Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 02-18-86MI~ OF All ADJOURNED ~GULAR OF ~ I~_I)EVL:I. OP~ ~ENC¥ Tl(E CIl~' OF llJSTXN, CJ~LIFORNIA FEBRUARY 18, t986 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 8:25 p.m. by Chairman Greinke in the City Council Chant~ers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. ~ C~LJ. Agency Members Present: Agency Men,)ers Absent': Others Present: Frank H. Greinke, Chairman Donald J. Saltarelli,'Chairman Pro Tom Richard B. Ed~r Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula E. Kennedy None William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk Donald D, Lamm, Community Development Director Robert S. Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Royleen A. White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Services Steve Foster, Police Captain Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent Approximately 20 in the audience It was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Edgar, to approve MinuteS of the February 3, 1986, Regular Memtlng~. Motion c~rried 5-0. APPROVAL OF ~ - JAMUA.qY, 1986 It was moved by ~oes~arey~ seconded by Edgar, to approve demands in the amount of $558,217.15 for the month of O~nuary, ~985, as recom, nended by the Director of Financeo The motion carried 5-0. ' 60 OESIG~I REVIEW FOR USE I~RMIT 86-$ - RESOLUTION NO. ROA 86.-2 Chairman Pro Tom Saltarelli concurred with the staff recommendation contained in the inter-eom prepare<] by the Community Development Department dated February 18, 1986. However, he stated preference that 10 of the 15 spaces which were deleted for landscaping be put back in. It was then moved by Saltarelli? seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt the following with inclusion of 10 paPking spaces in place of landscaping: ~ESOt. UTIO# NO. ROA 86-2 - A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF A 160 UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF NEWPORT AVENUE IN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Agency me~er Kennedy expressed project disapproval for the following ~) The Agency has' had three opportunities to deny a high-density project at this location; 2) The proximity of the freeway, the propane station, and the rail road trac~s; 3) The dead-end which the City is now petitioning PUC to open as an at-grade crossing; 4) Tustin has enough of this type development; and S) The project qreates a brand-new slum that the City will have to take care of in 20 years. The motion carried 4-1,,, Kennedy opposed. 60 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES Page 2, 2-18-86 6. ~ BL~SINESS None. ~ At 8-'34 p.m. the meeting was adjourned to the next Regular Meeting on Monday, March 3, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. by unanimous infomal consent. CHAIRMAN MIMIITES OI~ A/I Ai~IOIJI~NIm REGIJI.AR )~:EiIMG OF lliE CIl~' COUNCIL ·r l'dE CIlY OF T1J~'TIN, CAI. IFDRNIA FEBRUARY 18, 1986 CALL TO ORDER/PI.EDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tam Saltarelli at' 7:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Hoesterey, and the Invocation was gt yen by Councilwoman Kennedy. ROIL CALL Councllpersons Present: Councllpersons Absent: Others Present: Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Pro Tam Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoestarey Ursula E. Kennedy Frank H. Gretnke, Mayor (Arrived at 7:28 p.m.) William A. Huston, City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Oonald O. Lamm, Com. Oevelopment Director Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works Royleen A. White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Srvcs. Steve Foster, Police Captain Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Susan Jones, ~ecreation Superintendent Approximately 60 in the audience Mayor Pro Tea Saltarelli announced ihat the City of Tustin Com- munity Services Department is sponsoring subject clinic. It will be held at Tustin High School Track from March 3-28 for boys and girls born between 1971 and 1978. Steve Waltner, Head Coach of the Tusttn Roadrunners will be the instructor. He referred interested persons to contac~ City Mall for registration. PUBI. IC INPUT None. It was moved by Hoeeterey~ s~ond~ by Edgar, to appFove the entire Consent Calendar. Page 2 of the February 3, 1986, Minutes was corrected by Council woman Kennedy as follows: '5. BOARD OF DIRECTORS - TUSTIN AREA SENIOR CEIfl'ER PJNO, I/lC. Councilwoman Kennedy reported that Ken Hoesterey has had to step down fron the Board of Directors, Tustin Area Senior Center Fund, Inc. The Board voted last week to recommend to Council that Janet Schwartz be appointed to fill subject vacancy. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to appoint Janet Schwartz to the Board of Directors, Tustln Area Senior Canter Fund, Inc. Carried 5-o." The motion carried 4-0, Greinke absent, to approve the entire Consent Calendar, 1. ~¥AI. OF MINIJll[$ - JANUARY 29, 1986, SPECIAL MEE-I'ING F~RUARY 3, 1986, REGULAR MEETING (Corrected) Zo ~0¥~1. ~ OE)tAIIDS IN ll~E AItOUNT OF $507,5g0.9[ I~TIFI~TIO# OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $145,24,B.01 50 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 2-18-86 3. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 85-42; CLAIMANT: I$OBEL FIELD; OATE OF LQSS: 8/30/85; DAlE FILEI) WITH CITY: 9/9/85 Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 4. REJECTION OF BIDS - POLIC£ DEPARTMENT COI~MUNICATIONS ~N~R BUILD- ING NOO IFICATIONS RESOI.UTIOII NO. 86-25 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TOSTIN APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR COMMUNICATIONS CENTER UPGRADE IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FACILITY AND DIRECTING THE CITY 'O_ERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS Rejected all bids received to date; and adopted Resolution No. 86-25 as recon~nended by the Chief of Police. 82 RE~IO(( NO. 8K~-22 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PERSONNEL RECORDS Adopted Resolution No. 86-22 as recommended by the Director of Community and Administrative Se?vices. 79 R~.EA~E OF SUBOIVISION lil2J)JI~(~Y BONI) - ~ NO. I1586 (EASTERLY SIDE OF HOLT & BETWEEN 292-458 FEET SOUTHERLY OF WARREN AVENUE) Authorized release of Subdivision Warranty Bond NO. K01530252 in the amount of $1,750 as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. gg 7. RESOt. IXTIOi( NO. ~-24 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF llJSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW- PORT AVENUE FAU PROJECT Adopted Resolution No. 86-2¢ as recommended by the Director Public Works/City Engineer. g4 8. ~ AVENUE I'I~FFIC SIGNAL Iki~CONNECT FEDERAL AID ~ (FA/I) PI~ECT Approved Program Supple'~ent No. 7 to Local Agency/State Agree., ment No. 07-527! covering installation and modification of traffic signals and interconnect on Newport Avenue from E1 Camino Reel to Sycamore Avenue as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. g4 SMTA ANA YAL/.EY IRRI~TIOll COIMP~ (SAVI) QUITCI.AIM DEE1) Authorized the Mayor to execute a Quitclaim Deed; and directed staff to record said document subject to receipt of $90 trans- fer fee as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engt neet. 49 lO. 12. ~SOI. UTIOII NO. 86-2! - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF lllSTIN APPROVING FOURTH REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT 11370 (SOUTHERLY TEPJ4INUS OF NEWPORT AVENUE) Adopted Resolution No. 86-2! as recommended by the Community Development Depart~nt, ~ RF. SO~UTIOi( NO. 86-23 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR l~HE "ANNEXATION NO. 136 - TENTATIVE TRACT 11370 TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN" Adopted Resolution NO. 85-23 as recommended by the Community Development O~artment, 24 ~ND~Nl' TO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER [8, 1985, & JANUARY Approved amendments to City Council Minutes as follows: November 18~ 19857 .- Pa~e 7: Added the following action from Closed.Session: ilJSl'I# ARF..~ SE]IIOR (~')~m't~ F1JND, INC. - BOARD OF D[RECTORS It was moved b7 Gretnke? seconded b~ Saltarelli, to appoint the following to the Tustin Area Senior Center Fund, Inc., Board of Directors: Richard B. Edgar; Ursula E. Kennedy; William A. VI. Vll. cITY COUNCIL MINUTES ~age 3, 2-18-86 Huston; Margarete Thompson; and Kenneth Hoesterey. Carried 5°0." January 6t 1986~ - Page 8: Included the following official statement for adjournment to a Closed Session: RECESS - CLOSED SESSION - At 9:07 p.m. the meeting was recessed to a Clo~ed Session pur- suant to Government Code Section 54956.g(a) to confer with the City Attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the City is a party, the title of which is kopez & Ports vs. City of Tustin, et al, Orange County Superior Court; and thence adjourned to the next regular meeting on January 20, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. by unanimous informal consent. O~)INA~$ ~ ~/)O~TIO# HAZAROOUS PATERIALS DISCLO~JRE OROINANCE & IMPtE]qENTATION PLAN - ORI)INANCE NO. 9~. As recommended in the inter-cOm dated February 18, 1986, prepared by the Community Development Department, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to continue considermtion of drmft Ordinance NO. 964 tO March 3, [986, as follows: ORI)IN~JI~E NO. g6~ - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 5600 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHIN~ REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE DISCLOSURE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - The motion carried 4-0,, Greinke absent. 