The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1 MINUTES 06-03-85MINUTES OF AM AO~)GURRED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA MAY 23, 1985 II. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tern Saltarelli p.m. in the City Hall Conference Room, 300 Centennial Way. at 5:30 ROLL ~L Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Pro Tem Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula E. Kennedy Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Richard B. Edgar William A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works III. NEW 1. BUSINESS RESOLUTION NO. 85-55 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 85-1 IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy to adopt Resolution No. 85-53 as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engi- neer. Motion carried 3-0, Greinke and Edgar absent. 25 AGREEMENTS FOR SALE OF CITY OF TUSTIN WATER SYSTEM FACILITIES TO THE CITIES OF SAMTA ANA AMO ORANGE It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to authorize the execution of the revised agreements for sale of Tustin Water System Facilities to the cities of Santa Aha and Orange as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Motion carried 3-0, Grenke and Edgar absent. 107 45; 85-14; 85-19 IV. AOJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 5:39 p.m. to the next regular meeting on June 3, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. by unanimous informal consent. MAYOR CITY CLERK #INUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA MAY 20, 1985 CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli at 7:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. Councilman Hoesterey led the Pledge of Allegiance, and the Invocation was given by Mayor Pro Tem Saltarellt. II. ROLL CALL Counctlpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula E. Kennedy Frank H. Gretnke, Mayor (Arrived 7:22 p.m.) William A. Huston, City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Robert S. Ledendecker, Dtr. of Public Works Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Royleen A. White, Dtr. of Com. & Admtn. Srvcs. Jeffrey C. Kolin, Recreation Superintendent R. Kenneth Fleagle, Planning Consultant Jeff Davis, Associate Planner Janet Hester, Administrative Secretary Approximately 35 in the audience RECESS - CLOSED SESSION - RECONYENED At 7:03 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Saltarellt announced that the City Council would recess to a Closed Session to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. It was moved b7 Hoestere¥, seconded by Edgar, to recess to a Closed Session as stated above. Carried 4-0, Gretnke absent. The meeting was reconvened at 7:22 p.m. with all Counctlmembers pres- ent, Mayor Greinke resuming the Chair. III. PROCLAMATION 1. JAMES B. SHARP - RESIGNATION FROM SERVICE TO THE CITY Mayor Greinke read and presented a proclamation commending James B. Sharp for his dedication and commitment to the City through service as member of the Planning Commission, City Council, and former Mayor during the past twelve years. Mr. Sharp thanked the Council members individually. 84 e SPECIAL PRESENTATION TO COUNCIL - SECOND ANNUAL EL CAI~I#O REAL CUAIMPIONSHIP CHILI COOK-OFF The Director of Community and Administrative Services presented each Councilmember with an apron as a reminder/memento of the Second Annual E1Camino Real Championship Chili Cook-off to be held on Sunday, June 2, 1985, on E1 Camino Real between Third and Main Streets. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 5-20-85 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 135 (LAGUNA-111STIN EAST) - RESOLUTION NO. 85-51 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Director of Community Development as contained in the inter-com dated May 20, 198S, prepared by the Community Development Department. Mayor Gretnke opened the public hearing at 7:30 p.m. Stephen Gould, 1920 San Juan, spoke in opposition to the proposed annexation. Elton D. Carson, 1932 Jan Marie Place, expressed approval of the proposed annexation. Marlene Frances, 1792 San Juan, spoke in opposition to the proposed annexation. There were no other speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed at 7:39 p.m. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION HD. 85-51 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPLICATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY KNOWN AS LAGUNA-TUSTIN EAST ANNEXATION NO. 135 TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN Councilman Hoesterey noted that Council adoption of Resolution No. 85-51 will afford area residents the opportunity to vote in favor/ opposition of the proposed annexation. The motion carried 5-0. 24 ABAl~ENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCES - VARIOUS LOCATIONS A. 13282 MARSHALL LANE The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated May 20, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. The public hearing was opened by Mayor Greinke at 7:45 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to: 1) Note for the record that the violation outlined in Section I-B of Resolution No. 85-37 has been abated; and 2) Direct staff to inform the owner of subject property that future violations of the Tustin City Code resulting in similar conditions outlined in Section I-B of Resolution No. 85-37 shall be subject to the immediate issuance of citations pur- suant to appropriate sections of the Municipal Code. Motion carried 5-0. B. 14351 HEAltIERFIELD - RESOLUTION NO. 85-45 81 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the tnter-com dated May 20, 1985. Mayor Greinke opened the public hearing at 7:47 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoestere¥, to adopt the following: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 5-20-85 RESOLUTION #0. 