HomeMy WebLinkAboutNB 5 ANALYSIS I-5 ETC 12-15-86 NE~'I BUSINESS
NO. 5
DATE' DECENBER 10, 1986
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY HANAGER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR1)4ENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONNENTAL ANA4.YSIS OF I-$/EA~STERN ll~NSPORTATION
CORRIDOR (ETC) INTERCHANGE
RECOMMENDATION:
For the City Council meeting of December 15, 1986.
That the City Council approve the firm of R.B.F. and Associates to perform
engineering and environmental analysis of the I-5/ETC interchange and authorize a
supplemental budget appropriation in the amount of $39,400.00 for Tustin's share
of said work.
BACKGROUND:
In a Memorandum of Understanding between the cities of Irvine and Tustin dated
March 19, 1986, it was agreed by both cities that the ETC should be aligned to the
east of the Irvine Ranch Agricultural Headquarters. It was further agreed by both
cities that two distinct interchange locations with the I-5 freeway would be
considered. These two locations are as follows:
1. Current location of the Jamboree Road (formerly Myford Road) freeway
interchange identified as Alternative H-5.
2. A location approximately 500 feet easterly of the Jamboree Road (Myford)
interchange identified as Alternative G-4.
The purpose of the study is to provide environmental information and preliminary
engineering to allow the selection of an interchange location and design that will
address the needs and concerns of each City. Major issues to be studied are noise
impacts to existing residential developments, impacts/right-of-way requirements to
existing developments and effects on arterial street systems.
The intent of the two cities with this analysis is to include it with and have it
considered with the Phase II ETC Route Location Study analysis currently being
prepared by the County.
DISCUSSION:
The initial concept of this analysis was to be a three party effort between the
City of Irvine, The Irvine Company and City of Tustin with each agency assuming
one-third the costs. Since the receipt of the proposals, the Irvine Company has
informed both City agencies that their maximum participating amount would be
limited to $10,000.00. Each City staff has indicated that the study should be
funded equally or that it should be a City study only with Irvine and Tustin
assuming a full 50% share.
DECEMBER 9, 1986
PAGE TWO
The staff's of both Irvine and Tustin solicited proposals to two firms, Robert
Bein, William Frost and Associates (R.B.F.) and Van Dell and Associates {VA). The
firm of R.B.F. completed all of the previous studies and alignment alternatives
for The Irvine Company, City of Irvine and Tustin to date. The firm of V.A. is
currently working for the County of Orange as the consultant for the Phase II
Route Location Study.
Proposals were received as follows:
Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates ............. $78,800.00
Van Dell and Associates ............................... $64,600.00
Both City staffs recommend the firm of R.B.F. to perform the work based upon the
past performance on previous studies related to the analysis and the understanding
of both communities needs, desires and concerns. Copies of both proposals are
attached for reference.
This study is currently an unbudgeted item and will require a supplemental 1986-87
fiscal year budget appropriation from general fund revenues. Funding requirements
with and without Irvine Company participation is recapped below:
Agency
Irvine Company
City of Irvine
~ity of Tustin
Inclusive of
Irvine Company
Parti ci pati on
Exclusive of
Irvine Company
Participation
$10,000.00 $ -0-
$34,400.00 $39,400.00
$34,400.00 $39,400.00
The City of Irvine Council will be considering this item at their meeting of
December 16, 1986. Irvine staff is recommending the study be awarded to R.B.F.
and Associates in the amount of $78,800.00. Additionally, they will be
recommending that the cost be shared by both cities equally and that The Irvine
Company not be included within the study as a participating agency.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
BL:jm
Attachment
Ct ben CBei t,cWilliam c ssOciates
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS
November 7, 1986
JN 23822
(Second Revision)
Mr. George Divine
Principal Transportation Analyst
Transportation Services - Advance Planning
City of Irvine
17200 Jamboree Road
Irvine, California 92713
Subject: Engineering and Environmental Analysis of I~5/ETC
Interchange
Dear George:
In accordance with your request, Robert Bein, William Frost &
Associates (RBF) is pleased to submit this revised proposal for
consulting transportation planning and environmental services to
further the development of the I-5/Eastern Transportation
Corridor (ETC) interchange. In a Memorandum of Understanding
between the cities of Irvine and Tustin dated March 19, 1986,
both cities agreed that the ETC should be aligned to the east of
the Irvine Ranch Agricultural Headquarters. In previous
negotiations between the two cities, two distinct interchange
configurations were considered. Those two concepts, one at the
current Myford interchange location (H-5) and one approximately
five hundred feet east (G-4), are intended to be the subject of
this detailed analysis. Also to be examined is the alignment of
adjacent arterial streets that would be impacted by the Corridor
Alignment, particularly Harvard from Irvine Center Drive to
Myford.
The goal of this study is to provide preliminary engineering and
environmental information that will, when considered with the
Phase 2 ETC Route Location Study analysis currently being
prepared by the County of Orange,. provide the basis for selecting
an interchange location and design. This study will examine
issues raised in previous planning efforts by the cities of
Irvine and Tustin as well as the County of Orange and Caltrans.
A major issue identified by both cities is noise impacts on local
existing residential development.
The limits of Our study will be Irvine Boulevard to the north,
the A.T. & S.F. Railroad to the south, Jamboree Boulevard to the
west and Culver Drive to the east.
PO 8OX 2590 · !401 QUAIL STREET · NEWi~ORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 · (714)
27403 YNEZ ROAD · SUITE 201 · RANCHO CALIFORNIA. CALIFORNIA 92390 · 4714) 676-8042
WORK PROGRAM
The following is an -outline of the specific work tasks
anticipated under this contract as we have defined the work
program in response to your requests:
TASK 1: - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FUNCTIONS
1.1
DATA COLLECTION
Prepare composite topographic base maps at a scale of 1" = 200'
utilizing available design drawings, topographic mapping, and
aerial photography prepared by us and others under separate
contracts. Obtain the most recent design drawings for the I-5
Widening, Myford/I-5 Interchange Reconstruction Project, the
realignment and extension of Myford Road from Michelle to Irvine
Center Drive, and the realignment of Myford Road from I-5 to
Irvine Boulevard. These projects will be utilized as a base for
design products produced in this study.
