HomeMy WebLinkAboutPH 1 ANNEXATION 138 01-19-87'
DATE: JANUARY 19, 1987
' PUB!IC HEARING
NO. 1
1- -87
Inter Corn
TO:
FROtv{:
SUBJECT:
HONORABLE MAYOR & MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PROPOSED RANCHWOOO/BELLEWICK ANNEXATION NO. 138 PROTEST HEARING
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct staff to prepare a Resolution making one of the following findings
regarding the value of written protests:
Ae
Terminate the proceedings if written protests have been filed and not
withdrawn by 50% or more of the registered voters within the affected
territory; or
B. Order the territory annexed without election.
PROJECT ANALYSIS:
The proposed annexation was initiated by the Tustin City Council on October 6,
1986 with the adoption of Resolution No. 86-118. The annexation territory
contains approximately 20 acres and is located at the southeasterly corner of
Irvine Boulevard and Browning Avenue.
The area is fully developed with 80 single-family dwellings and known as the
Bellewick Homeowners Association.
Annexation is proposed for the purpose of increasing the economy and efficiency of
government services by incorporating an unincorporated island within the city's
sphere of influence.
Section 56375(d) of the Government Code enpowers LAFCO to approve a city
annexation after notice and hearing, and to authorize the conducting authority to
order annexation of territory without election if the Commission finds the
territory contained in the annexation proposal meets all the requirements of the
Government Code.
On December 3, 1986, the Local Agency Formation Commission held a public hearing
and authorized that the annexation be completed consistent with the following
provisions:
1. The Tustin City Council shall be the conducting authority for completing
the annexation proceedings in compliance with said Resolution.
JANUARY 19, 1987
PAGE TWO
The Tustin City Council shall conduct a public hearing on the proposed
annexation and not more than 30 days after the conclusion of the hearing,
make a finding regarding the value of written protests filed and not
withdrawn and shall either:
terminate proceedings if written protests have been filed and not.
withdrawn by 50 percent or more of the registered voters within the
affected territory; or
(b) order the territory annexed without election.
The City of Tustin, as applicant, shall be liable and pay the applicable
State Board of Equalization filing and processing fee prior to the
issuance of the final statement of boundary change by the Executive
officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission.
MAC:CS:jm
Attachments
Director of Community Development
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
~ 25
~ 27
RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
December 3, 1986
On motion of Commissioner Clark, duly seconded and carried, the following
resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, a resolution for the proposed annexation designated
Ranchwood/Bellwick Annexation No. 128 to the City of Tustin in the County of Orange
was heretofore filed by the City of Tustin and accepted for filing November 4, 1986
by the Executive officer of this Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Part 3
of Title'S, Division 2, commencing with Section 56000 et seq of the Government Code;
WHEREAS, the Executive Officer, pursuant to Government Code Section 56828
set December 2, 1986 as the hearing date on this proposal and gave the required
notice of hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Executive Officer, pursuant to Government Code Section 56832,
has reviewed this proposal and prepared a report including his recommendation
thereon, and has furnished a copy of this report to each person entitled to a copy;
and
WHEREAS, this Commission called this proposal for public hearing on
'December $, 1986, heard from the interested parties, considered the proposal and the
report of the Executive Officer, and considered the factors determined by the
Commission to be relevant to this proposal, including, but not limited to, factors
specified in Government Code Section 56841; and
WHEREAS, the city of Tustin, as lead agency, determined the proposed
annexation to be categorically exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970.
NOW, THEREFORE', the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of
Orange DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE and ORDER as follows:
Section 1. Subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter specified,
said proposal is approved.
Section 2. The boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed to
the City of Tustin are specifically described in the legal
description attached hereto and by this reference made a
part hereof. Said territory is found to be inhabited and
is assigned the following short-form designation:
RANCHWOOD/BELLWICK ANNEXATION NO. 138 TO THE CITY OF
TUSTIN.
Resolution No. 86-72
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
1!
12
3
14
15
16
17
19
2O
21
22
23
24
?
Section 3.
· Section 4.
Section 5.
Section 6.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS
NOES: COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
The City of Tustin is designated as the conducting
authority and the legislative body thereof is hereby
directed to initiate annexation proceedings in compliance
with this resolution.
Any election called upon the question of confirming an
order for annexation shall be called, held and conducted
upon such annexation only within the territory ordered to
be annexed.
The City of Tustin, as applicant, shall be liable for and
pay all proper expenses incurred in conducting proceedings
in compliance with this resolution.
The Executive Officer is' hereby authorized and directed to
mail certified copies of this resolution in the manner as
provided in Section 56853 of the Government Code.
