Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES OF 09-29-86Iio MINUTES OF A JOIIfr AI)dOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AI(D ll(E PLANNING CO)I(ISSION OF lllE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 29, 1986 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Meyor Pro Tem Hoesterey at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. ROLL CALL Council persons Present: Counctlpersons Absent: Planning Commissioners Present: Planning Con~nissioners Absent: Others Present: III. 6ENERAI. DISCUSSION Ronald B. Hoesterey, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar John Kelly Ursula E. Kennedy Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Kathy Well, Chairperson Pro Tem Alden L. Baker Donald Le Jeune Leslie Anne Pontious None Wi111am A. Huston, City Manager dames $. Rourke, City Attorney Rob Balen, Planning Consultant deff Oavts, Acttng Senior Planner darter Hester, Administrative Secretary IV. "Parents Who Care" made a presentation regarding the sale of liquor in the community. The City Council and Planning Commission responded that they would take subject proposal into consideration. DINNER RECESS - AO~OURNII!NT At 6:00 p.m., the meeting was recessed for dinner at The Barn Restau- rant, 14982 Red Hill Avenue, Tustin. Councilman Kelly left at 6:30 p.m. At 8:15 p.m., the meeting was adjourned by unanimous informal consent to the next regular meeting on Monday, October 6, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. CII~CLERK i~ II. III. MIIlIIES O~ A RE~ ~ETING OF I~IE cITY ClIU#CIL flF THE CI'I~ ~ TUb'TIN, CALIFORNIA SEPTEM6ER 1S, lg~6 ~ TO OI~ER/Pt.I~£ OF ALL£$IANC~/INVOCATIOll The meeting was called to order by Mayor Saltarellf at 7:03 p.m. in the City Council Cha~foers, 300 Centennial Way, The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Edgar, and the Invocation was given by Council- woman Kennedy. Council persons Present: Council persons Absent: Others Present: Oonald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Ronald B. Hoesterey, Mayor Pro Richard B. Edgar John Kelly Ursula E. Kennedy ~ne William A. Huston, City Manager Jams G. Rourke, City Attorney Mar7 E. Wynn, City Clerk R~erl: S. Ledefldecker, Otr. of Public Works Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Ronald A. N~ult, Finance Director Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent Jeff Oavts, ~:tlng Senior Planner Janet Hester, Administrative Secretary Approximately 35 in the Audience PUBLIC INPUT 1. CITY OF IRVlltf'5 I~IIOEST TO ~0I# ~ JOINT POt~:.RS AUTI~}I~ (JPA) Frank Gretnke, 230 South 'A' Street, oo~le~ented Councllme~oer$ on the fine job in seeing to completion various metters left over from his administration as Mayor during ig85-86, He expressed concerns re~ardlng past and present relationships between Tustin and Irvine. He spoke strongly against Irvtne Mayor Agran's current position to all o~ Irvtne to rejoin the JPA, two · onths after dropping out, without [~ytng the fees ~lch other me~- ~er cities have paid. Mr. ireinke co~ended Irvtne'$ manag~ent team and Irvtne Council ~ers Oavld Baker, lally ~lller and former Mayor Oavld Sills. He urged the Tusttn City Council to vote on October g against allowing Irvtne to re~oln the JPA until they have paid the feeS that Tusttn and other cities have paid. Mayor Saltarelli informed Mr. ~retnke that he and the City Manager met with Mayor Agran last ~eek v~nere they indicated an aura of cooperation in trying to plan the roads. In t~e event they drop out or are forced out due to a court ruling or ruling of a vote of Irvfne residents, The Irvtne Co~oany has agreed to pay the fees, so the money will be there. Mr. Gretnke objected that in the meantime Irvine still has the right to vote and the fees might be rescinded. He felt they should pay their fees; when they pay their fees, they have a right to vote. He encouraged the Council to discuss the matter. Z. b'TL:VEN5 ~ P~R~IN~ STRUCTURE Richard Vtnlng, 400 West ~ain Street, inquired on the status of the Stevens Square parking structure. He was informed that the City owns 38~ of the structure, The City Manager reported that the matter would ~e discussed in Closed Session this evening. Mayor Saltarelli assured Mr. Vintng that the City is working on resolving the matter as quickly as possible. 81 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 9-15-86 IV. CONSENT CALENOAR Item No. 9 was removed from the Consent Calendar by staff. It was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Edgar, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Motion carrle~l 1. APPROYAL OF MI#UTES - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986, ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING 2. APPROYAL OF OFJa. M~S IN THE N4OUNT OF $450,999.86. PJ~TIFICATION OF PAYROU. IN THE ~OUNT OF $139,070.99. 