HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes of 08-17-87 MINUTES OF A R~6ULAR ~£TI~
CITf OF ~STIN, ~IF~IA
AUGUST 17, 1987
-.. The meeting was call~ to order by Mayor Edgar at 7:00 p.m. tn the City
Council Cha~er~, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance was led
by Councilman ~elly, aha ~e Invocation was given by Councilman
Councilpersons P~sent: Richard B. Edgar, Mayor
Ursula E. Kennedy, ~yor Pro Tam
Ronald B. Hoesterey
Jo~n Kelly
Earl J. Prescott
Council pe~ons ~sent: None
Others Present: William A. Huston, City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney ~
Ma~ E. Wynn, City Clerk
Christine Shingleton, C~. Dev. Director
Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police
Roba~ Ledendeckar, Otr. of Public Works
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Royleen ~(te, C~. & A~nin. Srvcs. Director
) Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent
~proximately ~O in the Audience
1. E~LISHI~ ~E ~LIO ~E ~ECTION ~E F~ 1987-~ & A~ORIZ-
The Ftnance Otrector gave the staff report. Thts ts a contfnuatlon
of ~e trash fees m the tax bill as was created last year. The
tnc~ase Js bas~ upon the weight~ factor that was agre~ to four
years ago ~t~ ~r current trash haulers. Those factors Increased
3.34~. The overall Increase to the soltd waste collect~ fee as
propos~ ts actually ~out 2.25~. T~ere are two elements that make
up the collection fee. One ts the cost for ¢estdential pickup, and
t~en the~e ts the dtsposal fee ~ich the County ~arges at the
landfill stte at $1.50 per residential untt. The prospos~ fee ts
$5.48 per ~sldenttal fee and the annual fee ts $65.76. There ~ill
be appcoxtmately 5,000 residential units affect~ by t~is fee.
.... The public hearing was open~ at 7:04 p.m; The~ we~ no speakers
On t~e ~tter, and the publlc hearlng was closed.
~', It was ~ved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Kennedy, to adopt the
RE~L~ION ~. 87-93 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~E CITY
OF ~ST[N, ~LZFORN[A, ~OPTED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SEC-
T[ON 5473 ~ SEQ. OF THE HEALTH ANO SAFE~ CODE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, F[~LLY APPROV]NG ~D ADOPTING A REPORT RELATIVE TO
P~CELS OF RE~ PROPERTY RECEIVING SOLID gASTE COLLECT[ON SERVICES,
DETERMINING ~E ~ARGE5 FOR SOL~D ~STE ~LLECT]ON TO ~ ~SESSED
AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE LOTS OR PARCELS OF LAND ~ THEY APPE~ ON
THE ~RRENT ~SESSMENT ROLL
The ~tton carried S-O. 97
2. ZON~ ~D[~CE ~ ~. 87-3 - ON-SITE & O~-SZTE ~DEMPT~ON
CEN~ ~ ~CYC~ ~GE ~A[~ - ORD[~N~ ~. 993
The Sentor Planner, present~ the staff report. This it~n is a
zoning o~t~ance ~en~ent ~ich would add ~o our Municipal Code,
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 8-17-87
provisions for dealing with the California Beverage Container
Recycling and Litter Reduction Act which was passed by State Legis-
lature in 1986. Tht~ Act establishes six convenient zones in the
City which are determined by the State Department of Conservation.
A convenience zone qualifies as an area that lies within a half,
mile radius o~ a supermarket which does $2,000,O00/year. or more in
gross annual sales. Commencing September l, all beverage con-
tatners will be marked with a redeemable value. These are for con-
tainers made of aluminum, glass, or plastic. There are al so some
provisions in soma areas for bi-metal, meaning steel and aluminum.
Provisions of State Law prohibit the City from denying approval of
~ small collection facility or reverse vending machine. However,
they do not prohibit the City from placing reasonable controls on
these facilities.
The Planning Commission adopted a resolution which recommends
approval of Ordinance gg3 which provides for three different types
of collection facilities within the convenience zones in Tustin.
The first one is a reverse vending machine, which is similar to a
soda machine or a water vending machine. The 'second type of
machine is known as a bulk vending machine or a small collection
facility. This is the type of facility that would be located in a
parking lot where material would be deposited and the redemption is
given out based on weight. The third type of facility is a large
collection facility which would occupy a free-stahding building or
a store front in an existing shopping center. In dealing with
these three types of facilities, staff has attempted to address
issues of location, design, and signage.
