HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES OF 05-23-88MINUTES OF AN AO~IOURNED REGULAR /~ETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN. ~LIFORNXA
mY 23, 1988
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Councilman Edgar at 5:02 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way.
II. ROLL CALL
Councilpersons Present:
Councilpersons Absent:
Others Present:
Richard B. Edgar
John Kelly
Earl J. Prescott
Ronald B. Hoesterey
Ursula E. Kennedy
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Approximately 2 in the audience
III. NEW BUSINESS
].o AWRRO OF CONTRACT FOR [MPROVEMENT OF EL CAHINO REAL 8ETWEEN MYFORO
ROAD AND JAMBOREE ROAD
Completion of E1 Camino Real between the E1 Modena Channel and
Jamboree Road in a timely manner is necessary in order to maintain
the scheduled opening of the first phase of the Tustin Marketplace
project.
Five bids were received at the bid opening on May 17, 1988, as
follows:
Griffith Company, Santa Aha
McGrew Construction, Anaheim
Sully-Miller Company, Orange
Blair Paving, Anaheim
Clayton Engineering, Laguna Hills
839,204.40
840,655.75
868,357.50
887,598.80
It was moved by Kelly, seconded by Prescott, to award the contract
to Griffith Company, Santa Aha, in the amount of SB2B,136.00 for the
subject project as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engi-
neering Division. The motion carried 3-0, Hoesterey and Kennedy
absent.
IV. ABOOURNMENT
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Prescott, to adjourn the meeting
at 5:05 p.m. to a Budget Workshop on June 6, 1988, at 5:00 p.m., and
thence to the next Regular Meeting on June 6, 1988, at 7:00 p.m.
Motion carried 3-0, Hoesterey and Kennedy absent.
RICHARD B. EDGAR, COUNCI~4RN
MARY E.~YN~ Ci~CLERK
MINIFI'E$ OF A REGULAR NEETING
OF llE CITY COUNCIL OF ~
CIl'f O~ TUSTIN. AIFORNIA
MAY Z, 1988
CALl. TO OROER/PLEDGE OF. ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
The m~eting was called to order by Mayor Hoesterey at 7:02 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers,.300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance was
led by Mayor Pro Tam Kennedy, and the Invocation was given by Councilman
Edgar.
II. ROLL CALL
Counctlpersons Present:
Counctl persons Absent:
Others Present:
Ronald 8. Hoesterey, Mayor
Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tam
Richard B. Edgar
John Kelly
Earl J. Prescott
None
William A. Huston, City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary £. Wynn, City Clerk
Christine Shingleton, Dtr. of Cum. Development
Fred Wakefield. Police Captain
Robe~ Ledendecker, Dlrector of Public Works
Royleen White, Dtr. of Comm. & Adm. Services
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Valerie Whiteman, Deputy City Clerk
Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent
Approximately 100 in the audience
III. PEOCLAI~TIONS
1. OLDER AMERICANS
Mayor Hoesterey read and presented the Proclamation to Katherine
Child, President of the Tuscin Senior Citizens Club; Estelle
Otckerson-Newboldt, President of Tustin American Association of
Retired Persons, Chapter 3479; and Nick Ogden, TLC Program. The
Proclamation designated the month of May, 1988, as "Tustin Older
Americans Month'. ~
2. FIRE SERVICE RECOGNITION DAY
Mayor Hoeste~ey read and presented the Proclamation to Fire Chief
McCoy. Fire Chief McCoy, on behalf of Fire Chief Larry Holms,
expressed appreciation for the Proclamation and invited the Council
and staff to attend the Fire Department's Open House on May 21,
1988. ll~e Proclamation designated May 1¢, 1988, as "Fire Service
Recognition Day". 84
IV. SPECIAL PRESENTATION FOR CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN ll4E MAYOR'S BEEN(FAST
Representatives from the Chamber of Commerce and Jaycees were not
in attendance for the presentation. 84
V. PUBLIC NEARI N6
1. ZONING ORDINANCE N~ENDHENT 87-4 (CULTURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT)
Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, gave a
staff report indicating that this item, after review by Council on
March 7, 1988, was referred back to the Planning Comtission for
additional modifications. For the benefit of those in the audience
not present on March 7, a background report was given. This program
was initiated at the request of the City Council in October, 1986,
in response to issues raised regarding development proposals in the
Old Town area. The specific objective was to design zoning
requirements to retain the character of Old Town, reduce potential
land-use conflicts and preserve historical resources. The City
Council adopted a moratorium on subdivisions, zone changes and
land-use changes and requested staff to begin the necessary zoning
CITY COUNCIL MINUTEc
Page 2, 5-2-B8
code amendments. After community workshops and extensive staff
research, a draft ~rdinance was prepared and presented to the
community in December, 1987. After receiving input from the
community, the ordinance was modified to )neet co~nunity concerns and
referred to the Planning Co~mnission. The Planning Coanission held
a Public Hearing on February 8, 1g~8, and made their recommendation
to the Council on March 7, 1988.
