HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 09-16-85AGE DA
,,,,ACTION
AGENDA
TUSTIN PLANNING ~J)MRISSION
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTERBER 9, 1985
REPORTS
NO. 1
9-16-85
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
6:30 p.m.
Workshop: Santa Fe Land Specific Plan No. 7
Council Chambers
Present: Well, McCarthy, Baker, Puckett, White
7:30 p.m. Commission meeting was called to order
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
PRESENTATIONS:
PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. Minutes from Planning Commission meeting August 26, 1985.
2. Final Parcel Map 85-270, Senior Citizen Center.
Puckett moved, McCarthy second to approve the consent calendar.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
3. USE PERMIT 85-20
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Presentati on:
Hotton carried 5-0.
Lawrence Bente
13201 Silver Birch Drive
Authorization to retain a satellite dish which was installed
without the required permits and exceeds the size and height
requirements of the Tustin City Code.
Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner
Chair Wetl called the hearing to order at 7:38 p.m. Lawrence Bente, satellite dish
owner, explained the background in installing the antenna. Seeing no one further
wishing to speak, Well closed the hearing at 7:48 p.m.
Commission questions and answers of staff and applicant ensued.
Baker moved, Puckett second to continue the matter for two weeks for further
investigation by staff and Mr. Bente to determine how much he can lower the dish
without interfering with signal. Motion carried 5-0.
Action Agenda
September 9, 1985
page two
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
VARIANCE 85-5, RUBY'S RESTAURANT
Douglas Cavanaugh and Ralph Kosmides on behalf of John Prescott
205 E1Camtno Real
Authorization to vary with the parking requirements of the
Tustin City Code in order to allow a 1288 square foot addition
to the existing restaurant.
Presentation: Ed Knight, Senior Planner
Chair Well opened the public hearing at 7:54 p.m. Douglas Cavanaugh, owner,
explained their goals and the expansion. He expressed concern with conditions of
approval 9 and 12.
Commission questions and answers of staff and applicant regarding traffic and
potential traffic problems.
Michael Kearney, Tustin Chamber of Commerce, explained most of the downtown merchants
would welcome Ruby's and the additional traffic.
Majorie Lightfoot, Assistance League, expressed their concern with traffic and
parking. The former Ruby's caused parking problems for the League by patrons parking
in the League's lot.
White moved, Puckett second to approve Variance 85-5 by the adoption of Resolution
No. 2269 with the following amendments: delete condition no. 3; add to no. 12 that
when a development plan is processed through the city for lots $, 7, and 8 that the
parking for that development be considered with this site and the overall parking
requirement determined jotntly; and add no. 13 that a covenant be recorded at this
ttme acknowledging the requirements placed on lots 6, 7, and 8. Motion carried
5-0.
5. TENTATIVE TRACT 12372
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Gary Siegel
14662 Newport Avenue
Authorization to consolidate two lots into one lot for a
commercial condominium
Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
Chair Well opened the public hearing at 8:29 p.m. Gary Siegel, applicant, explained
the reason for the consolidation for condominiums. Seeing no one further wishing to
speak, Well closed the hearing at 8:34 p.m.
Puckett moved, White second to approve staff's recommendation by the adoption of
Resolution No. 2267. Motion carried 5-0.
Action Agenda
September 9, 1985
page three
Appli cant:
Locati on:
Request:
VARIANCE 85-6 AND USE PERMIT 85-19
Milton Polsky and Michael Hirsch
17311 McFadden Avenue
Authorization to develop an approximate 3,800 square foot retail
commercial center while varying with the requirements of the
front-yard setback.
Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
Chair Well opened the public hearing at 8:39 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak,
she closed the hearing at 8:39 p.m. Puckett moved, McCarthy second to approve
Variance 85-6 and Use Permit 85-19 by the adoption of Resolution 2265 with an
amendment to condition of approval no. 10 adding a double double yellow line on
McFadden between 'B' Street and Newport Avenue. Motion carried 4-1, White opposed.
AOMINISTRAIIVE MRTTERS
Old Business
7. Extension of Use Permit 84-15, 15582 "B" Street
Presentation: Edward M. Knight, Senior Planner
McCarthy moved, Baker second to approve extension of Use Permit 84-15 for six months
until April 8, 1986. Motion carried 5-0.
New Business
None
STAFF CONCERNS
8. Report on Council actions September 3, 1985
Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
LATE AGENDA ADDITION
9. ~~sjo~.~rizin_~Financial Institutions
r~ Zonin~ District.
Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
Puckett moved, McCarthy second to approve staff's recommendation with the exception
of requiring conditional use permits for banks with drive thru tellers. Motion
carried 4-0, Baker abstained.
Action Agenda
September 9, 1985
page four
COI~J~ISSION CONCERNS
Well requested clarification on why the acceleration lane on Newport was requested by
the engineering division. Commission discussion.
White requested a representative from the engineering department be present at
Planning Commission meetings for input on engineering and traffic issues.
ADJOURNHE#T
McCarthy moved, White second to adjourn at 9:00 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled
meeting.
aeUUeLd ~ue~s~ssV 'dn~o~d eane~
: uo ~3, e3 u asa,~d
· epo3 X~O u~3sn£ aq3 jo s3uaaedLnbaa
3qS~aq pue ez~s eq3 speeoxe pue s3~aded pea[nbea eq~ ~noq~
PaLLe3SU~ se~ q3~q~ qsLp a3[LLa3es e u[e3ad o3 uo~3ez[aoq3n¥
aA~JO qoa~8 deAL,S lOg£T
a~ua8 a3uaa~q
:3senbe~
:uo~3e3oq
:3ue3~tdd¥
02-~B £IW~3d 3S~ '~
· ae3ue3 uez~3~3 ao~ues 'OL~-~8 dew LaOaed LeU~3 '~
'S86I 'gz 3snBnv 6u~3eam uo~ss[mmo3 6u~uueLd moJ~ se3nu~w '!
('NOI£DV 3£VaVd3S aO~ ~VON3qV3 £N3SN03 3H1 WOa~
O3AOW3a ~O/ONV 035SR~$I0 38 01 SW31I 3I~I33dS 153~03a DI~SRd
~0 ~V£S 'NOI$$IWWOD 3H£ ~0 Sa38W3W SS3~NR NOI£OW 3H£ NO 9NIZOA
3HI ~0 3WI£ 3H£ 01 ~OI~d $W3£I 353H1 ~0 NOISS~3SIO 3£V~Vd3S
ON 38 99IM 3B3H£ 'NOI£OW 3NO ~8 03£~VN3 38 99IM ONV 3NI£~OB
Q3B3QISNO3 3BY BVON3IV3 £N35NO3 B3QNR Q3£SI9 $~3££VW qlV)
:BVON3I~"J IN3SN03
'QBOD3B 3H£ aO~ SS3BOQV QNV 3WYN 99R~
3AI9 3SV39d 'OSqV '398V£ S,B3XV3d$ 3H£ NO Q3£V309 SQBV3 3H1 ±no
99I~ 3SV39d '£33DBRS Y NO NOISSIWWOD 3Hi Ol ~V3d$ 0£ HSI~ ROA
(epue6e eq3 uo 3ou sme%~ ao~ uosaed aad sa%nu[m E o3 pa%[m~9) :$#a33#0~ 3118Rd
:SNOI£¥1N3S3Bd
NOIIVOOANI/33NVI931'~ JO 39031d
e~[4~ '33a~ond 'aa~e8 'Xq~aeDoW 'L~e~
saeqmeq3 t~ouno3
'ON UeLd o~D3ads PUe9 a~ e3ues :doqs4aoM
· m'd OE:9
:B3OBO Ol 11¥0
· Bu~3eaa uo~$s~a~o3 Bu~uu~La paLnpaq3s ~L~£nBaa ~xeu aq3 03 uano~p¥
~N3WN~flO~Q¥
SN~3~N~ NOI$SII~dO~
~uamdoLeAae ~unmmo9 ~o do~3ed~ 'mm~q 'd PL~UOd :uo~3~3uesed~
~96~ '£ daqme~des suo~e L~uno~ uo ~dode~
SN~33#03 33¥~S
euoH
sseu[sn9
ssau~sne PLO
S~311VId ]AIIVILLSINI#QV
~&e%aJ ~oo~ aJenb$ OOB'E a%e~&xoJdde ue dO~aAap o% uoD%ez&Joq%nv :~sanbaB
anuaAV uappejoW II£ZI :uo~leDol
qo$J)H kaeqD&w pue X4$£ou uo%L&H :~u~oD~ddv
6I-SB ±IWB3d 35D ONV g-SB 3ONVIBVA '9
aaUUeLd at~ossv 'UteLaaqm~q3 uuv XJ~W
mn[u~mopuo3 Le[3d~lutuo3
e do~ 3OL euo o3u~ S3OL o~ e3eP~LOSUO3 03 uo[Tez[doq~nv
anua^v ~dod~aH
LaBels
:uo~he3uasadd
:hsanbau
:uo~3~3ol
:hu~3~LddV
~Lt~l £3Va£ 3AI£V£H3I
'S
deuueLd do,uaS %qB[u~ P3
uo~h~pp~ hooj ad,nbs BBZl ~ ~OLke oh depdo U~ apo3 Xht3 u[hsn~
aqh ~o shueaadtnbad Bu~qd~d eqh qh~ ~de^ oh uo)hez~doqhnv
k~a~ ou~m~3 L3 SOZ
hho3sadd uqo~ ~o jLeqaq uo sap~mso~ qdLe~ pue qBn~ue^e3 S~LBnoo
:uo~hehuasaad
:3. senbel~
: uo [he3Ol
: 3. ueo .L LddV
~NVB~V£S3B S,ABD~ 'S-SB 33NVI~VA
o~q abed
~86I '6 deqmehdes
~pueBv
MINUTES
TUSTIN PLANNING CO~IMISSION
REGU~R ~ETING
AUGUST 26, 1985
!
