Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes of Reg. Mtg. 6-01-87lo Iio III. IV. MIllES OF A RE6ULAR IEETIN6 OF TIE Cll'f COUNCIL OF THE CIT~ OF IUSTIN. CALIFORNIA JUNE 1, 1987 CALL TO gRDER/PLED6E OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 7:00 p.m. in the City Counctl Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of'Allegiance was led by Mayor Edgar, and the Invocation was given by Councilman Hoestereyo Counctlpersons Present: Counct 1 persons Absent: Others Present: · PROCI.A~TIO~S Richard B. Edgar, Mayor Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tm, Ronald B. Hoesterey . John Kelly Earl J. Prescott None W1111am A. Huston, City Manager Thomas L. t~xxlruff, Assistant City Attorney ~ry E. llynn, City Clerk Christine Shtngleton, Cam. Dev. Dtrector Charles R. Thayer, Chtef of Pollce Robert S. Ledendecker, Dtr. of Public Works Lloyd Dick, Butldtng Offtctal Jeff Davis, Sentor Planner Laura Ptckup, Associate Planner Janet Hester, Administrative Secretary Approximately 60 in the Audience 1. SARAH COLEIM, DIRECTOR, L. P. REPERTORY Hayor Edgar announced that subject proclamation would be presented at a later date. KNIGHTS OF PYTHIAS, llISTIN LOOG~ NO. 85 o gtchael Cald~e11, Sr., accepted a proclamation from Mayor Edgar commending .the Kntghts of Pythtas, Tusttn Lodge No. 85, for their servtce to the cm~unlty. Mr. Cald~ell thanked the Council. 84 O0~ O. BP~LEY, I~ER OF I~ll;lfl'$ OF PYTHIAS, FOR COI~INITY SERVICE Mayor Edgar presented a proclamation to John O. Bradley in recogni- tion of his 33 years of service as a member of the Knights of Pythias. Mr. Bradley expressed hts thanks to Counct1. 84 P~BLIC IEARINGS APPEAL OF PLANNING COI~qlSSION DENIAl OF USE PERHIT 87-6 - 14082 RED HILL AVENUE AT NISSON ROAD - RESOLUTION 'NO. 87-60 & RESOLUTION Iii. 87~60A The staff report and recoenendatton were presented by the Connuntty Development Otrector as contained in the inter-cmn dated June 1987, prepared by the Community Development Department. The publlc heart ng was opened by Mayor Edgar at 7:13. p.m. Stephen J. Watson, Marketing Representative, Exxon Company, U.S.A., resldtng at 1852 Roanoke Avenue, spoke tn favor of Use Permit 87-6 and requested the Counct1 overturn the Planntng Commission's denial of same. Nadtne Fro'sch, 2411 N. Bellbrook, Orange, urged Counctl to uphold the Planntng Commission's dental of Use Permit 87-6. She was asked to speak by Parents Mo Care, and described her ordeal as a victim ~hose vehtcle was htr by a drunk driver. CITY COUNCIL MINUTE' Page 2, $-1-87 There were no other speakers on the matter, and the public, hearing was closed at 7:23 p.m. Mr. Watson responded to Councilman Hoesterey that Tri-State Engi- neering originally .filed the Conditional Use Permit on Exxon's behalf. It was never Exxon's policy to never request to sell beer and wine. He stated that Exxon was not aware that Mr. Baker of Tri-State made representations that a request to sell alcoholic beverages would never be made. It was moved by Hoest. erey~ seconded by Kennedy, to adopt the fol l owt ng: RESOLUTXO# NO. 8~-60 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COI~MISSION'S DENIAL OF USE PERMIT 87-6 FOR AN OFF-SITE BEER AND WINE SALES LICENSE AT 14082 RED' HILL AVENUE Councilman Kelly spoke in opposition to the motion. He was suppor- tive of the applicant's request, based on their track record and character. He was impressed with the applicant's restrictive guidelines in handling alcoholic beverages. Councilman Prescott concu fred. Jack Miller, Parents Who Care, reported that a similar experience recently occurred before the Pasadena City Council with representa- tives from ARCO gasoline stations, ~hich is certainly a respected organization. However, despite all the assurances, programs, poli- cies, and video equipment, two Pasadena City College students (ages 19 and 20) were still able to purchase alcoholic beverages at three of the four convenience stores they visited. Police Chief Thayer stated that there are more liquor licenses per capita in Tusttn than in any other Orange County community, and noted that there are considerable liquor establishments in subject area. He disagreed with the addition of any liquor licenses in the community until such time that growth can support that. He spoke strongly to uphold the Planning Commission's denial of Use Permit 87-$. Dave Larson, Tusttn Meadows resident, Executive Director of the National Council on Alcoholism in Orange County, concurred with Chief Thayer. He urged Council to deny Use Permit 87-6. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy spoke adamantly in opposition to Use Permit 87-6. Mayor Edgar spoke in favor of Use Permit 87-6 as a step in the com- munity to maintain economic strength. Councilman Kelly and Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy ensued in debate on the matter. Ethel Reynolds, Parents Who Care, read an article to appear In their newsletter ~htch ltsts statistics on political donations by ltquor and gasoltne lobbtes. She noted that Ordinance No. 981, effective on dune 4, 1987, would prohibit such an establishment based on distance requirements. On behalf of Parents Who Care, she requested Council's dental of Use Permit 87-6. Nadtne Froesch expressed disbelief that the Council majority would support beer and wine sales at a gasoline station. She encouraged Council to explore other means of improving the community. Lyn Van Oyken, 235 South "A" Street, spoke in opposition to Use Permit 87-6. Jack Miller again spoke in opposition to use Permit 87-6. Dave Larson expressed amazement that Council majority would accept assurances by Exxon that sales will be restricted. He reported instances where he has testified against illegal sales practi6es in spite of company policies. 'ITY COUNCIL MINUTES age 3, 6-1-87 Karen Harglure, bustness o~ner tn Lar~tn Square, spoke in opposi- tion to Use Permit 87-6. The morton fatled 2-3, Edgar, Kelly and Prescott opposed. It was moved by Ed§ar~ seconded by Prescott, to approve Use Permtt 87-6, and Incorporate all the strict guidelines Identified by Exxon as conditional, Hayor Pro Tem Kennedy stated her sincere beltef that the Amertcan process ts a government by and for the people; that a gasoline statton will not renovate Red Htll; and that ~hen electton time comes around, all Counctlmembers ~tll have. to respond to the people for not listening to ~hat they are saytng. Councilman Kelly declared Hayor Pro Tem Kennedy out of order. Hayor Edgar called for the question. The m~.tlon ca?led.3-2, Hoesterey and Kennedy opposed. The Assistant City Attorney and Community Development Director Interjected that staff had prepared a resolution for Council's approval of Use Permtt 87-6, reversing Planntng Commission's denia] of same. it NaS moved by Edgarr seconded by Prescott, to adopt the follo~- trig: RESOLUTION NO. 87-60A -*A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF llJSTIN, REVERSING THE PLANNING COIMHISSION DENIAL OF USE PERH[T 87-6 FOR OFF-SITE BEER AND WINE SALES IN COFUUNCTION WITH A MINI-MARKET AND GAS STATION USE AT 14082 RED HILL AVENUE The motton carrted 3-2, Hoesterey and Kennedy opposed. 81 EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM ORDINANCE - OLD TO~ RESIDENTIAL AREA - UI~NCY OImINANCE NO. 987 Ordinance No. 987 would grant an extension of 10 months and 15 days of the moratorium on processing, approval or Issuance of permtts for subdivisions, changes tn land use occupancy and zone changes tn the Old Town residential area as tmposed by Ordinance No. 984 adopted by Counctl on Apr11 20, 1987. The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Con~nuntty Oevelopment Dtrector as contained tn the t nter-com dated Hay 21, 1987, prepared by the Commntty Development Department. The Mayor was supportive of staff's deletion of the area between Ftrst Street and Irvtne Boulevard, easterly and westerly of Yorba from the extended moratorium. The Community Development Dtrector responded to Counctl questions. , The public heartng was opened by Hayor Edgar at 8:05 p.m. Ther~ were no speakers on the matter, and the public heartng was c]osed. It was moved by Kenned),, seconded by Prescott, that Urgency Ordi- nance No. 987 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading by ttt]e only of Urgency Ordinance No. 987 by the Ctty Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, that Urgency Ordinance No. 987 be Introduced as follows: ORDZNANCE NO. 987 -AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ON THE PRO- CESSING, APPROVAL OR ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR SUBDIVISIONS, CHANGES IN LAND USE OCCUPANCY AND ZONE OIANGES ON PROPERTIES IN THE RESI- DENTIAL AREA OF OLD TOWN TUSTIN AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 984 AND EXEMPTING CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY OF YORBA STREET FROM THE EXTENDED MORATORIUM The motto*n carried 5-0. 