1.2
DESIGN STANDARDS
Identify design standards of the City of Irvine, County of Orange
and Caltrans that will be utilized as a part of this study. Any
requirement for modifications to the design standards shall be
identified by RBF and approved by the Directors of Public Works
prior to application.
1.3
FACILITY SIZING AND ANALYSIS
Determine interchange ramping needs, related arterial
requirements, and number of lanes, based upon detailed computer
modeling techniques and analysis provided by the City. The City
of Irvine will provide computerized travel forecasts using the
ITAP model and will generate forecast volumes of through traffic
and turning movements for all alternative network configurations.
Design volumes will be provided for AM and PM peak periods for
two alternative network scenarios. Additional configurations
will be examined as de-med appropriate by the City for an
additional fee.
Analyze the computer modeling results. Products of the analysis
will include:
e
Two exhibits identifying lane requirements for ETC and
I-5 mainlines, freeway to corridor and corridor to
freeway ramps, arterial interchange ramps, frontage
roadways, and any arterial streets in the vicinity of
the interchange and interfacing with ETC and I-5,
including the potential realignment of Harvard Avenue.
Type and location of proposed HOV facilities.
3. Calculations of mainline, ramp, and arterial operating
-2-'
peak period to insure adequacy.
Associates).
(Austin-Foust
e
Calculations of corridor and ramp weaving and merging
volumes to provide appropriate distances and levels of
operation. (Austin-Foust Associates)
1.4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DESIGN
Prepare preliminary engineering design drawings at a scale of one
inch equals two hundred feet (1"=200') for two alternative
network configurations analyzed in 1.3 above. This will include
profiles for ramps, the Eastern Transportation Corridor, and
Harvard Avenue. The budget amount for this task is in addition
to the budget amount of $5,300 expended in preparation of
preliminary plans of the Eastern Transportation Corridor for The
Irvine Company under separate contract.
GEOMETRY
Establish the preliminary geometric configurations based on
applicable design standards defined in Task 1.2 and lane
requirements identified in Task 1.3 for interchange G-4 and H-5.
1.5
MEETINGS AND CONSULTATION
Attend meetings during the completion of this work scope.
budget maximum of forty (40) hours has been established for this
work effort. Any additional meeting attendance, if requested,
will be completed on an hourly basis for an additional fee.
TASK 2: - ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates will perform preliminary
environmental analyses for the two alternative Network
Configurations identified under Task 1.3 of this Scope of Work.
The purpose of this preliminary environmental analysis will be to
provide an environmental evaluation of noise and aesthetics which
will allow decisionmakers to compare impacts associated with each
of the alternatives on a preliminary basis. This environmental
analysis will be informational in nature and will not be prepared
as a formal Environmental Impact Report for public review, CEQA
processing, NEPA processing or certification. RBF will confer
with the Orange County Environmental Management Agency Study
Group on the Eastern Transportation Corridor to facilitate
compatibility of the environmental reviews.
-3-
2.1
NOISE ASSESSMENT
An acoustical analysis will be prepared as a part of this study.
A comparison of short-term and long-tea~L acoustical impacts for
each interchange configuration will be performed. Impacts upon
existing residential and recreational areas, including
determination of probable noise contours, will be identified
within the Study Area as detailed below:
Existin~ Environment
On-site measurements will be made in the project area to
determine existing ambient noise levels. Noise measurements
will be made at 8 sites. The FHWA highway noise model
("FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model",
FHWA-RD-77-108) in conjunction with the monitoring results
will be used to describe existing noise levels in the
project vicinity. Existing noise levels will be described
in terms of CNEL for the County/City requirements, and in
terms of peak hour Leg noise levels for Caltrans
requirements. The existing noise section of the report will
describe applicable noise standards, the noise measurement
survey methodology, survey results, other significant noise
sources in the area (i.e., aircraft and train), and the
existing noise levels.
Potential Impacts
The potential noise impacts can be divided into short te~m
construction noise, and impacts on surrounding land uses.
Short term noise 'impacts associated with the roadway
construction will be addressed in terms of the type of
equipment to b~ utilized and the typical noise levels
generated by these equipment. Hours of construction and
estimated duration will be presented. The applicability of
controlling the construction noise with the noise ordinances
of the local jurisdictions will be discussed.
Long term noise impacts will be described for each of the
project alternatives. For each scenario the FHWA Model will
be run to project the resultant noise levels. CNEL noise
levels will be developed and contours presented for each of
the alternatives. The projections of CNEL noise levels will
be compared to the local jurisdiction's noise standards.
The peak hour Leg analysis will be performed for specific
site locations.
The noise projections will be compared to existing levels.
Additionally, the projections will be compared to local,
state, and Federal criteria. Impacted areas will be
identified for each scenario, and the need for mitigation
identified.
-4-
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation will be considered for the project case and
alternatives, as necessary. Areas will be identified for
which a noise barrier would be required to comply with
either City, County or State standards. Height requirements
for such barriers will be identified based on preliminary
roadway design information. Caltrans also requires that
when a barrier is needed, the benefit of various barrier
heights be determined. Therefore, a benefit analysis of
various barrier heights will be done. Final noise barrier
design will be done as part of the environmental work, and
should be done as a part of the final design study.
2.2
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
A project description and analysis will be completed as part of
the environmental study. Existing environmental conditions,
impacts and potential mitigation measures will be identified and
analyzed as a part of the environmental study for the following
areas:
2.2.1 Noise Analysis
Based upon the acoustical report, the consultant will prepare an
environmental analysis and comparison of each interchange
alternative. The technical report -will be su~LuL~arized by
environmental analysts and presented in the environmental study.
2.2.2 Aesthetics
An analysis of the interchange visibility from adjacent areas
will be performed. This analysis will include a photo survey of
existing site conditions and a descriptive discussion of the area
and potential impacts.
In addition a visual analysis depicting alternatives on photos
using an overlay technique will be provided for three views of
the interchange. This visual analysis will entail layout control
points of the interchange location, surveying, a site visit by a
graphics photo team, illustration of a "ghost image" and hardline
drawings. The budget amount includes 1 view each for the two
alternative interchange configurations. Additional views will
be provided for an additional fee.
