HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 12-15-86ACTION AGENDA
TUSTIN PLANNING COF~IZSSION
REGULAR MEETING
DECF~BER 8, 1986
REPORTS
NO. 1
12-15-86
CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATIOR
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
All present: Puckett, Wetl, Baker, Le Jeune, Ponttous
(Ltmtted to 3 mtnutes per person for items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON ]'HE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
(ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
Roved by Co~sstoner
Approved 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. USE PERMIT 86-34
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
Presentation:
Minutes of November 24, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting.
Wetl, LeJune seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar~
Mr. Robert Savage on behalf of Great Western Real Estate
Authorization to expand an existing office building by 6~857
square feet.
333 E1Camino Real
Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
Planning Commission Action Agenda
December 8, 1896
Page two
Moved by Commissioner Wet1, seconded by Baker to approve Use Permlt 86-34 by the
adoptton of Resolution #o. 2377 wtth (2) t~o amendments. 1.) Oelete from condition
ii. F.6 the reference to woodchtps. 2.) Add the following to condition II.F.7.
'...pursuant to the approved landscape plan.' Approved 5-0.
3. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12763
Appl 1cant:
The Irvine Company
Location:
Sectors 10 & 11 of the East Tustin Specific Plan
Request:
To subdivide approximately 260 acres of land providing for
development of specific land uses pursuant to the East Tustin
Specific Plan.
Presentation:
Jeffrey S. Davis, Acting Senior Planner
Moved by Commissioner Ponttous seconded by Well, to recommend to City Council
approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 12763 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2376 with
staff's recommended editorial revisions. Approved 5-0.
4. USE PERMIT 86-37
ApPlicant:
Tai Au Yeung
Location:
2512 Walnut Avenue, Unit
Request: Authorization to sell beer and wine in conjunction with
restaurant use.
Presentation:
Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
Moved by Commissioner #etl, seconded by Legune, to approve Use Permit 86-37 by the
adoptton of Resolution No. 2378 wtth the following amendment: 1.) Add the following
to II.E. "The sale of alcoholic beverages shall be ltmtted to the hours of 11:00
a.a. to 9:00 p.e. and ts further restricted to a mxtmm of one hour after the
kitchen ts closed.' Approved 5-0.
BEW BUSIBESS
None
OLD BUSINESS
None
Planning Commission Action Agenda
December 8, 1896
Page three
STAFF CONCERNS
5. REPORT ON COUNCIL ACTIONS DECEMBER 1, 1986.
Presentation:
Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development
COI,IMI~ION CONCERNS
Commissioner Pontlous mde a complaint about Arco lnfatable sign at Red Htll and
Hltchell.
C~m;sstoner Le Ouene asked about status of Ruby's and at what stop in a project
design review conditions such as no left turn stgns, etc. are notod. He also
mentioned that he is particularly concerned about tngress to the 7-11 Store at
N~port and Walnut.
Commissioner Le Oeune asked for displays at meetings to be out where those
attendance could more easily view.
Complaint made by Comdsstoner Le deune about g~afftttl on walls off Walnut near
Browning.
ADdOURI~IEEr
Adjourned to the next regularly scheduled meetlng.
AGENDA
TUSTIN PLANNZNG CO~ISSZON
REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 8, 1986
CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/IMVOCATION
ROLL CALL: Puckett, Well, Baker, Le Jeune, Ponttous
PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(ALL MAITERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE .AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
Minutes of November 24, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Applicant:
Request:
USE PERMIT NO.
Location:
Presentation:
86-34
Mr. Robert Savage on behalf of Great Western Savings
Authorization to expand an existing office building
square feet
17240 E. Seventeenth Street
Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
by 6,857
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 86-34 BY THE ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO.
2377
RESOLUTION NO. 2377. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
AUTHORIZING A 6,857 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION OF A BUILDING LOCATED IN THE PLANNED
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL AT 17240 E. 1?TH STREET
Planning Commission Agenda
December 8, 1986
page two
3. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12763
Appltcant~
Location:
Request:
Presentation:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
RESOLUTION NO. 2376.
The Irvine Company
Sectors 10 & 11 of the East Tustin Specific Plan
To subdivide approximately 260 acres of land providing for
development of specific land uses pursuant to the East Tustin
Specific Plan.
Jeffrey S. Davis, Acting Senior Planner
RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
NO. 12763 BY THE ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2376.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
RECOMMENDING TO THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12763 AND
APPROVING THE CONCEPT LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12763
4. USE PERMIT 86-37
Applicant: Tai Au Yeung
Location: 2512 Walnut Avenue, Unit 1
Request: Authorization to sell beer and wine in conjunction with a
restaurmnt use.
Presentation:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
RESOLUTION NO. 2378.
AUTHORIZING USE PERMIT NO. 86-37 TO ALLOW THE ON-SITE SALES OF BEER AND WINE IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT USE AT 2512 WALNUT AVENUE, UNIT 1
NEW BUSINESS
None.
OLD BUSI#ESS
None.
STAFF CONCERNS
5. REPORT ON COUNCIL ACTIONS DECEMBER 1, 1986
Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development
Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 86-37 BY THE ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO.
2378.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
Planning Commission Agenda
December 8, 1986
page three
COMMIS$IO# CONCERNS
AOJOURllIENT
Adjourn to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting.
MINUTES
TUSTIN PLANNING COHNISSION
REGULAR NEETING
NOYENBER 24, 1986
CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Counctl Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGXANCE/TNVOCATION
ROLL CALL:
Present:
Also Present:
PUBLIC CONCERNS:
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Puckett, Wetl, Baker, Le Oeune, Ponttous
Christine Shtngleton, Jeff Davis, Mary Ann
Chamberlain, Patrizia Materassi, Laura Pickup, Suzanne
Atkins
1. Minutes of November lO, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting.
2. · Resolution No. 2373, La Fayette Plaza Pole Sign.
Moved by Commissioner Baker, Well seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar.
Approved 5-0.
Chairman Puckett read two letters to the Planning Commission from students it the
Ability Plus school on Browning Avenue.
PUBLIC HF. JLRINGS
3. USE PERMIT 86-32 WITH VARIANCE 86-6
Applicant: Mr. Raymond Salmi on behalf of E1 Camino Partnership
Request: V 86-6: To allow a reduction in the required number of parking
spaces from 12 spaces to 9 spaces.
UP 86-32: To allow over 50S office use in a building located in
the C-2 zone.
Location: 333 E1 Camino Real
Presentation: Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
Chairman Puckett opened the public hearing at 7:42 p.m.
Richard Rengel, project architect, spoke in favor of the project.
Gte9 Kelly, 330 E1 Camino Real, commented that people in the area preferred retail
uses rather than office uses.
Seeing no one further wishing to speak, Chairman Puckett closed the hearing at 8:00
p.m.
Planning Commission Mtnutes
November 24, 1986
Page two
Commissioner Well recommended earthquake standards be added to Resolution 2369 I.E.
Commission discussion ensued pertaining to the city's parking structure and how long
it would be before it is repaired.
Commissioner Baker questioned the applicant what future parking demands the butldtng
would generate.
Moved by Con,missioner Wet1, seconded by Le Jeune to approve Use Permtt 86-32 by the
adoption of Resolution No. 2369 with (2) two amendments. 1.) Add "earthquake
standards" to I.E and; 2.) Add the following finding to I-C-7 "There is currently a
high turnover rate for retail users in the immediate area and low pedestrian traffic
rate"-. Approved 5-0.
Moved by Commissioner Wet1, seconded by Pontious to approv· Variance 86-6 by the
adoption of Resolution No. 2375. Approved 5-0.
4. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12763
Applicant:
The Irvine Company
Location:
Sectors 10 & 11 of the East Tustin Specific Plan
Request:
To subdivide approximately 215 acres of land
development of specific land uses pursuant to
Specific Plan.
Presentation:
Jeffrey S. Davis, Acting Senior Planner
Moved by Commissioner Well, seconded by Le Jeune, to approve staff'
to continue Tentative Tract Map No.
regular meeting. Approved 5-0.
5. USE PERMIT 86-33
providing for
the East Tustin
s recommendation
12763, as an open public hearing, to the next
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
PreSentation:
The O. K. Earl Corporation on behalf of Mercury Savings and Loan
12911 Elizabeth Way
Authorization to install a parking lot at 12911 Elizabeth Way
and demolish an existing single family home.
Mary Ann Chamberlain,'Associate Planner
Chairman Puckett opened the public hearing at 8:20 p.m.
John Gray, applicant for Mercury Savings & Loan, spoke in favor of the parking lot.
He stated the existing lot is full at noon and for late night functions. Three or
four nights a week the facility is used for community functions. These night
functions would not use the new lot because of its distance from the building.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 24, 1986
page three
Lynn Fuss, Elizabeth and Wass Ave., (no form submitted) spoke against the project.
John Mosely, 12888 Elizabeth Way, spoke against the project and was disappointed that
only one copy of the staff report was available. 'He stated the parking lot is
usually only 1/2 full and when they use the community room it does get late at
night. He admitted the existing house is in bad condition and he thought it would be
better to continue the hearing.
Michael Mullen, 1200 Wass, spoke in opposition to the project because he felt there
would be loss of control of land uses in the area.
Gatl Bozarth, 12gO1 Elizabeth Way, requested that if this project is going to happen
that there should be a 10' wall along the north property line.
Blondell Ftshburn, 12882 Elizabeth Way, opposed the project and stated they would
like the neighborhood to continue like it has been in the past. She also stated her
mother-tn-law lives across the street from the proposed parking lot and this could
mean headlights glaring in her bedroom.
In response to a question from the Commission, Mr. Gray returned to the podium and
stated the existing parking lot is not full all the time however, at the noon hour
the lot is often full to capacity. For nighttime activities the people park close to
the building. He suggested the new lot handle enq~loyees during the day.
Commissioner Pontious questioned if the new parking lot could be closed after banking
hours and how many people the community room holds.
Mark Huntle¥, Mercury Savings Representative, explained they could close the lot
after banking hours and the room holds 35 to 40 people.
Chairman Puckett stated that in his past involvement in organizations that utilize
the community'room, they always used the parking stalls closest to the building.
After some discussion among the Commissioners regarding the height of the wall and
the times of meetings the Commission took a recess at 9:00 p.m. for the applicant to
explain the details of the plan to the concerned neighbors in the audience.
Chairman Puckett recovened the meeting and closed the public hearing at 9:12 p.m.
Commission discussion ensued regarding the proposed wall, the texture of the wall to
match existing wall, plant materials should be planted which will provide sound
attenuation and aesthetic mitigation.
Moved by Commissioner Wetl, seconded by Pontious, to approve Use Permit 86-33 by the
adoption of Resolution No. 2374 with the following two amendments: 1.) Add the
following to II-D-2 "36 inch boxed trees shall be installed along the northerly
property line adjacent to the south side of the proposed wall with spacing of the
trees to be dense enough to adequately screen adjacent residential properties subject
to approval of the Director of Community Development"; and 2.) Add II-H "The parking
lot shall be for daytime use only and chained off after banking hours". Approved
5-0.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 24, 1986
Page four
OLD BUSINESS
None
NEW BUSINESS:
6. SITE PLAN / DESIGN REVIEW 86-29, MCKELLAR/TUSTIN
Applicant:
Gensler & Associates/Architects on behalf of McKellar
Development
Location:
14272 Franklin Avenue
Request:
Presentation:
Commission approval of Site Plan and Architectural Design of a
proposed 69,972 square foot space R & D Industrial/Office
building.
Patrtzta Materasst, Planner
Commissioner Ponttous questioned the location of the handicapped parking spaces and
suggested that they be moved to be more accessible for handicapped persons. Staff
responded this could be accon~ltshed on the final site plan.
Commissioner LeJeune questioned sidewalk width - 5' vs. 8'.
Moved by Commissioner Well, seconded by Baker that Design Review 86-29 be. approved by
Resolution No. 2372. Approved 5-0.
7. FORMAL FINDING NO. 86-1
Applicant:
City of Tusttn
Location:
First Street Specific Plan Area
Request: To authorize pre-school and nursery school uses in the
Commercial district established by Specific Plan No. 10.
