The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 10-06-86ACTION AGENDA TUSTIN PLANNING COHMISSION REGUULR MEETING SEPTEMBER Z2, 1986 REPORTS NO. 1 10-6-86 SZUD¥ SESSION: 5:00 p.m. Auto tour of current construction and dinner. CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION ROLL CALL: Present: Puckett, Well, Baker, Le Jeune, Pontious, PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda) IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) 1. Minutes of September 8, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting. Commissioner Wetl moved, LeJeune second to approve the Consent Calendar. carried 4-0, Puckettabstatned. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. USE PERMIT 86-27 Applicant: Location: Request: Presentation: Notion Old World Wines, Inc. 148 W. Main Street Authorization for an on-site and off-site beer and wine license. LAURA CAY PICKUP, Assistant Planner Cmmtsstoner Wetl moved, Le&eune second to approve Use Permit 86-27 by the adoption of Resolution 2363. ~otton carried 5-0. 3. USE PERMIT 86-28 and 86-29 Applicant: Location: Barry Watkins 17245 E. Seventeenth Street Request: Authorization to sell general liquor for on-site consumption in conjunction with two (2) restaurant uses. Presentation: LAURA CAY PICKUP, Assistant Planner Cmmtsstoner Well moved, Ponttous second to approve Use Permit 86-28 by the adoption of Resolution 2364. Notlon carrted 5-0. Planning Commission Action Agenda September 22, 1986 page two Coemlsstoner Well moved, Baker second to approve Use Permit 86-29 by the adoption of Resolution 2365. )lotion carried 5-0. OLD BUSINESS None. NEll BUSINESS None. STAFF CONCERNS 4. Report on Council Actions of September 15, 1986. Presentation: ROB BALEN, Planning Consultant 5. Workshop on Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for East Tustin Specific Plan Development Agreement. Presentation: JEFFREY S. DAVIS, Acting Senior Planner Jeff Davis made a brief presentation on the background of the proposed Development Agreement and Supplemental EIR. Mr. Davis announced that there would be a public hearing on these matters October 13th before the Planning Commission and a public hearing before the City Council October 20th. Mr. Tom Smith, Principal, MBA consultants, introduced Mr. Gary Jacobs, Project Manager in charge of preparation of Supplemental EIR and Mr. Tony Skidmore, Project Manager in charge of the original EIR for the East Tustin Specific Plan. Mr. Smith explained why a Supplemental EIR is necessary. Mr. Smith indicated that the Development Agreement, and, therefore the SEIR, focus on impacts and proposed mitigation relating to project implementation phasing and required infrastructure improvement phasing. Mr. Smith pointed out that the SEIR primarily assesses impacts associated with traffic and circulation, public services and infrastructure needed to support the project and hydrology/drainage impacts. Chairman Puckett requested questions from the Planning Commission. Commissioner Well stated that the SEIR was a very thorough and well done document. Ms. Well had particular questions regarding the city's liability and liability insurance provisions in the Development Agreement and flood control provisions covered in the SEIR. Mr. Smith responded that there are controls required in the project implementation phase as governed by the City and County Flood Control District. City Attorney Lois Jeffrey replied that the City had limited exposure to liability and that the proposed bodily injury liability coverage was more than adequate. Commissioner Puckett questioned whether there was a problem with off-ramp spacing along the freeway. Mr. Terry Austin, Austin-Foust Traffic Engineers, responded that the SEIR analyzed the off-ramp and on-ramp spacing and found that there were no problems. Planning Commission Action Agenda September 22, t986 page three Mr. Balen requested the traffic consultant to explain the level of analysis done for the SEIR and its relationship to the Development Agreement. Mr. Austin responded that traffic impacts related to infrastructure improvements, project phasing and delay of some key mitigation improvements were assessed and that further mitigation was suggested in some cases. In addition, Mr. Austin commented that traffic analysis indicates that at ultimate build-out the traffic impacts of the East Tustin Specifc Plan are fully mitigated. Mr. Balen further explained the role of a Development Agreement and the level of impact assessment that is included in the SEIR. Mr. Puckett indicated that there were no further questions. COIINISSION CONCERNS Commissioner Well requested Rob Balen check into the Minutes preparation to ensure the Commission's justification for their vote on the motions be reflected. ADJOURI~qE#T Chairman Puckett adjourned at 8:45 p.m. to September 29, 1986 at 5:00 p.m. for a joint meeting with the City Council. AGENDA TUSTIN PLANNING COmmISSION REGULAR REETING SEPTI~BER 22, 1986 Sll~OY SESSION: 