HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 PC ACT AGENDA 03-16-87*"ACTION AGENDA
M~CH 9, 1987
REPORTS
NO. 1
3-16-87
CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL: Present: Puckett, Well, Baker, Le Jeune, Pontious
PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
1. Minutes of February 23, 1987 Planning Commission Meeting.
Well moved, Ledeune second to approve the mtnutes with an addition to UP 87-4 that
Parents Who Carp ~ere notified of the hearing. Notion carried 5-0.
2. FINAL TRACT MAP 12719
To subdivide for 127 single family detached houses, East Tustin.
Wetl moved, Baker second to approve Final Tract ~ap 12719 with changes to the
resolution as recommended by staff. ~otlon carried 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
3. USE PERMIT 87-5
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Mr. George Hillyard on behalf of Mobil Oil Corp.
172411rvine Boulevard
To convert an existing 167 square foot sales area to a
mini-market.
Presentation:
RESOLUTION NO. 2393:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO INSTALL A 167 SQUARE FOOT
MINI-MARKET AT 17241 IRVINE BOULEVARD
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE USE
PERMIT 87-5 BY THE ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2393.
Pontious moved, LeJeune second to approve UP 87-5 by the adoption of Resolution
2393. Motion carried 5-0.
Planning Commission'Agenda
March 9, 1987
page two
Applicant:
Presentation:
RECOMMENDATION:
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 87-1
City Council
Laura'Pickup, Associate Planner
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION INSTRUCT STAFF TO
SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING FOR ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 87-1.
Chairman Puckett, with a consensus from the Comdssion, instructed staff to set a
public heartng for consideration of Zontng Ordinance Amendment 87-1.
OLD BUSINESS
None.
NEll BUSINESS
5. STATUS REPORT - TUSTIN HEIGHTS SHOPPING CENTER DRIVE ALIGNMENT
Presentation: Jeffrey S. Davis, Senior Planner
6. LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development
Commissioner Pontious left the meeting at 9:10 p.m.
Le ~eune moved, Baker second to receive and file. Motion carried 4-0.
STAFF CONCERNS
7. REPORT ON COUNCIL ACTIONS MARCH 2, 1987
Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development
COMMISSION ~NCERNS
Commissioner Well discussed the Hoffman report and potential fiscal impacts caused by
the different annexations.
Commissioner Le Jeune expressed concern with temporary signs at the auto center and
questioned the status of Ruby's Cafe.
Commissioner Baker questioned if any further communication had been received
concerning the Will's office building and questioned when Bryan Avenue will reopen.
ADOOURNMENT
Wet1 moved, Baker second to adjourn to the next regularly scheduled Planning
Co~ssion meeting. Motion carried 4-0.
AGENDA
TUSTZN PLANNING COI~IZSSION
R£GULAR I~ETING
)lARCH 9, 1987
CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/ZNVOCATZON
ROLL CALL: Puckett, Wetl, Baker, Le Jeune, Pontious
PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
Minutes of February 23, 1987 Planning Commission Meeting.
FINAL TRACT MAP 12719
To subdivide for 127 single family detached houses, East Tustin.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
3. USE PERMIT 87-5
Applicant:
Locatt on:
Request:
Mr. George Hillyard on behalf of Mobil Oil Corp.
172411rvine Boulevard
To convert an existing 167 square foot sales area to a
mini-market.
Presentation:
RESOLUTION NO. 2393:
Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO INSTALL A i67 SQUARE FOOT
MINI-MARKET AT 17241 IRVINE BOULEVARD
1ECOMMENDED ACTION: IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE USE
PERMIT 87-5 BY THE ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2393.
Planntng Commission Agenda
March 9, 1987
)age two
Applicant:
Presentation:
RECOMMENDATION:
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 87-1
City Council
Laura Pickup, Associate Planner
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION INSTRUCT STAFF TO
SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING FOR ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 87-1.
OLD BUSINESS
None.
NEW BUSINESS,
5.
m
STATUS REPORT - TUSTIN HEIGHTS SHOPPING CENTER DRIVE ALIGNMENT
Presentation: Jeffrey S. Davis, Senior Planner
LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development
STAFF CONCERNS
7. 'REPORT ON COUNCIL ACTIONS MARCH 2, 1987
Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development
COMMISSIOMCONCERNS
AO~OURI~E#T
Adjourn to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting.
MINUTES
TUSTIN PLANNING COMI4ISSION
REGULAR INEETI NG
FEBRUARY 23, 1987
~L TI) ORDER: 7:33 p.m., City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL: Present: Puckett, Well, Baker, Pontious
Absent: LeJeune
PUBLIC CONCERNS:
None.
CORSELET CALENDAR:
1. Minutes of February 9, 1987 Planning Commission Meeting.
2. PERMIT TO OPERATE A LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOME
1651Copperfield Drive, Nancy Hormuth
Commissioner Well moved, Baker seconded to approve the Consent Calendar.
carried 4-0.
PUBLIC HEARIRGS
3. USE PERMIT 87-3
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Presentation:
RESOLUTION NO. 2390:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion
Joseph Miccio on behalf of Continental Health Management Systems
2472 Walnut Avenue
Authorization to install a medical clinic and laboratory in an
existing 27,622 gross square foot building.
Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
AUTHORIZING INSTALLATION OF A MEDICAL CLINIC AND LABORATORY AT
2472 WALNUT AVENUE.
APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 87-3 BY THE ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO.
23g0.
Seeing no one further wishing to speak, Chairman Puckett closed the. public hearing at
7:43 p.m.
Joe Mlccio, Continental Health Management, made himself available for questions and
commented CHMS is looking to purchase the building.
Chairman Puckett opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m.
Commission discussion ensued with questions of staff concerning parking regulations
for patients and employees, handicap parking requirements and if the applicant is
leasing or purchasing the building.
Planning Commission Minutes
February 23, 1987
page two
Commissioner Pon~ious expressed further concern with the limited number of
handicapped parking spaces especially in light of the use at this facility. Laura
Pickup responded staff could work with the applicant on this; it would require an
additional $' of parking area.
Christine Shingleton informed the Commission that the occupancy classification in the
Building Code could affect the number of spaces required.
Commissioner Wetl moved, Pontious seconded to approve Use Permit 87-3 by the adoption
of Resolution 2390. Motion carried 4-0.
4. USE PERMIT 87-4
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Spoons
Tusttn Plaza, 13741 Newport
Authorization for an on-site beer, wine and distilled spirits
license in conjunction with a restaurant use (license type 47)
Presentation:
Jeffrey S. Davis, Senior Planner
RESOLUTION NO. 2391:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
AUTHORIZING A BEER, WINE AND DISTILLED SPIRITS LICENSE FOR
ON-SITE SALES AT 13741 NEWPORT AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION:
APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 87-4 BY THE ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO.
2391.
Jeff Davis reviewed the hours of operation, proximity to schools, supervision of
employees who serve alcohol and outdoor seating. Alcohol would be served only from
11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. and only when food is concurrently served. The original
application requested the restaurant portion be closed at 12:00 a.m. with the bar
area remaining open until 1:00 a.m. Previous Commission action has been that bar
activity should be concurrent with restaurant operation.
Chairm~n Puckett opened the public hearing at 7:4g p.m.
Dorson Jackson, Spoons, requested relief from condition 2 in the resolution. There
are other Spoons where they close the restaurant one hour before the lounge. 11:00
a.m. to 12:00 p.m. with the restaurant closing at 11:00 p.m. The percentage of food
sales is approximately 75/25%. They are aware of.the liability associated and are
conscientious. They requested they be allowed to keep the lounge open an extra hour.
Commissioner Baker explained the Commission is concerned with the place becoming a
bar rather than a restaurant. As a con~romtse if they would leave the dining area
open eventhough the kitchen is closed.
Commissioner Well suggested a light menu in the lounge.
Dorson Jackson responded they could have a limited menu but he would have to check
with the other Spoons staff on what it would be.
Seeing ~ one further wishing to speak, Chair~n Puckett closed the hearing at 7:55
p.m.
Planning Commission Minutes
February 23, X987
page three
Commissioner Baker clarified C.2. would remain in the conditions of approval.
Commission discussion ensued concerning types of foods which would be served in the
lounge and time involved in kitchen clean up.
Commissioner Well moved, Pontlous seconded to approve Use Permit 87-4 by the adoption
of Resolution 2391 with a change to I.A. indicating Dorson Jackson represents
Spoons. Motion carried 4-0.
5. AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO USE PERMIT 85-9
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Carver Development
Tustln Plaza office/retail sites westerly side of Newport Avenue
between Main Street and E1Camino Real.
To authorize implementation of a shared parking plan as an
amendment to the Development Plan approved by Use Permit 85-9
Presentation:
Jeffrey S. Davis, Senior Planner
RE-SOLUTION NO. 2392:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED BY USE PERMIT 85-9
AUTHORIZING SHARED PARKING FOR A FREESTANDING RESTAURANT AT
1374! NEWPORT AVENUE.
RECOMMENDATION:
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2392 AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED
DY USE PERMIT 85-9 AUTHORIZING IMPLEMENTATION OF A SHARED
PARKING PLAN FOR A FREESTANDING RESTAURANT.
Jeff Davis explained two factors differentiate this center from others: 1)
approximately 31~ of the project was constructed for office purposes; and 2) the
center is without the traditional "anchor" tenant that is often a major draw to an
area. Given these circumstances and in an effort to accommodate capacity seating
staff is proposing the implementation of a shared parking program. According to a
study by ULI peak demand for mixed use is at different times during the day. During
the busiest time of year (December) the center's demand will be 20 more spaces than
provided. In a letter dated February 5, 1987, planning staff noted that in order to
process a shared parking program the orientation of the building would need to be
modified. Originally it was to face Newport Avenue. The entrance should be directed
to the southwest to maximize the spaces under utilized at this time as well as spaces
at the office complex. Staff met with representatives of Spoons and received revised
plans. However, the building was submitted with an orientation to Newport. Part of
staff's analysis of shared parking program was based on the assumption the building
would be oriented to the southwest.
Jeff Davis further emphasized items I to 6 outlined in the staff report be approved
as part of the plan with the addition of #7 to require the orientation of any
restaurant to be to the southwest in order for this amendment to the development plan
to work.
Planning Commission Min~.ds
February 23, 1987
page four
Commission Baker questioned if anything is being done to encourge people to walk
across 6th Street.
Jeff Davis responded I) staff's opinion is that given the hours of operation of the
center and the tenant mix the potential for utilization of any parking spaces in the
office complex for patrons is small. Employees of any of those users should park at
6th Street. 2) In order for this parking plan to work the orientation of the
building needs to be to the south.
Commissioner Pontious expressed her concern that parking problems are happening now
and wondered why they weren't addressed during the initial process.
Jeff Davis responded that it was under estimated what the need for the restaurant
seats would be. The magnitude of the seating for Souplantation was not anticipated.
Chairman Puckett opened the public hearing t 8:22 p.m.
Ktm Josephson, Carver, informed the Commission the lease agreements allow Carver to
ask employees to park in the back lot. He questtoned staff on how the standards are
being calculated and if there will be a preclusion of any future food uses in Tustin
Plaza.
Jeff Davis responded limitations are based on the shared parking plan. Future uses
would have to be considered on an individual basis.
Klm Josephson further informed the Commission that Spoons feels reorienting their
plans would disfigure their floor plan to a point it would become infeasible to
operate; not aesthetically desirable to orient the building toward the parking lot.
He agreed the shared parking plan would work at Tustin Plaza irrespective of which
way the restaurant is oriented.
Jeff Davis clarified that the issue was the orientation of any restaurant not of
Spoons. It is the concept of where the people will park.
Klm Josephson requested clarification of item 6 in the staff report.
Christine Shingleton explained OCTD has asked that major developers participate in
the car pool information program. It is a voluntary program. Staff is just
requesting that Carver provide OCTD with a list of tenants.
Klm Josephson emphasized that a lease is signed with Spoons so they are definitely
dealing with Spoons, not just any restaurant user.
Dorson Jackson, Spoons, explained it is important to face the street. The
orientation of the building has little affect on where the people will park. They
will park where places are available. Accessiblity and visibility are important to
Spoons. The window of activity is only available to 1/2 of the cars that travel on
Newport if the front door doesn't face the street. They hope to have astrong
pedestrian traffic from not only the parking lot but from the surrounding uses. The
driveway forms a barrier keeping people parking on the side staff has recommended.
The orientation of the building will complement the shared parking concept. They
plan to work with staff to review the s(tuation further. He further requested
clarification of condition #5 in the staff report.
Planning Commission
February 23, 1987
page five
Christine Shlngleton explained that only a monthly schedule would be required for the
first six months.
Seeing no one further wishing to speak, Chairman Puckett closed the hearing at 8:50
p.m.
Commissioner Well agreed with the orientation of the building toward the parking
area. She suggested that signage be provided indicating additional parking and a
pedestrian crosswalk on 6th Street.
Commissioner Baker questioned the need for the applicant to submit a detailed work
schedule and construed it as a possible hardship.
Christine Shingleton responded the condition doesn't require a schedule but only an
actual shift count for number of employees to assess the joint parking concept.
Pursuant to Commission discussion, Christine Shingleton reviewed the following
changes to the Resolution of approval:
I.C.5. "Subject property is currently zoned Planned Community Commercial, as such
development standards are established via an overall development plan. A
modification of said development plan is now justified for the following reasons: a)
31% of the proposed project is an office whose office use peak demand for parking is
considerably less than a conventional commercial development; b) the center is
without the traditional anchor tenant."
II.A. "Maximum floor area for restaurants and/or food related uses shall not exceed
existing tenant commitments and/or proposed tenant plans of Carver Development as of
February 23, 1987 including plans for a freestanding restaurant."
II.B. "Maximum office area shall be established by the Director of the Department of
Community Development consistent with ensuring adequate shared parking conditions
which accommodate peak parking demands."
II.£. "A monthly work schedule for the first six months of operation of any
restaurant user on the restaurant pad shall be submitted to the Community Development
Department indicating the number of personnel and shift times."
II.F. "The Carver Development shall participate and coordinate with Orange County
Transit District to encourage that all tenants in the Center and their employees are
encouraged to utilize car pools or alternative means of transportation to alleviate
parking demand."
II.G. "Drientation of the entrance of the proposed freestanding restaurant is to face
to the southwest. Restaurant's main access is to be provided from within the center
to encourage even utilization of parking spaces to justify the joint shared parking
condition, to provide continuities to the center's pedestrian orientation and to
reduce any liabilities which may result from vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle
conflicts within the public right-of-way along Newport Avenue."
Planning Commission Mi, .es
February 23j 1986
page six
Commissioner Well added two modifications:
II.H. "Carver Development will provide strategically placed signs reading 'Additional
Parking is Available' to encourage people to participate in the shared parking
concept subject to approval of the Director of Community Development pursuant to site
plan review process".
II.I. Staff is directed to coordinate with the City Engineer to determine the
feasibility of a pedestrian crosswalk painted across 6th Street. If such crosswalk
is feasible, then it shall be installed.
Commissioner Baker moved, Wetl seconded to approve Amendment No. 1 to Use Permit 85-9
by the adoption of Resolution 2392 with amendments as specified. Motion carried 4-0.
OLD BUSZNESS
None.
NEW BUSINESS
None.
STAFF CONCERNS
REPORT ON COUNCIL ACTIONS FEBRUARY 17, 1987
Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development
COMMISSION CONCERNS
Commissioner Well requested the Commission be supplied a copy of the annexation
brochure.
Commissioner Baker questioned if any effort is being made to realign the intersection
at Old Irvine and 1trine Blvd. Jeff Davis responded a series of studies have been
done by the Public Works Department, the results should be forthcoming.
Commissioner Puckett thanked city staff for repairing the broken sidtng at Magnolia
Park.
ADOOURI~IENT
Commissioner Well moved, Baker seconded to adjourn to the next regularly scheduled
Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 4-0.
CHARLES E. PUCKETT,
Chairman
DONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
Planning Commission
DATE: HARCll 9, 1987
S~JE~:
FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 12719
APPLICART:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENVIRONHENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
BREN CONPANY
ONE CIVIC PLAZA, SUITE 100
NEffPORT BEACH, CA 92660
RONDA HEACOCK, PROJECT PIANAGER
PROPERTIES BOUNDED BY BROWNING AVENUE, EL CANINO REAL, BRYAN
AVENUE AND PARKCERTER DRIVE ARE SHOWN ON APPROVED TRACT NO. 12345
(FAST TUSTIN RESIDENTIAL PHASE I, AREA 1)
PLANNED COMIqUNITY RESIDENTIAL
ENYIRONHENTAL INPACT REPORT 84-3 .HAS APPROVED IN COHPLIANCE WITH
THE CALIFORNIA ENYIRONHENTAL QUALITY ACT AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 938.
