HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Hearing #3 10-07-87 , ~UBLIC HEARING
~'~' ~' -7~ O, 3
DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1987 ·
TO: HONORABLE HAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CO.UNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTHENT
SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 146
1TrH STREET/LAURINDA tiAY
RECOmmENDATION:
Adopt Resolution No. 87-107 which petitions the Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFCO) to proceed with proposed Annexation No. 146 17th St./Laurinda
Way.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
The Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 authorizes the City
Council to make application to LAFCO for the annexation of territory after the
adoption of a resolution. In the past it has been City Council policy to
initiate annexations when citizens of the area have filed a petition with the
City. In this case a petition was filed by 21% of the registered voters in the
area. This area also qualifies as an inhabited "island" annexation because it
is surrounded by the City of Tustin on three sides.
The hearing before the City Council is an information hearing to provide an
opportunity for the residents of the area to express their concerns and views on
the resolution of application. This is not a protest hearin~ and the filing of
a protest at this hearing has no validity as to the status of the annexation
proposal.
The area is bounded on the north by current City boundary (which is 1000 feet
northerly of 17th Street), current City boundary on the east (which is 100 feet
easterly of Laurinda Way), and extends to Prospect Avenue 470 feet northerly of
17th Street for 200 feet and returns to a point 100 feet easterly of Laurinda
Way, and current City boundary on the west (which is 100 feet westerly of
Laurinda Way). (See attached map.) The area consists of 18 single-family
residences, the Gerber Pre-School and one professional office building. The
zoning is E-4-100 (Estate Residential) and PA (Professional Office).
According to the O~ange County Regtstrar's office, there are 43 registered
voters in the area with an estimated population of approximately 68.
City Council Report
October 7, 1987
Annexation No. 146
Page two
If the City Council adopts the attached resolution, the Local Agency Formation
Commission then conducts a fact finding hearing to determine if the subject
proposal meets the requirements of the Government Code. Upon LAFCO's
determination, the matter is referred to the City Council as the "conducting
authority" for a protest hearing. In the case of the inhabited "island"
territory, if less than $0~ of the registered voters of the area file a protest
then the "conducting" authority orders the annexation completed. If more than
50~ of the registered voters protest, then the annexation would be terminated.
A Fiscal Impact Analysis of recent annexation proposals has been completed for
the Council's information and is attached to the report for Annexation No. 144
Fatrhaven Avenue.
Christine A.' Shtn~leton
Associate Planner Director of Comm(fntty Development
MAC:CAS:ts:pef
Attachments: Resolution 87-107, Map, Legal
Corn rnunity Development Depariment ~"
1
2: RESOLUTION NO. 87-107
' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPLICATION FOR THE
4 INHABITED "ISLAND" ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY KNOWN AS
17TH STREET/LAURINDA WAY ANNEXATION NO. 146
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tustin on its own motion has
6 initiated preliminary proceedings for the annexation of certain inhabited
territory; and
7
WHEREAS, the City of Tustin has the ability to extend the full range
8 of municipal services to the subject territory to better serve the needs of
the residents of the area; and
9
WHEREAS, the City Council on October 7, 1987 did adopt a resolution
10 of application for annexation of the subject territory to the City of
Tustin; and
11
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed annexation
12 is a Categorical Class 19 exemption from the requirement of CEQA;
13 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Tusttn, California that:
1. The proposal for the 17th Street/Laurinda Way Annexation No. 146
15 to the City of Tusttn is made pursuant to Part 3, Chapter 1 of
the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985.
16
2. The proposed change of organization consists of the annexation
17 of 8.9 acres of inhabited territory, surrounded by the
incorporated limits of the City of Tustin and the County of
!$ Orange, and said territory will derive benefits of full
municipal services as a result of the annexation.
19
3. The subject territory is bounded by Seventeenth Street on the
20 south, present City boundary on the west (which is 100 feet
westerly of Laurinda Way), present City Boundary on the north
21 (which is 1000 feet northerly of Seventeenth Street), present
City boundary on the east (which is 100 feet easterly of
22 Laurinda Way), and extends to Prospect Avenue 470 feet northerly
of Seventeenth Street for 200 feet and returns to a point 100
23 feet easterly of Laurtnda Way.
24 4. The proposed annexation is made for the purpose of increasing
the econon~y and efficiency of government services by
25 incorporating territory within the City's sphere of influence.
Resolution No, 87-107
Page two
3
5 5. The appllcatlon for annexation ts submitted by the Ctty Council
of the City of Tusttn on its own'motion along with a~ request
6 from vartous owners tn the area.
? 6. The Local Agency Formation Commission is hereby requested to
undertake annexation proceedings pursuant to Part 2, Chapter 3
8 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985.
9 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Tustin, California on the~ day of , 1987.
10
Richard B. Edgar
Mayor
14 Mary E. Wynn
City Clerk
17
18
19
20
stIllY
17th STREET- LAURINDA WAY ANNEX. NO. 146
· TO T#E CITY O~ TUITIN, CALIFORNIA
, PASSED ANI ADDPTED BY RES, NO _DATID
ClllTIIrliD BY THE BICIIETAIY IlL' DTATR..
