HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 05-19-86ACTION AGENDA
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR ~ETING
MAY 12, 1986
REPORTS
NO, 1
5-19-86
CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC CONCERNS:
Present: Wetl, Puckett, Baker; Absent: Hc Carthy
(Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
Minutes of April 28, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting.
Final Tract Map No. 85-362.
Vacation and abandonment of Myford Road at Dow Avenue.
Commissioner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to approve the consent calendar.
cart¶ed 3-0.
)q]~INGS
Mort on
4. USE PERMIT 86-16
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Mr. Hagop Ourfilian
14254 Newport Avenue
Authorization for installation of an on-site beer and wine sales
license.
Presentation: Laura Cay Pickup, Assistant Planner
Coe~tsstoner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to approve
adoptton of Resolution No. 2330. Motion carrted 3-0.
Use Permit 86-16 by the
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUB,]ECl':
APPLICANT:
OMNER:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENVTRONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
PAY 12, 1986
FTNAL PARCEL PAP 85-362
HETRO ENGINEERING
ARS PARTNERSHIP
SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF NALNUT STREET AND NEHPORT AVENUE.
COI~ERCIAL GENERAL (CG) AND RETAIL (~RCIAL (C-1)
THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
C.E.O.A.: CLASS 15
AUTHORIZATION TO CREATE ONE PARCEL FROM FOUR EXISTING PARCELS
RECOIIdlENDED ACTION:
Recommend t'o the City Council approval of Ftnal Parcel Map 85-362 by
adoption of Resolution No. 2331.
PROJECT ANALYSIS:
the
The applicant is proposing a 9,790 square foot retail shopping center at the
southeasterly corner of Newport and Walnut Street. The proposed map of .75
acres consolidates four (4) lots into one (1) lot in order to accommodate the
retail center. The map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan and
the Zoning Ordinance.
On November 12, 1985 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
tentative map by the adoption of Resolution No. 2279. On November 18, 1985 the
City Council approved the tentative map by the adoption of Resolution No.
85-111.
All the conditions of approval have been complied with and the final map is in
substantial compliance with the tentative map.
EDWARD M. KNIGHT,
Senior Planner
ssoclate anner
MAC:pef
Attachments: Resolution No. 2331
Community Development Department
BLOCIC ,MOOt.IL.E
· ~ OF TENTATIVE~
PARCEL MAP
O. ?~.;; ACRSr ~
ONE
PARCEL MAP NQ 85~62..,,.
IN THE CITYOF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF OflANG~
STATE OF CAI.JFO~NIA
BEING A LOT CONSOLIDATION Of' LOTS 9,10,ll &APO~TION OF I;~
OF MARTIN'~ ADDITION TO 'rile TOWN OF TUSTIN, AS SHOWN
ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 19, PAGE '/cj~ MISC~ ~ ANEOU$
RECORDS OF ~ ANGEL~$ COUNTY, CN. IFORNIA
METRO ENGINEERIN~
MICHAEL SANCHEZ m_q 5508
SHEET I OF.-.~ SH~£T$
i~4NNINO COMA4~ION C~/FI~AT~:
,.,.-,~,,,,, PARCEL MAP NO 85-362.
IN ~ ~l'rY ~lr TUI'I'IN,COLE17 17 ~
· ~rATF. 01mr C,~LiirORWA ·
I~'TRO [N~INF.~RIN~
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2331
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF FINAL
PARCEL MAP 85-362 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY
CORNER OF WALNUT STREET AND NEWPORT AVENUE
The Planning Commission of the city of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
That Final Parcel Map No. 85-362 was submitted to the Planning
Commission pursuant to Ordinance No. 847 by Metro Engineering
requesting authorization to create one parcel from four existing
parcels for the property known as Lots 9, 10, 11, 12 in Block B
of Martin's Addition as recorded in Book 19, page 79 of
miscellaneous records of Los Angeles County, California.
That said map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General
Plan.
II.
That this project Is categorically exempt from the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act; Class 15.
That the final map is in substancial compliance with the
tentative map.
The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council
approval of Final Parcel Map No. 85-362 subject to the
final approval of the City Engineer.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 1985.
KATHY WEIL, Chairman
PENNI FOLEY, Recording Secretary
~ATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
APRIL ~1, 1986
DON LA~, DIRECTOR OF COIqldIJNITY DEVELOPtqENT
PUBLIC MORKS/ENGINEERING DIVISION
Inter- Corn
STEM # 3
VACATION AND ADANDOIflENT OF KfFORD ROAD AT DOg AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION:
I% is reco~nded that the Tustin Planning Commission, at their meeting of May 12,
1986, find the abandonment of Myford Road is categorically exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act (C.E.Q.A.) requirement and' that the
CommiSsion pass and adopt the attached Resolution recommending to the City Council
disposition of surplus road right-of-way on Myford Road at Dow Avenue.
BACKGROUND:
On May 19, 1986, the City Council will be considering adoption of a Resolution
declaring the City's intent to vacate and abandon a portion of Myford Road and
setting a date for public hearing.
That portion of Myford Road to be abandoned is described and delineated on
Exhibits A and B attached to the Planning Commission Resolution.
The abandonment of this surplus right-of-way has been requested by the Irvine
Industrial Research and Development Company per the attached correspondence and is
no longer needed for public street purposes.
Assistant City Engineer
DAW/BL/jr
Attachments
Bob Led~
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
March 13, 1986
Bob Ledendecker
City Engineer
CITY OF TUSTIN
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
RE= Tract #12490 Street Vacation
Dear Bob:
Attached is a legal description and exhibit indicating the
proposed vacation of 1209 sq ft which we had previously
discussed. I would appreciate your starting the vacation
process.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Cordially,
Gerald C. Weeks
Sr. Director Business Development
GCW: vm-d
550 C Newport Center Drive, P.O. Box I, Newport Beach, California 92658-8904 (714) 720-2400
A DivisiOn of The Irvine Company
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF MYFORD
ROAD PROPOSED VACATION
THAT PORTION OF MYFORD ROAD, IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON MAP FILED IN BOOK 114, PAGE 31 AND 32 OF PARCEL
MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE IN THE CENTERLINE OF
SAID MYFORD ROAD SHOWN ON SAID MAP AS HAVING A BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N 4° 04' 09"
W 528.46 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID MYFORD ROAD SOUTH 85° 55'
51" WEST 50.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY
HAVING A RADIUS OF 27.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 85° 55' 51"
EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39° 47' 29"
AN ARC DISTANCE OF 18.75 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY
HAVING A RADIUS OF 70.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 1° 03' 22"
WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50° 42' 37"
AN ARC DISTANCE 61.95 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF SAID MYFORD ROAD;
THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE SOUTH 4° 04' 09" EAST 38.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 1209.0 SQUARE FEET.
~ (
50'
~LAT TO ACCOMPANY LE~At- DE~CI~I~TION
OF PF.O~O~ED lv~'l'l=Ol~,D I~OA~ VAC-A'TIOk[
ADAMS/STREETER
CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC.
17981 SKY PARK CIRCLE, SUITE M
IRVlNE, CALIFORNIA 92714
PHONE 714o250.1540
L
/0 - ?..I- 55
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ON
MYFORD ROAD AT DOW AVENUE
The Planntng Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows:
1. The Planning Commission 'finds and determines as follows:
Re
That a proper application was filed by the Irvine Industrial
Research and Development Company for the purpose of determining
the needs, if any, of public right-of-way known as Myford Road as
described by Exhibit "A" and as delineated on Exhibit "B" attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as set forth
herein in full.
That the subject property should be declared excess to the City's
needs and disposed of for private development for the following
reasons:
The road alignment and configuration of Myford Road has been
constructed to its ultimate alignment which vacates subject
area.
Ce
2. The property is not suitable nor adequate for other public
purposes, such as parks or recreational needs.
3. There is no present known use of the property as street
right-of-way.
That pursuant to Section 8330 of the Streets and Highways Code for
the State of California, it is possible to reserve public interest
in easements for sewer, storm drains, and utility purposes.
That the Commission recommends the vacation of the easement for
street purposes to the adjoining property owner without fee.
Subject project is categorically exempt from the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act.
That the vacation of the subject street right-of-way will be in
conformance with the City of Tustin General Plan.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution 2332
Page ~o
The Planning Commission, pursuant to Sections 37350 and 65402 of the
Government code, hereby recommends to the City Council the declaration
of the subject parcel as excess to the needs of the City and its
disposition to the adjoining property owner with the reservation of
easements to conduct, maintain, operate, replace, remove and renew
those facilities necessary' for -storm drain, sewers, and public
utilities.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City
of Tustin, California, held on the day of 198
KATHY WEIL, Chairman
PENNI FOLEY, Recording Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, PENNI FOLEY, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Recording
Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that
Resolution No. 2332 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Tustin Planning Commission, held on the day of , 198
PENN[ ~OLEY
Recording Secretary
Report to the
Planning Commission
ITEM # 4
DATE: RAY 12, i986
SUB~IECT:
USE PERMIT 86-16
APPLICANT:
!~. HAGOP OURFILIAN
3801PARKVIEN LANE, 23 O
IR¥INE, CA. 92715
PROPERTY OMNER: DONALD SIEVEKE
7817 SANDBERG LANE
ORANGE, CA. 92669
LOCATION!
