HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 07-21-86ACTION . AGENDA
YU-STYN 'P~A~NI NG
REGULAR I~ETING
JULY 14, 1986
REPORTS
NO. 1
7-21-86
CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
COMMISSION REORGANIZATION:
Installation of new Planning Commissioner-s and election of Chairman and Chair Pro Tem
Commissioner Baker moved, LeJeune seconded to nominate Commissioner Puckett as the
Chairman. Motlon carrled 4-0.
Comtsstoner LeJeune moved, Baker seconded to nominate Comtssloner Well as Chatrman
Pro Tee. Morton carrted 4-0.
ROLL CALL: Present: Well, Baker, Le Jeune, Pontious,
Absent: Puckett
PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR 'ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF .THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
1. Minutes of June 9, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting.
2. Minutes of June 23, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting.
Commissioner Baker moved, Ponttous seconded to approve the Consent Calendar. )lotion
carried 4-0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
3. USE PERMIT 86-20
Applicant: Mr. Ron Oliver on behalf of Mustard's Restaurant
Request: Authorization for on-site beer and wine sales in conjunction
with a restaurant use.
Location: 13882 Newport Avenue, Units F and G
Presentation: Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
Cmmtsstoner Baker moved, LeJeune seconded to approve Use Permit 86-20 by the
adoption of Resolution No. 2342. Morton carrted 4-0.
Planntng Commission Actton Agenda
July 14, [986
Page two
4. AMENDMENT NO. [ TO USE PERMIT 86-3
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
Carver Development
To amend Variance 86-3 thereby
identification wall signs in excess of
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2323.
[372[ Newport Avenue/Tustin Plaza
allowing two tenant
the area approved by
Presentation:
Jeffrey S. Davis, Associate Planner
Co,mission discussion ensued with questions and answers from staff concerning the
formula used to determine stgn stze and exposed neon tubing.
Chair Pro Tom Wetl opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. Klm Josephson, Carver
Development, explained that these two tenants will be the main draw for the center;
with the exclusion of monument signs, over 300' setback from Newport Avenue, and the
120' depth of the stores it creates a hardship.
Seeing no me further wishing to speak, Chair Pro Tom Wetl closed the public hearing
at 7:58 p.m.
Com,tsstoner Baker moved, Pontious seconded to approve Amendment tl to Use Pen"tt
86-3 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2345. ~otton carried 4-0.
5. USE PERMIT 86-21
Applicant: MTC Management on behalf of Togo's Eatery
Request: Authorization for on-site beer and wine sales
with a restaurant use.
556 E. First Street
Location:
in conjunction
Presentation:
Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
Comnlsston discussion ensued with questions and answers from staff concerning the ABC
age requirements for servlng alcohol.
Chair Pro TemWetl opened the public bearing at 8:05 p.m. Dean Kotke, MTC
Hanagement, explained that company policy requires 21 year old adult supervision at
all times. Seeing no one further ~tshtng to speak, Chair Well closed the hearing at
8:09 p.m.
Co.missioner Wetl ~oved, Baker seconded to approve Use Pen.it 86-21 by the adoptton
of Resolution 2344 with the addition of tte~ TI.f., "All persons servtng or selltng
alcoholic beverages shall be 18 years of age or older and shall be supervised by
someone 21 years of age or over while the restaurant remains open.' Motion carried
4-0.
Planning Commission Actton Agenda
July 14, 1986
Page three
Appl t cant:
Request:
Location:
Presentati on:
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 86-201
J. P. Kapp & Associates on behalf of Signal Development Co.
Authorization to resubdivide one (1) lot into three (3) lots.
14551, 14471 and 2472 Chambers Road
Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
Chair Pro Tom#et1 opened the publlc heartng at 8:14 p.m. Pat Kapp of dP Kapp
requested relief from the requirement to tnste11 full wtdth sidewalks on Nalnut and
Chambers Ortve.
Conmtsston discussion ensued wtth questions and answers of staff concerning the
amount of pedestrian trafftc in the area and the requtred width of stdedalks.
dames Ltndsey, o~ner of Bldg. 2, opposed adding sidewalks.
C~tsstoner Ponttous moved, Ledeune seconded to approve Tentative Parcel Map 86-201
by the adoptlon of Resolution No. 2346 and reconmend 'to the City Counctl to consider
a narrower stdedalk to perhaps flve or stx feet. Hotton carrted 4-0.
7. VARIANCE 86-5
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
Integrated Sign Associates on behalf of Home Federal Savings &
Loan.
Authorization to vary with the Tustin Sign Ordinance as it
pertains to tenant identification and allowable sign area.
182311rviune Blvd.,
Presentation: Jeff Davis, Associate Planner
Pursuant to applicant's request, C~lsstoner ~etl moved, Baker seconded to contlnue
this 1rem to the next regularly scheduled Planntng Commission meetln§. Motion
carrted 4-0.
OLD BUS[NESS
8. Ruby's Restaurant, E1 Camtno Real: Demolition of existing structure.
Presentation: Edward Knight, Senior Planner
c;~tsstoner Baker moved, Ponttous seconded to recetve and ftle. Morton carrted
4-0.
NEH BUSINESS:
None.
Planning Commission Action Agenda
July 14, 1986
page four
STAFF CONCERNS
9. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS OF JUNE 16, 1986 AND JULY 7, 1986
CO##ISSIO# CONCERNS
Comdsstofler LeJeune expressed his appreciation to the City Council for his
appotn~nt to the Planning Co..mission and is pleased to be able to serve the city.
Commissioner Ponttons expressed her appreciation to the City Counctl for her
appointment to the Planntng C~sston and looks forward to working with a fine group
of people In helptng Tustin move forward.
Co. missioner Baker questioned when the permanent sign would he installed at the Auto
Center so staff can enforce the removal of the banners.
Comflsstoner Wet1 requested a status report and tour of current projects for the new
Co~sstoners.
Commissioner Wetl read a letter request 'from Parents Who Care for a workshop on
Septc~mber 29th.
ADJOURNMENT
C_~m~tsstoner Baker moved, Le&eune seconded to adjourn to next regularly scheduled
Planning Commission meeting. Hotlon ca~ried 4-0.
AGENDA
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 14, 1986
CALL TO ORDER:
7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
CDI~NISSION REORGANIZATION:
Installation of new Planning Commissioners and election of Chairman and Chair Pro Tem
ROLL CALL:
Weil, Puckett, Baker, Le Jeune, Pontious,
PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(ALL MA'FTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
1. Minutes of June 9, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting.
2. Minutes of June 23, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
3. USE PERMIT 86-20
Applicant:
Request:
Locati on:
Mr. Ron Oliver on behalf of Mustard's Restaurant
Authorization for on-site beer and wine sales
with a restaurant use.
13882 Newport Avenue, Units F and G
in conjunction
Presentation: Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
Planning Commission Agenda
July 14, 1986
Page two
4. AMENDMENT NO. I TO USE PERMIT 86-3
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
Carver Development
To amend Variance 86-3 thereby allowing two tenant
identification wall signs in excess of the area approved by
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2323.
13721 Newport Avenue/Tustin Plaza
Presentation:
Jeffrey S. Davis, Associate Planner
5. USE PERMIT NO. 86-21
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
Presentation:
6.
MTC Management on behalf of Togo's Eatery
Authorization for on-site beer and wine sales
with a restaurant use.
556 E. First Street
Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 86-201
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
Presentation:
in conjunction
J. P. Kapp & Associates on behalf of Signal Development Co.
Authorization to resubdivide one {1) lot into three (3) lots.
14551, 14471 and 2472 Chambers Road
Edward M. Knight, Senior Planner
7. VARIANCE 86-5
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
Presentation:
Integrated Sign Associates on behalf of Home Federal Savings
Loan
Authorization to vary with the Tusttn Sign Ordinance as it
pertains to tenant identification and allowable sign area.
