HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 01-07-85MINUTES OF A REGULAR FLEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
JANUARY 7, 1985
II.
III.
IV.
Ve
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
Following a 5:00 p.m. Special Closed Session which was duly called and
noticed to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Sec-
tion 54957, the meeting was called to order by Mayor Kennedy at 7:02
p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 "Centennial Nay. The Pledge of
Allegiance was led by Councilman Saltare111, and the Invocation was
given by Councilman Edgar.
ROLL CALL
Counctlpersons Present:
Councilpersons Absent:
Others Present:-
Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor
Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Pro Tem
Richard B. Edgar
Ronald B. Hoesterey
Donald J. Saltarelli
None
William A. Huston, City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director
Robert S. Ledendecker, Dtr. of Public Works
Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
R. Kenneth Fleagle, Planning Consultant
Approximately 40 in the audience
PUBLIC If"c. ARI NGS
1. PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 105
85-2
(MEDFORD-GROVESITE)
- RESOLUTION NO.
The Co,,miunity Development Director presented the staff report and
recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated January 7, 1985,
prepared by the Community Development Department.
The public hearing was opened at 7:06 p.m.
The following' persons spoke in opposition to proposed Annexation
No. 105:
W. F. Davenport, 13762 Loretta Drive, Santa Aha
Mary Kincaid, 13815 Grovesite Drive, Santa Ana
After Council/staff discussion, it was moved by Greinke,
by Edgar, to adopt the following:
seconded
RESOLUTION NO. 85-2 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPLICATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY KNOWN AS MEDFORD-GROVESITE ANNEXATION NO. 105 TO THE CITY
OF TUSTIN
24
Following Council discussion, the motion carried 5-0.
PUBLIC INPUT
None.
PRESENTATION
1. JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT - SLIDE PRESENTATION, CITY OF NEWPORT 8EACH
Evelyn R. Hart, Newport Beach Council member and former Mayor,
'spoke regarding the proposed expansion of John Wayne Airport and
introduced Ken Delamo, Newport Beach City Manager's Office, who
presented a narrated slide show on the matter to be considered by
the Orange County Board of Supervisors on January 30, 1985.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 1-7-85
Tustin City Council members expressed thanks for the presentation,
and discussion followed. 101
VI.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Item No. 7 was removed from the Consen~ Calendar by Edgar. It was '
moved by. Hoestere~, seconded by Saltarelli, to approve the remainder of
the Consent Calendar. Carried 5-0.
1. APPROVAl. OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 18, 1984
2. APPROVAJ. OF DE~JbqDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,295,059.81
RATIFICATION OF PAYR~L IN THE AMOUNT OF $112,519.72
5O
o
PROPOSED CONll~CT FOR REHABILITATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTIES ()(lCD)
Authorized the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute subject con-
tract as recommendecl by the Community Development Department.
45; 85-1
e
PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS, NOUSING &
COI~I4UNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 (HCD)
Authorized the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute subject
contract as recommended by the Community Development Depart-
ment. 45; 85-2
,1,
RESOLUTION NO. 85-3 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDA-
TION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (Fiscal Year 1983-84 Sidewalk and Curb
Repair Program, Harper Construction Company)
Adopted Resolution No. 85-3 and authorized payment of the final
10% retention of $5,943.92 thirty days after the date of
recordation of the Notice of Completion if no liens or stop
payment notices have been filed as recommended by the Engineer-
ing Department. 92
RESOLUTION NO. 85-4 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN STATING INTENTIONS TO RETAIN AND ENFORCE EXISTING ACCESS
RESTRICTIONS ON SYCAMORE AVENUE BETWEEN PASADENA AVENUE AND NEWPORT
AVENUE
Adopted Resolution No. 85-4 as recommended by the Engineering
Department. 94
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT - SAN DIEGO CREEK/UPPER NEWPORT BAY WATER-
SHED
Authorized the Mayor to execute the first amendment to subject
agreement subject to the final approval of the City Attorney's
office as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer. 45; 85-4
RESOLUTION NO. 85-1 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
AUTHORIZING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 13,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 1372 IRVINE BLVD.