102 FOOTHILL/F. Jt~I~R# TIU%NSPORTATION CORRIDOR As requested by the City Attorney, it was moved by Hoesterey, sec- onded by Saltarelli, to_~fer the following item to the end of the agenda (see p~ges ! and8): ~INRNC£ NO. g6~ - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 948 AND THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF Carried 4-0, Gretnke absent, lO0 1. A~Am)&) OF CONTRACT - FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 PAVEMENT RE}IABILITATION ASI~.T CONCR£TE OVERLAY Bids for subject project were received as follows: Blair Paving & Planing, Anaheim Sully-Miller Contrectlng Co~, Orange R. J. Noble Company, Orange Industrial Asphalt, Irwindale Grifftth Company, Santa Aha $145,575.53 $151,493.28 $152,506.26 $154,004.64 $161,517.1¢ It wes moved by Ed~art seconded by Hoesterey, to award the contract for subject project to Blair Paving and 'Planing, Anaheim, in the amount of $~45,575.53; and authorize staff to add additional work to the contrec! in order to utilize all funds available for street maintenance as recommended by the Engineering Division in the inter-eom dated February ll, 1986. Carried ~-0, Greinke absent. 95 O(~TIO# TO SOUTH COAST REPERTORY THEATRE - ORAL REPORT As recoe~ended by the City Manager, Council concurred to defer sub- ject item pending Mayor Greinke's arrival. {see page ~.) CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 2-18-86 VlIl. REPORTS ~. PI.ANNIN$ CO~IS$I0# AgTION$ - FEBRUARY 10, Councilwman Kennedy commend~ Community Development Oepartment staff for resolving the satellite dish antenna probl~ at 17362 No~ood Park Place {UsA Pe~it 86-1 withdrawn by applicant). It was th~ mov~ b~ Hoesterey~ s~ond~ by Edgar, to ratify the entire Planning C~isston Action Agenda of Pebruary 10, 1986. Motion carri~ 4-0, Greinke absent. 80 2. I~E~ ~ ~ ~ ~y 31, 19~ It was ~v~ by Hoestereyt s~onded by Edgar, to receive and file the Investment Sch~ule as of January 31, ~g86, prepar~ by the Finance Dir~tor. Carri~ 4-0, Greinke absent. 50 The Co.unity Oevelopment Otrecto~ pr~seflC~ the sCa~ ~mpo~ an~ PKo~efldation as contained in the i~e~-com dat~ Kebruary ig86, prepar~ by the Co~unity Oevelopmeflt Department. The Director reco~end~ maintaining the ~-1 zone intact. If Coun- oil wishes, land uses that c~pl~ent R-[ use ~ould be added by creating an overlay zone, which is a second zone that's "sand- wlch~" ~to the The C~unity Oeveiop~nt Otcecto~ nac~at~ a l~-by-lot slide pr~entatl~ of the a~a along Hain Stre~ betw~ "C" Street and the Route 55 Fray. Counctlm~e~ Saitarell~ and Hoesterey ~ppess~ p~efe~ence for the matte~ to be consldeP~ through the public hearing process before ~h the Planning C~ts~tofl and City Council. The following pemons spoke on the Et'chard Vtntng, 400 West ~tn Street, stat~ he ~s one of the original petitt~ signem r~uestlng ~ezoning of prooe~les along Main Street to Professional Office (PR). Mr. Vining stat~ he op~ to so~ change, however he's in the minority. The majority residents want zoning left as ts. Traffic enforc~ent on Main StP~ Is still a ~Jop pcobl~. He then present~ a petition con- tatning 1~ signatures with a graphic ~p indicating those con- tact~, those tn favor of R-[ only, and those oppos~ to R-1 only. Jer~ Shannon, 455 Pacific Street, point~ out that people in favo~ of the zone ~ange ace ~s~tee lando~ers. Ed Gage, 405 West Main Street, expressed concern that ~at Council decld~ to do and w~at ls impl~ent~ se~ to always be dtffe~- ent. He stated that Main Stree~ ~nnot tolerate ~ch ~ange, and to make any chang~ would leave it wide op~ to unkn~ns. A~huc ChaPleton, resident at ~0 West 2nd Stre~ for 5~ years, refl~t~ ~ unsuccessful ~t~pts to vary with land uses along Main St~ in the past. He spoke In opposition to a zone change other than ~yo~ Gretnke a~tv~ at 7:28 p.m. and assu~ the Chai Charles Mitchell, 420 West ~tn Street, initiator of the zone change r~uest, stat~ that the probl~ ts that the area Is going to ~ange, tt Is not a ~stdenttal area, It is not r~ogntz~ by the State o~ C~ty ~ r~identlal, and the 40 ~h spe~ limit i5 not a ~tdenttal speed limit. He spoke in favor of a zone ~ange on Main Strut to help p~ese~e the hlsto~lc nature of the area. Mayor P~O T~ Saltace]li stat~ that when the Gfelle~ project was approved, he thought c~itments ~re ~de