Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 02-01-88 REPORTS NO 1 A CT I O N AG [ N 0 A 2-1-88 TUSTIN PLANNING COI~ISSION REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 25, 1988 (CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers ll~JEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION IIOLL CALL: Puckett, Well, Baker, Le Jeune, Pontious I~UBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda) IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. (~ONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) 1~. Minutes of the January 11, !988 Plannin9 Commission Meetin9 Commissioner Puckett moved to approve the minutes, Baker seconded subject to monir ~hanges. Motion carried 5-0. P~BLIC HEARINGS (ILO BUSINESS 2!. Street Improvements P, resentation: Bob Ledendecker No Co.mai ssion action necessary. 3. C C & R Provisions Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development Commissioner Le aeune moved, Baker seconded to continue the CC & R discussion until -the February 8, 1988 meeting.' Motion carried $-0. ¢, 1988 Goals and Objectives Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development No Commi ssi on action necessary. Planning Commission Action ~enda January 25, 1988 ~age two NEW BUSINESS 5. Larwin Square, Removal of Gazebo Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner Commissioner Puckett moved to recommend the approval of the removal of the Gazebo to the Redevelopment Agency. 6. City Entrance Signs Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development !1o Cored sst on action necessary. 7. Joint meeting of South County Planning Commission and Community Development Di rectors Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development Chat rman Wet 1 wi 11 be attendl ng the January 28th meettng with et ther Comet sstoner Jaker or Commissioner Puckett and a member of the Community Oevelopment Staff. 8.. Report on City Counctl actions taken at January 18, 1988 meeting Presentation: Christine Shtngleton, Director of Community Development ADJOURNMENT At 10:17 p.m the meeting was adjourned by informal unanimous consent to a meeting on February 4, 1988 at 6:00 p.m. in the Chambers Conference Room. AGEND.A TUSTIN PLANNING CONNISSION REGULAR #EETING &ANUARY 25, '1988 CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Councll Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION ROLL CAI. L:. Puckett, Wetl, Baker, Le Jeune, Pontlous PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda) IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) 1. Minutes of the January 11, 1988 Planning commission Meeting PUBLIC HEARINGS OLD BUSINESS 2. Street Improvements Presentation: Bob Ledendecker 3. C C & R Provisions Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development 4. 1988 Goals and Objectives Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development MEld BUSINESS 5. Larwin Square, Removal of Gazebo Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner 6. City Entrance Signs Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development Planning Commission Agenda January 25, 1988 Page two 7. Joint meeting of South County Plannin0 Commission and Community Development 6irecl~ors III Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development 8. Report on City Council actions taken at January 18, 1988 meeting) Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Dtrector of Community Development ADJOURNHENT Adjourn to the next regular scheduled meeting on February 8, 1988. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: MINUTES TUSTIN PLANNING COI, INXSSTON REGULAR NEETING JANUARY 11, 1988 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers PRESENT: Pontious, Le Jeune, Baker and Well ABSENT: Puckett PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION PUBLIC CONCERNS: None IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S-TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. CONSENT CALENDAR: . (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC 'REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) Minutes of December 14, 1987 Planning Commission Meeting Commissioner Ponttous moved, Le Jeune seconded to approve the minutes of the December 14, 1987 meeting, ii Motion carried 4-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS . Vesting Tentative Tract Map 13274, Design Review 87-37, Conditional Use Permit 87-30 and Variance 87-06 APPLICANT: LOCATION: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Donahue Schriber for the Irvine Company Southwest corner of Bryan Avenue and Jamboree Road The project is covered by Final EIR 85-2 for the East Tustin Specific Plan (a program ~IR). No additional environmntal documentation is required. RECOMMENDED ACTION' 1. Approve the Environmental Determination for the project by adoption of Resolution No. 2463, as submitted or revised. 2. Approve Design Review 87-37, Conditional Use Permit 87-30 and Variance 87-06 by adoption of Resolution No. 2464, as submitted or revised. Planning Commtsston Minutes January ll, 1988 Page two 3. Recommend to the City Council approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 13274 by adoption of Resolution No. 2465, as submi tted or revised. Resolution No. 2463 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, FINDING THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN IS ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS THE PROGRAM EIR FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13274, DESIGN REVIEW 87-37, CUP 87-30 AND VARIANCE 87-06 AND ALL FEASIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. Resolution No. 2464 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 87-37, CUP 87-30 AND VARIANCE 87-06 FOR A MIXED USE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON 78~ ACRES IN SECTOR 12 OF THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN Resolution No. 2465 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING TO THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL APROVAL OF .VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13274 Presentation: Steve Rubin, Senior Planner Commissioner Le Jeune asked who is on the Design Review Committee. Staff responded that the Committee is made up of Department Heads within the City who are routed sets of plans for their review regarding their jurisdiction. Commissioner Well asked the height of the lights and sign in the Auto Center. Staff responded that the height is 20 feet for the lights and 50 feet for the sign. At 7:58 p.m. the public hearing was opened. Mr. Tom Shriber, representing Donahue and Shriber, 3200 Bristol, Costa Mesa, noted that he was proud to bring this project to the City and introduced Mr. Glenn Meyers. Mr. Glenn Meyers, presented a slide show highlighting the proposed merchandising, architecture and entertainment of the center. He introduced Mr. Leason Pomeroy. Plannlng Commission Minutes January 11, 1988 Page three Mr. Leason Pomero¥, representing-Leason Pomeroy & Associates, 