18231 Irviune Blvd.,
Jeff Davis, Associate Planner
OLD BUSINESS
8. Ruby's Restaurant, E1Camino Real: Demolition of existing structure.
Presentation: Edward Knight, Senior Planner
NEW BUSINESS:
None.
ST~F CONCERNS
9. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS OF JUNE 16, 1986 AND JULY 7, 1986
COMMISSION CONCERNS
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting.
MINUTES
TU~'~IN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
· lURE 9, 1986
'CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., Ctty Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC CONCERNS:
Present: Baker; McCarthy; and Puckett
Absent: Wetl
(Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE .RECORD.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(ALL MAI'FERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED
FROM l~JE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
1. Minutes of May ~2, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting.
2. A.T. & S. F. Bridge at Peters Canyon {FO6 Channel).
Co,,,ntssioner Mc Carth¥ moved, Baker seconded to approve the consent calendar with one
change. On the minutes of May 12, 1986 the vote on the consent calendar was 4-0.
Motion carried 3-0.
PUBLIC HEAJ~INGS
3. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 12759
Appl i cant:
Locati on:
Request:
J. P. Kapp & Associates on behalf of the Irvine Company
North of the Santa Aha Freeway, West of Jamboree, East of E1Camino
Real
Authorization to subdivide eight (8) lots (three [3] numbered and
five [5] lettered) into seven (7) numbered lots.
Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
Planntng Commission Mtnutes
June 9, 1986
Page two
The public hearing was opened at 7:35 p.m., seeing and hearing no one the hearing was
closed at 7:36 p.m.
Commissioner Mc Carth¥ moved, Baker seconded to approve Tentative Tract Map 1275g by
the adoption of Resolution No. 2338. Motion carried 3-0.
OLD BUSINESS
-4. DESIGN REVIEW 86q6, IRVINE PACIFIC (PHASE 1 RESIDENTIAL) APARTMENTS
Presentation:
Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
Staff reported that the applicant had requested that Item number 6 of the Conditions
of Approval be removed from the resolution. Staff recommended the removal of that
item.
Mr. Kevin Pohlson, Irvine Pacific Company, 610 Newport Center Drive, 7th Floor,
Newport Beach, Ca., gave a 15 minute slide presentation on the project.
Commissioner Baker asked how much of this project would be low cost housing. Staff
replied that 20~ would be low cost housing.
Commissioner Mc Carth¥ moved, Baker seconded to approve Design Review 86-6 by the
adoption of Resolution No. 2339. Motion carried 3-0.
NEW BUSINESS:
5. AUTO CENTER FREEWAY SIGN
Presentation: Edward M. Knight, Senior Planner
Staff gave a short slide presentation
Bonnie Holmes, The Irvine Company gave a 15 minute slide presentation.
A short discussion followed between Commission, Staff and Ms. Holmes regarding Cal
Trans' sign policy and the height of the walls and buildings.
Commissioner Mc Carthy moved, Baker seconded to approve the Tustin Auto Center
Freeway Identification Sign by the adoption of Resolution No. 2343. Motion carried
3-0.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 9, 1986
Page three
6. STATUS REPORT ON BRYAN AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS
Presentation:
Edward M. Knight, Senior Planner
Staff stated that the goal is to provide two travel
protected turning lanes in each direction. This will
intersection and curb at Bryan and Main Street.
lanes in each direction with
eliminate any parking by the
STAFF' CONC£P,N$
7. REPORT ON COUNCIL ACTIONS JUNE 2, 1986
Presentation:
Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
Staff reported that Variance 86-3, Carver Development, was appealed by City Council.
The Council denied.the request for two tenant identification monument signs. It is
possible for Carver to reapply for more wall signing instead of monument signing.
The City Council appealed the Tustin Auto Center Loudspeaker system. The Loudspeaker
presentation will be given at the June 16, 1986 City Council meeting.
COMMxsSION CONCERNS
Commission thanked Don Lamm for all his help and guidance. They also complimented
staff for a well prepared agenda.
ADJOUR~ENT
Commissioner Mc Carthy moved, Baker seconded to adjourn at 8:24 p:m. Motion carried
3-0.
CHAIRMAN
PENNI FOLEY, Recording Secretary
IqINUTES
TUSI'"[N PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 23, 1986
CALL l~ ORDER: 7:38 p.m., City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL: Present: Puckett; Well
Absent: Baker; Mc Carthy
Chairman Weil, noting that there was not a quorum, asked Suzanne Atkins, City
Attorney whaEl'the procedure was in this matter.
Suzanne Atkins replied that, due to the lack of a quorum, the meeting could not
continue and a~l items should be continued until the next meeting on July 14, 1986.
The meeting was adjourned by a concensus of the attending Commissioners at 7:40 P.M.
CHAIRMAN
PENNI FOLEY, Recording Secretary
Report to the
Planning Commission
iTEM NO. ~
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
PROPERTY OgNER:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
JULY 14, 1986
USE PER~IT NO. 86-20
MR. RON OLIVER ON BEHALF OF MUSTARD'S RESTAURANT
17832 SI~g~ER AVENUE
ARTESIA, CA. 90701
HR. ELDON PRIMROSE
1219 S. MAIN STREET
SANTA ANA, CA. 92707
13882 IEWPORT AVENUE, UNITS F AND G
CG - C0~ERCIAL GENERAL
ElrflROI~ENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
CATAGORICALLY E~ERPT CLASS 21
AUTHORIZATION FOR ON-SITE BEER AND WINE SALES IN CONJUNCTION
WITH A RESTAURANT USE.
REC01~ENDED'ACTION:
That the Planning Commission approve Use Permit No. 86-20 by the adoptton of
Resolution No. 2342.
SLI~ARY:
An application has been filed by Mr. Ron Oliver on behalf of Mustard's
Restaurant requesting authorization for on-site beer and wine sales in
conjunction with a restaurant use. MuStard's is a small chain of restaurants in
the Southern California area that offers Chicago style hot dogs, ribs and
chicken.
The proposed location for this restaurant is at 13882 Newport Avenue in the
recently completed Primrose Center. Staff has identified certain critical
issues related to this application regarding hours of operation and proximity to
schools and supervision of employees who sell alcoholic beverages as discussed
below.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS:
In discussion with the applicant, Mr. Oliver, the proposed hours of operation
for Mustard's would be similar to their other locations. These hours will be
from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. As with all Type 41 Licenses (on-site beer and
wine sales in conjunction with a restaurant use), the majority of gross sales
must be in food items as opposed to liquor.
. Community Development Deparlment
Planning Commission Report
July 14, 1986
Page I~o
The main tssue of concern regarding this application ts the proximity to Tustln
Htgh School. Whtle the High School ts' approximately 600 feet away, the type of
11cense requested may be considered appropriate tf conditioned properly.
Due to the proximity to Tusttn High School, staff has raised questions regarding
the age and supervision of employees who serve or sell any alcoholic beverages.
According to ABC, all servers shall be [8 years of age as long as they serve
food along wtth alcoholic beverages. Wtth proper supervision and assurance of
enforcement of all age requirements, this problem may be alleviated.
Staff has prepared the following requirements as conditions of approval:
All alcoholic beverages shall be consumed on-site.
Alcoholic beverages shall be sold during the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 10:00
p.m. and only when food is being sold.
The restaurant menu shall consist primarily of foods that are prepared
on-site.
4. No out-door seating is allowed at this location.
· 5. Authorization for an on-site beer and wine license is contingent upon the
use remaining as a restaurant. At such time the restaurant use is
discontinued, authorization for the beer and wine license will be
rescinded.
6. All persons selling or serving alcoholic beverages must be 18 years of age
and the restaurant shall be supervised by someone over 21 years of age or
older while the restaurant remains open.
