HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1 MINUTES 02-04-85r
MINUTES OF A REGULAR ~EETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
JANUARY 21, 1985
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kennedy at 7:02 p.m. in the
CitY Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Girl Scout Troop No. 902, and
Council acknowledged Troop Leader Marie Bjang.
The Invocation was given by Councilman Hoesterey.
II. ROLL ~L
Councilpersons Present:
Councilpersons Absent:
Others Present:
Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor
Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Pro Tem
Richard B. Edgar
Ronald B. Hoesterey
Donald J. Saltarelli
None
William A. Huston, City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk .
Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director
Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works
Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
RD Kenneth. Fleagle, Planning Consultant
APproximately 50 in the audience
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. CRIllERIA FOR DISH ANllENNAE INS'TALLATION - ZONING ORDINANCE A~END-
MENT NO. 84-2 - ORDINANCE NO. 926
The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community
Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated
January 21, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department.
The public hearing was opened by Mayor Kennedy at 7:06 p.m. There
being no speakers on the matter, the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 926
have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first
reading by title only of Ordinance No. 926 by the City Clerk, it
was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 926 be
introduced as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 926 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 9270 AND 9271 OF THE TUSTIN
CITY CODE BY REQUIRING A USE PERMIT AND ESTABLISHING STANDARDS AND
CRITERIA FOR THE INSTALLATION OF DISH ANTENNAE
Motion carried 5-0.
110
2. APPEAL OF PtJkNNING CO~ISSION A~PROVAL OF USE PERMIT 84-27, 550
WEST SIXTH STREL:'F
Mayor Kennedy noted that staff has recommended continuance of the
matter.
The public hearing was opened at 7:09 p.m. There were no speakers
on the matter.
It was then moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, to continue
the open public hearing to February 4, 1985, w~en full analysis of
the water easement issue will be presented. Carried 5-0. 81
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 1-21-85
EAST TUSTIN PLANNED COFtiUNITY - TUSTIN AUTO C~NTER - RESOLUTION
NO. 85--9, RESOLUTION NO. 8S.-10, ORDINANCE NO. 927
The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community
Development Director as contained in his inter-com dated
January 21, 1985.
The Community Development Director summarized a letter from Stan
and Carol Taylor, 13532 Farmington Road, which questioned approval
of the Auto Center prior to formal approval and commitment of
Jamboree Road interchange by the California Department of Transpor-
tation, and increased traffic along Bryan Avenue and Myford Road.
The Director noted the Taylors' concerns would be addressed during
the public hearing by staff and project consultants.
Coralee Newman, Government Relations Manager with The Irvine Com-
pany, provided a chronolOgical history of the project.
Bonnie Holmes, Project Manager with The I~vine Company, spoke on
the project's fiscal benefits to the City, and addressed concerns
relative to lighting, noise, traffic, flood control, and aesthetics
associated with the Auto Center.
The Director of Public Works noted that the display map for a seg-
ment of the I-5 widening project, with proposed modifications to
the Myford Road interchange and the Jamboree Road interchange, was
obtained after the January 14 Planning Commission meeting, and it
confirms that the State is considering both interchanges in its
ultimate freeway plans. Secondly, the Director explained how cer-
tain improvements by the developer to the E1 Modena-Irvine channel
will increase its capacity by 120%.
The City Manager amplified the following points: Although the
Irvine Boulevard widening project is not associated with the Auto
Center project, it will have a beneficial impact on diverting traf-
fic from Bryan Avenue; the sales tax generated by the Auto Center
will provide the cash flow to assist the City in assuring that
service to the East Tustin Area, as it develops over the next 15-20
· years, will be quality service and not a drain to the City's exist-
ing General Fund; the Myford Road interchange is a committed pro~-
ect scheduled for 1988 and funded by CalTrans (as the interchange
is rebuilt, the existing interchange will remain open}; the City is
not endorsing an overpass at Browning Avenue; the Jamboree Road
interchange E!R shows that without the interchange there is suffi-
cient road capacity to handle traffic generated by the Auto Center;
there is no question that the Jamboree Road interchange is a very
key part of the project in terms of diverting traffic from other
streets; and as far as commitment, it has been on the City's long-
range plan and the County's Master Plan of Arterial Highways for a
number of years.