RALPH B. CLARK, DONALD A. HOLT, JR., DONALD J. SALTARELLI,
PHILLIP R. SCHWARTZE, AND ROGER R. STANTON
NONE
NONE
SS
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, RICHARD T. TURNER, Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Orange County, California, hereby certify that the above and foregoing
resolution was duly and regularly adopted by said Commission at a regular meeting
thereof, held on the 3rd day of December, 1986.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of December,
1986.
RICHARD T. TURNER
Executive Officer of the
Local Agency Formation Commission
of Orange County, California
Se~ary
Resolution No. 86-72
Block 5752
Rodule 95
EXHIBIT "A"
RANCHWOOD - BELLWICK
ANNEXATION NO. 138
TO THE
CITY OF TUSTIN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 That portion of Lot 5 in Block 44 of Irvine's Subdivision in the
8 Unincorporated Territory of the County of Orange, State of California, per
9 map recorded in Book l, page 88 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the
10 County Recorder of Orange County, California, described as follows:
11 BEGINNING at an angle point in the exfsting boundary line of thej
12 City of Tustin as established by the "Irvine-Myford Annexation No. 81
13 (Amended), Parcel A", said'angle point being the Northeasterly terminus of
14 that certain course described in said annexation as "N. 40° 37' 16" E.,
15 1321.07 feet", said angle point also being the most Easterly.corner of
16 Tract No. 6628, ~er map recorded in Book 246, ~ages 36 through 38 o~
17 Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said Orange
18 County, CaliforNia, and said angle point also beifig a point on the center-
19 line of Irvine Boulevard (which centerline coincides with the Northeasterly
20 line of said Block 44 of Irvine's Subdivision) distant S. 49° 18' 55" E.,
21 660.00 feet from the centerline intersection of Irvine Boulevard and
22 Browning Avenue;
23 Thence along said existing boundary line of the City of Tustin as
24 established by said "Irvine-Myford Annexation No. 81 (Amended), Parcel A"
25 and~lopg the Southeasterly and Southwesterly boundary lines of said Tract
26 No. 6628, the following courses and distances:
27 S. 40°'37' 16" W., 1321.07 feet;
28 Thence N. 49° 19' 41" W., 660.00 feet to an angle point in said
29 existing boundary line of the City of Tustin, said angle point being the
30 most Westerly corner of said Tract No. 6628, and said angle point also
31 being a point on the centerline of Browning Avenue {which centerline coin-
32 cides with'the Northwesterly line of said Block 44 of Irvine's Subdivision);
Page 1 of 2
1
7
8
9
10
11
12
13~
14
15
16
17
,18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
3O
31
32
Block 5752
Module 95
EXHIBIT "A"
PJkNCNWOOD - BELLWICK
ANNEXATION NO. 138
TO THE
CITY OF TUST[N
Thence.]eavtng said existing boundary line of the City of .... Tustin as
established, by the "Irvine-Myford Annexation No.. 81 ' {Amended }, Parcel A",
and along the Northwesterly boundary line of said Tract No. 6628, and
along, said Browning Avenue centerline and the Northwesterly line of said.
Block 44, N. 40° 37' 16" £., 1321.22 feet to the most Northerly corner of
said Tract No. 6628, being the centerline intersection of Irvine
Boulevard and Browning Avenue, and also being the Northerly corner of
said Block 44 of Irvine's Subdivision;
Thence along the Northeasterly boundary line of said Tract No. 6628,
and along said Irvine Boulevard centerline and the Northeasterly line of
said Block 44, S. 49° 18' 55" E., 660.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
All as more particularly shown on a map, EXHIBIT "B", attached hereto
and by this reference made a part hereof.
CONTAINING:
20.017 acres = 0.0313 sq. mi.
Legal description prepared by:
Licensed Land Surveyor No. 4125
. This proposal does meet !he ....
approval of the Orange C(3~*'~;!y Surveyor's) Office
C.R. Nelson, County Surveyor
Ds,. t -t - pu,v Cou.,v surv,vor
Page 2 of 2
TR. ~0. 66~8
~0¢1~.~ O~
IRVINg'S
?. TUSrlIV,BOUNOARY
· ANN~ATION NO.
/I~e6'r£AST~RL y ¢ORN£R
.... ANNEXAT/ON aOUNOARY
Oaie I '~-- I (~ - ~)~puty County ~urveyor_
RANCHWOOD - BELLWlCK
ANNEXATION NO. 1:38
AREA:
~0,017 AC. -- 0.0515 .~. MI.
SARY SlffgffL a OOMPANY
Land Surveying I~ Related Services
~60 Centennial Way, Tusfin, California 92680
Phone (7~4) ?$1-4500
DATE SaP~. 26,/986 ,SCALE t,,, = £oo'
TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA.
FIELD ~vo r
800KA,~pZlC,~8,cE JOEl NO. 30086