The above requirements will establish certain controls which will help to avoid
conflicts with the nearby students. Restrictions of on-site consumption and
indoor seating will ensure proper' enforcement of alcohol related laws and
requirements. With these conditions imposed upon the license, staff contends
that approval of Use Permit 86-20 would be appropriate for this location.
Assistant Planner
EDWARD M. KNIGHT
Senior Planner
LCP:pef
Attachments:
Site Plan
Floor Plan
Resolution No, 2342
ABC Application
Corn munity Development Department
'~.UNO~
2
The
6
7
9
:12
13
~5
]7
]9
20i
2]
22
23
2~
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2342
A RESOLUTION OF THE. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, AUTHORIZING A BEER AND WINE
LICENSE FOR ON-SITE SALES AT 13882 NEWPORT AVENUE
UNITS F AND G
Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
That a proper application (Use Permit 86-20) has been filed by
Mr. Ron OliVer requesting authorization for an ABC license {type
41) to sell beer and wine for on-site consumption at 13882
Newport Avenue, Units F and G.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be
detrimental to the health,-safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
1. The sale of beer and wine is on-site consumption only.
That sale of beer and wine is limited to hours of operation
between 10:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. and only When food is
being sold concurrently.
That the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the city of Tusttn, and should be
granted.
Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fire 'Marshal, and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
F. That this project is categorically exempt from the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 21.
Final development plans shall require the review and approval of
the Community Development Department.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2342
Page two
II.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No.
86-20 to authorize the issuance of an on-site beer and wine license
at 13882 Newport Avenue, Units F and G subject to the following
conditions:
A. All alcoholic beverages shall be consumed on-site.
8. Alcoholic beverages shall be sold during the hours of 10:00
a.m. and 10:00 p.m. and only when food is being sold
concurrently.
C. The restaurant menu shall consist primarily of foods that are
prepared on-site.
D. No outdoor seating is authorized at this location.
E. Authorization for an on-site beer and wine license is contingent
upon the use remaining as a restaurant. At such time that the
restaurant use is discontinued, authorization for the beer and
wine ltcense will be rescinded.
F. All persons selling or serving alcoholic beverages shall be
eighteen years of age or older and shall be supervised by
someone twenty-one years of age or older while the restaurant
remains open.
G. The applicant shall complete and return an "Agreement to
Conditions Imposed" form as required by the Director of
Community Development.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 1986.
KATHY WEIL, CHAIRMAN
PENNI FOLEY, RECORDING SECRETARY
,/
.......... --RECEIVED
I. TYPE(S) OF UCENSE'~$)
3. TYI~S) OF TRANS~TION(S)
COO~ '~020
Temp. Pefl~t
TOTAL
FEE
TYP~
$
19%oo
$
49~
¢i1~ I. imitJ?
10. Have you e~of ~,;v;~ any al the p,..v:~:o~ of ~e Alcoholll
~e C~ ~ M r~ubfi~ of the ~flMnt p~
6-2-66
· 13. ST.aTE OF C,I, UFONNIA Ccwnq M 0 ~zl~?_ Oma ........................
,- __ · .......
. htb~=~, o,.~,~ ...................... = ................................
APPUCAllON BY TRANSFEROR
15. STATE O~ CAUFORNfA
..... ,~. 18. License Number(s)
16..":_.:.-:~) of L; ......:'.:.~ 17. ,~? ........,~) of tic_ _,s)
19. Locodo~, NvmbM omi SWNt O~ and Zip Code Cc-~
Do NM Wr~e ~lmo T~ ~; F~ ~ UM ~y
~ ~ ~ CO~E$ ~iLED ~_ ~ .................
ITEM NO. ~ " t
DATE: &UL¥ 14, 1986
SUBJECT: AIqERD#ENT NO. I TO VARIAIICE 86-3
APPLICAHT:
LOCATION:
CARVER DEVELOPMENT
1100 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE
NEMPORT BEACH, CA. 92660
13721 NEMPORT MENUE/TUSTI# PLAZA
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM'THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA
ENYINOI~ENTAL QUALITY ACT
TO AMENO VARIANCE 86-3 THEREBY ALLOWING TWO TENANT
IDENTIFICATION WALL SIGNS IN EXCESS OF THE AREA APPROVED BY
PLANNING COmmISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2323.
RECOI~ENDED ACTION:
It is recommended that signs requested for Royale Stationers and Nherehouse
Entertainment be approved by the adoption of Resolution No. 2345.
SUIIIAR¥:
On April 14, 1986 the Planning Commission by approval of Variance 86-3,
authorized the following as a portion of the comprehensive sign package for
Tusttn Plaza:
1. Six (6) center identification signs at drive entrances.
e
Business wall signs for specific units equalling 15~ of Storefront
area even if such a ratio exceeds maximum sign area of 75 square
feet.
Two {2) free standing tenant identification signs along Newport
Avenue.
Subsequently, upon City Council appeal, Variance 86-3 was modified overruling
Commission approval of free-standing tenant signs thereby precluding use of such
signing. However, the Council action also provided that Carver Development
could return to the Commission requesting additional wall signage if they so
desired.
Community Development Department
Planning Con~ntssion Report
July 14, 1986
Page two
In a letter dated June 5, 1986, Carver requested that the Commission again
consider the size of wall signs for two specific tenants.
DISCUSSION:
As approved, Variance 86-3 authorizes business wall signs for tenants occupying
Units 23, 24, 25 and 26 of Tustin Plaza up to 15~ of storefront area. This
ratio is permitted even if sign area would exceed the 75 square foot maximum
allowed by code. For prospective tenants, Wherehouse Entertainment and Royale
Stationers, this would mean that signs of approximately 112 square feet. and 102
square feet respectively would be allowed.
At the. time of Commission approval, the applicant and future tenants felt that
signs authorized would provide sufficient identification. However, with the
loss of free-standing identification resulting from Council's action, Carver
contends that from an overall perspective tenant identification is now
inadequate..
As such, Carver has requested that signs for Wherehouse Entertainment and Royale
Stationers be increased to 127.5 square feet {17[ of storefront) and 126 square
feet (18.4~ of storefront) respectively.
UIALYSIS:
When considering constraints of the site, and previous Commission discussion
relating to the comprehensive sign plan for the center, Carver Developments
current request is supportable. Specifically, the distance from Newport Avenue
and future visual obstructton to be caused by a required restaurant impair the
view of tenant identification. Additionally, at the time of approval of
Variance 86-3, the Commission indicated that it would be in favor of larger wall
signs if free-standing signs were deleted from the plan. Now that free-standing
identification has been denied, it is appropriate for the Commission to
reconsider Carver's request. Finally, although not grounds for approval of a
variance, the architectural design of the project can accommodate signs
requested by Amendment No. 1 to Variance 86-3 without detracting from overall
design quality. Accordingly, it is recommended that Amendment No. 1 to Variance
86-3 be approved by the adoption of Resolution No. 2345.
y~E~. DAVIS,
~A~socl'ate Planner
JSD:pef
Attachments:
Resolution No. 2345
Site Plan
Corn munity D~velopment Department
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 23&5
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
VARIANCE 86-3 AUTHORIZING WALL SIGNS OF 126
SQUARE FEET AND 127.5 SQUARE FEET FOR TENANTS
OCCUPYING UNITS 24 AND 25, RESPECTIVELY, AT
13721 NEWPORT AVENUE (TUSTIN PLAZA).
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustln does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper application {Variance No. 86-3) was filed by
Carver Development requesting to vary from requirements of the
City of Tustin Sign Code by authorizing the following:
1. Six (6) center identification signs;
2. Two (2) free-standing tenant identification signs; and
3. Four (4) tenant identification, wall type signs, 150 square
feet each.
