HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1 MINUTES 07-07-86MIN~ffES OF AN MOURNED REGULAR ME~-~ING
OF llmE CITY COUNCIL OF ll4E
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
JUNE 30, 1986
II.
III.
IV.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor"Saltarelli
City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way.
at 5:04 p.m. in the
ROLL CALL
Councilpersons Present:
Coun~ilpersons Absent:
Others Present:
Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor
Ronald B. Hoesterey, Mayor Pro Tem
John Kelly
Ursula E. Kennedy
R~chard B. Edgar (Arrived at 5:25 p.m.)
William A. Huston, City Manager
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works
No Audience Members Present
NEW BUSINESS
1. REJECTION OF BIDS - EL MDDENA-IRVINE CHANNEL (FO7)
IM~OVEMENTS RF_A~H I FOR A~SSESSMEI~ DISTRICT 85-1 (Pl~m~SE V-A)
Bids for subject project were received on June 24, 1986, as fol-
lows:
K E.C. Company, Corona
Belczak & Sons, Orange
$5,018,572.00
$5,361,164.00
The low bid was $1,426,172.00 or 39.7% over the engineer's estimate
of $3,592,400.00.
As recommended in the inter-com dated June 30, 1986, prepared by
the Public Works Department/Engineering Division, it was moved by
Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, that all bids for subject project
be rejected and that the project be re-advertised for bids at a
later date. The motion carried 4-0, Edgar absent. 25
AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR FAIRHAVEN, YORBA, NEWHAVEN, AND TROPIC LANE
WATER HAIN IMPROVEMENTS
Bids for subject project were received on June 24,
lows:
Spear Pipeline Construction, Orange
Pacific Desert Cnstruction, Escondido
As recommended in the inter-com dated June 24, 1986,
1986, as fol-
$191,803.73
$203,288.00
prepared by
the Public Works Department/Engineering Division, it was moved by
Saltarelli, seconded by Kennedy, to award the contract for subject
project to Spear Pipeline Construction, Orange, in the amount of
$191,803.73. The motion carried 4-0, Edgar absent. 107
AD~IOURNMENT
At 5:36 p.m. the Council adjourned to the next Regular -Meeting on
July 7, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. b~unanimous informal consent.
CITY CLERK
MAYOR
MIMUT£S OF A REGUU~R MEETING
OF ll(E CITY COUNCIL OF ll~E
CITY OF ll~STIN, CA~.IFORNIA
JUNE 16, 1986
CAJ. L TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Saltarelli at 7:03 p.m. in the-
City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance
was led by Councilwoman Kennedy, and the Invocation was given by Mayor
Pro Tem Hoesterey.
II. ROLL CALL
Councilpersons Present:
Councilpersons Absent:
Others Present:
III. PRO, LACtATION
Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor
Ronald B. Hoesterey, Mayor Pro Tem
Richard B. Edgar
John Kelly
Ursula E. Kennedy
None
William A. Huston, City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Edward M. Knight, Senior Planner
Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works
Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police
Royleen A. White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Srvcs.
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent
Approximately 50 in the audience
IV.
1, TUSTIN AREA HISTORICAl. SOCIETY lOl}m ANNIVERSARY & )~RGARET GREINKE
Mayor Saltarelli read a proclamation commending the Tustin Area
Historical Society, and General Tea Chairperson Margaret Greinke,
on its Tenth Anniversary. Mrs. Greinke thanked the Council. 84
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. VACATION & ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF MYFORD ROAD AT DOW AVENUE -
RESOLkF~ION NO. 86-78
Mayor Saltarelli opened the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. There were
no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed.
As recommended in the inter-com dated June 4, 1986, prepared by the
Public Works Department/Engineering Division, it was moved by
Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt the following:
RESO~tF~ION NO. 86-78 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING VACATION OF A PORTION OF MYFORD
ROAD
The motion carried 5-0.
105
2, FISCAk YEAR lg80-87 PRELIMINARY PROGRAM AND FINANCIAL PLAN BUDGET
The public hearing was opened by Mayor Saltarelli at 7:09 p.m.
Andria Midkiff, 1440 E. First St. #400, Santa Ana, requested
$2,822 be appropriated to the Orange County Consolidated Transpor-
tation Services Agency (CTSA) for transportation services to
Tustin's elderly and disabled.
