Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES 01-07-85MINUTES OF A REGULAR FLEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 7, 1985 II. III. IV. Ve CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION Following a 5:00 p.m. Special Closed Session which was duly called and noticed to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Sec- tion 54957, the meeting was called to order by Mayor Kennedy at 7:02 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 "Centennial Nay. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Saltare111, and the Invocation was given by Councilman Edgar. ROLL CALL Counctlpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present:- Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Donald J. Saltarelli None William A. Huston, City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Robert S. Ledendecker, Dtr. of Public Works Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director R. Kenneth Fleagle, Planning Consultant Approximately 40 in the audience PUBLIC If"c. ARI NGS 1. PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 105 85-2 (MEDFORD-GROVESITE) - RESOLUTION NO. The Co,,miunity Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated January 7, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. The public hearing was opened at 7:06 p.m. The following' persons spoke in opposition to proposed Annexation No. 105: W. F. Davenport, 13762 Loretta Drive, Santa Aha Mary Kincaid, 13815 Grovesite Drive, Santa Ana After Council/staff discussion, it was moved by Greinke, by Edgar, to adopt the following: seconded RESOLUTION NO. 85-2 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPLICATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY KNOWN AS MEDFORD-GROVESITE ANNEXATION NO. 105 TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN 24 Following Council discussion, the motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC INPUT None. PRESENTATION 1. JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT - SLIDE PRESENTATION, CITY OF NEWPORT 8EACH Evelyn R. Hart, Newport Beach Council member and former Mayor, 'spoke regarding the proposed expansion of John Wayne Airport and introduced Ken Delamo, Newport Beach City Manager's Office, who presented a narrated slide show on the matter to be considered by the Orange County Board of Supervisors on January 30, 1985. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 1-7-85 Tustin City Council members expressed thanks for the presentation, and discussion followed. 101 VI. CONSENT CALENDAR Item No. 7 was removed from the Consen~ Calendar by Edgar. It was ' moved by. Hoestere~, seconded by Saltarelli, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Carried 5-0. 1. APPROVAl. OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 18, 1984 2. APPROVAJ. OF DE~JbqDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,295,059.81 RATIFICATION OF PAYR~L IN THE AMOUNT OF $112,519.72 5O o PROPOSED CONll~CT FOR REHABILITATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTIES ()(lCD) Authorized the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute subject con- tract as recommendecl by the Community Development Department. 45; 85-1 e PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS, NOUSING & COI~I4UNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 (HCD) Authorized the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute subject contract as recommended by the Community Development Depart- ment. 45; 85-2 ,1, RESOLUTION NO. 85-3 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDA- TION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (Fiscal Year 1983-84 Sidewalk and Curb Repair Program, Harper Construction Company) Adopted Resolution No. 85-3 and authorized payment of the final 10% retention of $5,943.92 thirty days after the date of recordation of the Notice of Completion if no liens or stop payment notices have been filed as recommended by the Engineer- ing Department. 92 RESOLUTION NO. 85-4 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN STATING INTENTIONS TO RETAIN AND ENFORCE EXISTING ACCESS RESTRICTIONS ON SYCAMORE AVENUE BETWEEN PASADENA AVENUE AND NEWPORT AVENUE Adopted Resolution No. 85-4 as recommended by the Engineering Department. 94 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT - SAN DIEGO CREEK/UPPER NEWPORT BAY WATER- SHED Authorized the Mayor to execute the first amendment to subject agreement subject to the final approval of the City Attorney's office as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 45; 85-4 RESOLUTION NO. 85-1 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND AUTHORIZING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 13,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 1372 IRVINE BLVD. Adopted Resolution No. 85-1 as approved by the City Council. 81 Consent Calendar Item No. 7 - Newport Avenue Traffic Signal Inter- connect/Modification - The Director of Public Works responded to Councilman Edgar that although this particular project will not entail any computerization, it can be integrated in the future to a computer- ized program. Councilman Edgar expressed eagerness to embark on a com- puterized traffic control program, to which the Director noted that the matter will be addressed in the City-wide Traffic Study which should be ready for Council presentation in January/February, 1985. The Public Works Director responded to Mayor Pro Tem Greinke's concern that subject consultant had no involvement in the loss of trees during the E1 Camino Real improvement project. Mayor Pro Tem Greinke stated that, nevertheless, he had a problem in approving the matter. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 1-7-85 It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the following: e CONSULTANT AGREEgENT - NEWPORT AVENUE TRAFFIC SZGilAL INTERCONNECT/ MODIFICATION PROJECT. Authorized the Mayor to execute Agreement No. 5271-841 for sub- ject project between the City and Berr3nnan -& Stephenson, Inc., as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Carried 4-1, Greinke opposed. 