85-45 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT CERTAIN CONDITIONS ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14351 HEATHERFIELD (AP# 432-341-09) CONSTITUTE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND HEREBY ORDERING THE ABATEMENT OF SAID NUI- SANCE Motion carried 5-0. 81 C. 14092 DEL ARO AVENUE - RESOLUTION NO. 85-46 The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated May 20, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. The public hearing was opened by Mayor Grefnke at 7:48 p.m. William A. Bray, 14082 Del AmD, relayed conditions at subject neighboring residence, and requested Council's assistance in enforcing its clean-up. There were no other speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed at 7:50 p.m. It was then moved by Hoestere¥~ seconded by Edgar, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 85-46 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT CERTAIN CONDITIONS ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14092 DEL AMO AVENUE {AP# 432-063-12) CONSTI- TUTE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND HEREBY ORDERING THE ABATEMENT OF SAID NUISANCE Carried 5-0. 81 D. 2392 APPLE TREE - RESOLUTZON NO. 85-47 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated May 20, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Director. Mayor Gretnke opened the public hearing at 7:52 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by KennedT~ seconded by Edgar, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION MO. 85-47 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT CERTAIN CONDITIONS ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2392 APPLE TREE {AP# 432-424-32) CONSTITUTE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND HEREBY ORDERING THE ABATEMENT OF SAID NUISANCE The motion carried 5-0. 81 E. 275 RAIN STREET - RESOLUTION NO. 85-48 The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated May 20, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. The public hearing was opened by Mayor Greinke at 7:53 p.m. Jim Scott, subject property tenant, assured Council the problems would be resolved in two or three weeks. Councilman Saltarellt commended Mr. Scott for his cooperation and thanked him for appearing before Council. It was then moved by Saltarellt, seconded by Edgar, to continue consideration of the following 'resolution for 30 days to allow the tenant to complete clean-up operations and to obtain a business license: RESOLUTION NO. 85-48 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT CERTAIN CONDITIONS ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 275 MAIN STREET (AP# 401-585-01) CONSTITUTE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND HEREBY ORDERING THE ABATEMENT OF SAID NUISANCE Carried 5-0. 81 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 5-20-85 F. 140 NORTH 'A' STREET - RESOLUTION NO. 85-49 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated May 20, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. Mayor Greinke opened the public hearing at 7:57 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. Following a question-and-answer period, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Saltarelli, to adopt the following resolution and amend Section II-D to read, "That items contained in Section II of this Resolution must be accomplished within 60 days from date of adop- tion.'' -- RESOLUTION NO. 8S-4g - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT CERTAIN CONDITIONS ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 140 NORTH "A" STREET (AP# 401-522-15) CONSTI- TUTE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND HEREBY ORDERING THE ABATEMENT OF SAID NUISANCE Carried 5-0 81 V. PUBLIC INPUT None. VI. CONSENT CALENOAR It was moved by Hoesterey~ Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. seconded by Edgar, to approve the entire 1. APPROVAL OF MINUll[S - MAY 6, 1985 4e 0 ge APPROVAL OF DEMRNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $617,556.18 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $125,253.98 5O REJECTION OF CLAIM OF JOHN CHACONAS; DATE OF LOSS: 3/1/85; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 4/1/85; CLAIM NO.: 85-2I Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 REJECTION OF CLAIM OF JAMES MATHIAS NISSON; DATE OF LOSS: 8/29/84; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 4/22/85; CLAIM NO.: 85-24 Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 OECLARATION OF SURPLUS FIXED ASSETS Declared the items on the subject list as surplus fixed assets and authorized the sale of same at the annual Police Auction on June 22, 1985, as recommended by the Engineering Department. 