AUTHORIZATION TO SUBDIVIDE THE SUBJECT AREA PROVIDING FOR THE
DEYELOPI4ENT OF 127 SINGLE FANILY DETACHED HOUSING UNITS, COI4NON
RECREATION AREA, AND PRIVATE STREETS
RECOI~ENDATION:
That the Commission recommend to the City Council approval of Final Tract Map
12719 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2397.
BACKGROUND:
Final Tract Map No. 12345 was approved by the City Council on May 5, 1986 by
adoption of resolution No. 86-55. This map subdivided the area westerly of the
auto center known as Phase I Residential.
The Bren Co. is now requesting the *ftnal authorization to subdivide area 1
within Phase I Residential into 127 individual single family lots, common
recreation and landscaped areas and private streets.
On July 28, 1986 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the subject
Tentative Tract map by the adoption of Resolution No. 2348. On August 4, 1986
the City Council approved the subject Tentative Tract Map by the adoption of
Resolution No. 86-95.
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
Final Tract 12719
page two
As permitted by the Subdivision Map Act, developers may submit multiple final
maps providing each such map is in compliance with the approved tentative. A
final map, 12868, was submitted for a portion of the project (75 lots) approved
by Tentative Tract Map 12719. The City Council, at its meeting of November 3,
1986 approved Final Tract Map 12868.
It should be noted that sixteen (16) lots out of the originally approved 218 are
not 'being developed at this time. The area has been reserved to accommodate
flood control devices and proposed extension of the Browning Corridor. Those
lots should not have been part of originally approved tentative tract map. At
such time development is authorized, this area will require a new tentative
tract and final map.
The proposed final map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan and
the Planning Community District Regulations adopted July 1, 1985 (Ordinance No.
938). The final map is in substantial compliance with the tentative map and all
conditions of approval have been met.
Planner
PM:do
attach
Reso 2397
Tentative Map
Ft'nal Map
CHRISTINE' SHINGLETON~,
Director of Communt~cy
Development
Corn munit¥ Dev~loprnont Dopar~rnent
'~0 VNNOQ
uetuate43
'££3~3Rd '3 S39~¥H~
'ZS6Z ' ~o Xep eq3 uo PLeq
uo~ss~mmo3 5utuueLd u~3sn£ eq3 ~o 5ut3eem aeLn§ea e 3e ~3£dO~V ~NV ~3SSVd
'aeeu~u3 ~3~3 eq3 ~o
L~^o~dde LEU[& eq~ 03 33e~qns 6[ZZ! 'ON deH %3eaL [eutj ~o [eAoadde
[~3uno3 X3~3 eq3 o3 spuemmo3ea Xq~eq uo~ss~mmo3 §u[UUeLd eqZ
'II
· detu eA~3e3ue3
eq~ q3t~ eou~LdUJo3 Le[:~ue3sqns u.~ st detu LeU~ eq3 3eql '0
'I eseqd u~3snl ~se3 ao~ suo~3eLnSea ~unaao3
pauuetd aq3 pue sSu~L[at~p ~[tae~ etfu~s ~o 3ueadoLeAep eq3
o3 SUt~3dad 3~ se aPO3 §u~uoz u~snI eq3 pu~ u~£d [~deue9
u~3snl eq3 q3~ a3uemdo~uo3 u~ s~ uo~s~p pesodoad eq3
'3
~tsno~^e~d se~ (~-~S aI3) 3dodea 33edm! te3uemuod~Au3 ue 3eql
*B
e~e~tad pue seeJe uo~eeaoea uotauoo 's~un §u~snoq peqoe~ep
eede aq~ ap~^~pqns o~ Xuedmo3 eu[^a! eq£ ~o ~[eqaq uo uotsstmtuo3
5u~uue£d eq~ o~ pe~tmqns se~ 6[Zg[ 'ON de~
*¥
:S~OL[O~ se seu~mae~ep pue spu~ uotss~mmo3 6u~uueLd eql -!
:SaOL[O~
se e^Losed Xqedeq seop ut~sn£ ~o X3t3 eq~ ~o uo~sstmmo3 6utuuetd eql
6IZZ! 'ON dVH IDYal 9VNI3 ~0 9VAOaddV
913N~03 A/ID NI£S~/ 3H1 01 9NION3NNO33a NI£S~I ~0
AlI3 3H£ JO NOIS$INNO3 9NINNVgd 3HI JO NOI£RgOS3B
Z6£~ 'ON NOIIflgos3B
9~
O~
6[
£[
9[
g[
~[
[[
O[
6
9
f,
[
,,.,~ ~- TRACT NO, 12719
DATE OF ~UIqVEY, IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANG~, ~TAT~. OF CALIFORNIA.
,,.,,, ~- Ti .ACT NO 12719
FINAL Pt'~E OF TENTATIVE ·
~INAL PHA~[ OF 'I~ITAT~V~[
TIqACT NO, 127! 9
IN THE CITY OF ~llll, COI.~ITY OIe ORANI~, ~TATE OF CALIFORNIA.
'~EET 4 OF ? SHEETg
]Z"/' LOTS ANO L.DT8 'A' THRU 'E'
FINAL PHASE OF TEhTAT~VE
TRACT NO. 1271D
DATE OF SURVEY;
T~^CT NO, ! 2719
IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF OEANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
~'~T 5 OF ? SleET8
I
17-'7 LOT~ ANO LOT~ 'A' THRU
TRACT NO,, 12719
IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN. COUNTY OF ORANGE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
MM,
/
~ FIN~ ~ ~ ~ATIVE ~
DA~ ~ ~VEY, IN THE CZTY OF TUST[N, COUNTY OF ORATE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
/
Planning Commission
DATE: MARCH 9, 1987
SUBJECT:
USE PERMIT 87-5
APPLICANT:
MR. GEORGE HILLYARD ON BEHALF OF
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 290
DALLAS, TEXAS 75080
PROPERTY
OIINER:
.OCATION:
ZORRO INVESTMENT CORPORATION
C/O MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 290
DALLAS, TEXAS 75080
172411R¥INE BOULEVARD
ZONING:.
PC-COMM - PLANNED COIttUNITY COBt4ERCIAL
ENVIRORMENTAL
STATUS: CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS I)
REQUEST: TO CONVERT AN EXISTING 167 SQUARE FOOT SALES AREA TO A
MINI-MARKET
RECOI~qENDATION:
It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve Use Permit 87-5 by the
adoption of Resolution No. 2393.
BACKGROUND AND SUP~ARY:
On December 9, 1985 Tustin Planning Commission approved Use Permit 85-28. This
Use Permit authorized installation of a mini-market in an existing sales area.
The sales area was not converted to a mini-market.
According to Section 9293 (b) of the Tustin Municipal Code all Use Permits shall
be null and void if not implemented within one {1) year from the date of
%pproval. At this time, the applicant is reapplying for approval of the same
mini-market which was considered by the .Commission in 1985. Seeing that no
changes have been made to the previous request, staff recommends the approval of
Use Permit 87-5.
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
Use Permit 87-5
page two
ANALYSIS:
Staff has reviewed the application and has identified certain issues of
concern. These include signs, sales of alcoholic beverages and site design.
Signs: As a condition of approval staff is recommendi, ng that the
applicant be required to submit a separate master sign plan which shall
conform to the Tustin Municipal Code.
Alcoholic Beverages: The applicant has not requested authorization to
sell alcoholic beverages at this time. However, should the proprietor
choose to sell alcoholic beverages in the future, a separate Use Permit
will be required.
Site Design: The applicant has met all parking, landscape and 'setback
requirements of the Tusttn Municipal Code. No exterior alterations are
being made and all structural changes are being made within the building.
- Since this request meets all requirements of the Tustin Municipal Code, staff
recommends approval of Use Permit 87-5 by adoption of Resolution 2393.
Planning Intern
CHRISTINE SHINGILETON.-'?
' Director of Communit~y/
Development
CP:do
Community Development Dcpanmcnl
1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2393
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO INSTALL A
167 SQUARE FOOT MINI-MARKET AT 17241 IRVINE BOULEVARD
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
AJ
That a proper application (Use Permit 87-5) has been filed by
Mr. George Hillyard on behalf of Mobil Oil Corporation to
authorize the installation of a mini-market in an existing 167
square foot sales area at 17241 Irvine Boulevard, in conjunction
with a retail gasoline and automotive service station.
Be
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
Ce
That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
The use is in conformance with the Tustin Area General
Plan.
The project is located in the PC:
Commercial zone.
