HomeMy WebLinkAboutConsent Calendar #1 6-22-87CUHSEH I I~ALLN UAK
NO. 1
6-22-87
Inter- Com
TO:
·
FROM:
SUBJECT:
WILLIAN HUSTON, CI'l'~ HA#AGER
CONNUIIIT~ DE~ELOPNE#T DEPARTNENT
FINAL TRACT NAP 12763
RECOI~IENDED ACTION:
That the City Council approve Tract 12763 by the adoption of Resolution No.
87-64.
~ACKGROUND:
On December 8, 1986, the Planning Commission r~viewed and recommended to the
City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map 12763 by adoption of Resolution
No. 2376. The City Council subsequently approved Tentative Tract 12763 as
recommended by the Commission on December 15, 1986. The subject map created 16
numbered and 28 lettered lots for residential, school and public uses in Sectors
10 and 11 of the East Tustin Specific Plan. Provisions for public streets and
accommodations for public utilities were also established.
The applicant has now submitted a Final Tract Map for City Council
consideration. The Planning Commission at their regular meeting on June 8, 1987
adopted Resolution No. 2409 recommending to City Council approval of Tract 12763
and determining that conditions contained in Resolution No. 2376 which are
required prior to recordation of the final map had been met. In the case of
public improvements yet to be constructed, appropriate bonds have been secured.
The configuration, number of lots and roadway alignments shown on the map are in
substantial compliance with the approved Tentative Map.
Ctty Council Report
Ftnal Tract ~lap 12763
June 15, 1987
Page t~o
Attached to this report ts correspondence the Commission recetved from the
School Dtstrtct whtch the Commission tnformed the Dtstrtct tt would pass onto
the Ctty Counct 1.
Christine Shingler?/
Dtrector of Community Development
3SD:per
Attachment:
Resolution No. 87-64
Ftnal Tract Map 12763
Commission Resolution No. 2376
Commission Resolution No. 2409
Correspondence from TUSO on 6-8-87
'~-~- ,,, Community Development Department
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11..
12
13
14
15
.16
17
18
19'
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
RE$OLUTIOH riO. 87-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, APPROVING.FIHAL TRACT HAP 12763
The Ctty Counct1 of the Ctty of Tusttn does hereby resolve:
I. The Ctty Counct1 ftnds and determines as follows:
A.
That Ftnal Tract Hap 12763 was submitted to the Ct ty Counctl on.
behalf of The [rvtne Company for the purpose of creattng 44 lots
(16 numbered and 28 lettered), a subdivision from a portton of
Blocks 43, 44 and 64 of Irvtne; subdivision as shown on a map
thereof ftled tn Book 1, page 88 of Htscellaneous Haps tn the
offtce of the County Recorder of the County of Orange, State of
Ca1 tfornta.
B.
That a. publlc heartng concerning Tentative Tract Hap 12763 was
duly called, nottced and held considering said map.
Ce
That Environmental Impact Report 85-2, as supplemented, has
previously been prepared, considered, approved and certified
whtch adequately addresses the general environmental setttng of
the project, 1ts significant environmental tmpacts, and the
alternatives and mitigation measures applled to each significant
environmental effect for the proposed project and no additional
environmental document need be prepared. The Planntng
Commission has revtewed and considered the Information obtained
tn the preVtous environmental tmpact report prlor to approval of
the project.
D.
That Tentative Tract Hap 12763 was found by the Planntng
Co,,,t sst on and Ctty Councll to be tn conformance wtth applicable
zontng and subdivision regulations and. the Tusttn Area General
Plan by the adoptton of Resolutions 2376 and 86-142
re spectt ve ly.
E.
That Ftnal Hap 12763 was determined by the Planning Commission
to be tn substantial compliance wtth the approved Tentative Hap
and In conformance wtth applicable zontng and subdivision
regulations and the Tusttn Area General Plan by the adoptton of
Resolution No. 2409 at thetr regular meettng on June 8, 1987,
Further, by the adoptton of satd resolution, the ,,~ommt sst on has
recommended to Ctty Counct 1 approval of FI nal Hap ~'12763.
II.
The Ctty Counctl ftnds Ftnal Tract Hap 12763 to be tn substantial
compliance wtth the approved Tentative Hap and hereby approves Ftnal
Tract Hap 12763.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at 'a regular meeting of the Ctty Counctl of the Ctty of
Tusttn on the 15th day of June, 1987.
Hary E. ~lynn
Ct ty Clerk
chard B. i=.dgar
Hayor
!
i~ ~,mtm:r~t ar to m II. LOll .4fl~ LOIrA
NO, 127'63
ts. ~..mmm. n.G.m., m
I/~ till dll I., I
Imllllllllll~- , · I0 mil
mm
ammmm~ m
~ ~ ~ lis ~v. mlll~ delOe II CatIMC'I~V - :~
' mi ~ II WRA { { POll{IN Illlellll
wml ~, mm i m {mlm, I m MmJm m i m ilim~,
~.L ! ---mssmmm~mmsmm~mmmm. sm
1
m iLlmm lm L. ~m !
.t
e.
IrI, ll,~I i,;~I-, 1iii Z
Mil
./
e III ~I e ~ w - ,w. ~ .I. I,~,.iI.
___~I-- f '.~ .---- il ~llIil~ "· l ' '.. '
II ' lIII ~ I~i Ii III
III ' ' III II i : "-. I I II
~~ ~--~l'--l:~ l I I i .. . I II -. xll; 8 l
I~ t ., ' . ~ ~I~ I .~ '
·----_ =-.. ~ ..
III, I I I't I.I II
- .
. ..
· ~IImi~.IlII
IIIIL
If,.& leO. ~-10:30 ~,
J.I
NO. 1Z,7'~;~
'3'
I
I
~L
III '
I I! *
It
I,
I
I
.g
mmmmmm m
/
/ / .
