Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 01-06-86II. III. MINUTES OF A R£GUL~ ~EEI'ING OF lt~E CIl'f COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 6, 1986 CA}.L TO ORDER/Pi. EDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Greinke at 7:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Pro Tom Saltarelli, and the Invocation was given by Councilwoman Kennedy. RO~L CA~L Councilpersons Present Counctlper~ons Absent: Others Present: PR~LA~TIONS 1. Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula E. Kennedy William A. Huston, City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mar7 E. Wynn, City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Dale E. Wick, Assistant City Engineer Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Monda Buckley, Administrative Assistant Approximately 30 in the audience LOUIE'S B&~RBER S)~]P - TWENTIEll4 ANNIVERS~.RY YEAR Mayor Greinke presented a proclamation to Luciano "LouSe" PrintS- parD, owner of Louie's Barber Shop at 414 East First Street in recognition of his twentieth anniversar~ year in business. Mr. Principato thanked the Council. 84 IV. CO~AUNITY NORS l, C~4. IFORNIA A£~JU)EMIC DECATHLON o FO(O'HILL HIGH SA:~OOL, SECONO PLACE Mayor Greinke noted that the Foothill High School Academic Decath- lon team placed second in the California Academic Decathlon held at Rancho Santiago College on January 3, 1986. He congratulated the students and the Tustin Unified School District on their achieve- ments, go PUBLIC HEJ~IN~S 1. ~P~4. OF CONDITIO#S OF APPROVAL ON USE PERMIT ~. 8~28 - ~8[L OIL ~MP~Y, 17241 IRVINE ~ULEV~O Mayor Greinke declared a conflict of interest on the matter. Mayor Pro Tom Saltare).li assumed the Chair. Council woman Kennedy noted that due to the absence of the Director 6f Pub]ir Works, she was hopeful the matter would be continued until her concerns are answered. Mayor Pro Tom Saltarelli opened the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. George Hillyard, representative of Mobil Oil Company, spoke in favor of the appeal to waive the ten foot irrevocable offer of dedication along £rvine Boulevard. He noted that the same problem has existed with other service stations in the City; Mobil Oil is not the property owner; and the property owner is opposed to the dedication. Steve Inman. dealer of subject service station, spoke in favor of the appeal. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 1-6-86 There were no other speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed at 7:15 p.m. Councilman Edgar stated that Council has approved similar appeals on the premise that ultimate development of some major arterials needs to be done in its entirety rather than on a piecemeal basis. In the interest of being consistent, it was moved by Edgar, sec- onded by Hoesterey, to waive the requirement for a ten foot irrevo- cable offer of dedication as required by Use Permit No. 85-28. Councilman Hoesterey expressed concern that Tustin has a tremendous traffic problem. Council must start to look more closely at these dedications and take more action to require same so that when expansion of major arterials is Feasible, the City is able to do it without financial hardship. Councilwoman Kennedy was very sympathetic with the applicant's request. However, she felt traffic is a greater concern. She feels the solution is to find a very advanced way for Tustin to set the pace for the rest of the County to demand irrevocable right- of-way dedications and then allow businesses to expand over them. Following Council debate, the motion carried 3-I, Kennedy opposed, GreinZe abstained. 81 Mayor Greinke resumed the Chair. Mr. Hillyard commended the Council on their sincere interest in the people that live and work in the community. 2. ZONING ORDINANCE AMEND~ENT NO. 85-7 - REVISIONS TO CO~iERCIAL PARK- ING STANOARO$- ORDINANCE NO. 963 The staff report and rec~,endation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-cpm dated January 6, 1986, prepared by the Community Development Department. The Community Development Director responded to Council questions. The pub]it hearing was opened at 7:27 p.m. by Mayor Greinke. There were no speakers On the matter, and the public hearing was closed. It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordi- nance No. 963 have first reading by title Only. Carried 5-0. Fo)lowing first reading of Ordinance NO. 963 by title only by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordi- nance No. 963 be introduced as follows: OROINANCE NO. g63 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE PERTAINING TO COMMERCIAL PARKING STANDARDS ?he motion carried 5-0. 