HomeMy WebLinkAboutPH 1 URBAN WTR MGMT 12-16-85AGENDA'
DATE DECEMBER 3, 1985
TO: THRU:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER ~'~
BOB LEDENDECKER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
MONDA BUCKLEY, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
TUSTIN URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
RECOMMENDATION:
Request the Tustin City Council, at their regular meeting of December 16, 1985, to
adopt the Resolution for the Tustin Urban Water Management Plan.
BACKGROUND:
At the regular City Council meeting of December 2, 1985, Council conducted the
public hearing for the Tustin Water Management Plan. Adoption of the Plan was
continued to the regular meeting of December 16, 1985 so that Council could review
the Plan.
A copy of the original staff report and the Plan is attached.
Administrative Assistant
MB:jr
Attachment
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 85-118
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING TNE
TUSTIN URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
The City Council of the City of Tustin, California, hereby resolves
as follows:
1. The City Council finds and determines:
A. That proceedings were regularly commenced to review the
Tustin Urban Water Management Plan.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on
said Plan on December 2, 1985.
C. That the proposed Tustin Urban Water Management Plan conforms
to California Legislature AB-797.
2. The Tustin Urban Water Management Plan is hereby adopted.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council,
held on the day of , 1985.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
PUBLIC HEARING
NO. 1
' 12-2-85
AGENDA
DATE: NOVEMBER 21, 1985
TO: TI'IRU:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
BOB LEDENDECKER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
MONDA BUCKLEY, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
PUBLIC HEARING FOR AND ADOPTION OF TUSTIN URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
RECOMMENDATION:
The Tustin City Council, at their meeting of December 2, 1985, conduct a public
hearing for the Tustin Urban Water Management Act; and, subsequently adopt the
Tustin Urban Water Management Plan.
BACKGROUND:
In the 1983-84 regular session of the California Legislature, AB-797 was passed
and chaptered as part of the California Water Code (Section 10610 et. seq.). This
bill, commonly known as the Urban Water Management Planning Act (UWMPA), requires
all urban water purveyors with greater than 3,000 service connections or water use
of more than 3,000 acre-feet per year served directly to consumers to prepare,
adopt, and submit a plan not later than December 31, 1985.
The Act specifies one of two plans must be adopted: a basic plan or an extended
plan. Tustin currently falls under the criteria established for the basic plan.
The attached plan was prepared on provided forms and in accord with State
guidelines.
The plan as presented poses no economic, environmental, social, health, consumer
or technological impacts to the City or the community. Required reviews may alter
this condition in the future.
The Act requires the City to conduct a Public Hearing on the Tustin Urban
Management Plan and adopt the Plan by Resolution by December 31, 1985.
~:~.-~¥~ ~< ~ ¢~ ~ ·
Monda Buckley
Administrative Assistant
MB:jr
Attachment
TUSTIN URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
NOVEMBER 13, 1985
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLANNING ACT
BASIC PLAN FORMAT
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
Name of Utility: CITY OF TUSTIN WATER SERVICE
Address: 300 Centennial Wa~
Tustin, CA 92680
Telephone: 1-714-544-8890
Name of Person Completing Plan:
Population Served: 62,000
Monda Buckle~
Number of service connections: 13,986
Date of Last Census or Inventory: 12-31-84
-1-
B. WATER USE RECORDS
Historical Water Use:
Period of available records: Year:
Water use records are: Daily
Monthly
Annual
Other
1960 to present.
Source of records:
Water Sales:
Source Meter(s):
Other:
Water sources: (check all appropriate)
o Groundwater X
Current no. of active wells
° Surface water
o Purchased water X
-2-
Historical Data:
Yea r
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981-82
1982-83
1983-84
Total Use (Acre Feet)
4,088.5
5,118.7
4,864.3
5,234.0
6,624.7
6,743.5
7,486.6
7,814.7
8,891.2
9,135.8
10,825.0
11,177.7
11,703.1
11,204.1
11,866.4
11,681.5
12,418.3
10,939.6
11,621.2
12,516.8
12,837.1
12,709.9
12,222.5
13,440.2
Current Water Use:
- Most current year of record: 1983-84
- Total water use: 13,440 acre feet
Projected Water Use: Based upon historical data, and utility records, please
project water use:
Year: 1984-85 Water Use: 13,770 acre feet
Year: 1985-86 Water Use: 14,100 acre feet
Year: 1986-87 Water Use: 14,400 acre feet
-3-
Water Use Percentages: For the current year of record, please indicate the
percentabe 'of use in each of the following areas:*
Percent
Residential: 57.7
Multiple Units: 26.8
Industrial: 5.4
Commerci al: 6.8
Governmental: 3.3
Other: ---
Unaccounted: 9.7
* If this information is not available, please indicate.