50 3. RE~tlTION NO. 86-113 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN COM- MUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RECORDS Adopted Resolution No. 86-113 as recommended by the Community Services Oepartment, 41 4. RES~IYI'IO# NO. ~-11! - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUST[N, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING [TS RESOLUTION NO. 81-61 TO MODIFY THE DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES CONTAIN~ IN THE CONFLICT OF INTER- EST CODES OF THE DEPARTMENTS OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN Adopted Resolution No. 86-111 as reco~nended by the Administra- tive Services Department. 32 $o RESOI~tlTIOII NO. 86-114 - A RESOLUTION OF THE cITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING. THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNOS UNDER THE REGIONAL COMPETITIVE PROGRAM OF THE CALIFORNIA PARK ANO RECREATION FACILITIES ACT OF 1984 FOR MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS TO P[NETR£E PARK Adopted Resolution No. 86-114 as recommended by the Community Services Department, 77 6. TI~ EXTEI~S[O# FOR CO#~ET[O# OF ~EWPORT AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MOD[FICAT[O#S [FAU ~M016(002)] Approved a ttme extension through Septe~er 30, [986, for com- pletion of the Newport Avenue Traffic Signal Installations and Modlflcations, also known as FAU Project No, M-MO16(O02) (Steiny & Co., InCo) as recommended by the Department of Public Works, Engineering Oivision. 94 7. REQUE~ FOR RE,%~[C~I[O PARKI~ DIJR[~ STREE'T SWEEPING OP~ATIONS Authorized the prohibition of parking during street sweeping operations on the Hyannisport Road cul-de-sac between the driveways at [4712 and 14711 Hyanntsport Road, subject to receipt of a written request from both affected residents 'as recommended by the Oepartment of Public Works, Engineering 75 Division. 8. M~OPOSED i~I#TJIt#~)I)/BEI. LW[C~ ~NE~TIO# NO. 138 Authorized staff to ~verttse a public hearing for October 6, t986, on the City Council's intent to adopt a resolution as application for the Ranchwood/Sel~wick Annexation No. i38 to the City of Tustin as recommended by the Community Oevelopment 2¢ Department. Ce~ent Calendar Item #oo 9 - T~at~ve Tract Map tie. [2732 - The City Attorney recommended that pursuant to agreement made between The Irv!ne Company and the City that Resolution No. 86-116 be modified in para- graph II-1 to read, "All conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2356 must be adhered to provided, however, that Condi- tion 1g is amended to read, 'Assessment bonds on each property within the subdivision shall be converted to a fi xed rate and confirmation of the conversion shall be furnished to the City in a form approved by the C~ty's Finance Director prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy for any residential unit. This condition, however, does not apply to issuance of certificates of occupancy for model homes.'" It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt the following as modified: ie VI. VII. Vlll. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 9-15-86 (EAST TUSTIN RESIDENTIAL PHASE I, AREA NO. 2) The motion carried S-O. URDI~ES FOR INIRflOUCTIO# None. UROINAJ~:£ FOR ~ION RESOLUTION NO. 8~-116 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, ~ALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12732 0EVELOPI~EltTS NITIIIN PROPO:.~i) SPECIFIC RAN NO. 7 AREA - URGENCY OROINAIIC£ NO. 975 As reCommended in the inter-cOrn dated Septenfoer lB, [985, prepared by the Community Development Oepartment, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. g7S have flrst reading by title only. Carried Following first reading by tltle only of Ordinance No. 975 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Hoesterey~ seConded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 975 be introduced. Motion carried 5-0. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 975 have seCond reading by title oniy. CaF,'led 5-0. Pollewtng second reading by title only of Ordinance NO. 975 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 97S be passed and adopted as follows: ORDIRMIC£ NO. 975 - AN URGENCY OROINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIl~f OF llJSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN, REQUIRING THE PAYMENT OF A CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT FEE, ANO ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT FEE SCHEOULE Roll call vote: AYES: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kelly, Kennedy Saltarellt NOES: None ABSENT: None It wes ~)ved by Edgar, seConded by Kennedy, to authorize staff to advertiS~ a public hearing for the extension of the ordinance beyond the 45-day limit for a period of lO months and 15 days dur- lng w~ich time Specific Plan No. 7 will be undergoing review and adoption. The motion carried 5-0. 