B. That a public hearing before the Planning Commission was duly
called, noticed and held on said application.
C. That through the course of public testimony and Commission
discussion, consideration of the application submitted was
limited to center identification signs, as requested;
free-standing tenant signs, as requested; and tenant wall signs
not te exceed 15% of storefront areas.
D. That the Planning Commission, by the adoption of Resolution
No. 2323 authorized the following signage:
1. Six (6) Center Identification Signs. Lettering on center
identification design features at complex entrance points
shall be individual, back-lit, letters not to exceed 12
inches in height.
2. Wall signs 'for tenants occupying suites numbered 23, 24,
25 and 26 as shown on the attached site plan {Exhibit "A")
shall be limited to 15% of each suite's storefront area.
In no case shall sign area for any sign exceed 150 square
feet.
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
19.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2345
Page two
Ge
e
Two (2) free-standing tenant identification signs, final
locat4ons to be determined by the Director of Community
Development. Each sign structure shall be a maximum of 35
square feet and 6 feet above grade. These signs shall be
allowed to be double faced signs, situated perpendicular
to Newport Avenue, with three tenants maximum on each side
of the sign.
That upon appeal of the City Council, approval of Variance 86-3
was scheduled for public hearing before Council.
That said appeal hearing was duly noticed and held on June 2,
1986.
That the City Council ratified signage listed in items I.D.1 and
I.D.2 of this resolution authorizing center and tenant (wall
sign) identification.
That the City Council overruled Commission approval of signs
indicated in item I.D.3 of this resolution, thereby denying the
use of free-standing tenant identification signs based upon the
following findings:
1. That no special circumstances exist on the site that
warrant free-standing tenant identification signs for
selected tenants.
I. That Carver Development submitted an application requesting an
amendment to Variance No. 86-3 to allow additional wall sign
area for tenants who will occupy units 24 and 25 within Tustin
Plaza.
. J. That a public hearing was duly called noticed and held
concerning said amendment to Variance 86-3.
K. That circumstances of hardship found in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 2323 are still present on site justifying a
variance to the sign code.
L. That all other findings contained in Planning Commission
Reolution No. 2323 are still valid as they relate to the
proposed amendment.
1
2
4
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2345
Page three
II.
The Planning Comm¶ssion hereby aproves Amendment No.
86-3 subject to the following conditions:
1 to Varlance
A. That the sign area f6r space 24 shown on the attached Exhibit
"A" shall be limited to 126 square feet.
B. That the sign area for space 25 shown on the attached Exhibit
"A" shall be limited to 127.5 square feet.
C. That all permits required by the building division shall be
obtained prior to sign installation.
D. That all other provisions of the Sign Ordinance and the Center
Master Sign Plan must be met.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission
held on the day of , 1986.
KATHY WEIL, Chairman
PENNI FOLEY, Recording Secretary
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
PROPERTY OWNER:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENV IRONMEErAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
JULY 14, 1986
USE PERHZT 86-21
RFC IdlANAGEHENT (TOGO'S EATERY)
900 E. CAIdPBELL AYENUE
CAMPBELL, CA. 95008
LAR#IN SQUARE LTD.
275CEErENNIAL ~AY #209
TUSTIN, CA. 92680
556 E. FIRST STREET
C-2 - CENTRAl. COI~IERCIAL
CATAGORICALLY EXEI~PT, CLASS 21
AUTHORIZATION FOR ON-SITE BEER AND WINE SALES IN CONJUNCTION
¥ITH A RESTAURANT USE
RECOmmENDED ACTION:
That the Planning Commission
Resolution No. 2344.
SU~IARY:
approve Use Permit 86-2! by the adoption of
This application has been filed by MTC Management which is involved with the
popular Togo's Eatery restaurant chain. A location has been chosen at 556 E.
First Street which is in Larwin Square. The applicant has proposed to locate a
Togo's Eatery at this address and is now requesting authorization for an on-site
beer and wine sales license in conjunction with a restaurant use.
Consideration of this request requires study of certain pertinent issues which
may affect the local area. In this case, staff identified the following issues:
proximity to schools; hours of operation; and maintenance of restaurant use.
~ , Community Development Department J
Planning Commission Report
July 14, 1986
Page two
Staff contends that, if properly conditioned, this request would be appropriate
for approval by the Commission.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS:
Upon receipt of this application, certain issues were identified by staff.
Proximity to schools, hours of operation, and the overall integrity of the
business were studied in order to establish the appropriate conditions of
approval for this request.
The closest public school to the proposed Togo's is over 1/3 of a mile away.
This school is Tusttn High School which is located on San Juan Street. However,
Newport Avenue divides these locations and provides a protective barrier to
uncontrolled access by the High School students.
In discussion with the applicant, the proposed hours of operation are from 10:30
a.m. to 10:00 p.m. During these hours, food will also be sold to their
customers.
According to the ABC requirements of this license type, the establishment must
be maintained as a restaurant. A majority of the gross sales shall consist of
sales of foods as opposed to sales of alcoholic beverages, therefore, this
license can only be in effect while the restaurant use is maintained.
Staff has prepared the following requirements that, if this request is granted,
should be included as conditions of approval:
1. ' The sale of beer and wine is for on-site consumption only and shall be
sold during the hours of 10:30 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.
m
The restaurant menu shall consist primarily of foods that are prepared
on-site.
Alcoholic beverages may only be sold while food items are offered for
sale.
Authorization for this on-site beer and wine license is contingent upon
the use remaining as a restaurant. At such time the restaurant use is
discontinued, authorization for the beer and wine license will be
rescinded.
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
July 14, 19B6
Page three
These conditions have been included in the attached Resolution No. 2344.
Assistant Planner Senior Planner
LCP:pef
Attachments:
Site Plan
Floor Plan
Resolution No. 2344
ABC Application
Community Development Department
,. -,; ...... :w .,:[ ,,,. . ,.. :;:: -:iii
f,,F..... ....
5 The Planning
follows:
6 I.
?
8
9
10
11
12
12
17
18
RESOLUTION NO. 2344
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN,'AUTHORIZING A BEER AND WINE
LICENSE FOR ON-SITE SALES AT 556 E. FIRST STREET
Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper application {Use Permit 86-21) has been filed by
MTC Management requesting authorization for an ABC license (Type
41) to sell beer and wine on-site at 556 E. First Street.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
C. That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
1. The sale of beer and wine is for on-site consumption only.
-2. The sale of. alcoholic beverages is limited to the hours of
10:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and only when food is being sold
concurrently.
D. That the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the city of Tustin, and should be
granted.
E. Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fire Marshal, and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
F. That this project is categorically exempt from the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 21.
G. Final development plans shall require the review and approval of
the Community Development Department.
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
10
11
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
27
28
Resolution No. 2344
Page two
II.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No.
86-21 to authorize the issuance of an on-site beer and wine license
at 556 E. First Street subject to the following conditions:
A. The sale of beer and wine is for on-site consumption only and
shall be sold during the hours on 10:30 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.
B. The restaurant menu shall consist primarily of foods that are
prepared on-site.
C. Alcoholic beverages can be sold only while food items are
offered for sale.
Authorization for this on-site beer and wine license is
contingent upon the use remaining as a restaurant. At such time
that the restaurant use is discontinued, authorization for the
beer and wine license will be rescinded.
and return an "Agreement to
required by the Director of
E. The applicant shall complete
Conditions Imposed" form as
Community Development.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 1986.
KATHY WEIL, CHAIRMAN
PENNI FOLEY, RECORDING SECRETARY
,/
COPY..,--.
2. IqA/~(S) OP A..tqJCq~(s)
~ ~. IN4:. (P-J2 San Jose)
~--/*gilin9 Addtm (if diffeffNff
I. TYtq(S) OF UCE.'qR.(S)
C~ ~ B~R G ~dXh~
Rt:CrIV£O
JUN 0 4 1986
~M~ OE~L~
co~ xx !.
