B -9-
r
!
r?
10. All proposed walls and fences, including height and
proposed 1..andscaping in as nmcA deeail as possible.
13. Locaeion o£ nearese walls and serucCures and adjacent
14.
o~er gene=~ ~=accerisCics c~c would' apply
17.
Indicaee building size, .typo o£ conserucCion, and
~uilding elevation.
Indicate all exiseing street lights, ~ciliCy poles,
Crees &nd signs wiCAin CAe' public rigAc-of-way adjacent
T~e. Director og C~/~-nunicy Development s~all respond co sub-
~CCal of ~e ~v~LisC~ i~o~Cion wi~in CAirCy (30)
~..Su~_rls~e ~ ~CiCuCe approval, approval with
s~eC~ ~d welfare, or disa~roval of Appli~nC's sics
pl~. I~ no action is C~en wi~in CAe alloCC~ rime, CAe
sics plan s~l be de~ approve, unless the rime limit ~s
waiv~ by CAe Appli~nC.
B -10-
[:
L
I:
l. '~o sera=cure o~ ~y' kind, a~ no ~C
be p~c~ on ~ si Ce close= ~co a pcopecc2 line
herein pcovi4~. ~e ~oll~i'nq sC~ccu~es ~d
se~~ p~ovisions:
&. Roo~ ore=hang.
and valks.
s~All ooC be v£CAim 10 feeC of CAe street
lanes.
d. fences, ezcepC ~aC no fence sAall~ .be plac,~
· sco=aqe buildinvs.
e. C~3ndacapinq.
..g. -.Sl~xm and d£splAys ~denC~¥inq
o= occu~mc.
cae owner, lessee
g. ~.Lght:ing.
3. SeCbAc~ ~rom sC=eeC pcoperC¥ lanes:
~n!~m o~ ~0' ~=~ c~e enc=ance sc:ceca. Roo~
Service and storage ~uildings s~all ~e sec ~ac~
A ~inimum of ~0' ~rom CAe ~ron= ~=ope:Cy lines
lanes. Howeve=, a service o= s=ocage ~uilding
B
line.
o~ '~is do--nC, s~ecC ~o Pla~in~ Co~ssion
· . Buildin~ Kei~ACs
..
1-. B~l~nqs s~lI be a ~~ of 30' 'in height Co Co9
be allowed
' on ~op of any building.
·
·
3. Au~mobile s~oraqe'in ~he second level o~ a building
s~ll be ~owedo~y i~ ~ully screened ~amview,
~ s==~u=es w~i~~y ~e bull= ac=oss J~m~=ee
c. p, ark,in~
1. Eac.~ au=o dealec .sltall provide..a ~inimum o~ eleven
d~~C=aCo= nut--biles vhi~ are d=iven by a
~y ~loy~.
employee packing is pcovided in a common ~acilicy
by seve=al ~=c~Cs, a =eco=ded doc~enC
~i1~ vi~ ~he Building and Planning
De~r~n~s ~nd s~l be sign~ ~y =he Owne= of =he
use of CAe site ~o= ~loyee par~iflg
.
o
e .
4. Each automobile deale= shall provide
six onsiCe pa=king spaces =eserved exclusively tom
cus=omers' use. Addi=ional cus=ome= pa=~ing shall
S. Onsi=e handicapped par~ing shall ~e p=ovided as
=equiced ~y =he gove=ning agencies.
B -12-
·
L&ndsca~e
1. Ever~ site on vhi~ a 'building is placed shall be
~cl~Cinq w~kways ~4 d=ivevay areas. The AuCo
~~ge in ~li~ce wi~ =As Declara=ion o~
~ve~Cs, ~ndiCZo~ ~d Restrictions of Chis AuCo
o
· he propecC2 ovnec, lessee or occupant sAall provide
irrigation and ,-ainCenance ~acilities fro= ~Ae land-
s~~ a=e~, ~d s~ll .~eep said ~acilicies in good
~andscaping shall be installed vi thin thirty (30)'
days ol occupancy o~ completion of CAe building,
w~i~evec ~s-
S. Site landscaping shall be compatible with the land-,
scape nmaCe= plan w~icA has been develope~ as a
~uide to coordinate CAe species o~ planc'~Cerials,
~ p~idin9 ~ncinui~y o~ landscape wi Chin CAe
CanOe=.
.
~ae pro~ecC developer' shall provide' a continuous
landscape buf~er between CAe Auto Canter and
Jamboree and Laguna Roads. Addi =ionally, Land-
scaping shall ~e provided in CAe median o~ Jamboree
Road.
.
Undeveloped areas reserved Ear ~u=ure expansion,
suc~ as CAe ~reeway interchange or any parcel hoc
promptly bull= ouC, shall be maintained in a weed-
~ree condition but need ~oC be landscaped.
I'
L
r
r
1. O£~si~e and. street ligi~ting ~ill ~e provided by
project' s de.vel~per.
e
~2~uc ~d ~cc i~cu~e ~cin~ and va=Cage pro-
~s~ by ea~ auto dealer.
4~
~ixCures e~lual Co Els~-~ Manufacturing Co. 's Auto
Einq VI to d/re=t lighting downward only.
sc~~d a~ a ~n~ o~ 40, on cen~er. The
in~erior of ~e ~Splay a~ea
~sp~y lig~Cs. These ~ixCu:es s~ll be on
sCan~:~ ~ higher ~ 20', s~l ~e spac~ no
closer ~ ~O' on center, ~d
~ ~ou= ~ixCu:es per ~ll.