The reverse vending machine is a small simple facility that staff
has proposed to be dealt with on an administrative permit basis...A
bulk vending machine and the large collection facility would be
subject to a Conditional Use Permit. .
Councilwoman Kennedy was curious as to who enforces the Health Code
Sanitation Standards.
Senior Planner Rubin responded that staff included in the standards
that the area be kept clean, free of litter, and free of pests and
vermin. We would have the ability -to have the supermarket or the
supplier company to keep the.facility clean.
Councilwoman Kennedy said that we have such a difficult time
enforcing health and safety in the City that she would like to see
it in the system before we have the problem, if we can look at the
Conditional Use Permit wording.
Councilman Prescott had problems with the bulk vending machines.
It would seem that they have the right to operate 24 hours within
30 feet of residential usage with noise levels up to 60 dba.
Senior Planner Rubin responded that the noise level standards were
taken from the City's noise ordinance and the hours of operation
and the distance were standards that were recommended by the
Department of Conservation in what they call a model ordinance.
Those are flexible. They do not have to be open 24 hours a day.
The minimum is 30 hours a week, and they are required to be open a
certain number of hours past or beyond that which the host user
supermarket is open for convqnience.
Councilman Hoesterey suggested opening the public hearing before
the Council had further discussion.
The public hearing was opened at 7:19 p.m. Seeing no one, the
public hearing was closed.
Councilwoman Kennedy felt sound tones should be reduced.
The Community Development Director said that the 65 dba is the
limit for commercial uses. Larger setbacks might be a better solu-
tion. She suggested perhaps 50-75 foot setbacks.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
"~ge 3, 8-].7-87
Councilman Prescott suggested coupltng the setbacks wit. h limitation
on hours of 'usage.
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Kelly, that Ordinance No. 993
have first reading by title only with addition of a 75-foot setback
,, i'~ limitation.
A substttut, e mo[ton was made by Prescot. t~ seconded by Edcjar, that
the hours of operation be ltmited to between 6:00 a.m. to midnight
and with a 7S-foot setback limitation.
Councilman Hoestarey satd we have the option to implement the hours
as problems artse.
Substitute mo[ton carried 3-2, Kennedy and Hoesterey opposed.
[t was moved b.v.Hoestere~ seconded b,v Kenned)', that Ordinance No.
993 have first reading by' t~t. le only. Motion carried 5-O..
Following first raadtng by tttle only of Ordinance No. 993 by the
Ctty Clerk, it was moved by Prescot, t~ seconded by £dcjar, that. the _-
amended Ordinance No. 993 be Introduced as follows:
ORO[NANC£ NO. 993 - Alt ORDINAl[CE OF 1TIE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 87-3 THEREBY AMEND-
ING SECTIONS 9232.a:2, gg32.b, 9233.c, 92~,4.d, 9244.e.2 AND 9297 OF
· THE TUST[N MUNICIPAL COOE, TO PERMIT REDEMPTION CENTERS FOR
RECYCLABLE BEVERAGE CONTAINERS IN THE C-1, C-2 & PC, ZONING DIS-
. TRLCTS, SUBJECT TO AOMZN[STRATIVE ANO CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
,. '. The mo[ton carried 4-1, Hoesterey opposed. 81
,, ,~ ,'. Mayor Edgar asked for a time limit for a staff report regarding any
probl ems*.
· .-:, ;~ Councilman Hoesterey recommended that we handle problems on an
exception besls and If wa have a problem, It wtll come back
,. : ::~ Counctl. Mayor Edgar agreed.
IV.. PUBLIC INPUT
.~ Joseph Herzfg, 1751 Ratnbow Ortve, requested petttton statistics on
' Annexations No. 139 and No. 140. He sent matlgrams to the 5
Councilmembers ~nd one to City Hall and has not received an
,~' answer. Me read the matlgram.
Mayor Edgar responded that copies of the petitions are in your
possession and the analysis that the City Attorney performed was an
analysis regarding those copies. I)ased upon that analysis, he
wrote an opinion to the City Council, of which you have a copy, and
based on that opinion, Council determined that an election was'
appropriate. To direct the City Attorney to do more work than he
has interpreted is not something Council is electing to do.
The City Attorney said that he had received a copy of the mailgram
this date and had a letter sent to Mr. Herztg which says, "Please
find enclosed copies of our letters to your attorney Roger Grable.
