Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1 MINUTES 06-02-86MINUTES OF A REGULAR )(iETING OF lltE CIll~ ~OUN:IL OF lltE Clll~ OF llJSTIN, CALIFORNIA MAY 19, 1986 CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Saltarelli at 7:00' p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Provost Marshal's Office Color Guard from the United States Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin, presented the flag colors. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Isabelle McClements, Recreation Coordinator. The Invocation was given by Nick Ogden, Site Manager, TLC Program. II. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Council persons Absent: Others Present: Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Ronald B. Hoesterey, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar John Kelly Ursula E. Kennedy None William A. Huston, City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Royleen A. White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Srvcs. Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent Approximately 50 in the audience SPECIAl. PRESEICfATION 1. UNVEILING OF SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER RENDERING At Mayor Saltarelli's request, Councilwoman Kennedy announced that the rendering of the proposed Senior Center was to be unveiled this evening. She asked the following members of the Steering Committee for a Senior Center to stand: Ron Hoesterey, Rose Zuccarelli, Janet Schwartz, Ruth Jacobsen, Jim Kane, Nick Ogden, Ken Hoesterey, Ruby May, Margarete Thompson, Ron Paige, Royleen White, Isabelle McClements, and Susan Jones. Janet Schwartz, on behalf of the Tustin Area Women's Club, pre- sented the first community donation to the Tustin Area Senior Cen- ter Fund in the amount of $500. Councilwoman Kennedy announced that fund-raising officially begins this evening with a goal of $600,000. City, County and Federal funds in the amount of $2,000,000 have been obtained to date. Six audience members were randomly drawn by Council members and Mrs. Schwartz for the unveiling. The unveiling by Hazel Spillman, Alyce Bemis, Glenda Farrell, Ida Sternberg, Ruby May, and Janet Schwartz was applauded by the audience. At 7:13 p.m. Mayor Saltarelli officially declared a .five-minute recess to allow those interested to view the rendering. The meet- ing was reconvened at 7:18 p.m. with all members present. 41 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 5-19-86 IV. 2. PROCLANATION - MISS TUSTIN 1986 Mayor Saltarelli presented a proclamation -to Christine Larson honoring her as Miss Tustin 1986. Miss Larson thanked the Coun- cil. Jeff Post, Director of Miss Tustin Pageant, ~resented the'City with the official photo of Miss Tustin 1986 to be hung in City Hall. 84 ~LIC 1. ZONE CHANGE 86-2 - HEALTHCARE ~DICAL CENTER - ORDINANCE NO. 969 There were no Council questions of staff, and no additonal staff comments to the inter-com dated May 19, 1986, prepared by the Com- munity Development Department. Mayor Saltarelli opened the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. Mike Fields, Manager of Market Development for Healthcare Inter- national, spoke in favor of the zone change. He indicated agree- ment to all conditions set forth by the Planning Commission with the exception of the two-story limitation. He agreed to accept a maximum restriction of three stories or 40 feet which was previ- ously agreed to with City staff and Planning Commission. He urged Council's serious consideration of same. Mr. Fields responded to Council questions. Bill Greenwalt, representing the current property owner, provided information on building heights on surrounding properties, stating they are close to 40 feet. There were no other speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed at 7:30 p.m. In response to Councilwoman Kennedy, the Community Development Director noted that Ordinance No. 969 provides for relocation assistance through.rent reduction by one-third for a period of six months. Councilman Edgar stated that the two-story, 30-foot limitation for the entire parcel size is not reasonable. He felt that the exist- ing height is acceptable recognizing that a use permit will be necessary. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Exhibit "B" of Ordinance No. 969 be modified whereby any structure built on the property shall not exceed three stories or 40 feet in height, whichever is lower. Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey stated that since the property abuts resi- dential properties he would prefer the 30-foot restriction remain, and then based upon a suitable proposal, a varlance application could be made. Following Council discussion, the motion carried 3-2, Hoesterey and Kennedy opposed. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 969 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 969 by the .City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 969 be introduced as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 969 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, REZONING THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE RANCHO LA PAZ APARTMENTS AT 1101 SYCAMORE AVENUE FROM MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) TO PUBLIC & INSTITUTIONAL {P&I) The motion carried 3-2, Hoesterey and Kennedy opposed. 110 ]ITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 5-19-86 AGEB ORDER V. PUBLIC INPUT 1. SENIOR CENTER Ida Sternberg, 14400 Newport Avenue, #109, spoke in favor of the Senior Center. She expressed joy and thanks that the project is finally coming to fruition. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS APPEAL OF VARIANCE NO. 86-3 - TUSTIN PLAZA SIGNING, CARVER DEVELOP- #ENT The Community Development Director stated that Carver Development has requested a two-week continuance. There were no speakers on the matter. As requested by Carver Development, it was moved b~ Hoesterey, sec- onded by Edgar, to continue the appeal hearing of subject item to June 2, 1986. The motion carried 5-0. 81 3. PROPOSED STREET IIAME CHANGE FROM HDULTON PARKWAY TO B) INGER AVENUE - RESOLUTION NO. 86-64 Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey requested that if there were no speakers on the matter, that the item be continued to allow Council review of material received from affected businesses. Mayor Saltarelli announced that Council had received seven letters from bus'inesses in the area objecting to the proposed name change. Mayor Saltarelli opened the public hearing at 7:41 p.m. Paul Lothrop, Controller, Intermac Corporation, spoke in opposition to the proposed name change. He noted the costs of changing all literature and advertising, notification to customers of an address change, and desirability to retain their identity. Mr. Lothrop felt Mayor Saltarelli's proposal was reasonable that six-month period be allowed to phase-in the name change. The Mayor explained to Mr. Lothrop that Edinger Avenue runs through a number of political jurisdictions. A .very small portion of it through Tustin has two different names. Therefore, within the dis- tance of 1-1/8 miles, its name changes three times. It is very confusing to people who are not area residents. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to continue the following: RESO~.UTIOll NO. 86-64 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING DESIGNATION OF MOULTON PARKWAY', BETWEEN REHILL AVENUE AND HARVARD AVENUE, TO EDINGER AVENUE The motion carried 5-0. 96 4. PROPOSED STREET NAME CHANGE FR(M JAMBOREE ROAD TO TUSTIN RANCH ROAD - RESOLUTION NO. 86-65 Mayor Saltarelli opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the follow- ing: RESOI. UTIGN NO, 86-65 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING DESIGNATION OF JAMBOREE ROAD, BETWEEN THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AND BRYAN AVENUE, TO TUSTIN RANCH ROAD Motion carried 5-0. 96 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 5-19-86 ¥. PUBLIC INPUT 1. REQUEST FOR PROCLAMATION - 'LITERACY WEEK' Dean Beck, President of the Orange Literacy Project, LVA-Orange, requested the Tustin City Council join the Orange City Council in declaring the.week of July 27 as "Literacy Week." The Mayor thanked Mr. Beck and asked him to leave a number where he could be reached by staff. 2. NOISE FROM IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX Wiley Kennedy, 14711Danberry Circle, complained that a business in the Irvlne Industrial Complex, off of Franklin and Dow Avenues, operates 24-hours a day and creates noise which is a public nui- sance. The Mayor requested that staff investigate the matter and report back to Council on same. 3. SENIOR CENTER BUILDING Lyn Van Dyken, 235 South "A" Street, expressed delight at seeing the artist rendering of the proposed Senior Center. She requested, however, that part of Peppertree Park not be taken for parking. She suggested underground parking to save the parkland. Councilwoman Kennedy was sensitive to Ms. Van Dyken's comments. She stated she would take another look at placing parking bn the other side of the School District Administration building. 4. COMPLAINTS FROM M~%,~iALL LANE [IIiEOWNEIIS ASSOCIATION Daniel Al fonzo, 13312 Marshall Lane, referenced a letter addressed to Council and various governmental agencies from the Marshall Lane Homeowners' Association. Mr. Alfonzo requested that the issues in subject letter be brought up at the next Council meeting for reso- lution of those particular problems. Mayor Saltarelli stated that rather than discussing the matter at a Council meeting, Council would contact Mr. Alfonzo and advise him of staff's investigation on the matter and how to best handle same. Tulen Galllan, 13262 Marshall Lane, requested the Mayor divulge the contents of subject letter, and spoke in defense of adolescents in subject area. The Mayor informed Ms. Gallian that she would be included in any discussions relative to the problem. VI. CONSENT CALENOAR It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve the entire Consent Calendar. The motion carried 5-0, APPROVAL OF MINI~rES - MAY 5, 1986, REGULAR MEETING APPROVAL OF ~DS IN THE AMOUNT OF $916,932.86 RATIFICATION OF PAYR~L IN THE AMOUNT OF $140,128.89 5O REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 86-19; CLAIM/gIT: JACK WOOD; DATE OF LOSS: 2/15/86; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 4/22/86 Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney's Office. 