I
2.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
~3
~5
16'
~7
18
19
20
21
22'
24
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2376
A RESOLUTION OF THE. PLANNING COHHI$$ION OF THE
CITY* OF TUSTIN, RECOHHENDING TO THE TUSTIN CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT I~P
12763 AND APPROVING THE CONCEPT LANDSCAPE PLAN
FOR TE)ITATIVE TRACT )10. 12763
The Planntng Commission of the Ctty of Tusttn does hereby resolve:
I. The Planntng Co;mission ftnds and deterMnes as follows:
A. That Tentative Tract I~ap 127'63 was submitted to the Planntng
Commission on behalf of The Irvtne Company for the purpose of
creattng 44 lots (16 numbered and 28 lettered), a subdivision
from a portton of Blocks 43, 44, and 64 of Irvtne's subdivision
as. sho~n on amp thereof ftled tn Book 1, page 88 of
Iqtscellaneous I~aps .tn the offtce of the County Recorder of the
County of Orange, State of California.
B. That a Publlc heartng was duly called, nottced and held
considering satd rap.
C. That Environmental Impact Report 85-2, as supplemented, has
previously been prepared, considered, approved and certified
whtch adequately addresses the general environmental setttng, of
the project, 1ts significant environmental tmpacts, and the
al.ternattves and ~ittgatton* masures applted to each significant .*
environmental effect for. the proposed project and no addltlonal
envtronmntal document nee~l be prepared. The Planntng
Co;wlsston has rev-tewed and considered the tnformtlon contained
tn the prevtous environmental, tmpact report prtor to approval of
the project.
D. The proposed subdivision ts tn conformance wtth applicable
ordinances, poltctes and standards Of the C.lty of Tusttn, as
evidenced by the following findings:
1. That the proposed mP ts consistent ~tth the Tusttn Area
General Plan tn that:
Proposed densities and land uses are Identified tn
accordance ~tth the Land Use Element;
b. Parkland has been Identified and allocated tn
accordance ~ith the Recreation Element;
c. Provisions for affordable houstng as outltned In [IR
85-2 and the Houstng Element ~tll be considered at
subsequent, project level, subdivision map processing.
1
2
5
$
?
9
10
11
15
15.
17
lg
19
20
21
Resolution go. 2'376
Page tv.
d. Necessary acttons to wittgate notse Impacts wtl I be
requlred pursuant to the llotse Element, and pursuant to
conditions of the Brovnlng Corrtdoe.
2. Th'at the proposed map ts consistent wtth the East Tusttn
SPectftc Plan tn that: -
a.
Pr.visions of Sector processing requirements concerning
circulation, gradtng','dratnage, and medtan and parkway
landscape plans relattve to Sectors 10 and 11 have been
met. (Sectlon 3.5)
b- The number of' rest denttal un1 ts proposed t s wt th1 n the
established l'tmtts stated tn the East Tusttn Spectftc
Plan' (Sectton 3.4.3.)
C,.
That Identified 1'and uses upon the subject map are
const.stent'wtth permitted land uses outltned tn the
East Tusttn Spectflc Plan (Sectlon 3.4)
t
d. That school and park sttes have been Identified tn
accordance. ~tth the Spectftc Plan (Sectton 3.4)
That the' pro~lect as subMtted ts consistent ~tth the
adopted Deve]opment Agreement between the Ctty of Tustl n
and The Zrvtne Company d~ted danuary 27, 1986.
4. That the proposed map ts tn conformance ~tth an agreement
between the Tusttn Untfled School Dtstrtct and The Irvlne
Company.
0
That approval and recordation of Tract 12763 ts not the
ftnal discretionary approval for development ~tthtn the
subdivision. Subsequent subdivision maps wtll be requtred
prtor to development of any lot created by Tentative Tract
Flap ]~2763.
E. That the stte ts physically suttable for the type of development
proposed.
F. That. the stte ts physically suttable for the proposed denstty of
development.
!
'2
· o
Resolution No. 2376
Page three
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11'
12
115
15
17
18
Th'at the destgn of the subdivision or the proposed Improvements
are not ltkely to cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and avoidably ln~ure ftsh or wtldllfe tn thetr
habttat.·
H. That the deslgn of the subdivision or the ~jpe of Improvements
proposed wt11 not confltct wt~h easements acqutred by the
public-at-large, for access ~hrough or use of the property wtthtn
the proposed subdivision.
I. That the destgn of the subdivision or the ~jpes of Improvements
proposed are not 11kely to cause sertous publlc health problems.
II. The Plannlng Commission hereby, recommends to the Ctty Counctl
approval of Tentative Tract l~ap !~o. 12763 subject to the following
conditions:
~eneral
1.1 ~/tthtn l~enty four months from Tentative Tract ~lap approval, the
Subdivider shall ftle wtth appropriate agencies, a Ftnal
prepared tn accordance wtth subdivision requirements of the
Tusttn. Huntctpal Code, the State Subdivision ~lap Act, and
applicable conditions contained heretn.
1.2 A note shall be placed on r~p that untt counts and Identified
land uses Indicated on Tentative Tract 12763 are for Information
purposes only. These ftgures do not constitute ftnal untt counts
and ftnal untt counts are subject to approval of subsequent
Subdivision Naps.
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1.3 Butldtng Permtts may not occur upon any lot created by Tract
12763 unttl such ttme that subsequent, project level, Subdivision
Raps are approved for Individual lots. l~tth l~e exception of Lot
13 sho~n for net ghborhood commercial use or any lot as applicable
provtded that no additional subdivision ts destred or requtred
pursuant to requirements, of the Tusttn ~luntctpal Code and/or
State Subd.t vt st on Flap Act. Lots established by Tract 12763 may
be further subdivided Independent of each other.
1.4 Subdivider' shall adhere to all applicable requirements outltned
tn the East Tusttn Spectftc Plan, Environmental Zmpact Report
Ilo. 85-2 as supplemented and Development Agreement as adopted.