Planned Community
II.
The use applied for is an allowed use in the PC: Planned
Commuity Commercial zone.
D8
That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin as evidenced by
compliance with the City's Zoning and Development standards.
E. Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
F. That the project is categorically exempt from the requirements
of the. California Environmental Quality Act as specified in
Section 15303c.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Use Permit 87-5 to authorize
the installation of a 167 square foot mini-market within the existing
sales area at 17241 Irvine Boulevard as applied for, subject to the
following conditions:
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26i
27'
28
Resolution No. 2393
page two
Ae
Development plans shall conform to the approved plans as herein
modified date stamped March 9, 1987. Any changes in these plans
shall require approval of the Community Development Director.
Final development plans shall require the review and approval of
the Community Development Department.
The provisions of the Use Permit do not include authorization
for the sale of alcoholic beverages.
Prior to conversion to the mini-market, a sign plan shall be
submitted and approved by the Community Development Department.
Approval of Use Permit 87-5 is contingent upon the applicant
signing and returning an "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form
as established by the Director of Communit~ Development.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a 'regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the
City of Tustin, California held on the day of ,
1987.
CHARLES E. PUCKETT,
Chairman
DONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
Planning Commission
DATE: HARCH 9, 1987
SUB,]ECT: ZONING ORDINANCE AFIENDMENT NO. 87-1: CONDITIONS OF APROVAL FOR
ALCOIIOLI[C BEVERAGE SALES ESTABLTSHFIENTS
RECOI,~ENDATZO#:
It is recommended that the Planning Commission instruct staff to schedule a
public hearing for Zoning Code Amendment No. 87-1.
SII, IPIARY:
On January 26, 1987 the City Council directed staff to prepare proper code
amendments, resolutions and ordinances to codify and adopt regulations for
alcoholic beverage sales establishments. This report includes background and
analysis of the proposed Zoning Code Amendment. Staff is forwarding this
information at this time for comments and is requesting authorization to
schedule the matter for a future public hearing.
BACKGROUND:
On September 29, 1986 the City Council and Planning Commission conducted a joint
session. This session included a presentation by Parents Who Care regarding
regulation of alcoholic beverage sales establishments. Parents Who Care had
requested Tustin to consider placing more stringent regulations and review
procedures on alcoholic beverage establishments. They were concerned that the
current Use Permit process was not effective in proper regulation of location
hours of operation, and the character of the sales establishments.
As a result of this session, the Planning Commission and City Council directed
Community Development staff to prepare recommendations. Appropriately, the
Community Development Department has conducted a detailed analysis of state and
local regulations, surveyed local jurisdictions on their current requirements,
and collected numerous studies and reports regarding alcoholic beverage
control. Based on this information recommendations have been tailored to meet
the needs within the City of Tusttn.
· Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
Zoning Ordinance Amendment 87-1
page 'c~o
ANAL¥S~S OF CURRENT CO#D~T[O#S:
Number of existing alcoholic_beverage sales establishments
The City of Tusttn contains 117 alcoholic beverage sales establishments.*
These establishments can generally be grouped into two (2) categories.
Totals:
On-site Consumption
47 (beer and wine)
22 (~eneral liquor)
69
Off-site Consumption
24 (beer and wine)
24 (general liquor)
48
Of the off-site licenses, only five (5) licenses are in conjunction with
gasoline sale's with locations as shown on Exhibit A. Exhibits B and C
show the locations of all on-site and off-site alcoholic beverage sales
establishments wi thin the City. As evidenced by theseexhibits, the
concentration of sales establishments is found along Newport Avenue.
Exhibit D is an analysis of alcoholic beverage licenses. This chart shows
the total number of licenses for the County of Orange, Tustin, 'Santa Aha,
Orange and Irvine. Although the licenses per 1000 population rates seem
higher for Tusttn (i.e. off-site general, on-site general-public place and
overall ratio of licenses per 1000 population) the population used to
determine these figures does not include Tustin's sphere of influence. If
this area was included, population ratios fo~ Tustin would be reduced by
60%.
e
Current C.it¥ Regulations
Tustin currently requires a CUP for all new alcoholic beverage sales
establishments. Standard conditions of approval are as follows:
On-site sales in conjunction with a restaurant use
° All alcoholic beverages shall be consumed on site.
° Authorization for on-site sales of beer and wine/liquor sales is
*contingent upon the use of the subject site remaining a restaurant. At
such time the restaurant use is discontinued the use permit becomes null
and void.
° All persons serving alcoholic beverages must be eighteen years of age or
older and supervised by someone twenty-one years of age or older.
° Hours of operation are limited to the hours of ~a.m. to
p.m. (hours are identified'depending on~ the type of operation-~[- Food
must be served during these hours.
° The menu of the restaurant shall consist of foods that are prepared on
'the premises.
° Options:
- No outdoor seating is allowed at this location.
- No 'bar' type seating is allowed.
Corn rnunl~ Development Depar~rncn~
Planning Commission Report
Zoning Ordinance Amendment 87-1
page three
,3.
Off-site sales license (beer and wine/liquor)
Authorization for off-site sales of beer and wine/liquor is contingent
upon the use at the ~ubject site remaining as
· (specific use is identified here) Should this use change or be
~ontinued, authorizations for this use permit is null and void.
All persons selling alcoholic beverages shall be eighteen years of age
or older and shall be supervised by someone twenty-one years of age or
older at all times.
Hours of operation are limited to the hours of to __ (hours
are identified depending on the type of operation .-T[~
Options:
- "No Loitering" signs shall be posted at the entrance of the business
or other specified location(s).
- No video games are allowed at this location·
The'above conditions are enforceable by the City. Should any violation of
these conditions occur, the City of Tustin retains the right to hold a
public hearing to consider revocation of an approved CUP..
~nalysis of regulatory activities in California:
Many cities in the Southern California area have passed ordinances
regulating the location and number of alcoholic sales outlets. One of the
cities that appears in the forefront of regulation is the City of Compton
which has established a 'cap' on the total number of licenses for liquor
stores and 'barsl.
Staff have also conducted a survey of 23 Orange County cities. The survey
found that most cities are concerned with on-site sales of liquor, beer or
wine. Seven {7) of the 23 cities surveyed, did not require CUPs merely
relying on ABC regulations and enforcement. The results of the survey are
as follows:
CUP REQUIRED
ON-SITE ONLY
ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS
Yes 16 7 3
No 7 16 20
Tustin is in relative conformance with nine (9) of the cities surveyed·
These cities require a CUP for both on-site and off-site sales. In these
cities, however, no other required conditions are part of each city's
zoning code. Tustin, as with most other cities, uses land use criteria and
distance analysis as a matter of City policy rather than an actual adopted
code requirements.
The remaining seven (7) cities require a CUP for On-site sales only. These
cities are concerned with drinking and driving aspects as opposed to sales
to.minors. Most cities rely on ABC to enforce the license requirements and
all state regulations.
Comrnunt~y Developmen: Depar~rnen~
Planning Commission Report
Zoning Ordinance Amendment 87-1
page four
'5.
The League of California Cities is currentl~ pursuing amendments to the
California Business and Professions Code. These amendments include
provisions for California cities to regulate alcoholic beverage sales in
conjunction with gasoline sales. At this time, no specific legislation
has been passed on this issue. However, there are a number of legal cases
that are currently pending on this matter.
Input from Parents Who Care
Numerous recommendations have been proposed to staff by Parents Who Care.
These are attached to and included to this report as Exhibit E. Staff
have met with representatives of Parents Who Care and have reviewed each
of their recommendations. We have concluded based on background
information, survey materials and recommendations of Parents Who Care,
that a number of additional zoning code amendments and policy guidelines
for alcoholic beverage sales establishments would be appropriate.
Unfortunately,'not all of the recommendations made by Parents Who Care are
appropriate and the legality of a number of their recommendations is in
question. Staff however feels confident that the direction recommended
will be enthusiastically supported by Parents Who Care.
Recommendations
Recommendations are listed below. Proposed zoning code amendments and
recommendations to be addressed by adoption of a resolution establishing
guidelines are included.
Proposed Zoning Code Amendments
Off-site alcoholic beverage sales shall be permitted subject to a CUP
provided that the establishment is located a minimum distance from
the following facilities:I
1. a minimum of 600 feet from the public schools, play grounds,
parks, churches and other 'sensitive' uses (i.e. hospitals,
convalescent homes and private schools);
2. a minimum of 100 feet from residentially zoned or used properties;
3. a minimum of 300 feet from another off-site alcoholic beverage
sales establishment.