44 Plaza Square, Orange, thanked the City and staff for their cooperatJon and help. He explained the design concept and regional aspect of the center. He noted that he would be happy to answer any questions. Mr. Shrtber noted that there were representatives from the STOR present. He stated that their merchandising concept needs to accommodate truck loading and receiving. They also have a need for a customer pt ck-up area. Having the customer pick-up area on the east stde of the building ts not practical. He noted that the new wording compiled by staff that afternoon is more flexible. Commissioner Wetl agreed that the new wording leaves a lot of room for negotiating. The public hearing closed at 8:23 p.m. Commissioner Baker questioned if Bryan Avenue will be open before construction on this center is started. His concern is that there should be access to the Auto Center from both directions. Ron Wolford, Engineering Services Manager, responded that construction on Bryan Avenue should begin In May. Commissioner Baker asked where the Browning Corridor is located in relation to this ~roject and whether the tower lighting would pose a problem to ground control at USMCA(H). Mr. Meyers noted that the project has been brought to the Marines and as long as the lighting is below 1500 feet they have. no problem with it. Staff concurred. Commissioner Baker further questioned whether there is sound insulation, if the walking surfaces Iwill be artificial brick, and whether there will be a block wall or a berm along Bryan. Staff responded that sound insulation is not required for commercial structures, the walkway textures will be specified .in the landscape plan and there will be a berm only on the Bryan side. Commissioner Baker asked for clarification on standard terminology. He also asked if the height of the towers is measured from the current grade level or the finished grade. Staff clarified that the towers would be measured from the finished level. Commissioner Baker asked if the signs will be on the building or freestanding and when in the process does the issue of security lighting surface. Staff responded that tenant identification will be limited to the storefront, center identification will be limited to the screen wall facing the Santa Aha Freeway and a comprehensive sign plan will be submitted for Commission approval at a later date. The security lighting will be included in the landscape plan. Planntng Commission MJnutes aanuary 11, 1.988 Page four Commissioner Baker referred to the tssue of cumulative glare. _ Staff clarified the 11ghttng types and their advantages and disadvantages. Commissioner Le ~eune tnqutred tf the tenant was confirmed for the movie complex. Mr. Meyers stated that they were tn negotiation and felt that there were many possfble tenants that were very Interested tn the stte. Commissioner Le ~eune asked what ts going to happen to the other side of ~amboree. Coralee Newman, representing the Irvtne Company stated that there are no plans as yet, the parcel ts withtn the Browntng Corridor and the [rvine Company is looking at the parcel as a residential community. Staff clarified that the ~rvlne General Plan shows the property as bustness park. Commissioner Le ~eune-asked who approves the fina'l destgn of the 11ghting towers and the landscape plan. Staff responded that staff approves these Items. Commissioner Le ~eune asked for clarification of the size of the palm trees, that the bushes be kept low in the store ctrculatlon pattern, that "No Parking" stgns be posted so that there ts no overnight parklng for trailers and how many compact parking spaces there would be versus standard parklng spaces. Staff responded that the "No Parking" stgns must be posted by the property owner and can be made as a site plan condition. Staff also noted that there were not a htgh number of compact parktng stalls proposed. Commissioner Pontious noted concern over tha landscaplng of the parking lots. StYe asked that tf pos'stb~e taller trees, the larger the better, be added instead of low bushes. Staff responded that the landscape nodes in the parking lot are 5 X 8 feet and that the developer Is trytng to matntaln balance but trees can be made as a condition. The stte plan shows a shrub type tree 6 to 8 feet wtth a canopy. Commissioner Pontlous noted that she was not comfortable wtth the Color palette. Commissioner Baker stated that he ts havtng a difficult ttme with the color palette, that It ts not tn keeping with the Tustin Ranch and Old Town Tustin theme, .especially the use of the color purple. A short discussion regarding accent color hues and signage followed. Staff noted that the color of the monolJthe would be re. viewed at the time of the slgn program is reviewed by the Planntng Commisslon at a later ttme. Commissioner ~ietl asked tf there will be any entrances to the center from Bryan Avenue. Planning Commission Minutes January 11, 1988 Page ftve Mr. Shrtber noted that the only access from Bryan Avenue would be for service %rafftc. Staff clarified that the E1 Camino Myford entrance is also available. Con~nissioner Well also noted that she would like to see the applicant maintain the sculpture. Con~nissioner Well asked the status of the School District Facilities Agreement. Coralee New. an stated that the Irvtne Company has a good feeling about the progress With the District. They are currently in discussions. The Director confirnmd that the Facilities Agreement in no way affects building permit issuance on this project. .C. ommissioner Well noted that on Resolution No. 2465, B 10 is a duplicate of B 5. Ron Wolford noted that the Public Works Department is not convinced that a signal is ~usttfied on Jamboree north of E1 Camino Real. ,-Con~nissioner Wetl asked that bike lanes be made available on the New Myford bridge 'l"lhen the improvements are designed (if the bridge'is needed). The Director responded that it has not been determined that there will be an overpass on New Myford. Con~ntssioner Le Jeune moved to adopt Resolution No. 2463 with the addition of the ~ddendum. I n Con~nisstoner Baker moved to remove Item 3.2 of Exhibit A Motion died for lack of second. ' ii Con~ntssioner Baker seconded the motion to adopt revised Resolution No 2463 Motion carried 4-0. ' ' .. mi Con~nlssioner Pontlous moved, Le Jeune seconded to approve Resolution No. 2464 with ~he following revisions- Clarify that the Variances are for three building elements; delete C 13 regarding proposed signing; in Item F change "roof" structures to "tower" structures; and add F 5. "Towers shall be designed and constructed to all applicable building codes to assure their structural integrity." Exhibit A, drop Variance and CUP from heading; add to section 3.13 "and to be aesthetically attractive subject to final approval of Community Development"; add to section 3.18 as the third sentence "Areas under canopies for smaller tenants in the hardgoods section shall be a minimum of two feet of pedestrian area clear of obstruction." Planning Commission Minutes January 11, 1988 Page stx Exhibit C, add section 3.4 "Spill lighting shall be controlled by optical cut-off shielding directional and vertical aiming methods." Motion carried 4-0 Commissioner Baker moved, Ponttous seconded to approve Resolution No. 2465 including ~'he CEQA certification of the addendum. Motion carried 4-0. ., At 9:30 p.m. the Commission adjourned for a 10 minute break. The meeting reconvened at 9'38 p.m. NEW BUSINESS 3. .Revision to Approved Site Plan (Recreation Area)/Tract 12855 Presentation. Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development There was no Commission opposition. OLD BUSINESS 4. L. ocal and R.egional Transportation Improvements Presentation- Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development No Commission action necessary. 5. Status of 265 S. Pacific _ Presentation. Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development No Commission action necessary. 6. planning Commission and City Council Schedules Orange and Irvine Presentation- Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development No Commission action necessary. 7. immZm988 Goals and Objectives Presentation- Christine Shtngleton, Director of Community Development The Director will be calling each Commissioner to obtain their individual list of goals and objectives for 19'88; discussions continued to meeting on January 25, 1988. Planntng Corem1 ssion. MI nutes January 11, 1988 Page seven STAFF CONCERNS g. Report on Ctt¥ Council actions taken on December 21, 1987 and Januar7 4, 1988 Presentation: Christine Shtngleton, Director of Community Development The following actions were taken: Building permit fees revisions approved Adopted EIR and Tract Map for Tract 13161 Adopted F_IR and Tract Map for Tract 13106 Resolution for the F,IR for the San Diego Pipeline was introduced Franchise Agreement was adopted for Pipeline Proposed redevelopment retail center at E1 Camino Real and Newport approved Update on John Wayne Airport Noise Study COMMISSION CONCERNS Commissioner Well asked the status of the City purchasing sites from the school district. Commissioner Le Jeune asked if all of the Auto Center lots are sold. . The Director responded' taht there are commitments for all of the lots, some have not submitted plans as yet. However, the Auto Center is looking for additional space. Commissioner Baker questioned the Auto Center si gnage. The Director clarified that when all dealers are in place the signage will change. Commissioner Well noted that she appreciated the League notice for the meeting in Anaheim and asked that she be signed up. She also asked that she receive a copy of the report on growth initiative from the Center for F,conomic Research at Chapman College. The meeting was adjourned at 10'00 p.m by unanimous informal consent. Kathy Wei 1 Chairman Penni Foley Secretary Planning Commission DATE: SUB,]ECT: ,]AIIUAR¥ 25, 1988 STREET IIqPROVEMEk'TS Staff report to be presented at meeting along with oral presentation. pef Community Development Department Report to the Planning Commission ITEM NO. 3 DATE ' SUB,]ECT: ~ANUARY 25, 1988 CC & R PROVISIONS The Planning Commission at a regular meeting on December 14, 1987 appointed a sub-committee to review and suggest possible modifications to standard CC & R provisions imposed by the Commission in approving subdivisions. A meeting was held on December 16th. The Committee discussed general issues and possible revisions. Members of the Committee that were present included Jerry Well, Kathy.Weil, Don Le Jeune, Lois Jeffrey and Christine Shingleton. While staff have not had the opportunity to meet with the Committee since their last meeting, preliminary revisions to CC & R approval conditions have been drafted for purposes of further discussion based on these preliminary comments received. The City Attorney's office has also reviewed the draft and made appropriate changes. Prior to finalizing the revised provisions, .I would recommend that they be revieWed by the Committee, corrected (if needed) and then incorporated into future subdivision resolutions. Dtrector of Community Development CAS: pef Attachment Community Development Department (~) (3) (8) (9) CCaR' s 7.1 Prior to approval of the final map, all organizational documents for the project including any deed restrictions, covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department and City Attorney's Office. Costs for such review shall be borne by the subdivider. A copy of the final documents shall be submitted to the Community Development Department after thelr recordation. CCR's shall include but not be limited to the following provisions: A. The City shall be included as a party to the CCR's for enforcement purposes of those CC&R provisions in which the City has interest, as reflected by the following B through O. However, the City shall not be obligated to enforce the CCR's. B. The requirement that association bylaws be established. C. Provisions for effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and facilities including landscaped areas and lots, recreation areas, pools and spas, private parks, walls and fences, private roadways (i.e., walks, sidewalks, trails) and paseos. Membership in said association shall be inseparable from ownership in individual lots. D. Architectural controls shall be provided and may include but not be limited to provisions regulating exterior finishes, roof materials, fences and walls, accessory structures such as patios, sunshades, trelleses, gazebos, .awnings, room* additions, exterior mechanical equipment, television and radio antennae. E. Maintenance standards shall be provided for applicable items listed in Section C above in CCR's. Examples of maintenance standards are shown bel ow: (1) All common area landscaping and private lawn areas visible from any public way shall be properly maintained such that they are evenly cut, evenly edged, free of bare of brown spots, free of debris and free of weeds above the level of the lawn. An acceptable standard of lawn height would be 2 1/2 inches during warm seasons {July through September) and 2 inches during cooler weather (October through June). All planted areas other than lawns shall be free of weeds, dead vegetation and debris. All trees and shrubs shall be trimmed so they do not impede pedestrian traffic along the walkw, ays. Trees shall be pruned so they do not intrude into neighboring property and shall be maintained so they do not have droppings or create other nuisances to neighboring property. All trees shall 'also be root pruned to eliminate exposed surface roots and damage to sidewalks and driveways. (2) All private roadways, sidewalks and paseo shall be maintained so that they are safe for users. Significant pavement cracks, pavement distress, excessive slab settlement, abrupt vertical variations and debris on travel ways' should be removed or repaired promptly. P~ge 1~o (!H,~l11!st de l~jects) i~ode.c:s ) (3) Common areas shall be