Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES OF 07-08-85MINUll~S OF AN ADQOURNED RE.AR HEETING OF 1)lE CITY COUNCIL OF ll4E CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA JULY 8, 1985 i II. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Greinke at 6:30 p.m. in the City Hall Conference Room, 300 Centennial Way. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Council persons Absent: Others Present: Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula E. Kennedy None William A. Huston, City Manager Suzanne Atkins, Deputy City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works III. MEMORA&4DUM OF UNDERSTANDING - EAS~RN CORRIDOR ~IGNMENT IV. VI. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve the subject MOU and authorize the Mayor to execute same. Councilman Saltarelli amended the motion to approve the MOU if both agencies would agree that the road would be placed below ground with berms around it at the Santa Ana Freeway intersection. The amendment to the motion died for lack of a second. Following further discussion, the original motion was amended by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve the MOU and authorize the Mayor to execute same subject to staff modifying the language of the MOU as directed by the City Council and subject to its approval by the 1trine City Council. If approved by the Irvine City Council prior to July 12, 1985, then the City Attorney shall not file the lawsuit chal- lenging the validity of the City of Irvine Westpark Project Environmen- tal Impact Report. Carried 3-2, Kennedy and Saltarelli opposed. 45 85-33 FIRAL AGREEMENT - EXII~NSION OF MYFORD ROAD THROUGH MCA.S(H)-TUSTIN It was moved by Hoesterey~ seconded by Edgar, to approve the final agreement between the Cities of Tustin and Irvine, The Irvine Company, and the United States Marine Corps for the extension of Myford Road through the helicopter base. Carried 5-0. 45 85-34 OTHER BUSINESS - APPROPRIATION FOR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoestere¥, to authorize an appro- priation of $20,000 for aerial photographs of the City for the Engineering Division. Carried 5-0. 29 ADJOURNMENT At 7:30 p.m. it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to recess to a Closed Session for personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957, and thence adjourn to the next regular meeting on July 15, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. Motion carried 5-0. MINUTES OF A REGULAR I~EETING OF 1}iE CITY COUNCIL OF ll(E CIllf OF TURIN, CALIFORNIA JULY 1, 1985 II. CALL TI) ~DER/PLEDGE OF ~LEGIANCE/INVOCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Greinke at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli led the Pledge of Allegiance, and the Invocation was given by Council- man Hoesterey. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Frank.H. Greinke, Mayor Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula E. Kennedy None William A. Huston, City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Eva A. Nava, Deputy City Clerk Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police' Dale Wick, Assistant City Engineer Royleen A. White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Srvcs. Jeff Kolin, Recreation Superintendent Eileen Harter, Recreation Supervisor Suzanne Atkins, Deputy City Attorney Approximately 30 in the audience III. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS & PROCLA~tRTIONS 1. FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION Mayor Greinke extended a hearty invitation to all to attend the free sixth annual Fourth of July Fireworks Spectacular at Tustin High School, with entertainment beginning at 6:00 p.m. AWARD TO COPES, INC., OF PROCEEDS FROM F! CAMINO REAL CHAMPIONSHIP CHILI COOK-OFF On behalf of the Tustin City Council, Jeff Kolin, Recreation Super- intendent, presented a check in the amount of $4,177.98 to COPES, Inc., which was accepted by Executive Director Marilyn Morgan, President of the Board Gerald Klein, Dottle Hill, and Bob Hill. Mr. Klein offered recognition and gratitude to the Tustin City Council, the E1 Camino Real Championship Chili Cook-off Steering Committee, the Cook-off sponsors, and the community for the dona- tion. He presented the Recreation Superintendent with a plaque. The Recreation Superintendent introduced Eileen M. Harter, Recrea- tion Supervisor, who was responsible for coordination of the Cook- off. Mrs. Harter was commended by the Council for her work. 41 3. NATIONAL "SAFEGUARD & IMPROVE YOUR ENVIRONMENT" DAY Mayor Greinke read and presented a proclamation accepted by Judy CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 7-1-85 IV. Mr. Kolin expressed his thanks to the Council, City staff, and the Tustin community for their cooperation and support. 84 5. CONGIUkTULATIONS TO mlltE TUSTIN NEWS" EDITOR Mayor Greinke noted that John Orr has recently been promoted to Editor of "The Tustin News," and offered his congratulations to Mr. Orr on his new position. 