Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES OF 10-22-86II. III. IV. OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 1USTIN, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 22, 1986 CALL TO ORDERIPLEDG~ OF AU. EGIANC~IIIWOCATIOR The meeting was called to order by Mayor Saltarellt at 6:5g p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial ~ay. The Pledge of AHegiance was led by Councilwoman kennedy, and the Invocation was given by Counctlman ~el ly. Councilpersons Present: Counctlpersons Absent: Others Present: Oonald J. Saltare111, Mayor Ronald $. ~esterey, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar 3ohn ~elly ~rsula E. Kennedy William A. Huston, Ctty Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. ~ynn, City Clerk Robert. S. Ledendecker, Otr. of Publlc ~orks Lt. Welt gedmneyer, Pollce Oepar~ment Ronaid A. ~ult, Ftnance Rob ~len, P~ann~ng Consultant Jeff Oavts, ~tng Sen~o~ Planner Approx1~Cely ~0 in the Audience PRO~TIOIE "RED RZ__nl~t_N IdEF. K' - Oi;~b~R 27 - NOVE]qBER 3, 1986 Mayor Saltarellt presented a proclamation to Ethel Reynolds desig- nating October 27 through Nove~f~er 3, 1986, as "Red Ribbon tdeek." Mf~. Reynolds ~anked the Council on behalf of Parents ~o Care and encouraged citizens to pa~tclpate by wearing ~d ~tbbons. 84 .The 1. PUBLIC If~RIN~S City Council considered Publtc Hearings I and 2 tn conjunction. IRVI~ ~ ~TI~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~T ~IN ~ECIFIC P~ ~E~ ~ - ~l~ ~. 9~ E~[~ ~S ~ A ~D ~LO~ ~ ~T]~ TO ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ZN ~ECZF[C ~ ~E~ R~I~ ~. ~1~ ~1on ~ PuDltc Hea~tng No. 1 as contained in ~he in~er-com dated October 22, 1986, pre~ar~ b~ the Co~nity Development ~e Acting Senior Planner present~ ~he staff re~o~ and reco~en- dation ~ PuDltc Hearin~ No. 2 as con~ain~ In t~e inter-c~ da~ed October 22, 1986, preRar~ by ~he Co~nity Oeve]opmen~ Oe~ar~men~. Tom ~it~, ~tc~ael ~ran~n S Associates, hi~hllghtN lhe process fOIlO~ In ~spondlng ~o c~en~s r~e~ved on ~he sup~l~ental EIR. A question-and-answer peri~ followed. ~ayor $altarelli open~ ~he public hear~n~ at 7:15. The~e were no speakers ~ either tlem, and ~he public hearin~ was closed. CITY COUNCIL MINUT Page 2, 10-22-86 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kelly, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 86-126 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI~ OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) 85-2 AS SUPPLEMENTED, AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT The motion carried 5-0. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance NO. 978 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Foll owing first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 978 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 978 be introduced as ~ollows: OEDIIIAJICI[ NO. 978 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT {EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO), AS DEFINED BY SECTION 65865.2 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, BE19~EEN THE CITY O~ TUSTIN AND THE IRVINE COMPANY PERTAINING TO DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT AREA Councilman Edgar noted that it may appear to some that Council is acting hastily on something that's very important. He reflected that it is a culmination of years of dialog between staff and Coun- cil. with a tremendous amount of input, with the net result of that before Council this evening. He comeended The Irvine Company and staff on their accomplishment. Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey commented that through this entire process the City has met goals originally established at the beginning of the process nearly three years ago: i) Adding recreational amenities to our community~ 2) Planning East Tustin as an entire area instead of spot development; and 3) Preventing a negative fiscal impact on existing residents and community; He commended everyone on the excellent job done. The development agreement guarantees what has been given by both sides and is the final document of this entire process. Councilwoman Kennedy also noted that this matter has been discussed for three years, and many questions have been answered. Recently, community concerns were raised regarding closeness of the water table to land surface in Phases I and II. Staff haa researched that and satisfied her that it will not be a problem. If so, it will be The Irvine Co~any's responsibility. She felt the entire Council is concerned about project density and the