Presentation:
Laura Cay Pickup, Assistant Planner
The Commission made positive remarks regarding preschools and felt that it was an
oversight not to have this use in the Specific Plan No. 10 area. These uses will be
subject to a Use Permit.
Commissioner Wetl moved, Baker seconded to approve Formal Finding No. 86-1 by the
adoption of Resolution No. 2371, Approved 5-0.
STAFF CONCERNS
8. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS OF NOVEMBER 17, 1986
Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development
Planning Commission ~llnutes
November 24, 1986
page five
COIdlHISSION CONCERNS
Commissioner Wet1 requested that a memo be prepared for City Counctl consideration
regarding the width of sidewalks tn the industrial areas.
The Commission welcomed Hs. Christine Shtngleton to her new post as Dtr'ector of
Communtty Development.
ADJOUR~IE~T
The meettng was adjourned at 10:05 p.m. tO the the next regular meettng on December
8, 1986.
CHARLES E. PUCKETT,
Chairman
MARY ANN CHAMBERLAIN,
Associate Planner
Acting Recording Secretary
Report to the
Planning Commission
Item 2
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
PROPERTY
O#NER:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
DECEHBER 8, 1986
USE PERHIT 86-34
ROBERT SAVAGE, AIA
209 E. FZFTEENTH ST.
SANTA ANA, CA 92701
BRUCE A. ENDERLE, TRUSTEE
10505 E. ESCALANTE
TUSCON, AZ 87530
17240 E. 17TH STREET
PC - PLANNED COBg4UNITY COIg4ERCZAL
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS BEEN FILED IN CONFOP. J4ANCE #I'114 THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONHENTAL QUALITY ACT.
A 6,857 EXPANSION AN EXISTING 'BUZLDZNG IN A PLANNED COtI4UNITY
ZONE
REC(X, g4ENDED ACTZON:
Approve Use Permtt No. 86-34 by the adoptton of Resolution No. 2377.
SLII~RY:
This project is located in a Planned Community Commercial zoning district which
was established on the property in 1977. Shortly after rezoning of the property
occurred, the Enderle Shopping Center project was approved as the development
plan for the area. Any modifications of this development plan must be approved
by the Planning Commission subject to issuance of a Conditional Use Permit.
The applicant is proposing to modify the existing Great Western building which
is located in the Enderle Center Development Plan. The project includes
renovation of an existing structure and a 6,857 square foot addition.
Staff has identified key issues associated with the project which are discussed
separately. These issues include zoning requirements, architectural style,
landscaping, and the proposed sign program. A copy of the proposed site,
elevation and landscaping plans are attached for review.
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
Use Permit 86--34
Page two
Zontng Requirements:
As previously mentioned, thts project ts located tn a Planned Community
Commercial District. The ortglnal development plan wa~ approved as a 1,875
square foot structure on the south west corner of Seventeenth and Yorba
Streets. All requtred development standards are as follows:
Requtred Proposed
Front Setback: 15' [5'
Side Setback-
East: 10' 16'-6"
West: O' 1'
Rear Setback: none + 120'
Parking Ratio: 1/per 250 sq.ft. T/per 250 sq.ft.
No. of Parking Spaces 35 35
Height: 35' Building 34'
Tower 39'
No. of Stories: 2 2
All original development standards have been met in regards to setbacks and
parking. The height requirement for the structure is 35' and the proposed tower
is 3g'. The tower is an uninhabitable architectural feature and may exceed the
35' height limit according to Section g271 of the Zoning Code.
The westerly setback is adjacent to the 55 Freeway. Staff has contacted
Caltrans regarding the building location. Attached is a letter from Caltrans
which approves the location of this building.
Architectural Style:
The original development plan for the Enderle Center includes elements of
Spanish and Mission style architecture. The applicant has proposed to upgrade
the existing building by adding 6,857 square feet of area. This addition, as
shown on the attached elevations, is of two stories.
The tower and cornice details, along with the stucco treatment and proposed
colors incorporates and encourages Mission Style architecture. The building is
considered compatible with the remaining structures in Enderle Center.
The applicant proposes to use two shades of beige paint on the stucco portions
of the structure with two shades of darker brown on the facia and cornice trim.
All surfaces are stucco treated to encourage the Mission Style. The roof has
been designed with a red tile roof typical of the Mission Style.
Landscaping Plan:
The applicant proposes to incorporate a series of 15 gallon and 24 inch box
trees in the front sides and rear of the property. These trees include the
preservation of existing pine trees in front of the building and the addition of
palm, coral and eucalyptus trees throughout the site.
Community Development Department
Planntng Commission Report
Page three
Ground cover and clinging vines are proposed to treat the remaining landscape
surfaces. Vines are also used to cover the western portion of the building
surface which faces the 55 freeway.
The north east corner of the property is the focal point of the landscape
elements. The landscape berm proposed will be used to plant seasonal annual
fl owers.
Sign Program
The Sign Code allows freestanding commercial structures one freestanding
monument sign of 32 square feet. This sign is proposed at the north easterly
corner of the property. The sign materials are precast concrete with the blue
and white Great Western logo.
Wall mounted signs are proposed on each side of the structure. Each sign is
proposed as raised metal letters. One sign, for the northerly facing elevation,
is 28 square feet. The remaining signs are 25 square feet. The monument and
wall signs proposed are in conformance with Tustin's Sign Code size
requirements.
CONCLUSIONS:
All of the major elements of the building are in conformance with Tustins Design
Guidelines and Municipal Code. The architectural style of the building and
lanjscape elements proposed are compatible with the remainder of the Enderle
Center Development Plan.
Staff considers the overall design of the structure and landscaping plan to be
appropriate for the area. Since all requirements have been met, staff
recommends that the Planning Commission approve Use Permit No. 86-34
auhthoriztng the 6,857-square foot expansion of the Great Western Building.
Director of Community Development
LCP:jd
Attachments:
Site Plan
Landscape Plan
Elevations
Caltrans letter
Resolution 2377
Community Development Department
"oul 46OAOS IJ~qOl"OIII a01)AOS IJ~qO/' 'OIII ~&~kiS IJ~q~/' 'I4H ~HI~i4JS IJ4414J''1411 4~i~r
STATE OF CALIFORNIA--BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor
>ARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RIC~' 7, P.O. ~OX 23~4, LOS ANGELES 90051
· 'e~ephone: (213) 620-3210
August 28, 1986
Mr. Ro, bert Ledendecker
Director. of Public Works
City of'Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
Dear Mr. Ledendecker:
BY
RECEIVED
SEP 0,11986
7-ORA 5/55 Stage II
Reconstruct Interchange
07209 - 101641
Category: 351
Robert Savage, Inc., requested that we review the site
proposal for the Great Western Real Estate Building to be
located adjacent to the Route 55 Freeway northbound off-ramp
to t7th Street.
The existing Route 55 right-of-way will-accommodate envisioned
freeway expansion and modifications at this location.
Therefore, Caltrans has no objection to the site proposal.
We appreciate your cooperation and the opportunity to review
any proposed new development plans along the freeway corridors
which are being proposed for improvements. If there are any
questions regarding this matter, please call Mr. C. Christopher
at (213) 620-4554.
~inQe~ely,
C. K. OHARA, P.E.
Senior Transportation Engineer
Project Development Branch B
cc: Mr. Robert Savage
Robert Savage, Inc.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
O:
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
10
20
21
22
25
26
9.7
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2377
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, AUTHORIZING A 6,857 SQUARE FOOT
EXPANSION OF A BUILDING LOCATED IN THE PLANNED
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL AT 17240 E. 17TH STREET.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin dobs hereby
follows:
resolve as
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. A proper application, (Use Permit No.86-34) has been filed by
Mr. Robert Savage on behalf of Great Western Real Estate, to
request authorization to expand an existing building by 6,857
square feet at 17240 E. Seventeenth Street.
B. A public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
C. Establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for
will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental
to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of
the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such
proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
1. The project is located in the Planned Community Commercial
zone.
2. The use requested is an authorized use in the Planned
Community Commercial zone.
3. This project is in conformance with the Tustin General
Plan.
The project, as proposed, meets zoning requirements and
Development Standards as established by the Tustin City
Council.
D. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied
for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property and
improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, nor to
the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and should be
granted.
E. Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
9.9.
23
26
27
28
Resolution No. ~,377
page two
II.
F. A negative declaration has been filed in conformance with the
California Environmental Quality Act.
Final development plans shall require the review and approval of
the Community Development Department.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No.
86-34 to authorize the 6,857 square foot expansion of an existing
building at 17240 E. Seventeenth Street subject to the following
~onditions:
AJ.~ The final site plan shall be standardized and reflect all
approprite City standard drawing numbers. The developer shall
construct all missing or damaged street improvements to said
development per the City of'Tustin "Minimum Design Standards of
Public Works" and "Street ~Improvement Standards". This work
shall consist of, but is nbt limited to, curbs and gutters,
sidewalks, drive apron, and street pavement.
The project shall substantially conform to the plan, date
stamped December 8, 1986, on .file with the Oepartment of
Community Development as herein modified or as modified by the
Director of Community Development pursuant to the City's design
review procedures.
This Conditional Use Permit 'shall become null and void unless
~-~bUiljing permits are issued within twelve (12) months from the
date of this resolution.
D. At building plancheck, structural calculations and Title 24
energy calculations shall be submitted.
E. Orange County Fire Department approval is required prior to
issuance of a building permit.
Fe
The following corrections shall be made to landscaping and
irrigation plans:
Contractor shall be required to maintain and guarantee all
plant materials for a.minimum of 90 days after completion
of installation.
2. All mechanical equipment'shall be screened.
Soils testing shall be for oil fertility and agricultural
suitability with a recommendation for soil amendments. At
least two soil samples from different parts of the site are
required.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2377
page three
4. The use of pre-emergent herbicides Js required prior to
new planttng tnstallatton~
Remove # 11. No artificial plant materials, t.e. woodchtps
or other artificial landscaping is acceptable.
A comprehensive irrigation plan should be submitted
including layout and specifications for the following:
water meters; design pressure; point of connection;
backflow preventors; controllers; water lines; valves; and
sprinkler types, spacing and coverage.
Please note on landscaping plans that adequacy of coverage
of landscaping and irrigation materials is subject to field
inspection of the Department of Community Development.
Upon completion of inspection, the Department reserves the
right to request installation of additional landscaping at
developer's expense.
8. Six (6) inch planter curbs shall be installed along the
interior borders of all landscaped areas.
Note on plans that vines should be planted at no more than
3 - 4' on center with training devices installed.
10. Spacing of all ground cover shall be 8 - 10" on center.
The applicant shall sign and return and Agreement to Conditions
Imposed form as required by the Community Development Director.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 1986.
CHARLES E. PUCKETT,
Chairman
DONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
LCP:jd
.: eport to the
Planning Commission
Item 3
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
DECEMBER 8, 1986
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12763
THE IRVINE COMPANY
AN AREA ROUGHLY BOUNDED BY BRO#NING AVENUE, BRYAN AVENUE,
JAMBOREE ROAD (FORMERLY MYFORD) AND IRVINE BOULEVARD. SECTORS 10
AND 11 OF THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA.
TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 260 ACRES OF LAND PROVIDING FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFIC LAND USES PURSUANT TO THE EAST TUSTIN
SPECIFIC PLAN.
RECO~eqENDED ACTION:
It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend to City Council
approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 12763 by the adoption of Resolution No.
2376, as submitted or revised.
SUMMARY:
Tentative Tract Map No. 12763 is the first subdivision map being processed
pursuant to the East Tustin Specific Plan. If approved, this map will formally
establish defined land use areas within Sectors 10 and 11 of the Specific Plan.
Land uses proposed include single and multiple family dwelling units;
neighborhood and community level parks; one site for an elementary school and
another site for a senior high school; and finally an area for neighborhood
oriented commerical land uses.
As submitted, Tentative Tract No. 12763 will serve as the initial subdivision
map for Sectors 10 and 11. In accordance with applicable regulatotns, no
residential development within these sectors may occur prior to processing of
additional, project level, subdivision maps. Therefore, while each lot shown on
the proposed map indicates specific land use and in some cases actual
residential unit counts, final approval of any project will be withheld pending
approval of subsequent subdivision maps.
