HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 10-19-87ACTION AGENDA
TUSTIN PLANNXNG COMHTSSION
REPORTS
NO. 1
10-19-87
REGULAR MEETX NG
OCTOBER 12, 1987
CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL: Present: Wet1, Puckett, Baker, Le ~eune, Ponttous
PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
1. Minutes of September 28, 1987 Planning Commission Meeting
Comdsstoner Le deune moved, Baker seconded to approve the minutes of the September
28, 1987 meeting with the following change: on page eight under Commission Concerns
Comtsstoner Le Jeune should be 'Com~sstoner Wet1'. Hotton carried 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Extension of Use Permit 86-30
Applicant:
Owner:
Location:
Zoning:
Environmental
Status:
Request:
Tri-State Engineering Co.
701S. Raymond Avenue
Fullerton, Ca. 92634
Exxon Company U.S.A.
P.O. Box 4388
Houston, Texas 77210-4388
14082 Red Hill Avenue at Nisson Road
C-1 Retail Commercia;
Categorically Exempt Class I
Extension for a 6 month period of previously approved Use Permit 86-30
authorizing construction of a 1,938 square foot Mini-Market and Gas
Station.
Resolution No. 2438
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
AUTHORIZING A SIX (5) MONTH EXTENSION OF USE PERMIT 86-30 FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF A 1938 SQUARE FOOT MINI-MARKET AND GASOLINE
SALES STATION AT 14082 RED HILL AVENUE.
Planntng Commission Action Agenda
October 12, 1987
Page two
Presentation: Laura Cay Pickup, Associate Planner
Cmmtsstoner Baker ~oved, Ponttous seconded to extend Use Permit 86-30 by the
adoptton of Resolution No. 2438 wtth the change of square footage from 1938 to 1104
throughout the Resolution. Morton carrted S-O.
3. Tentative Parcel Map 87-370
Applicant:
Owner:
Location:
Zoning:
Environmental
Status:
K. W. Lawler & Associates, Inc. on behalf of Mac Pherson Properties,
301 West Warner Avenue, Santa Aha, California 92707
The Irvine Company
550 Newport Center Drive
Newport Beach, California 92660
2, 33, 21 Auto Center Drive
Lots 10, 11, 12 of Parcel Map 84-1032
Planned Community Commercial (Auto Center).
Class 15, Categorically Exempt
Resolution No. 2439 A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City
of Tustin, recommending approval of Tentative Parcel
Map 87-370 Located at 2, 33, 21 Auto Center Drive
Presentation: Laura Cay Pickup, Associate Planner
Cmmtsstoner Puckett ~oved, Ponttous seconded to recomend to City Council approval
of Tentative Parcel F~p 87-370 by the adoptton of Resolution #o. 2439. ~lotion
carrted 5-0.
4. Tentative Tract Map No. 13094 and Dest. gn Review 87-16
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Environmental
Status:
Bramalea California, Inc.
Lots 1, 2, D, F, G, and H of Tract 12763
1) Authorization to subdivide 20.47 acres into 103 numbered and 4
lettered lots for single family development,
2) Approval of Site Plan and Architectural Design of the proposed
project
The project is covered by a previous EIR (85-2) for the East
Tustin Specific Plan. No additional documentation is required.
Resolution No. 2440
A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of
Tustin, finding that the Final Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) for the East Tustin Specific Plan is
adequate to serve as the program EIR for Tentative
Tract Map 13094 and Design Review 87-16 and all
feasible mitigation measures have been incorporated as
required by the California Environmental Quality Act.
Planntng Commission Acttot, Agenda
October 12, 1987
Page three
Resolution No. 244[ A Resolution of the Planning CommisSion of the City of
Tusttn, conditionally approving Design Review 87-16 a
project with 103 detached single family dwelling units
project located on Lots I and 2 of Tract 12763.
Resolution No. 2442 A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the
Ct ty of Tustln recommending to the Tustin City
Council approval of Tentative Tract Hap No. 13094.
Presentation: Christine Shtngleton, Director of Community Development
Coeetsstoner Baker aoved~ Le Jeune seconded to the Envtronaental Oetemtnation for the
project by the adoption of Resolution No. 2440. ~otton carried 5-0.
Cmtsstoner Puckett coved, Ponttous seconded to approve Oesign Review 87-16 by the
adoption of Resolution No. 2441 as revised. Motion carried 5-0.
Coaaatsstoner Baker aoved, Le Jeune seconded to recoeaend to Ctty Council approval of
Tentative Tract#ap [3094 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2442 as revised.
carrted 5-0.
OLD BUSINESS
NE# BUSINESS
5. Oral Report on Meeting with County Planning Commissioners
Presentation: Co~mtsstoners Le Oeune and Ponttous
6. Transmittal of San Diego Ptpeltne EIR
STAFF CONCERNS
7. Report on Actions taken at the October 7, 1987 City Counctl..meettng (Action
Agenda to follow under separate cover.
Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Dtrector of Community Development
8. Report on Work Projects
Presentation: Christine Shtngleton
9. Introduction of New Staff Members: Joel Slavtt and Cheyrl Pengue
Presentation: Christine Shlngleton, Director of Community Oevelopment
Planntng Commission Actto,, Agenda
October 12, 1987
Page four
COHHZSSZON CONCERNS
Comdsstoner Puckett commended staff for a job vel1 done, congratu]ated doe1 $1avtt
and Cheryl Pengue on thetr appointments wtth the Community Deve]opment Department adh
thanked Ltnda Andrevs for a successful Tusttn Ttller Days.
Chatrman Net1 noted an unsightly entrance Stgn on the 55 freeway. She also requested
the ftscal tmpact analysts on the annexation reports.
AO~OURII4ENT
At 9:10 p.m. the meettng vas adjourned to the October 26, 1987 Planntng Comtsston
Heettng to be held at 7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR HEETZNG
OCTOBER 12, 1987
CALL TO ORDER:
7:30 p.m., Ctty Counctl Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEG]ANCE/ZNVOCAT]ON
ROLL CALL:
Puckett, Wetl, Baker, Le Jeune, Ponttous
PLIILIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
1. Minutes of September 28, 1987 Planntn~ Commission Meetln~
PUBLTC HEARXNG$
Extension of Use Permit 86-30
Applicant:
Owner:
Location:
Zoning:
Environmental
Status:
Request:
Tri-State Engineering Co.
701S. Raymond Avenue
Fullerton, Ca. 92634
Exxon Company U.S.A.
P.O. Box 4388
Houston, Texas 77210-4388
14082 Red Hill Avenue at Ntsson Road
C-1 Retail Commercia;
Categorically Exen~t Class I
Extension for a 6 month period of previously approved Use Permit 86-30
authorizing construction of a 1,g38 square foot Mini-Market and Gas
Station.
Resolution No. 2438
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
AUTHORIZING A SIX (6) MONTH EXTENSION OF USE PERMIT 86-30 FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF A 1938 SQUARE FOOT MINI-MARKET AND GASOLINE
SALES STATION AT 14082 RED HILL AVENUE.
Presentation: Laura Cay Pickup, Associate Planner
Planning Commission Agenda
October 12, 1987
Page two
3. Tentative Parcel Hap 87-370
Applfcant:
Owner:
Location:
Zoning:
Environmental
Status:
K. W. Lawler & Associates, Inc. on behalf of Mac Pherson Properties,
301 West Warner Avenue, Santa Aha, California 92707
The Irvine Company
550 Newport Center Drive
Newport Beach, California 92660
2, 33, 21 Auto Center Drive
Lots 10, 11, 12 of Parcel Map 84-1032
Planned Community Commercial (Auto Center)
Class 15, Categorically Exempt
Resolution No. 2439
A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City
of Tustin, recommending approval of Tentative Parcel
Map 87-370 Located at 2, 33, 21 Auto Center Drive
Presentation: Laura Cay Pickup, Associate Planner
4. Tentative Tract Map No. 13094 and Design Review 87-16
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Environmental
Status:
Bramalea California, Inc.
Lots 1, 2, D, F, G, and H of Tract 12763
1) Authorization to subdivide 20.47 acres into 103 numbered and 4
lettered lots for single family development,
2) Approval of Site Plan and Architectural Design of the proposed
project
The project is covered by a previous EIR (85-2) for the East
Tusttn Specific Plan. No additional documentation is required.
Resolution No. 2440
A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of
Tusttn, finding that the Final Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) for the East Tusttn Specific Plan is
adequate to serve as the program EIR for Tentative
Tract Map 13094 and Design Review 87-16 and all
feasible mitigation measures'have been incorporated as
required by the California Environmental Quality Act.
Resolution No. 2441
A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of
Tusttn, conditionally approving Design Review 87-16 a
project with 103 detached single family dwelling units
project located on Lots 1 and 2 of Tract 12763.
Resolution No. 2442
A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the
City of Tustin recommending to the Tusttn City
Council approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13094.
Presentation: Christine Shingleton, Director of Coim,iunity Development
Planntng Com~ntsston Agent.
October [2, [987
Page three
OLD BIJSZNESS
NE# BUS[NESS
5. Oral Report on Meeting wtth County Planntng Commissioners
Presentation: Commissioners Le Jeune and Pontlous
6. Transmittal of San 0te9o Ptpeltne
STAFF CONCERNS
7. Report on Acttons taken at the October 7,
Agenda to follow under separate cover.
Presentation:
COMNISSION CONCERNS
ADdOURIIIENT
Adjournment to the October 26, 1987 Planntng Commission Meettng
1987 Ctt¥ Counctl meeting (Action
Christine Shtngleton, Dtrector of Community Development
MINUTES
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTENBER 28, 1987
CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL: PRESENT: PUCKETT, WEIL, BAKER, LE JEUNE, PONTIOUS
PUBLIC CONCERNS: (LIMITED TO 3 MINUTES PER PERSON FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
Margaret Grinke, Chairwoman of the 60th Anniversary Celebration presented the
Commissioners with commerative glasses. The Commission commended Mrs. Greinke on a
great celebration and a job well done.
1. MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Commissioner Le Jeune moved, Baker seconded to approve the minutes of the September
14, 1987 meeting. Motion carried 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. USE PERMIT 87-18
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
KAL GHOSN
171E. YORBA LINDA BLVD.
PLACENTIA, CA. 92670
13011 NEWPORT AVENUE
C-2 CENTRAL COMMERCIAL
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT, CLASS 1
AUTHORIZATION FOR AN ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE BEER AND WINE LICENSE
IN CONJUNCTION WITH A GREEK RESTAURANT USE.
Planning Commission Minutes
September 28, 1987
Page two
RESOLUTION NO. 2426
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
AUTHORIZING A BEER AND WINE LICENSE FOR ON-SITE SALES AT 13011
NEWPORT AVENUE.
PRESENTATION:
MARY ANN CHAMBERLAIN, ASSOC}ATE PLANNER
The public hearing was opened at 7:42 p.m.
Mr. Kal Ghosn contended that he had a lease that permitted him to sell beer and wine
for on-site and off-site consumption.
Suzanne Atkins clarified that the Planning Commission was bound by City Code to
require the signature of the property owner and that the City could not legally
accept the lease as approval by the owner.
Mr. Herman' Boodman, 13091 Barrett Hill Cir., Santa Ana, spoke in favor of the
Use Permit.