109 Mayor Greinke recessed the meeting at 7:24 p.m. to allow set-up for the next item. The meeting was reconvened at 7:30 p.m. with all members present. VI. ORAL PRESENTATION ~. BOTTLENECK FEASIBILITY STUOY- SHARON GqEENE, ORANGE COUNTY TRANS- PORTATION COMMISSION The Community Development Director introduced Sharon Greene, staff member, Orange County Transportation Commission. MS. Greene defined the 8ottleneck Feasibility Study as two studies in .one. First, it is a Foothill/Eastern t-5 Bottleneck analysis study - looking at whether a direct connection between the existing freeway system and newly-proposed freeways IFoothill and Eastern corridors) is feasible. Secondly, it is a toll road feasibility CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 1-6-86 study - looking at whether toll financing of.Foothill and Eastern corridors is acceptable for corridor costs left over in association with the MT & BFP adopted by a nunfoer of jurisdictions. She identified the study area boundaries and purposes of the bottleneck study. She ~t~ted that the study is ~l~rly being con- ducted in full recognition of the fact that it involves a heavily developed area, and the entire issue of financial feasibility and cost are being taken into consideration. She noted the four study alternatives: 1) "No project"; 2) Freeway Connectors; 3) Arterial Connectors; and 4) Upgrade of Existing Facilities. Ms. Greene closed by stating that preliminary findings will be reported to the technical information exchange group and policy committee on January 23. She extended an invitation to a public open house on study results to be held on January 30 at Santiago Junior High School in Orange at 5:00 p.m., with a formal meeting at 7:00 p.m. Kia Mortazavi, member of the Orange County Transportation Commis- sion, explained how the four alternatives were developed. With MS. Greene's assistance, Mr. Mortazavi then identified the various alternatives on wall maps. MS. Greene stated that the draft final report will. be completed by June, if not earlier. Ms. Greene responded to questions.. Following Councilman Edgar's personal thanks, Mayor GreinKe thanked MS. Greene and Mr. Mortazavi for their presentation. VII. PU81. I¢ INPUT l. FORT1JNE TE).LIN(; BUSINESSES - OROINANC£S NO. gsa), 959 AND 960 Dewey Adams, doing business at Newport and McFadden, stated that he felt Section 3818(c)(2) pertaining to a $10,000 bond is exces- sive. He requested Council input on the matter. The City Attorney responded that subject matter is on this eve- ning's agenda. His recommendation will be to continue the ~atter tO January 20 to allow staff review of additional amendments which have been prepared by his office. VIII. CONSENT CALENOAR Item No. 7 was removed from the Consent Calendar by Edgar; Kennedy abstained on Item No. 1 - Minutes of the December 20, 1988, Special Meeting. It was then moved by Saltare)li, seconded by Edgar, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. The motion carried 5-0. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUI'ES - DECEMBER 16, lg85, REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 20, lg85, SPECIAL MEETING (Kennedy abstained) 2. APPROVAL OF DE.NOS IN THE AMOUNT OF $938,928.58 APPROVAL OF DEMJ~NOS IN THE AMOUNT OF S29,875.00 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $128,389.98 RA?IFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $130,896.71 50 3. REJECTION OF C~AIM NO. 85-48; ~AI)IANT: G~.qY d. 80YKO; DATE OF LOSS: 8/23/85; [~I'E FILED WIll4 CITY: 11/19/85 Reject subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 4. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 85-49; CLAI~NT: /~qTHUR WILLIA~I ~UER; DATE OF LOSS: 8/23/85; OAllE FILEI) WITH CITY: 12/2/8B Reject subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 IX. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page ¢, i-6-86 5. RESOLUI'ION NO. 86-2 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ISJSTIN, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP 85-196 LOCATED AT THE NORTH- EASTERLy CORNER OF VALENCIA AND DEL ANO AVENUES Adopt Resolution No. 86-2 as recommended by the Community Deve]opment Department. 