Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPH 1 ORD 922 AMEND 1 05-06-85 DA PUBLIC HEARING NO. 1 -~'- ~ - ~-~ 5-6-85 Inter- Corn · : May 6, 1985 ~ TO: FROM: SUBJECT: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL COFgqUNITY DEVELOPRENT DEPARTMENT AHENDHENT NO. I TO ORDINANCE NO. 922 APPLICANT: YUJI E. NAITO 141511LqiPONT AVENUE, SUITE 201 TUSTIN, CA OWNER: SHUNICHI gAITO 14151 NEWPORT AVENUE, SUITE 201 TUSTIN, CA LOCATION: 17432-17442 MITCHELL AVENUE ZONING: PLANNED COf~UNITY - RULTIPLE FAMILY (PC--HF) ENV IRONHENTAL STATUS: A NEGATIVE DECLARATION gAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FOR THIS PROJECT ,,, J BACKGROUND: On November 19, 1984 City Council adopted Ordinance No. 922 which changed the zoning for the properties located at 17432 and 17442 Mitchell Avenue from R-3 - 2,000 Multiple Family Residential to PC-MF Planned Community Multiple Family. The ordinance included a development plan (Exhibit "C") which set forth the proposed land uses and standards of development for a 20 unit "Senior Citizen" complex. DEYELOPHENT PROPOSAL: Another developer is now requesting authorization to amend the development plan (Exhibit "C") which is a part of Ordinance No. 922. The project will remain a Senior Citizen apartment complex wi th the same conditions of approval but the site plan has been changed which places the buildings on the front part of the property with the parking located behind the buildings. The front setback area is shown as 8.7 feet and staff recommends that a 10 foot landscaped setback be provided. The exterior elevations as proposed show a stucco finish with wood trim and tile roof. These elevations are an upgrade of what was shown at the previous public hearing for the zone change. Attached to this report is the original zone change report and ordinance. City Council May 6, 1985 page two On Aprtl 22, 1985 the Planning Commission recommended approval of thts amendment by the adoptton of Resolution No. 2222. RECOI~E#DED ACTION: M.O. that Ordinance No. 931 have first reading by title only. M.O. that Ordinance No. 931 be introduced. MARY AN,Nr/CHAMBERLAIN, Assocfat~e Planner MAC:do attach: PC Resolution No. 2222 CC Zone Change Report Ord. 922 New Exhibit "C" Ord. 931 Community Development Department 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2222 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT # 1 TO ORDINANCE 922 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17432-17442 MITCHELL AVENUE. The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does follows: 1. The Planning Commission finds and determines: A. hereby resolve as That a proper application has been filed by Yugi Naito of S.B.D. Developers to amend (#1} Ordinance No. 922 to allow a change in the development plan, known as Exhibit 'lC"; for the properties located at 17432 and 17442 Mitchell Avenue. That the development plan hereby establishes an apartment complex of 20 units for "Senior Citizens" of which 12 units shall be rented at Fair Market Rates according to the Orange County Housing Authority for a period of at least five years to accommodate Section 8 Certificate holders. II. Ce That this change as applied for will not under the circumstances of this case be detrimental to the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the commuinity and should be granted evidenced by the following findings: The intent of the PC-MF zone is to allow diversification of land uses and accomodation of this unique housing opportunity for senior citizens. 2. The project as proposed conforms with the provisions of both the City's general plan and zoning ordinance. The project may not be amended in any substantial fashion without approval by the City's Planning Commission and City Council. De That a Negative Declaration was previously approved for this project. ~ The Planning Commisssion hereby recommends to the City Council approval of Amendment #1 to Ordinance 922 which allows a change in the development plan known as Exhibit "C" for the properties located at 17432 and 17442 Mitchell Avenue subject to the following conditions: A. All conditions listed in Exhibit "A" of Ordinance 922 apply to this project, except Condition No. 10. B. The front landscaped setback area shall be a minimum of 10 feet. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 27 Resolution No. 2222 Page two C. That any minor changes to the development plan (Exhibit "C") may be amended by the Community Development Director. .D. The location of the trash receptacles shall be reviewed by Waste Management Inc. for access by their refuse trucks with respect to the dead-end driveway and a letter provided to the City indicating approval or disapproval. E. Any controlled entry access shall be approved .by the fire marshal. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a~c~ular me~ting of the Tustin Planning Commission held on theg2~u~day 'Donna Orr, Recording Secretary Ronald H. White, Chairman 28 EXHIBIT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ZONE CHANGE 85-3 e A final grading plan for the development review and approval. Street improvement plans for the Mitchell to the parcels will be required. These street include, but not be limited to the following items; a. Curb and gutter; b. Sidewalk; c. Drive apron; d. Street lights with underground conduit; e. Street trees; f. Sanitary sewer lateral; g. Domestic water services; shall be submitted for Avenue frontage adjacent improvements may The proposed development is comprised of two parcels. Either a parcel map must be filed to consolidate these two parcels into one, or the execution and recordation of a "Covenant and Agreement" to hold both parcels as one. Payment of East Orange County Water District fees at the time a building permit is issued in the amount of $500 per dwelling unit. Payment of Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer connection fees at the time a building permit is issued in the amount of $250 per dwelling unit. Dedication for street and utility purposes to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Fire hydrants are required to be operational prior to combustible construction. 8. Satisfy all code requirements of Chapter 12 of the 1979 Uniform Building Code. 9. The second floor units will require two exits. 10. 6 foot 8 inch block wall where needed on the perimeter of the property. 11. The final site plan and architectural building elevations including colors and materials of construction shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. Exhibit "A" Zone Change 85-3 page two 12. 13. Covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded on the subject property limiting occupancy to tenants 55 years of age or older. Also the CC & Rs shall prohibit conversion to any other form of occupancy without the review and approval of the City of Tustin. A landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted for City staff approval, and landscaping installed prior to occupancy of the subject building. 14. All roof top mechanical equipment shall be screened from view. ~N~q.~lVd¥ gN3ZLL~ PUBLIC HEARINGS NO. 3 FROM: COI~NI~ DEVELOPf4ENT DEPARTHENT SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 84-6 APPLICAHT/ OWNERS: LOCATZON: ZONING: ENVZRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: 14ARK S. FERGUSEN GILBERT AND ANITA FERGUSEN BRIAN J. HANICINS DEVELOPERS, INC. 17432 ANO 17442 MITCHELL AVENUE R-3 - 2,000 (MULTIPLE FAHILY RESIOEI[TIAL) A I[GATTYE DECLARATION HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR TO CONFORM WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENYZRONI[NTAL QUALITY ACT. TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM MULTIPLE-FAmILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3 - Z,O00) TO PI. ANNE/) COI~4UNITY MULTIPLE-FAHIL¥ (PC-MF) AND ADOPT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMITING CONSTRUCTION ANO OPERATION OF A SENIOR CITIZEN COMPLEX. BACEGROUND: - A change of zone has been requested for two properties on the south side of Mitchell Avenue between Newport Avenue and South "B" Street. These properties were annexed into the City in 1978 and pre-zoned (R-3 - 2,000) multiple-family residential. At this time the applicant is requesting zoning entitlement to specifically approve 20 units of apartments for senior housing only. The actual processing of this project requires the following actions by the Planning .Commission and CiLT Council: A. Rezonlng of the property to (PC-MF) Planned Community Multiple Family. B. Adoption of a development plan with it's associated conditions as part of the zone change ordinance. DEYELOPHENT PLAN: The development plan submitted with this application proposes to construct 20 residential units for senior citizens, of which 12 units will be maintained at Fair Market Rates for Section 8 certificate holders for a period of at least five years. The remaining 8 units will be rented at Free Market Rates for seniors only. City Council Report Zone Change 84-6 page two The plans submitted which -include a site plan and building elevations are the development plans necessary pursuant to the Planned Community Zone. For approval of a planned community project, the developer must specify building type, character, height of structure and its location to surrounding properties and adjoining streets. Since the plan would become part of this zone change ordinance, it is subject to both Planning Commission and Council approval and cannot be modified without an amendment to the ordinance. In addition, final development plans shall be recorded in the office' of the County Recorder. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The subject property is approximately t40 feet in width fropttng on the southerly side of Mitchell Avenue with 16¢ feet of depth bounded by a single family one-story dwelling on the west and. a self-service gasoline station and parking lot ~o the east. Along the southerly property line are two-story apartment structures. Sill[ PLAN: The site plans indicate construction of an "E" shaped two-story building composed of residential dwelling units connected by two laundry rooms. With a total of 20 units, the applicant is proposing 24 on-site parking spaces. Since. the multiple family provisions of the zoning ordinance would not apply in this requested zone, ~is project is not subject to typical parking or density standards. Therefore, with appproximately 1.2 parking spaces per dwelling unit the applicant is anticipating that some of the senior citizens will not own automobiles. In comparison to the Senior Board and Care Home recently approved on Bryan Avenue, that project had 24 spaces for 85 rooms while this project has 24 spaces