14254 NENPORT AVENUE
ZONING:
C-G C(XI~RCIAL GENERAL
ENYIROlmENTAL
STATUS: CATEGORICALLY EXEHPT (CLASS 21)
REQUEST:
AUTHORIZATION FOR INSTALLATION OF AN ON-SITE BEER AND NINE SALES
LICENSE.
RECOI~ENDED ACTION:
That the Planning Commission approve Use Permit 86-16 by the adoption
Resolution No. 2330.
S~Y:
of
Mr. Ourfilian is now applying for an on-site beer and wine license in order to
supplement the newly revised menu offered by the cafe'. Staff has considered
the issues regarding this request for beer and wine sales as outlined below.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS:
In considering an application for authorization to install an alcoholic beverage
sales establishment, certain basic issues are raised, along with any others
which may be unique to a particular application. This request has, as an
on-site sales license, certain built-tn remedies that can be used to avoid
particular problems associated with liquor sales. The following issues have
, Community Development Department
The applicant, Mr. Ourfilian, has recently purchased the cafe' located in the
small center behind Carl's Jr. Restaurant on Newport Avenue. Since Mr.
Ourfiltan has operated the business, he has made some minor interior changes and
has also completely revised the image of the services offered at the now called
"Jacques Cafe'".
Planntng Commission Repeort
May 12, 1986
Page two
been identified by staff when considering this request: proximity to schools;
the type of establishment Selling alcoholic beverages; and saturation of
alcoholic beverage sales establishments in the area.
The closest public school to Jacques Cafe' is Beswick Elementary School which is
approximately 3200 feet away (over one-half mile). Of most concern to staff is
the proximity to high school age students. Tustin High School is approximately
4200 feet or over three-quarters of a mile away from this location.
As with all alcoholic beverage sales licenses the Community Development
department considers that the maintenance of the intended use be preserved of
utmost importance. In this case, this request is intended to allow sales of
beer and wine as a supplement to a unique cafe' type menu. Therefore, this
location should remain as a restaurant in order to keep the license active.
Although Jacques Cafe' is located a fair distance away from public schools,
there are two other alcoholic beverage, sales establishments adjacent to this
restaurant. One is a convenience market (off-site sales), the other is the
Newport Five Cocktail Lounge which holds an on-site sales license. This request
involves on-site sales, which can be conditioned in order to avoid possible
problems. Staff has formulated the following requirements for this application
conditions of approval" ' ·
All alcoholic beverages must be consumed on-site.
This location' shall
restaurant use be
forfeited.
be maintained as a restaurant,' should the
discontinued, the liquor license must be
The menu of this restaurant must consist primarily of foods prepared
on-site.
4. No "bar" type seating is allowed in this establishment.
With these conditions, it will be possible to maintain the integrity of the
business and avoid future problems with liquor sales at this location.
Assistant Planner
LCP:pef
· 'I)~ARD M. KNIGHT,
Senior Planner
Attachments: Resolution No. 2330
Floor Plan
Enclosed: Site Plan
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14:
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2330
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN AUTHORIZING USE PERMIT NO. 86-16
TO ALLOW THE ON-SITE SALES OF BEER AND WINE IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT USE AT 14254 NEWPORT
AVENUE.
The Planning
follows:
Commission of the city of Tustin does hereby resolve as
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
That a proper application (Use Permit 86-16) has been filed by
Mr. Hagop Ourfiltan on behalf of Jacque's Cafe requesting
authorization for on-site sales of beer and wine at 14254
Newport Avenue.
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of other persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
1. The sale Of'beer and wine is for on-site consumption only.
No schools are located in the immediate area, therefore the
use should not have any detrimental effect on children.
(Closest school is approximately 3200 feet away.)
That the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the city of Tustin, and should be
granted.
Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as
administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal, and street
improvement requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
That'this project is categorically exempt from the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 21.
G. Final development plans shall require the review and approval of
the Community Development Department.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2322
Page t~o
II.
The Planntng Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No.
86-16 to authorize the tssuance of an on-site beer and wtne sales
ltcense In conjunction with a restaurant use at 14254 Newport Avenue
subject to the following conditions:
That authorization for an on-stte beer and wtne sales license is
contingent upon the use in the subject sufte remaining a
restaurant. At such ttme that the restaurant use is
discontinued, authorization for the beer and wtne sales license
will be rescinded.
B. That a menu be metntatned which conststs prtmert]y of foods that
are prepared on the premises.
Ce
That no alcoholic beverages may be sold for consumption off the
premises.
D. That no bar seating is allowed.
That the applicant complete and return an "Agreement to
Conditions Imposed" form prior to installation of beer and wine
sales.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tusttn Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 198
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
PENNI FOLEY,
Recording Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, PENNI FOLEY, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Recording
Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tusttn, California;
that Resolution No. 2330 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting
of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the day of
1986. ,
PENNI FOLEY
Recording Secretary
_ FOR RENOVATIONS OF
"JACQUES' CAFE & CATERING"
14254 Newport Ave, Tustin, CA.
(2)
~_+1000 sq-ft
X
(3)
TABLE I
[DINING
x
(v)
.o. o_
,(vl) x
- - -M3~?CE ,~. I
17'6"
The marked numbers indicate future renovations:
(1) The shaded area indicates flue part of the Walk-in refrfgerator which
will be ~emoved.
(2) Red line indicates an 11" high opening, between marked wall and cei-
ling, which will be sealed.
{3) Fi~ze decorative electric wall 1-,~'~s will be added at all x marks in
Dining Area,'
(4) All Pmbl.es-seat 4 persons each, except (VII) & (VIII) are for two r:
persons only. ~otal capacity is therefore around 28.
Report to the
Planning Commission
~TEM # 5
DATE:
SUB,]ECT:
APPLICAEI':
PROPERTY
Ot~IER:
LOCATI ON:
ZONING:
ENV IROI~IEErAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
MAY 12, '1986
USE P~P~IT 86-18
!~. ~IOE RKCALUZO
12 RED ROCK
IRVINE, CA. 92715
THSTIN CORPORATE PARK, LTD.
3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 100
NE'~ORT BEACH, CA. 92660
2512 #ALNUT MENUE, UNIT 3
PC-COI~q, PLANNED COI~qUNITY COI~ERCIAL
CATAGORICALLY EXERPT (CLASS 21)
AUTHORIZATION FOR INSTALLATION OF Ali OIl-SITE BEER AND WINE SALES
LICENSE.
RECOI~ENDED ACTION:
That the Planntng Commission
Resolution No. 2329.
approve Use Permit 86-18 by the adoption of
SLII~IARY:
As part of the Tusttn Corporate Plaza:located at the southwest corner of Walnut
and Franklin Avenues, a small retail center has been developed. In Unit 3 of
this four unit center, a small sandwich shop called Stuffer's 101 Sandwiches has
been installed. This particular restaurant is part of a chain of sandwich shops
called "The Tumn~y Stuffer".
The proprietor, Mr. Joe Macaluzo, is requesting authorization to sell beer and
wine as part of his services. The license type requested would allow for
on-site consun~tion, therefore restrictions can be applied to maintain the
restaurant and assure all beverages are consumed on-site.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS:
In reviewing this request, the following issues were identified: proximity to
schools; restriction of beer and wine sales to on-site consumption; and
maintenance of the integrity of the business establishment. It is staff's
contention that, if properly conditioned, this request is appropriate for the
location intended.
, Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
May 12, 1986
Page two
The closest school to Stuffer's is C. R. Nelson £1ementary School which is 4400
'feet (over three-quarters of a mile) away. The actual land uses surrounding
Stuffer's are mostly industrial in nature, therefore, residential neighborhoods
are not adjacent to this site.
As with all new on-site liquor sales licenses, the Planning Commission and staff
have expressed concerns regarding the overall effect of the establishment. In
this case, Stuffer's is expected to serve people working in the nearby
industrial complexes. In order to avoid possible removal of the restaurant,
staff considers the following conditions appropriate for this application:
e
That authorization for an on-site beer and wine license is
contingent upon the use in the subject unit remaining a
restaurant. At such time that the restaurant use is discontinued,
authorization for the beer and wine sales license will be
rbsctnded.
That a menu be maintained which consists primarily of foods that
are prepared on the premises.
That no alcoholic beverages may be sold for consumption off the
premises.
That no "bar" seating is allowed.
That the sale of alcoholic beverages be limited to the hours of 9
a.m. to 6 p.m. These hours may be extended with the approval of
the Community Development Director.