All the records of the City relative to Annexation No. 140 are in
the office of the City Clerk and may be inspected by you or anyone
else anytime during regular working, hours of the City Hall. Copies
of these records may be obtained by you upon request. The City.
Council after reviewing the facts and considering staff reports and
recommendations, adopted Resolution 87-71 finding and determining
:hata majority protest was not made and set an election for
November 3, 1987, for the voters of the annexation territory to
vote on whether they wanted their territory to be annexed to the
City of Tustin. The election will be conducted by the Registrar of
Voters pursuant'to the request of the Council's Resolution 87-81."
The City Attorney thought thi's an adequate response to Mr. Herzig's
inquiries. The Council had no further comments.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 8-17-87
2. TRAFFI~ PROBLEM ON ACACIA DRIVE
· Ed Son~rath, 14581 Acacia Or., said his problem is an unbearable traf-
fic situation. The stop signs are just not adequate. He requested the
City survey the situation in unmarked cars as people are on their best
behavior men they see a marked Police car. People are ignoring the
stop signs.
The City Engineer and Chief of Police said they would study the situ-
ation and possibly put .signs warning of a stdp sign ahead. They said
they would do as much as they could to remedy the problems. 94
V. CONSENT CALENDAR
Item No. ! was removed from the Consent Calendar by Councilman
Prescott. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to approve
the remainder of the ~onsent ~al~ndar. Ihe motion carried 5-0.
2. APPROVJU. OF DEt4ANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $950,828.62
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $151,146.94 50
3. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 87-20; CLAIMANT: SVETLARA C~IZHIK; DATE OF
LOSS: 12-~ 86; BATE FILED WITM CITY: 7/20/87
Rejected Claim No. 87-20 fqr indemnification as recommended by
the City Attorney. 40
4. ~ESSt4ENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 I~TILITY AGREEMENTS WITH IRVINE Ib~NOI
WATER DISTRICT t
Approved agreements for construction of water, sanitary sewer
and reclaimed water facilities for A.D. 85-1 PPoject No. 6
(Tustin Ranch Road between Bryan Ave. and Irvine Blvd.) in the
amount of $3,294.50, and Project No. 9 {Myford Road between E1
Camino Real and Irvine Blvd.) in the amount of $14,488.50; and
authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute same as recom-
mended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 45
87-39; 87-40
$. JN480EEE EON) BETWEEN 1-5 & IRVINE B~VO. FUNDING AGEEEMENT WITH THE
IRVINE CO~A~r
Approved subject agreement which provides for the AssessmeQt
District to fund 71.51% and The Irvtne Company to fund 28.49%
of the totai project cost; and authorized the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute same as recommended by the Public Works
Oepartmeflt/Engtneering Division. 45
87-41
6. ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT DEEDS ON ALLENAN PLACE FOR FIRE HYDRANT
PURPOSES
Accepted easement deeds for fire hydrant purposes on Alleman
Place south of 17th Street from Robert and Linde Hitchens and
from Richard and Rosemary Hernandez; and authorized recording
with the County Recorder as recommended by the Public Works
Department/Engineering Division. 49
7. DECLARATION AS SURPLUS, ONE PITNEY BOWES SCALE/POSTAGE I~C141WE, AND
ONE 8ASIC FOUR COMPUTER SYSTEM
Declared one Pitney Bowes Scale/Postage Machine, Model #5600,
and one Basic Four Computer System as surplus; and authorized
the Finance Director to dispose of same at the highest return
to the City as recommended by the Finance Department. 87
Consent Calendar Item No. 1 - Minutes of August 3, 1987 - Councilman
Prescott requested that Redevelopment Agency Minutes of the August 3,
1987, meeting reflect that he abstained on the votes regarding Ruby's
Restaurant. It was moved by Edge% seconded by Kennedy, to approve the
Minutes with the above correction.
1. APPROVAJ. OF MINUTES - JULY 27, 1987, ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 3, 1987, REGULAR MEETING
Carried 5-0.,
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5, 8-1~-87
VI. OPJ}II(~C£$ FOR INTROOUCTIOI(
None.
ORDII~(C~ FOR ADOPTION
1. Z~ ~ 87-1 - ORI)INA~IC£ NO. gBg
' ' Subject ordinance had first reading and introduction at the
'~' August 3, 1987, City Council meeting.