for 20 apartments. With 12 units being held for Section 8 certificate holders, it is unlikely that any of those residents would own a car. The question 'of density is as follows: Under the R-3 - 2,000 designation the applicant would be allowed to build eleven (11) units on this 22,960 square foot parcel. Under the new zoning classification, the applicant will be allowed to build 20 one (1) bedroom units of 500 square feet. The justification for the increased density is that this project will be a seniors only complex. ELEVATIONS: The elevations as proposed show a stucco finish with tile roof and wood trim. The rear {south) elevation faces another rear elevation of an existing apartment complex and thus will be out of view. However, the second story of the rear side elevations will be seen from Newport Avenue and %" Street. It is suggested that a roof parapet be added for decorative effect. Since the building elevations presented are conceptual in nature, the precise design and colors utilized should be subject to future staff approval. Community Development Department City Council Report Zone Change 84-6 page three ANALYSIS: Staff has met with the project applicant Mr. Mark Fergusen on several occasions to review the project plans and discuss the "affordable" housing issue. Staff is supportive of this senior'citizen housing since it is a residential land use compatible with the surrounding uses and it's accessibility to nearby shopping areas, bus service, and medical services. The Tustin Community Hospital and other medical offices are all within walking distance. The physical site design, setbacks, parking and other features appear reasonable to staff, if this project is specifically deed restricted to senior citizens. If not, the parking would not be adequate for a typical apartment project. ' On October 22, 1984, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this zone change and development plan and recommended approval to the City Council by the adoption of Resolution No. 2188 with conditions of approval as listed in Exhibit "A". At that time, the Commission discussed the side elevations of the buildings and took an action that the applicant should add an additional roof parapet for decorative effect and screening of roof top equipment. RECQI~NDATION: Uphold the findings of the Planning Commission and conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. g2Z by title only; introduce Ordinance No. 922. Associae~P1 anner MAC:do Attachments: Ordinance 922 Exhibits A, B Development Plans (site plan + elevations) Community Development Deparlment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 922 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY'OF TUSTIN, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 84-6 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17432 & 17442 MITCHELL AVENUE, TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, FROM R-3 - 2,000 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO PC-MF PLANNED COMMUNITY MULTIPLE FAMILY The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby ordain as follows: I. The City Council finds and determt6es: That a proper application has been filed by Mark Fergusen to rezone property from R-3 - 2,000 Multiple Family Residential to PC-MF Planned Community Multiple Family as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. That a development plan setting forth proposed land uses and standards of development has been included within the application for zone change to the planned community district and is attached hereto as Exhibit "C". That ~he development plan hereby establishes an apartment complex of 20 units for "Senior Citizens" of which 12 units shall be rented at Fair Market Rates according to the Orange County Housing Authority for a period of at least five years to accommodate Section 8 Certificate holders. That the zone change as applied for will not under the circumstances of this case be detrimental to the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community and should be granted evidenced by the following findings: 1. The intent of the PC-MF zone is to allow diversification of land uses and accommodation of this unique housing opportunity for senior citizens. 2. The project as proposed conforms with the provisions of both the City's general plan and zoning ordinance. The project may not be amended in any substantial fashion without approval by the City's Planning Commission and City Council. The City Council hereby approves the filing of a negative declaration of environmental impact for this zone change, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ordinance No. 922 page t~o II. The City Counctl hereby approves Zone Change 84-6 subject to the development plan as detatled In Exhibit "C" and conditions applicable to the development plan as detailed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. PASSED. AND ADOPTED at a regular meettng of the Tusttn Ctty Council, held on- the [Dth day of November , 1984. URSULA E. KENNEDY, Mayor A~E~: EXHIBIT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ZONE OIANGE 84-6 A final grading plan for the development shall be submitted for review and approval. Street improvement plans for the Mitchell Avenue frontage adjacent to the parcels will be required. These street improvements may include, but' not be limited