HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA DESIGN REVIEW 07-01-85 _ ~ "l" -'~"~" ... 7 - 1- 85
DATE: JULY 1, 1985 I1~t~1' '--COTI1 '%
TO:
FROM:
SU BJ ECT:
HONORABLE CHAIRHAN AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEHBERS
COHfeJN[TY DEVELOPI~NT DEPARTNENT
DESIGN REVIEW - PLAZA LA FAYETTE
BACKGROUND
The Community Developement Department received a proposed project for
the northwest corner of Newport Avenue and Irvine Bouldvard, located
in the Town Center Redevelopment Area. The project is the subject of
a development agreement between the City's Redevelopment Agency and
the deveopment firm of Burnett Ehline Company.
In keeping with the provisions of the redevelopment plan, staff has
reviewed the proposed project and submits this report for
consideration by the Agency. Proposed conditions or deviations from
standards have been noted, and future submittals by the developer
should reflect these notations.
DISCUSSION
The proposed project is for a multi-use center on approximately 4.5
acres of land. Projected land uses include 28,500 square feet of
retail, 15,300 square feet of office, and a proposed restaurant site
of approximately 9,000 square feet. The proposed center will supply
approximately 243 parking spaces, with 142 spaces allocated to the
retail uses and 51 spaces for the office users. This leaves a total
of 50 remaining parking spaces allocated to the restaurant site,
supporting a total of 150 seats, at the City's standard of one space
for each three seats. If a future restaurant proposal requests more
than this allocation, a parking variance from the standard will be
required.
The proposed architecture of the center will be a type of French
Chateau with an average height of 30'-0". No roofline exceeds the C-2
height limit of 50'-0", although some of the spires exceed 50'-0", but
these are not considered in the height requirement of the zone.
Although staff has not received all the elevations, the ones submitted
seem to show a good level of design development. Judging from the
type of development this project would replace (Newforth Center, the
former Fricker Chemicals), the proposed project would be a definite
asset to the area.
Design Review Plaza LaFayette
Page two
Other comments and conditions include:
Building
Staff would recommend that the reastaurant pad be
hydroseeded and irrigated until such time that the
restaurant is developed.
The southern landscape area adjacent to Irvine Boulevard
should be coordinated with the adjoining landscaping for the
World Savings building. The wall should be drawn back from
the southern property line and the landscape area enlarged
to match the adjoining property.
3. The site plan should show the jet fuel line easement in the
westerly area of the site.
The landcape area along Newport Avenue should be increased
from 10 feet to 12'-6", allowing a full ten feet to the
beginning of the first parking stall.
5. A 6'-8" masonry block walt is required along the northern
property li.ne.
6. A preliminary 'landscape plan is required at this time.
7. A master sign plan is required for review and approval.
Fire
1. The Fire Department will be requiring on-site fire hydrants
as needed.
e
A turnaround is required at the north west parking area,
which can either be a cul-de-sac or hammerhead designed to
fire department requirements.
Engineering
The street right-of-way, as shown on the revised preliminary
site plan, shows a half street width of 56 feet which should
read 58 feet. This will provide for the westerly curb to be
set at 52 feet westerly of centerline with a 6.0 foot clear
pedestrian sidewalk.
. Community Development Department
Design Review Plaza LaFayette
Page three
Be
The sidewalk will be required to be clear of all street
lights, signs, fire hydrants, trees, etc. These items will
require placement behind the sidewalk i'n a 4 foot wide
public easement within the 9.5 foot landscaped green area.
The right-of-way width will taper back to a 50 foot half
street at the northerly property line. The beginning of
taper will be a distance of 460 feet as measured along the
centerline of Newport Avenue from the centerline of Irvine
Boulevard.
A minor amount of additional right-of-way dedication will be
required at the corner of Newport Avenue and Irvine
Boulevard to accomodate a 35 foot curb return radius and a
sidewalk landing.
The most southerly driveway will not have left turn ingress
and egress, but will be restricted to right turn in and out.
The relocated drive opposite Old Irvine Bouldvard will have
left turn ingress and egress.
Newport Avenue northerly of Irvine Boulevard is scheduled.
for a Utility Underground District in 1986. All
improvements -within the public right-of-way should be
coordinated with this project.
Following are public improvements which will be required
along the Newport Avenue frontage.
a. Street paving
b. Curb and gutter
c. Sidewalk
d. Drive aprons
e. Marbelite street lights with underground conduit feed.
f. Domestic water service(s}
g. Sanitary sewer lateral(s)
h. Fire sprinkler service (if required)
i. Plan'and profile street improvement plans will be
required.
A final grading plan shall be required showing all key
finish elevations of the proposed development and all
existing elevations of adjacent properties.
Community Development Department
Design Review Plaza Lafayette
Page four
e
The final site and grading plan shall show all easements and
substructures on the site (old railroad parcel).
A parcel map will be required to consolidate the parcels.
Annexation of any portion of the parcel not currently in any
lighting district to a forthcoming City of Tustin Lighting
District.
The City may require this development to enter into a
Agreement to particiate in the upcoming Eastern/Foothill
Corridor Fee Program. The fee will be based upon new or
additional square footage of building area and is estimated
at $1.05 square foot. This amount is only an estimate and
has not been finalized at this time.
These and other routine comments will be included in a letter to the
architect following the July 1st review by the Redevelopment Agency.
RECOI~ENDED ACTION
Staff feels that the proposed project will be an asset to the area and
recommends that the agency accept the proposal with the conditions
attached in this report.
Senior Planner
EMK:pef
Community Development Department