Dote
im~d
3. TYPE(S) O~ TIAN~S) ~ LIC.
O:L.:Lg4 na I 300. O0 4
Annual Fee [95.00
,_.oo
I ~. ~i~ e.'~ "~ TOTAL 4
10.~H~ Ygv'.~x~' rigged any d the ff,~,.~ of the
II. E4dab 4 ,,yES,, M oo jOmu 9 e~ t0 off off oflechm4m whit# thall IM d#msd Pa~t ef th&t a~-~,'
12. Apldicmf agrees (a) Ihat any nuneO~ employed in on-~de licensed Femises will have oil tho q~.,.,...~.; of a | ..... fl=
19. Locaio. NuedMw and S4.m City and Zip Code Co~n*
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBdECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
dULY 14, 1986
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 86-201
14551, 14471, AND 2472 CHAJ4BERS ROAD
J. P. KAPP AND ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF SIGNAL DEVELOPMENT CO.
ENV IROIOIENTAL
STATUS:
ZONING:
REQUEST:
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend to the City Council approval of Tentative Parcel
adoption of Resolution No. 2346.
BACKGROUND: '
CATAGORIC~LY EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONHLENTAL QUALITY ACT: CLASS 15; MINOR LAND DIVISION
PLANNED COMMUNITY INDUSTRIAL (PC-H) OFFICE PORTION OF
INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
AUTHORIZATION TO RE,SUBDIVIDE ONE (1) LOT INTO THREE (3) LOTS
Map 86-201 by the
This proposed map was part of the original Tusttn/Irvtne industrial subdivision
and was known as Lots 15 and 16 of Tract 8590. This subdivision was recorded in
July of 1974. In August of 1979 Tract 10815 was recorded which created a one
(1) lot subdivision for condominium purposes for these parcels.
ANALYSIS:
The owner is now requesting authorization to create three (3) lots from the
previous one {1) lot. The total area of the proPOsed map is 3.029 acres and
will be split into three {3) lots with each lot having an existing building and
parking spaces provided as follows:
Parcel No. Building Area Stalls
1 10,930 sq. ft. 44 ea.
2 19,243 sq. ft. 77 ea.
3 10,930 sq. ft. 44 ea.
Community DeveLopment Deparxment
Planning Commtsslon Report
July [4, 1986
Page two
According to the City of Tusttn Minimum Design Standards for Public Works, house
laterals are required for each individual lot or parcel. Because these three
(3) buildings were developed on one parcel, they share a common sewer lateral.
The owner wishes to deviate from this standard and his request is attached to
this report. The applicant will record a covenant concurrently with the final
map which will guarantee proper maintenance of the service and will provide
mutual access rights for all parcels.
The proposed map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan and the
Planned Community Guidelines for the Tustin/Irvine Industrial Park.
The conditions of approval are listed in Resolution No. 2346.
Senior Planner
MAC:pef
Attachments:
Resolution No. 2346'
Letter of Request
Map
Community Devolopmont Dopartment
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2346
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 86-201 LOCATED AT 2472,
14451 AND 14471 CHAMBERS ROAD
The Pla'nntng Commission of the City of Tustln does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
That Tentative Parcel Map No. 86-201 was submitted to the
Planning Commission pursuant to Ordinance No. 847 by J. P. Kapp
& Associates on behalf of Signal Development Co. for the purpose
of subdividing one (1) lot into three (3) lots of Tract 10815 of
Miscellaneous Maps, Book 470, pages 16 and 17.
B. That said map is in conformance with the Tustln Area General
Plan.
That the proposed project is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality.Act; Class
16; Minor Land Division.
II.
The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council
approval of Tentative. Parcel Map NO. 86-201 subject to the following
conditions:
Construction and/or replacement of all missing or damaged public
improvements will be required and shall include, but not be
limited to, the following:
1. Driveways
2. Domestic water services
3. Fire services
4. Sidewalks
S. Sanitary sewer laterals
B. Reciprocal ingress and egress, parking utility and pedestrian
easements required across all three {3) parcels.
C. All applicable conditions of previous maps, Tract No. 8590 and
Tract No. 10815.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 1986.
KATHY WEIL, Chairman
~[NNI FOLEY, Recording Secretary
TENTATIVE P~'EL MAP
NUI"IBER 86,-201
THE CITY OF TUSTIN. COUNTY OF oRAN6[,
EASEMENT
O~NER' $ STA.TEHEN'T
CIVIL ENGINEERS, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, & SURVEYORS
Hay 27, ~986
Tustln City Council
300 Centennial way
Tustln, Ca. 92680
SUBJ: Tentative Parcel Map NO. 86-20[
Honorable City Council Persons:
The Tusttn City Code requires separate domestic water and
sanitary service lines to each parcel. We request this
requirement waived tn the case of tentative parcel map number
86-20[.
The existing sewer and water lines Jointly service the three
office buildings on Lot ! of Tract 10815 (see attached water
sewer plans). Four water meters are located near Chambers
Road. One for each building and one for the outdoor sprinkler
system.
Tentative parcel map no. 86-20[ plans to subdivide Lot I of
Tract [08[5 into 3 separate parcels with one office build'lng
per parcel. The Installation of new sewer and water lines to
service each parce! would require removal and repair of
existing curbs, gutter, and parring areas. We feet that this
is an unnecessary expense for an office building/professional
development. Since the maintenance of the common areas will
be co~ered under certain conditions of approval we feel that
the water and sewer lines could be handled tn a similar
manner.
Thank you for your time and effort on this project. Please
feel free to contact us tF you have any questions or need
additional information.
15892 PASADENA AVE., TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680, 714/730-5757
Planning
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
BUSINESS:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENYZROI~ENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
Commission
JULY 14, 1986
VARIANCE NO. 86-5
INTEGRATED SIGN ASSOCIATES
10845-DgNEATLANDS
SANTEE, CA 92071
HOflE FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN
625 BROAD#AY
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
182311RVINE BLVD.
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (Pr) DISTRICT
CATEGORICALLY EXERPT
TO EXCEED I~AXII~U~ SIGN AREA PERMITTED AND TO INSTALL SIGNS
OTHER THAN TENANT IDENTIFICATION CONTRARY TO SECTIONS 9493
AND 9430 OF THE TOSTIN CITY CODE.
RECOmmENDED ACTION:
Continue the public hearing on Variance Application 86-5 to the next regularly
scheduled Commission meeting~ The applicant has requested that consideration be
postponed until that date.
JD:do
Community Development Department J
Report to the
Planning Commission
DAT£: JULY 14, 1986
ITEM NO. 8
SUBdECT:
LOCATION:
RUBY'S RI~STAURAMT, DElqOLI'TIOIi OF F..XXSTIliG STRUCTURES
205 EL CAMI#O REAL
RECOI~EIJDED ACTXO#:
Receive and file.
DISCUSSION:
Last year, Ruby's Restaurant received a parking variance to remodel the
restaurant and operate with less parking than required by code. One of the
conditions stated that the variance would be null and void if the entire
structure was demolished.
A problem has arisen with the remodeling of the structure, .inasmuch as the
existing stwucture appears not worth saving. The applicants have determined
that the structural integrity and economic merit of saving the building is
null. But a complete demolition of the structure would theoretically invalidate
the variance, and the applicant did not want to start the entire process over
again.
It is the intent of the owners to reconstruct the new building substantially as
the old, neither larger nor taller. The City Attorney was consulted and it was
determined by staff and the attorney that if the structure is not demolished
until building permits are issued and those plans are substantially the same as
the original structure, that the intent of the variance has been met. The
applicants agree and have submitted a letter acknowledging those points
(attached).
