HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA MINUTES 03-03-86MINUTES OF All NXIOURllED REGULAR I~ETIN~
OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
llJE CIllf OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 8:25 p.m. by Chairman Greinke in the
City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California.
Agency Members Present:
Agency Members Absent:
Others Present:
Frank H. Greinke, Chairman
Donald J. Saltarelli, Chairman Pro Tern
Richard B. Edgar
Ronald B. Hoesterey
Ursula E. Kennedy
None
William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney .
Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk
Donald O. Lamm, Co,,~unity Development Director
Robert S. Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Royleen A. White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Services
Steve Foster, Police Captain
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent
Approximately 20 in the audience
3. APPROVAl. OF MINtffES
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edg, ar, to approve Minutes of the
February 3, 1986, Regular Meeting. Motion carried 5-0.
4. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS - JAIIUARY; 1986
It was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Edgar, to approve demands in the
amount of $568,217.16 for the month of January, 1986, as recommended by
the Director of Finance. The motion carried 5-0. 60
5. DESIGN REVIEW FOR USE PERMIT 86-5 - RESOLUTION NO. RDA 86-Z
Chairman Pro Tem Saltarelli concurred with the staff recommendation
contained in the inter-com prepared by. the C~..,unity Development
Department dated February 18, 1986.
However, he stated preference that 10 of the 15 spaces which were deleted
for landscaping be put back in. It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded
by Hoesterey, to adopt the following with inclusion of 10 parking spaces
in place of landscaping:
RESOLtffION NO. RI)A 86-2 - A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SITE PLAN AND
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF A 160 UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT THE
SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF NEWPORT AVENUE IN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Agency member Kennedy expressed project disapproval for the following
reasons:
1) The Agency has had three opportunities to deny a high-density project
at this location;
2) The proximity of the freeway, the propane station, and the railroad
tracks;
3) The dead-end which the City is now petitioning PUC to open as an
at-grade crossing;
4) Tustin has enough of this type development; and
5) The .project creates a brand-new slum that the City will have to take
care of in 20 years.
The motion carried 4-1, Kennedy opposed. 60
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
Page 2, 2-18-86
6. OTHER BUSINESS
None.
7. AO~OURNMENT
At 8:34 p.m. the meeting was adjourned to the next Regular Meeting on
Monday, March 3, lg86, at 7:00 p.m. by unanimous informal consent..
RECORDING SECRETARY
CHAIRMAN