Mr. Christopher Rieber, 2061 Inwood, Santa Ana, spoke in favor of the Use Permit.
Ms. Isabel Boodman, 13091 Barrett Hill Cir., Santa Ana, spoke in favor of the Use
Permit.
The following people indicated that they were in'favor of the Use Permit however,
they did not speak to the Commission: Elie Wazen, 12550 Irvine Bl vd; Maya Schan,
12842 Newport Avenue; and Klm Fair well, 12842 Newport Avenue.
The public hearing was closed at 8:00 p.m.
Chairman Weil moved, Pontious seconded to approve Use Permit 87-18 by the adoption of
Resolution No. 2426 and to reco,,,end to the City Manager that the fee for a
Conditional Use Permit be waived if the applicant chooses to return to the
Commission, with approval of the property owner, with a request to sell alcoholic
beverages for off-site consumption at subject location. Motion carried 5-0.
3. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13030/DESIGN REVIEW 87-32/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-19
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
THE IRVINE PACIFIC COMPANY
LOTS 14, AA AND BB OF TRACT 12763
1. AUTHORIZATION TO SUBDIVIDE FOR ~EVELOPMENT PHASING AND
FINANCES PURPOSES LOTS 14, AA AND BB OF TRACT 12763 FOR
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
2. APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHICH WOULD AUTHORIZE
DEVELOPMENT OF 266 APARTMENT UNITS.
3. COMMISSION APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
Planning Commission Minu'
September 28, 1987
Page three
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
THE PROJECT IS COVERED BY A PREVIOUS EIR (85-2) FOR THE EAST TUSTIN
PLAN AND NO ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION IS
SPECIFIC
REQUIRED.
RESOLUTION NO. 2432 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, FINDING THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT (EIR) FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN IS
ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS TNE PROGRAM EIR FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP 13030, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-19 AND
DESIGN REVIEW 87-32 AND ALL FEASIBLE MITIGATION
MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS REQUIRED BY THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
RESOLUTION NO. 2433
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 87-32 A
PROJECT WITH 266 APARTMENT UNITS ON 15.4 ACRES ON LOT
14 OF TRACT 12763.
RESOLUTION NO. 2434 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-1.9 FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF A 266 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX ON LOT 14
OF TRACT 12763
RESOLUTION NO. 2435
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING TO THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13030
Presentation:
Jeffrey S. Davis, Senior Planner
The public hearing was opened at 8:15 p.m.
Mr. Kevin Pohlson, Irvine Pacific, i Park Plaza, Irvine, addressed the Commission
noting that he would be available to answer any questions they might have.
Mr. Dennis Wilson, asked why there were no garages in this projects, staff responded
that ETSP does not require garages, only carports.
The public hearing closed at 8:20 p.m.
Staff recommended changes to Resolutions 2433, 2434, and 2435.
The public hearing was re-opened at 8:35 p.m.
Mr. Clayton Parker, attorney for Tustin Unified School District, noted that the costs
of schools is not, in the opinion of the District, mitigated by implementation of
school impact fees and asked that the language in the Resolutions be changed.
Mr. Keith Greet, The Irvine Company, noted that the school facilities have been
discussed; that it is an on-going process and hopefully they will reach an agreement
with the District in thirty to sixty days.
Planning Commission Minut~
9eptember 28, 1987
Page four
The public hearing was closed at 8:45 p.m.
Commissioner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to find that the Final Environmental
Impact Report for the East Tustin Specific Plan is adequate as the program EIR for
Tentative Tract Map 13030, Conditional Use Permit 87-19 and Design Review 87-32 by
the adoption of Resolution No. 2432. Motion carried 5-0.
Commissioner Pontious moved, Puckett seconded to conditionally approve Design Review
87-32 incorporating changes recommended by staff to Exhibit A "Conditions of
Approval" Motion carried 5-0.
Commissioner Le Jeune moved, Pontious seconded to approve Use Permit 87-19 by the
adoption of Resolution No. 2434. Motion carried 5-0.
Commissioner Puckett moved, Pontious seconded to recommend to City Council approval
of Tentative Tract Map No. 13030 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2435 incorporating
changes recommended by staff to the Resolution and to Exhibit A "Conditions of
Approval". Motion carried 5-0.
DESIGN REVIEW 87-13, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-20, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13038:
"RANCHO ROBLES" APARTMENTS - LOTS 12, W & X OF EAST TUSTIN TRACT 12763
APPLICANT: IRVINE PACIFIC COMPANY
REQUEST:
1. APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF PROPOSED
PROJECT;
2. APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AUTHORIZING THE
CONSTRUCTION OF 252 APARTMENT UNITS; AND
3. AUTHORIZATION TO SUBDIVIDE LOTS 12, W & X OF MASTER TRACT 12763
FOR FINANCING AND DEVELOPMENT PHASING PURPOSES
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
THE PROJECT IS COVERED BY A PREVIOUS REPORT EIR
EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN. NO ADDITIONAL
DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED.
(85-2) FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL
RESOLUTION NO. 2428
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, FINDING THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT {EIR) FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN' IS
ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS THE PROGRAM EIR FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP 13038, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-20 AND
DESIGN REVIEW 87-13 AND ALL FEASIBLE MITIGATION
MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS REQUIRED BY THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
RESOLUTION NO. 2429
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 87-13, A
PROJECT WITH 252 APARTMENT UNITS ON 15.5 ACRES ON LOT
12 OF TRACT 12763.
Planning Commission Minut
September 28, 1987
Page five
RESOLUTION NO. 2430
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-20 FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF A 252 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX ON LOT 12
OF TRACT 12763
RESOLUTION NO. 2431 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN RECOMMENDING TO THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13038
Presentation:
Patrizia Materassi, Planner
The public hearing was opened at 9:00 p.m.
Mr. Kevin Pohlson, Irvine Pacific, indicated that he was available to answer any
questions the Commission might have.
Mr. Clayton Parker, stated that the comments that school fees and reservations of
§chool sites is mitigated is entirely unsupported.
Mr. Brad Olson, The Irvine Company, indicated that the Irvine Company was not in
disagreement with staff's language concerning school fees.
The public hearing was closed at 9:05 p.m.
Commissioner Puckett moved, Le Jeune seconded finding that the Final Environmental
Impact Report for the East Tustin Specific Plan is adequate for Tentaive Tract 13038,
Conditional Use Permit 87-20 and Design Review 87-13 by the adoption of Resolution
No. 2428. Motion carried 5-0.
Commissioner Pontious moved, Le Jeune seconded to conditionally approve Design Review
87-13 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2429 incorporating changes recommended by
staff to Exhibit A "Conditions of Approval". Motion carried 5-0.
Commissioner Le Jeune moved, Pontious seconded to approve Conditional Use Permit
87-20 with corrections noted by staff incorporated in the Resolution. Motion carried
5-0.
Commissioner Puckett moved, Le Jeune seconded to recommend to City Council the
approval of Tentative Tract Map 13038 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2431
incorporating changes recommended by staff to the Resolution and Exhibit A
"Conditions of Approval". Motion carried 5-0.
At 9:25 p.m. a ten minute recess was called. The meeting resumed at 9:35 p.m.
5. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12870/SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SECTORS 7, 8, AND 9)
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
THE IRVINE COMPANY
ROUGHLY BOUNDED BY JAMBOREE ROAD TO THE EAST, IRVINE BOULEVARD TO
THE SOUTH, EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO THE WEST, AND
PORTOLA PARKWAY AND SECTOR 5 OF THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN TO
THE NORTH.
Planning Commission Minutes
September 28, 1987
Page six
REQUEST:
TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 634.14 ACRES OF LAND PROVIDING FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFIC LAND USES PURSUANT TO THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC
PLAN.
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
THE PROJECT IS COVERED BY A PREVIOUS REPORT EIR (85-2) FOR THE EAST
TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION WILL BE .PREPARED.
RESOLUTION NO. 2437 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
FINDING THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR
THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN IS ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS THE
PROGRAM EIR FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 12870 AND ALL FEASIBLE
MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS REQUIRED BY THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
RESOLUTION NO. 2427 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
APPROVING THE SECTOR PLAN AND CONCEPT LANDSCAPING PLAN IN'
CONJUNCTION WITH TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12870 FOR SECTORS 7, 8
AND 9 OF THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN
RESOLUTION NO. 2436 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
RECOMMENDING TO THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 12870
Prsentation:
Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development
Commissioner Weil read a letter from Glenn Roberts, La Colina Dr., in favor of the
design criteria as submitted by the Irvine Company.
The public hearing was opened at 9:40 p.m.
Mr. Brad Olson, The Irvine Company, commended City, staff and the Irvine Company on
their efforts in seeing this project to this point, the golf course, while keeping
the master plan fiscally sound. The Irvine Company is extremely proud of this plan
and their relationship.
Mr. Jay Pierce, the Irvine Company, thanked the Commission, staff and the community
members for the their efforts and highlighted the major elements of the Specific Plan
as they are planned.
A discussion regarding the designer of the course, Ted Robinson followed.
Mr. Clayton Parker, attorney for Tustin ~nified School District noted that Memorial
School has no present capacity available for classrooms. He asked that access to the
school site from the easterly side of this tract and an addition to the school be
shown.
Mr. Joe Herzi~, 1751 Rainbow, recommended denial of this development due to the
adverse impact on traffic, asked that the Commission order a new EIR and asked that
development be delayed to examine the possibility of total easterly access. He
presented a petition asking that a plan be developed eliminating access through their
area. There were 10 signatures.
Planntng Commission Minutes
September 28, 1987
Page seven
Janine Harmon, 12232 Ranchwood, noted that residents have worked with the City and
the Irvine Company. She questioned the grade level of the single story homes and the
date of the EIR. Staff clarified issues.
Sheila Pr¥or, questioned why Sector g was not single story. Staff responded.
The, pub!Cc hearing closed at 10:15 p.m.
A discussion between the Commission, staff and Jay Pierce ensued regarding cable TV,
hydrology concerns and equestrian trails.
Mr. Pierce asked that the responsibility of the trail maintenance be removed from the
developer..
The public hearing was reopened at 10:50 p.m.
Mr. Ketth Greer, representing the Irvine Company noted that the issue of the Tustin
Memorial School expansion has not been discussed in the District's correspondence
received in response to filing notice. This item should be addressed in the context
of the facilities plan. He also noted that the the school district's concern was not
the proximity to the air station but rather the overflight paths.
Mr. Herzt~, again noted that the Commission can deny this map due to adverse
impacts.
Mr. Clayton Parker, stated that the safety of the children should be
regarding the air station and flight paths.
The public hearing was closed at 10:55 p.m.
considered
Commissioner Baker moved, Le Oeune seconded to find that the Final Environmental
Impact Report for the East Tustin Specific Plan is adequate for Tentative Tract Map
12870 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2437. Motion carried 5-0.
Commissioner Baker moved, Ponttous seconded to approve the Sector Plan and Concept
Landscaping Plan in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map 12870 for Sectors 7, 8 and 9
of the East Tustin Specific Plan by the adoption of Resolution No. 2427 incorporating
changes recommended by staff. Motion carried 5-0.
Commissioner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to recommend to the City Council approval
of Tentative Tract Map 12870 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2436 with changes to
recommended by staff to the Resolution and Exhibit A "Conditions of Approval"
Motion carried 5-0.