Adopted Resolution No. 85-1 as approved by the City Council.
81
Consent Calendar Item No. 7 - Newport Avenue Traffic Signal Inter-
connect/Modification - The Director of Public Works responded to
Councilman Edgar that although this particular project will not entail
any computerization, it can be integrated in the future to a computer-
ized program. Councilman Edgar expressed eagerness to embark on a com-
puterized traffic control program, to which the Director noted that the
matter will be addressed in the City-wide Traffic Study which should be
ready for Council presentation in January/February, 1985.
The Public Works Director responded to Mayor Pro Tem Greinke's concern
that subject consultant had no involvement in the loss of trees during
the E1 Camino Real improvement project. Mayor Pro Tem Greinke stated
that, nevertheless, he had a problem in approving the matter.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 1-7-85
It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the
following:
e
CONSULTANT AGREEgENT - NEWPORT AVENUE TRAFFIC SZGilAL INTERCONNECT/
MODIFICATION PROJECT.
Authorized the Mayor to execute Agreement No. 5271-841 for sub-
ject project between the City and Berr3nnan -& Stephenson, Inc.,
as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
Carried 4-1, Greinke opposed.
45; 85-3
VII. ORDINANCES FO~ INT~OOUCTION
None.
VIII.
ORDINANCES FOR' ADOPTION
1. ZONE OIANGE 84-8 - ORDINANCE NO. 925 - 15901, 15941, 15991 REDHILL
AVENUE
It was moved by.~dgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No.
925 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following
second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 925 by the City
Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance
No. 925 be passed and adopted as follows':
ORDINATE NO. 925 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REZONING FROM P.C. INDUSTRIAL TO P.C.
INDUSTRIAL/BUSINESS FOR THE PROPERTIES KNOWN AS 15g01, 15941, 15991
REDHILL AVENUE
Roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli
None
None
110
IX.
OLD BUSINESS
None.
NEW BUSII~SS
1. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR LDRETTA DRIVE A/ID ROSALIND DRIVE WATER PAIN
REPLACEMENT IMPROVEHENTS
Bids for subject project were received on December 27, 1984, as
follows:
Forster Construction, Fullerton
J & B Contractors, Inc., Highland
John T. Malloy, Los Angeles
Brkich Bros. Corp., E1 Monte
Schuler Engineering Corp., Anaheim
Macco Constructors, Inc., Paramount
Duty Bros. Equipment Co., Norwalk
$45,074.15
$45,447.04
$48,567.50
$49,022.00
$49,492.50
$61,426.00
$69,102.25
As recommended in the Inter-cum dated December 28, 1984, prepared
by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded
by Hoesterey, to award the contract for the subject project to
Forster Construction, Fullerton, in the amount of $45,074.15.
At the request of Councilman Edgar, the Director of Public Works
provided a status report on the sale of subject area to the City of
Orange. Mayor Kennedy announced that Mayor Pro Tem Greinke had
declared a conflict of interest on the matter.
The motion carried 4-0, Greinke abstained. 107
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 1-7-85
XI.
XlI.
REPLACEMENT OF ROLLER
Bids for subject item were received as follows:
J. I. Case, City of Industry $11,270.96
Case Power & Equipment, Riverside $11,890.02
Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the inter-com dated
December 26, 1984, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli,
to authorize the purchase of a Case W121 roller with trailer from
J. I. Case, City of Industry, for $11,270.96. Motion carried 5-0.
~7
3. SALE OF SALVAGE
As recommended in the inter-com dated December 20, 1984, prepared
by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by
Edgar, to accept the sale of unusable Water Division salvage in the
amount of $2,692.50 to Key Metals, Santa Ana. Carried 4-0, Greinke
abstained. 87
REPORTS
1. REQUEST FOR BUILDING PERMIT ISSUAI~CE, PACIFIC OELL TELEPHONE
CO)I)ANY
The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community
Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated January 7,
1985, prepared by the Community Development Department.