percentage of apartments discussed. She is comforted by the fact that this is simply a guideline, and it is not mandatory that Tustin have exactly 25%. Tustin has been so badly impacted by apartments, with ~ulti-family housing close to above 60%. She expressed delight that The Irvine Company will own them and that they are ve~ responsible people. She closed by stating she hopes something would happen to reduce that percentage, depending on the housing market. She voiced support of the matter. The motion carried 5-0. B1 Mortice Florian, Vice President of The Irvine Company, stated they are pleased that the development agreement admirably reflects the mutual promises and commitments made through the specific plan pro- CeSS. She noted they are eager to begin the next very important step of making the marvelous community a reality in East Tustin as envisioned over the last three years. On behalf of the Council, Mayor Saltarelli thanked the consultants, City staff, and The Irvine Company staff for a tremendous job. CITY . ,iCIL MINUTES Page 3, [0-22-86 Councilwoman Kennedy felt it may be appropriate to form a Council policy conm,tttae to reflect minimum standards that have been estab- lished relative to driveways, private roads, pathways, senipr hous- ing, weter, etc. She expressed a desire to serve on suc~ a com- mittee. The Mayor reduested the City Manager develop guidelines for estab- lishing same to watch over East Tustin developments as they pro- gress, ~nd agendtze the matter at a future meeting. Council will th~ select coam, ittoe ~ers, with emphasis towards Mrs. Kennedy. 1. SOLID WASTE COLLECTION FEES - TAX ~ In response to Frederick J. Helllng, 14582 Emerywood Road, who brought the matter to Council's attention at the October 5 meet- ing, subject item was considered out of agenda order at this point in t~e meeting (Report No. 8). The Finance Otrector presented the staff report as contained in inter-cpm dated October 15, 1986, prepared by the Finance Depart- merit. The City ~anager provided further clarification, Council/staff discussion followed. The City Attorney stated that if we assume that the entir~ unr~olved amount ($54,000) will be paid to the trash hauler, then the amount that has been assessed on the tax roll is exactly the right amount for this fiscal year. It's only to the extant that the City ends up paying a lesser amount that a credit would be due to either the City or residents. NO o~e has actually been overcharged. Staff is currently negoti- ating with tbe trash hauler and will get the best deal possible. To t~et extant, a credit will be issued against the assessment for next fiscal year. After further discussion, Mayor SaltareIli appointed a committee of Counctlmembers EdgeJ~ and Hoestarey to meet with staff and report bac~ to Council on November 17 with a recon~endatlon as to how to handle this properly. Council concurred. 102 Richard Vtntng, 400 West Main Street, reiterated his request to revert to billing h~mmowneri individually for residential trash collection. 2. S~I RENO ITALIAN MARKET - SUNI)AY JNi SESSIONS Mary Jane Stephens, 49 Via Entrada, spoke in favor of the Sunday jam sessions held at the San Ram) Italian Market, 13682 Newport Avenue owned by Joe Massimino. Approximately 17 patrons were present to show their support of same. Ms. Stephens reported that she had a petition containing 66 signatures in support of the Sunday jam sessions. Staff responded that they are currently working with the owner and have advised him that he must apply for a use permit for outdoor seating and outdoor entertainment to legally continue same. VI. ~,~ENT CAL~N~ It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to approve the entire Consent Calendar. Carried 5-0. 1. AI~OV~ OF MINUTE~ - OCTOBER 6, 1986, REGULAR MEETING 2. APPROVAl. OF 0[NANO$ IN THE AFIOUNT OF $2,322,057.48 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $148,626.79 5O RESOI. IFrIOll NO. 8~-127 - A RESOLUTION O~ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY O~ TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "B" STREET ANO "C" STREET WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND OIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIOS Adopted Resolution No. 86-127 as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 107 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 10-22-86 ARO(I~ S£RVIC£$ ~E£)IENT - CIVIC ~NTER E~PANSION PRI~JECT Authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agFeement with John Bates Associates, Inc., for preparation of WOrking drawings for the Civic Center Expansion Project as recommended by the City Manager. 