85 RESOLUTION NO. 85-50 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE APPLICATION OF THE MASTER PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER AGREEMENT TO THE PROPOSED LAGUNA-TUSTIN EAST ANNEXATION NO. 135 TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN Adopted Resolution No. 85-50 as recommended by the Community Development Department. 24 RESOLUTION NO. 85-44 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP 84-1031 LOCATED AT THE CORNERS OF WALNUT AVENUE AT FRANKLIN AND THE FUTURE JAMBOREE Adopted Resolution No. 85-44 as recommended by the Community Development Department. g9 RESOLUTION NO. 85-52 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, TRANSFERRING "PRIVATE ACTIVITY BOND LIMIT" TO THE COUNTY OF ORANGE {TUSTIN ROYALE PROJECT) Adopted Resolution No. 85-52 as recommended by the Community Development Department. 81 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 5-20-85 VII. VII-I. ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION 1. INFRACTION CITATION ORDINANCE - ORDINANCE NO. 932 As recommended in the inter-com dated May 20, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department, it was moved by Hoesterey, sec- onded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 932 have first reading by title only. Carried $-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordi- nance No. 932 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Saltarelli~ sec- onded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 932 be introduced as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 932 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TUSTIN CITY CODE SECTION '1121 RELATIVE TO VIOLATIONS, PENALTIES AND ENFORCEMENT, TUSTIN CITY CODE SECTION 1132 RELATIVE TO AUTHORITY TO MAKE ARRESTS, AND TUSTIN CITY CODE SECTION 1133 RELATIVE TO CITATION PROCEDURES Motion carried 5-0. 81 ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION 1. ORDINANCE NO. 931 - AMENDMENT NO, I TO ORDINANCE NO. 922 ZONE CHANGE 85-3, 17432-17442 MITCHELL AVENUE It was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 931 have second reading by title onlY. Motion carried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 931 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 931 be adopted: ORDINANCE NO. 931 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ORDINANCE NO. 922 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17432 TO 17442 MITCHELL AVENUE The Director of Community Development addressed Councilwoman Kennedy's concern that Ordinance No. g31 would not prevent possible misuse of the 20 units approved for senior housing. He responded that the CC&R's prohibit the conversion to any other form of occu- pancy without City review and approval which can be monitored by staff. If a complaint is filed with City staff by a project resi- dent over age 62 that the landlord has allowed someone under 62 to occupy, staff would investigate. If a violation is found, the City would then have permission to seek legal action and enforce the actual zoning documents. Such a violation of the planned community zone is a misdemeanor, subject to up to six months in jail/SS00 fine. Council concurred to alert senior groups of the senior housing project to enlist their assistance in monitoring the project. Roll call vote to adopt Ordinance No. 931: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy None None Saltarellt 110 2. DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 7 AREA - URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 930 The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated May 20, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordi- nance No. g30 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 931 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Saltarelli~ seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 930 be introduced. Motion carried 5-0. It was then moved by Saltarelli~ seconded by Hoestere¥, that Ordi- nance No. g30 have second reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 5-20-85 IX. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 930 by .the City Clerk, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 930 he passed and adopted as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 930 - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH PROPOSALS OF A SPECIFIC PLAN Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli None None It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoestere¥, to authorize staff to adve6tise a public hearing for the extens(on of Ordinance No. 930 beyond the 45 day limit for a period of 10 months and 15 days while Specific Plan No. 7 is undergoing review and adoption. The motion carried 5-0. 81 OLD BUSINESS CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF USE PER~IT 85-6 - GAll~S OFFICE BUILDING (450 WEST FIRST STREET) The staff report was presented by the Community Development Direc- tor as contained in the Inter-com dated May 20, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. The motion by Saltarelli, to approve the project with the stipula- tion that final precise plans be approved by staff which would include extensive enclosure of grade level parking died for lack of a second. Councilman Edgar stated that it was not Council's intent to increase office space through the elimination of the third floor and retail use. Therefore, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the project with the stipulation that final precise plans be approved by staff which would include extensive enclosure of grade level parking, and to limit the project to 5,600 square feet and two-stories in height. Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli felt that the developer is penalized by being required to build a far less economic project; that removal of retail has eliminated the opportunity for the City to receive sales tax revenue; and the Council should have approved the project as originally submitted. Councilwoman Kennedy stated she thought Council clearly expressed its concern with density of new buildings, the parking problems associated with them, and the fact that the City is between estab- lishing a new parking standard and an existing one. She continued that Council wanted to assist Mr. Gates but did not want another dense project, that it is not Council's job to make a profit for every developer in town but to protect the town's lifestyle and make fair decisions based on information available. She expressed disappointment that the applicant did not understand Council's con- cerns. Councilman Hoesterey stated the purpose of eliminating the retail requirement was to benefit the applicant by relieving him from the burden of leasing retail space as previous retail projects have experienced, which would then allow moving the third floor office to the first floor with very little effect on total building density. Harry Gates, 1540 Edinger, Santa Aha, explained that he, his archi- tect, and various staff members concluded that Council's elimina- tion of the retail was a "concession" for removal of the third floor. He expressed a desire to meet Council's wishes, and frus- tration with delays in obtaining project approval. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 5-20-86 Mr. Gates noted that the project as presently designed does meet parking requirements forOffic~ Space. Further Council/applicant discussion followed. The motion carried 4-1, Saltarelli opposed. 8! NEW BUSINESS 1. PROHIBITION/REGULATION OF SlqOKING Following consideration of the inter-com dated May 10, 1985, pre- pared by the Director of Community and Administrative Services, it was moved by Saltarellt~ seconded by Kennedy, to direct staff to prepare an ordinance to regulate' smoking primarily in the workplace with medium restrictions, relying upon staff to utilize the best sections of local ordinances on which the Council can have a healthy debate. Council discussion followed, and public input on the matter was invited. Dr. W. James Nethery, who practices at Western Medical Center, spoke in favor of a smoking ordinance, for the protection of both the smoker and non-smoker, and he spoke on the effects of cigarette smoking. Dr. Jerrold Cohen, 420 E1 Camino Real, spoke in favor of a smoking ordinance for the benefit of non-smokers, specifically those who are hypersensitive to second-hand cigarette smoke. Jack Miller, 17352 Parker Drive (also speaking on behalf of Cecilia and Michael May, 13443 Charloma who could not be present), expressed appreciation of Council's consideration of a smoking ordinance. Robert Davis, Lucero Way resident, stated he is a non-smoker and employer. He spoke against a strict non-smoking ordinance which would be detrimental to local businesses. Howard Mitchell, 714 Bonair Way, La Jolla, President of Califor- nians for Non-Smokers Rights, San Diego affiliate, relayed experi- ences in San Diego's adoption of a smoking ordinance, and encour- aged the Council to follow San Diego's example which is designed to be cost-free to the employer. Mr. Mitchell responded to Council questions. John Sonnet, 135 North "B" Street, relayed negative effects on him personally with second-hand smoke and encouraged Council adoption of a smoking ordinance. Dr. George Banks, 17902 Lucero Way, spoke on the effects of second-hand smoke on the non-smoker and encouraged government regu- lation of smoking for the benefit of all citizens. Sherry Miller, 131 Hall Circle, stated that a City ordinance regu- lating smoking would ensure enforcement of company policies regard- ing smoking in the workplace. There were no other speakers on the matter. Mayor Gretnke stated Council has a responsibility to protect the rights of non-smokers, and he suggested an educational program, through the Tustin Today brochure, to inform citizens of the hazards of cigarette smoking, the annual cost to the smoker for cigarettes as a way to deter smoking, etc., in lieu of government regulation of smoking. Council discussion/debate followed. Staff indicated a timetable of 60 days to report back to Council. The motion carried 4-1, Gretnke opposed. 67 CITY COUNCIL MINUTE~ Page 8, 5-20-86 XI. e Mayor Gretnke suggested that in the interim, the matter be publi- cized through the Tustin Today, and that the Chamber of Commerce be encouraged to assist in publicizing the matter. AUTHORIZATION TO AOVERTISE FOR BIDS - PARK IMPROVEMENTS TO COURqBUS TUSTIN PARK NORTH It was moved by Saltarelli~ seconded by Hoestere¥, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 85-53 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PARK IMPROVEMENTS TO COLUMBUS TUSTIN PARK, BENETA WAY BETWEEN PROSPECT AVENUE AND LIVINGSTON STREET Carried 5-0. 