As with all Use Permits, should any violation of the conditions of approval take
place, or the general health, safety or welfare of Tustin residents be
endangered, the Planning Commission can reconsider the approval of beer and wine
sales at this location.
LAURA CAY P~XUP,- ~-
Assistant PYanner
~~ARD M~T~
Senior Planner
LCP:pef
Attachments: Site Plan
Floor Plan
Resolution No. 2329
Community Development Department
'1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2329
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN AUTHORIZING USE PERMIT HO. 86-18
TO ALLOW THE OH-SITE SALES OF BEER AND WINE IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT USE AT 2512 WALNUT
AVENUE, UNIT 3.
The Planning Commission of the city of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
Be
Ge
That a proper application (Use Permit 86-18) has been filed by
Mr. Joe Macaluzo on behalf of Stuffer's requesting
authorization for on-site sales of beer and wine at 2512 Walnut
Avenue, Unit 3.
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of other persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
1. The sale of beer and wine is for on-site consumption only.
e
No schools are located in the immediate area, therefore the
use should not have any detrimental effect bn 'children.
(Closest school is approximately 4400 feet away.)
That the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the city of Tustin, and should be
granted.
Proposed development shall be in accordance wi th the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as
administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal, and street
improvement requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
That this project is categorically exempt from the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 21.
Final development plans shall require the review and approval of
the Community Development Department.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2329
Page t~o
II.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No.
86-18 to authorize the issuance of an beer and wine sales license in
conjunction with a restaurant use at 2512 Walnut Avenue, Unit 3,
subject to the following conditions:
The authorization for an on-site beer and wine sales license is
contingent upon the use in the subject location remaining a
restaurant. At such time that the restaurant use is
discontinued, authorization for the beer and wine sales license
will be rescinded.
B. A menu will be maintained which consists primarily of foods that
are prepared on the premises.
C. No elcoholic beverages may' be sold for consumption off the
premises.
D. No bar seating shall be allowed.
Ee
The sale of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to the hours of
g a.m. to 6 p.m.. These hours may be extended with the approval
of the Communtty~evelopment Director.
That the applicant complete an "Agreement to Conditions Imposed"
form prior to installation of beer and wine sales.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 198
PENNI FOLEY,
Recording Secretary
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, PENNI FOLEY, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Recording
Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California;
that Resolution No. 2329 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting
of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the day of
19 '
PENNI FOLEY,
Recording Secretary
Planntng Commission Action Agenda
May [2, [986
Page two
5. USE PERMIT 86-18
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Mr. Joe Macaluzo
2512 Walnut Avenue, Unit 3
Authorization for installation of an on-site beer and wine sales
license.
Presentation: Laura Cay Pickup, Assistant Planner
Commissioner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to approve Use Permit 86-18 by the
adoption of Resolution #o. 2329. Motion carrted 3-0.
AD#I#ISTRATIVE MATTERS
Old Business
6. MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN, PHASE I RESIDENTIAL
Presentation: Jeffrey S. Davis, Associate Planner
Commissioner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to approve the Master Landscape Plan,
Phase I Residential by the adoption of Resolution No. 2333 wtth some minor chart§es.
Motion carrted 3-0.
7. POLICY DETERMINATION: TEMPORARY BANNER SIGNS ON PARK FENCES
Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
Commissioner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to direct staff to prepare a Temporary
Banner St§n Policy to be subnflttod at the next Commission meeting. Motion carried
3-0.
~ Business
STAFF CONCERNS
8. Report on Council Actions, May 5, 1986.
Presentation:
Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
)IS$IO# CO#CER#S
ADdOUR#NEMT
Conmtsstoner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to adjourn at 8:50 p.a.
3-0.
Motion carried
AGENDA
TUSTIN PLANNING COll4IS$ION
REGULAR ll~ETING
HAY 12, 1986
CALL TO ORDER:
7:30 p.m., Ctty Counctl Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL:
Wetl, McCarthy, Puckett, Baker
PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Ltmtted to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE ANO WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
1. Minutes of April 28, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting.
2. Final Tract Map No. 85-362.
3. Vacation and abandonment of Myford Road at Dow Avenue.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. USE PERMIT 86-16
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Mr. Hagop Ourfilian
14254 Newport Avenue
Authorization for installation of an on-site beer and wine sales
license.
Presentation: Laura Cay Pickup, Assistant Planner
Planning Commission Agenda
May 12, 1986
Page two
S. U.~E PERMIT 86-18
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Presentation:
Mr. Joe Macaluzo
2512 Walnut Avenue, Unit 3
authorization for installation
license.
of an on-site beer and wine sales
Laura Cay Pickup, Assistant Planner
AI)MIIlISll~A?IYE NATll~RS
OTd Business
6. MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN, PHAS__E I RESIDENTIAL
Presentation: Jeffrey S. Davis, Associate Planner
7. POLICY DETERMINATION.- TEMPORARY BANNER SIGNS ON PARK FENCES
Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
Ney Business
STAFF CONCERNS
8. Report on Council Actions, May 5, 1986.
Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
COP, IMISSZO# CONCERNS
ADgOURNMENT
MINUTES
TUSTIN PLANNING CQPItI$$ION
REGULAR PEETING
APRIL 28, 1986
CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., Ctty Counctl Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGXAIiCE/IliVOCATION
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATION:
PUBLIC CONCERLS:
CONS[NT CALENDAR:
1. Minutes of Apr11 14, 1986 Planntng Commission Meeting.
2. Ftnal Tract Map, Tract Ho. 12345
3. Resolution Ho. 2323 for Vartance 86-3, Carver Development.
Commissioner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to approve the
Commissioner Well asked that Itom 3 be removed from
Present: Wetl, McCarthy, Puckett, Baker
Commissioner Wet1 presented a proclamation to Ronald White,
former Commissioner, for hts service on the Planning Commission.
Hone
separately. The Commissioners all agreed.
Vote on Item 3:3-1 (He11).
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. USE PEP~IT 86-17
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Morton on
St. Cecilia's Catholic Church
1301 Sycamore Avenue
To construct two permanent storage areas
hall.
Presentation:
Commissioner Hell
consent calendar.
the calendar and considered
Items 1 and 2 carried 4-0.
onto existing parish
Jeffrey S. Davis, Associate Planner
asked if there were any responses to the Public Hearing notice.
Staff responded that there were none.
The public hearing was opened at 7:40 p.m. It was closed at 7:41 p.m.
Commissioner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to approve Use Permit
adoption of Resolution No. 2325. Motion carried 4-0.
86-17 by the
Plannlng Comrisslon Hlnutes
Apr11 28, 1986
Page two
5. USE PERMIT 86-3
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Presentation:
PacTel Mobile Access
1171 E1 Camino Real (Formerly Laguna)
Authorization to install a 77 foot tall antenna and a 572 square
foot building on the Tustin High School site.
Jeffrey S. Davis, Associate Planner
The public hearing was opened at 7:48 p.m.
Mr. Netl Fitzpatrick and Mr. Rick Dannell, representatives of PacTel, 151Kalmus Dr.,
Costa Mesa, Ca., spoke in favor of the project.
A discussion followed between Commission, Staff, Mr. Nell Fitzpatrick, and Mr. Rick
Dannell (representatives of PacTel) regarding: other locations; access ways to the
ball field and fire routes; effect on television and telephone reception; and
location of other antennas in the area.
Mr. Pete Van Dyken, 235 South "A" Street, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, questioned if PacTel
would be responsible for any property taxes.
Mr. Arvel Nelson, representing the Church on Red Hill stated that he was there to
observe the proceedings.
The public hearing was closed at 8:03 p.m.
Comflsstoner Puckett moved to approve Use Permit 86-3 subject to the conditions in
Resolution No. 2328. Motion failed due to lack of second.
Chairman Well moved to add Item 4. to section A of Resolution 2328 as follows: This
Use Permit is granted based on a 6 (six) month review by the Commission, requiring a
public hearing. If there are no complaints a permanent Use Permit would be
provided. Motion failed due to lack of second.
Staff stated that with the power of revocation, the Commission could respond to
justifiable complaints in an appropriate manner.
Commissioner Puckett moved, Wetl seconded to approve Use Permit 86-3 by approval of
Resolution No. 2328. Motion failed vote: ayes - 2; noes - 1 (Baker); abstention - 1
(Mc Carthy).
Commissioner Baker moved to continue this item in order to give the Commission an
opportunity to observe the other antennas on-site before approving this project.
Motion failed due to lack of second.
Commissioner Puckett moved, Wetl seconded to approve Use Permit 86-3 by the adoption
of, and subject to the conditions of, Resolution No. 2328. Motion carried 3-0
Commissioner Mc Carthy abstained.
Planning Commission Htnutes
Apr11 28, 1986
Page three
6. ZONE CHANGE 86-2
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Physician's Office Services on behalf of Healthcare Services
1101 Sycamore Avenue
To change the zone from Multiple-Family (R-3) to Public
Institutional (P&I).
and
Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
Commissioner Wetl asked if there were any responses from the public hearing notice.
