HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 5 CLAIM #87-2 02-02-87TO: HONORABLE NAYOR ~ CITY COUNCILL.~..
CITY ATTORNEY
SUBJECT:
CLAIMANT: DAVID & DOROTHY HAUSER; D/L:
FILED W/CITY: 1/5/87; CLAIM NO: 87-2;
11/3/86; DATE
CARL WARREN
J
After investigation and review it is recommended that the above-
referenced claim be rejected and the City Clerk directed to give
proper notice of the rejection to the claimant and to the
claimant's attorney.
JGR(F4.se)
Enclosure:
Copy of Claim
1
4
5
?
8
9
I0
11
12
13
14
17
18
19
27
HORTON BARBARO & REILLY
~wyers
200 Nor~ Main Street
Second Floor
SanTa Aha, California 92701
(714),835-2122
ATtorneys for Claimant
DAVID HAUSER; DOROTHY HAUSER;
CHARLES HAUSER; NARY HAUSER
Claimant,
VS.
CITY OF TUSTIN
and DOES 1 to 20
Respondents.
TO: THE THE CITY OF TUSTIN:
CLAIM FOR PERSONAL
INJURIES
GOVERNMENT
SECTION 910
et seq.
CODE
CITY CLERK; CITY OF TUSTIN, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin
California.
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that claimants DAVID, DOROTHY
CHARLES ~ MARY HAUSER whose address is
claim damages from the City of Tustin,
in an amount computed as of the date of this claim in the
sum of $500,000.
1
2
4
6
8
10
11
14
15
17
18
19
~4
All notices concerning this claim should be sent to
the law~-offices of Horton Barbaro &.Reilly, 200 North-~ain
Street, Second Floor, Santa Ann, California 92701.
The dates and places giving rise to this claim
are' on or about November 3, 1986, a% or near the intersection
of Myford Avenue and ~ichelle Drive, in the City of Tustin,
County of Orange, State of California.
That on or about November 3, 1986, claimant David Hauser
was involved in an automobile accident at the aforementioned
location wherein a car traveling eastbound driven by Donald
Creas¥ failed to stop at the stop sign and collided
claimant's automobile which was in the process of making
a left...turn. As a result of the accident, claimant David
Hauser is now a quadrapalegic.
Claimants state that the intersection of Myford and
Michelle Drive was wholly or partially owned and/or
controlled by the City of Tustin and that the City of Tus~in
so negligently carelessly and unlawfully owned, operated,
controlled 'and maintained and designed said intersection
so as to cause this accident to occur.
The names of any other individual employees and/or
agents of respondent .the City of Tus~in who were working
for respondents and were responsible for the incidents
described above, are unknown to claimanu au this time.
However, claimant further contends that respondent City
of Tustin while acting as principal, master and/or employer
Of the above-named individuals, was negligent in the
selection hiring, training, .maintenance, supervision and
1
4
?
9
10
11
12
14
17
19
20
retention of same. As a d~rect and proximate resultof
the con'ct complained of heretofore, claimant has suffered
d-mages. The amount claimed as of the date of the
presentation of this claim.is computed as follows:
.1. General Damages for the Claimant in the sum of
$500,000.00
2. Medical Expenses in a sum currently unknown.
3. For Future Medicalexpenses in a sum according ~o
proof;
4.
5.
currently unknown.
6. For such other and further relief as may be deemed
Just and proper.
The computation of the amount of claimed damages is
based upon the best information available to the claimant
as of the date of the presentation of this claim. The exact
=mount will be set forth when the same ~as been ascertained
and when the'full amount of permanent disability is known.
DATED: December 31, 1986
For Loss of Earnings in a sum currently unknown. ~ ....
For Loss of Future Earning Capacity in a s.um :-~