Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1 MINUTES 08-05-85MINUTES OF A REGULAJ~ I(?ETING OF lllE CITY COUNCIL OF l}lE CITY OF llJSTIN, CALIFORNIA JULY 15, 1985 II. III. IV. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ~LEGIANCE/INVOCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Greinke at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli led the Pledge of Allegiance, and the Invocation was given by Council- woman Kennedy. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula E. Kennedy None William A. Huston, City Manager Suzanne Atkins, Deputy City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Eva A. Nava, Deputy City Clerk Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works Royleen A. White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Srvcs. Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Approximately 30 in the audience PROC~TION 1. BUILDING PLAN C$4ECKER RICARDO P. LA7_ARO - ATTAINMENT OF UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP Mayor Greinke read and presented a proclamation to Ricardo P. LazarD, Building Plan Checker, extending congratulations and com- mendations upon his obtaining United States citizenship. Mr. LazarD received a standing ovation from the audience, and he expressed his gratitude to all. ~ PUBLIC HEARINGS CONTINUEO CONSIDERATION OF A,°PEAJ_ OF USE PERMIT 85-13 - MOBIL OIL STATION AT 13872 RED HILL AVENUE AT LAGUNA ROAI) (EL CAJ4INO REAL) The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated July 15, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. The Director of Public Works responded to Mayor Greinke that there is no date certain for the widening of Red Hill Avenue and that the service station is located very close to the proximity of the Santa Ana Freeway widening and rebuilding of Red Hill Avenue interchange which is scheduled by Cal Trans for 1988-89. The dedication requested on this development is on Red Hill frontage. Mayor Greinke opened the public hearing at 7:08 p.m.. George Hillyard, applicant, spoke in favor of the appeal to waive the ten foot irrevocable offer of dedication along Red Hill Avenue. He stated that Mobil Oil is not the property owner, the property owner is opposed to the dedication, and the dedication requirement would halt operation of the service station. There were no other speakers, and the public hearing was closed at 7:09 p.m. A brief question-and-answer period followed. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 7-15-85 e e Councilman Hoesterey was hesitant to give up parkland for the future and did not want to set a precedent. Councilwoman Kennedy concurred and encouraged the City maintain the maximum parkland for the future. Council debate ensued. Mayor Greinke voiced pleasure that the issues between the Tustin Unified School District, The Irvine Company, and the City have been resolved, and commended The Irvine Company for their efforts in same. Mr. Olson stated that his purpose in suggesting the amendment was to allow both parties to keep their options open, with no intent to back away from any commitments to the City. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoestere~, to: 1) Amend Exhibit "A," Condition of Approval No. 26, to Resolution No. 85-68, last sentence to read, "The applicant/developer (The Irvine Company) shall assist and work with the School District in evaluating these options, and submit a report to the Plan- ning Con~nission within 30 days of approval of this tentative tract outlining feasible mitigation measures for documented overcrowding within the Tustin Unified School District atten- dance area which is attributable to Phase I development"; and 2) Adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 85-68 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12345 The Director responded to Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli that wording in Condition No. 27 precludes The Irvine Company from receiving credit for improvements to public recreation facilities. After further Council/staff discussion, the motion carried 3-2, Greinke and Saltarelli opposed. 81 APPEAL OF USE PERMIT 85-10 & VARIANCE 85-4 (13891 RED HILL AVENUE) The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Director of Community Development as contained in the inter-com dated July 15, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. The Director noted that the applicant has withdrawn Appeal of Vari- ance 85-4 thereby eliminating the need for Council consideration of same. Mayor Greinke opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. Dale Lewis, 511 North Brookhurst, representing Shell Oil, spoke in favor of Appeal of Use Permit 85-10 to waive the ten foot irrevo- cable offer of dedication. Mr. Lewis stated that the property owner is not agreeable to the dedication, and it would have a nega- tive impact on the business. There were no other speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed at 7:48 p.m. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to uphold Appeal of Use Permit 85-10 to remove the requirement for a ten foot irrevo- cable offer of dedication along Red Hill Avenue. Councilwoman Kennedy expressed her opposition to the motion. The motion carried 4-1, Kennedy opposed. 81 FORMATION OF THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DISTRICT - RESOLUTION NO. 85-75 Ronald E. Wolford, representing Berryman & Stephenson, Inc., con- sultants for subject district, presented the staff report and recommendation, and noted that no protests have been filed to date. Mr. Wolford responded to Council questions. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 7-15-85 Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli None None It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 940 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 940 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 940 be introduced as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 940 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE SOUTH/CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJ- ECT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. I The motion carried 5-0. 6O The joint session of the Council/Redevelopment Agency was adjourned at 8:09 p.m. to the regular meeting of the City Council. VACATION & ABANDONMENT OF NOULTON PARKWAY FROM REALIGNED MOULTON PARKWAY TO HARVARD AVENUE - RESOLUTION NO. 85-79 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Director of Public Works as contained in the inter-com dated July 3, 1985, prepared by the Engineering Division. The Director noted that Resolution No. 85-79 has been revised to indicate the utility com- panies by name and operation of where the existing roadway easement will be held in perpetuity for the maintenance and replacement/ operation of their facilities. The Mayor opened the public hearing at 8:11 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. Mayor Greinke noted a conflict of interest and abstained on the matter. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the follow- ing: RESOLUTION NO. 85-79 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING VACATION OF A PORTION OF MOULTON PARKWAY The motion carried 4-0, Greinke abstained. 