Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 06-02-86r III. 11[. ~ TO OIIIIER/~ OF ~L{.EalNI~/IIWOCATIOW The meeting was ;alle~ to order by t4ayor Saltarellf at 7:02 p.m. in the City Council Chanmers, 300 Ce~enntal ~ay. The Pl~ge of Allegiance was 1~ ~y Counc~l~n.~el]y, a~ ~he Invocation was g~ven by ~ayor Pro T~ H~ter~, Counctlpersons Present: Count1] persons Absent: Others Present: Donald J. Saltare111, Mayor Ronald 8. ,oesterey, Mayor Pro Tam Richard B. Edga~ John Kelly Ursula ED Kennedy None ~tlltam A. Huston, City Nenager Ja~s G, Rourke, City Attorney Wary E. ~ynn, Ctty Clerk Donald D. La.~., Ca.. Development Oirector Robert S, Ledendecker, Otr, of Public Norks Charles R, Thayer, Chief of Police Royleen A. ~htte, O~r, of Com, & Admtn. Srvcs. Ronald A. Nau]t, Finance £dwa~l N. KntgWc, Senior Planner Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent Approxlmetely 40 in the audience PROCI. AWRTION I{k'T]REWENT OF CLIFF EVERT, WRInTEWANCE SUPERINTENDENT Mayor Saitarellt honored C11ff Ever'c, Naintenence Superintendent, by present~ng btm wttha proclamation in recognition of sixteen years of service to the City. Mr. Ever~ expressed his thanks ~o the Council. 84 FiI~LiC HF.~IIr, S COWTZNI~) CONSZDERAT]OW ~ AN~L ~ V~RIANCE NO. 86-3 - TUSTIN The Coal.unity Oevelopment Director presented the staff repor~ as contained in the intar-com dated June 2, 1986, prepared by the Cam- muntty Devel'opment Department. The Otrector stated that subsequen~ to Council appeal of April Carver submttteq a Justification packet dated May 22, 1986. Page 2 contains an outline cRar~ tden~lfying four businesses concerning wa1] stgntng ~or spaces 23 through 26, .~n ~ntch Ca~ver has analyzed Code requirements, the vartanca approved by Planning Commission, and their reques~ this eventng. SubJec~ request is outside of was approved by the Planning Cmmtsston. It is staff's opinion Council may only consider Planning Co~tsston actions of Aprll 14, If Council ~{shes to consider additional expansion of the variance, staff recommends Council refer the matter back to the Planning Com- mission for rehearing and proper no~cing of same. The Hayor opened t~e puUltc hea~fng aC 7:~0 pom. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was c]osed. The 01rector responded to Council questions. It was moved by Hoestereyr seconded by Kennedy, to: ~) Approve six driveway-entry cen~er iden~i~tcatlon signs based upon hardship created by structure locations and a ~edu~red bike CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - Page 2, 5-2-86 2) 3) Approve tenant wall signs in excess of maximum square footage allowed provided that such area not exceed I$% of storefront area of each Individual unit, based upon distance froe Newport, obstruction of view by free-standing structures, and the requirement will kee9 these signs tn proportion to other signs in the center; and Oeny the use of t~e free-standing tenant identification signs tn that no hardshtp ~nder the sign code exists for such sign- age, A question-and-answer period followed. Councilwoman Kennedy expressed sunrise that ~resentatives fr~ Car~ar ~re n~ pre- sent to spea on the matter and that their request dated May 22 was su~ttted ~rectly to C~nctl and n~ through the C~unity Oevel- opmont Department. Mayor Saltarelll spoke in favor of the variance as approved by the Planning Commission. He stated he believes the project's success and its ability to draw quality tenants will be enhanced by