CALL TO ORDER:
7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Well, McCarthy, Baker, Puckett, White
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
PRESENTATIONS:
PUBLIC CONCERNS:
None.
CONSENT CALENOAR:
1. Minutes from Planning Commission meeting August 12, 1985.
White moved, Puckett second to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. USE PERMIT 85-21
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Charles Erickson on behalf of Charlie's Off Road
15722 Tustin Village Way, Suite A
To install accessory equipment to certain types of motor
vehicles.
Presentation:
Jeff Davis, Associate Planner
Chair Well opened the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. Charles Ericson, owner, explained
the operation of his business. Commission discussion ensued with questions and
answers of applicant and staff.
Puckett moved, White second to approve Use Permit 85-21 by the adoption of Resolution
No. 2264. Well amended item II. B. 4 of the resolution, "that overnight parking of
off-road vehicles outside the building is prohibited." Motion carried 5-0.
3. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 85-287
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Eldon Primrose
Newport Avenue and Bonita Street
To consolidate four parcels into one parcel for the purpose of
developing a retail commercial center.
Presentation:
Don Lamm, Director of Community Development
Chair Well opened the hearing at 7:45 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak she closed
the hearing at 7:46 p.m. Puckett moved, McCarthy second to recommend approval to the
City Council of Tentative Parcel Map No. 85-287 by the adoption of Resolution No.
2263. Motion carried 5-0.
Planning Commission Minutes
August 26, 1985
page two
3. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 85-287
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Presentation:
Eldon Primrose
Newport Avenue and Bonita Street
To consolidate four parcels into one parcel for the purpose of
developing a retail commercial center.
Don Lamm, Director of Community Development
Chair Well opened the hearing at 7:45 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak she closed
the hearing at 7:46 p.m. Puckett moved, McCarthy second to recommend approval to the
City Council of Tentative Parcel Map No. 85-287 by the adoption of Resolution No.
2263. Motion carried 5-0.
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Presentation:
USE PERMIT 85-19
Milton Polsky and Michael Hirsch on behalf of Robert Elzig
17311 McFadden Avenue
To develop a 3,900 square foot retail commercial center.
Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
Mr. Lamm explained that this matter should be re-advertised for the September 9th
meeting because there is a variance in the front set back area because of future
street dedication requirement.
Puckett moved, McCarthy second to direct staff to readvertise for the September 9th
meeting. Motion carried 5-0.
ADMINISll~ATIYE MATT£RS
Old Business
None
New Business
5. School Agreement, East Tustin Phase I residential
Presentation: Don Lamm, Director of Community Development
White moved, Puckett second to affirm by Minute Order that the proposed agreement
meets the intent of Condition No. 26 of Resolution No. 85-68. Motion carried 5-0.
STAFF CONCERNS
6. Report on Council actions August 19, 1985
Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
CO)~tlSSION CONCERNS
Commissioner White questioned the First Street moratorium waiver and when the
Commission would review the Santa Fe Land Specific Plan. He further expressed
concern with the E1Modena Channel and requested staff to investigate the status and
safety.
Planning Commission Minutes
August 26, 1985
page three
Further Commission discussion ensued concerning the Santa Fe Land Specific Plan and
they decided to schedule a workshop on September 9, 1985 at 6:30 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
Puckett moved, Baker second to adjourn to 6:30 p.m. September 9, 1985 for a workshop
concerning the Santa Fe Land Specific Plan and then convene the regularly scheduled
Planning Commission meeting at 7:30 p.m. September 9th.
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
DONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
Repor
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
SEPTEHBER 9, 1985
FINAL PARCEL HAP 85-270
GARY SIEGEL ON BEHALF OF CITY OF TUSTIN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
300 S. "C" STREET
PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL
ENVIRONHENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION itAS BEEN APPROVED FOR lltlS PROJECT IN
COMFOR)IANCE WITH lllE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL ACT
SUBDIVIDE ONE PARCEL INTO TWO PARCELS
RECOI~ENDED ACTION:
Recommend to the City Council approval
adoption of Resolution No. 2268.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
of Final Parcel Map 85-270 bY the
The City of. Tustin Redevelopment Agency is in the process of acquiring property
from the Tustin Unified School District in order to construct a Senior Center.
The proposed map shows one parcel of 3.21 acres being split into two parcels:
Parcel one (1) will contain approximately 86,300 square, feet and will continue
.to be utilized as the administrative headquarters for the Tustin Unified School
District. Parcel two (2) will contain approximately 53,550 square feet to be
developed as the City of Tustin's Senior Citizen Center. All parcels are in
conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. The
final map is in substantial compliance with the tentative map.
On August 12, 1985, the Planning 'Commission recommended approval of this
tentative map to the City Council by the adoption of Resolution No. 2262. The
conditions of approval in that resolution will be met when building permits are
issued.
On August 19, 1985, the City Council approved the recommendations of the
Planning Commission.
MARY ANN ~AMBERLAIN)
Associate Planner
MAC:do
attach:
Map
Resolution No. 2268
Resolution No. 2262
i Connrnun~y Developrnen~ Deparlmen~
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2268
A RESOLUTION OV THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL
MAP 85-270 LOCATED AT 300 SOUTH "C" STREET
The Planning Commission of the city of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
That Final Parcel Map No. 85-270 was submitted to the Planning
Commission pursuant to Ordinance 247 by Gary Siegel on behalf of
the Redevelopment Agency of the city of Tustin requesting
authorization to subdivide three lots into two lots for the
properties known as Parcels 1, 2 and 3 as shown on a map
recorded in Book 140, pages 11 and 12 of parcel maps in the
office of the recorder of Orange County, California.
That said map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General
Plan.
C. That a Negative Declaration was previously approved for the
project.
D. That the final map is in substantial compliance with the
tentative map.
II.
The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council
approval of Final Parcel Map No. 85-270 subject to the final approval
of the City Engineer.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission, held on
the day of , 1985.
KATHY WEIL, CHAIRMAN
DONNA ORR, RECORDING SECRETARY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2o
21
22
23
2~
25
2§
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2262
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP 85-2?0 LOCATED AT 300 SOUTH "C" STREET
The Planning Commission of the city of Tusti,n does hereby, resolve as
follows:
II.
