The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 10-10-85ACTION AGENDA TUSTIN PLANNING COI~ISSION REGULAR MEETING SEPTEi~BER 23, 1985 REPORTS NO. 1 10-10-85 ~AAAk CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION PRESENTATIONS: PUBLIC CONCERNS: CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes from Planning Commission meeting September 9, 1985. 2. Resolution No. 2269, Ruby's Cafe. White moved, Puckett seconded to approve the consent calendar. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. USE PERMIT 85-20 Applicant: Location: Request: Motion carried 5-0. Weil, McCarthy, Baker, Puckett, White Puckett moved, Baker seconded to deny Use Permit 85-20 and directed staff to prepare a resolution of dental. Motion carried 4-1, McCarthy opposed. Lawrence Bente made himself available for questions. Commission discussion and questions of staff of alternatives in height and the existing ordinance. Chair Well opened the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak she closed the hearing at 7:35 p.m. Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner Presentation: Lawrence Bente 13201 Silver Birch Drive Authorization to retain a satellite dish which was installed without the required permits and exceeds the size and height requirements of the Tustin City Code. Action Agenda September 23, 1985 page two PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT 8451 Applicant: Location: Request: Adams, Streeter Civil Engineers on behalf of The Irvine Company Tustin-Irvine Industrial Complex, south of Dow Avenue, west of Tustin boundary and north of Moulton Parkway. Authorization to create one lot of 12.5 acres for the final portion of land under the original tentative map. Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner Chair Weil opened the hearing at 7:50 p.m. Jerry Weeks, The Irvine Company, agreed with staff's recommendation and made himself available for questions. Seeing no one further wishing to speak, Chair Well closed the hearing at 7:51 p.m. White moved, McCarthy seconded to approve Revised Tentative Tract 8451 by the adoption of Resolution 2270. Motion carried 5-0. 5. AMENDMENT #1 TO USE PERMIT 72-400 Applicant: Location: Request: Jo Jo's Restaurants 17631E. 17th Street Authorization to construct a green house addition of 611 square feet to an existing Co Co's Restaurant. Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner Chair Well opened the public hearing at 7:58 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak, she closed the hearing at 7:58 p.m. Puckett moved, Baker seconded to approve Amendment tl to Use Permit 72-400 by the adoption of Resolution 2271. Motion carried 5-0. AI)MINISTRATIV£ ~U~I'~ERS Old Business None. New Business None STAFF CONCERNS 6. Report on Council actions September 16, 1985 Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development Action Agenda September 23, 1985 page three COMMISSIOM CONCERNS Well questioned if the Engineering Department would have a representative at the Commission meetings. Lamm responded staff was working on it with Engineering. White requested guidance from the Council for policy on setback and landscape requirements to avoid creating non conforming uses in the future when the street is eventually widened. ADJOURNMENT Puckett moved, McCarthy seconded to adjourn at 8:00 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. AGENDA TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 23, 1985 CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: Weil, McCarthy, Baker, Puckett, White PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION PRESENTATIONS: PUBLIC CONCERNS: CONSENT CALENDAR: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda) IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) 2. Resolution No. 2269, Ruby' CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. USE PERMIT 85-20 Applicant: Location: Request: Presentation: Minutes from Planning Commission meeting September 9, 1985. s Cafe. Lawrence Bente 13201 Silver Birch Drive Authorization to retain a satellite dish which was installed without the required permits and exceeds the size and height requirements of the Tustin City Code. Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner Agenda September 23, 1985 page two PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT 8451 Applicant: Adams, Streeter Civil Engineers on behalf of The Irvine Company Location: Tustin-Irvine Industrial Complex, south of Dow Avenue, west of Tustin boundary and north of Moulton Parkway. Request: Authorization to create one lot of 12.5 acres for the final portion of land under the original tentative map. Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner 5. AMENDMENT #1 TO USE PERMIT 72-400 Applicant: Location: Request: Jo Jo's Restaurants 17631E. 17th Street Authorization to construct a green house addition of 611 square feet to an existing Co Co's Restaurant. Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Old Business None. New Business None STAFF CONCERNS 6. Report on Council actions September 16, 1985 Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development COMMISSION CONCERNS ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. MINUTES TUSTIN PLANNING CJ)MMISSION REGULAR ~ETING SEPTEMBER g, 1985 CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: 6:30 p.m. Workshop: Santa Fe Land Specific Plan No. 7 Council Chambers Don Lamm, Director of Community Development and Larry tlebb, private consultant, gave a presentation and update of Specific Plan #7. This plan covers the industrial area bounded by Redhill Avenue on the east, Valencia on the south, Costa Mesa Freeway on the west {SR#55) and the Santa Fe Railroad tracks on the north. Present: Weil, McCarthy, Baker, Puckett, White 7:30 p.m. Commission meeting was called to order PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION PRESENTATIONS: PUBLIC CONCERNS: cONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes from Planning Commission meeting August 26, 1985. 