Staff members and Terry Austin (Austin-Foust Associates, Inc.)
responded to Council questions pertaining to flood control, per-
mitted uses in the Auto Center, Code updates requiring special
footings for expansive soils, the hundred-year flood plane, esti-
mated cost for the Jamboree Road interchange, City sales of water,
the number of dealerships in the Auto Center, traffic circulation
reports, peak hour traffic counts, and the timetable for I-5 free-
way wi deni ng.
Mayor Kennedy opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m.
Anita Austin, 13351 Nixon Circle, spoke in opposition to the Auto
Center on the basis of a change in nature from residential to com-
mercial and flooding.
Edward Reinig, 1792 Andrews Street, raised questions regarding berm
height; hours of operation; timetable for extension of Laguna Road;
opening day of the Center; widening of Bryan, Laguna, and Irvine
Boulevard; traffic congestion on Red Hill Avenue; and lighting at
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 1-21-85
the Auto Center. Bob Kallenbaugh (Robert Bein, William Frost &
Associates-Civil Engineering Consultants), staff, The Irvine Com-
pany representatives, and Council responded to-Mr. R~inig's ques-
tions individually.
Earl Coate, 1922 Burnt Mill Road, voiced concerns regarding traf-
fic, location of the Auto Center, funding of the Jamboree Road
interchange, and outdoor lighting. The City Manager and Community
Development Director responded to Mr. Coate.
John Avey, 1912 Burnt Mill Road, questioned The Irvine Company's
interest/benefit from the project versus those to the City; he was
opposed to directional "signs with arrows" pointing consumers to
various dealerships; he urged the City to obtain a written commit-
ment from CalTrans regarding the Jamboree Road interchange; and he
questioned the location of the Auto Center. The Community Develop-
ment Director, City Manager, and Director of Public Works respon-
ded to Mr. Avey's questions.
Jackie Haney, 13352 Nixon Circle, expressed concern regarding use
of loud speakers at the Auto Center, to which Bonnie Holmes, The
Irvine Company, responded that criteria is still being developed
for same.
Carol Taylor, 13532 Farmington, was informed of Clity boundary
lines; she voiced concerns regarding intensity/height of outdoor
lighting and use of loud speakers; and she was informed that the
auto dealers could not sue the City if the Jamboree Road inter-
change is not built.
Barry Ader, 1932 Blueberry_ Way, wondered what precendent-setting
effects the Auto Center would have on future development in the
area, to which Councilmembers responded that there will not be
piecemeal development, one land owner allows tighter control on
development, a Master Plan does exist for the area which is subject
to public hearings, and there is no intent for intense development
adjacent to residential areas in East Tustin. Bonnie Holmes
pointed out that one goal in planning development is to provide
financial resources for the City to render services to the entire
planning area. This project has-the least impact on existing resi-
dential areas than any other type of retail use in terms of traf-
fic, amount of land used, etc.
John Haney, 13352 Nixon Circle, asked how much additional revenue
must be generated through commercial ventures to support residen-
tial development. Councilman Edgar responded that a comprehensive
analysis of the financial impact in which all needed services and
tax bases must be identified for the entire area, will be presented
in three to four months.