The Public Hearing was opened by Mayor Hoesterey at 7:22 p.m. The
following spoke in favor of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 87-4 for
reasons that included preservation of historic homes and
neighborhoods, availability of low interest loans, tax benefits for
merchants and owners, increased property values, and community
pride.
John Sauers, 515 S. Pacific, Tustin
Richard and Sally Vintng, 400 West Main, Tustin
Alan Curl, 3720 Orange, Riverside
Ruth Harmon, 1327~ Fairmont Way, Tustin
deff Thompson, 405 West 6th, Tustin
There were no other speakers on the matter and the Public Hearing
was closed at 7:48 p.m.
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt the
following:
RESOLUTION NO. 80-16 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION'AS
ADEQUATE FOR ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 87-4 INCLUDING REQUIRED
FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE ~LIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Councilman Edgar voiced his opposition to the concept of
incorporating a commertcal area and wanted to approve the Resolution
without being committed to the land-use.
The motion carried 3-0, Kelly and Prescott abstained.
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded b~y Edgar, that Ordinance No.
have first reading by title only. The motion carried 3-0, Kelly and
Prescott abstained. Following first reading by title only of
Ordinance No. ~001 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy,
seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 100! be introduced as
follows:
OROII~RNCE NO. 100! - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ZONING ORDINANCE /44ENDMENT 87-4
AMENDING PART 5 AND 7 OF CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE g OF THE TUSTIN
MUNICIPAL CODE AS IT RELATES TO CULTURAL RESOURCES.
The motion carried 3-0, Kelly and Prescott abstained.
Councilman Edgar stated his quandry was forcing people in the
commercial area into the district and proposed an amendment to
delete the commercial area. He would not support the Ordinance
without the amendment.
It was moved by Edgar that an amendment deleting the commerical area
be added to proposed Ordinance NO. 1001. (No second was made).
Mayor Hoesterey stated that because the commerical district is a
"window" to the area and there are historical buildings there, he
did not want to delete the commerical district. Future amendments
could be made if necessary. He supported the Ordinance as presented
by the Planning Commission.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy felt it was a mistake to separate the
commercial district from the cultural overlay district. She had not
received input from any business expressing either inclusion or
deletion from the district. Commerical property owners had
participated in the planning workshops and it would be a great folly
to separate these two districts. The fragile center of the town
COUNt IL MINUTES 5-2-88
VI.
mu.st be protected and she urged Councilman Edgar, because he had the
deciding vote, to keep the two districts together,
Councilman Edgar repeated that he was in favor of an overlay
district to protect the homes in the downtown area, but he could not
vote against his conscience by forcing the commerical people into
the district.
Mayor Pro Tom Kennedy asked if a two week continuance would be
acceptable in order to receive input from the commercial area.