6. RESOLIXFION NO. 8~-3 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAp 85-197 LOCATED AT 1361 VALENCIA AVENUE Adopt Resolution No. 86-3 as recommended by the Community Development Department. 8. R£S474) D~YEI. OP~NT 99 Approve the Developer Participation Agreement between the City and Red Hill Edinger Partnership and authorize its execution by the Mayor and City Clerk as recommended by the Community Oevel- opment Department. 45; 86-1 9. RES~J) DEVELOPI~ENT Approve the agreement between the City and RESCO Development Company for payment of Circulation improvement fees for :he Chelsea Cafe at 1481 Edinger Avenue; and authorize its execu- tion by the Mayor as recommended by the Community Development Department. 45; 86-2 C~$ent Calendar Item No. 7 - Undergrounding Agrtm~m~tlt Nth Edison Company . £t was mOved ~d~a~, seconded by Sa)tarelli, to adopt the following: 7. ~ESOI. UI'ION NO. 864 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ENCOURAGING THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED REVISION TO THE RULE 20A ALLOCATION FORMULA FOR UNDERGROUNDINO OF ELECTRICAL POWER LINES In response to Councilman Edgar, the Assistant City Engineer stated that staff is in the process of preparing the legal description for the Newport Avenue underground district. District boundaries should be on the Council agenda for approval next mOnth. Councilman Edgar requested a report regarding the undergrounding ~und account showing the beginning balance, the projected cost of Newport Avenue undergrounding, and :he ending balance available for the next project. The Assistant City Engineer responded that the Director of Public Works plans to present Same to Council in the near future. The~motion carried 5-0. 104 ORDINAN(~ES FOR IIEFRODUC~FiON None, ORDINANCES FOR Al)OPTION ZONIN(i ORDINANiCE ~NO~ENT NO. 85-6 - LOCATION PROFESSIONAL/INDUSTRiAL ZONES - ORDINANCE NO. g67 It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Ed~a,, that Ordinance No. 957 have second reading by title only. ~arried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinanc~ No. 957 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edga,' that Ordinance No. 957 be pas~ed and adopted as fo)lows: ORDINANCE NO. 957 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 85-6 AUTHORIZING SCHOOL USES, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, IN THE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (Pr) AND INDUSTRIAL {M) DISTRICTS Roll call vote: AYES: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli NOES: None ABSENT: None I09 XI. XII. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 1-6-86 AJ~IENOMENTS TO THE MUNICIPAl. COOE- REGULATIONS OF FORTUNE TELLINO BUSINESSES - OROINAN~ES NO. g~B, NO. g59 ANO NO. g~o As recommended by the City Attorney, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to continue consideration of the following to January 20, 1986: ORDINANCE NO. 968 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, (ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 86-9) AMENDING SECTION 9232b AND SECTION 9233c OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE PERTAINING TO THE OPERATION OF FORTUNE-TELLING BUSINESSES O~U)INANCE NO. 959 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2523 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE (FORTUNE TELLING) ORDINANC~ NO. 960 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA REGARDING THE PRACTICE OF FORTUNE-TELLING The motion carried 5-0. F~RST ~I~ET SPECIFIC MAN (SPECIFIC MAN NO. [0) - ORDINANCE It wes moved by Kennedy, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. g6! have second reading by title only. Carried S-O. Following first reeding by title only of Ordinance NO. 961 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 961 be passed and adopted as follows: OROI~ANCE NO. g6! - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING LAND USE ANO DEVELOPMENT REGULATION SECTIONS OF THE FIRST STREET SPECIFIC PLAN Roll call vote: AYES: Edgar, Greinke. Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli NOES: None ABSENT: None 81 OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS INSTALLATION OF NO PARKIN~ SIGNS FOR STREET ~EEPING PURPOSES {ROSELEAF AVENUE, PACIFIC STREET & MIMOSA LANE) AS recommended in the inter-tom dated December 26, ~985, prepared by t~e Engineering Division, it was moved by Edgart seconded by Hoesterey, to authorize the installation of no parking signs for street sweeping purposes from 6:00 a.m. to Noon on Fridays on Rose- leaf Avenue between Yorba Street and Mimosa Lane, Pacific Street northerly of Roseleaf Avenue, and Mimosa Lane between Vinewood and northerly of Roseteaf Avenue. After a question-and-answer period, the motion carried ¢-1, Salta- relli opposed. Recognizing persons in the audience wishing to speak on the matter, Council concurred to reconsider subject item. Bruce Traywick, 14651 Pacific Street, felt that the street sweeping policy was a misapplication in this instance and spoke in opposi- tion to the recommendation. Tony Mealey, Sycamore Street resident, expressed interest in enforcement of the street sweeping policy on his street. He was referred to contact the Administrative Assistant. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 1-6-86 Keith Koster, 17331 Vinewood, expressed concern that vehicles restricted From parking on adjoining streets may overflow onto Vinewood. He spoke in favor of restricting parking on Vinewood. Because the survey resulted in a tie, Vinewood was not included in the restricted parking, and he requested a resurvey be conducted to contact the two property owners who did not respond. Mr. Koster was informed of the procedure and policy for conducting another questionnaire survey. Nan HocKer, Vinewood resident, spoke in oOpo$ition to restricted parking on Vinewood. The original motion carried ¢-l, Saltaretli opposed. 75 REQUEST FOR REMOVAl. OF NO'PARKING SIGNS FOR STREET SWEEPING ON BOTH SIDES OF PASADENA AVENUE FROM 15500 PASADENA TO 15657 PASADENA It was moved by Edger, seconded by Hoesterey, to deny the request for rmnova) of no parking signs for street sweeping purposes on both sides of Pasadena Avenue from 15500 Pasadena to 15657 Pasadena as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer in the inter-rom dated December 26, 1985. Carried 5-0. 75 AUTHORIZATION TO AOVERTISE FOR BIDS - POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING EXPANSION OF OUTSIDE PROPERTY STORAGE A~EA - RESOLUTION NO. 86-5 As recommended in the inter-com dated December 17, 1985, prepared by the Chief of Police, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 86-5 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIC OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BUILDING EXPANSION OF THE PROPERTY STORAGE AREA - POLICE DEPARTMENT FACILITY AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS Motion carried 5-0. XIII. REPORTS 1. XIV. Pt. ANNIN~ CO~I$$ION ACTIONS - DECF, MBER 23, 1985 It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to ratify the entire Planning Commission Action Agenda of December 23, 1985. The motion carried 5-0. 80 OTHER BUSINESS 1. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 8~-t {PHASE II) IMPROVEMENTS - BRYAN AVENUE & BROWNING AVENUE The City Attorney stated that Council awarded the contract for sub- ject project to Fleming Engineering, Inc., Buena Park, in the · amount of $562,535.75 at its December 16, 1985, meeting. To date, Fleming Engineering has advised that they have been unaPle to com- ply with specifications regarding insurance. The second lowest bidder, Sully Miller Contracting Co., Orange ($564,045.50), has been contacted by the Engineering Department. They have advised that they are able to comply with specifications regarding insurance. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded By GreinkP, to place Fleming Engineering on notice that if they cannot comply with insurance requirements by 5:00 p.m., January 8, 1986, their bid award will be revoked and the contract awarded to the second lowest bidder, Sully Miller Contracting Co., Orange, in the amount of $564,0A5.50. Motion carried 5-0. 25 REQUEST FOR C).OSEO SESSION The City Attorney requested a Closed Session for discussion of legal matters. XV. XVI. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 1-6-86 3. W[L~81~ TO OIR£Cl'O~, IRVINE RA#CN ~TER OI~'TRICT Mayor Sreinke welcomed and recognized Peer Swan, Oirector of the Irvine Ranch Water District. Mr. Swan thanked the Mayor. 