HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 4-20-87MINUTES OF A REGULAR ~ETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
APRIL 20, 1987
Ie
II.
III.
IV.
Ye
CALL TO 0ROER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 7:00 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance was led
by Councilman Kelly, and the Invocation was given by Mayor Pro Tem
Kennedy.
ROLL CALL
Councilpersons Present:
Councilpersons Absent:
Others Present:
Richard B. Edgar, Mayor
Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem
Ronald B. Hoesterey
John Kelly
None
William A. Huston, City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Christine Shingleton, Com. Dev. Director
Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police
Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works
Royleen White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Srvcs.
Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent
Laura Pickup, Associate Planner
Janet Hester, Administrative Secretary
Approximately 80 in the Audience
OATH OF OFFICE - EARL J. PRESCOTT, I,I[I~ER OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPOINTED
TO FILL THE UNEXPIRED TERM OF DONALD J. SALTARELLI
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Earl J. Prescott,
newly-appointed Member of the City Council.
Councilman Prescott delivered an articulate speech stressing the impor-
tance of the role he has assumed and the pride with which he will ful-
fill that role as a native son of Tustin. He thanked the Council for
placing their trust in him to carry on as Donald J. Saltarelli's suc-
cessor..
Mayor Edgar recognized former-Mayor Saltarelli who was present in the
audience.
The Mayor expressed a personal welcome to Councilman Prescott. 38
PROCI. AI~T ION
1. LAW DAY U.S.A. - MAY 1, 1987
Mayor Edgar presented Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy with a
designating Friday, May 1, 1987, as "Law Day U.S.A."
Kennedy thanked Mayor Edgar.
proclamation
Mayor Pro Tem
84
PUBLXC HEARING
ZONING O~DINANCE A~ENDMENT NO. 87-1 - REGULATIONS FOR OFF-SITE
ALCOHOLIC B~VERAGE SA~.ES LICENSES AND CONVENIENCE MARKETS - ORDI-
NANCE NO. 981
The proposed amendment would establish distance requirements for
off-sit~ alcoholic beverage sales establishments and require a Con-
ditional Use Permit for convenience markets.
The Associate Planner presented the staff report and recol,nendation
as contained in the inter-corn dated April 20, [987, prepared by the
Community Development Department. She responded to Council ques-
tions.
The public hearing was opened by Mayor Edgar at 7:14 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 4-20-87
Ethel Reynolds, 10841 Thorley Road, co-founder of Parents Who Care,
spoke in favor of the proposed zoning ordinance amendment. She
thanked the Community Development Department, the City Attorney's
office, members of the Planning Commission, and the City Council
for their diligent work on subject amendn~ent.
Frank P. Greinke, 1011 E1 Camino Real,. spoke on behalf of the
Tustin Chamber of Commerce. He stated that possibly the problmn
is not how alcohol is sold, how much is available, or existing
rules, but possibly enforcement of the rules. Existing establish-
merits are there because of economic demand which is regulated by
the consumer. The zoning distances which would be establish by the
proposed ordinance would affect the value of existing licenses and
establ i shments.
Mr. Greinke suggested the City consider analyzing the enforcement
problem and develop a community program of education against abuse
as an alternative to legislating. He asked that free enterprise
and the free market be allowed to work and that the Chamber be
allowed to assist in educating people on abuses of alcohol as a
sol uti on to the problem.
Jack F. Miller, 17352 Parker Drive, spoke for Parents Who Care in
favor of the proposed zoning ordinance amendment. Mr. Miller
rebutted Mr. Greinke's comments with statewide statistics on how
alcohol substance abuse affects our society. He closed by stating
that the community's only chance is to be heard by the City Coun-
cil, not by the Legislature. The community depends on the City
Council to protect the health, safety and welfare of its youth and
all citizens.
Lucy A. Street, 1545 Wyndham Court, co-founder of Parents Who Care,
spoke in favor of the proposed zoning ordinance amendment. She
stated it is an opportunity for the community to articulate its
feelings about the values, goals, and ideals it would like to pass
on to its youth.