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
That Tentative Parcel Map No. 85-270 was submitted to the
Planning Commission pursuant to Ordinance 247 by Gary Siegel on
behalf of the Redevelopment Agency of the city of Tusttn
requesting authorization to subdivide three lots into two lots
for the properties known as Parcels 1, 2 and 3 as shown on a map
recorded in Book 140, pages 11 and 12 of parcel maps in the
office of the recorder of Orange County, California.
B. That said map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General
Plan.
C. That a Negative Declaration was previously approved for the
project.
The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council
approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 85-270 subject to the following
conditions:
Construction or replacement of all missing or damaged public
improvements will be required across the "C" Street and "B"
Street frontages as each parcel develops and shall include but
not be limited to the following:
a. Curb and gutter
b. Sidewalk
c. Street trees
d. Street lights
e. Individual sanitary sewer service to each parcel
f. Individual domestic water service to each parcel
2. Payment of Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 fees will be
required at the time building permits are issued for each
parcel.
3. Payment of East Orange County Water District fees will be
required at the time building permits are issued for each.
parcel.
PASSED AND APOPTED at a regulator meeti~J~?f~he Planning Commission, held on
the /ry~ ~ day of y~. ~(~{~ , 1985.
KATHY WEIL,/ CHAIRMAN
D ARY
STATl~ OR CALI?ORNIA)
COUNTY Or ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, DONNA OAR, the under$tgmed, hereby cer%ify that I ~m the ~e¢ording
Secret~ry of the Planning Co~ission.~ the Ci~ of Tustin,
Racordi ng Secra:~r7
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
REQUEST:
SEPTEHBER 9, 1985
USE PERHIT 85-20
LAWRENCE BENTE, 13201 SILVER BIRCH DR., ~STIN
1320I SILVER BIRCH OR.
R-I, SINGLE FAI~ILY RESIOENTIAL
TO RETAIN A I2' DIAHETER SAT£LLII'E RECEIVING OISH WHICH CAN BE
SEEN FROH THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
RECOI~qENDEDACTION:
Approval of Use Permit No. 85-20 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2266.
SU)e(ARY:
This application is requesting authorization of a previously installed satellite
dish which does not meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 926. Accordingly, all
satellite dishes in residential areas must meet the following criteria:
1. Height limit ten (10) feet.
2. Antenna must be in rear yard.
3. Antenna must not be visible from public right-of-way view.
This particular dish has been installed in the rear yard, however, the antenna
exceeds the height restriction and is visible from Olwyn Drive, Silver Birch
Drive and Red Hill Avenue. A Use Permit is required due to non-conformance to
the previously mentioned criteria and the absence of obtaining the required
Building Permits.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS:
Prior to the adoption of Ordinance No. 926, the City did not regulate the
placement and screening of satellite dish antennae. At various locations in the
city, satellite dish-antennae can be found which do not meet the criteria of
this Ordinance. These antennae were installed without regard to aesthetics and
created the need for the adoption of satellite dish placement regulations.
Since the adoption of this Ordinance, satellite dish installations have been
required to meet the Ordinance criteria or obtain a Use Permit.
, Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
September 9, 1985
page two
The visual impact of this antenna will be reduced if the applicant, as
conditions of approval for Use Permit 85-20, meets the following criteria:
1. Lower the dish to ground level, and;
Install two to three feet of lattice fencing along the top of the
existing block wall which faces 01wyn Drive. Height to be determined
by field inspection.
Although the receiving capabilities of the antenna may be reduced by meeting
these conditions, the aesthetic quality of the neighborhood will not be affected
as a result of the applicant's maintenance of the satellite dish antenna.
LAURA PICKUP k/~
Assistant Planner
LP:em
attach: Resolution No. 2266
Community Development DePartment
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
~5
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2266
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, GRANTING A.CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ON THE
APPLICATION OF MR. LAWRENCE BENTE TO AUTHORIZE A TWELVE (12)
FOOT DIAMETER SATELLITE DISH ANTENNA INSTALLED IN THE REAR
YARD OF 13201 SILVER BIRCH DRIVE.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
Ae
That a proper application, (Use Permit No. 85-20) has been filed
by Mr. Lawrence Bente to request authorization to retain a
twelve (12) foot diameter satellite dish in the rear yard of
13201 Silver Birch Drive in the R-l, Single Family zone.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
Ce
That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of iuch proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
The use is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan
and with use.and application procedures of the Zoning Code
(Section 9271y).
That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, as evidenced
by compliance with the City's Zoning and Development standards.
Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adoPted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
The project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act as specified in Section
15301-1.
II.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Use Permit No. 85-20 to
authorize the retainment of a twelve {12) foot satellite dish in the
rear yard of 13201 Silver Birch Drive subject to the following
conditions:
A. Compliance with Building Department requirements for the
following:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2266
page two
Issuance of the appropriate Building and Electrical Permits
as required by review of the installation details of the
antenna.
Be
Compliance with Planning Department requirements for the
following:
1. Said satellite dish antenna shall be lowered to ground
level and shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height.
e
A lattice fence screen shall be installed along the length
of the southerly block wall facing Olwyn Drive. Height to
vary from two (2) to three (3) feet subject to field
inspection.
That the applicant shall sign and return the "Agreement to
Conditions Imposed" form prior to issuance of Building
Permits.
Final development plans shall require the review and approval of
the Community Development Department.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 198
RONALD H. WHITE,
Chairman
DONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
Planning Commission
DATE: SEPTF.~BER 9, 1985
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
VARIANCE 85-5
DOUGLAS CAVANAUGH & RALPH KOSHIDES
PROPERTY
OWNER:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
GENERAL PLAN:
JOHN PRESCO]T
18752 E. 17th STREET
SANTA ANA, CA 92705
205 EL CANINO REAL
C-2 CENTRAL CO~ERCIAL
COMNERCIAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
CATEGORICALLY EXEHPT CLASS 3
TO VARY WITH THE PARKING STANDARDS OF THE C-2 DISTRICT FOR A
RESTAURANT TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING NON-CONFORHING
USE.
RECO~ENDEO ACTION:
Staff recommends that Variance 85-5 be approved by the Planning Commission by
the adoption of Resolution No. 2269.
BACKGROUND:
Approximately less than a year ago, the business interest running Ruby's
restaurant closed, and since thatl time, no new lessee has reopened the
business. Recently, staff has been approached by Doug Cavanaugh and Ralph
Kosmides, who propose to expand, renovate, and open up Ruby's as a 1940's period
restaurant.
Ruby's is an existing non-conforming use, since it provides no parking for the
approximate 65 seats within the restaurant. An expansion of a non-conforming
use is not allowed, unless the entire business is brought into zoning code
conformance. The applicants are proposing to provide sufficient parking for the
expansion, but are requesting a parking variance for the remaining seats
that are currently a part of the restaurant.
Corn munity Development Deparxment
Planning Commission Report
Variance 85-5
page two
DISCUSSION:
A breakdown of the proposal includes:
1. Expand the restaurant by approximately 1,288 square feet, including a new
kitchen, storage, refrigeration and restrooms.
2. Expand seating from 65 to 95 seats.
3. Provide eleven new parking spaces.
In analyzing this proposal, it is key to note what the code allows or does not
allow. Allowed under code, the proposed applicants could make improvements to
within 50% of the assessed value of the property and reopen the existing
business with the current number of seats without the need of a variance. The
requirement for the variance comes with any expansion of the existing
non-conforming use.
The applicants are proposing to provide more than just an expansion of the
number of seats. The current restaurant will be modernized with a new kitchen,
restrooms, and storage. The inside will be redecorated to match a 1940's era
cafe. The improvements should be a positive addition to the old Tustin downtown
area and a way to preserve, in some form, the old Ruby's restaurant.
Currently, the area and uses surrounding Ruby's are underparked by code
standards, yet the area does not suffer from a parking problem, with the
exception of Assistance League meetings. This lack of a parking problem is
mainly due to a combination of businesses that do provide sufficient parking,
and the marginal nature of other businesses in the area. Since the applicants
are proposing to supply sufficient parking for the expansion, theoretically
there should not be a greater parking impact than experienced by reopening the
existing Ruby's. In reality, if the business is a big success, more cars could
be drawn into the area than previously experienced.
