The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRDA MINUTES 09-03-85 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CIl~/ OF llJSTIN, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 19, 1985 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:59 p.m. by Chairman Greinke in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. 2. ROLL CALL Agency Members Present: Agency Members Absent: Others Present: 3. A?PROVAL OF MINUTES Frank H. Greinke, Chairman Donald J. Saltarelli, Chairman Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula E. Kennedy None William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, C~,,,unity Development Director Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Robert S. Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Approximately 10 in the audience It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to approve Minutes of the August 19, 1985, Regular Meeting. Motion carried 4-0, Kennedy abstained. ACCEPTANCE OF DEEDS - RESOLUTION NO. RDA 85-10 As recommended in the inter-com dated July 31, 1985, prepared by the City Attorney, it was moved by Saltarel.li, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 85-10 - RESOLUTION OF THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOP- MENT AGENCY AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF ALL DEEDS OR GRANTS CONVEYING ANY INTEREST OR RIGHT IN OR EASEMENT uPON REAL ESTATE TO THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES; APPOINTING AND AUTHORIZING THE SECRETARY OF THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO CONSENT TO SUCH DEEDS OR GRANTS AND TO THE RECORDATION THEREOF ON BEHALF OF THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The motion carried 5-0. 6O SOUTH MEWPORT - EDINGER CIRCULATION STUDY (Continued from August 5, 1985) Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the inter-com dated July 26, 1985, prepared by the Director of Public Works, it was moved by Salta- relli~ seconded by Edgar, to authorize staff to solicit proposals for con- sultant services for preparation of a precise horizontal and vertical alignment for the extension of Newport Avenue based upon Alternative 3, inclusive of staff variation; and approve a budget appropriation in the amount of $40,000.00. Carried 5-0. 95 DESIGN REVIEW - 138/)2 MEWPORT AVENUE As recommended in the inter-com dated August 19, 1985, prepared by th~ Co,m~unity Development Department, it was moved by .~a.ltarAlli,..seconded by Edgar, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 85-11 - A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DESIGN OF A RETAIL COMMERCIAL CENTER AT 13882 NEWPORT AVENUE Agency members made favorable comments regarding the project. The motion carried 5-0. ~1) REDEVELOPMENT AGE' v MINUTES Page 2, 8-19-85 7. AWARD OF CONll~ACT FOR FIRST Sll~ELrT SPECIFIC Following consideration of the inter-cmn dated August 19, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department, it was moved by Saltarelli, sec- onded by Edgar, to: 1) Retain The Planning Center, land use consultants, to prepare the First Street Specific Plan and instruct staff to prepare the necessary agreements; 2) Authorize the Agency Chairman to execute said agreements when pre- pared; and 3) Increase the budget appropriation for subject project from that previ- ously approved in the FY 1985-86 budget of $55,000 to $60,000. Carried 4-1, Saltarelli opposed. 45; 85-40 81 8. OTHER BUSINESS A. NEWPORT AVENUE EXll~NSION STUDY Chairman Pro Tem Saltarelli requested the Director of Public Works to include within the Newport Avenue extension study an analysis of a "no project" alternative, in light of the possibility that the extension will funnel more traffic into the center of town which may not be in the City's best interest. B. 'PASS-THROUGH" FUNOS Agency member Edgar reported that he has participated in discussions between Orange County cities and representatives of the Sanitation Dis- tricts regarding property tax pass-through funds. The consensus was that each city would be requested to identify housing unit developments in its redevelopment area, recognizing the inequity that exists in terms of not having that pass-through, and then as a redevelopment agency decide how those funds would be provided to the Sanitation Districts. He requested that staff analyze and report back to the Agency on the matter. 9. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to adjourn at 8:07 p.m. to the next adjourned regular meeting on Tuesday, September 3, 1985. The motion carried 5-0. CHAIRMAN RECORDING SECRETARY