Finally, the map as submitted meets development and processing criteria
established by the East Tustin Specific Plan. Accordingly it is recommended
that the Commission recommend to City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map
No. 12763.
PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
For reference purposes and to set a focal point from which to begin the review
of Sectors 10 and 11 a brief description of each area is in order.
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
Page two
Sector lO
This sector is bounded by Irvlne Boulevard on the north, Tusttn Ranch Road on
the east, Bryan Avenue on the south, and Browning Avenue and existing
residential development on the west. A Southern California Edison Substation is
located in the southeast corner of the Sector.
Approximately three-quarters of the sector has been designated for low density
residential development with a maximum density of 5 dwelling units/acre.
Medium density residential development has been allocated in this sector at
maximum density of 18 dwelling units/acre. An elementary school had previously
been designated for this area, but is not now required pursuant to requirements
of the Tustin Unified School District.
General policies which apply to Sector 10 are as follows:
The maximum number of residential units permitted in this sector shall be
405 a units. (This figure does not include potential for transfered
units).
2. Low density residential development within this sector shall be
consistent in character with residential areas located immediately
adjacent and to the west of the sector.
Residential units shall be restricted to a maximum height of two
stories within the low density area adjoining Browning Avenue.
All low density residential units shall be restricted to single
family detached structures.
In addition to the specific submittal requirements for the Subdivision
Map of this Sector, a conceptual landscape plan for arterial roadways
within this Sector shall also be submitted with the Subdivision Map for
approval by the Director of Community Development.
Sector 11
This sector is bounded by Tustfn Ranch Road alignment on the west, Irvine
Boulevard on the north, Jamboree (Myford) on the east, and Bryan Avenue on the
south.
Several land uses are proposed within this sector. The residential uses inlcude
medium density which is to be located in the southwest quadrant of the sector.
Medium high residential development is to be situated along the eastern boundary
of the site encompassing the entire area between Bryan and Irvine Boulevard. A
Community Development Department
Plannin. g Commission Report
Page three
34 acre stte has been designated for a htgh school just south of Irvlne
Boulevard. This site wtll be centrally located to both Jamboree (Myford) and
the Tusttn Ranch Road extension. A community park Is shown located on the
northwest corner of the site adjacent to the high school. At the northeast
corner of the sector, a 10+ acre neighborhood commercial site has been planned
at the intersection of I~ine Boulevard and Myford Road, an important entry
point into the City from the east. An elementary school has been generally
located between the medium and medium high residential development. A
neighborhood park has been generally located in the area of the medium
residential development.
The following policies apply to Sector 11:
Ae
The maximum number of residential units permitted in this sector are
1500, units. (This figure does not include potential for unit transfer.)
In addition to the specific submittal requirements for the Subdivision
Map of this 'Sector, a conceptual landscape plan for arterial roadways
within this Sector shall also be submitted with the Subdivision Map for
approval by the Director of Community Development.
Ce
The community park shall be located on the southeast corner of Irvine
Boulevard and Tustin Ranch Road. Because of the type of sports and
recreation facilities envisioned for the community park, sports lighting
will probably be provided. The Planning Commission should prepare a plan
stipulating and regulating the hours when sports lights can be used.
A buffer for the E1 Modena channel shall be provided. The methods for
buffering shall include, but not be limited to fencing and landscaping.
PROJECT ANALYSIS:
In reviewing Tentative Tract Map 12763 several areas of discussion are
warranted. The remainder of the transmittal wtll be directed towards analyzing
each of the following areas:
A. Sector Plan Processing pursuant to the East Tustin Specific Plan
B. Conformity of the map to East Tustin Specific Plan regulations
C. Issue Analysis
D. Environmental Assessment
E. Recommended conditions of approval.
Community Development Department
Planntng Cormnlssion Report
page four
A. Sector Plan Processing
Prior to or concurrent with the submission of an initial subdivision map for a
given sector, a sector plan for the entire sectoc shall be submitted for
Planning Commission approval. Information to be included is as follows:
An overall circulation plan and access plan for the sector shall be
included and approved by the City Engineer.
A conceptual grading plan.
An overall drainage plan for that sector. For sectors 10, 11 and 12
this shall include preliminary design for improvements to the E1
Modena Channel.
A detailed geological investigation for any sector containing the E1
Mod,ha Fault, to determine applicable development regulations which
apply to construction adjoining the fault.
A specific trail design and right-of-way reservation/dedication plan
for those sector where the regional trail passes.
A concept median and parkway landscape plan with a sector perimeter
tract wall design.
Following approval of a Sector Plan with an initial subdivision map, containing
all of the information listed above, a subsequent subdivision map with
individual "Development Projects" may be processed. Development projects
include but are not limited to subdivisions of detached or attached single
family homes, multifamily homes (apartments), shopping centers, and/or office
complexes.
A this time, the application before the Commission pertains only to the
"initial" subdivision map level. Conformity to this processing format as well
as other aspects of the Specific Plan in terms of Tentative Tract 12763 will be
addressed in the following section of this report.
B. Conformity of the Map to East Tusttn Specific Plan Regulations
In terms of processing requirements, Tentative Tract Map 12763 addresses all
necessary areas. A circulation system to the sectors has been submitted;
conceptual grades are shown addressing drainage; .improvements to the E1 Modena
Channel have commenced; a geological investigation for these sectors is not
required; a trail design plan for these sectors is not required; and a concept
median and parkway plan has been submitted. (Note: A discussion of the parkway
plan is found in Appendix A of this report.)
As to the proposed maps conformity to other aspects of the Specific Plan,
discussion is fairly limited at this stage of processing. Required sites for
schools and parks have been indicated and appropriate acreages allotted. Also,
Community Development DeparTment
Planning Commission Report
Page five
housing type and density patterns have been properly identified, and the
neighborhood commercial site deliniated.
In short, Tentative Tract Map 12763 meets the criteria mandated by the Specific
Plan. However, there are a few issues relating to this Map that should be
addressed further.
C. ISSUE ANALYSIS:
Upon receiving comments from various agencies, departments and the public, staff
has identified six issues that need individual discusion. These issues are:
development of the community park; the perimeter concept landscaping plan; the
use of a tentative tract map to identify unit counts; residential development
proposed beneath the'Browning Corridor; and .joint use of School/Parksites.
Issue-'Community Park Development - Pursuant to the Specific Plan a 16
acre Community Level park, to be dedicated to the City, is included as a
portion of Sector 11. Interest from at least one youth sports
organization has been expressed concerning the type of facilities to be
developed at this particular site. However, at this point, it is not
appropriate to make any commtttments relating to the park.
Instead, the only real issue here is that the land be dedicated. In
terms of park use, several factors must be considered in defining the
needs of the overall Community and how to meet these needs. A needs
assessment will be conducted on a mere project level basis at the next
stage of development processing.
Issue- Perimeter Landscape Plan - In an effort to continue the landscape
theme established in the Phase I Residential Area, the Master Landscape
Plan proposed by the applicant is attached as Appendix A of this report
and is presented for the Commission review and approval.
Predominate use of two eucalyptus varieties and a "theme wall" are
constant aspects proposed on the overall concept plan. Through the use
of different types and colors of ground cover (See Appendix A) the plan
offers a deliniation between north/south and east/west roadways. For
example alternate color oleander and trumpet vines will be used on Tustin
Ranch Road as compared to Irvine Boulevard. Additionally, the concept
provides for differentation between major roads and collectors by using a
third eucalyptus variety along the local streets.
Staff's main concern in reviewing this concept revolves around the
potential monotony a long stretch of wall area and a repetitious planting
scheme may cause. However the applicant contends that within these
particular sectors and as an extension of Phase I, the consept plan
proposed should be approved. It is reasoned that with breaks in the wall
at intersections, project entrances, and the community park a balance
between theme continuity and the avoidance of monotony has been
acheived.
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
Page slx
Staffs position and recommendation, however is that the Plan proposed~ is
a good base form which to work, (as was the initial plan in Phase I) but
that minor modifications should be made within the concept. Specifically
at least one additional variety of trees be included (An Evergreen
variety is suggested). Staffs' recommendation, in this regard is
consistent with Landscaping Guidelines provided in the East Tustin
Specific Plan which recommends use of evergreen and/or flowering
deciduous varieties in occasional pockets. Introduction of more variety
is also common practice to avoid infestation which can often effect one
species type of planting material.
At this point it is important to emphasize that this plan is' for Sectors
10 and 11 Only. Without information relating to precise~: intesection
locations, project types and interactions with open space (sChools, parks
and the golf course) staff cannot committ to supporting extension of any
precise plan into remaining sectors.
This is not to say that the concept cannot be supported with minor
modifications (eg. the north/south, east/west arterial deliniation, and
the eucalyptus theme) only that there must remain the flexibility to
in, rove or add to the plan as future development may warrant.
Issue - Unit Count Designations on a Tentative Map - Discussion covering
this item is fairly limited. In termsof preparing an overall
development concept for the sector it is important to compile information
on' residential unit types and anticipated unit counts. However these
numbers are to be used for initial analysis only and are not to be
considered as formally approved figures. Actual unit counts will be
determined by subsequent subdivision maps. Numbers shown on Tentative
Tract 12763 are for information purposes only, and not to be 'coq)strued as
any form of entitlement. '~
Issue - Browning Corridor - Development within Sector 11 will in some
areas be impacted by air traffic utilizing the Browning Corridor. Upon
all subdivision maps, the precise demarkation of this corridor shall be
shown in relation to particular project configurations. Where
applicable, the following procedures shall be in~lemented and shall be
conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map 12763:
Plans for the. noise attenuation of units located near arterial
highways or freeways or which insure that interior and exterior
noise levels do not exceed the City of Tustin noise ordinance, shall
be submitted for review and approval at the time of builder's
tentative tract consideration for residential development.
be
All residential lots and dwellings shall be sound attenuated against
present and projected noise, which shall be the sum of all noise
impacting the project, so as not to exceed an exterior standard of
65 dB CNEL in outdoor living areas and an interior standard of 45 dB
Community Development Department
Planntng Co~nisslon Report
Page seven
CNEL tn all habitable rooms. Evidence prepared under the
supervision of an acoustical consultant that these standards wtll be
satisfied tn a manner consistent wtth applicable zontng regulations
shall be submitted as follows:
1) Prior to the recordation of a final tract/parcel map or prior to
the issuance of grading permits, at the discretion of the city,
an acoustical analysis report shall be submitted to the Tustin
Community Development Department for approval. The report shall
describe in detail the exterior noise environment and preliminary
mitigation measures. Acoustical design features to acheive
interior noise standards may be included in the report in which
case it may also satisfy "2" below.
2) Prior to the issuance of any building permits, an acoustical
analysis report describing the acoustical design features of the
structures required to satisfy the exterior and interior noise
standards shall be aubmttted to the Tustin Community Development
Department for approval along with satisfactory evidence which
indicates that the sound attenuation measures specified in the
approved acoustical report(s) have been incorporated into the
design of the project.
3) Prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Use and Occupancy,
field testing in accordance with the Title 25 regulations may be
required by the Manager, Building Inspection Division, to verify
compliance with STC and IIC design standards.
Issue - Joint Use of School/Park Sites Pursuant to various
sections of the Specific Plan, the Development Agreement, and other
agreements between the City and the Irvine Company as well as those
with the Tustin Unified School District and the Irvine Company,
schools and parks must be provided within Sector l0 and 11.
In terms of parkland, the Irvtne Company is dedicating to the City a
16 acre Community Park and a 3.03 acre Neighborhood Park. As for
school sites, the Tusttn Unified School District indicates that
standard acreage for high schools are approximately 40 acres while
elementary schools should be approximately 10 acres.
Tentative Tract Map 12763 shows lots 7 and 9 being reserved for park
sites of 16 and 3.03 acres respectively. Additionally, lots l, 8,
l0 and 15 are all shown as potential school sites. Through an
agreement between TUSD and the Irvine Company only lots 8 and 10
will be formally considered for schools uses. Lot 8 is shown as a
34 acre high school site, while lot 10 is a 7.16 acre elementary
school site. Pursuant to TUSD standards, neither school sites meets
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
Page eight
minimum acreage requirements. However, TUSD is 'willing to accept
lot 8 as proposed, and lot 10 (increased to a minimum of 8 acres)
providing that some form of joint use concept incorporating adjacent
park sites is approved. As a part of such a joint concept the
School District is requesting that the park site on lot g be
increased to a minimum of 4 acres.
