Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1 MINUTES 05-05-86II. III. IV. NINUTES OF A REGULAR NEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 1986 CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION The,meeting was called to order by Mayor Greinke at 7:04 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Hoesterey, and the Invocation was given by Councilman Edgar. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula E. Kennedy None William A. Huston, City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public W6rks Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Royleen A. White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Srvcs. Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Captain Wakefield, Police Department Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent Approximately 80 in the audience PROCLANATIONS 1. KEN HOESTEREY - VOLUNTEER FOR SENIOR PROGRAMS Mayor Greinke read a proclamation honoring Ken Hoesterey for his many volunteer services in senior programs. Mr. Hoesterey thanked the Council. 84 2. NORMAN llETZGER - PRESIDENT OF MESTNED GOLD CLUB Mayor Greinke presented a proclamation to Norm Metzger commending him on his recent selection as President of the Westmed Gold Club. Mr. Metzger expressed his thanks to the Council. 84' 3. SAMUEL LYONS - COI~IUNITY SERVICE At the Mayor's request, Police Chief Thayer and Captain Wakefield escorted Mr. Samuel Lyons to the speakers' podium. The Mayor then presented Mr. Lyons with a proclamation in recognition of his many community services. Mr. Lyons eloquently thanked the Council. He then introduced Ernest Elchlepp, new president of Reason Buick Company. 84 Tova Griffith, President of the Tustin Chamber of Commerce, pre- sented Mr. Lyons with a lifetime membership in the Chamber in appreciation of his many years of support and good humor. CO)~UNITY NOTES CO)~IUNITY EXCURSIONS AND EVENTS M~aYor Greinke announced the following excursions and events: Las Vegas Turnaround, April 26 and 27, 1986 Catalina Cruise and Tours, May 17, 1986 E1Camino Real Championship Chili Cook-Off, June 1, 1986 Tustin Historical Society Tenth Anniversary Victorian Garden Party, May 4, 1986 General Municipal Election, April 8, 1986 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 4-7-86 Ve I~BLIC NEARIN6S 1. GENERAL R.AN N4ENDIWENT 86-2b - REVISIONS TO THE NOISE B. EMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAl. R.AN - RESOLUTION NO. 86-45 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated April 7, 1986, prepared by the Community Development Department. The public hearing was opened by Mayor Greinke at 7:25 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to: 1) Direct staff to make appropriate changes to the Browning Corri- dor definition (reference Page 10, first paragraph); 2) Direct staff to show the Eastern Corridor on all future docu- ments as recently agreed upon by Tustin and Irvine; 3) Direct staff to reflect the current status of flights from John Wayne Airport {reference Page 11, last paragraph); and 4} Adopt the following: RESOI. UTION NO. 86-45 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF llJSTIN APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-2b AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE NOISE ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN The motion carried 5-0. Councilwoman Kennedy requested that the noise ordinance be updated to reflect the new policies as contained in Attachment A to Resolu- tion No. 86-45 and brought back to Council. 2. GENERAL R.AN AMENOI~ENT 86-2c - 1101 SYCAMORE AVENUE The Co,,,unity Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated April 7, 1986, prepared by the Community Development Department. The Director responded to Council questions. Mayor Greinke opened the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. Mike Fields, 3700 Parkview I-C, 1trine, spoke in favor of General Plan Amendment 86-2c. There were no other speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed at 7:36 p.m. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, 'to approve General Plan Amendment 86-2c on the basis that it is "in the public inter- est" by bringing a high-quality medical care facility into Tustin. In response to Councilman Hoesterey, the Community Development Director stated that the property is presently approved as an apartment project for long-term or non-transient rental occupancy. If changed to Public & Institutional (P&I), all uses would require a Conditional Use Permit {CUP). If the hospital converted the apartments from long-term occupancy to short-term transiency for outpatient residency, it would constitute a change in use requiring a use permit which Council could approve or deny, and would be viewed as a violation of its present approved land use. Transiency is normally considered up to 30 days. Hotels/motels are not sup- posed to exceed that and must pay a transient occupancy tax for such. The Community Development Director responded to Council questions regarding R-3 vs. P&I zone