maintained tn such a manner as to avoid the reasonable determination of a duly authorized official of the Ct ty that a publlc nuisance has been created by the absence of adequate maintenance such as to be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare, or that such a condition of deterioration or disrepair cause harm or ls materially detrimental to property or Improvements within one thousand (1,000) feet of the property. F. Homeowner's Association approval of extertor Improvements requiring a butldtng permtt shall be obtained prior to requesting a building permtt from the City of Tusttn Community Development Department. All plans for exterior Improvements shall conform to requirements set forth by the City and the CCR's. G. Residents shall not store or park any non-motorized vehlcles or motorized vehtcles that exceed 7 feet htgh, 7 feet wide and 19 feet long In any parktng, driveway or private street area except for purpose of loadtng, unloading, making deliveries or emergency repatrs. Guests of residents occupying detached single family units may park thetr motorized vehtcles that exceed the above dimension on a private driveway or on a prtvate street for a period not to exceed. two weeks provided there shall be no power, water or dratnage hookups to the residences. H. Notification that surrounding properties may be developed in accordance with City ordinances tn a manner which may partially or totally obstruct vt ews from the owner(s) untt, and that the City of Tusttn makes no clatm, warranty or guarantee that views from any untt will be preserved as development of surrounding properties occurs, shall be tncluded In the CC & R's. I® parking spaces shall be permanently and Irrevocably assigned to individual condominium untts at a rate of parking spaces per dwelllng. An additional guest parklng spaces shall be established and maintained wtthin the common area and shall be marked and used for guest parking only. Condominium units shall not have separate televislon and radio antenneas. Etther a central antennae shall be provided with connections to each unit via underground or Internal wall wiring, or each untt shall be prewired and served by an underground cable antennae service provtded by a company licensed to provide such servtce wtthtn the ctty. K. All utility services serving the site shall be installed and mai ntai ned underground. CC, Page three L. The Association shall be required to file the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of at least one member of the Association Board and/or the Manager of the project before January 1st of each year with'the City of Tusttn Community Development Department. M. Disclosure information related to aircraft noise impacting the subdivision, as approved by the City of Tustin Community Development Department, shall be included within the CC&R's. N. Perimeter project block walls to be constructed on private property shall be maintained and replaced, tf necessary by a homeowner's association. This shall not preclude a homeowner's association from assessing charges to individual property owners for .structural damage to the wall or fence. O. No amendment to alter, modify, terminate or .change the homeowner's association's obligation to maintain the common areas and the project perimeter wall [include if the wall is located on private property] or other CC&R provisions in which the City has an interest, as noted above, or to alter, modify, terminate or change the City's right to enforce maintenance of the common areas and maintenance of the project perimeter wall, shall be effective without the prior written approval of the City of Tustin Community Development Department. Planning Commission DATE: SUB,I£CT: ,]ANUARY 26, 1988 1988 GOALS AND OB,]ECTIYES RECOI~ENDED ACTZON Pleasure of the Planning Commission. eAcrr oux ,o, · The Planning Commission at their regular meeting on January 11, 1988, continued discussion of 1988 Goals and Objectives to provide Commissioners With an opportunity to submit their Individualized wish lists to staff for presentation to the Corem1 sston. Attached Is a 11st of projects submitted Individually by members of the Commission for further discussion of the Commission (Exhtbtt A). Also attached ts a 11st of current projects etther scheduled or underway in the Department (Exhibit B). It would be appropriate for the Commission to discuss the attached list, and any priori tization Commtssionsers desire so that staff can prepare a 1988 Work Program. ,~' ,,,' / Christine Shingleton Director of Community i)evelopment CAS:pef Attachments: Exhibit A Exhtbit B Community Development Department EXHIBIT A PLANNING COMMISSION 'WISH LIST' PROJECTS Sign Code Revisions Design Guidelines or requirements for outdoor eating areas Landscape Guidelines - incorporation into Resolutions of Approval Undergrounding of utilities (current program) Citywide Traffic Improvement Program Annexation Areas - Planning/zoning issues Landscaping - Street trees Annual review of General Plan CAS- pef 1-19-88 EXIIIBIT B DEPARTMENT OF COIWIMUIIITY CURRENT SPECIAL WORK Annexal:tons S1 gn Code rev1 s~ ons Cull:ufa1 Resource Ordinance Town Center' Redevelopment Plan Amendment and EIR Santa Fe - Pacific Center Spectf~c Plan, EIR Park tng Ordinance Oestgn guidelines for "Old Town" Newport/Hain Redevelopment Analysis/Negotiation Newport/I-5 Redevelopment AnalysJs/Negottatton Clvtc Center Expansion and Remodel Development/Redevelopment News1 etter OEVELOPNENT PROJECTS and Development Agreement Department Procedures ~lanual - Including all new development application and public dlstrlbutlon/ Informational materials Development and Implementation of a department program for computerization of department's current records and Comprehensive review and reorganization ftles (I.e., microfilming, etc.) Revtston of department base maps Abandoned San Otego Ptpeline right-of-way (use alternatives) CAS: per 1-19-88 Report to the Planning Commission ITEM NO. 5 DATE: SUB&ECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION:. ZONING: ENV IROII4ENTAL · STATUS: REQUEST: ~ANUARY 25, 1988 RF. HOVAL OF GAZEBO AND PUBLIC RESTROONS IN LAR#IN SQUARE TED FESSLER PROPERTY lqANAGER/LARWIN SQUARE 275 CENTENNIAL WAY, SUITE 209 TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 LAR#IN SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER - SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF NEWPORT AND FIRST STREET C-2 (CENTRAL COPtHERCIAL) CATEGORICALLY EXEI~T, CLASS 1, EXISTING FACILITIES TO RENOVE THE GAZEBO AND PUBLIC RESTROOHS AND REPLACE WITH PARKING AND LANDSCAPING RECOHNENDED ACTION Pleasure of the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND In December of 1976, the Planning Commission approved Use Permit 76-25 which authorized the renovation of the existing Larwin Square and the construction of new structures. The approved site plan showed a gazebo and restroom area in addition to the required building footprints (new and existing), elevations