84 PUBLIC HEARINGS CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ABATEMENT AT 155 HAIN STREET - RESOLUTION NO. 85-48 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated July 1, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. A brief question-and-answer period followed. The public hearing was opened by Mayor Greinke at 7:15 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to: 1) Adopt the following; and RESOLUTION NO. 85-48 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT CERTAIN CONDITIONS ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 155 MAIN STREET (AP # 401-585-01) CONSTITUTE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND HEREBY ORDERING THE ABATEMENT OF SAID NUISANCE 2) Authorize staff to file a misdemeanor complaint against the business and property owner as deemed appropriate by the City Attorney, should compliance not be obtained by August 1, 1985. The motion carried 5-0. 81 EXTENSION OF MDRATORIUM ON DEVELOPI~ENT ALONG FIRST STREET - IJ~GENCY ORDINANCE NO. 936 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated July 1, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. Mayor Greinke opened the public hearing at 7:17 p.m. There were no speakers, and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 936 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 936 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 936 be introduced. Councilman Saltarelli expressed opposition to the ordinance. The motion carried 4-1, Saltarelli opposed. It was then moved ~, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 7-1-85 3, SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 7 - URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 937 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated July 1, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. The public hearing was opened by Mayor Greinke at 7:21 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 937 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 937 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar., that Ordinance No. 937 be introduced. Motion carried 5-0. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 93Y_have second read~ng by title only. Carried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 937 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by ~dgar, that Ordinance No. 937 be passed and adopted as follows: ORDINANCE NO. g37 - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH PROPOSALS OF A SPECIFIC PLAN Roll call vote: AYES: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli NOES: None ABSENT: None 81 APPEAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 85-13 - MOBIL OIL STATION AT 13872 RED HILL AVENUE AT LAGUNA ROAD (EL CANIND REAL) The staff report was presented by the Community Development Direc- tor as contained in the inter-com dated July 1, 1985, and stated that since waiver of the required irrevocable offer of dedication is subject to Council policy, the recommended action is pleasure of the Council. Mayor Greinke opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter. The Community Development Director recommended that the matter be continued to July 15, 1985, to allow the applicant/appellant an opportunity to speak on the matter. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to continue the open public hearing and appeal of Use Permit No. 85-13 to July 15, 1985. Carried 5-0. 81 LAND USE REGULATIONS GOVERNING CERTAIN PROPERTIES ON YORBA STREET A. GENEPJ~L PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 85-1 - RESOLUTION NO. 85-65 B. ZONE CHANGE 85-5 - ORDINANCE NO. 934 C. SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 9 - ORDINANCE NO. 935 The staff report and recommendation for the three actions pertain- ing to Yorba Street land use regulations were presented by the Com- munitx Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated July 1, 1985. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 7-1-85 The Community Development Director reiterated the public hearing notice procedure at Councilwoman Kennedy's request. Councilman Edgar spoke in favor of the proposed actions. A. GENERA4_ PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 85-1 - RESOLUTION NO. 85-65 It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 85-65 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN ~ENDMENT 85-1, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES ON YORBA STREET BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND IRVINE BOULEVARD AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO After further Council discussion regarding the widening of Yorba Street to its ultimate width, the motion carried 5-0, 56 B. ZONE OiANGE 85-5 - ORDINANCE NO. 934 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 934 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 934 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 934 be introduced as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 934 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 85-5 REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTIES LOCATED ON YORBA STREET BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND IRVINE BLVD. AS INDICATED ON EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO Motion carried 5-0. 