Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 11-19-84 City CounCil chambers 7:30 p.m., Clktt '[0 ORDER'- pLeDGE OF i%e, ~e~l, McCarthY, pucker%, Sharp ~gend~ Wh_ '-ett absent ~-s pet person for ~%emS no~ on (Limited ~" -" _.. 9E CORMI~SI, BLE. ALSO, pLEASE . meeting October 2Z, ~95A. ~AinuteS from planning CommissiOn A6option of City capital improvement program' ~esolutiOn ~o. t~92, ~ome Fe6er~l Savings- ~l Tract lAa~ ~t~06, Mnslle. Resolution ~o. ~tB9, kuer oevelopment' ~esolution Ro. 2195, ~]n lendar- ~ved aPproval of Conse-t Ca sba~LiC R~IRGS . corntche oevelopment corP. ~-.iel 0'C°nn?-°n b ._. 0talnance ~t:ii~% ~rofeSs~ Requ~o ' Ois%ric~ ~._. kssoc~ ate ~l anner , nde6 CounCil c°n~c% M~r~ knn Chamberlain, ~-0 (~eco~_.~ fr~ the ~velOP~ utt on ~o. 2t94- he h~s acru=- sent~tion: ' of Resol ~e mqaest Planning Commission November 13, 1984 page Ja Applicant: Location: Request: Presentation: USE PERMIT 84-26 Daniel O'Connor on behalf of Corntche Development Corp. 1372 Irvine Blvd. Approval to construct a 13,000 square foot two story professional office building. Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner Sharp/Well moved approval. 4-0 8. PARCEL MAP 84-1030 Applicant: Location: Request: Presentation: Well/McCarthy moved approval. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Daniel O'Connor on behalf of Corniche Development Corp. 1372 Irvine Blvd. To subdivide the property for professional office. Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner 4-0 Old Business None New Business None White introduced resolution commending Alan Warren. Sharp/Well moved approval. 4-0 STAFF CONCERNS g. Report on Council Actions November 5, 1984 Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner 10. Sion Code Violation at Builders Emporium, 1100 Edinger. Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner Mary Ann suggested Commission neet on December 26th rather than Christmas Eve. Questioned which Comissioners would be interested in auto center tour on December 1st. Weil, McCarthy and Sharp were interested. COI~IISSIO# CONCERNS 11. Letter of Commendation to Alan Warren Well commented the bullet train is dead. ADJOURNMENT Sharp/Well moved adjournment at 8:10 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting AGENDA TUSTIN PLANNING CO)~4ISSION REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 13, 1984 CALL ll) ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF AJ_LEGIANCE/INVOCATION ROLL CALL: White, Well, McCarthy, Puckett, Sharp PUBLIC CDNCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda) IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. CONSENT CALENDAR: 2. 3. 4. (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) Minutes from Planning Commission meeting October 22, 1984. Adoption of City Capital Improvement Program. Resolution Ho. 2192, Home Federal Savings. Resolution No. 2189, Auer Development. 5. Resolution No. 2195, Final Tract Map 12106, Ainslie. PUBLIC HEARINGS e Applicant: Location: Request: ZONE CHANGE 84-7 Daniel O'Connor on behalf of Corniche Development Corp. 1372 Irvtne Blvd. Amendment to the Tustin Zoning Ordinance No. 157, as amended from a Public and Institutional District (P&I) to Professional District (PR) for a portion of the property. Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner Planning Commission Agenda November 13, 1984 page two 7. USE PERMIT 84-26 Applicant: Daniel O'Connor on behalf of Corniche Development Corp. Location: 1372 Irvine Blvd. Request: Approval to construct a 13,000 square foot two story professional office building. Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner 8. PARCEL MAP 84-1030 Applicant: -Daniel O'Connor on behalf of Corniche Development Corp. Location: 1372 Irvine Blvd. Request: To subdivide the property for professional office. Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner ADMINISTRATIVE HAI-I'£RS Old Business None New Business None STAFF CONCERNS 9. Report on Council Actions November 5, 1984 Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner 10. Sign Code Violation at Builders Emporium, 1100 EdingeK. Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner COMMISSION CONCERNS 11. Letter of Commendation to Alan Warren AOJOURNMENT MINUTES TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR t~ETI NG OCTOBER 22, 1984 CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/IN¥OCATION ROLL CALL: PUBLIC CONCERNS: None. CO#SENT CALENDAR: White, Weil, McCarthy, Puckett, Sharp Minutes from Planning Commission meeting October 8, 1984. Resolution No..217¢, approving Variance 84-i, L(ndsey Resolution No. 2183, approving Variance 84-2, Drug Emporium Resolution No. 2191, Use Permit 84-25, Tustin Pre-school Commissioner Sharp moved, Well second to approve all items on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. CONTINUED PUBLIC NEA~INGS Applicant: Loca ti on: Request: USE PERMIT 84-23 Larwin Square Limited on behalf of Home Savings and Loan Corner of Newport Avenue and First Street. Authorization to construct and operate a 2,418 square foot savings and loan in the Larwin Square shopping center. Presentation: Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner Chairman White opened the public hearing at 7:¢4 p.m. The following people spoke in favor of Use Permit 84-23: Doug Danielson, architect, and Morrey Friedman, Manager of Larwin Square, supported Alternative 2. Seeing no one further wishing to speak Chairman White closed the public hearing at /:SS p.m. Commission discussion ensued concerning the two Alternatives. Commissioner Well moved, Sharp second to approve Alternative 1 as recommended by staff. Motion carried 3-2 (McCarthy/Puckett opposed). Planning Commission Minute~ October 22, 1984 page two CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 6. ZONE CHANGE 84-6 Applicant: Location: Request: Mark Fergusen 17432 & 17442 Mitchell Avenue. AuthorizatiOn to change the zone from multiple family, residential {R-3, 2000) to Planned Community Senior Residential Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner Chairman White opened the public hearing at 8:00 p.m. The following person-spoke in favor of Zone Change 84-6: Mark Ferguson, applicant, questioned the ~ecessity for two exits and requested the City donate water and sewage fees since it is a public serv$ce project. Seeing no one further wishing to speak, Chairman White closed the hearing at 8:14 p.m. Commission discussion ensued concerning the Uniform Building Code requirements for two exits and they advised Mr. Ferguson to present his request to the City Council for waiver of fees for water and sewage. Further discussion ensued concerning staff's recommendation for a roof parapet, outside parking area and age' restrictions for tenants. Commissioner Well moved, Sharp second to recommend approval to the City Council by the adoption of Resolution 2188 with the conditions contained in Exhibit "A". Motion carried 5-0. 