OLD BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
STAFF CONCERNS
Planning Commission Minutes
September 28, 1987
Page eight
6. REPORT ON ACTIONS TAKEN AT THE SEPTEMBER 21, 1987 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Presentation: CHRISTINE SHINGLETON, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION CONCERNS
Commissioner Le Jeune asked that an oral report on the recent meeting he and
Commissioner Pontious attended with the County Planning Commission be agendized for
the next meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
At 11:15 the meeting Nas adjourned to October 12, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. by unanimous
informal consent.
Kathy Weil
Chairman
Penni Foley
Secretary
Planning Commission
DATE: OCTOBER 12, 1987
EXTENSION OF USE PEP. NIT 86-30
APPLICAKr:
TRI-STATE ENGINEERING CO.
701 S. RAYHOND AVENUE
FULLERTON, CA 92634
OWNER:
LOCATION:
EXXON COMPANY U.S.A.
P.O. BOX 4388
HUSTON, TEXAS 77210-4388
14082 RED HILL AVENUE AT NISSON ROAD
ZONING:
C-1 RETAIL COHHERCIAL
ENVZROII~ENTAL
STATUS: CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT CLASS I
REQUEST:
EXTENSION FOR A 6 MONTH PERIOD OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED USE
PEP, NIT 86-30 AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION OF A 1,938 SQUARE FOOT
MIMI-MARKET AND GAS STATION.
RECOI~ENDED ACTION:
It ts recommended that the Planning Commission authorize the requested six (6)
month extension by the adoption of Resolutton No. 2438.
SUltRY:
The applicant has filed a request for extension of Use Permit No. 86-30 which
was approved on October 13, 1986. According to Section 9293-b of the Tustin
Municipal Code, A Use Permit is null and void if not used within one year from
the date of approval, unless otherwise specified in the Resolution approving
such Use Permit. Subject Use Permit expires on October 13, 1987 and to date
construction of the approved project has not yet commenced.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS:
The original Use Permit authorized construction of a 1,938 square foot
mini-market and gasoline sales station for the Exxon Company. This project
included demolition of the existing gas station facility and reconstruction of a
new mini-market and gasoline station in conformance with the Service Station
Design Guidelines. A copy of the staff report and resolution of approval are
attached for further information.
Community Development Department
Planntng Commission Report
October [2, [987
Page two
Since the date of approval for the project, the applicant initiated plan check
and submitted plans for structural plan check. The structural plan ch~ck
submittal was completed on ~eptember 24, 1987 when final Health Department
approval was issued for the underground tank tnstallatfon. Since demolition and
actual construction at the site will not be con~leted prior to the expiration of
the original Conditional Use Permit on October 13, 1987 a Use Permit extension
is necessary.
The applicant is at a point where permits are nearly ready for issuance and
construction can commence 'and be completed within a period of six {6) months.
No modifications are proposed from the original Use Permit application. The
proposed time extension would not modify the project in any form other than
extending the deadline for completion of construction authorized by the Use
Permit.
CONCLUSION:
Staff considers the project to be in conformance with the Zoning Code and the
previously approved project. Extension of the Use Permit, as proposed, will
allow the applicant sufficient time to complete construction and begin operation
of a use which has previously been authorized. All conditions of approval for
the original permit are incorporated into the proposed resolution o.f ~pproval
for the extension. With the inclusion of the previously required conditions,
staff considers this extension request to be acceptable and recommends approval
of the project.
Laura Cay Pickup,
Associate Planner
LCP:CAS :ts
Christine A. Shingle-to~ , l/
Director of Community Dev~Topment
Attachments:
Staff Report
Site Plans
Resolution No. 2438
Corn rnunity Devetoprnem Department
J ~,-6~1
i~il
,'l i!
L
I
Report to the
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBdECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENV TRONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
ITEH NO. 2
OCTOBER 13,-1986
USE Ell,liT NO. 86-30
TRI-STATE ENGINEERING
P.O. BOX 4214
FULLERTON, CA 92634
14082 REDHILL AVENUE AT NISSON ROAD
C-1 RETAIL'COI~IERCIAL
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT CLASS 2
TO DEPlOLISN AN EXISTING 1938 SQUARE FOOT SERVICE STATION AND
RECONSTRUCT A 1104 SQUARE FOOT MINI MARKET AND GAS STATION.
RECOI~ENDED ACTION:
Approve Use Permit No. 86-30 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2366.
smeaRY:
The applicant has filed Use Permft No. 86-30 to request authorization to
demolish an existing 1938 square foot gasoline sales and auto service station
and reconstruct an 1104 square foot convenience store and gasoline sales
station. The existing gasoline service station was issued a Conditional Use
Permit in January 1975 in order to allow a 52 foot high freeway identification
sign and establish the service station as a conforming use in the C-[ zone.
The present request meets all the requirements of adopted Service Station
Guidelines, zoning and sign codes. The applicant, as required by Section 9232-K
of the Municipal Code, is required to obtain a Use Permit. This application, as
submitted, is considered appropriate for the proposed location therefore, staff
recommends approval for this project.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS:
I1 newly constructed gasoline or service stations must follow the Service
Station Guidelines for site planning and design. These guidelines have been
attached for reference. In reviewing this application, staff has identified
'areas of concern. These issues include building design and site plan lay out,
sign placement and size and land use intensity. Each issue is discussed below:
Planning Commission Report
Exxon station
oage two
Butldlng and Stte Destgn:
This project includes the construction of a 1104 square foot retail convenience
market and two gasoltne pump islands. The C-1 zone parking requirements (one
parking space for every 200 square feet of retail area) are more restrictive
than the Service Station Guidelines. Therefore, six (6) on-site parking spaces
must be provided.
The overall lay out Is shown in the attached Exhtbtt to the Service Station
Guidelines. This preferred site lay out orientates building openings and
gasoltne pumps to the rear of the property.
Exxon has followed all service station guidelines in regards to site lay out,
parktng and landscaping. As noted on the plans as required by the Tusttn
Engineering Department, an irrevocable offer of dedication of 10 feet along
Redhtll Avenue shall be provided. The'applicant has agreed to this and has set
the building back.gO feet to ensure maintenance of required set backs after the
street ts widened.
The building itself has been designed to incorporate the new Exxon image and
color scheme. All building facades wtll be whtte tn color. All signs will be
'ed and white. The overall effect is of minimal color distraction and will
propose a 'clean' appearance. Attached are drawings of the building elevations
for further clarification.
Sign Program:
As previously mentioned, a Use Permit was granted for a 52 foot htgh freeway
identification sign. The applicant is requesting that all of the stgns on the
stte be revised. All wall mounted stgns are In conformance with the Sige Code.
Each stgn will be flush mounted and incorporate the corporate colors of red with
white trim.
This location currently has two free standing signs. One is the freeway pole
sign, the other is a six foot high monument sign. As requested, the applicant
wishes to reface the monument sign and maintain its current size. The freeway
sign will be revised by removing the existing 200 square foot sign can and
replacing it with a 140 square foot sign can.
A~l signs are in conformance with the Tustln Sign Code. Therefore, a use permit
or variance for signs is not needed for this application.
Land Use:
The project site is currently operated as a self service station only. All lube
'lays have been closed off and the service portion of the business has been
discontinued since 1975.
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
- Exxon station
~age three
This request, if authorized, would tnclude a retatl market for the sale of auto
related 1rems, food and beverage products and retell gasoltne sales. The
applicant is not requesting authorization for beer, wine or liquor sales at thls
ttme. No expected major increase, in land use Intensity is expected due to the
nature of this request. Most customers are expected to purchase f6od or
beverage items while purchasing gasoline. As previously mentioned, the existing
site is a self service gasoline retail store, therefore no major increase in
customer traffic is anticipated.
CO#CLUS]OIIS:
All design guidelines and City Code requirements have been met or exceeded in
this request. The overall land use effect, building design, site lay out and
sign program are considered acceptable for the site as reviewed by planning
staff. Although the building design and color is somewhat different for Exxon,
this new building will look similar to that of the Union 76 Station in Enderle
Center on Seventeenth Street.
The format and site lay out of the Service Station Guidelines promote
construction of projects such as this new station for Exxon. Therefore, staff
-ecommends approval for Use Permit No. 86-30 with the conditions contained in
6xhibtt A.
Assistant Planner
LP:do
attach:
~ervlce Station Guidelines
Site Plan
Elevatt OhS
Sign Plan
Resolution No. 2366
Community Development Department
'XII. SERVICE STATION DEVELOP!, T GUIDELINES
A. Policy,
Be
The City council of the City of Tustin recognizes the vehicle service
station as an essential service to ~he public. Th.e location and design of
service stations shall be such as to provide an aesthetic amenity, free
from hazards and urban blight, in addi=ion =o being a service to ~he public.
A Use Permit' shall =her,fore be required for any Service Station, Self-SerVe
Station, Drive-thru Convenience outlet, or related facilities and operations,
to assure comparability with ~he surrounding area.
Definition
1. Service Station shall mean an attended occupancy whic~ primarily
provides for the sale of motor fuels, bu~ also supplies the servicinq
and operations incidential to motor vehicles rate~ at. one and one-half
(1%) tons or less. These incidental services include the retail sale
of petroleum products and auton~tive accessories; automobile washing
(by h~nd); waxing and polishing of automobiles; ~/~e sale and repair
of tires (excluding recapping); battery service; cleaning and flushing
of radiators (excluding steam cleaning and repair); and the ins=dilation
of accessory cu~onents. Also, the follow/rig operations are permitted
if conducted within a building: lubrication of motor vehicles (1%
tons or' less); brake service limited to ~ervicing and replacement of
brake cylinders and brake shoes; wheel balancing; and the te~cing,
adjustment, an~ repla~,ement of carburetors, coils, condensers, dis-
tributor caps, fan belts, filters, gene.tarots, ~oints, rotors, spark,
plugs, voltage regulators, water hoses and wiring. The performance
of minor emergency repairs is allows for vehicles of one and one-half
(1%) tons or less.
2. Self-Serve Station,. shall mean an occupancy which primarily provides for
the self-~ispensing of motor fuels, and may also include automatic
e
9.
10.
11.
d. Drive-thru convenience Outlet -3 spaces plus 1 space for each 200
sq. ft. of building area on the site.
Accessor~ buildings, for the storage of accessory goods to be sold at
retail on the site, such as tires, tubes, waxes, lubricants, e~c., shall
be architecturally harmonious wi~h ~he design of =he main structure and
shall require specific Use Permit approval.
Trash storage areas shall be an enclosed masonry s=ructure, minimum six
(6) foot by eight (8) foot.
Lights. for ill,--{nating the site or advar~ise the facility shall be
located in such a manner so as to contain all direct rays upon ~he
subjec~c property. Fixtures and intensi~y shall require the approval of
the c~unity Development Director.
' signing shall be in accordance with =he City. of Tustin Sign Code (Ord.
No. 684).
Maximum Allowable Height - thirty-five (35) fee=.
Minimum Buildin~ Site - ten thousand (10,000) s.cuare feet.
Maximum Lot Coverage- (Buildings an~ Structures) Fifty (50) Percent.
