HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1 MINUTES 07-18-88MINt S OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR ~ET
OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
JULY 5, 1984~
Ie
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
The meeting was called to ord6r by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy at 7:01 p.m. in
the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance
was led by Councilman Prescott, and the Invocation was gi.ven by
Councilman Kelly.
II. ROLL CALL
Co~ncilpersons Present: Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern
Richard B. Edgar
John Kelly
Earl J. Prescott
Councilpersons Absent' Ronald B. Hoesterey, M~yor
Others Present: William A. Huston, City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Christine Shingleton, Dir. of Comm. Development
Fred Wakefield, Acting Chief of Police
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Royleen White, Dir. of Comm. & Adm. Services
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Valerie Whiteman, Deputy City Clerk
Lloyd Dick, Building Official
Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent
Approximately 40 in the audience
III. PROCLAMATION - PARKS AND RECREATION MDNTH
Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy read and presented a proclamation fr'~n the City
Council to Susan Jones, Recreation Supervisor. The proclamation
proclaimed the month, of July, 1988, as "Parks and Recreation Month".
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy offered a special thank you to staff for The Great
American Fireworks Show held on the 4th of July at the Tustin High
School Stadium. She noted that Tustin is one of the few remaining
.
cities in Orange County offering a fireworks show for the community free
of charge.
Susan Jones, on behalf of the Community Services Department, thanked the
Council for their continuing support and recognition of how Community
Services improves the quality of life for Tustin residents.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS- None
V. PUBLIC INPUT - None
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
Items i and 12 were removed from the Consent Calendar by Mayor Pro Tem
Kennedy and Item 11 was removed by Councilman Edgar. It was moved
Edgar, ..sec.o. nded by. Kelly, to approve the remainder of the Consent
Calendar. The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent.
2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,300,889.65
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $178,622.01
3. MEMBERSHIP OF 1}lE CITY OF MISSION VIEJO IN THE FOOTHILL/EASTERN
TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR
Approved Addendum No. I to the Corridor Agency Joint Exercise of
Powers Agreement as recommended by the City Manager.
4. TAPES AND TRANSCRIPTS OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Approved continuance of this item to the July 18, 1988, Council
Meeting as recommended by the City Clerk.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 7-5-88
5. AUTHORIZATION'TO CONTINUE OPERATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-89
Authorized the City Manager,' through Minute Action, to continue
fiscal operations for 1988-89 at an appropriation level to
exceed that of 1987-88,. until such time as the budget process
can be completed as recommended by the Fi n-ance Department. -
-6. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 88-27; CLAIMANT-KIRK WATILO, DATE oF
LOSS-2/10/88, DATE FILED WITH CITY-4/26/88
Rejected subject claim for property damage in the amount of
$314.40 as recommended by the City Attorney.
7. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 87-33; CLAIMANT-MARY ANN CARTER AND LINDA
GRIFFIN, DATE OF LOSS-8/2¢/87, DATE FILED WITH CITY-9/8/87
Rejected subject claim for property damage and personal injury
in the amount of $1,000,000 as recommended by the City Attorney.
8. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 88-22; CLAIMANT-JASON PFEIFER, DATE OF
LOSS-12/16/Bl, DATE FILED WITH CITY-3/23/88
Rejected subject claim for property damage and personal injury
in the amount of $265,188.82 as recommended by the City
Attorney.
9. RESOLUTION NO. 88-69 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 88-206
LOCATED AT 1302 INDUSTRIAL WAY
Approved Tentative Parcel Map 88-206 by adoption of Resolution
No. 88-69 as recommended by the Community Development
Department.
10. RESOLUTION NO. 88-71 -A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIFY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA,. RELATING TO THE COMPENSATION OF PART-TIME
EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN.
Adopted Resolution No. 88-71 relating to the compensation c,'5
part-time employees_ as recommended by the Administrative
Services Department:
13. RESOLUTION NO. 88-6 --A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT
NO. 10, NEWPORT/MCFADDEN AVENUE, AND ORDERING THE CONVERSION
·.