7. REVOCATION HEARING FOR USE PERMIT 80-2~ Applicant: City of Tustin Location: 1651 Mitchell Avenue/Windsor Gardens Apartments Request: Consideration of revoking use permit thereby terminating the conversion from apartments to condominiums. Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development Chairman White opened the public hearing at 8:25 p.m. The following people spoke in favor of revoking Use Permit 80-21: Mark Rafter, tenant, explained in detail the the existing living conditions at the complex. Michael Daly, property owner on two sides of complex, felt this project was a disgrace to the community due to the numerous police reports, fire hazards, health hazards, trees and fences collapsing onto his properties. Seeing no one further wishing to speak, Chairman White closed the hearing at 8:50 p.m. Commission discussion ensued over the developer's desire to complete the project and what incentive the City could provide. Commissioner Sharp moved, McCarthy second to recommend to the City Council revocation of Use Permit 80-21. Motion carried 5-0. Planning Commission Minutes October 22, 1984 page three PUBLIC HEARINGS 8. USE PERMIT 84-24 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 84-1031 Applicant: Location: Request: Albert Auer on behalf of Tustin Corporate Park Southwesterly corner of Walnut Avenue and Franklin Avenue Authorization to develop a mixed use project consisting of 104,300 square feet of Research and Development, 39,800 square feet of commercial office and 10,000 square feet of retail commercial. Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner Chairman White opened the public hearing at 9:05 p.m. The following person spoke in favor of Use Permit 84-24: David Neish, Tustin Corporate Park Ltd., concurred with staff's recommendation. Seeing no one further wishing to speak, Chairman White closed the hearing at 9:07 p.m. Commissioner Puc~ett moved, Well second to approve Use Permit 84-24 and recommend to City Council approval of Tentative Parcel Map 84-1031. Motion carried 5-0. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 84-3 Applicant: Request: City of Tustin. To amend City Zoning Ordinance to require a conditional use permit for any business to sell alcoholic beverages. Presentation: Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner Chairman White opened the public hearing at 9:11 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak, he closed the hearing at 9:12 p.m. Commissioner Sharp moved, Well second to approve Resolution 2187. Motion carried 5-0. ADMINIS'FRATIVE MATTERS Old Business None. New Business None. STAFF CONCERNS 10. Report on Council Actions October 15, 1984. Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development 11. Building Department Monthly Report. Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development P]annlng Commission Minute' October 22, 1984 page four COMMISSION CONCERNS C6mmissioner Sharp expressed concern and wondered if the City can prohibit any further Windsor Garden type projects. Commissioner Well thanked Jeff Davis for the letter to Redhill Shopping Center. Commissioner White requested a letter to Alan Warren. He further commented that he didn't feel zone changes should be contingent upon development plans, but development plans should require, conditional use permits . ADJOURN~EI('I' Commissioner Wetl moved, Puckett second to adjourn at 9:25 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting. Motion carried 5-0. RONALD H. WHITE, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary Report to the ,0. - '1 Planning C:ornrnisston " OATE: SUBJECT: NOVEMBER 13, 198~. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BACKGROUND: Section 65401 of the California Government Code states that each community with an adopted General Plan shall prepare a list of proposed public works projects for each year, and this list shall be reviewed and adopted as a public works program by the City Council for that community. Additionally, this approved list of proposed public works projects.shall be submitted to the Planning Commission. Their task is to review the subject list and determine if this program is in conformance with. the City's General Plan, and report their finding to the City Council. DISCUSSION: The City of Tustin maintains a five year capital improvement program. Each year at budget time, the program is updated for the next fiscal year and submitted t~ the City Council for their review and input. As a part of the budget process, the City Council adopts the five year capital improvement program. The adopted five year program for fiscal year 1984-8S has been enclosed for your review. In regard to the City's General Plan, the capital improvement program is consistent with the intent of the Master Plan of Arterial Highways, consistent with the goal of Protecting the public health, safety and general welfare, and with the specific objective of upgrading public improvements to ensure a quality living environment for the citizens of Tustin. Developing a five year program ensures that adequate advanced and financial planning can ~ke place, and goes beyond the intent of Section 64S01 requirement of examining capital improvements at only one year at a time. RECOf,~IENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission, by minute order, report to the City Council that the adopted 1984-85 five year capital improvement program is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan. TERMS Abbreviations used in the five year program: GF GT RS CO FAU AHFP HCDA B IRV CFC SF General Fund Gas Tax Revenue Sharing County Federal Aid Urban Highways Arterial Highway Fund Program (County Grants of State Gas Tax) Housing Community Development Administration Beautification Irvine, City of County Flood Control Sewer Fund ~0'~' I ~ I I I I I I I I I , , , % , , , ~. , I ~1 ~ ~ ~ ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2192 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA APPROVING USE PERMIT NO. 84-23 AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2418 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING, AND THE CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING KEY SHOP TO AN AUTOMATED BANK TELLER IN THE SHOPPING CENTER KNOWN AS LARWIN SQUARE. The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That a proper application, (Use Permit No. 84-23) has been filed -by Morrey-Friedman on behalf of Larwin Square Ltd., requesting authorization to construct a 2418 square foot commercial building and convert an existing key shop to an automated teller machine in the shopping center known as Larwin Square. The precise location of the 2418 square foot structure is noted on Exhibit "B" attached and incorporated herein by reference. B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said application. C. That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings: 1. The use is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan and with the Tustin Zoning Code as they pertain to commercial development. 