HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA DESIGN REVIEW 06-16-86AGEN
DATE:
dUNE 16, 1986
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
'lO. 4
6-16-86
Inter- Com
TO:
FROM:
S U BJ ECT:
WILLIAM A. HUSTON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
COI~UNII~ DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DESIGN REVIEW/730 EL CAMINO WAY
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the Agency review and approve revisions the office project located at
730 E1Camino Way as approved by Use Permit 85-14. Action should be taken
by the adoption of Resolution No. RDA 86-6.
St~ARY:
On May 26, 1986, based upon information contained in the attached "Report
to the Planning Commission," revisions to a previously approved office
project were authorized. Specifically, the structure located at 730 E1
Camino Way was lowered in height, the lot size of the project reduced, and
the site plan/parking layout was altered. However, the architectural theme
has not been changed, and in fact the structure's appearance has actually
been enhanced resulting from its reduced scale.
Each of the above mentioned changes are required due to a change in Santa
Ana Freeway modification plans proposed by Cal Trans.
As is the case with all projects in the Redevelopment Project Areas, Agency
approval is required for architectural and site plan aspects of this
revised plan.
EMK:JSD:em
EDWARD M. KNIGHT
Senior Planner
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
10
21
22
~5
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 86-6
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY. OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING THE DESIGN OF AN OFFICE STRUCTURE
TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT 730 EL CAMINO WAY AS
APPROVED BY AMENDMENT NO. i TO USE PERMIT
85-14 THEREBY SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NO.
RDA 85-7
· The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City .of Tustin, California
does hereby approve the design of the office project proposed to be
constructed at 730 E1Camino Way pursuant to Amendment No. i to Use
Permit 85-14 based upon the following findings:
That the architecture of the revised project, as approved by
Amendment No. 1 to Use Permit 85-14, is consistent with the
goals of the Town Center Redevelopment Plan and is compatible
with the surrounding area.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at.a regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency held on
the day of , 1986.
DONALD J. SALTARELLI
Chairman
MARY E. WYNN
Secretary
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
NAY 26, 1986
ANENDMENT NO. I TO USE PERMIT 85-14
MARK O. CERNICH
1745 ~. KATELLA, SUITE k
ORANGE, CA 92669
730 EL CAMI#O IIAY
CENTRAl. COI~ERCIAL (C-2) DISTRICT
REQUEST:
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION gAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ZN CONgUNCTION
#ITH USE PERRIT 85-14 IN COMPLIANCE gITH THE CALIFORNIA
EMVIROI~RTAL QOALITT ACT.-
AUTHORIZATION TO AP, END USE PERMIT 85-14 AS FOLLOgS:
1. TO REDUCE THE HEIGHT AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE APPROVED
PRO~ECT.
2. TO CONSTRUCT A REVISED PROJECT ON A S~ALLER PARCEL AS THE
RESULT OF A STATE PROPOSED FREE~AY ~IDENXNG PROJECT.
RECOI~ENDED ACTION:
It ts recommended that the Commission' approve Amendment No. 1 to Use Permit
85-14 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2335.
BACKGROUND:
In actions taken by the Planning Commission and the Redevelopment Agency in 0une
and July of last year, Use Permit 85-14 authorizing construction of a 15,316
square foot offtce butlding at 730 E1Camtno Nay was approved. Subsequent]y, as
a result of a change in freeway alignments proposed by Ca] Trans, a large
portion of the stte w~]l be used for freeway right-of-way.
The appitcant st~11 wtshes to construct an offtce butldtng on the remainder of
the parcel and Is requesting that the revised site plan and elevations be
approved as an amendment to Use Permtt 85-14.
Cal Trans'has been notified of this evenings public hearing via certified mail
(return receipt received) and no comments were received at the writing of this
report.
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
May 26, 1986
page ~o
A#ALYSIS:
As revised, the subject project reduces overall height of the building by seven
feet and decreases' square footage from 15,316 square feet to 7,450 square feet.
Further the lot size has been decreased from 27,314 square feet to slightly over
1S,000 square feet. Virtually all other aspects of the project (e.g. setbacks,
building materials and architectural design) are the same as those approved by
Use Permit 8S-14 and are in conformance with the C-2 Zone District Regulations.