105 e JOINT CITY COUNCIL & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING - FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 BUDGET - RESOLUTION NOS. 85-77, 85-78 & RDA 85-9 The Finance Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the two inter-coms dated July 10, 1985. Mayor Greinke opened the public hearing at 8:17 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. Following pared by was moved who have tinuation consideration of the inter-com dated July 15, 1985, pre- the Director of Community and Administrative Services, it by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to notify those groups received non-profit revenue sharing monies that the con- of the program is uncertain at this time, and to appro- priate a lump sum of $20,000 for distribution to community groups from the Revenue Sharing Fund reserves. Council discussion followed regarding the impact on community groups if revenue sharing funds were completely discontinued in 1985-86. A substitute motion was made by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to fund Revenue Sharing at a minimum of $20,000 with proceeds carried over from 1984-85, and at a pro-rated maximum of $40,000. VII. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 7-15-85 Consent Calendar Item No. 4: Senior Center Bond Act Funds - Resolution No. 85-74 - In response to Mayor Greinke, the Director oF Community and Administrative Services reported that staff proceeded on the advice of Supervisor Riley's office but was unsuccessful in locating additional contingency funds at the County level. She suggested Council contact Supervisor Riley again and hopefully obtain better results. Mayor Greinke encouraged Councilmembers to do so. It was then moved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to approve the following: RESOLUTION NO. 85-74 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDS UNDER THE CALIFORNIA SENIOR CENTER BOND ACT OF 1984 FOR TUSTIN MULTIPURPOSE SENIOR CENTER Adopted Resolution No. 85-74 authorizing the application for 1984 Senior Citizen Bond Act Funds for the Tustin Multipurpose Senior Center Project in the amount of $1,210,000.00 as recom- mended by the Director of Community and Administrative Ser- vices. Motion carried 5-0. 41 ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION See Joint Public Hearing No. 5. VIII. ORDINAJ~CES FOR ADOPTION ZONE CHANGE 85-5 (YORBA STREET) - ORDINANCE NO. 934 It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 934 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 934 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 934 be passed ana adopted as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 934 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 85-5 REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTIES LOCATED ON YORBA STREET BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND IRVINE BLVD. AS INDICATED ON EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli None None 110 2. SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 9 (YORBA STREET) - ORDINANCE NO. g35 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 935 have second reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 935 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 935 be passed and adopted as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 935 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 9 REGULATING DEVELOPMENT INCLUD- ING CERTAIN PROPERTIES ON YORBA STREET BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND IRVINE BLVD. AS INDICATED ON EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli None None 81 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 9, 7-15-85 XI. LEFT-TURN SIGNALS AT VARIOUS INTERSECTIONS Mr. Kawamura continued with a slide presentation of various inter- sections along Newport Avenue and Red Hill .Avenue, describing the different left-turn phasing signal movements throughout the City. He commented that a grant application was recently made for traffic safety improvements under the Hazard Elimination and Safety (HES) Program. Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli recommended a City-wide policy to make all left-turn movements consistent. Mr. Kawamura explained that there are several intersections in the City which are signal- ized and controlled by the State (i.e., southbound Newport at Nisson) which would make his recommendation difficult to implement. Council discussion followed. Subject report was received and filed by unanimous informal con- sent. 94 REPORTS 1. PLANNING CO~ISSION ACTIONS - JULY 8, 1985 It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to ratify the entire Planning Commission Action Agenda of July 8, 1985. The motion carried 5-0. 80 2. INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF JUNE 30, 1985 It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file subject report dated July 5, 1985, prepared by the Finance Direc- tor. Carried 5-0. 50 3. STEERING CO~4ITTEE FOR A SENIOR CENTER PROGRESS REPORT Following consideration of the inter-com dated July 10, 1985, on subject matter, Councilman Edgar expressed concerns that plans were being finalized without sufficient Council input. Council/Com- mittee members Hoesterey and Kennedy assured Councilman Edgar that there would be a sufficient review period for Council input. Council concurred to conduct a workshop regarding the Senior Center on Monday, September 9, 1985, at 5:00 p.m. with the Steering Com- mittee for a Senior Center (SCSC). Mayor Greinke reminded Council to personally contact County Super- visor representatives Riley, Stanton, and Nestande on the matter of Tustin's Senior Center, and received Council consensus to forward a letter to these legislators on same. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to receive and file subject report. Carried 5-0. 41 XII. Oll4ER BUSINESS 1. REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION The City Manager requested a Closed Session to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. Councilwoman Kennedy interjected that any Council action from Closed Session is taken in public, and she invited the press and all members of the public to remain in the Council Chambers follow- ing Closed Session to witness same. 2. MYFORD ROAD EXTENSION It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to direct staff to analyze the concept of funding opportunities for the engineering design work relevant to extending Myford Road through the MCAS(H), Tustin, and as it intersects the I-5 Freeway with the purpose of accelerating the project if desired, and report back to Council on same. Motion carried 5-0. 95 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 11, 7-15-85 XIV. A~TION FROH CLOSED SESSION - MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN XV. It was moved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to approve the 1984-85 Management Incentive Compensation Plan and appropriate $45,000 for management incentive compensation, of which $10,000 is granted to the City Manager, and the remaining amount to be allocated by the City Manager to other management personnel pursuant to the Plan. The motion carried 5-0. ~ ADJOURNMENT At 10:31 the meeting was adjourned to the next regular meeting on August 5, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. by unanimous informal consent. MAYOR CITY CLERK