Christine Shtngleton informed Council that proper' notice had been
given regarding the Public Hearing and the executive summary of the
proposed Ordinance had been sent. She indicated, if directed, her
willingness to speak to the individual tenants. A timeline longer
than· two Weeks would be required to accomplish this task.
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to continue this item
at Ge June 5, ~988, meeting. The motion carried 3-0, Kelly and
Prescott abstained. IlO
PUBLIC IMpbrl'
USE PI[RMIT 88°5 (VINEYARD CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP)
Sally Vtning, 400 W. Main Street, Tustin, asked that an EIR be
completed regarding concentration of churches in the downtown area
and the number of hours for services.
Christine Shingleton stated that the Council did certify the
conq)letton of the negative declaration and a notice of determination
had been ffledo All provisions of the Californl~ E~tvir~mmef)~jl
Quality Act had been met and she recommended that the matter not he
opened for further discussion, 43
PRESERVATION OF REOMOOO TREES - EAST IIJSTIN COI~IUNITY PARK AREA
Richard Vtning, 400 W. Main Street, Tustin, was concerned about the
redwood trees in the area of the East Tustin community park and
wanted to insure their preservation.
Christine Shingleton stated that both the environmental document and
East Tustin Specific Plan reinforces the preservation of the redwood
grove in conjunction with future community park sites or other
community facilities.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy asked that the trees be watched careful)y and
are not unnecessarily medically treated. ~
3. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM MO. 3 (FiliAL TRACT I~P NO. 12870)
Joseph Herzig requested that Item No. 3, Approval of Final Tract Map
No. 12B70, be pulled from the Consent Calendar.
Mayor Hoesterey stated that Mr. Herzig could speak on Item No. 3
during the Consent Calendar portion of the agenda. 99
4. GO-KART RACES
Kevin Shetn, Championship Kart Racing Association, informed the
Council that filing of a temporary use permit For the
Franklin/Walnut site had been completed and quotes for insurance in
the requested amount were being obtained.
,5. CONCERN REGARDING COUNCILMAN KELLY"S CAMPAIGN BANNERS
Theodore Fessler, 275 Centennial Way, Tustin, expressed his concern
regarding the banners displayed at Councilman Kelly's campaign
headquarters. As property manager of Larwin Square, several of his
tenants had complained to him about this disregard for existing
laws. After speaking wit~ Councilman Kelly about the matter, he
was extremely concerned about conflict of interest and asked Chat
C[TY COUNC[L MIItUTE~
Page 4, 5-g-88
Councilman Kelly resign his position on the Council and [hen
contlnue his campaign for Congress.
Councilman Kelly stated he would not respond; that there were ,~ore
important items on the agenda for discussion.
Mayor Hoesterey said that he had become dismayed with the articles
in the newspapers regarding this situation. He felt that when
Councilman Kelly took his oath of office he swore to uphold the
laws, but his actions indicate that he intended to break the law
when he displayed the banners and moved into a condemned building.
The Mayor stated that to remain silent at this time would be to
condone Councilman Kelly's activities.
Councilman Kelly stated that he was not aware he was breaking the
law and will continue to go forth. He felt that the existing laws
covering this matter needed to be eliminated,
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy stated that she had received telephone calls
questtonntng a situation that allows one councilperson to break the
laws that they are responsible for enforcing. It has been an
'embarrassment and she looked forward to Councilman Kelly taking
steps to change the laws in an orderly way.
Greg Kelly~ 330 E1 Camino Real, Tustin, spoke in favor of his
brother's position.
Judy Karwelis, 17891 Allegheny, Tustin, stated that Councilman
Kelly is responsible for upholding the laws.
Jerry Well spoke regarding the obeisance of City laws.
6. PRESERVATION OF HOME AT 14851 YORBA STREET
93¸
Jeff Frank, 12032 Sky Lane, Santa Ara, asked for assistance from the
City regarding the. preservation of the home at I4851 Yorba Street,
which he is attempting to purchase. He will need to have the house
moved to a location that will requirf a lot-split. He al so
questioned the amount of $8,000 in permit fees for the lot-split.