To counteract this possibility, staff is recommending a condition that sets up
two parking impact criteria. The parking situation will either be reviewed by
the Planning Commission on an annual basis if substantial complaints from
merchants are received. If a finding of parking impact is found, the property
owners of Ruby's, in accordance with the lessee, will be required within 60
days, to provide improved parking facilities on a temporary basis; with a
maximum of 22 spaces on an adjoining vacant lot, which is shown on the
assessor's parcel map as Book 401-584, lots 6, 7 or 8. These lots are owned by
the property owner of Ruby's.
In addition, the applicants are put on notice that the existing roof sign will
have to be removed if there is a change in either proprietorship or identify.
The current sign will--novation as a part of this variance.
~DWARD M. ~NIGHT,' /
~,.~Senior Planner
'~:ao Community Development DePartment
July 17, 1985
City of Tustin Planning Con~ission
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
Dear Con~issioners:
Attached is our application to reopen the old Ruby's Cafe located at 205 E1
Camino Real. We are the owners and operators of the other Ruby's Diner
located on the end of the Balboa Pier in Newport Beach. We also recently
opened a new Ruby's Diner in the Market on the Lake shopping center in Mission
Viejo. Our Ruby's Diner concept authentically recreates a 1940's style diner
which features Orange County's best hamburgers (according to KABC's Elmer
Dills and Orange Coast magazine), real malted milks, homemade chili and
chowder, and delicious cherry cokes, all served with the atmosphere, music,
and fun of the Glenn Miller era.
We are proposing to expand the old Ruby's Cafe structure by approximately 1288
square feet. This addition would house a new modern kitchen along with
enlarged storage and public restroom facilities. The existing structure would
be used primarily for public dining area. By reviewing the renderings
submitted with this application you will notice that we are preserving the
character of the old Ruby's Cafe as much as possible.
The old Ruby's Cafe had a seating capacity of approximatley 65 persons. The
remodel proposes increasing the seating capacity to approximately 95 persons.
The additional seating is necessary to make the project economically feasible.
There is a vacant dirt lot behind the restaurant facility that we are
proposing to develop into an eleven space parking lot which would be in
addition to the street parking available on E1 Camino Real and 2nd street. We
understand that this amount of parking would not fully satisfy the parking
requirement, however, it would render the project economically unfeasible to
secure additional property and develop additional parking lots.
For the above reasons we ask that the Planning Comm/ssion consider
"grandfathering" the parking for the old Ruby's and allow the new proposed lot
and street parking to satisfy the parking requirements for the new facility.
The City has previously approved a similar variance request in the application
from the R~ahegorz restaurant located on Main street in Tustin.
P.O. Bo× 887 . ER lko, , 9'206, . (71z.t) 675- UBY
If the project is approved, the City could expect in return a vastly improved
and attractive structure along with a vital new business that would help
contribute to the redevelopment of downtown Tustin. The additional traffic
that would he generated by our new business could help revitalize this end of
E1 Camino Real and perhaps help other merchants in this area.
If you are interested, we ask that you visit either of our restaurants to
experience the concept as well as to see how well they coaplement their
surrounding envirom~ents. Please feel free to contact us if you have any
questions or if you would like a personal tour of our facilities.
Sincerely,
Ralph L. Kosmides
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2269
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 85-5
ALLOWING AN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING RESTAURANT
AT 205 EL CAMINO REAL TO VARY WITH THE PARKING
REQUIREMENTS FOR A RESTAURANT IN THE C-2 ZONE.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
That a proper application, (Variance No. 85-5), was filed
by Douglas Cavanaugh & Ralph Kosmides, requesting authorization
to vary from the parking requirements of the C-2 zone for an
existing non-conforming restaurant located at 205 E1 Camino
Real.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
Co
That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject
property, relative to size, shape, topography, location or
surroundings, a strict application of the Zening Ordinance is
found to deprive subject property of privileges enjoyed by other
properties in the vicinity and under identical zone
classification, evidenced by the following findings:
The use is in'conformance with the land use element of the
Tustin Area General Plan.
2. The variance will be an incentive to, and a benefit for,
non residential development in the area.
The applicant is supplying parking per the zoning code for
any additional seats over the existing non-conforming
number.
That the granting of a variance as herein provided will not
constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the
limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and district
in which the subject property is situated.
E. That this project is categorically exempt from the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act.(Class III)
Fo
That the granting of the variance as herein provided will not be
contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance or the public
safety, health and welfare, and said variance should be granted.
Ge
Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council; Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official; Fire Codes as
administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal; and street
improvement requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No.
Page two
II.
Final sign plans shall require the review and approval of the
Community Development Director.
The Planning Commission hereby grants a variance as applied for, to
authorize the existing non-conforming restaurant located at 205 E1
Camino Real to vary with the parking requirements for a restaurant in
the C-2 zone, subject to the conditions attached hereto in Exhibit
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 198t.
RONALD H. WHITE,
Chairman
DONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
VARIANCE NO. 85-5
o
6e
The number of seats es:abltshed as the existing non-conformlng use Is 65
seats, with the total number of parking space variance equaling twenty-two
(22) parktng spaces.
This variance shall be null and void upon the demolition of the structure
at 205 E1Camtno Real.
Ali remaining signs shall be renovated.
The roof sign shall be removed upon a change in proprietorship or
identity, in keeping with the sign code of the city of Tustin.
A master sign plan shall be approved for the subject project prior to
building permit issuance.
A landscape plan is required for review and approval prior to building
permit issuance.
Any changes .in exterior materials and colors requires the review and
approval of the Community Development Department.
Any missing or damaged street improvements on either street frontage shall
be installed or replaced. All improvements shall be shown on a final site
or grading plan, and reference applicable city standard drawing
references.
A grading plan delineating all finish floor, site elevations and'
elevations of adjacent properties shall be submitted for review and
approval.
The city shall require a right-of-way dedication at the northwesterly
corner of the property in the shape of a triangle corner cut-off of
5'x5'. In the event this dedication interferes with roof overhangs, it
shall be decreased in size.
10. The alley has a sewer easement for maintenance purposes, and the developer
shall work with the public works department to determine the viability of
the two parking spaces adjacent to the alley. Any reduction in spaces
requires a reduction in seating within the restaurant.
11. Payment of the following fees shall be required at the time a building
permit is issued:
County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer connection fee based upon
$50.00/1,000 sq. ft. of new building area or $250.00 whichever is
larger.
b. East Orange County Water District fees for new building area.
. Community Development Department
Conditions of Approval
Variance 85-5
page two
12.
The restaurant business shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission on an
annual basis if substantial complaints are received by the department in
regard to on-street parking. If the Planning Commssion makes a finding
that the area merchants are impacted from on-street parking generated by
the restaurant business, the property owner, in accord with the lessee,
shall within 60 d~ys provide permanent improved parking facilities based
on a maximum of twenty-two (22) parking spaces, on an adjoining lot known
in the Assessor's Book as 401-584, lots 6, 7, and 8.
Community Development DePartment
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
ONNER:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
SEP'rl~MBER 9, 198S
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12372
GARY SIEGEL & COMPANY ON BEHALF OF HEALTH CARE TUSTIN, INC.
SAFECARE COMPANY, INC.
P.O. BOX 21485
SEATI'LE, NA 98111
14662 NEWPORT AVENUE
PUBLIC & [#STITUTIONAL
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION ~AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FOR THIS PROJECT.
CONSOLIOATE T~O (2) LOTS INTO ONE LOT FOR CONOOMINIUM PURPOSES
RECOI~ENDED ACTION:
Recommend approval of Tentative Tract 12372 to the City Council by the adoption
of Resolution No. 2267.
PROJECT ANALYSIS:
Use Permit 84-16 approved the development of a 57,000 square foot medical office
to be located in the front yard of the existing Healthcare Center of Tustin
(formerly known as the Tustin Community Hospital). The proposed map of 6.449
acres consolidates two lots into one lot for condominium purposes. The
condominium units are proposed as folqows:
Ao
Unit No. 1, as shown hereon, encompassing all airspace within the exterior
surfaces of medical office building proposed to be constructed in
conformance with Use Permit No. 84-16 (and all of the conditions of
approval thereof) as approved by the City Council of the city of Tustin by
Resolution No. 84-86 adopted November 5, 1984.