It was moved by Kennedyt seconded by Kelly, that Ordinance No. 989
have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following second
reading by title only of Ordinance No. 989 by the City Clerk, it
was moved by Kennedyt seconded by Hoasterey, that Ordinance No. 98g
be passed and adopted as follows:
OI~J)IIIAliCE NO. 989 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 87-1 TO REZONE PROPERTIES GENERALLY
LOCATED EAST OF NEWPORT AVENUE BETWEEN ~IN STREET AND SAN JUAN
FROM (CG) COMMERCIAL GENERAL AND (CG-PUD) COMMERCIAL GENERAL-
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO (PC-C) PLANNED COII~tUNITY~ COMMERCIAL
'' Roll Call Vote:
AYE~ Edgar, Hoesterey, Kelly, Kennedy, Prescott
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
~ ., 2. ZONE CHAMGE 87-2 - OIU)INANCE NO. 990
Subject ordinance approves Zone Change B7-1 which rezones proper-
ties west of Newport Avenue between the I-5 Freeway and Mitchell
Avenue from Multiple Family Residential (R-3) and Retail Commercial
(C-l) to Planned Coat, unity Commercial (PC-C).
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No.
990 have second reading by title only. ~arried 5-0. Following
second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 9go by the City
Clerk, it was moved by Hoesterey) seconded by Kennedy, that Ordi-
nance No. ggo be passed and adopted as follows:
OIU)IN/UICE NO. 990 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 8.7-2 TO REZONE PROPERTIES GENERALLY
LOCATED WEST OF NEWPORT AVENUE BETWEEN THE I-5 FREEWAY AND MITCHELL
AVENUE FROM MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) AND RETAIL COMMERCIAL
. +; (C-1) TO PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (PC-C)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:' Edgar, Hoesterey, Kelly, Kennedy, Prescott
NOES ~ None
ABSENT: None 110
~ , ,~jN°neo
IX;'-? N~W BU~IMES$
. 1.. R£q~£ST FOR ST~T NAJ~£ C~U~NI~E - WA~MUT STREET
A request from Ms, Jocelyn H, Edwards to change the name of Walnut
Street between Newport Avenue and Orange Street to "Old Walnut."
Councilman Hoesterey said that since he brought this change to the
Council's attention about four years ago, he thought it might be
beneficial that instead of having staff take a poll each time, that
as wa receive a request from people in the area, that they carry a
petition to the neighborhood so that they can interact with the
people they are asking to sign the petition for a street name
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 8-17-87
Mayor Edgar responded that he thought that was an excellent idea
and perhaps a list of the people who live in the area could be pro-
vided to Mrs. Edwards so that she could make that contact.
The City Engineer said staff had recommended a name change t~) Sizth
Street.
There was Council consensus to direct staff to contact Mrs. Edwards
to see if she would be willing to make the survey. 96
2. APPROVAL OF SUPER CO~ITTEE TRANSPORTATION PRO,~ECTS
The Chairman of subject committee has requested each city review
its list of project submittals and confirm same with Council
act t on.
It was moved by Ed!)ar~ seconded by Hoesterey, to confirm the
following project submittals in the order of priorttization as
shown:
~ Local -
1. Eastern Transportation 1. ~'-~mino Real ~identng
Corridor Construction :>. Jamboree Road Construction
:~. Santa Aha (I-5) Freeway 3. Edinger Avenue Widentng
Widening. 4. Newport Ave. Extension to
Edtnger Avenue
The motion carried 5-0. 10!
3. REQUEST FOR STOP SIGNS 'AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF bEAI:VO00 LANE/
LOREi IA OR]VE NiO LAURIE LANE/LORETTA DR[YE
The City Engineer responded that staff' has no additional informa-
tion ~cher than the triter-rom dated duly :>4, 1987, prepared by the
Public Works Department/Engineering Oivlsion. Not Included were
the actual warrants or the workout sheets for the warrants.
Mayor Edgar said he thought the staff report was clear. The issue
is similar to the one presented earlier in the meettng bn Amaganset
and Acacia. The residential street, through many circumstances,
has been and continues to be mtsused. Unfortunately, Loretta Drive
has a dtstance of well over I/C-mile of stratght good road and some
people choose to drive on it very fast. There was a serious acci-
dent a few ~eeks ago that could very eastly have been fatal.
Unfortunately, he saw no alternatives to the stop sign to inhibit
the number of people who choose to speed. He was In favor of
installing a stop stgn at Loretta Drive and Laurie Lane with the
hope that it wtll slow down the speeders on Loretta.