Christine Shingleton indicated that the property requiring the
lot-split is located in the County jurisdiction. [f she could
receive a contact name from Mr. Frank, she would assist him in his
discussions with the County.
Mr. Frank indicated an additional problem of electrical and cable
television lines during the move and asked for assistance from the
City.
Mayor Hoesterey, with Council concurrence, directed staff to work
with Mr. Frank in dealing with the various agencies involved.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy restated the Council's commitment to saving
this house and she was upset with the previous information given to
the Council indicating that this home had been damaged beyond repair
by termites. She intends to obtain an explanation. 31
CONSENT CALENOAR
Item .3 was removed from the Consent Calendar at the request of Joseph
Herzig, and Item 11 was removed by Edgar. It was moved by Kennedy,
seconded by Edgar, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
The motion carried 5-0.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - APRIL 18, 1988, REGULAR MEETING
2. APPROVAL OF DEMANOS IN THE AMOUNT OF $999,587.43
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $178,245.46 50
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
P 5, 5-2-88
REJECT[ON OF O. AIM NO. 88-4; C[J~IMAJJT - ALLEN ~INKSCALE; DATE OF
LOSS - 11/9/87; DAlE FILED WZl~l CZTY - 1/25/~
Rejected subject clatm for property damage in the amount of
$3,321.17 as recommended by the City Attorney. 40
5. RES~UTION NO. 80-46 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, TERMINATING FAIRHAVEN AVENUE ANNEXATION NO.
144.
Adopted Resolution No. 88-46 as recommended by the City
Attorney. 24
RESOI. UTION NO. 88-47 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, TERMINATING PROSPECT AVENUE ANNEXATION NO.
145.
Adopted Resolution NO. ~-47 as recommended by the City
Attorney. 24
7. RESOLUTION NO. ~-~ - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIM, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
SIDEWALK AND CURB AND GUTTER REPAIR PROJECT, lg87-88 FISCAL YEAR,
AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIOS.
Adopted Resolution No. 88-48 as recommended by the Public Works
Department/Engineering Division. 92
8. [MPROVEJ~NTS BY ORANGE (COUNTY IN EL NOOENA-IRVINE OIANNEL AND IN
RED HILL C~L
Approved the County project for construction of improvements in
E1 Modena-Irvine Channel (FO7) and in Red Hill Channel (F13) as
recommended by the Public Work~ Department/Engineering
Oivislon. 67
RESOLUTION NO. 88-49 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CIFY COUNCIL OF TIlE CIFY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING PREPARATION OF AN ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR THE LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE [g88-89 FISCAL YEAR FOR
THE TUST[N I.~NOSCAPE AND LIGHTING OISTRICT.
Adopted Resolution No. 88-49 as recommended by the Public Works
Department/Engineering Division. 63
10. RESOI. UTIOM NO. 8~,-51 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, O~LIFORNIA, REQUESTING CONSENT OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODIES
OF THE CITY OF ORANGE AND THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO THE FORMATION OF
AND WORK RELATING TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.
86-2, THE ASSESSMENT ON THE LJkNO THEREIN. AND THE ASSUMPTION OF
JURISDICTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSESSING CERTAIN LAND IN THE CITY
OF ORANGE ANO THE COUNTY OF ORANGE LYING WITHIN SUCH ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT.
Adopted Resolution No. 88-51 as prepared by the City Attorney.
25
12. AGREF_~IEIET ~ll'H IRgD ~ INSTALLATION OF FACILITIES IN EL CAMINO
REAL
Approved an agreement with the Irvine Ranch Water District
providing for installation of domestic water and reclaimed
water facilities in E1 Camino Real between Myford Road and
Jamboree Road as recommended by the Public Work~
Department/Engineering Division. 107
Consent Calendar Item No. 3 - Resolution No. 88-45
Joseph Herzig expressed his concern with subject tract map regarding
potential flood problems. He submitted a letter to the Council.