Exceptions, however, are: (1) the nominal amount of retail floor space in the
previous project has been eliminated; and (2) 30~ of the parking area has been
designated for compacts. This ratio is in excess of the standard 20~ maximum.
Given the location of the structure, staff concurs with the applicant's
contention that retail is not a viable use within this project. Therefore it is
recommended that all retail area requirements be deleted. Further, .since the
increased use of compact spaces is negligible, and this ratio is consistent with
development standards recently adopted for other portions of the city (First
Street Specific Plan), it is recommended that the site' plan be approved as
submitted.
CO#CLUSXO#S:
As a result of circumstances beyond the applicant's control, modification of the
previously approved office project is unavoidable. Modifications proposed,
however, actually enhance aesthetic qualities of the structure and therefore,
staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 1 to Use Permit 85-14.
Associate Planner
jSD:EMK:em:pef
Attach:
Senior Planner
Resolution No. 2335
Resolution No. 2252 Approving Use Permit 85-14
Reduced Copies Original Site Plan/Elevations
Reduced Copies Revised Site Plan/Elevations
Full Size Site Plans/Elevations
Development Review Summary
Community Development Department
1
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
15
17
18
10
20
21
22
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2335
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. i TO USE PERMIT 85-14
AUTHORIZING MODIFICATIONS IN BUILDING SIZE, ELEVATIONS,
AND SITE LAYOUT OF THE OFFICE STRUCTURE APPROVED BY USE
PERMIT 85-14 AT 730 EL CAMINO WAY.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
That a proper application (Use Permit No. 85-14) was filed by
Mr. Mark D. Cerntch requesting authorization to construct a
1B,361 square foot, three-story office building.at 730 E1 Camino
Way.
Be
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
appl t cati on.
C. That Use Permit 85-14 was approved as submitted.
That as a result of a proposed freeway widening project, the
State of California will be acquiring a large portion of the
subject property.
That because of the loss of property, the office structure,
approved by Use Permit 85-14, must be modified reducing its
height and gross square footage and the site plan must be
altered.
That in accordance with all applicable regulations, the project
applicant has requested that Use Permit 85-14 be amended to
reflect a revised project.
Ge
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held
considering Amendment No. 1 to Use Permit 85-14.
He
That all of the findings, determinations, and conditions of
approval (with the exception of condition IIQ which is to be
deleted) for Use Permit 85-14 are still valid and will remain in
affect in conjunction with Amendment No. 1 to Use Permit 85-14.
1
2
3
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
25
27
28
Resolution No. 2335
Page two
II.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Amendment No. 1 to Use Permit
85-14 subject to the following conditions:
A. That all conditions of approval contained in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 2252 shall apply to the revised project with the
exception of condition 1IQ which shall be deleted.
B. That the structure approved by Amendment No. i to Use Permit
85-14 shall not exceed (2) two stories or 40 feet above existing
grade.
C. That the maximum square footage of gross floor space of the
modified office structure shall not exceed 7,450 square feet.
D. That compact sized parking spaces on the modified site shall be
limited to a maximum of 30% of total space required.
PASSED AND ADOPTED.at a regular q~[ing of the Tustin P~ning Commission,
held on the~__~day of_~ , 1981
Chairman
Recording Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, PEHNI FOLEY, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the
Recording Secretary of the Plannin~ C~mmtsston of the City of Tusttn,
California; that Resolution No.~ was duly passed and adopted ak/
a regular..me~ing of the Tus~i~n~g Commission, held on the~q~
day of_~~_~, 19~'~.
!
2
3
5
$
?
8
10
11
12
16
18
~0
2I
RESOLUTION NO. 2252
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF THE'CITY OF
I~JSTIN, APPROViNG.USE PERMIT 84-14 AU~q(ORIZING CONSTRUCTION OF 15,361
SQUARE FOOT, ll~R£E-STORY OFFIC£ BUILDING IN THE C£NTRAL COMMERCIAL
(C-2) OISI~ICT AT 730 EL CAMINO WAY.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A:
Tha~ a proper appltcatton,..(Use Permit No. 85-14) has been filed
by Mr. Mark D. Cernich requesting authorization to construct a
15,361 square foot, three stor~y office buildtn~ at 730 E1Camino
Way.