1.5 Access potnts on curves of publlc streets may pose stte
visibility or pedestrian ortented constraints. Each access
potnt ts conceptually approved but exact locatton must be
revtewed Individually as development occurs at either the
subsequent ftltng of an additional tract or parcel map or as a
part of a stte plan revte~ when a tract or parcel map ts not
required.
..
1
2
$
$,
?
$
9
10
11
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
28
Resolution No. 2376
page four
1.6 Subdivider shall submit a duplicate mylar of the Ftnal Map, or 8
1/2 tnch by 11 tnch transparency of each map sheet and "as bullt"
gradlng, landscape and Improvement plans.
1.7 All lettered lots pertaining to the E1 Modena-Irvtne Channel will
requtre ulttmate dedication to the County of Orange for flood
control purposes.
1.8 The Ranchwood Storm Drain (Facility FO7P08) located_along "A'
Street and Lot 2, shown as betng part of proposed development,
· wtll need to. be constructed pursuant to Agreement No. 085-153
dated 24 ~une 1986 between the City of Tusttn and Orange County
Flood Control Otstrict to enable acceptance of E1 Modena-Irvine
Channel (Facility FO7) for maintenance by the Agency.
1.9. The Subdivider shall pay all costs related to the calculation of
the revtsed parcel assessments, the preparation of the revtsed
assessment dtagre, and other requtred administrative duttes
related to Assessment 0tstrtct No. 85-1 as a result of the
subdivision of parcels of land previously established wtthtn the
boundaries of Assessment Otstrtct No. 85-1 confirmed by the
Tusttn Ctty Counct1 on Ouly 21, 1986.
Prtor to Ftnal Map Recordation
2.1 Prtor to recordation, Subdlvfder. shall submit a current title
report~
2.2 Prtor to recordation of a Ftnal Map the Subdivider shall provtde
the following Information and/or corrections to the submitted
map:
A. The Browntng Corrtdor Avtatton Easement and the G.C.A.
Easement as outltned tn the Memerandua of Understanding
dated ~uly 1985 between the Untted States Martne Corps, the
Ctty of Irvtne and the Ctty of Tusttn shall .be Indicated on
Tract Map 12763 and all subsequent subdivision maps.
Be
Street 'C' as a publlcly dedicated street must be revtsed to
show the following dimensions:
Half street-. 28 feet
Center line to curb- 20 feet
Parkway - 8 feet
SJdewalk - 5 feet and adjacent to curb
C. At discretion of subdivider landscaped lots 'S' and '0'
adjacent to Street C may be Increased 'by 2 feet.
5
6'
?
8
9
10
11
12
14
115
17
18
19
~0
~./ 26
27
28
Resolution tto. 2376
page flve
D. M1 major ar~erla] Intersections may require additional
street wtdth to accommodate dual left turn movements and
free rtght turn movements. Subdivider sba11 provtde
Intersection · analysts to the satisfaction of the Ctty
£ngtneer for all subject Intersections wtth flnal' street
wtdths subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
£. An engineering-destgn shall be prepared for submittal and
approval of the Ctty Engtneer addressing potential verttcal
stte dlstance constraints that may artse from locattng the
southerly extension of ~lew ~lyford Road at Bryan Immediately
adjacent to the E1 I~odena-:[rvtne Flood Control Channel.
F. The Tttle Block for Tract ~tap 12763 shall be amended to
delete reference that saJd map ts for "slngle famtly
detached and condomtntum purposes".
sheet 3, typtcal sections, of Tract 12763 shall be mvtsed
as follows:
(1) Bryan Avenue (Sectton A-A). Stdewalk on northstde wtll
requtre an easement. Stdewalk locatton wtthtn Edtson
Easement must be approved by Southern Cal lfornta Edt son
Company.
(2) Bryan Avenue (Sect16n C-C). Stdewalk locatton wtthtn
Edison £asemant must be approved by Southern Ca11 lorn1 a
Edlson Company. Parkway wtdth must be a ,rlntmum 8 feet
not 3 feet and can be satisfied by etther dedicated
land or an easement on Southern California Edtson
Company property.
2.3 Prior to recordation of final map, the Subdivider shall prepare
plans for and construct or post securtty guaranteeing
construction of all publlc and/or prtvate, Infrastructure
tmprovemants wtthtn the boundary of satd tract map tn conformance
wtth applicable Ctty standards, Including but not 11mlted to the
following:
A. Curb and gutter/cross gutters
B. Stdewalk
C. Drlve aprons
D. Street pavtng
E. Street stgntng and strtptng
F. Landscapt ng/factl ttles
G. Santtary sewer servtce facilities
H. Domestlc water servlce fact 1 tttes
Reclaimed water servtce facilities
Gas, electric, telephone, cable T.V. facilities
K. Trafftc stgnal systems and other trafftc control devtses
1
$
$
7'
8
9
10
11
1:2.
14:
15
16
17
18
19
21
27
Resolution rio. 2376
page stx
L. Street 11 ghttng
Storm dra t ns
#. Undergroundtng of extsttng and proposed uttllty distribution
1'tries.
2.4 Placement of all above ground facilities, such as stgntng, street
11ghts, ftre hydrants shall be behtnd the stdewalk when sald
sidewalks are constructed ad~lacent to the curb pursuant to
Condt tt on 2. 3.
-
2.5 Preparation of plans for and construction of a11 santtary sewer
facJlttles must be subMtted as requtred by the Ctty Engineer.
These facilities shall tnclude a gravtty flo~ system per
standards of the Zrvtne Ranch Hater District.
2.6 Preparetton of plans for and construction of a domesttc water
system to. the standards of the Irvtne Ranch 14ater District/City
of Tusttn 14ater Servtce, whlchever ts applicable at the ttme of
plan preparation ts required. Any requtred reclaimed water
systems shall be to the standards as requlred by the Irvtne Ranch
~later District.