Helen Edgar satd the police were out three nights tn a row about
:>-1/2 weeks ago in the middle of the night because of accidents and
cars betng driven across two lawns just two houses south of her.
She and her neighbors are asking for a three-way stop at Laurie
Lane and Loretta Drive going north, south, and coming .,~,off of
Laurt nda Way. · ·
It was moved by Edgar~ seconded by Kelly, to authorize staff to put
a three-way stop sign at Laurie Lane and Loretta Drive. The motion
carried 5-0. ~
4. II(S~rALLATION OF ~ M~LqBELITE I~RNNER POLES - RESOLUTION NO.-87-g2
A prpposal to install two poles at a cost of $2,000 in the sidewalk
area of 235 and 220 East Main Street to promote City functions.
As recommended in the inter-corn dated August 6, 1987, prepared by
the Community Services Department, it was moved b), Kenned)% sec-
onded by Hoesterey, to adopt the following:
RESOLUTION NO. 87-gZ - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF TWO MARBELITE STREET LIGHT
POLES FOR THE PURPOSE OF POSTING BANNERS TO PROMOTE PUBLIC EVENTS
AND ESTABLISHING POLICIES FOR REGULATING THE USE FOR DISPLAY
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
~ge 7, 8-17-87
The motion carried 4-1, Kelly opposed. 41
REPORTS
,,1.;-PLANNING COBI~ZSSION ACTIONS - AUGUST 10, 1987
All actions of the Planning Con~isslon.become final unless appealed
by the City Council or member of the public.
It was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Kennedy, to ratify the
~ entire Planning Comission Action Agenda of August 10, 1987. The
motion carried 5-0. I
2. 1988-89 ARTERIAL HIGIWAY FINANCING PROGRAM (AHFP) PROJECTS
, ~ An infomational report on staff's intention to submit three candi-
date projects for fiscal year 1988-89.
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded .by ,Kennedy, to receive and
file subject inter-corn dated August 10, 1987, prepared by the
, ~: Public .Works Department/Engineering Division.
Mayor Edgar requested staff contact the Edison Company to see what
*, the cost would be to underground Yorba Street between Irvine
Boulevard and First Street.
The Publtc Works Oirector said he thought the only poles there were
telephone poles and one street light that is wired overhead. He
said he weuld check with the Edison Company. When 'staff reports
back in Oecember with the formal applications to the County, a
.. feasibility report will be included.
Motion carried 5-0. 95
3. NOEI'It 1USTIN SPECIFIC PLAN
It was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Kennedy, to continue subject
item to the Septe~er 8 Council meeting. Motion carried 5-0. 81
4. ~ATUS REPORT ON REQUEST FOR CROSSWALK O~ ~t~IN STREET, ANO A ll~RF-
FIC SIG/IAL AT 1HE INTERSECTION OF FIRST STREET/'B' STREET
A status report on requests by Council to evaluate possible instal-
lation of a crosswalk on Main Street between Centennial Way and the
library building; and possible installation of a traffic signal on
First at "B# Streets.
It was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Edgar, to receive and file
subject report dated August 10, 1987, prepared by the Public Works
Department/Engineering Division. The motion carried 5-0. 46
~ :~ 5.. IMVEST~NT SCMEOULE AS OF JULY 31, 1987
A report listing vartous investment schedules for the City and
Redevelopment Agency with maturities 12 months or less and in
excess of 12 months.
It was mo~ed by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file
subject report dated August 11, 1987, prepared by the Finance
Department. The morton carried 5-0. 50
II. OTHER BUSINESS
1. UPGRADII~ OF SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ~RIN AND WILLINiS
Councilman Kelly inquired if staff could do something to upgrade
the southwest corner of Main and Williams. The Public Works
Director responded that the property is in the future street
right-of-way. He said that staff would come back with suggestions
for upgradi rig.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 8, 8-17-87,
2. AIRART SOUNO MONITORING EQUIPMENT
Councilman Kelly request~ that the matter of the airplane sound
· onitoring equipment, the consultant's contract regard~n~ t~e
~nfo~at~on Counct] requested, and a t~ ]~t for the repo~ ~e
agend~zed for the next ~t~ng. lOI
~. R~RT ~ CITY ~ IO~IFIUTION SIGNS
Counc~]w~an Kenn~y request~ a repo~ for t~e next meet~n~ on the
entrance s~gns that ~re to ~ Installed at various locations
the City.