-4-
C. CURRENT CONSERVATION MEASURES
Please indicate by checking the current types of conservation measures
being practiced by your utility (check all appropriate):
- Water meters: X
- Source meters: X
- Water use records by user type
(Commercial, etc.): From 1979 thru 1982
- Leak detection program: No
- Meters installed only on new
connections in the system:
- Public education school programs: No
- Public information (general) programs:
- Rate structure to encourage conservation:
New connection restrictions or conditions:
Home retrofit of plumbing fixtures: No
- Wastewater reclamation and reuse: No
- System pressure control program: No
- Landscape irrigation program: No
- Other (please describe):
Percent of system: 100
Percent of sources: 100
All connections
Yes
No
-5-
D. ALTERNATIVE CONSERVATION MEASURES
0
®
Leak Detection Program: Implementation of a leak detection program is
proposed for fiscal 1986-87. This program would have no environmental,
social or health impacts. A technological impact may exist in that
equipment and personnel are not readily available in this utility for
leak detection work. The estimated economic impact to $25,000/year for
a percentage of several crew members time to detect leaks. The City of
Tustin System indicates no more than 10 percent of the water produced is
unaccounted for.
Public Education School Program: No impacts are expected from this
program in the economic, environmental, health or technological areas.
In the past, the City of Tustin has relied on the School Education
Program provided by the Municipal Water District of Orange County. At
present, this system seems to be the most feasible for this utility.
General Public Information Programs: Same as above. Short messages
regarding conservation are periodically printed on the water bill
itself. No surveys have been done to measure the effectiveness. Other
literature could be distributed but actual water savings as a result of
this measure is unknown at this time but expected to be minimal.
Rate Structure: Current rates are not intentionally set to promote
conservation. However, the City of Tustin has adopted a pass through
plan (pass through increases for electric and water purchase cost) that
could result in conservation. Current supplies available to Tustin do
not indicate that cutbacks or conservation will be necessary.
New Connection Restrictions: Not needed, adequate supplies of adequate
quality exist. This restriction raises no issues in the areas of
health, technology or the environment but could result in social and
economic protest.
Home Retrofit of Plumbing: In that shortages do not exist, the value of
this program is deemed negligible. At this time, social and economic
impacts are unknown.
Wastewater Reclamation: Wastewater is collected and treated by other
surrounding utility services with limited distribution to the Tustin
area. Adequate rainfall and availability of water makes this program of
questionable value at this time.
Landscape Irrigation: Adequate rainfall occurs to support native plants
in this area and adequate water exists to allow normal irrigation with
existing supplies. Demonstration gardens could be developed at various
City owned building sites. Attritional changing of existing plants
would not have an economic impact nor is it anticipated that other
impacts would arise from this change.
-6-
Eo
SUPPLY DEFICIENCY ANALYSIS
City of Tustin: See Attachment A.
° Source Type and Average Year Production:
Surface Water -
Groundwater 6,100
Purchased Water 7,300
ac-ft/yr
units/year
units/year acre feet
units/year acre feet
Has the utility experienced regular or frequent supply
deficiencies during the period of record? No .
-7-
If yes, which year(s)?
If more than once a year, which months?
Amount of deficiency~ (units/percent?)
What were the impacts or actions taken by the
utility?
Rationing
No new connections
Water exchanges or transfers from
others
Higher rate schedules
Other actions
Will this utility have to develop new source
capacity to meet current or project demands?
Groundwater X amount 7400
- Surface Water {new) amount
- Surface Water
{expanded) amount
- Purchase Water amount
When will additional capacity be required?
1986-87 year.
Yes.
acre feet/year
units
units
units
-8-
Did the utility experience shortages during drought
periods (1976-77, etc.)? No.
If yes, which year(s)?
A4nount of deficiency?
(units/percent?)
What where the impacts or actions taken by
the utility?
- Rationing?
- No new connections?
- Water exchanges or transfers?
- Rate schedule changes?
- Other emergency actions?
Does this utility plan to develop new source
capacity to meet drought shortages or to meet
projected demands? Yes.
- Ground Water X
- Surface Water
- Surface Water
(expanded) amount__ units
When will additional capacity be required?
amount 2,400 acre feet
amount units
Note:
Additional water source is required so that
the City does not have to rely so heavily on
imported water.
-9-