the additional tenant ~dentiflcatton signs, Coundlman Edgar spoke in favor of the motion. Councilwoman Kennedy rebutted Mayor Saltarelli that the City has already made a terrific ~promtse o~ the tenant wall signs, and she did not want to set a precedent that would be difficult to live with as East Tusttn develops. The motion carried ~-1, Saltarelli opposed. After further discussion regarding Carver's letter dated May 22, lg86, it was moved by Edgar~ seconded b~ Kennedy, to waive fees for consideration'of aedltlonal vartance requests to Increese size of the wall signs tn Tusttn Plaza by Car~er Oevelo~ment, shoul~ the applicant wish to submit same to the Planning Commission. The motion carried 5-0. 2., SUBOIVI$IOII ~ ACT ~NOMEIITS - OROINANC£ NO. 971 3® There were no Council questions regarding the staff report and rec~¥.~qdatton as contained in the inter-co~ dated June 2, 1986, prepared by the Community Development Department. Mayor Saltarelli opened the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. It was moved b) Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. g71 have first readihg by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No:'"g71 by the City Clark, it was moved by Edgar~ seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 971 be introduced as follows: OROlNN~E NO. 971 - AN OROINANC£ OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVII~ THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION g3[[ OF THE TUSTIN CITY COOE AHO ESTA8LISHING REGULATIONS FOR VESTIHG TENTATIVE MAPS FOR RESIDENTIAL ~80IVISIONS After a brief question-and-answer period, the motion carried NBJPORT AVENUE tJNOER~OUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 7 - 972 The Oirector of Public Works Identifieq the number of poles to be removed at specific locations. A question-and-answer period followed. The public hearing was opened by Mayor Saltarelli at 7:29 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. 4e CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 6-2.86 It was moved by Moestereyt Seconded by Edgar, that the public necessity, heal:n, safety or welfare redulre removal of po]es, ove~ead wires and associaC~ overhead structures and establishment of the N~po~ Avenue Underg~und Utility D~strict No, 7; and that Ordinance No, g72 have ftrst reading by title on]y. Carried 5-0, Following firs: reading by title on]y of Ordfnance NO. 972 by the City Clerk, It was ~oved by Edqar, seconded bZ Kennedy, that Ord~- hence No. g72 be ~ntroduced as OI~IN/UIC£ NO. 972 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, C~LIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING UNOERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 7, NEWPORT AVENUE, ANO DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONVER- SION The motion carried 5-0. 104 HOLT AVENUE/%RV%NE 80ULLrVARO ~ UTILITY O~STR%CT NO. 8 - . ORDIMNCE NO. 973 Following consideration of the tnter-c~m dated May 27, ig86, pre- pared by the Public Vorks Department/Engineering O~v~s~on, the public hearing was opened by Mayor Saltare11~ aC 7:30 p.m. There were no speakers on the moCCer, and the pu~11c hearing was closed. IC was moved by Ed~ar~' seconded ~ Hoes:eras, that the public necessity; health, safety or welfare redu~re the removal of poles. overhead ~rss and associated overhead structures and the estab- lts~went of the Holt Avenue/Zrv~ne Boulevard Underground 01s:rtct No. 8; and that Ordinance No. g73 have f~rst reading