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Prescott to adopt the following -
as reco~nended by the Community Development Department:
3. RESOLUTION NO. 88-45 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP NO. ~2870.
The motion carried 5-0. g9
CITY C~UNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 5-2-88
Consent Calendar Item No. 11 - Resolution No. 88-50
Counct(man Edgar was concerned about the destruction of City Council
and Planning Commission minutes.
City Attorney Rourke assured him that these were copies being destroyed
and the official records were retained in the City Clerk's office.
Councilman Prescott suggested that the copies be offered to the
Historical Society.
It wms moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt the following as
recommended by the Public Wor~s Department/Engineering Division:
RI[SOI. UTIO# NO. 80-50 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, C~LIFORNIA, APPROVING DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC
WORKS DEPARTMENT RECORDS.
The motion carried 5-0.
86
VIII. OROINANCES FOR II~rRoOUCTION - None
IX. OROINANCES FOR ADOPTION - None
X. OLD BUSINESS
1. ,)IiA NOISE MDMITORING PROGRAm! - STATUS Rt~PORT
Christine Shingleton reported there was no change in status.
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to receive and file
subject report. The motion carried 5-0.
2. AUI)IT CO~IITTEE APPOINTMENTS
Mayor Hoesterey stated that applicants had been interviewed on
April 18, [988, by the City Council. Voting on the candidates
would be public information. He directed the Council to submit
the three names of their choice in writing and sign their ballot.
The three individuals receiving the highest number of votes 'would
be appointed to the Audit Committee.
Before the vote, it was moved by Prescott, seconded by Edgar, that
a fourth position of alternate be added to the committee and scoff
agendlze an amendment to Resolution 87-131 reflecting that change.
The motion carried 5-0. 27
Following is the tabulation of votes for committee members:
Evelyn Feldman (4 votes), Frank Greinke (3 votes), Jerry Weil (3
votes), Thomas Mulcahy {2 votes), Anthony Pagano {1 vote), William
Daly (1 vote), and Walter Sullens ([ vote).
Following is the tabulation of votes for alternate:
Walter Sullens (4 voteS) and Anthony Pagano {1 vote}.
The following will serve on the Audit Co~nittee: Evelyn Feldman,
Frank Greinke and Jerry Well. Walter Sullens will serve as
alternate.
A question was raised from the audience as to the term of office.
Staff will report 'back to Council this information.
NEWPORT AVENUE/MCFAOOEN AVENUE UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. [0
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar ~o continue this item at
the May 16, 1988, meeting. The motion carried 5-0.
Councilman Edgar asked if a response from Mrs. O'Dell had been
received by staff.
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works, indicated that she
CIT-¥ COUNCIL MINUT[S
Pi 7, 5-2-88
was still out of town and staff had not been able to make full
contact with the utility involved. Thus, the reason for
redOmmendtng contihuanca. 104
XZ. N[W BUSINESS
XlI.
1. ~TIN-IRVINE~ (TIO) I4EI~ORANOUM ~ UNDERSTANI)IRG FOR F'O(YFHILL
EASTERN TI~$PORTATION CORRIOOR
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kelly, to approve the Memorandum
of Understandfng between the Cities of Tustin, Irvine, and Orange
regarding the implementation of the Foothill/Eastern Transportation
Corridor subject to final approval by the City Attorney as
reco~ended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division.
The following spoke in opposition to the Memorandum of
Understanding with concerns including lack of community
participation in the negotiations of the MOu, air and noise
pollution, size and proximity to homes of the Jamboree expressway,
water and drainage problems, lack of an EIR for Peters Canyon, and
future upgrading of the Jamboree expressway:
Carole Katz, tBO1 Bridle Path, Santa Ara
Frank Cate, [0204 Overhill, Santa Ara
Jerome Dully, [06[[ Equestrian, Santa Ara
Francine Passer, 1772 Slrrine, Santa Ara
Mayor Hoesterey stated that the City of TuSttn is only one of a
nu~er of agencies making a recon~nendation to Cite Trar~sportation
Commission. The EIR will be completed and public comments will be
made at the level of the agency making the decisions as to future
alignments of the corridors.