There was a letter from Mr. Leonard R. Markwttz, 1476! Del Amo Avenue, Tustin, Ca.,
g2680, stating that he did not want any additional traffic added to the area.
The public hearing was opened at 8:25 p.m.
Mike Fields, 3700 Parkviow, Irvtne, Ca., 92715, representative of Physician's Office
~v~, stated that he had met with staff and tenants of Rancho La Paz. A decision
was made to give the tenants a 6 (six) month notice and to refund their security
deposit within 30 days after that notice is given.
Commissioner Mc Carth) asked if any single family residents were invited to that
meeting. Staff invited all tenants and surrounding property owners to the meeting.
However, no property owners attended the meeting.
Commissioner Baker asked what Healthcare had in mind for that location. Mr. Field
replied that there were no plans yet.
, 1192 Sycamore Avenue, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, spoke in opposition of the
that the area be kept as family housing. She is concerned with the
trafffic problems and the possible effect on property values in the area.
Staff responded'that the zone change was for the Rancho La Paz complex only. Any use
of this area would require a Use Permit from the Planning Commission which would
automatically become a public hearing item. At that time all affected property
owners would be notified. Also, the traffic problem could be mitigated at that time.
Rae Lee, P. O. Box 634, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, a Rancho La Paz resident, was concerned
that there would be a zone change without a plan. She also questioned whether the
rent reduction after the 6 month notice was 30% or one-third. Staff clarified that
it was one-third.
Kar)n Ramsberg, 1101 S.E. Sycamore Avenue, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, stated that the
tenants of Rancho La Paz were kept well informed.
Pete Van DTken, 235 South "A" Street, Tusttn, Ca., 92680, stated that if the
residents are concerned about the value of their homes, possibly Healthcare should be
responsible to compensate those owners for the devaluation.
At Commissioner Wetl's request staff explained the General Plan/Zone Change
procedure whereby the General Plan and the zoning map must be in compliance.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 28, 1986
Page four
Janet Tyler, 1101 S.E. Sycamore
apartments on Del Amo are run down.
Paz had been kept well informed.
Avenue, Tustin, Ca., 92680, stated that the
She also stated that the tenants of Rancho La
The public hearing was closed at 8:40 p.m.
A discussion followed between Commission, staff and Mr. Fields regarding the height
of the proposed buildings. Staff stated that a height restriction could be set at
the time of the Use Permit application.
Chairman Wetl moved, Puckett seconded to recommend to City Council the approval of
Zone Change 86-2 by the adoption of Resolution 2327. The following amendments were
made:
1. That the security deposit shall be refunded within 30 days of the 6 month
notice. Amendment carried 4-0.
2. That no demelishton permits shall be issued until all tenants have
vacated the entire premises. Amendment carried 4-0.
That the buildings to be constructed on the premises shall not exceed
stories or 30 feet. Amendment carried 3-1 (Puckett).
All potential new tenants shall be notified of the pending change of use
of the property before signing a lease to rent. Amendment carried 4-0.
Motion carried 4-0.
7. USE PERMIT 86-9
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Mr. Lance Luffee on behalf of Pineapple Hill Restaurants
654 East First Street
To authorize the on-site sales of general liquor in conjunction
with a restaurant use.
Presentation: Laura Cay Pickup, Assistant Planner
The public hearing was opened at 9:00 p.m.
Lance Luffee, 4454 Van Nuys Blvd., Sherman Oaks, Ca., 91405, gave a brief description
of the decor and services intended for this location. The hours would be 11:00 a.m.
to 2:00 a.m. He has no intent to make this a beer bar.
The public hearing was closed at 9:08 p.m.
Commissioner Puckett moved, Baker seconded to approve Use Permit 86-g by the adoption
of Resolution No. 2322. Motion carried 4-0.
AI]#I#ISllL~TIVE
Old Business
A recess was called at g:10 p.m. The Commission reconvened at 9:lg'p.m. -
Planntng Commission Minutes
April 28, 1986
Page ftve
AIMqI#I~'RATIVE I~qTTERS
Old Bustness
8. TUSTIN AUTO CENTER LOUDSPEAKER CRITERIA
Presentation: Laura Cay Ptckup, Assistant Planner
Commissioner Mc Carthy moved to place thts 1rem on the next agenda as a public
hearing. Motion fatled due to lack of second.
Bonnie Holmes, representing the Irvtne Company, gave an explanation of the process of
the loudspeaker study.
Oavtd Dubbtnk, of David Oubbtnk Associates, made a 30 mtnute computer analysts
presentation Illustrating notse levels.
Hubert Clark, lg42 San Juan, Tustin, Ca., g2680, representing San Juan Homeowners
Association, thanked the Ctty for the letter and the Zrvtne Company for their
cooperation and reports. However, he has some concerns that there are not enough
controls placed on the Individual dealers in this matter. He was also concerned
about the g foot Wall that is proposed for Jamboree and Browning.
Carol Taylor, 13532 Farmtngton Rd., Tusttn, Ca., 92680, encouraged the use of a
paging system.
Alice Huber, 13882 Da11 Lane, Tustin, Ca., 92680, asked that the beeper system be
Implemented.
Michael Mc Lean, representing Mc Lean Cadillac, spoke regarding Mc Lean's tntended
use of a combined loudspeaker/pager system.
A discussion followed between Commission, Bonnie Holmes, Mr. Dubbtnk, Mr. Mc Lean,
and staff.
Commissioner Puckett moved, Wet1 seconded to direct staff to prepare a resolution
including the conditions of approval of the Loudspeaker Criteria. Motion failed
vote: ayes - 2; no - ! (Mc Carthy); Commissioner Baker abstained.
Commissioner Mc Carthy moved to direct staff to draft a resolution and hold a public
~'earing. Motlon fatled due to lack of second.
Commissioner Puckett moved to direct staff to draft a resolution and open the item to
public hearing. Motion failed due to lack of second.
Commissioner Puckett moved , Mc Carthy seconded to direct staff to: 1.) draft a
resolution including the conditions of approval; and 2.) to direct staff to notice
this item for public hearing. Motion carried 3-0. Commissioner Baker abstained.
g. TUSTIN AUTO CENTER MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN/SIGN CRITERIA
Presentation: Laura Cay Pickup, Assistant Planner
Planning CommissiOn Mtnutes
Apr11 28, 1986
Page stx
Commissioner Mc Carth¥ moved, Baker seconded to approve the East Tustln Master
Oevelop~ent Plan Sign Crlterta by the adoption of Resolution No. 2326. Morton
carrted 4-0.
Ney Busfness
10. POLICY DETERMINATION: TEMPORARY BANNER SIGNS ON PARK FENCFS
Staff recommended that this item be delayed unttl the next scheduled meeting (May 12
1986). ,
STAFF CONCERNS
11. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS APRIL 21, 1986
Presentation: Donald D. Lame, Dtrector of 'Community Development
The following actions were taken:
e
City Counctl has approved the Hazardous Materials Disclosure Ordinance.
The Chili Cook-off has been cancelled due to insurance costs.
Council .appealed Variance 86-3, Carver Development signs. It will be put on
the next Council agenda as a public hearing.
The Redevelopment'Agency approved the Senior Citizen Center.
CQIII(ZSSION CONCERNS
Commissioner Mc Carthy noted his concerns regarding the parktng situation at the
French Quarter Center.
Commissioner Net1 asked staff to research the ltghts on Red Htll at the Acura dealer.
AIX]OURliNENT
Commissioner Mc Carth¥ moved, Puckett seconded to adjourn the meeting at 11:25 p m.
Motion carried 4-0. ·
PENNI FOLEY,
Recording Secretary
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION;
E)rf IROIIFENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
RAY 12, 1986
RASTER LANDSCAPE THE~E PLAN/EAST TUSTIN RESIDENTIAL, PHASE I.
111E IRVINE COI4PANY
SSO I~'tgP~ CENTER DRIVE
NENPORT 9EACH, CA., 92660-9969
ENTZRE RESZDENT~AL PRO~TECT AREA ADJOZNZNG BYRAIi AVENUE,
BROldlIZNG AVENUE, EL CAJ4INO REAL, TUSTIN RANCH ROAD, AND
STREETS 'A' AND 'B'.
ElrfIRONRENTAL ]RPACT REPORT 84-3 gAS PREPARED /diD CERTIFIED
FOR I)EVELOPRENT OF TilE SUI~IECT PROdECT AREA.
PLANNZNG COI4HISSION APPROVAL OF THE RASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR
EAST TUSTIN RESIDENTIAL PHASE i.
RECOI~ENDED ACTION:
Tha~ the Commission approve the conceptual landscape plan for East Tustin, Phase
! by the adoptton of Resolution No. 2333 subject to the conditions contained
therein.