Community Development Depar~men~
Planning Commission Report
Tentative Tract 12372
page two
Unit No. 2, as shown hereon, encompassing all airspace within the exterior
surfaces of the existing hospital building located on the subject property,
commonly known as Healthcare Medical Center of Tustin {formerly Tustin
Community Hospital)
The proposed tentative map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan.
The conditions of approval are listed in Resolution No. 2267.
MARY Aw CHAMBERLAIN,
Associate Planner
MAC:do
attach:
Map
Resolution No. 2267
Resolution No. 2182
Resolution No. 84-86
Community Development Department
it'!
;l
/ i
ill~ lhi: jl.J:l,jj .I.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2267
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 12372
The Planning Commission of the city of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
Ae
That Tentative Tract No. 12372 was submitted by Gary Siegel on
behalf of Healthcare Tustin, Inc. pursuant to Subdivision Ord.
847 for the purpose of consolidating two (2) lots into one (1)
lot for condominium purposes for the property known as a portion
of Lot 49 on Plat No. 1 of the subdivision of a portion of the
Ranchos Santiago De Santa Aha and San Joaquin, as shown on a map
recorded in Book 5, page 7 of Miscellenous Records of Los
Angeles County, California.
B. That said map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General
Plan.
C. That a Negative Declaration was previously approved for this
project.
II.
The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council
approval of Tentative Tract 12372 subject to all conditions of Use
Permit 84-16; Planning. Commission Resolution 2182 and City Council
Resolution No. 84-86.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on
the day of , 1985.
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
DONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 8~-86
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
CALIFORNIA, ACTING ON AN APPEAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL
AFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CONCERNING USE PERMIT NO, 84-16 (Tustin Community Hospital)
The City Council of the City of'Tustin, California does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper application (Use Permit No. 84-16) was filed on
behalf of Tustin Community Hospital requesting authorization to
construct a 57,563 four story medical office building at 14662
Newport Avenue.
B. That a Public Hearing Was duly called, noticed and held on the
said application.
C. That the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, by
Resolution No. 2182 did approve said use permit application.with
authorization to develop a 57,563, four story medical office.
D. That the City Council, at their meeting of Oct. 1, 1984, by a
vote of five ayes, appealed the decision of the Planning
Commission pursuant to City Code Section 9294b.
F. That the City Council determined that the findings and
conclusions of the Planning Commission were correct and the
conditions of approval were appropriate to mitigate negative
environmental impacts.
II. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby affirm the
findings of the Planning Commission as contained in Resolution No.
2182, subject to the additional following conditions:
Q. The final parking plan shall be subject to review and approval
of City Council.
R. The hospital agrees to maintain the present level of acute care
facilities and not inordinately increase the specialized care
.' r~h. ah~lttatfon programs w~thout City approval.
S. During the four year period following City issuance of a
"certificate of occupancy" for the medical office building,
Tustin Community Hospital agrees to perform a parking and
circulation study at City direction, utilizing a traffic
engineering firm acceptable to the City. If the study results
1
2
3
4
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 84-86
page two
indicate inadequate onslte parking to accommodate both Tustin
Community Hospital and the medical office building demands, the
Hospital, at the discretion of City Council will provide the
required additional parking to a maximum of 519 onsite spaces by
one of the following alternatives;
1. Purchase and/or lease adjoining property or provide the
needed parking spaces.
2. Build structured parking onsite.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on
the 5th day of Ngy~mber , 1984.
URSULA E. KENNEDY,
Mayor
AtZest:
MARY E..&(%NN, /~
City C 1 ~Jk U
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) §
CITY OF TUSTIN )
MARY E. WYNN, City Clerk and ~ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the.City of
Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of
the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing
Resolution No. 84-86 was duly and regularly introduced, passed and adopted at an
adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on the 5th day of
lg~, by the following vote:
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT:
COUNCILPERSONS:
COUNCILPERSONS:
COUNCILPERSONS:
Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Saltarelli
Kennedy
None
MARY E. WYNN, ~ty ~
City of Tustin~)CalifornLi)a
1
2
3
4
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2182
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, AUTHORIZING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A
57563 MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING IN THE PUBLIC &
INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT AT 14662 NEWPORT AVENUE
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
That a proper application, (Use Permit No. 84-16), has been
filed on behalf Tustin Community Hospital, to request
authorization to construct a 57,563 four story medical office
building at 14662 Newport Avenue as shown on Exhibit "A".
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this c~e, be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
Th&t the hospital use and associated medical office is in
conformance with the land use element of the Tustin Area
General Plan.
De
That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and should be
granted.
Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building. Official, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
F. That a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts is hereby
approved.
Final development plans shall require the review and approval of
the Community Development Department.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2182
October 8, 1984
page two
II.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No.
84-16 to authorize construction of a 57,563 medical office building
with 407 parking spaces as shown on Exhibit "A", subject to the
following conditions:
A. All missing or damaged public improvements will be required to
be constructed or replaced. These improvements will include but
not be limited to the following:
a. curb and gutter
b. sidewalk
c. drive aprons
d. street trees
e. street lights {marbelite standards with underground
conduit) on each street frontage, Newport Avenue and
Sycamore Avenue. .
f. domestic water and/or fire service laterals
g. sanitary sewer lateral
Any im~rovements to be constructed should be shown on the
final site and/or grading plan and referenced with appropriate
City Standard drawing numbers.
A final grading plan will be required for the areas of new
development as they relate to the existing development on the
site, as well as, adjacent properties.
Payment of Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer
connection fees will be required at the time a building permit
is issued. Fee amounts will be $50.00/1,000 sq.ft, of
additional floor area.
Payment of East Orange County Water District fees will be
required at the time a building permit is issued.
Both the existing parcel and the newly acquired 100 ft. wide
parcel will require annexation to the Orange County Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. All annexation
applications shall be filed with the City of Tustin Engineering
Division.
A striping plan for Newport Avenue shall be submitted to the
Engineering Department for review and approval. The owner shall
reimburse the City for all costs associated with the striping
modifications not to exceed $1,000.
1
2
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
i9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2182
October 8, 1984
page :hree
G. The owner shall provide a "fairshare" portion of the funds
necessary to signalize the intersection of Newport and Sycamore
Avenues of 11.6% of the %ota] cost.
H. That the southerly one hundred foot (lO0') parcel, of Parcel
Maps 84-1029, which is to be used as a hospital parking area,
shall be joined to the hospital parcel by the filing of a new
parcel map.
I. That the owner of the southerly parcel of Parcel Map 84-1029
shall authorize the rezoning of the parcel to the Public and
Institutional District.
j. That a fire sprinkler system per National Fire Protection
Association Standard No. 13 shall be provided to protect the
entire medical office structure. The sprinkler system shall be
supervised by a U.L. listed control receiving station.
K. Plans of combined standpipes and fire sprinklers, medical gas
and fire hydrant systems shall be received and approved by the
Fire Depar~nt prior to installation of systems.
L. All building mechanical equipment shall be screened from view in
a manner consistent with the architectural elevations depicted
on Exhibit "A". Ground mounted equipment is preferred.
M. Continuous 6" concrete curbs shall be provided between landscape
planters and parking spaces and drive aisles.
N. A master sign plan must be submitted to the Planning Commission
for review and approval prior to the issuance of any sign
permits for the hospital and office' site..
O. Any existing mature trees which are removed during construction
must be replaced with 36" box specimens. The site drawings
shall indicate those trees to be removed and a planting plan
shall indicate the location of the replacement specimens.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2[82
October 8, 1984
3age four
P. Payment of the New Development Tax is required at the time of
building permit issuance.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular ~eeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on ~ day of~, 1984.