2. That the traffic circulation patterns at the entrance to the center located at the intersection of Newport and Bryan Avenue will be modified to alleviate traffic conjestion and increase pedestrian and vehicular safety. D. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and should be granted. E. The proposed development shall be in accordance with the development policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement requirements as administered by the City Engineer. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 18 20 21 22 23 2~ 25 2~ 27 28 Resolution No. 2192 page two A Negative Declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. G. Final development plans shall require the review and approval of the Community Development Department. II. The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 84-23 authorizing the construction of a 2418 square foot commercial building and the conversion of an existing key shop to an automated bank teller as- applied for subject to the conditions contained in .Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the day of , RONALD H. WHITE, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary lO. 11. 12. EXHIBIT "A' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL USE PEP. MIT 84-Z3 RESOLUTION HUMBER 2192 That "Alternative 1" outlined in the Traffic Study conducted by Basmaciyan-Darnell, Inc. be incorporated into the existing circulation system in Larwin Square. That "stop" signs be placed at locations where minor drive aisles empty into the main drive aisle that traverses diagonally across the center. That the main drive aisle be delineated so that this ~o-way traffic is clearly indicated. That five (5) parking stalls immediately adjacent to the proposed automated teller be marked for "Automated Teller Parking Only". The final site plan shall be standardized and reflect all appropriate city standard drawing numbers. The develoPer shall construct all missing or damaged street improvements to said development per the City of Tusttn "minimum Design Standards of Public Works" and "Street Improvement Standrds". This work shall consist of, but is not limited to: curbs and gutters, sidewalks, drive apron, street pavement, street trees and marbelite street, lights with underground conduit. A grading plan will be required for review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit. Orange County Sanitation District No. ? connection fees in the amount of $50.00 per 1,O00 square feet of floor area will be required at the time a building permit is issued. Payment of East Orange County Water District fees will be required at the time a building permit is issued. Continuous 6" concrete curbs shall be provided along landscape planters adjacent to parking spaces and drive aisles. The developer shall comply with all construction requirements of the Orange County Fire Marshal's office which includes installation of necessry fire extinguishers, on-site private fire hydrants and fire sprinkler system. A comprehensive signing plan shall be approved by' the Community Development Department prior to installation of any building or free-standing monument signing. A landscape plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to installation or modification of any landscape planter. Said plan shall include: a. location, size and species of all specimen trees, shrubs and vegetative ground cover; Community Devetopmen~ Department Fxhibit "A" page ~o b. soil amendment specifications to insure proper plant growth. 13. Wheelchair and handicap access shall be installed on-site and off-site in accordance with the State of Californi~ and City of Tustin Building Department standards. On-site security lighting shall be arranged so that direct rays will not shine on adjacent properties or produce glare for street traffic. All roof-mounted equipment, such as heating and air conditioning units, shall ~be completed screened from public view by architecturally compatible screening material, subject to the approval of City staff. lB. The Automated T~ller shall not have recessed doorways or chambers; shall be unobstructed by trees or shrubbery; and must be equipped with protected lighting. 16. That any future additions to the center shall require approval, of a Conditional Use Permit, and a reassessment of the approval-granted by Use Permit 76-25 will be conducted. 17. The building materials and colors for the proposed 2400 square foot building and the automated teller shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department. , Community Development Department rner~et and r~tail sh4p~ -- -- restaurant blnk proposed home federal bldg. FIGURE 4 ALTERNATIVE REGOMMENDED SITE CIRCULATION EXHIBIT ~ Res, 2192 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2189 A RESOLUTION OF 'THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING USE PERMIT 84-24 FOR 'THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WALNUT AVENUE BETWEEN FRANKLIN AND FUTURE JAMBOREE The Planning .Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: That a proper application, (Use Permit No. 84-24) has been filed by Albert Auer to authorize the development of 104,300 square feet of R&D, 39,000 square feet of professional office and 10,000 square feet of retail commercial. B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said application. C. That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use' applied for will not, under the. circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or .general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, evidenced by the following finding: 1. This proposed project will generate approximately 2,000 vehicle trips per day as opposed to the previously proposed project which would have generated 11,340 trips per day. D. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and should be granted. E. Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement requirements as administered by the City Engineer. F. That'a Negative Declaration is hereby approved to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act. Final development plans shall require the review and approval of the Community Development Department. .1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 2189 page two II. The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 84-24 to authorize the-development of 104,300 square feet of R&D, 39,000 square feet of office and 10,000 square feet of Retail Commercial subject to the following conditions as attached hereto in Exhibit "A": PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the day of , 198 ._. RONALD H. WHITE, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary EXHIBZT 'A" PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL USE PER~IT 84-24 1. A final grading plan based upon U.S.G.S. datum will be required. This plan should delineate how all on-site storm water drainage will be disposed of. 2. All work within the public right-of-way should be shown on the final site and/or grading plan and should be so referenced with appropriate city standard drawing references. These improvements will include but not be 1Jmited to the following: a. drl veway s b. domestic/fire water services c. sidewalks 3..' The most westerly driveway on Walnut Avenue (at the median opening) is shown at 30 feet of width. The 'existing radius type driveway opening is currently constructed at a width of 40 feet. The final plan should be revised to refect this width. 4. The most easterly driveway, as shown, will be limited to right turn ingress to and right turn egress from the site only. This driveway should also be constructed as a radius type driveway. 5. Vehicular access rights to Walnut avenue at this location will require relinquishment by the City Council. Prior to finalization of these plans, the developer should request this relinquishment by letter to the City Council. 6. Franklin Avenue i-s shown as an 80 foot wide right-of-way. It is a variable width right-of-way from 80 ft. to 60 ft. and should be shown as such on the final plans. 7. A parcel map shall be recorded to subdivide this parcel. B. The most northerly driveway on Franklin may be located in a conflicting area with respect to the pavement striping on Franklin Avenue. This striping should be plotted on the final plan to determine if the driveway requires relocation. g. A sewer plan Should be prepared indicating the on-site layout of alt sewer facilities with respect to the proposed water facilities. 10. Payment of Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer connection fees in the amount of $50.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. of building area will be required at the time a building permit is issued. Communily Development Deparxment Exhibit "A" Use Permit 84-24' page two 11o ' 13. 15. 16. All roof top equipment must be'screened from view. Exterior building materials and colors must be submitted to Community Development Department ~or review. All roof drains shall be contained within the exterior building walls. Buildings 4 and 5 in' Phase II shall be reviewed by the'Planning Commission. Before issuance of building permits, a plan for maintenance of the parking lot and landscape areas shall be approved by the Community Development Department Director. Prior to issuance of building permits, measures to mitigate the additional traffic shall be resolved which may include: (a)' Restriptng of Walnut Avenue and Franklin Avenue. (b) Participation (fair share) in the future signalization of Future Jamboree and Walnut Avenue and the proposed left turn at Walnut and Franklin. - Community Development Department - Report to the Piannin commission ITEtq NO. 5 DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: · REQUEST: NOVEMBER 13, 1984 FINAL TRACT NO. 12106 HARK O. AINSLIE 13641 Malena Drive Tusttn, CA 92680 1042, 1052, 1062 WALNUT STREET, R-3 (2000) MULTIPLE FAMILY AUTHORIZATION l'O SUBDIVIDE .623 ACRES INTO THIRTEEN (13) LOTS FOR TOWNHOMES AND ONE (1) LOT FOR COI~N OPEN SPACE AREA BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: On December 12, 1983 and December 19, 1983," the Planning Commission and City Council approved Tentative Tract No. 12106 with conditions. All conditions of approval which were listed in Resolution No. 2126 have been completed. The final map is in substantial compliance with the tentative map. This map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan which is multi-family residential. RECOI~4ENDATION: Recommend approval of Final Tract No. 12106 to the City Council by the adoption of Resolution No. 2195. MAI~Y AN~? CHAMBERLAIN, Associate Planner MAC:do attachments: Resolution No. 2195 Map Mylar Reduction Resolution No. 2126 , Community Development DeparTment RESOLUTION NO. 2126 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 10 20 21 25 26 27 28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 12016 The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That a proper application was filed by Mark Ainslie on behalf of Ainslie Development pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 847 for the purpose of creating a 14 lot (13 townhomes and 1 common lot) subdivision from Lots 6, 7, and 8 in Block B of Martin's addition as shown on a map recorded in Book 19, page 79 of Miscellaneous Records, Los Angeles County. B. That said map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan. C. A Negative Declaration has been applied for to conform wi th the California Environmental Quality Act. II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 12106, subject to the following conditions: 1. Submission of CC&R's to the City Attorney's office for review and approval .prior to any Council action on the final tract map. 2. Provision for an individual sanitary sewer (service from alley) and domestic water service to each residential lot and a separate water meter for the COmmOn area. 3. Submission of a final grading plan for review and approval. 4. Preparation of improvement plans for and construction of, but not limited to, the following public works improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a. street paving; b. curb and gutter; c. sidewalk; d. street trees; e. street lights; f. water mains; g. cable television conduit; h. alley pavement as needed adjacent to this development; i. cross gutter and spandrel. Resolution No. 2126 Page 2 Resolution No. 2126 9 10 !1 12 '13 14 15 16 17 19 2O 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 I 5. Payment of the following fees: 2 a. Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 in the amount of $250/dwelling unit. 3 b. East Orange County Water District in the amount of $500/dwelling unit. 6. Payment of Parkland Dedication fees. 5 7. Provide easement for the two buildings encroaching 6 into Lot 14 (common area) which shall terminate when the buildings are removed. ? 8. The final map shall show the correct location of all utilities including water. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission held on December 12, 1983. Janet Hester Recording Secretary d'~mes B. Sharp, Chairm~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE cITY OF TUSTIN I, JANET HESTER, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Recording Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. ~-~./~ was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting ~tin PlanntQg Commission, held on the ~/,~ day of Tusti n P1 arming Commi ssion Secretary 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2~ 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2195 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF FINAL TRACT MAP 12106 · The Planning Commission of the City of Tusttn does hereby resolve as follows: The Planning Commission finds and determines as fpllows: A. That a proper application was filed by Mark Ainslie on behalf of Ainslie Development pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 847 for the purpose of creating a 14- lot (13 townhomes and i common lot) subdivision from Lots 6, 7 and 8 in Block B of Martin's addition as shown on a map recorded in Book 19, page 79 of Miscellaneous Records, Los Angeles County. B. That said map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan. C. A Negative Declaration has been applied for to conform with the California Environmental Quality Act. D. That the final map is in substantial compliance with the tentative map. II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Final Tract Map No. 12106, subject to the final approval of the City Engineer. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning commission, held on the day of , 1984. RONALD H. WHITE, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary Planning Commission DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: ENY IRO#MENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: NOVEMBER 13, 1984 ZONE CHANGE 84-7 DANIEL O'CONNOR ON BEHALF OF CORNICHE DEVELOPMENT NORTHWEST PORTION OF 1372 IRVINE BLVD. PUBLIC & INSTITUTIONAL (P&I) APPLICANT HAS PETITIONED FOR A NEGATIVE DECLARATION A C~ANGE FROM THE PUBLIC & INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT (P&I) TO THE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT (PR) IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTIOM OF A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUIL.DING. BACKGROUND: ~ The subject.site is the western portion of the First Christian Church property located at 1372 Irvine Blvd. The site is currently a vacant lot, with adjacent single family residents on the west and south sides, and the church complex located to the east of the site. The Planning Commission and City Council have recently considered a request to amend the land use element of the Tustin General Plan for this site. On September 24, 1984 the Planning Commission recommended that the City adopt the change from Public & Institutional to Professional, and the City Council adopted this change at its regular meeting on October 15, 1984. DISCUSSION: The applicant is proposing a change to the Professional District (PR) which permits a variety of professional office uses. All of these potential office uses are permitted by right within a set of development standards, which are enclosed for your review. The current desfgnation of Public & Institutional also permits a variety of institutional uses (schools, churches, hospitals, etc.), but any proposal requires the approval of a use permit. In order for the proposed zone district to maintain the same level of review as the property must currently comply wi th, a use permit must be required for any proposed project. The State of California will allow a zone change to be subject to conditions if the appHcant consents to the imposed conditions. Mr. O'Connor has submitted a letter to the Community Development Department indicating his willingness to · Community Development Department Report to the Planning Commission November 13, 1984 page two accept this condition. Further, he has submitted all the necessary exhibits and -applications for a Use Permit, and staff has accepted this filing and advertised for a public hearing for a Use Permit. Mr. O'Connor's consent binds all future owners of this site to the use permit requirement. R£CO~ENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Qommission adopt Resolution recommending approval of Zone Change 84-7 to the City Council. No. 2194 Associate Planner EK:do attachments , Community Development Department PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT Development Standards Maximum Height: Minimum Building Site: Minimum Front Setback: Minimum Side Setback: Minimum Rear Setback: Two stories or 35 feet. 7,200 square feet 20 feet 5 feet i story-5 feet, 2 story-lO feet G AL .AND_ AVE.._ -, IRVINE 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2194 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING REZONING OF THE NORTHWEST PORTION OF 1372 IRVINE BLVD. FROM PUBLIC & INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT (P&I) TO THE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT (PR), AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT "A". The Planning Commission follows: II. of the City of. Tustin does hereby resolve as The Pla6ning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That a proper application, (Zone Change No. 84-7) has been filed by Daniel' O'Connor on behalf of Corniche Development to change the zone for the northwest portion of 1372 Irvine Blvd. from Public & Institutional District (P&I) to Professional District (PR), as shown on Exhibit "A". B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said application. C. That a zone change should be granted for the following reasons: 1. The proposed zone designation is in conformance with the Land Use Element of the Tustin Area General Plan. 2. That the proposed change would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare of the surrounding property owners. D. Development of subject property shall be in accordance with the policies adopted by the City Council; Uniform Building Codes as administered by the Building Official; Fire Codes as administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal; and street improvement requirements as administered by the City Engineer. E. Final development plans shall require the review and approval of the Community Development Director. F. A Negative Declaration has been filed in conformance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, and is hereby recommended for adoption. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of Zone Change No. 84-7 to designate the Professional District for the property indicated on Exhibit "A", subject to the following conditions: A. All permitted uses in the Professional District shall be subject to the Use Permit requirement, as detailed in the City of Tustin Zoning Code. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 2194 page two Bo This resolution shall become effective when the owner of the subject site or his authorized agent submits a letter of consent to the Community Development Department agreeing to Condition PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission, held on the day of , 1984. RONALD H. WHITE, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary Report to the Planning Commission ITE:~ NO. 7 DATE:_ SUBJECT: APPLICANT: NOVEMBER 13, 1984 USE PEP. qIT 84-26 DANIEL O'CONNOR ON BEHALF OF CORNICHE DEVELOPMENT CURRENT ZONING: PUBLIC & INSTITUTIONAL (P&I), -THE APPLICANT HAS APPLIED FOR A ZONE CHANGE TO PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT (PR) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: REQUEST: APPLICANT HAS PETITIONED FOR A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 13,000 SQUARE FOOT PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING BACKGROUND: The subject site is the northwest portion of the First Christian Church property located at 1372 ]rvine. The site Is currently a vacant lot, adjacent to sln91e family residential to the west and south, and the church complex to the east. The Planning Commission and City Council recently amended the Land Use of the subject site from a Public & Institutional designation {P&I) to a Professional designation (PR). The applicant is now seeking to change the zone to a Professional District {PR) and receive approval of a Use Permit to construct a professional office building. DISCUSSION: As stated in several previous staff reports, the applicant is seeking approval to construct a 13,000 square foot professional office building fronting on Irvine Blvd. and just west of Redhill Avenue. The approximate size of the subject property is 30,000 square feet. The development will need to supply 44 parking spaces at one per 300 square feet to support a 13,000 square foot building. This development is supplying 47 parking spaces, of which 14 spaces will be located on the church property and shall be part of a reciprocal parking agreement. The number of parking spaces for the project will support all professional and general offices identified in the Professional District, with the exception of any medi.cal office uses. The applicant will need to supply parking at six (6) per thousand square feet to permit these uses. Community Development Department Report to the Planning Commission November 13, 1984 page two The applicant has attempted to minimize the impact of this office on adjacent residential areas by fronting the building on Irvine Blvd. and placing the bulk of the structure adjacent to the church complex. Still, staff would recommend that appropriate landscaping be planted adjacent to residential units that help buffer and minimize the impact of the parking lot and structure. Additionally, all second story windows that are immediately adjacent to residential areas should be t6anslucent to a height of four feet from the bottom of the window sill or six feet from the finished floor elevation of the second story. The building will be a two story structure with an overall height of 34' 6". The architectural motif is reminiscent of the spanish style with the use of spanish tiles for the roof, and a tan exterior with dark brown trim. Vehicles enter through a portecochere with a high point of 12' 6". The applicant has provided a secondary vehicular access that can be utilized by vehicles visiting the offices, as well as emergency vehicles that cannot use the portecochere entrance. A reciprocal agreement will be required for a trash service truck to access and serve the site. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The subject project supplies sufficient parking for all office uses with the exception of medical offices. 2. The applicant has attempted to design the project with consideration to the adjacent residential uses. 3. The applicant will need reciprocal agreements for access and parking on adjacent church property. 4. An environmental review of the proposed project shows that the proposed project will not a significant effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration is recommended. 5. The project meets or exceeds all development standards of the Professional District, with the exception of parking for medical dental offices. 6. The proposed architecture should be an enhancement for the surrounding area. RECO~£NDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Use Permit 84-26, by the approval of Resolution No. 2196. Associate Planner EK:do Community Development Department DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SUMMARY Location/DiStrict;- Action: Building: Front Setback Side Setback Rear Setback Gross Square Footage Net Floor SqUare Footage Height Number'of Stories Materials/Colors Lot Size Lot Coverage Parking: Number of Spaces Ratio (space/square footage) Percent of Compact Spaces Type Uses: Number of Public Notifications (Owners): Environmental .Status * No Standard District Requirement Proposed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2196 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, AUTHORIZING'THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 13,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 1372 IRVINE BOULEVARD The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: resolve as A. That a ~roper application, (Use Permit No. 84-26) has been filed by Daniel O'Connor on behalf of Corniche Development, requesting authorization to construct a 13,000 square foot professional office building on a lot located at the northwest corner of 1372 Irvine Blvd. B. That a public hearing was duly c~lled, noticed and held on said Co application. That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for wilt not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, 'or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings: 1. The development as proposed is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan. The development as propo'sed is in substantial conformance with the requirements of the Professional District (PR). 