Douglas O'Kieffe, 1440 E. First St. #400, Santa Aha, also spoke in
favor of CTSA funding for senior transportation services.
Mayor Saltarelli explained that subject request would be considered
with Consent Calendar Item No. 4 (see page 3).
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 6-16-86
There were no other speakers on the matter, and the public hearing
was closed at 7:18 p.m.
It was then moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to direct
staff to prepare a resolution approving the proposed 1986-87 Budget
for governmental funds {net of the Redevelopment Agency}, which
includes revenues for all funds of $38,885,904 and appropriation
requests of $38,817,533. The motion carried 5-0. ~
PUBLIC INPUT
None..
VID
CONSENT CALENDAR
Item No. 4 was removed from the Consent Calendar by Kennedy. It was
moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve the remainder of the
Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0.
APPROV~ OF MINUTES - JUNE 2, 1986, REGULAR MEETING
APPROVAL OF OEIWU~NDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $985,751.67
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $140,107.91
5O
OENIAJ. OF APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION l~) PI~ESENT LATE CLAIM FILED ON
BEeF OF RITA BE~S; CLAIM .NO. 86-22
Denied subject application as recommended by the City Attorney,
40
RESOLUTION NO. 86-77 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING AND MODIFYING PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVAL OF VARIANCE NO. 86-3 FOR THE SHOPPING CENTER KNOWN AS
TUSTIN PLAZA
Adopted Resolution No. 86-77 pursuant to Council action on
June 2, 1986. 106
6. STORI~I DRAIN & Sll~EET INPROVEMENTS IN SDUTHEAST llJSTIN - MINEXATION
NO. 135 AREA
Approved Contract No. C40258 between the City and County of
Orange to transfer $114,696.78 for construction of storm drain
and street improvements on Sierra Vista Drive, Karen Way and
Jan Marie Place; and authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute same as recommended by the Community Development
Department. 45
86-27
7. RESOLUTION NO. 86-66 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12759 {North of the
Santa Ana Freeway, West of Jamboree, East of E1Camino Real}
Adopted Resolution No. 86-66 as recommended by the Community
Development Department. 99
8. RESOI. UTION NO. 86-79 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING PLACEMENT OF CERTAIN STOP SIGNS
("B" STREET AND MITCHELL AVE.}
Adopted Resolution No. 86-79 as recommended by the Public Works
Department/Engineering Division. 95
°
10.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-80 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, INFORMING THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING
PROGR/~M ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF THE STATUS OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
MASTER PLAN OF ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS
Adopted Resolution No. 86-80 as recommended by the Public Works
Department/Engineering Division. 95
ORANGi[ COUtfTY CITIES RISK ~IANAGEMENT AUTHORITY BYLAWS AF1ENDHENT
Authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute subject amend-
ment allowing for an alternative method of allocating the cost
of excess insurance, when warranted, as recommended by the
Finance Department. 45
86-28
]TY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 6-16-86
VII.
VIII.
RESOI.UTION NO. 86-67 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN PETITIONING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE
PROCEEDINGS FOR A TRANSFER OF TERRITORY FROM THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN KNOWN AS ORANGE COUNTY MUNICIPAL REORGANIZA-
TION NO. 91
Adopted Resolution No. 86-67 as recommended by the Community
Development Department. 24
Consent Calendar Item No. 4 - Fiscal Year 1985-86 Revenue Sharing Fund-
)rig Recm~nendations - It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Kennedy,
to:
1) Authorize Fiscal Year 1986-87 Revenue Sharing Funds to Consolidated
Transportation Services Agency (CTSA) in the amount of $2,500; and
2) Approve the following:
FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 REVENUE SHARING FUNDING RECO~IENOATIONS
Ratified the recommendations of the Revenue Sharing Review Com-
mittee as follows: ATSC - $4,000; Boys & Girls Club of Tustin
$4,000; Feedback Foundation/TLC - $3,000; Bartlett Center/
Meals on Wheels - $2,000; COPES, Inc. - $4,000; Lestonnac Free
Clinic - $500; Family Services Association $1,000; South
O.C. Volunteer Center - $500; and Tustin Historical Society -
$1,000; and authorized the Mayor to execute agreements with
successful applicants.
The motion carried 5-0.
5O
The Mayor noted that applicants will be notifed if Federal Revenue
Sharing funds become available next year.
ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION - None.