There were no other speakers on the matter. The public hearing was
closed at 7:33 p.m.
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Kelly, that Ordinance No 981
have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following ~irst
reading by title only of Ordinance No. 981 by the City Clerk, it
was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Kelly, that Ordinance No. 981 be
introduced as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 981 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 87-1
THEREBY AMENDING SECTIONS 9232 b., 9233 c., 9234 c., 9235 c.,
9242 b. AND 9297 OF TIlE TUSTIN MUNICIPAL CODE, TO REQUIRE ISSUANCE
OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CONVENIENCE STORES AND ESTABLISHING
DISTANCE STANDARDS FOR OFF-SITE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES ESTABLISH-
MENTS
Councilman Prescott stated he had concerns similar to those of Mr.
Greinke's because he thought it would affect the transfer of exist-
ing licensees. After studying the matter, however, his concerns
were mitigated. The amendment will establish three separate dis-
tance requirements for newly-constructed alcoholic beverage sales
establishments as follows:
1) 100 ft. from residential property;
2) 300 ft. from another existing off-site sales establishment; and
3) 600 ft. from any church, public or private school, playground
or hospital.
Councilman Hoesterey stated that a matter for discussion is the
difference between the Planning Commission resolutions and Ordi-
nance No. 981. Relative to the Planning Commission resolutions, he
thought the Chamber may want to work with Parents Who Care Co bring
forth greater consistency in review of Conditional Use Per~its.
Relative to Ordinance No. 981, he did not have any difficulty at
this time in approving same.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 4-20-87
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy expressed support of the ordinance. The Cc~n-
munity Development Director responded that there is no actua~
appeal process of resolutions adopted by the Planning Commission.
Council does have the prerogative at any time to refer a matter
back to the Commission for additional study and ask them to address
issues of Council concern. Without that direction, however; the
policy guidelines would be used by the Planning Commission as a
very broad framework to review future Conditional Use Permit appli-
cations. She reemphasized that these items were not codified as
part of a proposed ordinance because they are flexible, and.each
case needs review on an individual case-by-case basis so that
impacts and characteristics of each particular use can be evaluated
appropriately.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, the Community Development
Director confirmed that at this time review will be by guidelines
adopted through meetings between Parents Who Care and Planning
staff. The Chamber of Commerce will not be involved in review of
each Conditional Use Permit.
Councilman Hoesterey clarified his point that the Planning Commis-
sion resolutions are guidelines for initial screening of all
CUP's. Some people have concerns with those guidelines. He
thought the Chamber and Parents Who Care could get together in the
future and work those out because everyone's aim is for greater
education of the public. Council could then review any outstanding
differences. If everyone is agreeable, it can then go back to the
Planning Commission. Council action this evening is strictly lim-
ited to the ordinance which establishes distance guidelines.
Mayor Edgar offered his interpretation of the matter. He stated
that a set of guidelines has been established to identify levels of
consistency to work towards. Those guidelines will serve the Plan-
ning Co~nission in their consideration of any new alcohol estab-
lishment application. During dialog with Parents Who Care, it
became apparent to Planning staff that distance elements deserved
codification. The ordinance does nothing but set those {distance)
numbers in place. The guidelines have been established/accepted,
yet ?ey can still be modified.
Further discussion followed. Councilman Kelly voiced support of
the ordinance. The Community Development Director indicated that
staff strongly supports the guidelines that have been established.
Staff would encourage a meeting between Parents Who Care and the
Chamber to identify any outstanding issues, and bring any matter
back to Council that cannot be worked out.
The motion carried 5-0.
81
VI. PUBLIC IN~UT
1. DOM~TOWN PARKING STRUCTURE
Richard Vining, 400 W. Main Street, questioned the status of the
parking structure. The City Attorney provided a status report on
its reconstruction. The Community Development Director added that
the site has been completely fenced and is secured at this point.