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
appl t cart on.
Ce
That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be
de. mental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or genera~
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
nat the.use as proposed ts in conformance with the Tustin
Area Gene~l Plan as it pertains to commercial development.
l~at. the use as proposed is t~ compliance with the Tustin
Zoning Code in that it is hereby found and determined that
the construction of' a general office building is more
compatible with surrounding uses in the area then permitted
retail commercial uses based on the following:
a)
The Irregular lot shape and location is not conducive
to retail uses.
b) The traffic volume in the immediate area will not
support retail uses.
De
l~at the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not he injurious or detrimental to the property
and tmp~ovement~ in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and should be
granted.
1. P. esolut,ion No. 2252
Page Two
23 F.. Proposed development, shall be in accordance wtth the development.
poltcies adopted by t,he City Counctl. Untform Bu~'ldtng Codes as
ad,rintstered by the Butldtng Official, Ftre Code 'as administered
· by the Orange County Fire l~arshaTM st,rent, t,~rovement
requirements as ad,rintstered by the Ct~y Engineer.
F: A tl~gat,lve O~clarat,ton has been applted for tn compliance
the California Environmental qualt~Y Act, and ts hereby approved.
8 6. Final development, plans sh&ll ~equtm the ~evte~ and approval
the Co,,,unl~/ Development, Oepar13,ent.
II. The Planntng Comrisston hereby approves Conditional Use Permtlc ~1o.'
8~,-t4 te authorize construc~on of a :tS,$6:t offtca butldtng at, 730
Ca,rlno Way subject te the following condtt,tons:
A. The ftnal stte plan shall be stendardtzed and reflect all
te Ct standard drawtng numbers. The developer
approprta ty __ s~reet t,~rovement,s ~ satd.
construct, all ,ri~3tng or damaged . ....
Ct of Tusttn Minimum Design $~near~s
development, per the · ~Y__ ndards". Thts work
Publlc Wor~s, and Street, Improvement, ~tacurt~s and guttars.
but ts not 11mired
shall consist of,
sidewalks, drive apron, and street, pavement,.
9
11
15
1
17
18
19
:2O
:21
B. Trash enclosures sho~n'on site plan mst, be relocated on site,
t,o the rear of the'propertY. Sparta1 arrangements ~th the
Ct~'s refuse hauler will ~ required.
C. Re~ve lands~ptng from along ~e wall screening parking salls
and mloca~ els~hem on the s~te. The ex~s[~ng t~ sh~n on
O. A s~x (6) foe~ block ~all sh~11 ~ cont~nued along the no~he~
and wes~ pe~. The no~ elevation of the ~all
sepa~a[~ng the subSec~ p~ope~ f~om the adSo~n~ng shopping
cen~ shall be t~ea~d w~ the sa~ ~ate~als and colo~s
at~l~zed on ~e p~opoeed building, ~nclud~ng a ~ ~P ~ch~ng
~e con[~as~ fea~es of the s[~uc~e.
26
$
?
9
11
.14'
15
17
18
19
2O
2!
~6
:17
Resol,,tton No. 2252
Page Three
E. The maxtmum hetght of the proposed s~'uc~ure shall not exceed 47
feet from extstlng grade. [f as a result of required grading,
the height of the 's~-uc~u~e wtll be tn excess of 47 feet from
extsttng grade, the plans 'must be returned to the Commtsstofi for
~evtew and approval.
F: A g~adtng p~an shall be ~equtred showing all key ftntsh
elevations of the proposed development and exist.lng el,vat.Ions
of all ad~lacent prope~tes.
The cons~ruc'cton of all mlsstng or damaged s~'eet tmprovement.s
ad~lacent to the property wt]l be required, Including but not.
llM~d to the following:
Curb and gutter
2) Sidewalk
3) I~H ye apron
Street trees -
541 ~/ater se~vt ce/meter
6) Santl~ry sever connection
All requtred public improvements should be shown on a separat.e
ctvtl stte plan and so not.ed and referenced wtt.h applicable ctt.y
s~ndard drawing numbers.
A sant~ary sewer ts locatod along the northerly portion of thts
parcel. This sewer shall be plott.ed on all stt.e 'plans, grading
plans and ctvtl st~a plan to de,ermine tf the~e ts any conflict.
wtth the proposed butldtng location.
