HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 04-21-86ACTION
AGENDA
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR I~ETING
APRIL 14, 1986
REPORTS
NO. 1
4-21-86
CALL TO ORDER:
7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: Baker, Puckett, McCarthy, Wetl
PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON l~E SPEAKER'S TABLE. 'ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON l~E MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
1. Minutes of March 10, 1986.
2. Resolution No. 2303, Variance Application No. 86-2 for Miller's Outpost Sign
3. Resolution No. 2319, Final Parcel Map 85-287
Commissioner Puckettmoved, Baker seconded to approve the consent calendar with minor
changes in the minutes. Motion carried 4-0.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. USE PERMIT 86-4
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
John Bartlett Associates on behalf of St. Jeanne de Lestonnac.
16791 E. Main Street
Authorization to relocate classroom facilities, and to construct
a new school center consisting of a Gymnasium and Little
Theater.
Presentation: Jeff Davis, Associate Planner
Ca, missioner Baker moved, Puckett seconded to adopt Resolution 2321 (with minor
changes in the resolution and the Design Revteff Summary) Including the recommendation
that the fees be tmtved, approving Use Permit 86-4. Motion carried 4-0.
Planning Commission Actton Agenda
April 14, 1986
Page two
PUBLIC HEARZNGS
5. USE PERMIT 86-10
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
MONY-Btrtcher Red Hill
15621, 15641 and 15661 Red Hill Avenue
Authorization for a blanket use permit for the Northpointe Complex
to allow offices.
Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
Cemndsstoner Mc Carth¥ moved, Puckett seconded to adopt Resolution #o. 2318, with the
amendment of the Blrtcher letter as Exhlblt 'A' to the Resolution, approving Use
Permit 86-10. Morton carried 4-0.
6. USE PERMIT 86-15
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Presentation:
Chairman Wetl
City of Tustln
200 South "C" Street
Authorization to construct a Multipurpose Senior Citizen Center.
Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
moved, Baker seconded to adopt Resolution No. 2317 and fecund to
City Counctl that the Use Permtt and Building fees be waived. Motion carried 4-0.
Commdsstoner Puckettmoved, McCarth~ seconded the approval of Use Permit 86-15 by the
adoptton of Resolution 2317. Morton carried 4-0.
7. USE PERMIT 86-14
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Healthcare Medical Center of Tustin
14662 Newport Avenue
Authorization to install identification signs for
Medical Center.
the Healthcare
Motion carrled 4-0.
Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
Coemlsstoner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to approve Use Permit 86-14 by the
adoptlon of Resolution Ho. 2316.
8. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-2d
City of Tustin
Northstde of 6th Street between "B" Street and Pacific.
Change the General Plan designation from Single-Family
Multiple-Family.
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
tO
Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
Commissioner Puckettmoved, Baker seconded to receive and file General Plan Amendment
86-2d terminating any further action by the Planntng Cmtsston or City Council.
Motion carried 4-0.
Planning Commission Action Agenda
April 14, 1986
Page three
9. USE PERMIT 86-11
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Presentation:
Carver Development (Tustin Plaza Center)
13681 Newport Avenue
Authorization to obtain an on-site beer
conjunction with a restaurant use.
Jeff Davis, Associate Planner
and wine license in
Comrisstoner Mc Carthy moved, Puckett seconded to adopt Resolution No. 2308
approving Use Permit 86-11 based on on-site consumption only. Motion carried 4-0.
PUBLIC HF~INGS
10. USE PERMIT 86-12
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Presentation:
Carver Development (Tustin Plaza Center)
13771 Newport Avenue
Authorization to obtain an on-site
conjunction with a restaurant.
Jeff Davis, Associate Planner
beer and wine license in
Comdsstoner Puckett moved, Mc Carthy seconded adoption of Resolution Mo. 2309
approving Use Perwlt 86-12 based on m-site consumption only. Morton carrted 4-0.
11. VARIANCE 86-3
Applicant:
Locatt on:
Request:
Carver Development (Tustin Plaza Center)
Tustin Plaza Retail site bounded by Main Street, Newport Avenue and
Sixth Street
Authorization to vary from various sections of the Sign Code to
allow: 6 center identification signs; two free-standing tenant
signs; and 4 wall signs in excess of maximum area permitted.
Presentation: Jeff Davis, Associate Planner
Comdsstoner Puckett moved, Mc Carth) seconded to approve Variance 86-3 with the
following conditions: 1.) 6 free standing center Identification signs; and 2.) 2
free standing double faced multi tenant signs; and 3.) staff recommendation for units
23 through 26 as outlined in the staff report. Motion carried 3-1 Chairman Wetl
descending.
Planning Commission Action Agenda
April 14, 1986
Page four
12.
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
USE PERMIT 86-13
Presentation:
Yehia Elhak on behalf of Fast Stop
17311 Mc Fadden Avenue
To authorize an off-site beer and wine sales license for a proposed
convenience market.
Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
Commissioner Puckett moved, Baker seconded the approval of Use Permit 86-13 by the
adoption of Resolution #o. 2320. Motion carried 4-0.
ADMIMISTRATIVE MATTERS
Old Business
13.
Presentation:
Extend Use Permits 76-25 and 77-23.
Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
14. Future Facility Sign for Tustin Auto Center.
Presentation: Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
Commissioner Puckett moved, Mc Carth) seconded to receive and file the report on
Tustin Auto Center faclllty slgns. Hotion carried 4-0.
15. Update on flood control improvement and rough grading in the Phase
I residential area.
Presentation: Ed Knight, Senior Planner
Commissioner. Mc Carth) moved, Puckett seconded to receive and file the report on
flood control improvement and rough gradtng tn the Phase ! residential area. Motion
carried 4-0.
New Business
None.
STAFF CONCERMS
16. Report on Council Actions, March 17, 1986 and April ?, 1986.
Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
CO~I$SIOIi CO#CERNS
ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to adjourn at 11:15 p.m. Motion carried
4-0.
Commissioner Mc Carth)f moved, Puckett seconded to receive and file the report with no
extension ~ranted at this meeting. Motion carried 4-0.
AGENDA
TUSTIN PLANNING COlg4ISSION
REGULAR HEETING
APRIL 14, 1986
CALL TO ORDER:
7:30 p.m., Ctty Counctl Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIARCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL:
Wetl, McCarthy, Puckett, Baker
PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON ll4E SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
1. Minutes of March 10, 1986.
2. Resolution No. 2303, Variance Application No. 86-2 for Miller's Outpost Sign
3. Resolution No. 2319, Final Parcel Map 85-287
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. USE PERMIT 86-4
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
John Bartlett Associates on behalf of St. Jeanne de Lestonnac.
16791E. Main Street
Authorization to relocate classroom facilities, and to construct
a new school center consisting of a Gymnasium and Little
Theater.
Presentation: Jeff Davis, Associate Planner
Planning Commission Agenda
April 14, 1986
Page two
PUBLZC HEARZNGS
5. USE PERMIT 86-10
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
MONY-Btrtcher Red Hill
15621, 15641 and 15661 Red Hill Avenue
Authorization for a blanket use permit for the Northpotnte Complex
to allow offices.
Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
6. USE PERMIT 86-15
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
City of Tusttn
200 South "C" Street
Authorization to construct a Multipurpose Senior Citizen Center.
Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
7. USE PERMIT 86-14
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Healthcare Medical Center of Tustin
14662 Newport Avenue
Authorization to install identification signs for
Medical Center.
the Healthcare
Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
8. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-2d
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
City of Tusttn
Northstde of 6th Street between "B" Street and Pacific.
Change the General Plan designation from Single-Family
Multiple-Family.
to
Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
9. USE PERMIT 86-11
Appltcantion:
Location:
Request:
Carver Development (Tustin Plaza Center)
13681 Newport Avenue
Authorization to obtain an on-site beer
conjunction with a restaurant use.
and wine
license
in
Presentation: Jeff Davis, Associate Planner
Planning Commission Agenda
Apr11 14, [986
Page three
PUBLIC H£ARXNGS
10. USE PERMIT 86-12
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Carver Development (Tusttn Plaza Center)
[377[ Newport Avenue
Authorization to obtain an on-site
conjunction with a restaurant.
Presentation: Jeff Davis, Associate Planner
beer and wine 11cense in
11.
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
VARIANCE 86-3
Carver Development (Tusttn Plaza Center)
Tusttn Plaza Retail site bounded by Main Street, Newport Avenue and
Sixth Street
Authorization to vary from various sections of the Sign Code to
allow: 6 center identification signs; two free-standing tenant
signs; and 4 wall signs in excess of maximum area permitted.
Presentation: Jeff Davis, Associate Planner
12. USE PERMIT 86-13
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Yehla Elhak on behalf of Fast Stop
17311 Mc Fadden Avenue
To authorize an off-site beer and wine sales license for a proposed
convenience market.
Presentation: Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
AI~INISTRATI¥1r RRI'rERS
Old Business
13.
Presentation:
14.
Presentation:
15.
Extend Use Permits 76-25 and 77-23.
Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
Future Facility Sign for Tustin Auto Center.
Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
Update on flood control improvement and rough grading in the Phase
I residential area.
Presentation: Ed Knight, Senior Planner
Planntng Commission Agenda
Aprtl 14, 1986
Page four
New Bustness
None.
STAFF CONCERNS
16. Report on Counctl Acttons, March 17, 2986 and Apr11 7, 1986.
Presentation:
COMMISSION CONCERNS
ADJOURNMElrr
Donald D. Lamm, Otrector of Community Development
14ZllUTES
TUSTIW PLARNI#G COMMzSSIOII
REGULAR I[ETING
, rttAROH .~10',.: ~19~6 :'
CALL TO ORDER:
7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Wet1, Puckett, Baker, McCarthy
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIARCE/INYOCATION
PRESENTATIONS:
None.
PUBLIC CONCERNS:
'~one.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Mtnutes from Planntng Commission meettng February 24, 1986.
~.l~ /~ "~
Resolution No. 2305 deny off-site beer and wtne ltcense
Avenue, Sutte A.
at [3842 Newport
Commissioner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion
carried 4-0.
P~BLZC HEARINGS
3. GENERAL PLAN AHENDMENT 86-2b
Applicant:
Ctty of Tusttn
Request:
To update and amend the Noise Element of the Tusttn Area General
Plan.
Presentation:
Jeff Davis, Associate Planner
Jeff Davis asked that these additions be made to the document:
On page 10 of the Draft Element, the first paragraph as it pertains to the
Browning Corridor. Add a sentence at the end of that paragraph that
states "Information also contained in this appendix (referring to appendix
B) as it pertains to the Browning Corridor were compiled for the Master
Plan for MCAS(H) Tusttn." This is additional information and exhibits
showing the noise contours as well as the actual confines of the Browning
Corridor.
Planntng Commission Mtnutes
,larch 10, 1986
Page two
On Table ], (before page 12) a notatton should be made at the bottom of
the page that states "These noise levels were computed without the benefit
of any consideration for mitigating measures."
0
On page I7, ~the ftnal sentence should be changed to. read "Documentation
supporting the ftndtng of no adverse impact ts found tn the intttal study
questionaire completed for the Negative Oeclaratton prepared tn
conjunction wlth thts project."
One final note that the information In appendtx B referred to wasn't recetved at the
time of agenda transmittal. This notse study, conducted by the County of Orange, ts
basically an Information item only, that would be a part of the Element.
A discussion followed between staff and the Commissioners regarding clarification of
definitions of terms, additional information and some minor changes in the text of
the document.
Public hearing was opened at 8:50 p.m.
public hearing section was closed.
Seeing that no one wished to speak, the
Commissioner McCarthy moved, Puckett seconded to adopt Resolution No. 2310, with the
addition of minor changes, thereby reco,,,,ending approval of General Plan Amendment
86-2b to the City Council. Motion carried 4-0.
4. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-2c
Applicant:
Location:
Physician's Office Service, Inc.
1101 Sycamore Avenue
Request:
To amend the land use diagram of the Land Use Element for the
Tusttn Area General Plan. The proposal is to change the land
use from Multi-family Residential to Public and Institutional.
Presentation:
Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
At 8:00 p.m. the public hearing session was opened. The following people spoke:
Mike Fields, 3700 Parkview l-L, Irvine, Ca., 92715, working for Healthcare, offered
to answer any questions and expressed his thanks for considering his request.
Bill Greenwalt III, 601 Lido Park Dr, # 30, Newport Beach, Ca., 92663, a Real Estate
broker representing the owners of Rancho La Paz Apartments, offered to give tenants a
6 month notice to make other housing arrangements. In a discussion between Mr.
Greenwalt and the Commission, he agreed to notify, in writing, all future tenants of
the possibilities of eviction in the near future. The possibility of a relocation
allowance will be brought up with th~ owner ....
_ Planning Commtsssion Minutes
'arch 10, 1986
.~age three
Ltnda Clair, 1151 Meat Ln., Tustln, Ca., 92680, was concerned about the expansion of
the hospital to Red Hill Avenue. She wanted to kno~ what the long range expansion
plans for the hospital were. Mr..Green~alt responded that Healthcare International
had no plans to acquire any other apartments in the area.
Rocct Ltuzzt, 1120 Sycamore, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, noted concern about the expansion tn
a residential area. His concerns were about the traffic flow, height ltmtts and the
environmental impact on the area. Mr. Greenwalt responded the issue was whether the
hospttal was gotng to. be allowed to expand.to serve the community.
Frank Ltuzzt, 1120 Sycamore, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, votced his
tentative plans to make thts tnto a drug rehabilitation center.
The public hearing was closed at 8:20 p.m.
concern about the
Commissioner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to adopt Resolution No.
recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 86-2c. Motion failed:
opposed.
5. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-2d
,ppllcant:
Location:
Request:
2314 which
Well, McCarthy
City of Tusttn Planning Commission
The area bounded by Sixth Street on the south, "B" Street on the
east, 333 feet northerly of Sixth Street on the north and 200
feet easterly of Pacific Street as the westerly boundary.
To amend the land use dtagram of the Land Use Element of the
Tustln Area General Plan. The proposal ts to change the.current
designation of Residential Single Family to Multiple Family
Residential.
Presentation:
Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
was noted that a written response was received from Ms. 3acqueline Haney, 13352
Ntxon Ctr,. Tusttn, CA., 92680, urging the Commission to vote no on this matter.
Several people sought Information from the publlc counter at Ctty Hall, Including
Mr. and Mrs. Solberg, 460 S. "B" Street. They have requested that their property be
tncluded in the General Plan Amendment map.
The public hearing was opened at 8:35 a.m.
Jerome H. Shannon, 455 Pacific, Tusttn, Ca. 92680, questioned some of the information
tn this report and the crtterta used In making these decisions. He stated tha:
Resolution No. 2315 [. O. was not a true statement.
~tchard Vlntn9, 400 N. Main Street, Tustln, Ca. 92680, presented copies of a petition
stgned by over 200 people stating "NE, THE RES[DENTS OF OLO TONN TUST[N OPPOSE THE
ABOVE PROPOSAL AS PRESENTED TO TI~E PLANNING COMMISSION." He questioned where the
maasuremont was originated from to send public hearing notices. He was also
concerned with the traffic at Pacific and Main Streets, the possible parking
problems, vandalism, and posstble property Improvements on Sixth Street.
Planning Commissston Minutes
March 10, 1986
Page four
Edward L. Gage, 405 W. Main Street, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, was concerned that area
cannot withstand more traffic and noise problems.