2. Final Parcel Map 85-270, Senior Citizen Center. Puckett moved, McCarthy seconded to approve the consent calendar. 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. USE PERMIT 85-20 Applicant: Lawrence Bente Location: 13201 Silver Birch Drive Motion carried Request: Authorization to retain a satellite dish which was installed without the required permits and exceeds the size and height requirements of the Tustin City Code. Oresentation: Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner Chair Weil called the hearing to order at 7:38 p.m. Lawrence Bente, satellite dish owner, explained the background in installing the antenna. Seeing no one further wishing to speak, Well closed the hearing at 7:48 p.m. Commission questions and answers of staff and applicant ensued. ~inutes September 9, 1985 page two Baker moved, Puckett seconded to continue the matter for two weeks for further investigation by staff and Mr. Bente to determine how much he can lower the dish without interfering with signal. Motion carried 5-0. 4. VARIANCE 85-5, RUBY'S RESTAURANT Applicant: Location: Request: Douglas Cavanaugh and Ralph Kosmides on behalf of John Prescott 205 E1Camino Real Authorization to vary with the parking requirements of the Tustin City Code in order to allow a 1288 square foot addition to the existing restaurant. Presentation: Ed Knight, Senior Planner Chair Well opened the public hearing at 7:54 p.m. Douglas Cavanaugh, owner, explained their goals and the expansion. He expressed concern with conditions of approval 9 and 12. Commission questions and answers of staff and applicant regarding traffic and potential parking problems. Michael Kearney, Tustin Chamber of Commerce, explained most of the downtown merchants would welcome Ruby's and the additional traffic. Majorie Lightfoot, Assistance League, expressed their concern with traffic and parking. The former Ruby's caused parking problems for the League by patrons parking in the League's lot. White moved, Puckett seconded to approve Variance 85-5 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2269 with the following amendments: delete condition No. 3; add to No. 12 that when a development plan is processed through the city for lots 6, 7, and 8 that the parking for that development be considered with this site and the overall parking requirement determined jointly; and, add No. 13 that a covenant be recorded at this time acknowledging the requirements placed on lots 6, 7, and 8. Motion carried 5-0. 5. TENTATIVE TRACT 12372 Applicant: Location: Request: Gary Siegel 14662 Newport Avenue Authorization to consolidate two lots into one lot for a commercial condominium Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner Chair Weil opened the public hearing at 8:29 p.m. the reason for the consolidation for condominiums. speak, Weil closed the hearing at 8:34 p.m. Gary Siegel, applicant, explained Seeing no one further wishing to Puckett moved, White seconded to approve staff's recommendation by the adoption of Resolution No. 2267. Motion carried 5-0. Minutes September 9, 1985 page three VARIANCE 85-6 AND USE PERMIT 85-19 Applicant: Location: Request: Presentation: Milton Polsky and Michael Hirsch 17311 McFadden Avenue Authorization to develop an approximate 3,800 square foot retail commercial center while varying with the requirements of the front-yard setback. Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner Chair Weil opened the public hearing at 8:39 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak, she closed the hearing at 8:39 p.m. Puckett moved, McCarthy seconded to approve Variance 85-6 and Use Permit 85-19 by the adoption of Resolution 2265 with an amendment to condition of approval No. 10 adding a double-double yellow line on McFadden between "B" Street and Newport Avenue. Motion carried 4-1, White opposed. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Old Business - 7. Extension of Use Permit 84-15, 15582 "B" Street Presentation: Edward M. Knight, Senior Planner McCarthy moved, Baker seconded to approve extension of Use Permit 84-15 for six months until April 8, 1986. Motion carried 5-0. New Business None STAFF CONCERNS 8. Report on Council actions September 3, 1985 Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development LATE AGENDA A~)DITION 9. Formal Finding of the Planning Commission Authorizing Financial Institutions In the Professional Office (PR) Zoning District. Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development Puckett moved, McCarthy seconded to approve staff's recommendation with the exception of requiring Conditional Use Permits for banks with drive thru tellers. Motion carried 4-0, Baker abstained. Minutes September 9, 1985 page four COMMISSION CONCERNS Weil requested clarification on why the acceleration lane on Newport was requested by the engineering division. Commission discussion ensued. White requested a representative from the engineering department be present at Planning Commission meetings for input on engineering and traffic issues. ADJOURNMENT McCarthy moved, White seconded to adjourn at 9:00 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting. KATHY WEIL, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary 2 3 .4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 23 2,~ 25 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2269 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 85-5 ALLOWING AN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING RESTAURANT AT 205 EL CAMINO REAL TO VARY WITH THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR A RESTAURANT IN THE C-2 ZONE. The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby follows: resolve as The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: That a proper application, (Variance No. 85-5), was filed by Douglas Cavanaugh & Ralph Kosmides, requesting authorization to vary from the parking requirements of the C-2 zone for an existing non-conforming restaurant located at 205 E1 Camino Real. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said application. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, relative to size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, a strict application of the Zoning Ordinance is found to deprive subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification, evidenced by the following findings: 1. The use is in conformance with the land use element of the Tustin Area General Plan. The variance will be an incentive to, and a benefit for, non residential development in the area. The applicant is supplying parking per the zoning code for any additional seats over the existing non-conforming number. De That the granting of a variance as herein provided will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and district in which the subject property is situated. That this project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.(Class III) Ge That the granting of the variance as herein provided will not be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance or the public safety, health and welfare, and said variance should be granted. Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development policies adopted by the City Council; Uniform Building Codes as administered by the Building Official; Fire Codes as administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal; and street improvement requirements as administered by the City Engineer. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 23 24 26 27 28 Resolution No. Page two II. Final sign plans shall require the review and approval of the Community Development Director. The Planning Commission hereby grants a variance as applied for, to authorize the existing non-conforming restaurant located at 205 E1 Camino Real to vary with the parking requirements for a restaurant in the C-2 zone, subject to the conditions attached hereto in Exhibit PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the day of , 198 KATHY WEIL, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VARIANCE NO. 85-5 10. 11. The number of seats established as the existing non-conforming use is 65 seats, with the total number of parking space variance equaling twenty-two (22) parking spaces. This variance shall be null and void upon the demolition of the structure at 205 E1Camino Real. All remaining signs shall be renovated. A master sign plan shall be approved for the subject project prior to building permit issuance. A landscape plan is required for review and approval prior to building permit issuance. Any changes in exterior materials and colors requires the review and approval of the Community Development Department. Any missing or damaged street improvements on either street frontage shall be installed or replaced. All improvements shall be shown on a final site or grading plan, and reference applicable city standard drawing references. A grading plan delineating all finish elevations of adjacent properties shall approval. floor, site elevations and be submitted for review and The city shall require a right-of-way dedication at the northwesterly corner of the property in the shape of a triangle corner cut-off of 5'x5'. In the event this dedication interferes with roof overhangs, it shall be decreased in size. The alley has a sewer easement for maintenance purposes, and the developer shall work with the public works department to determine the viability of the two parking spaces adjacent to the alley. Any reduction in spaces requires a reduction in seating within the restaurant. Payment of the following fees shall be required at the time a building permit is issued: County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer connection fee based upon $50.00/1,000 sq. ft. of new building area or $250.00 whichever is larger. b. East Orange County Water District fees for new building area. Community Development Department J Conditions of Approval Variance 85-5 page two 12. 