ORDINANCES FOR ABOPTION
SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AMENDMENTS - ORDINANCE NO. 971
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 971
have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following second
reading by title only of Ordinance No. 971 by the City Clerk, it
was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 971 be
passed and adopted as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 971 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN APPROVING-THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 9311 OF THE TUSTIN CITY
CODE AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR VESTING TENTATIVE MAPS FOR
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Edgar, Hoesterey, Kelly, Kennedy, Saltarelli
None
None
99
2o NEWPORT AVENUE UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 7 - ORDINANCE NO.
972
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 972
have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following second
reading by title only of Ordinance No. 972 by the City Clerk, it
was moved by Edgar, seconded ibY Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 972 be
passed and adopted as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 972 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO.
7, NEWPORT AVENUE, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONVER-
SION
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Edgar, Ho,stet,y, Kelly, Kennedy, Saltarelli
None
None
104
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 6-16-86
IX.
3. HOLT AVENIJE/IRVINE BOULEVARD UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 8 -
ORDINANCE NO. 973
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No
973 have second reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0~
Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. g73 by the
City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, 'seconded by Kennedy, that Ordi-
nance No. 973 be passed and adopted as follows:
OP, DINANCE NO. 973 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO.
8, HOLT AVENUE/IRVINE BOULEVARD, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO
ORDER THE CONVERSION
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Edgar, Hoesterey, Kelly, Kennedy, Saltarelli
None
None
104
OLD BUSINESS
1. COLUMBUS llJSTIN PARK CONCESSION STAND PROPOSAL
Following a question-and-answer period, it was moved by Kennedy,
seconded by Edgar, to authorize the Community Services staff, with
assistance from the City Attorney's office, to draft an agreement
between the City of Tustin and Mr. Dave Ascher for the use and
renovation of the Columbus Tustin Park Concession Stand, as recom-
mended in the inter-com dated June 10, 1986, prepared by the Com-
munity Services Department. The motion carried 5-0. 41
2. APPOINTMIEI{T OF PL~ININO COI~4ISSIONERS
Nominations for appointment to the Planning Commission were made as
follows:
Councilman Edgar nominated Kathy Well, Charles E. Puckett, A. L.
Baker, Donald A. LeJeune, and Leslie A. Pontious.
Councilman Kelly nominated Edmund Shaheen.
Mayor Sal~arelli nominated John McCarthy.
After some discussion on the voting procedure, appointments were
made by the following votes:
Edmund Shaheen - 1
Kathy Well - 4
Donald A. Le~eune - 4
John McCarthy - 2
Charles E. Puckett - 3
A. L. Baker - 3
Leslie A. Pontious - 3
80
Mayor Saltarelli extended congratulations to Kathy Well, Donald
LeJeune, Charles Puckett, A1 Baker, and Leslie Pontious on being
appointed to the Planning Commission. Councilman Edgar suggested
that thank-you letters from the Mayor's office be sent to all
applicants.
Councilwoman Kennedy noted that she applied three times before
being appointed to the Planning Commission.
3. FOOTHILL/EASTERN/I-5 BOI'I1.ENECK ANAJ_YSIS AND TOLL ROAD FEA~SIBILITY
STUDY
Councilmembers voiced strong objections to alternatives under
Scenario I. Specifically, comments were that extending the Garden
Grove Freeway down to Seventeenth Street, across Newport Avenue,
down through La Colina, Tustin and East Tustin is unacceptable.
Secondly, Walnut Avenue is not going to be a super street and
Tustin should request its immediate removal from the study. Irvine
TY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5, 6-16-86
Boulevard will not handle more traffic than what it is programmed
for in its current capacity. Double decking of freeways is also
not an acceptable alternative.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to authorize staff
to respond strongly to the Orange County Transportation Commission
relaying Council comments/concerns in opposition to Scenario I and
as outlined in the letter dated June 17, 1986, to Sharon Greene,
Project Manager, and request that the SR 133 route be studied as an
alternative in the Foothill/Eastern/I-5 Bottleneck Analysis and
Toll Road Feasibility Study.
In response to Councilwoman Kennedy, the Direc%or of Public Works
explained that the 18,000 acres referenced in his June 17 letter is
the future annexed area to Orange. That area has not been consid-
ered as an augmented land use, only as a very general-type land
use. It was felt that that area would possibly help decisions lead
into Scenario II, which would be'relocation of the southerly leg of
the Eastern Corridor to a more southeasterly location off the SR
133.