The City Attorney responded to Mr. Vining that there is no approxi-
mate completion date. Reconstruction costs may be approaching
$500,000; of which he does not expect the City to be responsible
for any part. 60
AGENDA ORDER
X. OLD BUSI NESS
Greg Kelly, 330 E1 Camino Real, requested Council consider Old Business
Item No. 2 (El Camino Real Championship Chili Cook-Off) at this time so
that representatives of Parents Who Care could participate in dis-
cussion of the matter since it involves alcoholic beverages.
Council concurred with Mayor Edgar to consider Old Business Items No. 1
and No. 2 in conjunction at this point in the agenda.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 4-20-87
1. CITY'S 60TH BIRTHDAY
&
2. EL CAI~INO REAL C~PIONSHIP CHILI COOK-OFF - SEPllEMBER 27. 1987
Margaret Greinke, Comnittee Chairperson, presented a preliminary
budget on April 6, 1987. A request has been made for $15,000.
Approximately $8,000-10,000 will be returned through memorabilia
sales and a Birthday spaghetti dinner.
On April 6, 1987, Council approved the concept of combining the
Chili Cook-Off and Birthday Celebration. The Tustin Chamber of
Commerce has submitted a letter of support for subject event.
Mayor Edgar stated that concerns have been raised that the number
of events planned over a short span may diminish community inter-
est. Namely, the City's 60th Birthday and Chili Cook-Off will be
held on Sunday, September 27; The Miss Tustin Pageant has been
rescheduled for Saturday, September 26; and two weeks later, Tustin
Tiller Days will be held on October g, 10 and 11. He felt these
issues warrant Council discussion so that a decision can be made
collectively in the best interests of the community.
Margaret Greinke, Birthday Committee Chairperson, felt that the
events will provide maximum recognition of the City's 60th Birth-
day. Mrs. Greinke responded to Council questions regarding volun-
teers, location of the event, and a time schedule for the day's
events.
Additionally, she provided information on other items on which she
has received commitment: The Department of Agriculture Forestry
Service, with regional headquarters in Riverside, has agreed to
donate 1,000 tree seedling kits, and the Tustin Area Wmnen's Club
will provide a clown troupe for entertainment during the Cook-Off
and Birthday Party.
Tentative plans include a quilting contest, a Sweet Adelines sing-
ing group, a home beautification contest, and qualifying Tustin for
a "Tree City USA" designation from the Forest Service. Only two
Orange County cities, 16 Statewide, presently carry that designa-
tion.
The Recreation Superintendent provided a report on the Chili Cook-
Off and responded to Council questions.
Councilman Kelly presented a petition signed by 18 downtown resi-
dents opposed to the location of the Chili Cook-Off in their area.
He felt it vital to have input from Parents Who Care on the on-site
consumption of alcoholic beverages. He reiterated his request that
the Cook-Off location be moved to the East Tustin area adjacent to
the Auto Center, in cooperation with The Irvine Company. He noted
that Ordinance No. 510 stated that nothing in that immediate area
shall be sold in the public right-of-way.
Ethel Reynolds, Parents Who Care, responded that they are not
opposed to the sale of beer at the Chili Cook-Off. She did express
concern that oftentimes advertising by Coors overpowers City ban-
ners for the event.
Following further Council discussion, it was moved by )toesterey,
seconded by Kelly, to authorize $15,000.00 appropriation for City's
Birthday Celebration. The motion carried 5-0.
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, that the City Coun-
cil:
1) Appropriate $2,000 from the General Fund as seed ~noney for the
1987 E1 Camino Real Championship Chili Cook-Off ($2,300 was
contributed to General Fund from the previous Cook-Off); and
2) Designate El Camino Real between Main Street and First Street
as the location of the Chili Cook-Off.
Councilman Kelly stated he could not support the motion.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5, 4-20-87
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy stated that downtown area residents expressed
concern to her about drinking, not because it had been witnessed,
but because it might occur. Perhaps the problem could be solved if
Council made a cmmnitment to appropriate funds so that the Police
Department could be present to keep the event family-oriented. The
Chief of Police responded to Mayor Edgar that the ma:ter wou.ld be
taken care of. The Mayor's interpretation was that the Police
Department will maintain full control via high visibility of Police
Officers in the area, and removal of persons abusing alcohol.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy reminded Councilman Kelly that the event was
instigated three years ago to bring attention to the $3 million
refurbishment of the downtown area.