Convenience markets shall only be permitted subject to a CUP in the
C-1, C-2 and C-G zones. The Code should be amended to define such
uses. (A retail store of 15~000 or less square feet in size which
sells food items, beverages, and miscellaneous products for use
and/or consumption off the premises where sold.)
i Cornrnun~y l~loprncni Department
Planning Commission Report
Zoning Ordinance Amendment 87-1
page five
Policy Guidelines for Review of Alcoholic Beverage
Sales Establishments
In addition to the conditions currently required on alcoholic beverage
sales through the CUP process the following guidelines should also be
utilized in reviewing and conditioning these establishments:
A. Guidelines for proliferation of alcoholic beverage sales
establishments:
per 2000 persons - on-site general liquor sales
per 2500 persons - off-site general liquor sales
These population quotas shall be based upon current city population,
projected population for the East Tusttn area, and projected
population totals in portions of the City's sphere of influence for
which the City is currently processing an annexation request.
Determine the hours of operation as appropriate for the use proposed
and its relation to:
Ce
1. Residential areas
.2. Arcades
3. Other similar uses
4. Relation to live entertainment locations.
Determine maximum floor area devoted to alcoholic beverage sales as
necessary for proposed use.
D. Require. all signage to be limited to non-alcoholic beverage items.
E. All off-site sales locations should post 'no ]oitering' signs'at the
entrance.
F. Avoid placement of video games at off-site sales establishments.
All recommendations will require preparation of the necessary ordinances and
'resolutions as approved by' the City Attorney. As proposed, these regulations do
not specifically discriminate against alcoholic beverage sales as long as all
other similar uses are conditionally permitted uses. The hours of operation for
any alcoholic beverage sales establishment may not be differentiated between
alcoholic and non-alcoholic products. Therefore, staff considers individual
review of each application more apprdpriate rather than establishing a 'curfew'
for all sales.
a ASSistant PI~
LP:do
ttach: Exhibits A, B, C, D
community DeVelopment Depa~rnent
~H~ISTINE SH [ NGLETOt~,
Director of Community Development
EXHIBIT A
L
GASOLINE AND ALCOHOL SALES SITES
Superstop-395 W. First Street 3. Station Liquor Store-l. 6471 Mc Fadden Ave.
Skip's Mobil Station-171 E. First S'treet 4. Southern Counties Oil-lOll E1 Camino Real
5. AM PM Mini Market-14231 Red Hill Ave.
h
TU~TII~
OFF-SITE LIQUOR SALES
O--Single Site
&--Multiple Site
EXHIBIT C
TUSTtN
ON-SITE'LIQUOR SALES
· --Single Site
A--Multiple Site
EXHIBIT B
0
nc:
~el .,inary Draft
Alcoholic Beverage Outlet Guidelines
General
1. CUP required for all new alcoholic beverage outlets (abo's).
2. CUP required for change of ownership, change in type of op-
eration/kind of business; or, if a business is discontinued
for a period of two months or more, CUP required--ali abo's.
3. No abo's will be permitted in higher crime areas, as deter-
mined and defined by the Tustin Police Department (TPD).
4. No abo will be permitted in any location that will detract
from residential areas.
5. No abo will be permitted to'operate if such operations create
disturbances in or around the premises.
6. No abo may sell alcoholic beverages to a minor (State law).*
7. Persons making sales of alcoholic beverages (ab) must be at
least 21 years old or be under adult supervision of a person
located on the premises in the area where sales are made.
8. Off-sale abo's should agree to maintain a special alert for
customers who make frequent purchases over an unusually short
period of time and to report such purchases to the TPD to
help prevent procurement for minors.**
9. Alcohol may not be sold in any abo after 10 pm, except for: 1)
Type 42 and 48 bars already in existence and which close
later under State law; 2)restaurants may continue to serve
ab's in their dining area until midnight, but not in any
separate bar operation; and 3)places of lodging which have
"duplicate" licenses to operate a bar may do so until midnight.
10. Distances
a. Sensitive Areas--No abo(on or off-sale) may be located
closer than 600 feet from a school, playground, place of
worship or other "sensitive" use (as may be defined by
the Planning Commission or City Council).
b. Separation of Outlets--No overconcentration of abo's will
be permitted, and all must be separated by at least 600 ft.
However, if a commercial development has special design
features which make it desireable to be closer, and the
Planning Department determines it reasonable and prudent,
separation may be reduced (e.g. a restaurant cluster).
*6b. Signs must be posted clearing explaining no sales to minors.
**8a. Must have signs warning about buying ab's for others.
8b. Must have signs warning about no loitering.
8c, Cold beverages must be locked after 10 pm. to prevent"beer runs."
11. Ail on-sale abo's must have a bona fide "designated driver"
type program in operation,~a~ties of 2 or more persons to
designate one person as the driver and a person who will not
be served ab's. These abo's should arrange with the TPD for
periodic educational program for ab servers, and the outlets
should have available for sale, breath analyzers to help pre-
vent over-consumption and driving under the influence.
12. The fee associated with CUP's for abo's should cover the
additional costs relative to processin~ this type of permit
and to cover other City costs for ensuring conformance to
the conditions of the CUP, both initial and subsequent.
a. Part of this fee could be in the form of a substantial
deposit of $1,000-$5,000, which could be refunded after
one year of conforming operation, less any exceptional
costs to the City in obtaining conformance.*
b. Part of the fee could be directed to the TPD for its
educational program for enforcing servers' awareness
of 6onsu~ption amounts, signs of intoxication, etc.
13. Abo's muse operate so as not to be unusually detrimental to
the public health, safety, welfare and tranquility.
14. No category of abo may have a higher ratio of outlets to the
City population than the ratios for the County as a whole.
*Consideration should be given to charging for Police Department
service calls fn connection with "disturbing the peace" reports
where alcoholic beverages are involved.
PWC/JFM 1/19/87
-3-
Prel{minary Draft
Alcoholic Beverage Outlet Guidelines
Specific Types of Business
1. Bars--No ~UP will be granted for either type 42 or type 48
bars (no food, no one under 21). These are not consistent
with community standards for land use. (health, safety, welfare)
2. Liquor Stores--No CUP will be issued for liquor stores. These
are not consistent with community standards for land use.
a. Existing liquor stores--Should be allowed to sell only ab's
and non-drug related items. ~o not allow sales of drug
paraphernalia, drug magazines, clove cigarettes, etc.
3. Motor Vehicle Fuel--No CUP will be granted for any establish-
ment which sells motor vehicle fuel.
a. Existing locations--Should not be allowed to advertise
ab's outside or in the windows of the establishment; not
allowed to sell cold beer; not allowed to sell single
serving size containers of ab's, i.e. 12-14 oz. or less.
4. Drive-thru's--No CUP will be granted for drive-thru businesses.
5. Convenience Stores--Ab's must be a minor part of the business,
as determined by'fi~or space, such that ab's may not occupy
more than 1/25th*of total sales floor space. Print advertising
must limit promotion of ab's to 1/25th of total space. No
advertising permitted outside the building or in windows of
the establishment itself; may not sell cold beer; and may
not sell single serving size containers of ab's.
6. Grocery/Supermarkets--Ab's must be a minor part of the busi-
ness as determined by floor space, such that ab's may not
occupy more than 1/25th of total sales floor space. Print
advertising must limit promotion of ab's to 1/25th of total
space. No window advertising or outside displays of ab's.
No sales of cold beer. Ab's must be located in that 1/2 of
the store that is located away from customer entrances and
exits.
7. Drug Stores--Same requirements as for Supermarkets above.
*Note: Wherever 1/25th appears this could be changed to 5%.
-4-
8. Restaurants*-No separate bar area preferably. If such an
area were to be granted, it should be no more ~han 1/10th
of total customer floor space and must cease operation by
10~00 pm. As pointed out in the General sections, restaur-
ants may, however, continue to serve ab's in their normal
dining area until midnight.
9. Lodging--Establishments of this type which plan to operate
a restaurant(s) as an integral part of its lodging building
and serve ab's, come under the conditions given above for
restaurants. Consideration may be given to permitting the
operation of one bar/cocktail lounge on premises, with a
closing time of midnight.
8a.Restaurant bar areas are not to be tg%ally closed off and
separate from the dining area, nor should they be on a sepa-
rate level. (Applications for any such separate areas would
be considered as type 48 bars and not as part of the restaurant.)
8b. If the dining area closes or stops serving food, then any bar
area should also close.