Joint use of public facilities is not a new concept and in fact is
currently being utilized within the City (eg. Columbus Tustin
School/Park sits). Additionally, the Recreation Element of the
Tustin Area General Plan not only identifies the potential in East
Tusttn for the "economical development, operation and maintenance of
combined 'joint use' school/park sites" it further lists specific
strategies to fullfill such potential. The Recreation Element goes
on to state the following:
To ensure that existing and future school play fields and
playgrounds continue to serve their historic role as recreational
open space for the benefit of the community.
To encourage all future public neighborhood and community parks
in the City be designed as joint-use facilities contiguous with
public schools and sharing playfields, playgrounds, and other
amenities.
Finally, the adopted Development Agreement between the' City and the
Irvine Company states that "...the City will give due consideration,
consistent with the Recreation Element of its General Plan, to
locations adjacent to City parks and to the joint use by the Tustin
Unified School District of adjacent City parks for school recreation
facilities."
The specific issue involved here is whether ~r not the City is
strongly committed to the joint use concept. From the staff level,
the concept is supportable for several reasons, the most basic being
that joint use provides for maximum flexibility in addressing
overall community needs. This flexibility is enhanced by the
positive economic benefits derived from multiple users utilizing
shared facilities.
Staff recommends that the joint use concept be incorporated into
approval of Tentative Tract 12763 and that the Commission recommend
to City Council accordingly.
Issue - Further Subdivision of Lot 11 - After initial submittal, the
applicant has determined that Lot 11 will be developed potentially two
projects rather one. Therefore, The Irvine Company is requesting that
the subdivision of Lot 11 into two lots be authorized. Staff has no
objections to this request and recommends that it be granted.
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
Page nine
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:
Based upon review of the subject hep as well as Environmental Impact Report 85-2
{as supplemented) it has been determined that environmental issues relating
to this project have previously been addressed. Al.so, appropriate mitigating
measures identified in EIR 85-2 will be conditions of'approval for this and all
subsequent subdivision maps. With this information in mind, it is recommended
that the Commission in any resolution of approval make the finding that
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been met.
E. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
A substantial list of conditions of approval is included within draft Resolution
No. 2376. Outside of specific issues discussed in this report, conditions of
approval are standard conditions required by either the Specific Plan, other
applicable municipal codes or the approved Development Agreement for the project
area. Staff will respond to any questions concerning listed conditions at the
December 8, public hearing.
COMCLUSIO#S:
Given the analysis conducted by staff and consideration of comments from other
agencies and the public, it is concluded that Tentative Tract Map 12763 meets
requirements of the East Tustin Specific Plan, the Subdivision Map Act as
adopted, and the California Environmental quality Act.
With the inclusion of conditions of approval listed in to draft resolution 2376,
it is recommended that the Commission recommend to City Council approval of
Tentative Tract Map 12763.
Community Developmen~
Dt rector
3SD:jd
Attachments:
Appendtl "A" - Landscape Plan
Resolution No. 2376
Full Size Tract Map
Reduced Tract Map
Community Development Department
TUSTIN RANCH
SECTORS 10 - 12
MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTAL
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
The intent of the landscape concept for Tustin Ranch as called out in the
Specific Plan is to draw upon existing landscape features of the site
while relating to the landscape heritage of the City of Tustin. The
landscape concept is designed to create a rustic ranch like character
utilizing Iow maintenance plant material in bold informal groupings and
drifts. The basis of this concept is to expand the existing eucalyptus
"grove" character located in the Tustin Hills throughout the new
community creating a dramatic yet simple landscape framework for Tustin
Ranch.
The following landscape elements called out in the Specific Plan and
identified on the conceptual landscape plans work together to create the
informal ranch like image for Tustin Ranch.
Primary Tree:
In order to extend the eucalyptus forest concept throughout the
community, the Red Gum shall be planted as the primary tree along all
major streets in the ¢latland sectors. Within the hilly sectors the
primary tree will be the Sugar Gum. The Spotted Gum will be the
secondary tree in all sectors on the major streets, planted in small drifts
supporting the primary trees.
To establish a hierarchy of landscaping within Tustin Ranch, the Spotted
Gum will be planted as the primary tree supported by the Desert Gum as
the secondary tree along all collector streets.
Accent Trees:
The Aleppo Pine shall be used at all trail connections, parks, school sites
and golf course edges as the dominant tree providing a evergreen (pine)
open space accent and a strong contrast to the Eucalyptus drifts along
all streets within the community.
Varieties of Oleanders and Trumpet vines providing accent color and
variety will be used to distinguish the north/south and east/west major
streets.
For historical reasons, the Olive tree is used at the major intersections
of the community with the Oleander shrub and, where designated, a
community monument sign. The Carrotwood tree together with
'190 Newl:)ort' Center Drive, Upper Gallery, Newport' Beach, California 92660 ~714) 644-8001
Raphiolepis shrub are used to identify neighborhood intersections and
project entries. Both treatments create a sense of identity for the
community, establish a street hierarchy, and provide accent punctuation
to the eucalyptus streetscape planting.
Spacing:
The trees and shrub groupings called in the major streets are to be
planted in large informal drifts.
Sidewalk:
The location of the sidewalk will vary within the parkways of the major
streets designed in conjunction with the trees, shrubs, and groundcover
drifts in order to add to the natural informal image of the landscape
concept.
Groundcover:
Turf and Honeysuckle will not be planted under the shrubs, but along
with them in informal drifts.
DESIGN CONDITIONS
The following list of conditions will be met'by The Irvine Community
Development Company in the design and .the implementation of the Master
Landscape Plan for Sectors 10-12.
All trees, shrubs, groundcover and vines shall be planted in
accordance with the Master Landscape Plan. Precise location of
plant material and alignment of sidewalk elements shall be approved
by The Director of Community Development.
e
In all locations calling for Eucalyptus camaldulensis, said trees shall
be planted in the following proportions:
a. u,0% shall be a minimum of fifteen (15) gallon size.
b. 60% shall be a minimum of five (5} gallon size.
In all locations calling for Eucalyptus maculata, said trees shall be
planted in the following proportions:
a. u,0% shall be a minimum of fifteen (15) gallon size.
b. 60% shall be a minimum of five (5) gallon size.
In all locations calling for Eucalyptus rudis, said trees shall be
planted in the following proportions:
a. 40% shall be a minimum of fifteen (15) gallon size.
b. 60% shall be a minimum of five (5) gallon size.
The following quantities of trees shall be planted in various
locations:
NW and NE corners of Bryan and Tustin Ranch Road -
minimum of four (4) field grown Olea europea per corner.
(Note: Tree size, location and number will be subject to
Southern California Edison review. }
NW corner of Bryan at Jamboree Road - minimum of four {4)
grown Olea europea. (Note: Tree size, location and number
subject to Southern California Edison review).
SW corner of Irvine at Jamboree Road minimum of four (4)
field grown Olea europea.
d. SW corner of Irvine at Tustin Ranch Road - minimum of four
(4) field grown Olea europea.
eo
ko
NW and NE corners of both intersection of Bryan at "A"
street-minimum of six (6) 36 inch box (minimum) Cupaniopsis
anacardioides per corner. (Note: Tree size, location and
number will be subject to Southern California Edison review. )
NW, SW and SE corners of Tustin Ranch Road at "A" Street -
minimum of six (6) 36 inch box (minimum) Cupaniopsis
anacardioides per corner.
NE and SE corner of 'lA" Street at "B" Street - minimum six
(6) 36 inch box (minimum) Cupaniopsis anacardioides per corner.
SE corner of Irvine at "B" Street - minimum of six (6) 36 inch
box (minimum) Cupaniopsis anacardioides.
NW and NE corners of Bryan at "B" Street - minimum of six
(6) 36 inch box (minimum) Cupaniopsis anacardioides per corner.
(Note: Tree size, location, and number subject to Southern
California Edison review. )
Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Eucalyptus rudis shall be planted
at a minimum ratio of one tree for every 40 lineal feet of
landscape area.
Eucalyptus maculata shall be planted at a minimum ratio of one
tree for every 100 lineal feet of landscape area.
TwentL)'-four (2ti,) inch box Pinus canariensis shall be planted
alongBrowning Avenue at a ratio of one tree for every 75
lineal feet of landscaped area.
Entry points into residential subdivisions off "A". "B". and "C"
streets shall be planted with thirty-six (36) inch box
Cupaniopsis anacardioides.
6. Heights of walls shall be in accordance with Planned Community
Regulations for East Tustin Specific Plan. Final construction
documents shall note specific locations where minimum barrier
heights for sound attenuation must be achieved as determined by a
Noise Consultant.
7. Pe~,,imeter walls shall be split face block complete with a brick trim
cap~,and a brick pilaster cap.
Nerium oleander and red and violet trumpet vines shall be used in
lieu of flowering, deciduous trees to provide accent color on Tustin
Ranch Road. Irvine Boulevard. Bryan Avenue and Jamboree Road
parkways.
Distictis buccinatoria (Red Trumpet vine) and Clytostoma
calliste~, ioides (Violet Trumpet Vine) shall be planted to achieve a
minimum of thirty (30) percent wall coverage.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
lg
14
1,5
17
18
10
20
21
25
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2376
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING TO THE TUSTIN CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.
12763 AND APPROVING THE CONCEPT LANDSCAPE PLAN
FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12763
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
Ae
That Tentative Tract Map 12763 was submitted to the Planning
Commission on behalf of The Irvine Company for the purpose of
creating 44 lots (16 numbered and 28 lettered), a subdivision
from a portion of Blocks 43, 44, and 64 of Irvine's subdivision
as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 1, page 88 of
Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of the
County of Orange, State of California.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held
considering said map.
That Environmental Impact Report 85-2, as supplemented, has
previously been prepared, considered, approved and certified
which adequately addresses the general environmental setting of
the project, its significant environmental impacts, and the
alternatives and mitigation measures applied to each significant
environmental effect for the proposed project and no additional
environmental document need be prepared. The Planning
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained
in the previous environmental impact report prior to approval of
the project.
The proposed subdivision is in conformance with applicable
ordinances, policies and standards of the City of Tustin, as
evidenced by the following findings:
That the proposed map is consistent with the Tustin Area
General Plan in that:
a. Proposed densities and land uses are identified
accordance with the Land Use Element;
b. Parkland has been identified and allocated in
accordance with the Recreation Element;
Provisions for affordable housing as outlined in EIR
85-2 and the Housing Element will be considered at
subsequent, project level, subdivision map processing~
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
10
~0
21
22
23
27
28
Resolution No. 2376
Page two
Ee
Necessary actions to mitigate noise impacts will be
required pursuant to the Noise Ele.ment, and pursuant to
conditions of the Browning Corridor.
That the proposed map is consistent with the East Tusttn
Specific Plan in that:
Provisions of Sector processing requirements concerning
circulation, grading, drainage, and median and parkway
'landscape plans relative to Sectors 10 and 11 have been
met. (Section 3.5)
The number of residential units proposed is within the
established limits stated in the East Tustin Specific
Plan. (Section 3.4.3.)
That identified 1and uses upon the subject map are
consistent with permitted land uses outlined in the
East Tustin Specific Plan {Section 3.4)
d. That school and park sites have been identified in
accordance with the Specific Plan (Section 3.4)
That the project as submitted is consistent with the
adopted Development Agreement between the City of Tustin
and The Irvine Company dated January 27, 1986.
That the proposed map is in conformance with an agreement
between the Tustin Unified School District and The Irvine
Company.
That approval and recordation of Tract 12763 is not the
final discretionary approval for development within the
subdivision. Subsequent subdivision maps will be required
prior to development of any lot created by Tentative Tract
Map 12763.
That the site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed.
That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
development.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2376
Page three
II.
Ge
He
That the design of the subdfvtston or the proposed improvements
are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and avoidably Injure fish or wlldltfe fn their
habitat.
That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements
proposed will not conflict with easements acquired by the
public-at-large, for access through or use of the property within
the proposed subdivision.