tttle only. ~ot~on carrded Following f~rst read~ng by title only of Ordinance No. g73 by the Cl~y Clerk, tt ~as moved b~ Ed~ar~ seconded by Kennedy, that Ordi- nance No. 973 be 'introduced as follows: OI~II~NCE NO. 973 - AN OROINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI~E CITY OF TU~TIN~ CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING UNOERGROUNG UTILITY DISTRICT NO. HOLT AVENUE/IRVINE BOULEVARO, ANO OECLARING ITS INTENTION TO O~DER THE CONVERSION Carried 104 PROPOSi~] STREET NME (:~ANGE FRON NOULTON PARKWAy TO rnlNGER AVENU~ - RESOLUTION NO. 86-64 (Continued from May 19, ~g86) Following consideration of the staff repor~ and recommendation con- 'retried in the inter-tom dated May 9, 1986, prepared by the Public Wor~s Oepart~ent/Engtneer~ng Otvtston, Mayor Saltarellt opened the public hearing at 7:3! p.m. Paul Lothrop, Intermac ~est, 1542 Houlton Parkway, re~terated h~s C~...e~tS of May ~g that the name change was acceptable w~th a reasonable tt~e pe~tod for conversion of same. The Otrector of Public Works stated that the duplicate street names are usually carried for a one-year per~od. The C~ty w~]] place two street name signs on posts, and the U.S. Post Office w~]1 also carry the two names for a one-year period. There were no ocher speakers on the mat:er, and the pub]~c hearing was closed*at 7:35 p.m; It was moved by Heesterey~ seconded by Kennedy, to adopt the follo~ng: RF. SOLUT~ON NO. 8~-64 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC:L OF THE CITY OF TUST~N, CAL/FORNIA, CHANGING DESIGNATION OF MOULTON PARKWAY, BETWEEN REOHILL AVENUE ANO HARVARO AVENUE, TO EDINGER AVENUE The motion carried 5-0. 96 CITY 03UHCIL MINUTES Page ¢, 6-Z-86 I~J~L.[C INPUT 'll~l'[# AUTO C~NTER LOUO$I~:A~R He~e~ Huber, ~82 Droll Lane, Santa Aha 9~705, express~ opposi- tion to the Planning C~ission approval of subject lt~. Huber P~ueit~ Oouncil appeal sa~ and sch~ule tt for public h ma rtng. ~myor Saltarellt tnfo~ M~. Huber that C~nctl ~uld revi~ Plan- ning C~i~ion'~ action on 5ubJ~ tt~ under Repo~ No. ~ this ~entng. (See Page 7 of thee Minute.) CI)~EMT CAI.fII)AR It was moved by Hoestarey~ seconded by Edqar, to approve the entire Consent Calendar. The motion carried 5-0. 1. A~.~ziV~I. OF ~ - MAY 19,..~986, REGULAR MEETING 2. AIH~OVAL OF OE)IAIIOS IN ~E ~UNT ~ $~4,2~2.74 ~TXFXCATXOM ~ PA~ IN ~E ~U~ ~ $140,929.44 50 3. ~ ~. ~ - A RE~O~UTION ~ ~E CITY COUNCIL OF ~E CITY OF ~STIN, ~IFOR~IA. APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR ~E REPLACEMENT ~Y S~UC~RE AT ~GNOL[A TREE P~K A~ O[RECT[~ THE CI~ CLERK TO ~VERTXSE FOR BiOS Ado~t~ Resolution No. 86-68 as reco~end~ by the Co.unity Se~ic~ Depa~nt. 77 4. ~[~ ~. ~70 - A R[SOLUT[ON ~ ~E CXTY COUNCXL OF THE CITY OF ~ST[N ~CEPT[~ ~R~ ~ [MPROVEMENT ~0 ~THORIZING RECORDA- TION ~ ~T[CE ~ COMPLETION (P~SE I, BUILDING MOOIFICATION, CO~- ~NXCATXO~ CENTER) ~oDt~ Resolution No. 86-70; a~ tf no clat~ or stop pa~ent n~ic~ are ftl~ 30 days after r~ordatlon, authoriz~ payment of t~e final [0% r~ention ~unt as reco~end~ by the Police R~ Dtr~ t~e City Attorney's office to c~F.F~nce legal actio~ against Tustin Memt C~any to abate the ongoing public nui- senti t~is use has creat~ u~n the surrounding c~untty r~nd~ by t~e C~ntty Development Oepa~ment. 6. R~]~ ~. ~9 - A R~SOLUTION ~ ~E CITY COUNCIL OF ~E CITY OF ~STIN, ~[FORN]A, ~ORIZING APPtICATIONS FOR TRANSFER OF FORFE~T~ PROP~R~ TO THE TUSTIN POLICE DEP~TME~ AND ESTABLISHING GUXDEL]NES ~0 CONTROLS R~TIV~ ~ERETO Adopted Resolution No. 86-69 with the following guidelines: Place assets de~v~ fr~ state or f~eral narcotic investiga- tions In t~e "Tustin Police Narcotics Satzure Fund" w~ich held in a t~st in agency account; 2) Utilize funds fr~ the "Tusttn Police Narcotics Seizure Fund" for improving and devel- oping narcotic ~forcment programs in t~e City of Tustln as provtd~ for tn the California Health'& Safet~ Code; 3) Direct staff ~ ~ke ~sbursmants fr~ this account in confo~ance wtt~ pr~writtan warrant proc~ures for the purpose provid~ in t~e Califo~ta Health & Safer7 Coda, ~t~ t~ts action to take place mt the direction of t~e Chief of Police; and 4) Direr the Finance Oir~tor to ~tablish an account in order to r~aive and distribute these funds, as rec~end~ by the Police O~a~ment. 7. RES~[OR ~. ~-71 - A RESOLUTION ~ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~STIN, C~IFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FAIR- HAVEN, YORBA, NEWHAVEN AND TROPIC LANE WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING THE CITY C~ERK TO ~VERTISE FOR BIDS Adopted Resolution No. 86-71 as reco~end~ by the Public Works Depa~ment/Engi neeri ng Oi vi s i on. ~07 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 6-2-86 7. RESOLUTION NO. 86-71 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'THE CITY OF llJSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FAIR- HAVEN, YORBA, N[WHAVEN AND TROPIC LANE WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS Adopi:ed Resolui~l*on No. 86-71 as r. eco~mended by the Pu011c Works Department/Engineering Division. 107 8'. LONI A6REEMENT, TUSTIN CONMONITY R~I)EVEI. OPt~NT AI~NCY - SOUTH CENTRAL PROJECT AI~ ANO CITY OF TUST[N (RESCO DEVELOPMENT) Authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute suOJect loan agreement as approved by Council on January 5, 1.988. 45 86-23 9. RESOLUTION NO. 86-73 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE COILh'TRUCT]ON OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 85-1. (PHASE V-A) AND O[RECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERT%SE FOR Adopted Resolution No. 86-73 as rec~m,endnd by the Public'Worl<s Oedartmont/Engt neeri ng Otvision. 10. R. AC~NT OF SOLID WASTE ~/reT%ON FE£S ON PROP'cRTY TAX ROLL Directed staff to prepare a report containing each parcel receiving se~tce and the amount to be charged each parcel; and se~ a public hear-lng date for June 1.5, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. on subject matter as recommended by the Finance Oepartment. 97 11. RE.~UT]ON NO. 8~-74 - A RESOLUT[ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUST[N, CN.I. FONN[A, [N[TIAT[N6 PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT .LEVY FORMATION OF A OISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANO$CAPINO ANO LIGI~TIN6 ACT OF ).972 ANO FOR THE ANNEXATION OF AOO[T]ONAL TERN[TORY TO SA[O EX[STING OISTR[CT Adopted Resolution No. 86-74 as recommended by the Public Works Oepartment/Engt neert ng Otvtston. 