M~-~um Lot Width at Pro~e=~ Line:
Corner Lot: One hundred (100) feet
Interior Lot: One hundred (100) feet
Yards and Setbacks.: Front Side Rear
Frontage on Major Highway (120 ' ' ~W) 75 ' 75 ' 75 '
(Measured from centerline)
Froatage on Primary Highway (100 ' P~W) 65 ' 65 ' 65 '
(Measured from centerline)
Frontage on Secondary Highway (80 ' ROW) 55' $5' 55'
(Measured from centerline)
Ail other si=es and yards, not abutting a priory or Secondar~ Highway:
Front Yard: Fifteen (15) feet, unless otherwise indicated ~n Zoning
Side Yard: Unless otherwise indicated on Zoning Map: 12'
DR I VE
APRON
SET3~
L I NE
'~4~g~~ ~;~ ..~.~ .... ~ /
,Za,c., '
PAVEMENT. ~ TRASH E~JCLOSUR~
~ ~ '~~ -,, ~,Z[~ ..... ~ ,
STREET TREES PER CITY---~
MASTER PLAN
ARTERI._._AL HIGHWAY
J I
t l' ] ,
,,..,,,. I, I t~,, ii
!t!~,~i, IIi Ii ~,, ~1~,i, ,~ ,"
I I _
I1
'i
iii ii ii t~ t~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
:25,
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2366
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING CONSTRUCTION OF A MINI
MARKET AND GAS STATION AT 14082 REDHILL AVENUE
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
Ae
That a proper application, (Use Permit No. 86-30) has been filed
on behalf of Exxon USA te request authorization to construct &
~tni ~rket and gas station at 14082 Redhill Avenue.
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
appli cati on.
C®
That estebllshment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case,
be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or
general welfareof the persons residing or working tn the
neighborhood of such proposed use, evidenced by the following
findings:
1. This project is located in the C-1 Retail Commercial Zone..
The use applied for is in conformance with the C-1 zone
requirements of the Tustin Municipal Code.
That service stations are' permitted subject to Conditional
Use Permtt.
That the proposed project is in conformance with adopted
Service Station Guidelines.
De
That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimantel to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and should be
granted.
Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the ButldingOfficial, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
This project is categorically exempt (Class 2) from the
requirements of the California Environmental. Quality Act.
Final development plans shall require the review and approval of
the Co~mmunity Development Department.
2
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
'17
18
19
20
21
22:
23
25
27
28
Resolution ~1o. 2366
page ~o
ii.
The Planning Commission hereby apDroves Conditional Use Perm~'c No.
86-30 to authorize const~ctlon of a mtn1 market and gas station at
14082 I~eclh~11 Avenue subjec'~ to the conditions con~tned tn Exhlbtt
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a mgula ~r~'i~ee_!;.1.~. ,o,f the Tusttn P
he'ld on the /o--'~4 day of ~.. ~_ ,,,~_,~..~ ~., xx'ntng
, 198 ~ .
Recto-d1 ng Sec~'e~r7
on ~
Chat renan
do
up86-30
at~ach: Exh'i bt 1: A
EXHIBIT "A"
RESOLUTION NO. 2366
e
The ftnal stte plan shall be standardized and reflect all appropriate City
standard drawtng numbers. The developer shall construct all missing or
damaged street improvements to said developmant per the City of Tustin
"Minimum Design Standards of Public Works" and "Street Improvement
Standards". This work shall consist of, but is not limited to, curbs and
gutters, sidewalks, drive apron, and street pay,men=.
Current records tndtcate that the existing development may not be connected
to a sanitary sewer. In the event it is not, the new building shall be
connected.
Records indicate that O~ange County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer
connection fees have not been paid. These fees will require payment at the
time a building permit is issued. Fee amounts are based upon $180.00 per
[,000 Sq. ft. of build~ng area or $250.00, whichever is greater, and any
front footage charges if connected to a County sanitation trunk sewer.
An irrevocable offer of dedication of street right of way [0 feet in width
along Redhill Avenue will be required, as well as an enlarged corner
cut-off area to accommodate the curb return.
The subject parcel wtll requtre annexation to the City of Tusttn [972
Street Ltghtlng and Landscape 01strict.'
A separate street improvement plan will be requtred showing all extsttng
and proposed publlc tmprovemants which shall include, but not be limited
to, the following:
a. Replacement or construction of damaged or missing curb/gutter, drive
apron or s~dewa~k
b. Closure of driveways and replacemant with curb/gutter and sidewalk
c. Sanitary sewer latoral if required
d. Street trees
e. Street lights
All new construction must be referenced to the applicable City standard
drawing numbers.
The Engineering Division requires that a letter from the developer, stating
that they agree to annex to the Tustln Light, rig/Landscape Oistr~ct
effective August 1, 1987.
a. The developer wtll be required to install the street light conduit and
pay Edison Co. the street light Installation cost.
b. The developer wtll be requtred to pay the ctty the advanced energy
charges from the date of £dtson tnstellatton to August [, [987.
xhtbit "A"
page two
10.
13.
Underground tanks and product lines shall meet the requirements of Orange
County Health and State Codes.
This project shall comply with the Uniform Fire Code Div. IX Section 79.901
1982 edition.
All signs shall conform to the requirements of Tusttn's Sign Ordinance No.
684.
No alcoholic beverages are authorized for sale at this location unless a
Use Permit is granted for such sales.
All on-site lighting shall be directed inward to avoid light expansion
beyond the property line.
The monument sign shall be relocated at the time Redhtll Avenue is widened,
the cost of which shall be beared by Exxon USA or its assignees or
successors.
A landscaping plan shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of
building permits.
I5. All products and storage shall be contained within the building.
COUNTY OF ORANGg )
CITY OF TU~'I'IN )
~ecr~ o~ ~e Planning Co~ss~ofl of ~e C~ of Tus:~n,
~llfornia;, ~a: Resalu~on ~o. ~..X,,.-~ was duly passed and adopted
O0'NNA Ona
-~e¢ordl ng Secretary
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11~
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2438
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, AUTHORIZING A SIX (6) MONTH
EXTENSION OF USE PERMIT 86-30 FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF A 1938 SQUARE FOOT MINI-MARKET AND GASOLINE
SALES STATION AT 14082 RED HILL AVENUE.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as-
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
That a proper request for extension for Use Permit No.86-30 has
been filed on behalf of the Exxon Company U.S.A. requesting
authorization for a six. (6) month extension to allow for
construction and operation of a 1938 square foot mini-market and
gasoline sales station at 14082 Red Hill Avenue.
B. That a pubic hea~tng was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case,
be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or
general welfare of the persons residing or working in .the
neighborhood of such proposed use, as evidenced by the following
findings:
Section g293-b of the Tusttn Municipal Code authorizes the
Planning Commissio~ to grant time limit extensions on
previously approved Use Permits.
2. The project is in relative conformance with the previously
approved Use Permit.
The use applied for is in conformance with the Tustin
General Plan and is a conditionally permitted use in the C-1
Retail Commerical Zoning District.
That the extension requested will allow for the establishment,
maintenance, and operation of a use which will not be injurious
or detrimental to the property and improvements in the
neighborhood of the subject property, nor to the general welfare
of the City of Tustin, and should be granted.
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2438
page two
E. Proposed development shall be tn accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer and-
requirements of the County of Orange Environmental Management
Agency.
F. This project is categorically exert from the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act.
Ge
Final development plans shall require the review and approval
of the Community Development Department.
II.
The Planning Commission h~reby approves a 6 (six) month extension of
Conditional Use Permit No. 86-30 to authorize a 1938 square foot
mini-market and gasoline sales station at 14082 Red Hill Avenue
subject to the following conditions:
All conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 2366
which authorizes Use Permit 86-30 shall apply to this extension.
The use applied for shall be constructed and in operation prior
to April 13, 1987 unless an. extension of this time limit is
approved by the Planning Commission.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 198
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
PENNI FOLEY,
Recording Secretary
Report. to the
Planning Commission
ITEM NO. 3
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
OCTOBER 12, 1987
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 87-370
K. #. LAM. ER & ASSOCIATES, INC. ON BEHALF OF MAC PHERSON
PROPERTIES, 301 NEST WARNER AVENUE, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92707
THE IRVINE COMPANY
550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660
2, 33, 21 AUTO CENTER DRIVE
LOTS 10, 11, 12 OF PARCEL MAP84-1032
PLANNED COll~UNITY COMMERCIAL (AUTO CENTER)
ENVIROIIIENTAL
STATUS: CATEGORICALLY EXEHPT, CLASS 15
RECOI~IENDATION:
It is recommended that the Planning-Commtssto~ recommend approval of Tentative
Parcel Map 87-370 to the City Council by the adoption of Resolution No. 2439, as
submitted or revised.
BACKGROUND:
In June, 1985 the Tusttn Auto Center was created by final approval of a Parcel
Map (84-1032) which subdivided 56 acres into 12 numbered parcels for auto
dealerships.
The applicant is now requesting authorization to resubdtvtde three (3) parcels
for the purpose of creating two (2) separate auto s~les *facilities. Both of
these auto dealerships will be owned and operated by Mac Pherson Properties.
The dealership on proposed Lot 1 will be for Ford Motor Company products and
proposed Lot 2 will be a facility for a Hyundai dealership.
The subject properties to be resubdlvtded are currently vacant with all street
and public improvements in place. The site is bordered on all sides by Auto
Center Drive. The balance of the Auto Center is reserved for new car
dealerships, three (3) of which are. in operation with a fourth under
construction.
, Community Development Department
Planntng Commission Report
October [2, 1987
Tentative Parcel Map 87-370
Page two
Although the destgn of the proposed auto dealerships does not requtre Planntng
Commission revtew, development plans propose etght (8) buildings which wtll
total 74,730 square feet or 194 of the enttre stte, a parktng and circulation
area of 166,013 square feet or 434 of the stte, and a dtsplay area of 123,100
square feet or 324 of the stte, and landscaped area of 22,185 square feet or 64
of the stte.
The subject site ts a modified ctrcular shape whtch wlll Incorporate perimeter
landscaping consisting of palm trees and turf. In addttton to perimeter
landscaping the tntertor of the lot wtll be landscaped in conformance with the
Auto Center Landscaping Guidelines.
Proposed structures Incorporate the use of a Spanish Mtsston style of
architecture wtth stucco Walls and barrel tile roofs. All proposed structures
are in conformance wtth the Auto Center Architectural Guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS:
The proposed map is in conformance with the Tustln Auto Center Guidelines and
the Subdivision Map Act. Therefore, staff recommends that the Commission adopt
the attached Resolution No. 2439.
MAC:per
Attachments: Map
Resolution No. 2439
Director of Community Development
Corrtrnunity DeveloPment DeparTment
oo
-- __'IA Ill n l~.L#!~
O/fly
,/
The
6
7
8
9
13
14
17
20
21
22
23
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2439
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP 87-370 LOCATED AT 2, 33, 21 AUTO CENTER DRIVE
Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
Ae
That Tentative Parcel Map No. 87-370 was submitted to the
Planning Commission pursuant to Ordinance No. 847 by K. W.
Lawler & Assotctates, Inc. on behalf of Mac Pherson Properties
and the Irvine Co.any, requesting authorization to resubdivide
three (3) parcels into two (2) parcels for Parcels 10, 11 and 12
of Parcel Map 84-1032 as recorded in Book 200, Pages 19 through
24 in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held for said
map.