2.3
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
The above two studies will be documented through the preparation
of a technical report and included as an appendix to the Project
Report. Ten (10) review copies of the environmental document
will be provided.
-5-
TASK 3: - PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FINAL REPORT
3.1
PROGRESS REPORTS
The consultant will prepare up to five (5) monthly progress
reports summarizing the engineering and. environmental analysis,
additional data requirements, and significant issues affecting
the study. These progress reports will indicate the percentage
of work completed and will be consistent with the monthly
invoices.
3.2
MEETINGS AND PRESENTATIONS
The consultant will meet and confer with City (Irvine and Tustin)
and Irvine Company staff, as necessary, to review progress and
results of the study. The consultant shall also present the
results of the study to the Transportation Commission and City
Councils. It is anticipated that there will be two (2) such
presentations. The consultant will prepare appropriate printed
handouts, slides, and exhibits for use in the presentations,
which summarize specific issues, analysis, and results of the
study as deemed necessary. Time for meeting attendance and
presentation graphics has been budgeted to a maximum of 80 hours
for this work task. Should work necessitate time beyond this
amount, additional time will be provided under a separate scope
of work for an additional fee.
3.3 FINAL REPORT
The consultant will prepare and submit ten (10) copies of a draft
final report. The report shall document all information, data,
assumptions, analysis, findings, and recommendations of the
study.
The City of Irvine, City of Tustin and The Irvine Company will
review the draft report for content, accuracy, and consistency of
information, and will make changes as necessary. The consultant
shall make required changes and submit ten (10) copies of the
final document. Upon approval, the consultant shall provide
twenty (20) additional copies of the report.
COMPENSATION
RBF will complete all services outlined herein in accordance with
a time and material billing system based on 2.75 times the wages
spent for all personnel actually working on the project subject
to a maximum budget of $73,800 as detailed in the fee schedule,
-6-
plus a budget amount of $5,000 for the direct cost of
blueprinting and reproduction.
WORK TASK FEE
Task 1.
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
ENGINEERING FUNCTIONS
DATA COLLECTION $ 1,500
DESIGN STANDARD $ 800
FACILITY SIZING AND ANALYSIS $ 7,500
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DESIGN $ 36,800
MEETINGS AND CONSULTATION $ 3,000
Subtotal Professional Fees - Task 1
Blueprint and Reprographics
Budget Amount - Task 1
Total Task 1
Task 2.
2.1
2.2
2.3
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
NOISE ASSESSM~ENT
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
2.2.1 Noise Analysis
2.2.2 Aesthetics
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
Subtotal Professional Fees -
Task 2
Blueprint and Reprographics'
Budget Amount - Task 2
Total Task 2
$ 49,600
$ 2,500
$ 52,100
$ 5,700
$ 50O
$ 3,000
$ 3,000
$12,200
$ 500
$12,700
Task 3 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FINAL REPORT
3.1 .PROGRESS REPORTS $ 1,2-00
3.2 MEETINGS AND PRESENTATIONS $ 4,000
3.3 FINAL REPORT $ '6,800
Subtotal Professional Fees - Task 3 $ 12,000
Blueprint and Reprographics
Budget Amount - Task 3 $ 2,000
Total Task 3
Total Professional Fees
Total Blueprint and Reprographics Amount
Total
14,000
73,800
5,000
78,800
Progress billings will be forwarded to the City to be paid on a
monthly basis. These billings will include the fees earned for
the billing period plus all direct costs advanced by us.
-7-
The Standard Provisions of Agreement are attached hereto and made
a part hereof (see Exhibit "A" attached).
We appreciate the opportunity to submit our contract proposal on
this project. Work will commence upon receipt of a signed
Purchase Order which will also serve to acknowledge approval of
the terms contained herein.
Robert Carley~r.
Senior Vice P~esident
Planning /
Attachment
RC/jeb
cc: Bob Ledendecker, City of Tustin
Brent Muchow, City of Irvine
John Boslet, The Irvine Company
Doug Frost, RBF
Larry Wilson, RBF
Barbara Eljenholm, RBF
Gary Warkentin, RBF
-8-
400 Col~oJ Moll. Suite 232. Soc,ome~o. CA (916) 444.3060
Form BM 82-1C o 1973 by' California Council
of Civil I~nL~neers and Land Surveyors
A
STANDARD PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CLIENT AND CONSULTANT
p~
30.
32. ~ ~ffe ~t ~ ~ic b~i~Jfrom ~l~t Mcbut m ~ ~h~' I~ ~ ~ cbnt ~le chem m~ ~ (10}~ f~ the ~M °f~[e pt °f such
Proposal for
ENGINEERING AND
ENVIRONMENTAL
ANALYSIS OF
I-5/ETC INTERCHANGE
CITY OF IRVINE
Submitted bY:
VAN DELL and ASSOCIATES, INC.
with Phillips Brandt Reddick
and Mestre Greve
November 7, 1986
Van Dell and Associates, Inc.
17aO1 Cam,,nght
ir~a~.e Caltfc ,n-.'.~ 92714
714/474- 14CC
November 7, 1986
Mr. George Divine
Principal Transportation Analyst
City of Irvine
17200 Jamboree Road
I~vine, CA 92713
PROPOSAL FOR ENGINRRRING AND ENVIRO~NTAL ANALYSIS
OF I--5/ETC INTERCHANGE
Dear George:
We are pleased to submit the attached proposal for engineering
and environmental analysis of the I-5/ETC interchange in response
to your request of October 30, 1986. We have included four
copies of our proposal for your purposes.
As you are aware,.the proposed study team is currently working on
the subject interchange for EMA, as part of the Eastern
Transportation Corridor study. Although this makes us obvious
candida~es for the work, our selection could introduce a
perceived conflict of interest for the consultants. Therefore,
in an attempt to prevent this; we have included "proposal
conditions" which requires full knowledge and concurrence of all
parties associated with the work. We trust that this will be
acceptable.
Based on the Scope of Work, .we have derived what we believe are
an appropriate schedule and an adequate budget for the project.
The Schedule we proposed indicates a duration of 3 to 4 months
depending upon the review process and presentation requirements.