81 CITY COUNCIL MINUTE.C Page 4, 6-1-87 It was moved by Kelly~ seconded by Hoesterey, that Urgency Ordi- nance No. 987 have second readtngby title only. Following second readtng by title only of Urgency Ordinance No. 987 by the City Clerk, tt was moved by Kennedy~ seconded by Hoesterey, that Urgency Ordinance No. 987 be passed and adopted as follows: ORDINRIICI[ NO, 987 - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ON THE PRO- CESSING, APPROVAL OR ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR SUBDIVISIONS, CHANGES IN LAND USE OCCUPANCY AND ZONE CHANGES ON PROPERTIES IN THE RESI- DENTIAL AREA OF OLD TOWN TUSTIN AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 984 AND EXEMPTING CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY OF YORBA STREET FROM THE EXTENDED MORATORIUM Roll Call Vote: AYES: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kelly, Kennedy, Prescott NOES: None ABSENT: None 81 3. EXTENSZON OF MORATORIUM ORDINANCE - NEWPORT AVENUE - URGENCY ORDI- NANCE NO. 986 Ordinance No. 986 would grant an extension of the moratorium on processing, issuance of permits or approvals of any kind for development projects on properties generally located on the east side of Newport between Main and San Juan, and on the west side of Newport between the I-5. Freeway and Mitchell Avenue as imposed by Ordinance No. 983 adopted by Counct 1 on Apri 1 20, 1987. The Community Development Director presented the staff report and reco~m~endatton as contained in the l nter-com dated May 21, 1987, prepared by the Community Development Department. The Director and Council concurred with Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy's request to include business owners as well as residents in the dune 22 Planning Camission workshop on the matter. Mayor Edgar opened the public hearing at 8:09 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. It was .moved by Kennedy, seconded ..by Kelly, that Urgency Ordinance No. 986 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Urgency Ordinance No. 986 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedyt seconded by Hoesterey, that Urgency Ordinance No'~"986 be introduced as follows: ORDIllANCE NO. 986 - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ON PROCESSING, ISSU- ANCE OF PERMITS OR APPROVALS OF ANY KIND FOR DEVELOPMENT PROdECTS OF PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NEWPORT AVENUE BETWEEN SAN JUAN AND MAIN STREET AND ON THE WEST SIDE OF NEWPORT AVENUE BETWEEN THE I-5 FREEWAY AND MITCHELL AVENUE AS PREVIOUSLY! ADOPTED BY. ORDINANCE NO. 983 The motion carried 5-0. 81 It was n~ved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, that Urgency Ordi- nance No.I' 986 have second reading by title only. Carried .5-0. Following s~ond reading by title mly of Urgency Ordinance No. 986 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, that Urgency Ordinance No. 986 be passed and adopted as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 986 - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ON PROCESSING, ISSU- ANCE OF PERMITS OR APPROVALS OF ANY KINO FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS OF PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIOE OF NEWPORT AVENUE BETWEEN SAN JUAN AND MAIN STREET AND ON THE WEST SIDE OF NEWPORT AVENUE BETWEEN THE I-5 FREEWAY AND MITCHELL AVENUE AS PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED BY OROINANCE NO. 983 -'TY COUNCIL MINUTES .ge 5, 6-1-87 Roll Call Vote: AYES: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kelly, Kennedy, Prescott NOES: None ABSENT: None 81 Ye e APPEAL