81 None. 1. BI,SI#ESS REJECTION OF BIOS - PLAY STRUCTURE FOR THE C~ILO CARE PRO~RAM AT LA~£RT SCIa)OL Bids for subject project were received on September 9, 1986, as followS: Hanson & Associates, Inc., Santa Aha $5,810.00 Ryco Construction, Inc., Gardena $12,121.00 Ryco Construction's biU proposal was over the allotted amount, and Hanson & Associates' bid proposal was not in concurrence with bid packet specifications. Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the inter-tOm dated September 9, 1986, prepared by the Community Services Department, it was moved by Kennedy~ seconded by Edgar, to reject all bids for subject play structure eno reaover:~se tot bids at a later date. Motion carried 5-0. 77 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, g-15-86 Xe 2. ENGIREERIR6 SERVICES A6~EI~IENT FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 As recommended in the lnter-com dated September 10, [986, prepared by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division, it was moved by Kennedy~ seconded by £dgar, to authorize the Mayor to execute subject agreement with Hunsaker and Associates for the design and plan preparation for public improvements within the East Tustin Assessment District No. 85-1 in the amount of $371,104.00. Carried 5-o. 45~--~ REPORTS 1. PL~NI~ O)~4ISSION ACTIONS - SEPTEI~ER 8, 198~ After a question-and-answer period, it was moved by Hoesterey~ sec- onded by Edgar, to appeal Public Hearing Items C through 7 (Zone Change 86-1, Specific Plan No. 11, Use Permit 86-26, and Tentative Tract Map No. [2833 filed by Mark Ainslie for properties at 335-455 West Sixth Street). Following Council discussion, the motion carried S-O. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to ratify the remain- der of the September B, 1986, Planning Commission Action Agenda. Carried 5-0. 80 INVEST)tENT SE~EOULE AS OF AUGUST 31, 1986 It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar. to receive and file subject report dated September g, 1986, prepared by the Finance Director. Motion carried 6-0. 50 RECESS - RECONVENED . The meeting was recessed at 7:28 p.m. to allow set-up for the following item. The meeting was reconvened at 7:37 with all members present. 3. PRESENTATION REgiROING CIVIC CENTER SPACE NEEOS STUDY The City Manager commented that funds were included in Fiscal Year [985-86 for the Space Needs Study. When the present facility was built it was sized for a population of roughly 43,000. With the East.Tustin Plan, Tustin will grow by at least 25,000, and there is always the potential of annexation. The options are to either lease space at a very high price through- out town and it's also very dysfunctional organizationally, or increase the size of the facility - which was the purpose of this study. The City Manager enphasized that this evening Council will see a "broad brush" conceptual plan. It is simply a space needs study that offers options for handling future space needs. The City Manager noted that following Mr. Bates' presentation, the next issue to be dealt with is how to proceed. He recommended that if Council approves the option that's being recommended, to autho- rize staff to proceed to negotiate a contract for working drawings and to work out the financing plan for same. He stressed that it is a critical need from the standpoint of providing efficient operation. John Bates, Consultant for the Civic Center Space Needs Study, com- menced with showing slides of the kakewood Civic Center which was 20-30 years old and had similar problems. It showed a three-block area that was redeveloped and completed last year. He then presented slides of conceptual drawings for expansion of existing Tustin Civic Center facilities. An outside consultant and staff assessed needs through approximately the year 2000 for a population of about 85,000. That information was translated onto a plate which demonstrates each facility's potential deficiency and allows shortages to be quantified. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 9-15-86 The additional building area required for City Hall is approxi- mately 10,000 sq. ft. for a total of 24,000 sq. ft. The deficiency in parking is 30 spaces for City Hall. The Police facility has a significant deficiency of 98 spaces. The required area they need for expansion is approximately 11,000 sq. ft. in addition to the 8,800 sq. ft. they currently occupy. Mr. Bates stated that the first approach was to de~ict parking alternatives. He described the three parking concepts which were studied. It is staff consensus and his recon~endation to maintain development of the Civic Center within its own limits and develop a semi-subterranean parking structure adjacent to the Police facility and in proximity to City Hall as depicted in Parking Concept A. He described the three development concept alternatives which were explored, detailing selected Concept A. The City Manager recommended Council proceed with the second phase of the study by negotiating an agreement with John Bates' firm for the design working drawings. The RFP initially indicated the City's intent to enter into a working drawing phase with the archi- tact subject to negotiating an appropriate fee. He stated that staff is happy with Conce~t A, it's functional, it's not elaborate, and it's financeable. In the development agreement coming before Council in October, one element for financing will be covered through The Irvine Company due to their contribution to expansion. Timing is of the essence fram the standpoint that if approved tonight, completion is still three years away. During that time there is going to be a lot of development occurring. The estimated cost for expansion is $5 million. The City Manager responded to Councilwoman Kennedy that the County has indicated no plans or desire to expand existing library facili- ties within the Civic Center cemplex. Councilman Edgar provided hist~rical background on the lease between the City and County relative to the library facilities. In accordance with Councilwoman Kennedy's request, the Mayor indi- cated he would direct a letter to the County Board of Supervisors informing them of Tustin's Civic Center Space Heeds study should they wish to concur any library facility modification plans with the City's plans, It was moved by Hoestereyt seconded by Edgar, to proceed with the second phase of the study by negotiating an agreement with John 8ares & Associates for preparation of design working drawings. Councilman Edgar expressed support of the concept to expand exist- ing facilities in 1leu of obtaining more land, He viewed it as efficient and attractive with.a very refreshing attitude. Councilman Kelly stressed the importance of meeting City code park- ing requirements, suggesting construction of a parking structure to meet same, The motion carried 5-0. OTHER BUSINESS REQUEST FO~ ~OSEO SESSION As requested by the City Attorney, the Mayor announced that the City Council would recess to a Closed Session pursuant to Govern- ment Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with the City Attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the City is a party, of which the title is Rodrtguez vs. the City of Tustin. CITY OF IRVINE'S REQUEST TO REJOIN THE JOIN1' POI~RS AUTHORITY (JPA) (See Page [, Public Input Item No. 1) Councilwoman Kennedy concurred with former Mayor Frank Greinke's position on subject item. She stated she has not received any information on the matter. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 9-15-86 Mayor Saltarelli requested that the City Manager forward copies of JPA minutes to Council, He explained that the JPA has taken only formative action such as setting up committees, and nothing substan- tive has occurred relative to freeway locations. Relative to Mr. Greinke's comments, he continued that Mayor Agran is concerned that Irvtne be permitted to rejoin the JPA as a full operating member subject to: [) If the Supreme Court rules that they must drop out because of litigation that was standing, they have the right to back out without penalty; and 2) Whatever the pre- ferreq alignments and choices of the JPA are, that they be voted upon by Irvine citizens as to location and method of financing. He emphasized that Tustin must decide whether to support Irvine's readmlssion. He stated his position that as long as Irvine is pay- ing their dues, they should be a full voting member. The issue of whether Irvine should continue, or if Tustin should be appointed, to sit on the Operations Committee must be discussed with other JPA members. It has been agreed that Irvtne and Tustin will communicate on a close basis (hopefully monthly) regarding JPA actions, both Councils will be informed of same, and both Councils intend to support a mutually acceptable alignment solution. Mayor Agran has indicated he and Irvine Council members would personally support, and urge Irvine voters to support, an alignment which has the least impact on Irvine and Tustin which is acceptable to all JPA members. Further Council debate/discussion followed. The Mayor requested Staff provide Councilmembers with Irvine's memorandum on the matter, along with any additional information, for Council review. This will assist Council in deciding at its October 6 meeting how it will vote on the issue at the JPA's October 9 meeting. 