That the design of the subdivision or the types of improvements
proposed are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council
approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 12763 subject to the following
conditions:
General
1.1
1.2
1.3
Within twenty four months from Tentative Tract Map approval, the
Subdivider shall file with appropriate agencies, a Final Map
prepared in accordance with subdivision requirements of the
Tustin Municipal Code, the State Subdivision Map Act, and
applicable conditions contained herein.
A note shall be placed on Map that unit counts and identified
land uses indicated on Tentative Tract 12763 are for information
purposes only. These figures do not constitute final unit counts
and final unit counts are subject to approval of subsequent
Subdivision Maps.
Building Permits may not occur upon any lot created by Tract
12763 until such time that subsequent, project level, Subdivision
Maps are approved for individual lots. With the exception of Lot
13 shown for neighborhood commercial use provided that no
additional subdivision is desired or required pursuant to
requirements of the Tustin Municipal Code and/or State
Subdivision Map Act. Lots established by Tract 12763 may be
further subdivided independent of each other.
1.4 Subdivider shall adhere to all applicable requirements outlined
in the East Tustin Specifi6 Plan, Environmental Impact Report
No. 85-2 as supplemented and Development Agreement as adopted.
1.5 Access points on curves of public streets may pose site
visibility or pedestrian oriented constraints. Each access
point is conceptually approved but exact location must be
reviewed individually as development occurs at either the
subsequent filing of an additional tract or parcel map or as a
part of a site plan review when a tract or parcel map is not
required.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
15
17
18
20
21
:22
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2376
page four
Prior to utility or security releases, Subdivider shall submit a
duplicate mylar of the Final Map, or 8 1/2 inch by 11 inch
transparency of each map sheet and "as built" grading, landscape
and improvement plans.
1.6
1.7 All lettered lots pertaining to the E1Modena-Irvine Channel will
require ultimate dedication to the County of Orange for flood
control purposes.
1.8 The Ranchwood Storm Drain (Facility FOTP08) located ~long "A"
Street and Lot 2, shown as being part of proposed devAlopment,
will need to be constructed pursuant to Agreement No.~D85-153
dated 24 June 1986 between the City of Tustin and Orangd County
Flood Control District to enable acceptance of E1 Modena-Irvine
Channel (Facility FO7) for maintenance by the Agency.
1.9 The Subdivider shall pay all costs related to the calculation of
the revised parcel assessments, the preparation of the revised
assessment diagram and other required administrative duties
related to Assessment District No. 85-1 as a result of the
subdivision of parcels of land previously established within the
boundaries of Assessment District No. 85-1 confirmed by the
Tustin City Council on July 21, 1986.
Prior to Final Map Recordation
2.! Prior to recordation, Subdivider shall submit a current title
report.
Prior to recordation of a Final Map the Subdivider shall provide
the following information and/or corrections to the submitted
map:
2.2
The Browning Corridor Aviation Easement and the G.C.A.
Easement as outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding
dated July 1985 between the United States Marine Corps, the
City of Irvine and the City of Tustin shall be indicated on
Tentative Tract Map 12763 and all subsequent subdivision
maps.
Street "C" as a publicly dedicated street must be revised to
show the following dimensions:
Half street - 28 feet
Centerltne to curb - 20 feet
Parkway - 8 feet
Sidewalk - 5 feet and adjacent to curb
At discretion of subdivider landscaped lots 'S' and
adjacent to Street C may be increased by 2 feet.
'0'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2376
page five
2.3
All major arterial intersections may require additional
street width to accommodate dual left turn movements and
free right turn movements. Subdivider shall provide
intersection analysis to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer for all subject intersections with final street
widths subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
An engineering design shall be prepared for submittal and
approval of the City Engineer addressing potential vertical
site distance constraints that may arise from locating the
southerly extension of New Myford Road at Bryan immediately
adjacent to the E1Modena-Irvine Flood Control Channel.
The Title Block for Tract Map 12763 shall be amended to
delete reference that said map is for "single family
detached and condominium purposes".
Sheet 3, typical sections, of Tract 12763 shall be revised
as follows:
(1)
Bryan Avenue (Section A-A). Sidewalk on northside will
require an easement. Sidewalk location within Edison
Easement must be approved by Southern California Edison
Company.
(2)
Bryan Avenue (Section C-C). Sidewalk on southside will
require an easement. Sidewalk location within Edison
Easement must be approved by Southern California Edison
Company. Parkway width must be a minimum 8 feet not 3
feet and can be satisfied by either dedicated land or
an easement on Southern California Edison Company
property.
Prior to recordation of final map, the Subdivider shall prepare
plans for and construct or post security guaranteeing
construction of all public and/or private, infrastructure
improvements within the boundary of said tract map in conformance
with applicable City standards, including but not limited to the
following:
A. Curb and gutter/cross gutters
B. Sidewalk
C. Drive aprons
D. Street paving
E. Street signing and striping
F. Landscaping/facilities
G. Sanitary seWer service facilities
H. Domestic water service facilities
I. Reclaimed water service facilities
J. Gas, electric, telephone, cable T.V. facilities
K. Traffic signal systems and other traffic control devises
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
15
16
17
18
19
~0
~5
~6
g7
Resolution No. 2376
page six
L. Street 11ghttng
Storm dratns
N. Undergroundlng of extsttng and proposed uttllty distribution
lines.
2.4
Placement of all above ground facilities, such as stgntng, street
11ghts, ftre hydrants shall be behtnd the stdewalk when said
sidewalks are constructed adjacent to the curb.
2.5
Preparation of plans for and construction of all santtary sewer
facilities must be submitted as requtred by the Ctty Engineer.
These facilities shall tnclude a gravtty flow system per
standards of the Zrvlne Ranch Water District.
2.6
Preparation of plans for and construction of a domestic water
system to the standards of the Irvine Ranch Water District/City
of Tustin Water Service, whichever is applicable at the time of
plan preparation is required. Any required reclaimed water
systems shall be to the standards as required by the Irvine Ranch
Water District.
2.7
Preparation of plans and construction of improvements a~ong the
easterly side of Jamboree Road between the Santa Aha Freeway and
Irvine Blvd. as required and approved by the City Engineer and
conditions of this Map and constructed.
2.8
Preparation of a hydrology and hydraulic study of the tributary
area impacting the proposed development shall be prepared and
submitted. Preparation of plans for and construction of all
storm drain facilities as required by the City Engineer, Orange
County EMA and Caltrans when applicable and pertaining to their
facilities shall also be submitted.
2.9
The Ranchwood storm drain (Facility FO7-P08) shall be designed in
accordance with Orange County E.M.A. - Flood Control District
standards and criteria and/or as approved by district and with
the provision of all County required easements for same inclusive
of all ingress/egress to the facility.
2.10 Prior to recordation of any Final Map, Subdivider shall pay plan
check and inspection fees for all public and/or private
infrastructure improvements within City's responsibility
excluding those financed by Assessment District.
2.11 The Subdivider shall satisfy dedication and/or reservation
requirements as applicable, including, but not limited to the
following:
Dedication of all required street and flood control
right-of-way defined and approved as to specific location by
the City Engineer and other responsible agencies.
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
'28
Resolution No. 2376
page seven
Ce
Dedication of all vehicular access rights to Tustin Ranch
Road, Bryan Avenue, Browning Avenue, Irvtne Boulevard,
Jamboree (Myford Road), "A", "B", and "C" Street except at
designated street openings is required defined and approved
as to specific locatton by the City Engineer.
Subdivider shall provtde for dedication of a minimum of 20
acres of land for park purposes. Lot 7 shall be a mintmum
of 16.0 acres for a community park site, and Lot 9 shall be
a ~lnlmum of 4 acres for a neighborhood park site. However,
since an additional .97 acres ts requested as a Condition of
Acceptance of school sizes by the Tusttn Unified School
District, Subdivider shall receive credit for only 19.03
acres required.
The following items must be provided and conditions met
prior to acceptance of park sites by the City.
(1)
Submitted and approved by the Department of Planning
and Community Development of a soils report and rough
grading plans submitted by Subdtvider's registered soil
and civil engineers. In addition to a standard soil
report, Subdivider shall also provide soil t6sting for
fertility/agrononly with any recommendations for soil
amendments..
(2)
Each lot to be dedicated for park purposes shall be
rough graded per an approved rough grading plan free of
obvious rock or construction by-product material.
(3)
Full public improvements must be installed or bonded
for by the developer around the perimeter of each park
site subject to approval of City Engineer.
(4)
Public utility laterals of a sufficient size including
water, electricity, sewer, storm drain, natural gas and
telephone communication shall be installed or bonded
for to the park sites' property lines with actual
designated locations subject to approval of City
Engineer.
(s)
Any joint use of park sites adjacent to proposed
schools shall be subject to agreement between the City
of Tustin and Tusttn Unified School District as to the
effect of joint use, type of facilities, their use,
development, and maintenance. For purposes of
negotiation between the City and Tustin Unified School
District it shall be assumed that a minimum of 6 acres
of the Community Park site shown on Lot 7 may be
utilized for possible joint use and a minimum of .97
acres on the neighborhood park site shown on Lot 9.
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2376
page eight
(6) Subdivider shall provide concepts for any joint use as
required by condition 4.8 of this resolution.
Reservation of Lots 8 and 10 identified as elementary and
high school locations, subject to acceptance by the Tustin
Unified School District, provided that Lot 10 shall be
increased in size to a minimum of 8 acres. No elementary
school is required in Sector 10.
2.12 Prior to recordation of Final Map, the Subdivider shall post with
Community Development, a cash deposit to guarantee sweeping of
streets affected by construction activities. The amount of the
deposit shall be determined by the City Engineer.
2.13 Street sweeping on both public and private streets will be the
responsibility of the Subdividers/developers. Prior to
recordation of the final map, Subdivider or developer shall post
with the Community Development Department a minimum $2,500 cash
deposit or letter of credit to guarantee the sweeping of these
streets. In the event this/these deposit(s) are depleted prior
to completion of development or City acceptance of public
streets, an additional incremental deposit will be required.
2.14 Prior to the recordation of a Final Tract Map and/or grading
permits at the discretion of the Director of Community
Development, an acoustical analysis report shall be submitted to
the Tustin Community Development Department for approval. The
report shall describe in detail the exterior noise environment
and preliminary mitigation measures necessary to bring the
proposed projects into conformance with any City Noise Standards
and Policies in effect at the time of project review. The
acoustical analysis shall be prepared by an expert or authority
in the field of acoustics.
Preliminary plans shall be submitted for review and approval
regarding noise attenuation of units located near arterial
highways or freeways or under the Browning Corridor which insure
that interior and exterior noise levels do not exceed the City of
Tusttn Noise Ordinance.
2.15 Prior to recordation of a Final Map, any well sites to be
abandoned located within the Tract shall be removed to standards
of the State Health Department and all applicable agencies.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
3.1
Prior to issuance of grading permits, a soils engineering report
conforming to the City requirements shall be submitted to and
approved by the Department of Community Development.
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
~3
~4
~5
26
Resolution No. 2376
page nine
3.2
Preparation and submittal of a Final Grading Plan subject to
approval of the Department of Community Development delineating
the following information is required:
A. Final street elevations at key locations.
Bo
Final pad or finish floor elevations, as applicable, and key
elevations for all site grading. All final pad elevations
to be a minimum of 1.0 feet above the base flood elevation
as defined by FEMA.
C. All flood hazard areas of record.
3.3 Preparation of a sedimentation and erosion control plan for all
construction work related to'Tract 12763.
3.4
The grading plan shall provide secondary surface relief to the E1
Modena-Irvine Channel as required by the City Engineer at
determined points on "A" and "B" Streets.
3.5
Grading plans shall provide a secondary type surface relief to
the E1 Modena-Irvtne Channel at the intersection of "B" Street
and "A" Street. Such relief shall be brovided as required by the
City Engineer.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
4.1
Prior to issuance of building permits within the Tract,
Subdivider shall record a Final Map in accordance with the
approved Tentative Map and conditions herein.
4.2
Prior to the issuance of any building permits, an acoustical
analysis report describing the acoustical design features of the
structures required to satisfy the exterior and interior noise
standards shall be submitted to the Tustin Community Development
Department for approval along with satisfactory evidence which
indicates that the sound attenuation measures specified in the
approved acoustical report(s) have been incorporated into the
design of the project.
