Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 06-06-88NINUTE$ OF A REGULAR I~ET[NG OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CZTY ~ TUSTZN, CAL[FORNXA JUNE 6, 1988 CALL TO OROER/PLEDG£ OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION The meeting was called to' order by Mayor Hoesterey at 7:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Hoesterey, and the Invocation was given by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. ROLL CALL Counctlpersons Present: II. Councilpe~sons Absent: Others Present: III. PUBLIC NEARINGS - None IV. PUBLIC INPUT - Ronald B. Hoesterey, Mayor Ursula ED Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar John Kelly Earl J. Prescott None William A. Huston, City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, city Clerk Christine Shingleton, Oir. of Comm. Development Fred Wakefield, Acting Chief of Police Robert Ledendecker, Director Of Public Works Royleen White, Diro of Comm. & Adm. Services Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Alan Watts, Deputy City Attorney Pablo Rodrtguez, Field Services Manager Valerie Whiteman, Deputy City Clerk Lloyd Dick, Building Official Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent Approximately 40 in the audience SKA~BOA~J)I#G ON CITY HALL GROUND~ ARO IN CITY PARKS Helen Edgar, 13622 Loretta Drive, Tustin, voiced her concern about skateboard use on the City Hall complex grounds and in the City parks. Mayor Hoesterey directed the Public Works Department to investigate the situation. TRUCI(~ PARIOEO ON ~EOFORO AVENUE BETWEEN YOR~R A~9) CARROLL DiAY Helen Edgar reported the continuous parking of trucks on Medford Avenue between Yorba Street add Carroll Way. Mayor Hoesterey directed the Police Department to investigate the situation for enforcement of 2C-hour parking ordinance. 3. GRAFFITI ON BLOCK WALL ON I~EOFORO AVENUE BETWEEN YORBA/CARROLL WAY . Helen Edgar reported the existence of new graffiti on the block wall on Medford Avenue between Yorba Street and Carroll Way. Mayor Hoesterey directed staff to remove the graffiti as soon as possible. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy indicated Council would fund any new monies needed for 9mmediate removal of the graffiti. CITY COUNCIL MINUTKS Page 2, 6-6-B8 4. HIGi( DENSITY DE HALF-WAY HOUSES IN THE VICINITY DE LINOA LANE Walter Davis, 17551 Linda Lane, repotted to Council that the neighborhood was concerned about the density of drug/alcohol rehabilitation, juvenile and bed-and-board facilities in their area. There are a total of five such houses in close proximity. In ,their attempt to gain information about these houses and the responsible agencies, a letter was received stating that if the addition of an agency house is within 300 feet of an existing one, the City can ask for a denial. Mr. Davis requested that Council dir9ct the City Attorney to research the situation and act on this information to reduce, if possible, the density in the area. Mayor Hoesterey requested that Mr. Davis meet with Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, and, along with the information he has gathered, work together to ascertain the City's options to act in this matter. After further discussion, Mayoc Hoesterey also directed staff to agendize this item as soon as possible. CONSENT CALENDAR Item 6 was removed from the Consent Calendar by Councilman Kelly and Item 17 by Councilman Edgar. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded b~ Prescott, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. The motio~ carried 5-0. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 8, 1988. ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING MAY 16, 1988, REGULAR MEETING MAY 23, 1988, ADJOURNED I(EGULAR MEETING 2. APPROVAL OF'DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,159,294.25 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $357,627.64 3. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. '88-6; CLAI~ANT-KEITH NEIL$ON, DATE OF L055-!/22/88, DATE FILED WITH CIT¥-1/28/88 Rejected subject claim for property damages in the amount of $361.24 as recommended by the City Attorney. 4. REJECTION OF CLAIM *RD. 88-8; CLAII~/UIT-LAURIE CROSBY, DATE OF LOSS-2/g/88, OATE FILEO WITH CITY-2/16/88 Rejected subject claim of an undetermined amount as recommended by the City Attorney. 5. REJECTION OF CLAIM ND. 88-10; ClAIMANT-RAYMOND GOLON, DATE OF LOSS-1/18/88, DATE FILED WITH CLTY-2/16/88 Rejected subject claim of an undetermined amount as recommended by the City Attorney. 7. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 88-13; CLAIMANT-PACIFIC BELL, DATE OF kO$S-12/lg/DT, DATE FILED WITH CITY-2/22/88 Rejected subject claim for property damages in the amount of $1,676.08 as recommended by the City Attorney. 