110 C. SPECIFIC PLAN NO. g - ORDINANCE NO. 935 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 935 have first reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 935 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 935 be Introduced as ~o)lows: ORDINANCE NO. 935 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 9 REGULATING DEVELOPMENT INCLUD- ING CERTAIN PROPERTIES ON YORBA STREET BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND IRVINE BLVD. AS INDICATED ON EXHIBIT ATTACHED HERETO Carried 5-0. 81 It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to direct staff to report back on the feasibility of the immediate widening of Yorba Street, including the concept of undergrounding utilities, and that staff communicate with existing property owners regarding dedication of right-of-way to minimize development costs. The motion carried 5-0. 81 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, ?-1-85 Brad Olson, President of The Irvine Community Development Company, a subsidiary of The Irvine Company, provided chronological history on the East Tustin development plans to date. · Steve Ross, Manager of Urban Planning & Design, narrated a five- minute slide presentation on the evolution of the Phase I residen- tial community concept plan before Council this evening. Mr. Olson provided closing comments, addressing issues of density, parking, flood control, and public schools. Stephen D. Johnson, representing the North Tustin Municipal Advi- sory Council (formerly the Santiago Municipal Advisory Council), asked Council to reject the EIR, stating more engineering studies are needed to determine the impact on the County area within Tustin's sphere of influence, including the shared school system (Tustin Unified School District). Carol Taylor, 13532 Farmington Road, spoke in rebuttal to Mr. Johnson's comments, noting that there has been a great deal of new development in the County area, whose residents also use Tustin roads, and the County has done nothing to help resolve traffic problems. In response to Mrs. Taylor, Mr. Olson defined the difference between a townhome and condominium is the legal distinction as to form of ownership. A townhome involves fee ownership of the land, and a condominium involves ownership of airspace and land ownership belongs to the association. There were no other speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed at 8:25 p.m. A. FINAL ENVIRONMENT~ IMPACT REPORT 84-3 - RESOLUTION NO. 85-66 Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli commended the staff and Planning Commis- sion for their excellent work and spoke in favor of the Phase I residential plan. It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 85-66 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) 84-3 AND AMENDMENTS, AS FINAL EIR 84-3 Councilman Edgar also spoke in favor of EIR 84-3. Mayor Greinke commended the Planning Commission on their exceptional work rela- tive to receiving extensive public input during the public hearings on the matter. Councilwoman Kennedy echoed Mayor Greinke's commen- dations. In response to Councilwoman Kennedy, James McDonald from the consultant firm of Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates, described flood control mitigation measures to be implemented along Browning Avenue between San Juan and E1 Camino Real. Council dis- cussion followed. Terry Austin from the consultant firm of Austin, Foust & Asso- ciates, responded to Councilwoman Kennedy's concerns on traffic. He stated there will be improvements made to Bryan and Browning Avenues as part of the Phase .I residential project. The major CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 7-1-85 Councilman Edgar spoke in support of EIR 84-3. Mayor Greinke spoke relative to negotiations with the Tustin Uni- fied School District and the spirit of cooperation being maintained to continue the good working relationship the City and School Dis- trict have enjoyed. The motion to adopt Resolution No. 85-66 carried 5-0. 81 B. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-4 - RESOLUTION NO. 85-67 It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 85-67 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN FOR AN AREA BOUNDED BY THE I-5 FREEWAY, BRYAN AVENUE, BROWNING AVENUE, AND PROPOSED JAMBOREE ROAD, AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT "A" Carried 5-0. 