4.3
Prior to issuance of any building permits for City project that
falls under the Browning Corridor, a complete noise study shall
be conducted and submitted to the City for review. In addition
to Community Noise Equivalency Levels (CNEL) said study provide
information on single event noise measurements as generated by
helicopter flyovers for information purposes only.
All residential lots and dwellings shall be sound attenuated
against present and projected noises, which shall be the sum of
all noise impacting the project, so as not to exceed an exterior
standard of 65dba. CNEL in outdoor living areas and an interior
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2376
page ten
III.
standard of 45 dba CNEL in all habitable rooms. Evidence
prepared under the supervision of an acoustical consultant that
these standards will be satisfied in a manner ~onsistent with
applicable zoning regulations.
4.4
Prior to issuance of any building permits, within the tract,
Subdivider shall confer with and prepare for review by the
Community Development and Tustin Unified School District
preliminary site plan and activity concepts for the development
of joint use areas on Lots 7/8 and Lots 9/10.
4.5
Prior to issuance of project level building permits recordation
of project level Final Maps, whichever occurs first, the
Subdivider shall provide a mechanism for landscaped maintenance
and ownership of all lettered lots utilized for landscape
purposes by adjoining community associations within the tract.
Said agreement shall be subject to approval of the City Attorney,
City Engineer and Director of Community Development.
4.6
Prior to issuance of building permits, Subdivider shall comply
with all requirements of the Orange County Fire Marshal including
adequate fire flow, installation, where required of fire hydrants
subject to approval of the Fire Marshal and Irvine Ranch Water
District or City Engineer as applicable.
Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Useor Occupancy
5.1
Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Use or Occupancy, field
testing in accordance with the Title 25 regulations may be
required by the Building Division to verify compliance with STC
and IIC design standards.
5.2
If the work identified in Condition 2.3 is to be bonded for, the
construction of improvements for any portion of the project must
be completed prior to issuance of certificates of use or
occupancy within the tract.
The Planning Commission approves a concept landscape plan and a Sector
perimeter Tract wall design for Tentative Tract 12763 subject to the
following conditions:
Approval of the concept plan as herein modified does not commit
the City to the extension of said landscape plan to the remainder
of the East Tustin Specific Project Area.
Future submittals shall substantially conform to the submitted
landscape concept plan on file with the Department of Community
Development, as herein modified or as modified by the Director of
Community Development pursuant to the City's design review
procedures.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2376
page eleven
3. A completely detailed landscape and irrigation plan must be
submitted with detail at whatever scale necessary to depict
adequately what is occurring. Provide a summary table applying
an indexing identification to plant materials and their actual
location. The plan and corresponding table must list botanical
and common names, sizes, spacing, actual location, and quantities
of all materials proposed.
ShOW planting and berming details, soil preparation, staking,
etc~ The irrigation plan shall be submitted prior to building
per,it and must show location of control and backflow prevention
devi~es, pipe size, sprinkler type, spacing, and coverage.
Details for all equipment must be provided. Planting and
irrigation in public right of way should also be shown where
proposed. Appropriately show all property lines, public right of
way areas, sidewalk widths,, parkway areai and wall locations on
landscaping and irrigation plans. The Department of Community
Development may request minor substitutions of plant materials,
or request additional sizing or quantity of materials during
plancheck. Place note on landscaping plans that "adequacy of
coverage of landscaping and irrigation .materials is subject to
field inspection of the Department of Planning and Community
Development. Upon completion of inspection, the Department
reserves the right to request installation of additional
landscaping pursuant to the approved landscaping plans.
4. The S~ubmitted landscape plans should reflect the follOWing
requirements.
A. Tree plantings should be planted, wherever possible in
informal drifts and groupings in staggered triangulations.
Any landscaping within numbered landscaping lots should be
coordinated with parkway landscaping.
Ce
Primary eucalyptus tree plantings should be a combination of
5 gallon and 15 gallon, and shall be planted in the
following proportions.
(1) 60% shall be a minimum of 5 gallon
(2) 405 shall be a minimum of 15 gallon
De
One additional variety of tree (evergreen) in addition to
the proposed accent and eucalyptus treatments proposed along
street frontages shall be planted {an aleppo pine or a
similar alternative material would be acceptable) in the
following proportions:
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
15
17
18
10
20
21
22
23
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2376
page twelve
(1) 30% shall be a minimum of 15 gallon
(2) 50% shall be a minimum of 24" box
(3) 20% shall be a minimum of 36" box
The actual tree size, location and number of paseo accent and
community accent trees shall be subject to review and approval by
the Department of Community Development.
When possible and to add visual interest bermtng along landscape
lot frontages shall be provided which is creative and done not
only to flow to walls, but be slightly horizontally undulated
(broad rolling a wavelike free-flowing appearance) maintaining
visibility at entrances to Projects. Berming slopes shall be
less than 3:1 and planted with drought resistant turf and
coordinated with shrubs and groundcovers. Any details on berming
shall be shown on landscaping and grading plans.
7. Spacing of all groundcover shall be at 8" - 10" on center.
Perimeter walls should be provided with vines in order to
eliminate large expanses of wall by adding greenery and color.
Vines should also be informally grouped with training devices
installed with the actual location noted on plans.
Entryways to the project site should be focal points. In
addition to the larger tree treatments, these areas should be
provided with a variety of color and treatment of landscaping.
10.
A complete detailed subdivision sign program including location,
sizes, colors and materials shall be submitted subject to review
and approval of the Department of Community Development.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission
held the day of , 1986.
CHARLES E. PUCKETT,
Chairman
DONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
:24
25
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2376
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING TO THE TUSTIN CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.
12763 AND APPROVING THE CONCEPT LANDSCAPE PLAN
FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12763
The Planntng Commission of the City of Tusttn does hereby resolve:
I. The Planntng Commission finds and determines as follows:
That Tentative Tract Map 12763 was submitted to the Planning
Commission on behalf of The Irvine Company for the purpose of
creating 44 lots (16 numbered and 28 lettered), a subdivision
from a portion of Blocks 43, 44, and 64 of Irvine's subdivision
as shown .on a map thereof filed in Book l, page 88 of
Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of the
County of Orange, State of California.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held
considering said map.
iThat Environmental Impact Report 85-2, as supplemented, has
pre~iously been prepared, considered, approved and certified
which adequately addresses :he general environmental setting of
the project, its significant environmental impacts, and the
alternatives and mitigation measures applied to each significant
environmental effect for the proposed project and no additional
environmental document need be prepared. The Planning
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained
in the previous environmental impact report prior to approval of
the project.
The proposed subdivision is in conformance with applicable
ordinances, policies and standards of the City of Tustin, as
evidenced by the following findings:
That the proposed map is consistent with the Tustin Area
General Plan in that:
Proposed densities and land uses are identified in
accordance with the Land Use Element;
b. Parkland has been identified and allocated in
accordance with the Recreation Element;
Provisions for affordable housing as outlined in EIR
85-2 and the Housing Element will be considered at
subsequent, project level, subdivision map processing.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2376
Page two
Necessary actions to mittgate notse impacts wtl] be
requtred pursuant to the Noise Element, and pursuant to
conditions of the Browning Corridor.
That the proposed map is consistent with the East Tustln
Specific Plan in that:
Provisions of Sector processing requirements concerning
circulation, gradtng, drainage, and medtan and parkway
landscape plans relattve to Sectors [0 and 1[ have been
met. (Sectton 3.5)
be
The number of residential units proposed ts wtthtn the
established 11mtts stated tn the East Tusttn Spectftc
Plan. (Sectton 3.4.3.)
That Identified 1and uses upon the subject map are
consistent wtth permitted land uses outltned In the
East Tusttn Spectftc Plan (Section 3.4)
That school and park sttes have been Identified in
accordance with the Spectftc Plan (Section 3.4)
That the project as submitted is consistent with the
adopted Development Agreement between the City of Tustin
and The Irvine Company dated January 27, 1986.
That the proposed map is in conformance with an agreement
between the Tustin Unified School District and The Irvine
Company.
That approval and recordation of Tract 12763 is not the
final discretionary approval for development within the
subdivision. Subsequent subdivision maps will be required
prior to development of any lot created by Tentative Tract
Map 12763.
E. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed.
F. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
development.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
Resolution N~. 2376
Page three '
II.
Ge
That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements
are not likely to cause substantial environmental, damage or
substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife in their
habitat.
That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements
proposed will not conflict with easements acquired by the
public-at-large, for access through or use of the property within
the proposed subdivision.
That the design of the subdivision or the types of improvements
proposed are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council
approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 12763 subject to the following
conditions:
General
1.1
Within twenty four months from Tentative Tract Map approval, the
Subdivider shall file with appropriate agencies, a Final Map
.prepared in accordance with subdivision requirements of the
Tustin Municipal Code, the State Subdivision Map Act, and
applicable conditions contained herein.
k note shall be placed on Map that unit counts and identified
land uses indicated on Tentative Tract 12763 are for information
purposes only. These figures do not constitute final unit counts
and final unit counts are subject to approval of subsequent
Subdivision Maps.
1.3
1.5
Building Permits may not occur upon any lot created by Tract
12763 until such time that subsequent, project level, Subdivision
Maps are approved for individual lots. With the exception of Lot
13 shown for neighborhood commercial use provided that no
additional subdivision is desired or required pursuant to
requirements of · the Tustin Municipal Code and/or State
Subdivision Map Act. Lots established by Tract 12763 may be
further subdivided independent of each other.
Subdivider shall adhere to all applicable requirements outlined
in the East Tustin Specific Plan, Environmental Impact Report
No. 85-2 as supplemented and Development Agreement as adopted.
Access points on curves of public streets may pose site
visibility or pedestrian oriented constraints. Each access
point is conceptually approved but exact location must be
reviewed individually as development occurs at either the
subsequent filing of an additional tract or parcel map or as a
part of a site plan review when a tract or parcel map is not
required.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2376
page four
1.6 Prior to uttltty of securtty releases, Subdivider shall submtt a
duplicate mylar of the Final Map, or 8 1/2 inch by 11 inch
transparency of each map sheet and "as built" gradtng, landscape
and Improvement plans.
1.7
All lettered lots pertaining to the E1Modena-Irvtne Channel will
require ultimate dedication to the County of Orange for flood
control purposes.
1.8 The Ranchwood Storm Drain (Facility FO7P08) located along "A"
Street and Lot 2, shown as being part of proposed development,
will need to .be constructed pursuant to Agreement No. D85-153
dated 24 June 1986 between the City of Tustin and Orange County
Flood Control District to enable acceptance of E1 Modena-Irvine
Channel (Facility FO7) for maintenance by the Agency.
1.9
The Subdivider shall pay ali costs related to the calculation of
the revised parcel assessments, the preparation of the revised
assessment diagram and other required administrative duties
related to Assessment District No. 85-1 as a result of the
subdivision of parcels of land previously established within the
boundaries of Assessment District No. 85-1 confirmed by the
T~stin City Council on July 21, 1986.
Prior to Final Map Recordation
2.1
2.2
Prior to recordation, Subdivider shall submit a ~urrent title
report.
Prior to recordation of a Final Map the Subdivider shall provide
the following information and/or corrections to the submitted
map:
Ae
The Browning Corridor Aviation Easement and the G.C.A.
Easement as outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding
dated July 1985 between the United States Marine Corps, the'
City of Irvine and the City of Tustin shall be indicated on
Tentative Tract Map 12763 and all subsequent subdivision
maps.
Street "C" as a publicly dedicated street must be revised to
show the following dimensions:
Co
Half street - 28 feet
Centerline to curb - 20 feet
Parkway - 8 feet
Sidewalk - 5 feet and adjacent to curb
At discretion of subdivider landscaped lots 's' and
adjacent to Street C may be increased by 2 feet.
'0'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
22
23
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2376
page five
2.3
Fe
Ge
All major arterial intersections may require additional
street width to accommodate dual left turn movements and
free right turn movements. Subdivider shall provide
intersection analysis to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer for all subject intersections with final street
widths subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
An engineering design shall be prepared for submittal and
approval of the City Engineer addressing potential vertical
site distance constraints that may arise from locating the
southerly extension of New Myford Road at Bryan immediately
adjacent to the E1Modena-Irvine Flood Control Channel.