regulations. He noted that if the hos- pital had any intention of using the property for residential-type purposes such as short-term or outpatient, they would be wisest to leave it zoned R-3. In response to the Mayor, Mr. Fields provided a preliminary time- table of when development plans for subject property will be brought back to Council. iITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 4-7-86 e Councilwoman Kennedy stated that there has not been any real assur- ance the property will not be used for drug or alcohol rehabilita- tion. When the new building was approved, the size of the hospital actually reduced, The building now being constructed is four sto- ries and is a medical office building although many people think it is a hospital. Mr, Fields. responded that the second, third and fourth floors will be medical offices for physicians. The entire first floor is devoted toward ambulatory services (one-day surgery, pharmacy, physical therapy, all outpatient services) to provide more out- patient services. He assured Councilwoman Kennedy that the hospi- tal will not be reduced further. Councilwoman Kennedy also expressed concern regarding building height. She asked about the possibility of a tenant relocation program. Mayor Greinke expressed opposition to relocation benefits in this instance. The amendment to the motion by Saltarelli to approve General Plan Amendment 86-2c with the provision that tenants be allowed up to nine months for relocation purposes if requested died for lack of a second. The amendment to the motion b~ Greinke to approve General Plan Amendment 86-2c with the provision that the applicant submit a development plan to Council within 14 months died for lack of a second. Further Council discussion followed. Councilman Edgar questioned placing a condition on the general plan amendment. The Community Development Director concurred, stating that at the General Plan Amendment stage, nothing can be done to condition same. However, the zone change process at the Planning Commission level must immediately follow, which would then come to Council. Recent legislation has allowed councils to condition zone changes with the applicant's concurrence. At that point, the Coun- cil could condition such things as number of months to vacate the property, or perhaps a relocation package stipulating a month's free rent. Such conditions could be put into the zone change only if the hospital agreed to same. The original motion by Saltarelli~ seconded by Edgar, to approve General Plan Amendment 86-2c on the basis that it is "in the public interest" by bringing a high-quality medical care facility into Tustin carried 4-1, Kennedy opposed for reasons stated. 56 GENERAL R.AN ANENDHENT 86-2e - 1800 SAN JUAN STREET - RESOLUTION NO. 86-42 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated April 7, 1986, prepared by the Community Development Department. Mayor Greinke expressed surprise that at a recent meeting of The Church of Latter Day Saints, no mention was made of this proposed amendment. He requested that the Director advise the church bishop of Council action on same. Mayor Greinke opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 86-42 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FOR 1800 SAN JUAN STREET Carried 5-0. 56 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 4-7-86 4. GENERAL PLAN AI~ENDIqENT 86-2f - 13881-13895 BROWNING AVENUE - RESO- LUTION NO. 86-43 The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated April ~, 1986, prepared by the Community Development*Department. The public.hearing was opened by. Mayor Greinke at 8:08 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. Councilman Hoesterey wondered how many other parcels under County jurisdiction were zoned single-family but developed as multi- family, and the potential for it reoccurring in the future. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to deny Gen- eral Plan Amendment 86-2f.~ Council discussion followed regarding spot zoning in general and rezoning subject property to PUD-Residential. The motion carried 5-0. 56. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to direct staff to report back to Planning Commission and Council (recognizing the idea of PUD) with a zone change recommendation; and if necessary, recommend a General Plan Amendment that would not perpetrate what is there but have a practicality of accepting what we can do. Motion carried 5-0. 56 Note: Pursuant to Council action to deny General Plan Amendment 1)'~C-~f, the following resolution was not adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 86-43 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FOR 13881 TO 13895 BROWNING, FROM (SF} SINGLE-FAMILY TO (MF) MULTI-FAJ~ILY RECESS - REDEVELOP#ENT AGENCY - RECONVENED At Councilwoman Kennedy's request, the meeting was recessed to the Redevelopment Agency at 8:19 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:41 p.m. with all members present. VI. PUBLIC INPUT Eileen Sally Vining, 400 West Main Street, thanked the Council for its action on March 17, 1986, to discontinue the study on any overlay zon- ing of Main Street. Mayor Greinke graciously thanked Mrs. Vining for her comments. VII. CONSENT CALENDAR Items 5 and 6 were removed from the Consent Calendar by Greinke, and Item 10 by Hoesterey. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Carried 5-0. e APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 7, 1986, ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING APPROVAL OF DENANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,325,508.66 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN-THE AMOUNT OF $142,388.80 5O AP~ICATION TO FILE I. ATE CLAIR - YATSUE I~MCAJIARA, CLAIM NO. 86-6 Denied the Application to File Late Claim and directed the City Clerk to notify claimant and claimant's representative of such denial, as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 ~ITY COUNCIL MINUTES rage 5, 4-7-86 RESOLUTION NO. 86-44 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 43 (Community Park- lands Act of 1986) Adopted Resolution No. 86-44 as recommended by the Director of Community and Administrative Services. 77 7. RESOLUTION NO. 06-46 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR BELL AVENUE STORM DRAIN EXTENSION AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVER- TISE FOR BIDS Adopted Resolution No. 86-46 as recommended by the Engineering Division. 91 8. RESOLUTION NO. ~-38 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CA, IN SUPPORT OF THE REMOTE ACCESS NETWORK OF THE CALIFORNIA IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (CAL-ID) Adopted Resolution No. 86-38 as recommended by the Chief of Police. 82 9. RELINOUISHIJENT OF ACCESS RIGHTS TO WALNUT AVENUE Approved the relinquishment of access rights to Walnut Avenue from Tract No. 10815; and authorized the Mayor to execute a Quitclaim Deed for said relinquishment, subject to City approval of a plan for said work, as recommended by the Direc- tor of Public Works/City Engineer. 49 Consent Calendar Item No. 5 - Fourth of July Fireworks Contract - The Director of Community and Administrative Services responded to Mayor Greinke that staff could attempt to negotiate a penalty clause for a late show start. All contracts contain the same protection for the City indemnity-wise. She highly commended Pyro Spectaculars' past per- formance record vs. San Diego Fireworks, which was contracted in 1985. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve the following: e FOURltl OF JULY FIREWORKS CONTRACT Authorize the City Manager to execute agreement in the amount of $8,900 between the City and Pyro Spectacular Fireworks Com- pany to provide a pyro-musical show for the Annual Fourth of July Celebration as recommended by the Community Services Department. The motion carried 5-0. 45; 86-19 Consent Calendar Item No. 6 - E1 Camino Real Championship Chili Cook- Off - Council concurred with Mayor Greinke's request to defer this item to coincide with New Business No. 2 (see Page 8). EL CA/IINO REAL CNAMPIONSHIP OIILI COOK-OFF - JUNE 1, 1986 Appropriate $2,000 from the General Fund as seed money for the 1986 E1 Camino Real Championship Chili Cook-off as recommended by the Recreation Superintendent. 41 Consent Calendar Item No. 10 - Compensation of Part-Time Employees - Following a question-and answer period, it was moved by Kennedy, sec- onded by Saltarelli, to adopt the following: 10. RESOLUTION NO. 86-37 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO THE COMPENSATION OF PART-TIME EMPLOYEES OF THE:CITY OF TUSTIN Carried 5-0. 79 VIII. OROINRNCE FOR INTRODUCTION 1. CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF ZONING ORDItLANCE AI4ENDMENT NO. 85-8 - PROHIBITION OF TOXIC UTE TP. MiSFER ~ATIONS - OROIMNCE NO. 954 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, '4-7-86 The Community Development Director presented the staff report as contained in his inter-com dated April 7, 1986. Frank Greinke, Jr., representing the Tustin Chamber of Commerce, stated that the Chamber's position is the ordinance is not needed because adequate protection exists for the City to prevent anything drastic from happening in Tustin, and the intent of the law was not to abolish waste oil. Councilwoman Kennedy stated that the ordinance was never meant to intimidate service stations from recycling motor oil. The idea was that Tustin did not want to be a regional center for toxic waste. If Counci~ iS hesitant to adopt an ordinance, she suggested a resolution which would let the entire county know that Tustin will not tolerate, or go through the use permit process, for a toxic waste center in Tustin. Councilman Edgar concurred with the Chamber's position that if a transfer station was proposed, it would have to .go through the individual use permit process. Council would then be obliged on the basis of the data at that particular time, to make a ruling. He felt it not necessary to create laws to attempt to streamline every use that could ever be proposed. Councilman Hoesterey stated he was in favor of the ordinance until he attended meetings of the Chamber and Orange County Fire Depart- merit and learned that 700 common chemicals are listed as hazar- dous. He noted that there is probably no business in town that does not have hazardous materials. He did not see how Council could definitively stnucture an .ordinance now that would send a message to the county that says "don't ever come here." Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli concurred with Councilwoman Kennedy. He stated Tustin is a small town, it is the only city divided into. three county supervisorial districts, and political decisions seem to wind up in Tustin. He felt .it wise that Tustin go on record that it does not want certain wastes or transfer stations. He suggested that Council ask legal staff to research the area and find out what the State and County preempt, and then perhaps con- sider a positlon paper or resolution that states there are certain things Tustin flnds unacceptable. After further discussion, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to direct legal staff to come back with a resolution or ~ which would make Tustin's position clear that it does not intend to have a toxic waste transfer station within its city boundaries. Councilman Hoesterey expressed concern that if Tustin does not address the matter on a regional basis, there will be an increase in illegal dumping of toxic wastes. Councilwoman Kennedy responded that illegal dumping is already a problem, and government must now take a position to assist industry in disposing of toxic waste and resolve the illegal dumping problem. She noted that with the mam- moth traffic problems in the City, Tustin is an unlikely safe site for a toxic waste transfer station. Frank Greinke, Jr., reiterated the Chamber's position on the mat- ter. The motion carried 5-0. 102 Note: There was no Council action on the following ordinance: OIU)XNANCE NO. 954 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 85-8 PROHIBITING THE DEVELOPMENT AND/OR OPERATION OF TOXIC WASTE TRANSFER STATIONS WITH- IN THE CITY LIMITS IX. ITY COUNCIL MINUTES cage 7, 4-7-86 ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION 1. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURE ORDINANCE & IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - ORDINANCE NO. 964 & RESOLUTION NO. 86-14 The Community Development Director presented the staff report. He stated he has met with the Chamber of Commerce and Orange County Fire Department regarding the Chamber's concerns. The Director stated that the City empowers the County to enforce fees. Council must decide whether it desires the County to bill the City or bill the businesses directly. Mayor Greinke declared an abstention on the matter. Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli presided~ The City Manager clarified that this is State mandated and it is now a question of who will pay for it. The deadline for enactment of this has passed. Fire Marshall Mike Cate spoke regarding the fees and the exception for packaged containers. It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to continue the following to April" 21 and to have some information regarding fees. ORDINANCE NO. 964 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 5600 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE DISCLOSURE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESOLUTION NO. 86-14 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN NAMING THE ORANGE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT AS THE AGENCY RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING AND ENFORCING THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE Of CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 2185 The motion carried 4-0, Greinke abstained. 102 Mayor Greinke resumed the Chair. 2. EAST TUSTIN PLANNED COI~IUNITY - ORDINANCE NO. 966 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 966 have second reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 966 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, that Ordi- nance No. 966 be passed andadopted as follows: ORDINAJICE NO. 966 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, REZONING FROM PLANNED COMMUNITY TO PLANNED COMMUNITY/RESI- DENTIAL; PLANNED COMMUNITY/COMMERCIAL; PLANNED COMMUNITY/MIXED USE AND PLANNED COMMUNITY/COMMUNITY FACILITIES FOR THE AREA BOUNDED BY: THE SANTA ANA FREEWAY {I-5) TO THE SOUTH; EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND THE UNINCORPORATED COMMUNI- TIES OF LEMON HEIGHTS AND COWAN HEIGHTS TO THE WEST; UNINCORPORATED LAND TO THE NORTH; AJiD UNINCORPORATED AREA WITHIN THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE LINE (MYFORD ROAD) FOR THE CITY OF IRVINE TO THE EAST ENCOMPASSING APPROXIMATELY 1,740 ACRES, COMMONLY KNOWN AS EAST TUSTIN {EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO). Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey,.Saltarelli Kennedy None 81 3. EAST TUSTIN PLANNED COMMUNITY - ORDINANCE NO. 967 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 967 have second reading by title only. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 967 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 967 be passed and adopted as follows: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 4-7-86 OROINANCE NO. 967 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ADOPTING SECTION 3.0 OF THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN (SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 8) AND EXHIBIT "C" AS THE LAND USE PLAN. Roll Call Vote: AYES: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Saltarelli NOES: Kennedy ABSENT: None 81 X. OLD BUSINESS None. XI. NEW BUSINESS 1. COLU~US TUSTIN PARK CONCESSION STAND PROPOSAL As recommended in the inter-com dated April 1, 1986, prepared by the Community Services Department, it was moved by Saltarelli, sec- onded by. Edgar, that a concession is appropriate at Columbus Tustin snack bar, and to direct Community Services staff and City Attorney to work together to ensure that all legal requirements are met in the process of establishing the Columbus Tustin Park Concession stand. Mayor Greinke expressed that he thought the concession stand was a good idea. He asked if the proceeds would go to the organization or to the City. The Director of Community and Administrative Ser- vices responded that staff will report back on same. She stated that the City cannot preclude what the contractor will do. The contract does contain a clause that a certain percentage of the monthly gross will be paid to the City. The motion carried 5-0. 41 The City Manager will consult with the City Attorney on whether such a proposal requires open, competitive bids. SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE - CHILI COOK-OFF AND TUSTIN TILLER DAYS Council considered this item in conjunction with Consent Calendar Item No. 6. Consent Calendar Item No. 6 - E1 Cemtno Real Championship Chili Cook-Off - The Recreation Superintendent clarified that the seed money will be replaced and then the profits will go to the Tustin Area Senior Center Fund, Inc. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to approve the following: EL CAMINO REAL O(AMPIONSHIP OIILI COOK-OFF - JUNE 1, 1986 Appropriated $2,000 from the General Fund as seed money for the 1986 E1 Camino Real Championship Chili Cook-Off as recommended by the Recreation Superintendent. Motion carried 5-0. 41 New Business Item No. 2 - Special Event Insurance - Chili Cook-Off and Tustin Tiller Days - The City Manager stated that the Council should appropriate money for insurance for the event. It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to appropriate $20,000 for insurance for the E1 Camino Real Championship Chili Cook-Off and the Tustin Tiller Days events. Following further discussion, a substitute motion was made by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to continue the matter to April 21, 1986. Carried 5-0. 41 e ITY COUNCIL MINUTES gage 9, 4-7-86 ESTABLISHMENT OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE - STREET NAME CHANGE FROM ,)AHBOREE ROAD TO TUSTIN RANCH ROAD - RESOLUTION NO. 86-47 As recommended in the inter-com dated March 28, 1986, prepared by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to: 1) Adopt the following; and RESOLUTION NO. 86-47 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE INTENTION TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF JAMBOREE ROAD, BETWEEN THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AND BRYAN AVENUE, TO TUSTIN RANCH ROAD 2) Establish the public hearing time and date to be at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, May 5, 1986. Carried 5-0. 96 4. AWARO OF BID - I~)LICE COII(OMICATIONS BUILDING NOBIFICATIOMS Bids for subject project were received as follows: Ultimo General Contractors, Dana Point South Coast Construction, Inc., E1 Toro Department of Interior Construction Co., Irvine Means & Ulrich Contractors, Santa Aha Lenn Freeman General Contractors, E1 Toro Seashore Interiors, Irvine Jen-Beck Associates, Inc., Santa Ana Adams/Mallory Construction, Stanton $16,322.00 $16,870.00 $17,500.00 $17,700.00 $21,000.00 $22,650.00 $31,965.00 $32,685.00 The third bidder was the lowest bidder who complied with all instructions during the bidding process. Pursuant to the recom- mendation contained in the inter-com dated April 1, 1986, prepared by the Chief of Police, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by ~, to award the contract for subject project to Department of ~n~erlor Construction Company,. Irvine, in the amount of $17,500.00. Carried 5-0. 82 RECESS - RECONVENED The meeting was recessed at 10:08 p.m. by Mayor Greinke. was reconvened at 10:16 p.m. with all members present. The meeting FOOTHILL/EASTERN/I-5 BOTTLENECK ANALYSIS & TOLL ROAD FEASIBILITY STUDY The Director of Public Works presented the staff report and recom- mendation as contained in his inter-com dated March 26, 1986, not- ing attachments describing the four project alternatives. Mayor Greinke suggested several changes in the letter which he felt make Tustin's position more assertive as follows: Alternative #2, second sentence - "The consultants should address these potential lane requirements as they . . ." Alternative #3 - "A quantitative amount of relief to traffic con- gestion should be indicated . ." "Additionally, the-study team should address any additional i~pacts .