45; 85-3 VII. ORDINANCES FO~ INT~OOUCTION None. VIII. ORDINANCES FOR' ADOPTION 1. ZONE OIANGE 84-8 - ORDINANCE NO. 925 - 15901, 15941, 15991 REDHILL AVENUE It was moved by.~dgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 925 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 925 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 925 be passed and adopted as follows': ORDINATE NO. 925 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REZONING FROM P.C. INDUSTRIAL TO P.C. INDUSTRIAL/BUSINESS FOR THE PROPERTIES KNOWN AS 15g01, 15941, 15991 REDHILL AVENUE Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli None None 110 IX. OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSII~SS 1. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR LDRETTA DRIVE A/ID ROSALIND DRIVE WATER PAIN REPLACEMENT IMPROVEHENTS Bids for subject project were received on December 27, 1984, as follows: Forster Construction, Fullerton J & B Contractors, Inc., Highland John T. Malloy, Los Angeles Brkich Bros. Corp., E1 Monte Schuler Engineering Corp., Anaheim Macco Constructors, Inc., Paramount Duty Bros. Equipment Co., Norwalk $45,074.15 $45,447.04 $48,567.50 $49,022.00 $49,492.50 $61,426.00 $69,102.25 As recommended in the Inter-cum dated December 28, 1984, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to award the contract for the subject project to Forster Construction, Fullerton, in the amount of $45,074.15. At the request of Councilman Edgar, the Director of Public Works provided a status report on the sale of subject area to the City of Orange. Mayor Kennedy announced that Mayor Pro Tem Greinke had declared a conflict of interest on the matter. The motion carried 4-0, Greinke abstained. 107 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 1-7-85 XI. XlI. REPLACEMENT OF ROLLER Bids for subject item were received as follows: J. I. Case, City of Industry $11,270.96 Case Power & Equipment, Riverside $11,890.02 Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the inter-com dated December 26, 1984, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to authorize the purchase of a Case W121 roller with trailer from J. I. Case, City of Industry, for $11,270.96. Motion carried 5-0. ~7 3. SALE OF SALVAGE As recommended in the inter-com dated December 20, 1984, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Edgar, to accept the sale of unusable Water Division salvage in the amount of $2,692.50 to Key Metals, Santa Ana. Carried 4-0, Greinke abstained. 87 REPORTS 1. REQUEST FOR BUILDING PERMIT ISSUAI~CE, PACIFIC OELL TELEPHONE CO)I)ANY The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated January 7, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to authorize the Pacific Bell Telephone project to proceed since Specific Plan #7 has yet to be completed, and, to further direct staff to accept a surety bond in an amount necessary to cover estimated assessment district fees for regional circulation improvements. Carried 5-0. 81 2. APPOINTMENT OF NEW SENIOR PLANNER The report dated January 7, 1985, prepared by the Community Devel- opment Department on subject item was received and filed by unani- mous informal consent. ~9 3. STATUS REPORT CONCERNING 545 "B" STREET It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file the int~h-com dated Janua"F~ 7, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. The Co, m,unity Development Director stated that the project is under control; it is being inspected regularly; and when completed (in approximately 45 days), staff will again contact Mr. Anderson to insure his property is cleaned and that walls and fences are built as required. The motion carried 5-0. 81 4. WATER OEBT SURCHARGE FUNO ~H FLO# ANALYSIS Following consideration of the Finance Director's inter-com dated January 2, 1985, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to acknowledge that due to additional appropriations to the Water Debt Surcharge Fund (to augment the balance of Water Bond proceeds to repay the General Fund), the Council recognizes that the fund balance posture will be negative and that during the six-month period from January 1, 1985, to June 30, 1985, resources of the Water Enterprise Fund will be made available to the Debt Surcharge Fund as needed. The motion carried 5-0. 50 OTHER BUSINESS 1. REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION The City Manager requested a Closed Session for discussion of personnel matters and the potential acquisition of property. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 1-7-85 r XlII. XIV. XV. XVI. 2. BIDDING OP~)RTUNITIES FOR TUSTIN BUSINESSES Mayor Kennedy restated Council's request that staff, when purchas- ing items totaling less than the amount which requires formal bid procedures, allow businesses located within Tustin the opportunity to compete in a fair, open market. She reminded staff of Council's commitment in this regard. BO 3. CIll~ EI(I1)J~E I~(TIFICJ~TION sIGnS In response to Mayor Pro Tem Greinke, the Community Development Director reported that the three new entrance signs are in place, and the three old signs have been stored at the City Maintenance Yard. Mayor Pro Tem Greinke requested that staff report back on the cost of refurbishing the old signs for placement at some easterly main corridors. 