The Title Block for Tract Map 12763 shall be amended to
delete reference that said map is for "single family
detached and condominium purposes".
Sheet 3, typical sections, of Tentative Tract 19763 shall be
revised as follows:
(1)
(2)
Bryan Avenue (Section A-A). Sidewalk on northside will
· require an easement. Sidewalk location within Edison
Easement must be approved by Southern California Edison
Company.
Bryan Avenue (Section C-C). Sidewalk on southslde will
require an easement. Sidewalk location within Edison
Easement must be approved by Southern California Edison
Company. Parkway width must be a minimum 8 feet not 3
feet and can be satisfied by either dedicated land or
an easement on Southern California Edison Company
property.
Prior to recordation of final map, the Subdivider shall prepare
plans for and construct or post security guaranteeing
construction of all public and/or private, infrastructure
improvements within the boundary of said tract map in conformance
with applicable City standards, including but not limited to the
following:
A. Curb and gutter/cross gutters
B. Sidewalk
C. Drive aprons
D. Street paving
E. Street signing and striping
F. Landscaping/facilities
G. Sanitary sewer service facilities
H. Domestic water service facilities
I. Reclaimed'water service facilities
J. Gas, electric, telephone, cable T.V. facilities
K. Traffic signal systems and other traffic control devises
1
2
3
5
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
21
9.3
25
26
28
Resolution No. 2376
page six
L. Street lighting
M. Storm drains
N. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution
lines.
2.4
Placement of all above ground facilities, such as signing, street
lights, fire hydrants shall be behind the sidewalk when said
sidewalks are constructed adjacent to the curb.
2.S
Preparation of plans for and construction of all sanitary sewer
facilities must be submitted as required by the City Engineer.
These facilities shall include a gravity flow system per
standards, of the 1trine Ranch Water District.
2.6
Preparation of plans for and construction of a domestic water
system to the standards of :he Irvine Ranch Water District/City
of Tustin Water Service, whichever is applicable at the time of
plan preparation is required. Any required reclaimed water
systems shall be to the standards as required by the Irvine Ranch
Water District.
2.7
Preparation of plans and construction of improvements along the
easterly side of Jamboree Road between the Santa Aha Freeway and
Irvine Blvd. as required and approved by the City Engineer and
conditions of this Map and constructed.
2.8 Preparation of a hydrology and hydraulic study of the tributary
area impacting the proposed development shall be prepared and
submitted. Preparation of plans for and construction of all
storm drain facilities as required by the City Engineer, Orange
County EMA and Caltrans when applicable and pertaining to their
facilities shall also be submitted.
2.9
The Ranchwood storm drain {Facility FOY-P08) shall be designed in
accordance with Orange County E.M.A. - Flood Control District
standards and criteria and/or as approved by district and with
the provision of all County required easements for same inclusive
of all ingress/egress to the facility.
2.10 Prior to recordation of any Final Map, Subdivider shall pay plan
check and inspection fees for all public and/or private
infrastructure improvements within City's responsibility
excluding those financed by Assessment District.
2.11 The Subdivider shall satisfy dedication and/or reservation
requirements as applicable, including, but not limited to the
following:
Dedication of all required street and flood control
right-of-way defined and approved as to specific location by
the City Engineer and other responsible agencies.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2376
page seven
Be
Ce
Dedication of all vehicular, access rights to Tusttn Ranch
Road, Bryan Avenue, Bro~ntng Avenue; Irvtne Boulevard,
Jamboree (Myford Road), "A", "B", and "C" Street except at
designated street openings Is required defined and approved
as to specific location by the City Engineer.
Subdivider shall provide for dedication of a minimum of 20
acres of land for park purposes. Lot 7 shall be a minimum
of I6..0 acres for a.communtty park site, and Lot 9 shall be
a nflntmum of 4 acres for a neighborhood park site. However,
since an additional .97 acres Is requested as a Condttfon of
Acceptance of school sizes by the Tustin Unifted School
District, Subdivider shall receive credit for only lg.03
acres required.
The following items must be provided and conditions met
prior to acceptance of park sites by the City.
(1)
Submitted and approved by the Department of Planning
and Community Development of a soils report and rough
grading plans submitted by Subdivider's registered soil
and civil engineers. In addition to a standard soil
report, Subdivider shall also provide soil t6sting for
fertility/agronomy with any recommendations for soil
amendments..
(2)
Each lot to be dedicated for park purposes shall be
rough graded per an approved rough grading plan free of
obvious rock or construction by-product material.
(3)
Full public improvements must be installed or bonded
for by the developer around the perimeter of each park
site subject to approval of City Engineer.
(4)
Public utility laterals of a sufficient size including
water, electricity, sewer, storm drain, natural gas and
telephone communication shall be installed or bonded
for to the park sites' property lines with actual
designated locations subject to approval of City
Engineer.
(s)
Any joint use of park sites adjacent to proposed
schools shall be subject to agreement between the City
of Tustin and Tustin Unified School District as to the
effect of joint use, type of facilities, their use,
development, and maintenance. For purposes of
negotiation between the City and Tustin Unified School
District it shall be assumed that a minimum of 6 acres
of the Community Park site shown on Lot 7 may be
utilized for possible joint use and a minimum of °97
acres on the neighborhood park site shown on Lot 9.
1
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16,
17
18
19
20
21
28
Resolution No. 2376
page ntne
3.2
Preparation and submittal of a Final Grading Plan subject to
approval of the Department of Community Development delineating
the following information is required:
A. Final street elevations at key locations.
Final pad/finish floor elevations and key elevations for all
site grading. All final pad elevations to be a minimum of
1.0 feet above the base flood elevation as defined by FEMA.
C. All flood hazard areas of record.
3.3 Preparation of a sedimentation and erosion control plan for all
construction work related to Tract 12763.
3.4 The grading plan shall provide secondary surface relief to the E1
Modena-Irvine Channel as required by the City Engineer at
determined points on "A" and "B" Streets.
3.5 Grading plans shall provide a secondary type surface relief to
the E1 Modena-Irvine Channel at the intersection of "B" Street
and "A" Street. Such relief shall be provided as required by the
City Engineer.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
4.1
Prior to issuance of building permits within the Tract,
Subdivider shall record a Final Map in accordance with the
approved Tentative Map and conditions herein.
4.2
Prior to the issuance of any building permits, an acoustical
analysis report describing the acoustical design features of the
structures required to satisfy the exterior and interior noise
standards shall be submitted to the Tustin Community Development
Department for approval along with satisfactory evidence which
indicates that the sound attenuation measures specified in the
approved acoustical report{s) have been incorporated into the
design of the project.
4.3
Prior to issuance of any building permits for City project that
falls under the Browning Corridor, a complete noise study shall
be conducted and submitted to the City for review. In addition
to Community Noise Equivalency Levels (CNEL) said study provide
information on single event noise measurements as generated by
helicopter flyovers for information purposes only.
All residential lots and dwellings shall be sound attenuated
against present and projected noises, which shall be the sum of
all noise impacting the project, so as not to exceed an exterior
standard of 6$dba. CNEL in outdoor living areas and an interior
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2376
page ten
III.
standard of 45 dba CNEL in all habitable rooms. Evidence
prepared under the supervision of an acoustical consultant that
these standards will be satisfied in a manner consistent with
applicable zoning regulations.
4.4
Prior to issuance of any building permits, within the tract,
Subdivider shall confer with and prepare for review by the
Community Development and Tustin Unified School District
preliminary site plan and activity concepts for the development
of joint use areas on Lots 7/8 and Lots 9/10.
4.5
Prior to issuance of project level building permits recordation
of project level Final Maps, whichever occurs first, the
Subdivider shall provide a mechanism for landscaped maintenance
and ownership of all lettered lots utilized for landscape
purposes by adjoining community associations within the tract.
Said agreement shall be subject to approval of the City Attorney,
City Engineer and Director of Community Development.
4.6
Prior to issuance of building permits, Subdivider shall comply
with all requirements of the Orange County Fire Marshal including
adequate fire flow, installation, where required of fire hydrants
subject to approval of the Fire Marshal and Irvine Ranch Water
District or City Engineer as applicable.
Prior to Issuance of Certificates Of Use or Occupancy
5.1
Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Use or Occupancy, field
testing in accordance with the Title 25 regulations may be
required by the Building Division to verify compliance with STC
and IIC design standards.
The Planning Commission approves a concept landscape plan and a Sector
perimeter Tract wall design for Tentative Tract 12763 subject to the
following conditions:
Approval of the concept plan as herein modified does not commit
the City to the extension of said landscape plan to the remainder
of the East Tustin Specific Project Area.
Future submittals shall substantially conform to the submitted
landscape concept plan on file with the Department of Community
Development, as herein modified or as modified by the Director of
Community Development pursuant to the City's design review
procedures.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Resolution No. 2376
page eleven
A completely detailed landscape and irrigation plan must be
sqbmitted with detail at whatever scale necessary to depict
adequately what is occurring. Provide a summary table applying
an indexing identification to plant materials and their actual
location. The plan and corresponding table must list botanical
and common names, sizes, spacing, actual location, and quantities
of all materials proposed.
Show planting and bermtng details, soil preparation, staking,
etc. The irrigation plan shall be submitted prior to building
permit and must show location of control and backflow prevention
devices, pipe size, sprinkler type, spacing, and coverage.
Details for all equipment must be provided. Planting and
irrigation in public right of way should also be shown where
proposed. Approximately shoWn all property lines, public right
of way areas, sidewalk widths, parkway areas and wall locations
on landscaping and irrigation plans. The Department of Community
Development may request minor substitutions of plant materials,
or request additional sizing or quantity of materials during
plancheck. Place note on landscaping plans that "adequacy of
coverage of landscaping and irrigation materials is subject to
field inspection of the Department of Planning and Community
Development. Upon completion of inspection, the Department
reserves the right to request installation of additional
landscaping.
The submitted landscape plans should reflect the following
requirements.
Tree plantings should be planted, wherever possible in
informal drifts and groupings in staggered triangulations.
B. Any landscaping within numbered landscaping lots should be
coordinated with parkway landscaping.
Cm
Primary eucalyptus tree plantings should be a combination of
5 gallon and 15 gallon, shall be planted in the following
proportions.
(1) 60% shall be a minimum of 5 gallon
(2) 405 shall be a minimum of 15 gallon
De
One additional variety of tree (evergreen) in addition to
the proposed accent and eucalyptus treatments proposed along
street frontages shall be planted {an aleppo pine or a
similar alternative material would be acceptable) in the
following proportions:
28
1
3
4
5
6
7
;8
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Re~olutton No. 2376
page twelve
(1) 30~ shall be a minimum of 15 gallon
(2) 50~ shall be a mtnimum of 24" box
(3) 20~ shall be a mtntmum of 36" box
The actual tree stze, location and number of paseo accent and
community accent trees shall be subject to review and approval by
the Department of Community Development.
When possible and to add visual interest berming along landscape
lot frontages shall be provided which is creative and done not
only to flow to walls, but be slightly horizontally undulated
(broad rolling a wavelike free-flowing appearance) maintaining
visibility at entrances to projects. Berming slopes shall be
less than 3:1 and 'planted with drought resistant turf and
coordinated with shrubs and groundcovers. Any details on bermin§
shall be shown on landscaping and grading plans.
7. Spacing of all groundcover shall be at 8" - 10" on center.
Perimeter walls should be provided with vines in order to
eliminate large expanses of wall by adding greenery and color~
Vines should also be informally grouped with training devices
installed with the actual location noted on plans.
Entryways to the project site should be focal points. In
addition to the larger tree treatments, these areas should be
provided with a variety of color and treatment of landscaping.
10.
A complete detailed subdivision sign program including location,
sizes, colors and materials shall be submitted subject to review
and approval of the Department of Community Development.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission
held the day of , 1986.
CHARLES E. PUCKETT,
Chairman
DONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
Report to the
Planning Commission
I~em h
DATE:
SUBdECT:
APPLICANT:
PROPERTY
ONNER:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENVIROlmENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
DECEMBER 8, 1986
USE PER,lIT NO. 86-37
MR. 3Al~ AU YEUNG
270 S. BRISTOL #110
COSTA HESA, CA 92626
TUSTIN CORPORATE PARK, LTl).