The Cost Summary indicates the budget we propose for each of the
tasks. The assumptions and limitations relevant to these budgets
are noted in the Work Program.
We thank you for considering us for this work and hope that our
proposal meets with your approval.
Sincerely,
VAN DELL AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Don B. McDougald
Project Manager
DBM:dw
Enclosure
Proposal for
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
OF I-5/ETC INTERCHANGE
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION
PROPOSAL CONDITION
STUDY TEAM
WORK PROGRAM
SCHEDULE
COST SUMMARY
APPENDICES
RFP and Scope of Work
Resumes
Rate Schedules
PBR Proposal
Page
1
1
1
2
4
5
Proposal for
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
OF I-5/ETC INTERCHANGE
INTRODUCTION
This proposal is prepared in response to the City of Irvine's
request dated October 30, 1986 and the accompanying Scope of
Work. Copies of these documents are appended to this proposal.
PROPOSAL CONDITION
Van Dell and Associates, Inc. (VA) is currently working on Phase
II of the ETC Route Location Study for the County of Orange EMA.
This project includes an analysis of interchange geometrics and
noise impacts for the considered ETC alignments including
alternatiTes for an interchange with I-5 in the vicinity of
Myford Road. This ETC work is being done using OCTAM traffic
data provided by EMA and using a scale of 1"-500' for the
geometrics.
Because of the similarities between the ETC study and the
proposed project, there are obvious advantages for the same
consultant to do both projects. However, because of potential
differences in results and clients' points of view, the
consultant may be placed in an awkward position unless there is
full accord .among the parties involved. Therefore, a condition
of this proposal is that Van Dell and Associates, Inc. will
undertake the assignment only with the County's full knowledge
and concurrence.
STUDY TEAM
The proposed study team is comprised of personnel from three of
the firms working on the ETC Route Location Study. These firms
are:
Van Dell and Associates, Inc., the prime consultant with
responsibility for the engineering functions
Phillips Brandt Reddick, a subconsultant with
responsibility for the environmental services
Mestre Greve Associates, a subconsultant with
responsibility for the noise aspects of the project
From Van Dell and Associates, Inc., the key individuals assigned
to the proposed project will be=
Don McDougald, a senior engineer-economist, who will be the
Project Manager
Ray Allard, a senior civil engineer, who will be the
project engineer
Ron Jonas, a traffic engineer, who will direct the
transportation analysis
From Phillips Brandt Reddick, Tom Holm, a senior planner, will
direct the environmental analysis.
From Mestre Greve Associates, Vincent Mestre, a specialist in
environmental engineering, will direct the noise analysis.
Resumes for the individuals named above are appended to this
document.
Other individuals from the personnel resources of the three firms
will be used as required.
WORK PROGRAM
TASK 1: ENGINEERING FUNCTIONS
1.1 Data Collection
- As per the Scope of Work with no exceptions or additions
- Assumes two meetings
1.2 Design Standards
- Prepare draft for review and approval by the City of
Irvine
- Finalize report after the review is complete
- Assumes that the City of Irvine will process the design
standards through the County and Caltrans
1.3 Facility Sizing and Analysis
- Arterial sizing will be based on daily volumes with
consideration to peak hours in the vicinity of freeway
ramps
- Interchange ramp volumes and arterial sizing will be
within the area bounded by Irvine Boulevard, Irvine
Center Drive, Old Tustin Ranch Road, and Culver Drive
- Freeway and ramp sizing will be based on peak period
projections providea by the City of Irvine
- Ramp metering design capacities will not be evaluated
unless specifically identified in lieu of operating
capacities
- Ail weaving and merging requirements will be calculated
based on criteria in the California Highway Design Manual
- HOV lane facilities will be qualitatively considered and
quantitatively estimated
1.4 Preliminary Engineering Design
- Prepare base sheets with data from Task 1.1
- Prepare conceptual design in plan view only showing
geometric layout and ramp grades
- Obtain approval for conceptual design
- Complete the preliminary engineering design at a scale of
1"-200' including one sheet with plan view and two sheets
with profiles for each alternative
1.5 Meetings and Consultation
- Assumes six meetings attended by up to four engineering
specialists
TASK 2: ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
2.1 Noise Assessment
- An acoustical analysis will be done in accordance with
the Scope of Work
2.2 Environmental Analysis
- Noise analysis will be based on the acoustical report
- Aesthetic analysis will include three photos with
overlays for the two considered interchange
configurations
2.3 Environmental Document
- The environmental analysis will be sununarized and
presented in the environmental document including
graphics and photo overlays
- Assumes ten review copies
TASK 3: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FINAL REPORT
3.1 Progress Reports
- Assumes three monthly progress reports will be required
3.2 Meetings and Presentations
- Assumes a total of six meetings with up to four
consultants in attendance
3.3 Final Report
- Based on 10 draft final reports, 10 final reports for
approval, and 20 approved final reports
SCHEDULE
TASK 1: ENGINEERING FUNCTIONS
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
Data Collection
Design Standards
Facility Sizing
Preliminary Engineering
Meetings
TASK 2: ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
2.1
2.2
2.3
Noise Assessment
Environmental Analysis
Environmental Document
TASK 3: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
3.1
3.2
3.3
Progress Reports
Presentations
Final Report
XX
XXXX
XXXXXX
XXXX
X X X
X
Months
2 3
XX
XXXXXXXZ <XXX
X X X
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXi XXXX
XXXX
X X
XXXXXX
X X X
COST SUMMARY
The budget for the proposed project as tabulated below was
derived by estimatin~ the time required by employee
classification and applying the appropriate hourly rate in
accordance with the appended rate schedules. Reimbursables were
estimated on the basis of anticipated reprographic requirements.
TASK 1: ENGINEERING FUNCTIONS
1.1 Data Collection
1.2 Design Standards
1.3 Facility Sizing
1.4 Preliminary Engineering
1.5 Meetings
TASK 2: ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
2.1
2.2
2.3
Noise Assessment
Environmental Analysis
Environmental Document
TASK 3: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
3.1
3.2
3.3
Progress Reports
Presentations
Final Report
Reimbursables
$ 2,930
1,200
6,130
22,460
2,700
5,720
5,100
3,680
1,280
4,600
4r800
$60,600
4r000
Total
$64,600
APPENDICES
City of Irvine. 172C0 jarn,~soree Road. P.O. Box 19575, !rvine, California 92713 (714) 660-3600
October 30, 1986
Mr. Don B. McDougald
Project Manager
Van Dell & Associates, Inc.