Steven Johnson, 420 W. Main Street, Tustln, Ca., 92680, a tenant that did not receive
notice of this hearing. He questioned why the City of Tustin was the applicant in
this matter, why there is not an :EIR%n ~hts zone change, recommended that the
Planning Commission require an EIR, and where the 35S multi-family use figure was
obtained. He was also concerned 'libo~:~'the noise issue. He also questioned the
requirements of R-3. He suggested the possibility of lot consolidation. He
recommended that the Commission recommend against the approval of this project.
Staff responded that notices were only sent.to property owners within a 300' raduis.
Seven seperate property owners requested this General Plan Amendment. Staff felt
that making the city the applicant would simplify matters.
John V. Sauers, 615 S. Pacific, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, did not receive a notice. He
spoke in opposition of the amendment.
£tleen Vtntng, 400 W. Main Street, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, wanted the zoning to stay the
same and wanted no change.
Commissioner Wetl reiterated that this issue is not a zone change.
Cyn Allyn VanDyken, 235 S. "A" Street, Tusttn, Ca. 92680, noted that the residents of
that neighborhood did not want it changed.
Charles. W. Young, 340 W. Main Street, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, spoke on the Main Street
Zone Change, and in opposition of this General Plan Amendment 86-2d.
Charles W. Anderson, 255 W. Sixth Street, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, spoke on his concern of
the traffic and parking in the area and the situation at 545 S. "B" Street.
Arthur Charleton, 460 W Second Street, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, questioned about the
combination of general plan amendments altogether, along with his concerns about
parking, water, and the cost of~'the':&xt-sttng'apartments. He was opposed to the
amendment.
Barbara Cox, 450 1/2 S. "B" Street, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, spoke in opposition to this
amendment.
Bob Edgell, 345 W. Main Street, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, asked who requested this General
Plan Amendment and voiced his opposition.
Mark Atnslte, 13641Malena Drive, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, owner of 40S, 41S, and 425 W.
Sixth Street, stated that he had no intent of building apartments. He wanted to
build single family residences including a homeowner's association to guarantee the
asthettcs of the community. The parking would be more than required for R-1. They
iould be two story duplexes, with a pool and jacuzzi. He indicated that he wanted to
address the concerns of the homeowners of the area. He suggested that the R-3 zoning
could be tailored to fit the areas needs.
Planntng Commtssston H~nutes
- March 10, 1986
Page ftve
At 9:25 p.m. a 5 mtnute break was called. The meeting was reconvened at g:35 p.m.
I~r. Sauers questioned tf North Stxth street was ~onstdered a b11ghted area.
A discussion ensued between staff and the Commission explaining the definition of a
transitional area.
Rtchard .¥tntn~ asked that the area rematn
Lyn Yan Dyken questioned who dectdes whether the area ts In transition or not. She
also commented that tf the property were rezoned to R-3 another developer could butld
a 3 story apartment complex,. She was concerned that the developer's concerns were
profit and not to help the neighborhood.
3er~ Shannon stated that addtng congestion would not help the neighborhood.
Charles Youn~ stated hts concerns about the usage change on the property.
Ltnda Prtce, 520 S. "B" Street, Tust~n, Ca., 92680, stated that the apartments have
changed the al~osphere of the neighborhood. She agatn stated here opposition.
Shaft1 Clark, 545 Pactftc, Tusttn, Ca. 92680, stated her opposition.
Ltbby Pankey, 320 W. ~la~n Street, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, stated her oppost, tton.
There were no other people wishing to speak. The public heartng was closed at 9:50
p.m.
Comm4ss~oner McCarthy' moved, Puckett seconded, that th~s project be continued until
the March 2¢, 1986 meeting to g4ve Mr. A~nslte an opportunity to present h~s project
to the people.
A general d4scuss~on ensued between the Commissioners ~n ?egard to the continuation.
At g:50 the public heartng was reopened.
~ stated the Ctty has already stated that the street ts too noisy for
tal. The street can't handle any more notse.
The publlc heartng was closed at 9:55 p.m.
There was more discussion among the com;tssloners. Staff was Instructed to
re-notice,by mat1, all property owners wtthtn 300 feet of the affected area.
Morton carrted 3-1 (On the continuance). Baker opposed.
Planning Commt sssl on Mi nutes
March 10, 1986
Page six
GENERAL PLAN AHENDMENT 86-2f
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Tusttn Area
Residential
designation.
Ct ty of Tusttn
13881 to 13895 Browning Avenue
To amend the land use dtagram of the Land Use' Element of the
General Plan from the current Single-family
designation to the Multi-family Residential
Presentation:
Ed Kntght, Senior Planner
At 10:00 p.m. the publlc hearing was opened.
Herbert Hub, r, 13882 Da11 Lane, Tusttn, Ca. 92680, asked that the City
letter stattng that thts amendment would not cause htm any additional
taxes, assessments, sewer services, water services, etc.
After some discussion between staff, Suzanne Atktns
instructed to write the letter to Mr. Huber.
send him a;
expenses in
and the Commission, staff was
'Commissioner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to adopt Resolution 2313 which reco,~ends
approval of General Plan Amendment 86-2f to the Ctty Counct1. Morton carrted 4-0.
eeing no one wtshtng to speak further on this subject, the public hearing was closed
at 10:07 p.m.
GENERAL PLAN AMENOMENT 86-2e
Applicant:
Location:
City of Tusttn
1800 San Juan Street
Request:
To amend the land use diagram of the Land Use Element of the
Tustin Area General Plan from the current Multi-Family
designation to the Public and Institutional designation.
Presentation:
Ed Knight, Senior Planner
The public hearing was opened at 10':10 p.m. Seeing there was no one wishing to speak
the public hearing was closed at 10:11 p.m.
Commissioner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to adopt Resolution No.
recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 86-2e. Motion carried 4-0.
*' '- ' (i ~
8. VARIANCE 86-2
Applicant: N.B. Sign Company
_ Location: 17th. Street and Carroll Way
2312 which
xequest:
Authorization to vary with the sign code and contruct a 260 sq.
ft. monument sign.
Presentation:
Jeff Davis, Associate Planner
The public hearing was opened~at 10:15.
Planning Commlssston Minutes
March 10, 1986.
Page seven
Barry Watktns, owner of the French quarter, 17251 E. Seventeenth St., Suite D,
Tusttn, Ca., 92680, ~tated that the sign ts needed because the extsttng one is at a
hetght Inadequate for visibility from Seventeenth Street.
~, representative for Mtller's Outpost, 3932 Elmwood Ct., Riverside, Ca.,
92506, stated some concerns about landscaping and future buildings obstructing the
sign. He was in favor of this variance.
Jack Brttton, applicant, H.P.Stgns, 210 Adams, Huntington Beach, Ca., stated that he
did not want to change the sign, he Just wanted to raise the hetght of the exlsttng
sign.
Letters oppostng this vartance were recetved by the Planntng Commission. These
letters were from Maurtce Enderle; Enderle Center, P 0 Box 989, Tusttn, Ca. 92680 and
Jim E. Shtmozono, 1920 E. Katella'Ave;'$~tt&'S, Orange, Ca., 92667.
There was some discussion of the Commission,
regarding the alternatives in this matter.
The public hearing was closed at 10:45 p.m.
staff, Watktns, Stewart and Brttton
Commissioner Puckett meved~ Baker seconded to approve Variance 86-2 with the
conditions that the sign must be the same size as the existing sign and the base be
raised to no more than 5 feet higher than presently Installed. Resolution No.
2203 will be rewritten and placed on the consent calendar of the March 24, 1986
Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 4-0.
9. USE PERMIT 86-8
Shu Jut Huang on behalf of Master Chicken
17292 - L McFadden Avenue
Applicant:
Location:
Authorization for an on-stte beer and wine sales license.
REquest:
Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
Presentation:
The public hearing was opened at 10:50 p.m. Since there was no one wishing to speak,
the publlc hearing was closed at 10:50 p.m.
After staff and Commission discussion, staff was directed to add "F. The location of
this establishment is more than 1800 feet from a public school" to Resolution No.
2311.
Commissioner Wetl moved, McCarthy seconded to approve Use Permit 86-8 by the adoption
of Resolution 2311 (with a minor addition). Motion carried 4-0.
JU)MI#ISIllATIYE NATrERS
Old Business
10. Pacific Bell Emergency Episode Transportation Management Plan
Puckett moved~ McCarthy seconded to recommend the approval of the proposed Pacific
Bell Emergency Episode Transportation Management Plan to the City Council. Motion
carried 4-0.
Planntng Commission Minutes
March 10, 1986
Page eight
New Bustness
None.
STAFF CONCERNS
11. Oral.Report on Counctl actions of March 3, 1986.
Presentation: Edward M. Knight, Senior Planner
At the March, 3 1986 City CounctY meettn~ the Circulation Element passed through
Resolution No. 86-27. The East Tustin Planned Community public hearing was continued
until the March 17, 1985 meeting for further input. An agreement has been reached
between the City of Orange, the City of Tustin, The Irvine Company, and the County of
Orange regarding the Peter's Canyon Regional Park Meaorandum of Understanding.
Planning Commission actions were ratified, with one appealed item, the Hockenberry
office building on "C" and Second.
COIgIIZSSTON CONCERNS.
ADJOURII~E#T
Commissioner Puckett moved~ McCarthy seconded a motion for adjournment at 11:10 p.m.
Motion carried 4-0.
KATHY WEIL, Chairman
PENNI FOLEY, Recording Secretary
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2303
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING VARIANCE
APPLICATION NO. 86-2 FOR MILLERS OUTPOST
AT 17TH AND CARROLL WAY
The Planning Commission of the city of Tustin does hereby resolve .as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
That a proper application, (Variance No. 86-2), was filed on
behalf of Millers Outpost requesting authorization to vary from
the requirements of the city of Tustin Sign Code for the
installation of a 14'2" high by 16'9" wide monument sign.
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject
property, relative to size, shape, topography, location or
surroundings, a strict application of the Zoning Ordinance
deprives subject property of privileges enjoyed by other
properties in the vicinity and under identical zone
classification, evidenced by the following findings:
That conditions on the property that existed at the time of
approval of the existing sign still remain.
That visibility of the sign is obstructed by the use of a
required parking stall.
That the approval does not authorize additional signage
only that the maximum height be increased.
That the granting of a variance as herein provided will not
constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the
limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and district
in which the subject property is situated.
That this project is categorically exempt from the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act. (Class 11.)
That the granting of the variance as herein provided will not be .
contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance or the public
safety, health and welfare, and said variance should be granted.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2303
Page two
II.
The Planning Commission hereby approves variance ,application 86-2
subject to the following conditions:
That the subject approval only authorizes the increase in height
of the sign structure. The existing monument structure may, by
this approval, be increased by five ($) feet in height. All
other aspects of the sign including the actual sign area (26.8
sq. ft.) shall remain the same.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 198 .
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
PENNI FOLEY,
Recording Secretary
Report to the
Planning Commission
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM #3
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLZCANT/
OYNER:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENVXRONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
APRIL 14,-1986
FINAL PARCEL HAP 86-287
ELI)ON PRIHROSE
1219 S. HAIN STREET
SANTA ANA, CA 92702
13882 IEWPORT AVENUE
COI4HERCIAL GENERAL
THIS PRO,1ECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXE}tPT FROM THE REQUIREHENTS OF THE
C.E.Q.A; CLASS 15
CONSOLZDATE FOUR LOTS INTO ONE.
RECOI4MENDED ACTION:
Recommend ~pproval to the Ctty Counctl of Final Parcel Map No. 85-287 by the
adoption of Resolution No. 2319.
PRO&ECT ANALYSIS:
The applicant is constructing a 7,600 square foot retail shopping center at the
northeasterly corner of Newport and Bonita. The proposed map of .704 acres
consolidates four lots into one lot in order to accommodate the retail center.
The proposed map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan and the
Zoning Ordinance.
On September 3, 1985 the City Council approved the tentative map by the adoption
of Resolution 85-g0.
The final map is in substantial compliance with the tentative map and all the
conditions of approval have been met.
Associate Planner
MAC: pef
Attachments: Resolution 2319
~ C~mmunitv Develooment DeparTment
1
2
3
4 The
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2319
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL
MAP 85-287 LOCATED AT 13882 NEWPORT AVENUE
Planning Commission of the city of Tusttn does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
That Final Parcel Map NO. 85-287 was submitted to the Planning
Commission pursuant to Ordinance 847 by Boyer Engineering on
behalf of Eldon & Nedra Primrose for the purpose of
consolidating four {4) lots into one (1) lot for the properties
known as Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16 in Block B of Martin's Addition
as shown on a map recorded in Book 19, Page 79 of Miscellaneous
Records of Los Angeles County, California.
B. That said map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General
Plan.
That this project is categorically exempt from the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act; Class 15.
D. That the final map is in substantial compliance with the
tentative map.
II.
The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council
approval of Final Parcel Map No. 85-287 subject to the final approval
of the City Engineer.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission, held on
the day of , 1986.
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
PENNI FOLEY,
Recording Secretary
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
OllUER:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENVIRONMENTAL.
STATUS:
REQUEST:
APRIL 14, 1986
USE PERMIT 86-4
JOHN BARTLETT ASSOCIATES
250 il. COLORADO BLVD.
ARCADIA, CA. 91006
SISTERS OF THE COMPANY OF MARY
16791 E. RAIN STREET
TUSTIN, CA. 92680
16791 E. RAIN STREET (ST. &EANNE DE LESTONNAC SCHOOL)
PUBLIC & INSTITUTIONAL (P&I)
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVlRONHENTAL IMPACT HAS BEEN PREPARED
IN COHPLIANCE lllTH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIROMMENTAL QuALrr~ ACT.
AUTHORIZATION TO RELOCATE CLASSROOM FACILITIES, 'AND TO CONSTRUCT
A NEll SCHOOL CENTER CONSISTING OF A GYHNASIUN AND LITTLE THEATER.
RECOI~ENDED ACTION:
It is recommended that the Commission approve the relocation and expansion of
classroom facilities at 16791 E. Main Street by the adoption of Resolution No.
2321.
Adoption of Resolution No. 2321 as drafted would also waive processing fees at
such time the applicant wishes to return before the Commission for a
gymnasium/theater complex planned for the site.
BACKGROUND:
While under the jurisdiction of the County of Orange, St. Jeanne de Lestonnac
parochial school, and convent was approved in December, 1959 and the present site
plan was approved by the Orange County Planning Commission in 1968.
i. Corn munity Development Department
Planning Commission Report
April 14, 1986
Page t~o
The subject parcel was annexed to the City tn [980 and given zonlng and general
plan designations of Publlc & Institutional reflecting the use of the property.
Presently the'school has an enrollment of approximately 550 students ranging
from pre-school age to the etghth grade. Maximum enrollment will not, according
to the applicant, exceed 600 students.
PRO~ECT AIIALYSIS:
Before any analysis of this project can be given, tt must be noted that the
Public & Institutional Otstrtct does not mandate any spectftc development
standards. Building height, setbacks, lot coverage, and parking requirements
are al1 subject to terms and conditions of the conditional use permtt process.
As proposed, Use Permit Application 86-4 requests authorization to relocate and
expand extsttng classroom factlfttes, and to construct a gymnasium/theater
complex at the St. Jeanne de Lestonnac school. However, because of time
constraints facing the school and an unresolved issue concerning adequate
parking for the gymnasium complex, the applicant has agreed to revise the
subject application deleting the gyenastum/theater at this time. As such, the
only remaining tssue .concerns the relocation and expansion of classroom
facilities.