2.7 Preparation of plans and construction of Improvements along the
easterly st de of Jamboree Road between the Santa Ana Freeway and
Zrvtne Blvd. as requtred and approved by the-Ctty Engtneer and
condt tJons of thts Map and cons'tructod pursuant to Condttton 2..3.
2;8
Preparetton of a hydrology and hydraulic study of the tributary
area Impacting the proposed development shall be prepared and
submitted. Preparation of plans for and construction of all
storm dratn facilities as requtred by the City Engineer, Orange
County E~A and Caltrans when appl t cable and pertaining to thetr
fact 11ttes sba11 also be subnd tted.
2.9 The Ranchwood storm dratn (Facility FO7-P08) shall be destgned In
accordance wtth Orange County E.M.A. - Flood C~ntrol Dtstrtct
standards and crtterta and/or as approved by dtstrtct and wtth
the provision of all County requtred easements for same Inclusive
of all Ingress/egress to the facility.
2.10 Prtor to recordation of any Ftnal Hap, Subdivider shall pay plan
check and Inspection fees for all publlc and/or prtvate
Infrastructure Improvements wtthtn Ctty's responsibility'
excluding those ftnanced by Assessment District.
2.11 The Subdivider shall sattsfy dedication- and/or reservatt, on
requirements as applicable, Including, but not 1trotted to the
following:
28 A. Oedtcatton of all requlred street and flood control
right-of-way, deftned and approved as to spectftc locatlon by
the Ctty Engtneer and other' responsible agencies.
1
2
5
$
?
9
10
11
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
~0
21
2~
:26
Resolution go. 2376
page seven
B. Dedication 'of a11' veht'cular aCcess rtghts to Tusttn Ranch
Road, Bryan Avenue, Bro~nlng Avenue, Zrvlne Boulevard,
Jamboree (Hyford. Road), "A", "B", and "C" Street except at
designated street openlngs ts requtred deftned and approved
as to spectftc locatton by the Ctty £ngtneer.
C. Subdivider shall provtde for dedication of a mtntmum of 19
ac~e~ of land for park purposes. Lot 7 shall be a mtntmum
of 16.0 acres for a community park stte, and Lot_9 shall be
a M ntmum of 3 acres for a neighborhood park st tr.
The following 1terns must be provtded and conditions met
prtor to acceptance of park st tes by the Ct ty.
(1) Subwltted and approved by the Department of Planntng
and Community Development of a sotls report and rough
g~adtng plans submitted by Subdlvtder's registered sotl
and ctvt I engineers. In add1 tton to a standard sot 1
report,' Subdivider shall also provtde sotl testlng for
fertility/agronomy wtth *any recommendations-for soll
amendments..
(2) Each lot to be dedicated for park purposes sh&11 be
rough graded or bonded for per an approved rough
gradtng plan free of obvtous rock or construction
by-product m terta 1'.-
(3) Full publlc' ImProvements must be Installed or bonded
for by .the developer around the perimeter of each park
stte subject to approva] of' Ctty Engineer.
(4) Publlc uttllty laterals of a sufficient stze Including
water, electricity, se~er, store dratn, natural gas and
telephone com,untcatton shall be Installed or bonded
for to the park sttes' proper~y 1tries wtth actual
designated locations subject to ap~oval of Ctty
Engineer.
(5) Any Jotnt use of park sttes adjacent, to proposed
schools shall be subject to agreement between the Ctty
of Tusttn and Tust~n Untfted School Dtstrtct as to the
effect of Jot'nt use, type of facilities, thetr use,
development, and maintenance. For purposes of
negot.t att on between the Ctty and Tust~n Untfted School
Dlstrlct tt shall be assumed that a mtntmum of 6 acres
of the Community Park st're and a portlon of the 3 acre
neighborhood park stye may be ut111zed for posstble
Jotnt use.
1
Resolution No. 2376
page eight
,4
5
6.
..
8.
9
10'
11
I2
14
15
]6
17
(6) Subdivider shall provtde concepts for any Jotnt use as
required by condition 4.8 of this resolution.
·
F'.. Reservation of Lots-8 and 10 Identified as e]ementary and.
high school locations, subject to acceptance by the Tusttn
Unified School District, provided that Lot 10 shall be
Increased tn size to a minimum of 9 acres. No elementary
school i s required t n SeCtor 10.
..
2.12 Street sweeping on both public and private streets will be the
responsibility of the Subdividers/developers. Prior to
recordation, of the Final map, Subdivider or developer shall post
with the Community Development Department a minimum $2,500 cash
deposit or letter of credit *to guarantee the sweeping of these
streets. In the event this/these deposit(s) are depleted prtor
to completion of' development or City acceptance of public
streets, an additional incremental deposit will be required.
2.13 Prior to the recordation of a Final Map and/or grading permits at
the dtscrett'on of the Director of Community Development, an
acoustt.cal analysis report shall be submitted to the Tustin
Community Development Department for approval. The report shall
describe in detail the exterior noise environment and preliminary
mitigation measures necessary to bring the proposed projects into
conformance with any City Noise Standards and Policies in effect
at the time of project revte~. The acoustical analysis shall be
prepared by an expert or authority in the Yteld of acoustics.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Preliminary plans shall be submitted for review and approval
regarding noise-attenuation of units located near arterial
highways or. freeways or under the Browning Corridor which insure
that interior and exterior noise levels do not exceed the City of
Tusttn Not se Ordt nance.
2.14 Prior to recordation of a Final Map, any well sites to be
abandoned located within the Tract shall be removed to standards
of the State Health Department and all applicable agencies.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Petal. ts
3.1 Prtor to tssuance of gradtng permtts, a sot'l.s engt neert ng report
conforming to the Ctty requtrements sba11 be submitted to and
approved by the Department of Community Develqpment.