LEGEND AREA
..... I'ilSTIN& CITY llr TUSTIN BOUNDARY //~ ~ I.sO ACRES
'~'--"------PDIPOSED CiTY 05 TUSTIN IAUNIAIY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR
I?TH STREET -- LAURINDA I~AY ANNEXATION NO. 146
TO TIlE CITY 'OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA
1 BEGINNING AT AN ANGLE BOINT IN THE EXISTING BOUNDARY OF TIlE CITY OF
2 TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AS ESTABLISHED BY THE SEVENTEENTH STREET - LAURINDA '
3 WAY ANNEXATION NO. 96 PER RESOLUTION NO. ~ PASSED AND
4 ADOPTED ~ SAID POINT BEING ON THE CENTERLINE OF 17Tit
~' STREET BEING DISTANT SOUTH 88° 50' 54" WEST 71.30 PEET FRON THE INTER-
6 SEcTION OP TR~- c~r~LIREs oF ~?TH S{~E~r AND PROSPEcT ^VENUE (SOUTH)~
8
9 THENCE NORTH OO° 04' 21" WEST ALONG SAID CITY OF TUSTIN BOUNDARY AND
~0 ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF TNE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINg OF TRACT
11 NO. 2834, AS 'PER HAP RECORDED IN BOOK 84, PAGES 35 AND 36 OF NISCEL-
~2 LANEOUS HAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY AND ALONG SA'ID ~ESTERLY
13 BOUNDARY LINE,, A DISTANCE OF 1003.22 PEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN THE
~4 EXISTING BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFOENIA~ AS ESTABLISHED BY
15 THE PROSPECT-CARLSBAD ANNEXATION NO. 75 PER RESOLUTION NO. 72-24~ PASSED
16 AND ADOPTED HAY ~, 1972, AND BY TNE HALENA DRIVE ANNEXATION, PER ORDIN-
17 ANCE NO. 2,~4, PASSED AND ADOPTED HAY 4, 1964, SAID POINT ALSO BEING TIlE
18 NORTNI~ST CORNER OF SAID TRACT NO. 2834~
19
20 TIIENCE NORTH 89° 19' O1" EAST ALONG SAID CITY OF TUSTIN BOUNDARY AND
21 ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT NO. 2834 A DISTANCE OF 319.09
92 FEET TO THE NORTNEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT NO. 283~ AND TO AN ANGLE
23 POINT IN THE EXISTING BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN PER SAID PROSPEcT-
24 CARLSBAD ANNEXATION NO. 75{
25
26 THENCE SOUTH O0° 06..' 21" FAST ALONG SAID CITY OF TUSTIN BOUNDARY AND
27 ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRAcT NO. 2836.. A DISTANCE OF 336,.09
28 FEET TO TH{;: .NORTHI,T~ST CORNER OF PARCEL 2, AS PER ~ RECORDED IN BOOK
29 27, PAGE .50 OF PARCEL HAPS, RECORDS OF SAID OEANCE COUNTY, AND TO AN
30 ANGLE POINT IN TH'e EXISTING BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN pER SAID PROS-
~1 PEcT-CARLSBAD ANNEXATION NO. 7.5;
32
1 THENCE SOUGH 89° 51' O~" EAST ALONG SAID CITY OF T~.STIN BOUNDARY AND
2 ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL 2 AND THE EASTERLY EXTENSION
3 OF SAID NORTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 344.56 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF
4 PROSPECT AVENUE;
6 THENCE SOUTH 03° 29' 15" WEST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF PROSEECT AVENUE
? A DISTANCE OF 206./+9 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH TIlE EASTERLY
8 PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2; SAID POINT ALSO
9 BEING AN ANGLE POINT IN THE EXISTING BOUNDARY LINE OF THE CITY OF 'fUSTIN
10 CALIFORNIA AS ESTABLISHED BY THE PROSPECT AVENUE- SEVENTEENTH STREET
11 ANNEXATION NO. 119;
12
I~3 THENCE NORTH 88° 05' 5/+" ~EST ALONG SAXD CITY OF TUSTIN BOUNDARY A DIS-
14 TANCE OF 331.9/+ FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO.
15 28't/+ AND TO AN ANGLE POXNT IN THE EXISTXNC BOUNDARY OF THE CXTY OF
16 TUSTXN PER SAID PROSPECT AVENUE - SEVENTEENTH STREET ANNEXATXON NO. 119;
18 THENCE SOUT~ GO° O/+' 2X" EAST ALONG SAID CITY OF TUSTXN BOUNDARY AND
19 ALONG SAXD EASTERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 470.01 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT XN
90 THE EXISTXNG CXTY OF THSTIN BOUNDARY PER SAID PROSPECT AVENUE - SEVEN-
2~ TEENTH STREET ANNEXATION NO. 119 AND BY MEREDITH ANNEXATXON NO. 69 PER
22 ORDINANCE NO. 512~ PASSED AND ADOPTED AUGUST 24, 1971. SAID POINT ALSO
23 BEING A POINT ON TIlE CENTERLINE OF I?TH STREET BEING DISTANT SOUTH 880
24 /+3' 39" NEST 303.93 F~ET ~ROH THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINES OF
25 PROSPECT AVENUE (NORTH) AND 17TH STREET;
28
27 THENCE SOUTH 88° /+3' 39" WEST ALONG SAID CITY OF TUSTIN BOUNDARY AND
98 ALONG THE CENTERLINE 'OF 17TH STREET A DISTANCE OF 2/+7.84 FEET;
29
30 THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CITY OF TUSTIN BOUNDARY AND ALONG THE CEN-
t1 TERLINE OF 17TH STREET SOUTH 88° 50" 54" WEST A DISTANCE OF 71.30 FEET
32 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 8.90 ACRES. --" 165-01-146 '
/
ANNA M. BEAL, L.S. /+955 { ~ {
REGISTRATION EXPIRATION DATE: 12-31-89}~ ~ No. 4955
\ \Expires 12/31/89