5:00 p.m. Auto tour of current construction and dinner. CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION ROLL CALL: Puckett, Well, Baker, Le Jeune, Pontious, PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda) IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON ll4E SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON'I~E MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) 1. Minutes of September 8, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. USE PERMIT 86-27 Applicant: Location: Request: Presentation: Old World Wines, Inc. 148 W. Main Street Authorization for an on-site and off-site beer and wine license. LAURA CAY PICKUP, Assistant Planner 3. USE PERMIT 86-28 and 86-29 Appl i cant: Location: Request: Barry Watkins 17245 E. Seventeenth Street Authorization to sell general liquor for on-site consumption in conjunction with two (2) restaurant uses. Presentation: LAURA CAY PICKUP, Assistant Planner Planning Commission Agenda September 22, 1986 page two OLD BUSINESS None. NEI( BUSINESS None. STAFF CONCERNS 4. Report on Council Actions of September 15, 1986. Presentation: ROB BALEN, Planning Consultant 5. Workshop on Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for East Tustin Specific Plan Development Agreement. Presentation: JEFFREY S. DAVIS, Acting Senior Planner COHHI$SION CONCERNS ADJOUR~ENT Adjourn to September 29, 198'6 at 5:00 p.m. for a joint meeting with the City Council. HINUTES TUSTIN PLANNING COHHISSION REGULAR EL'rING SEPTEHBER 8, 1986 -_ -__- -_~ C~LL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., Ctty Counctl Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGZANCE/ZNVOCAT[ON ROLL CALL: Present: Net1, Baker, Le Jeune, Ponttous, Absent: Puckett PUBLIC CONCERNS: None CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes of August 25, 1986 Planntng Commission Meeting. Baker moved, LeJeune second to approve the Consent Calendar. CONT%NUED 'PUBLZC HEARTNG 2. TENTATIVE TRACT 12732 Appl t cant: Locatton: Request: Presentation: Morton carried 4-0. Bren Company Lot 2 of Tract 12345 (East Tustin) Authorization to subdivide for phasing purposes, lot 2 of Tract 12345 for residential condominium purposes. The subdivision would permit development of 248 condominium units. JEFFREY S. DAVIS, Acting Senior Planner Chair Pro Tem Weil opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. Ronda Heacock, Bren Co. representative, made herself available for questions. Seeing no one further wishing to speak, Well closed the hearing at 7:41 p.m. Commissioner Well moved, Pontious second to recommend to City Council approval of Tentative Tract 12732 by the adoption of Resolution 2356 with an amendment to condition 19 excluding building permits on model homes. Motion carried 4-0. Planntng Corem1 ssi on Mi nutes September 8, [986 page two 3. USE PERMIT 86-25 Applicant: Michael Todd Location: Northwesterly corner of Redhtll and Edtnger Avenues Request: Authorization to allow retail uses in an industrial zone Presentation: MARY ANN CHAMBERLAIN, Associate Planner Chair Pro Tem Well opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. Michael Todd, applicant, answered questions from the Commission concerning parking ratios for retail and R&D, and explained that a typical tenant would have retail use in the front with warehouse or manufacturing in the back. Seeing no one further wishing to speak, Chair Pro Tem Well closed the hearing at 7:49 p.m. The Commission, staff and applicant discussed square footage calculations for the proposed retail uses. Commissioner Pontious moved, Baker second to approve Use Permit 86-25 by the adoption of Resolution 2361 amending condttion'l'kI.B, to include that retail uses may not exceed 60% of the gross floor area (37,260 square feet). Motion carried 4-0. 4. ZONE CHANGE 86-1 Applicant: Locatt on: Request: An action initiated by the Planning Commission 335, 345, 355, 365, 405, 415, 425, 435 and 445 W. 6th Street To consider re-zoning of properties from Single Family Residential (R-l) to Planned Community Single Family Residential (P.C. Residential) Presentation: JEFFREY S. DAVIS, Acting Senior Planner 5. SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1! Applicant: Location: An action initiated by the Planning Commission 335, 345, 355, 365, 405, 415, 425, 435, 445 and 455 W. Street 6th Request: Adoption of a development plan in the form of a Specific Plan. Said Specific Plan would authorize the development of single family residential homes on minimum lot sizes of 6,000 square feet. These homes would be limited to single story structures. Presentation: JEFFREY S. DAVIS, Acting Senior Planner Planning Commission Minutes September 8, 1986 page three Appl i cant: Locatt on: Request: USE PERMIT 86-26 Atnslte Development 405, 415, 425 W. 6th Street Authorization to construct eight (8) single family detached homes in accordance with proposed Specific Plan No. 11 Presentation: JEFFREY S. DAVIS, Acting Senior Planner 7. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12833 Applicant: Request: Mark Ainslie To consolidate and re-subdivide three lots into eight lots for single-family residential purposes. Location: 405, 415, 425 Sixth Street Presentation: JEFFREY S. DAVIS, Acting Senior Planner Chair Pro Tem W,il combined the public hearings on Zone Change 86-1, Specific Plan No. 11, Use Permit 86-26 and Tentative Tract Map No. 12833. She opened the hearings at 8:16 p.m. for testimony from the audience. The following people spoke: Mark Ainslie, applicant, gave background on project and explained the Zone Change and Specific Plan would provide Continuity for the entire area. This plan encourages lot consolidation and encourages development and improvement of existing properties. John Sauers, 515 S. Pacific, opposed the project; thought the Commission was giving the applicant preferential treatment; and, disputed staff's traffic count. Richard Vinin~, 400 W. Main, opposed the project; saw the Planned Community as a · vehicle to circumvent the 7200 sq. ft. lots; this only benefits the applicant; creates spot zone situations; eight units where there are three creates an adverse impact on surrounding area; not an orderly growth pattern. Charles Anderson, 255 W. 6th, opposed the project; only benefits the applicant; The City Council promised the citizens during the bed and breakfast hearings the area would be left as it is and would not be touched again. He also requested his curb be re-painted red. Ed Gage, 405 Main, opposed to project due to lack of recreational area; puts 50 to 60 people into an area designed for 25; negative impact on 6th Street due to limited access. Jack Carlile, 355 and 365 W. 6th; In favor of the plan because it should enhance the ~alue of exl'sttng properties. Barbara Cox, 450 1/2 S. "B" Street, opposed; ctted inaccuracy tn public hearing notice; preferred six houses; the current zoning already allows property owners to build four .houses on 13,o lots so thts proposal only beneftts the applicant; she further cited the staff report, "the residents are urged to Consolidate their lots" tn her concern on overall denstty changes. Planning'Commission Minutes September 8, 1986 page four Seeing no one further wishing to speak, Chair Pro Tem Well closed the hearing at 9:05 p.m. Commission discussion ensued: Commissioner LeJeune questioned the lot configuration, which is the front and back of the lot; asked for clarification on .the increase in number of units per lot when lots are consolidated; stated that a consistent plan providing for two houses per lot would be fair. Commissioner Baker expressed concern with the public hearing notice information being incorrect and confirmed the property owners received legal notice. He further clarified the procedure in amending the Specific Plan in the future. Chair Pro Tem Well explained to the audience good planning with single family homes using the Housing Element as a guideline. She further stated that she thought these houses and the Specific Plan would be an asset to the area. Commissioner Pontious moved, Baker second to recommend to the City Council approval of Zone Change 86-1 by the adoption of Re'-olution 2358. Motion carried 3-1, LeJeune opposed. Commissioner Well moved, Baker second to recommend to the City Council approval of Specific Plan No. 11 by the adoption of Resolution 2359. Motion carried 3-1, LeJeune opposed. Commissioner Well moved, Pontious second to approve Use Permit 86-26 by 'the adoption of Resolution 2360. Motion carried 3-1, LeJeune opposed. Commissioner Well moved, Baker second to approve Tentative Tract Map No. 12833 by the adoption of Resolution 2362. Motion carried 3-1, LeJeune opposed. Chair Pro rTem Well called for a recess at 9:35 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:45 p.m. 8. VARIANCE 86-4 Applicant: Request: Mark Atnslie Authorization to vary with the lot size requirement in order to develop eight single family homes Location: 405, 415 and 425 Sixth Street Presentation: JEFFREY S. DAVIS, Acting Senior Planner Rob Balen informed the Commission the applicant had requested withdrawal of his Variance request. Commissioner Baker moved, LeJeune second to accept the applicant's withdrawal of Variance 86-4. Motion carried 4-0. OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS Planning. Commission Minutes September 8, 1986 page five ST/~T COI~ER#S 9. Report on Council Actions of August 18, 1986 Presentation: Rob Balen, Planning Consultant C~8gISSIO# CO#C£R#S Commissioner Baker wondered what the construction is on the 5 Freeway between Newport and East Tusttn area. Commissioner Well questioned the purpose of the joint meeting with the Council. Since staff had not been informed of the purpose, the Commission asked for clarification due to a letter received from Parents Who Care which assumes they are the reason for the meeting. Commissioner Well further requested clarification on the Sign Code and on CC&R's in Planned Community