$1ilg~Y:
In accordance with Planned Community Regulations adopted for East Tusttn Phase
! Residential, the Planntng Commission must revtow and approve a master
landscape theme plan for the enttre project area. As submitted, the plan
tncludes spectftc ~ypes and varieties of landscape matertal to be used as well
as a perimeter wall plan.
The plan Submitted meets all minimum requirements of Phase ! Planned Community
Regulations and only the more detetled aspects of the proposal warrant
Commission consideration.
In general, the varieties of plant material proposed are compateble with each
other creating the desired theme effect. However, staff is concerned with the
minimum size of plants proposed, and wtll recommend that some of the smaller
plant sizes be increased.
Community De%,elopment Department
Planntng Commission Report
Hay 12, 1986
Page two
Ftnally, the plan tncludes provisions for construction of Wall and berm features
creating sound barrters that mttlgate trafflc notse generated from the Santa Ana
Freeway, E1Camlno Real, Bryan and Browning Avenues and Tustln Ranch Road.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSTON:
On July 1, 1985, the East Tusttn (Phase I Residential) Planned Community
Regulations were adopted by the City Council. Included wtthtn these regulations
is the stipulation that a master perimeter landscape plan must be approved by
the Planntng Commission prior to development of any parcel within the area. The
stated goal of such a plan is to ensure uniform and consistent landscape
treatment throughout the entire project area. Details of perimeter wall
metertals and colors are also to be tncluded in the master theme plan.
After several meetings with Community Development Staff, the Irvtne Company has
pcepared and submitted a proposed landscape plan for Commission cevtew. In the
following analysts section a comprehensive discussion of landscape setbacks,
types and stzes of plant metertals, and the perimeter wall requirements wtll be
presented.
AML~SI$:
To somewhat stmpllfy the analysts of the subject proposal, a 11stlng of
plant matortals to be used is summarized on Table [. To further stmpltfy thts
revlew, the project area wtll be dtvtded tnto secttons and each section wtll be
discussed ~ndtvtdually.
Section 1: Brzan Avenue between Browning Avenue and Tustln Ranch Road.
As required by adopted Planned Community Regulations, Bryan Avenue will
have a 24 foot wide landscape strip. This dimension, as ts the case
throughout the project area ts measured from the face of curb bordering
adjacent publtc streets.
The landscape palette for this particular strip can be summarized' as
follows:
Corners of Bryan /Browning and Bryan/Tustin Ranch Road will be
provided with a minimum of four (4) "field grown" olive trees which
wtll be complimented with the Nerium Oleander.
Corners of Bryan at "B" Street will be planted with a minimum of six
(6) 48 inch box type Carrot Wood trees and highlighted with five
gallon size Raphiolepis "Springtime".
Community Development Department
Planntng Commission Report
May 12, 1986
Page three
The balance of the landscape area will be planted with Eucalyptus
Camaldulensts at a ratio of 1:40 lineal feet; Eucalyptus Maculata at
a ratio of 1:100 lineal feet; and will include shrubbery and ground
cover consisting of the Pittosporum 'Vartegata'; Abelia Grandiflora,
Lontcera Japonica and turf. All shrubs throughout the plan shall be
a minimum of five (5) gallon size.
Staff ts co~ortable with this proposed plant schedule in terms of
"density". However, the minimum tree size is of concern. The
Irvtne Company is proposing that of each type of Eucalyptus
provided, 75% be five gallon size and 25% in 15 gallon size.
Staff's recommendation is that these proportions be reversed to some
extent. It is recommended that 60% of all Eucalyptus trees be a
minimum of 15 gallon, and 40% be permitted to be a minimum of five
gallon size. This recommendation is extended to all areas where the
Eucalyptus varieties are used.
Section II: Tustln Ranch. Road between Bryan Avenue and the Santa Ana Freeway.
This 20 foot wide landscape strtp tncludes the same Eucalyptus tree mix as
Section I. Furthermore, the corner treatment of E1Camino Real and Tusttn
Ranch Road is Identical to the intersection of Bryan Avenue and "B" Street
in Section I. A difference in this sectlon co~q~ared to Section 'I is the
use of Escallonta 'Rosea' in place of the Abella Grandtflora.
Section III: The area roughly paralleling the Santa Ana Freeway between Tustin
Ranch Road and Browning Avenue.
Once again, the primary and secondary trees in this area are Eucalyptus
Camaldulensls and Eucalyptus Maculata. However, since the landscape area
along this strip is in excess of 30 feet wide and in an effort to mitigate
adverse impacts of the Santa Aha Freeway, the "density" of these trees has
been increased. For this section the Eucalyptus Camaldulensts at a ratio
of 1:20 ltneal feet and the Eucalyptus Maculata at a ratio of 1:45 lineal
feet wtll be required. Additionally, the ground cover in this section
consists of Nertum Oleander and Japanese Honeysuckle. In this section
extensive use of bermtng and sound wall treatment is utilized. More
discussion on the wall will follow in a later section of this report.
Section IV: Browning Avenue between E1 Camtno Real and Bryan Avenue.
As can be seen in the attached Exhibit "A", the extensive landscape area
has been provided along Browning Avenue particularly between E1 Camtno
Real and San Juan. This large open space area has been provided in
response to the need for controlling overflow drainage. As such, there is
a swale that traverses the area splitting it into two sections. With this
larger open space area, the number and varieties of plant material used
Cornrnunity DevelOpment Department
Planntng Commission Report
May, 12, 1986
Page four
has been increased. The primary tree for the area ts again, the
Eucalyptus Camaldulensts provided at a'ratio of 1:40 ltneal feet on each
side of the drainage swale. The secondary tree within the strip is the
Eucalyptus Maculate provided at a ratio of l:lO0 ltneal feet tn the area
west of the s~ale, and 1:50 ltneal feet in the area east of the wale.
Additionally, Canary Island Pines in 24 inch box and ~5 gallon sizes have
been provided tn the swale. The overall ratto of these trees is 1:75
ltneal feet west of the swale and 1:150 lineal feet east of the swale.
The last of major trees to be planted in thts area has been grouped near
the north section of E1 Camino Real and Browning Avenue and conststs of
fifteen (~S) 36 inch box Carrotwood trees. In the area north of San Juan
to Browning, the same landscape pattern delineated in Section I ts
utilized.
At thts point tt should be pointed out that thts overflow area ts only a
temporary solutton unttl ftnal improvements for the E1 Modena Flood Control.
Channel are complete. Ultimately, this area may be uttltzed as a portton of a
freeway overpass, or in fact may be developed as a part of a single-family
houstng tract proposed in the area..
Section V: "A" Street between Browntn9 Avenue and "B" Street.
At both Intersections each corner will be planted with a minimum of six
(6) 48 inch box Carrotwood trees. Along the north side of "A" Street the
repeating pattern of Eucalyptus varieties wtll be employed. At a proposed
entry into a single family housing tract, additional Carrotwoods will be
used to highlight the access point. Ground cover and shrubs on the north
side are proposed to be Ptttosporum Tobtra, Raphtolepts 'Springtime', and
turf.
On the other hand, the south side of "A" Street is a little different.
The primary tree is still the Eucalyptus Camaldulensis in the standard
quantity. However, the secondary tree is a 36 inch box type pine tree.
This alteration in pattern will no doubt increase the attractiveness of
the pedestrian oriented parkway which includes a meandering sidewalk
feature. On this side of "A" Street the ground cover consists mostly of
turf further enhancing the pedestrian orientation.
Section VI: "B" Street between Bryan Avenue and E1 Camino Real.
As a major gate-way into Phase I, "B" Street echoes the tree theme present
in the previous sections. At Bryan Avenue, six large Carrotwoods set the
tone for the remainder of the street. Along the west side of "B" Street
both varieties of Eucalyptus trees are used at the recommended ratio, and
each entry point into a subdivision is framed with 48 inch Carrotwoods.
Combinations of complementing ground cover and turf are also provided.
Community De"veioprnent Department
Planntng Commission Report
Hay 12, 1986
Page five
The east side of "B" Street uses the same pattern and plant type, however,
the number of Carrotwoods at each subdivision entry is doubled, and the
meandering sidewalk concept is utilized. Additionally, two 48 inch box
type Ptnus Halepensts trees are shown Immediately adjacent to the proposed
park site. When taken in conjunction with the "A" Street treatment, the
east side of "B" Street, acts as a transition area leading into the park.
Section VII: E1Camtno Real between Tusttn Ranch Road and Brownin9 Avenue.
This final sectton may be the most important area within the overall
plan. E1 Camino Real serves as a major connection route between
established development, and future development in the entire East Tustin
Project Area. E1 Camtno Real serves the Auto Center and provides a
circulation pattern from downtown and the Santa Aha Freeway to Tustin
Ranch Road. Additionally, perimeter landscaping along this street is an
integral part of a sound attenuation plan which mitigates adverse noise
impacts of the Santa Aha Freeway.