to the following items; a. Curb and gutter; b. Sidewalk; c. Drive apron; d. Street lights with underground conduit; e. Street trees; f. Sanitary sewer lateral; g. Domestic water services; The proposed development is comprised of two parcels. Either a parcel map must be filed to consolidate these two parcels into one, or the execution and recordation of a "Covenant and Agreement" to hold both parcels as one. Payment of East Orange County Water District fees at the time a building permit is issued in the amount of $500 per dwelling unit. Payment of Orange County Sanitation District No. ? sewer connection fees at the time a building permit is issued in the amount of $250 per dwelling unit. Dedication for street and utility purposes to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Fire hydrants are required to be operational prior to combustible construction. Satisfy all code requirements of Chapter 12 of the 1979 Uniform Building Code. The second floor units will require two exits. Ro~X~oarapet shall~J~~o the an west el s f /de~co~ e~ - 6 foot 8 inch block wall where needed on the perimeter of the property. The final site plan and architectural building elevations including colors and materials of construction shall be subject to the approval of the Director of CommuNity Development. Exhtbi % "A" page 12. Covenants tri¢%ions shall be recorded on the subject proper%Y limiting occupancyI to l~nants 55 years of age or older. Also the CC & Rs shall prohibit conversion to any other form of occupancy without the review andi aPProval of the City of ?ustin. 14. A l~nd$¢ape and irrigation plan sha.ll be submitted for City $~ff approval, and landscaping inst~lled' prior to occupanc7 of the subjec% bui 1 di rig. 15. All roof top mechanical equipment shali be screened from view. EX-HIBIT "B' R-3 (2000) ,~d~,- ii"--' i: 4~'~' * ' 'MITCHELL'AYE' 70' 70' ?0' I · PC, ,MF R-3 ooo, L. " ZONE CHANGE MAP TUSTIN, CA. I'- I00' PC-MF: PLANNED COMMUNITY MULTIFAMILY STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNI'Y OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) MARY E. WYNN, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Ordinance No. 922 was duly and regularly introduced and read at a regular meeting of the City ~cil held on the 5th day of November, 1984, and was given its second reading and duly passed an~opted at a regular meeting held on the lgth day of Nov(~mber, lgt)~, by the following vote: AYES : COUNCILPERSONS: NOES : COUNCILPERSONS: ABSENT: COUNCILPERSONS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILPERSONS: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy None Greinke Saltarelli City of Tusti~ CaliforniaLJ SUMMARY PUBLISHED IN TUSTIN NEWS: November 15, 1984 November 29, 1984 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 10 11 17 18 10 20 ~.1 ~7 28 ORDINANCE NO. 931 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. i TO ORDINANCE NO. 922 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17432 TO 17442 MITCHELL AVENUE The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby ordain as follows: The City Council finds and determines: That a proper applicatioq has been filed by Yugi Naito of S.B.C. Developers to amend (#1) Ordinance No. 922 to allow a change in the development plan, known as Exhibit "C" for the property located at 17432 and 17442 Mitchell Avenue. That the development plan hereby establishes an apartment complex of 20 units for "Senior Citizens" of which 12 units shall be rented at Fair Market Rates according to the Orange County Housing Authority for a period of at least five years to accommodate Section 8 Certificate holders. That this change as applied for will not under the circumstances of this case be detrimental to the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community and should be granted evidenced by the following findings: The intent of the PC-MF zone is to allow diversification of land uses and accommodation- of this unique housing opportunity for senior citizens. 2. The project as proposed conforms with the provisions of both the City's general plan and zoning ordinance. The project may not be amended in any substantial fashion without approval by the City's Planning Commission and City Council. II. D. That a Negative Declaration was previously approved for this project. The City Council hereby approves the amendment (#1) to Ordinance No. 922 for the properties located at 17432-17442 subject to the following conditions: A. All conditions listed in Exhibit "A" of Ordinance g22 apply to this project, except Condition No. 10. B. The front landscaped setback area shall be a minimum of 10 feet. C. That any minor changes to the development plan (Exhibit "C") may be amended by the Community Development Director. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ordinance No. 931 page two The location of the trash receptacles shall be reviewed by Waste Management Inc. for access by their refuse trucks with respect to the dead-end driveway and a letter provided to the City indicating approval or disapproval. E. Any controlled entry access shall be approved by the fire marshal. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council held on the day of , 1985. Attest: FRANK H. GREINKE, Mayor MARY E. WYNN, City Clerk 8.LN:~I~LMYdY ~N~IZI,LIO MO '~v~3.~[M]I:311v's~vOOSSV' ~,e,.~ ,..~..~, e ONVMVS ' I