Adopted Resolution No. 88-6 establishing Underground Utility
District No. 10, Newport/McFadden Avenue and ordering the
conversion as recommended by the Public Works Department/
Engineering Division.
14. RESOLUTION NO. 88-74- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND WATER LINE
RELOCATION ON JAMBOREE ROAD FROM TUSTIN RANCH ROAD TO CHAPMAN
AVENUE (NEW)
Adopted Resolution No. 88-74 approving plans and specifications
and authorizing advertising of bids as recommended by the
Public Works Department/Engineering Division.
15. RESOLUTION NO. 88-75 - A RESOLUTION OF %HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF.TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF TIlE HOLD!NG OF
A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8,
1988, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE
PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO
GENERAL LAW CITIES
RESOLUTION NO. 88-76 -A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS" OF TIlE
COUNTY OF ORANGE TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 1988, WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON THE DATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 23302 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE
Adopted Resolutions No. 88-75 and 88-76 as recommended by the
City Clerk.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 7-5-88
Consent Calendar Item No. I -Approval of Minutes, June 20, 1988
Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy requested correction of the City Council Minutes
dated June 20, 1988, as follows'
Page 3, under Ordinances for Adoption, Item I - Zoning Ordinance
Amendment 87-4, second paragraph, should read' It was moved by Kennedy,
seconded ibJ/ Ed~)ar,. that Ordinance No. 1001 have second reading by title
only. The motion carried 3-0, Kelly and Prescott abstaining. Following
second reading by I'title Ioln'ly of Ordinance No. 1001 by the City Clerk, it
was moved b~ Kennedy, ..... seconded ...bym Edgar that Ordinance No. 1001 be
passed and adopted. .(The City Clerk has rechecked the tape and verified
that the motion was as corrected by Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy).
Discussion of Closed Session Statement, June 20, 1988:
Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy then stated that there had been an error in the
wording of the Closed Session agenda statement of the June 20, 1988,
City Council Meeting. She requested that the error be publicly noted
and the correct statement, which would have been clearer, reflected in
these minutes. The correct statement is as follows'
Mayor Hoesterey announced that the City Council will recess to Closed
Session because litigation has been formally initiated to which the City
is a party. The title of said litigation is Fenwick vs. City of Tustin,
Case No. 479698. Said Closed Session is held pursuant to the authority
of California Government Code Section 54956.9(a). Also, based on
existing facts and circumstances, the City Council has decided to
initiate or is deciding whether to initiate litigation and said Closed
Session is also held pursuant to the authority of California Government
Code Section 54956.9(c).
It was moved bi/ Kennedy, seconded bs Edgar, that the correct Closed
Session statement be entered into the minutes of the July 5 1""",
, :,o,, City
Council meeting. The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent.
Consent r~alendlar Item No. 11 - Authorization for Professional
SerVices/S~ructural Plan C~eck ~nd Infrastructure Services
It was moved by Councilman Edgar, seconded bi/I Prescott, that this item
be continued and approve extension of the existing contracts.
After both Councilman Kelly and Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy voiced opposition
to that motion, it was moved bi/ Ke,lll~,.secondedlbJ/ Kennled~/, to approve
the agreements with the firms of Mel ad & Associates, Roger Leggett,
Inc., BSI Consultants, Inc. and GPS Consulting Engineering and authorize
the City Manager to execute said agreements subject to City Attorney
approval.
With no action possible on that motion, it was moved by Edgar, seconded
by Prescott, that this item be continued to the July 18, 1988 meeting.
Again, with no action possible, it was moved bi/ iKenne.ds, seconded by
Edgar, that this item be continued to the July 18, 1988 meeting and
approve extension of the existing contracts. The motion carried 4-0,
Hoesterey absent.