The motion carried
It was moved by Prescott, seconded by Kelly, that, as an addition to
the original motion, Councilman Edgar write a cover letter to
arc.any the MOU.
Councilman Edgar stated that this MOU represents several years of
interface between himself, representing the City of Tustin, and the
cities of Irvine and Orange. The Cities had tried to reach an
appropriate compromise that would accommodate traffic and, at the
same time, have minimal environmental impact. This MOU is not a
final decision, the final decision will be made by the
Transportation Corridor Agency.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy said she felt that the City of Tustin had done
more than its share of solving regional traffic problems. She
regretted having to approve the MOU; and, if the expressway was
moved even slightly closer to Tustin or the City loses t~e eastern
leg of this new plan, she would gather local support and help defe~t
this plan.
The motion carried 5-0.
101
2. 1988-89 BUDGET WORIC~IOP
Council concurred that the Budget Workshop would be on June 6,
~988, at 5:00 p.m. 29
3. COALITIOR 95 b'~EER'ING COI~I411'rEE - CITY COUNCIL APPOINTHENT
[t was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Mayor Pro Tem
Kennedy be appointed to the Coalition 95 Steering Committee. The
motion carried 5-0.
The Coalition will gather information regarding off-shore oil
leasing. 38
REPORTS
PLANNING COF~IISSION ACTION AGENOA - APRIL Z~, 1988
CITY COUNCIL MINUTr~
Page 8, 5-2-88
Al'l actions, of the Planning Commission become final unless appealed
by the City Council or member of the public.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy requested tbat Item No. 6 (Tustin Market
Place) be pulled from the Action Agenda.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to ratify the
remainder of tbe Planning Commission Action Agenda of April 25,
[988. The motion carried 5-0.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy expressed her concerns over the unusual design
of the project. The Council, when presented a very sophisticated
plan, had requested it be toned down. She was extremely disappointed
that the Planning Commission had allowed 90 ft. towers that would be
covered in aluminum and painted. The Planning Commission also
allowed use of accent colors such as purple, pink and limo green.
She felt these colors need to be used with extreme caution,
especially when covering huge walls. She did not want to appeal
this item, but asked Council to agree on very careful monitoring of
this project.
Mayor Hoesterey stated he shared the samo views. The project
presented was not the same one going forward now. Prior discussions
bad included that accent colors would only be used at entrance ways,
not on massive walls.
Kathy Well, Chairman of the Planning C~=Hssion, stated that the
Commission had been told there were no changes from the original
model and additional colors had not been added.
Christine Shtngleton indicated that this matter had been brought
the Planning Commission because of the assurance that use of color,
not the palette, would be toned down. The renderings appeared
show that there were larger vertical surface areas with color Chert
had been originally viewed. The Planning Commission delayed their
decision regarding the parameter walls.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to ratify Item No. 6
with the provision that regular reports on the project are provided
to Council. The motion carried S-O. 80
2. PICIO~ICI~ RANOR, &OOFATHER'S B,qR HOISE COlq~AINT
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file.
The motion carried 5-0. 42
3. STATUS R~PORT - SAN DIEGO PIPELINE INSTALLATION
Richard Vlning stated his concerns regarding the level of
performance of San Oiego Pipeline, particularly in the area of
regrinding road surfaces.
Mayor Hoesterey stated that final grinding and resurfacing will take
place on May 2, 1988, and direct'ed staff to monitor.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy had received telephone calls from residents
regarding road conditions and the mud on Bryan has not been cleaned
up. She suggested perhaps a financial penalty against San Diego
Pipeline.