4. ORA/IG~ COU~fFY CENTIENNIAL COMNI[TEE Mayor Greinke referenced a letter from the Orange County Centennial Ca.mittee requesting a representative to serve in culmination of the celebration of Orange County's lOOth birthday in 1989. He out- lined some of the duties involved. The Mayor stated he would be making an appointment to subject committee in the near future. S, LAFCO APPOINTNENT Council discussed the upcoming appointment to t~e Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). Council concurred to authorize Councilman Edgar to conduct an informal poll of the Counci;, and vote accordingly at the January 9 League meeting at which subject appointment wi;1 be made. 2¢ Councilwoman Kennedy expressed her recommendation for Phil Schwartz or Evelyn Hart for appointment. 5. 0RA,~G~ C~UNT¥ CITY SELECTIO# CO~I~I'FrEE BY-LAwS As requested by the Orange County. League of Cities, Council con- cuffed to approve the proposed changes to the by-laws of th'e Orange ~City Selection Committee. 68 7.RKn HILL AVENUE RAILROAD C~OSSIN6 Councilwoman Kennedy relayed problems with the Red Hill Avenue railroad crossing, specifica]ly half-hour traffic de)ays and the surface condition over the crossing. She requested that the Engi- neering Department contact the appropriate parties regarding same. 101 RECESS - REDEVE].OPf, E~T - RECONVENED At 8:35 p.m. it was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded Saltarelli, to recess to the Redevelopment Agency. The motion carried 5-0. Fo)lowing adjournment of the Redevelopment Agency meeting, a recess was called at 8:39 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:¢7 p.m. with all members present. ~Kk'I'ING POLICY FOR TUSI'[N Mayor Greinke explained that in an effort to relay a positive message to the public from Tustin on its heritage and future, he formed a com- mittee with Walt Fredricksen and Dan O'Connor to market this idea. He reflected on elements which are unique to Tustin which have made it what it is today. The committee then contacted The Irvine Company ~or assistance, and a concept presentation is to be made this evening. He then introduced Cora Newman, The Irvine Company, and RoOin White- sides, Intercom, who presented the general marketing concepts to Coun- cil which include: I) A Positioning Statement; 2) A brochure for use by the Chamber of Commerce and City for new residents and businesspersons; 3) A calendar for marketing which could be used as a City fund-raiser; 4) A script outline for a slide show presentation; and 5) A public relations consultant with a media plan. Mayor Greinke thanked both Cora Newman and Robin Whitesides for the presentation. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 1-6-86 XVII. RECESS - CLOSED S[SSION - AI)dOURNMI~NT At 9:07 p.m. the meeting was recessed to a Closed Session for discus- sion of legal matters as announced during the Redevelopment Agency (see Redevelopment Minutes of January 6, 1986}; and thence adjourned to the next regular meeting on January 20, I986, at 7:00 p.m. by unanimous informal consent. MAYOR CITY CLERK MINUllES OF A RE.AR ~k-rING OF ll4E REDEYELOPMENT AGENCY OF ll4E CITY OF TUSTIN. ?.~LIFORNIA JANUARY 6, 1986 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 8:35 p.m. by Chairman Greinke in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. Agency Members Present: Agency Members Absent: Others Present: Frank H. Greinke. Chairman Donald J. Saltarelli, Chairman Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula E. Kennedy None William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Community Development Director Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Dale E. Wick. Assistant City Engineer Monda 8uckley, Administrative Assistant Approximately 10 in the audience 3. APPROVAL OF MI~S It was moved b~ Saltarelli, seconded by Hoestere¥, to approve Minutes of the Dece~er 16, 1985, Regular Meeting. Motion carried 5-0. 4. RE$O D~YELOP~NT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT The Community Development Director stated that the developer has requested modification in the agreement whereby payment for actual cost of con- strutting off-site public improvements could be drawn as completed. As suggested by the Community Development Director, it was moved by Salta- relli~ seconded by Edgar, to: 1) Approve the Development Participation Agreement between the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency and the Red Hill Edinger Partnership; 2) Amend Page ll, Section V-C-(503) whereby the City could authorize fifty percent payment upon completion of one-half of the pub)it improvements with the balance due upOn completion and final account- ing; and 3) Authorize execution of the agreement by the Agency Chairman and Secre- tary. With the City Attorney's acceptance, the motion carried 5-0. OTHER BUSINESS None, 6. AN~EM£Kr OF CLOSED SESSION Chairman Greinke announced that the City Council will recess to Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with the City Attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated for- mally and to which the City is a party. The title of the litigation is Lopez & Ports vs. City of Tustin, et al, Orange County Superior Court. 