8. REJECTION OF CLAIM ND. 88-15; CLAIF~UfT-ROBERT JONES, DATE OF L055-2/15/88, DATE FILED WITH CITY-2/26/88 Rejected subject claim for property damages in the amount of sgo.o0 as recommended by the City Attorney. g. REJECTION OF CLAIM MU. 88-18; CLAIMA/f~-BRUCE JEFFERS, DATE OF L055-12/12/87. DATE FILED WITH CITY-3/g/B8 Rejected subject claim for property damages in the amount of $1,517.27 as recommended by the City Attorney. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 88--1g: CLAIMANT-MAOELINE O'DAY, DATE OF L055-2/10/88, DATE FILED WITH CITY-3/9/80 Rejected subject claim of an undetermined amount as recommended by the City Attorney. 10. CI~ COUNCIL MINUTES P, 3, 6-6-88 11. RE,1ECTIOI~ OF CLAIM NO. 88-23; CLJ~IMAI~f-rJ~IS~TIN BERGFORO, OATE OF LO$S-2/lg/88, OAl~[ FILEO WITI( CITY-3/2g/88 Rejected subject claim of an undetermined amount as recommended by the City Attorney. 12. REJE~IOM OF CLJkIM NO. 8~)-31; CtJ~Ila-RNT-PACIFIC BELL, OATE OF LOSS-2/19/88, OATE FILED WITH CITY-5/iO/B8 Rejected subject claim for property damages in the amount of $1,823.60 as recommended by the City Attorney. 13, CITY OF llJSTXl~ IN1/[STMENT POLICY Received and filed the Statement of Investment Policy as recommended by the Director of Finance. 14. PARKING CITATION PROCESSING SERVICE Authorized execution of the contract amendment with Turbo Oata Systems, Inc. for increased costs involved with parking citation processing due to process changes authorized by law as recommended by the Police Department. RESOLbrr10# NO. 88-64 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CJ~LIFORNIA, ADOPTING STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION Adopted Resolution No. 88-64 adopting Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 15. 13LAJISirER/PURCIIAS£ OF OFFICE EOJIPMENT Au'tl~orized (I,) the transfer of a Hewlett Packard 150 computer together with software and LaserJet printer from the Field Services office to the Water Division; and (gl approved the purchase of an' Apple letter quali.ty printer for the Field Services office as recoeanended by the Public Works Department/Field Services Division. 18. R£SOLUTIOI~ NO. 80-58 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 13[6[. Approved Final Tract Map No. 13161 by the adoption of Resol uti on No. 88-58 as recommended by the CommurH ty Development Department. 19. RESOLUTION NO. 88-59 - A RESOLUTION OF TH'E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 88-179 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SEVENTEENTH STREET, 370 FEET EAST OF ENDERLE CENTER WAY. Approved Tentative Parcel Map 88u179 by the adoption of Resolution No. 88-59 as recommended by the Community Development Department. 20. R£SOLUTION NO. 88-57 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13096. RESOLUTION NO. ~-63 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT {EIR) FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN IS ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS THE PROGRAM EIR FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13096 AND ALL FEASIBLE MITIC~RTION MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS REQUIRED DY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. Approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map 13096 by adoption of Resolution No. 88-57 and approved the environmental determination for project by adoption of Resolution No. 88-63 as recommended by the Community Development Department. Consent Calendar Item No.'6 - Rejection of Claim 88-11 (Carmen Barnett) Councilman Kelly was concerned about claims for tree damages in general. He specifically referred to the three eucalyptus trees in front of the McCharles House. It had been recommended by staff, approximately 3 years ago, that the trees be removed. The City Council at that time overturned the recommendation. His concern now was for the current City Council's legal responsibility if those trees should cause damage on private property. CITY COUNCIL MINUT~ Page 4, 6-6-88 VI. Mayor Pro Tom Kennedy reported that the trees were saved when the Historical Society and ~ther residents in the downtown area wanted to preserve them. After further discussion, it was moved by Kelly, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the following: 6. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. B8-11; CLAIMANT-CARMEN BARNEI-I', DATE OF LOSS-1/17/88, DATE FILED WIl~l CITY-2/19/88 Rejected subject claim for property damages in the anount of $748.34 as recommended by the City Attorney. The motion carried 5-0. Consent CalenJ~r Item No. 17 - Consultant Agreement for Development of Pav~n~ Ranag~nt System It was m_oved by Edgar, seconded by Hoestere~, to approve the following: 17. CONSULTANT AGREEHENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF PAVEMENT t~NAGEMENT SYSTEM Approved selection of DS1 Consultants, Inc, for professional services (or development of the pavement management system at a fee not to exceed $31,500, and authorized execution of a consultant agreement by the Mayor and City Clerk as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. Councilman Edgar asked for clarification from staff if this agreement would provide a quantified numeric system for improvements of all roads within the. City. Bob Ledendecker, Public Works Director, confirmed the program will be implemented in 5-year increments. Councilma~ Edgar expected that this agreement would provide an inventory of the entire City with a tabulation of those streets most critical for the first year. The $380,000 budgeted for this item will be adequate to cover the expense. He asked what was the expected timeline for completion. Mr. LedendeckeF estimated approximately go days. He added that within the plan are provisions for training City staff to update the program. The motion carried 5-0. ORDINANCES FOR INTROOUCTION 1. CO#NUNITY SERVICES COMI~IS$10N OROINANCE NO. 1009 The'City Council previously took action to reestablish a Con~nunity Services Commissi on. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Prescott, that Ordinance No. 1009 have" first reading by title only. The motion carried 5-0. Following first ~eading by title only of Ordin~'Rce No. 1009 by. the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 1009 be introduced as follows: ORDItLRNCE ~1). 1009 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADDING PART V, CONSISTING OF SECTIONS 1551 THROU(~H 1557, TO CHAPTER 6 OF ARTICLE I OF THE .TUSTIN CITY CODE TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION. The motion carried 4-1, Hoesterey opposed. Councilman Edgar stated the press should be utilized in seeking applicants for the Con~nission and suggested that the interviews be set for the July 18, ~988, Council Meeting. Council concurred. COUNCIL MINUTES 5, 6-6-88 ZONI.NG O~U)zNANCE N4ENDMENT 87-4 (CULTURAL RESOURCES OZSTR[CT) The City Council at their regular meeting on May 2, 19~18, reviewed proposed Zoning Ordinance ~nendmenC 87-4. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar,- that Ordinance No. 1001 have first reading by title only. The motion carried 3-0, Kelly and Prescott abstained. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 1001 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 1001 be introduced as fo110WS: ORDI#ANCE NO. 1001 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 87-4 AMENDING PART 5 AND 7 OF CHAPTER 2, ART[CLE 9 OF THE TUSTIN MUNICIPAL CODE AS IT RELATES TO CULTURAL RESOURCES. Councilman Edgar commended staff for a very thorough survey. He asked if the survey had been sent to every business owner. Christine Shtngleton, Director of Community Development, stated the three components of those surveyed, either through mailing or contact in the field, consisted of business owners, property owners and tenants. The percentage of business and property owner respondents that either supported the Ordinance or had no opinion was 65% of the total number surveyed. The motion carried 3-0, Kelly and Prescott abstained. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy asked that staff establish the criteria for membership on the Cultural Resources Advisory Committee and advertise ?or applicants. CITY ORDINANCE 1008 -ADOITION TO TUSTIN MUNICIPAL CODE 4930 PERTAIRING TO CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL, PUBLIC WATER sYSTEMS The State of California revised its Regulations relating to Cross-Connection, more specifically, California Administrative Code Title 17, Sections 7583 through 7605, inclusive. The effective date of' the revised regulations was June 25, 1987. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 1008 have first reading by title only. ' Ime motion carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 1008 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded, by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 1008 be introduced as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1008 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM, THEREBY ADDING CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4930 TO THE TUSTIN MUNICIPAL CODE, TO PROTECT ZHE PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM WITHIN THE CITY'S WATER SYSTEM AREA The motion carried 5-0. Vll. ORJ)INANCES FOR A~OPTION 1. ADOPTION OF FIRE COOES - ORDINANCE NO. 997 The following Ordinance No. 997 had first reading and introduction at the May 16, 1988, meeting. It was moved 'by Kelly, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 997 have second reading by title only as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 997 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF ARTICLE 5 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE AND ADOPTING THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS, 1985 EDITIONS, WITH AMENDMENTS THERETO AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE 1987 SUPPLEMENT AS THE FIRE PROTECTION REGULATIONS. The motion carried 5-0. CITY ~OUNCIm MINUW Page 6, 6-6-88 VIII. Ol.O 1. Steve Lefever, representing the Irvine Co., requested a 30-day continuance On adoption of Ordinance No. 997 in order to clarify the application of the Ordinance and what systems will be used. Christine Shingleton,. Director of Community Development, concurred and offered to meet with the Irvine Co. to discuss their questions. It was moved by Edgar~ seconded by Hoesterey, that this item be continued to the July 5, 1988, Council Meeting. The motion carried BUSINESS AIRPORT STATUS R~PORT - JWA, JOINT USE/EL TORO, AIRPORT SITE COALITION Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, indicated that the staff report, in addition to the JWA Noise Monitoring Program, also contains status reports on other activities that impact air traffic in the region. These include activity reports on meetings of "Coalition for a Responsible Airport Solution (CRAS)" which is focused on opposing joint use of MCAS E1 Toro and the Airport Site Coalition (ASC) whose program is to find a solution by consensus for an additional airport site or sites to service Orange County. This additional information will be included in future status reports to Council. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy felt that is was necessary to have a City representative attend meetings of both CRAS and ASC. She was disappointed that the ASC meetings were held on Saturdays and asked · if it would be influential to request that the meetings he held during regular business hours. Christine Shingleton indicated that ASC had requested input for a convenient meeting schedule because of displeasure expressed by others regarding the Saturday meeting time. She felt it would be very effective to direct a letter to ASC requesting evening meetings as opposed to Saturdays. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that (1} the City send a repre§entative to all CRAS and ASC meetings, (2) a letter be forwarded to ASC requesting the meeting schedule be changed from Saturdays to weekday evenings, (3) the City support the model resolution submitted for adoption by CRAS and (4) receive and file subject report. The motion carried 5-0. THE ROLE OF 194£ CITY IN ENFORCING CC&R'S Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, stated that the Planning Commission,. over the past several months, had discussed the City's role related to Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions. Under the Planning Commission's revised language, the City would be included as a party to CC&R's for enforcement of only those provisions in which the City has an interest, such as maintenance and nuisance provisions. The City would also not be obligated to enforce the CC&R's, which is a new provision. She also pointed out that the City has a prior practice of involvement in enforcement of CC&R's. The Planning Co~nission is requesting clarification and direction from the Council as to the role of the City. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy felt that the City should not enforce CC&R's, except when the health and safety aspect becomes an issue or when it appears that a financial plan is weak. She was interested in hearing input from Kathy or Jerry Well. Jerry Weit, 1702 Summerville Ave., Tustin, felt the concept was that the Associations are responsible for maintaining the property values of the residents in their area. The City becomes involved when there is a problem with a def~mct Association or Association leadership that does not unders'tand their responsibilities. The concept on which the Planning Co~nission and staff worked was how ~[TY COUNCIL MINUTES ~ 7, 6-6-8B IX. to ~orce the Associations to meet their responsibilities. He felt the document before Council was a reasonable compromise of inde- pendence for Associations and. protection of the City's interests that areas do not become blighted due to lack of Association enforcement, Christine Shingleton added that the standard language, included for future projects, stipulates that any changes