Councilman Kelly reiterated that he could not support the motion
unless the event was moved to a different location.
Helen Edgar stated that if sale/consumption of beer is confined to
a roped-off area as is done at Tiller Days, drinking should not be
a problem at the Chili Cook-Off.
Margaret Greinke added that combining the two events will result in
cost savings to the City since there will be no duplication of City
personnel time.
Lyn VanOyken, 230 South "A" Street, expressed concern that ade-
quate outdoor restroom facilities be provided for public use.
The motion carried 4-1, Kelly opposed.
VII. CONSENT CALENDAR
Item No. 4 was removed from the Consent Calendar by Edgar. It was
moved by Kennedy, seconded by Kelly, to approve the remainder of the
Consent Calendar. The motion carried 5-0.
1. APPROVAl. OF NINUllES - APRIL 6, 1987, REGULAR MEETING
APPROYAL OF DEMANOS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,965,396.66
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $157,510.95
5O
3. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 87-I0; CLAIMANT: FIFE, ET. AL.; (lATE OF
LOSS: 11/24/86; (lATE FILEO WITH CITY: 3/2/87
Rejected Claim No. 87-10 as recontnended by the City Attorney.
5. RESOLUTION NO. 87-4S - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 87-1
(Santa Fe Land hnprovement Company, Easterly Side of Del Amo Avenue
and northerly of Valencia Avenue)
Adopted Resolution No. 87-45 as recommended by the Public Works
Department/Engineering Division. 86
6. RESOLUTION NO. 87-46 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDA-
TION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR EL MODENA-IRVINE FO7 CHANNEL
IMPROVEMENTS - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 85-1 (PHASE V-A AND V-B)
Adopted Resolution No. 87-46; and ass~ning no claims/stop pay-
merit notices are filed, 30 days after recordation of Notice of
Completion, authorized payment of final 10% retention amount
{$856,691.47 - K.E.C. Company, Inc.) as recommended by the
Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 25
7. RESOLUTION NO. 87-47 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATE;(
MAIN REPLACEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERFISEMENT FOR BIDS (ARROYO
AVENUE, OAK LANE, ALLEMAN PLACE, STRATTON WAY AND BEVERLY GLEN)
Adopted Resolution No. 87-47 as recommended by the Public Works
Department/Engineering Division. 107
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 4-20-87
8. RESOLUTION NO. 87-48 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ENDORSING THE AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA'S PROPOSAL, "FREEWAY DEVELOPMENT TO THE YEAR 2000"
Adopted Resolution No. 87-48 as recommended by the Public Works
Department/Engineering Division. 54
Consent Calendar Item No. 4 - Slurry Seal Project - It was moved by
Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the following:
4. RESOLUTION NO. 87-44 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR SLURRY SEAL
PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
Adopted Resolution No. 87-44 as recommended by the Public Works
Department/Engineering Division.
The Mayor questioned when a control/analysis timetable for slurry seal
will be computerized. The Director of Public Works responded that the
software for subject project is a line item in the FY 1987-88 budget.
Once approved, the program should be well underway by September/
October.
The motion carried 5-0.
95
VIII. ORDINANCE FOR INTROOUCTION
A~IENI)IWENT TO CITY CODE SECTION 5331n, PARKING BY PERMIT ONLY -
ORDINANCE NO. 985
A request by residents of Heatherfield Drive and Sandwood Place
between Mitchell Avenue and Cloverbrook Drive due to overcrowding
of streets from adjacent apartment areas.
It was moved by Kelly, seconded by Prescott, that Ordinance No. 985
have first reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0. Following
first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 985 by the City Clerk,
it was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded by Kelly, that Ordinance No.