PWC/JFM 1/19/97
Planning Commission
DATE: MARCH 9, 1987
SUBJECT: TUSTTN HEIGHTS SHOPPTNG CENTER/DRIYEYAY OPPOSZT£ OLD IRYINE BLVD.
DISCUSSION:
At the last Commission meettng, Commissioner Baker requested a status report on
the driveway condition and Intersection re-alignment at the Tusttn Heights
Shopptng Center. Thts center ts located on Irvtne Blvd. between Nowport Ave.
and Redhtll with 1ts n~ln entrance across from the Old Irvtne/Irvtne Blvd.
intersection.
There has been a project proposed for this area which would alter the drive
entrance to be in line with Old Irvtne, to relocate traffic signal standards,
and to reconfigure the drive approach eliminating the severe angle of the drive
apron. An agreement between the property owner and the city has been reached
whereby the city will be funding public improvement costs and the owner will be
responsible for on-site renovation.- The project is scheduled to commence
sometime in February but all final details have yet to be completed.
At this time the property owner has been requested to submit a work schedule and
the city is awa!ting response. Upon establishment of f4rm time tables the
Commission will be updated on project status.
JD:do
CHRISTINE SHINGLET ,
Director of Community
Devel opment
~-,, Community Development Department
Report to the
Planning Commission
I)ATE: lqNICH 9, 1987
SUBOECT: LANDSCAPE DEVELOPIqENT ~rANDARDS
ITEM 6
RECOI~E#DAT[ON:
It is recommended that the Planntng Commission recetve, comment and ftle.
BACKGROUND:
In order to minimize confusion tn communicating design review requirements for
landscaping and irrigation with applicants and to ensure installation of high
quality landscaping within the City, Community Development Department staff have
developed a document entitled !'Landscaping and Irrigation Submittal
Requirements".
The draft document includes:
minimum planting/irrigation standards
submittal requirements
- a suggested list of plant materials
Staff is also currently preparing typical site examples or details displaying
the standards contained in the draft' document. These details will be attached
to any final version of the document.
Please review the attached document and provide any comments. Thank you.
CHR I STT~E~ ~jh [ NGLI~TO N,//
Director of Community' Development
PM:do
COmmunity Development Department
LANDSCAPZNG AND ZRRTGATTON
SOI)Mill'Al. REQUIREMENTS
CITY OF TUSTIN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
FEBRUARY 1987
CI'Ff OF 'PJSTIN
DEPART)lENT OF CO~INU#ITY DEVELOPNE#T
LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS
LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
GENERAL
Landscaping generally* refers to planted areas on the property and within the
public right-of-way and includes trees, shrubs, ground covers, decorative
paving, water features, walls, lighting, street furniture, berming, and
irrigation systems. Existing, mature landscaping should be preserved and
Incorporated into the ultimate design.
Landscaping should be designed as an integral part of the complete site.
Select the type, quantity, and placement of plant material for structure
color, texture, and ultimate growth pattern. Keep in mind that all materials
should be a compatible part of the stte design to enhance the site and
architecture. The following design review objectives shall be taken into
consideration in preparing landscape and irrigation plans:
¸3.
Buffer and screen service, loading, mechanical equipment and parking
areas from public right-of-way and adjacent properties.
Promote proper vehicular and pedestrian circulation, paving and lighting,
creating a safe and pleasant environment.
Consider local topographic and climate restrictions and proper
irrigation, drainage and maintenance.
Complement and highlight the architectural design elements of the
structures on the site, such as architectural style, color scheme and
textures, etc.
Establish compatibility with the character of adjacent landscaping,
provided that the quality of such landscaping meets the above standards.
Create an aesthetically pleasing development utilizing a combination of
trees, shrubs, vines, annual color, ground cover and turf.
A blend of integration of materials should be achieved throughout the
landscape design eventhough.each part serves a different function.
The use of drought tolerant materials, including California native plants
is encouraged.
Annual color should be incorporated into projects on highly visible and
common areas. Color should not be limited to annuals. Careful selection
of flowering trees and shrubs to provide seasonal color all year. The
use of evergreen and deciduous plant material, bark color, seeds and
fruit that persist, can provide additional color to landscaping.
page t~o
it,. MINIMUM STANDARDS
1. Plant Hat. rials
Turf is unacceptable for grades over 25%. A combination of
materials shall be used. Ground cover alone is not acceptable.
Select material for Agricultural suitability i.e., soils, water and
sun conditions·
Provide a minimum of one 24" box tree per 30 lineal feet of street
frontage. (Need not be spaced @ 30' o.c.) and 6 - 5 gallon shrubs
per 25 lineal feet of street frontages or a combination of 3 - 5
gallon and l0 - 1 gallon shrubs.
Ce
Provide one 15 gallon size tree for every 30 lineal feet of property
line on the property perimeter and 5 - 5 gallon shrubs. Any
perimeter parking lot trees shall be planted in planter of
sufficient width to provide 2 1/2 ft. min. clearance for vehicle
overhand.
de
Provide one 15 gallon tree for each 5 parking stalls within the
Parking lot and 5 - 5 gallon shrubs per 25 lineal feet of parking
lot area.
e. In single family development, provide one 24" box tree per lot.
fJ
In multiple fami. ly developments, provide one 24" box for each
units.
In addition to the required street trees, provide one tree per 250
S.F. of landscaped area. 30% of all trees shall be 24" box trees
or larger.
Provide landscaping adjacent to structures on site including one 15
gallon tree for every lineal foot of exterior wall. (Need not be
spaced ~ 30' o.co)
Required landscaped yard or setback areas shall not be construed as
satisfying any portion of the landscaped area.
At least 5% of any parking lot area and any additional portion not
actually used for movement and parking of vehicles shall be
landscaped with trees, shrubs and groundcover.
k. All newly planted trees shall be staked according to City
standards.
1. Shrubs .shall be a minimum 5 gallon size and shall be spaced a
minimum of 5' o.c. when intended as a screen planting.
page three
m. Ground covers shall be planted between 8 to 12 inches on center.
n. When 1 gallon plant sizes are used, the spacing may vary according
to the materials used.
Oa
qa
re
Wa
Along fences or walls, including refuse storage and equipment areas,
provide landscape screening with shrubs, and/or vines and trees.
Buffer parking areas with a 30" minimum height buffer {30" maximum
at driveway access points to preclude restriction of visibility).
This buffer may be achieved with a shrub screen, a berm, or a
combination of these two elements.
Provide turf or ground cover in private parkways and in perimeter
landscaping.
All plant materials shall be installed in a healthy, vigorous
condition typical to the species.
Landscaping shall be enclosed by minimum six inch high concrete
curbs.
Maintain landscaping in a neat and healthy condition. This will
include but not be limited to: trimming, mowing, weeding, removal
of litter, fertilizing, regular watering, and replacement of
diseased or dead plants.
Select and locate plant materials to promote water and energy
conservation.
Restrict trees on south facing slopes to types that will be no
taller than buildings at maturity.
All landscape areas shall be adequately maintained.
Any unused space resulting from design of a parking area shall be
landscaped.
2. Irrigation
All.landscaped areas shall be provided with a permanent and adequate
means of irrigation which is adequately maintained.
be
Backflow preventions shall be provided including screening for
backflow prevention units.
c. Enclose controller in lockable housing.
d. Design system to provide sufficient coverage avoiding water
overspray on buildings and sidewalks.
page four
II.- LANDSCAPE AMD IRRIGATION SUBMITTAL REOUlRF. IqENTS
A.
I#ITIAL SUBMIITAL REQUIREMENTS
The applicant shall submit to the
Department the following items:
1.
2.
3.
7. Provide an itemized construction cost estimate.
City of Tustin, Community Development
Three sets of landscape plans.
Irrigation design calculations (worst case only at each p.o.c.)
One copy of agronomic soils report and recommended specification. (One
test sample per 4 acres)
One set irrigation plans approved and signed by IRWD (Irvine Ranch Water
District) if IRWD is to be water source.
Grading plans if landscape grades are not included as a portion of the
landscape plans.
Identification of landscape amenities.
B. GENERAL REQUIRE]qEMTS,
'2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
All materials to be submitted in final form.
submittals will be accepted. Plans must be
landscape architect.
No partial or incomplete
signed by a registered
Plan scale shall be not less than 1'-30'-0".
North arrow and scale shall be shown on each sheet.
Match lines clearly shown and labeled on each sheet.
Street names clearly called out on each sheet.
Note any existing easements including restrictions.
Clearly denote right of way lines and indicate areas of city maintenance
or to be maintained by others.
8. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed and, maintained in
accordance with the approved landscaping plan.
Revisions made on plans after city approval shall be submitted to city
for subsequent approval and noted on title sheets prior to
implementation.
10. Plan should show the calculated percentage of on-site landscaping'.
page five
C. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. Title Sheet
ae
Vicinity map showing street names, match lines, north arrow, tract
boundart es.
b. Index of sheets.
c. Title block with project title, address and tract number.
d. Owner/developer and project manager's name, address and phone
number.
e. Landscape architect's firm name, address, phone number, date
prepared, and signature and professional seal.
f. General notes shall be affixed to plans, as applicable, including
but not limited to:
(1)
Grading standards:
sidewalk max 8.3%
turf max 4:1
ground cover max 2:1
(2)
Owner shall provide a two-year tree bond as a warranty for
trees planted within the right of way and city maintained
areas.
(3) No trees shall be planted within sewer and water easements.
(4)
All trees shall be planted a minimum of 5' from right of way
line.
(s)
Contractor shall notify the City of Tusttn Community
Development Department 48 hours (two working days) prior to
required inspections at (714) 544-8890 ext. 250.
Required inspections include:
- prior to pre construction meeting
- prior to backfilling the irrigation system
- landscape grading final prior to planting
- pre-maintenance to be attended by owner's representative,
landscape sub contractor and city representative
- final inspection
(6)
The developer shall provide full landscape maintenance of all
landscape areas for a minimum of 90 days after initial city
acceptance of project.
plan six
(7)
SpecifY pre-emergent weed controls to be applied by a State
Licensed Operator.
Planting
ae
de
ee
Show location of exiSting plant material to remain.
Indicated type, size and count of all proposed plant materials.
Provide a plant legend on each sheet if ~ymbols are used. The plant
legend shall specify the type and spacing of ground cover, including
turf and hydroseed mix, if applicable.
note: plant legend shall include identifying symbol, botanical and
common name, qualities, quantities, sizes, and special remarks.
Provide planting details; specify soil mixture, fertilizer and other
special material requirements.
Indicate 6" curb where required.
The footprint of buildings, walls/fences shall be shown where
immediately adjacent to landscape areas.
Location of electrtcal,'iplumbing or other mechanical equipment and
how it will be screened.
Irrf g&tt on
(a) Point of
Including:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(b)
(c)
connection information for each irrigation system
Source (portable or reclaimed) water meter location and size.
Available water pressure.
Peak flow meter (GPM)
Detail backflow unit (See detail E)
Finished grade at backflow preventer and highest head served
(portable water only)
Standard notes and information as required by IRWD for systems using
reclaimed water. Plans must be reviewed and signed by IRWD.
Provide legend showing all pertinent data (specifications) for
materials used in system design, i.e.
controller
valves
backflow
PVC
hose bibbs and/or quick couplers
sprinkler heads (p.s.i., G.P.M., radius, manufacturer, model number)
page seven
(d) The footprint of bu~ldtng and walls shall be shown where adjacent to
irrigated areas.
Grading
(a) Provide grades of the following:
{1) Finished floor on buildings.
(2) Top of curbs/top of slopes/top of retaining walls
{3) Catch basin and flow lines.
(b) Show contours
(c) Show drainage devices where applicable.
(d) Show typical sections as necessary to depict final grade in extreme
situations, i.e. transitions between slope and flat, planting
details on slope, retaining walls.
Bardscape Amenities
This section includes paving, walls, fencing, water features, lighting,
and street furniture.
1. Pedestrian circulation, access and paving shall be detailed as to
texture, materials and color.
2. Show construction-dimensions on plans.
3. Call out, specify, and detail all landscape materials to be used.
4. Items not of custom design to be indicated with manufacturers' name
and number.
5. Detail treatment of all walls and fences and trash enclosures. All
walls or fences over 3'0" in height shall be accompanied by
engineer's calculations. All trash enclosures shall be gated with
solid self-mounting gates.
B. SUBSEQUENT SUBMIllALS
The applicant shall submit to the city two sets of corrected plans and
redlined copies from previous submittals.
APPROVAL
The applicant shall submit the following items when plans are ready for
final city approval.
page eight
Three sets of corrected landscape plans (one to be held for city
records, one to be released with permit and be held at construction
site. One to be released to applicant)
A bond for landscape completion shall be submitted by owner. A bond
shall be submitted by the owner for a warranty of trees to be
planted within the right of way and city maintained areas. The bond
shall be effective for a period of no less than two years from the
date of final acceptance.
F. PRXOR TO RELEASE OF BONDS AMD ACCEPTANCE OF WORK
III.
A.
The applicnt shall submit the following material:
1. One set "record plans" showing completed landscape and irrigation
installation.
SUGGESTED LIST OF PLAN MATERIALS
GENERAL
Proposed plant materials shall relate to the architectural and site design
elements based on the chractertsttcs of the plant groups to assure
compatibility with the site improvements. Please find attached a list of
acceptable and unacceptable plant materials. The list is provided as an
example only. Plant materials not included on the list may be considered
providing materials meet the horticultural criteria necessary for optimum
growth and adaptability to soil conditions.
TREES
1. Street Trees
Specific streets in Tustin may have a designated species of tree.
Contact the Maintenance Department at 544-8890.
Agonts Flexuosa/Peppermtnt tree
*Calodendron Capense/Cape Chestnut
Ceratonia Seliqua/Carob tree (female only)
*Ctnnamemum Camphora/Camphor tree
Cupaniopsts Anacardioides/Carrotwood tree
Eucalyptus Citriodora/Lemon Scented Gum
Eucalyptus Ficifolia/Red Flowering Gum
Eucalyptus Leucoxylon/Large Fruit Red Flowering Gum
Eucalyptus Nicholii/Peppermint Gum
Eucalyptus Polyanthemos/Silver Dollar Gum
*Ficus Nitida or Retusa/Indian Laurel **
Koelreuteria Paniculata/Goldenrain tree
Larus Nobilus/
Lagerstruemia Indica/Crepe Myrtle
Ligustrum Lucidum/Glossy Privet
*must have root barrier installed if within 5 feet of a building or paved
area.
***regular growth must be trimmed extens)vely.
page nine
*Llquldambar Styraclflua/Amertcan Sweet Gum
Llrtodendron Tullpidera/Tultp tree
Magnolia Grandiflora/
Melaleuca Ltnarifolta/Flaxleaf Paperbark
Melaleuca Quinquenervia/Cajeput tree
*Platanus Acertfolia/London Plane tree
Pinus Canariensis/Canary Island Pine
Plnus Pinea/Italian Stone Pine
Prunus Pissardi/Purple Leaf Plum
Pyrus Calleryana/Bradford Pear
Quercus Ilex/Cork Oak
Rhus Lancta/African Sumac
Trtstanta Conperta/Brisbane Box
2. Acceptable for Sl~e Use
Acacia Melanoxylon/Blackwood
*Alnus Rhombifolia/White Alder
Arbutus Unedo/Strawberry tree
Eriobotrya Deflexa/Loquat
Feijoa Sellowianwa/Pineapple Guava
Platanus Racemosa/California Sycamore
Pinus Halepensis/Allepo Pine ***
* must have root barrier installed if within 5 feet of a building or a
paved area.
** must be deep watered
*** regular growth but must be trimmed extensively
3. Trees not 1~ be used vt~htn publtc right of way.
Fraxtnus (species)
Grevtllia Robusta/
Myoporum Laetum
Nerium Oleander/Oleander
Olea Europa/Olive
Populus (species)
Zelkova
C. SHRUBS
Abelia Grandiflora/
Agapanthus Africanus/
Carissa (species)
Ceanothus (species)
Chrysanthemum Frutescens
Cistus (species) Rockrose
Cytisus Racemosus
Dodonea Viscosa
Eatium Fastuosom
Eleagnus Pungens
***regular growth must be trimmed extensively
*must have root barrier installed if within 5 feet of building or paved area
**must be deep watered
page ten
Escallonia Fradesi
Hemerocallis
Juniper (species)
Lantana
Ligustrum
Limonium Perezii (statice)
Mahonia (species)
Myrtus Communis (True Myrtle)
Nandina Domestica/Heavenly Bamboo
Photinta
Pittosporum (species)
Raphiolepis {species)
Tecomaria Cadenis/¢ape Honeysuckle
Thevettta Peruviana/Yellow Oleander
Viburnum (species)
Xylosma Congestum
Do GROUND COVERS
Acacia Redolens Prostrata/Prostrate Acacia
Baccharis Twin Peaks Type II/Prostrate Coyote Bush
Bouganvilla (species)
Carissa Grandiflora 'Turtle'
Ceanothus (species)
Cotoneaster 'Lowfast'
Gazania (species)
Hedera (species) *
Juniper (species)
Lobularia Maritima/Sweet Alyssum
Lonicera Japonica Halliana
Myoporum Pacfica or Parvifollium/N.C.N
Pelargontum Peltatum/Geranium
Rosmartnus Offictnalis 'Prostratus'/Prostrate Rosmary
Trtfolium Fragtferum/O'Conner's Legume
Turf Bermuda Grasses/Hybrid Fiscues
VX#ES
Bigonia/Trumpet Vine
Bouganvilla (species)
Clemantts Armandtt/Evergreen Clemantis
Poxantha Ungus-Catt/Cats Claw
Ficus Repens/Creeping Fig
Gelsemium Sempervirins/Carolina Jasmine
Parthenocissus Tricuspidata/Boston Ivy
* This is overused and can create a monotonous visual appearance. The
aggressive habit of this plant and its buildup of a woody understructure which
is an attractive rodent habitat should omit its use.