OF PLANNING COMgISSIO# DENIAL OF DEVIATION FROM TUSTIN PLAZA MASTER SIGN PLA# - BRISTOL SPAS, 13771 NEWPORT AVENUE, 17 On May 11, 1987, Planntng Con~ntsston denied the applicant's request to deviate from the Master Sign Plan. The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Camuntty Development Director as contained in the inter-can dated June 1, 1987, prepared by the Canmuntty Development Department. The Direc- tor responded to Counctl questions. Mayor Edgar opened the publtc hearing at 8:14 p,m. Stuar'c Swtdler, 13771 Newport Avenue, owner of Brtstol Spas, spoke in favor of his request to deviate fram the Tusttn Plaza Master Sign Plan. He presented a chronology of events fran application of the sign permit. He stated that none of his business neighbors object to the orange sign, and several businesses already have orange stgns (Chin's Chinese and Payless-Shoe Source). He respect- fully suggested that Council reconsider and approve the orange- color stgn. He emphasized that electrical problems would be cor- rected to meet UL standards. · Tom Kelly, Tusttn resident, noted that the Ctty logo consists of a l&rge orange. There were no other speakers on the matter, and the public hearing .was closed at 8:25 p.m. Mr, Swtdler responded to Council questions. Council discussion followed. Zt was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kelly, that the color orange for the sign be approved; that the sign be brought into Code con- formance as' quickly as possible; and that staff report back to Counctl on the matter on June 15. Council discussion follov~l. Mayor Pro Tam Kennedy thanked staff for their diligence in trying to maintain uniformity. However, she felt previous approval of varlance requests had set precedent. The motion carried 5-0. 93 PUBLIC IgPUT 1. STATUS gl: DOBNTOWM PNtJ~ING STRUCTURE & ItAgDIC~ R&qPS Richard Vlntng, 400 West Main Street, requested a status report on the downtown parking structure, and asked if the restricted parking on '8' Street will be reinstated when the structure is completed. The Community Development Director reported that the parking struc- ture Is nearly completed. The only thing remaining is the ramp which should be completed within a week or two. The City Manager assured Mr. Vtning that parking restriction on "B" Street will be reinstated upon completion of the downtown parking structure. Mr. Vt ntng stated that the entire curb on the northeast corner of 'B' and Main Streets was demolished for signal installation, and then reinstalled by the contractor to its original condition. He wondered why a handicap ramp was not installed, and why similar curbs couldn't be converted to handicap ramps piecemeal. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page $, 6-1-87 · VI. The Director of Public Works responded that the Idatn Street Recon- struction Project will be awarded on June 15. Subject curb was not modtfted until completion of street Improvements so as not to adversely tmpact dratnage any further. Upon project completion, all curb returns will have-~ handicap ramp with the exception of the northwest corner of 'B' and Main Streets where the existing driveway will be utilized since it encroaches into the *curb return. Additionally, the Director of Public Works reported that only undergrounding of street lighting conduits on Main Street will be funded in conjunction with the project. 60 ANREXATIONS NO. 139 & 140 JOseph Herztg, 1751 Rainbow Drive, was informed by Mayor Edgar that all matters in regard to the protest signatures will be considered by the Council m June 15. 24 CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by iKennedy, to approve the entire Consent Calendar. The motion carried 5-0. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - HAY 18, 1987, REGULAR I~EETING 2. ~.oPROVAL OF DEMAROS IN THE ANDUNT OF $549,064.91 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AIdOUNT OF $157,746.93 '* 60 3. RESOLUTION NO. 87-69 -A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN DESIGNATING THE CITY ENGINEER AND THE CITY FINANCE DIREC- TOR TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL (For Correction/Cancella- tion of Special Assessments) Adopted Resolution No. 87-59 designating the City Engineer and the Finance Director to correct or cancel special assessments for weed abatement, street lighting, refuse disposal and land- scape maintenance as recoemnended by the Finance Department. 