He stated that Alternative 2A (Santiago Creek) and Alternative 2B
(Chapman Avenue) are recommended for elimination because it was
'felt that these particular freeway connectors would not carry the
amount of traffic necessary to relieve bottleneck congestion.
Staff felt these two alternatives may be viable solutions if used
in combination with other alternatives and did not concur that they
should be eliminated from the study.
The motion carried 5-0.
100
Xe
NEW BUSINESS
AWARD. OF CONTP~ACT - TRAFFIC SIGNAL & SAFETY LIGI{TING AT INTERSEC-
TION OF llJSTIN RA&ICH ROAD & EL CAMINO REAL
Bids for subject project were received on June 10, 1986, as
follows:
Sierra Pacific Electrical Contracting, Riverside
Signal Construction Company, Anaheim
Steiny and Company, Inc., Fullerton
Paxin Electric, Inc., Lancaster
C & N Loops and Electric, Alhambra
$75,710.00
$84,231.00
$84,500.00
$88,372.00
$90,000.00
As recommended in the inter-com dated June 10, 1986, prepared by
the Public Works Department/Engineering Division, it was moved by
Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to award the contract for subject
project'to Si.efta Pacific Electrical Contracting, Riverside, in the
amount of $75,710. Carried 5-0. 94
2. AWARD OF BID - REMOVAL OF UNOERGROUND TANK AT 235 EAST I~IN STREET
Kamtec Corporation, Compton, was the sole bidder for subject proj-
ect.
Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the inter-com dated
June 10, 1986, prepared by the Public Works Department/Engineering
Division, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to autho-
rize the removal of the 500-gallon underground storage tank located
at 235 East Main Street by Kamtec Corporation, Compton, for a cost
of $6,230 plus. The motion carried 5-0. 107
3. AUTHORI7_ATION TO PURCHASE ONE 3-WHEEL SCOOTER (GASOLINE) FOR
SPECIAJ. IZED ATHLETIC FIELD KUNTE%ANCE
Bids for subject project were received on June 3, 1986, as follows:
Toro Pacific Equipment Company, City of Industry
Frankson, Inc.
Norton Nevada
$5,840.00
$6,129.98
$7,363.83
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 6-16-86
W~K~N
ITB
As recommended in the inter-com dated June 9, 1986, prepared by the
Community Services Department, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by
Saltarelli, to authorize the purchase of one Cushman 3Jwheel Haul-
stet from Toro Pacific Equipment Company, City of Industry, in the
total amount of $5,840.60. The motion carried 5-0. 87
4. llJSTIN LI~i~TING & LANDSCAPE DISTRICT - R£SOLtFFIONS NO. 86-75 AND
NO. 86-76
Following consideration of the inter-com dated June 6, 1986, pre-
pared by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division, it was
moved by Edgar~ seconded by Kennedy, to adopt the following:
R£SOLI~TION NO. 86-75 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE
ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
DISTRICT AND FOR THE ANNEXATION OF ADDITIONAL TERRITORY TO SAID
EXISTING DISTRICT
R£~tFFIO# NO. 86-76 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO
ORDER THE ANNEXATION OF ADDITIONAL TERRITORY TO AN EXISTING DIS-
TRICT A~ID TO PROVIDE FOR A~I ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC LIGHTING FACILI-
TIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRITORY INCLUDED IN THE TUSTIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS
PURSUANT TO THE lANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND GIVING
NOTICE THEREOF
Carried 5-0. 25
4A. GREATER EAST ll~STIN AJ~EA A.SSESSME)FF DISTRICT
The Director of Public Works presented the staff report and recom-
mendation as contained in the inter-com dated June 16, 1986, pre-
pared by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. A
question-and-answer period followed.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to:
l)
Accept the petition filed by The Irvine Company requesting
formation of the Greater East'Tustin Area Assessment District;
and
2) Direct staff to initiate the assessment district proceedings.
Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey noted that the purpose of the assessment
district is to ensure that the East Tustin area is self-supporting
and is not funded from existing community areas.
The motion carried 5-0.
25
5. ~SESSNENT DISTRICT 85-1 (EA~ST ll~STIN) - R£SOLlYTIONS NO. 86-81 A~iD
NO. 86-83
The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Director
of Public Works as contained in the inter-com dated June 9, 1986,
prepared .by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division.