7. AOJOURNM~NT At 8:39 p.m. the meeting was adjourne~ to the next Regular Meeting on Monday, January 20, 1986. at 7:00 p.m. by unanimous informal cogsen~t~. ~ ,_Xy~.,,~A ~, ~"~"'~'~'"~ CHAIRMAN AGENDA OF A REGULAJ~ I~EETING OF ll4E TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 CENTENNIAL WAY JANUARY 6, 1986 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TI) ORDER/PLEDGE OF ~LEGIANCE/INVOCATION II. ROLL CAI_L III. PROCLAJ~mJ~TION 1, LOIJIE'S BAJ~BER SHOP - llWENTIETH A31NIVERSAJ~Y YEAR IV. PUBLIC HEJ~RI NGS 1. APPE~ OF CONDITIONS OF A,°PROV~ ON USE PERMIT NO. 85-28 - MOBIL OIL COMPA,NY, 17241 IRVINE BOULEVAJ~D Recommendation: Pleasure of the City Council. 2. ZONING ORI)II~ANCE AI~ENDI~NT NO. 85-7 - REVISIONS TO COI~4ERCI~ PA.RKING STAJIDAJ~DS - ORDINANCE NO. g63 ORDINANCE NO. 963 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE T1JSTIN CITY CODE PERTAINING TO COMMERCIAL PARKING STANDARDS Recommendation: M.O. That Ordinance No. title only. M.O. - That Ordinance No. 963 be introduced. 963 have first reading by V. Ot~AL PRESENTATION 1. BOI'I1. ENECK Fl~A~SIBILITY SllJDY - SHARON GREENE, ORANGE COUNTY ll~ANSPORTA- TION COI~ISSION VI. PUBI. IC INPUT (For City of Water Service procedures.) Tustin Residents and Businesspersons on any matter, and for Customers having a concern unresolved by Administrative VII. CONSENT CAJ. ENDAJ~ All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items prior to the time of the voting on the motion unless members of the Council, staff or public request specific items to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1. APPROV~ OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 16, 1985, REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 20, 1985, SPECIAL MEETING APPROVAJ. OF DEMAJ(DS IN THE AMOUNT OF $938,928.58 APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $29,875.00 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $128,389.98 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AJvlOUNT OF $130,896.71 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 1 1-6-86 REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 85-48; CLAIMANT: GARY J. BOYKO; DATE OF LOSS: 8/23/85; DATE FILEO WITH CITY: 11/19/85 Reject subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 85-49; CLAIMANT: ARTHUR WILLIAM BAUER; DATE OF LOSS: 8/23/85; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 12/2/85 Reject subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. RESOLLFFION NO. 86-2 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP 85-196 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF VALENCIA AND DEL AMO AVENUES Adopt Resolution No. 86-2 as recommended by the Community Development Department. RESOLUTION NO. 86-3 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP 85-197 LOCATED AT 1361 VALENCIA AVENUE Adopt Resolution No. 86-3 as recommended by the Community Development Department. RESOLUTION NO. 86-4 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ENCOURAGING THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED REVISION TO THE RULE 20A ALLOCATION FORMULA FOR UNDERGROUNDING OF ELECTRICAL POWER LINES Adopt Resolution No. 86-4 as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. RESCO DEVELOPMENT Approve the Developer Participation Agreement between the City and Red Hill Edinger Partnership and authorize its execution by the Mayor and City Clerk as recommended by the Community Development Department. RESCO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Approve the agreement between the City and RESCO Development Company for payment of circulation improvement fees for the Chelsea Cafe at 1481 Edinger Avenue; and authorize its execution by the Mayor as recommended by the Community Development Department. VIII. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION None. IX. ORDINANCES FOR AOOPTION ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 85-6 - LOCATION OF SCHOOL USES IN PROFESSIOMAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONES - ORDINANCE NO. 957 ORDINANCE NO. 957 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 85-6 AUTHORIZING SCHOOL USES, SUB- JECT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, IN THE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (Pr) AND INDUSTRIAL (M) DISTRICTS Recommendation: M.O. - That Ordinance No. 957 have second reading by title only. M.O. - That Ordinance No. 957 be passed and adopted. (Roll Call Vote) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 2 1-6-86 OF FORTUNE TELLING A~NDMENTS TO TRE MUNICIPAL CODE RESULAT!ONS BUSINESSES - OROI. NANCES NO. 958. NO. ~59 AND NO. 960 ORDINANCE NO. 958- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, (ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 85-9) AMENDING SEC- TION 9232b AND SECTION 9233c OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE PERTAINING TO THE OPERATION OF FORTUNE-TELLING BUSINESSES CE NO. 959- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORDINAN ........ ~u~u ING SECTION 2523 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE (FOR- TUSTIN, CALI~U){m~, TUNE TELLING) ORDINANCE NO. 960- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA REGARDING THE pRACTICE OF FORTUNE-TELLING Recommendation: M.O. - That Ordinance No. 958 have second reading by _ Vote) ~-{t 1 e only. M.O. - That Ordinance No. 958 be passed and adopted. (Roll Call M.O. - That Ordinance No. 959 have second reading by title only. M.O. That Ordinance No. 959 be passed and adopted. (Roll Call Vote) M.O. - That Ordinance No. 960 have second reading by title only. M.O. That Ordinance No. 960 be passed and adopted. (Roll Call Vote) FIRST STREET SPECIFIC PLAN (SPECIF).C pLAN NO- 10) - ORDINANCE NO- 961 ANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORDINANCE NO. 961- AN ORDIN . OPMENT REGULATION SECTIONS TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING LAND USE AND DEVEL OF THE FIRST STREET SPECIFIC PLAN Recommendation.: M.O. - That Ordinance No. 961 have second reading by Title only. M.O. - That Ordinance No. 961 be passed and adopted. (Roll Call Vote) X. OLD BUSINESS None. X1. HEW BUSINESS 1. ),NSTAJ. LATXON OF NO pARKING SIGNS FOR STREET SWEEPING PURPOSES (ROSELEAF AVENUE, PACIFIC STREET & MIMOSA LANE) Recommendation: Authorize the installation of no parking signs for ~reet sweepiJ~g purposes from 6:00 a.m. to Noon on Fridays on Roseleaf Avenue between Yorba Street and Mimosa Lane, Pacific Street northerly of Roseleaf Avenue, and Mimosa Lane between Vinewood and northerly of Rose- leaf Avenue. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 3 1-6-86 INSTALLATION OF NO PARKING SIGMS FOR STREET SWEEPING PURPOSES (SAN JUAN STREET, MYRTLE AVENUE & MITCHELL AVENUE) Recommendation: Authorize installation of no parking signs for street sweeping purposes as recommended by the Engineering Division as follows: 1) 15962 and 16002 Myrtle Avenue between 6:00 a.m. to Noon on Monday; 2) 1777 Mitchell Avenue between 6:00 a.m. to Noon on Monday; and 3) Northerly side of San Juan Street between Red Hill Avenue and~620 + feet easterly between 6:00 a.m. to Noon on Thursday - REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF NO PARKIN6 SIGNS FOR STREET SWEEPING ON BOTH SIOES OF PASAOENA AVENUE FROM 15500 PASAOENA TO 15657 PASAOENA Recommendation: Deny the request for removal of no parking signs for street sweeping purposes on both sides of Pasadena Avenue from 15500 Pasadena to 15657 Pasadena as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. AUTHORIT. ATION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIOS - POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING EXPAN- SION OF OUTSIOE PROPERTY S'FORAGE /LREA - RESOLUTION NO. 86-5 RESOLUTION NO. 86-5 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BUILDING EXPANSION OF THE PROPERTY STORAGE AREA - POLICE DEPARTMENT FACILITY AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 86-5 as recommended by the Chief of Police. XII. REPORTS 1. PLANNING COI~qISSION ACTIONS - DECEMBER 23, 1985 All actions of the Planning Commission become final unless appealed by the City Council or member of the public. XIII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. CITY )tANAGER 2. CITY AI'FORNEY 3. CITY COUNCIL XIV. ADJOURNMENT To the next Regular Meeting on Monday, January 20, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 4 1-6-86