56 C. ZONE C)~ANGE NO. 85-4 - ORDINANCE NO. 938 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 938 have first reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0. Follow- ing first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 938 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 938 be introduced as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 938 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, REZONING AN AREA BOUNDED BY THE I-5 FREEWAY, BRYAN AVENUE, BROWNING AVENUE, AND THE PROPOSED JAMBOREE ROAD, FROM PLANNED COM- MUNITY TO PLANNED COMMUNITY/RESIDENTIAL AND PUBLIC AND INSTITU- TIONAL AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT "A" AND INCLUDING THE INCORPORATION OF PLANNED COMMUNITY REGULATIONS KNOWN AS THE EAST TUSTIN PHASE I RESIDENTIAL Mayor Greinke voiced great concern that there is insufficient off- street parking (driveways) for the three and four-bedroom units. Mr. Olson responded that The Irvine Company does not intend to have any four-bedroom apartment units, and same was included at the request of the Planning Commission to assure that if any were built the parking requirement would be greater. Mr. Olson responded to further Council questions. Councilwoman Kennedy raised concerns over the parking system in the Phase I residential community that will have no driveways - only blacktop alleyways, curbing, landscaping, and the front door; and if garages are used for storage, residents will have no place to park. There is nothing to prevent The Irvine Company from selling the apartments in the future, and she sees all problems developing in the next ten years will belong to the City. She added that she is bothered by the "postage stamp" parks designed to meet the City's minimum parkland requirement of 3 acres per 1,000. She com- mented that the density is great because Phase I is not designed in conformance with the rest of the City with sidewalks, front lawns, public streets, and the requirements are inconsistent in CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 7-1-85 In response to Mayor Greinke, the Community Development Director stated that the only real difference between private and public streets is that the narrower private streets lack available park- ing, with the positive factor being that maintenance jurisdiction rests with a homeowners' association and not with the City. The Community Development Director responded to Councilmembers' concern that Condition No. 4 of Tentative Tract Map No. 12345 (Public Hearing No. 7) addresses the adequate right-of-way and the resultant equivalent decrease in density. The motion to introduce Ordinance No. 939 carried 4-1, Kennedy opposed. 110 RECESS RECONVENED Mayor Greinke recessed the meeting at 9:26 p.m. The meeting was recon- vened at 9:30 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. 7. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12345 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated July 1, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. The public hearing was opened by Mayor Greinke at 9:31 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to continue the open public hearing on Tentative Tract Map No. 12345 to July 15, 1985. The motion carried 5-0. 99 8. JOINT PUBLIC )(EARING - CITY COUNCIL & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LAFAYETTE PLAZA - DISPOSITION & DEVELOPMENT AGREENENT The City Manager/Executive Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in his inter-com dated July 1, 1985, and responded to Council/Agency questions. Mayor/Chairman Greinke opened the joint City Council/Redevelopment Agency public hearing at 9:42 p.m. Jack Harry, representing Lafayette Partners, spoke in favor of the proposed development and responded to Agency/Council questions. Doreen Jacobs, co-owner of Electric Eye video store located in the Newforth Shopping Center, read her letter dated July 1, 1985, per- taining to the subject disposition and development agreement. The City Manager/Executive Director and City Attorney responded to the ten questions posed by Mrs. Jacobs. Don Hall, representing the Christian Science Reading Room, was instructed to contact Burnett-Ehline directly on when tenants will know the cost of what will be available in Lafayette Plaza. Earl Jacobs, co-owner of Electric Eye, voiced great dissatisfaction with negotiations between tenants, City staff, and the relocation consultant to date. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 7-1-85 V. PUBLIC INPUT None. VI. CONSENT C~J. ENDAJ~ It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the entire Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 17., 1985 2. APPROVAL OF DEMANOS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,734,049.89 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $127,339.18 50 REJECTION OF CLAIM OF CRAIG & DEBORAH P~ILLIPS; DATE OF LOSS: 2-27-85; DATE FILED WIll~ CITY: 5/28/85; CLAIM NO.: 85-31 Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 4. EAST TUSTIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 - APPROVAL OF WILLDAN ASSOCIATES AS ll4E ASSESSMENT ENGINEER Approved Willdan Associates as the Assessment Engineer for the East Tustin Assessment District No. 85-1, and authorized the Mayor to execute the subject Professional Services Agreement as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 25 45; 85-30 RESOLUTION NO. 85-69 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING PERSONS TO PERFORM VARIOUS DUTIES FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS Adopted Resolution No. 85-69 as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 25 ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RELEA~SE OF BONOS - ll~ACT NO. 12018 (SW Corner of Holt Avenue and Warren Avenue) Accepted the public improvements within Tract No. 12018 and authorized the release of all pertinent bonds as indicated in the staff report dated June 19, 1985, as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 99 e RESOLUTION NO. 85-70 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDA- TION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (NEWPORT AVENUE RESERVOIR ROOF REPAIRS) Adopted Resolution No. 85-70 and authorized payment of final 10% retention amount of $3,124.55 providing no liens or stop payment notices have been filed within 30 days as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 107 RESOLUTION NO. 85-71 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, INFORMING THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF THE STATUS OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN MASTER PLAN OF ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS Adopted Resolution No. 85-71 as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 95 9. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ANO RELEASE OF BONDS - ll~CT NO. 11582 {SW Corner of San Juan Street and Orange Street) CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page g, 7-1-85 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. RESOL%F~ION NO. 85-61 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 85-196 LOCATED AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF VALENCIA AND DEL AMO AVENUES Adopted Resolution No. 85-61 as recommended by the Community Development Department. gg RESOLUTION NO. 85-62 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 85-197 LOCATED AT 1361 VALENCIA AVENUE Adoption of Resolution No. 85-62 as recommended by the Com- munity Development Department. 9g REJkPPOINll~ENT OF A REPRESENTATIVE ll) THE ADVISORY CO~II-~EE OF THE ORAJ(GE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY Appointed Mary Ann Chamberlain as representative and Jeff Davis as alternate to the Orange County Housing Authority Advisory Committee. .... 67 RESOLUTION NO. 85-63 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Tustin APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 85-212 LOCATED AT NORTH- WESTERLY CORNER OF RED HILL AVENUE AT BELL AVENUE Adoption of Resolution No. 85-63 as recommended by the Com- munity Development Department. gg RESOLUTION NO. 85-64 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF THE PLANNING COM- MISSION CONCERNING USE PERMIT NO. 85-9 {NEWPORT AVE. BETWEEN MAIN ST. AND EL CAMINO REAL) Adopted Resolution No. 85-64 as approved by the City Council. 81 VII. VIII. IX. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION See Public Hearings 5 and 6. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION See Public Hearings 2 and 3. OLD BUSINESS None. Xo NEW 1. BUSINESS AWARD OF BID - IRRIGATION, LANOSCAPE AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS AT COLU)~)US-TUSTIN PARK PHASE I Bids for subject project were received on June 18, 1985, as follows: Hondo Company, Inc., Santa Aha Ultimo General Contractors, Dana Point Valleycrest Landscape, Santa Ana Artistic Landscape, South Gate C & B Engineering, Los Angeles Taylor-Sharer, Inc., Long Beach $134,919.15 $158,397.32 $168,002.35 $172,669.15 $205,272.50 $206,544.00 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Pa§e 10, 7-1-85 It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to: 1) Approve the EQgineer's Report as a preliminary document; 2) Adopt the following; and RESOLUTION NO. 85-72 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE FORMATION OF TUSTIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 3) Set July 15, 1985, as the date for public hearing to discuss subject district. The motion carried 5-0. 25 XI. REPORTS 1. PLANNING COI~qISSION ACTIONS - JUNE 24, 1985 It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to receive and file the Planning Commission Action Agenda of June 24, 1985. Car- ried 5-0. 70 2. INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF MAY 31, 1985 It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to receive and file subject report dated June 24, 1985, prepared by the Finance Director. The motion carried 5-0. 50 STEERING COte4II'TEE FOR A SENIOR CENTER PROGRESS REPORT As recommended by City staff, it was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded by Saltarelli, to continue subject matter to July 15, 1985. Car- ried 5-0. 