17801 Cartwright Road
Irvine, CA 92714
SUBJECT: Engineering and Environmental Analysis
Interchange - Request for Proposal
of Z-5/ETC
Dear Don:
The City of Irvine, in conjunction with the City of Tustin
and The Irvine Company, is soliciting proposals for the attached
scope of work. Considering your involvement in the ETC Study,
we felt this might be a project you would be interested in.
Please deliver your proposal to my office no later than Friday,
November 7, 1986. Should you have any questions about the
attached, please contact me at 660-3638.
Very truly yours,
Principal Transportation Analyst
GD:GA:pl
Attachment
cc:
Dennis Wilberg
Bob Ledendecker, City of Tustin
John Boslet, The Irvine Company
SCOPE OF WORK
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF
I-5/ETC INTERCHANGE
INTRODUCTION
This scope of work is the first step t'owards satisfying the
directive of the Irvine City Council on March 25, 1986, to "pursue
the necessary preliminary engineering and environmental work
to further the development" of the I-5/ETC interchange. In
the Memorandum of Understanding between the cities of Irvine
and .Tustin, both cities agreed that ~he ETC should be aligned
to the east of the Irvine Ranch Agricultural Headquarters and
that Irvine would decide the location of arterial highways south
of I-5. In previous negotiations between the two cities, two
distinct interchange configurations were considered. Those
two concepts, one at the current Myford interchange location
and one approximately five hundred feet east, are intended to
be the subject of this analysis.
PURPOSE OF ANALYSIS
The goal of this study is to provide preliminary engineering
and environmental information that will assist in the selection
of an interchange location and design. The study will examine
issues raised in previous planning efforts by the cities of
Irvine and Tustin as well as the County of Orange and Caltrans.
A major issue identified by both cities is noise impacts on
local existing residential development.
TASK 1: - ENGINEERING FUNCTIONS
1.1 DATA COLLECTION
Prepare composite topographic base maps at a scale of 1" = 200'
utilizing available design drawings, topographic mapping, and
aerial photography. Obtain the most recent design drawings
for the I-5 Widening, Myford/I-5 Interchange Reconstruction
Project, the realignment and extension of Myford Road from
Michelle to Irvine Center Drive, and the realignment of Myford
Road from I-5 to Irvine Boulevard. These projects will be
utilized as a base for design products produced in this study.
1.2
DESIGN STANDARDS
Identify design standards of the City of Irvine, County of Orange,
and Caltrans that will be utilized as a part of this study.
Any requirement for modifications to the design standards shall
be identified by the consultant and approved by the Directors
of. Public Works prior to application.
-1-
1.3
FACILITY SIZING AND ANALYSIS
Determine interchange ramping needs, related arterial require-
ments, and number of lanes, based upon detailed computer modeling.
techniques and analysis provided by the City. The City of Irvine
will provide computerized travel forecasts using the ITAP model
and will generate forecast volumes of through traffic and turning
movements for all alternative network configurations. Design
volumes will be provided for AM and PM peak periods for two
alternative network scenarios.
Analyze the computer modeling results.
will include:
Products of the analysis
Two exhibits' identifying lane requirements for ETC
and I-5 mainlines, freeway to corridor and' corridor
to freeway ramps, arterial .interchange ramps, frontage
roadways, and any arterial streets in the vicinity
of the interchange and interfacing with ETC and I-5,
including the potential realignment of Harvard Avenue.
Type and location of proposed HOV facilities.
Calculations of mainline, ramp, and arterial operatingA
peak period to insure adequacy. (AusLi~ Fcust As~c --
ciates).
Calculations of corridor and ramp weaving and merging
volumes to provide appropriate distances and levels
of operation. ~Auutin Ucust Asacciatcs}
1.4.
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DESIGN
Prepare preliminary engineering design drawings at a scale of
one inch equals two hundred feet (1"=200') for two alternative
network configurations analyzed in 1.3 above. This will include
profiles for only depressed ETC alignments, including profiles
for ramps.
GEOMETRY
Establish the preliminary geometric configurations based on
applicable design standards defined in Task 1.2 and lane require-
ments identified in Task 1.3 for interchange G-4 and H-5 for
a depressed ETC alignment.
1.5
MEETINGS AND CONSULTATION
Attend meetings as necessary during the completion of this work
scope.
TASK 2: - ENVIKONMENTAL ISSUES
2.1
NOISE ASSESSMENT
An acoustical analysis will be prepared as a part of this study.
A comparison of short-term and long-term acoustical impacts
for each interchange configuration will be performed. Impacts
upon existing residential and recreational areas, including
determination of probable noise contours; will be identified
within the Study Area~ as detailed below:
Existing Environment
On-site measurements will be made in the project area to
· determine existing ambient noise levels. Noise measurements
will be made at 8 sites. The FHWA highway noise model
("FHWA Highway Traffic NoiSe Prediction Model", FHWA-RD-
77-108) in conjunction with the monitoring results will
be used to describe existing noise levels in the project
vicinity. Existing noise levels will be described in terms
of CNEL for the County/City requirements, and in terms
of peak hour Leg noise levels for Caltrans requirements.
The existing noise section of the report will describe
applicable noise standards, the noise measurement survey
methodology, survey results, other significant noise soures
in the area (i.e., aircraft and train), and the existing
noise levels.
Potential Impacts
The potential noise impacts can be divided into short term
construction noise, and impacts on surrounding land uses.
Short term noise impacts associated with the roadway con-
struction will be addressed in terms of the type of equipment
to be utilized and the typical noise levels generated by
these equipment. Hours of construction and,estimated dura-
tion will be presented. The applicability of controlling
the construction noise with the noise ordinances of the
local jurisdictions will be discussed.