985 be introduced aS follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 985 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TUSTIN CITY CODE SECTION 5331 TO PRO-
VIDE FOR A "PARKING BY PERMIT ONLY" SYSTEM
The motion carried 5-0.
75
IX.
ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION
1. PROPOSED MORATORIUM - OLD TOWN RESIDENTIAL AREA - URGENCY QRDINANCE
NO. 984
The interim urgency ordinance would impose a moratorium until com-
pletion of a planning process to analyze the residential area of
Old Town for possible zoning changes.
The Community Development Director presented the staff report and
recommendation as contained in the inter-corn dated April 20, 1987,
prepared by the Community Development Department.
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No.
984 have first reading by title only. The motion carried 5-0.
Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 984 by the
City Clerk, it was moved b), Kennedy, seconded by Kelly, that Ordi-
nance No. 984 be introduced as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 984 - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FHE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING A MORATORIUM ON THE PRD-
CESSING, APPROVAL OR ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR SUL~D[VISIONS, CHANGES
IN LAND USE OCCUPANCY AND ZONE CHANGES ON PROPERTIES IN THE RESI-
DENTIAL AREA OF OLD TOWN TUSTIN
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 7, 4-20-87
The Community Development Di rector responded to Councilman
Hoesterey that at the end of the 45-day effective period, staff
anticipates an extension of the moratorium for an additional period
of time (two additional extensions are permitted by law up to a
maximum of 24 months).
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, the Director stated that
staff received a preliminary submittal/application for a proposed
subdivision on property currently in escrow, formerly owned by Mark
Ainslie. Staff has deemed the project incomplete, and there are
four or five pages of corrections yet to be taken care of.
Mark Ainslie, owner of 405, 415 and 425 West Sixth Street, provided
historical background on his property, stating he has been working
with staff for the past two years in an effort to obtain approval.
He encouraged the buyer to proceed as he was directed by Council
on October 6, 1986, when his eight-home project was denied and he
was encouraged to redesign it as a six-home project.
Mr. Alnslie stated that the plans were formally submitted on
March 10. The project is a tentative tract map under existing zon-
ing, nothing more. If the project cannot proceed, the property
sale will default. He stated that he was informed the project was
being delayed because of a heavy workload. Project coanents came
back from staff the same day they received notification of the
request for the moratorium.
Mr. Ainslie expressed deep frustration on the matter. He requested
that Council exclude from the moratorium those projects which have
already been formally submitted. He stated that subject project
will improve the area.
At the Mayor's request, the Community Development Director
responded to Mr. Ainslie's comnents. She stated that a submittal
was received on March 11. It was considered a preliminary sub-
mittal as it was the first tract map and site plan design review
received on the project. Staff comments were completed and typed
on April 16, five days past the 30-day review period. She infomned
the project engineer that the delay related to staff shortage and a
heavy workload.
She stated that many items are not merely corrections, but poten-
tial conditions of approval. She emphasized that no promises were
made on October 6 that the proposal would be approved if submitted
for six homes. Further, the moratorium being considered this
evening would not preclude Mr. Ainslie from proceeding with
development of two units on each lot, if those lots were maintained
in their current configuration. However, the resubdivision would
create a private street system and things of a nature requiring
further review.
She felt that staff has treated the applicant fairly and not in a
manner tied to the moratorium proposal. Staff concerns about pre-
serving the integrity of the planning process with the old town
residential area are such that this is one step towards mutual
agreement on appropriate zoning guidelines established in that
area.
Mr. Ainslie rebutted that his right to subdivide is being denied,
severely damaging his property value, and jeopardizing the escrow
on same. The buyer has expended $10,000 on plan preparation to
date.
Dan Flair, PaddocX & Flair Architects, stated he has been working
with Mr. Ainslie on this project for a couple of years. He stated
that a preliminary presentation was made in a meeting with staff on
February 17. They received comments at that time which were
resolved in the March 10 submittal. They inet with staff a second
time when all items requested and comments made by staff were
submitted and incorporated. Mr. Flair responded to Council
questions.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 8, 4-20-87
·
The Community Development Director clarified preliminary submittal
as defined in the Subdivision Ordinance. She stated that prelimi-
nary meetings were held with the developer, but the information was
insufficient for the review process to proceed until the March 11
submittal.
