HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Hear #2 10-07-87 AnnexA,~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~4 PUBLIC HEARING
"N ,, NO. 2
DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1987
TO: HONORABLE HAYOR AND CITY COUNCTL
FROM: COHHUNITY DEVELOPNEEr DEPART[lENT
SUBJECT: PROPOSED PROSPECT AVENUE A~NEXATION NO. 145
RECO~ENDATION:
Adopt Resolution No. 87-106 which petitions the Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFCO) to proceed with proposed Annexation Noo 145 Prospect Avenue,
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
The Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 authorizes the Ctty
'ounct] to make application to LAFC0 for the annexation of territory after the
,doptton of a resolution. In the past it has been City Council po]icy to
initiate annexations when citizens of the area have fi]ed a petition with the
City. In this case a petition was ft]ed by 21~ of the registered voters In the
area. This area also qualifies as an 'inhabited "is]and" annexation because it
iS surrounded by the City of Tusttn on three sides.
The hearing before the City Council is an information hearing to provide an
opportunity for the residents of the area to express their concerns and views on
the resolution of application. This is not a protest hearing and the filing of
a protest at this hearing has no validity as to the status of the annexation
proposal.
The area is bounded on the north by current City boundary (which is 345 feet
southerly of Santa Clara), current City boundary on the west (which is 100 feet
westerly of Laurtnda Way), and current City boundary on the south (which is 100
feet southerly of Laurie Lane) and Prospect Avenue on the east. (See attached
map.) The area consists of 53 single family residences and the zoning is R-1.
According to the Orange County Regtstrar's office, there are 123 registered
voters in the area with an estimated population of approximately 201.
If the City Council adopts the attached resolution, the Local Agency Formation
Commission then conducts a fact finding hearing to determine if the subject
proposal meets the requirements of the Government Code. Upon LAFCO's
~etermtnation, the matter is referred to the City Council as the "conducting
,uthortty" for a protest hearing. In the case of the inhabited "island"
City Council Report
October 7, 1987
Annexation No, 145
Page two
territory, if less than 505 of the registered voters of the area file a protest
then the "conducting" authority orders the annexation completed. If more than
505 of the registered voters protest, then the annexation would be terminated.
A Fiscal Impact Analysis of recent annexation proposals has been completed for
the Council's information and is attached to the report for Annexation No. 144
Fatrhaven Avenue.
rla ' s e . ~nlngl~on
Associate Planner Director of Communiq~y Development
MAC: CAS: ts: per
Attachments: Resolution 87-106, Map, Legal
Corn rnunity Developrnen~ Department ~
!
2 RESOLUTION NO. 87-[06
3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPLICATION FOR THE
4 INHABITED "ISLAND" ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY KNOWN AS
PROSPECT AVENUE ANNEXATION NO. 145
5
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tusttn on its own motion has
6 initiated preliminary proceedings for the annexation of certain inhabited
territory; and
7
WHEREAS, the City of Tustin has the ability to extend the full range
8 of municipal services to the subject territory to better serve the needs of
the residents of the area; and
9
WHEREAS, the City Council on October 7, lg87 did adopt a resolution
10 of application for annexation of the subject territory to the City of
Tustin; and
11
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed annexation
12 is a Categorical Class 19 exemption from the requirement of CEQA;
]3 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Tustin, California that:
14
1. The proposal for the Prospect Avenue Annexation No. 145 to the
15 City of Tusttn is made pursuant to Part 3, Chapter 1 of the
Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985.
2. The proposed change of organization consists of the annexation
17 of 16.49 acres of inhabited territory, surrounded by the
incorporated limits of the City of Tustin and the County of
18 Orange, and said territory will derive benefits of full
municipal services as a result of the annexation.
19
3. The subject territory is bounded by Prospect Avenue on the east,
20 current City boundary on the north {which is 345 feet southerly
of Santa Clara) current City boundary on the west (which is 100
2] feet westerly of Laurtnda Way) and current City boundary on the
south (which is 100 feet southerly of Laurie Lane).
22 4.
The proposed annexation is made for the purpose of increasing
23 the econon~y and efficiency of government services by
incorporating territory within the City's sphere of influence.
24
25
26
27
28
!
2 Resolution No, 87-106
Page two
5 5. The application for annexation is submitted by the City Council
of the City of Tusttn on its own motion along with a request
O from various owners in the area.
? 6. The Local Agency Formation Commission is hereby requested to
undertake annexation proceedings pursuant to Part 2, Chapter 3
8 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985.
· 9 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Tusttn, California on the day of , 1987.
10
11
12 Richard B. Edgar
Mayor
14 Mary E. Wynn
City Clerk
15
17
18
19
20
PROSPECT AVENUE ANNEXATION, NO. 145
CimTIFIE! 1¥ T#i SECRETAIY Or STATE
CiTY OF TUSTIN IOUUOARY l ~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR
PROSPECT AVENUE ANNEXATION NO.
TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
I BEGINNING AT AN ANGLE POINT IN THE EXISTING CITY BOUNDARY OF TIlE CITY
2 OF TUSTIN AS PER PROSPECT-CARLSBAD ANNEXATION NO. 75 PER RESOLUTION
3 NO. 72-24, PASSED AND ADOPTED NAY 5, I972, SAID ANGLE POINT BEING THE
4 SOUTHE~AST CORNER OF TRACT NO. 19OO AS PER HAP RECORDED IN BOOK 53,
PAGES 15 AND 16 OF HISCELLANEOUS HAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY,
SAID POINT BRING ON THE CENTERLINR OF PROSPECT AVENUE (NORTH) BEING
DISTANT NORTH 03° 29' 15" EAST 1311.67 FEET FRON THE INTERSECTION OF
THE CENTERLINES OF I?TH STREET AND ~RO~CTAVENUE (NORTII);
THENCE NORTH 89° 53' 55" ~EST ALONG SAID CITY OF THSTIN BOUNDARY AND
11 ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 1900 A DISTANCE OF 704.42
12 FEET TO THE SOUTII~EST CORNER OF SAID TRACT NO. 19OO AND TO AN ANGLE
13 POINT IN TIlE EXISTING BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN PER SAID PROSPECT-
14 CARLSBAD ANNEXATION NO. ?§,' BY TIlE HALENA DRIVE ANNEXATION PER ORDI-
15 NANCE NO. 254, PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE 8, 1964,
1S AND BY THE YORBA STREET ANNEXATION NO. 2 PER ORDINANCE NO. 1392 PASSED
17 AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 10, 1960;
18
19 THENCE NORTH O00 O1~ 4~' WEST ALONG SAID CITY OF TUSTIN BOUNDARY AND
20 ALONG THE WESTERLY DOUNDANY OF SAID TRACT NO. 1900 A DISTANCE OF
21 ~94.37 PEET TO THE NORTh'~EST CORNER OF SAID TRACT NO. 1900 AND TO AN
~2 ANGLE POINT IN TNR EXISTING BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN PER SAID
23 TORBA STREET ANNEXATION NO. 2; SAID POINT ALSO BEING A POINT ON T~R
24 SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT NO. 2708 AS PER NAP RECORDED IN BOOK 90,
25 PAGE 25 OF MISCELLANEOUS HAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY;
~? THENCE NORTH 89° ~3' ~' WEST ALONG SAID CITY OF TUSTIN BOUNDARY AND
28 ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 2708 A DISTANCE OF 0.?5
29 FEET TO TIle SOUTHI~ST CORNER OF SAID TRACT NO. 2708 AND TO AN ANCLE
~0 POINT IN THE EXISTING BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN PER SAID YORBA
31 STREET ANNEXATION NO.
THENCE NORTH OO° 04' 5,7" 14EST ALONG SAID CITY OF T~STIN BOUNDARY AND
ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT NO. 2708 A DISTANCE OF
383.14 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT NO. 2708 ARD TO AN
ANGLE POINT IN THE EXISTING BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN PER SAID
YORBA STREET ANNEXATION NO. 2;
THENCE SOUTH 89° 53' 55" EAST ALONG SAID CITY OF TUSTIN BOUNDARY AND
ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 2708 A DISTANCE OF 1.14
FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE REVISED SANTA CLARA ANNEXATION PER
l0 ORDINANCE NO. 266, PASSED AND ADOPTED JANUARY 1, 1965; THENCE CONTIN-
11 UING ALONG SAID CITY OF TUSTIN BOUNDARY AND ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE
12 SOUTH 89° 53' 55" EAST A DISTANCE OF 724.38 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN
13 THE EXISTING BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN PER SAID REVISED SANTA
14 CLARA ANNEXATION;
15
16 THENCE DEPARTING FROM SAID CITY OF TUSTIN BOUNDARY SOUTH 89° 53* 55"
17 EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 2708 A DISTANCE OF
18 40.07 FEE~ TO THE CENTERLINE OF PROSPECT AVENUE (NORTH) BEING DISTANT
19 SOUTH 03° 29~ 15" WEST 345.35 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER-
20 LINES OF SANTA CLARA AVENUE AND PROSPECT AVENUE (NORTH);
21
22 THENCE SOUTH 03° 29~ 15" ~EST ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
23 TRACT NO. 2708 AI~D ALONO THE CENTERLINE OF PROSPECT AVENUE (NORTH) A
24 DISTANCE OF 979.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
26 CONTAINING 16.49 ACRES.
29 ANNA M. HEAL, L.S. 4955 No. 49§5
:30 REGISTRATION EXPIRATION DATE: 13-31-89 ,[:xDire$
JUNE 29, 1987
PROSPECT AVENUE ANNEXATION NO. 145
PAGE THO