regulationns. Her concern is to reduce the city's liability by making the city part of the review process. Comnflssioner Well further informed that she is representing the city in meetings with North Tustin residents regarding annexation. AI)~OURI~E#T Commissioner LeJeune moved, Baker second to adjourn at 10:05 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Sep~mber 22, 1986 for a tour and dinner meeting prior to the regularly scheduled 7:30 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 4-0. CHARLES E. PUCKETT, Chairmen DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary Planning DATE: SUB,1ECT: APPLICANT: ' LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: Commission SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 USE PERHIT NO. 86-27 NEW WORLD NINES, INC. 148 ¥. HAIN STREET TUSTIN, CA 92680 148 W. HAIN STREET C-2: CENTRAL COII~RCIAL CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT, CLASS 1 AUTHORIZATION FOR TWO BEER AND #ZRE LICENSES: (1) TYPE 20 OFF-SITE BEER AND WINE SALES (2) TYPE 17 BEER AND NINE WHOLESALES RECOI~ENDED ACTION: Approve Use Permit No. 86-27 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2363. $1,~g4ARY: New World Wines currently operates their ~orporate offices at 148 W. Main Street and is in the business of selling wine retailing franchises. They would like to install a 'prototype' retail unit at this location for franchise sales and retail purposes. Installation of this 239 square foot retail area requires issuance of type 17 and 20 beer and wine sales and wholesale licenses. The sales area covers only a minor portion of the office area and is considered a secondary use in conjunction with the office headquarters. Based upon the size of the retail area and the implementation of the conditions contained in Resolution No. 2363, staff is recommending approval for this application. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS: The licenses requested in this application involve off-site sales of beer and wine. .As with all new alcoholic beverage sales establishments, staff identifies key issues. Areas of concern include: proper supervision of beer and wine sales, hours of operation, storage of products and the retail sales area size. Community Development Department Pl anntng Commission Report New World Wlnes page two New World Wines ts proposing to operate a prototype wine sales establishment for installation into existing businesses such as gourmet food shops and department stores. This retail area would be located tn the New World Wines corporate office and will be supervised by the officers of the business. This terM1 sales area, as previously discussed, wtll be a part of the major business operations and walk-in business will be allowed., tn order to discourage a 'liquor store' atmosphere, the retail sales area Is limited to an area of 239 square feet. The hours of operation will also be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. while the offices are open. The attached floor plan clearly delineates the retail area.. While only 239 square feet In size, New World Wines is confident that their products will be adequately displayed. The wholesale license, as requested, is not to create a wine warehouse at this site but Is required by Alcoholic Beverage Control. To avoid further expansion and increased possibility of changes in the character of the business, staff recommends that the sales area be limited to a maximum of 239 square feet. Should the applicant wish to expand, approval of the Community Development Director should be required. Staff considers the follewtng conditions of approval appropriate for this application: [. All alcoholic beverage sales shall be conducted by someone [8 years of age or older and shall be supervised b~ someone 2[ years of age or older. 2. The hours of beer and wtne sales are 11mtted to 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m 3. The beer and wtne sales area Is ltmtted to 239 square feet in size and shall not be expanded unless approved by the Director of Community Development. 4. Storage of beer and wtne products ts llmtted to the 239 sq. ft. retafl area only. Staff recommends approval of Use Permit 86-27 based upon the condltlom ;tared above. LP:do attach: floor plan site plan Resolution 2363 Community Development Department 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2363 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, AUTHORIZING OFF-SITE BEER AND WINE SALES AND WHOLESALING AT 148 W. MAIN STREET The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: That a proper application, (Use Permit No. 86-27) has been filed on behalf of New World Wines to request off-site beer and wine sales and wholesaling at 148 W. Main Street. B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said application. That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applted for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons resldtng or working tn the neighborhood of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings: 1. The use applied for is allowed subject to a use permit in the C-2 zoning district. 