This project is Categorically Exempt, Class 15 from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act for the
subject project area.
That the proposed subdivision is tn conformance with the Tusttn
Area General Plan, adopted East Tustin Specific Plan, Tustin
Auto Center Guidelines, East. Tusttn Development Agreement and
Subdivision Map Act.
That the site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed.
That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
development.
Ge
That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements
are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife in their
habitat.
He
That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements
proposed will not conflict with easements acquired by the
public-at-large, for access through or use of the property
within the proposed subdivision.
I. That the design of the subdivision or the types of improvements
proposed are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
12
15
17
18
10
20
21
27
28
Resolution No, 2439
Page two
II.
The Planning Commfsslon hereby recommends to the Ctty Council
approval of Tentative Parcel Hap No. 87-370 subject to the conditions
attached hereto as £xhtbtt A.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustln Planning Commission,-
held on the day of , [987.
Kathy Weil,
Chairman
Penni Foley,
Secretary
Exhtbit A
to Resolution No. 2439
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 87-370 '
PUBLZC/PRXVATE XNFRASTRUCTURE XNPROVEXENTS
1.11 Any damage done to exlsttng street improvements and utilities shall be
repatred before acceptance of the tract and/or issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for development on any parcel within the
subdivision.
1.13 Prior to any work in the public right-of-way, an Excavation Permit must
be obtained (and applicable fees paid) from the Public Works
Department.
GRADING/DRAINAGE
2.1 Preparation and submittal of final grading plans
following is required prior to approval of Final Map.
2.2
2.3
delineating the
A. Final street elevations at key locations
B. Final pad/finish floor elevations and key elevations for all site
grading. All final pad elevations to be a minimum of 1.0 feet above
the base flood elevation as defined by FEMA.
C. All flood hazard areas of record must be shown.
Prior to issuance of precise grading permits, a detailed soil
engineering report shall be submitted to and approved by the Building
Official conforming to the requirements of the Uniform Building Code,
City Grading Requirements.
Prior to issuance of grading permits, preparation and submittal of a
grading plan subject to approval of the Department of Community
Development delineating the following information:
A. Methods of drainage in accordance with all applicable City
standards.
B. All recommendations submitted by geotechntcal or soil engineer and
specifically approved by them.
C. Con~ltance with conceptual grading shown on tentative tract map.
D. A drainage plan and necessary support documents to comply with the
following requirements:
1)
Provision of drainage facilities to remove any flood hazard to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer which will allow building
pads to be safe from inundation from rain fall which may be
expected from all storms up to and including the theoretical 100
year storm and dedication of any necessary easements on the
final map as required.
2) Elimination of any sheet flow and ponding.
3) Provision of drainage facilities to protect the lots from any
high velocity scouring action.
Resolution No. 2439
Exhibit A
Page two
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
4) Provision for contributory drainage from adjoining properties.
E. All flood hazard areas of record.
F. A note shall be placed on the grading plan requiring Community
Development Department approval of rough grading prior to final
clearance for foundations. The Department will inspect the site for
accuracy of elevations, slope gradients, etc. and may require
certification of any grading related matter.
Preparation of a sedimentation and erosion control plan for all
construction work related to the subject Tract including a method of
control to prevent dust and windblown earth problems.
A precise grading permit shall be issued prio~ to issuance of any
building permits within the subject Tract.
A qualified paleontologist/archealogist, as appropriate shall be
present during rough grading operations. If resources are found, work
shall stop in the affected area and all resources shall be excavated or
preserved as deemed appropriate or as recommended by the
paleontologist/archealologist subject to review and approval by the
Department of Public Works and Community Development. All "finds"
shall be reported immediately to the Department of Community
Development.
The paleontologtst/archealogtst shall attend the pregrade construction
meeting to ensure that this condition and necessary procedures in the
event of a "find" are explained.
All earthwork shall be performed in accordance with the City of Tustin
Municipal Codes and grading requirements.
FXRE DEPARTMENT
3.1
3.2
The subdivider shall comply with all requirements of the Orange County
Fire Marshall, including required fire flow, installation where
required of fire hydrants subject to approval as to location by the
Fire Department, City of Tustin Public Works Department and Irvine
Ranch Water District, and compliance with all requirements pertaining
to construction.
Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction,
evidence that adequate water supply and operational fire hydrants are
available for fire protection is available shall be submitted and
approved by the Orange County Fire Marshall. The subdivider shall also
submit water improvement plans for approval of Fire Marshal.
Resolution No. 2439
Exhibit A
Page three
NOISE
FEES
GENERAL
4.1
5.1
All construction operations including engine warm up shall be subject
to the provisions of the City of Tustin Noise Ordinance and shall take
place only during the hours of 7:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday unless the Building Official determines that said
activity will be in substantial conformance with the Noise Ordinance
and the public health and safety will not be impaired subject to
application being made at the time the permit for the work is awarded
or during progress of the work.
Prior to issuance of any building permits, payment shall be made of all
required fees tnclud!ng:
A. Major thoroughfare and bridge fees to Tustin Public Works
Department.
B. Sanitary sewer connection fee to Orange County Sanitation District.
C. Grading planchecks and permit fees to the Community Development
Department.
D. All applicable Building plancheck and permit fees to the Community
Development Department.
E. New development fees to the Community Development Department.
F. School facilities fee to the Tusttn Unified School District subject
to any agreement reached and executed between the District and the
Irvine Company.
6.1 Within twenty four months from Tentative Tract Map approval, the
Subdivider shall file with appropriate agencies, a Final Map prepared
in accordance with subdivision requirements of the Tustin Municipal
Code, the State Subdivision Map Act, and applicable conditions
contained herein.
6.2 Prior to Final Map approval, ~subdtvider shall submit a current title
report.
Resolution No. 2439
Exhibit A
Page four
6.3
6.4
Subdivider shall conform to all applicable provisions of the City
Code. All requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act, the City's
Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance shall be satisfied.
Subdivider shall submit a duplicate mylar of the Final Map, or 8 1/2
inch by 11 inch transparency of each map sheet prior to final map
approval and "as built" grading, landscape and improvement plans prior
to certificate of acceptance.
6.5 All easements of record shall be shown on the Final Map.
Planning Commission
ITEM NO. 4
DATE:
SUB~IECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
OCTOBER 12, 1987
TENTAT]:¥E TRACT MAP NO. 13094 AND DES]~GN REVIEW 87-16
BRAMALEA CALIFORNIA, INC.
LOTS 1, 2, D, F, G, AND N OF TRACT 12763
1) AUTHORTZATION TO SUBDIVIDE 20.47 ACRES ]~NTO 103 NUMBERED AND 4
(FOUR) LETTERED LOTS FOR SINGLE FA/lILY DEVELOPMENT,
2) APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED
PRO~IECT
THE PRO~IECT IS COVERED BY A PREV]~OUS EIR (85-2) FOR THE EAST
TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN. NO ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED
RECOI~ENDED ACTION:
It is recommended that the Planning Commission take the following actions:
1. Approve Environmental Determination for project by adoption of
Resolution No. 2440, as submitted or revised.
2. Approve Design Review 87-16 by adoption of Resolution No. 2441, as
submitted or revised.
· 3. Recommend to City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map 13094 by
adoption of Resolution No. 2442, as submitted or revised.
SIJI~ARV:
Applicant proposes to subdivide a 20.47 acre site into 103 numbered and four (4)
lettered lots for'the purpose of developing 103 single family detached dwelling
units. Prior to development as proposed, the Planning Commission must approve
the proposed Tentative Tract Map and a Design Review of the project pursuant to
provisions of the East Tustin Specftc Plan.
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
October [2, 1987
Tentative Tract Map [3094
Page two
The project stte is bordered by Brownfng Avenue on the west, a Southern
California Edtson subsfatlon and Lot 15 of Tract 12763 to the south, Park Center
Lane to the east, an *extsttng stngle family development to the northwest, and
Lot 3 of Tract Map [2763 to the northeast. Planned and anticipated development
in the vtcfntty include a proposed church to the south on Lot 15 (subject to
future, qpproval of a Conditional Use Permit) and a proposed 118 unlt stngle
family detached development to the northeast immediately adjacent to the
project.
PROJECT' DESCRIPTION/SITE PLAN:
Submitted development plans for the project propose constructlon of [03
two-story stngle family detached dwelltng untts on lots approximately 5,000
square feet in stze. The project contatns three unit types -- 25 four bedroom
(or three bedroom plus a den) units, 36 five bedroom units and 42 four bedroom
units wfth famtly room and. bonus room. Units wtll range tn size from
approxlmetely 2,573 square feet to approxfmately 2,9[4 square feet. The overall
densfty of the project ts proposed at ffve dwellfng untts per acre with twenty
foot minimum front setbacks proposed for the project. Although the Speciftc
Plan recommends a minimum rear setback of 25 feet and an average of 30 feet
adjacent to extsttng stngle family dwellings to the north, development plans
propose setbacks whtch range between 27 - 67 feet with an average setback of 40
feet far in excess of the minimum setback requtred fn the East Tustt'n Specific
Plan.
In conjunction wtth the proposed project, the applicant proposes construction of
seven publtc streets all of whtch w~ll be built at a publlc street right-of-way
standard of 56 feet with Inclusion of a standard parkway and sidewalks. Access
to the exlsttng street system surrounding the project wfll be provtded by Burnt
Mtll Road on the west at Browntng Avenue approxt_mately 160 feet north of the
southerly border of the project and on the east at "B" Street and Park Center
Lane at the northeast corner of the project. The applicant has entered tnto an
agreement for the construction of common Intersection Improvements for "B"
Street with the J. M. Peters-Company who will be processfng Tentative Tract Map
[3053 for development of [[8 stngle famtly untts immediately to the nor'th of "B"
Street.
Other features of the project can be summarized as follows:
The project proposes a lO foot wide pedestrfan and btcycle paseo lot
(Lot "0") at the southeast corner of the project located between Lot
44 and 45 to facilitate dtrect and hazard free connections to adjacent
projects, neighborhood support services, acttvtty nodes and Cftywtde
btcycle tratls (the closest betng along Bryan Avenue).
-- Three (3) landscaped lots are proposed for landscapfng along Brownfng -
Avenue and Park Center Lane.
Com rnunlty DeveloPment Department
Planning Commission Report
October 12, 1987
Tentative Tract Hap 13094
Page three
The project ts proposed to be constructed in three (3) phases with
construction of 30 units in Phase t, 31 units in Phase II and 37 units
in Phase III.
Up to a 6'8" split face concrete block wall consistent with the theme
wall approved with Tract Map 12763 is proposed to be constructed
around the project. Staff would recommend establishment of design
standards to be. used for any wall and fencing constructed to divide
common property lines within the Tract.
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN:
The proposed architectural design for the project will introduce three (3)
architectural styles --- an upgraded Spanish Colonial style (stucco Spanish roof
tile, arched windows), Spanish Monterey style (second story wood balconies, wood
roof beams) and an early California Monterey ranch style (exposed roof beams,
window and door wood trim and some wood siding). Prospective buyers will be
able to choose one of the above architectural designs for any one of the
proposed unit types.
The proposed architecture is consistent with the desired East Tustln Ranch
style.