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to explore financial
penalties against San Diego Pipeline and direct San Diego Pipeline
to restore roads, remove mud from south side of Bryan, and repaint
curbing. The motion carried 4-0, Kelly absent. 45
4. COI4P[TITIVE BI0 PROCESS '- FULRKEO PATROL UNIT PURCHASE
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to receive and file.
The motion carried 5-0. 82
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
P g, 5-2-88
PETERS CANYON REGIONAL PARK STATUS
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to receive and file.
The motion carried 5-0. 77
6. REPORT .REGARDING SI'UOENT INTERN PROGRN4
Councilman Prescott thanked staff for a well-done report and
requested that this item be tabled until a response was received
from the Tustin Unified School District.
Mayor Pro Tam Kennedy stated her interest was in an annual
Government Awareness Day or college level internship program. She
did not feel a high school program would be appropriate because of
the cost to the City.
Mayor Hoesterey supported the college-level interns,-but did not
have enoug~ information at this time to recommend a program ?or high
school students.
Councilman Prescott requested permission to pursue this matter at
the high school level with the school district. Council concurred.
XIII. OTI~R B~ZNE$S
1. NAILING OF C[TY STREETS
Mayor Pro Tam Kennedy requested agendtzlng the procedures required
to name a City street, g6
2. REQUESTS FOR TRANSCRIPTS OF COUNCIL t4EETINGS
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy requested agendiztng preparation of a policy
governing requests for transcripts of Council meetings, 37
TIMELINE OF DOCUNENTA~IOll ~ PA~K ADVISORY CO~I(ISSION
Councilman Edgar asked for status on ordinance to create the
Commission.
City Attorney Rourke will have the information for Council as soon
as possible. 76
REINSTATEMENT OF PUBLIC COFFEE POT IN COUNCIL O~4BERS
Councilman Prescott requested that coffee be available for the
public during Council meetings. Council concurred. 39
5. TREES ALONG CENll~NNIAJ. WAY
Councilman Prescott noted that there are three trees on Centennial
Way that are different from the others. Me requested replacement
for conformity of bloom.
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy verified that he meant by natural attrition.
Mayor Hoesterey requested that Robert Ledendecker check into the
matter. 86
XIV. REC[SS - REDEVELOPMENT - AOdOURNMENT
At I0:07 p.m., it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to recess to
the Redevelopment Agency, and thence to a joint workshop with the
Planning Commission on Monday, May 16, 1988, at 5:00 p.m., and thence
adjourn to the next Regular Meeting on Monday, May 16, 1988, at 7:00
p.m. The motion carried 5-0.
MINUTES OF A REC~ULAR ~ETING
OF lltE REOEVELOPM(ENT AJ~ENCY OF
THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
MAY 2, 1988
1. CALL TO OI~ER
The meeting was c.alled to order by Chairman Hoesterey at 10:07 p.m. in
the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California.
ROLL CALL
Agency Members Present:
Agency Members Absent:
Others Present:
Ronald B. Hoesterey, Chairperson
Ursula E. Kennedy, Chairperson Pro Tem
Richard B. Edgar
John Kelly
Earl J. Prescott
None
William A. Huston, City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Christine Shingleton, Dir. of Comm. Development
Fred Wakefield, Police Captain
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Royleen White, Dir. of Comm. & Adm. Services
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Valerie Whiteman, Deputy City Clerk
Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent
Approximately 30 in the audience
3, A.oPROVA4. OF MINUTES - APRIL 18, ~988, REGULAR I~EETING
5e
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to approve the Minutes of
the April 18, 1988, meeting. The motion carried 5-0.
AJ~PROYAJ. OF DEMANDS IN 171E AMOUNT 'OF $165,717.64
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to approve subject demands
in the amount of $165,717.64 as recommended by the Finance Department.
The motion carried 5-0. 60
OTHER BUSINESS - None
ADJOURN~NT
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to adjourn at 10:08 p.m. to
the next Regular Meeting on Monday, May 16, 195~, at 7:00 p.m. The
motion carried 5-0.