40 4. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 86-18; CLAIMANT: J. STUPY, M.D.; DATE OF LOSS: 4/3/86; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 4/21/86 Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney's Office. 40 ITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 5-19-86 REJECTIOg OF CLAIM NO. 86-15; CLAII~: FRANCES M. WATTS; DATE OF LOSS: 3/20/86; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 4/15/86 Rejected subject claim as r~commended by the City Attorney's Office. 40 ¸7. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 86-14; CLAIMANT: TERESA.LA REINE QUICK; DATE OF LOSS: 1/4/86; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 4/11/86 Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney's Office. 40 REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 86-16; CLAIMANT: H. TED & SANORA K. HERTZ; DATE OF LOSS: 1/13/86; DATE FILED WITH CITY': 4/16/85 Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney's Office. 40 8. RESOI. UTION NO. 06-60 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP 86-362 LOCATED AT THE SOUTH- WESTERLY CORNER OF WALNUT STREET AND NEWPORT AVENUE Adopted Resolution No. 86-60 as recommended by the Community Development Department. 99 AT&SF IUIILWAY COMPANY, E'T AL V. STATE BOARD OF EQUALI7J~TION, SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. 855589 (CLAIM NO. 86-20) Authorized the County Counsel of the County of Orange to defend the City of Tustin in the above-referenced action pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 5149 as recommended by the City Attorney's Office. 40 10. RESOLUTION NO. 86-61 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABAN- DON A PORTION OF MYFORD ROAD AND TO FIX A TIME AND PLACE OF PUBLIC HEARING THEREON Adopted Resolution No. 86-61 as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 105 11. 12. RESOLUTION NO. 86-62 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSEC- TION OF TUSTIN P~ANCH ROAD (JAMBOREE BLVD.) AND EL CAJ~INO REAL (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 85-1, PHASE VI) AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS Adopted Resolution No. 86-62 as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 94 DECLARATION OF SURPLUS CITY EQUIPMENT TO BE AUCTIONED ON JUNE 28, 1986 Declared items on subject list as City surplus and authorized same to be sold at the City Police Auction June 28, 1986, as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Divi- sion. 87 13. RESOLUTION NO. 86-63 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDA- TION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION ("B" ST. & MITCHELL AVE. HCDA STREET IMPROVEMENTS) Adopted Resolution No. 86-63; and if no claims or stop payment notices are filed within 30 days after date of recordation, authorized payment of the final 10% retention amount as recom- mended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 95 14. REVISED LANDSCAPE AGREE)lENT, llLRCT 12345, EAST TOSTIN PHASE I RESI- OENTI/U. Directed the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the revised Land- scape Maintenance Agreement between the City and The Irvine Company as recommended by the Community Development Department. 45; 86-22 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 5-19-86 VII. OIU)IMANCE FOR INll~ODIM~TION VIII. IX. 1. I~OPOSED ~ll[FI~II~HISE FOR COI~JNII"~ CABLEVISION - ORDINANCE NO. 97O AS recon~nended in the inter-com dated April 2, 1986, prepared by the City Attorney's Office, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by e' that Ordinance No. 970 have first reading by title only. d 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 970 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 970 be introduced as follows: OI~J)IItAJICE NO. 970 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE.CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FRANCHISE FOR A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM GRANTED TO COMMUNITY CABLEVISION COMPANY The motion carried 5-0. 