45; 86-63 YOUTli S~QRTS - LIGHT FEE WAIVER Adopted the proposed criteria as contained in the inter-rom dated October 14, [986, regarding light fees for youth sports programs as recommended by the Community Services Department. 4! 6. RF. SOLI~ION NO. 86-128 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, DETERMINING AND ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR [986-87 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CONSTII~JTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND SECTION 7910 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE Adopted Resolution No. 86-[28 as recommended by the Finance Department. 50 7. __A__~_"E__PTANC£ OF PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS A/JO REDUCTION OF BONO AMOUNTS IN 1RACT NO. 12:)46 Accepted street, storm drain, water, sewer and other public utilities within Parkview Way, Parkcenter Lane, and related easements within Tract No. [2345; and authorized reduction of the following bonds: Performance Bond No. 524[-00-68 (reduced $510,[50 [75%]}; Labor and Materials Bond No. 524[-00-68 (reduced $255,075 [75%]); and Monumentation Bond )o. 5241-00-69 (reduced {$6,800 [100%]) as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 99 8. AUTHIN~IZATION ~ RI~v~)V£ TR£[$ AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS Authorized staff to remove trees at following locations: Ficus at [4751 Foxcroft; Ficus at [7532 Medford; Silk Floss at 13331 Coral Reef; Ficus at 2002 Nantucket; and Ficus at [3432 Cindy Lane as recommended by Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 86.1 9. ~NTATXVE TRACT ~ NO. 12833 (Sixth Street) Accepted mppltcant's request to continue consideration of Ten- tative Tract Map No. [2833 and tabled the item at this time as recon~nended by the Community Development Department. 99 [0. RESOLUTION NO. 86-!25 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, OVERTURNING PLANNING CO~IISSION APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT 86-Z6 THEREBY DENYING SAID PROJECT (405, ~15 & 425 Sixth Street) Adopted Resolution No. 86-125 pursuant to Council action on October 6, 1986. 81 VII. OF. DINAN~ES FOR I~OOUCTION See Public Hearing No. 1 - Ordinance No. 978. VIII. O~DINA~£$ FDR ADOPTION None. IX. OLD 6USINES$ None. NLqi ~INESS 1. TRAFFIC SIGNAL I/~STALLATION AT HAIN. SIREL-T & PACIFIC Sll~EET. A/d) AT MAIN STREET & 'B" STREET Sealed bids for subject project were received on October 6 as follows: Steiny and Company, Fullerton $13[,000.00 Signal Construction, Anaheim $146,602.00 Sierra Pacific, Riverside S147,717.00 CITY C IL MINUTES Page 5, .d-22-86 It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to award the bid for traffic signal installation at Main Street and Pacific Street, and at Main Street and "B# Street to the low bidder, Steiny and Company, Fullerton, in the amount of $131,000 as recommended ~y the Public Works Department/Engineering Division in the inter-tom dated October 13, 1986. Mntton carried S-O. g4 MIS(~..LLAHEOUS P~BLIC FACILITY )I)OIFICAIIOIIS As reco~m~ended in the inter-cam dated October 15, 1986, prepared by the Finance Department, it was moved by Kennedyr seconded by Edgar, to: 2) The Authorize the modification of miscellaneous public facilities for handicapped access as follows; and Modify Restrooms at Centennial Park $ 5,000 Nodtfy Restroom at 235 E. Main Street $ 3,000 (Water Oepar~.ment Office) Access Ran~=s to ~agnolia Park Tennis Courts $ 1,000 Designated Handicapped Parking at 235 E. Main Street and Centennial Park $ 1,000 Appropriate $10,000 from the unappropriated reserves of the Revenue Sharing Fund for co,M~letion of same. motion carried 5-0. 50. 3. SNITA AlIA FREEI~AY WIOENING 8ElliE~N ROUTE 1-405 AgO IEWP<)RT AVENUE lC was moved by Edgarr seconded by Hoesterey, to authorize staff to send the letter of concurrence attached to subject report dated October 15, ~986, to CalTrans for the widening of the Santa Aha F~way ~t~n Route 1-405 and Newport Avenue. Councilwoman Kennedy stated subject matter was discussed at the League of Cities Conference. She felt the City should take a vet7 strong position on noise mitigation, sound walls, and beautifica- tion. Council discussion follo~. The Otrector of Public Works responded that Federal Law does mandate sound walls. However, there is a current California Transportation Commission policy that landscaping is not put in on new construction. With consent of the maker and the second, the motion was amended to tnclude in the letter Tusttn's request that maximum sound attenu- ation and beautification Is important in our sector. The Director of Public Works responded to Councilwoman Kennedy that this is a segregated project and does not encroach onto Sixth Street. In response to Councilman Edgar, the Director stated that staff does have maps of Alternative 38 available for viewing, and quite a few business coammnity mold)ers have reviewed same. The amended motion carried 5-0. 