The Director stressed the importance of being in a process where
staff is beginning to define what the issues and problems are in
the area. From a solid planning standpoint, she felt it would be
best to define what the issues are and what might be the recom-
mended direction before specific individual action on a project of
this nature occurs, which may be inconsistent with where the City
is going.
John Sauers, 515 South Pacific Street, asked Mr. Ainslie how he
could afford construction of six homes on three lots, when nine
months earlier he had indicated it was not financially feasible.
Mr. Ainslie responded that he did not feel the unit sales price for
six homes vs. eight homes was warranted. He made a business deci-
sion not to proceed, and sold the property on that basis.
Richard Vining, 400 West Main Street, felt that the moratorium will
expose the developer to some hardship. However, he felt it is of
paramount importance that every landowner be given the same process
to develop. He stated he would rather see creation of flag lots or
something that would benefit and blend with the unique quality of
the neighborhood. He felt it is an unfair situation for Mr.
Ainslie, but the paramount decision is equal development of the
entire area.
Lyn VanDyken, 235 South "A" Street, stated that any land speculator
takes a risk. She felt the old town area should be maintained.
Mr. Ainslie stated that the area is being developed under R-1 stan-
dards set for the entire City. He is not asking for any special
consideration. The proposal is far in excess of what's been
granted in East Tustin. Single-lot subidivions, as suggested by
Mr. Vining, would not be permitted under the moratorium. The proj-
ect will be stopped dead in its tracks.
Mayor Edgar stated that there are inequities visible, but he feels
very constrained to preserve the old Tustin area. Although it is
unfortunate that there will be a delay, he thought the long-term
benefits to the City will be real.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy concurred that there have been some injus-
tices to Mr. Ainslie. She faulted both the Community Development
Department because of changes in personnel, and Mr. Flair for r)ot
knowing he had submitted a formal proposal. These injustices, how-
ever, are outweighed by the downtown area. Should Mr. Ainslie and
his new buyers choose to continue, she felt Council will have to
monitor the project in light of what's transpired this evening.
Councilman Hoesterey stated he hopes the process will proceed
quickly as with the First Street Specific Plan so that people are
not caught in the middle. He encouraged the Communty Development
Director to acquire a copy of the City of Orange's handbook which
deals with development in their downtown area. He felt it is para-
mount and incumbent upon the City and TRUST (Tustin Residents
United to Save Tustin) to cmnplete the process and come up with a
good product as quickly as possible.
The motion carried 4-1, Prescott opposed.
81
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No.
984 have second reading by title o~ly. Carried 5-0. Followir)g
second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 984 by the City
Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordi-
nance No. 984 be passed and adopted as follows:
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 9, 4-20-87
ORDINRII::E NO. 984 - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING A MORATORIUM ON THE PRO-
CESSING, APPROVAL OR ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR SUBDIVISIONS, CHANGES
IN LAND USE OCCUPANCY AND ZONE CHANGES ON PROPERTIES IN THE RESI-
DENTIAL AREA OF OLD TOWN TUSTIN
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kelly, Kennedy
NOES: Prescott
ABSENT: None
81
2. PROPOSED ~TORIUM ON EASTERLY SIDE OF NEWPORT AVE. BETMEEN SAN
,JUAN AND I~IN STREETS AND ON THE ~STERLY SIOE OF NEWPORT AVE.
BETIdEEN I-5 FREEWAY AND MITCHELL AVE. - URGENCY ORDINANCE HO. 983
Staff's position is that limited access/traffic issues along New-
port Ave. necessitate properties in each study area be developed as
comprehensive, cohesive projects. The interim urgency ordinance
would impose a moratorium on processing/approval/issuance of build-
ing permits or discretionary actions until zone change enactment.
The Community Development Director presented the staff report and
recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated April 20, 1987,
prepared by the Community Development Department.