Gary Diesart, assessment engineer from Willdan Associates,
responded to Council questions on the Preliminary Engineer's
Report.
In response to Councilman Edgar, Mike Ellis, representing the
Irvine Community Development Company, stated that the Engineer has
determined that the west side portion of Myford Road (future
Jamboree) shown in the Assessment District can benefit said side
and rightfully be included within the Assessment District. The
portion outside of that will be built as development proceeds and
will be funded by The Irvine COmpany or other districts to benefit
the other side of Myford (future Jamboree).
~TY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 7, 6-16-86
Mr. Ellis clarified that more than one-half of the entire road will
be built. Construction of curbs and gutters, etc., will be held
back until development plans for the easterly side are finalized to
eliminate tearing up improvements at a later date. Infrastructure
improvements (storm drains and sanitary sewers) in the existing
assessment district will be funded by The Irvine Company. Paving
will be the only increment left, so costs should be minimal.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to adopt the follow-
ing:
RESOLUTION NO. 86-8! - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE FORMATION OF THE
EAST TUSTIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND THE CONSTRUCTION
OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS THEREIN
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey, Mr. Ellis reiterated that
the road may not initially be built to its ultimate width. At this
time, the road is two lanes northbound, five lanes total, holding
back on the last lane and curb/gutter on the east side until speci-
fic development plans are determined. The road may be wider than
that when a final determination is made from the traffic study.
The motion carried 5-0.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt the following:
RESOLUTION NO. 86-83 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN APPROVING A PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT
Motion carried 5-0.
81
6. TUSTXN AUTO CENTER LOUDSPEAKER CRITERIA
The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Senior
Planner as contained in the inter-com dated June 16, 1986, prepared
by the Community Development Department.
Jim Hughes, 1752 Lance Drive, industrial physicist, made a 15-
minute presentation utilizing visual aids entitled, "Tustin Auto
Center Noise Study," which he prepared. With the use of three
statistical models, Mr. Hughes compared dB(A) noise levels depen-
dent on the number of dealers using a loudspeaker paging system.
Mr. Hughes offered the following candidate noise mitigations:
1) Use of a combination of loud speakers and voice pagers;
2) Limit sharply the number of speakers and restrict them to the
service bay interiors; and
3) Limit sharply the allowed sound levels in the dealership court-
yards.
Mr. Hughes responded to Council questions.
Herbert Huber, 13882 Dall Lane, Santa Ana, owner of property at
13891, 13893 and 13895 Browning Avenue, spoke in opposition to the
loudspeaker system. He spoke in favor of individual voice pagers.
Hubert Clark, 1942 San Juan, stated that the Planning Commission
approval of the loudspeaker system was rushed through. He recom-
mended Council carefully consider the recommendations made concern-
ing speakers inside the work areas to which they have no objec-
tion. However, he recommended Council consider a different system
of outside speakers.
Bonnie Holmes, The Irvine Company, clarified several points of
misunderstanding relative to: zone paging {all speakers in a given
lot cannot sound at the same time); the number of dealer lots (a
maximum of 11 dealer lots, not 12); the requirement for hand-held
pagers in addition to loudspeakers; placement of loudspeakers must
be several feet lower than perimeter walls, and must be shielded by
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 8, 6-16-86
XI.
XII.
buildings whenever possible; there will be major background noise
from future traffic on Jamboree; and soundwall construction around
future residential areas is scheduled to start in one to one-and-
one-half months.
Ms. Holmes noted that The Irvine Company has a vested interest in
protecting those properties adjacent to the T~stin Auto Center, and
have established more stringent criteria than the City's existing
sound ordinance. Additionally, once the soundwall is built, it
will serve as an additional mitigation measure.
Bruce McLean, 17392 Village Drive, stated that McLean Cadillac is
most impacted by loudspeakers, they do use voice pagers and por-
table telephones, and are constantly looking' at other alternatives
and better ways to eliminate loudspeaker use. He noted that com-
pany policy states the loudspeaker system is not used unless all ·
other avenues to contact an individual have been used. He
requested approval of the loudspeaker system.
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, that opponents of the
loudspeaker system meet with representatives of The Irvine Company
to review the matter and work out differences and then bring back
their recommendations at the July 7, 1986, meeting.
Council discussion followed. Councilwpman Kennedy concurred with
Mr. Hughes that the City's current noise ordinance is inadequate.