£xhtbtt "A" of this report shows the locatton of existing classroom facilities
as well as where the replacement building ts proposed to be butlt.' Approval of
this plan would authorize a net tncrease of approximately [,[00 square feet of
building area. Additionally, Exhibit "A" shows a more efficient parking layout
for the site providing an 'increase over existing parking of six (6) spaces.
Thts Increased efficiency, In part, ts a result of using 25 foot drtve aisles In
lieu of the standard 27 feet. However, since the use of the site ts private in
nature, a 25 foot wtdth can be an a~ceptable dfmenston.
[n general, with the exception of some "fine tuning" detatls concerning
final landscape plans, parking lot details that will be finalized at the staff
level, the conceptual and site plan Is acceptable. However, there ts one
potential problem that must be noted. Although tt has yet to be verified, tt
appears that there may be a 20 foot wide Orange County Santtazation 01strtct
easement that runs along the northerly property line. If thts is found to be
the case, the proposed bulldtng will have to be relocated. The applicant is
requesting that independent of the easement tssue, the Commission approve
locatton of the butldlng In this particular area. [t is leasable to move the
building the necessary distance away fron the property line provtded enhanced
construction 1n compliance wtth the Untform Butldtng Code ts utilized. As long
as the new structure can be built wtthln the general area proposed, staff
recommends that the Commtsssion authorize construction. However, if for
whatever reason the factltty must be moved to another portton of the site,
Commission review will be required. In etther case, buildtng permits will not
be issued until the easement tssue is resolved.
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
April 14, 1986
Page three
Finally, since the applicant is faced with a time'constraint (it is necessary to
have new facilities operational by the commencement of the next school year) the
issue of a gymnasium/theater complex has been deferred at this time so the
classroom facilities portion would not be delayed. Since the majority of
background work has already been done on the entire project, it is suggested
that the Commission waive future filing fees at such time that the applicant
wishes to pursue the gymnasium complex. However, waiver of fees should not
include waiver of costs involved for public notice requirements.
COI~LUS[O#S:
Based upon facts that the net increase of classroom area proposed is relatively
small, and that the site will be developed in substantial conformance with
development standards applied to uses outside of the P&I District, it is
concluded that the new classroom facility as proposed is an appropriate use for
the site and should be approved.
JSO:pef
Attachments:
Development'Review Summary
Resolution No. 2321
Exhibit "A"
Elevations
Com munily Developmen~ Departrnen~
DEVELOPRENT REVXEN SUIV~IARY
Project:
USE PERMIT 86-4
Location/District: 16791E. MAIN STREET/PUBLIC & INSTITUTIONAL
Rcttofl: RELOCATION AND EXPANSION OF EXISTING CLASSROOM FACILITIES.
Building:
Front Setback
Side Setback
Rear Setback
Gross Square Footage
Net Floor Square Footage
Height
Number of Stories
Hatertals/Colors
Lot Size
Lot Coverage
Parking:
Number of Spaces
Ratio (space/square footage)
Percent of Compact Spaces
Type
Uses:
Number of Public Notifications (Owners):
Environmental Status
* No Standard
District Requirement Proposed
* 440'
280" FROM WEST P.L.
* " P.L.
* 5'
NEW BUILDING
* 7,800
* + 1,150
* 14' 3"
* 1
* TO MATCH EXISTING
* 7.57 ACRE
TOTAL SITE=APPROX 20%
* NEW STRUCTURE ~ 2%
* 104
20% 0
* OPEN AT GRADE
PUBLIC/QUASI-PUBLIC PRIVATE SCHOOL
300' RADIUS 108
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS BEEEN APPLIED FOR
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2321
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING USE PERMIT 86-4
RELOCATIION AND EXPANSION OF CLASSROOM
FACILITIES AT 167g! E. MAIN STREET
The Planning Commission of the City of Tusttn does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
That a proper application, (Use Permit No. 86-4) has been filed
on behalf of the Sisters of the Company of Mary requesting
authorization to relocate and expand existing classrom
facilities and to construct a gymnasium/theater complex at 16791
E. Main Street (St. Jeanne de Lestonnac School and convent).
B. That the applicant has at this time agreed to defer the request
for the gymnasium complex to a future date.
C. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
The proposed use is in conformance with the Tustin Area
General Plan, and the Public and Institutional Zoning
District regulations.
2. That the net increase in square footage is limited to
approximately 1,100 square feet and additional parking
spaces have been provided on-site.
3. The expanded area will not increase the maximum number of
students permitted at the subject location.
That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and should be
granted.
Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resoultton No. 2321
Page ~3vo
That a Negative Declaration of environmental impact has been
applled for in compliance wtth the California Environmental
Quality Act.
Final development plans shall require the review and approval
ofthe Community Development Department.
II.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit
Application No.86-4 authorizing the relocation and expansion of
existing classroom facilities for St. Jeanne De Lestonnac School
located at 16791E. Main Street subject to conditions contained in
the attached Exhibit "A".
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tusttn Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 198
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
PENNI FOLEY,
Recording Secretary
EXHZBTT "A"
TO
PI.d~NNTNG COFg4ISSZON RESOLU'I'ZON NO. 2321
CONDZTZONS OF APPROVAL
e
That construction of a 7,800'+ square foot classroom building is
authorized in the location indicated on the attached site plan.
However, prior to issuance of building permits, the status of any
easements along the northern property line must be identified.
If it is determined that an easement restricting construction is
present on the site, the construction of the classroom facility in
the general location shown on the site plan approved by the Planning
Commission is authorized. The structure may be relocated any
required distance to the south providing all applicable requirements
of the Uniform Building Code are met. As an alternative, upon
approval of the Orange County Sanitation District and the City
Engineer, on,site sewer lines may be relocated permitting development
upon the existing easement.
If for whatever reason the approved structure cannot be constructed
in the area depicted on the approved site plan, the project must be
returned for Commission review prior to issuance of building permits.
All exterior colors and materials shall match existing classroom
structures' on the site.
Final parking and landscape plans shall be approved by the Community
Oevelopment Department.
The maximum number of students attending classes at the subject
location shall not exceed 600.
At such time that the applicant wishes to proceed with the
gymnasium/theater c~mplex contained in the original application form,
processing fees, with the exception of public notice costs, shall be
waived.
Corn munity Development Department
~L
Il :! ii ii Il ll:i i:
!!!~":':..:
Report to the
Planning Commission
ITF~M # $
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APRIL 14, 1986
USE PERMIT 86-10
APPLICANT/
OlfllER
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENVIRONHENTAL
REQUEST:
HONY-BZRTCRER RED HILL
A CALXFORNXA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
27611 LA PAT ROAD
LAGUNA NZGUEL, CA. 92677
15621, 15641, AND 15661 RED HILL AVENUE
KNO#N AS BIRTCHER NORTHPOINTE
PLANNED COPIIUNITY INDUSTRIAL/BUSINESS
TI. lIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEHPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
CALIFOR#IA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
AUTHORIZATION FOR A BLANKET USE PERMIT FOR THE NORTHPOINTE
COMPLEX
RECOPI~ENDED ACTION:
Approve Use Permit 86-10 by the adoption of ReSolution No. 2318.
PROJECT ANALYSIS:
On May 14, 1984 the Planntng Commission revtewed the Northpotnte Project which
ts located at the northwesterly corner of Red Hill and 8ell Avenues. The zoning
for the project Is Planned Community - Industrial/Business which allows
industrial users as a right, plus office and retail users with a use permit.
The use permit is to assure that adequate parking is avMlable. Attached to
this report ts an extensive analysts of the project, including parking and
traffic concerns. This analyMs was submitted by the applicant.
At 15991 Red Hill Avenue, another project located in the sane zone and area,
(Warner/Red Hill Business Park), the agent had 5 separate use permits approved
within a 3 month period. He eventually applted for and received a blanket use
permit for the project subject to staff revte~ of each separate tenant permit.
Corn reunify Developmen~ Deparxmen:
Planning Commission Report
April 14, 1986
Use Permtt 86-[0
Page t~o
Thts applicant/owner ts no~ requesting authorization for a blanket use permtt
for this complex. As stated In their enclosed analysis, they have appoxtmately
one parktng space for each 250 square feet gross floor area.(138,75g gross sq.
ft. vs. 551 parktng spaces). According to the parking standards for thts
dtstrtct there are enough spaces to accommodate all uses. Staff feels that
there really ts no necessity for individual use permtts for each user because of
the adequate parktng provtded on-site and the mtx of uses will complement what
already extsts tn the surrounding area.
One suggested condition of approval is that when new tenants come in for tenant
modification or business licenses, the tenant will be required to file an
"Application for Business Permit/Parking Permit". The owners are willing to
comply with this requirement and have agreed to attach this city application to
their leasing agreement.
MAC: pef
Attachments: Analysis
Resolution No. 2318
Corn munity Development Department
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2318
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING USE PERMIT 86-10 AUTHORIZING
A BLANKET USE PERMIT FOR BUSINESS AND OFFICE USES
AT THE NORTHPOINTE COMPLEX AT 15621, 1564! AND 15661
RED HILL AVENUE.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
Ae
That a proper application, (Use Permit No.86-10) has been filed
on behalf of MONY-Birtcher Red Hill requesting an authorization
for a blanket use permit at the Northpotnte Complex to allow
business and office uses.
De
Ee
Fe
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case,
be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or
general welfare of the persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of such proposed use, evidenced by the following
findings:
1. The uses are in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance and
the Tustin Area General Plan.
2. Adequate parking is available for these uses.
That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the City of Tusttn, and should be
granted.
Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act.
Final development plans shall require the review and approval of
the Community Development Department.
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2318
page two
II.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permtt Ho.
86-[0 to authorize a blanket use permit for bustness and office uses
at Northpotnte Complex subject to the following conditions:
Before a tenant modification, permit or business license ls lssued,
the tenant shall be required to file an "ApplJcatton for Business
Permit/Parking Permit" to allow the Community Development Department
the ability to track the Information regarding the square footage,
employee counts and parking spaces available.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tusttn Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 198
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
PENNI FOLEY,
Recording Secretary
February 6, 1986
NORTHPOINTE BUSINESS COMPLEX
Tustin, California
OBJECTIVE
We wish to obtain a blanket use permit for Birtcher Northpointe which
defines the percentage of R&D space and office space alotted to the
entire project.
We request to utilize the R&D and office allotment as needed for each
building, noting that there are minimum/maximum amounts of each use for
the project.
In order to achieve this objective we have developed a two step formula:
II.
Identify each suite as either an R&D or
office use.
Based on the use designation (either R&D
or office), the gross square footage would
be applied against project allottments.
FORMAT
Our recom~endations in t~is proposal are a result of an extensive analysis
of the following areas:
Review of the Birtcher Northpointe Business Complex.
a. Zoning/parking/traffic impact "
2. Analyze and define the terms R&D and office.
3. Develop two step formula' for determining tenant use categorization.
4. Conclusion.
1. BIRTCHER NORTHPOINTE BUSINESS COMPLEX
Birtcher Northpointe is a 138,759 sq. ft. R&D project located at the
northwesterly corner of Redhill Road and Bell in the city of Tustin.
Page 2
It consists of three, two-story buildings ranging in size from 41,000
gross rentable sq. ft. to 50,000 gross rentable sq. ft. Birtcher
Northpointe is situated in a park-like setting and features a
fitness/conference center, a three-level parking structure in
addition to surface parking, a functional lobby area in each
building with elevator service and sky lights.
Because of its many features, Birtcher Northpointe is attracting
upscale R&D users requiring facilities for their executives and
administrative support groups. In addition, because of its amenity
package, freeway accessibility, and 1:250 parking ratio, office
users are also taking a strong look at the project.
a. Zoning and Parking.
On December 3, 1979, the.zoning on this property was changed
from the Planned Community-Industrial to the Planned Community-
Industrial/Business Zone. This current zoning allows industrial
users, professional and general office users, along with retail
and commercial users. However, all "business users" are subject
to a use permit'to insure that adequate-parking is available.
In order to meet the parking requirements for both R&D and
business uses, we have provided parking at a ratio of 1:250.
this way we have insured the City and ourselves that we can
accommodate parking for as great as a 100% office park, plus
meeting with the City's overall parking code.
In
Structure:
160 stalls
Surface Parking:
391 stalls
TOTAL PROJECT PARKING: 551'stalls
We addressed the parking impact issue a further step by hiring
the Traffic Engineering firm of Herman Kimmel and Associates to
determine the impact of cars from Birtcher Northpointe on the
area surface streets. His results are as follows:
"The proposed development will generate about 950
vehicle trip ends per day. The greatest impact will
be on Redhill Avenue, where traffic volumes will be
increased by about 890 trips per day. However, the
critical P.M. peak hour will only increase by approxi-
mately 40 trips.
Considering the existing volumes, plus the added volume,
all impacted streets have adequate capacity to accommodate
the project volumes."
Page
2. ANALYSIS OF R&D USES AND OFFICE USES
When this project was first conceived, it was anticipated that due
to its amenity package it would attract upscale R&D users as well as
office users. Both require similar types of office layouts and
similar buildings.
The following breakdown attempts to isolate functions within a suite
which can easily be categorized and identified as a technical R&D
function or an R&D office use.
R&D
Laboratory/research testing
Manufacturing/assembly
Warehouse
Woodworking
Equipment testing
Drafting
Engineering
Training room/auditorium
Kitchen
OFFICE
Office for individual conduct
admin, function
Reception
Secretarial areas
Library
Kitchen
Copy/storage room
Conference room
Computer room
Blueprinting
Open bays for telephone work
Based on the above divison of activities we have made several assumptions:
e
e
An R&D company combines the activities of both office and .technical,
R&D users.
Upscale R&D space includes facilities for company's executives.
Layout requirements include conference, library kitchen, and
secretarial areas. '
The ratio of R&D use and office use in a suite can vary with
a greater amount of office being necessary to support a
smaller technical R&D function.
The technical R&D function requires office support amenities,
(ie: conference, kitchen, library, secretarial).
P 4
Regardless of size of the suite and R&D function, the R&D
use requires a secondary access, {ie: back door, truck door,
crane to ground level).
R&D requires a technical function to be performed, (ie:
testing, warehouse, manufacturing assembly, drafting and
engineering).
It is our posture that in order for a suite to be considered R&D, a
technical function must be performed. We have shown that upscale
R&D may require substantial administration to support it; therefore,
we contend that the size of the technical function can be relatively
small yet, represent a full R&D activity. Here we analyze our two
step formula recommended for determining the amount of R&D/office
allowed for the project.
Step I
We recommend a suite be considered R&D if it consists of a minimum
of 25% technical R&D activity. Note the following example..
Company A
Reception
8 Private offices (168 ft. ea.)
Kitchen
Conference
Copy storage area
Secretarial/open bay
168 sq. ft.
1,344 sq. ft.
244 sq. ft.
260 sq. ft.
264 sq. ft.
1,200 sq. ft.
Office
Function
Equipment testing
Equipment storage
1,000 sq. ft. l
R&D
600 sq. ft.J Function
TOTAL Sq. Ft.
TOTAL Office
TOTAL R&D
5,060
3,460 sq. ft. = 68%
1,600 sq. ft. = 32%
Since 32% of the suite is a technical R&D use, the entire suite would
be considered R&D (Should the R&D have fallen below 25%, it would
have been considered an office function.)