There being no other speakers on the matter, the public hearing was
closed at 9:15 p.m.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to adopt the following:
RESOL~FFION NO. 85-10 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN CERTIFYING FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) 84-2
FOR THE TUSTIN AUTO CENTER
Following Council comments in support of the project, the motion
carried 5-0. 81
It was then moved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the
following:
RESOLUTION NO. 85-9 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP OF THE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN FOR AN AREA BOUNDED BY THE
I-5 FREEWAY, PROPOSED JAMBOREE ROAD, PROPOSED LAGUNA ROAD, AND A
LINE 192 FEET WEST OF THE EL MODENA CHANNEL, AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT
Carried 5-0. 81
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 1-21-85
It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance
No. 927 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following
first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 927 by the City Clerk,
it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 927
be introduced as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 927 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN REZONING AN AREA BOUNDED BY THE I-5 FREEWAY, PROPOSED
JAMBOREE ROAD, PROPOSED LAGUNA ROAD, AND A LINE 192 FEET WEST OF
THE EL MODENA CHANNEL, FROM PLANNED COMMUNITY TO PLANNED
COMMUNITY/COMMERCIAL AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT "A" AND INCLUDING THE
INCORPORATION OF PLANNED COMMUNITY REGULATIONS FOR THE EAST TUSTIN
AUTO CENTER
Motion carried 5-0.
110
RECESS; RECONVENEI)
Mayor Kennedy called a recess at 9:25 p.m.
at 9:30 with all Councilmembers present.
The meeting was reconvened
4. WINDSOR GARDENS - 1651 MITCHELL
The Community Development Director provided an oral status report
on the development progress towards project completion.
The public hearing was Qpened by Mayor Kennedy at 9:34 p.m. There
were no speakers on the matter.
It was then moved by Hoestere¥, seconded by Edgar, to continue the
open public hearing to the FebruarY 19, 1985, meeting. Carried
5-o.
IV. PUBLIC I~UT
1. CALIFORNIAN APARTMENTS
The following persons voiced complaints and relayed inc-jdents
regarding undesirable and hazardous living conditions at the
Californian Apartments:
Barbara Stroud, 14930 Newport Avenue, #K
Jody Spence, 14888 Newport Avenue, #G
Ms. Chambers, 14914 Newport Avenue, #L
Sal Belcore, 14912 Newport Avenue, ~B
Steve Price, 14918 Newport Avenue, #E
Mayor Kennedy indicated staff would investigate all the concerns
expressed over which the City has jurisdiction and report back to
the residents.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Item No. 5 was removed from the Consent Calendar by Councilman Edgar.
It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the
remainder of the Consent Calendar. The motion carried 5-0.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JANUARY 7, 1985
APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $558,353.33
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $233,553.74
50
REJECTION OF CLAIM OF CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH (BERAN); DATE OF LOSS:
2-20-84; DATE FILED W/CITY: 12-21-8~; CLAIM NO. 84-12
Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40
RESOLUTION NO. 85-5 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ANNUAL REPORT OF THE REDEVEL-
OPMENT AGENCY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1983-84
Adopted Resolution No. 85-5 as recommended by the City Manager.
6O
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5, 1-21-85
VI.
VII.
VIII.
RESOLUTION NO. 85-12 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 85-1
(GYLAH LANE)
Adopted Resolution No. 85-12 as recommended by the Director of
Public Works/City Engineer. 81
7. AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF SAliTA A~A TO PROVIDE FOR THE RESURFACING OF
MCFADDEN.STREET
Authorized the Mayor to execute subject agreement as recommen-
ded by the Engineering Department. 45; 85-5
e
RESOLUTION NO. 85-8 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CONFIRMING THE APPLICATION OF THE MASTER PROPERTY TAX
TRANSFER AGREEMENT TO THE PROPOSED MEDFORD-GROVESITE ANNEXATION
NO. 105
Adopted.Resolution No. 85-8 as recommended by the City Manager.
24
Consent Calendar Item No. 5 - Trac~ No. 11330, Release of Public
I~rovement Bonds - lhe Director of Public Works responded to Council-
man Edgar that subject item pertains to completion of public improve-
ments only, not completion of the entire condominium project. It was
then moved 'by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to approve the following:
RELEASE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BONDS - TRACT NO. 11330 (NE CORNER OF
REDHILL AND SA&(JUAN)
Authorized the release of the following bonds: Faithful Per-
formance No. L05-068745 in the amount of $8,500.00; Labor and
Materials No. L05-068745 in the amount of $4,250.00; and Monu-
mentation No. L05-068747 in the amount of $2,500.00 as recom~
mended by the Directo~ of Public Works/City Engineer.