60 4' REJECTION OF Q. AIM NO. 87-16; CI. AIIMNT: BURTSOIER, ROBERT F.; DATE OF LOSS: 2/15/87; DATE iFILED WITH CITY: 4/29/87 Rejected subject claim for personal injury in the amount of $5,000,000 as recmmmnded by the City Attorney. 40 5. REJECTION OF (/AZ# NO. 86-61; C~Z~: GEORGE I(OROL, M.D.; DATE OF LOSS: 8/1/86; DATE FZLED tJZTH CITY: 11/7/86 Rejected subject clatm for property damage in the amount of $1,112,000 as reconmnended by the City Attorney. 40 6. RESOI. UTZON NO. 87-62 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ANENOING RESOLUTION NO. 87-58 (LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT HEARING DATE) Adopted Resolution No. 87-62 amending Resolution No. 87-58 to set the hearing date for dune 15, 1987, as recommended by thp Publ t c Works Department/Engt neeri ng Dt vi s t on. 6~, 7. SURPLUS HOWZNG B~JIPHENT Declared as surplus the following equipment: three 25" Tru-cut reel mowers; four 21' Snapper rotary mowers; four McLane edgers; one weed eater; and one backpack blower as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. The equipment will be sold at the annual auction. 87 e EL MOOENA-IRVINE C~EL EASEIIENTS AND DE£OS Authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute E1 Modena-Irvine Channel documents on behalf of the City as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division as follows: a) Quitclaim Deed (Quitclaims construction easement back to The Irvtne Company which is no longer required by the City); b) Escrow Instruction Letter (Provides. for opening of escrow account so that all documents can be processed in orderly manner with respect to stipulated order of execution/ recordation); and 'CITY COUNCIl. MINUTES- Page 7, $-1-87 ~ c) The Irvine Company Eas ,ement to City of Tusttn (Provides permanent blanket easement over flood channel facility for repair/maintenance of City inlets to the E1 Modena-Irvtne Channel facility). 45; 87-23 9. RELOCATION OF SCHOOL CROSSWALF, ON BitYAN AVENUE Approved the sketch attached to the staff report showing relo- cation of the existtng .schooT crosswalk on Bryan Avenue from the Utt Drive intersection to a new location neap Charloma to serve residents in the senior citizens home at XZBZ Bryan Avenue and school children in the local area as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Div.tsion. 46 10. AGREEMENT 8ETHEEN THE CITY AND ASSESSMENT MO TR~TI~NT SERVICES CENTER (ATSC) Approved the agreement wtth ,ATSC for counseling services of youthful offenders at a rate ,of $200 per referral by the City; and authorize the City Hana~er to execute same as recoa~ended by ~he Police Department. 45; 87-24 11. RESOLUTION NO. 87-61 -A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AHENDING THE SCHEDULE FOR TUSTIN CITY CODE VIOLATIONS Adopted Resolution No. 87-61 as recommended by the Police Department. 82 · VII. OIIDZNANCES FOR INTROOIJCTION - None. VIII. ORDINAN(/~ Rllt N)OPTION - None. . IX. OLD ~IME$S 1. EVENIMGSIDE/RAINBOW ANNEXATION NO. 139 On Hay 25, 1987, Council received and filed written protests on subject annexatl on. It ms moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to continue certifi- cation of the value of written protests .for subject annexation to June 15, 1987, as rectum,haled by the City Clerk in the inter-corn dated June 1, 1987. Carried 5-0. 24 2. LA CoLINA/BROMIING ANNEXATION NO. 140 X. On Hay 26, 1987, Council received and filed written protests on subject annexatt on. It was moved b~, Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to cOntinue certifi- cation of the value of written protests for subject annexation to June 15, 1987, as recommended by the City Clerk in the inter-corn dated June 1, 1987. Carried 6-0. 