Step II
We propose that the same square footage percentages, (25% R&D and
75% office) be utilized when determining the total amount of R&D and
office allotted per project, once the Step I determination is made.
Page 5
The breakdown is as follows:
Project Sq. Ft. Total:
Minimum R&D
Maximum office:
138,759 sq. ft.
34,690 sq. ft.
104,069 sq. ft.
Returning to Step I, Company A was classified as an R&D trans-
action since it exceeded the minimum 25% R&D requirement. There-
fore, the 5,060 sq. ft. suite would be applied against the
projects' minimum R&D requirements of 34,690 sq. ft. Thus, a
remainder of 29,630 sq. ft. of R&D must be achieved for the
project.
We propose that this procedure be utilized throughout the lease up of
Northpointe.
CONCLUSIONS
We believe that the two step formulas will simplify the permit
process for the city and provide the developer the flexibility
to work with quality tenants for the project.
The project is presently providing above standard parking per
zoning code. The number of existing spaces is ample for an
entire office park, per code.
The impact of traffic on surface streets., due to additional
administration in the R&D suite is negligible.
The mix of R&D and office users we are proposing will compliment
the overall look of the project for the city.
It is our desire to work closely with the city of Tustin to provide
a development that both Tustin and Birtcher are pleas'ed to include
in their portfolio of quality projects.
Report to the
Planning Commission
ITEM # 6
DATE:
SUB~IECT:
APPLICANT/
OYNER:
AOORESS OF
PROJECT:
ZONING:
ENVTRONRENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
Al)RTL 14~ 1986
USE PERNXT 86-15
CXTY OF TUSTXN / COII~UNXTY SERVXCES DEPARTHENT
200 S: "C" STREET / PEPPERTREE PARK'
PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL (P&I)
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION NAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FOR THIS PROJECT.
AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT A 17,580 SQUARE FOOT HULTIPURPOSE
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER.
RECOIldlENDED ACTXON:
Approve Use Permit 86-15 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2317.
BACKGROUND:
In October of 1980, the Tusttn City Counctl created the Senior Citizens'
Coordinating Council for the purpose of coordinating all senior activities. In
August of 1983 the Senior Center Steering Committee was formed to review the
need, establish the feasibility and develop a program and scope for the proposed
Senior Center. In September of 1985 Parcel Map 85-270 was recorded which
created a parcel of 1.229 acres for this Senior Center. Attached to this report
Is a design development report which was prepared by our city consultant,
Recreation Systems, Inc., and approved in concept by City Council.
PROJECT ANALYSIS:
This proposal is to construct a 17,580 square foot multipurpose senior citizen
center northerly of the existing Tusttn Unified School District Administration
Building. The floor plans Indicate classrooms, game room, lounge and work areas
with kitchens. There is also a multi-purpose room of 1,200 square feet which
can serve 100 people for lunch. Also provided wtll be an auditorium which can
accommodate up to 350 people for banquets or meetings. A more defined outltne
of the bufldlng and tt's function is found in the attached design development
report.
Corn rnunity D~velopment Department
Planning Commission Report
April 14, 1986
Page two
The stte plan (Concept No. 1) shows 95 parking spaces and landscaping with the
retention of existing trees and two (2) ingress and egress points. In addition
to those on-stte spaces there are 42 school dtstrtct spaces available for
evening events plus other (on-street) parking which can be used jointly with
the park. The design of the butldtng has taken the adjacent park into
consideration. Since the project will occupy an area greater than the parcel
that was acquired from the school district, (100 feet easterly), accommodations
are being made to relocate the barbeque and sand play area to another locatton
in the park. The buildtng has been ortented to face the front parktng lot on
"C" Street where office and commercial uses are situated. The rear of the
building extends along "B" Street in an attempt to encourage people to use the
"C" Street entrance, as to not disturb the stngle-famJly 'residences along the
westerly side of "B" Street. The proposed elevations show red roofing tile with
off-white stucco walls.
The plans as submitted are conceptual only and final development plans will be
bid out after Planntng Commission approval. The recommended conditions of
approval are listed in Exhibit "A" attached to Resolution No. 2317.
MA~Y ANN~HAMBERLA~N; '
Associate P1 anner
MAC:pef
Attachments: Site Plan
Elevation Plans
Resolution No. 2317
Community Development Department
iii
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2317
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, APROVING USE PERMIT 86-15 FOR
MULTIPURPOSE SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER AT
200 SOUTH "C" STREET.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve-as
follows:
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
Ae
That a proper application, (Use Permit No. 86-15) has been filed
on behalf of the City of Tusttn, requesting authorization to
construct and operate a Multipurpose Senior Citizen Center of
17,580 square feet at 200 South "C" Street.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applted for wtll not, under the circumstances of this case,
be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or
general welfare of the persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of such proposed use, evidenced by the following
findings:
1. The proposed center is in a compatible location next to a
park and the school district administration offices.
2. Sufficient off-street parking will be available because of
other shared parking spaces available in the adjacent area.
3. The location of the center will be convenient for it's
clients because it is close to senior housing and bus
lines.
De
That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the City of Tusttn, and should be
granted.
Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
F. That a Negative Declaration was previously approved to comply
with the California Environmental Quality Act.
Final development plans shall require the review and approval of
the Community Development Department.
1
2
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2317
page ~o
II.
The Planning Cormtsston hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No.
86-15 to authorize the construction and operation of a Multipurpose
Sentor Ctttzen Center subject to the conditions as 11sted tn Exhibit
"A" attached to this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tusttn Planning Commission,
held on the day of , [98 ..
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
PENNI FOLEY,
Recording Secretary
COliDXT]:OIIS OF APPROVAL
USE PERlq]~T 86-15
EXll[BI'T
10.
Any work required within the public rights of way shall be shown on a
separate civil site plan. These improvements would include but not be
limited to the following:
a. Curb and gutter
b. Sidewalks
c. Driveway aprons
d. Street light on both "B" and "C" Streets
e. Sanitary sewer laterals
f. Domestic water service
A final grading plan shall be required so as to provide compatibility
with the project and adjacent properties/uses.
The final site plan shall show the Second Street intersection on the
site plan along with any other street improvements, subject to the
approval of the City Engineer.
The final site plan and building elevations shall be reviewed by the
Planning Commission and the Redevelopment Agency for conformance with
concept plans. Final plans shall be fully dimensioned including
reference to existing lot lines and surrounding school district
buildings and adjoining intersection along "C" Street.
A sign plan shall be approved by the Community Development staff prior
to permit issuance.
The type of construction shall be a minimum of Type V-1 hr. and a
group of occupancy of A2.1.
Designated oversize parking shall be provided for vans or mini buses.
Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer connection fees will be
required at the time a building permit is issued. Fee amounts are
$50.00/1,000 sq. ft. of building area.
East Orange County Water District fees will be required at the time a
building permit is issued. Fee amounts can be obtained from Earl
Rowenhorst at the Tustin Water Service.
Building shall meet the regulations of applicable codes, the Uniform
Fire Code, Building Code and the Administrative Code of California
Title 19 and 24.
Exhibit "A"
Resolution No. 2317
April 14, 1986
Page two
11.
12.
13.
14.
Building is required to be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler
system.
A fire hydrant may be required.
Should the proposed Senior Cttlzen Center building cross existing lot
lines, a lot line adjustment shall be recorded prior to a certificate
of occupancy being issued by the City.
Final landscaping plans shall be required for review and approval
prior to building permit issuance.
Planning
DATE:
SUB,)ECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
REQUEST:
Commission
APRIL 14, 1986
USE PERJ4IT 86-14
HEALTHCARE I[DICAL CENTER OF TUSTIN
14662 NEWPORT AVENUE
PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL
AUTHORIZATION TO INSTALL IDENTIFICATION SIGNS FOR THE HEALTHCARE
#EDICAL CENTER.
RECOI~qENDED ACTION:
Approve the proposed master stgn plan by the adoption of Resolution No. 2316.
BACKGROUND:
On November 5, 1984 the Ctty Council approved Use Permit 84~16*whtch authorized
the construction of a 57,563 square foot medical offtce butlding at the
Healthcare Medical Center (formerly Tusttn Community Hospital) at 14662 Newport
Avenue.' In conjunction with that approval, a new parking lot was provided on
part of the Tusttn Block Co. property. When that new parking lot was completed,
construction of the office building commenced which now is approximately 50%
completed.
PROdECTANALYSIS:
Healthcare Medical Center is requesting authorization for their pr'oposed master
sign plan. Because this medical center is located in the "Public &
Institutional" zoning district, a use permit is required for their sign plans.
Community Development DeparTment
P1 annl ng Commt ssion Report
April 14, 1986
Page two
Their sign proposal is as follows:
LOCATION SIZE
I 3.75 sq. ft.
2.$ sq. ft.
each face
approximately
15 sq. ft..
14 sq. ft.
5,6,7,8 Per state
requirements
9 See attached
Plans
10
FUNCTION
Directional
Directional
Primary Site I.D.
Secondary I.D.
Handicap Parking
Handicap Notice
Handicap
Accesabiltty
LEGEND
Emergency Entrance
Hospital Registration
Visitor Parking
Service Entrance
Staff Parking
Hospital Services
Physician Offices
Healthcare Medical Center
Of Tusttn
(2 sign units)
Emergency Entrance
Hospital Registration
(No Parking Symbol)
Loading or Unloading Only
Tow Away Zone
Handicapped Parking Only
Unauthorized vehicle not
displaying placards on
license plates issued for
physically handicapped
persons may be towed away
at Owner's expense.
Towed vehicle may be
reclaimed at
or by telephoning~
Sec.2-27102.
applies only to
handicapped spaces.
(Handicap Symbol)
Com munity Development Department
Planntng Commission Report
Apr11 14, 1986
Page three
All stgn legends wtll be Helvetica Hedtum Condensed. The colors of the
stgns on the locatton map numbered 1, 2, 3 and 4 are forest green
(pantone color 343C) wtth white lettering. Stgns 5 through 10 are
specified by Tttle 24, of the CallforMa Administrative Code for both
stze and color whtch are exempt from permtts. Signs 1, 2, and 4 are
classified as directional stgns because they have no bustness
Identification or advertising on them. Because of the stze of these
directional signs, only Stgn ~4 needs a permtt. SJgn #3 Is the only stgn
whtch requires spectftc approval, however, staff was destrous of the
Commission revtewfng and approving the sfgn plans for the enttre s~te.
Stgns #3 are for bustness Identification located on etther stde of the
math entrance. The stze of the sfgns proposed ts approximately 15 square
feet, and wtll be located on a concrete retatnfng wall wJth a
foundation. There wtll be an earthern berm to conceal the retaining
wall. The matn entrance ts for pedestrian trafftc only so the hetght of
the retaining wall wtll not have any effect on vehicular trafftc.
HAR~' ANN ~AHBERLATN,
Associate Planner
~AC:pef
Attachments: Resolution No. 2316
Corn munJty Development Department
illJli~i ,,
.il
i
6
7
8
10
11
12
14
1G
17
18
10
90
21
O.5
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2316
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING USE PERMIT 86-14 WHICN
AUTHORIZES A MASTER SIGN PLAN FOR HEALTHCARE MEDICAL
CENTER AT 14662 NEWPORT AVENUE.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper application, (Use Permit No. 86-14) has been filed
on behalf of Healthcare Medical Center requesting authorization
for a master sign plan for the property at 14662 Newport Avenue.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
appl i cati on.
That establishment, maintenance; and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case,
be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or
general welfare of the persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of such proposed use, evidenced by the following
finding:
The master sign plan is in conformance with the Tustin Sign
Ordinance.
D. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the City of Tusttn, and should be
granted.
E. Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
P. This sign plan is categorically exempt from the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act.
G. Final development plans shall require the review and approval of
the Community Development Department.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2316
page two
II.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No.
86-14 to authorize the master sign plan as submitted for the
Healthcare Medical Center subject to:
A. Approval of structural plans and issuance of permits.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 198
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
PENNI FOLEY,
Recording Secretary
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
GENERAL PLAN
D£SZGNATTON:
REQUEST:
APRIL 14, 1986
CONTINUED CONSIDERATTON OF GENERAL PLAN AHENDPlENT NO. 86-2d
TUSTZN PLANNING COI~Z$SION
NORTHSIDE OF SIXTH STREET BETiiEEN "B" STREET AND PACIFIC STREET
R-1 SINGLE FAHZLY RESIDENTIAL
STNGLE-FAHTLY RESIDENTIAL
TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESTGNATION
SZNGLE-FAJqTLY I~$ZDENTIAL TO IqULTZPLE FAHILY RESIDENTIAL
FRO#
RECOI~ENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends the Planning Commission receive and file the proposed General
Plan Amendment thereby terminating any further consideration by either the
Planning Commission or City Council. However, should the Commission wish to
approve the amendment, the attached Resolution No. 2315 should be adopted
thereby recommending Council approval.
BACKGROUND:
On February 10, 1986, staff forwarded to the Planning Commission a request by
several property owners along 6th Street between "B" Street and Pacific Street
to amend the City General Plan and subsequent zoning from Single Family
Residential density to Multtple Family*Residential. Since the request concerned
the majority of the subject block, staff believed all properties should be
considered as a group to avoid the improper practice of spot zoning. The
Commission concurred and directed staff to notice a public hearing.
On March 10, 1986, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to receive
public testimony concerning the proposed General. Plan Amendment.
Overwhelmingly, property owners in the immediate area voiced oRposition to the
proposal and sought Planning Commission denial of this subject. The general
concensus of the. surrounding community is that of supporting the existing single
family plan which includes keeping the R-1 zone intact.
Community Development Department
Planntng Commission Report
Apr11 14, 1986
Page two
The Commission continued consideration of thts General Plan Amendment to its
meettng on March 24, 1986 and then to Apr11 14, 1986 due to lack of a quorum at
the March 24th meettng.
CONCLUSZONS:
The Land Use Element of a City General Plan is intended to establish long term
goals and policies for the development of land uses in the community. While the
General Plan reflects long term goals, the current property zoning dictates
permissible land uses and their development standards. Case law requires that
both property zoning and its general plan designation be consistent, i.e.,
single family land use designation and R-1 Single Family zoning.
In the case of 6th Street, the community has expressed its desire for the long
term development of the area. Amending the general plan to a land use not in
the community's best interest would be improper. Therefore, since the Planning
Commission is the applicant, staff is recommending the subject be simply
received and filed without further consideration. In this manner, the property
will remain both planned and zoned for single family development.
A fact that property owners along 6th Street should be aware of is the
non-conformity of those properties where more than one residence presently
exists. Staff estimates nearly 35~ of the parcels in this area are being
presently used as multiple' family residential i.e., more than one dwelling unit
on the same lot. At such time these buildings are to be demolished for
reconstruction, they may not be replaced. Only one dwelling unit may be
permitted for construction on any single lot. To permit two or three homes per
ning to an R-2 or R-3 zone.
Director of Community Development
DDL:pef
Attachments:
Resolution No. 2315
Exhibit "A"
Community Development Department
1
3
4
5
The
6
7
8
9
10
11
14
15
16
17 II.
18
19
~0
21
~.3
~5
26
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2315
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL AMEND THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE
GENERAL PLAN FOR GPA 86-2d
Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds' and determines as follows:'
A. Section 65356.1 of the Government Code of the Sta~e of
California provides that when it is deemed to be in the public
interest, the legislative body may amend a part of the General
Plan.