and circulation layout. (Attached to this report is the .resolution with the conditions of approval.) DISCUSSION The applicant is now requesting demolition and removal of the public restrooms and gazebo in order to alleviate the visibility problems caused by these structures. The 30,000 square foot space located directly behind the gazebo has been vacant for nearly a year. Prospective tenants have found this location undesirable because of the poor visibility of the storefront caused by these structures. (Please see the attached correspondence.) .... Community Development Department 3anuary 25, 1988 Larwin Square Gazebo Page two While the gazebo and restrooms were shown on the approved site plan, there are no planning or building requirements mandating these types of amenities in a shopping center. The restroom provisions are mandated by the building code for each individual tenant, and constructed accordingly. Staff continues to be concerned about the layout of the parking lot and the traffic flow within the center. In May of 1986 the Planning Commission authorized the enclosure of the- garden shop area which is adjacent to 500 E. First Street. One of the condi tions of approval and findings was the fol 1 owing' That the Planning Commision hereby determines that the subject site has been expanded to capacity using parking ratio established by Use Permit 76-25. Any future addition's to the center will require renovation of the parking lot design. Since the proposed demolition is not an addition and 14 new parking stalls will be provided staff felt that a renovation of the parking area could not be required at this time. However, staff is encouraging Larwin Square to prepare a feasibility study for future realignment of the parking lot lanes within the interior of the center. Since the approved development plan did show the gazebo and the restrooms, staff wanted to apprise the Commission that the Community Development Department will be issuing demolition permits for these structures if the Redevelopment Agency concurs. However, if the Commission determines that the gazebo and restrooms should remain, the Commission should direct staff accordingly by minute order. MaHy And Chamberl Associate P1 anner MAC:pef Attachments: Letter from applicant Plot Plan Resolution No. 1580 Cornrnuni~y Developrnen~ Depar~rnen~ SQUARE TUSTIN January 14, 1988 To: CITY OF TUSTIN 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92680 Re: Removal of Gazebo and public restrooms in Larwin Square ATTENTION: Christine A. Shingleton Director - Community Development Department Dear Christine, As you know the 30,000 square foot space formerly occupied by Designer Depot (which is owned by the K-Mart Corporation) has been vacant for nearly one year now. There have been a number of excellent potential tenants interested in this space, but all have eventually declined this locatiOn because of the extremely poor visibility of the store front caused by the presence of the Gazebo and the adjacent public restrooms. We therefore want to inform you that it is the intentions-of Larwin Square to remove these two structures from Larwin Square which will totally open up the visual line of sight to this store location from anywhere within the interior of the Larwin Square complex which in turn will considerably increase the tax base to the City of Tustin~ Also, said removal of these structures might possibly open the door sometime in the future to feasability studies for realignment of the parking lot lanes and the traffic flow through same within the center. With the removal of the Gazebo and the restrooms, which will be replaced by much needed additional parking, we will then be able to successfully complete leasing negotiations with the caliber of tenant that will further enhance the desireability of Larwin Square-Tustin. In order for us to proceed with the demolition and removal of the Gazebo and public restrooms we respectfully request that the necessary approvals, if any, be issued by the appropriate city department having authority over a request of this nature. In as much as time is of the essence regarding this matter, if there are requirements necessary from Larwin Square beyond this letter please so advise as soon as possible. Sincerely, - ~)'/FESSLER Property Manager/Larwin Square-Tustin MANAGEMENT OFFICE: 275 Centennial Way- Suite 209- Tustin, Ca. 92680. (714) 544-3300 'Jliiiii.iIIIIIIIIIU-''~ Li .L I.L I.LI ~ I1 i.!. I 1 !-~ RESOLUTION NO. 1580 A RE~ TION OF THE PLANNING CO.~ SION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN GRANT-ING USE PERMIT' NO. 76-25 ON THE AP-' PLICATION OF NOP~tAN PULLI~I FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE LARWIN SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: ? 8 9 10 11 14 15 '17 I8 19 · 1. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows a· That a proper application Use Permit No. 76-25 was filed by Norman Pulliam, 1517 N. Fairview, Santa Ana, CA 92706, for the purpose of authOrizin~ the renovation and new construction of the Larwi~ Square Shopping Center located at the parcel bounded by Newport Avenue, First Street and Centennial Way. b. That a.public hearing was duly called and noticed and held on said application. Ce That the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use applied for will not, under the circum- stances of this case be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or ~orking in the neighborhood of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings: 1) The subject use is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan as adopted by the City Council of Tustin~ and - 2) The development will be constructed in ac- cordance with approved plans for the buildings and site with architectural modifications to conform to the design requirements of the City of Tustin. - de That the establishment, maintenance of operation the Shopping Center complex will not be ~njurious or detrimental to the property and improvements. in the neighborhood of the subject property, or to. the general welfare of the City of Tustin and should be granted. e· The proposed development shall be in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance and development policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered by the Fire Chief, street improve- ments as required and administered by the Ci%y Engineer, and subject to the review and approval of the Tustin Redevelopment Authority. f· That a-request for an exemption for Environmental Impact Report has been requested and is hereby approved. The Planning Commission hereby grants a Use Permit as applied for to authorize the construction of new 4 § ? 