77 3. AWARD OF BID - FISCAL YEAR 1984-85 SIDEWALK & CURB REPAIR PROGRAM Bids were received on May g, 1985, as follows: Arm & Hammer Concrete, Tustin Dearmond Construction, Alta Loma Hardy & Harper, Inc., Santa Aha Walsh Engineering Company, Anaheim Damon Construction Company, South Gate Harper Construction Company, Running Springs $32,760.43 $34,792.60 $35,936.41 $38,343.21 $40,156.60 $50,002.42 As recommended in the tnter-com dated May g, 1985, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoestere¥, to award the contract for subject project to Arm and Hammer Concrete, Tustin, in the amount of $32,760.43. The motion carried 5-0. ~ AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS - LAGUNA ROAD.& JAMBOREE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Director of Public Works as contained in the tnter-com dated May 15, 1985. The Director requested that Council schedule an adjourned regular meeting for consideration of the resolution approving plans and specification for subject project. It was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Kennedy, to schedule an Adjourned Regular Meeting on Thursday, May 23, 1985, at 5:30 p.m. to consider subject item. The motion carried 5-0. g5 5. EAST TUSTIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the inter-com prepared by the Director of Public Works dated May 20, lg85, it was moved by Saltarellt, seconded by Hoesterey, to authorize the Mayor to exe- cute the subject Agreement for Payment of Costs for Infrastructure Improvements Proposed for Assessment District No. 85-1 on behalf of the City, subject to final approval of the City Attorney's office. The motion carried 5-0. 25 REPORTS 1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - MAY 13~ 1985 It was moved by Hoestere7~ seconded by Edgar, to appeal Use Permit 85-9 (C~rver Development on behalf of Tusttn Main Associates, Ltd.). Motion carried 4-1, Saltarelli opposed. 81 The remainder of the May 13, 1985, Planning Commission Action Agenda was ratified by unanimous informal consent. 80 2. INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF APRIL 30, 1985 It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to receive and file subject report dated May 13, 1985, prepared by the Finance Director. Carried 5-0. 50 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page g, 5-20-85 3. THIRD QUARTER FISCAL REPORT Subject report was continued to June 3, 1985, pending receipt of information by unanimous informal consent. 50 4. COUNCIL REVIEW OF BUOGET Council concurred to set a budget workshop on Monday, June 10, 1985, at 4:00 p.m. 29 XII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION TO CONSIDER PERSONNEL HAI~RS The City Manager requested a continuance of the 7:03 p.m. Closed Session to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. 2. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS I AND 7 - RESOLUTION NO. 85-54 As recommended by the City Attorney, it was moved by Edgar~ sec- onded by Hoesterey, to adopt ResolutiOn No. 85-54 with the notation that for District No. 1 the First Alternate Director is Ronald B. Hoesterey, the second Alternate Director is Donald J. Saltarelli; and for District No. 7 the First Alternate Director is Richard B. Edgar, the second Alternate Director is Donald J. Saltarelli: RESOLUTION NO. 85-54 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA The motion carried 5-0. 72 3. HISTORICAL LISTING OF FORJ~ER MAYORS /glO COUNCILMEMBERS Councilwoman Kennedy thanked the City Clerk for the historical list of Tustin's former Councflmembers and Mayors. She suggested that a copy be provided to Agnes Bacon and Margaret Byrd. 4. EASTERN CORRIDOR STUDY It was moved by Edgar. seconded by Hoesterey, to authorize Mayor Gretnke to make a commitment on a name on the City's behalf for the East Tustin Alignment Study (the Eastern Corridor). The motion carried 5-0. 5. ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - DISTRICT I It was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Greinke, to submit to the League of Cities Councilman'Rfchard B. Edgar as a nominee to serve on the Orange County Transportation Commission - District 1. Car- ried 5-0. -ll)l 6. BUILDING MORATORIUM ALONG FIRST STREET PENDING COMPLETION OF SPECIFIC PLAN In light of the confusion over the Gates development, it was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Edgar, to direct staff to institute an urgency ordinance to establi~h"a moratorium on development along First Street until a Specific Plan is adopted to avoid future misunderstandings by developers, for consideration at the June 3, 1985, Council meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Saltarellt stated he felt the moratorium would be a confiscation of private property owners' rights. The motion carried 4-1., Saltarelli opposed. 81 CITy COUNCIL MINUTES Page 10, 5-20-85 XIII; RECESS - REDEVELOPMENT; CLOSED SESSION - ADJOURNHENT At 9:33 p.m. the Mayor announced that following the Redevelopment Agency meeting, the City Council would recess to a Closed Session to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. It was then moved by Hoestere¥~ seconded by Edgar, to recess to the Redevelopment~gency, thence to a Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54g~7 as stated above; and thence adjourn to an Adjourned Regular Meeting on May 23 at 5:30 p.m., and thence to the next regular meeting on June 3, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. Carried 5-0. MAYOR CITY CLERK