41 XII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. ADJOURNED REGULAR I~EETING - JULY 8, 1985 The City Manager recommended the Council adjourn to an Adjourned Regular Meeting on July 8, 1985, at 6:30 p.m. to consider an agree- ment between the City and the United States Marine Corps regarding Myford Road. REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION The City Manager requested a Closed Session to consider personnel matters. 3. KUDOS TO MAYOR GREINKE Councilman Hoesterey commended Mayor Greinke on his conduct of this evening's lengthy meeting. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 11, 7-1-85 CITY-WIDE ~FIC SIGNAI. S In response to Councilwoman Kennedy's comments, the City Manager reported that synchronization of traffic signals City-wide will be addressed in a report to Council in the near future. 94 6. IRVINE VALLEY COLLEGE Mayor Greinke reported that he was honored to speak at the open house at the newly-named Irvine Valley College (formerly Saddleback Collge North) which was .held earlier in the day. XIII. RECESS - REDEVELOPMENT; CLOSED SESSION - ADJOURNMENT Mayor Greinke announced that the City Council would recess to a Closed Session to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Sec- tion 54957. At 10:37 p.m. it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to recess to the Redevelopment Agency, thence to a Closed Session as stated above; and thence adjourn to an Adjourned Regular Meeting on July 8, 1985, at 6:30 p.m., and thence to the next regular meeting on July 15, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. Carried 5-0. MAYOR MINUTES OF A REGULAR ~E'FING OF THE REDEVELOPF~:ltT AGENCY OF ltlE CITY OF TOSTIN, CALIFORNIA JULY 1, 1985 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 10:38 p.m. by Chairman Greinke in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. 2. ROLL CALL Agency Members Present: Agency Members Absent: Others Present: 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Frank H. Greinke, Chairman Donald J. Saltarelli, Chairman Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula E. Kennedy None William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Eva A. Nava, Deputy City Clerk Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Dale A. Wick, Assistant City Engineer Royleen A. White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Srvcs. Suzanne Atkins, Deputy City Attorney Approximately 10 in the audience It was moved by Hoestere¥, seconded by Edgar, to approve Minutes of the June 17, 1985, Regular Meeting. Motion carried 5-0. SOUTH/CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PLAN AMENOMENT & REPORT - RESOLUTION NO. ROA 85-8 As recommended in the inter-com dated July 1, 1985, prepared by R. Kenneth Fleagle, Planning Consultant, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the following: RE~LUTION NO. ROA 85-8 - A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ADOPTING A REPORT AND TRANSMITTING REPORT, PROPOSED AMEND- MENT, AND EIR 85-1 FOR THE SOUTH/CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AMENDMENT Carried 5-0. 60 5. CARVER DEVELOPMENT PROJECT - RESOLUTION NO. RDA 85-6 It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the following as corrected: RESOLUTION NO. ROA 85-6 - A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DESIGN OF A COM- BINATION COMMERCIAL/RETAIL OFFICE PROJECT LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY FRONTING ON THE WESTERLY SIDE AT NEWPORT AVENUE, BETWEEN MAIN STREET AND EL CAMINO REAL /kS APPROVED BY USE PERMIT 85-9 Motion carried 5-0. 81 DESIGN REVIEW - PL~ I.~ FAYE1-FE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES Page 2, 7-1-85 A question-and-answer period followed regarding the undergrounding of utilities in the project area. At Chairman Greinke's request that it be made public record, the Executive Director stated that the development agreement specifically provided that any polluted soil shall be removed at the developer's expense. In response to Mr. Edgar's concern, Mr. Burnett noted that they are presently working with the City Engineer regarding integration of signali- zation of the extension of Old Irvine Boulevard as it accesses into the center, and they will be very cooperative on same. Chairman Greinke commended Mr. Burnett on the beautiful project which will hopefully come to realization within the next six months. The motion carried 5-0. LA FAYETTE PLAZA - DISPOSITION & DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 6O See Page 7 of the July 1, 1985, City Council Minutes - Joint Public Hear- ing No. 8 for action on this item. 8. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:47 p.m. by unanimous informal consent to the next regular meeting on July 15, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. CHAIRMAN '-'Xy.~ ~ ~ECRET Y~ RECO~O=~iNG~ k~