8 9 10 11 14 15 17 I8 19 ~0 S5 12-13-76, Page 2 _actures and renovation o. ~isting buildings to be comprised of not more than 209,162 s~._ ft. of building area with not less than parking accommodations at a ratio of one parking space for each 250 sq..ft, of gross floor area, subject to' the following conditions· a. Redesign and or relocation of the fast food · operation shall'~ be required with Plannin~ Con-miss±on approval.. be Ce That traffic circulation patterns, street improve- ment plans, 'and required drainage plans shall be subject to the approval of the Cit~ Engineer. Those structures, not a firm part of the submittal as hereby revi.ewed, shall require the review of the Planning Commission for conformance with the con- cept of the Master Plan as hereby approved without the necessity of a public hearing. d· The final development plans to include plot, e!e-.- vations, materials, landscaping, irrigation, lighting, and signing shall be submitted for re- view and approval by staff, in accordance with the concepts of the approved preliminary plans. e. f. Installation of all utilities underground, with no addition of overhead poles to be set'within the property or adjacent to the street right of way. Installation of the street improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and conformance to the design criteria as contained in the City of Tustin development standards (Resolution 76-23).. g· Conformance to the requirements of the Fire Depart- ment as related to the location of fire hydrants and sprinkler systems~to, include the installation of the fire hydrant in front of the Thrifty Drug Store, at the Bryan Street entrance, and 400 ft. westerly of the Bryan Street entrance a's desig-~ nated by the Fire Chief. h · The approval of the City Council for the one way right turn drive cut on Newport Avenue upon the submission of a letter of consent of the adjoining property owner on the most southerly lot line. i · 29 of December, 19 76. ~0 The approval of the Redevelopment Agency prior to the issuance of permits. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California, held on the 13th day QH~IRMg. N OF THE PLANING 'CO~4ISSI . ~. .... , PLA:~NING ,~O~mfSSION ~ECORDING SECRETARY Report to the Planning Commission DATE: SUB,]ECT: ,]ANUARY 25, 1988 CITY ENTRANCE SIGNS RECOMMENDATION Commlsslon discussion and direction as deemed appropriate. BACKGROUND In response to a request from the City Council, the Community Development Department is currently exploring additional entry stgnage opportunities to the Ctty. The ftrm of Urban Destgn Studtos has been selected to prepare a number of s~hemattc destgns and working drawings for a monument sign and two pole signs. Prtor to proceeding with a speclfic design, Urban Destgn Studios has prepared a number of posstble monument and pole stgn treatments that could be envisioned as an alternative to the "wishing well" monuments where traffic median or sidewalk dimensions provtded space constraints. Input and discussion by the Commission on the attached schematics would be appreciated. A colored set of the schematlc wtll also be available to review on January 25th. hrtstine Sht~gletoFf/ Dtrector of Community Development CAS: per Attachments: Sign Schematics · Community Development Department tNU~q ~IC~I,,I oH e,I · OvN~,P-F, Tr~ r~l~,q WITH TILt~ c~r & CI:TY OF 'TIP-LID" L Ac,~'I'i..I ~.'~ ~UST~M ~H~mS PAINI'F-P~ 5r. tN$t~N~ ~K PIF--~J.~r/HANP-~IJI' 'vINYL., ~k'¥ ~A:N A,I.~o AI~?~ ~H ~,l~l~- PL/~I'IF-') Ok THIIJ 6~A$1' (OUT oF H~I',~L oR CITY OF TUSTIN ENTRY SIGN DEVELOPMENT MATERIALS LIST YES NO MATERIAL FOR MONUMENT SIGN WOOD SANDBLASTED WOOD SIGN FOAM (LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE SANDBLASTED WOOD) SHEET METAL STEEL STRUCTURAL SHAPES ACRYLIC BRONZE AND ALUMINUM STONE , CONCRETE FIBERGLASS GLASS YES NO LETTER MATERIAL X ACRYLIC THICK ALUMINUM W/SATIN FINISH FLEXIGLASS BIRCH OR OTHER WOOD INCISED SLATE OR MARBLE (EXPENSIVE) SHEET METAL PAINTED INCISED CONCRETE EPOXY CAST SIGN FOAM BRONZE PLATE NEON STAINLESS STEEL VINYL DIE-CUT Report to the Planning Commission ITEM NO. 7 DATE: SUBJECT: ~LRNUARY 25, 1988 JOINT HEETING OF SOUTH COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND COMMUNI~ DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORS RECOI~ENDATION Receive and file.. BACKGROUND Please find attached a notice and agenda for the next ~meeting of the South County Planning Commissioners. It would be appropriate for two Commissioners to attend. Christine Shingleton Director of Community Development , Community Development Department N'l-we' OF PLANNING COMMISSION J~~¥ 13, 1988 City of Tustin. Christine Shinsleton, Director Community Planning 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92680 FILE Dear Ms. Shingleton and Commissioners Lejeune and Pontius Joint 'Heeting of South County Planning Co=;issioners and planning/Com~unity Development Directors Dear The next. meeting of' the South County Planning Conunissioners and Vlanning/Conununity Development Directors is scheduled for: Date: Thursday, January 28, 1988 Time: 7:00 p.m. - 9:30 p.m. Location: 'City of Irvine Council Chambers 17200 Jamboree Drive Irvine, CA The agenda (see attachment) will include a presentation by County staff on the proposed Council of Governments issues with a discussion to follow. . If you ha~e any questions, they may be directed to Robert G. Fisher, County Planning Director at 834-4643. Ve look forward to seeipg you and discussing issues which are of concern to all of us. Very truly yours, · Tom Moody, Chairm~/n Orange County Planning Commission PKS: th(PC/67) At tachmen t 8005 AGENDA SOUTH COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ~4]~ETING JANUARY 28, 1988 1. Opening Statement/Velcome - City of Irvine Commissioner 2. Self-Introductions 3. Presentation on proposed Council of Governments issue Bill Hodge, Staff Analyst, County Administrative Office 4. Report on County Regional Planning Activities Joan Golding, Nanager, RNA/Advance Planning Division 5. Commissioners' Thoughts 6. Setting of next meeting date 7. Adjournment PKS.'th(PC/70) 8005 1. City of Irvine Larry Hogle, Director Community Development P.O. Box 19575 Irvine, CA 92713-9575 Commissioners Cameron Cosgrove Steven Kuhn 2. City of Laguna Beach Kyle Butterwick, Director Community Development 505 Forest Avenue Laguna Beach, CA 92651 3. City of Orange Ron Thompson, Director Planning & Development Services P.O. Box 449 Orange, CA 92666 4. City of San Clemente Jim Holloway, Director Community Development' 101 W. E1 Portal San Clemente, CA 92672 Commissioners Elisabeth Brown Mary Fegraus Commissioners Don Greek Carmine Masters Commissioners Bob Hamilton Ed Kweskin Also send notice to Jim Barnes 5. City of San Juan Capistrano Thomas G. Merrill, Director ~ Community Planning & Development Commissioners 32400 Paseo Adelanto Richard Wordes San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Carolyn Nash Also s~nd notice to City Planner, Thomas Tomlinson 6. City of Tustin Christine Shingleton, Director Community Planning 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92680 7. County of Orange Robert G. Fisher, Director EMA-Planning P.O. Box 4048 Santa Aha, CA 92702-4048 Commissioners Don Lejeune Leslie A. Pontius Commissioners George Osborne Tom Moody PKS: th(PC/68) 8005 Report to the