24 ~ BUSINESS 1. ASSEilILY BILL 21.90 (CHACON) HANUATORY DISTRICT ELECTIONS At its meeting on May 18, 1987, Councilman Hoesterey requested sub- Ject item be agendized for Council consideration. Councilman Kelly voiced vehement opposition to Assembly Btll 2190. As recommended .in the Inter-corn dated May 20, 1987, prepared by the Administrative Services Department, it was moved b~ Kelly, seconded by Edgar, to direct staff to continue active opposition to Assembly Bill 2190 which would mandate cities with population over 25,000 to elect their governing bodies by or from districts. Carried 5-0. 61 2. AklARD OF CONTRACT FOR ASPHALT CONCRETE REHABILITATION /VID OVERLAY PROJECT, 1986-87 FISCAL YEAR Bid opening for subject project was held on May 26, 1987. The following bids were submitted: CITY COUNCIL MINUT' Page B, 6-1-87 R. J. Noble Company, Orange Sully-Miller Con, any, Orange Vernon Paving Company, Anaheim Blair Paving Cmtoany, Anaheim $2i3,941.55 $215,376.19 $241,101.06 $255,032.06 The low bid is 3.g% below the engineer's estimate of $222,525. Zt was moved by Hoesterey, seconded iby Kennedy, to award the con- tract to R. J. Noble Company, Orange, in the amount of $213,g41.55 for subject project as recommended by the Public Works Department/ Engineering Division in the tnter-com dated May 26, 1987. The motion Carried $-0. 95 3. JMBOREE RON) EXTENSION THROUGH A Joint project with the City of Irvine and The Irvine Company. The consultant has incurred additional costs on design work which have been reviewed and found acceptable to all parties by verbal response. Tusttn's share of the change'order is $24,014. e As recommended in the Inter-corn dated May 26, 1987, prepared by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division, it was moved by Hoesterey; seconded by Kennedy, to authorize execution of the extra work change order to Church Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $147,810 to cover extra design work on the Ja~oree Road extension plans, subject to r'ecetpt of written concurrence from both the City of Irvtne *and The Irvine Company. Carried $-0. 95 1987-88 ,A4)VANC~ FROM THE GENERAL FUND'TO THE SOUTH C~NTRAL PRO~ECT AREA (Reference Redevelopment Agency Minutes of June 1, 1987, Item No. 4) Completion of various Agency projects in the South Central Project Area require an additional $600,000 advanced from the General Fund. Pursuant to the reconm~endation contained in the inter-corn dated Hay 27, 1987, prepared by the Finance Department, it was moved by Hoestereyl~ seconded by Kennedy, to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk ~ execute the agreement ~tween the City of Tustin and the Tusttn C~ntty Redevelo~nt Agency directing the advance of an additional $600,000 to the South Central Project Area to c~rry out the programs of the Redevelo~nt Agency during the 1987-88 fiscal year as rec~ended by the Finance Director. I~tion carried $-0. 45; 87-26 Replacement of a mower currently out of service and in need of $5,000-$7,000 worth of repat rs. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to waive the fomal competitive bid pr~edure; and authorize the purchase of a recon- ditioned Hydro-Power 180 mower from Bob Hicks Turf and Equipment at a cost of $23,000 to replace the Ford. tractor and Gang Reel mow,er as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division in the Inter-corn dated May 26, 1987. 87 e FINAL ~CEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVDENTS - CURBS, GUTTERS & CROSS- GUTTERS, 'A" STREET FROH HRIN TO SECOND - RESOLUTION NO. 87-63 Councilman Hoesterey echoed Mr. Vlntng's comments during Public Input that whenever possible, staff coordinate construction proj- ects to eliminate duplication of work, especially at curbs and gutters. As recommended in the tnter-com dated May 27, 1987, prepared by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division, it was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Kennedy, to: 1) Adopt the fol 1 owing; and RESOLUTION NO. 87-63 -iA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF llJSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND- AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION lTV COUNCIL MINUTES age 9, 6-1-87 Xl. 2) Assumtng no claims or stop payment notices are filed, 30 days after date of recordation of gottce of Completion, authorize payment of the ftnal 10% retentlon..