4. REQU[S'r F~Jt TILAFI~IC SI~ AT WNU~.J~ AVENUE A/iD PU~.UaAN STREET It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to program the traf- fic signal installation at Warner A~nua and Pullman Street for the 1986-87 fiscal period subject to recommended funding participation from City of Santa Aha and Steelcase, Inc., as recommended in the inter-tom dated October ~, ~g86, prepared by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. After a question-and-answer period, the motion carried 5-0. 94 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 10-22-86 XI. 5. AWARD OF BID FOR TNE PUiiCJlASE OF A CUSHMAN SCOOTER FOR WATER READING Bids for subject item were received as follows: Franksons Incorporated, Glendale Pacific Equipment, Industry Mission Chemical, [nc., San Diego West Star Distributing, Hayward $6,982.72 $7,018.76 $7,685.00 $7,812.72 The low bidder's warranty did not include service calls or trans- portation charges, which can be critical at times. As recommended in the Inter-eom dated October 15, [986, prepared by the Public Works Department/£ngineering Division, it was moved by Hoestere~, seconded by Edgar, to authorize the purchase of a Cushman Scooter for water meter reading from Pacific Irrigation and Equipment, Inc., Industry, in the amount of $7,018.76. Carried 5-0. 87 REPORTS 1. ~UIIIIII~ CO)III~IOII ACTIOII~ - OCTOBER ~3, lga~ It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to ratify :he entire Planning Coaatssion Action Agenda of October 13, 1986. The Planning Consultant and Acting Senior Planner responded to Councilwoman Kennedy's concerns regarding Use Permit 86-27 for 01d World Wines, Inc. It was explained that the only wine tasting done at the store would be by licensed wine buyers for resale, not the general public. The motion carried 5-0. 80 P. EIPA/II~ E~/ALUATIO# OF SIGNALS AT W/U.gUT AVENUE & C~IERRYI~ As reco~ended in the inter-com dated October 1, 1986, prepared by the Public Works Departlaent, Engineering Division, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to in~lement no changes to the signal's ®eratton at subject intersection. Carried 5-0. g4 3. EL C~INO ~ Rl~lOM BEU. ~ It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to receive and file subject report dated October l, [986, prepared by the Public Works Department, Engineering Division. Motion carried 5-0. 93 4. SEPTENBER INVESTMENT I~PORT It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to receive ~nd file subject report dated October 15, 1986, prepared by the Finance Department. The motion carried 5-0. 50 5. FICUS TREE RENOVAL OR MIEELER ORIVE The Director of Public Works presented the staff report and recom- mendation as contained in the inter-eom dated October 14, 1986, prepared by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to receive and file same. Carried 5-0. 86.1 6. TUSTIN HEIGHTS SHOPPING CENTER DRIVEWAY MOOIFICATION AT IRVINE BOULEVARO/OLD IRVINE BOULEVARO The Director of Publtc Works presented the staff report and recom- mendation as contained in the inter-com dated October 15, 1986, prepared by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. He responded to Council questions. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoestere~, to authorize staff to proceed with split-phasing traffic signal modification at sub- ject location at an estimated cost of $1,600.00. The motion car- ried 5-0. 94 III. CITY C ,Ik MINUTES Page 7, t0-22-86 Council/staff discussion ensued regarding subject item as contained in the Inter-tom dated October 14, 1986, prepared by the Public Works Oepartment/~ngineertng Division. Heyor Saltarelli suggested that staff prepare a letter for the Mayor's signature stating that Council has reviewed the matter with staff relative to the drains, etc., and as soon as CalTrans deter- mines t~e exact relocation'of Nisson Road, the City complete the storm drain extension. The City Attorney responded to Councilman Kelly that he does not see any basis for liability on behalf of the City as alleged Ms. Megallon's letter dated October 7, [986. The Director stated he would draft a response to Ms. Megallon for review by the City Attorney's office, and bring it back to Council at the November 3 meeting for further review prior to 9! 