Long term noise impacts will be described for each of the
project alternatives. For each scenario the FHWA Model
will be run to project the resultant noise levels. CNEL
noise levels will be developed and contours presented for
each of the alternatives. The projections of CNEL noise
levels will be compared to the local jurisdiction's noise
standards. The peak our Leg analysis will be performed
for specific site locations.
The noise projections will be compared to existing levels.
Additionally, the projections will be compared to local,
State, and Federal criteria. Impacted areas-will be iden-
tified for each scenario, and the need for mitigation iden-
tified.
-3-
2.2.
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation will be considered for the project case and
alternatives, as necessary. Areas will be identified for
which a noise barrier would be required to comply with
either City, County,or State standards. Height require-
ments for such barriers will be identified based on preli-
minary roadway design information. Caltrans also requires
that when a barrier is needed, the benefit of various barrier
heights be determined. Therefore, a benefit analysis of
various barri~.r heights will be done. Final noise barrier
design will'~be done as part of the environmental work,
and should be done as part of the final design study.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
A project description and analysis will be completed as part
of the environmental study. Existing environmental conditions,
impacts and potential mitigation measures will be identified
and analyzed as a part of the environmental study for the fol-
lowing areas:
2.2.1
Noise Analysis
Based upon the acoustical report, the consultant will prepare
an environmental analysis and comparison of each interchange
alternative. The technical report will be summarized by environ-
mental analysts and presented in the environmental study.
2.2.2 Aesthetics
An analysis of the interchange visibility from adjacent areas
will be performed. This analysis will include a photo survey
of existing site conditions and a descriptive discussion of
the area and potential impacts. In addition, a visual analysis
depicting alternatives on photos using an oyerlay technique
should be provided for the interchange.
2.3
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
The above two studies will be documented through the preparation
of a technical report and included as an appendix to the Project
Report. Ten (10) review copies of. the environmental document
will be provided.
TASK 3: - PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FINAL REPORT
3.1
PROGRESS REPORTS
The consu'ltant will prepare monthly progress reports summarizing
the engineering and environmental analysis, additional data
requirements, and significant issues affecting the study. These
progress reports will indicate the percentage of work completed
and will be consistent with the monthly invoices.
-4-
3.2
MEETINGS AND PRESENTATIONS
The consultant will meet and confer with City (Irvine and Tustin)
and Irvine Company staff, as necessary, to review progress and
results of the study. The consultant shall also present the
results of the study to the Transportation Commission and City
Councils. It 'is anticipated that there will be two (2) such
presentations. The consultant will prepare appropriate printed
handouts, slides, and exhibits for use in the presentations,
which summarize specific issues,' analysis, and results of the
study as deemed necessary.
3.3 FINAL REPORT
The consultant will prepare and submit ten (10) copies of a.
draft final report. The report'shall document all information,
data, assumptions, analysis, findings,' and recommendations of
the study.
The City of Irvine, City of Tustin and The Irvine Company will
review the draft report for content, accuracy, and consistency
of information, and will make changes as necessary. The consul-
tant shall make required changes and submit ten (10) copies
of the final dccument. Upon approval, the consultant shall
provide twenty (20) additional copies of the report.
-5-
DON~r.~ B. McDOUGAT.~
V~n Del~ =nd Assoc~es. Lnc.
EXPERIENCE
ENGINEER-ECONOMIST
Van Dell and Associates, Inc.
Responsible for engineering eqonomic studies, financial
feasibility, and benefit-cost analyses for a broad range of
project types. Recently completed a study for the Solid Waste
Association of Orange County which was to evaluate the levels of
services and associated rates for Solid Waste Collection in
Orange County. Currently serving as Project Manager for the
Eastern Transportation Corridor Alignment Study.
SENIOR ENGINEER-ECONOMIST/SYSTEMS ANALYST
Swan Wooster Engineering Company Ltd.
Vancouver, British Columbia
Consulted with international clientele, performing feasibility
and cost-benefit analyses for transportation and port development
related projects including marinas, port improvements, and
import/export terminals. As manager of the Planning and Economics
Group, supervised and participated in business development,
client liaison, project administration, and report preparation.
Additionally, experience included engineering design,
construction supervision, and computer program development for
civil, industrial, and marine projects, specific projects
included, the Port of Vancouver, 1st Narrows Dredging Study;
miscellaneous British Columbia Coast port improvement projects;
Forest products terminal planning in New Zealand and Indonesia;
and coal and miscellaneous product terminal planning in Canada,
Brazil, Australia and USA.
LECTURER, ENGINEERING ECONOMICS
UBC Center for continuing Education
Vancouver, British Columbia
Taught courses in discounted cash flow analysis in Vancouver and
other locations throughout the province for 15 years as part of
the University of British Columbia's continuing education
program.
EDUCATION
STANFORD UNIVERSITY
M.S., Engineering Economic Planning, 1969
UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
B.A.Sc., Civil Engineering, 1968
Van Den and A~oc~ates, ~-c.
DONAT.n B. MCDOUGAT.~ ( Continued )
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
Registered Professional Engineer, British Columbia ~7818
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Member, Association of Professional Economists of British
Columbia
Member, Canadian Association of Business-Economists
Vcm Del/=nd Associctes, Inc.
~P~I~CE
SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER
Van Dell and Associates, Inc.
Irvine, California
Mr. Allard is responsible for civil engineering design
applications and data management for all types of design projects
and for training and consulting services to firms in computer-
aided design and data management techniques.
His experience includes all aspects of preliminary and final
engineering design including grading, street, storm drain, and
sewer and water systems. Projects have been varied throughout
Orange County with emphasis in the Irvine area.
Past projects include major arterial highway and freeway
projects, for which Mr. Allard served as design engineer. In
addition, he served as project manager of highway design for the
Eastern Corridor Route Location Study; design engineer for the
Foothill Transportation Corridor Study; and designer for the
Alton Parkway/I-5 overcrossing and the resurfacing of runways at
John Wayne Airport.
His previous experience includes a position as a.field
superintendent and estimator for an established Orange County
grading and paving contractor.