It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to authorize the
Pacific Bell Telephone project to proceed since Specific Plan #7
has yet to be completed, and, to further direct staff to accept a
surety bond in an amount necessary to cover estimated assessment
district fees for regional circulation improvements. Carried 5-0.
81
2. APPOINTMENT OF NEW SENIOR PLANNER
The report dated January 7, 1985, prepared by the Community Devel-
opment Department on subject item was received and filed by unani-
mous informal consent. ~9
3. STATUS REPORT CONCERNING 545 "B" STREET
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file
the int~h-com dated Janua"F~ 7, 1985, prepared by the Community
Development Department. The Co, m,unity Development Director stated
that the project is under control; it is being inspected regularly;
and when completed (in approximately 45 days), staff will again
contact Mr. Anderson to insure his property is cleaned and that
walls and fences are built as required. The motion carried 5-0.
81
4. WATER OEBT SURCHARGE FUNO ~H FLO# ANALYSIS
Following consideration of the Finance Director's inter-com dated
January 2, 1985, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to
acknowledge that due to additional appropriations to the Water Debt
Surcharge Fund (to augment the balance of Water Bond proceeds to
repay the General Fund), the Council recognizes that the fund
balance posture will be negative and that during the six-month
period from January 1, 1985, to June 30, 1985, resources of the
Water Enterprise Fund will be made available to the Debt Surcharge
Fund as needed. The motion carried 5-0. 50
OTHER BUSINESS
1. REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION
The City Manager requested a Closed Session for discussion of
personnel matters and the potential acquisition of property.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5, 1-7-85
r
XlII.
XIV.
XV.
XVI.
2. BIDDING OP~)RTUNITIES FOR TUSTIN BUSINESSES
Mayor Kennedy restated Council's request that staff, when purchas-
ing items totaling less than the amount which requires formal bid
procedures, allow businesses located within Tustin the opportunity
to compete in a fair, open market. She reminded staff of Council's
commitment in this regard. BO
3. CIll~ EI(I1)J~E I~(TIFICJ~TION sIGnS
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Greinke, the Community Development
Director reported that the three new entrance signs are in place,
and the three old signs have been stored at the City Maintenance
Yard. Mayor Pro Tem Greinke requested that staff report back on
the cost of refurbishing the old signs for placement at some
easterly main corridors. 93
RECESS - REDEVPlOP~NT - RECONVENED
At 8:17 p.m. it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, to recess
to the Redevelopment Agency. Carried 5-0.
The meeting was reconvened at ~:33 p.m. with all members present.
RECESS - CLOSED SESSION - RECONVENED
At 8:33 p.m. it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, to recess
to a Closed Session to meet with designated representatives regarding
labor negotiation related matters pursuant to Government Code Section
54967.6, and also to discuss negotiations with Burnett-Ehline concern-
ing the purchase of the property located at Irvine Boulevard and New-
port Avenue pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. Motion car-
ried 5-0.
The meeting was reconvened at 9:45 p.m. with all members present.
PERSONNEl. SAI.ARIES - RESOLUTION NOS. 85-6 & 85-7
By way of action from Closed Session, it was moved by Saltarelli, sec-
onded by Hoestere~, to adopt the following:
RES(~.UTION NO. 85-6 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION, AND
TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT OF CONFIDENTIAL, NON-ADMINISTRATIVE AND NON-
MANAGEMENT GENERAL EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
RESOLUTION NO. 85-7 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION, AND
TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT OF NON-ADMINISTRATIVE AND NON-MANAGEMENT SWORN
POLICE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
Motion carried 4-1, Greinke opposed.
79
AD,)OURNHENT
At 9:46 p.m. it was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded by Greinke, to adjourn
to a Closed Session on January 21, 1985, at 4:00 p.m. for discussion of
personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957, and thence
to the next regular meeting on January 21, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. Carried
5-0.
MAYOR
MINUTES OF A REgJI.AR
OF lliE REI)EVELOPFIENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
JANUARY 7, 1985
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Kennedy at 8:17 t~.'m, in the
City Council ChaSers, 300*Centennial Way, Tustin, California.