53 ORDIN~CE FOR ADOPTION 1. STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES ON PUBLIC ROADWAY - Offi)INANCE NO. 968 It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 968 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 968 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 968 be passed and adopted as follows: ORDIMAI~CE NO. 964) - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TUSTIN CITY CODE SECTIONS 5340e, 5330e AND SECTION 5311 RELATIVE TO THE STORAGE OF VEHICLES ON PUBLIC ROADWAYS Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kelly, Kennedy Saltarelli None OLD BUSINESS 1. MAIN STREET LIGHTING The staff report as contained in the inter-com dated May 12, 1986, was presented by the Director of Public Works. The Director noted that the County currently will not authorize installation of any additional lights in the old lighting district. Tustin would have to pay the energy charge on these lights until it assumes adminis- trative operational duties of the district from the County. Councilwoman Kennedy wondered if a Victorian theme could be used for the replacement lights. The Director responded that there are nine existing lights on wood poles. The staff report proposes replacement of those lights with conventional marbelite-type stan- dards used throughout the City. Six or seven additional new lights would fill in the gaps and provide adequate lighting. Each inter- section where a traffic signal is installed will have conventional traffic safety lighting over it so that those particular areas will be well-lit. Easterly on Main between Prospect and "C," staff continued theme- type lighting' from the E1 Camino area with a mission-bell-type luminaire. Staff could obtain different samples of any type light- ing desired, as long as it's manufacturable. It was moved by. Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to proceed with planning for t~e construction o~ replacement street lighting on Main Street; to include undergroundtng for street lighting; to consider upgrading the standards; and to reaffirm that the area between "B" and "C" Streets will be funded with Redevelopment monies. The motion carried 5-0. g4 .ITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7,' 5-19-86 Councilwoman Kennedy suggested that members of TRUST (Tustin Resi- dents United to Save Tustin) be advised of Council action. Xe NEW BUSINESS 1. TUSTIN TILLER DAYS PAJUU)E David Edgar, Tusttn Jaycees, presented the Tustin Jaycees request as contained in his letter dated May 19, 1986. Mr. Edgar responded to Councilman Kelly's concern on the $1,500 expense for band judges. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the follow- ing proposals: 1) The Jaycees will procure adequate liability ihsurance to cover their own involvement in the Parade while the City procures its own coverage to the extent of its own involvement, with each party then having coverage to the extent it may deem necessary; Only those equestrian units with substantial parade experience (i.e., six pa6ades within last 12 months) and good safety records will be allowed to participate; in addition, with the exception of military units, these entries will be required to provide evidence of at least $1,000,000 of liability coverage and sign an agreement relieving the City and Tustin Jaycees of any liability resulting from their participation in the parade; 3) The City will provide advance funds to the Tustin Jaycees to run the Parade in an amount not to exceed $4,250; and 4) The Parade route will remain the same as in 1985; staging will be on "A," Third and Second Streets. The motion carried 5-0. 34 2. STREET LIG)ITIN6 - llJ~TI# ~ (CARVER DEVELOPIRENT) As recommended in the tnter-com dated May 12, 1986; prepared by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division, it was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Edgar, to authorize the installation of ten street lights along Newport Avenue, Main Street, and Sixth Street adjacent to Tustin Plaza; and appropriate funds in the amount of $1,390 in FY 1986-87 Budget for electrical energy and maintenance of said lighting. The motion carried 5-0. 94 3. AWJ~RD OF CONTRACT FOR FY 1985-86 SIDEWALK & CURB REPAIR PROGR/~ Bids for subject project were received on May 13, 1986, as follows: Dudley Masonry, Inc., Anaheim Loant Construction, Buena Park Am & Hammer Concrete Removal, Tustin Bruce Paving Company, Inc., Gardena $114,863.12 $122,791.74 $123,273.76 $198,563.73 Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the inter-com dated May 13, lg86, prepared by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to award the contract for subject project to Dudley Masonry, Inc., Anaheim, in the amount of $114,863.12; and authorize staff to add additional work to the contract to utilize all budgeted funds {$136,000). Motion carried 5-0. 95 1986-87 BUDGET WORKSHOP Council concurred to conduct a FY 1986-87 Budget Workshop on dune 2, tg86~'at 4:00 p.m. in the City Hall Conference Room. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 5-19-86 5. CONSOLIDATION OF ELECTIONS Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey suggested tabling subject item for 2-3 months to allow Council review of data from other cities, mayors, and committees. Councilma,n Kelly spoke in favor of consolidation of City elections and suggested Council conduct a public hearing on the matter. Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey debated that the Tustin City Council has always, taken a position of local control in local elections on local issues. He noted arguments against consolidation as con- tained in the inter-com dated May 14, 1986, prepared by the City Clerk. Councilman Edgar concurred. He suggested the Mayor send a letter to each Mayor in Orange County on their feelings relative to con- solidation of elections. Mayor Saltarelli stated he was prepared to vote on the matter this evening either way. Ed Shaheen, 14611 Alder Lane, spQke in favor of'consoiidation. It was moved by Kelly, seconded by Saltarelli, to consolidate the City's General Municipal Election with the general statewide elec- tion in November. Councilwoman Kennedy spoke in favor of continuing the matter. She noted that the most powerful argument against consolidation is that the City absolutely takes the spotlight in an April municipal elec- tion. A substitute motion was made by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to continue the matter for two months. The motion carried 4-1, Salta- relll opposed. 48 Mayor Saltarelli requested that staff provide additional informa- tion on the matter and prepare a letter to all non-charter cities, irrespective of size, on the Mayor and City Manager opinions on advantages or disadvantages of consolidating. MANNER OF ~?poIlfrI~ PLANNING CO)ttlSSIONERS It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, that Council policy on the manner of appointing Planning Commissioners be done on a single selection by each Council member subject to ratification of the City Council. The City Attorney commented that there is a question in the law applicable to general law cities whether any group other than the Council as a whole can make appointments to the Planning Commis- sion. He suggested that if the Council wishes to have single selection by each member, that it could be done, but it should then be ratified by a vote of the whole Council. The motion carried 5-0. 8O The Mayor suggested that nominations be made at the June 2 or June 16 meeting for ratification by a majority of the Council, with seating of Planning Commissioners the second week of July. XI. REPORTS 1. P~ANNING ~OFI(ISSION ACTION AGENi)A - ~IAY 12, 1986 It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to approve the entire May 12, 1986, Planning Commission Action Agenda. Carried 5-0. 80 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 9, 5-19-86 XlI, XlII. 2. STATUS OF REVISION TO CITY NOISE ORDINANCE It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to receive and file subject report dated May 19, 1986, prepared by the Community Devel- opment Department. Councilwoman Kennedy pointed out that a speaker this evening reminded Council that the City's noise ordinance is inadequate to protect its residential communities from the noise impacts from the industrial park. She stated that the ~xisting loopholes must be closed. Richard Vining, 400 West Main, commented how quiet his nieghborhood is since the helicopters (Sky Stallions) stopped flying over the area in the past month. He requested that the decibel level of helicopters be included in the noise ordinance. The motion carried 5-0. 81 OTHER BUSINESS 1. APPOINTT~NT OF EDGAR TO BOTll. ENECK POLICY CONMITTEE Following a brief oral report by the City Manager, Council con- curred to appoint Councilman Edgar to fill the vacancy of former Mayor Greinke as the City's representative on the Bottleneck Policy Committee. 100 2. REQUEST FOR LIGNT FIXTURE ON THIRD STREET Councilman Kelly reported he has received complaints of inadequate lighting on Third Street behind E1 Camino Pet Grooming or the Black Sheep Bistro. He requested staff look-into some type of light fix- ture at that location. 63 3o COBBLESTONE CROSSWALKS ON EL CAMINO REAL Councilman Kelly reported that the cobblestone crosswalks on E1 Camino Real have become extremely dirty, and motorists are not aware that it's a crosswalk and speed right ~through them. He requested that the crosswalks be painted along the cement sepa- rating the asphalt from the cobblestone for more distinction. 4. ORANGE COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL Councilwoman Kennedy reported that Orange County Vector Control has traps available to people who have problems with opossums. They have recently been declared a vector (disease-carrying animal) and are considered dangerous in residential areas. Mayor Saltarelli suggested an article in Tustin Today on subject matter. 5. JOINT POMERS AGENCY AGREEMENT At Mayor Saltarelli's request, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to direct the Mayor to execute the Joint Powers Agency Agreement. Mayor Saltarelll relayed his misgivings relative to joining the Agency. The motion carried 4-1, Saltarelli opposed. RECESS - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - ADJOURNMENT At 8:52 p.m. the Council recessed to the Redevelopment Agency; and thence adjourned to a Budget Workshop on June 2, 1986, at 4:00 p.m., and thence to the next Regular Meeting on June 2, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. by unanimous informal consent. MAYOR CITY CLERK