Planning Commission ITEM NO. 8 aANUARY 25, 1988 SUBaECT' REPORT ON COUNCZL ACTIONS - aanuary 18, 1988 Oral presentation. pef Attachments' City Council Actton Agenda - January 18, 1988 , ,. Community Development Department ACTION AGENDA OF A REGULAR t'~EETING OF THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 18, 1988 7:00 P.M. ?:00 I. CALL TO ORDER PRESENT II. ROLL CALL I I I. PROCLAMATION PRE~NTED TO ~EFF POST 1. "JAYCEE WEEK" - JANUARY 17-23, 1988 - TUSTIN JAYCEES THE TUSTIN JAYCEES IV. PUBLIC HEARING Ct)I~TINUED TO THE 1. NEWPORT/MCFADDEN AVENUE UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 10 - ~ I~EETING FOR A RESOLUTION NO. 88-6 RE~RT ON THE COHPARISON OF THE UNDERGROUND FUNDING Formation of subject district will provide for undergrounding of all ~ THE DOWNTOWN PROdECT overhead telephone, _cable television, and Edison distribution W#ERE THE RESIDENTS ERE facilities within its boundaries, located within the .South Central ASSESSED FOR THE UNDER- Redevelopment Project Area. (Reference Redevelopment Agency Agenda GII~)UNDI~ Item No. 5. ) RESOLUTION NO. 88-6 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 10, NEWPORT/MCFADDEN AVENUE, AND ORDERING THE CONVERSION Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Receive the City Engineer's Report dated January 6, 1988; 2. Conduct the public hearing; and 3. Adopt Resolution No. 88-6 as recommended bY the Public Works Department/Engineering Di vision. ~/~FF TO V. PUBLIC INPUT AGENDIZE POSSIBILITY OF THE CITY SENDING A LETTER TO CONGRESSMAN BADHAM REGARDING GETTING THEm CODES CHANGED FROM 92705 TO 92680 FOR THE PROPERTIES IN ANNEXATION NO. 138 AS REQUESTED BY &I~ALD FELDMAN. TO AGENDIZE IN 30 DAYS A REPORT ON THE POSSIBILITY OF THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY USING THE HOUSE ON li~IN ST. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR APPRO;VED APPROVED STAFF RE:' ~ENDATION · 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JANUARY 4, 1988, REGULAR MEETING 2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,082,203.54 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $156,992.38 3. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR COMPUTER EQUIPMENT PURCHASE Appropriate $4 ;375 from the General Fund (of $4,400 cash obtained in a drug arrest in 1984) to purchase computer equip- ment (two terminals and one touch screen) as recommended by the Poli ce Department. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA PAGE i . 1-18-88 ~m~TF.O RESOLUTION r 4. RESOLUTION NO. 88-2 - .A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN CITY RECORDS, DOCUMENTS, AND PAPERS IN THE POSSESSION OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR THE CONDUCT OF CITY BUSINESS PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY GRANTED BY SECTIONS 34090.5 AND 34090.7 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF 'THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Adopt Resolution No. 88-2 as recommended by the Police Depart- ment and consented to by the City Attorney. APROVED STAFF RECOMI~ENOATION 5.' PROPOSED CONTRACT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR PROVISION OF SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER FUNDS - 13TH YEAR HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Approve subject contract in the amount of $15,000 to be utilized for the Senior Center project; and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute same as recommended by the Community Develop- ment Department. Al)OPTED RESOLUTION I10. 88-3 APpROVEo STAFF RECOMME~ATION 6. RESOLUTION' NO. 88-3 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS - SECOND STREET, THIRD STREET, WASS STREET, ELIZABETH WAY, AND IRVINE BLVD.) Adopt Resolution No. 88-3; and assuming no claims or stop pay- ment notices are filed, 30 days after date of recordation of Notice of Completion, authorize payment of final 10%' retention amount ($20,456.24 - Spear Pipeline Construction) as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 7. UTILITY AGREEMENT NO. 7UT-8945 WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FOR WATER MAIN RELOCATION AT MC FADDEN AVENUE & ROUTE 55 FREEWAY Approve subject agreement with CaiTrans at an estimated cost of $80,000 (100% reimbursable by the State); and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute same as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. CONTINUEO FOR FURTHER 8. RESOLUTION NO. 88-4 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY REPORT WITH PERHAPS OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PICTURES OF THE AREAS CONSTRUCTION OF EMBOSSED CONCRETE MEDIAN PAVING IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Adopt Resolution No. 88-4 as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engi neeri ng Di vi si on. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 88-5 9. RESOLUTION NO. 88-5 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 88-1 (Donald L. Bren Company, Lot D [Recreational Area], Tract 13044) Adopt Resolution No. 88-5 as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engi neeri ng Di vi si on. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 88-7 10. RESOLUTION NO. 88-7 -A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ACEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS - LA POSADA APART- MENTS) Adopt Resolution No. 88-7; and assuming no claims/stop payment notices are filed, 30 days after recordation of Notice of Com- pletion, authorize payment of final 10% retention amount ($2,277.77 - Spear Pipeline Construction), as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA. Page 2 1-18-88 VII. ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION IUED llB THE NEXT 1. CITY COUNCIL COMPENSATION - ORDINANCE NO 1000 Hru.....~ WITH REPORT THAT ' · PROVIDE O~TIONS FOR A proposed ordinance t6 increase compensation from $400 to $440 per P~JllllI~ THIS ON THE BALLOT month, last adjusted in September, 1985. The increase would become effective at the beginning of a new term of any Council person following the next municipal election. ' ORDINANCE NO. 1000 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE RELATIVE TO COUN- CIL COMPENSATION VIII. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION - None IX. OLD BUSINESS RI~i3~ED AND FILED 1. JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE STUDY - UPDATE An ongoing status report on the John Wayne Airport Noise Monitoring Program. Recommendation: Receive and file subject report dated January 18, 1988, prepared by the Community Development Department. X. NEW BUSINESS 'ON lO REMAIN AS 1. BALLOT MEASURE - APPOINTMENT OF CITY CLERK ~ED POSITION Subject report was requested by Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy. Recon~ndation: Pleasure of the City Council. P~M~E~ A~PROVED WITH 2. REPORT ON MAIN' STREET PARKING PROHIBITION FROM NEWPORT S~'lO BRING BACK l~ME WESTERLY {SOUTH SIDE) R~JSII~ICTIONS IN 60 DAYS A.q~O~T THE PARKING MAY Subject report was requested by Councilman Hoesterey. B~E R~4OVED AT A FUTURE DATE S.I1)~PSIGNS lo BE Recommendation: Pleasure of the City Council. 