4. U~ATE ~ ~ITION ~ ~OP~TY AT 17592
..
The Co.unity Oevelop~nt Director repo~ that over the last few
~eks staff has undertaken a ~od deal of work ~ the property.
The~ has been a n~ driveway poured, the exterior has been cleared
of all overgrown debris and trees and shrubs. Everything is now tn
place to co~ back with the lien against the property to be imposed
on the property ~ner. We have had very good ~sponses from the
surrounding neighbors. At this point the record~ nuisance filed
with the County Recorder is going to be a continual enforcement
it~ that ~ will ke~ regular tab on. We will co~ back to the
Council ~th the proposed lien if ~ can't ~t a payment up front
fr~ the ~roperty owner.
In response to Mayor Edgar, the Co.unity Development Director s~id
t~at t~e work was done by the City under Nuisance Abatement. which
amount~ to approximately $5,000. A "Notice of Subs~ndard Condi-
tion" ~its the City to continue to do this as needed until the
prope~y ts In a state of continued ~tntenance. 81
S. ~l~ ~0~
Councilman Prescott request~ that the City adjourn in memory of
the ~ople ~o lost their lives in the Northwestern airplane crash.
6. ~EE ~ ~.1-5
Mayor Edgar ask~ if the Jamboree to I-5 project would be on the
Sept~ber 8 agenda. The Public Works Director ~sponded that it
was schedul~ for this meeting but the plans were not receive.
Staff hopes to receive them in time for the next ~eting. The
Mayor ask~ that the April repo~ be updated, with a precise time
line of contracts and completions of all t~e proj~ts so that we
can monitor as a c~untty, the completion of Jambor~ Road
Chapman Avenue to the 405 freeway.
XI %. RE.SS - R~E~LOP~ ~NCY - A~OU~
At 8:26 p.m., it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to recess
to a ~ettng of the R~evelopment Agency; and thence adjourn to the
next Adjourned Regular Meeting on Tuesday, September 8, ~987, at 7:00
p.m. Carried 5-0.
MINUTES OF A REGUIJ~R MEETING
OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF IUSTll(, CALIFORNIA
AUGUST 17, 1987
1. CAkL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 8:26 p.m. by Chairman Edgar in the City
Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California.
2. ROLL CALL
Agency Members Present: Richard B. Edgar, Chairman
Ursula E. Kennedy, Chairman Pro Tem
Ronald B. Hoesterey
John Kelly
Earl J. Prescott
Agency Members Absent: None
Others Present: Wi 11t am A. Huston, Exec. Dt rector/City Managen
dames G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary
Christine Shingleton, Corn. Dev. Director
Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police,
Robert Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Royleen White, Com. & Admin. Srvcs. Director
Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent
Approximately 15 in the Audience
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - AUGUST 3. 1987, REGULAR MEETING'
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the Minutes of
t)~e August 3, 1987, Regular'Meeting. The motion carried 5-0.
4. COMPLIANCE IJIltl AB 265 CONCERNING "SET ASIDE" FUNDS ~ LOW AND NOOEPd~TE
INCOME HOUSING - RESOLUTION NO. RDA 87-11 AND RESOLUTXOfl NO. RI)A 87-12
AS reco~mnended in the inter-cam dated August 17, 1987, prepared by the
Community Development Department, it was moved by Moestereyt seconded by
Kennedy, to adopt the following:
RESOLUTIO# NO. RDA 87-11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CO.UNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN REGARDING THE READOPTION OF A STATEMENT OF
EXIST[NG OBLIGATIONS OR PROGRAMS OR BOTH IN CONNECTION WITH THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TOWN CENTER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 87-12- A RESOLUTION OF THE COR4UNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN MAKING A FINDING RELATING TO THE TOWN PRO,[ECT
AREA LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FUND DEPOSITS PURSUANT TO SECTION
33334.6 OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW
The motion carried 5-0, 60
5. APPROVAl. OF OF_HANDS - JULY, 1987
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the Demands for
the month of duly, 1987, in the amount of $135,124.41. Carried 5-0. 60
6. OlliER BUSINESS
Agency Member Prescott was informed by the Executive Director that there
would not be another Budget Workshop, but a public hearing for same is
scheduled for the September B meeting. 29
7. ADOOURNNENT
It was moved by Hoestereyt seconded by Kennedy, to adjourn at 8:28 p.m. to
the next Adjourned Regular Meeting on Tuesday, September 8, 1987. Carried