25 VII. OI~II~NCE ~ INTROOUCTIOM Noml. VIII. OIIOlKMIC£ FO~ AIX)~TIO# I~PO~I) ~ PRNIOIISE FOR COMMUNITY C~LEYISION - ORDINANCE MO. 970 It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 970 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 970 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy! seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 970 be passed and adopted as follows: ONI)IMMIC£ NO. 970 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ANENOING THE FRANCHISE FOR A CABLE TELEVISION 5YSTI~ GRANTEO TO COMMUNITY CABLEVI$ION COMPANY Roll call vote: AYES: Edger, Hoestery, Kelly, Kennedy, Saltarellt JOES: None ABSENT: None 53 ZONE C~AN6~ 86-2 -NEN. THCAR£ ~I)ICAL CENI~R - OROINANC£ NO. 969 It was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 959 have seco6d readlng by title only. Motion carried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 96g by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar~ seconded by Saltarellt, that Ordinance No. 969 be passed and adopted as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 969 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, REZONING THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE RANCHO LA PAZ APARTMENTS AT 11.01 SYCAMORE AVENUE FROM MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) TO PUBLIC & INSTITUTIONAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 5-2-86 AYES: Edger, Kelly, Saltarelli NOES: Hoesterey, Kennedy Al)SENT: Hone 110 IX. OU) ~USINF. S~ Hone, I. IEREENENT P~flDIN6 FOR THE IRVI~ COMPANY TO A..SSUME CONOITIONS OF FLOGO COm'ROI. DISTRICT PERNIT As recommended in the inter-corn deted Mey 27, 1986, prepared by the Public Works Oepertment/Englneertng Division, it was ~ved~ Kennedym seConded by Hoesterey, to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute subject agreement re~erdtng the coQstruction, operation end nmintenence of interim flood control improvements between the City and The I~vtne C~peny. The motion carried 5-0. 45 (F~CZLI~ ~07) Pursuent to the reco~Kendetion contained in the inter-tom dated Mey 28, lg86, prepared by the Public Works Department/Engineering. Division, it wes moved by Noesterey~ seconded by Kenned? to epprove subject agreement and authorize the Mayor and City Cl.rk to execute same. The O~rec~or of Public Works stewed the~ recent communication through the County Couflsel's office proposes a c~aflge in subject egreement in favor of the City. Proposed language approved by the County to Page 6, Paregreph 19, would read, "In the event ~he City does not proceed with the work as outlined above within one (1) year of the execution of this Agreement, OISTRICT may terminate the Agreement. ~ees collected by DISTRICT for expenses incurred pur- *suant to Paragraph 10 shall be retained by t~e DISTRICT and the balance refunded to the City,' in lieu of the Otstrtct retaining the e~ttre unused balance. The maker and second of the motion concurred with subject amendment to the agreement. The motion carried 5-0. 45 86-25 3. LE~ OF CZl~f ~RTY AT ~10 NORll40U) TUSTIH AVENUE, SNJTA ~ It wes moved by Edgar~ seconded by Hoesterey, to authorize the City Clerk to advertise the notice of intention to lease City property; and euthortze steff to meil requests for proposel to leese property to individuals/businesses having expressed interest in leasing property at ~810 North Old Tustin Avenue, Senta Aha, as reco~r~ended in the inter-tom dated May 21, 1986, prepared by the Public Works Depertment/Engineering Division. The Director of Public Works responded to Council questions on sub- Ject item. The motion carried 5-0. 85 4. FOOTHILI. IF.~Jt TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR FEE ASSE$$NENT As reco~mendep in the Inter-tom dated May 28, 1986, prepared by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division, it was moved by Edger; seconded by Kennedy, to authorize payment of $25,000 assess- ment to Foothill [astern Joint Powers Agency; and authorize a sup- plementel budget appropriation for 1985-86 in the amount of $25,000. The motion carried 5-0. 