Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 01-06-86ACTI0N AGENDA TUSTIN PLANNING COI~4ISSION REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 23, 1985 ~ORTS 1-6-86 CALL TO ORDER: 6:30 p.m, EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN STUDY SESSION Present: Well, Puckett, Baker, McCarthy Absent: White Don Lamm will make an oral presentation with questions and answers following. 7:30 p.m. REGULAR MEETING ROLL CALL: Present: Well, Puckett, Baker, McCarthy Absent: White PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION PRESENTATIONS: None. PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda) IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT lq4E CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) Minutes from Planning Commission meeting December 9, 1985. Approve Final Parcel Map 85-196 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2249. Approve Final Parcel Map 85-197 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2289. Moved and seconded to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of correcting the ,dnutes to reflect attendance at workshop. Motion carried 4-0. Agenda December 23, 1985 page two PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. USE PERMIT 85-27 Appli cant: Locati on: Request: Mr. Mike Porto on behalf of Independent Development Company 17102 McFadden Avenue To install an 18 foot high pylon sign and to allow for an off-site beer and wine license. Presentation: Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner Moved and seconded to approve UP 85-27 by the adoption of Resolution 2282. Motion carried 4-0. 5. AMENDMENT #1 TO USE PERMIT 80-17 Applicant: Bill Taylor on behalf of Taylor's Restaurant Location: 1542 E1Camino Real Request: To expand an existing game room by 320 square feet. Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner Moved and seconded to continue this matter to the next meeting. ADMINISTRATIVE MRTTERS Old Business None. New Business None. STAFF CONCERNS 6. Oral Report on Council actions of December 16, 1985. Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development COF~ISSION CONCERNS AOJOURIIMEIIT Adjourned at 8:02 p.m. to continue the East Tustin study session (completed at 8:50 p.m.); and, then to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 4-0. AGENDA TUSTIN PLANNING COI~ISSION REGULAR FIEETZNG DECEI~BER 23, 1985 CALL TO ORDER: IN SPECIFIC PLAN STUDY SESSION Don Lamm will make an oral presentation with questions and answers following. 7:30 p.m~ REGULAR MEETING ROLL CALL: Well, Puckett, Baker, McCarthy, White PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION PRESENTATIONS: None. PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda) IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) Minutes from Planning Commission meeting December 9, 1985. Approve Final Parcel Map 85-196 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2249. Approve Final Parcel Map 85-197 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2289. Agenda December 23, 1985 page two PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. USE PERMIT 85-27 Applicant: Location: Request: Mr. Mike Porto on behalf of Independent Development Company 17102 McFadden Avenue To install an 18 foot high pylon sign and to allow for an off'site beer and wine license. Presentation: 5. AMENDMENT #1 TO USE PERMIT 80-17 Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner Applicant: Bill Taylor on behalf of Taylor's Restaurant Location: 1542 E1Camino Real Request: To expand an existing game room by 320 square feet. Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner AD#INISTRATIVE )IA'ri'ERS Old Business None. New Business None. STAFF CONCERNS 6. Oral Report on Council actions of December 16, 1985. Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of community Development COI~ISSION CONCERNS ADJOURNHENT Adjourn to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. MINUTES TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR ~EETI~ DECEMBER 9, 1985 CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 p.m. EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN STUDY SESSION Present: Ed Knight, Jeff Davis, Irvine Company representatives, public Ed Knight made an oral presentation with questions-and answers following. session adjourned at 6:20 p.m. 7:30 p.m. REGULAR MEETING ROLL CALL: The study Present: Wetl, Puckett, Baker, McCarthy, White Staff: Ed Knight, Jeff Davis, Laura Pickup, Donna Orr, Suzanne Atkins, All Bell and Mark Brodeur fromThe Planning Center. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION PRESENTATIONS: None. PUBLIC CONCERNS: CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes from Planning Commission meeting November 25, 1985. Puckett moved, White seconded to approve the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 85-6 Applicant: Action: Presentation: Motion carried $-0. Initiated by the Planning Commission Recommend to the City Council to amend the City of Tustin Code as it relates to the Professional Office and Industrial Districts to allow school and instructional uses subject to conditional use permits. Jeff Davis, Associate Planner Puckett moved, White seconded to approve Resolution No. 2283 recommending to the City Council adoption of ZOA 85-6. Motion carried 5-0. Commissioner White questioned the parking standards and the allottment for parents visiting the school or dropping off students. Jeff Davis explained that all other similar type schools are parked the same way as recommended. Chair Well opened the meeting at 7:35 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak, she closed the hearing at 7:36 p.m. Mi nutes December 9, 1_985 page two '. PIJBLZC HEARZNGS (cont.) 3. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 85-7 Applicant: Action: Presentation: Initiated by the City Council Recommend to the City Council %o amend the City of Tustin Code as it relates to office parking standards in all applicable zones. Jeff Davis, Associate Planner Chair Well opened the hearing at 7:43 p.m. Seeing no one to speak she closed the hearing at 7:43 p.m. Commissioner White requested jeff Davis summarize Table 1_ of his staff report dated December g, 1985 and what changes.were made. Commissioner Baker questioned the affect on Carver Development. Jeff Davis responded there would be no affect because the Carver project was previously approved. Puckett moved, Baker seconded to adopt Resolution No. 2284 recommending to the Cit~ Council approval of ZOA 85-7. Motion carried 5-0. 4. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 85-8 Applicant: Action: Initiated by the Planning Commission Recommend to.the City Council to amend the City Code prohibiting the ~onstruction and/or operation of toxic waste transfer stations within the city. Presentation: Jeff Davis, Associate Planner Chair Well opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. closed the hearing at 7:45 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak she Chair Well added her support to this amendment. She commented that Tustin is very small and has homes and schools close to industrial areas. Toxic materials represent too much of a threat to the health, safety and welfare of our community. Puckett moved, Baker seconded to adopt Resolution 2285 recommending to the City Council approval of ZOA 85-8. Motion carried 5-0, 5. USE PERMIT 85-28 Applicant: Locati on: Request: George Hillyard on behalf of Mobil Oil Corporation 17241 Irvine Blvd. To convert an existing 167 square foot sales area to a mini-market. Presentation: Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner Chair Well opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. Commission discussion ensued as follows: Minutes ' December g, 1985. page three Commissioner Baker questioned the necessity for a 10' dedication. Laura Pickup responded that the requirement is part of the city's master plan of arterial highways. Commissioner White questioned the outcome of the preservation of development standards for the dedication of arterial highways. Ed Knight responded there has been no decision to date. The following people from the audience spoke: George Hillyard representing Mobil Oil Corporation clarified they are not interested in selling alcoholic beverages. He did request relief from the 10' dedication requirement. He explained they don't own the property and so they don't have the right to dedicate the 10' The outside pump island is 23' from the street; if the 10' were dedicated they would lose the use of that island. Seeing no one further wishing speak, Chair Well closed the hearing at 7:55 p.m. Chair Weil asked the applicant how close his business is to the 55 freeway. He responded his station is located on the corner of the Irvine Blvd. on-ramp. Chair Well clarified the chances of widentng. Irvine Blvd. in that area are very slim due to the extensive bridge work that would be involved. Laura Pickup explained the City Council could waive the 10' dedication if they felt it appropriate. Mr. Hillyard could appeal the Planning Commission's decision thereby bringing it before the Council. Commissioner White agreed with staff's recommendation and felt this was a matter for the City Council to decide. Commissioner McCarthy recommended this go to the City Council. Puckett moved, White seconded to approve UP 85-28 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2287 which includes the 10' dedication requirement. Motion carried 5-0. 6. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 85-9 Applicant: Action: Initiated by the City Attorney Recommend to the City Council to amend the City Code to require a Conditional Use Permit for Fortune Telling businesses. Presentation: Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner Chair Well opened the public hearing at 8:05 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak, she closed the hearing at 8:05 p.m. Commissioner Puckett commented he did not like the idea of passing an ordinance permitting fortune telling in Tustin. Commissioner White questioned if a Conditional Use Permit would be requi?ed. Jeff Davis responded affirmatively. Minutes December 9, 1985 page four Chair Wetl con~nented that she contacted the Police Department for their views on this ordinance. The Police Department stated there are many legitimate fortune telling businesses, but they will observe the situation and take appropriate action. Baker moved, McCarthy seconded to adopt Resolution 2286 recommending approval of ZOA 85-9 to the City Council . Motion carried 4-1, Puckett opposed. 7. FIRST STREET SPECIFIC PLAN Applicant: Action: Initiated by the City Council Recommend to the City Council adoption of the First Street Specific Plan. Presentati on: Jeff Davis, Associate Planner A1 Bell, associate with The Planning Center, highlighted the exhibits presented. The basis of the plan is to preserve what is good, to improve what needs improvement and to stimulate economic growth. 1) The decision to change remains with the property owner; the 'decision for the quality of the plan is with the city. Quality is defined by projects that are consistent with the uses specified in the regulations of the plan; projects that conform with the development standards will be projects that utilize the design guidelines. 2) Physical determinants: parcel size; current use relationship to other parcels; potential for the expansion of the use; access opportunities and limitations; feasibility of achieving adequate parking on the site or adjacent; location preferences; arterial and freeway exposure. Overall conclusion: There is significant interest in the future development and getting the greater use out of the area while preserving friendly atmosphere. The primary uses recommended contain requirements and incentives. Incentives: lot consolidation, mixed use, consolidation for parking; responding to bse objectives or eliminating constraints. Mixed use incentives require that the first floor remain commercial where the second floor is office. Design guidelines (requirements): intend to convey the physical character expected in the First Street corridor. The plan. attempts to expand the existing quality of the area. The following people from the audience spoke: Patrick Ryan, 17892 Irvine Blvd., questioned if this is leading to formulating a guideline for the improvement of First Street. He further was concerned with a strip ~center where one suite changed uses; what would happen to the other 3 businesses. H. Victor Eastman, 661 W. First, protested parking lot design: Tustin has the worst parking design especially with planters. Suggested no tree wells, walkways