The main intent of this memo is to assure the Planning Commission {ahead of
time) that although Ruby's may be demolished, the new structure will retain the
old town flavor the old Ruby's seemed to enjoy.
Senior Planner
EK:do
~.attach: Ruby's letter, 6-18-86 ·
Community Development Department
June 18, 1986
Mr. Ed Knight
Senior Planner
C~nity Develol~ent Dept.
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
Dear Mr. Knight:
RECEIVE. O
CO~I~IUN(TY DEYELOPNiENT
AS I progress in the re-creation of Ruby's in Tustin, I have uncovered a
troublesome roadblock. The purpose of this letter is to seek your assistance
and guidance in overcoming the problem.
Preliminary pricing for recons{ruction has shown no economic merit in
remodeling the existing buildings. In addition, a structural engineer has
advised me the structural integrity of the two structures when compared to
today's standards are questionable at best. As a result of this information,
it has been established new construction would be both less costly and more
structurally prudent.
I acknowledge my variance is based on remodeling and in fact, prohibits me
from tearing down the existing building. I agree with the intent of this
requirement -- to save the image of the old ~by's ~afe. Yet, if this
provision in the variance is enforced by the "letter" in lieu of "intent", I
will be required to spend more than what new construction would cost and still
end up with a building with far less structural integrity.
Please understand, I am not suggesting a different type of restaurant or a
different asthetic be achieved. Ail I am attempting to do is meet our cc, m~n
goal of re-opening }a~hy's as has been approved in my existing variance, with
new building materials in lieu of old.
The new Ruby's will be the mmme design as that in the existing variance, only
more structurally sound and economically viable.
I faced a similar problem in the develol~ent of Bubbles Balboa Club in Newport
Beach. In order to meet the intent of the local codes we were allowed to
remove all but one wall of the old building and still qualify as a re~del.
May I have this flexibility within the existing variance for Ruby's in Tustin?
If so I would expect the City to withhold any demolition permits until the
time you have approved the design develolm~ent drawings prepared by my
architect.
I am c~,,,dtted and capable of proceeding iamediately with the project, as
approved in the existing variance, with the only interpretation being the use
of new materials in lieu of patching and repairing old materials.
Your thoughts and continued support are greatly appreciated. Please contact
me at your earliest convenience so we may discuss the details of my proposal.
DouglaS. Cavan~h
Planning Commission
duly 14, 1986
SUBd£CT: REPORT ON COUNCil ACTTONS - dune 16 and duly 7, 1986
Ora*l presentation to be gtven by Edward lq. Kntght,' Sentor Planner
do
Attachments: City Counctl Actton Agenda - dune 16 and duly 7, 1986
Community Development Department
ACTZON AGENDA OF A REGULAR t~ETING
OF THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 16, 1986
7:00 P.M.
1:03 I. CALL TO ORDER
&LL PRESEI~T II. ROLL CALL
PRESENTED PROCLA~TION TO MARGARET GREINKE
III.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION 1.
NO. 86-78
PUBLIC HEARINGS
VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF MYFORD ROAD AT DOW AVENUE -
RESOLUTION NO. 86-78
RESOLUTION NO. 86-78 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING VACATION OF A PORTION OF MYFORD ROAD
APPROVED STAFF 2.
RECO~NDATION
C' JE IV.
Recommendation: Pending results of the public hearing, and if City
Council desires to vacate and abandon a portion of Myford Road within
the limits stated, adopt Resolution No. 86-78.
FISCAL YEAR 1986-87 PRELIMINARY PROGRAM AND FINANCIAL PLAN BUDGET
Recon~endation: .Direct staff to prepare a resolution of adoption incor-
porating any changes resulting from the public hearing to be placed on
the next appropriate agenda, at the pleasure of the City Council.
PUBLIC INPUT
(For City of Tustin Residents and Businesspersons on any matter, and for
Water Service Customers having a concern unresolved by Administrative
procedures.)
V. CONSENT CALENDAR
APPROVED
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 2, 1986, REGULAR MEETING
APPROVED
2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $985,751.67
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $140,107.91
APPROVED STAFF 3.
RECOI,I~ENDATION
DENIAL OF APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO PRESENT L~ATE CLAIM FILED ON
BEHALF OF RITA BEALS; CLAIM NO. 86-22
Deny subject application as recommended by the City Attorney.
APPROVED STAFF 4.
RECO~,~ENDATI ON WITH
APPROVAl. OF $2,500 FOR
ORANGE COUNTY CTSA
FISCAL YEAR 1986-86 REVENUE SHARING FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS
Ratify the recommendations of the Revenue Sharing Review Committee
as follows: ATSC - $4,000; Boys & Girls Club of Tustin - $4,000;
Feedback Foundation/TLC - $3,000; Bartlett Center/Meals on Wheels -
$2,000; COPES, Inc. - $4,000; Lestonnac Free Clinic - $500; Family
Services Association - $1,000; South O.C. Volunteer Center - $500;
and Tustin Historical Society - $1,000; and authorize the Mayor to
execute agreements with successful applicants.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA
PAGE 1 6-16-86
ADOPTED P~SOL~I'~ON 5,
qO. 86-77
APPROVED STAFF 6.
RECOiIIENOATIOll
ADOPTE]) RESOLUTIO# 7.
NO. 86-66
ADOPTED RESOLIJTIO# 8,
NO. 86-79
N)0PTB) RE. SOUJTIOM 9.
NO. 86-8O
APPROVED STAFF 10.
R£COI,~{ZNDATIO#
N)OPTEO 11.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-67
VI.
VII.
ADOPTB) ORDINANCE
NO. 971
RESOLUTION NO. 86-77 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING AND MODIFYING PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL
OF VARIANCE NO. 86-3 FOR THE SHOPPING CENTER KNOWN AS TUSTIN PLAZA
Adopt Resolution No. 86-77 pursuant to Council action on June 2,
1986. {Saltarelli registered a "NO" vote.)
STORM DRAIN & STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN SOUTHEAST TUSTIN - ANNEXATION NO.
135 AREA
Approve Contract No. C40258 between the City and County of Orange
to transfer $114,696.78 for construction of storm drain and street
improvements on Sierra Vista Drive, ~aren Way and Jan Marie Place;
and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute same as recom-
mended by the Community Development Department.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-66 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12759 (North of the Santa Ana
Freeway, West of Jamboree, East of E1 Camino Real}
Adopt Resolution No. 86-66 as recommended by the Community Develop-
merit Department.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-79 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING PLACEMENT OF CERTAIN STOP SIGNS ("B"
STREET AND MITCHELL AVE.)
Adopt Resolution No. 86-79 as recommended by the Public Works
Department/Engineering Division.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-80 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, INFORMING THE ARTERIAL. HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM
ADVISORY COMMIT'FEE OF THE STATUS OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN MASTER PLAN OF
ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS
Adopt Resolution No. 86-80 as recommended by the Public Works
Department/Engineering Division.
ORANGE COUNTY CITIES RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY BYLAWS AMENDMENT
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute subject amendment
allowing for an alternative method of allocating the cost of excess
insurance, when warranted, as recommended by the Finance Department.
-RESOLUTION NO. 86-67 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN PETITIONING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PRO-
CEEDINGS FOR A TRANSFER OF TERRITORY FROM THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO THE
CITY OF TUSTIN KNOWN AS ORANGE COUNTY MUNICIPAL REORGANIZATION NO. 91
Adopt Resolution No. 86-67 as recommended by the Community Develop-
ment Department.
ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION - None.
ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION
1. SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AMENDMENTS - ORDINANCE NO. 971
ORDINANCE NO. 971 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN APPROVING THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 9311 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE
AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR VESTING TENTATIVE MAPS FOR RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISIONS
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA PAGE 2 6-16-86
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
'q0o 972
NEWPORT AVENUE UNDERGROUND LFFILITY DISTRICT NO. 7 - ORDINANCE NO. 972
ORDINANCE NO. 972 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 7,
NEWPORT AVENUE, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONVERSION
ADOPTED O~J)INAJ~:E 3. HOLT AVENUE/IRVINE BOULEVARD-UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 8 - ORDI-
NO. 973 NANCE NO. 973
ORDINANCE NO. 973 - AN ORbINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 8,
HOLT AVENUE/IRVINE BOULEVARD, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE
CONVERSION
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
APPROVED STAFF
~ECO~NDATION
1. COLUMBUS TUSTIN PARK CONCESSION STAND PROPOSAL
Recommendation: Authorize the Community Services staff, with assistance
from the City Attorney's office, to draft an agreement between the City
of Tustin and Mr. Dave Ascher for the use and renovation of the Columbus
Tustln Park Concession Stand.
- APPOINI'EB KATHY 2. APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
WEIL, DONALD
LEJEUNE, (~4AJ~LES Reco~endation: Pleasure of the City Council.
PU~, A. L. ~ER
~ ~IE ~I~I~S
~'.P~V~ ~AFF 3. FOOTHILL/EASTERN/I-5 BO~LENECK ANALYSIS AND TOLL ROAD FEASIBILITY STUDY
'RE~ATION ~D I~ ~ L~ENDECK~ ~ I~L~E IN HIS L~R ~P~RT ~ ~RIO II
~O IN ~E ~E~ ~RIO I IS ~CEP~, I~LUDE ~AIN ~ONG ~E~S ~AI~ V~IOUS
AERMTIVES.
Reco~endation: Authorize staff to' respond to the Orange County Trans-
portation Co~ission per co~ents/concerns outlin~ in the letter dated
June 17, 1986, to Sharon Greene, Project Manager.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
APPROVED STAFF
RECO~NDATION
AWARD OF CONTRACT - TRAFFIC SIGNAL & SAFETY LIGHTING AT INTERSECTION OF
TUSTIN RANCH ROAD & EL CAMINO REAL
Recommendation: Award the contract for subject project to Sierra
Pacific Electrical Contracting, Riverside, in the amount of $75,710.
APPROVED STAFF
RECOMI~NDATION
APPROVED STAFF
RECOM~NDATION
2. AWARD 'OF BID - REMOVAL OF UNDERGROUND TANK AT 235 EAST MAIN STREET
Recommendation: Authorize the removal of the 500-gallon underground
storage tank located at 235 East Main Street by Kamtec Corporation,
Cempton, for a cost of $6,230 plus.
3. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE ONE 3-WHEEL SCOOTER (GASOLINE) FOR SPECIALIZED
ATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENANCE
Recommendation: Authorize the purchase of one Cushman 3-wheel Haulster
from Toro Pacific Equipment Company, City of Industry, in the total
amount of $5,840.60.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA PAGE 3 6-16-86
ADOPTED P.[~)LUTION 4.
, 86-75 AND 86.-76
I~JSTIN LIGHTING & LANDSCAPE DISTRICT - RESOLUTIONS NO. 86-75 AND NO.
86-76
RESOLUTION NO. 86-75 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, C~U. IFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY
OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT AND FOR
THE ANNEXATION OF AI)DITIONAL TERRITORY TO SAID EXISTING DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO. 86-76 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE
ANNEXATION OF ADDITIONAL TERRITORY TO AN EXISTING DISTRICT AND TO PRO-
VIDE FOR AN ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT, MAINTENANCE
AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC LIGHTING FACILITIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE
TERRITORY INCLUDED IN THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT AND TO
LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
ACT'OF 1972 AND GIVING NOTICE THEREOF
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 86-75 and Resolution No. 86-76.
ACCEPTED THE 4A. GREATER EAST TUSTIN AREA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
~TITION FI~O BY
IRVINE COMPANY RE~S'TING FORX~ATION OF TH£ GRF. J~T£R ~ TUSTIN AJUEA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND
DIRECTED STAFF TO INITIATE THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROCEEDINGS.
ADOPTED RESOLUTIO# 5. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 85-1 (EAST TUSTIN) - RESOLUTION NO. 86-81
NO. 86-81 AND 86-8.3 RESOLUTION NO. 86-81 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTiN OECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE FORMATION OF THE EAST TUSTIN
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND THE CONSTRUCTI.ON OF CERTAIN
IMPROVEMENTS THEREIN
Recommendation: Approve the Preliminary Engineer's Report for Assess-
merit District No. 85-1; and adopt Resolution No. 86-81 which sets
Monday, July 21, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. as the date, time and place of the
public hearing for Assessment District No. 85-1.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-83 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN APPROVING A PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT
MOVED THAT THE 6. TUSTIN AUTO CENTER LOUDSPEAKER CRITERIA
OPPONENTS OF THE LOUOSPEAKERS ANO THE IRVINE COMPANY I~ET TO TRY TO WORK OUT DIFFERENCES AND
THEN BRING BACK THEIR RECOI~WOATIONS AT THE NEXT IwEETING.
RATIFIEI)
REPORTS
1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA - JUNE 9, 1986
All actions of the Planning Commission become final unless appealed by
the City Council or member of the public.
XI. OTHER BUSINESS
ADOPTED RESOLUTION 1. RESOLUTION NO. 86-82 - A resolution regarding prohibitions of sale of
NO. 86-82 units at 1651 Mitchell Ave.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA
PAGE 4
6-16-86
ROURK~ TO INVF. STIGAlt ORAN~ O)UNTY ATHLETIC C~UB g)ING OUT OF
FROM
L~ERO~¢KF.R TO LO~K INTO ~OSSIBILII~ OF Y~LOW OOUBtE STRIPIN~ AT RAINTREE A~D ANA TREE
CITY MAgAGER TO SEND LETTERS OVER ~YOR'S SIGNATURE TO JOHN MC CARTHY AND RONALI) WI4IT£ FOR
TMEIR SERVZC£ OM TRE PI.ANNIN~ CO~ISSION.
EI)~AR ,a,~POINTED ~ $&NTA ~ RIVER R~71'ECTION A~NCY.
K~LY APPOINTED AS LIAISON TO OFFICE OF PROTOCOL.
9:04 XII.
ADJOURNMENT
To an Adjourned Regular Meeting on June 30, 1986, at 5:00 p.m. to award con-
tract for the E1 Modena-Irvine Channel, and thence to the next Regular Meet-
ing on Monday, July 7, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA
PAGE 5 6-16-86
ACTION AGENOA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF
THE TUSTIN REI)EVELOP~ENT AGENCY
JUNE 16, 1986
7:00 P.M.
9:04 1. CALL TO ORDER
ALL 2.
PRESENT
APPROVED 3.
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 2, 1986, REGULAR MEETING
Re~onm~endatioo: Approve.
ADOPTED 4.
RESOLUTION NO.
RDA 86-6
DESIGN REVIEW - 730 EL CAMINO WAY - RESOLUTION NO. RDA 86-6
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 86-6 - A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DESIGN OF AN OFFICE STRUCTURE TO
BE CONSTRUCTED AT 730 EL CAMINO WAY AS APPROVED BY AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO USE
PERMIT 85-14 THEREBY SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NO. RDA 85-7
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. RDA 86-6.
L:'ROVED PUBLIC HEARING ON 1986-87 PRELIMINARY PROGRAM AND FINANCIAL PLAN BUDGET
B.
,'~'F RECOI~ENDATION
Recommendation: Direct staff to prepare a resolution of adoption incorporating
any changes resulting from the public hearing to be placed on the next appro-.
priate agenda, at the pleasure of the Agency.
NONE 6. OTHER BUSINESS
9:06 7.