Direct construction supervision has included projects throughout
Los Angeles, Orange, and Riverside counties such as subdivision
work, major slope repair, harbor levee construction, and pipeline
work. Specifically, these construction assignments have included
the patching of various runways on the E1 Toro Marine Corps Air
Station in E1 Toro; the widening of Ford Road in Irvine and Dale
Street in Anaheim; slope repair in Anaheim Hills; slope and
freeway reconstruction on 1-15 in Corona; and levee construction
in Long Beach Harbor.
He is familiar in working with a variety of agencies including
cities, counties, Caltrans, Flood Control districts, and the Army
Corps of Engineers.
EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Irvine, California
Bachelor of Science (Civil Engineering), 1980
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
California Civil Engineer 36052
RON~?.r~ J. JONAS
V=n DeU =nd A~oci~es. inc.
SENIOR TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
Van Dell and Associates, Inc.
Irvine, California
Project Engineer for traffic and transportation analysis,
evaluation, and report preparation. Site impact transportation
planning and analysis. Liaison with public works and other
governmentaI agencies.
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER
Kunzman Associates
Irvine, California
Responsible for technical traffic impact analysis on mote than 75
site development, General Plan, Area-wide, Specific Plan areas
which ranged form 2 to 10,500 acres in size. Other studies
included arterial roadway improvement projects, freeway and
interchange needs and design criteria, parking demand studies,
speed zoning studies, and signal timing and progression studies.
SENIOR PROGRAM ENGINEER
The Irvine Company
Newport Beach, California
Technical liaison with jurisdictional agencies and consultants in
the management and planning of site specific and general plan
level circulation studies, site plan development and review, and
arterial highway improvement projects. Coordinated right-of-way,
lease transfer, adjacent site and roadway improvement projects,
and improvement funding.
PROJECT ENGINEER
HNB Consulting Engineers
Denver, Colorado; Cheyenne, Wyoming
Project Engineer fo~ Airport Master Plans for General Aviation
and Third Level Air Carrier airports, and for the Cheyenne
Transit Study.
Van Dell and A.~cc~ate$, In¢~
RON~T.n J. JONAS (Continued)
~n~UCATION
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Berkely, California
Master of Science (Civil Engineering, Transportation), 1973
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES (UCLA)
Los Angeles, California
Bachelor of Science (Engineering), 1972
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
California Traffic Engineer 1201
California Civil Engineer 396~4
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Institute of Transportation Engineers
American Society of Civil Engineers
THOKAS F. HOLN, AICP
DIRECTOR
EDUCATION
M.A., Architecture and Urban Plan-
ning, University of California,.
Los Angeles, 1976
B.A., Political Science, Univers)ty
of California, Irvine, 1973
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
American Institute of Certified
Planners
American Planning Association
Association of Environmental
Professionals
Director, Natural History
Foundation of Orange County,
California
EXPERIENCE
Phillips Brandt Reddick - Senior
Project Manager
Jack G. Raub Company - Manager of
Resource Planning
California Energy Commission -
Research Assistant
Urban Innovations Group - Planner
RESPONSIBILITIES/qUALIFICATIONS
SPECIAL SKILLS
Environmental Analysis
Policy Planning
Coastal Planning
Community Planning and Processing
As Director of PBR's Environmental Planning Division, Mr. Holm is respon-
sible for a variety of environmental, community planning and feasibility
studies. Among recent assignments, he is currently PBR Project Manager
for the Eastern Transportation Corridor Alignment Study EIR, has super-
vised various specific plan/EIRs and preparation of natural systems com-
ponents for the Route 71 Transportation Corridor EIR/EIS, contributed' to
policy planning studies for the 18,000-acre East Orange sphere of influ-
ence, and directed a multi-phase, Economic Development Study for the City
of San Diego.
Prior to joining PBR, Mr. Holm supervised numerous environmental studies
and advance planning projects for the Planned Communities of Aliso Viejo
and Mission Viejo in Orange County, California. He was a key member of
the original community design and processing team for Aliso Viejo. In
this capacity he assisted in environmental analysis of transportation cor-
ridor proposals and the Master EIR for the planned community, and prepared
elements of a local coastal plan, and urban runoff management plans. His
other accomplishments included supervision of use and management plans for
a 5,300-acre greenbelt system including sensitive resources, and assis-
tance with community theme and streetscape master plans.
With the California Energy Commission, Mr. Holm performed research for an
EIS on Outer Continental Shelf oil development leasing plans, and prepared
oil spill contingency plans and legislative recommendations. Coursework
leading to his Master's degree at UCLA emphasized environmental systems
planning and management. Owing to his experience in project management
and resource management studies, Mr. Holm is currently serving on the
Board of Directors of the Natural History Foundation of Orange County.
¢INCENT MESTRE, P.Eo
NOISE CONTROL
AIR QUALITY
ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING
EXPERIENCE : Has over eight years experience in environmental
engineering analysis. Included in this experience is project management,
pro~ram analysis, client coordination, and extensive computer modeling
anaJysis. Specialties include the mathematical and computer modeling of
environmental impacts for use in noise, air quality, and environmental impact
analyses. Most recently noise and vibration control and architectural
acoustics have been emphasized.
Previous experience i~cludes the following:
Project Manager and coordinator for the noise analysis for the
Alternative Airport Site Selection Study conducted by the Southern
California Association of Governments. Study included generating noise
contours and land use impact comparisons for 8 alternative sites for a
new major regiona) airport in Southern California.
..Project Manager for the noise analysis, including noise measurements and
computer modeling of noise generated by E1 Toro Marine Corps Air
Station. Follow on work included the design, specification,
installation, calibration, and start-up of a 3 year continuous noise
~monitoring program.
Aircraft noise consultant for FAA sponsored Airport Noise Land Use
Compatibility (ANCLUC) Studies at Salt Lake International Airport, Reno
International Airport, and Wiley Post Airport (Oklahoma City). More
recently, the project .manager for ANCLUC studies done for Harlingen
International Airport {Texas), Lawton Airport, donesboro Airport and
Tulsa International Airport {Oklahoma).
Project Engineer for airport environmental studies (noise and air
quality) for Master Plan updates at Hollywood-Burbank Airport, Los
Angeles International Airport (Over Oceansl Operations), Palm Springs
International Airport, Hemet Airport and Max Westhiemer Airport
(Norman, Oklahoma). '
Project Engineer for the noise study done for Air Installation
Compatible Use Zone Study (AICUZ) done for Alameda Naval Air Station.