-.." Page 2, second paragraph, last sentence - "Widening would destroy the business community along this roadway with displacements." Page 2, third paragraph - "The Arterial Alternative should include any upgrading . . ." Councilman Edgar suggested that the letter as modified be sent. In addition, he suggested Council adopt a resolution stating Tustin's strong opposition to Irvine Boulevard and Moulton Parkway as CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 10, 4-7-86 "super" streets, and opposition to double decking of the I-5/55 Freeways. It was then moved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to: 1) 2) Authorize staff to respond to the Orange County Transportation Commission (OCTC) per the. comments/concerns outlined in the letter dated March 26, 1986, from the Director of Public Works/ City Engineer to Sharon Greene, Project Manager, Orange County Transportation Commission and as amended by Greinke; and Authorize staff to prepare a response, for signature by all Councilmembers, to the Orange County Transportation Commission specifically stating .Council's preferences and recommendations regarding the Foothill/Eastern/I-5 Bottleneck Analysis and Toll Road Feasibility Study (i.e., opposition to double-decking of I-5/55; opposition to expansion of La Colina; opposition to 1trine Boulevard, 17th Street, or Moulton Parkway as "super streets"; and opposition to "No Project" alternative. The motion carried 5-0. lO0 Mayor Greinke suggested that Council seriously consider in budget sessions the addition of a full-time transportation/traffic expert on a two-year program to assist staff in matters that will be forthcoming. The Director of Public Works/City Engineer added that the final report is due in June/July, 1986. 6. PROPOSED STREET ~ CHANGE - MYFORD ROAD TO ~IAIRBOREE ROAD As reco,)w,ended in the I nter-com dated March 28, 1986, prepared by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to direct staff to communicate with and request each involved agency, the City of Irvine and County of Orange, to initiate subject name change proceedings within their respective jurisdictions. Carried 5-0. 96 PROPOSED ~I~EET ~ CHANGE - IRVINE CENTER ORIVE/MOULTON PARKWAY/ EDINGER AVENUE TO NOULTON PARKWAY Following Council discussion regarding the inter-com dated March 28, 1986, prepared by the Director of Public Works/City Engi- neer, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to direct staff to implement a name change from Moulton Parkway to Edinger, between the Route 55 (Costa Mesa) Freeway and Harvard Avenue. The motion carried 5-0. 8. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR NEWPORT AVENUE FAU PROJECT I~..M016(002) Bids for subject project were received on March 21, 1986, follows: 96 as Stetny and Company, Inc., Fullerton Moore Electrical Contracting, Brea DBX, Inc., Temecula Baxter-Griffin Company, Inc., Stanton $188,714.00 $189,800.00 $202,222.00 $730,000.00 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to award the con- tract for subject project to Steiny and Company, Inc., Fullerton, in the amount of $188,714, as recommended in the inter-com dated March 31, 1986, prepared by the Engineering Division. Carried 5-0. 94 RWARO OF CONTRACT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF MOULTON PARKWAY ANO MYFORD ROAO Bids for subject project were received on March 18, 1986, as follows: 'ITY COUNCIL MINUTES ~age 11, 4-7-86 XII. Paxin Electric, Inc., Lancaster Steiny and Company, Inc., Fullerton Moore Electrical Contracting, Brea DBX, Inc., Temecula $ 95,212.00 $ 98,7O0.00 $105,900.00 $123,545.00 As rec6mmended in the inter-com dated March 31. 1986, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Salta- relli, to award the contract for subject project to Paxin Electric, Inc., Lancaster, in the amount of $95,212. Motion carried 5-0. 94 10. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE TWO TRAILER-MOUNTED ARROW BOARDS After a brief question-and-answer period, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to authorize the purchase of two trailer- mounted arrow boards from Starlite/Blinkerlite Safety Supply Com- pany, La Mirada, in the amount of $7,146.16 for the Water Division as recommended in the i nter-com dated March 29, 1986, prepared by the Engineering Division. Motion carried 5-0. 87 11, REVISION TO A~REE}~ENT FOR PAYMENT OF COSTS FOR INFRASll~UCTURE IMPROVEMENTS - EAST llJSTIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 12. As recommended in the inter-com dated March 26, 1986, prepared by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, it was moved by Salta- relli~ seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the revised subject agree- ment between the City and The Irvine Company; and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute same. The motion carried 5-0. 