Be
resolve as
Ce
That in accordance with Section 65356 of the Government Code of
the State of California, a public hearing was duly called,
noticed, and 'held on motion from the Planning Commission to
change the land use from Single-Family to Multiple-Family for
the properties described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
That a Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with
the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and
is hereby recommended for adoption.
De
That a change in classification would be in the public interest
and not detrimental to the welfare of the public or the
surrounding property owners.
The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that
General Plan Amendment 86-2d be adopted, amending the Land Use
Element for the properties described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto
from Single-Family to Multiple-Famlly.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission
on the day of , 1986.
KATHY WEIL, CHAIRMAN
PENNI FOLEY, RECORDING SECRETARY
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-2d
EL (;AMINO RE/
GPA 86-2d
SINGLE FAMILY TO MULTI-FAMILY
($F TO MF)
CITY OF TUSTIN
'~ESOLUTION NO. 2315
uATE: ;lARCH 10, 1986
EHItIBIT A
COIvlt'~'{U Ni]"! O£VF..LO?~tENI
AINSL E CONSTPUCTION INC.
LI #484820
13641 k4ALENA DPlVE · TUSTIN. CA 92680 · 714 832-8297
March t7, !986
City of Tustin-Planning Commission
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
RE: Proposed General Plan Amendment
for Sixth Street.
Dear Commissioners,
I will be unable to attend the next two Planning Commission
Meetings on March 24 and April 14, due to the fact that I will
be out of town. Therefore as a proponent of the general plan
amendment for Sixth Street, I am requesting that you postpone
action on this matter until your April 28 meeting.
I have written a letter to the noticed property owners,
which is enclosed, to notify them of my request.
Sincerely,
Mark D. Ainslie
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBOECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENVTRONHENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
APRIL 14, 1986
USE PEP. NIT 86-11
CARVER DEVELOPHENT
1100 NEI~PORT CENTER DRIYE
NEIJPORT BEACH, CA
ON BEHALF OF SOUPLANTATION
13681 REIJPORT AVENUE, SPACES 4 and 5
PLANNED COPIHUNITY COI~ERCIAL (P.C. COBtt.)
CATEGORICALLY EXEHPT (CLASS 21)
AUTHORIZATION TO OBTAIN AN ON-SITE
CONOUNCTZON #ITH A RESTAURANT USE.
BEER AND #iRE LICENSE IN
RECOBI"IENDE~ ACTION:
It is recommended that the Commission approve Use Permit 86-11 by the adoption
of Resolution No. 2308.
BACKGROUND:
Carver Development, on behalf of Souplantatton is requesting that authorization
to obtain an on-site beer and wine license be given for the subject location.
Souplantatton is a specialty type restaurant to be located in spaces 4 and 5
shown on the attached site plan. The alcoholic beverage license would permit
the sale of beer and wine only in conjunction with the restaurant use.
Given the type of restaurant, the location of the unit in a large retail
center, and the fact that Newport Avenue acts as a barrier between the subject
site and residential and school uses, it is recommended that Use Permit 86-11 be
approved by the adoption of Resolution No. 2308.
OD:do:pf
Attachments: Resolution No. 2308
sit._ p~ ~Com munity Development Department
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
~5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2308
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, AUTHORIZING A BEER AND WINE
LICENSE FOR ON-SITE SALES AT 13681 NEWPORT AVENUE,
UNITS 4 AND 5.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tusttn does hereby resolve
follows:
as
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
Ae
That a proper application (Use Permit 86-11) has been filed by
Carver Development on behalf of Souplantatton requesting
authorization to obtain an alcoholic beverage license to sell
beer and wine, on-site, at 13681 Newport Avenue, Units 4 and 5.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
Ce
That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applted for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
1. The sale of beer and wine is on-site only, and in
conjunction with a hestaurant use.
2. The subject suites are located in a large retail shopping
center.
3. Newport Avenue acts as an effective barrier separating the
subject site from sensitive residential and school uses.
De
That the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the City of Tusttn, and should be
granted.
Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fire Marshal, and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
The Use Permit 86-11 is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, Class
21.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution 2308
page t~o
The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No.
86-11 to authorize the issuance of an on-site beer and wine license
at [368[ Newport Avenue, Units 4 and 5.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tusttn Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 1986.
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
PENNI FOLEY,
Recording Secretary
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Ai~PLICAMT:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENV IROMlqEMTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
APRIL 14, 1986
USE PERHIT 86-12
CARVER DEVELOPfqENT
1100 BE#PORT CENTER DRIVE
NEHPORT B~CH, CA
ON BEHALF OF ROUNDTABLE PIZZA
13771 BEMPORT AVENUE, UNIT 42
PLANNED coIq~UNITY CO~RCIAL (P.C. COW4.)
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 21)
AUTHORIZATION TO OBTAIN AM OM-SITE BEER AND MINE LICENSE IN
CONJUNCTION MITH A RESTAURANT.
RECOI~NBED ACTION:
It ts recommended that the Commission approve Use Permtt 86-12 by the adoptton
of Resolution No. 2309.
BACKGROUND:
Carver Development, on behalf of Roundtable Pizza, is requesting that
authorization to obtain an on-site beer and wine license be given for the
subject location. Roundtable Pizza wishes to obtain such a license in
conjunction with their restaurant use.
Given the type of use requested, and that the unit is in a large retail center
separated from school sites by Newport Avenue, it is recommended that Use Permit
86-12 be approved by the adoption of Resolution No. 2309.
JD:do:pf
attach:
Resolution 2309
Reduced Site Plan
Corn munity Development Department
'1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2309
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, AUTHORIZING A BEER AND WINE
LICENSE FOR ON-SITE SALES AT 13771 NEWPORT AVENUE,
UNIT 42.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
That a proper application {Use Permit 86-12) has been filed by
Carver Development on behalf of Roundtable Pizza requesting
authorization to obtain an alcoholic beverage license to sell
beer and wine, on-site, at 13771 Newport Avenue, Unit 42.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
That establishment, maintenance; and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
1. The sale of beer and wine is on-site only, and in · conjunction with a restaurant use.
2. The subject suite is located in a large retail shopping
center.
3. Newport Avenue acts as an effective barrier separating the
subject site from sensitive residential and school uses.
That the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor 'to the general welfare' of the City of Tusttn, and should be
granted.
Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fire Marshal, and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
The Use Permit 86-12 is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, Class
21.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution 2309
page two
II.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No.
86-12 to authorize the issuance of an on-site beer and wine license
at 13771 Newport Avenue, Unit 42.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tusttn Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 1986.
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
PENNI FOLEY,
Recording Secretary
Plannin Commission
DATE: APRIL 14, '1986
SUBJECT: YARIANCE NO. 86-3
APPLICANT: CARYER DEYELOPHENT
1100 NEWPORT CENTER ONIYE
NE#PORT BEACH, CA
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENY IRONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
THSTIN' PLAZA RETAIL SITE BOUNDED BY' HAIN STREET, NEHPORT AYENUE
AND SIXTH STREET
PLANNED COIIBJNITY C01g4ERCIAL
CATEGORICALLY EXEHPT FROH THE REQUIRERENTS OF TH[ CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONHENTAL QUALITY ACT (CLASS 3)
VARIANCE APPLICATION NOHBER 86-3 REQUESTS AUTHORZZATTON FOR THE
FOLLONING YARIANCES FROH THE SIGN CODE:
1. THE INSTALLATION OF SIX (6) FREE-STANDING CENTER
IDENTIFICATION SIGNS. CODE PERMITS ONLY THREE' (3).
2. THE INSTALLATION OF THO (2) FREE-STANDING #ULTI-TENANT
SIGNS. CODE PERJ4ITS ONLY ONE (1) DIRECTORY TYPE SIGN, AND THEN
ONLY IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER FREE STANDING SIGNS ON SITE.
3. THE INSTALLATION OF FOUR (4) TENANT IDENTIFICATION HALL SIGNS
EACH IN EXCESS OF THE 75 SQUARE FOOT HAXIHU# PERHI'I'FED BY CODE.
REC01g4ENDED ACTION:
It is recommended that the Commission
Application No. 86-3:
2.
3.
take the following actions on Variance
Approve free-standing center identification signs as requested.
Deny the proposed free-standing tenant identification.
Approve tenant identification wall signs for units 23 through 26 consisting
of sign area of 15% of storefront area.
Corn munity Development Department
Planning Commission Report
Tustt n Plaza.
page two
$11~ARY:
This report analyzes and makes recommendations concerning a comprehensive sign
package submitted by Carver Development for the Tusttn Plaza project. As
submitted, the package requests three separate variances with the Municipal
Code. In reviewing each request individually, staff Js recommending that a
portion of the package be authorized, with one section being denied and the
third significantly altered.
In short, staff's recommendations and reasons supporting such action are as
follows:
1. Approval of center identification signs based upon hardship created by
structure locations and a required bike trail. Additionally, the aggregate
sign area requested is less than otherwise permitted by code.
e
Denial of free-standing' tenant identification signs in that no hardship
under the sign code exists for such stgnage.
Approval of tenant wall signs in excess of maximum square footage allowed
provided that such area not exceed 155 of storefront area of each
individual unit. Justification is based upon distance from Newport,
obstruction of view' by free-standing structures and that the 15~
requirement will keep these signs in proportion to other signs in the
center.
BACKGROUND:
After extensive review, several public hearings and considerable alteration of
architectural design of the project, Tustin Plaza was approved by the Commission
and City Council. The lengthy review process stemmed from Commission, Council
and community concern over development of one of the last major sites in the
downtown area. Additionally, as a ."gateway" into the E1 Camtno Real business
district, aesthetic quality of the project was a major consideration.
Presently, Tusttn Plaza is under construction (with the exception of two free-
standing structures) and Carver Development is marketing the project in search
of major tenants which will act as a draw supporting the remainder of the
center. It is Carver's contention that in order to secure these major tenants,
signing in excess of that permitted by code is required.
DISCUSSION:
As submitted, Carver's sign package requests several deviations from the sign
code. Each variance will be reviewed Individually in the analysis section of
this report. However, it should first be noted that prior to granting any
variance the Commission must make both of the following findings:
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
Tusttn Plaza
page three
That because of exceptional circumstances applicable to the subject
property, the strict application of the sfgn code Is found to deprive
subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vtctntty
and under, similar circumstances.
That the variance shall be subject to such conditions as will assure that
the adjustments thereby authorized will not constitute a grant of special
privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the
vicinity and district in which the subject property is located.
AIIALYS !S:
For purposes of clarity, Variance Application 86-3 will be divided into three
separate areas of discussion: Project monument signs; free-standing tenant
identification signs; and tenant identification wall type signs in excess of
square footage permitted by code.
Project Monument Signs - As indicated on Exhibit "A", six (6) separate
project identification signs (two situated at each major-entrance; one on
the corner of Sixth Street at Newport and one "feature" sign on the corner
of Main Street at Newport) are proposed. Each of these signs would be
placed upon design features to be constructed as a part of the approved
project. Surface* area supporting each sign is approximately 39 square
feet, yet the actual sign, consisting of individual die-cast letters, will
cover approximately ten (10) square feet. To be visible at night, each
letter will be back-lit with neon creating a "halo" effect which would be
compatible with overall center design concepts.
Pursuant to Tusttn Sign regulations, this site is permitted three, 75
square foot, double face monument signs. Therefore, the number of signs
requested is in excess of the number permitted. However, ~the signs
are to be mounted on structures~ady approved and since the actual sign
area for each two signs is less than would be allowed on one double face
monument, granting approval of signs requested should not constitute a
grant of special privilege. Additionally, the configuration of the bike
trail parallelling Newport and the positioning of structures on the site
create circumstances that preclude effective use of a standard double face
sign. Therefore, a claim that the project is deprived privileges enjoyed
by other properties can be supported.
With both criteria necessary to grant approval of a variance present, it is
recommended that the six center identification signs as proposed be
approved.
Free-standing Tenant Identification Signs - Exhibit "D" attached shows
locations of two proposed tenant identification signs. Each of these signs
would be a single face, 35 square foot structures, with sign area for two
"major" tenants. Each tenant would be given 7.5 square feet of sign area.
Communil¥ Development Department
Planning Commission Report
Tusttn Plaza
page four
e
Pursuant to Sign Ordinance 684, the Center is permitted only one (1) tenant
directory type sign, and then it is to be in lieu of all other
free-standing signs on site.
Further, each tenant is limited to a maximum of six (6) feet of sign area.
Given the fact that the applicant desires center identification signs, and
that undoubtedly building number Z will want a monument permitted by code,
free-standing tenant identification signs, proposed should not be approved.
There is not present any unusual circumstances in. that the developer has
opted for center identification signs, and if approved, these signs could
be considered a grant of special privileges.
As a side note it should be mentioned that the applicant has cited the
Miller's Outpost monument sign (17261 17th Street) as a reason for
approving free-standing, signs in Tustin Plaza. However, the Commission
will recall that the Miller's sign was approved because it was a
substantial and voluntary reduction of an existing non-conforming pylon
sign.
Since this portion of Variance Application 86-3 does not meet either
criteria required for approval of a variance, it is recommended that
free-standing tenant identification be denied for the subject project.
Tenant Identification Wall .Stuns in Excess of Area Permitted by Code - In
an effort to attract "major" tenants to the center, Carver is requesting
wall signs for spaces 23, 24, 25, and 26 which would be over tWice the area
permitted by code. If approved as submitted, this portion of the sign
package would authorize 600 square feet of sign area. Under code, each
tenant is only allowed a sign equal to 15~ of their storefront area, not
exceeding 75 square feet. In this tntance, signs for each tenant would be
calculated and limited as folloWs:
Unit Storefront Area 15% of Storefront Sign Area Allowed
23 704 sq. ft. 105 sq. ft. 7S sq. ft.
24 594 sq. ft. 8g sq. ft. 7S sq. ft.
25 440 sq. ft. · 66 sq. ft. 6& sq. ft.
26 352 sq. ft. 52 sq. ft. $2 sq. ft.
The applicant contends that because these structures are setback over 350
feet from Newport Avenue, and because of free-standing buildings encouraged
by the Redevelopment Agency, visibility of units in question is
restricted. It is as a result of these restrictions that Carver argues
that special circumstances exist upon the property that warrant signs in
excess of that permitted. Further, the applicant cites approvals of
variances for other centers as grounds that a grant of special privilege
would not be granted if this package were approved.
Corn rnunity Development Department
Planning Commission Report
Tustt n Plaza
page ft ve
Tn staff's opinion, while these may be sufficient grounds to grant a
vartance tn this tnstace, 600 square feet of sign area ts not justifiable.
Approval for Pltller's Outpost and Orug £mportum authorized sign area equal
to approx!mately 10~ of storefront. Tn contrast, the Carver package asks
for almost 30:~. Therefore, as an alternative to the proposed package,
staff Is recommending that each unit be restricted to 15[ of storefront
even tf that figure exceeds 75 square feet. However, tt ts further
recommended that tf by re-configuration .of unit floor plans, storefronts
are increased, that a maximum of 150 square feet be imposed, tn this
fashion, a tenant would have to have a front area of at least gO lineal
feet to get maximum stgnage. Also, this method will keep these signs in a
proportional relationship to other signs tn the center.'
COllCLUSZONS:
As demonstrated in the body Of this report, :here are certain conditions upon
the subject site that justify some deviation from the strict application of the
sign code. At the same time tt has also been noted that these circumstances do
not warrant disregard of the intent and purpose of these regulations.