that "B" Street ~uld be the basic limit, of encroachment of professional or c~rcial-type CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 2-18-86 zoning on Main Street, Since State law prohibits "spot" zoning, he suggested the matter be set for public hearing before the Planning Commission and the City Council to allow everyone an opportunity to study the matter thoroughly. Councilman Hoesterey stated that his main concerns are to preserve the historical nature along Main Street and insure that it can be maintained by its residents. He agreed that the public hearing procedure would provide greater input and pa?haps new alternatives. Councilman Edgar acknowledged the controversy of the matter. He concurred that allowing community input would be a valuable effort in determining the best way to preserve Main Street's heritage. Councilwoman Kennedy stated that some of the residences on Main Street are historically valuable. The City should take steps to protect them and save them from economics which would force them tO be torn down. She suggested an historical overlay zone, and the use of funds for preservation of the area. She concurred that a "small-town" public hearing would be the best way to proceed. She requested that the Police Department enforce compliance with the 40 mbh speed limit on Main Street. Council/staff discussion followed regarding the recently-defeated 8Sth percentile legislation and speed limit enforcement with the use Of radar. Mayor Greinke spoke in favor of leaving Main Street zoned R-1 and. not; c~anging the land usage. He did not think economic hardship was sufficient reason for changing zoning. After further discussion, it- was then moved by Greinke~ seconded by Edgar., to set the matter-for public hearing. Councilw~an Kennedy requested that staff provide information on historical preservation to allay the Mayor's concern about taking away property owner's rights. Councilman Saltarelli stated that in addition to zoning, Main Street needs attention tn other areas - strut resurfacing, street restriping, and rooking left-turn traffic movements safer for resi- dents. The motion carried 5-0. tog Mayor Grefnke indicated that residents who sign the interest list would receive a public hearing notice. VII. NEW BUSINESS 2. OONRTION TO SOUT~ COAST RF. PERTORY THEATRE - ORAL REPORT Mayor Greinke reported that the City has been requested to become more involved with fine arts in Orange County by the South Coast Repertory Theatre. Tustin uses the South Coast Repertory Theatre through c~ildren's activities and training programs, and the Com- munity Services Department. It was then moved by Greinke~ seconded by Edgar, to authorize a donation in the a~ount of $1,000 to South Coast Repertory Theatre for promotional activities, in appreciation for their participation in the training of our youth. The City Attorney responded to Mayor Pro Tee Saltarelli that sub- jet: donation is legal. The motion carried 4-1, Saltarelli opposed. 41 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 2-18-86 IX. OTHER B~SINESS ~QU~ST ~ Q. OS~D S~SSION The City Attorney requested a Closed Session regarding litigation matters. OFFICIAL ~O~N~ - ~N~ J. ~M Councilman Edgar r~uest~ t~at the Council adjou~ in ~ of · ~enneth Carbon, Agnes Bacon's brother, ~o pass~ away on February 8. He was fo~erly a m~er of t~e Tustin City Council. ~C~ ~OY Councilman Edgar stmt~ that in te~ of the Bottleneck Stud~, ~e of the ~tions being suggest~ are not in Tustin's best interr ests. One is double-decking of the I-S. The other option is that Inine, Walnut and M~lton Parkway ~uld b~e "super" streets. It was then ~ved b~ ~d~ar) s~ond~ by Grein~e, that Council express its critlci~ of either t~e super street solution throug~ Tustin or double decking of the I-5 through Tustin. Council discussion followed. The Director of Public Work~ added that double decking also includes a potion of t~e Route 55 {Costa Mesa ~reeway) to the 22 Freeway {Garden Grove}. He reported that staff will prepa~ a rebo~ discussing.t~e foll~i.ng alternatives: ~) ~ project; g) Otr~ ~nn~tion freeway fr~ the F~thill Corridor ~sterly to the 22 Fr~ay; - 3)A~e~al ,Iterative {,c~p,sses six or seven a~ertals); and Fr~ay i~rov~ts (double decking}. Councilman Hoeste~y stat~ he wes not oppos~ to the motion. How- ever, he felt it ~re p~dent to state suppo~ of a solution rather than opposition to all the alternatives. The ~tion was withdrawn by the maker and second. Council concurr~ to agendize the matter for the March 3 meeting. 