2. The subject property is located in the C-2 zoning district. The hours of operation are limited to 8:00 a.m. ~ 7:00 p.m. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, nor to the general welfare of the City of Tusttn, and should be granted. Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement requirements as administered by the City Engineer. The use applied for is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 1. G. Final development plans shall require the review and approval of the Community Development Department. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 2363 page two II. The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 86-27 to authorize off-sJte beer and wine sales and wholesaling at [48 W. Math Street subject to the following condttJons: A. The final slte plan shall be standardized and reflect a11 approprite City standard drawtng numbers. The developer shall construct all mtsstng or damaged street improvements to said development per the Ctty of Tustin "Minimum Design Standards of Public Works" and "Street ImProvement Standards". Thts work shall constst of, but ts not 11mtted to, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, drive apron, and street pavement. B. The hours of operation are ltmtted to 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. C. All alcoholic beverage sales shall be conducted by someone [8 years of age or older and a!1 sales employees shall be supervised by someone 2[ years of age or older. O. The beer and wine retail sales area ts 11mtted to 239 square feet in size and shall not be expanded unless approved by the Community Development Director. E. Storage of beer and wine is 11mtted to the 239 sq. ft. retail area only. F. The applicant shall sign and return an Agreement to Conditions Imposed form as required by the Community Development Director. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the day of , i98 DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary CHARLES E. PUCKETT, Chairman Planning Commission DATE: SUB,]ECT: SEPTENBER 22, 1986 USE PERNITS NO. 86-28 AND 86-29 APPLICANT: BARRY WATKINS 17251E. 17th STREET TUSTIN, CA 92680 PROPERTY O~iER: LOCATION: ZONXNG: GEORGE BROO#ELL TUSTIN, CA 92680 17245 E. 17th STREET CG: CONNERCIAL GENERAL EI~ IROI~ENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: - CATEGORICALLY EXENPT, CLASS 1 AUTHORIZATION TO INSTALL 'rgo OM-SITE GENERAL LIQUOR SALES LICENSES IN CO.UNCTION WITH TM) RESTAURANT USES IN THE TUSTIN PAVILION CAFE BUILDINNG RECOI~ENDED ACTION: Approve Use Permit No. 86-28 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2364. Approve Usa Permit No. 86-29 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2365. SL~ARY: The Tusttn Pavilion Cafe building is currently under construction in the French Quarter shopping center on the northeast corner of Seventeenth and Yorba Streets. This building is intended to hold three restaurants in a pavilion or open market type concept. In 1985 the Planning Commission approved Amendment Number 1 to Use Permit No. 84-14 which authorized outdoor seating and one on-site beer and wine license for the building. At this time, the applicant is requesting authorization for two (2) new on-site general liquor licenses to be used by two (2) of the proposed restaurants. In order to complete lease agreements Mr. Watkins must obtain prior approval for these licenses. Staff is recommending approval for these use permits on a conditional basis. Community Development Department ~'~ Planning Commission Report Tustin Pavilion Cafe page two AIIALYSIS AND COIICLUSI~#S: As previously approved one of the three restaurants may install an on-site beer and wine license. However, the cafe is now proposed to hold three (3) restaurants instead of the original request for one restaurant with an open produce market. This change in the building concept has resulted in the request for two (2) additional on-site licenses; both of which are for general liquor sales including beer and wine. At this time, the name of the user has not been identified and hours of operation have not yet been determined. Due to leasing sale.requirements, the applicant must obtain prior approval for these licenses. Once leases have been signed, the user name, type and hours of operation can be determined. Staff recommends that the following conditions be included: Use Permits 86-28 and 86-29 are approved for leasing purposes only, when the user has been determined, the operators must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission to determine hours of operation. Upon determination of the user, the Planning Commission retains the right to call for a public hearing to place further conditions upon each use permit. 