28
Resolution No. 2376
page n1 ne
3
5
$
7
8
9
10
1I
12
14
15
3¸.2
Preparation and submt'ttal of a Ftnal Gradtng Plan sub~ject to
approval of the Department of Community Development delineating
the following Information ts required:
A. Ftnal street elevations at key locations.
B. Ftnal pad or ftntsh floor elevations, as applicable, and key.
elevations for all stte grading. All ftnal pad elevations
to be a mtntmum of :~.0 feet above the base flood elevation
as deft ned by ~r~A.
C. All flood hazard areas of record.
3.3 Preparation ot' a sedimentation and eroston control plan for all
construction work related to Tract 12763.
3.4
The gradtng plan shall provtde secondary, surface rellef to the E1
Modena-Irvtne Channel as requtred by the Ctty Engtneer at
determined potnts on "A" and "B" Streets.
3.5- Gradtng plans shall provtde a secondary type surface rellef to
the E1 Modena-Irvtne Channel at the Intersection of "B" Street
and "A" Street. Such re.11ef shall be provfded as requtred by the
Ctty Engineer.
16
Prt'or to Issuance of Butldtng Permtts
17
18
'4.1 Prtor to. tssuance of butldtng permtts wtthtn the Tract,
.Subdivider shall record a Ftnal Map tn accordance wtth the
approved Tentative Map and conditions heretn.
'19
20
21
22
23.
25
26
27,
28
4.2 Prtor to the tssuance of any butldtng permtts, an acoustical
analysts report describing the acoustical destgn features of the
structures requtred to sattsfy the extertor and tntertor notse
standards shall be submitted to the Tusttn Community Oevelopment
Oepartment for approval along wtth satisfactory! evtdence whtch
Indicates that the. sound attenuation measures specified tn the
approved acoustical report(s) have been Incorporated tnto' the
destgn of the pro~lect.
4..3 Pr1 or to .t ssuance of any bui ldt ng perm1 ts for City pro~lect that
falls under the Brokntng Corridor, a complete notse study shall
be conducted and submitted to the Ctty for revtew. In addttton
to Community Notse 'Equivalency Levels (CNEL) satd study provtde
Information on stngle event notse measurements as generated by
helicopter flyovers for Information purposes only.
All residential lots and dwellings shall be sound attenuated
agatnst present and pro~lected notses, whtch shall be the sum of
a'11 not se tmpacttn'g the pro~lect, so as not to exceed an extertor
standard of 65dba. CNEL tn outdoor 11vtng areas and an tntertor
. o
1
2
Resolution No. 2376
page ten
3
4
$
?
$
9
10
11
14
15
standard of 45 dba CtJEL tn all habitable rooms. Evtdence
prepared under the supervtst'on of an acoustical consultant that
these standards wtll .be satisfied, tn a manner consistent wtth
appl tcabl, e zontng .regul att ons.
4.4 Prior to tssuance of any butldtng permtts, wtthtn the tract,
Subdivider shall confer with and prepare for review by the
Community Development .and Tustln Untfted School Dlstrlct
preliminary stte plan and activity concepts for the development
of Joint use areas on_Lots 7/8 and Lots 9/:10.
4..5 Prior to tssuance of project level butldtng permtts recordation
of pro~lect level Ftnal Iqaps, whichever occurs ftrst, the
Subdivider shall provide a mechanism for landscaped maintenance
and o~nershtp of all lettered .lots uttllzed for landscape
purposes by adjoining community associations within the tract.
Said agreement shall be subject to approval of the Ctty Attorney,
City Engtneer and Director of Communtty Development.
4.6 Prior to tssuance of butldtng permtts, 'Subdivider shall comply
with all requirements of the Orange County Ftre Harshal Including
adequate fire flo~, Installation, where required of fire hydrants
subject to approval of the Ftre ~rshal an& Irvtne Ranch ~/ater
Dtstrtct or Ctty Engtneer as applicable.
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
/ 25
Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Use or Occupancy
.o
'5.1. Prior to tssuance of any Certificates of Use or Occupancy, fte.ld
testing Jn accordance wtth the Title 25 regulations may be
requlred by the Butldtng Dtvtston to 'verify compliance wtth STC
and IIC destgn standards. ·
III. The Planning Commission approves a concept landscape plan and a Sector
perimeter Tract wall destgn for Tentative Tract 12763 subject to the
following conditions:
:,
1. Approval of the concept plan as' herein modtfted does not commit
the City to the extension of satd landscape plan to the remainder
of the East Tusttn Specific Project Area.
Future submittal s she11 substantial ly conform to' the submttted
landscape concept plan on ftle with the Department of Community
Development, as heretn modtfted or as modtfted by the Dtrector of
Community Development pursuant to the City's destgn revtew
procedures.
27
28
1
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
·1'5
16
17
18
19
20
21
26
27.
28
Resolution No. 2376
page eleven
3. A completely detatled landscape and Irrigation plan must be
submitted wtth detatl .at whatever scale necessary to. deptct
adequately what is occurring. Provtde a summary table applying.
an tndextng Identification to plant materials and thetr actual
location. The plan and corresponding table must 11st botanical
and common names, slzes, spa.ctng, actual location, and quantities
of all matertals proposed.
o
Show planttng and bernrlng detatls, sotl preparation, staktng,
etc. The Irrigation plan shall be submitted prtor to butldtng
per,tr, and ~ust show locatton of control and backflo~ prevention
devtces, pipe stze, sprinkler Wpe, spactng, and coverage.
Detatls for all equtpmant must be provided. Planttng and
Irrigation tn publlc rtght of way should also be shown where
proposed. Appropriately show. all proper~y ltnes, publlc rtght of
way areas, sidewalk widths, parkway areas and wall locations on
landscaping and Irrigation .plans. The Deparl~nent of Community
Development my request minor substitutions of plant mtertals,
or request additional sizing or quantity of materials during
plancheck. Place note on landscaping plans, that "adequacy of
coverage of landscaping and irrigation materials is subject to
fteld inspection of the Department of Planning and Community
Development. Upon completion of inspection, the Department
reserves the* rtght to request installation of additional
landscaping pursuant to the approved landscaping plans.