~amaunt ($3,902.57 -Bruce Pavtng Company). The mot.ton carrted 5-0. 95 7. NITRATE RENOVAL I~NON~TItATION PROdECT As recmmended by the Publlc Works Department/Engineering Diviston tn the inter-cmn dated May 29., 1987, tt was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to: 1) 2) Request the Orange County Water Dtstrtct (OCWD) to award the contract for the Tusttn Nttrate Removal Demonstratton'ProjecC to Geco Systems, Inc., tn the amount of $1,264,800; and Authorize. the preparation of a supplemental agreement to the origtnal da~uary, 1985, agreement to provide for the City's acquisition of the project from OCWO at the end of the Cwo-year demonstration period per the following: a) Payment of $800,000 at end of demonstration period; and b) Annual payments at interest rate of 8~ based upon actual City cost savings of pumped water vs. purchased water unttl the balance of $464,000 is paid. · Tim mttbn carrted 5-0. REPORTS 1. PIJUIIIIlll CO~ISSIOII ACTIOIIS - NAY 26, 1987 45; 87-~6 107 It was moved by'.Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to rattfy the entire Planning C~mmlsslon Action Agenda'of May 26, 1987. Morton carrted 5-0. ; ~' ': 80 TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT N~IPORT AVENUE i OLD IRVIIIE BOULEVARD Mayor Edgar requested staff repo~c on the ~Osstbtltty of stgflaltz- trig subject Intersection and provtde a cost esttmate for same. The Director of Public Works presented the staff report as con- tatned tn his inter-cmn dated ~y 22, 1987. Although subject t ntersectt on meets trafftc signal warrants ,'/he recommended age1 nsc stgnal Installation due to the mtntmal amount of cars (200) extttng Plaza Lafayette, and 1ts proximity to the extsttng signalized Intersection at ]~vtne Bouleva~l and Newport Avenue. The Dtrector noted that there are several oCher locations throughout~, the City that are tn 'more crtttcal need of expendttute of funds for traffic control. Mayor Edgar suggested staff explore utilization of Redevelopment funds, agendize the matter, and perhaps accemplish the work without compremistng other work. The Director-responded that on Newpo~,t Avenue between Ir'vine BouTevard and 17th Street, the most lo9tcal location for' a traffic sigflal tn Chat vicinity would be at Wass and Newport. This location would serve many more cars, and provide overall spacing for gaps within timing to allow cars exiting com- mercial establishment driveways. The Director assumed Council would be requested to install a signal at Wass sometime in the near future. A signal at Old Irvina would make it difficult with timing by having too many signals in a given area. .: Council/staff discussio.n followed, :, Councilman Hoesterey suggested making the movement from Old Irvine onto Newport a "right turn only." Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy concurred. · As recoonended by the Director, it was;'moved .b~ Kennedy, seconded bY Hoesterey, to direct staff to study the entire area on Newport Avenue between Irvtne Boulevard and 17th Street, and report back to Council on the matter. The motion carried 5-0. 94 CITY COUNCIL MINUTF .Page 10, 6-1-87 ~II. OTlff~q 805INE$$ 1. POSTPONEHENT OF PARK FINANCI~ IIORKSHOP XlII. Council concurred with the City Manager's request to postpone the June 8 workshop on Pa~k Financing. 77 CLOSED S~SSIO# The Mayor announced that the Ctty Counctl wtll recess to a Closed Sesston to: 1) Constder legal matters pursuant to Government Code Sectton 54956.9; and 2) Gtve instructions to the Ctty negotiator regarding a portton of the property located at the northeast corner of Red Hill Avenue and galnut Avenue pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; and 3) Dtscuss personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Sectton 64957. XlV. RECESS - REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY; CLOSED SESSION - N)dOURNHENT At 9:01 p.m., tt was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to recess to a meeting of the Redevelopment A~ency, thence to 'a ClOsed Sesston pursuant to Government Code Sectton 54956.9, 54956.8 and 54957; and thence adjourn to the next Regular Meettng on June 16, 1987, at 7:00 · p.m. The morton carrted 6-0.