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No.
983 have first reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0. Follow-
ing first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 983 'Oy the City
Clerk, it was moved by Hoestere~,, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordi-
nance No. g83 be introduced as follows:
ORDINANCE N~. 983 - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, LIECLARING A MORATORIUM ON PROCESSING, ISSUANCE
OF PERMITS OR APPROVALS OF ANY KIND FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS OF
PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NEWPORT AVENUE
BETWEEN SAN JUAN AND MAIN STREET AND ON THE WEST SIDE OF NEWPORT
AVENUE BETWEEN THE I-5 FREEWAY AND MITCHELL AVENUE
The motion carried 5-0.
It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kelly, that Ordinance
No. 983 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following
second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 983 by the City
Clerk, it was moved by Kenned),, seconded by Hoestere~,, that Ordi-
nance No. 983 be passed and adopted as follows:
OROINRNCE NO. 983 - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING A MORATORIUM ON PROCESSING, ISSUANCE
OF PERMITS OR APPROVALS OF ANY KIND FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS OF
PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NEWPORT AVENUE
BETWEEN SAN JUAN AND MAIN STREET AND ON THE WEST SIDE OF NEWPORT
AVENUE BETWEEN THE I-5 FREEWAY AND MITCHELL AVENUE
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kelly, Kennedy, Prescott
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
81
AGENOA OROER
X. OLD BUSINESS
3. EAST TUSTIN POLICY COMMITTEE RECOI~MENOATIONS
On March 16, 1987, Council continued subject item to permit The
Irvine Company to meet with the East Tustin Po)icy Committee to
respond to requests for clarification.
It was moved by E_d~_a_r, seconded by Kennedz, that the City Council
concur with thePolicy Committee Recommendations as contained in
Attachment "A" of subject staff report dated April 20, 1987, pre-
pared by the Community Development Department. Motion carried 5-0.
81
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 10, 4-20-87
XI. NEW BUSINESS
1. BILLBOARD LITIGATION - REQUEST FOR SUPPORT FROM CITY OF ORANGE
Letter dated March 30, 1987, from Orange Mayor Jess Perez request-
ing political, legal and moral support in their involvement in
litigation with the National Advertising Company concerning bill-
boards.
It was fnoved b~y Kennedy,, seconded by Prescott, to meet with City of
Orange representatives to discuss "how Tustin can assist them either
with financial support or a "friend of the court" brief.
The Mayor responded to Councilman Kelly that Council approval con-
tains two elements: 1) In the interest of the two beautiful
cities, Tustin agrees to support legislation as a "friend of the
court," via appropriate letters of support to the City of Orange;
and 2) There is also the opportunity to share in the cost of liti-
gation which says Tustin believes that local cities have the
authority and right to monitor and limit billboards in their com-
muni ry.
Councilman Kelly expressed vehement opposition to providing any
financial assistance to Orange. He stated that they did not assist
Tustin in its battle against the Bullet Train several years ago.
Regarding the right to advertise, Councilman Kelly felt that the
free enterprise systmn is what made this country great, not small
city governments banding together and spending taxpayers money on
gigantic cases such as this.
Councilman Hoesterey stated that Tustin has already spent a great
deal of money developing sign ordinances, enforcing them, and
removing billboards from the City to give Tustin the aesthetic look
it has today in coordination with many businesses and the Chamber
of Commerce.
If Orange is unsuccessful in its litigation, Tustin will probably
be next on the list, expending far more money defending its indi-
vidual rights than contributing a small amount to Orange to show
its support. He stated that billboards do not have a proper place
on arterial highways within the City. He added that Tustin did
receive money, perhaps not from Orange, but from many other com-
munities during the Bullet Train situation which signified ground
level/grass roots support.
A substitute motion was made b),. Hoestere),, seconded by Edgar, to
authorize sending $1,000 to the City of Orange, and to prepare a
"friend of the court" brief in support of their litigation.
Councilman Kelly reiterated his opposition. Councilman Hoesterey
stated that he could support billboards if they were confined to
the same size as campaign political signs.