45; 86-20 AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE TWO REGENERATIVE AIR STREET SWEEPERS Bids for subject item were received on March 21, 1986, as follows: Nixon Egli, Santa Fe Springs {Broom Sweeper) Haaker Equipment, Pomona {Regenerative Air) $ 84,147.04 $103,145.42 After a question-and-answer period, it was moved by Kennedy, sec- onded by Edgar, to authorize the purchase of two Elgin Crosswind sweepers from Haaker Equipment Company, Pomona, in the amount of $202,290.84, as recommended in the inter-com dated March 29, 1986, prepared by the Engineering Division. Carried 5-0, Greinke opposed. 87 13. EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR/PARALLEL NORTH-SOUTH ROAD STUDIES As recommended in the inter-com dated March 25, 1986, prepared by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, it was moved by Salta- relli, seconded by iEdgar, to authorize staff to request the County of Orange to remove that segment of the north-south road between the Santa Ana Freeway and Santiago Canyon Road from the scope of work for the Eastern Transportation Corridor studies. Council concurred with Mayor Greinke's suggestion that the letter be signed by the Mayors of Orange and Tustin, and that it be addressed to Supervisors Tom Riley and Bruce Nestande. The motion carried 5-0. 100 There was some discussion regarding funding of the Joint Powers Agency. REPORTS 1. INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF MARCH 31, 1986 It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file subject report dated April 2, 1986, prepared by the Finance Direc- tor. Carried 5-0. 50 2. COSTA GSA (ROUTE 55) FREEWAY LANDSCAPING/WEED ABATEMENT It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file subject report dated March 28, 1986, prepared by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Carried 5-0. 54 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 12, 4-7-86 XIII. 3. FUEL STORAGE A/tO DISPI:'NSING FACILITIES A~REEMENT It was moved by Hoestere~, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file subject report dated April 1, 1986, prepared by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. After a brief question-and-answer period, the motion carried 5-0. OTHER BUSINESS REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION The City Manager requested a Closed Session for discussion of personnel matters. MAGNOLIA TREE PARK - PLAYGNOUMO EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT In accordance with Councilman Hoesterey's request, it was moved bx Hoestere~, seconded by Edgar, to appropriate $11,500 for the replacement of playground equipment at Magnolia Tree Park. The motion carried 5-0. 77 3. SEI(RTE BILL 2522 In response to Councilman Hoesterey's request that staff review SB 2522 {Senator Maddy), the Director of Community and Administrative Services stated that staff took the liberty of stating Tustin's opposition-on same. Subject bill would effective remove city zon- ing powers over establishments which sell beer and wine. 61 4. ll)J~FFIC SI&N~L AT PACIFIC & MAIN STREETS Councilman Edgar spoke regarding traffic along Main Street. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to direct staff to install a four-way stop sign at Pacific and Main Streets. Council discussion/debate followed. The Chief of Police stated that Council should be aware of lawsuits that have occurred as a result of unwarranted stop signs .being implemented in other cities. When an unwarranted stop sign/signal is installed, the liability that goes along with it must be accepted. He added that the stop signs will not eliminate traffic, but only displace it. Richard Vining, 400 West Main Street, complained about traffic on Main Street. The Chief of Police recommended a traffic signal at Pacific and Main Streets, and a four-way stop sign at Main and "B" Streets. In response to Councilman Hoesterey, the City Manager stated that staff could review the use of both Redevelopment and City funds in some proportionate share as traffic is related to the project area to pay for the traffic signal. A substitute motion was made by Hoestere~, seconded by Greinke, to direct staff to report back at the next meeting with a recommenda- tion on funding for a traffic signal at Pacific and Main Streets, and proceed from that point. The Director of Public Works explained that the project at Sycamore and Newport was connected to a Federal Aid Urban project and all the plans had to be processed and approved through CalTrans which took close to. two years. He estimated that the project would take six months total to complete, from design to signal installation. The motion carried 5-0. 