Accordingly, staff has made recommendations on the subject application that are
considered to be consistent with community goals, and recommends that the
Comm~sMon approve the sign package as detailed in this report. A formal
resolution reflecting the CommtsMon's dectsJon will be avMlable at the next
regularly scheduled meeting.
OSO:em
Attachments
Community Development Department ~/
~6
. I
I--.
Z
LLI
Z
17
I
18 ' , 16 · L ..
Planning Commission
DATE APRIL 14, 1986
SUBJECT:
USE PERFIIT 86-13
APPLICANT:
YEflIA ELHAK
1164 VESTA STREET, SUITE B
ONTARIO, CA. 91762
PROPERTY
OgRER:
gR. HILTON POLSK!
289 ARGONNE AVENUE
LONG BEACH, CA. 90803
LOCATION:
17311 MCFADDEN AVENUE, SUITE A
ZONING:
CG - COI~ERCIAL GENERAL
ENVIRONltENTAL
STATUS: CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (SECTION 15321)
REQUEST:
TO AUTHORIZE AN OFF-SITE BEER AND NINE SALES LICENSE FOR A
PROPOSED CONVENIENCE MARKET AT 17311-A gCFADDEN AVENUE
RECOI~ENDED ACTION:
That the Planning Commission approve Use Permit No. 86-13 by the adoption of
Resolution No. 2320.
SIJ~ARY:
In November, 1984, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 920 which required a
Use Permit for all new on or off-site liquor sales licenses. At this time the
applicant is requesting authorization for an off-site liquor sales license. The
applicant is proposing to install an independent convenience market.called the
"Fast Stop." The applicant is proposing to sell prepackaged foods and beverages
in conjunction with beer and wine sales if authorized.
ANALYSIS AND CONDITIONS:
Recently, when reviewing Use Permits for other off-site liquor sales licenses,
the Planning Commission and City Council have been concerned with access to
liquor sales by students. This particular Use Permit application is requesting
off-Site beer and wine sales at a location that is over one-half mile from
Beswick Elementary School (3200 feet) and Tusttn High School (3800 feet). Staff
has considered that the following requiremenets be included as conditions of
approval for this particular permit:
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
April 14, 1986
Page two
1. That two "No Loitering" signs be posted directly in front of the market;
That the alcoholic beverages be limited to sales .between the hours of
8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.;
3. That no video games or pinball machines be allowed in this market.
In speaking with the applicant, they have agreed to these conditions and realize
the potential problems with liquor sales for off-site consumption. It is their
intent to operate a neighborhood market that provides convenient market services
while not trying to attract "pass through" customers.
Although this particular center is adjacent to residential uses, the stores are
facing away from the homes. All store access will be facing McFadden Avenue and
the rear of the center is shielded by a 6' concrete block wall. Should at some
time in the future, the sale of beer andwine become a problem at this location,
the Planning Commission may hold a hearing to review the Use Permit and either
impose further conditions or revoke the license with probable cause.
In reviewing applications for liquor licenses, the Community Development
Department must consider the land use effect of the sale of alcoholic beverages
at any particular location. Although there are ten (10) other off-site sales
establishments within one-half mile of the center, this application does not
meet the criteria (proximity to schools) for staff to recommend denial.
Assistant Planner
LOP:per
Enclosure: Site Plan
Attachments: Resolution 2320
Community Development Department
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2320
The Planning
follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CIl~f OF TUSTIN, APPROVING USE PERMIT 86-13 FOR THE
OFF-SITE SALES OF BEER AND WINE AT 17311 MC FADDEN
AVENUE, SUITE A
Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve
as
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
Ao
That a proper application (Use Permit 86-13) has been filed by
Mr. Yehta Elhak of Fast Stop to request authorization for an
on-site beer and wine sales license.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
Co
That establishment, maintenance and operation of the use applied
for will not, under the .circumstances of this case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
1. The use is in conformance with the zoning ordinance and the
Tusttn Area General Plan.
II.
e
That the sale of alcoholic beverages is permitted in the
C-G zone subject to issuance of a Use Permit (Section
9235c (dd).
De
That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and should be
granted.
E. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 15321).
F. The license is authorized for a location that is over one-half
mile to the nearest school facility.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Use Permit 86-13 to authorize
the off-site sales of beer and wine at 17311 Mc Fadden Avenue, Suite
A, subject to the following conditions:
That the sale of beer and wine be allowed between the hours of
8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.;
e
That two (2) "No Loitering" signs be posted directly in front of
17311 Mc Fadden Avenue, Suite A.;
3. That no video games or pinball machines be located in the
market.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25~
26
27
28
Resolution 2311
page two
4. The applicant must sign and return an "Agreement to Conditions
Imposed" form as prepared by the Community Development Director.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tusttn Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 1986.
KATHY WEIL, Chairman
PENNI FOLEY,
Recording Secretary
Report 'to the
Planning Commission
ITEM # 13
DATE:
SUBdECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATXOM:
REQUEST:
APRIL 14, 1986
£XTE#$IO# OF MME#RMENT I10. I TO USE PERMIT 76-25 AND 77-23
PROPERTY I~AIIAGElqE#T: LARWI# SQUARE. LTD.
275 CENTE##IAL ~AY
TUSTI#, CA 92680
500 E. FXRST STREET
EXTE#$IO# OF AMENDMENT NO. I TO USE PERMIT 76-25 AND 77-23 FOR A
PERIOD OF SIX (6) ROIITHS.
RECOI~ENDED ACTION:
Xt is recommended that the Commission, by Mtnute Order, extend Amendment No. 1
to use Permit 76-25 and 77-23 for six (6) months. Amendment No. i to Use
Permits 76-25 and 77-23 would then exptre on August 11, 1986.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
On February 11, 1985, the Planntng Commission approved Amendment No. 1 to Use
Permits 76-25 and 77-23 for the enclosure of the garden shop area at 500 E.
First Street and conversion of the existing Keyshop to an automated teller
machine. In order to avoid expiration of the use permit amendment, the property
manager has requested that the Commission extend the Use Permit by six (6)
months.
The actual construction is not expected to commence until April 1986, therefore
staff recommends that the Commission extend Amendment No. I to Use Permits 76-25
and 77-23 to allow adequate time for the construction to be completed.
LAURA PICKUP
Assistant Planner
LP:em
Attachments:
Letter Requesting Extension
Previous Staff Report
Resolution No. 2211
eom munity Development Department
/US N
JANUARY 3, 1986
TO: City of Tustin
RE: 6 month extension of Use Permit
SQUARE
Dear Mr. Davis,
We respectfully request a (6) six month extension of our
Use Permit for Larwin Square-Tustin. The owners of Larwin
Square-Tustin made a decision to delay construction on this
project until after the first quarter of 1986.
We ask that you please put this on the agenda for the
meeting being held on January 27, 1986, for review and
approval. Thank you.
Property Manager
LARWIN SQUARE-TUSTIN
MANAGEMENT_OFFICE: 275 Centennial Way- Suite 209 - Tustin, Ca. 92680- (714) 544-3300
Planning Commission
DATE: ,1AHUARY 28, 1986
SUBOECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENY IRO~RENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
.~q4ENDHENT NO. 1 TO U~ PERMIT 76-26 AND
AI~..NDI~ENT NO. ! TO US[ PERNZT 77-23
NORREY FRIEDPIAN ON BEHALF OF
LAR¥IN SQUARE, LTD.
P.O. BOX 6221
ANAHEIM, CA 92801
500 £. FIRST STREET (LAHNIN SQUARE* SHOPPING C~NTER)
CENTRAL COtg[RCIAL (C-2) DISTRICT
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 1)
1. AMEND USE I~RMIT 76-23 TO AUTHORIZE THE ENCLOSURE OF THE
GARO£N HOP AREA ~D,1ACENT TO T'd£ FORI4ER S$ KRESGE STORE (6115
SQUARE FEET); AND
2. AMEND USE PERI, IT 77-23 TO CONVERT THE EXXSTIIIG FREE STANDING
KEY SHOP TO All AUTOf~ATED BANK TELLER.
BACKGROUND:
In late 1977, the remodel of Larwtn Square authorized by Use Perm1:76-26 was
completed. Subsequently, Use Permtt 77-23 was approved and the free standtng
key shop and was Installed.
Ntth the approval of Use Permtt 76-26, 209,153 square feet of mtxed use floor
area was authorized. However, as the pro~ject was submitted for structural
plan check, only 200,069 square feet was utilized. Ustng the approved parktng
ratto of I space: 250 square feet, the center ts requtred to have 808 parktng
stalls. On the stte plan submitted showtng the proposed enclosure, 816 spaces
are provided. An actual space count was made and a total of 814 usable spaces
are on the stte.
An analysts of the center Indicates that extsttng structures encompass sltghtly
under 200,000 square feet. Further, It appears as though the outdoor garden
area was tncluded tn square footage calculations used to determine parktng
demand.
, Corn munity Development Department
Planning Commission Report
Larwtn Square, Ltd.
page two
OZSCUSSZON:
The subject application requests that authorization be granted 'to modify the
architectural configuration of the garden shop area located near the southeast
corner of First Street and Centennial Way. Specifically, the applicant Is
proposing to enclose the 5,115 square foot area and create a store front
oriented towards First Street.
Stnce the garden shop was previously tncluded in determining the parktng demand,
the subject request should be considered essentially the same as an tntertor
tenant. Improvement. However, because the construction would physically alter
existing elevations, an amendment to Use Permit 77-26 ts required.
Additionally, eventhough the modifications would not tncrease the required
number of spaces, the applicant ts proposing to re-stripe portions of the lot to
add approximately 10 spaces.
The second portton of the application requests that the existing key shop be
permitted to be converted To an automated bank teller machine. Again,. whtle
merely a change tn us~ tkat would normally be processed admtntstrattvely, the
alteration of a structure approved' by a use Permit, requires an amendment .
to same. .
ANALYSTS:
Staff considers both of the' applicant's requests to be acceptable modifications
to the center. Parking provided on the site plan attached to this report is in
excess of what was required by Use Permit 77-26, and the change of use of the
key shop should create only an incidental, increase in patron activity.
Accordingly, staff will recommend that the requested '.amendments be approved.
However there are some conditions of .approval that should be imposed. Those
conditions are attached in Exhibit "A".
REC4)I~EMDED ACTION:
It is recommended that amendments to Use Permits 76-26 and 77-23 be approved
subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit "A" attached to this .report.
Associate I:'lanner.
JO:do
Community Development Department
£XHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
USE PERMITS 76-26 AND 73-23
That prior to issuance of any building permits for proposed modifications,
the parking lot must be striped to reflect the site plan reviewed with the
application.
That the materials and architectural style of the enclosre and the coverted
key shop match the existing structures in the center.
That roof-top equtp~nt be screened from view.
That the Commission determine that the center is built to capacity iusing
the parking ratio established by Use Permit 76-26, and that any future
additions to the center will require a complete renovation of the parking
layout.
Community Development Department
1
*2
3
4
5
.6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2211
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, AMENDING US.E PERMIT 76-26 AUTHORIZING
THE ENCLOSURE OF THE GARDEN SHOP AREA ADJACENT TO
THE STRUCTURE AT 500 EAST 1st STREET AND AMENDING
USE PERMIT 77-23 AUTHORIZING THE CONVERSION OF THE
EXISTING KEY SHOP IN LARWIN SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER
TO AN AUTOHATED BANK TELLER.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tusttn does hereby reso]ve as
follows:
The P]anntng Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That a p~oper app]tcatton, (Amendment to Use Permits No. 76-26
and 77-23) has been ft]ed on behalf 'of Larwtn Square, Ltd, to
authorize the enc]osure of the garden shop (~,119 square feet)
adjacent to 500 [. 1st, and to authorize the conversion of an
*existing key shop to an automated bank to]let.
B. i'~ That a pub]tc hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
.** application.
C. That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case,
~' be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or
-- -~ general welfare of the persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of.such proposed use, evidenced by the following
findings:
1. That the project is in conformence with the crtterta and
tntent of the City of Tustin Zoning Ordinance and the
Tusttn Area General Plan in that it is a retail/commercial
use in the Central Commercial (C-2) Zoning District.
2. That the area to he enclosed was calculated as usable
retail space for the purposes of parking demand at the time
Use Permit 76-26 was approved. Therefore, the center is in
compliance with parking requirements for the site.
3. That' the Planning Commission hereby determines that the
subject site has been expanded to capacity using parking
ratio estebltshed by Use Permit 76-26. Any future
additions to the center will require renovation of the
parking lot design.
That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not he injurious or detrimental to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the City of Tusttn, and should be
granted.
1
4
5
7
8
10
11
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2211
page Wo
E. Proposed development shall be in accordance wtth the development
poltctes adopted by the Ctty Counctl, Un~form Bu~ldtng Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fife Harshal and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
F. This project ts categorically exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act.
G. Final development plans shall require' the review and approval of
the Community Development Department.
The Planning Commission hereby approves amendments to Use Permll~s
No. 76-26 and 77-23 to authorize the enclosure of the g~den shop area
(5,115 square feet) adjacent to 500 East 1st and to authorize the
conversion of the existing key shop tn Lar~tn Square to an automated*
bank teller subject to the following conditions:
A. That prior to issuance of any butldtng permits for proposed
modifications, the parking lot must ~e stripped to reflect the
site plan revte~ed with this application.
B. Th. at the metertals and architectural style of the enclosure and
the coverted key shop match the eMsttng strucl~ures tn the
center.
C. That roof top equipment be screened from vtew.
D. That since the Commission has determined that the center Is
built to capacity using the parking ratio established by Use
Permit 76-26, any future additions to the center wtll require a
complete renovation of the parking layout.
II.
PASSED AND ADOPTED
Commission held on the
DONNA ORR,
Recordtng Secretary
at a~ regular ce~./e.t~g~, o~f~ ,/t~, Tusttn Planning
RONALD H. WHITE,
Chatr~n
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUB~IECT:
APPLICANT/
O~NER:
ZONING:
REQUEST:
APRIL 14, 1986
FUTURE FACILITY SiGN FOR THSTIN AUTO CENTER
THE IRVINE COMPANY
500 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE
NEIIPDRT BEACH, CA. 92658
PLANNED CO~UNITY COI~RCIAL
REVIE¥ OF ONE ON-SITE FUTURE FACILITY SIGN
RECO~RENDED All'ION:
Receive and file.
SLI~IARY:
On July 22,'1985, the Planning Commission approved the Tustin Auto Center Master
Plan. Although the specific sign criteria has yet to be presented to the
Commission, the applicant is now requesting an interim "future facility" sign.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION:
As shown on the attached set of plans, the proposed sign includes identification
for the Auto Center and also provides panels for each of the proposed dealers.
The overall size, height, number and location criteria for stgnage in the Auto
Center have not yet been adopted. ~Owever, the current Sign Ordinance allows
future facilities signs for new projects within the city.
The proposed sign is 143 square feet in size and includes additional 20 square
foot panels for individual dealers. In order to adequately advertise the
dealers who will be opening in the next few months, this sign will be used until
the permanent project sign can be approved and installed. Seeing that the
actual sign criteria has not yet been completed staff considers this sign
appropriate for the interim period until a permanent sign can be approved.