Consent Calendar Item No. 12 - East Tustin; Amendment to Subdivision
Agreement l~or 'lract '1'2'810 and Rein~ursement Agreement for Payments of
Costs for Infrastructure Improvements for East Tustin Assessment
District 86-2
Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy questioned staff why this item had been
'reagendized when it had been previously approved at the June 20, 1988
meeting wi th a 5-0 vote.
William Huston, City Manager, responded that there had apparently been a
question as to whether all Councilmembers had received the June 20th
addendum on this item. Due to this misunderstanding, staff had
preferred to reagendize it for a reaffirmation of approval.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy asked the City Manager if the City Clerk had to
certify in writing the posting of agendas or addendums to agendas.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 7-5-88
City Manager Huston stated that since the City Clerk was not in
attendance, ,he could not speak for her. It was his understanding, from
the City Attorney's statement, that she did post the addendum. He
again stated that the reason for reagendizing was for Council to
reaffirm their previous action.
It was moved bo/ Edgar, seconded bi/ Prescott, to approve amendment to
Subdivision Agreement and. Reimbursement Agreement and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy said that when she noticed the item had been
reagendized, she called the City Clerk and asked for her comments.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy then read a statement from the City Clerk
attesting to the posting of the addendum and personal delivery of the
addendum to all Councilmembers seventy two (72) hours preceding the
meeting of June 20, 1988.
Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy felt that the reagendizing of this item was
unnecessary and the vote shoul~ be taken only to reaffirm the City
Council's action taken on June 20, 1988.
The motion carried 4-.0, Hoesterey absent.
VI I. ORDINA)ICES FOR INTRODUCTION - None
VIII. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION
ADOPTION OF FIRE CODE - ORDINANCE NO. 997
Subject Ordinance had first reading by title only and introduction
on May 16, 1988.
Chrisl~ine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, gave a
staff report indicating that this Ordinance had been continued from
the meeting of June 6, 1988, for 30 days. The continuance was due
to concerns of the 1trine Company and builders in the East Tustin
area with the proposed provisions. Staff met with those concerned
and provided them with implementation guidelines. Those guidelines
were satisfactorily reviewed and, with no major alterations
required, staff recommended adoption of the Ordinance.
It was moved .by Edgar, seconded by Kelly, that Ordinance No. 997
have second reading by title only. The motion carried 4-0,
Hoesterey absent. Following s6cond reading by title only of
Ordinance No. 997 by the Deputy City Clerk, it was moved by Edgan,
seconded..bj/ .Kelly, that Ordinance No. 997 be passed and adopted as
fol 1 ows:
ORDINANCE NO. 997 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF ARTICLE 5 OF
THE TUSTIN CITY CODE AND ADOPTING THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND UNIFORM
FIRE CODE STANDARDS, 1985 EDITIONS, WITH AMENDMENTS THERETO AND THE
UNIFORM FIRE CODE 1987 SUPPLEMENT AS THE FIRE PROTECTION
REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent. (Roll call vote)
IX. OLD BUSINESS
1. STATUS REPORT - JWA/CRAS/ASC
Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, reported
that staff continued their monitoring of the installation of
hardware and software on the proposed monitoring program. Staff
will provide for Council a detailed report within 30 days regarding
some major problems with equipment and software development. She
also reported that staff continues to attend CRAS and ASC meetings.
It was moved b~/ Edgar, ,selc, ionded bi/ Kellj/, to receive and file
subject report. The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
~age 5, 7-5-88
2. RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY CA~E A~ND DRUG/ALCOHOL RECOVERY FACILITIES
Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, reported
that staff and the City Attorney had been directed by the City
Council to investigate the statutory limitations in regulating
Community Care Facilities and Drug and Alcohol Facilities in the
City. In recognizing statutory limitations, she suggested that
Council instruct staff to take.a strong position in lobbying local
legislators for modifications to State law. These modifications
would include {1) r~turn to City's local land use control over
sites, (2) reinforcement of State policy to prevent' overconcen-
tration, (3) Departments of Social Services and Alcohol/Drug
required to communicate to ensure adequate separation of both types
of Facilities, (4) Responsible agencies shall notice local
jurisdictions prior to licensing and (5} Departments of Social
Services and Drug/Alcohol shall respond to complaints in writing
within 10 days with a copy to local jurisdictions. She also
reported on one particular local facility that is operating with
more than six residents and the State has validated that fact.