From Tusttn Ranch Road, along the northerly side of E1 Camtno Real, a park
oriented landscape plan is used. With a meandering sidewalk; extensive
use of turf; a large landscape area (approximately 40 feet wide); double
the number of both types of Eucalyptus trees; and the inclusion of five
(5) 48 inch box Ptnus Halepensis and the five (5) 24 inch box Pinus
Canartensis, a substancial buffer has been provided between proposed
residential units and E1 Camtno Real. Staying on the north side of the
street, from "B' Street to Browning Avenue, the landscape treatment in
Section VI is extended onto E1 Camino Real.
The final 'anaiysts section of this report revolves around the perimeter wall
plan. The basic wall concept ts.depicted in the attached Exhibit "A". Exhibit
"B" shows the type of tract wall that will be constructed. Pursuant to Phase I
Planning Commission Regulations, top of tract walls, where required, must be a
minimum of 6'8" above the finished garde of public sidewalk or top of curb,
whichever is higher. The proposed wall plan meets this requirement.
Combination wall/berm heights, measured from top of curb adjacent to streets is
summarized in Table II.
With the slump stone type wall proposed and the use of bermed areas, noise
standards required by City regulations can be met. As to the aesthetic quality,
staff's major concern would be along the Browning Avenue sections. However,
with the large set-back area and the substantial increase in plant materials
staff is confident that the wall treatment will be attractive and unobtrusive.
Community De'veiopmem Dcpanmem
Planntn. g Commission Report
Hay 12, 1986
Page stx
COMCLOSXOMS:
Gtven the types, varieties.and modtfted stzes of trees and landscaping meter1=ls
proposed, staff concludes that the letter and fntent o¢ PhaSe ! regulations have
been met tn-terms of a master theme ]andscape plan. Addtttona]]y, concerns over
mitigating trafftc notse Impacting the project area have been sufficiently
addressed. Accordingly, tt ts recommended that the Commission approve the Phase
! Master Landscape Concep~ Plan by the adoptton of Resolution No. 2333.
Associate Planner
JSO:pef
Attechmen~s:
Table !
'Table !!
Resolution No. 2333
Exhtbtt "A"
Exhtbtt "B
Sentor Planner
Community Development Department
TABLE !
BOTANICAL NAME
Cupanta
Anacardtotdes
'Eucalyptus
Camaldulensts
Eucalyptus
Haculata
Abella
Grandtflora
Ptttosporum
Tob~ra
Lonlcera
Japontca
0lea Europaea
Hertum Oleander
'Petite'
Raphtolepts
'Springtime'
Escallonta,
'Rosea'
PI nu s
Halepensts
LcPtnus
anarienst s
COIIION RARE
Carrotwood
DESCRIPTION
Red Gum
Evergreen tree reaching 20 to 30
feet htgh wtth an open branching
spread of approxtmatoly 20 feet.
A ' very common and popular
eucalyptus tree capable of growing
to over 100 feet.
Spotted
Red Gum
Another common eucalyptus tree,
smaller than the Red Gum growing
to a height of approximately 50 to
75 feet.
Glossy
Abelta
Tobtra
Japanese
Honeysuckle
Olive
Evergreen reaching a height of
approximately 8 feet wt.th a five
foot spread. A flowering plant
displaying white or pink flowers.
Broad dense shrub or small tree
approximately 6 to 15 feet tall.
Dense leaves patterns wtth creamy
white flowers with orange blossoms
fragrance.
Evergreen vtne wtth deep green
leaves climbfng to 15 feet
covertng 150 square feet.
20 to 30 foot hlgh fruit bearing
olive tree.
Oleander
Evergreen shrub,
growtng to about 3
hetght.
flowering,
to 4 feet in
Vigorous evergreen shrub bearing
deep pink flowers.
An evergreen shrub growtng to 7
feet wtth shtney oval leaves
bearing whtte to red flowers
clustors.
Aleppo Plne
A moderate to fast growing pine
tree which generally grows to
between 30 to 60 feet.
Canary Island Another fast growing pine
Pine reaches a height of 80 feet.
Community Development Department -
which
T~EI
eOT XC .
Dodonaea V~scosa
'Purpurea'
dasm~ntum Humt]e
Xylosma 'Congestum'
CgI~OII BARE
Purple Hop Bush
Pcallan Jasmtne
DESCRIPTION
Evergreen shrub, can be pruned as
a hedge or can be left unpruned.
Known for its purple flowers
Evergreen shrub with wtllowtng
shoots to 20 feet high which droop
to form a l0 foot "mound". Bears
light green leaves with b~tght
yellow flower cluster.
Evergreen dectdtous shrub 8 to 10
feet high as well as wide.
-2-
Community Development Department
T~£II
LOCATION
SETBACK
BERM HEIGHT OR WALL
· ~'r"~'~C I A L HE It~HT
OVERALL HEIGHT
FROM CURB TOP
Bryan between
Browning and
"B" Street
20' mtntmal 7'-8' 7'-8'
Bryan between
"B" and Tusttn
Ranch Road
20' 2'-3' 6'-7'
approximately
Tusttn Ranch
Road between
Bryan and E1
Camtno Real
24'
2'-3' increasing 6'-7'
up to 12.5'
Tustln Ranch mtntmum of
Road beteen E1 24'
Candno Real and
project boundary
2'-3' Increasing 6'-7'
up to 13'
freeway side.
Area Paralleling
Santa Ana Freeway
from Tusttn Ranch
Road to Browning
H/A 6.5' 6'-7'
up to 13'
E1 Camtno Real
between "B" St.
and Browntng
20'
mtntmum to 3' 5'-6' 6'-7'
Browning between
E1Camtno Real
and Jan Marie
160' 2'-3' 6'-7'
Community Development Department
T~EII
LOCATION
SETBACK
BERM HEIGHT OR t~ALL
~C I~A,L 1TLF~e~HT
OVERALL HEIGHT
Brmentng between
Jan Matte and
San Juan
140' 2'-3' 5'-6'
approximately.
9'
Browntng between 20'-110'
San Juan and "A"
approximately 3' 5'-6'
Browntng between
"A" and Bryan
20'. mtntmal 6'-7' 6'-7'
-2-
Community Development Department
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
17
18
10
20
21
~7
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2333
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING THE MASTER
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR EAST TUSTIN
PHASE I RESIDENTIAL
The Planning Commission of the City of Tusttn finds and determines as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
Ae
That in accordance with adopted 'Planned Community Regulations ·
governing development in the area commonly known as East Tustin
Phase I Residential a master landscape and perimeter wall plan
has been prepared and submitted for Commission review.
That by utilizing a varlety of comparable plant materials and
various sizes of trees, and by incorporating a cohesive
integrated plan oriented towards the proposed park site, the
intent of the Planned Community Regulations calling for a theme
landscape plan has been met;
C. That Environmental Impact Report 84-3 was prepared and certified
for development within the project area.
II.
The Planning Commission hereby approves the Master Landscape Plan for
East Tusttn Phase I Residential subject to the following conditions:
That all trees, shrubs and ground cover specifically called out
on plans reviewed by the Planning Commission shall be planted in
accordance with those plans. Precise location of plant material
and alignment of sidewalk elements shall be approved by the
Director of Community Development.
B. In all locations calling for Eucalyptus Camaldulensts, said
trees shall be planted in the following proportions:
must be a minimum of fifteen (15) gallon size.
2. 40% may be a minimum of five (5) gallon size.
C. In all locations calling for Eucalyptus Maculata, said trees
shall be planted in the following proportions:
1. 60% must be a minimum of fifteen (15) gallon size.
2. 40% may be a minimum of five (5) gallon size.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution go. 2333
Page two
De
Quantities of trees to be planted tn various locations shall be
as follows:
e
e
e
Corner of Bryan at Browntng- minimum of four (4) fteld
grown 0lea Europaea trees.
Corner of Bryan at Tusttn Ranch Road -mtntmum of four (4)
gro~n Olea Europaea trees,
Each corner of Bryan at "B" Street -mtntmum of stx (6) 48
tnch box type Cupantopsts Anacardtotdes.
Except tn areas Indicated In Sectton ZI. 6 of thts
Resolution, where Eucalyptus Camaldulensts are used, satd
trees shall be planted at a ratio of one tree for every 40
1tn,al feet of landscape area.
Except tn areas tndicatod tn Sectton IZ. 7 of thts
Reso]utton, where Eucalyptus Maculata are used, satd trees
shall be planted at a ratto of one t~ee for every 100
1tn.al feet of landscape area.
For the landscape area bounding the southerly portton of
the project area and roughly paralleling the Santa Ana
Freeway, Eucalyptus Camaldulensts shall be planted at a
ratio of one tree for every 20 11neal feet. This ~atto
will also be used tn the area along the northerly stde of
E1Camtno Real between Tusttn Ranch Road and the park stte.