Project Manager for 'Noise Elements done for the Cities of Irvine,
Victorville and Palm Springs. The Palm Springs Element included noise
analyses, measurements and modeling, of the Palm Springs International
Airport. The Victorville Element included comprehensive noise
measurements and definition of the noise impacts of George Air Force
Base.
EDUCATION : Received a Master of Science Degree in 1975 from the
University of '-California, Irvine in Engineering, and a Bachelor of Science _
Degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering in 1973 from the Universit~ of
California. Irvine. '
REGISTRATION : Registered
California (Mechanical #18786)
Professional Engineer in the State of
RELEVANT PUBLICATIONS :
"A Monitoring System For Long Term Aircraft Noise Measurements," Sound and
Vibration, February 1982
Handbook of Environmental Impact Analysis , co-authored Noise Chapter
with D.C. Wooten, McGraw-Hill, 1980
"The California General Plan Noise Elements," with D.C Wooten, Inter-Noise 74
Proceedings, Washington, D.C., October 1974
"Anechoic
University
June 1977
Chamber for Transportation Noise Research," with D.C. Wooten,
of California, Irvine, Environmental and Resources Engineering,
Van De~l and. A.~ocia'te$, Inc.
VAN DELL AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
FEE SCHEDULE
Effective June 12, 1986
Classification
ENGINEERING/TRANSPORTATION
Senior Project Manager
Project Manager
Senior Engineer, Senior Transportation Engineer
Design Engineer
Associate Engineer, Designer
Associate Transportation Engineer
Assistant Engineer, Design Drafter
Assistant Transportation Engineer
Drafter, Intern
SURVEYING
Survey Manager
Senior Land Surveyor
Land Surveyor
Associate Land Surveyor
Assistant Land Surveyor
Two-Man Survey Crew
Three-Man Survey Crew
PLANNING
Planning Manager
Senior Planner
Associate Planner
Assistant Planner
Research Assistant
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Senior Landscape Architect
Senior Designer, Landscape Architect
Associate Designer, Associate Landscape Architect
Assistant Designerl Assistant Landscape Architect
SUPPORT
Senior Progrsmmer/Analyst
Progrs-~er
Graphics Coordinator
Clerical, Messenger
Hourly Pates
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
50.00
40.00
40.00
30.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
123.00
160.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
70.00
40.00
40.OO
30.00
V~m Dell ~nd A~soci~es, L~c.
FEE SCHEDULE (continued)
e
Computer-aided design, such as COGO, will be charged at $15.00
per terminal hour.
Computer-aided drafting will be charged at $25.00 per terminal
hour.
Reproduction and other reimbursables will be surcharged 15% and
billed in addition to the above rates.
3. Billing will be every four weeks. Invoices are due and payable
on presentation. A finance charge will be applied to any unpaid
balance commencing thirty days after the date of the original
invoice at the maximum interest rate allowed by law.
4. The use of company or employee vehicles for extraordinary trips
will be billed at $0.25 per mile.
5. Overtime, when requested by the client, will be surcharged.
6. Travel time, not within regular eight-hour work day, will be
billed at 50% of regular rates.
e
This rate schedule is subject to change due to the granting of
wage increases and/or other employee benefits to field or office
employees during the lifetime of this agreement.
PHILLIPS BRANDT R DICK
RATE SCHEDULE
Effective January 1, 1986
Office
President
Principals
Associates/Directors
Project Managers
Project Planners/Designers
Graphic Designers/Research Analysts
Graphic Production/Administrative Assistants/
Word Processing
Clerical
Per Hour
$150
$11o-$95
$90-$75
$75-60
$6o-$5o
$45-$35
$35-$28
$30
Note:
1. Travel, reproduction, materials, and other non-wage costs at cost
plus 15 percent administrative charge.
Rates for consulting in connection with appearance before courts
and/or commissions and councils for litigation will be $150.00 per
hour (four hour minimum}.
Invoices are payable within thirty days of receipt. Payments not
received within thirty days will be charged interest at the rate
of 1.5 percent per month for an effective annual rate of 18 percent.
PLANNING · ARCHITECTURE. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
18012 SKY PARK CIR~C~E. IRVINE, CA 92714: (714) 261-8820 C~I_?'__O_RN_I~
NovemDer 5, 1986
Mr. Don McDougald
Van Dell and Associates
17801Cartwrlgnt Road
Irvine, CA 92714
SuDject=
Proposal for Environmental
Interchange Studles
Services - I-5/ETC
Dear Don=
We nave reviewed t~e scope of work for the above named study and
In conjunction wit~ Mestre-~reve Associates are pleased to submit
t~e following proposal for your consideration=
PBR
Estimated Fee
- Tasl<s 2.2, 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2
$12,000
Mestre-~reve Associates
- TasKs 2.1, 3.2 $ 5~720
TOTAL NOT-TO-EXCEED FEES
$17,7~0
PBR's work product will incorporate the nolse assessment anO
aesthetic analysls In draft and flnal environmental documents
wnlcn utilize effective graphics (Including photo overlays), text
and evaluation tecnnlques (e,g. matrices) to convey anticipated
lmpacts,
I wlll De Project Olrector for t~e environmental analysis,
wlll be supported Oy PBR research staff and graphic designers who
are nlgnly famlllar wltn the Eastern Transportation
Route Locatlon Study, Attendance at up to slx (6) team meetlngs
and/or client conferences and two (2) presentations ls lncluded
In ~e PBR proposal.
PLANNING · ARCHITECTURE · LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE · ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
18012 S~KY PARK CIRCLE. IRVINE, CA 92714 ' (714) 261-8820 CALIFORNIA COLORADO HAWAII
If desired, PBR w111 also prepare grapnlc alsplays, slldes or
handouts for presentations on a ~lme and materials Oasls as
requested, P~o~o enlargements wl~n conceptual Interchange over-
lays coula be coordinated wl~n ~ne flela work for ~ne aesthetic
analysis and maQe available for presentations,
Please le~ me know If you have any questions.
Sincerely,
PHILLIPS BRANOT REDDiCK
TFH:cw