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MARCH 9, 1987
REPORT ON COUNCIL ACTZONS - March 2, 1987
Oral presentatt on.
do
Attachments: City Counctl Action Agenda - March 2, 1987
Community Development Department
ACTION A~ENDA OF A REGUIJ~R I~ETING
OF 'I)IE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 2, 1987
7:00 P.M.
7:01 Pl~ I. CALL TO ORDER
SELECTED EOGAR II. REORGANIZATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
AS RIkYOR; KENNEDY AS I~YOR PRO TEN
SALTARELLI RESIGNED AS COUNCILMAN EFFECTIVE NEXT MONTH
III. PUBLIC HEARING
AOOPTEO RES.
NO. 87-27
INCREASES IN PLANNING FEES - RESOLUTION NO. 87-27
RESOLUTION NO. 87-27 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PLANNING RELATED FEES AND SER-
VICE CHARGES
IV. PUBLIC INPUT
V. CONSENT CALENDAR
APPROVED' 1.
~PROVEO 2.
APPROVED STAFF 3.
RECOI~IENOATION
APPROVED STAFF 4.
RECOMNENOATION
AOOPTEO RESOLUTION 5.
NO. 87-31
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 17,~ 1987, ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $559,509.13
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $172,31'7.84
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING FOR 17TH STREET
IMPROVEMENTS, AHFP NO. 1173
Approve selection of Norris-Repke, Inc., for professional ser-
vices for construction staking for AHFP Project No. 1173, 17th
Street from Route 55 Freeway to Prospect Avenue, for a fee not
to exceed $7,500; and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to exe-
cute a consultant agreement subject to final approval by the
City Attorney, as recommended by the Public Works Department/En-
gineering Division.
ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS & RELEASE OF BONDS - PARCEL MAP
NO. 84-1031 (South of Walnut Avenue, between Franklin Avenue and
future Tustin Ranch Road; Subdivision Initiated by Albert Auer)
Accept public improvements constructed within Parcel Map No.
84-1031 and authorize release of the following: Faithful Per-
formance Bond No. FB005245 ($43,700); Labor and Materials Bond
No. FB005245 ($21,850); and Monumentation Bond No. FB005247
($2,000) as recommended by the Public Works Department/
Engineering Division.
RESOLUTION NO. 87-31 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING RECORDA-
TION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS ALONG BRYAN
AVENUE AND BROWNING AVENUE - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (PHASE II)
Adopt Resolution No. 87-31; and assuming no claims or stop pay-
ment notices are filed, authorize payment of final 10% retention
amount (Sully-Miller Contracting Company - $58,925.52) 30 days
after date of recordation of Notice of Completion as recom-
mended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page I 3-2-87
ADOPTED
RESOLUTION NO. 87-33
RESOLUTION NO. 87-33 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
IMPROVEMENT OF "A" STREET BETWEEN MAIN STREET AND SECOND STREET
Adopt Resolution No. 87-33 as recommended by the Public Works
Department/Engineering Division.
AOOPTED
RESOLUTION NO. 87-32
7. RESOLUTION NO. 87-32 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR MAINTENANCE OF
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
Adopt Resolution No. 87-32 as recommended by the Public Works
Department/Engineering Division.
AOOPTEO
RESOLUTION NO. 87-30
RESOLUTION NO. 87-30 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE APPLICATION OF THE MASTER
PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER AGREEMENT TO THE PROPOSEO LA COLINA/BROWNING
ANNEXATION NO. 140
Adopt Resolution No. 87-30 as recommended by the Community
Development Department.
VI. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION - None.
VII. ORDINANCES FOR A&)OPTION - None.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS - None.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
,,PPROVED STAFF
RECO~I~ENOATION
1. AWARD OF BID - RANCHWOOD STORM DRAIN FO7P08 (AD 85-1, PROj. NO. 13)
Recommendation: Award the contract for subject project to K.E.C.
Company, Corona, in the amount of $317,747.00 as recommended by the
Public Works Department/Engineering Division.
APPROVED STAFF
RECOI~ENOATION
2. CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN OF PROJECTS NO. 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
AND 24 WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS
Recommendation: Approve selection of Norris-Repke, Inc., for pro-
fessional services for design of Water Main Replacement Projects
No. 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 24 at a fixed fee of $11,500; and autho=
rize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Consultant Agreement sub-~
ject to final approval of the City Attorney as recommended by the
Public Works Department/Engineering Division.
APPROVEO STAFF
RECOI'~IENOATION
3. REFINANCING OF WATER LEASE-REVENUE BONDS
Recommendation: Authorize staff to proceed with steps required to
refinance all or a portion of the City's outstanding lease-revenue
water bonds if financially feasible as recommended by the City
Manager.
ABATED RESOLUTION NO. 4. PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 140 - LA COLINA/BROWNING - RESOLUTION NO.
87-29
RESOLUTION NO. 87-29 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPLICATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY KNOWN AS LA COLINA/BROWNING ANNEXATION NO. 140
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 87-29 as recommended by the
Community Development Department.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 2 3-2-87
ADOPTED RESOLUTTOII NO. 5.
87-34
Xe
PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 142 - LA COLINA/BEVERLY GLEN DRIVE - RESOLU-
TION NO. 87-34
RESOLUTION NO. 87-34 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPLICATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY KNOWN AS LA COLINA/BEVERLY GLEN ANNEXATION NO. 142
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 87-34 as recommended by the
Community Development Department.
REPORTS
RATIFIED 1.
RECEIVED & FILED 2.
AGENDIZE FOR ~ETING OF
mARCH 16TH
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - FEBRUARY 23, 1987
Alt actions of the Planning Commission become final unless appealed
by the City Council or member of the public.
Recommendation: Ratify the Planning Commission Action Agenda of
February 23, 1987.
TUSTIN AREA SENIOR CENTER: FUND RAISING CAMPAIGN READINESS ASSESS-
MENT REPORT
Recommendation: Pleasure of the City Council.
,AFF TO SEIki) XI. OTHER BUSINESS
LETTER OF CONGRATULATIONS TO THE 1USTIN HIGH SCHOOL BASKETBALL TERM;
FORMER I~YORS GREINKE, COCO, AND CHARLTON M~RE RECOGNIZED.
KELLY SUGGESTED THAT THE STREETS IN EAST TUSTIN BE NAMED FOR SOIqE OF THE GREAT TUSTIN
FAHILIES. HE SUGGESTED THAT THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY NIGHT TAKE ON THE TASK.
7:46 i~! XII. ADJOURNMENT
To the next Regular Meeting on March 16, 1987, at 7:00 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 3 3-2-87
ACTION AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF
THE 1USTIN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MARCH 2, 1987
7:00 P.M.
7:45 P~ 1. CALL TO ORDER
ALL PRESENT 2. ROLL CALL
APPROVED 3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 17, 1987, ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
Recommendation: Approve.
APPROVED STAFF 4.
RECOI~ENDATION
REFINANCING OF TAX ALLOCATION BONDS
Recommendation: Authorize staff to proceed with the steps required to
refinance all or a portion of the Agency's outstanding tax allocation
bonds and issue additional bonds for public projects as recommended by
the Executive Director.
NONE
5. OTHER BUSINESS
7:46 IM 6.
ADJOURNMENT
TO the next Regular Meeting on March 16, 1987, at 7:00 p.m.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION AGENDA Page i ' 3-2-87