Average wattage for ~ae entire display area shall
mDC exceed 1.5 watts/square ~oot. Display areas
wi~.~in 125' of Jamboree R~ad or Laguna Road s~all
m~C exceed i watt per square ~oot.
0
Sa:vice and storage par~ing areas shall be lighted
by stand&~ds no higher t~an 24' whic~ shall contain
no ~re C~an Cwo ~ix=u:es a~ =~e above described
sp~ilica=ion per pole. Average wa=Cage [or =he
s~re ~ooC. ·
Crea=ive lighting design and reinforcement ot
lighting intensity 'to provide varying degrees o~
light intensity ior merchandising-and highlighting
purposes are encouraged as Long as =he overall
average wattage .i~ adc exceeded.
B -1.4-
T
T
T
r.
0
10,
walls.
all,wed in an2 e~ecioc aces.
Walls ~d Fences.
1. ~ silica, soo=age ~d ==asa areas s~ll be
sc=~n~ ~=~ vi~ ~=~ ~ sO,eeC by a wall. ~nd-
scape sc=Hninq ~one s~l hoc be de~ su~fi-
cien=.
0
.
Walls consCrucce~ on ~s perimecer of CAe AuCo
C~iCecia. ~ese v~ s~i1 be no less C~n 8' and
pcopecc~, ~ pcopeccy o~e= s~ll pc.vide addi-
C~o~ ~~p~nq Co ~a~ize CAe visual ~acC off
~is v~l height on ad~acenc sC~eeCs.
su~ a sC~c=u=e, and any ~=ai~ge s~ll ~e away
~=~ ~e wall. into ~e sics. No ~acias, guCCe=s,
O~l= =oO~ ~ge C=ea~enCs shall be visible above
~e 14' height of =As wall.
4. Off~seCs in me per.seer walls are encouraged when
ad~acenC to a 14' high structure. Such of~seCs
shall be co~4Cible with CAe pcojecC"s design
G. Sound Attenuation
All body repair wor~ and all compressor wor~ shall
be performed LA an enclose~ area only. Access doors
Co such enclosures shall ~&ce away from J~m~o=ee
Road.
2. AuCo dealers adjacent Co Jamboree Road ~ay not open
service bay doors Coward Jamboree Road.
1-
r
·
doors are ao ~igi=er t~n C~e perimeter wall
screens C~em Cron LaVuna Road.
4.. Air coa~resaor e=muaC ~Cac~a shall conCain a
su~flin~ device.
I
,
S. ~m~o~ ~o~pe~e=s s~l be d~ecC~ ava~
~e ~c~Cer streets v~c~ sucro~d C~e Auto CanCer
~d ~~ b~ ~unc~ no ~V~er c~ ~2' above
any bu£1d£nq vi=icl= .is less tAan 65' ~rom a rear
property line.
3. Roo~-mounCed signs s~all mo~ be allowed.
4. Billboard signag~ shall
Storage and LoAding. Areas
No =aCerials, supplies or equipment, including ~irm-
owne~ or operaCe~ trucks, shall be scored in any
area on a site except inside a closed ~uilding or
beAind a visual harrier or service area w~ic~
screens tire ecpAipmenC ~rom view o~ all public
streets. The sin~lar exception s~all ~e any'
ve~icles w~i~ are a ~rC o~ the merchant's customer
display.
NeiCAar =he loading dock nor CAe o~loading opera-
tions for automotive parrs and ocher supplies s~all
be visible ~rcm any public streets.
o.
ad~aceni: property by an opaque screen.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 88-79
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 87-201 LOCATED
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE I-5 FREEWAY, EAST OF TUSTIN
RANCH ROAD, SOUTH OF THE EXISTING SOUTHERLY BORDER OF
THE AUTO CENTER AND WEST OF THE EL MODENA CHANNEL.
The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows:
I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. That Tentative Parcel Map No. 87-201 was submitted to the
City Council pursuant to Ordinance No. 847 by the Irvine Company
requesting authorization to reconfigure two (2) existing lots
into two (2) parcels and three (3) lettered lots for Parcels 9,
C and D of Parcel Map 84-1032 as shown on a map filed in Book
200, pages 19-24 of Parcel Maps and a portion of lots 26 and 27
of Book 44 of Irvine's subdivision per a map filed in Book 1,
page 88 of miscellaneous record maps, both filed in the of. fice
of the Orange County Recorder.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held for said
map on July 11, 1988.
C. This project is Categorically' Exempt, Class 15 from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act for the
subject project area.
D. That the proposed subdivision is in conformance with the Tustin
Area General Plan, Tustin Zoning Code and Subdivision Map Act.
E. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed.
V ·
That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
development.
Ge
That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements
are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife in their
habi tat.
H. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements
proposed will not conflict with easements acquired by the
public-at-large, for access through or use of the property
within the proposed subdivision.
I. That the design of the subdivision or the types of improvements
proposed are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 88-79
Page two
II.
The Ctty Council hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 87-20I
subject to the conditions contained In Planning Commission Resolution
No. 2513.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meting of the Tustin City Council held on
the day of , 1988.
ii ii i i i
Ronald B. HoestereY,
Mayor
Mary ~ynn,
Ct ty Clerk