RONALD WHITE
Chairman
DONNA ORR
Recording Secretar7
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANG~ )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, DONNA ORR, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Recording
Secret~r~ of the Planning Commission gf the City of Tustin,
California; that Resolution No. ~__~was duly passed and adopte~ ~a%
~ regular~eet_t~iin~ of the Tu~t~Fi~ng Commission, held on the ~c~-~
DONNA ORR
Recording Secretar~
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
SEPTEMBER 9, 1985
USE PERMIT 85-19 AND VARIANCE 85-6
MILTON POLSKY AND MICHAEL HIRSCH
289 ARGONNE AVENUE
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
ROBERT ELZIG
17311 MCFADDEN AVENUE
COMMERCIAL GENERAL (CG-PUD) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR TO CONFORM WITH THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALII~f ACT.
TO AUTHORIZE THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATE 3,800 SQUARE FOOT
ONE-STORY RE'FAIL SHOPPING CENTER WHILE VARYING WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF' THE FRONT YARD SET-BACK.
RECOI~ENDE~ ACTION:
Approve Use Permit 85-19 and Variance 85-6 by the adoption of Resolution No.
2265.
PROJECT ANALYSIS:
In June 1979, the subject property was brought into the city as a portion of
Annexation No. 120 and was prezoned multiple family {R-3) to conform with the
Tustin Area General Plan. On June 7; 1982, the general plan was changed from
residential to commercial (GPA 82-1[A]) and the zone was changed from R-3 to
Commercial General Planned Unit Development (CD-PUD}.
The applicant is now requesting authorization to develop a 3800 square foot
retail center. The site plan shows the building placed on the easterly property
line which necessitates the fire wall as shown on the east elevation. A
positive addition to the proposed center is the 15 feet of landscaping along
McFadden and the 1000 square feet of landscaping proposed along the curb radius
of South "B" Street.
The proposed elevations show tan stucco with a burnt mission tile mansard. The
easterly elevation (fire wall) shows tan split face slumpstone with decorative
brown split face slumpstone. 0nly one post is shown on the front elevation
therefore staff suggests that other posts be added to carry out the theme. This
addition can be reviewed by staff prior to issuance of building permits.
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
Use Permit 85-19
page two
One of the conditions of approval is that an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication be
executed for a ten foot wide strip of land adjacent to McFadden Avenue. At such
time as McFadden is widened the 15 foot front set-back would be reduced to five
(5) feet. At this time, three (3) variances have been granted for shopping
centers along McFadden which allowed the owners to vary with the set-back
requirements for an arterial highway. Staff supports the granting of this
variance because it would not constitute a special privilege for this property
since three (3) like variances have been granted for other properties in the
vicinity of which this property is located~ All between Newport Avenue and
South "B" Street along McFadden Avenue.
All the conditions of approval are listed in Exhibit "A" attached to Resolution
No. 2265.
MARY A~fl~ CHAMBERLAIN,
Associate Planner
MAC:do
attach:
Plans
Resolution 2265
Exhibit "A"
Development Review Summary
, Community Development Department
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SUMMARY
Project: McFadden - B Street Retail Center
Location/District: 17311 McFadden (CG-PUD)
Action: Approve the development of a 3892 square foot retail center
District Requirement Proposed
Building:
Front Setback 15 feet 5 feet
Side Setback none n/a
Rear Setback none n/a
Gross Square Footage n/a 3,892
Net Floor Square Footage n/a n/a
Height 35' 18'
Number of Stories 3 1
ea'r"th'~o'ne colors
Materials/Colors stucco 7 split face
Lot Size 3,000 sq. ft. ~ 14,000
Lot Coverage 100 %
Parking:
Number of Spaces 19 19
Ratio (space/square footage) 1/200 sq.ft.
Percent of Compact Spaces 20% 16%
Type n/a at grade
Uses: retail center
Number of Public Notifications (Owners): 38
Environmental Status Negative Declaration
* No Standard
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
'13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2265
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING USE PERMIT 85-19 AND
VARIANCE 85-6 AUTHORIZING THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN
APPROXIMATE 3800 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL CENTER AT THE
NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF MCFADDEN AVENUE AND "B" STREET
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
Ae
That a proper application, (Use Permit No. 85-19 and Variance
85-6) has been filed by Polsky & Nirsch requesting authorization
to develop an approximate 3800 square foot retail center at the
northeasterly corner of McFadden Avenue and "B" Street while
varying with the requirements of the front yard set-back.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
Ce
That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case,
be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or
general welfare of the persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of such proposed use, evidenced by the following
findings:
The proposed project is in conformance with the Zoning
Ordinance and the Tustin Area General Plan.
That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the
use applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the
property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject
property, nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and
should be granted.
Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development
policies adopted by the'City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
F:
A Negative Declaration has been applied for and is hereby
approved to conform with the California Environmental Quality
Act.
Final development plans shall require the review and approval of
the Community Development Department.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
'13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2265
page two
The Planning Commission further finds pursuant to Section 9292
of the Tustin City Code that the variances as applied for, shall
not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with
the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and
district in which the subject property is situated and that
because of special circumstances applicable to the subject
property, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is
found to deprive subject property of privileges enjoyed by
others in the vicinity and under identical zone classification.
II.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit
No.85-19 and Variance 85-6 to authorize the development of a retail
center at the northeasterly corner of McFadden Avenue and "B" Street
subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "A".
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the day of , 198
KATHY WEIL,
Chairman
DONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
CONDITIONS OF AI~PROVAL
USE ~£P. MIT 8~-19
EXHIBIT 'A'
10.
Continuous 6" concrete curbs shall be provided between landscape
planters and parking spaces and drive aisles.
All roof equipment and vents must be screened from view.
Landscape plans are required which shall include a planting plan and a
complete irrigation plan which should indicate the following:
a. point of connection
b. back flow prevention device(s)
c. location and types of valves
d. location and sizes of piping
e. sprinkler head types and locations
Separate permits are required for plumbing, electrical, grading,
signing and any work performed within the public right-of-way.
All work performed within the public right-of-way will require a
permit from the city of Tustin Engineering Department.
A master sign plan shall be submitted showing brown cabinets with tan
backgrounds.
A civil plan depicting all work within the public right-of-way shall
be provided and referenced to all applicable city standard drawings.
This plan shall be a separate drawing and show all proposed
improvement including but not limited to the following:
a. curb and gutter removal/replacement
b. sidewalk removal/replacement
c. drive aprons
d. domestic water service location
e. sanitary sewer lateral connections
f. street lights
g. street trees
h. fire hydrants
A final grading plan based upon benchmark datum of the Orange County
Surveyor's office will be required. This plan should show all key
finish elevations on the site as well as existing elevations of
adjacent properties.
The driveways as shown do not conform to city standards, either Std.
108 B or 108 E should be utilized. In the event the radius type drive
is utilized an additional dedication will be required.
Left turn ingress to the sight and egress from the site will not be
allowed from the driveway fronting on McFadden Avenue. Right turns
only will be permitted.
Community Development Department
Conditions of Approval
page two
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
EAst Orange County District fees will be required to be paid at the
time a building permit is issued. Contact Earl Rowenhorst at Tustin
Water Service for fee amounts.
Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer connection fees will be
required to be paid at the time a building permit is issued. Fee
amounts are $50.00/1,0-00 sq. ft. of building area less any previously
paid fees for the residential use.
The existing water meter should be relocated outside the driveway
limits.
Street lights may be required along McFadden Avenue. To obtain a
street light layout please submit three prints of the site plan to
So. Calif. Edison Co. (Archie Berry).
The trash container enclosure shall be constructed of a minimum
six-foot {6') high concrete block wall (to match the center) with
solid gates to block the view of trash bins.
In the event the city has established an Eastern Corridor Fee Program
at the time a building permit is issued, this development will be
required to pay the established fees.
Fire hydrants shall be provided depending on existing locations and
fire flow capabilities, as determined by the Orange County Fire
Marshal.
Wheelchair and handicap access shall be installed on-site and off-site
in accordance with the State of California and city of Tustin Building
Department standards.
On-site security lighting shall be arranged so that direct rays will
not shine on adjacent properties or produce glare for street traffic.
All roof-mounted equipment, such as heating and air conditioning
units, shall be completely screened from public view by
architecturally compatible screening material, subject to the approval
of city staff.
The dedication of an additional ten foot wide strip of land adjacent
to McFadden Avenue or the execution of an Irrevocable Offer of
Dedication for same will be required.