The submitted · landscape plans should reflect the following
requirements.
A. Tree plantings should be planted, wherever posstble in
tnformal drtfts and groupings tn staggered triangulations.
B. Any landscaping within numbered landscaping lots should be
coordtn&ted wi th parkway landscapt rig.
Ce
Prtmary eucalyptus tree plantings should be ~., combination of
$ gallon and 15 gallon, and shall be p"lanted in the
fol.lowt ng propor, t!ons.
(1) $0% shall be a minimum of.5 gallon
(2) 40% shall be a minimum of 15 gallon
D. One additional vartety of tree (evergreen) In addt tion to
the proposed accent and eucalyptus treatments proposed along
street frontages shall be planted (an aleppo pine or a
stmilar alternative matertal would be acceptable) In the
following proportions:
,/
! Resolution No. 2376
2
3
4
5
$
?
8
10
11
12
page twelve
(1) 30S shall be a mtnlmum of 15 gallon
(2) 505 shall be a mtntmum of 24" box
(3) 20[ shall be a ,rlnJmum of 36" box
5. The actual tree stze, locatton and number of paseo accent and
comuntty accent l~ees shall be subject to revtew and approval by
the Depar13,ent of Community Development. ..
$. l~hen posstble and to add vtsual tnterest bermtng along landscape
lot frontages shall be provtded whtch ts creattve and done not
only to flow to walls, but be sltghtly horizontally undulated
(broad rolling a wavelike free-flowing appearance) maintaining
visibility at, entrances to projects. Bermtng slopes shall be
less than 3:1 and planted wtth drought resistant turf and
coordinated wtth shrubs and groundcovers. Any detatls on bermtng
shall be shown on landscaping and gradtng plans.
13
7. .Spactng of all groundcover shall be at 8" - 10" on center.
15
16
17
18
20
21
0
Perimeter walls should be provtded wtth vtnes tn order to
elJmtnate large expanses ot= wall by addtng greenery and color.
¥tnes should also be Informally grouped wtth ~ratntng devtces
Installed wtth .the actual locatton noted on p~ans.
9. Entry~ays to th~-project stte should be focal potnts. In
addttton to the larger tree treatments, these areas should be
provtded wtth a varteW of color and treatment of landscaping.
10. A complete detatled subdivision stgn program Including location,
stzes, colors and materials shall be submitted subject to mvtew
and approval of the Depar13,ent of Community Davelopment.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meettng of the Tusttn Planntng Commission
held the day of , 1986. t
24
25
· CHARLES E., PUCKETT,
Chatrman
26
27
28
DONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
;
I
I
;,
!
£'
1
2
$
6
7
8
9
10
11
12'
14
15
16
17
18
19'
RESOLUTION NO. 2409
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COHHI$SION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTZN, RECOFtHENDINGTO THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
APPROVALOF FINAL TRACT HAP NO12763
The Planntng.¢omtsslon of the CI~y of Tusttn does hereby resolve:
The Planntng Comrlsston finds and deter,fines as follou,:
A. That Ft.nal Tract Map 12763 was subwltted to the Planntng
Comrlsston on behalf of The Irvtne Company for the purpose of
creatlng 44 lots (16 numbered and 28 lettered), a subdivision
from a portton of Blocks 43, 44'and 64 of %rvtne; subdivision as
shown on a map thereof ftled tn Book 1, page 88 of Htscellaneous
Raps tn the offtce of the County Recorder of the County* of
Orange, State of Ca 1 t f ornl a.
B'. That a publlc heartng concerning Tentative Tract Hap 12763 vas
duly called, nottced and held considering satd rap.
Co
That. Envlronmntal Impact Report 85-2, as supplemented, has
preFlously been prepared, considered, approved and certified
whtch adequately addresses the general envtronmntal setttng .of
the pro,fact, t~s significant environmental tmpacts, and the
altern&ttves and mitigation measures applled to each significant
environmental effect for the proposed pro,fact and no additional
environmental document need be prepared. The Planntng
Comdsston has revte~ed and considered the tnformtton obtatned
In the prevtous envlronmntel tmpact report prlo~ to approval of
the project.
o.
D. That Tentative Tract Map 12763 ~s found by the Planntng
Conmtsston and Ctty Counctl to be t n conformance wtth appllcabl ·
zontng and subdivision regulations and the Tusttn Area General
Plan by the adoptton of Resolutions 2376 and 86-142
respectively.
20
21
22
23
E. That Ftnal Hap 12763 as subwltted ts tn substantial compliance
wtth the approved Tentative Hap and ts tn conformnce wtth
applicable zontng and subdivision regulations and the Tusttn
Area General Plan. '
The Planntng Comwlssto hereby recommends to ~he Ctty Counctl approval
of Ftnal Tract Hap 12763.
24 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meetlng of ~he Pla_nntng Comt./~on of me
City of Tusttn on the 8th day of June, 1987, /~/1 // / '
Penn1 Foley
28 Recording Secretary
·
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANG[ )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
%, PENN! FOLEY, the un'derstgned, hereby certlfy that ! am the Rec.ordlng
Secretary ot' the ?].anrj.lng Comslsst.on of the Ctty of Tustln, Caltfornta, tha~
Resolution Ho. ~~¥ vas duly passed a~_adoptad at ~._.~g=ular meettng of
~he T~T_us~ln Plann'T'ng ~omatsslon, held on ~he ,j:~ day of ...~.~,,~ ,
~'-7-' ' ~ / -' ............