2. ROLL CALL
Agency Members Present:
Agency Members Absent:
Others Present:
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ursula E. Kennedy, Chairperson
Frank H. Greinke, Chairperson Pro Tem
Richard B. Edgar
Ronald B. Hoesterey
Donald J. Saltarelli
None
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager
Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk
Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director
Robert S. Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
R. Kenneth Fleagle, Planning Consultant
Approximately 10 in the audience
e
It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to approve the minutes of the
December 18, 198~, meeting. The motion carried 5-0.
TAX INCREMENT REVENUE RESTRICTED FOR AFFORDABLE
Agency consideration and discussion followed regarding the January 7,
1985, inter-com prepared by the Community Development Department on sub-
ject item.
It was mo.ved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the "Policy of the
Redevelopment Agency for the Allocation of Housing Assistance Funds"-as
follows:
A. General Policy
The Redevelopment Agency will consider requests for financial assis-
tance for low- and moderate-income housing on a project by project
basis, giving consideration to the specific policies contained herein.
B. Allocation of Funds
Of the total funds and interest accruing from the tax increment
housing set-aside, not less than 50% shall be reserved and allo-
cated for the replacement of low- and moderate-income housing that
has been removed as part of a redevelopment project.
The remaining 50% of housing set-aside funds shall be allocated on
the basis of one-half in a revolving loan fund and the other one-
half as project grants.
The allocation of housing funds will be in the order of requests
subject to the availability of funds, and in accordance with the
priorities of the Redevelopment Agency.
C. Operation of Revolving Fund
Loans may be made to private developers of housing pFojects at
below market interest rates for periods not to exceed five years..
Said funds may be applied to the construction of public improve-
ments, land or building costs.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Mr TES
Page 2, 1-7-85
Interest rates for revolving loans shall be not less than the
interest rate of any bonded indebtedness of the Redevelopment
Agency and shall be determined by the Agency at the time of appli-
cation.
3. Security for the loan shall be in a manner as approved by the City
Attorney and Redevelopment Agency.
D. Improvement Grants
Grants may be awarded to private developers for affordable housing
projects, subject to the availability of housing set-aside funds. The
funds may be used for the purpose of reducing housing costs pursuant
to the powers of the Agency.
E. Assurance of Affordability
Housing project loans shall be conditioned upon assurance of the
availability of affordable housing units as defined by Section
50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. Not less than
one affordable unit shall be provided and one additional unit
shall be provided for each $1,000 or portion thereof of the loan
amount for rental units. The assurance shall be subject to the
City Attorney's approval and shall extend for the duration of the
loan.
Grants for housing projects shall be conditioned upon the same
assurances required for loans but shall extend for the duration of
the Redevelopment Plan.
F. Priorities
Priorities for the allocation of available housing set-aside funds
shall be as follows:
1. Replacement housing, with preference given to the dispersion of
low-income housing.
2. Projects accommodating the greatest number of low-income families.
3. Affordable senior citizen projects.
4. Public improvement loans.
5. Private improvement loans.
6. Land acquisition grants.
7. Public improvement grants.
8. Subsidy payments.
9. Mortgage subsidies.
The motion carried 5-0.
5. AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT - 17432 & 17442 MITCHELL AVENUE
It was moved by Edgar, ..seconded by Greinke, to accept a request from Mark
S. Ferguson for the development project at 17432 and 17442 Mitchell Avenue
on the condition that approval be obtained for Section 8 Housing Certifi-
cate Holders and that it be set aside for the life of the Redevelopment
Agency.
Agency/staff discussion followed. The Executive Director indicated that
an agreement for project ratification would be prepared for the next
Agency meeting on January 21, 1985.
The motion carried 4-0, Saltarelli abstained.
60
6. AB,]OURNMENT
At 8:33 p.m., the Redevelopment Agency meeting was adjourned to the next
regular meeting on January 21, 1985, by unanimous informal consent.
RECO .G SECR t RY
CHAIRPERSUN