The motion carried 5-0.
99
~DINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION
None. (See Public Hearings Nos. 1 and 3.)
ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION
None.
OLD BUSINESS
1. PAJ~KING R~Sll~ICTIONS AT C~NTENNIAL PAJ~K
In response to Mayor Kennedy, the Director of Public Works stated
that two signs would probably be erected at each location.
As recommended in the inter-com dated January 15, 1985, prepared by
the Director of Public Works, it was moved by Greinke, seconded by
Edgar, to authorize the installation of signing to restrict on-
street parking to four hours between 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on
both Devonshire Avenue and Roanoke Avenue adjacent to Centennial
Park.
Councilman Saltarelli stated he could not support the motion on the
basis that too many persons will be cited.
Kathy Weil, Civic Liaison Director of Tustin Meadows Homeowners
Association, requested that the restriction as recommended by the
Association Board be imposed on a six-month trial basis.
The City Attorney stated it would be difficult to enforce prohibi-
tion of cars displayed for sale from parking on City streets.
The motion was amended by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to include a
six-month time limit on the parking restrictions noted above in the
original motion. The amended motion carried 3-2, Hoesterey and
Saltarelli opposed. 75
Councilman Edgar requested that both staff and the Association
Board provide a written report on the matter in six months.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 1-21-85
IX. NEW BUSINESS
Xe
1. TENTATIVE PARCEL PAP 84-1032 - RESOLUTION NO. 85~11
The Community Development Director requested a modification to
Resolution No. 85-11, Exhibit "A" Conditions of Approval for Tenta-
tive Parcel Map 84-1032, Item No. 1, to read "Preparation and sub-
mittal of a final grading plan delineating the following informa-
tion as deemed necessary by the City Engineer:"
It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to accept the
modification noted above and adopt the following:
RESOLUTION NO. 85-11 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 84-1032 LOCATED IN AN AREA
BOUNDED BY THE I-5 FREEWAY, PROPOSED JAMBOREE ROAD, PROPOSED LAGUNA
ROAD AND A LINE 192 FEET WEST OF THE EL MODENA CHANNEL
The motion carried 5-0.
99
2. AWARD OF coNSULTANT SERVICES coNllU%CT.- LAGUNA ROAD
As recommended in the inter-com dated~January 11, 1985, prepared by
the Director of Public Works, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded
by Greinke, to approve the selection of Robert Bein, William Frost
and Associates to perform the consultant civil engineering services
for the easterly extension of Laguna Road between the Auto Center
development and Myford Road and authorize a supplemental budget
appropriation from the General Fund Reserve in the amount of
$34,500.00 for said work. Carried 5-0. 45; 85-6
REPORTS
1. PI. ANNI~ CONNISSION AL'TIONS - JANUARY 14, 1985
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to rati~ the entire
Planning Commission Action Agenda of January 14, 1985. Carried
5-O. ~
2. coNSIDERATION OF SIGN CODE AJ~ENDMENTS REGARDING ltlE REGUI_ATION OF
POLITICAL SIGNS
Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the inter-com dated
January 21, 1985, prepared by the community Development Department,
it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to direct staff
to initiate proceedings and direct the Planning Commission to con-
duct a public hearing for consideration of the proposed political
sign ordinance.
Lengthy Council/staff discussion followed. Council members
expressed a desire that the proposed ordinance include a stipula-
tion that if confiscated signs are not picked up within a defined
period of time, they are subject to destruction, and to continue
allowing posting of political signs in parkways with approval of
adjacent property owners.
The motion carried 5-0.
93
3. INSTAJ. LATION OF CIl"f ENll~A~ICE SIGNS
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file
the inter-com dated Januar.y 21, 1985, prepared by the Community
Development Director on subject item.
Councilman Greinke expressed interest in seeing the signs used on
an interim basis in the rural areas of East Tustin.
A substitute motion was made by Hoesterey, .seconded...by.Edgar, to
further consider preparation of an urban design element which would
establish design standards for community appearance, and direct
staff to report back with a specific proposal outlining the scope
of work and estimated costs for such a project.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 7, 1-21-85
XI.