ISSUES
COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT - Several owners of the existing homes
t~'~e north have raised questions of con~atibility between the two tracts. The
primary concern of these owners is in the area of privacy. The proposed new
houses bordering Tract 6628 are two story structures, while only one of the
seven Tract 6628 houses on the border is two stories high. Adjacent owners feel
the situation is further exacerbated by the second story window areas on the
rear elevations of the proposed houses.
It is staff's view that the applicant has made efforts to reduce the qmpact of
the subject project on the existing tract to the north. As indicated previously
in the staff report, setbacks provided range from 27 to 67 feet although the
East Tustin Specific Plan only requires a minimum 25 foot rear yard. In'
addition, four of the proposed nine lots which abut the existing single family
development to the north contain unit types (Unit # 2) which only have one
second story master bedroom window which faces north.
Staff does not see redesign of the proposed houses as practical with the efforts
already made by the applicant. However, since the East Tustin Specific Plan
does permit 7 1/2 foot high walls on common property lines,.staff would suggest
that the proposed property line wall be increased in height to provide a greater
Comnnunity DeveloPment Dep~rtrnent
Planning Commission Report
October 12, 1987
Tentative Tract Hap 13094
Page four
degree of privacy for property owners to the south.
School Facilities -. As of the transmttta) date of this staff report no
correspondence has been recetved from the Tusttn Unified School 0istrfct on
Tentative Tracf Hap 13094. As Information becomes available, it will be
transmitted to the Commtssfon.
Whtle the Commission may recall that school facilities were reserved fn
conjunction with Tract Ma~ 12763, the School Facilities Agreement between the
Irvine'Company and the Tusttn Unified School District provides that the Irvine
Company would not process for approval by the Ctty ftnal residential builder
map unttl an agreement is reached between the Company and District providing a
funding mechanism for provision of adequate school facilities in East Tustln.
Prior to. ftling of' Tentatfve Tract Hap 13094, the City dtd request information
from the Distrfct and Company on the status of School financing. While, no
response has been recefved from the District, correspondence was received from
the Irvtne Company on September 21, [987. The Company has prepared a
Preliminary 5chool Facilities and Financing Plan for the Tusttn Ranch community
which was sent to the District on July 13, 1987. In addition, on August 14,
1987, they forwarded to the District a Technical Supplement to the plan which
provided a more detailed explana(ion of the methodology used in the preparation
of our Preliminary Financing and Facility Plan.
While the Company has reached no conclusions with the District on the plan,
staff feels that there has been a good faith effort by the Company to address
the requirements for the East Tustin Plan. In addition, in reviewing the status
of the School Facilities Agreement between The Irvine Company and the Tustin
Unified School District, the East Tusttn Specific Plan, EIR 85-2, the impacts of
Tentative Tract Map 13094 on School District facilities, and changes in State
law, it has been determined that the impacts on School District facilities by
approval of Tract Map 13094 are adequately addressed through the reservation of
a high school site and elementary site in.conjunction with Tentative Tract Map
12763, and imposition of school facilities fees as a condition of approval of
Tentative Tract Map 13094. :
ENVIROII~ENTAL ANALYSIS
Based upon review of the subject map as well as Environmental Impact Report 85-2
{as supplemented) it has been determined that environmental issues relating to
this project have previously been addressed. Also, appropriate mitigating
measures identified in EIR 85-2 are included as conditions of approval for the
project. With this information in mind, it is recommended that the Commission
make the finding that requirments of the California Environmental Quality Act
have been met and that no further environmental review is required.
Community DeveloPment Department
Planning Commission Report
October 12, 1987
Tentative Tract Map 13094
Page five
CONDITZONS OF APPROVAL.
A list of conditions'of approval is included within 'the attached Resolutions.
Outside of specific issues discussed in this report, conditions of approval are
standard conditions required by either the Specific Plan, other applicable
municipal codes, the approved Development Agreement for the project area or
requirements of City Departments or outside reviewing agencies. Staff will
respond to any questions concerning listed conditions at the October 12th public
hearing.
CONCLUSION
Given the analyst~ conducted by staff and consideration of comments from other
agencies and the. public, it is concluded that the proposed project meets
requirements of the East Tustin Specific Plan, the Subdivision Map Act as
adopted and the California- Environmental Quality Act. It is therefore
recommended that the Commission recommend to City Council approval of Tentative
Tract Map 13094 and approve Design Review 87-16.
Christine htng eton J/
Director of Community D~velopment
CAS:pef
Attachments: Site Plan
Elevations
Resolution No. 2440, 2441, & 2442
Corn rnunity Development Department
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2440
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, FINDING THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT (EIR) FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN IS
ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS. THE PROGRAM EIR FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP 13094 AND DESIGN REVIEW 87,16 AND ALL
FEASIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE .BEEN INCORPORATED AS
REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows: -
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
Ae
Tentative Tract Map 13094 and respective development plans are
considered "projects" pursuant to the terms of the California
Environmental Quality Act; and
The projects are covered by a previously certified final
environmental t~act report for the East Tustin Specific Plan
which serves as a Program EIR for the proposed project and;
II.
The East Tusttn Specific Plan final Environmental Impact Report
previously certified on March 17, 1986 was considered prior to
approval of these projects. The Planning Commission hereby finds:
this project is within the scope of the East Tustin Specific Plan
previously approved; the effect of this project was examined in the
Program EIR; and all feasible mitigation measures and alternatives
developed in the Program EIR are incorporated into this project. The
Final EIR is therefore determined to be adequate to serve as a
Program EIR for this project and satisfies all requirements of CEQA.
Applicable mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR have been
incorporated into this project which mitigates any potential
significant environmental effects thereof. The mitigation measures
are identified as Conditions on Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2441
approving Design Review 87-16 and Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2442
recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 13094.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustln at a
regular meeting held on the day of , 198__.
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
PENNI FOLEY,
Secretary
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2441
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 87-16 A
PROJECT WITH 103 DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS ON
20.47 ACRES ON LOTS 1 AND 2 OF TRACT 12763
The Planning Commission of the Cit~ of Tustln does hereby resolve as
follows: -
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper application, Design Review No. 87-16, was filed-
by Bramalea California, Inc., requesting approval of a 103
detached single family dwelling unit project.
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application on October 12, 1987.
Ce
Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tusttn Municipal Code, the
Commission finds that the location, size, architectural features
and general appearance of the proposed development will not
impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the
present or future development therein, or the occupancy as a
whole. In making such findings, the Commission has considered
at least the following items:~
1. Height, bulk and area of buildings.
2. Setbacks and site planning.
3. Exterior materials and colors.
4. Type and pitch of roofs.
5. Size and spacing of windows, doors and other openings.
6. Towers, chimneys, roof structures, flagpoles, radio
television antennae.
and
7. Landscaping, parking area design and traffic circulation.
8. Location, height and standards of exterior illumination.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
9.1
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2441
Page two
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Location and appearance of equipment located outside of an
enclosed structure.
Location and method of refuse storage.
Physical relationship of proposed structures to existing -
structures tn the neighborhood.
Appearance and design relationship of proposed structures
to existing structures and possible future structures in
the neighborhood and public thoroughfares.
Proposed signing.
Development Guidelines and criteria as adopted by the City
Council.
II.
The Planning Commission conditionally approves Design Review 87-16
authorizing construction of a project with 103 single family detached
dwelling units subject to the conditions attached hereto as Exhibit
A.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 198~.
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
PENNI FOLEY,
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
DESIGN REVIEM 87-16
CO#DITIO#SOF APPROVAL
RESOLUTION NO. 2441
GENERAL
1.1
The proposed project shall substantially conform wtth the submitted stte plan
for the project date stamped September 16, I987 on ftle with the Community
Development Department, as heretn modified, or as modtfted by the Dtrector of
Coi~e-~ntty Development Department tn accordance with thts exhibtt.
1.2 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in this exhibit shall be
complied with prior to the issuance of any building permit for the project,
subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department.
1.3 Design review approval shall be become null and void unless building permits
are issued within eighteen (18) months of the date on this Exhibit.
1.4
At building plan check, construction plans, structural calculations, and title
24 energy calculations shall be submitted. Requirements of the Uniform
Building Codes, State Handicap and Energy Requirements shall be complied with
as approved by the Building Official.
1.5 At building plan check, provide preliminary technical detail and plans for all
utility installations including cable TV, telephone, gas, water and
electricity. Additionally, a note on plans shall be included stating that no
field changes shall be mede without corrections submitted to and approved by
the Building Official.
1.6 At building plan check submittal of final grading and specifications
consistent with the site plan and landscaping plans and prepared by a
registered civil engineer for approval of the Community Development
Department.
1.7 Submittal of a precise soils engineering report provided by a soils engineer
within the previous twelve (12) months.
1.8 Applicants shall satisfy all Public Works Department requirements including
but not limited to all conditions contained in Resolution No. 2442.
1.9 Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Orange County Fire Chief
including required ftreflow and installation, where required, of fire hydrants
subject to approval of the Fire Department, City of Tustin Public Works
Department and Irvine Ranch Water District and compliance with all
requirements pertaining to construction.
1.10 Submittal of a detailed acoustical noise study prepared by a qualified
acoustical expert shall be subject to review and approval by the Community
Development Department to insure that interior noise levels do not exceed a
mextmum of 45dBa's.
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 2441
Page t~o
1.11 Consideration shall be given to rough plumbing to retatn future solar heattng
options. Copper shall be installed from hot water closet in attic and hot
water closet increased in size to accommodate a solar water heater and
addition of allOv electrical outlet.
1.12 Modifications to locations on specific unit types shall be permitted subject
to approval of Department of Community Development provided that location and
number of unit type #2 shall not change adjacent to existing single family
units to the north.
1.13 Applicant will be permitted to obtain building permits for model unit
construction prior to approval of Final Map 13094 provided all building code
requirements have been met including Public Works, Fire Department and
Co,m~nity Development Department requirements and approvals.
SIT, AND BUILDING CONDITIONS
2.1 All exterior colors to be used shall be subject to a review and approval of
the Director of the Community Development Department. All exterior treatments
must be coordinated with regard to color, materials and detailing and noted on
submitted construction plans and elevations shall indicate all colors and
materials to be used.
2.2
A six foot high chain linked fence shall be installed around the site prior to
building construction stages. Gated entrances shall be permitted along the
perimeter of the site for construction vehicles.
2.3
No rooftop mechanical or electrical fixtures and equipment shall be provided.
All telephone and electrical boxes must be indicated on the building plans and
shall be con~letely screened. Electrical transformers, where provided and
wherever possible shall be located toward the interior of the project
maintaining a sufficient distance from frontage of the project.
2.4
Submit detail for all on-site subdivision walls to be constructed by developer
including a design program for common property walls on individual lots. Show
type of wall cap and type of color, exterior materials which should be
consistent with wall concepts approved for Tract 12763 and decorative
treatment of all exposed walls. A protective rail or guard must be installed
on top of retaining walls where there is more than a thirty (30) inch drop.
Check the building code and provide details for such treatment. All walls
shall be contained within boundaries of individual lots with the exception of
subdivision walls along Park Center Lane and Browning Avenue which may be
located on landscaping lettered lots. The proposed common property lines
walls adjacent to existing single family dwellings to the north shall be
raised to 7.5 feet.