Following fees wtll ~equtre payment at the ttme .a buildtng
pe~it Is Issued:
Orange County Sanitation Distrlct NO. 7 sewer connect.fon
fees tn the amount of $50.00 per 1,O00 sq. ft. of butldtng
area plus any front footage charge for direct connect.ton to
a Dts~'tct ~unk line less any previously paid Sanitation
Dtstrtct charges.
1
3
$
7
$
9
10
11
13
15
16
17
18
19
21
26
Resolution ~o. 2252
Page ;our
East Orange County Water Otstrtct fees. Amounts may be
obtatned from Earl Ro~enhorst of Tustin Water Servtce. Hew
developmont t~x tn the amount of $.10 per square foot,
gross butldlng area.
J~ The developer shall enter Into an agreement obligating the
developer to participate Jn the £astarn/;oothtll Corrtdor
Program, as adopted by the City Counctl.
K. Compliance wtth the requirements of the Orange County Ftre
Oeparlaent as ~ndlcated tn the preliminary plan check report
dated Hay 29, 1985 ~s mandatory.
lie
Pe
A complete, detailed, landscape and Irrigation plan must be
subarltted for approval of the Coat, unity. Development Departmen~
prlor to'issuance to b~tld-~n~ permtt.
A master stgn plan ~n conformance wtth Stgn Ordinance 584 must
be subwltted and approved by the Community Development
Oepaement prior to the Installation of any stgns.
Continuous stx (5) 1rich concreto curbs shall be provtded along
landscape planters adjacent to parking spaces and drtve atsles.
All roof dratn do~n spouts and access ladders shall be
constructed wtth~n the bu~ld~ng structure.
All roof-top equipment shall be screened from vtew by the
parapet sho~n on the approved elevations.
On the ftrst 1floor of the proposed structure, 728 square feet of
floor area shall be reserved for a fete11 use. This cond~tfon
may be watved at a la,er date, by the Planntng Commission, upon
evtdence presented by the developer that the area ts not
leas,able for re~atl uses.
1
2
$
6
?
9
10
11
12
15
15
17
18
2O
21
R. The approval ~r~n~ed by ~ts Use Per;~ shall not be tn full
force and effec~ un~tl a stgned "Agreement to Conditions
~.~osed' for~. t$ s~ned returned to the Gommu. n~ty Development
Oep~r'ment.
Recording Secre~ar~J
PASSED AND'ADOP~ a~ & r~gula/~ mael:l, ng of ~he Tus'ctn~P.~anntng Commission,
held on. the ~/~ day.o~ , $98_~.
~. .
RONALD H. WHITE,
Chairman
~D:~$
$TA'I~ OF" CALIFORNIA)
¢OUNTT OF' ORANr.~- )
(:ITl' OF TU~I'~N )
DEYELOPM£NT RE¥IEW SUMMARY
Pro~ect: Amendment No. I Co Use Permit 85-14
Locat~on/D~str~ct: 730 E1 Camino Way/C-2
Action: Request authorization to modify structure previously.
approved by Use Permit 85-14.
U. P. 85-14
Original Plan Otstrtct Requirement
Building:
Front Setback o-15'
Stde Setback min. 12"
Rear Setback 47'
Gross Square Footage 15,31~
Net Floor Square Footage *
Nefght 47'
Number of stortes
Materials/Colors
Lot Stze 27,314
Lot Coverage 35~
Parktng:
Number of Spaces
3
Stucco/Tile
Earthtomes
0
0
0
0
*
50'
*
*
2OO
100%
1:250%~ic~ ii~50 office
Ratto (space/square ¢ootage)l:2OO retail
Percent of Compact Spaces 20%
Type Ac Grade
Retail/Profess.
Uses: Office
1:200 retail
20%
Proposed -
(Amend. No. 1)
0 - 15'
min 4'
52'
7450
*
40'
2
Stucco/Tile
Earthtones
15,177
1:250 office
3O%
At Grade
Retail/Office
with a C.U.P. Office
Number of Publlc Notiftcatfons (Owners):
Envlronmental Status
* No Standard
300' radius 7
A Negative Declaration was previously
app~'oved for the project.