8. Si)LIB I~STE Q)LLECTIOII FEES - TAX ROLLS See Public Input, Page 3 of these Minutes. 1. REQUEST FOR CL~ SESS2011 The Ctty Henager requested the City Council recess to a Closed Ses- sion to meet with its designated representatives regarding labor relations matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54967.6. 2. P.~IBENTIAL l~P~O~l~lff~ I# DOtfftTO~ ~ Councilman Kelly referenced Page 4 of Planning Con~ission Minutes dated October !3, !986, ~heretn Coae~isstoner Well questioned any research had been done concerning a specific plan for the Old Town area. He suggested that the Redevelopment area be expanded include downto~ residential to provide incentives for upgrade and development, and wondered if staff could prepare a statement on the matter. Mayor Saltarelli and Councilman Edgar explained to Councilman Kelly the difficulties involved ~dth his suggestion. For example, the entire redevelopment area would have to be reopened; that in turn would change the beseline of the tax allocation; .it would probably mean a reduction in present income; and the area would have to meet state and federal guidelines for 20% Iow-income housing. As an alternative, Councilman Edgar informed Councilman Kelly of the City's ongoing Community Oevelopment Block Grant Program for rehabilitation of private properties for low- and moderate-income famltes and spot rehabilitation within the City's boundaries. 60 3. COI~IUM[T~ [MPROI/E)IENT PROlgLq# - HONORABLE Mayor Pro Tea Heesterey reported that Tusttn received honorable man!ton as a finalist in the Helen Putnam Awards for its Community Improvement Program (CIP) at the League of Cities Conference. He felt it appropriate that the Mayor send a letter to each department who participated in same, expressing Council's pride and content- ment that they place people before policies. Councilwoman Kennedy requested The Tustin News photograph those who worked so diligently in the program, noting that Tustin competed against 45 cities, placing in the top three in our area. Mayor Pro Te~ Hoesterey noted that Tustin stood out by not ~equir- ing large amounts of public funds for program implementation. The entire C[P has been implemented with existing operating funds, not at public expense. CITY COUNCIL Mir i Page 8, 10-22-86 XIII. 4. TILLFR DAYS LOGO - DESIGNER HONORS Councilwoman Kennedy stated that Tiller Days has a very attractive, symbolic logo (an old bicycle and Tustin City seal) Which she believes was designed by a local artist. She requested that Coun- cil join in honoring the artist by awarding a proclamation. The Post Office used the logo to cancel stamps. Council concurred. 84 I.~_~ OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 1986 CONFf..xENCI[ Councilman Edgar commented that the League of California Cities 1986 Conference was a very productive and rewarding experience. Councilman Kelly thanked the City Manager and staff for resolving 11 complaints which he had submitted, commenting that they were all handled very quickly and efficiently. HEI. ICOi~TE~ ~ AT IJSI~.AS(H), TU~TIN Mayor Saltarelli noted that another Echo helicopter has crashed in the vicinity of Bryan and Culver. The City Manager confirmed that Council did send a letter indicating concern over that particular aircraft, suggesting it be grounded until such technical modifica- tions were found to explain its frequent malfunctions. The Navy Department grounded subject aircraft while they investigated, and it is now back in flight status. The Mayor requested another letter be sent to the Base Commander suggesting that until the problem is identified, the City would feel more comfortable in knowing that they are not flying over any residential or industrial areas where someone might be hurt. 101 8. LIABILITY IIISORAN~ SITUATION Mayor Saltarelli noted that the City has been notified that its insurance will be canceled at the end of the year. He reconwended that staff provide Council with a set of recomme~dations and possi- ble solutions to the insurance problem, without committing the City in any particular way until Council has had an opportunity to review same. He stressed it is a very high priority item and needs tO be resolved quickly. 