13. The restaurant business shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission on an annual basis if substantial complaints are received by the department in regard to on-street parking. If the Planning Commssion makes a finding that the area merchants are impacted from on-street parking generated by the restaurant business, the property owner, in accord with the lessee, shall within 60 days provide permanent improved parking facilities based on a maximum of twenty-two (22) parking spaces, on an adjoining lot known in the Assessor's Book as 401-584, lots 6, 7, and 8. Any development plans for the subject parcels shall incorporate the parking requirements of the restaurant variance at 205 E1Camino Real. That a covenant be recorded with the County Recorder, binding all present and future property owners of AB 401-584, lots 6, 7, and 8 to the conditions outlined in number twelve of this resolution. Community Development Department Repor to Planning Commission ITEM NO. 3 DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: REQUEST: SEPTEMBER 23, 1985 USE PERMIT 85-20 LAWRENCE BENTE, 13201 SILVER BIRCH DR., TUSTIN 13201 SILVER BIRCH OR. R-l, SINGLE FAMILY RESIOENTIAL TO RETAIN A 12' OIAMETER SATELLITE RECEIVING OISH WHICH CAN BE SEEN FROM l~lE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY RECOI~ENDEO ACTION: That the'Planning Commission deny Use Permit No. 85-20 and direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolution. SIJ~ARY: On September 9, 1985, Use Permit 85-20 was continued by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission wished to receive more information regarding the possibilities for reducing the visual impact of the previously installed dish antenna at 13201 Silver Birch Drive. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS: After an inspection of the satellite- dish by the Building Department, the antenna has been found to be structurally sound. Therefore, a Building Permit can be issued upon approval of the Planning Commission. Although all structural specifications have been met, the antenna still requires a Use Permit as outlined in Ordinance No. 926. Planning staff has inspected the dish location in regrds to the possibilities for relocation or a reduction in height. Unfortunately, the dish cannot be relocated because the receiving capabilities would be reduced by interference from the existing home and trees. Planning Commission Report September 23, 1985 page two A reduction in height was thought to be the only solution. However, after a lengthy discussion with the dish installer, this possibility was also eliminated. It seems that if the dish was lowered, the receiving capabilities of the dish would be greatly impaired by the existing city trees to the south. If the trees were removed, the dish could be lowered only two to three feet. If this was done, the dish would still be visible from Olwyn Drive, Red Hill Avenue, and Silver Birch Drive. Due to these unfortunate circumstances, the antenna cannot be lowered or relocated in order to meet the intentions of Ordinance No. 926. Therefore, the dish should be removed to eliminate the visual impact to the surrounding area. LAURA PICKUP~ Assistant Planner LP:em Community Development Department ITEM NO. 4 Planning Commission DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: SEPTEMBER 23, 1985 REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT 8451 ADAMS, STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS SOUTH OF DOW AVENUE, WEST OF TUSTIN BOUNDARY, NORTH OF MOULTON PARKWAY PLANNED COMMUNITY INDUSTRIAL AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT WAS PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED FOR THIS PROJECT (EIR 73-1) REINSTATE TENTATIVE TRACT 8451 TO CREATE ONE LOT OF 12.5 ACRES FOR THE FINAL PORTION OF LAND UNDER THE ORIGINAL MAP FOR THE TUSTIN-IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX RECOI~qENDATION: Recommend approval of Revised Tentative Tract 8451 to the City Council by the adoption of Resolution No. 2270. PROJECT ANALYSIS: Tentative Tract No. 8451 was approved by the City Council on March 4, 1974, by the adoption of Resolution No. 74-15. The map consisted of 302.7+ acres which was subdivided into 76 lots plus 3 lettered lots for the ~ustin-Irvine Industrial Complex. All of the numbered and lettered lots were approved under final tract maps except this portion. The lots north of Walnut, west of Franklin were part of Final Tract 8590. The lots westerly of Myford Road, north of Walnut were part of Final Tract 8603. All of the lots south of Walnut, westerly of the spur line were part of Final Tract 8763. The lots located at the southwesterly corner of Myford and Walnut were part of 10401. Only these 12.5 acres remain from the original tentative tract map. (See Exhibit "A".) , Community Development Department Planning Commission Report September 23, 1985 page two The applicant is now requesting authorization to reinstate this tentative map to create one lot of 12.5 acres for the final portion of land under the original map. The proposed map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan and the Planned Community District Regulations for the Tustin-Irvine Industrial District (Ordinance No. 611). The conditions of approval are listed in Resolution No. 2270. MARY ANN//CHAMBERLAIN Associa£e Planner MAC:em Exhibits: ?entative Map Resolution No. 2270 Resolution No. 74-15 Exhibit "A" Community Development Department ,J Z 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2270 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 8451 The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: II. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: Ae That Revised Tentative Tract No. 8451 was submitted by Adams, Streeter Engineers on behalf of the Irvine Company, pursuant to Ordinance 847 for the purpose of creating one lot for the property known as a portion of Lot 188, Blocks 45 and 63 of Irvine Subdivision recorded in Book 1, page 88 of miscellaneous map records of Orange County. That said map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan and the Planned Community District Regulations for the Tustin-Irvine Industrial Complex. C. That an Environmental Imapct Report was previously certified for this project (EIR 73-1). The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of Revised Tentative Tract 8451 subject to the following conditions: All applicable conditions of approval for the previously approved Tentative Tract No. 8451 shall apply to this map {Res. No. 74-15). Construction and/or replacement of all missing or damaged public improvements a)ong Dow Avenue adjacent to this tract will be required at the time of development and shall include but not be limited to the following: a. Curb and gutter b. Sidewalk (if required) c. Drive apron(s) d. Street lights e. Street trees f. Domestic water/fire service g. Sanitary sewer lateral A grading plan shall be required at the time of development and should be based on the Orange County Surveyor's bench mark datum. The finished pad elevation must be set at a minimum elevation of 59.00 which is one foot above the base flood elevation of 58.00. In the event the City has established an Eastern Corridor Fee Program at the time a building permit is issued, this development will be required to pay the established fee. 1 2 3 4 $ ? 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 2270 Page two The southerly right-of-way line of Dow Avenue shall be revised to reflect that the right-of-way provide a standard knuckle intersection at Dow Avenue and Myford Road per city standards. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the day of , 198_... KATHY WEIL, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary 5 6 7 $ !0 11 12 13 17 18 21 22 ~3 27 361 RESOLUTION NO. 71-15 A RESOLUTION CF TILT, CITY COU~:CiL OF THE ,--i~'Y OF TUSTIN APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT ~U~P NO. 8,t51 OF THE IRVINE INDUSTRIAL CC>:PLEX. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: 1. The City Council finds and determines: Ac Subject area and proposed development is in conformance with the Tuatin Area General Plan and is authorized for deve!opmen~ as a Planned Community Industrial and SuDport Commercial District. Bo An Environmental Impact ReDort has been adopted by the City Council for the subject area and con- ditions imposed to mitigate against adverse impacts. Co By adoption of Ordinance NO. 611, February 4, 1974 the City Council so,roved tho Zoninc of s~id oarus~ into the Planne~ Community District~(industri~i and SuoDort Commercial), and adopted =.~={ regulations and conditions of the zone chan~e action. Map A. Ciuy Cucncii i~ezeDv ap],£oves 7enu~ul%e '~uacu No. 8451 subject to the fo!lowing.conditions: Conformance td all the conditions cf Zone Change 73-6 as outlined on P!annin? Ccm,mission Res- olution No. 1382 dated December 10, !973, and Ordinance No. 611 as adcutcd cn ?ebruar,, 4, 1974, and the Planned Co~nunity District ~c- ulations. Final determination of location of the easterly boundary so that the tract boundary w~ll be coincidental with either the center!ine or --he westerly right-of-~.:ay line of the future Road. Extent of road improvements along M~-ford Road to be determzncd at the time the final aligr~ment and CitV boundary is det=~-mintd. C. Annexation of the area '.,'ithin the Tenr. ativc Ma~ includin~ the future Jamboree Road to ~chc Tust~a Lightin~ District. Proo~ of ~uch su]~m2 zc~nn of annexation to the Count~' ~uu,.,~%-or'~ be required Drier to np:~rcva! o~ t~c f~--~ ma~. D. Installation of mnrnelitc street ~nderground condui~ to tho UatlSf~lc' City Engineer. 362 ! 4 ? 9 10 ~7 ~8 19 ~0 ~7 IIIIIII E. Installation o~ all ut,~litics undcrUrc:un~i with no additional ow_~rhead holes tc be sat within the property or adjacent to c::isting or future ........ ~-~- "~;~--3f-,.,a~. F. Installation of a storm d~ain ~ystem either the public right-oJ-way or adequase c~:~c~cnts provide a complete unc]erqrcund conduiz as required by the City En.~ineer and the Orange County Flood Ccntro! 2istrict, where ag?licaS!c. This system shall bc based upon desl?~ critec~a as outlined in tko Orange County Ftcod C~nzrol District manuals. G. Provide sanitary sewer and water facii2ties to the satisfaction of ~he City of Tustln and any other applicable ~ovcrnm~ntal agency. Provision for slcDe e~sements a!onq Jamburee Road (future) at the crossing of the Santa Aha Freeway (Route I-5) and at the A.T.&S.F. Rail- road and Moulton Parkway. I. Installation of embankments, landscai:in= and irrigation system for ~lcpes at the overcrossin~sl described in conditions No. 8 & Nc. 9. J. Construction o~ the 48 ft. wide access road within the 64 ft. wide right-of-way fr:~. ~4yf~d Road to the Mvfcrd ?cad Interchanc%. w~zk SanUa Aha Freeway, (Route !-5) eo the City of !u~e standards. Mo Complete installation of railroad crc~si~',g and protective d~vices as recuired b,' the Railroad and the Public Utilities Commission Walnut Avenue, Street "A" and Street "D" (if applicable) . Installation of r~ised traffic median islands ,'izt landscaping and irrigation system along ~'la!nut Avenue. . An aqreement bet;..'~un the Irvine industrial C and the City of Tustin cbligatin~ the !r~,ine Industrial ~omplc:< to dedicate and fully improve Jamboree Road ,,;itn Davinq, curbs, gutters, s~de- walks (if requircd}, street lights, raised medians with landsca~ino and irrigation syste~ and street trees. Construction of Jamscree Road will be predicated on the need ~s to when it connected to either Nculton ?ark'^'ay ~r the Santa Aha Freeway, as ~pecificd by Commission Resoiut]on No~ ]382 and City Counc~l Ordinance No. 6i~. Final location ci :;i'~',q.'3t "A'; oY.J Ktre<~u "D" intersections wii t. A,,c~r.