The original motion was withdrawn by the maker and the second.
The motion carried 4-1, Kelly opposed.
63
XIl. REPORTS
1. PLANNING COI~ISSION ACTIONS - APRIL 13, 1987
All actions of the Planning Commission become final unless appealed
by the City Council or ~mber of the public.
It was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded by Kelly, to ratify the entire
Planning Conm~ission Action Agenda of April 13, 1987.
Regarding New Business Item No. 5, Revised Master Sign Program for
Tustin Plaza Shopping Center, Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy wondered why
Carver Development has a Master Sign Progrmn for Tustin Plaza since
it now contains more variances than conditions.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 11, 4-20-87
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy expressed delight with results of the busi-
ness community survey conducted by the Sign Code Revision Com-
mittee. The majority of merchants responded in favor of most of
the sign code, however, they were not in favor of temporary banner
sign regulations. She hoped that the Planning Co~mnission will look
at that aspect of the sign code. She expressed support of' sign
restrictions which have helped make Tustin a beautiful city.
The motion carried 5-0.
8O
2. UPDATE OF ,JOHN WRYNE AIRPORT VOR
Councilman Hoesterey requested subject report on April 6, 1987.
Following consideration of the inter-com dated April 20, 1987, pre- .
pared by the Community Development Department, it was moved by
Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file subject report.
Carried 5-0. 101
3. 'JAIqBOREE ROAO (FORMERLY MYFORO ROAO) STATUS REPORT
Subject report was requested by Council on April 6, 1987.
It was moved by Ed,)ar, seconded by Kennedy, to receive and file the
inter-tom dated April 15, 1987, prepared by the Public Works
Department/Engi neeri ng Di vi si on.
The Director of Public Works responded to Mayor Edgar that the
total construction time for segment I, which is between Barranca
Road and Edinger Street, will be approximately 15 months.
The Mayor requested staff again provide a status report in three
months, to include the Jan~)oree Road/I-5 Interchange project (Cal-
Trans project), so that Council will be able to monitor progress.
The City Manager noted that the project is contingent upon funding
availability. The Mayor expressed great confidence in staff's
ability to obtain funding.
The motion carried 5-0.
gs
XIII. OTHER BUSI~SS
1. KNIGHTS OF PYTHIAS
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy reminded Council that the Knights of Pythias
have extended an invitation to their poster contest to be held next
Saturday night.
2. FLOWERING ll~EES ALONG EL CA)~INO RF. JkL
The Mayor was pleased to note that the trees along E1 Camino Real
in the downtown area have finally bloomed.
3. REQUEST FOR CROSSWALIC ON BRYAN AVENUE
Mayor Edgar requested that staff investigate installation of a
crosswalk on Bryan Avenue at Charloma or Cindy Lane for residents
of the Tustin Royale retirement home to provide safer access to the
bus stop. 46
4. RESTRICTED PARKING ON SOUTH "B' STREET
In response to Mayor Edgar, the Director of Public Works stated
that the parking restriction signs were temporarily removed on "B"
Street south of Main to provide additional on-street parking during
rehabilitation of the parking structure. Upon completion, the
parking restriction will be reinforced. 75
5. REQUEST FOR OFFICIAL ADJOURNMENT - WALTER T. FLAHERTY, M.D.
Councilman Kelly requested that Council adjourn in [nemory of Walter
T. Flaherty, M.D., a Tustin area resident for 28 years who was
active in the Downtown Merchantsli, AsSo~liation .................................. ~
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 12, 4-20-87
XlV. RECESS - REDEVELOPMENT - OFFICIAL AOJOURNMENT IN FIEMORY OF I, RLTER T.
--
FLAHERTY, M.O.
At 9:31 p.m., the meeting was recessed to a meeting of the Redevelop-
merit Agency; and thence officially adjourned in memory of Walter T.
Flaherty, M.D., to the next Regular Meeting on May 4, 1987, at 7:00
p.m. by unanimous informal consent.