to the Association's obligation for maintenance of common areas would be an item within the discretion of the City's ability to review. That language is included in the revision to protect the City's interest in common Mayor Hoesterey stated he could foresee the possibility of an asso- ciation becoming very weak and neglecting enforcement. There may be a benefit to at least have the City as a member of that asso- ciation. Jerry Weil suggested adding language at the beginning of the docu- ment to the effect..."because of the City's interest and responsi- bility in maintaining overall property value and heal th and safety of the area, the City hereby does state these rules...", Currently there are no such stated concerns and if the City went to court, he suspected that it would have to first establish concerns before the City could enforce them. Councllman Kelly stated his disapproval of any City involvement in CC&R's. Mayor Hoesterey, in response, stated that associations have certain responsibilities for the maintenance of common areas. The City wants to insure that those responsibilities are carried out, not only for the benefit of that association, but for the community as a whole. Should associations decide not to maintain common areas, it could become a public health hazard. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that staff be directed to submit to the Rlanhing Commission for approval the added appropriate language for modification of the CC&R's document. The motion carried ¢~1, Kelly opposed. I.E.#GIll OF ERN FOR ~Lq)XT CDI~IIITEE ~148ER$ Mayor Hoesterey, while flipping a coin, asked Jerry Well to call beads or tails. Mr. Well lost the toss and it was determined that Frank Srelnke. would serve the 2-year term and Jerry Well would serve the 1-year term, Mayor Hoesterey felt the alternate should also serve a .1-year term allowing, the Council the opportunity for reappointment at the end of each term, It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that the alternate serve a L-year term. Jerry Well asked if the alternate could serve a 2-year term to increase the value and stability of the committee. After further Council discussion, the motion carried 4-1,' Kelly absent, NB B~I~SS 1. F. ASTTUSTIN ~SSME~ DI~RI~ Robert Ledendecker, Public Works Director, reported the jurisdic- tions and boundaries of Assessment District No. 86-2. Each juris- diction is required to adopt a Resolution which consents to making assessments within their particular boundary. The City of Orange has completed their requirement and it'is expected that the CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8. 6-6-88 Orange County Board of Supervisors will adopt their resolution of jurisdiction at their meeting Scheduled for June 7, 1988. Staff pcesented, for review, the three resolutions for the City of Tustin which will require.future action at 'a special meeting. Staff requested the ~neettng be scheduled sometime between the 8th and 13th of June. He gave a brief overview of each resolution. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy expressed her concern about the future residents of the area who will be burdened with this assessment, particularly the Jamboree Road segment. She wanted to know if those outside of the City, such as the City and County of Orange, will pay their fair share and, if so, in what dollar amount. Gary Oysart, Willdan Engineering, indicated that the City of Orange and the County of Orange will be assessed approximately $16.4 million out of the total $82 million. The East Tustin residents will be assessed the difference. Mayor Hoesterey also voiced his concerns regarding the areas of benefit vs. the areas of assessment. The Council felt that the City of Tustin was taking an undue burden because the area of benefit also included the Cities of Costa Mesa, Santa Aha, and Newport Beach. The majority of this burden being placed on the new residents of Tustin may not be the most equitable way of assigning these assessments. The City feels trapped from a standpoint of absorbing this entire burden when the area of benefit is greater. He asked what could be done to spread this burden out. Gary Dysart answered that the remaining $66 million is not just for Jamboree Road, there are significant other public improvements that are included in the total $82 m~llion. Those include Irvine ~lvd., Tustin Ranch Road and other improve~ents that ore opening thac area of Tustin to development. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy wanted to know If it was possible to receive assistance from the State to lift the burden on area residents or was it too late. William Huston, City Manager, responded that if the Jamboree Road project is not completed there will not be a Tustin Ranch project. Without Tustin Ranch you cannot pay for the road because the money is not there, that is the economic reality o? development today. The State is phasing the wide,lng of I-$ over a period of years because they do not have the money. If the City waits for the funds to accumulate, we are virtually talking about closing down the Tustin Ranch project. The alternative is to let the cost of the road come from the cost of the housing, but then you are asking a resident to borrow money at a much higher rate then if they pay for it through an assessment district. If you accept the fact that to build the road the residents will have to pay for it, then the most economic way is the assessment district. Council concurred to take action on this item on June 13, 1988, at 5:30 p.m. POEICY FOR TRJMJiSCRIPTS OF COUNCIL MEETINGS It was moved b~ Edgar, seconded b~ Kennedy, that this icon be continued tO the June 2U, 1988, meeting. The motion carried 5-0. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy stated that she had only asked that tapes be made available to the public, rather than transcribe them. Willi.am Huston, City Manager, stated that the City Attorney was reviewing the matter because of the State laws involved. ' REQUES~T FOR HANDICAPPED PARKING STALL Councilman Prescott asked what would prevent multiple requests such as this one from occurring in the future. r 'v COUNCIL MINUTES , .~ g, 6-6-88 Xe Robert Ledendecker, Public Works Director, stated that other requests had been received. Staff had exercised the option under current traffic code to implement handicapped parking stalls where a defined need had been estabilshe~ and removed the stall when tha~ need no longer existed. Mayor Hoesterey asked if Consolidated Reproductions had designated handicapped parking on site and felt that the problem was being moved to the City streets rather than being the responsiblity of the employer. He wanted that issue addressed before approving the handicapped parking on the street. After further discussion, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, that this item be continued at the June 20, 1988, meeting and directed Mr. Ledendecker to discuss the matter with Mrs. Davies regarding the effect on her employment. The motion carried 5-0. 4. AWARD OF ~ONTRACT FOR SIDEWJU. K AgD CURB AND GUTTER REPAIR PROJECT, 1987-~FY It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to award the contract for subject project to General Procurement & Construction Co., Inc. of Costa Mesa, California, in the amount of $184,745.50 and authorized staff to add additional work to the contract to utilize all budgeted funds as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. The motion carried 5-0. AGREEI~ENT FOR A LOAN BETWEEN TIlE CITY OF TUSTIN NeD THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY ISA 011 BI[liALF OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL PROJECT It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, .to authorize the Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency to execute the Loan Agreement offering and accepting a loan to the Agency of an additional $300,000 as recommended by the Finance Department. The motion carried 5-0. REPORTS 1. PIJUINING COI~IISSION ACTION AGENDA - MAY Z3, 1988 Item No. 5 was removed by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. It was ~ Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to ratify the remainder of the Planning Commission Action Agenda o~ May'23, 1988. The motion carried 5-0. Item No. 5 - Use Permit 87-29 - Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy asked Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, for a brief report on the solution of the Steelcase situation and if the City had been protected. Christine Shingleton, in response, stated that several months ago Steelcase applied for a Conditional Use Permit for two above-ground tanks, one for xylene solvent and the other for water-soluble acrylic resin. After concerns stated by the Fi re Department, Steelcase revised their proposal and significantly addressed all of the Fi re Department's public health and safety concerns. Steelcase will be installing one underground tank, w~ich will be in a concrete vault with complete fire suppression and venting. The second tank wi)l be an above-ground tank, w~ich will be completely enclosed hy a nonexplosive containment building. With these changes, the Fire Department has recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to ratify Item No. 5 of the Planning Commission Action Agenda of May 23, 1988. The motion carried 5-0. INVESTMENT