LP:pef
Enclosed:
Sign Plan
Site Plan
Corn munity Development Department
Pl nnin Commission
DATE:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APRIL 14, 1986
UPDATE ON FLOOD CONTROL INPROVENENTS AND ROUGH GRADING IN THE
PHASE I RESIDENTIAL.
AREA IS BOUNDED BT THE 1-5 FREENAY TO THE SOUTH, BRO#NING AVENUE
TO THE MEST~ BRYAN AYENUE TO THE NORTH, AND FUTURE ROAD TO THE
EAST. ·
RECOIIIENDATIO#:
Recetve and file.
DISCUSSION:
In October of last year, the City of Tusttn approved an amendment to the Parcel
Rap for th~ Auto Center (No. 84-1032) to extend the date of completion for the
box culvert across B~yan Avenue from October 14, 1985 to Hay 15, 1986. Since
that time, the interim channel has been constructed, the overflow weir has been
completed, and construction is underway on the box culvert.
As a part of this amendment process, grading tn the Phase I residential area
would be restricted until several items were completed to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer. These tnchded the construction of the interim channel,
overflow weir, and start of construction on the box culvert. Each' of these
items has been completed and The Irvtne Company will shortly begin rough grading
activity tn the area of Phase ! west of the railroad tracks. The current rainy
season is over and the box culvert will be completed long before the start of a
new season.
The completion of the box culvert represents the last of the flood control
conditions placed on both the Auto Center and Phase [. The next step in the
process to upgrade flood conrol facilities in this area ts the completion of
full channel Improvements between Bryan/Browning and the I-5 Freeway. These
improvements are a part of Assessment District 85-1 and hopefully can begin
shortly now that the East Tusttn plan has been adopted.
Corn munity Development Department
Planntng Commission Report
April 14, 1986
Page two
The last set of improvements includes flood control improvements to the north of
Bryan/Browning intersection. These improvements are the responsibility of the
County of Orange, and the City hopes that the improvements it is providing in
the East Tustin area will give the County enough incentive to begin construction
on the E1 Modena Channel in the northern area.
EMK:pef
Community Development Department
REC EIV~2'~
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
7:O1~
ALL PRESENT
I. CALL TO ORDER
II.
III.
ACTION /t~JENDA OF A REGUI.AR NEETING
OF Tile TUSTIN CITY COUMCIL
MARCH 17, 1986 - 7:00 P.M.
ACCEPTED BY VAN
ACCEPTED BY S~DY
LARTRELL
ACCEPTED BY
RAMONA CLARK
HISTORlCN- IV.
ROLL CALL
PROCLAMATIONS
1. OLIVER VAN HORN - RETIRED MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEE
2. "RED CROSS MONTH" - MARCH, 1986
3. "WOMEN'S BOWLING WEEK"
COMMUNITY NOTES
SOCIETY'S lOTH BIRTHDAY PART'/ ON MAY 5
APRIL 8TH EI. ECTION
RECREATION REGISTRATIOM AMD TICKETS ARE AVAILABLE FOR L P REPERTORY PLAY
CITY RECEIVED $275,000 FEDERAL GRANT FOR 1USTIN AREA ~NION CITIZEN PRO~IECT
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
N)OFTED RESOLUTION 1.
· 86-~8, INCLIN)ING
,AFF REI~RT ~ WITH
ANEND .I~'liTS TI~T I~
CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF EAST TUSTIN PLANNED COMMUNITY - RESOLUTIONS
NO. 86-28, 86-29, 86-30, 86-31, & 86-32, AND ORDINANCES NO. 966 & 967
RESOLUTION NO. 86-28 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY .COUHCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CERTIFYING FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) 85-2 AS
/kS A 4 LARE RESIBEN- REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
TIN. ErREET, NOT All ARTERIAL HIGIIWAY, THAT THEY UPHOLD THE FINI)II~$ OF TIE M.ANNII~ COMMISSION
WITH TWO PARKING SPACES ARD 50% GUEST PARKING ON THE STREET, AND THERE WAS A CONCENSUS THAT THE
TUSTIN RANCH ROAD (COULD VARY 100 FEET PI.US ON MINUS.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION NO. 86-29 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
86-29 TUSTIN, ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-1a, AMENDING THE LAND USE
ELEMENT TEXT AND DIAGRAM OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN FOR THE AREA
BOUNDED BY THE SANTA ANA FREEWAY (I-5) TO THE SOUTH; EXISTING RESIDEN-
TIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND THE UNINCORPORATED COMMUNI-
TIES OF LEMON HEIGHTS AND COWAN HEIGHTS TO THE WEST; UNINCORPORATED LAND
TO THE NORTH; .AND UNINCORPORATED AREA WITHIN THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
LINE (MYFORD ROAD) FOR THE CITY OF IRVINE TO THE EAST; ENCOMPASSING
APPROXIMATELY 1,740 aCRES COMMONLY KNOWN AS EAST TUSTIN {EXHIBIT "A"
ATTACHED HERETO)
ADOPTED RESOLUTION
NO. 86-30
RESOLUTION NO. 86-30 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-1b, AMENDING THE CIRCULATION
ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN FOR THE AREA BOUNDED BY: THE
SANTA ANA FREEWAY {I-5) TO THE SOUTH; EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND THE UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES OF LEMON
HEIGHTS AND COWAN HEIGHTS TO THE WEST; UNINCORPORATED LAND TO THE NORTH;
AND UNINCORPORATED AREA WITHIN THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE LINE (MYFORD
ROAD) FOR THE CITY OF IRVINE TO THE EAST ENCOMPASSING APPROXIMATELY
1,740 ACRES, COMMONLY KNOWN AS EAST TUSTIN (EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED
HERETO).
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA
Page 1 3.17-86
)PTED RESOLUTION
86-31
INTRODUCED ORDINAI~E
NO. 966
ADOPTED RESOLUTION
NO. 86-32
;RODUCED ORDINANCE
967
DENIED THE USE 2.
PERNIT
APPROVED STAFF
RECOI~qENDATIO#
RESOLUTION NO. 86-31 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF *
TUSTIN, ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-1c, AMENDING THE SEISMIC
SAFETY ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN FOR THE AREA BOUNDED BY:
THE SANTA ANA FREEWAY {I-5) TO THE SOUTH; EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP-
MENT IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND THE UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES OF LEMON
HEIGHTS AND COWAN HEIGHTS TO THE WEST; UNINCORPORATED LAND TO THE NORTH;
AND UNINCORPORATED AREA WITHIN THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE LINE (MYFORD
ROAD) FOR THE CIllf OF IRVINE TO THE EAST ENCOMPASSING APPROXIMATELY
1,740 ACRES, COMMONLY KNOWN AS EAST TUSTIN (EXHIBIT "A" A1TACHED
HERETO).
ORDINANCE NO. 966 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, REZONING FROM PLANNED COMMUNITY TO PLANNED COMMUNITY/RESIDEN-.
TIAL; PLANNED COMMUNITY/COMMERCIAL; PLANNED COMMUNITY/MIXED USE AND
PLANNED COMMUNITY/COMMUNITY FACILITIES FOR THE AREA BOUNDED BY: THE
SANTA ANA FREEWAY (I-5) TO THE SOUTH;. EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND THE UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES OF LEMON
HEIGHTS 'AND COWAN HEIGHTS TO THE WEST; UNINCORPORATED LAND TO THE NORTH;
AND UNINCORPORATED AREA WITHIN THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE LINE (MYFORD
ROAD) FOR THE CITY OF IRVINE TO THE EAST ENCOMPASSING APPROXIMATELY
1,740 ACRES, COMMONLY KNOWN AS EAST TUSTIN (EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED
HERETO).
RESOLUTION NO. 86-32 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
T1JSTIN RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION, BY RESOLUTION OF THE
COUNCIL, SECTIONS 1.0 AND 2.0 OF THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN (SPECIFIC
PLAN NO. 8).
ORDINANCE NO. 967 - AN
TUSTIN ADOPTING SECTION
PU~N NO. 8) AND EXHIBIT
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
3.0 OF THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN (SPECIFIC
"C" AS THE LAND USE PLAN.
Recommendation: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 86-28;
2) Adopt Resolution No. 86-29;
3) Adopt Resolution No. 86-30;
4) Adopt Resolution No. 86-31;.
5} M.O. - That Ordinance No. 966 have first reading by title only;
6) M.O. - That Ordinance No. 966 be introduced;
7) Adopt Resolution No. 86-32;
8) M.O. - That Ordinance No. 967 have first reading by title only; and
g} M.O. - That Ordinance No. 967 be introduced.
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF USE PERMIT 86-6, 13842 NEWPORT
AVENUE, UNIT A
Recommendation: Pleasure of the City Council.
3. APPEAL OF USE PERMIT 86-7 - OFFICE BUILDING AT 185-195 "C" STREET
Recommendation: Uphold findings of the Planning Commission as contained
in Resolution No. 2306 and approve Use Permit 86-7.
RICHARD VI. PUBLIC INPUT
~#ING ~QUESTED THAT THE CURBS AT 340 W. MAIN STREET BE REPAIRED QUIC~Y.
1L SNOW REQUESTED THAT THE 2~)NING ON M AIM STREU RF_IRAIN AS IT IS TOI)AY.
_ .,JP THE STUDY ON THE OVERLAY ZONE ON MAIN STREET.
COUNCIL VOTED TO
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA
PAGE 2 3-17-86
VII.
APPROVED
APPROVED
~OPTED ~ION
NO. ~36
APPROVED STAFF
RECOI~IENDATI ON
ADOPTED ~lFrlOl
NO. 86-39
APPROVED STAFF
RECOI~IENDATION
~ROVED STAFF
~ECOI~ENDATION
APPROVED STAFF
RECOI~ENDATION
ADOPTED P~SOLUT ION
NO. 86-40
CONSENT CALENDAR
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 3, 1986, REGULAR MEETING
APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT O~ $1,585,309.30
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $148,660.30
RESOLUTION NO. 86-36 - A RESOLUTION OF- TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CANVASS OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELEC-
TION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1986, TO BE MADE BY THE CITY CLERK
Adopt Resolution No. 86-36 as recommended by the City Clerk.
FREEWAY AGREEMENTS FOR MYFORD ROAD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS
Authorize the Mayor to execute the Freeway Agreement with CalTrans
for the I-5/Myford Road Interchange Modification Project as recom-
mended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-39 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, TO CONTINUE PARTICIPATION IN THE COUNTY CO-OP
PURCHASING PROGRAJ~
Adopt Resolution No. 86-39 as recommended by the Engineering Divi-
sion.
RENEWAL OF MAINTENANCE UNIFORM CONTRACT
Renew the maintenance uniform contract for an additional year at an
increased cost of five percent as provided in existing agreement as
recommended by the Engineering Division.
ANNUAL RENEWAL OF HEATING, VENTILATING & AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC) CON-
TRACT
Renew the annual Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning (HVAC)
contract with Air-Ex Air Conditioning, La Verne, for an additional
year at an annual cost of $34,900 as recommended by the Engineering
Division.
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS D86-02 & D86-03
Authorize the Mayor to execute subject agreements with the County of
Orange for adjustment of water valve boxes; and authorize a supple-
mental budget appropriation with the Water Enterprise fund in the
amount of $11,500 to fund said work as recommended by the Director
of Public Works/City Engineer.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-40 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO AND PROVIDING TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR
RELOCATION OF CERTAIN-PIPELINES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
Adopt Resolution No. 86-40 as recommended by the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer.
VIII. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION
CONTINUED TO 4-7-86 1.
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURE ORDINANCE & IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - ORDI-
NANCE NO. 964 & RESOLUTION NO. 86-14
ORDINANCE NO. 964 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN CALIFORNIA ADDING SECTION 5600 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING
REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE DISCLOSURE OF HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA
Page.3 3-17-86
IX. OLD
APPROYEI] STAFF 1.
RECOII~NOATION
X. NEW
APPROVED STAFF 1.
REGOI~IENOATION
APPROVED STAFF
RECOIIIENDATION
APPROVED STAFF 3.
RECO~NDATION
APPROVED STAFF 4.
RECOI~IENDATION
BUSINESS
NEWPORT AVENUE EXTENSION TO EDINGER STREET
Recommendation: Authorize staff to reapply to the railroad and Public
Utilities Commission for an at-grade crossing of Newport Avenue over the
AT&SF tracks, if desirous of pursuing extension of Newport Avenue to
Edinger Street.
BUSINESS
AWARD OF BID - COLUMBUS TUSTIN ATHLETIC FIELD #4 RENOVATION: . BACKSTOP,
DUGOUTS AND SIDE FENCING
Recommendation: Award the contract for subject renovation project to
the Wakefield Company, Irvine, in the amount of $11,800 as recommended
by the Community Services Department.
2. AWARD OF BID - COLUMBUS TUSTIN ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING
Recon~nendation: Award contract for subject lighting project to David-
Richards Construction, San Bernardino, in the amount of $88,712 as
recommended by the Community Services Department.
REJECTION OF BIDS - POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING EXPANSION OF OUTSIDE
PROPEBTY STORAGE AREA
Recommendation: Reject all bids received for building expansion of out-
side property storage area because of lack of available funds as recom-
mended by the Chief of Police.
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DISABILITY RETIREMENT & WORKERS COMPENSATION
PROJECT
Recommendation: Approve participation in the League's Disability
Retirement and Workers Compensation Project at a fee of $5,000 as recom-
mended by the Director of Community and Administrative Services.
APPROVED $6,000 5. ORAL REPORT - 1986 TUSTIN TILLER DAYS
TO BE PUT IN RESERVE FOR OPERATION PURPOSES, $2,000 FOR ELECTRICAL WORK, ANO STAFF TO AGENOIZE
FOR AORIL 7TH I~ETIIIG THE SUBJECT OF LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR THE FAIR.
XI. REPORTS
APPEALED GENERAL 1.
PLAN .aJ'IENDI~NT 86-.2c
PLANNING COMMISSION A~TIONS - MARCH 10, 1986
All actions of the Planning Commission become final unless appealed by
the City Council or members of the public.
RECEIVE)) AND FILE)) 2. INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 1986
Recommendation: Receive and file.
~AGENDIZE WITH 3. O.C.T.D. BUS PASSENGER SHELTER PROGRAM
~IBER OF BENCHES, WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IdlAINTENANCE, ETC.
HUSTON XII. OTHER BUSINESS
REQUESTED A CLOSEO SESSION FOR PERSONNEL MR1TERS.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 4
3-17-86
;TOll RECOMMENDED THAT THE COUNCIL AIMOURN THE I~ETING TO A JOINT ~ETING WI*IH THE SCHOOL
.~LRD ON NRROI 24TH AT 6:30.
KENllEOY REPORTEO THAT A LARGE HOLE ON SAN JUAN BY THE NORMOM OIURCH REEOS REPAIR.
NUSTON RESPONUED TO KEllNEOY THAT HE IS INVESTIGATING THE REQUEST FROM THE BOY'S CLUB FOR HELP.
NGVEO TO SUPPORT THE LEAGUE POSITION OF OPPOSING THE BILL REGARDING THE BROIJN ACT.
GREIllKE REPORTEO THRT THERE ARE 11t0 LARGE HOLES IN THE STREET Ill FRONT OF TUSTIN HONUA.
LEOENUECKER RESPONUEO TO EDGAR THAT THE UNUERGROUNDING FOR HEliPORT AVENUE WILL BE AGENOIZEO IN
APRIL.