93 RECESS - REDEVPlOP~NT - RECONVENED At 8:17 p.m. it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, to recess to the Redevelopment Agency. Carried 5-0. The meeting was reconvened at ~:33 p.m. with all members present. RECESS - CLOSED SESSION - RECONVENED At 8:33 p.m. it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, to recess to a Closed Session to meet with designated representatives regarding labor negotiation related matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54967.6, and also to discuss negotiations with Burnett-Ehline concern- ing the purchase of the property located at Irvine Boulevard and New- port Avenue pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. Motion car- ried 5-0. The meeting was reconvened at 9:45 p.m. with all members present. PERSONNEl. SAI.ARIES - RESOLUTION NOS. 85-6 & 85-7 By way of action from Closed Session, it was moved by Saltarelli, sec- onded by Hoestere~, to adopt the following: RES(~.UTION NO. 85-6 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION, AND TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT OF CONFIDENTIAL, NON-ADMINISTRATIVE AND NON- MANAGEMENT GENERAL EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN RESOLUTION NO. 85-7 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION, AND TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT OF NON-ADMINISTRATIVE AND NON-MANAGEMENT SWORN POLICE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN Motion carried 4-1, Greinke opposed. 79 AD,)OURNHENT At 9:46 p.m. it was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded by Greinke, to adjourn to a Closed Session on January 21, 1985, at 4:00 p.m. for discussion of personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957, and thence to the next regular meeting on January 21, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. Carried 5-0. MAYOR MINUTES OF A REgJI.AR OF lliE REI)EVELOPFIENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 7, 1985 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Kennedy at 8:17 t~.'m, in the City Council ChaSers, 300*Centennial Way, Tustin, California. 2. ROLL CALL Agency Members Present: Agency Members Absent: Others Present: 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ursula E. Kennedy, Chairperson Frank H. Greinke, Chairperson Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Donald J. Saltarelli None James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Robert S. Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director R. Kenneth Fleagle, Planning Consultant Approximately 10 in the audience e It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to approve the minutes of the December 18, 198~, meeting. The motion carried 5-0. TAX INCREMENT REVENUE RESTRICTED FOR AFFORDABLE Agency consideration and discussion followed regarding the January 7, 1985, inter-com prepared by the Community Development Department on sub- ject item. It was mo.ved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the "Policy of the Redevelopment Agency for the Allocation of Housing Assistance Funds"-as follows: A. General Policy The Redevelopment Agency will consider requests for financial assis- tance for low- and moderate-income housing on a project by project basis, giving consideration to the specific policies contained herein. B. Allocation of Funds Of the total funds and interest accruing from the tax increment housing set-aside, not less than 50% shall be reserved and allo- cated for the replacement of low- and moderate-income housing that has been removed as part of a redevelopment project. The remaining 50% of housing set-aside funds shall be allocated on the basis of one-half in a revolving loan fund and the other one- half as project grants. The allocation of housing funds will be in the order of requests subject to the availability of funds, and in accordance with the priorities of the Redevelopment Agency. C. Operation of Revolving Fund Loans may be made to private developers of housing pFojects at below market interest rates for periods not to exceed five years.. Said funds may be applied to the construction of public improve- ments, land or building costs. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Mr TES Page 2, 1-7-85 Interest rates for revolving loans shall be not less than the interest rate of any bonded indebtedness of the Redevelopment Agency and shall be determined by the Agency at the time of appli- cation. 3. Security for the loan shall be in a manner as approved by the City Attorney and Redevelopment Agency. D. Improvement Grants Grants may be awarded to private developers for affordable housing projects, subject to the availability of housing set-aside funds. The funds may be used for the purpose of reducing housing costs pursuant to the powers of the Agency. E. Assurance of Affordability Housing project loans shall be conditioned upon assurance of the availability of affordable housing units as defined by Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. Not less than one affordable unit shall be provided and one additional unit shall be provided for each $1,000 or portion thereof of the loan amount for rental units. The assurance shall be subject to the City Attorney's approval and shall extend for the duration of the loan. Grants for housing projects shall be conditioned upon the same assurances required for loans but shall extend for the duration of the Redevelopment Plan. F. Priorities Priorities for the allocation of available housing set-aside funds shall be as follows: 1. Replacement housing, with preference given to the dispersion of low-income housing. 2. Projects accommodating the greatest number of low-income families. 3. Affordable senior citizen projects. 4. Public improvement loans. 5. Private improvement loans. 6. Land acquisition grants. 7. Public improvement grants. 8. Subsidy payments. 9. Mortgage subsidies. The motion carried 5-0. 5. AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT - 17432 & 17442 MITCHELL AVENUE It was moved by Edgar, ..seconded by Greinke, to accept a request from Mark S. Ferguson for the development project at 17432 and 17442 Mitchell Avenue on the condition that approval be obtained for Section 8 Housing Certifi- cate Holders and that it be set aside for the life of the Redevelopment Agency. Agency/staff discussion followed. The Executive Director indicated that an agreement for project ratification would be prepared for the next Agency meeting on January 21, 1985. The motion carried 4-0, Saltarelli abstained. 60 6. AB,]OURNMENT At 8:33 p.m., the Redevelopment Agency meeting was adjourned to the next regular meeting on January 21, 1985, by unanimous informal consent. RECO .G SECR t RY CHAIRPERSUN