Community Development Department
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
SEPTEMBER 9, 1985
EXTENSION OF USE PERMIT NO. 84-15
PROPERTY OWNER: WONG UNITED DEVELOPMENT
7 NEW MEADOW
IRVINE, CA 92714
15582 'B" STREET
EXTENSION OF USE PERMXT 84-1S FOR A PERIO0 OF SIX (6) MONTHS
RECOMMENOEO ACTION:
It is recommended that the Commission, by Minute Order, extend Use Permit 84-15
for six {6) months. Use Permit 84-15 would then expire on April 8, 1986.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
On October 8, 1984, the Commission approved Use Permit 84-15 authorizing
development' of six (6) residential condominiums at 15582 South "B" Street. The
current status of the project is that structural plan check has been completed
and the building division is ready to issue building permits. However, several
conditions of approval pertaining to the subdivision map have not been met.
Specifically the Final Map has not been submitted in a form acceptable for
recordation. The applicant anticipates that the Final Map will be submitted
within the next two weeks.
Even if the Final Map is submitted within a relatively short period of time, the
project still might not be under construction by the October 8, 1985 expiration
date. Therefore, it is recommended that the Commission grant a six {6) month
extension for Use Permit 84-15 making the new expiration date April 8, 1986.
JSD:em
attachments:
Report to Planning Commission (Sept. 24, 1984)
Resolution No. 2184
,, Community Developmenl Department
Plann[n,g C, ornrniss[on
PUBLIC HEARING
DATE':
SUBJECT:
APPLICJtNT :_
SEPT~IBER 24, 1984
USE P[ILqIT 84-15
r,~AN ASSOCIATES
17581 IRYI~E ~YD., ~I~ 211
~I~, ~ 92680
PROPERTY
OWtlER:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
EN¥IRONHEN'TAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
DISCUSSION:
SIK ~ONG :
7 l~i I~:.AOOW
IRYINE, ~ 92714
15582 "B" STI~E~
~ULTIPL£ F~J(ILY IESIOEI(TIAL *~R-3-2000)
A ~K~TIVE DECIJ~R.&~ION ~ BE~N APPLIED FOR I~ COMPLIANCE WZlll ll4E
CALIFORNIA EJIYIRON~[NTAL QUALrTY ACT,
AUll(ORIY-~TION TO C~NS'FRUC~T SIX (6) RI~SIDEI~TIJU- ~NDOMINIUM UNITS.
An application for Conditional Use Permit has been submitted by Khan Associates on
behalf of Mr. Sik Wong requesting authorization to construct six (6) residential
condominium units on the property, located at 15582 "B" Street. A Use Permit is
required for the development of condominiums in the 1-3 zone, and the project must
conform to the development standards of the Planned Development District (Section 9224
of the City Code)'
Slll~ AMALYSIS:
The subject project is proposed to be built on a triangular shaped, 17,238 square foot
lot and would replace an existing single family residence. The site is bounded by
single family homes to the east, and a multiple family complex to the north. The
homes, which front on South "C" Street, are estimated to be between 30-50 years old,
and the multiple family complex was originall~c,,Used as military housing and is
estimated to be at least as old as the homes on Street. To the west of the site,
directly across "B" Street, is the Montesllla Mobile Home Part.
Along the "B" Street frontage, there is a substantial amount of landscaping and several
mature trees located on the site. Some of these trees will be displaced by the
development.
CoFamunity Development Department
Planning Commission Report
September 2¢, 1984
page two
PROOECT ANALYSIS:
the ro'ect meets all 'of the zoning regulations as provided in the
As submitted, P J ......... ~--efore recommend project approval,
, ment District
~lanned D~p .__ some ~evlations from the adopted develop?~t._guid~lf~e~;
nowever, ~nere
. . o en ar~lnq spaces are snow. ,=-,-v .....
Specific~ll~..t~ P - ~J- --~- -~-~ J4,th at its narrowest point is 23 feet in l~eu
the stanaaro ~xzu,
of the 27 foot standard.
The deviation of the open parking space size does nbt present a problem in that there
is adequate room for vehicular overhang. However, with only a 23 foot drive aisle,
backing of vehicles from the garages may be impeded. Therefore, the architectural
features that extend into the drive-aisle must be modified creating at least a 25 foot
clear area between buildings.
Of more importance than these minor deviations is that the site plan does not properly
reflect the location of public improvements required by the City. Engineer. The
Tentative Tract Map submitted in conjunction with this project correctly indicates the
location of new sidewalk, curb and gutter~ Should the Commission approve this project,
the site plan must be modified to agree with the Tentative Tract Map.
The development of this project would displace five' mature trees {each at least 12"
in diameter). Three other m~ture trees however could be saved. As a condition of
approval, it will be recommended the trees marked [, 2 + 3 on Exhibit "B", be retained,
and that the five trees lost be replaced with not less than five 48" box trees. These
requirements shall be included in the project landscape plans and must be approved by
the Director ~f Community Development prior to building permit issuance.
Finally, a portion of the lot immediately to the north of the subject site may be
a part of the I-5 freeway widening proJe6t. To mitigate any potential impacts of
freeway related noise, it is recommended that the applicant be required to provide
documentation from an acoustical engineer ensuring that in a worst case scenario, the
complex will comply with the noise standards contained in the Tustin ~oise Ordinance.
R£COI~iENDED ACTIO#:
It is recommended
Assistant Planner
that Use Permit 84-15 be approved
in Exhibit A attached.
subject to the Conditions of
JD:do
attachments:
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
Exhibit B - Trees to be removed
Exhibit C - Site Plan
Exhibit D - Elevations
Exhibit E Development Review Summary
.... Community Development Depar;ment
10.
11.
EXHIBIT
COND~ION$ OF APPROY~L
USE PIPIT
The proposed project shall be developed in accordance with all applicable
Building, Fire, and Health and Safety Codes adopted by the City of Tustin.
A final grading plan based'-upon benchmark elevation datum as utilized by the
Orange County Surveyor's Office must be submitted and approved prior .to issuance
of building permits.
Submittal of street improvement plans and construction of said improvements shall
be required. These 'improvements will include but not be limited to the
following:
b)
c)
d)
.e)
f)
h)
street paving;
curb and g~tter;
sidewalks;
driveway apron;
water mains/fire hydrants/water service;
sanitary sewer facilities;
storm drain extension across frontage of paved;
marbelite street lights with underground conduit;
i) provision for underground cable television service;
J) street trees.
Payment of Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer connection fees in the
amount of $250.00 per dwelling unit at the time building permits are issued.
Payment of East Orange County Water District fees in the amount of $500.00 per
dwelling unit at the time building permits are issued.
Submission of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrctions (CC&Rs) to the City
Attorney's Office for approval is required.
Payment of Partland Dedication Fees in the amount prescribed by City Ordinance
shall be remitted prior to issuance of building permits.
Payment of New Development Tax in the amount of $2,700.00 shall be remitted prior
to issuance of building permits.
Each residential unit shall be equipped with individual electric water and gas
meters.
That the location and construction of trash enclosures shall provide for access
to and from the containers at all times for the franchise refuse service. The
common trash container enclsoures shall be constructed of a minimum six-foot {6)
high concrete decorative block wall with solid gates to block visibility of trash
bins.
The CC&R's shall contain restrictions against the conversion of garage spaces to
any other use except the storage of motor vehicles. The City shall be a part of
the CC&R's and any modification of the CC&R's concerning these conditions shall
require approval by the City of Tusttn.
, Community Development Deparlment
USE P~RMIT 84-15
CONDITIO.NS OF APPROVAL
Page 1~o-
12, Final building elevations which indicate specific construction materials and
color schemes shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and
approval prior to the issuance of building permits,
t3, A landscape and irrigation plan Incorporating specimen size trees and an
automatic irrigation system shall be submitted to the Planning Deprtment for
revte~ and approval prior to the landscape installation This plan shall
include the retention of the trees indicated as l, 2 + 3 on ~'xhlbit "B" attached,
and shall include at least five (5) 48" box trees to replace the mature trees
displaced by construction. Occupancy of any unit will not be authorized until
approved landscaping is in place.