(.~.cordtng Secre~ar~ -~
Ll i ie/ 5chooo£ Dis/ ic/
sou/ h C si eeC l ustir , catll:o nia 9 6fi0 714 750 7501
Chris Layton's Address to Tustin Planning ~Commission
June 8, 1987
The Tustin Unified School District Board of Education has asked
me to make it explicitly clear that Tract Map 12763, which is
before you, does not adequately provide for the needs of the
school children of the City of Tustin. The identified needs,
which are supported by the State Department of Education, would
include elementary school sites of 10 acres and high school
sites of 40 acres. The Tract Map provides for neither of these.
This map.does not comply with the original land/use diagram
because it does not provide for sufficient sites in accordance
with the Tustin Unified School District requirementS.
.~e conditions of approval on the tentative tract map have not
been satisfied because there is no agreement between the City of
"Tustin and the Tustin Unified School District as to the effect
of joint use of the high school site and the adjacent community
park or the elementary site and the adjacent neighborhood park.
The proposed .map is not in conformance with the Agreement
between the Tustin Unified School District and The Irvine
Company because said Agreement provides for necessary school
facilities to meet the demands created by the development as
outlined.
The Tustin Unified School District was not properly notified of
the original filing of the tentative tract map. Official
notification was received on May 28, 1987. In accordance with
Government Code Section 66455.7, 'the District has twenty working
days in which to respond to Tract Map 12763, and it is the ~
intent of the Tustin Unified School District Board of Educat'ion
to provide sueh a response within that 'time period.
It is important you be fully aware that if you approve Tract Map
12763, you are doing so in violation of all statutes, statements
and agreements, and you are preparing to short-change the school
children of the City of Tustin.
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Chris Layton, President · Barbara Benson, Vice President/Clerk
Jane Bauer · Joyce Hanson · Gloria F. Tuchman
Maurice A. Ross, Ed.D., Superintendent
DECLARATION OF BRUCE LOWREY
·
I, Bruce Lowrey,' hereby declare as follows:
1. I am the consultant for Orange County in the School
Facilities Planning Division, California State Department
Educationf. My business address is 721 Capitol Mall, Sacramento,
California, telephone number (916) 322-1452. I have held the
position .of Consultant for.-three, years and ha~e been otherwise
affiliated with the Department of Education for sixteen years in
the curriculum division. I have a'doctorate degree in education
from the University of San Francisco and my background includes
teaching, counseling and administration.
2. Pursuant to Education Code section 39000, the State
Department of Education has a statutory duty to "establish
standards for school sites." Moreover, Education Code section
39101 requires the State Department of Education to advise the
governing board of each elementary, high school, and unified
school district on the application of new school sites, and after
review of available plots, give the governing board of the
district in writing a list of approval locations in the order of
their merit. The State Department on.' Education in rendering this
order must take into consideration matters of educational merit,
reduction of traffic hazards, and conformity to the organized
regional plans as presented in the master plan of the planning
commission having jurisdiction.
·
3. In complying with the statutory duty under the
Education Code, the State Department of Education has compiled
and' distributed a manual entitled "school site Analysis and
Development ." This manual sets forth minimum site
recommendations for elementary',-junior high and high schools.
4. It is my understanding that in order to accommodate the
students that will live in the East Tustin Specific Plan, the
Tustin Unified School District intends to build, in addition to
several elementary schools, a high school to house approximately
1800+ students. The instructional program of the high school
will include a physical education program and provisions for
intramural activities and athletics.
5. According to the School Site Analysis and Development
manual, the recommended minimum school site size for a high
school which expects to house 1800+ students is 41.6 acres.
6. I have reviewed Tract Hap No. 12763 of the City of '
Tustin. This tract map contains a site that has been reserved
for the Tustin Unified School District~s proposed high school.
The dimensions set forth on the tract map reveal that t,he acreage
of the proposed site is approximately 34 acres.
7. It is'my opinion that .34 acres is undersized for the
.hightschool that the Tustin Unified School District intends to
~.b_uii'.l~d) on this. site. Moreover, the School Site and Analysts
Development manual mentioned above, on page 20, recommends 41.6
.
·
acres for a 1800+ student, high school.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is
true and correct and .within my personal knowledge-and that I can
testify competently thereto if require~.
Executed at Sacramento, California,
1987.
this ~ day of ~-Z~~
_-/
BRUCE LOWREY, Ed~.D.
S' E" ' F:' G:,A"_'S
1~ m ml mm mm mm m
Enrollment
Up 40~
to to
400 600
Type of Outdoor Facility
NOTE.. If the school pfoKram is to include
aquatics and both' swimmin8 and divinK
pools Ire required, increase the site re-
quirement .6 oi an acre
Any Combination of Grades 9, 10, 11, and 12
601 801 1001 1201 1401 1601 1801 2001 2201
to tO tO to to to tO tO tO
800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400
Number Required
. .
G Field Area 260' x 260' I
Field Area 260' x 460' I I
K HardcourtArea ]00'x ]20' 2 2 3 3 3
L Field Area 360' x 360'
I 1
1 I 2 2 2
2
3 3 3 4 4 4
1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
6- 6 7. 7 7 8
1 1 1 1 2 2
5 5 6 6 7 7
M Field Area 300' x 750'
N Hardcourt Area 10W x 110' 3 4 5 5 6
O Field Area 200'x 360' 1 I I 1
P Apparatus Area (1000 Sq. Ft.) 2 ~ ~ 4 4
Percent Factor for Layout
25 20 20 20 20 15 15 15 !15 10 10
Area Use
Number of Useable Acres Required
PhysicalEducation 11.9 13.8 16.2 17.7 18.0 19.0 19.0 20.7 20.8 22.0 22.2
Buildings and Grounds
Parking and Roads
Total Acreage
3.3 4.0 5.1 6.2 7.3 8.4 9.5 10.6 11.6 12.6 13.5
2.1 3.6 4.4 5.2 6.0 6.8 7.6 8.4 9.2 10.0 10.8
17.3 21,4 25.7 29.1 31.3 34.2 36.1
39.7 ~41!~6' 44.6 46.5
Resolution No. 86-29 of the Ctty Counctl of the Ctty of Tusttn, &dopttng
General Plan Amendment 86-1a (East Tustln) states tn part:
'The land use dtagram vt11 provtde for sufficient school and park $ttes tn
Iccordance wtth *the Ctty of Tustln ordinances and Tusl:tn Untfted School
Dt strt ct. requirements. '
·
·
December 11, 1986
D,'pnrtm('~l (~! C~mmumty Dn,clopmcnl
Hr. Larry Sutherland
Tustin Unified School District
300 South "C" Street
Tustin, Ca. 92680
SUB3£CT' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL / TENTATIVE TRACT RAP 12763
Dear Mr. Sutherland'
As we discussed in your office on December B, 1986, the following.