Councilman Edgar commended staff for the completion of a very
thorough analysis. It was then moved
bi/I Edgar,I seconded by
Prescott, to (1) authorize the Mayor to transmit correspondence to
local state legislators, the League of California Cities and
surrounding cities requesting support for modifications to state law
relating to licensing of community care and drug and alcohol
recovery facilities, (2) i-nstruct staff to initiate a code
enforcement action against Yorba House I, 13682 Yorba Street, (3)
distribute tile letter to oilier Or,~nge County Jolegation individu,~ls
and interested community residents and (4) instruct staff to prepare
a resolution for presentation by Council to the League of California
Cities on August 14, 1988.
Councilman Prescott asked when the five facilities in question had
been notified that they would be the subject of a Public Hearing.
Christine Shingleton stated that this subject was not being
discussed during a Public Hearing and the matter is regarding large
groupings of these types of facilities in one area of the community
rather than these five particular facilities and their licensing.
Councilman Prescott stated that he agreed with the staff report and
concerns of the Council but felt uncomfortable taking action
regarding the five facilities without their having been properly
notified and given the opportunity to speak.
Christine Shingleton assured him that the proposed motion would not
effect the existing status of the facilities in question, but would
apply in the establishment of new facilities. In the matter of
Yorba House I, that was a code enforcement action handled under
standard operating procedures.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy stated that this discussion was to determine
the City's position when there is preemption by the State in
allowing five facilities that have possibly effected the life style,
safety and property value of a neighborhood. The State does not
request City approval nor are citizens notified. This is an action
by a political body at the local level requesting the State restore
"home rule".
Councilman Prescott made a substitute motion that the matter be
continued until July 18, 1988, and the other four facilities be
notified.
Because there was no second on the substitute motion, the
original motion carried 3-1, Prescott opposed. ~
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 7-5-88
X. NEW BUS I NESS
1. OUTDOOR SEATING
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy had requested agendizing outdoor seating at
restaurants for discussion and comments.
Councilman Edgar requested staff response on how effectively the
City 'could enforce the misuse of alcoholic beverages."
Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, stated that
the Planning Commission Resolution contains basic ABC standards for
licensing.
Councilman Prescott asked if this Resolution was specifically aimed
at the Roma D'Italia Restaurant.
Christine Shingleton answered no. It was primarily directed at
developing guidelines because of the increasing requests for outdoor
seating areas.
It was moved b~, Edgar, seconded bi/ Prescott, to receive and file
subject report. The motion carried' 3-1, K'elly opposed.
Councilman Kelly stated he was philosophically opposed to government
control of outdoor seating areas.
2. REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVALS
A. G. Saltarelli, 2332 Fig Tree Drive, Tustin, reported to the
Council problems he had experienced with his Carrotwood Tree, with
the street sweepers leaving debris on sidewalks, and with the lack
of response from maintenance staff regarding his concerns. He noted
that the staff report was recommending replacement of his tree with
another Carrotwood tree. He preferred to have the Carrotwood
replaced with a Magnolia tree.
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works, stated it would not
be a problem to plant a Magnolia tree at Mr. Saltarelli's residence.
It was moved b~/ Efdo~lalro~ seconded b..~v Kelly, to (1) approve tree
removals at the ing locat'~ns' 14902 Braeburn, 14791
Briarcliff, 1751 Heather, 14711 Mimosa, 13741 Malena, 1201-1202
Prospect, 14431 Emerywood, 14521 Emerywood, 142317 Cloverbrook,
14801 Branbury, 1035 Irvine Blvd., 14061 Charloma, 14892 Bridgeport,
14412 Heights, 17461 Norwood Park, 14261 Heatherfield, 2332 Figtree
and 14432 Cloverbrook and (2) replacement at 2332 Fig Tree Drive to
be a Magnolia tree.
At Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy's request, Robert Ledendecker responded to
Mr. Saltarelli's other concerns. He stated that staff had done an
extensive pruning of the Carrotwood tree to remove the berries, that
the street sweepers will be slowed down to reduce the scattering of
debris and root barriers are being installed around other Carrotwood
trees to reduce root damage.
After further discussion of the City's tree maintenance and planting
policies, the motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent.
3. REJECTION OF FORMAL EQUIPMENT BID
It was moved by Edg.ar,._s.econded by _Kelly, to reject the bid received
from Jim Click Ford on June 9, 1988, in the amount of $13,018.38,
for a pick-up cab and chassis with utility bed, and authorize staff
to revise the specifications. The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey
absent.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 7, 7-5-88
4. CLOSED SESSION MINUTES
Councilman Prescott had requested the agendizing of this issue
because he felt the public's level of trust in the City Council
would be increased if minutes were taken'by the City Clerk and a
tape recorder used during Closed-Sessions. The Minute Book and tape
recording would be available only to the Council and a court
judge. He suggested an ordinance enacting these procedures be
discussed at the meeting of July 18, 1988, when. Mayor Hoesterey
would be in attendance.
It was moved by Prescott, seconded by Kelly.i, that this item be
continued at the July 18, 198'8 mee¥ing' "
Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy felt that the confidentiality of an executive
session was extremely important and having it tape recorded was a
good idea. However, she felt that having a staff member present
would be expensive and difficult. The most perfect record would be
a sealed tape recording.
Councilman Prescott questioned the legality of such a tape recording
without a Minute Book under Government Code Section 54957.2.
As an addition to the original motion, Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy
requested an interpretation, at the July 18, 1988 meeting, of
Government Code Section 54957.2 by the City Attorney as it relates
to a tape recording in place of a Minute Book. The motion carried
4-0, Hoesterey absent.
OPTION OF THE CITY PRINTING AND MAILING THEIR OWN CAMPAIGN
STATEMENTS FOR THE NOVEMBER 8, 1988, CONSOLIDATED GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION
It was moved by Ed,)ar, seconded by Prescott, to approve a separate
mailing of City campaign statements t~ residents at the cost of t'he
candidates.
Councilman Prescott wanted to know if this would appear as being
advantageous to incumbents.
Councilman Edgar felt the residents benefited by having all the
campaign statements as a separate document.
Councilman Kelly stated that it was unnecessary for residents to
receive another, piece of campaign literature and was against
involvement i n a separate mail ing.
Councilman Prescott stated that current incumbents up for reelection
should not be allowed to vote on this issue.
James Rourke, City Attorney, responded that there was no legal
conflict of interest.
With a vote of 2-2, there was no action on .the motion (Hoesterey
absent).
It was moved .by Ed~)ar, seconded .by Kelly, to continue this item at
the July 18, 1988 meeting. The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey
absent.
XI. REPORTS
1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA - JUNE 27, 1988
It was moved by Edl~ar, seconded by Kelly, to ratify the Planning
Commission Action Agenda of June 27, 1988. The motion carried 4-0,
Hoesterey absent.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 8, 7-5-88
2. INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF JUNE 30, 1988
It was moved ib~/ Ed~)ar, seConded b~/ Prescott,' to receive and file
subject report. The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent.
3. CA&4PAIGN CONTRIBUTION ORDINANCE - SUPPLEMENTARY F~EMORANDUM
Councilman Prescott requested that in the future this item be
referred to as a campaign reform ordinance and suggested that the
other Councilmembers read the ordinance from the City of Newport
Beach. He felt it was an excellent, strong ordinance.