~ r~o.n~] hour desiqn speed for th,, future o'.'<,r:~n:-::e~ at the Santa Aha Frc~:*,v.G' and at f.fcu!tur: .1 4 10 t6 ~0 2_6 363 Provide adequate sJ. qht die, tahoe and enlarge curb return radii at thc inter~;uction of tlyford Road (future) and %~a!nut Avenue. Submittal of street improvement D!ans for approval and installation of ail'street imDrovem.~i.: including street paving, curb and gu~ter, ~ide~ walks (if required), street lights, street trees, driveways and storm drains per City standards~ Final maps, based upon the Tentative Tract Map No. 8451 shall be submitted in incremental phases in accordance with the procedures and - requirements of Section VII A.-2 of the ?lanned Community District Regulations. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the ~/-~ day of ~ , 1974 at Tustin, California. ATTEST: ! ~YOR - Planning Commission DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: SEPTEMBER 23, 1985 AIqENDNENT ~1 TO USE PERIqIT 72-400 JO JO's RESTAURANTS, INC. 17631 E. 17th STREET PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL THIS PROJECT ADDITION IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM REQUIRF_lqENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. CONSTRUCTION OF A GREEN HOUSE ADDITION OF 611 SQUARE FEET. THE RECOMMENDED ACTION: Recommend approval of Amendment #1 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2271. PROJECT ANALYSIS: On December 11, 1982 the Planning Commission approved Use Permit 72-400 by the adoption of Resolution 1307. This permit authorized the construction and operation of a Jo Jo's Restaurant of ~500 square feet. The applicant is now requesting authorization to construct a greenhouse addition to the existing restaurant. In this new addition, 32 seats are proposed for the 611 square foot area. Since there are 126 existing seats and 32 proposed, the restaurant will have a total of 158 seats. At the present time, there are 53 parking stalls available which meets the City Code requirements for parking. {1 space per each 3 seats) The elevations for the greenhouse addition as proposed, will match the existing elevations. Community Development Deparlment ~ Planning Commission Report Use Permit 72-400 page two The City is planning to remove all parking along 17th Street to provide three travel lanes in each direction. This action will preclude any on-street parking on 17th Street, however, there will still be a landscape setback of more than 15 feet in addition to the sidewalk and parkway areas. The conditions of approval are listed in Resolution No. 2271. I , i ~ ', · / MAR)F ANN C.,~V~kMBERLAIN, Associate ~Slanner MAC:do attachment: Plan Resolution No. 2271 Community Developmenl Department 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2271 A RESOLU?ION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ?USTIN, APPROVING THE 611 SQUARE FOOT GREENHOUSE ADDITION AT 17631 E. 17th ST. The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: Ao That a proper application, Amendment #1 to Use Permit No. 72-400 has been filed on behalf of Jo Jo's Restaurant, Inc. to construct a greenhouse addition of 611 square feet for the Coco's Restaurant at 17631E. 1?th Street. Co That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said application. That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings: The proposed use is a compatible use on a major arterial roadway, buffered from adjoining residential properties by private street, public street, flood control channel, and rear buffering by perimeter wall and landscaping. Adequate parking, landscaping, and design amenities are incorporated in the plot plan. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for, will not be injurious nor detrimental to the property and improvements of the neighborhood of the subject property, nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and should be granted. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and should be granted. Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement requirements as administered by the City Engineer. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 2271 page two F. That this project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. G. Final development plans shall require the review and approval of the Community Development Department. II. The Planning Commission hereby approves Amendment #1 to Use Permit No. 72-400 to authorize the construction of a 611 square foot greenhouse subject to the following conditions: Ae Submit Title 24 calculations for the building envelope~prepared by a registered professional, to justify compliance with the energy conservation regulations. B. Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer connection fees for new building area. C. East Orange County Water District fees for new building area. Do If the Corridor Fee Program is adopted by the city at the time a building permit is issued, Eastern/Foothill Corridor fees will be required. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the day of , 198 KATHY WEIL, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary ITEM NO. 6 Planning Commission September 23, 1985 SUBJECT: REPORT ON COUNCIL ACTIONS - September 16, 1985 Oral presentation to be given by Donald O. Lamm, Director of Community Development do Attachments: City Council Action Agenda - September 16, 1985 Community Development Department 7:01 I. ALL PRESENT II. EXCEPT GREINKE III. ACTION AGENDA OF A REGULAR ~ETING OF lliE llISTIN CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 16, 1985 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PROCLAMATION PRESENTED TO TUSTIN BOBBY SOXS NONE IV. V. INTRODUCED ORDINANCE NO. 946 INTRODUCED ORDINANCE NO. 947 APPROVED APPROVED 1. TUSTIN BOBBY SOX - 2ND PLACE, BOBBY SOX MINOR NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS PUBLIC INPUT PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. ZONE CHANGE 85-9 - ORDINANCE NO. 946 ORDINANCE NO. 946 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, REZONING THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF CARFAX AVENUE, WESTERLY OF SCHOOL ROAD, FROM PLANNED MANUFACTURING AND MANUFACTURING DISTRICT (PM&M) TO PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT (P&I), AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT Recommendation: M.O. - That Ordinance No. 946 have first reading by title only. M.O. - That Ordinance No. 946 be introduced. 2. ZONE CHANGE 85-11 - ORDINANCE NO. 947 ORDINANCE NO. 947 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, REZONING 1782 NISSON ROAD FROM DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-2) TO MOBILE HOME PARK DISTRICT (MHP) AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT ~'A". Recommendation: M.O. - That Ordinance No. 947 have first reading by title only. M.O. - That Ordinance No. 947 be introdu6ed. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 3, 1985, ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING ADOPTED 3. RESOLUTION NO. 85-92 >TED 4. RLSOLUTION NO. 85-93 APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $435,428.33 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $119,145.17 RESOLUTION NO. 85-92 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP 85-270 LOCATED AT 300 SOUTH "C" STREET Adopt Resolution No. 85-92 as recommended by the Community Develop- ment Department. RESOLUTION NO. 85-93 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12372 Adopt Resolution No. 85-93 as recommended by the Community Develop- ment Department. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page i 9-16-85 ~qPTED 5. )LUTION NO. 85-95 RESOLUTION NO. 85-95 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENTS ON VANDERLIP AVENUE FROM CLARISSA LANE TO NEWPORT AVENUE Adopt Resolution No. 85-95 as recommended by the Engineering Divi- sion. APPROVED STAFF 6. RECO~4ENDATION AGREEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND CONDUIT INSTALLATION, TUSTIN AUTO CENTER Approve the agreement between the City and Pacific Bell for under- ground conduit installation within Assessment District 85-1 to serve the Tustin Auto Center; and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute same, as recommended by the Engineering Division. ADOPTED 7. RESOLUTION NO. 85-96 RESOLUTION NO. 85-96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "B" STREET AND MITCHELL AVENUE HCDA STREET IMPROVEMENTS Adopt Resolution No. 85-96 as recommended by the Engineering Divi- sion. ADOPTED 8. RESOLUTION NO. 85-97 RESOLUTION NO. 85-97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CITY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM - CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS ~Adopt Resolution No. 85-97 as recommended by the Engineering Divi- sion. --qPTED 9. OLUTION NO. 85-98 RESOLUTION NO. 85-98 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ANNUAL TREE STUMP REMOVAL AND GRINDING PROGRAM AND DIRECT CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS Adopt Resolution No. 85-98 as recommended by the Engineering Divi- sion. APPROVED STAFF 10. RECOt~ENDATION TUSTIN TILLER DAYS PARADE - TUSTIN JAYCEES Approve Proposals I and 2; authorize Proposal 3 for immediate disbursement of $3,500 to Tustin Jaycees as adopted in 1985-86 Budget; and approve Proposal 4 contingent upon review and approval of the Police Department, as recommended by the Finance Director. ADOPTED 11. RESOLUTION NO. 85-99 INTRODUCED ORDINANCE NO. 943 RESOLUTION NO. 85-99 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CITY OF TUSTIN FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS Adopt Resolution No. 85-99 as recommended by the Engineering Divi- sion. VII. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION 1. REVISION TO BUSINESS LICENSE ORDINANCE - COLLECTION OF PENALTY FEES - ORDINANCE NO. 943 ORDINANCE NO. 943 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2521 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE, RELA- TIVE TO BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES ~RODUCED JINANCE NO. 948 2. MAJOR THOROUGHFARE & BRIDGE FEE PROGRAM FOR FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTA- TION CORRIDORS - ORDINANCE NO. 948 ORDINANCE NO. 948 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ADDING SECTION 2800 TO THE CITY CODE ADOPTING A MAJOR THOROUGH- FARE AND BRIDGE FEE PROGRAM CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 2 9-15-85 VIII. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION ~.~TED ORDINANCE 1. ~0. 944 ORDINANCE NO. 944 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, REZONING 12821 NEWPORT AVENUE FROM R-3 (MULTIPLE FAMILY) DIS- TRICT TO PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT (P&I), AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT ~DOPTED ORDINANCE 2. 40. 945 ORDINANCE NO. 945 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, REZONING 15352 WILLIAMS STREET FROM R-4 (SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT TO MOBILE HOME PARK DISTRICT (MHP), AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT "A" M.O. That Ordinance No. 945 have second reading by title only. M.O. - That Ordinance No. 945 be passed and adopted. IX. OLD BUSINESS qDOPTED RESOLUTION 1.. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 85-246 & SITE PLAN - CARVER DEVELOPMENT (There are two separate reports pertaining to this item.) 40. 85-88 WITH )ELETION OF II-l-d AND ~PPROVED TENTATIVE qAP NO. 85-246 Recommendation: 1) Deny the request of Carver Development for relief to Condition or.Approval II-l-d; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 85-88 as recommended by the Planning Commission. AND Confirm the following items pertaining to the Carver Development Site Plan: 1) Newport Avenue bike trail shall be 10 feet in lieu of 8 feet; 2) Landscape area between the sidewalk and bike trail along Newport Avenue shall contain only low profile shrubs and ground covers; and 3) Sidewalk along Main Street shall be 8 feet wide in lieu of 5 feet wide. X. NEW BUSINESS ~PPROVED STAFF ~ECO~ENDATION ~PPROVED STAFF ~ECO~I~ENDATION 1. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION FOR SENIOR CENTER FUND RAISING e Recommendation: 1) Approve a non-profit organization and private sector tund ralslng campaign for the Tustin Area Senior Center; and 2) Authorize the City Attorney and other City s%aff to proceed with incorporation of the tax-exempt organization as soon as possible, as recommended by the Director of Communty and Administrative Services. FINAL DESIGN DEVELOPMENT REPORT AND I~STER PLAN FOR TUSTIN AREA SENIOR CENTER Recommendation: 1) Approve final Design Development Report and Master Plan for Tustin Area Senior Center; and 2) Authorize staff to proceed with preliminary construction plans and outline specifications, and then to final construction plans and speci- fications - not to exceed budgeted amount of $120,000, as recommended by the Director of Community and Administrative Services. (The City Coun- cil will have the opportunity to review the preliminary construction plans and outline specifications before final construction plans, speci- fications, and bid documents are completed.) ]ITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 3 9-16-85 1~OTED 3. 1986-87 REGIONAL COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAM.- TUSTIN AREA SENIOR CENTER - ,UTION NO. 85-94 RESOLUTION NO. 85-94 RESOLUTION NO. 85-94 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS UNDER THE REGIONAL COMPETITIVE PROGRAM OF THE CALIFORNIA PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES ACT OF 1984 FOR THE TUSTIN AREA MULTISERVICE SENIOR CENTER Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 85-94 as recommended by the Direc- tor of Community and Administrative Services. STAFF TO APPLY FOR 4. HANDICAP RAMPS/CURB CUTS FUNDS AND RESPOND TO O.T.C.D. REQUESTS Recommendation: Pleasure of the City Council. APPROVED STAFF 5. REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVAL - 190 CENTENNIAL WAY RECOMMENDATION EXCEPT REPLACEMENT BE PER CASE [ OF CITY POLICY. Recommendation: 1) Authorize the removal of four trees and replacement of three or four trees along the Second Street frontage of Mr. OeIorio's property per Case II of City Policy; and 2) Authorize the planting of trees at City expense along the remaining portions of both sides of Second Street, as recommended by the Director of Public Works. XI. REPORTS ~TFIED 1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - SEPTEMBER 9, 1985 All actions of the Planning Commission are final unless appealed by the City Council or member of the public. ~ECEIVED AND FILED 2. ROUTE 55 COSTA MESA FREEWAY CORRIDOR OPERATION STATUS REPORT Recommendation: Receive and file. ADVISORY COMMITTEE EDGAR XII. OTHER BUSINESS ~EQUESTED THAT STAFF ARRANGE A ~ETING FOR DISCUSSION OF THE FIRE CONTRACT BEFORE ~GENDIZED FOR FINAL APPROVAL. 1. IT WAS MOVED AND CARRIED TO DIRECT STAFF TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS FOR AUDIT FOR NEXT YEAR. IT IS SALTARELLI REQUESTED STAFF TO LOOK INTO THE POSSIBILITY OF A MOVIE THEATRE NEXT TO THE NEW AUTO ]ENTER. SALTARELLI INFORMED THE COUNCIL THAT SUPERVISORS NESTANDE AND WEIDER ItAVE RESIGNED FROM LAFCO. 5:04 XIII. ADJOURNMENT To the next Adjourned Regular Meeting on Thursday, October 10, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. ]ITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 4 g-16-85 ACTION AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUSTIN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SEPTEMBER 16, 1985 7:00 P.M. 8:04 1. CALL TO ORDER ALL 2. ROLL CALL PRESENT EXCEPT GREINKE APPROVED 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 1985 APPROVED 4. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS - AUGUST, 1985 Recommendation: Approve demands in the amount of $124,336.66 for the month of August, 1985, as recommended by the Director of Finance. ADOPTED 5. RESOLUTION NO. RDA 85-13 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM, EL CAMINO REAL - RESOLUTION NO. RDA 85-13 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 85-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CITY OF TUSTIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM - EL CAMINO REAL AND DIRECTING THE SECRETARY TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. RDA 85-13 as recommended by the Engineer- ing Division. 6. OTHER BUSINESS SALTARELLI COMMENDED KATHY MONTGOMERY OF THE REGISTER FOR HER POSITIVE REPORTING. 8:06 7. ADJOURNMENT To the next Adjourned Regular Meeting on Thursday, October 10, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION AGENDA Page 1 9-15-85