The motion carried 5-0. 81
REPORTS
1. PLANNING COI~ISSION ACTION AGENDA - JUNE 9, 1986
It was moved by 'Hoesterey~ seconded by Edgar, to ratify the entire
Planning Commission Action Agenda of June 9, 1986. The motion car-
ried 5-0. 80
OTHER BUSINESS
1. WINDSOR GARDENS CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION, 1651 MITCHELL AVENUE -
PROHIBITION OF SALE OF UNITS - RESOLUTION NO. 86-82
As recommended by the City Manager, it was moved by Edgar, seconded
by Kennedy, to adopt the following:
RESOLUTION NO. 86-82 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA GIVING PUBLIC NOTICE THAT THE SALE OF INDI-
VIDUAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS LOCATED WITHIN THE APARTMENT COMPLEX AT
1651 MITCHELL AVENUE, TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
432-031-31} IS PROHIBITED
The motion carried 5-0.
43
2. ADJOURNED REGULAR ~I~ETING ON JUNE 30, 1986, AT 5:00
The City Manager reminded Council the meeting would be recessed to
an Adjourned Regular Meeting on Monday, June 30, 1986, at 5:00
p.m. to award the bid for the E1 Modena-Irvine Channel Project
which is part of Assessment District 85-1.
3. COBBLESTONE CROSSWALKS ON EL CAI4INO REAL
In response to Councilman Kelly, the Director of Public Works
stated that staff is still reviewing his request of May 19 that the
crosswalks be painted along the cement separating the asphalt from
the cobblestone for more distinction.
4. ORANGE COUNTY ATHLETIC CLUB
Councilman Hoesterey requested the City Attorney investigate the
sudden closure of Orange County Athletic Club for illegal activ-
ity. He reported receiving several complaints that the Orange
office closed, directed people to Tustin, and allegedly took
deposits and membership fees prior to closing the Tustin facility.
,TY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 9, 6-16-86
XIII.
S. Sll~IPING OF RAINTREE LANE TltROUGH AJSR TREE PtJ~CE
Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey requested staff investigate the possibility
of double-yellow-striping Raintree Lane through Aha Tree Place to
prohibit people from driving on the wrong side of the street on the
"S" curve. 95
6. ACKNOWI. EDGEMENT OF TI{ANKS FOR RESOI_IFFION OF NOISE PROBLEM
Councilwoman Kennedy acknowledged a letter of thanks from Erich and
Alice Geldmacher, Ken and Jessica Curry, Lee Illich, Dorothy
Foster, Sam Scalzo, and Wiley Kennedy for the City's positive reac-
tion to the noise problem caused by Gries Dynacast at 2652 Dow
Avenue. 56
7. RE.ST FOR PROCLAJ(ATIONS - FORMER PtANNING COF~4ISSIONERS
Council concurred with Mayor Saltarelli's request that proclama-
tions be presented to John McCarthy and Ron White in appreciation
of their service on the Planning Commission for presentation at the
July 7 meeting. 84
COUNCILMAN EI)GA,R APPOINTED TO SANTA AMA RIVER FLO00 PROTECTION
AGENCY
As recommended by Mayor Saltarelli, Councilman Richard B. Edgar was
appointed as Tustin's representative on the Santa Ana River Flood
Protection Agency by unanimous informal consent. 38
COUNCILMAN KELLY APPOINTED TO ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE OF PROTOCOL
Council concurred with Mayor Saltarelli that Councilman John Kelly
serve as Tustin's City Liaison Committee member to the Orange
County Office of Protocol which deals with the sister city program
in which most Orange County cities are involved. 38
10. PARENTS ktiO CARE REQUEST FOR WORKSHOP
Mayor Saltarelli reported he received a request from Parents Who
Care for a workshop on September 29 regarding their desire to
establish criteria for'approval of future alcoholic beverage
license requests. He requested the City Manager coordinate the
meeting date, and perhaps a Council committee could meet with them,
understand their concerns, and report back to Council. 81
RECESS - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - A[kIOURNMENT
At 9:04 p.m. it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded .by Edgar, to recess to
the Redevelopment Agency; and thence adjourn to an Adjourned Regular
Meeting on June 30, 1986, at 5:00 p.m. to award contract for the E1
Modena-Irvine Channel; and thence to the next Regular Meeting on
Monday, July 7, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. Carried 5-0.
MAYOR
CITY CLERK