100 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7. 6-2o86 II. It~PORT$ 1. ~#IN~ COMMI$$IO# Ab'TION ~NOA - ~1 ~, 19~ ~yor Saltarelll not~ that a ~ of the puOltc had ~uest~ appeal of Old Business Itm 1 - Tusttn Auto Center Loudspeaker terta. It was ~v~ by Edgar~ s~ond~ b~ Kennedy, to appeal sub- Je~ 1tm and approve the n~alnder of the ~y ZT. 1986, Planning C~,m;Sslon Actton Agenda.. ~e ~tlon carrt~ 5-0. ~r. ~ber ~s tnfom~ that Count11 ~uld revt~ the ~tter at the June ~. 1986, Count11 meeting. A]thou~ the matter wt~1 not be co~tder~ under public heartng lo,at, Counct~man Kenn~y ~u~t~ that persons on the matltng 11st of concern~ be lnfo~ of ~ C~ntC~ Developer 01rKtor repo~ that a m~ber of C~ntty. OevelopMnC O~a~nt a~ Pollce Oepa~nC vtsft~ sub- J~ p~pe~y today aC the ~ner"s Invitation. All ~rash and . d~rts has ~n ~v~, ~c~t for a dtsab~ aut~oblle on the stde ~ard. ~e Pollce Oepa~nt has al~o~ one ~e ~e~ for r~val of s~a. In the ~tnfon of the C~untty Development O~a~t, there Is no loflger a pub~tc nutsanca pe~atn~ng trash a~ d~rts. All ~her C~nctl conc'a~s muld ~ re~at~ to c~mtnal a~ 1~ ~fo~t activity. %t w~ th~ ~v~ b~ Edgart s~ond~ b~ Kefln~y. to ~ecetve and ~11e the ~n~er-c~ ~t~ 4une Z, 198G. prepar~ ~y the C~un~ty O~el~nt D~a~t. ~e ~tlon car~ 5-0. 4. ~l~ ~ ~ BY ~l~ O~ AT 265Z ~ AVE~E ~ r~nd~ tn the tnter-c~ dated June 2, 1986, prepar~ by the C~ntty Oevelop~nt Oepa~nt, tt ~s ~v~ by ;dgar~ seconded by K~n~y, to r~etve and ftle s~e. Motion carrted 5-0. 56 Counctl~n Kenn~y eepo~ that conflicting tnfo~atf~n has been r~etv~. ~dtttonal Info.etlon ~11 ~e provld~ to Council Ina flnal It was ~v~ ~y Edgart seconded by Kenn~y, to recetve and fl]e lntee-c~ ~t~ ~ay 23. Lgue, pcepar~ b~ :he Police Oepartment. Cart1 ~ S-O. 67 Pursuant. :o the r~endatlon conta~n~ tn :he ~nter-c~ dated May ~7. ~986, pr~ar~ by :he Publlc ~or~s Oepartmen:/Engineerlng 01vlston, tt was ~ved b~ Hoestere7~ s~onded b~ ~e11~, :o autho- rize Installation of one 9,S00 lu~n high-pressure sodtum vapor str~ light on the south side of ~led Street mld-~lock between C~tno Real and Prospect Avenue at an annual cost of $120. The morton carrt~ 5-0. 63 AS r~o~e~d~ by the City Attocney, tt was moved by ~ennedy~ sec- onded b~ Saltacelli, to authocize the Mayoc and City ClePk to exe- cute t~e ent~ pemit between the City and The Irvine Company for a CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 6-2-86 tmporary access road betv~en B~an Avenue and E] Camtno Real west- erly of Tusttn Ranch Road and easterly of Ja~oree Road. The motion carrted 5-0. 45 86-25 2. Lt.F'r-TURN I~}VENE~I' AT ~OR~A ~ 17T~ STREETS Councilman Edgar requested that staff report back on the possi- bility of a left-turn ~cket and error at the Yorba signal turning onto 17t~n Street, 94 3e PU~IC NUISANCE ASATENENT - 17592 ARAGA~SET In response to Council=an Edgar, the Community Oevelopm~nt provided a status report on subject matter. Staff is pursuing a~tntstrattve relief through the City itto~ey's office. If that fails, gaff ~11 come ~ck to Council for authorization to file I~al aG~on agatpst the progerty ~mer. 81 4. ANNEXATION OF NOET~ TURIN ~ Councilor Kelly reported that he has bee~ approached by residents Of the ~orth Tusttn unincorporated area ~no have expressed interest in annexation to Tusttn. ~lth Counct~ consensus, Mayor Saltare111 agreeq t~ att~ an info,al session ~th area ~sldents. 