3300 IRVINE BLVD.,
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
2512 NALNUT AVENUE,
PC--C PLANNED COFB~NITY COMMERCIAL
CATEGORICALLY EXEHPT CLASS 1
AUTHORIZATION TO SELL BEER AND NINE IN CONOUNCTION NTIH A PUBLIC
EATING PLACE. LICENSE TYPE NO. 41.
RECOF~ENDED ACTION:
Approve Use Permit No. 86-37 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2378.
As part of the Tusttn Corporate Plaza located at the southwest corner of Walnut
and Franklin Avenues, a small retail center has been developed. In Unit 1 of
this four unit center, a Chinese restaurant named Al's Palace is proposed. This
restaurant is part of a small chain and serves typical Chinese dishes.
The proprietor, Mr. Jame Au Yeung, is requesting authorization to sell beer and
wine as part of his services. The license requested would allow for on-site
consumption, therefore restrictions can be applied to maintain the restaurant
and assure all beverages are consumed.on-site.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS:
In reviewing this request, the following issues were identified; proximity to
schools, restriction of beer and wine sales to on-site consumption; and
maintenance of the integrity of the business establishment. It is staff's
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
Use Permit 86-37
Page two
contention that, if properly conditioned, this request is appropriate for the
location intended.
The closest school to Al's Palace is C.R. Nelson Elementary School which is 4400
feet (over three-quarters of a mile) away. The actual' land uses surrounding
Al's Palace are mostly industrial in nature. Residential neighborhoods are not
adjacent to this site.
As with all new on-site liquor sales licenses, the Planning Commission and staff
have expressed concerns regarding the overall effect of the establishment. In
this case, Al's Palace is expected to serve people working in the nearby
industrial complexes. In order to avoid possible removal of the restaurant,
staff considers the following conditions appropriate for this applicaton:'
Authorization for an on-site beer and wine license is contingent
upon subject location (unit 1) remaining a restaurant. At such
time that the restaurant use is discontinued, any previous
authorization for the beer and wine sales license shall become
null and void.
A menu shall be maintained consisting primariQy of foods that are
prepared.on the premises.
No alcoholi'c beverages may be sold for consumption off the
premises.
No "bar" seating is allowed.
The sale of alcoholic beverages be limited to the hours of 11:00
a.m. to 9:00 p.m.. These hours may be extended with the approval
-of the Community Development Director.
As with all Use Permits, should any viol.ation of the conditions of approval take
place, or the general health, safety or welfare of Tusttn residents be
endangered, the Planning Commission can reconsider the approval of beer and wine
sales at this location.
Assistant Planner
Director of Community Development
LCP:jd
Attachements: Site Plan
Floor Plan
community Devoloprnent Department
!
!i
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2378
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN AUTHORIZING USE PERMIT NO. 86-37
TO ALLOW THE ON-SITE SALES OF BEER AND WINE IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT USE AT 2512 WALNUT
AVENUE, UNIT 1.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A proper application (Use Permit 86-37) has been filed by Mr.
Jame Au Yeung on behalf of Al's Palace requesting authorization
for on-site sales of beer and wine at 2512 Walnut Avenue, Unit
1.
A public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
Establishment, malntenance,'and operation of the use applied for
will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental
to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of
other persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such
proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
1. The sale of beer and wine is for on-site consun~tion only.
No schools are located in the immediate area, therefore the
use should not have any detrimental effect on children.
(Closest school is approximately 4400 feet away.)
The use applied for is in conformance with the Tustin
General Plan.
4. The project is located in the PC-Commercial zone.
The use applied for is an allowed use in the PC-Commercial
zone.
Establishment, maintenance and operation of the use applied for
will not be injurious or detrimental to the property and
improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, nor to
the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and should be
granted.
Em
Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as
administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal, and street
improvement requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 21.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
22
23
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2378
Page two
Final development plans shall require the review and approval of
the Community Development Department.
II.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No.
86-37 to authorize the issuance of a beer and wine sales license in
conjunction with a restaurant use at 2512 Walnut Avenue, Unit l,
subject to the following conditions:
Ae
The authorization for an on-site beer and wine sales license is
contingent upon the subject location (Unit 1) remaining a
restaurant. At such time that the restaurant use is
discontinued, any previous authorization for the beer and wine
sales license shall become null and void.
A menu will be maintained which consists primarily of foods that
are prepared on the premises.
No alcoholic beverages may be sold for consumption off the
premises.
D. No bar seating shall be allowed.
The sale of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to the hours of
11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.. These hours may be extended with the
approval of Community Development Director.
The applicant complete an "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form
prior to installation of beer and wine sales.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 198
DONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
CHARLES E. PUCKETT,
Chairman
LCP:jd
Planning Commission
DATE:
Oece~ber 8, 1986
SUBJECT: REPORT ON COUNCIL ACT[O#S - December 1, 1986
Oral presentation.
pf
Attaclments: Ctty Counct1 Action Agenda - Oeceeber 1, 1986
Community Development Department
ACTION A~ENDA OF A PJ~GULAR )(~ETING
OF THE IUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 1. 1986
7:00 P.M.
7:04
I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ALL PRESENT II. ROLL CALL
III. SPECIAL PRESENTATION
POSTPONED TO
DECEMBER 15TH
IV.
1. PLAQUE FOR DAVID EDGAR, CHAIRMAN, TUSTIN TILLER DAYS PARADE
PUBLIC HEARINGS - None.
MARJORIE V. PUBLIC INPUT
NICKLUS REQUESTED REMOVAL OF A TREE AT 15912 S. MYRTLE AND "NO
CLEANING DAYS. STAFF TO INVESTI~TE AND ~PORT B~CK TO COUNCIL.
PARKING' SIGNS ON Sll~EET
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
APPROVED
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - NOVEMBER 17, 1986, REGULAR MEETING
Ap_PROVED
2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,793,541.69
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $142,649.45
~OVED STAFF 3.
RECOMMENDATION
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT MAIN STREET AND PACIFIC, AND AT MAIN
STREET AND "BI' STREET
Allow a time extension of the contract to Steiny and Company for the
construction of subject project per revised tentative schedule for
completion of construction on March 5, 1987, as recommended by the
Public Works Department/Engineering Division.
A&)O~TED ~JESOLb~FION 4.
NO. 86-138
RESOLUTION NO. 86-138 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF
NOTICE OF COMPLETION (TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT jAMBOREE ROAD AND EDINGER AVE.)
(Paxin Electric, Inc.)
Adopt Resolution No. 86-138; and assuming no claims or stop payments
are filed, authorize payment of the final 10% retention amount
($9,574.64) 30 days after recordation of Notice of Completion as
recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division.
APPROVED STAFF 5.
RECOIWMENDATION
DECLARATION OF SURPLUS VEHICLES
Find that the 5 vehicles detailed in report dated November 18, 1986,
are not required for public use; and declare them surplus vehicles
as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division.
APPROVED STAFF 6.
RECOI~ENDATION
CONTRACT FOR USE OF POLICE SHOOTING RANGE FACILITY
Approve the contract for range services with Straight Shooter Firing
Range .of Orange at an estimated annual cost of $7,200; and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute same as recommended by the
Police Department.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA PAGE i 12-1-86
APPROVED STAFF 7.
F~ ~I~NDATIO#
APPROVED STAFF 8.
RECOI~IENDATIOti
ADOPTED RESOLUT]Oll 9.
NO. 86-141
APPROVED STAFF
RECOI~ENDATION
ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CONTRACT FOR ANNUAL ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT
REPAIR PROGRAM
Extend the contract for subject program for one year with R. J.
Noble Company for an estimated cost of $181,273.70 as recommended by
the Public Works Department/Engineering Division.
RENEWAL OF TREE STUMP GRINDING AND REMOVAL CONTRACT
Renew the annual contract with Edney Tree Service for tree stump
'grinding and removal for an estimated annual cost of $~5,000 as
reconmnended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-141 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN RECORDS
Adopt Resolution No. 86-141 as recommended by the City Manager.
10. AGREEMENT WITH L.P. REPERTORY for 1987 PRODUCTION
Approve the agreement with L. P. Repertory for the 1987 play
production in cooperation with the Community Services Department as
recommended by the Community and Administrative Services Department.
VII. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION - None.
VIII. ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
NO. 979
1. AMENDMENT TO SMOKING ORDINANCE - ORDINANCE NO. 979
ORDINANCE NO. 979 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN AMENDING ARTICLE
IV, CHAPTER 1 OF THE TUSTIN MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 4122
RELATING TO THE SMOKING OF.CIGARS AND PIPES IN CITY-OWNED BUILDINGS
Recommendation: M.O. - That Ord~nanc~ No. 979 have second reading by
title only.
M.O. - That Ordinance No. 979 be passed and adopted. (Roll Call Vote)
IX. OLD BUSINESS - None.
APPROVED STAFF
REC0t~ENDATION
NEW
1.
APPROVED STAFF
RECOMHENDATION
BUSINESS
SEVENTEENTH STREET & YORBA STREET (SOUTH)/CARROLL WAY INTERSECTION
Recommendation: Authorize staff to proceed with the intersection modi
fications to provide dual left-turn lanes from northbound Yorba to west-
bound Seventeenth Street and coordinate said work with the proposed
A.H.F.P. project along Seventeenth Street; and authorize a supplemental
budget appropriation in the amount of $6,325 as recommended by the
Public Works Department/Engineering Division.
2. FISCAL YEAR 1986-87 BUDGET AMENDMENTS
Recommendation: As recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineer-
ing Division, amend the Fiscal Year 1986-87 Budget as follows:
1) Include two Capital Improvement Projects; and
S.B. 821 Pedestrian Projects $14,944.00
Sierra Vista Drive, Karen Way, and
Jan Marie Place, Pavement Rehabilitation/
Storm Drain Improvements $114,700.00
2) Include one Public Works Departmental Operating Account:
Street Light Energy/Maintenance Operations
Account No. 6125 $20,800.00
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA PAGE 2 12-1-86
C~q'l'/]l[]l~ '~D 4.
D~C. 15'~1
3. ~ (F (DNTRACT FOR ANNUAL PAVfM~NT ~gRKING PROGRAM
Recc~endation: Award the contract for subject project to J & S Sign
Ccmpany, Orange, for an annual amount of $24,780.05 as rec~,,,~nded by
the Public Works Depar~¥~nt/Engineering Divisi°n.
CONSIDERATION CF CITY PARTICIPATION IN THE ORANGE GDUNTY CITIES RISK
MANAC4~ENT AUTHO~ C~]ERAL AND AUTOMOBILE hI~ILITY POOL - R~OLUTION
NO. 86-140
RESOLUTION NO. 86-140 - A RESOLUTION CF THE CITY (DUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TJSTIN, CALIFOi~IA, AUTH)RIZING PARF/CIPATION IN THE ORANGE COUNTY
~tion: Adopt Resolution No. 86-140 as recommended by the
Finance Department.
1. PLANNING ~SSION ACTIONS - ~ER 24, 1986
A]] actio~ of the Planning Commission become final unless appealed by
the City ~ouncil or m~ber of the public.
~ XII. ~ BUSINESS
RE~ .~ON NO. 86-139 ~3'~gl~IZ'//,Ig
PA~ ~ 9&2T CF 1986.
7:34
XlII. AD3~
To a Closed Sessiun regarding LaborRelations and thence to the next Regular
Meeting cn Monday, December 15, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.
2ITY (DUNCIL ACTION ~ Page 3 12-1-86
ACTION AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF
THE TUSTIN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DECEMBER 1 1986
7:00 P.M.
7:34 1. CALL TO ORDER
ALL 2. ROLL CALL
PRESENT
APPROVED 3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - NOVEMBER 17, 1986, REGULAR MEETING
Recommendation: Approve.
APPROVED 4.
APPROVAL OF DEMANDS
Recommendation: Approve Demands for the month of October, 1986, in the amount
of $448,0~.91 as recommended by the Finance Department.
F--~ 5. OTHER BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT
To the next Regular Meeting on Monday, December 15, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION AGENDA PAGE i 12-1~86