64 4. TUSTIN AUTO CEHTER In response to Councilman Edgar, the Community Development Oirector rebo~ted that a loudspeaker system for the Auto Center has not yet been approved by the Planning Cm~ission. An individual paging system (pocket pager) has been ~proved until a more reasonable plan is presented to the Commission for approval. AGENOA alU)ER III. Cl)l~lllMIIll' ~ 2o MISS TUSTIN PAGe. ANT Mayor Grelnke announced the Miss Tusttn Pageant to be held on Saturday, February 22, lg86, at 7:00 p.m. sponsored by the Tustin Oaycees. He encouraged everyone to attend the pageant and support the ~2 entrants. 41 3. mA SN. OTE TO TI~'TIN BUSINESSES" On February 25 the Tustin Area Historical Society is sponsoring 'A Salute to Tustin Businesses," which dates back to 1910. One of the businesses involves the oldest shoemakers in Tustin. IX. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 2-18-86 4. SOUT~E~I C~i. IFORNIA ~TICS CUB The Mayor noted that the Southern California Aquatics Club will host a major swim event at Tustin High School on March 8 - 10. It is expected that between 800-1,000 swimmers and their families will be in attendance. The City of Tustin will be extending its greet- ings and a hearty welcome. 5. FINAL BAS~N.L GA#E OF SEASON - llJSTIN NIGH VICTORIOUS Mayor Greinke congratulated Tusttn Nigh School on its 88-70 victory over E1 Medena on February 14. He noted that Rog Mlddleton scored 45 points in the final basketball game of the 1985-86 season. OTHER ~U~INESS 6. SLOVENS SOUA~.E PA~KING NTRUCTURE Philip Cox, owner of commercial property on the southeast corner of E1 Camino Real and Main Street, reported on findings of a study he conducted regarding parking congestion in the downtovm area and lack of use of the parking structure by downtown merchants and cus- tomers. He presented a petition with 95 signatures requesting that the City provide easier access to the parking structure by constructing a ramp across a lot owned by the City at ¢50 E1 Camino Real. Mayor Greinke thanked Mr. Cox for his presentation. He was directed to submit his information to the Community Oevelopment Otrector for further revimw and'recmm~endation on the matter. RECESS - RtmEYEI.OPI(NT; ~.OSE]) SF. SSION o R£CONVENG) At 8:25 p.m. it was moved by Saltarelll~ seconded by Hoesterey, to recess to the Redevelopment Agency and thence to a Closed Session for discussion of legal matters. Carried 5-0. Mayor Greinke announced that the City Council will recess to Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.g(a) to confer with the City Attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to w~ich the City is a party. The title of the litigation is Lopez and Ports vs. City of Tustin, Additionally, the City Council will recess to Closed Session to confer with the City Attorney rlgarding pending litigation pursuant to Govern- meflt Code Section 64956.g(b)(2). (Based o~ an existing set of speci facts and circumstances, the City Council of the City is deciding whether the threat of litigation is likely or would be likely if dis- cussed in an open and public meeting.) The meeting was reconvened at 9:28 p.m. with all members present. OI~ER ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION 2o FOOTHII.J./EASI'~RN 'll~S?ORTATION CORRIDQ~ - RE,SOLUTION NO. 86-26 ANO UR~'NCY ~II~)INA, NC£ ND, ~ It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt the follow- ing: RE.SOLUTION NO~ 8~-26 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN SPECIFYING ~RTAIN RESERVED RIGHTS AND N)OPTING A POLICY STATEMENT REGARDING THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE FOCTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCY Carried 5-0. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 2-18-86 It was moved by Edgar~ seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 965 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 965 by Councilman Edgar, it was moved by Ed~ar~ seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 965 be introduced. Motion carried 5-0. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. g65 have seconU reaalng Oy title Only. Carrled 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 965 by Councilman Edgar, it was moved by. Ed~ar~ seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. g65 be passed and adopted as follows: ORDINA/I~£ NO. ~5 - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CA).IFORNIA, AMENOING ORDINANCE NO. 948 AND THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF Roll Call Vote: AYES: Edgar, Grelnke, Kennedy, Hoesterey, Saltarelli NOES: None ABSENT: None XI. A~OURNMENT 100 At 9:30 p.m. the meeting was adjourned in memory of Kenneth J. Cawthon to the next re<Jular'meeting on March 3. 1986, at 7:00 p.m. by unanimous informal consent.