Sa(El)tILE AS OF MY 31, 1988 It was moved By Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to receive and file subject report. The motion carried 5-0. CITY COUNCIL MINUT, Page 10, 6-6-88' 3. POLICE .DIiPART~ENT PUONE RECORDING EQUIPMENT Councilman Prescott asked Fred Wakefield, Acting Chief of Police, how long recording equipment tapes are kept for evidentfary purposes. Captain Wakefield replied that, as a matter of routine, tapes are kept 100 days. For evidentiary purposes, they are kept as long as needed, Councilman Prescott suggested that in this particular case, the tape be kept for a longer period of time. In the event of a possible lawsuit, damages could then be claimed from the tape company. He asked for Council concurrence to save the tape for a couple of years. Captain Wakefield was unsure if the tape was in possession. There was no recording on the tape by the time the defect was determined. Mayor Hoesterey directed that if the tape is still in possession that it be kept and a status report be submitted. Council concurred. 4. SAN DIEGO PIPELINE INSTALLATION It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to receive and file subject report. The motion carrieU 5-0. REPORT ON BUSINESS - FRANCOIS INTERIORS AT 620 W. MAIN STREET It was moved b~ Ed~ar~ seconded by Hoesterey, to receive and file subject report. The ,notion carried 5-0. 6. EARTHEN ILO00 CONTROL CHANNELS It was m,oved by Ed~ar~ seconded, by Hoesterey, to receive and file subject reportr The motion carried 5-0. XI ~ OTMER BUSINESS 1. AOOPTION OF ONDIMANCE LIMITING CN4PAION CONTRIBUTIONS Councilman Kelly requested agendizing the adoption of an ordinance limiting campaign contributions of approximately $100 to candidates for the office of City Council. He suggested obtaining samples of similar ordinances from other cities. After further discussion, Council concurred to agendize this matter on June 20, 1988. '. CITY STAFF AJ)PROACNING HOMEOWNER REGARDING PURCHASE OF PROPERTY Councilman Kelly reported being contacted by homeowner, Margaret Fleming. She stated that someone from the City staff approached her regarding the purchase of her home on Orange Street (across from Tustin High School). He was upset that this could occur. Staff will investigate and report back to Council. 3. CHILI COOK OFF Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy reported on her attendance at the Chili Cook Off. Ii was very successful with large participation. She acknowledged the amount of staff overtime required to insure the success of this event. Councilman Edgar also expressed his pleasure with the Chili Cook Off and the excellent job done by staff. Mayor Hoesterey also noted the smooth operation and the excellent coordination of the event. .. ~ v COUNCIL MINUTES ~ ~a 11, 6-6-88 4. CITY RESIDENT GREEN FlEE DISCOUIfrs AT TUSTIN P~RNC14 GOLF COURSE Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy asked to make a formal request of the Irvine CO. enabling City residents and staff to receive a slight discount on green fees. Mayor Hoesterey asked that the legal ramifications of this proposal be considered. Mayor Pro Tam Kennedy asked for agendizing of this matter and contact the Irvine Co. 5. PETERS CANYON R~GIONAL PARK PUBLIC HEAJ~ING Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy wanted assurance that the City would be represented at the Peters Canyon Regional Park Public Hearing. Royleen White, Director of Administative and Community Services, stated that Councilman Edgar would be the representative. 6. STRIEET NAMING Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy was concerned because this item was not on the agenda. She suggested that each Councilmember appoint one member to a committee. Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, relninded Council that there had .been a press release requesting potential street names and also interest on the part of residents to serve on the ad hoc committeA. Responses were asked to be received by June 27, 1988. She suggested agendlzing this matter after those responses had been received. 7. NEWPOI~/NCFAOOEN UNOLrRGROUNO LIGiITING DISTRICI' Councilman Edgar asked for a staff update on this item. Robert Ledendecker, Public Works Director, stated that :his item was scheduled to be on the June 6, 1988, agenda~ Time constraints prevented the submittal of a continuance report. This item will be on the agenda of June 20, 1988. 