11: 01 X I I I. ADJOURNMENT
To a Closed Session for Personnel matters, thence to a joint meeting with
the School Board on March 24th at 6:30 p,m., and thence to the next regular
meeting on April 7, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA
Page 5 3-17-86
ACTIOM A~E#DA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF
THE TUSTI# REDEVELOI~qENT A~ENCY
MARCH 17, 1986
7:00 P.M.
11:01 1. CALL TO ORDER
ALL 2. ROLL CALL
PRESENT
APPROVED 3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 3, 1986, REGULAR MEETING
APPROVED 4.
APPROVAL OF DEMANDS - FEBRUARY, 1986
Recommendation: Approve demands In the amount of $45,737.77 for the month of
February, 1986, as recommended by the Director of Finance.
ADOPTED 5.
RESOLUTION
RO. RDA 8G-4
DESIGN REVIEW FOR USE PERMIT 86-7, 185-195 "C" STREET - RESOLUTION NO. RDA 86-4
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 86-4 -'A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF.TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SITE AND ELEVATION PLANS FOR THE
PROPOSED OFFICE PROJECT AT 185-195 "C" STREET
Recommendation: If City Council affirms Planning Commission approval of Use
Permit 86-7, adopt Resolution No. RDA 86-4;
OR
If City Council continues or denies Use Permit 86-7, table subject action.
NOllE 6. OTHER BUSINESS
11:0~ 7.
ADJOURNMENT
To the next Regular Meeting on April 7, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION AGENDA Page 1 3-17-86
COMMUNllY D£¥ELO?MENT
ACTION AGENOA OF A REGULAR I~ETIN&
OF THE 1USTI# CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 7, 1986 - 7:00 P.M.
7:04 I. CALL TO ORDER
ALL P~ESENT II. ROLL CALL
III. PROCLAMATIONS
PRESENTED
PRESENTED
PRESENTED
1. FOOTHILL HIGH SCHOOL AQUATICS
2. NORMAN FETZGER - PRESIDENT OF WESTMED GOLD CLUB
3. KEN HOESTEREY - VOLUNTEER FOR SENIOR PROGRAMS
4, SAM LYONS - COMMUNITY SERVICE
LAS VEGAS IV. COMMUNITY NOTES
TURNAROURO, APRIL 25 & 27
CATALINA CRUISE, SATUROAY, NAY 17
CXIL! COOK OFF, ~UNE 1
HISTORICAL SOCIETY 10TH AMNIVERSARY, VICTORIAN GARDEN PARTY, NAY 10
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - APRIL 8
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
ADOPTED RESOLUTION 1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-2b - REVISIONS TO THE NOISE ELEMENT OF THE
NO. 86-45 TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN - RESOLUTION NO. 86-45
RESOLUTION NO. 86-45 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-2b AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE
NOISE ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 86-45.
ROVED APPROVAL 2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-2c - 1101 SYCAMORE AVENUE
OF GENERAL PLAN AMEROI~ 86-2c
Recommendation: Pleasure of the City Council; and direct staff to pre-
pare appropriate resolution.
AOOPTEO RESOLUTION 3. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-2e - 1800 SAN JUAN STREET - RESOLUTION NO.
NO. 86-42 86-42
RESOLUTION N0.'86-42 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
FOR 1800 SAN JUAN STREET
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 86-42.
DISAPPROVED
GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 86-2f
4. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-2f - 13881-13895 BROWNING AVENUE - RESOLUTION
NO. 86-43
RESOLUTION NO. 86-43 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
FOR 13881 TO 13895 BROWNING, FROM (SF) SINGLE-FAMILY TO (MF) MULTI-
FAMILY
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 86-43.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page I 4-7-86
· E# VI. PUBLIC INPUT
~_ .,NG THANmcED (For City of Tustin Residents and Businesspersons on any matter, and for
1}mE COUNCIL FOR Water Service Customers having a concern unresolved by Administrative
K£EPIN~ lliE SAME procedures.)
ZONII~ Oil MRI# STREET
VII. CONSENT CALENDAR
APPROVED
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 7, 1986, ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
/LaPROVED
APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,325,508.66
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $142,388.80
APPROVED STAFF 3.
RECOI~qENDATIO#
APPLICATION TO FILE LATE CLAIM - YATSUE NAKAHARA, CLAIM NO. 86-6
Deny the Application to File Late Claim and direct the City Clerk to
nottfy claimant and claimant's representative of such denial, as
reconwnended by the City Attorney.
ADOPTED RESOLUTIOII 4.
NO. 86-44
RESOLUTION NO. 86-44 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 43 (Community Parklands Act of
1986)
Adopt Resolution No. 86-44 as recommended by the Director of Com-
munity and Administrative Services.
APPROVED STAFF 5.
RECOI~IEIlDATIO#
FOURTH OF JULY FIREWORKS CONTRACT
Authorize the City Manager to execute agreement in the amount of
$8,900 between the City and Pyro Spectacular Fireworks Company to
provide a pyro-musical show for the Annual Fourth of July Celebra-
tion as recommended by the Community Services Department.
~P~V~ STAFF 6.
RE~I~END~I~
EL CANINO REAL CHAMPIONSHIP CHILI COOK-OFF - JUNE 1, 1986
Appropriate $2,000 from the General Fund as seed money for the 1986
E1 Camino Real Championship Chili Cook-off as recommended by the
Recreation Superintendent.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION 7.
NO. 86-46
RESOLUTION NO. 86-46 - A RESOLUTON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR BELL AVENUE
STORM DRAIN EXTENSION AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS
Adopt Resolution No. 86-46 as recommended by the Engineering Divi-
sion.
ADOPTED RES4)LUTIOM 8.
NO. 86-38
RESOLUTION NO. 86-38 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CA, IN SUPPORT OF THE REMOTE ACCESS NETWORK OF THE CALIFORNIA
IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM {CAL-ID)
Adopt Resolution No. 86-38 as recommended by the Chief of Police.
APPROVED STAFF 9.
RECOI~ENDATION
RELINQUISHMENT OF ACCESS RIGHTS TO WALNUT AVENUE
Approve the relinquishment of access rights to Walnut Avenue from
Tract No. 10815; and authorize the Mayor to execute a Quitclaim Deed
for said relinquishment, subject to City approval of a plan for said
work, as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
ADI:~PTED 10.
r LUTIOM I10. 86-37
RESOLUTION NO. 86-37 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO THE COMPENSATION OF PART-TIME EMPLOYEES
OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
Adopt Resolution No. 86-37 as recommended by the Director of Com-
munity and Administrative Services.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 2 4-7-86
VIII. ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION
LEGAl. STAFF TO COI~ 1. CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF ZONING 'ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 85-8 - PROHI-
BACK WIlll RESOLUTION BITION OF TOXIC WASTE TRANSFER STATIONS - ORDINANCE NO. 954
OR LE1TERS WHICH gDOLO
MAKE OUR POSITION ORDINANCE NO. 954 - AN OROINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEAR THAT I~ DO NOT TUSTIN APPROVING ZONING OROINANCE AMENDMENT 85-8 PROHIBITING THE DEVEL-
INTENO TO HRVE A TOXIC OPMENT AND/OR OPERATION OF TOXIC WASTE TRANSFER STATIONS WITHIN THE CITY
WASTE STATION IN LIMITS
TUSTIN
Rec~endation: Pleasure of the City Council.
IX. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION
CONTINUEO TO 4-2! 1. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURE ORDINANCE & IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - ORDI-
NANCE NO. g64 & RESOLUTION NO. 86-14
ORDINANCE NO. 964 - AN ORDII~ANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 5600 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISH-
ING REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE DISCLOSURE OF HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS
RESOLUTION NO. 86-14 -A-RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN NAIqING THE ORANGE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT AS THE AGENCY RESPON-
SIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING AND ENFORCING THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE OF
CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 2185
Tl~ ORDIliAI~E
966-
ADOPTED ORDINANCE 3.
NO. 967
ORDINANCE NO. 966 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, REZONING FROM PLANNED COMMUNITY TO PLANNED COMMUNITY/
RESIDENTIAL; PLANNED COMMUNITY/COMMERCIAL; PLANNED COMMUNITY/MIXED USE
AND PLANNED COMMUNITY/COMMUNITY FACILITIES FOR THE AREA BOUNDED BY: THE
SANTA ANA FREEWAY {I-§) to the south; EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND THE UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES OF LEMON
HEIGHTS AND COWAN HEIGHTS TO THE WEST; UNINCORPORATED LAND TO THE N
ORTH; AND UNINCORPORATED AREA WITHIN THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE LINE
(MYFORD ROAD) FOR THE CITY OF IRVINE TO THE EAST ENCOMPASSING APPROXI-
MATELY 1.740 ACRES COMMONLY KNOWN AS EAST TUSTIN (EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED
HERETO)
ORDINANCE NO. g67 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN ADOPTING SECTION 3.0 OF THE EAST llJSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN (SPECIFIC
PLAN NO. 8) AND EXHIBIT "C" AS THE LAND USE PLAN
XI. NEW BUSINESS
APPROVED STAFF
RECOI~ENDATION
' 'INUED TO 4-21
1. COLUMBUS TUSTIN PARK CONCESSION STAND PROPOSAL
Recommendation: If Council decides a concession is appropriate at
Columbus Tustin snack bar, direct Community Services staff and City
Attorney to work together to ensure that all legal requirements are met
in the process.
SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE - CHILI COOK-OFF AND TUSTIN TILLER DAYS
Recommendation: Pleasure of the City Council.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 3 4-7-86
RESOLUTION 3.
J6-47
APPROVED STAFF
RECOI~qENDATION
STAFF TO DRAFT TWO 5.
LETTERS. ORE TO BE
SIGNED BY ALL FIVE
COUNCILPERSONS ~ A
LETTER FROM A TECHNI-
CAL STANDPOZIlT FRO#
BOB LEDENDECKER
APPROVED STAFF 6.
RECOI~ENDATION
ESTABLISHMENT OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE - STREET NAME CHANGE FROM JAMBOREE
ROAD TO TUSTIN RANCH ROAD - RESOLUTION NO. 86-47
RESOLUTION NO. 86-47 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE INTENTION TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING
TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF JAMBOREE ROAD,
BETWEEN THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AND
BRYAN AVENUE, TO TUSTIN RANCH ROAD
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 86-47; and establish the public
hearing time and date to be at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, May 5, 1986.
4. AWARD OF BID - POLICE COt~4UNICATIONS BUILDING MODIFICATIONS
Recommendation: Award the contract for subject project to Department of
Interior Construction Company, Irvine, in the amount of $17,500.
FOOTHILL/EASTERN/I-5 BOTTLENECK ANALYSIS & TOLL ROAD FEASIBILITY STUDY
Recommendation: Authorize staff to respond to the Orange County Trans-
portation Commission (OCTC) per the conmnents/concerns outlined in the
letter dated March 26, 1986, from the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer to Sharon Greene, Project Manager, OCTC.
PROPOSED STREET NAME CHANGE - MYFORD ROAD TO JAMBOREE ROAD
Recommendation: Direct staff to communicate with and request each
involved agency, the City of Irvine and County of Orange, to initiate
subject name change proceedings within their respective jurisdictions.
DRIVE/MOULTON
STAFF TO COME BAC)C 7. PROPOSED STREET NAME CHANGE - IRVINE CENTER
WITH REPORT ON EDINGER AVENUE TO MOULTON PARKWAY
CtlANGING MOULT0# PARKWAY TO EDINGER N.L THE t~Y TO HARVARD AVENUE.
APPROVED STAFF
RECOI~ENDATION
APPROVED STAFF
RECOI~IENDATION
PARKWAY/
8. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR NEWPORT AVENUE FAU PROJECT M-M016(O02)
Recommendation: Award the contract for subject project to Steiny and
Company, Inc., Fullerton, in the amount of $188,714.
9. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTER-
SECTION OF MOULTON PARKWAY AND MYFORD ROAD
APPROVED STAFF
RECOI~ENDATION
K~VED STAFF
R~ ~qENDATION
· 10.
11.
Recommendation: Award the contract for subject project to Paxin Elec-
tric, Inc., Lancaster, in the amount of $95,212.
AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE TWO TRAILER-MOUNTED ARROW BOARDS
Recommendation: Authorize the purchase of two trailer-mounted arrow
boards from Starlite/Blinkerlite Safety Supply Company, La Mirada, in
the amount of $7,146.16 for the Water Division.
REVISION TO AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF COSTS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVE-
MENTS - EAST TUSTIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1
Recommendation: Approve the revised subject agreement; and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute same.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 4 4-7-86
Ai~VED ~I'AFF
F ~NDATION
12.
AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE TWO REGENERATIVE AIR STREET SWEEPERS
Recommendation: Authorize the purchase of two Elgin Crosswind sweepers
from Haaker Equipment Company, Pomona, in the amount of $202,290.84.
APPROVED STAFF
REC01g4F. NDATION
13. EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR/PARALLEL NORTH-SOUTH ROAD STUDIES
Recommendation: Authorize staff to request the County of Orange to
remove that segment of the north-south road between the Santa Aha Free-
way and Santiago Canyon Road from the scope of work for the Eastern
Transportation Corridor studies.
XII. REPORTS
RECEIVED AND FILED 1. INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF MARCH 31, 1986
Recommendation: Receive and file.
RECEIVED ~ FILED 2. COSTA GSA (ROUTE 56) FREEWAY LANDSCAPING/WEED ABATEMENT
Recommendation: Receive and file.
RECEIVED AMD FILED 3. FUEL STORAGE AND DISPENSING FACILITIES AGREEMENT
Recommendation: Receive and file.
HUSTON XIII. OTHER BUSINESS
Rr~'~.STED A
C .'D SESSION FON PERS4)NNEL MAI'~ER$
HOESTEREY REQUESTED STAFF TO SPEED UP THE REPLACEMENT OF PLAYGROUND EQUIPI~NT 'THAT ~S REMOVED
LAST YEAR AT WU~NO~IA TREE PARK.
STAFF TO CO~E BACK AT 1}lE NEXT ~ETING Will1 RECOI~IENDATION FOR SIGNAL AT PACIFIC AND MAIN ST.
AND A FOUR WAY STOP AT MAIN ST. AND 'B" ST.
INOVED TO APPROPRIATE $2,0OO FOR NECHANISM IN THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT RED HILL AND THE FREEWAY.
11:19 XIV. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourned in memory of Kathy Well's mother to the next Adjourned Regular
Meeting on Tuesday, April 15, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.; and thence to the next
Regular Meeting on Monday, April 21, 1986.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 5 4-7-86
ACTION AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF
TIlE ~TI# REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
APRIL 7, 1986
7:00 P.M.
8:19 1. CALL TO ORDER
ALL 2. ROLL CALL
PRESENT
APPROVED 3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 17, 1986, REGULAR MEETING
APPROVED 4.
APPROVAL OF DEMANDS - MARCH, 1986
Recommendation: Approve demands in the amount of $40,177.92 for the month of
March, 1986, as recommended by the Director of Finance.
STAFF TO 5. CONSIDERATION OF PARKING STRUCTURE ACCESS FROM EL CAMINO REAL
REPORT BACK WITH
COST OF LOg Recommendation: Pleasure of the Agency.
MAINTENANCE YARD AND A STAIRWAY TO 'II(E GARAGE.
6. OTHER BUSINESS
8:41 7.
ADJOURNMENT
To the next Regular Meeting on April 21, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION AGENDA Page 1 4-7-86