Following Council/staff discussion, the original and substitute
motions were withdrawn by the maker with approval of the second.'
An amended motion was made by Edgar, seconded b7 Greinke, to uti-
lize two of the old signs, one at Irvi~e-Boulevard and My~ord Road,
and the other at Bryan Avenue and Myford Road. The motion failed
2-3, Hoesterey, Kennedy, and Saltarelli opposed.
It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoestere7, to further
consider preparation of an urban design element which would estab-
lish design standards for community appearance, and direct staff to
report back with a specific proposal outlining the scope of work
and estimated costs for such a project, including placement of two
of the old signs. The motion carried 5-0. 93
4. REDHILL AVENUE & BRYAN AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNING
Council/staff discussion ensued pertaining to subject item and the
inter-com dated January 7, 1985, prepared by the Director of Public
Works. The Chief of Police recommended that the "no right turn on
red" signs be removed. The City Attorney stated that the City has
less exposure to liability with the signs prohibiting the right
turn on red.
Councilman Saltarelli suggested that prior to sign removal, the
signs be modified to read "no right turn on red when children
present" for a six-month period.
Police Chief Thayer suggested that the right turn on red be
restricted to one-half hour before and after school hours. The
Director of Public Works recommended that the School District be
contacted to determine elementary school hours, and the hours pro-
hibiting the right turn on red be set accordingly.
It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to authorize
staff to contact the Tustin Unified SchoolDistrict to determine
elementary school hours, and the signs be changed accordingly to
prohibit a right turn on red when school children would be crossing
the intersection of Redhill Avenue and Bryan Avenue. Carried 5-0.
OlllER BUSINESS
REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION
The City Manager requested a Closed Session for discussion of
personnel matters.
2. JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT
Councilman Saltarelli called attention to recent news articles
regarding pressure on the Orange County Board of Supervisors to
support a plan which would bring to the foreground a second site
for an airport in Orange County, and wondered if Tustin should
declare its position to support the expansion program for John
Wayne Airport to be considered by the Board of Supervisors later in
the month. Councilman Edgar concurred that Tustin should take a
position on the matter.
It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Tustin:
1)
3)
Indicate support for an increase in flights to 55 per day;
Include the fact that an artificial take-off pattern over
Tustin is wrong, acknowledging that it is acceptable that some
wind conditions justify going to the north;
State clearly that anything done in terms of airport expansion
should place a burden on the County to fund roadway in, rove-
merits as part of that particular pattern'(in recent weeks and
months they have ignored the cost of road improvements in terms
of modification); and
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 8, 1-21-85
4)
Be outspoken against the use of an alternate airport site at
Santiago Canyon or E1 Toro, perhaps supporting a site either at
Camp Pendleton or off-shore.
Councilman Saltarelli spoke strongly against limiting flights to 55
per day, which he .felt would essentially accept Newport Beach's
plan and not satisfy future, long-range needs for air transporta-
tion in Orange County, and in turn would necessitate another air-
port site in Orange County. He expressed aggravation that groups
who requested Tustin's support against Chino Hills as an airport
site are now pressuring the Board of Supervisors to support an
alternative site in E1 Toro or Santiago Canyon.
A substitute motion was made by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, that
Tustin:
1) Support reasonable expansion, one that is based upon the latest
technological advances in sound reduction and noise abatement;
2) Clearly vote against an artificial take-off pattern over
Tustin, it should only be wind-related; and
State emphatically that there is no acceptable alternative site
for a second airport in Orange County (namely, E1 Toro or
Santiago Canyon), and it is a financially unfeasible idea.
Councilman.Hoesterey expressed concurrence with Councilman Salta-
relli's position.
Mayor Kennedy stated she could not personally accept anything over
55 flights per day to'prevent take-offs over Tustin; she emphasized
that the County must budget, for road improvements; and she con-
curred with opposing Santiago Canyon and E1 Toro as alternate
sites.