Councilman Kelly had some specific actions that he wanted included
in the City's ordinance. Those actions included: (1) overall limit
of campaign expenditures to be $15,000.00, (2} contribution limit
from a company or individual to be $100.00, (3} source be submitted
on all contributions from $5.00 to $100.00 and (4) all contributions
must be from sources within the City of Tustin.
Councilman Edgar reminded Council that the ordinance had been
,agendized for August 1, 1988, when results of Proposition 68 and 73
would be available. When the Council voted to consolidate the
November election, it placed a financial burden on candidates and he
felt it was inconsistent to also limit campaign contributions.
Mayor Pro Teni Kennedy was concerned about the timing of the November
election and suggested agendizing the ordinance.
After further discussion, Council concurred to agendize a model
ordinance at the July 18, 198'8 meeting.
'4. PROPOSED SAN JUAN STREET VACATION
Councilman Edgar was in favor of vacating San Juan Street but only
on a timetable that was carefully coordinated with the widening and
improvement of E1 Camino.
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works, stated staff could
discuss with Caltrans their timetable and coordinate the efforts of
vacationing the street and respond to Council.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy was concerned about the reversion of the
property to the City if plans for the property do not proceed as
stated. She requested that information be submitted to Council.
It was moved b.j/ Edgar, seconded by Prescott, that this subject be
continued at the July 18, 1988 meeting.
Councilman Prescott suggested that Council continue this matter
until there was a joint dinner with the school district trustees.
The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent.
XII. Oll(ER BUSINESS
1. POLITICAL GRAFFITI POSTERS AT FIRST/NEWPORT AND RED HILL/I-5
FREEWAY
Councilman Prescott requested that political graffiti posters on the
traffic control boxes at First Street/Newport Avenue and Red
Hill/I-5 Freeway be removed by the Maintenance Department.
2. CEMENT BLOCK REPAIR OF PARKING STRUCTURE
Councilman Prescott had noticed a cement block in the southeast
corner of the parking structure that was in need of repair.
3. TUSTIN RANCH ROAD PROJECT
Councilman Prescott requested agendizing of the Tustin Ranch Road
project at the July 18, 1988 meeting.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 9, 7-5-88
Councilman Edgar also supported the agendizing of the Tustin Ranch
Road project with the inclusion of the preliminary planning and cost
of detailed plans.
4. JOINT DINNER OF COUNCIL AND llJSTIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TRUSTEES
Councilman Prescott 'requested staff to make arrangements for a joint
dinner between the Council and Trustees of the Tustin Unified
School District.
5. ADJOURNIqENT IN FI~IqORY OF SEVEN llJSTIN AIR STATION I"IARINES
Councilman Prescott requested that Council adjourn the meeting in
memory of Sgt. Jay Watkins, Captain Michael E. Bermel, 1st Lt.
Patrick C. Fleming, Staff Sgt. Stephen R. Yoder, Sgt. Eric C. Mau,
Sgt. Donald R. McKay and Cpl. Jason W. Chase. The Marines,
stationed at the Tustin Air Station, were killed when their
helicopter crashed in Japan on June 25, 1988.
6. PUBLIC HEA. RING FOR THE 19843-89 FISCAL BUDGET
Councilman Edga~ requested that the Public Hearing for the City's
1988-89 budget be held at the July 18, 1988 meeting.
7. TUSTIN EIqERGENCY PLAN
Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy requested a status report on the Tustin
Emergency P1 an.
8. GOVERNIqENT CODE SECTION 54957.7 (BROWN A£T)
Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy requested the agendizing of Government COde
Section 54957.7 (Brown Act). She was specifically concerned with
confi denti al ity imposed on Counci 1 members regarding subjects
discussed during Closed Sessions.
XlIl. ADJouR~IENT
At 8'50 p.m., it was moved b~, Prescott, seconded .b~, Edgar, to adjourn in
memory of the seven T~stin Air Station Marines to the next Regular
Meeting on July 18, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. The motion carried 4-0,
Hoesterey absent.
MAYOR
CITY CLERK