without trees and rear parking lots with landscaping. Harry Gates, 450 W. First, believed the new changes more restrictive than originally approved on his project: 15' setback. He expressed concern with the increasing traffic hazards caused by landscaping left turn lanes (Page IV-31). Seeing no one further wishing to speak, Chair Well closed the hearing at 9:30 p.m. Mi nu res . · December 9, 1985 page fi ve Further Commission ensued with questions and answer of staff and the representatives from the Planning Center. Topics included, parking, primary and secondary uses on parcels, pedestrian area guidelines and restrictions, and impacts on existing uses. Following is a summary of recommended amendments to the First Street Specific Plan: Page III-22, amend #2 Administrative Review as follows: ADD design guidelines. Any project having development plans approved by building permit issuance or land use Permit Prior to the adoption of this specific plan shall remain approved without amendment. Any Primary Use project proposed in the specific plan area shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission as an information item. 2. Page III-11, amend b. on top of page as follows: DELETE 3 story, 38 feet and replace with 2 story, 28 feet. 3. Page III-11, amend d.'DELETE reference to 3rd story - 32 feet. 4. Page IV-11, Materials Palette, ADD "pale pastel colors" to the 3rd column for walls color. ~ Page IV-19, ADD a design guideline for signs which states, "all buildings using rear parking lots shall clearly identify their businesses with rear wall stgnage. All structures shall exhibit clear address information on the 'front facade. {Recommended guideline: Minimum address number size shall be 6" for a 1 story building and 10" for a 2 story building.) For night identification the numbers shall be internally or externally lighted. Otherwise all signing shall comply with the Tustin Sign Code. 6. Page IV-28, on bus stops ADD that clear plexiglass may be added to the walls in order to block winds. 7. .Page IV-4 DELETE the right column guideline and. replace with the following: Utilize the front setback area in one of the following manners. The front setback may either be entirely landscaped (in conformance with the landscape guidelines) or made into a pedestrian pla~a, utilizing interlocking pavers as a base material, pedestrian level lighting and a minimum of 15% landscaped area. Page III-3, number 2, ADD to the end of the sentence, "this shall not preclude pedestrian arcades or awnings from encroaching into the front yard setback area." Page III-2, ADD triple asterisks after Planning units numbered 2-1, 2-5, 2-6 and add a note at bottom of page which states, "***these properties shall receive design review by Planning Commission regardless of Primary Use or Secondary Use. The area shall exhibit a strong pedestrian emphasis. 11. Page IV-15. ADD a design guideline for parking which states, "the parking area should be designed in a manner which links the buildiQg to street sidewalk system as an extension of the pedestrian environment. This can be accomplished by using design features such as walkways with enhanced paving, trellis structures, and/or landscaping treatment. Mt nutes Oecember 9, 198'5 page si x 11'. Page II-g ADD a number 8 to read as follows: Incentives for Plan Administration Issue: What city assistance, can implementation of this Plan. be provided to encourage GOALS: To encourage rapid rehabilitation of non-conforming structures and uses. OBJECTIVES: 8.1 Rehabilitation of facades (including signage) of existing comply with design guidelines of this plan. 8.2 Improve vehicular inter-site circulation. 8.3 Maximization of pedestrian movement and access. POLICY: To make available to property owners, where possible, funding redevelopment agency or other appropriate sources for rehabilitation. expediant structures to from the McCarthy moved, White seconded to recommend to the City Council adoption, of the First Street Specific Plan by the adoption of Resolution No. 2288 with the amendments discussed during the course of the public hearing and outlined above. Motion carried AI)#INIS1]~ATIVE MATT£ES Old Business None. New Business None. STAFF CONCERNS 8. 0ral Report on Council actions of December 2, 1985. Presentation: Donald D. Camm, Director of Community Development. Mi nutes December' 9, 198'5 page 7 COletI$$ZO# CONCERNS McCarthy. questioned the status of Bryan Avenue striping study to destgnaCe four lanes and left Urns be~een Browning and Newport Avenue. Baker requested the status of the culvert on Bryan (East Tusttfl). Puckett wondered if there are any fortune telling businesses presently'In Tustin. ADJOURleq[NT McCarthy moved, Baker seconded to adjourn at 10:25 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. on December 23, 1985 for a study session on East Tustin Specific Plan. The regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting will follow. Motion carried 5-0. KATHY WEIL, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary Planning Commission DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: DECEMBER 23, 1985 FINAL PARCEL HAP 85-196 LANLER AND ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF THE SANTA FE LAND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY. 'NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF VALENCIA AND DEL AMO AVENUES M-1 (INDUSTRIAL) THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, CLASS 15. SPLIT ONE LOT INTO TNO LOTS. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Recommend to the City Council approval of Tentative Parcel Map 85-196 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2249. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: In January of 1984 the Santa Fe Land Improvement Company developed a 71,000 square foot Research and Development building on the corner of Valencia and Del Amo. The building and improvements covered only a portion of the existing parcel. The owner is now requesting authorization to split the developed parcel (Parcel i of 5.066 acres) from the remainder of the parcel which now would become Parcel 2 of 4.073 acres. Both parcels comply with the Tustin Area General Plan and the City of Tustin Zoning Ordinance and proposed Specific Plan No. 7. Community Development Department Planning Commission Report Final Parcel Map 85-196 page two Since the map was approved as a tentative map, the property owner has requested a minor revision to the map. The tentative approval was for Parcel I (4.4 acres) and Parcel 2 (4.8 acres). Because this change is a minor one and no new lots are being planned and the lots are the same configuration, the final map is in substantial compliance with the tentative map. On June 24, 1985, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Tentative Parcel Map 85-196 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2249. On July 1, 1985, the City Council approved the tentative map by the adoption of Resolution No. 85-61. The conditions of approval have been satisfied. MAEY A¥)q CHAMBE~AIN Associate Planner MAC:em Attachments: Final Map Tentative Map Resolution No. 2290 Resolution No. 2249 Community Development Department 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO.' 2290 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP 85-196 LOCATED AT.THE ~NORTHEASTERLY CORNER o[~V~LENCIA AND DEL AMO AVENUES. The Planning Commission of the City of Tustln does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: That Final Parcel Map No. 85-196 was submitted to the Planning Commission pursuant to Ordinance- No. 847 by Lawler and Associates on behalf of the Santa Fe .Land Improvement Company requesting authorization to split one parcel into two parcels for the area known .as Parcel 2 as shown on a map filed in Book 67, page 5 of Parcel Maps of Orange County. B. That said map is in 'conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan. C. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. D. The final map is in substantial compliance with the tentative map. II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of Final Parcel Map No. 85-196 subject to the final approval of the City Engineer. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the day of , 198 KATHY WEIL, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary S~i~ET ! ~ ! SleETS PARCELS 9.1M ACRES GROSS ILOCK MOOUL! PARCEL MAP NO. 85'196 ~ *-* IN TIlE CITY Els TUSTIIj Cl(fllT~ M OI.A#&R, STATE OF CAt. IIrlI#IA '~[K__'~ s__ PARCELS PARCEL MAP NO. 85'196 IN TNI CITE `SE TUSTIN~ f,~M$'Y I~ M~ANS`S,, STATE OF CALIFIIIN~IA K.W. LAWLER &NB ARSI,~*IA'P`SS ~41'~ H 'SURVEY: S~PI'EMB41 ~ ANNA id. IlK L.S. ~ MONUMENT NOTES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 I. 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 II. 15 16 17 18 19 2O 23 24 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2249 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 85-196 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF VALENCIA AND DEL AMO AVENUES.~ The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A.' That'Tentative Parcel Map. No. 85-196 was submitted to the Planning Commission pursuant to Ordinance No. 847 by Lawler and Associates on behalf of the Santa Fe Land Improvement Company requesting authorization to split one parce into two parcels for the area known as Parcel 2 as shown on a map filed in Book 67, page 5 of Parcel Maps of Orange County. B. That said map is in conformance with the Tustin Area Gen~rai Plan. C. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 85-196 subject to the following conditions: An Eastern/Foothill Transportation Corridor fee may be assessed against Parcel 2. If the building permit is issued prior to the Joint Powers Agreement being executed by the City, then this parcel will be exempt. Parcel 2 may be subject to a transportation improvement program fee as it relates to City Specific Plan No. 7. Amounts of this fee have not yet been determined. Del Amo Avenue may be subject to realignment in the future, as based on the results of the South Newport/Edinger Circulation Study. Del Amo Avenue would begin to curve northerly in the general vicinity of Parcel 2 and connect to the realignment of Newport Avenue at Edinger Street. 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 1!6 ~7 Resolution No. 2249 Page Two Construction or replacement of all missing or damaged public improvements across the frontage of Parcel 2 will be required at the time of developemnt and shall include but not be limited to the following: a) Curb and .gutter. b) 'Driveway aprons. c) Street lights. d) Domestic water service/fire service. e) Sanitary sewer lateral. E. The execution of a Monumentation Bond will be required prior to recordation of this map. F. Payment of Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer connection fees at the time a building permit is issued. Ge Payment of East Orange County Water district fees at the time a building permit is issued. PASSED AND ADO~P_TJED at a re~lar meeting of the Tustin Pl. Jjlmning Commi held on the ./~/~.day of ~/~.-71_.~_-~~ , 198_~__. DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary ssion, RONALD H. WHITE, chairman Planning Commission DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: DECEMBER 23, 1985 FINAL PARCEL WLkP 85-197 LA#LER AND ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF THE SANTA FE LAND IMPROVEMENT COMPAHY. 1361 VALENCIA AVENUE AT MOSHER AVENUE M-1 (INDUSTRIAL) THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS' OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, CLASS 15. SPLIT ONE LOT INTO TWO LOTS. RECOI~qENDED ACTION: Recommend to the City Council approval of Final Parcel Map 85-197 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2289. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The Santa Fe Land Improvement Company is developing a 74,000 square foot industrial building at 1361 Valencia Avenue. The building and improvements for the Scantron building cover only a portion of the existing parcel. The owner is now requesting authorization to split the existing parcel of 7.4 acres into two parcels (parcel 1:3.939 acres and parcel 2:3.507 acres). Both proposed parcels comply with the Tustin Area General Plan and the City of Tustin Zoning Ordinance as well as the proposed Specific Plan No. 7. Community Development Department Planning Commission Report Final Parcel Map 85-197 page two On June 24, 1985, the Planning C'ommission recommended approval of Tentative Parcel Map 85-197 to the City Council by the adoption of Resolution No. 2250. On July 1, 1985, the City Council approved the map by the adoption of Resolution No. 85-62. All the conditions of the tentative map have been complied with and the final map is in substantial compliance with the tentative map. MA~Y AN~ CHAMBERLAIN Associate Planner MAC:em Attachments: Final Map Tentative Map Resolution No. 2250 Resolution No. 2289 Community Development Department 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2289 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARC£L MAP 85-197 LOCATED AT 1361 VALENCIA AVENUE. The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: That Final Parcel Map No. 85-197 was submitted to the Planning Commission pursuant to Ordinance No. 847 by Lawler and Associates on behalf of the Santa Fe Land Improvement Company requesting authorization to split one lot into two lots for the property known as parcel 5 as shown on a map filed in Book 51, page 32 of parcel maps, Orange County, California. B. That said map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan. That this project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 15. D. That this final map is in substantial compliance with the tentative map. II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of Final Parcel Map No. 85-197 subject to the final approval of the City Engineer. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission, held on the __day of , 198 KATHY WEIL, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary '/.444 A4BES BI*G~II Idll, lLS PARCEL MAP NO. 85'197 I# Till ClT~ O~ TUSTIN, ~3UNTY ~1~ OlIANSE, STATE af CALSPUINIA K.W. LAWLEB M AShlArS ~A~ OF SURVEY: Si~i~ ~ PARCEL MAP NO. 85'197 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 17 18 2O 21 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2250 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY'OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 85-197 LOCATED AT 1361 VALENCIA AVENUE. The planning Commission of the City of Tust~n does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: Ae That Tentative Parcel Map No. 85-197 was submitted to the Planning Commission pursuant to Ordinance No. 847 by Lawler and Associates on behalf of the Santa Fe Land Improvement Company requesting authorization to split one lot into two lots for the property known as parcel 5 as shown on a map filed in Book 51, page 32 of parcel maps, Orange County, California. B. That said map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan. That this project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 15. II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 85-197 subject to the following conditions: Ae Eastern/Foothill Transportation Corridor fee may be assessed against both parcels. If the buildin~ permit is issued prior to the Joint Powers Agreement being executed by the City, then that particular parcel will be exempt. Both of these parcels may be subject to a transportation improvement program fee as it relates to City Specific Plan No. 7. Ce Annexation of both parcels to the Orange County Street'Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 will be required. All annexation papers are to be filed with the City of Tustin Engineering Division. The execution of a Monumentation Bond will be required prior to recordation of this map. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 2250 Page Two Construction or replacement of all missing or damaged public improvements across the frontage Of both parcels will be required, as each develops and shall include but not be limited to the following: a) Curb and gutter. b) · Driveway.aprons. c) Separate domestic water service/fire parcel. d) Separate sewer service to each parcel. service to each F. Payment of Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer connection fees at the time a building permit is issued. G. Payment of East Orange County Water district fees at the time a building permit is issued. PASSED AN~Dj~DOPTED at a the L~/~ day of re~ng of the Planning Commission, held on , 1985. RONALD M. WHITE Chairman DONNA ORR Recording Secretary S'TAT~ OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUS~IN ) I, DONNA ORR, the undersigned, hereby cer%ify that t am the Re¢ordin~ Secret~ry of the Planning Co~is~ion Of the Ci~ of Tustin, C~liforni~; ~t Resolu=ion No. ~w~s duly passed ~nd ~dop:ed~% ~ regular m~tin~ of the Tus:in ~l~nnin~ day of ~ , L9 ~ Co~is~ion, held on the~ DONNA ORR Recording Secret~r~ Planning Commission DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: DECEMBER 23,1985 USE PERMIT NO. 85-27 MR. MICHAEL PORTO ON BEHALF OF INDEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, 2727 NEWPORT BLVD., NEWPORT BEACH, CA. INDEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 2727 NEWPORT BLVD., NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 17102 MCFADDEN AVENUE AT PASADENA AVENUE C-2 (CENTRAL COMMERCIAL) CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT CLASS 3 TO AUTHORIZE THE ISSUANCE OF AN OFF-SITE BEER AND WINE SALES LICENSE AND TO ALLOW THE INSTALLATION OF AN 18' HIGH POLE SIGN. RECOt~ENDED ACTION: That the Planning Commission approve Use Permit No. 85-27 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2282. SUFI~.ARY: On December 16, i985, the Redevelopment Agency approved the site plan and elevations for a new 5,989 square foot retail center on the southeast corner of McFadden and Pasadena Avenues. The property owner is now requesting authorization for an off-site beer and wine license and a center identification pole sign at this location. According to Tustin City Code Sections 9233 and 9494 a Use Permit must be approved for the installation of a pole sign and for any new liquor license. Although the proposed user has a liquor license for off-site beer and wine sales in Tustin, the Municipal Code requires that a use permit be issued for all new license locations. Community Development Department Plannfng Commission Report Use Permit No. 85-27 page two ANALYSIS: Off-Site Beer and Wine License: The proposed user of this license is Circle K. They currently operate a convenience market in an existing shopping center just south of 17102 McFadden Avenue. Circle K wishes to relocate to this new center, therefore, a new off-site beer and wine license must be issued. The existing Circle K store to the south will be vacated, however, Circle K holds a long term lease on the property