Council debate ensued over the number of flights, road improve-
ments, flight paths over Tustin, and taking a position regarding
alternate sites at Camp Pendleton, San Clemente, or Chino Hills.
Following further Council/staff discussion and debate, the substi-
tute motion was withdrawn with approval by the maker and sec~.
Council concurred to direct staff to draft a policy of Council's
position on expansion of John Wayne Airport for consideration at a
Special Meeting to be called prior to the January 30, 1985, Orange
County Board of Supervisors' meeting. 101
3. RANCHO SAN JUAN CONDOMINIU~ CONVERSION PROJECT
In response to Councilman Edgar, the Community Development Director
reported that subject project is complete and almost all units have
been sold. 43
XII. RECESS - REDEVELOPMENT - CLOSED SESSION
At 11:06 p.m. it was moved b7 Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to recess to
the Redevelopment Agency, thence to a Closed Session to meet with
designated representatives regarding labor relation matters pursuant to
Government Code Section 54967.6, and also to discuss negotiations with
Burnett-Ehline and FEBS concerning the purchase of the propert~y located
at Irvine Boulevard and Newport Avenue pursuant to Government Code Sec-
tion 54956.8. The motion carried 5-0. 8S
XIII.
RECONVENED - JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
The meeting was reconvened at 12:10 a.m., January 22, with all members
present acting as a Joint City Council/Redevelopment Agency.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 9, 1-21-85
XI¥. PURCHASE OF PROPERTY - tlE14FORTH CENTER
X¥.
By way of action from Closed Session, it was moved b7 Greinke~ seconded
by Edgar, to authorize and direct the Redevelopment Agency to purchase
the Newforth Center leasehold for $1,100,000 plus customary escrow
costs and to enter into an agreement of purchase and escrow for the
purchase' of the fee interests of the FEBS group for $1,780,000 plus
closing costs, with. the Agency depositing $25,000 into escrow upon
opening, with the escrow to close on or before June 30, 1985. Carried
5-0.
ADdOURNMENT
At 12:11 p.m. the City Council adjourned by unanimous informal consent
tO an Adjourned Regular Meeting on January 24, 1985, at 7:00 a.m. in
the City Hall Conference Room, and thence to the next regular City
Council and Redevelopment Agency meetings on February 4, 1985, at 7:00
p.m.
MAYOR
CITY CLERK
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
JANUARY 24, 1985
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kennedy at 7:00 a.m.
City Hall Conference Room, 300 Centennial Way.
II. ROLL CALL
Councilpersons Present:
Councilpersons Absent:
Others Present:
Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor
Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Pro Tem
Richard B. Edgar
Ronald B. Hoesterey
Donald J. Saltarelli
None
William A. Huston, City Manager
in the
III. JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT - RESOLUTION NO. 85-13
Following discussion of the draft policy regarding the John Wayne Air-
port, it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the follow-
ing:
RES~UTION NO. 85-13 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN CONCERNING THE JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT MASTER EXPANSION PLAN
Motion carried 5-0.
101
IV.
RECESS - CLOSED SESSION - RECONVENED
The meeting was recessed by unanimous informal consent at 8:15 a.m. to
a Closed Session to meet with its designated representatives regarding
labor relations matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54967.6.
Councilmembers Kennedy and Hoesterey left the meeting.
The City Council meeting was reconvened at 9:05 a.m. with Kennedy and
Hoesterey absent.
Ve
PERSONNEL MATTERS - RESOLUTION NO. 85-16
By way of action from Closed Session, it was moved by Edgar, seconded
by Saltarelli, to adopt the following:
RESOLUTION NO. 85-16 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO COMPENSATION AND TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT OF
MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
The motion carried 3-0, Kennedy and Hoesterey absent.
79
VI. ADJOURNI~ENT
At 9:10 a.m. the meeting was adjourned to a Workshop on February 2,-
1985, at 8:00 a.m. at the Marriott Hotel in Newport Beach by unanimous
informal consent, and thence to the next regular meeting on February 4,
1985, at 7:00 p.m.
CITY CLERK
MAYOR