3.. All employees serving alcoholic beverages must be 18 years of age or older and shall be supervised by someone 21 years of age or older. e The use applied for shall remain in conjunction with a restaurant, should the restaurant use be discontinued, authority for the liquor license shall be rescinded. Staff recommends approval of Use Permits 86-28 and 86-29 based upon inclusion of the conditions outlined above. LP:do attach: Site plan Resolution 2364 Resolution 2365 Community Development Department AV.E.NUE C D SEVEN. TEENT~. ST. Site Plan 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2364 A RESOLUTION oF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, AUTHORIZING ON-SITE SALES OF GENERAL LIQUOR AT 17245 EAST SEVENTEENTH STREET The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: That a proper application, (Use Permit No.86-28) has been filed on behalf of Mr. Barry Watkins to request authorization for on-site sales of general liquor at 17245 E. Seventeenth Street. B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said application. Ce That establishment, mmtntenance, and operation of the use applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings: 1. The use applied for is in conformance with the CG (Commercial General) zone. 2. That the subject properties are within the CG (CommerJial General) zone. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property and i~rovements in the neighborhood of the subject property, nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and should be granted. Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement requirements as administered by the City Engineer. F. This project is categorically exert from the requirements of the California Environmental. Quality Act, Class 1. Final development plans shall require the review and approval of the Community Development Department. 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ~0 ~5 ~6 27 ~8 Resolution NO. 2364 page two II. The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 86-28 to authorize on-site sales of general liquor at 17245 E. Seventeenth Street subject to the following conditions: Ae The final site plan shall be standardized and reflect all approprite City standard drawing numbers. The developer shall construct all missing or danmged street improvements to said development per the City of Tustin "Minimum Design Standards of Public Works" and "Street Improvement Standards". This work shall consist of, but is not limited to, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, drive apron, and street pavement. Be The use applied for is approved for leasing purposes only, when the user is determined, the operator shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission to determine hours of operation. Upon review of the user, the Planning Commission retains the right to impose further conditions on this use permit as may be necessary. De All employees serving alcoholic beverages shall be 18 years of age or older and shall be supervised by someone 21 years of age or older. The use applied for shall remain in conjunction with a restaurant use only. Should the restaurant be discontinued, authority for the liquor license shall be rescinded. The applicant shall sign and return an Agreement to Conditions Imposed form as required by the Director of Community Development. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the day of , 198 CHARLES E. PUCKETF, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 113 25 116 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2365 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, AUTHORIZING ON-SITE SALES OF GENERAL LIQUOR AT 1724S EAST SEVENTEENTH STREET The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: That a proper application, (Use Permit No.86-29) has been filed on behalf of Mr. Barry Watkins to request authorization for on-site sales of general liquor at 17245 E. Seventeenth Street. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said application. That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings: The use applied for is in conformance with the CG (Commercial General) zone. 2. That the subject property is in the CG (Commercial General) zone. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and should be granted. Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement requirements as administered by the City Engineer. F. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental' Quality Act, Class 1. Ge Final development plans shall require the review and approval of the Community Development Department. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 2365 page two II. The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 86-28 to authorize on-site sales of general liquor at 17245 E. Seventeenth Street subject to the following conditions: The final site plan shall be standardized and reflect all approprtte City standard drawing numbers. The developer shall construct all missing or damaged street improvements to said development per the City of Tustin "Minimum Design Standards of Public Works" and "Street Improvement Standards". This work shall consist of, but is not limited to, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, drive apron, and street pavement. The use applied for is approved for leasing purposes only, when the user is determined, the license shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission to determine hours of operation. Upon review of the user, the Planning Commission retains the right to call a public hearing and to impose further conditions on this use permit. De All employees serving alcoholic beverages shall be 18 years of age or older and shall be supervised by someone 21 years.of age or older. The use applied for shall remain in conjunction with a restaurant use only. Should the restaurant be discontinued, the authority for the liquor license shall be rescinded. The applicant shall sign and return an Agreement to Conditions Imposed form as required by the Director of Community Development. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the day of , 198 CHARLES E. PUCKETT, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary Planning Commission DATE: SEPTEI4BER 22, 1986 SUB,IECT: APORT ON COUNCZL ACTZONS - September 15; 1986 Oral presentation. do Attachments: City Council Actton Agenda - September 15, 1986 Community Development DeparTment ACTION A~ENDA OF A REGULAR )I~ETING OF THE TUSTIR CI~ COUMCIL SEPTEMBER 15, 1986 7:00 P.M. 7:03 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER ALL PRESENT II. ROLL CALL FRAJIK III. PUBLIC INPUT GREINKE SPOKE IN OPPOSITION TO THE CITY OF IRVINE JOINING THE ~IOINT ~WERS AUTHORITY UI~.ESS THEY PAY THE S~IE FEES THAT THE OTHER CITIES HAVE BEEN REQUIRED TO PAY. RICHARD VINING, 44)0 W. HAIN Sll~EET, INQUIRED REG,~ROING THE STATUS OF THE STEVENS SOUIU~E PARKING STRUCTURE. THE CITY I~kNAGER REPORTED THAT THIS SUB,)ECT WOULD BE COVERED DURING THE CLOSED SESSION FOLLOWING THE CITY COUNCIL ~EETING. APPROVED APPROVED IV. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986, ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING e ADOPTED RESOLUTION 3. qO. 86 -113 ADOPTED RESOLUTION 4. NO. 86-111 ADOPI'ED RESOLUTION 5. NO. 86-114 APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $450,999.86. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $139,070.99. RESOLUTION NO. 86-113 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RECORDS Adopt Resolution No. 86-113 as recommended by the Community Services Department. RESOLUTION NO. 86-111 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ITS RESOLUTION NO. 81-61 TO MODIFY THE DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES CONTAINED IN THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODES OF THE DEPARTMENTS OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN Adopt Resolution No. 86-111 as recommended by the Administrative Services Department. RESOLUTION NO. 86-114 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS UNDER THE REGIONAL COMPETITIVE PROGRAM OF THE CALIFORNIA PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES ACT OF 1984 FOR MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS TO PINETREE PARK Adopt Resolution No. 86-114 as recommended by the Community Services Department. APPROVED STAFF 6, RECOI~ENDATION ,PPROVED STAFF 7. RECOI~IIENDATION TIME EXTENSION FOR COMPLETION OF NEWPORT AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICA- TIONS [FAU M-M016(O02)] Approve a time extension through September 30, 1986, for completion of the Newport Avenue Traffic Signal Installations and Modifica- tions, also known as FAU Project No. M-M016(O02) (Steiny & Co., Inc.) as recommended by the Department of Public Works, Engineering Division. REQUEST FOR RESTRICTED PARKING DURING STREET SWEEPING OPERATIONS Authorize the prohibition of parking during street sweeping opera- tions on the Hyannisport Road cul-de-sac between the driveways at 14712 and 14711 Hyannisport Road, subject to receipt of a written request from both affected residents as ~ecommended by the Depart- ment of Public Works, Engineering Division. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 1 9-15-86 ~,PPROVED STAFF 8. .xECOleqENDAT ION PROPOSED RANCHWOOD/BELLWICK ANNEXATION NO. 138 Authorize staff to advertise a public hearing for October 6, 1986, on the City Council's intent to adopt a resolution as application for the Ranchwood/Bellwick Annexation No. 138 to the City of Tustin as recommended by the Community Development Department. ADOPTED RESOLUTION 9. RESOLUTION NO. 86-116 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NO. 8~-116 Will( TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12732 (EAST TUSTIN A)~ND)IENT TO CONDITION RESIDENTIAL PHASE I, AREA NO. 2) 19 OF THE PLANNING Adopt Resolution No, 86-116 as recommended by the Community Develop- COI~ISSIO# RESOLUTION ment Department. 2356. VI. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION None. VII. ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION ADOPTED URGENCY ORDINANCE ND. 975 AND APPROVED STAFF RECOIe~ENDATION 1. DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 7 AREA - URGENCY ORDI- NANCE NO. 975 ORDINANCE NO. 975 - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN, REQUIRING THE PAYMENT OF A CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT FEE, AND ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT FEE SCHEDULE Recommendation: Authorize staff to advertise a public hearing for the extension of the ordinance beyond the 45-day limit for a period of 10 months and 15 days during which time Specific Plan No. 7 will be undergoing review and adoption. VIII. OLD BUSINESS None. IX. NEW BUSINESS APPROVED STAFF RECOleqENDATION REJECTION OF BIDS - PLAY STRUCTURE FOR THE CHILD CARE PROGRAM AT LAMBERT SCHOOL Recommendation: Reject all bids for subject play structure and readver- tlse for bids at a later date as recommended by the Community Services Department. APPROVED STAFF RECOI~NDATION 2. ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor to execute subject agreement with Hunsaker and Associates for the design and plan preparation for public improvements within the East Tustin Assessment District No. 85-1 as recommended by the Public Works Department, Engineering Division. X. REPORTS ,HE CITY COUNCIL 1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - SEPTEMBER 8, 1986 APPEALED PUBLIC HEARINGS ND. 4, ZC 86-1; NO. 5, SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11; ND. 6, UP 86-26; AND ND. 7, TENTATIVE TRACT I~P NO. 12833. ALL THESE HEARINGS RELATE TO THE PROPERTY FROM 335 TO 455 W. SIXTH STREET. APPROVED BAL/U(CE OF THE PLANNING CO)9(ISSION ACTION-AGENDA. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 2 9-15-86 'ECEIVED A/ID FILED 2. INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF AUGUST 31, 1986 Recommendation: Receive and file. RECESSED AT 7:28 P.M. TO SET UP FOR THE FOLLOIJING PRESENTATION RECONVENED AT 7:37 P.M. MOVED TO CONTINUE 3. PRESENTATION REGARDING CIVIC CENTER SPACE NEEDS STUDY WITH PHASE II TO NEGOTIATE WORKING ORA~iINGS WITH THE CONSULTANT. THE CITY XI. OTHER BUSINESS AT[ORNEY REQUESTED A CLOSED SESSION FOR LEGAL HAl[ERS REGARDING ROORIGUEZ VS. CITY OF TUSTIN. FOLLOWING DISCUSSION OF THE CITY OF IRVINE ~OINING TIlE JPA, NDESTEREY REQUESTED TO SEE THE CONDITIONS FOR JOINING THE JPA. SALTARELLI ASKED THE CITY MANAGER TO SEND A COPY OF THE ME)IOIU~NDUM llLRT )iRS PASSED BY THE CITY OF IRVINE TO THE COUNCIL FUR THEIR REVIEW BEFORE THE NEXT ~ETING. THE CITY ENGINEER RESPONDED TO KENNEDY THAT THEY ARE OBTAINING PRICES FUR THE CITY TO O0 THE WORK AT THE CORNER OF REDHILL ANO EDINGER TO CLEAR UP THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS AND TO THEN BACK CHARGE THE NNOUNT TO THE DEVELOPER. HE ANTICIPATES IT BEING CO#PLETEO IN 7 TO' 10 DAYS. SALTARELLI REPORTED THAT THE LEFT-TORN SIGNAL ON EDINGER TO REDHILL IS ABOUT 2 SECONDS OR LESS. ONLY TWO CARS CAN GET THROUGH THERE. THIS IS A TEMPORARY CONDITION ANO WILL OIANGE WHEN THE STREEI'S ARE FINISHEO. OVED TO OIANGE THE DATE OF THE 2ND ~ETING IN OCTOBER FROM OCTOBER gOTH TO WEDNESOAY, OCTOBER '2ND AT 7:00 P.M. BECAUSE OF COUNCIL'S ATTENDANCE AT THE LEAGUE OF CITIES ~EETING. CONCURRED THAT EDGAR WOULD BE THE VOTIN6 DELEGATE AT THE LEAGUE ~ETING. THE CITY ENGINEER RESPOMOED TO EDGAR THAT THE TIME TABLE FOR COMPLETION OF JN4BUREE ROAD TO BARILRNCA WILL Nor BE UNTIL SEPTENBER, 1987, BECAUSE OF THE TOXIC CLEANUP. SUSAN JONES, RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT, RESPONDED TO EDGAR THAT THE SENIUR CENTER PLANS ARE IN PLAN OIECK AND HOPEFULLY THEY WOULD BE ON THE NEXT AGENDA. EDGAR SUGGESTED THAT COLUMBUS TUSTIN PARK BE DESIGNATED FOR YOUTH SPURTS WITH PERHAPS A GYM BEING BUILT SINCE THERE ARE PLANS FUR CULI'UILAL ACTIVITIES IN NURTH TUSTIN PARKS. HUSTON RESPONGED THRT THERE ERE PLAtlS BY A CONSULTANT ABOUT TWO YEARS AEd) ~ STAFF WOULO REPORT BACK ON lltIS o KELLY )IRS APPOINTED TO BE THE COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE WITH TIE ~ REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING ANNEXATION. 8:g8 XI. ADJOURNMENT - To an adjourned Regular meeting on September 29, 1986, at 5:00 p.m., and thence to the next Regular Meeting on Monday, October 6, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 3 9-15-86 ACTION AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUSTIN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SEPTEMBER 15, 1986 7:00 P.M. 8:28 1. CALL TO ORDER ALL 2. PRESENT APPROVED 3. ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986, ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING Recommendation: Approve. APPROVED 4. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS Recommendation: Approve Demands in the Amount of $189,734.14 for the month of August, 1986, as recommended by the Finance Department. NONE 5. OTHER BUSINESS a:30 6. ADJOURNMENT To the next Regular Meeting on Monday, October 6, 1986, at 7:00 p.m., REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION AGENDA Page I 9-15-86