items were included as recommended conditions of approval for
Tentative Tract Map 12763 and were adopted by the Planning Commission'
·
Condition Il 2.11 C5: Any joint use of park sites adjacent to
proposed schools shall be subject to agreement between the City
of Tustin mhd Tustin Unified School District ms to the effect of
Joint use, type of facilities, their use, development, and
maintenancc. For purposes of negotiation between thc City and
lustin Unified School District it shall be assumed that a
minimum of 6 acres of the Community Park site and a portion of
th(, 3 acre neighborhood park site may be utilized for possible
joint usc*.
·
Condition II 2.11 F: Reservation of Lots 8 and 10 identified as
elementary and high school locations, subject to acceptance by
the lustin Unt(ied School District, provided that Lot 10 shall
he increased in size to a minimum of 9 acres. No element@ry
school is required in Sector lO. '
0 3 I.-I I ri h I.IS r:l
.~()¢) ¢ chtr~mi~l W~.V · 7u.(h~. C~li[(,,,~ 926,N() · (?74)
· School F&ci:litJes Agreement. Is eat.areal Into as of .January 27t 191~6,
mhd between The 2rvfne Company (TLC) · ~Jchjga~ corporo~Jon, mad the
ItecJ t.a~ls
TIC proposes .to develop property tn the East ~'ustfn Specific
(L~TSP) area shown as I~xhibit A and vithin t. he :Jurisdiction of
the reputation of exce~]ence Jn education and facilities con~nue~
~du~s ~nd children. .'
TIC acknovledges that providing ?U~;D early information regarding the
'development Is necessary to facilitate TUSD decision-making process.
and ?~C desire to establish a ~nethod of f~nancjng schoo!
facilities necessary to serve the student population generated by
'~ and ?UiD acknow3edge anc] agree that schoo! facilities plan~ and
~.~gation ac~reement or agreement.s are necessar~ and should~ be base~
upon sound demographic data~ consideration of a number of fJnancJn~
opt~ons~ studies of current fac~tjes~ and pro~ected development
I~h'as~ng.
Agreement
, consideration of the above premises and the following
,ndit~on$~ ~C and ?USD agree a~ fo~ovs:
Aqreement ~o ~Provide Necessary Fac~lttfes
&oreement to Seek FundJnc~
and ?USD acknowledge that at the current t:ime state
not be available to fun~ school fac:ii:it:les when they
needed for ~zo~ecte~ 9zo~th~ ho~evez~ ~1] touzce~ of revenue
including Irate funding viii be ex~ioze~ to fun~ the ~cqut~ttjo
land and facilities. Notwithstanding the present uncertatnt
TUSD and 73C vii2 cooperate in preparing applications for 9ra~t
funding from the State of Califlornis~ ?:lC: visit ~t its cost
with grant applications. ~usD ~J]l provide &pproprJ'ate
exportJse fro~ the educatJoha2 p~rspectJve.
Hay 27, 1987
Department o! Community Deuclopme.t
Mr. Hollts Grtfftth
Tusttn Unified School District
300 S. "C" Street
Tustin, Ca. 926B0
SUI~IECT: TRACT MAP 12763/RESOLUTXON 2376 & RESOLUCTION 86-142
.
..
~ar Mr. Grtffith:
C.,,closed please find a copy of proposed Tract Map 12763 along wtt. h Resolution 2376
recommending approval and Resolution No. B6-142 approving Tentative Tract Map
12763. To date, formal consideration of the final map has not been scheduled for
Commission or Council action.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Si rice ,r.e4~,
..
8elf Davis,
Senior Planner
enclosure
JO:ts
300 Centennial Way · Tusfin, California 92680 · (7]4) 544-8890
§ ~C)4~.7. Schools &nd school distrleU: notice: written report:
time
Within 10 da~-s of the riling of a tentative map as pro~-lded in
Section 6 52, the clerk of' the legislative body or advisor~ agencY
shall send a notice of the filing of the tentative map to the governing
board of any elementary, high school, or unified school district within
the boundaries of which the subdivision is proposed to be located.
Such notice shall also contain JnforTnation about the location of' the
proposed subdivision, the number of units, density, and any other
dqsd~d~
Div. 2 PROCEDUi~E fi 66456
forrrmtion which would be relevant to the affected school district.
Such govel-ning board may review the notice and may send a vrritten
report thereon to the.agency required by law to approve such tenta-
tive map..If* a written report is made by the governing bcmrd, the
port shall Indicate the impact of the proposed subdivision on the
fected school district and shall make such recommendations Rs the
governing board of' the district deems appropriate. If a w~tten
por~ is made by the goveFTfing board, such report shaU be. FeturTted
~_.~.h...i.n~.20.*.~o.?.kifig:i, da)~s of the date off which the notice was mailed to
the school district for comment. In the event that the Koverning
board of any such district fails to respond within the 20-day period,
such failure to respond shall be deemed approval of the proposed sub-
division.
(Added b.v Stnt.q.19?6, c. 5, p. 3, § 1.)
Munieitm! (',)rlmrnt tonN (~:~43.
Zoning nmi I'l#uning
Llbrory References
t%J.g..%lunh41mJ P. orporn~ious
t'.J..q. Zi)ninK
to 34,