24 5. P~N#IN~ C0~qL~I0# APPOINTH~NT$ Mayor Saltarellt led discussion regarding appointment of Planning Cammtsstoners. The Mayor requested that staff provide a list of all applicants for Council rmvtese. T~e Mayor then asked Court, I- n. ers to be prepared to vo~e on the appointment of five Planning Ca~ssioners at the June 16, 1986, moating. 80 6. Iff.~I~NATIOM OF IX)MALD 0. LAIgl, ColleJNrrY O~VELOI~NT DIRECTOR Mayor Saltarellt dtr~ted the City Manager to prepare appropriate c~atton for 0onald 0. La~ upon his ~tgnation as C~untty 0evllo~nt Ot~tor. Counct~ congratulated Mr. Lam upon ~ts n~ position u Dtr~tor of Oeve~o~ent Semites for Costa ~esa effec- tive June 11. 79 Nr. Lammwas applauded b~ the Council and audience. Council. XlII. ~ - R~EgELOPI~/fr A6EJqCY o AI~OURI~ENT thanked the At 8:05 p.m. it vas meved by Hoestereyr seconded by Kennedy, to recess to the Redevelopment Agency; and thence adjourn to the next Regular Meeting on June 16, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. Carried 5-0. /~.~IAYOR MIIlJTES OF A REGULAR I~ET[NG OF ~ REOEVEL0P~EIFr JGE~CY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIM, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2, 198~ The meetlng was called to order at. 8:04 p.m. by Chatr~an Saltarelli in the Ctty Council Cham~ees, 300 Centennial Way, Tusttn, Callfornta. Agency ~.mbers Present: Agency Mem~e~ Absent: Other's Present: Donald J. Saltarellt, Chat rman Ronald B~ Hoesterey, Chai~man. Pro Ten Richard 8, Edgar John Kelly U~ula E. Kennedy None W111~am A. Xuston, Ex~. Otrector/C~ty Manager ~ G. Rourke, C~ty Attorney Ma~ E. Wynn, R~o~lng S~retary/C~t~ C~ert ~nald O. La~, C~untty O&~elog~nt Otrector Robe~ S. L~end~ker, Otr~tor of Public Works Charles R. ~ayer, Chte~ of Police Royl~ A. ~te, Oir. of Com. & Adm~n. Se~Ices E~ard M. Knight, Senior Planner ~san ~on~, R~reatton Sugertntendent ~g~x~tel~ ZS ~n the audience It was moved by Hoesterey.'seconded by Edgar, to alJprove Minutes of the May ig, 1986, Regular Meettng. Motion carried SoO. 4. C~1.~'I0~ OF CZT~ FL~ R~ - RL~2~UTION NO. RDA 8~-3 As recoa~aended tn the tnter-cc~ dated June 2, 1986, prepared by the Com- munity Oevelol~aent Oepartment, it ~as m~ved by Hoestereyt seconded by Edgar, to: Adopt the 1'ollowtn9; and assuming no clatms or stop payment notices are ftled ~thtn 30 days after date of recordation, authorize payment of :he flnal 10% retention amount. R~I/TION NO. ROA 8~3 - A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE cITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVE- MENT ANO AUTHORIZIN6 RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (CITY HALL MOOIFICATION - IJLTIMO G~NERAL CONTRACTORS) Carried 5-0. 39 5. LOAN .AGtEB4ENT, I'dSTIN (331~14UNITY I~EYELOIq4ENT AGENCY - SOUTH CEHTIML PItO~ECT NtF. A ~ CITY OF TUSTIN (RESCO 0L:VELOP~ENT) Pursuant to Agency action on January 6, 1985, and as reco~ended in the Inter-rom dated May 28, 1986, prepared by the Finance Oedartmen:, tt was moved by Hoestereyt seconded by Edgar, to authorize :he Chairman and Recording Secretary to execute subject loan agreement tn the amount of $375,000 between the City and Agency. The motion carried 5-0. (Reference City Council Minutes of June 2, 1986, page S.) 45; 8~,Z3 OTHER _~I~S None. At 8:05 p.m. the meeting was adjourned to the next Regular Meeting on June 16, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. by unanimous informal consent. ~?