8~. RRP REGARDING ll(E TUSTIN LANOSCAPE AND LIGI'ITING DISTRICT Councilman Edgar thought that a map would be available relating to the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District. Robert Ledendecker indicated that the map will be available for the Public Hearing on June 20, 1988. g. STATUS ~PORT ON DRAINAGE S'FUOY FOR COLUMBUS TURIN PARK Councilman Edgar asked for a status report on the drainage study for Columbus Tustin Park and wanted to agendize the hiring of the consultant for the detailed design of the park. Robert Ledendecker, Public Works Director. indicated the drainage study had been completed and submitted to Conmunity Services. Royleen White, Administrative and Community Services Director, Stated that the community task force recommendation was to delay funding the design until funds were available to build the park. Their reason for this recommendation was because technology could advance in the interim. She also stated staff concerns of adding another project at this time. The report of the drainage study will be on the agenda for June 20, 1988. After further Council discussion, Council concurred to direct staff, in their drainage study report on June 20, I988, to include information on possible timelines for initial phases on park completion and Council to discuss funding at their Budget Workshop on June 20, 1988. CITY'COUNCIL MINUTr" Page I2, $-6-88 I0. ACI)JISITION OF SCHOOl. DISTRICT AOMINISTATIVE BUILDI-NG Councilman Edgar asked that a letter be sent to the Tustin Unified School DJ§trier Board of Education regarding acquisition of Che school district's administration building. Council concurred. REMOVAL OF GRAFFITI AT VARIOUS CITY LOCATIONS Councilman Prescott reported graffiti at E1 Calnino/Main Streets and also on Sycamore Street. He asked for immediate removal. 12. TOUR OF MAINTENANCE YARD Councilman Prescott reported on his tour of the maintenance yard. He felt it was very educational and suggested that all Councilmembers tour the facility. 13. CLEANING STREET AFTER 04ILl COOK OFF 14. Councilman Prescott requested that a fire hose be used to clean the spots left in street following the chili cook off. ADJOURNMENT Il( MEMORY OF GREG AI(OERSON Councilman Prescott requested that the Council Meeting adjourn in memory of Grey Anderson, the Tustin teenager who was recently murdered. XII. ADJOURNMENT At g:14 p.m., it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to recess to · the Redevelopment Agency. and then adjourn in ,emery of Grey Anderson to an Adjourned Regular Meeting for Assessment District 86-2 on June 13, 1988. at 5:30 p.m.. and then to a Budget Workshop on June 20, lg88, at 5:00 p.m.. and then to the next Regular Meeting on June 20, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. The motion carried 5-0. HAYOR (~ . CITY ~CLERK ~ MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPHENT A4~ENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA JUNE ~, 1988 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Hoesterey at 9:15 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. ROLL CN_L Agency Members Present: Ronald B. Hoesterey, Chairperson Ursula E. Kennedy, Chairperson Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar John Kelly Earl J. Prescott Agency Members Absent: None Others Present: William A. Huston, City Manager James Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary Christine Shingleton, Dir. of Comm. Development Fred Wakefield, Acting Chief of Police Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Royleen White, Dir. of Comm.& Adm. Services Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Alan Watts, Deputy City Attorney Pablo Rodriguez, Field Services Manager Valerie Whiteman, Deputy City Clerk Lloyd Dick, Building Official Susan Jones, Recreation Supervisor Approximately 10 in the audience APPROVN. OF MIN~ES - MAY 16. 1988, REGULAR lqEETING It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kelly, to approve the Minutes of the May 16,"1988, meeting. The motion carried 5-0. APPROVN. OF DEHANOS IN THE ANOUNT OF $12,607.17 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kellz, to approve subject demands in the amount of $12,607.17. The motion carried 5-0. A~EEMENT FOR A LOAN BETWEEN THE CITY OF TIJSTIN AND THE TUSTIN COltMUNITY RDA ON BEHALF OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL PROJECT It was ~oved by Edgar, seconded by Kelly, to authorize the Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency to execute the Loan Agreement offering and accepting a loan to the Agency of an additional $300,000. The motion carried 5-0. 6. USE OF POLES ON MAIN STREET TO ADVERTISE TILLER DAYS Councilman Prescott requested that the poles on Main Street be utilized in the advertisement of Tiller Days. 7. ADJOURNMENT At 9:16 p.m., it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to adjourn to the next Regular Meeting on June 20, 1988~ at 7:00 p.m. The motion carried 5-0.