For the landscape area along Browning Avenue between E1
Camtno Real and San Juan, to the east of the requtred
dratnage swale, Eucalyptus Maculata shall be planted at a
ratio of one tree for every 50 11neal feet of landscape
area. This ratio wtll also be used tn the area along the
northerly std, of E1 Camtno Real between Tusttn Ranch Road
and the park site.
The corners of E1Camtno Real at Tusttn Ranch Road shall be
planted wtth a mtntmum of six (6) 48 inch box Cupaniopsts
Anacardtotdes trees.
10.
Ntthtn the drainage swale area along Browning Avenue, 24
1rich Ptnus Canartensts trees at a ratio of one tree for
every 75 1tn,al feet must be provided west of the swale.
Further, the same size tree must be provided at a 1:150
ratto tn the area east of the s~ale. Finally, a minimum of
fifteen (15) 36 inch box Cupantopsts Anacardtotdes trees.
A minimum of six (6) 48 inch Carrotwood trees will be
required on each corner of "A" Street at Browning and "A"
Street at "B" Street.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2333
Page three
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
A minimum of three (3) 36 inch box Plnus Halepensis will be
planted along the south side of "A" Street and clustered as
shown on the plans reviewed by the Commission.
Entry points into residential subdivisions off the west
side of "B" Street shall be 48 inch box type Carrotwoods.
On the east side of "B" Street, immediately adjacent to the
park site a minimum of two (2) 48 inch box Pinus Halepensis
shall be planted.
On the north side of E1 Camtno Real between Tusttn Ranch
Road and the park site the following trees shall be used in
addition to these noted in Sections II. 6 and II. 7 of this
resolution:
Five (5) 24 inch box Ptnus Canartensts
Five (5) 48 inch box Pinus Canartensts
Heights of walls shall be in accordance with Planned
Community Regulations for Phase I. Final construction
drawings shall include notes specifically identifying
locations where minimum barrier heights for sound
attenuations must be achieved as determined by a noise
study conducted by Mestre Greve Associates dated March 28,
1986.
Pertmater walls shall be split face block complete with a
brick trim cap.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tusttn Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 198
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
PENNI FOLEY,
Recording Secretary
WALL ,PLAN
AVE.
(~
.(
0
n-
O
Z
Z
I-
)-
TA ANA . FREEWAY
LEGEND
B COMMUNITY WALL/PRODUCT WALL
...... PRODUCT PARTIAL WALL
A-'7
, eport to the
Planning Commission
ITEM #7
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MAY 12, 1986
PLANNING COliI~ISSZON
COHHUNZTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
POLICY DETERMINATION: TEMPORARY BANNER SIGNS ON PARK FENCES
RECOMMENOED ACTION:
Direct staff to prepare a resolution for adoption at the next Planning
Commission meeting reflecting Planning Commission's policy toward temporary
banner signs on park fences.
DISCUSSION:
For several years public park fences have been a favorite location for the
installation of temporary cloth or paper banner type signs advertising community
wide events. In particular the chain link fence along Irvine Boulevard at
Columbus Tustin Park has been used by the city's Community Services Department
to advertise enrollment dates for city recreation programs. Since the city owns
the park site the banners are considered on-site advertising related to the
property owner.
Recently several signs have been appearing on park and school ground fences
placed there by such groups as the Lions Club, Rotary Club, and Assistance
League. It has been staff's position that unless the sign relates to a city
sponsored event such as Tiller Days, Chili Cook-off, or recreation programs, all
others are in effect off-premises advertising. We have taken that position to
prohibit the uncontrolled placement of signs by private businesses who wish to
advertise away from their business site.
The city sign code specifically regulates permanent on-site signing. Temporary
signing, however, has been delegated to the Director of Community Development
for review and approval. While private businesses in Tustin have the capability
of signing on their own property, most non-profit organizations are not property
owners, and therefore, can only advertise through the newspaper, in store-front
windows, or on park fences. To assist our community groups, staff proposes the
Planning Commission adopt a formal policy allowing temporary placement of banner
signs, subject to the following:
~ ...... Corn munity Development Department
Planning Commission Report
May 12, 1986
Page Two
All temporary banner signs will require written approval from the Community
Development Department prior to placement on any park or school ground
fencing.
2. The banners shall, be made of quality materials, professionally drawn, and
not dangerously distracting to motorists.
3. No more than two banners shall be maintained on any park or school fence at
the same time.
4. Banners shall be limited to legitimate Tustin non-profit organizations,
which specifically excludes private businesses or election related signing.
5. Banners shall not be permitted to remain on park or school ground fencing in
excess of fourteen (14) days.per calendar quarter each year.
Director of Community Development
DDL:cd
Corn munity Development Department
, teport to the
Planning Commission
STEM #7
DATE:
TO:
FRO#:
SUB~]ECT:
MAY 12, 1986
PLANNING COBI~ISSION
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
POLICY DETER~IMATION: TEMPORARY BANNER SIGNS ON PARK FENCES
RECOIIRENDED ACTION:
Direct staff to prepare a resolution for adoption at the next Planning
Commission meeting reflecting Planntng Commission's poltcy toward temporary
banner signs on park fences.
DISCUSSION:
For several years ~ublic park fences have been a favorite location for the
installation of temporary cloth or paper banner type signs advertising community
wide events. In particular the chain link fence along Irvine Boulevard at
Columbus Tusttn Park has been used by the city's Community Services Department
to advertise enrollment dates for city recreation programs. Since the city owns
the park site the banners are considered on-site advertising related to the
property owner.
Recently several signs have been appearing on park and school ground fences
placed there by such groups as the Lions Club, Rotary Club, and Assistance
League. It has been staff's position that unless the sign relates to a city
sponsored event such as Tiller Days, Chili Cook-off, or recreation programs, all
others are in effect off-premises advertising. We have taken that position to
prohibit the uncontrolled placement of signs by private businesses who wish to
advertise away from their business site.
The city sign code specifically regulates permanent on-site signing. Temporary
signing, however, has been delegated to the Director of Community Development
for review and approval. While private businesses in Tusttn have the capability
of signing on their own property, most non-profit organizations are not property
owners, and therefore, can only advertise through the newspaper, in store-front
windows, or on park fences. To assist our community groups, staff proposes the
Planning Commission adopt a formal policy allowing temporary placement of banner
signs, subject to the following:
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
May 12, 1986
Page Two
All temporary banner signs will require written approval from the Community
Development Department prior to placement on any park or school ground
fencing.
2. The banners shall be made of quality materials, professionally drawn, and
not dangerously distracting to motorists.
3. No more than two banners shall be maintained on any park or school fence at
the same time.
4. Banners shall be limited to legitimate Tustin non-profit organizations,
which specifically excludes private businesses or election related signing.
5. Banners shall not be permitted to remain on park or school ground fencing in
excess of fourteen (14) days per calendar quarter each year.
Director of Community Development
DDL:cd '
Corn munity Development Department
ACTION AGENDA ~ A REGULAR I~LrTING
OF llJE llISTXN CIl~ COUICIL
MAY 5, 1986
7:00 P.M.
7:00 I.
ALL PRESENT I I.
III.
PRESENTED TO
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ROLL CALL
PROCLAMATIONS
1. FIRE SERVICE RECOGNITION DAY
BA~AI. ION CHIEF HAROLD FEROIO
PI~ESENTI~) 11) 2. OLDER AMERICANS MONTH
ISADELLE ~mc CLEMENTS
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
NONE V.
VI.
APPROVED
~OVED
PUBLIC INPUT
CONSENT CALENDAR
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - APRIL 7, 1986, REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 15, 1986, ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 21, 1986, REGULAR MEETING
2. APPROVAL. OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT .OF $497,950.75
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $142,396.83
APPROVED STAFF 3.
RECOI~EROATION
APPROVED STAFF 4.
RECOI~iROATION
REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 86-5; CLAIMANT: STEVEN DOUGLAS GREEN; DATE OF
LOSS: 12/4/85; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 2/28/86
Reject subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney's Office.
REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 86-7; CLAIMANT: CAROL PETRY; DATE OF LOSS:
1/9/86; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 4/4/86
Reject subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney's Office.
ADOPTED RES(LUTION 5. RESOLUTION NO. 86-56 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NO. ~-56 TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF
NOTICE OF COMPLETION (Sully Miller Contracting Company - Assessment
District 85-1 Improvements, Jamboree Road and Laguna Road)
Adopt Resolution No. 86-56; and assuming no claims or stop payment
notices are filed 30 days after date of recordation, authorize pay-
ment of final 10% retention amount as recommended by the Public
Works Department, Engineering Division.
ADOPTED RESO~UTIOM 6.