and will maintain the lease by either subletting or converting the shop to a training center. This market is located farther than one-half mile from any public school or church. This license, if approved, would allow Circle K to continue to provide convenience market services to a densely populated area. The success of the current location has allowed Circle K to consider moving to a larger, more modern facility. Therefore, staff agrees that this retailer provides a much needed service to the surrounding residents. Pole Sign: As shown on the'attached plans, the design of this proposed sign is that of a center identification sign. Each tenant will be allowed six (6) square feet of advertising area. The sign is proposed to be 18' in height, and shall not exceed the height of the proposed building. As a part of standard procedure, all new retail centers must prepare and submit a Master Sign Plan for all new commercial developments. Accordingly, this pole sign and the proposed plan for wall signs consist of matching colors and textures. The content of. the signs shall consist of tenant identification only, therefore a uniform appearance will be maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Use Permit No. 85-27, if approved, would allow for an existing business to relocate and maintain its current retail stock. This permit also involves the authorization of a pole sign which, as a part of a comprehensive Master Sign Plan, would allow for center and tenant identification. Assistant Planner LP:em Community Development Department 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2282 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY'OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF AN 18' HIGH POLE SIGN AND AUTHORIZATION FOR OFF-SITE BEER AND WINE SALES AT 17102 MCFADDEN AVENUE. The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: II. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: That a proper application, (Use Permit No. 85-27) has been filed by Mr. Michael Porto on behalf of Independent Development Company to authorize the installation of an 18' high pole sign and for an off-site beer and wine sales license at 17102 McFadden Avenue. Be That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said application. Ce That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings: 1. The use is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan and with use and applicat.ion procedures of the Zoning and Sign Codes (Sections 9233c and 9494). D. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin as evidenced by compliance with the City's Zoning and Development standards. E. Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement requirements as administered by the City Engineer. F. That the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act as specified in Section 15303c. The Planning Commission hereby approves Use Permit 85-27 to authorize the installation of an 18' high pole sign and for off-site beer and wine sales at 17102 McFadden Avenue as applied for, subject to the following conditions: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25~ 26 2'7 28 Resolution No. 2282 Page two A. Compliance with Engineering Department requirements for the following: 1. Any missing or damaged public improvements shall be installed or replaced. 2. Provide an irrevocable offer of dedication of ten (10) feet along McFadden Avenue. Bo Final development plans shall require the review and approval of the Community Development Department. Ce Prior to building permit issuance, a Master Sign Plan shall be approved for this project. Approval of Use Permit 85-27 is contingent upon the applicant signing and returning an "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form as established by the director of Community Development. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California held on the ~ day of , 198,,,. KATHY WEIL, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary Planning Commission DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: DECEMBER 23, 1985 AMENDMENT TO USE PERMIT 80-17 BILL TAYLOR OF TAYLOR'S RESTAURANT 1542 EL CAMINO REAL (FORMERLY LAGUNA ROAO) RETAIL COI~ERCIAL (C-Z) CATEGORZCALLY EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENYIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CLASS I) INCREASE THE ARCADE ROOM BY 320-SQUARE FEET RECOI~ENDED ACTION: Continue the public hearing to.January 13, 1986, as requested by the applicant. Associate Planner MAC: em Attachment: Correspondence from Mr. Taylor Community Development Department Mr. Bill Taylor 1542 E1 Camino Real Tustin, California 92680 December 18, 1985 Community Development Department City Of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, California 92680 Attn: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner Project: Proposed Addition to Taylor's Restaurant, 1542 E1 Camino Real Tustin, California Subject: Request for Extension of Public Hearing on Amendment No.1 to Use Permit No. 80-17 Dear Ms. Chamberlain: Due to a conflict of schedules, my architects cannot attend a Public Hearing on December 123,1985. I do respectfully request, therefore, an extension of time until the January 13, 1986 hearing. Your approval of the request will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Bill Taylor BT/j h Xc: Shoemaker & Rutherford files Planning Commission December 23, 1985 SUBJECT: REPORT O# COUNCIL ACTIONS - December 16, 1985 Oral presentation to be given by Donald D. Lamm, Dtrector of Cmmuntty Development do Attachments: Ctty Council Actton Agenda - December 16, 1985 , Community Development Department ACTION ~ENDA OF A REGULAJ~ I~EETING OF 1}lE llJSTIN CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 16, 1985 7:00 P.M. 7:04 I. CALL TO ORDER ALL PRESElfT II. ROLL CALL NONE III. PROCLAMATIONS IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS ADOPTED RESOLUTION i. TUSTIN URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN - RESOLUTION NO. 85-118 NO. 85-118 (Continued from December 2, 1985) RESOLUTION NO. 85-118 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE TUSTIN URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AOOPTED RESOLUTION 2. NO. 85-116 BUT NO LIENS TO BE FILED UI~.ESS PROGRESS HRS STOPPED ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE AT 17592 AMAGANSET -RESOLUTION NO. 85-116 (Continued from December 2, 1985) RESOLUTION NO. 85-116 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT CERTAIN CONDITIONS ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17592 AMAGANSET AVENUE (AP# 401-033-01) CONSTITUTE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND HEREBY ORDERING THE ABATEMENT OF SAID NUISANCE __INTRODUCED ~ROINANCE NO. 957 3. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 85-6 - ORDINANCE NO. 957 ORDINANCE NO. 957 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 85-6 AUTHORIZING SCHOOL USES, SUB- JECT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, IN THE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE {Pr) AND INDUSTRIAL (M} DISTRICTS COIE[INUED TO 4. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 85-8; PROHIBITION OF TOXIC WASTE TRANSFER JANU/LRY 20, 1986 STATIONS - ORDINANCE NO. 954 ORDINANCE NO. 954 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 85-8 PROHIBITING THE DEVEL- OPMENT AND/OR OPERATION OF TOXIC WASTE TRANSFER STATIONS WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS 5. AMENDMENTS TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE - REGULATIONS OF FORTUNE TELLING BUSI- NESSES - ORDINANCES NO. 958, 959 AND 960 INTRODUCED ORD. NO. 958 ORDINANCE NO. 958 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, (ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 85-9) AMENDING SEC- TION 9232b AND SECTION 9233c OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE PERTAINING TO THE OPERATION OF FORTUNE-TELLING BUSINESSES INTRODUCED ORD. NO. 959 .NTROOUCED ORD. NO. 960 BUT AMENDED TO ELIMINATE 2) AND 3) ORDINANCE NO. 959 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2523 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE (FOR- TUNE TELLING} ORDINANCE NO. 960 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA REGARDING THE PRACTICE OF FORTUNE-TELLING OF SECTION 3812b - REGULATED USES CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 1 12-16-85 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 85-126 INTRODUCED ORDINANCE NO. 961 NONE APP~V~ ~P~V~ Ve 6. FIRST STREET SPECIFIC. PLAN (SPECIFIC PLAN NO.' 10) - RESOLUTION NO. 85-126 - ORDINANCE NO. 96I RESOLUTION NO. 85-126 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ADOPTING THE POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CONTAINED IN THE FIRST STREET SPECIFIC PLAN (SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 10) ORDINANCE NO. 961 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION SECTIONS OF THE FIRST STREET SPECIFIC PLAN PUBLIC INPUT CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 2, 1985, REGULAR MEETING ADOPTED 3. RESOLUTION NO. 85-123 ADOPTED 'ESOLUTION NO. 85-124 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 85-125 APPROVED STAFF 4. RECOlW~ENOATION APPROVED STAFF 5. RECOMFIENDATION APPROVED STAFF 6. RECO)~ENDATION APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $369,188.73 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $126,750.21 RESOLUTION NO. 85-123 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GEN- ERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1986, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF SAID CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES RESOLUTION NO. 85-124. - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO RENDER SPECIFIED SERVICES TO THE CITY RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN ON TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1986 'RESOLUTION NO. 85-125 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN ELECTION SENIOR CITIZENS ADVISORY COUNCIL NOMINATION Nominate Evelynn Hershey as the League of California Cities Repre- sentative to the County of Orange Senior Citizens Advisory Council, representing District 5, as recommended by the Recreation Superin- tendent. AGREEMENT TO MAINTAIN & REPAIR EARTHEN FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL (EL MODENA-IRVINE CHANNEL) Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute subject agreement with The 1trine Company on behalf of the City of Tustin, subject to the City Attorney's final approval, as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. FEDERAL AID SAFETY PROJECTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Program Supplement No. 6 to Local Agency(Tustin)/State Agreement No. 07-5271 (Depart- ment of Transportation) as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 2 12-16-85 APPROVED STAFF 7, ~COI~ENDATION LAMBERT SCHOOL LEASE RENEWAL Renew the lease with the Tustin Unified School District for the use of Lambert School for a period of one year commencing February 1, 1986, and ending January 31, lg87, as recommended by the Recreation Superintendent. ADOPTED RESOLUTION 8. NO. 85-127 RESOLUTION NO. 85-127 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR BUILDING MODIFICATIONS FOR THE COMMUNICATIONS CENTER UPGRADE' IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FACILITY AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS Adopt Resolution No. 85-127 as recommended by the Chief of Police. APPROVED STAFF 9. RECO~ENDATION SIGN CODE EXCEPTION - BURNETT-EHLINE PHASE I PROJECT, 18302 IRVINE BOULEVARD Adopt a Minute Order granting sign code exception authorizing a 12-square-foot wall sign for Allstate Insurance as recommended by the Community Development Department. VII. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION None. VIII. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION ADOPTED ORDINANCE 1. SMOKING REGULATIONS IN PUBLIC PLACES & PLACES OF EMPLOYMENT - ORDINANCE NO. 949 NO. 949 ORDINANCE NO. 94g - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN AMENDING ARTICLE 4, CHAPTER 1 OF THE TUSTIN MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING PART 2, SECTIONS 4120, 4121, 4122, 4123, 4124, 4125, 4126, 4127, 4128, AND 4129, RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF SMOKING IN PUBLIC PLACES AND PLACES OF EMPLOYMENT 2. ADOPTION OF NEW MODEL AMBULANCE ORDINANCE - ORDINANCE NO. 955 ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO. 955 ORDINANCE NO. 955 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING PART 2, SECTIONS 3421 THROUGH 3429.6, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 3 OF THE TUSTIN MUNICIPAL CODE AND ESTABLISHING NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR THE OPERATION OF AMBULANCES IN THE INCORPORATED AREAS OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE IX. OLD BUSINESS None, X. NEW BUSINESS APPROVED STAFF RECOI~¢ENDATION 1. INSTALLATION OF NO PARKING SIGNS FOR STREET SWEEPING ON THE WEST SIDE OF YORBA STREET BETWEEN BONNER DRIVE AND LAURIE LANE kVE THE MAYOR THE 2. aUTHORITY TO APPOINT A Recommendation: Authorize the installation of "No Parking Signs" for street sweeping purposes on the west side of Yorba Street between Bonnet Drive and Laurie Lane, as recommended by the Engineering Division. FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS AGENCY MEMBER AND AN ALTERNATE TO SERVE ON THE JOINT POWERS AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS WITHIN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 3 12-16-85 APPROVED STAFF 3. 'I~NDTION WITH · J. ETION OF P. EOUIRE- MENT REGARDING BONO APPROVED STAFF 4. RECOMMENDATION AMBULANCE SERVICE CONTRACTS - DOCTOR'S AMBULANCE & MORGAN AMBULANCE Recommendation: 1) M.O. - That Doctor's Ambulance be awarded a con- tract to provide primary ambulance service; 2) M.O. - That Morgan Ambulance be awarded a contract to provide secon- dary ambulance service; and 3) Authorize the Mayor to execute both contracts on behalf of the City of Tustin, as recommended by the Community Development Department. AWARD OF CONTRACT - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 85-1 (PHASE II) IMPROVEMENTS - BRYAN AVENUE & BROWNING AVENUE APPROVED STAFF RECOMMENDATION -&PPROVED STAFF ~COI~MENOATION XI. RATIFIED RECEIVED AND FILED RECEIVED AND FILED Recommendation: Award the contract for subject project to Fleming Engi- neering, Inc., Buena Park, in the amount of $562,535.75 as recommended by the Engineering Division. 5. S.B. 821 BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROJECT APPLICATION (1985-86) Recommendation: 1) Adopt a Minute Order approving the application of S.B. 821 funds to construct sidewalk along the northerly side of Service and School Roads between Red Hill Avenue and Sycamore Avenue; and 2) Request the Orange County Transportation' Commission to transfer funds allocated to the Nisson Road and McFadden Avenue projects to the Service and School Roads project as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 6. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE TRACTOR-MOUNTED ROTARY MOWER Recommendation: Authorize the purchase of one tractor-mounted rotary mower from Avery Rentals, Inc., Capistrand Beach, in the amount of $7,655.85 as recommended by the Engineering Division. REPORTS 1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - DECEMBER 9, 1985 2. PACIFIC BELL DEVELOPMENT - TRAFFIC SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 3. HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT - PROJECT RECAP RECEIVED AND FILED RECEIVED AND FILED GREINKE XlI. REQUESTED A CLOSED 4. INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 1985 5. STATUS REPORT CONCERNING MAIN STREET ZONING STUDY OTHER BUSINESS SESSION FOR LEGAL MATTERS. EEN~AR REQUESTED THAT THE IwEL:TING BE ADJOURNED IN I"EMORY OF LEE WAGNER. KENNEDY REPORTED TtLRT THE RESIDENTS ON OLWYN DRIVE ARE HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE THAT IS BEING BUILT FOR THE APARTMENTS IN BACK OF THEIR LOTS. DON ~ TO LOOK INTO THE PROBLEM. APPOINTED AS REPRESENTATIVE TO SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14. XIII. ADJOURNMENT Recessed to the Redevelopment Agency, thence to a Closed Session for legal matters regarding the Rott v. Tustin case, and thence adjourned in memory of Lee Wagner to the next regular meeting on January 6, 1986 at 7:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 4 12-16-85 ACTION AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUSTIN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DECEMBER 16, 1985 7:00 P.M. 9:48 1. CALL TO ORDER ALL 2. PRESENT APPROVED 3. ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 2, 1985, REGULAR MEETING APPROVED 4. CARVER DEVELOPMENT - OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT STAFF RECOI~4ENDATION Recommendation: Approve the Owner Participation Agreement between Carver Development and the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency; and authorize its execution by the Chairman and Secretary, as recommended by the Redevelopment Consultant. APPROVED 5. STAFF RECOI~IENDATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL & DRIVEWAY MODIFICATIONS AT TUSTIN HEIGHTS SHOPPING CENTER ENTRANCE AT IRVINE BOULEVARD & OLD IRVINE BOULEVARD Recommendation: Adopt Minute Order in concurrence with proceeding with subject work with R. J. Noble Company as the general contractor; and appropriate an additional $10,000 ~in Redevelopment funds to cover increased Agency share costs subject to execution of agreement between both parties, as recommended by the Engineering Division. iDOPTE]) 6. RESOLUTION NO. ROA 85-16 SITE PLAN/DESIGN REVIEW: TUSTIN VILLAGE, 17102 MC FADDEN AVENUE RESOLUTION NO. ADA 85-16 - A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF A 5,98g SQUARE FOOT RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER TO BE LOCATED AT 17102 MC FADDEN AVENUE ADO~Tg) 7. RESOLUTION NO. ADA 85-17 1984-85 ANNUAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REPORT RESOLUTION NO. RDA 85-17 - A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN-APPROVING AND TRANSMITTING THE ANNUAL REPORT FOR FY 1984-85 ADOPTED 8. RESOLUTION NO. RDA 85-18 WITH STAFF TO EXPAND THE CAPITAL RECENTLY-ENACTED LEGISLATION - AB 265 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 85-18 - A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF EXISTING OBLIGATIONS AND A STATEMENT OF EXISTING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROJECTS, PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES FOR THE DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM GREINKE 9. OTHER BUSINESS REQUESTED THAT STAFF CHECK INTO THE POSSIBILITY OF FLYING THE FLAG AT HALF KAST IN HONOR OF LEE WAGNER GREINKE REQUESTED THE CITY MANAGER TO CALL THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REGARDING SETTING UP A MEETING. J:S5 10. ADJOURNMENT - To the next regular meeting on January 6, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION AGENDA Page 1 12-16-85