3. REQUEST FOR STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTION OF LEAFWOOD DRIVE/LORETTA DRIVE Subject report was requested by Mayor Edgar. Recommendation: That stop signs not be installed at the inter- section of Leafwood Drive/Loretta Drive as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. N~)AC~ION 4. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS FEDERAL PROJECT FROM THE AGENDA NO. HES - O00SA (241) ' Recommendation. Award the contract to Baxter-Griffin Co., Stanton, in the amount of $129,840 for subject project; and approve an addi- tional appropriation of $19,500 from the General Fund as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Divisioq. CITYYCOUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 3 1-18-88 STAFF 'RF~'qI~NOATION NQ)/~irI'ION TAKEN 5. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR SAN" JUAN STREET STORM DRAIN & FRONTIER PARK DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT Bids were opened on January 12, 1988. The low bid is 7.9% over the Engineer's estimate of $94,500. Recommendation: Award the contract to Gosh Construction Corp,, Los Angeles, in the amount of $102,011 for subject project; and approve an additional appropriation of $22,500 from the General Fund as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 6. COUNTY GROWTH CONTROL INITIATIVE Subject report was requested by Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy. Recommendation: Pleasure of the City Council. A VEIl STAFF ~NDATION XI. REPORTS 1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA- jANUARY 11, 1988 All actions of the Planning Commission become final unless appeal ed by the City Council or member of the public. Recommendation: Ratify the Planning Commission Action Agenda of January 11, 19'88. 2. REPORT ON LEFT-TURN PHASE STUDY FOR WALNUT AVENUE AT CHERRYWOOD LANE - Results of an engineering study for. subject intersection conducted at Counci 1 ' s request. Recommendation: Authorize installation of exclusive left-turn phaL~e for Walnut Avenue and Cherrywood Lane as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engi neeri ng Di vi si on. I.I~REY XII. OTHER BUSINESS REQUESTED A PROCLAMATION FOR THE 40TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE LION'S CLUB. HOIE~REY SUGGESTED THAT WITH THE LOSS OF THE LARGE PINE TREE IN THE FRONT LAWN, THAT SERVICE ~ROUFPS COULD MAKE DONATIONS TO BUY A NEW TREE AND THEREFOR WOULD TAKE PRIDE IN PARTICIPATING. F~~ REQUESTED A REPORT ON UPDATE OF ENTRY SIGNS INTO THE CITY. ~TT SUGGESTED SIGNS BE INSTALLED ON IRVINE BLVD. AND NEWPORT AVE. TO INFORM THE CITIZENS 01~ I~ENDING CONSTRUCTION 14tEN THE SAN DIEGO PIPELINE IS INSTALLED. · Clq!tY ENGINEER TO REVIEW POSSIBILITY OF PUTTING SIGNS AT PROSPECT AND FIRST STREET THAT SAY "LEfFIT TURN YIELD ON GREEN' OR PERHAPS A GREEN ARROW. ~'. REQUESTED STAFF TO INSTALL SIGNS ON MAIN STREET THAT INDICATE MAIN STREET CHANGES TO B'~ ~ AVENUE. EI)G~l~ WAS CONCERNED ABOUT 'THE FAA STUDY AND FELT THE COUNCIL SHOULD MAKE IT UNDERSTO00 THAT WE 00} ~ WANT A LOT OF COMI~ERCIAL FLIGHTS OUT OF EL TORO FLYING OVER OUR CITY. COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 4 1-18-88 REC£~EO TO CLC SESSION XIII. CLOSED SESSION The City Council will. recess to Closed Session to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. 8:54 I V. ADJOUR NME NT Recessed to the Redevelopment Agency, thence to a Closed Session for Personnel matters, and thence adjourned to the .next Regular Meeting on Monday, February 1, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 5 1-18-88 8:54 ALL PRESENT le ACTION AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUSTIN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY JANUARY 18, 1988 7'00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVED 3. APPROVED 4. CONTINUED 5. Al)OPTED 6. RESOLUTION NO. ROA 88-! AND APPROVED STAFF RECOI~IENOATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JANUARY 4, 1988, REGULAR MEETING Recommendation: Approve. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DEMANDS - DECEMBER, 1987 A list of Redevelopment Agency Demands for the month of December, 1987. Recommendation: Approve Demands in the amount of $94,307.05 for the month of Decem-ber, 1987, as recommended by the Finance Department. NEWPORT/MCFADDEN AVENUE UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 10 A request to fund eight additional street lights, approximately 200 feet of conduit {not eligible for Rule 20A funds}, and to convert overhead services to underground facilities for three properties within the South Central Redevelopment Project Area. Recommendation: Approve funding in the amount of $16,250 be included in FY 1988-89 Budget for additional street lights, conduit and service con- versions associated with Underground Utility District No. 10 a's recom- mended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. AWARD OF BID FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS FOR CITY HALL MODIFICATIONS A request to appropriate additional funds to complete various improve- ments in the Civic Center Complex. RESOLUTION NO. RDA 88-1 - A RESOLUTION OF THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVEL- OPMENT AGENCY APPROVING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE INTERIM BIJILDING MODIFI- CATIONS FOR THE CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX AND DETERMINING THAT THE PROJECT IS A BENEFIT TO THE TOWN CENTER PROJECT AREA AND THERE ARE NO OTHER REASON- ABLE MEANS OF FINANCING THE PROJECT Recommendation- Adopt Resolution No. RDA 88-1; and approve a supple- mental appropriation for subject project in the amount of $57,000 as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION AGENDA Page 1 1-18-88 APPROVED STAFF RE'~' ~ENDATION AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR INTERIM CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX IMPROVEMENTS Recommendation: Award contracts and applicable conditions for subject project as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Divi-. sion as follows: A. Sheward & Sons & Sons, Newport .Beach, in the amount of $46,152 for replacement of carpeting; B. Yang H. Kim Painting, Irvine, in the amount of $8,900 for interior and exterior painting; C. Sheward & Sons & Sons, Newport Beach, in the amount of $5,386 for mini-blinds and valances; D. Master Craf-t, Laguna Hills, in the amount of $9,357.10 for uphol- stering of Council Chambers seating; E. Golden Office Trailers, Inc., Corona, in the amount of $52,028.40 for two office trailers; and waive the bid bond requirement. PRESCO1T ~LSKEO 8. OTHER BUSINESS THAT HUSTON SEND A LETTER TO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS THAT WE WOULD LIKE THE GUIN FOSS ANO RED HILL SCHOOL SITES SAVEO FOR OPEN SPACE. ' 9:00 9. ADJOURNMENT · To the next Regular Meeting on Monday, February i, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION AGENDA Page'2 1-18-88