NO. 86-57
RESOLUTION NO. 86-57 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF
NOTICE OF COMPLETION (Blair Paving, Inc. - Fiscal Year 1985-86 Pavement
Rehabilitation and Asphalt Concrete Overla~ Program)
Adopt Resolution No. 86-57; and assuming no claims or stop payment
notices are filed 30 days after date of recordation, authorize pay-
ment of final 10% retention amount as recommended by the Public
Works Department, Engineering Division.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA PAGE I 5-5-86
APPROVED STAFF
~IMDATIOll
ADOPTEI) RESOLUTION 8.
NO. 86-59
ADOPTED 10.
RESOLUTION #0. 86-1
ADOPTED 11.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-55
AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 86-47 - RESOLUTION FOR INTENTION OF STREET
NAME CHANGE FROM JAMBOREE ROAD TO TUSTIN RANCH ROAD
Amend Resolution No. 86-47 to change the date set for the public
hearing from May 5, 1986, to May 19, 1986, as recommended by the
Public Works Department, Engineering Division.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-59 - A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
T1JSTIN SETTING A TIME AND PLACE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
DESIGNATION AND ADOPTION OF AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT REQUIRING
THE REMOVAL OF POLES, OVERHEAD WIRES AND ASSOCIATED OVERHEAD STRUCTURES
WITHIN THE AREA OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN LOCATED ~ NEWPORT AVENUE BETWEEN
325 FEET NORTHERLY OF BRYAN AVENUE AND WASS STREET, WHICH AREA IS MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND ON THAT CER-
TAIN MAP ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AND CITY ENGINEER OF
THE CITY OF TUSTIN
Adopt Resolution No. 86-59 as recommended by the Public Works
Department, Engi neeri ng Di vi si on.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-58 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN SEI'~ING A TIME AND PLACE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
DESIGNATION AND ADOPTION OF AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT REQUIRING
THE REMOVAL OF POLES, OVERHEAD WIRES AND ASSOCIATED OVERHEAD STRUCTURES
WITHIN THE AREA OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN LOCATED ON HOLT AVENUE BETWEEN
NEWPORT AVENUE AND IRVINE BOULEVARD, AND IRVINE BOULEVARD BETWEEN HOLT
AVENUE AND NEWPORT AVENUE WHICH AREA IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
EXHIBIT "A" AI'FACHED HERETO AND ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AND CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
Adopt Resolution No. 86-58 as recommended by the Public Works
Department, Engi neeri ng Di vi si on.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-1 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CAi. IFORNIA, ESTABLISHING FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES FOR THE
DEPARTMENTS OF LEGISLATION, POLICE, AND WATER SERVICE BILLING
Adopt Resolution No. 86-1 as approved by the City Manager.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-55 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 12345 (Phase I Residential, East
Tustin)
Adopt Resolution No. 86-55; authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute the Parkland Agreement between the City and The Irvine Com-
pany; and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Land-
scape Maintenance Agreement between the City and The Irvine Company
as recommended by the Cc,,,.unlty Development Department.
VII. ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCED
OROIllANCE RD. 968
WITH CHANGE IN
SECTION le FROM 24
HRS. TO 48 HRS.
1. STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES ON PUBLIC ROADWAY - ORDINANCE NO. 968
ORDINANCE NO. 968 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TUSTIN CITY CODE SECTIONS 5340e, 5330e AND
SECTION 5311 RELATIVE TO THE STORAGE OF VEHICLES ON PUBLIC ROADWAYS
Recommendation: M.O. - That Ordinance No. 968 have first reading by
title only.
M.O. - That Ordinance No. 968 be introduced.
VIII. ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION - None
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA PAGE 2 5-5-86
IX. OLD BUSINESS
DRll~) ~ll~RNA- DRAFT EIR-EIS FOR THE SANTA ANA FREEWAY (I-5) FREEWAY WIDENING PROJECT
~t~E 2a ~'ll{ RECOM.- BETWEEN ROUTE 405 AND ROUTE 55
MENDATION THAT AFTER THE H~ EXPERIHENT IS OVER, WE NDUI.D I~UCE OUR POSITION CLEAR ON THAT.
Recommendation: Support Alternative 3B as the City's preferred alterna-
tive for the Santa Aha Freeway Widening Project; and authorize staff to
transmit the letter of City concerns and comments on the Draft EIR-EIS
document to CalTrans.
IKSTAI=I SI~S AT 2.
PACIFIC & MAIN AMD
lB' STREET & MAIN,
RE)~)VE P~PPERll~EE AT
'B' STREET AND IWRIN,
MAIN STREET TRAFFIC CONTROLS ()rAIN STREET AT "B" STREET INTERSECTION)
Recon~nendation: 1) That the Tustln City Council not authorize a
four-way stop sign installation at subject intersection;
2) That the California Pepper tree at the southwesterly corner be
AND TRAFFIC $IfilML removed and red zones installed at the easterly and westerly Main Street
CONTROL BI~I'~ORS, WHIR approaches; and
IN COLOR, BE Rd~CED OR 3) That a traffic signal not be installed at subject intersection at
THE ROAD SURFAC~, this time.
E~OUND OR I~%IN, ~ OF THE FREEWAY ORIDGE APPROACHING THE NEW SIGNAL LIGHT TO WARN DRIVERS
OF THE APPROACHIR~ SIGNAL LIGHTS. THESE BUTTOMS WOULD BE U~ED IN COl&)UNCTION WITH SIGNS,
PAINTED OR THE ~ SIBE OF HAIM EET, STATING SIGIIAJ. A~EAD. THE FUNDING TO BE FROM REDE-
VELOPf~NT AGENCY.
X. NEW BUSINESS
APPROVED STAFF
R,~J)I~I!MOATION
APPROVED STAFF 2.
RECOI~NDATIOR
1. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR BELL AVENUE STORM DRAIN EXTENSION
Recommendation: Award the contract for subject project to Gillespie
Construction, Inc., Costa Mesa, in the amount of $96,673.50.
AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR EL CAMINO REAL EXTENSION FROM TUSTIN AUTO CENTER
TO MYFORD ROAD
XI.
Recommendation: Award contract for subject project to'S.A. Healy Co.,
Azusa, in the amount of $684,073.50.
REPORTS
RATIFIH)
RECEIVED AND FILED 2.
DELAYED UNTIL
FURTHER REPORT
1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA - APRIL 28, 1986
All actions of the Planning commission become final unless appealed by
the City Council or member of the public.
INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF APRIL 30, 1986
Recommendation: Receive and file.
3. MAIN STREET UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES AND STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION
Pleasure of the City Council.
Recommendation:
TAKEN SOMEONE TO S#ALL CLAIHS COURT
EDGAR XII. OTHER BUSINESS
r !STED A REPORT OR A FE~ INSTANCES MJERE k~ HAVE
k._.~DING A TRAFFIC TICKET.
STAFF TO SEND A LETTER TO CURRIE ~IUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL COMMENDING THE~ OR PLACING 41'1t N4ONG 39
SCilQQL$ IN Ni ~U)E]4IC P~NT~THLON NID THEY ~LSO Pt.~ED FIRST IN A SUPER ~UIZ COHPL:TITION.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA PAGE 3 5-5-86
CI~JI~IL #O~ED TO A6EI~)ITI: FOg ~ ~I~ ~E ~SIBILI~ ~ ~ID~TI~ ~E~IO~.
~LI ~A~ IF ~E ~ ~-~E~ION, ~ I~ED ~ REAPPOI~ ~ ~T ~ ~CO
~IC ~ER.
S~T~LI ~R~ ~T ~ ~RI~ HI~Y FI~I~ ~ ~ ~E BO~D. ~ ~PERVIS~S ~
YO~ ~ I~L~ $1~,~ ~L~ATIOR ~ ~ CI~ ~ ~IN ~ATIVE ~ ~E I~RSE~ION ~
R~HILL ~D ~.
~E~I~ ~RER ~ ~I~I~ ~NI~ ~I~I~S F~ ~ 19, 19~, ~I~ ~ ~ L~ERS
TO ~ESE~ ~ISSI~RS ~IFYI~ ~ ~T ~IR ~ ~ILL ~PIRE JUNE 1, 1~, ~ IF ~EY
ARE I~RE~ IR ~YI~, P~ ~IFY ~ ~IL.
XI I I. ~JOURNMENT
To the next Regular Meeting on Monday, May Ig, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA PAGE 4 5-5-86
ACTZON AGENDA OF A REGULAR II~ETING OF
THE TUSTIN RED£VELOPHENT AGENCY
MAY $, 1986
7:00 P.M.
8:20 1, CALL TO ORDER
ALL 2. ROLL CALL
PRESENT
APPROVED 3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - APRIL 7, 1986, REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 21, 1986, REGULAR MEETING
NOVEl) TO 4. OTHER BUSINESS
APPROPRIATE FUNOS FOR SZGNAL AT MAZN STREET AMI) 'B' STREET NOT TO EXCEED SgO,O00.
8:22 5. AOOOURNMENT
To the next Regular Meeting on May 19, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION AGENDA PAGE 1 5-5-86