2.5 Provide security lighting along bicycle and pedestrian paseo (Lot B) which
shall be decorative and consistent with the architectural style of the
project.
Exhtbtt A
Reosolutton No. 2441
Page three
2.6 The submitted mailbox architectural detail shall be revised indicating color
and exterior treatment {number of coats of paint, etc.) to ensure wear and
durability. The style of individual mail boxes shall be subject to approval
of the Director of Community Development prior to installation and should be
decorative and consistent with architectural style of project. Indicate on
site plan and improvement plans the proposed location of all structures and
provide construction level footing and attachment details.
2.7
Provide final master sign plan for project to include: a) project
identification; b) on-site address signs. Provide generalized location,
sizes, design and colors subject to review and approval of Tustin Police
Department and Community Development Department.
LANDSCAPING, GROUNDS AND HARDSCAPE ELEHENTS
3.1 Landscaping plans for landscaping lots "A"," B", and "C" shall address the
control of fertilizers, pesticides, and irrigation water runoff.
3.2
Future formal submittals shall substantially conform to the submitted
landscaping concept plan on file with the Department of Community Development,
for Tract Map 12763 as herein and modified or as modified by the Director of
Community Development pursuant to the City's Design Review procedures.
3.3
At plan check stages a completely detailed landscape and irrigation plan must
be submitted for landscaping Lots "A", "B" and "C" with whatever scale
necessary to depict adequately what is occurring. Provide summary table
applying indexing identification to plant materials in their actual location.
The plan and table must list botantical and common names, sizes, spacing,
actual location and quantity of the plant materials proposed. Show planting
and berming details, soil preparation, staking, etc. The irrigation plan
shall show location and control of backflow prevention devices, pipe size,
sprinkler type, spacing and coverage. Details for all equipment must be
provided.
Show all property lines on the landscaping and irrigation plan, public
right-of-way areas, sidewalk widths, parkway areas, and wall locations. The
Department of Community Development may request minor substitutions of plant
materials or request additional sizing or quantty materials during plan
check. Note on landscaping plan that coverage of landscaping irrigation
materials is subject to field inspection at project completion by the
Department of Community Development.
3.4 The submitted landscaping plans at plan check must reflect the following
requirements for areas included in master landscape plan for Tract 12763:
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 2441
Page four
a)
Turf is unacceptable for grades over 25~ a combination of planting
materials must be used, ground cover on large areas alone is not
acceptable.
b) Provide a minimum of one 15 gallon size tree for every 30 feet of
property line on the property perimeter and five 5 gallon shrubs.
3.5 All newly planted trees shall be staked according to City standards.
3.6 Shrubs shall be a minimum of 5 gallon size and shall be spaced a minimum of 8
feet on center when intended as screen planning.
3.7 Ground cover shall be planted between 8 to 12 inches on center.
3.8 When I gallon plant sizes are used the spacing may vary according to materials
used.
3.9 Up along fences and or walls and equipment areas provide landscaping screening
with shrubs, and or vines and trees on plan check drawings.
3.10 All plant materials shall be installed in a healthy vigorous condition typical
to the species.
3.11 Landscaping must be maintained in a neat and healthy condition, this will
include but not be limited to trimtng, mowing, weeding, removal of litter,
fertilizing, regular watering, or replacement of disease or dead plants.
3.12 In irrigation areas controller to be enclosed in lockable housing. Design
irrigation systems to provide sufficient coverage of avoiding water overspray
on buildings and sidewalks. Note of this requirement to be on plan check
drawings.
3.13 A landscape buffer shall be installed adjacent to the proposed subdivision
wall on Lots 8 through 16 to provide additional screening and providing for
existing units to the north. Trees shall be spaced a minimum of 10-15 feet
apart and of a size and species type to be approved by the Department of
Community Development.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2442
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING TO THE TUSTIN
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
NO. 13094
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby -resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That Tentative Tract Map No. 13094 was submitted to the Planning
Commission by Bramalea California, Inc, for consideration.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held for said
map.
Ce
That an Environmental ImpaCt Report (EIR 85-2 for the East
Tustin Specific Plan) has been certified in conformance with the
requirements of California Environmental Quality Act for the
subject project area.
De
That the proposed subdivision is in conformance with the Tustin
Area General Plan, adopted East Tusttn Specific Plan,
Development Agreement and Subdivision Map Act as it pertains to
the development of multiple family dwellings.
E. Parkland required of this project was previously dedicated with
recordation of Tract 12763.
That the City has reviewed the status of the School Facilities
Agreement between The Irvine Company and the Tusttn Unified
School District, the East Tustin Specific Plan, EIR 85-2, the
impacts of Tentative Tract Map 13094 on School District
facilities, and reviewed changes in State law, and finds and
determines that the impacts on School District facilities by
approval of this map are adequately addressed through the
reservation of a high school site and elementary site in
conjunction with Tentative Tract Map 12763, and imposition of
school facilities fees as a condition of approval of Tentative
Tract Map 13094.
G. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed.
Ho
That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
development.
1
2
3
4
5
6~
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2442
Page two
That the design of the subdivision or the proposed Improvements
are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife in their
habitat.
That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements-
proposed will not conflict with easements acquired by the
public-at-large, for access through or use of the property
within the proposed subdivision.
That the design of the subdivision or the types of improvements
proposed are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
IIo,
The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council
approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13094 subject to the conditions
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the' day of , 1987.
Kathy Well,
Chairman
Penni Foley,
Secretary
Resolution 2442
EXHIBIT A
CO#DITIO# OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13094
PUBLIC/PRIVATE I~FRASTRUCTURE X#PROVE]~EIITS
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
Prior to recordation of final map, the Subdivider shall prepare plans for
and construct or post security guaranteeing construction of all public
and/or private, infrastructure improvements within the boundary of said
tract map in conformance with applicable City standards, including but
not limited to the following:
A. Curb and gutter/cross gutters
B. Sidewalks including access facilities for physically handicapped
persons
C. Drive aprons/approach
O. Street paving
E. Street signing and paving
F. Landscaping/irrigation facilities
G. Sanitary sewer service facilities
H. Domestic water service facilities
I. Reclaimed water service facilities
J. Utility corrections (i.e. gas, electric, telephone, and cable T.V.
facilities)
K. Traffic signal systems and other traffic control devices
L. Street and paseo lighting
M. Storm drains and subdratns
N. Undergroundtng of existing and proposed utility distribution lines
O. Lot monumentation
P. Fire hydrants
The amount of acceptable security for construction of public improvements
shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Work Department. The amount
and acceptable security for private improvements shall be reviewed and
approved by the Building Official.
All construction within a public right-of-way and/or public easement must
be shown on a separate 24" X 36" plan with all construction referenced to
applicable City, County, Irvine Ranch Water District standard drawing
numbers.
All changes in existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks and other public
improvements shall be responsibility of subdivider.
Placement of all above ground facilities, such as signing, street lights,
fire hydrants shall be behind the sidewalk when said sidewalks are
constructed adjacent to the curb within the public right-of-way.
Resolution No. 2442
Exhibit A
Page ~o
1.5
Preparation of plans for and construction of all sanitary sewer
facilities must be submitted as required by the City Engineer and local
sewertng agency. These facilities shall tnclude a gravity flow system
per standards of the [rvine Ranch Water District.
1.6
Preparation of plans for and construction of a domestic water system to
the standards of the Irvine Ranch Water District/City of Tustin Water
Service, whichever is applicable at the time of plan preparation is
required. Improvement plans shall also be reviewed and approved by the
Orange County Fire Department for fire protection purposes. The adequacy
and reliability of water system design and the distribution of fire
hydrants will be evaluated. The water distribution system and
appurtenances shall also conform to the applicable laws and adopted
regulations enforced by the Orange County Health Department. Any
required reclaimed water systems shall be to the standards as required by
the Irvine Ranch Water District.
1.7
In tract storm drain design for sump conditions to be 100 year design.
The storm drain easement through Lot 44 shall be a minimum width as
required by Orange County £MA standards.
1.8 Proposed streets shall be designed to the following specifications:
A. All public streets shall be 56 feet in right-of-way width.
B. All proposed streets shall be designed in substantially the same
alignment as shown on the approved tentative tract map unless
modified and approved by the Director of Community
Development/Public Works.
C. All public streets shall be constructed in accordance with City
requirements in terms of type and quality of materials used.
1.9 The subdivider shall satisfy dedication and/or reservation requirements
as applicable, including, but limited to the following:
Dedication of all required street and flood control right-of-way,
vehicular access rights, sewer easements and water easements defined
and approved as to specific location by the City Engineer and other
responsible agencies.
1.10 Prior to recordation of the Final map, subdivider shall post with the
Community Development Department a minimum $2,500 cash deposit or letter
of credit to guarantee the sweeping of streets and cleanup of streets
affected by construction activities. In the event this deposit is
depleted prior to completion of development or City acceptance of public
streets, an additional incremental deposit will be required.
1.11 Any damage done to existing street improvements and utilities shall be
repaired before acceptance of the tract and/or issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy for development on any parcel within the subdivision.
Resolution No. 2442
Exhibit A
Page three
1.12
Obligation for 25% share of total traffic signal installation at Bryan
Avenue at Park Center Lane. A cash deposit will be required for a five
(5) year period after map recordation with a return clause if funds are
not utilized.
1.13
1.14
Prior to any work in the public right-of-way, an Excavation Permit must
be obtained (and applicable fees paid) from the Public Works
Department.
Lots lettered A, B, C and D to be the responsibility of adjoining
property owner and/or future Homeowners Association.
GRADING/DRAINAGE
2.1
Preparation and submittal of final grading plans delineating the
following is.required prior to approval of Final Map.
A. Final street elevations at key locations
B. Final pad/finish floor elevations and key elevations for all site
grading. All final pad elevations to be a minimum of 1.0 feet above
the base flood elevation as defined by FEMA.
C. All flood hazard areas of record must be shown.
2.2
2.3
Prior to issuance of precise grading permits, a detailed soil
engineering report shall be submitted to and approved by the Building
Official conforming to the requirements of the Uniform Building Code,
City Grading Requirements
Prior to issuance of grading permits, preparation and submittal of a
grading plan subject to approval of the Department of Community
Development delineating the following information:
A. Methods of drainage in accordance with all applicable City
standards.
B. All recommendations submitted by geotechntcal or soil engineer and
specifically approved by them.
C. Co~liance with conceptual grading shown on tentative tract map.
D. A drainage plan and necessary support documents to comply with the
following requirements:
Resolution No. 2442
Exhibit A
Page four
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
1)
Provision of drainage facilities to remove any flood hazard to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer which will allow building
pads to be safe from inundation from rain fall which may be
expected from all storms up to and including the theoretical 100
· year storm and dedication of any necessary easements on the
final map as required.
2) Elimination of any sheet flow and ponding.
3) Provision of drainage facilities to protect the lots from any
high velocity scouring action.
4) Provision for contributory drainage from adjoining properties.
E. All flood hazard areas of record.
F. A note shall be placed on the grading plan requiring Community
Development Department approval of rough grading prior to final
clearance for foundations. The Department will inspect the site for
accuracy of elevations, slope gradients, etc. and may require
certification of any grading related matter.