59 REC~.SS - REDEVE~.OPMENT; CLOSED SESSION - RECONVENED At 8:21 p.m., it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to recess to the Redevelopment Agency; and thence to a Closed Session to meet with designated representatives regarding labor relations matters pur- suant to Government Code Section 54967.6. Carried 5-0. The meeting was reconvened at 9:15 p.m. with all members present. XlV. ACTIOMS FROM CLOUD SESSION 1. A~NENT Wllll ADMINISTRATIVE, ~%~NAG~NT & CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the agreement with administrative, management and confidential employ- ees and officers. Motion carried 5-0. 79 2.BUll. DIN6 OFFICIAL SALARY RAN6E It was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded by Edgar, to increase the salary range tot the Building OffiCial by 8%. Carried 5-0. 79 IV. ADJOORNMENT ci~ CL~RK ~ At g:16 p.m. the meeting was adjourned to the next Regular Meeting on Monday, November 3, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. by unanimous informal consent. ~/XMAYOR MINUTE~ OF AN AD~IOURIIEO REGULAR I~'ETING OF ~ REDEVELOP#ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF 1IISI'IN, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 22, 1986 The meeting was called to order at 8:21 p.m. by Chairman Saltare111 in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tusttn, California. Agency M~ers Present: Donald J. Saltarellt, Chairman Ronald B. Hoesterey, Chairman Pro Te~ Rtchard B. Edgar John Kelly Ursula E. Kennedy Agency Mm~aers Absent: None Others Present: William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Me~ E. Wynn, Recording Secretary R~rt S. ~e~decker, Director of Public Works Lt. Welt ~myer, Police Oepartment Ronald A. Ault, Finance Otrector Rob 8alert, Planning Consultant Jeff Oavls, kttng Senior Planner App~xtmately 25 in the audience APPROVAL OF #INUTES - OCTOBER 6, 1986, REGULAR Zt wes moved by Hoasterey? seconded by Edgar, to approve Mtnutes of the October 6, 1986, Regutar Meeting. ~tJon carried 4. APPROVAL OF OE~NANOS It was moved bZ Hoestere~ seconded b}, Edgar, to approve de, ands for the month of 5epte~Oer, ~986, In the aeount of S121,873.84 as ~co~end~ by tbe Ftnance O~a~nt. Carried 5-0. ~ Councilwemn Kennedy expressed concern that the pro, eot could eastly revert to office. ~tch seers to be a constant proble~ in the R&O areas. Subject building will provide 255 parking spaces where only ~! are required. This seems to give carte blanche to that developeent to go of~Ica, and therefore have an adverse t~pact on traffic t~rough greater use. The Planning Consultant stated that up to 50~ office use is atlowed. Over 50~ office use would requtre a use permit. Councilwoman Kennedy was still concerned with how the City could keep track of the use s~nce it is so easy to ~odtfy to offices. She stated she was informed that staff has corrected the problem in other areas of the Cfty by ~aktng the owner go through the use permit process. However, it's a frustration, and the area ~s already intensely developed and has traffic proPlems. The City Manager responded to Chat rman Pro Tem Hoesterey that Specific Plan No. 7 has been prepared in draft form, but will require additional time for completion until potential circulation issues are resolved. The Planning Consultant stated that this pro~ect is permitted under ex~sting zoning. Therefore, as the Redevelopment Agency, review is strictly lim- ited to architectural review under redevelopment law. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded b~ Hoesterey, to adopt t~e FolTowing: RESOI. trrIOg NO. ~ 8~12 o A RESOLUTION OF ~E COHf4UNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY QF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DESIGN OF AN INOUS~IAL BUILDING TO BE LOCATED AT 13II VALENCIA Further Agency/staff discussion followed. REDEVELOPMENT ~ 'Y MINUTES Page 2, 10-22-~, The motion carried 5-0. It was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded by Kenned),, to direct staff~ to inves- tigate the possibility of requesting the Orange County Fire Department to notify the City if, during routine building inspections, they encounter parking problems which could be hazardous to getting fire equipment in and out, since it may be indicative of an overuse of the property. This would allow spot inspections of problem areas relative to parking. Carried s-o. ---1 In accordance with Richard Vining's suggestion, Council concurred to direct staff to prepare the appropriate con(mendation for t~e Tustin Tiller Days Parade. 84 7. ADdOI~NI4Effl' It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Kelly, to adjou~ at 8:28 ~.m. to the next R~u)ar ~eting on ~nday, November 3, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. Carried