The developer shall comply with all construction requirements of the Orange
County Fire Marshal's office which includes inst~llation of fire extinguishers
and on-site private fire hydrants if necessary.
A development plan shall be submitted to City staff, ~rior to issuance of
building permits to detailing amenities provided within 'the common recreation
area; i.e. spas, walkways, tot lots.
16. A six foot eight inch {6'B') high, concrete block wall shall be inst~lled along
the property side yards of the project. However, the height of the wall along
the northern property line may be constructed to a height up to eight feet (8'}
as a sound attenuation wall for the recreation and patio areas if so reconmmnded
by an acoustical engineer.
17. An analysis of the project shall be conducted by an acoustical engineer verifying
that the project will comply with the City Ordinance No. 828 pertaining to noise.
Included in this analysis will be consideration of impacts of the I-5 freeway
widening project. ..
~8.' All roof top equipment shall be screened from public view.
19. The Final Tract Map shall be submitted, ready for recordation, prior to the
issuance of building permits. At such time that construction of the units is
complete, and all final inspections have been conducted, the Final Map shall be
reviewed by the City Council for consideration of approval.
I' Community DCVelOpmen~ Dcp~rtrnenT
EXHIBIT "E"
BEV~LOPME}IT ~¥IEW SUMMARY
Project: ' ' ~-
Locatlon/Ofstrict: 15582 S. "B" Street ---
Acti on: R i ' ' '
Otst~ct ~equtre~en~
Building:
Front Setback
Side Setbac~
Rear Setbac~
Gross Square Footage
Net FlOor Square Footage
Hetght
Number' of Stories
Matert al s/Col ors
Lot Size .
Lot Coverage (project)
10'
800 sq'.ft./unit
30' max
3
lO,O00 sq.ft.
14,838 sq.ft, max.
1308 sq.ft/unit
2
17,238 sq.ft.
8,047 sq.ft.
Par~tng:
Number of Spaces
Ratio (space/square footage)
Percent of Compact Spaces
Type
Number of Public Notifications (Owners):
Environmental-Status
* No Standard
14
__?/,mit A ? O''p~ ~unit & 2 ques. t
0 0
12 garage/2 open 12 garage/2 open
Apartments/Condominiums Condominiums
35
A Negative Declaration has been applied
for.
5
6
,7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2~
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2184
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, APPROVING USE PERMIT 84-15 AUTHORIZING THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SIX (6} RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS AT
15582 SOUTH "B" STREET
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper application, (Use Permit 8¢-15), was -filed on
behalf of Sik Wong requesting authorization to construct six (6)
residential condominium units at 15582 South "B" Street pursuant
to the City of Tustin Planned Development District Regulations.
B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on
said application.
C. That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be
detrimental to the heal th, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
1. The use is in conformance with the land use element of
the Tustin Area General Plan and the City of Tustin Zoning
Ordinance as it pertains to the dewetopment of multiple
family dwellings.
2. The design is in conformance with the provisions of the
Planned Development District Regulations.
3. That the project conforms with the South Central
Redevelopment Agency Plan.
D. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the
use applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the
property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject
property, nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and
should be granted.
E. .Proposed development shall be in accordance with the
development policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform
Building Codes as administered by the Building Official and the
Fire Code administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal, and
street improvement requirements as administered by the City
Engineer.
F. A negative declaration is hereby approved in conformance
with the California Environmental Quality Act.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2184
October 8, 1984
page t~o
II. The Planning Commission hereby approves Use Permit 84-15 subject to
the conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A":
PASSED AND .ADOPTED at a~regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on
the ~r~ day of ~____~, 1984.
RONALD H. ~iHITE
Chairman
80)~NA ORR
Recording Secretary
EXHIBIT "A'
C0#DITI0#$ 0~ A~?R0¥AL/R£SOLDTI0~ ~O. 2184
USE PEP. NIT 84-15
3.
9.
10.
11.
The proposed project shall be developed in accordance with all applicable
Building, Fire, and Health and Safety Codes adopted by the City of Tustin.
A final grading plan based upon benchmark elevation datum as utilized by the
Orange County Surveyor's Office must be submitted and approved prior to issuance
of building permits.
Submittal of street improvement plans and construction of said improvements shall
be required. These improvements will include but not be limited to the
following:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
f)
street paving;
curb and gutter;
sidewalks;
driveway apron;
water mains/fire hydrants/water service;
sanitary sewer facilities;
storm drain extension across frontage of paved;
h) marbelite street lights with underground conduit;
i) provision for underground cable television service;
street trees.
Payment of Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer connection fees in the
amount of $250.00 per dwelling unit at the time building permits are issued.
Payment of East Orange County Water District fees in the amount of $500.00 per
dwelling unit at the time building permits are issued.
Submission of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrctions {CC&Rs) to the City
Attorney's Office for approval is required.
Payment of Parkland Dedication Fees in the amount prescribed by City Ordinance
shall be remitted prior to issuance of building permits.
Payment of New Development Tax in the amount of $2,700.00 shall be remitted prior
to issuance of building permits.
Each residential unit shall be equipped with individual electric water and gas
meters.
That the location and construction of trash enclosures shall provide for access
to and from the containers at all times for the franchise refuse service. The
common trash container enclsoures shall be constructed of a minimum six-foot (6)
high concrete decorative block wall with solid gates to block visibility of trash
bins.
The CC&R's shall contain restrictions against the conversion of garage spaces to
any other use except the storage of motor vehicles. The City shall be a part of
the CC&R's and any modification of the CC&R's concerning these conditions shall
require approval by the City of ?ustin.
Community Development Department
USE PERMIT 84-15
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page two
12. Final building elevations which indicate specific construction materials and
color schemes shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and
approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
A landscape and irrigation plan incorporating specimen size trees and an
automatic irrigation system shall be submitted to the Planning Deprtment for
review and approval prior to the landscape installation . .Thi~B,plan.. shall
include the retention of the trees indicated as 1, 2 + 3 on Exhibit attached,
and shall include at least five (5) 48" box trees to replace the mature trees
displaced by construction. Occupancy. of any unit will not be authorized until
approved landscaping is in p.lace.
14. The developer shall comply with all construction requirements of the- Orange
County Fire Marshal's office which includes installation of fire extinguishers
and on-site private fire hydrants if necessary.
yI~S'. A development plan shall be submitted to City staff, prior to issuance of
- building permits to detailing amenities provided within the common recreation
area; i.e. spas, walkways, tot lots.
16. A six foot eight inch (6'8") high, concrete block wall shall be installed along
the property side yards of the project. However, the height of the wall along
the northern property line may be constructed to a height up to eight feet {8')
as a sound attenuation wall for the recreation and patio areas if so recommended
by an acoustical engineer.
17. An analysis of the project shall be conducted by an acoustical.engineer verifying
that the project will comply with the City Ordinance No. 828 pertaining to noise.
Included in this analysis will be consideration of impacts of any I-5 freeway
widening project(s).
18. All roof top equipment shall be screened from public view.
19. The Final Tract Map shall be submitted, ready for recordation, prior to the
issuance of building permits. At such time that construction of the units is
complete, and all final inspections have been conducted, the Final Map shall be
reviewed by the City Council for consideration of approval.
20. That the site plan when submitted for structural plan check must show the
location of public improvements in agreement with Tentative Tract Map 12273.
21. That the interior drive-aisle must maintain a clearance of at least 25 feet in
width.
Community Development DeparTment
i /
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
DONNA ORR, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Recording
· Commission of the City of Tustin,
~;cret~r~ of =he ~lan~l~__ No _~,e~/ w.s duly passed and
California; that Keso/u~on · · ·
a regular%~e_}ingyof the Tus~.~/P an~ning Commlss~on, held on the
Recording Secretary
Pl nning Commission
September 9, 1985
SUBJECT: REPORT ON COUNCIL ACTIONS - September 3, 1985
Oral presentation to be given by Donald O. Lan~a, Director of Community
Oevelopment
do
Attachments: City Counctl Action Agenda - September 3, 1985
Action agenda not completed as of agenda deadline, will be hand delivered at
meeting.
~., . Community Development DeparTment