100 TRAFFIC CONCERNS AT CORNER OF REDHILL & EDINGER AVENUES The Director of Public Works responded to Councilwoman Kennedy that staff is preparing proposals for completion of reconstruction of Edtnger through a City contract. Once completed, the third lane on Redhill can be ooened. Staff hopes to get that done within 7-10 days. The Director explained that the third lane is blocked off for safety reasons. Mayor Saltarelli reported that the left-turn signal from Edinger onto Redhill at subject intersection is ve~ brief and only two cars at a time can get through. The Director responded that this is a temporary condition which will be remedied when construction is com- pleted. 95 OCTOBER 20 NEETING RESCHEOULED TO OCTOBER 22 It was moved by Ed~ar~ seconded by Hoesterey, 'to reschedule the October 20 meetlng to Wednesday, October 22. 1~86, at 7:00 p.m. due to Council's attendance at the League of Cities meeting. Carried 5-0. 38 VOTING DELEGATE AT LEAGUE OF CITIES Council concurred to formally recognize Councilman Richard B. Edgar as the voting delegate, with Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey as alternate, at the League of Cities meeting. 38 EXTENSION OF J/~BOREE FROg EDINGER TO BARRANCA The Director of Public Works provided Councilman Edgar with a time- table for subject project. Due to the toxic waste cleanup on the air base, construction will not commence until September, 1987. g$ SENIO(~ CENTER PLAJ~NXNG The Recreation Superintendent responded to Councilman Edgar that plans for the Senior Center are in plan check and will hopefully be on the October 6 agenda. 41 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 9-15-86 8. YOUTi( S~RTS FACZLXTY AT CI)I.LII~US TUSTXN PA~K Councilman Edgar suggested that Columbus Tustin Park be designated for youth sports, perhaps with a gymnasium. The City Manager responded that a Master Plan for Columbus Tustln Park was prepared by a consultant about two years ago. Coun6tl concurred to direct staff to report back on the matter for further consideration. 77 9. C~UIC[L R~PIIE~NTAT]¥E 10 ~ '~IST]. MUNICXPAI. ~DVISORY COUNCZL (MTM~C) At Mayor Saltarelli's request for a volunteer, Councilman Kelly was appointed as the representative to interface with NTMAC by attending their meetings. NTMAC will reciprocate by appointing a member to attend meetings of the Tustln City Council. 24 10. RE.ST Fl)Il ll~II~I~ ~ ~£$ Mayor Saltarellt requested the Director of Public Works to look into requests by a nun~aer of citizens to trim the ficus trees in the tracts north of'Irvlne Boulevard, west of Yorba Street, bounded by Parker and Acacia. 86.1 II. R£C£~ - REI)£¥~qOPI~rJIT; O. OSEI) ~ION - AI)dOUIUII~iENI' At 8:28 p.m., it was moved by Kennedy~ seconded by Edgar, to recess to the Redevelopment Agency; thence to a Closed Session pursuant to Govern- ment Code Section 54956.g(a); and thence adjourn to an Adjourned Regular Meeting on ~onday, Septc~nber 2g, 1986, at 5:00 p.m.; and thence to the next Regular Meeting on Monday, October 6, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. Motion carried $-0. C~ CLERK MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF 1TIE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 15, 1986 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 8:28 p.m. by Chairman Saltarelli in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. ROLl. CN.L Agency Members Present: Agency Members Absent: Others Present: 3e Donald J. Saltarelll, Chairman Ronald B. Hoesterey, Chairman Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar John Kelly Ursula E. Kennedy None William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary Robert S. Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent Jeff Davis, Acting Senior Planner Janet Hester, Administrative Secretary Approximately 25 in the audience APPROVAL OF MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986, AO~OURNEO REGULAR MEETING It was moved by Hoestere~ seconded by Edgar, to approve Minutes of the SePtembe~ 2, 1986, Adjourned Regular Meeting. Motion carried 5-0. APPROVAL OF OEMANDS It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve demands in the amount of $189,734.14 for the month of August, 1986, as recon~ended by the Finance Department. Motion carried 5-0. 60 5. OTHER BUSINESS None. AOdOURNHENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. to the next Regular Meeting on October 6, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. by unanimous informal consent. ~RIRMAN ECORO G SECRET6)Y AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 CENTENNIAL WAY SEPTEMBER 15, 1986 7:00 P.M. II. III. IV. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION ROLL CALL PUBLIC INPUT (For City of Water Service procedures.) Tustin Residents and Businesspersons on any matter, and for Customers having a concern unresolved by Administrative CONSENT CALENOAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items prior to the time of the voting on the motion unless members of the Council, staff or public request specific items to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986, ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING 2. APPROVAL. OF DEINANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $450,999.86. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $139,070.99. o RESOLUTION NO. 86-113 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RECORDS Adopt Resolution No. 86-113 as recommended by the Community Services Department. RESOLUTION NO. 86-111 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ITS RESOLUTION NO. 81-61 TO MODIFY THE DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES CONTAINED IN THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODES OF THE DEPARTMENTS OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN Adopt Resolution No. 86-111 as recommended by the Administrative Services Department. RESOLUTION NO. 86-114 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS UNDER THE REGIONAL COMPETITIVE PROGRAM OF THE CALIFORNIA PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES ACT OF 1984 FOR MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS TO PINETREE PARK Adopt Resolution No. 86-114 as recommended by the Community Services Department. TIME EXTENSION FOR COMPLETION OF NEWPORT AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICA- TIONS [FAU .-M0~6(002)3 Approve a time extension through September 30, 1986, for completion of the Newport Avenue Traffic Signal Installations and Modifica- tions, also known as FAU Project No. M-M016{O02) {Steiny & Co., Inc.) as recommended by the Department of Public Works, Engineering Division. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page I 9-15-86 REQUEST FOR RESTRICTED PARKING DURING STREET SWEEPING OPERATIONS Authorize the prohibition of parking during street sweeping opera- tions on the Hyannisport Road cul-de-sac between the driveways at 14712 and 14711 Hyannisport Road, subject to receipt of a written request from both affected residents as recommended by the Depart- ment of Public Works, Engineering Division. PROPOSED RANCHWOOD/BELLWICK ANNEXATION NO. 138 Authorize staff to advertise a public hearing for October 6, 1986, on the City Council's intent to adopt a resolution as application for the Ranchwood/Bellwick Annexation No. 138 to the City of Tustin as recommended by the Community Development Department. RESOLUTION NO. 86-116 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT I~AP NO. 12732 (EAST TUSTIN RESIDENTIAL PHASE I, AREA NO. 2) Adopt Resolution No. 86-116 as recommended by the Community Develop- ment Department. VI. ORDINAMCES FOR INTRODUCTION VII. None, OI~DII(~NCE FOR ~DOPTION 1. DEVFIOPltENTS MITHIN PROPOSED SPECIFIC PI_AN NO. 7 AREA - URGENCY ORDI- NARCE NO. 975- ORDINAMCE NO. 975 - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN, REQUIRING THE PAYMENT OF A CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT FEE, AND ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT FEE SCHEDULE Recommendation: M.O. - That Ordinance No. 975 have first reading by title only. M.O. - That Ordinance No. 975 be introduced. M.O. - That Ordinance No. 975 have second reading by title only. M.O. - That Ordinance No. 975 be passed and adopted. (Roll Call; 4/5 Vote) Authorize staff to advertise a public hearing for the extension of the ordinance beyond the 45-day limit for a period of 10 months and 15 days during which time Specific Plan No. 7 will be undergoing review and adoption. VIII. OLD BUSINESS None. IX. NEll BUSINESS 1. REJECTION OF BIDS - PLAY STRUCTURE FOR THE CHILD CARE PROGRAM AT LA~ERT SCHOOL Recommendation: Reject all bids for subject play structure and r,adver- tise for bids at a later date as recommended by the Community Services Department. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 2 9-15-86 Xe XI. XIIo 2. EI~INEERING SERVICES A~REElqENT FOR ASSESSIqENT DISTRICT gO. 85-1 Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor to execute subject agreement with Hunsaker and Associates for the design and plan preparation for public improvements within the East Tustin Assessment District No. 85-1 as recommended by the Public Works Department, Engineering Division. REPORTS 1. PLANNII~ COMIqISSION ACTIONS - SEPTElqBER 8, 1986 All actions of the Planning Commission become final the City Council or member of the public. 2. INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF AUGUST 31, 1986 Recommendation: Receive and file. 3. PRESENTATION REGARDING CIVIC CENTER SPACE NEEDS STUDY unless appeal ed by OTHER BUSINESS 1. CITY PANAGER 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY COUNCIL AU,)OURNWENT To the next Regular Meeting on Monday, October 6, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 3 9-15-86