Preparation of a sedimentation and erosion control plan for all
construction work related to the subject Tract including a method of
control to prevent dust and windblown earth problems.
A precise grading permit shall be issued prior to issuance of any
building permits within the subject Tract.
Prior to the issuance of precise grading permits, the Subdivider shall
submit a construction traffic routing plan to be reviewed and approved
by the Director of Public Works.
Prior to issuance of precise grading permits, written approval must be
obtained from adjacent property owners for rights-of-entry on
construction activity across lot lines.
A qualified paleontologist/archealogist, as appropriate shall be
present during rough grading operations. If resources are found, work
shall stop in the affected area and all resources shall be excavated or
preserved as deemed appropriate or as recommended by the
paleontologist/archealologtst subject to review and approval by the
Department of Public Works and Community Development. All "finds"
shall be reported immediately to the Department of Community
Development.
The paleontologtst/archealogist shall attend the pregrade construction
meeting to ensure that this condition and necessary procedures in the
event of a "find" are explained.
Resolution No. 2442
Exhibit A
Page five
2.9 All earthwork shall be performed in accordance with the City of Tustin
Municipal Codes and grading requirements.
FXRE DEPARTME#I'
#OISE
3.].
3.2
3.3
The subdivider shall comply with all requirements of the Orange County
Fire Marshall, including required fire flow, installation where
required of fire hydrants subject to approval as to location by the
Fire Department, City of Tustin Public Works Department and Irvine
Ranch Water District, and compliance with all requirements pertaining
to construction.
Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction,
evidence that adequate water supply and operational fire hydrants are
available for fire protection is available shall be submitted and
approved by the Orange County Fire Marshall. The subdivider shall also
submit water improvement plans for approval of Fire Marshal.
Sign plan shall include "Fire Road - No Parking" signs as shown on Fire
Department notes.
4.1
Prior to the issuance of any building permits, a final acoustical
analysis report describing the acoustical design features of the
structures required to satisfy the exterior and interior noise
standards shall be submitted to the Tusttn Community -Development
Department for approval along with satisfactory evidence which
indicates the the sound attenuation measures specified in the approved
acoustical report{s) have been incorporated into the design of the
project. The acoustical analysis shall be prepared by an expert or
authority in the field of acoustics.
Prior to issuance of any building permits for any project that falls
under the Browning Corridor, a complete noise study shall be conducted
and submitted to the City for review. In addition to Community Noise
Equivalency Levels (CNEL) said study provide information on single
event noise measurments as generated by helicopter flyovers for
information purposes only.
All residential lots and dwellings shall be sound attenuated against
present and projected noises, which shall be the sum of all noise
impacting the project, so as not to exceed an exterior standard 65
dba. CNEL in outdoor living areas and an interior standard of 45 dba
Resolution No. 2442
Exht bi t A
Page six
4.2
4.3
CNEL in all habitable rooms. Evidence prepared under the supervision
of an acoustical consultant that these standards will be satisfied in a
manner consistent with applicable zonlng regulptions shail be provided.
Prior to issuance of any Certifications of Use of Occupancy, field
testing in accordance with the Title 25 regulations may be required by
the Building Offtcial to verify compliance with STC and IIC design
standards.
All construction operations including engine warm up shall be subject
to the provisions of the City of Tustin Noise Ordinance and shall take
place only during the hours of 7:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday unless the Building Official determines that said
activity will be in substantial conformance with the Noise Ordinance
and the 'public health and safety will' not be impaired subject to
application being made at the time the permit for the work is awarded
or during progress of the work.
CCR'S
5.1
Prior to approval of the final map, all organizational documents for
the project including any deed restrictions, covenants, conditions, and
restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the Community
Development Department. Costs for such review shall be borne by the
subdivider. A copy of the final documents shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department after their recordation. CCR's shall
include but not be limited to the following provisions:
A. The City shall be included as a party to the C.C. & R's for
enforcement purposes.
B. Provision for effective establishment, operation, management use,
repair and maintenance of all common areas and facilities including
landscaping, common areas, walks and fences through a homeowner's
association or equivalent. Membership in said association shall be
inseparable from ownership in individual lots.
C. Architectural controls which shall include but not be limited to
provisions regulating roof materials, exterior finishes, walls,
fences, lighting, landscaping, etc.
D. Landscaping, including vegetation, irrigation systems, and earth
mounding shall be installed on all landscaping lots as provided in
the Development Plan and shall be permanently maintained in good,
first-class condition; healthy, without deterioration; and free of
waste and debris. City shall have the right to remedy any default
and enter property and be reimbursed for the cost of such remedy.
Resolution No. 2442
Exhibit A
Page seven
£. Declarant, the Association, and all Owner(s) shall be required to
maintain the property in good and first-class condition, and in such
a manner as to avoid the reasonable determination of a duly
authorized official of the City that a public nuisance has been
created by the absence of adequate maintenance such as to be
detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare, or that
such a condition of deterioration or disrepair causes harm or is
materially detrimental to property or improvements within one
thousand (1,000) feet of the property.
F. Non-automotive vehicles, boats, trailers, or non-automotive storage
shall not be allowed in any parking, driveway or private street
area. Any vehicle with a width in excess of 84 inches shall not be
allowed in any parking, driveway, or private street area except for
purpose of loading, unloading, making deliveries or emergency
repairs.
G. Any construction repair, modification, or alteration of any
buildings, equipment, structures, or improvements on the property
shall be subject to the approval of the City of Tusttn Community
Development Department.
H. All utility services serving the site shall be installed and
maintained underground.
I. The declarant, the Association, and all Owner(s) shall be required
to file the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of each member
of the Association Board and/or the Manager for the project before
January 1st of each year with the City of Tustin Community
Development Department.
J. No amendments to any C.C. & R's filed in conjunction with this
project or development plan shall be recorded without the prior
approval of the City of Tusttn Community Development Department.
TENANT/HOMEBUYER NOTIFICATION
6.1
Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the subdivider shall
record a document separate from the deed which will be an information
notice to future tenants/homebuyers of aircraft noise impacting the
subdivision. The notice shall further indicate that additional
building upgrades may be necessary for noise attenuation. This
determination to be made as architectural drawings become available.
6.2
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the Subdivider shall
submit for review and approval of content by the Director of Community
Development, a copy of rental/sales literature for the residential
project with the approved aircraft/helicopter noise statement and the
approved schools notification statement, printed on it. Any changes to
the rental/sales literature after initial City approval shall be
submitted to the Director of Community Development for approval.
Resolution No. 2442
Exhibit A
Page eight
6.3 Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the Subdivider shall
provide the City with a copy of the approved aircraft/helicopter noise
statement which shall contain a disclosure document on aircraft
notification. Said document must be signed by each tenant/homeowner
prior to occupancy of any unit. The content of the statement shall be
approved by the Director of Community Development prior to circulation.
6.4 Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the developer shall
provide the City with a schools notification statement which shall be
reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development with
participation by the governing school district. Said document must be
signed by each tenant/homeowner prior to occupancy of any unit. The
schools notification statement shall contain the most current available
information on:
6.5
6.6
A. The location of existing and proposed elementary, middle and high
schools which will serve the subdivision {text and map).
B. The estimated opening date of proposed schools or any revisions to
student capacity in existing schools which would change school
attendance assignments.
C. The type of provider of transportation available to transport the
students to the school sites.
D. The estimated length of travel time required to transport the
students to a school site outside the boundaries of the project.
E. The schools notification statement shall further advise homebuyers
that proposed school sites may never be constructed.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the Subdivider shall
provide the City with a statement which must be signed by each
tenant/homebuyer which shall contain a comprehensive description of all
private and public improvements and developments adjacent or in close
proximity to the proposed development.
Subdivider shall notify all potential home buyers of the following
Assessment/Maintenance Districts:
A. Assessment District 85-1.
B. City of Tustin 1982 Landscape and Lighting District.
Resolution No. 2442
Exhibit A
Page nine
FEES
raEllERAL
7.1
7.2
7.3
8.1
8.2
8.3
Prior to recordation of any Final Map, Subdivider shall pay plan check
and Inspection fees for all publlc and/or private infrastructure
improvements within Ctty's responsibility excluding those financed by
an Assessment District.
Prtor to tssuance of certificates of use or occupancy, the Subdivider
shall pay al1 costs related to the calculation of the revised parcel
assessments, the preparation of the revtsed assessment dtagram and
other required administrative duties related to any Assessment
Districts applicable to the subdivision. (Assessment District 85-i).
Prior to issuance of any butldtng permits, payment shall be made of all
required fees including:
A. Major thoroughfare and bridge fees to Tustin Public Works
Department.
B. Sanitary sewer connection fee to Orange County Sanitation District.
C. Grading planchecks and permit fees to the Community Development
Department.
D. All applicable Building plancheck and permit fees to the Community
Development Department.
£. New development fees to the Community Development Department.
F. School facilities fee to the Tustin Unified School District subject
to any agreement reached and executed between the District and the
Irvine Company.
Within twenty four months from Tentative Tract Map approval, the
Subdivider shall file with appropriate agencies, a Final Map prepared
in accordance with subdivision requirements of the Tustin Municipal
Code, the State Subdivision Map Act, and applicable conditions
contained herein.
Prior to occupancy of units, the Subdivider shall record a final map in
conformance with appropriate tentative map.
Prior to Final Map approval, subdivider shall submit a current title
report.
Resolution No. 2442
Exhibit A
Page ten
8.4
8.5
8.6
8.7
8.8
Subdivider shall conform to all applicable provisions of the City
Code. All requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act, the City's
Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance shall be satisfied.
Subdivider shall submit a duplicate mylar of the Final Map, or 8
inch by 11 inch transparency of each map sheet prior to final map
approval and "as built" grading, landscape and improvement plans prior
to certificate of acceptance.
Prior to release of building permits all conditions of approval of
Design Review 87-32 on the subject project shall be complied with as
shown on Exhibit A attached to Resolution No. 2433 and incorporated
herein by reference. However, applicant will be permitted to obtain
building permits for model home construction prior to approval of a
final map provided approvals have been obtained from the Department of
Community Development, Public Works and Fire Department.
Adherence to all pertinent requirements contained in East Tusttn
Spectfc Plan and Development Agreement, EIR 85-2, and Tract 12763.
The cumulative number of residential units for which certificate of
occupancy may be issued shall not exceed the cumulative total or square
feet of occupied revenue generating uses or equivalents as shown in the
East Tusttn Specific Plan Development Agreement.
//
ITEM NO. 6
Inter- Corn
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
PLANNING COHHIS$ION
CHRISTINE SHINGLETON, DIRECTOR OF COHHUNITY DEYELOPHENT
SAN DIEGO PIPELINE - DRAFT EIR! EIR 87-2, SCH t 87080Jll
Attached is the draft EIR for your review. The public heartng for this project is
scheduled for October 26, 1987.
Should you have any questions or need any additional information prior to the
hearing, please contact me.
Christine Shtngldton
Director of Community Dei&lopment
CAS: PM: pef
Planning Commission
DATE::
OCTOBER 12, 1987
SUB,]ECT: REPORT ON COUNCIL ACTIONS - October 7, 1987
The Action Agenda of the October 7th City Council Meeting will be presented
under separate cover as the preparation of this agenda packet occurred prior to
the meeting time.
Oral presentation.
per
Communi~ Development Department