ADJOURNMENT
To the next Regular Meeting on July 7, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION AGENDA
Page I 6-16-86
ACTION AGENI)A OF A REGIJULR )IEETING
OF THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
JULY 7, 1986
7:00 'PM
7:01 I.
ALL II.
PRESENT
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL
III. PROCLAMATIONS
PRESENTED
TO BE HAILED
PRESERI'ED
PRESENTED
TO BE HAILED
1. RETIREMENT OF DALE WICK, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER
2. JOHN J. MC CARTHY AND RONALD H. WHITE, FORMER PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
3. NICK OGDEN - TLC SITE MANAGER
4. "PARKS AND RECREATION MONTH". JULY, 1986
5. TUSTIN HIGH AQUATICS WATER POLO TEAM
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. SOLID WASTE COLLECTION FEES PLACED ON TAX ROLLS
PPROVEO STAFF
~ECOMI~NDATION
1ST READING &
INTROOUCEO
Recommendation: Take appropriate action as determined by the City Attorney to
approve the placement of solid waste collection fees on the property tax rolls
at the proposed amount of $64.20 per unit to a maximum of three units.
ORDINANCE NO. 974 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ll4E PROVISIONS OF SECTION 5473 ET SEQ OF THE
HEALTH & SAFETY.CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINALLY APPROVING AND ADOPTING
A REPORT RELATIVE TO PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY RECEIVING SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
SERVICES, DETERMINING THAT A MAJORITY PROTEST HAS NOT BEEN MADE, AND DETERMIN-
ING THE CHARGES FOR SOLID WASTE COLLECTION TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE RESPEC-
TIVE LOTS OR PARCELS OF LAND AS THEY APPEAR ON THE CURRENT ASSESSMENT ROLL
ADOPTED
2. TUSTIN LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DISTRICT - RESOLUTION NO. 86-86
RESOLUTION NO. 86-86 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF llJSTIN,
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF ADDITIONAL TERRITORY TO
AN EXISTING DISTRICT AND CONFIRMING THE ANNUAL 1986-87 FISCAL YEAR LEVY OF
ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC LIGHTING
FACILITIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRITORY INCLUDED IN THE TUSTIN LAND-
SCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
Recommendation: If Council ascertains that the additional territory should be
annexed to the existing district and that the proposed 1986-87 Fiscal Year levy
should be assessed to all affected parcels, a~opt Resolution No. 86-86.
V. PUBLIC INPUT
~ICHARO VINING COMPLAINEO ABOUT DIRT PILE IN STEVENS SQUARE. HE WAS INFORMED IT IS FOR
~liUILDING OF THE RAMP; PRO~ECT COMPLETION EXPECTED WITHIN 4-6 WEEKS. KENNEDY REQUESTED
INI/ESI'I~TING POSSIBILITY OF REPt.RCING BLOCK WALL WITH IRON FENCE AROUND UPPER LEVEL OF PARKIMG
STRUCTURE.
V-A. ORAL PRESENTATION - SHARON GREENE, PROJECT MANAGER ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION - BOTTLENECK STUDY
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page i 7-7-86
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
APPROVED 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 16, 1986, REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 30, 1986, ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
APPROVED 2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $485,363.88
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $295,491.86
REJECTED 3. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 86-12; CLAIMANT: CANDICE LILY COWART; DATE OF LOSS:
2/2/86; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 4/4/86
Reject subject claim as recon~nended by the City Attorney.
A~OPTED 4. RESOLUTION NO. 86-84 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
ADOPTING THE CITY BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING REVENUE OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 1986-87
Adopt Resolution No. 86-84 pursuant to Council action of June 16, 1986.
VII. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION - None
VIII. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION - None
IX. OLD BUSINESS
ONTINUED 1. TUSTIN AUTO CENTER LOUDSPEAKER CRITERIA
,0 7-21-86
Recommendation: Continue to July 21, 1986.
CONTINUED 2. EAST TUSTIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1
TO ADJOURNED REGULAR I~[ETIN~ TO BE HELD 7-14-86 AT S:O0 Pt~
Recommendation: Pleasure of the City Council.
CONTINUED 3. EL MOOENA-IRVINE CHANNEL (FACILITY FO7)
TO ADdouRNED REGULAR )EETIN6 TO BE HELD 7-14-86 AT 5:00 PIM
Recommendation: Pleasure of the City Council.
X. NEW BUSINESS
1. AWARD OF BID - REPLACEMENT PLAY STRUCTURE AT MAGNOLIA TREE PARK
APPROVED STAFF Recommendation: Award the contract for subject park improvements to Miracle
RECO~NDATION Recreation Equipment Company, San Pedro, in the amount of $9,203.44.
XI. REPORTS
1. DECORATIVE CROSSWALKS ON EL CAMINO REAL AND MAIN STREET
APPROVED STAFF Recommendation: Authorize installation of raised white reflective markers at
RECO~NDATION two test intersections - E1 Camino Real and Third Street, and Main and "C"
Streets; and if acceptable, complete installations on all other decorative
- crosswalks along E1 Camino Real and Main Street.
XII. OTHER BUSINESS
CITY t4ANAGER REQUESTED CLOSED SESSION FOR PERSONNEL MRI'rERS
KELLY REQUESTED MOVEMENT OF AIRPORT APPROACH SOUNI) MONITORS FROM BONITA WRY TO 300 S. "C" ST.,
ANO FROM GRAND & MC FADOEN TO SERVICE ROAD. STAFF TO MA&CE REQUEST TO COUNTY.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 2 7-7-86
KELLY REQUESTED STAFF SERVE IN HIS R_ACE OR LIAISON CO~ITTEE TO O.C. OFFICE OF PROTOCOL
KENNEDY REQUESTED STAFF REPAIR BASKETBALL HOOPS & INVESTIGATE POSSIBILITY OF RUBBERIZING
BASKElliALL COURT SURFACE AT NAGNOLIA TREE PARK
COUNCIL AUTHORIZED STAFF TO TAKE NECESSARY STEPS TO INITIATE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS WITH LAFCO
AS REQUESTED BY THE BELLWICK COIW~UNITY ASSOCIATION FOR THE AREA LOCATED AT BROWNING & IRVINE
9:03 XIII. ADJOURNMENT - To Adjourned Regular Meeting on Monday, July 14, 1986, at 5:00 p.m.
and thence to the next Regular Meeting on Monday, July 21, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.
ACTION AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF
THE TUSTIN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
JULY 7, 1986
7:00 P.M.
9:03 1. CALL TO ORDER
ALL 2. ROLL CALL
PRESENT
APPROVED
ADOPTED 4.
APPROVED
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 16, 1986, REGULAR MEETING-
Recommendation: Approve.
ADOPTION OF 1986-87 CITY OF TUSTIN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT -
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 86-7 ~
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 86-7 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TUSTIN
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, ADOPTING THE AGENCY BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING
REVENUE'OF THE AGENCY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1986-87
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. RDA 86-7.
5. AFFIDAVIT OF DEMANDS
Recommendation: Approve Demands in the amount of $538,54~.76 for the month of
May, 1986, as recommended by the Finance Department.
APPROVED 6. GENERAL SERVICES CONTRACT - KATZ, HOLLIS, COREN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
STAFF RECOI~ENDATION
Recommendation: Direct the Chairman to execute subject contract for consultant
services on Redevelopment Agency undertakings.
APPROVED 7. AWARD OF CONTRACT - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY NEWSLETTER
STAFF RECOI~NDATION
Recommendation: Retain the firm of Dean Oavisson Public Relations to design
and produce a quarterly newsletter promoting Agency activities; and direct the
City Attorney to prepare all necessary contractual documents.
NONE 8. OTHER BUSINESS
9:08 9.
ADJOURNMENT
To the next Regular Meeting on July 21, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 3 7-7-86