94 XIV. ITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 13, 4-7-86 5. UPOATES TO THE GENERAL PLAN Councilman Edgar requested that the Community Development Depart- ment report on the exact status of all elements to the General Plan which have recently been approved. If they are delinquent, he requested a report on when Council will have a complete, updated set of the General Plan. 56 6. SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION - SIGNAL AT RED HILL & SANTA ANA FREEWAY Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli reported synchronization problems with the traffic signals at Red Hill and the Santa Ana Freeway in the last month. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded .by Edgar, to authorize a sup- plemental budget appropriation in the amount of $14,000 for replacement of the synchronization mechanism in the traffic signal control box at Red Hill and the Santa Aha Freeway. Carried 5-0. 94 7. KUDOS TO NAYOR FRANK H. GREINKE Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli commended Mayor Greinke on his service on the City Council and as Mayor during the last year. 8. WELCOME TO PEGGY BLIZZARO, THE TUSTIN NEWS Mayor Greinke extended a welcome to Peggy Blizzard. She is substi- tuting for John Orr who is awaiting the birth of his first chi'ld with his wife Donna Orr, former secretary to the City Council. 9. OFFICIAL ADJOURNMENT - CATHERINE F. FRENCH Council concurred with Councilman Hoesterey to adjourn the meeting in memory of Catherine F. French, mother of Kathy Well, Chairperson of the Tustln Planning Commission, who passed away on April 7, 1986. 84 RECESS - EXECIFFIVE SESSION; OFFICIAL AO~OURNMENT IN MEMORY OF CRTHERINE F. FRENCH At 11:19 p.m. the Council recessed to an Executive Session for discus- sion of personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957; and thence adjourned in memory of Catherine F. French to the next Adjourned Regular Meeting on Tuesday, April 15, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.; and thence to the next Regular Meeting on Monday, April 21, 1986, by unani- mous informal consent. MAYOR CITY CLERK II. MINUTES OF AN AO~OURNEO REGULAR I~ETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA APRIL 15, 1986 CALL TO OROER/PLEDGE OF aLLEGIANCE/Ue/OCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Greinke at 7:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers,,300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Greinke, and the Invocation was given by Councilman Hoesterey. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula E. Kennedy None William A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Royleen A. White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Srvcs. Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent Edward Knight, Senior Planner Ronald Nault, Finance Director Janet Hester, Administrative Secretary Approximately 90 in the audience III. CERTIFICATE OF CANVASS OF GENERAL I~JNICIPAL ELECTION - RESOLUTION NO. 86-50 The City Clerk presented the Canvass of the General Municipal Election and recommended adoption of Resolution No. 86-50. The Canvass of the election was as follows: For Member of City Council Ursula E. Kennedy John Kelly Ronald H. White Stephen D. Johnson John Norman Butler Jim Scott James A. Niemiec Eileen M. Dow Clyde F. Tracy 1,936 Votes 1,431 Votes 1,285 Votes 635 Votes 499 Votes 476 Votes 343 Votes 204 Votes 95 Votes It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 86-50 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY ON APRIL 8, 1986, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW Motion carried 5-0. IV. ADNINISTILRTION OF OATHS OF OFFICE BY THE CITY CLERK Mayor Greinke turned the meeting over to the City Clerk and left the Council dais. The City Clerk administered the Oaths of Office to Councilwoman Ursula E. Kennedy and Councilman John Kelly. Councilwoman Kennedy and Councilman Kelly took their seats on the dais as reelected and newly elected Councilpersons. REORGANIZATION OF COUNCIL 1. ELECTION OF NRYOR - DONALD J. SALTARELLI It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Councilman Saltarelli be appointed as Mayor of the City of Tustin for one year. Carried 5-0. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 4-15-86 2. ELECTION OF MAYOR PRO TEMPORE - RONALD B. HOESTEREY It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edger_, that Councilman Ronald B. Hoesterey be appointed as Mayor Pro Tempore for one year. Carried 5-0. VI. PRESENTATIONS TO FRANK H. GREINKE,"PAST MAYOR AND COUNCILMAN Mayor Saltarelli presented Frank H. Greinke with a gavel plaque for his one year service as Mayor and a plaque for his four years' service as Council- man. VII. OTHER BUSINESS Mayor Saltarelli welcomed John Kelly as a new Councilman. VIII. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn at 7:25 p.m. to a reception in City Hall. Carried 5-0. The reception will honor past Mayor and Councilman Greinke, reelected Councilwoman Kennedy, newly-elected Councilman Kelly, and newly-appointed Mayor Saltarelli and Mayor Pro Tempore Hoesterey. MAYOR CITY CLERK CONSENT CALENDAR NO. 1 5-5-86 AGENDA ITEN: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIl. 21, 1986, REGULAR )EETING *BACKGROUI~: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council April 21, 1986, will be delivered in a supplemental packet. held on