3. That utilization of a use permit procedure helps to ensure compatibility with adjoining residential areas. D. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and should be granted. E. Proposed development shall be in accordance with the development policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as administered by the Building Official, Fire Code as administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement requirements as administered by the City Engineer. F. That a Negative Declaration was prepared in conformance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, and is hereby adopted. G. Final development plans shall require the review and approval of the Community Development Department. 1 -2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 2196 page two II. The Planning Commission hereby apprdves Conditional Use Permit 84-26, to authorize the development of a 13,000 square foot professional office building at the northwest portion of 1372 Irvine Boulevard, subject to the following conditions: A. The final site plan shall be standardized and reflect all appropriate City standard drawing numbers. The developer shall construct all missing or damaged street improvements to said development'per the City of Tustin "Minimum Desigh Standards of Public Works" and "Street Improvement Standards". This work shall consist of,but is not limited to: curbs and gutters, sidewalks, drive aprons, street trees, and street pavement. B. A final grading plan shall be required for review and approval. C. A landscape plan shall be required for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. D. This use permit shall become effective when Zone Change 84-7 has been adopted by the City Cguncil. E. This use permit shall not be applicable for medical-dental office uses, unless said use permit is amended and adequate parking is provided. F. Prior to building permit issuance, reciprocal access agreements shall be required for parking spaces off-site and ingress and egress into the subject property. G. Prior to building permit issuance, a vehicular reciprocal access agreement shall be required for trash service to the subject property. H. Fenestration on the second floor and immediately adjacent to residential areas shall be translucent to a height of six feet from the finished floor of the second story or four feet from the bottom of a window sill. I. At the time building permits are issued, County Sanitation District connection fees and East Orange County water District fees shall be required. J. The proposed office shall have its own domestic water service and sanitary sewer lateral. K. Any subsequent construction documents shall be in substantial conformance with the site plan and elevations that are submittd and approved by the Planning Commission at a public hearing. L. The Master Site Plan shall be prepared in conformance with the City's sign ordinance. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 10 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 2196 page three M. All electrical, telephone, community antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, shall, within the exterior boundary lines of such property, be installed ~nderground. N. A tentative and final parcel map shall be required. O. Any roof equipment and vents mus~ be screened from view. P. All exterior colors and materials shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval. Q. A lighti-ng plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval. Parking lot lighting shall be arranged so t~at direct rays do not shine on adjacent property. R. A 6'8" masonry wall shall be required adjacent to any R-1 development. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission held on the day of , 1984. RONALD H. WHITE, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary Planning C:ommission DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: NOVEHBER 13, 1984 TENTATIVE PARCEL RAP 84-1030 CORNICHE DEVELOPMENT CORP. 1372 IRVINE BOULEVARD BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The subject map of 2.174 acres has been submitted to create two parcels, from one existing parcel. The First Christian Church occupies both parcels and after the subdivision will occupy parcel 2 only. Parcel 1 is for the proposed office building for Corniche Development Corporation. If the zone change {Zone Change 84-7) and use permit {Use Permit 84-26) are approved, it would then be appropriate to take action on this map. On October 15, 1984, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment No. 84-4A which changed the land use on Parcel 1 from Public and Institutional to Professional Office. The map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan. RECOI~4ENDEO ACTION: Recommended to the City Council approval of Tentative Parcel Map 84-1030 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2193. ~4ARY AN~/CHAMBERLAIN, Associate Planner MAC:do i Community Development Department MAP NO. 84- 10:50 ,/ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2193 A RESOLUTION OV THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 84-1030 LOCATED AT 1372 IRVINE BOULEVARD The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 84-1030 was submitted to the Planning Commission pursuant to Ordinance No. 847 by Corniche Development for the purpose of splitting a lot for the property known as Parcel 2 of maps filed in Book 51, page 18 of Orange- County. B. That said map is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan. II. C. A Negative Declaration has been approved for this project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 84-1030 subject to the following conditions: Construction and/or replacement of all missing or damaged public improvements will be required and shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Driveways 2. Domestic water services 3. Fire services 4. Sidewalks 5. Sanitary sewer laterals Payment of Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer connection fees will be required at the time a building permit is issued. Reciprocal parking, access and utility easements shall be required and may be shown on the parcel map. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the __ day of , 198__. RONALD H. WHITE, Chairman DONNA ORR, Recording Secretary planning Commission ITEM NO. 9 November 13, 1984 SUBJECT: REPORT ON COUNCIL ACTIONS - November 5, 1984 Oral presentation to be given by Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development do Attachments: City Council Action Agenda - November 5, 1984 Community Dcv¢lopmen~ Dcpartmcn~ ACTION AGENDA OF A REGULAR ~ETING OF ll4E- i'US'TIN CITY COUNCIL November 5, 1984 7:00 P.M. 7:02 I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDgE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION ALL PRESENT II. ROLL CALL HOESTEREY ARRIVED AT 7:43 III. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING APPROVED GENERAL PtAN 1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84-¢D, RECREATION ELEMENT OF THE I"JSTIN AMENDMENT ~ITH C~ANGE OF ONE GENERAL PLAN ACRE PER-THOUSAND FOR PRIVATE Adoption of General Plan ~mendment 8J-4D, Recreation Element PARKS, ONE AND O~NE HALF ACRE of the Tustin General Plan as recommended by the Director of FOR CO,UNITY, AND OldE AND ONE Community and Administrative Services. H~F ACRE FOR ~IGHBORHO00 PARKS IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS APPROVED'STAFF 1. llTH YEAR APPLICATION IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT RECO~ENDATION PROGRAM (HCD) Approve submittal of the llth year CDBG application for fis- cal year 1985-86 as recommended by the Community Development_ Advisory Board and staff. INTRODUCED ORDINANCE 2. NO. 920 ORDINANCE NO. 920 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 84-3 THEREBY AMENDING SECTIONS 9232b(p), g233c(v), 9234c{~0), 9235c(dd), 92¢2b(g) AND 9297 OF THE TUSTIN MUNICIPAL CODE, TO REQUIRE THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ANY BUSI- NESS WHICH SELLS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES M. O. -That Ordinance No. 920 have first reading by title only. M. O. - That Ordinance No. 920 be introduced. INI~RODUCED ORDINANCE 3. NO. 922 ORDINANCE NO. 922 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 84-6 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17432 + 17442 MITCHELL AVENUE, TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, FROM R-3 - 2,000 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO PC-MF PLANNED COMMUNITY MULTIPLE FAMILY M. O. - That Ordinance No. 922 have first reading by title only. M. O. - That Ordinance No. 922 be introduced. JIM V. PUBLIC INPUT MC LAUGHLIN REQUESTED A STOP LIGHT AT THE O)RNER OF MC FADOEN AND I~DALLION. STAFF TO DO A WSuRI~ANT RUN O~ THAT INll~RSECTION VI. CONSENT CALENDAR APPROVED 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - October 15, 1984 and October 29, 1984 CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 1 1t-5-84 "~PROVED APPROVED STAFF RECO~ENDATION 2. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $119,122.90 ~ .APPROVAL OF DEMANDS in the amount of $1,661,670.69 3~ REJECTION OF CLAIM. OF jAMES P. YOUNG; DATE OF LOSS: 7/11/84; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 10/8/8~; CLAIM NO. 84-23 Rejection of subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. ADOPTED RESOLt~TION 4. RESOLUTION NO. 84-86 - A Resolution of the City Council of the NO. 84-86 WIll4 C~4ANGE IN II.R. City of Tustin, California, ACTING ON AN APPEAL OF THE CITY OF ELIMIIt&TING THE WORD COUNCIL AFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION "OUTPATIENT' CONCERNING USE PERMIT NO. 84-16 (TUSTIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL) Adoption of Resolution No. 84-86 as approved by the City Council. ADOPTED RESOLI~TION 5. RESOLUTION NO. 84-87 - A Resolution of.the ~ity Council of the NO. 84-87- City of Tustin, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 84-1031 LOCATED AT 'THE CORNERS OF WALNUT AVENUE AT FRANKLIN AND THE FUTURE jAMBOREE ROAD Adoption of Resolution No. 84-87 as recommended bY the Community Development Department. AOOPTED RESOLUTION 6. RESOLUTION NO. 84-92 - A Resolution of the City Council of the NO 84-92 City of Tustin, California, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERING · THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS GYLAH-WARREN ANNEXATION NO. 13¢ TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN Adoption of Resolution No. 84-92 as recommended by the Community Development Department. APPROVED STA~:F 7. SANTA ANA VALLEY IRRIGATION CO. (S.A.V.I.) RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Mayor to execute the subject Quitclaim Deeds and direct staff to record same subject to the receipt of the $90.00 transfer- fee for each parcel as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. ADOPllED RESOLUTION 8. RESOLUTION NO. 84-93 - A Resolution of the City Council of the NO. 84-93 WIll~ COUNCIL HAVING City of Tustin REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE OPPORllJNITY 10 REVIEW THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE )~_I)IMIS SEVENTEENTH STREET BETWEEN THE COSTA MESA FREEWAY AND PROSPECT AVENUE NORTH Adoption of Resolution No. 84-93 as recommended by the Engineering Department. APPROVED STAFF 9. RENEWAL OF THE ANNUAL PAVEMENT MARKING PROGRAM CONTRACT RECOI~MENDATION Renew the pavement marking contract with J & S Sign Company for an estimated annual cost of $23,588.31 as recommended by the Engineering Department. APPROVED ST~F 10. RENEWAL OF THE ANNUAL ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR PROGRAM RECOM~ENDATION Renew the asphalt concrete repair contract with R. J. Noble Company for an estimated annual cost of $167,085.10 as recommended by the Engineering Department. APPROVED STAFF 11. REQUEST FOR RESTRICTED PARKING DURING STREET SWEEPING HOURS RECO~ENDATION (Both sides of Lear Lane westerly of Utt Drive) Authorize the installation of signing to restrict parking along both sides of Lear Lane westerly of Utt Drive during the hours of street sweeping, 6:00 a.m. to noon on Fridays, as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 2 11-5-84 'I · PPROVED ST~F 12. ,(ECO~ENDATION NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON COLUMBUS/TUSTIN PARK FIELD RENOVATION AND LIGHTING PROJECT Approve the filing of a Negative Declaration for the Columbus/Tustin Park athletic field renovation and lighting project as recommended by the Community Development Department. VII. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION I)(TRODUCED ORDINANCE 921 1. ORDINANCE NO. 921 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City WIT}( CHANGES TO PAGE 3, LINE of Tustin, California, AMENDING PART 7, SECTION 9370, CHAPTER 3, 4, CHANGED TO 1 INSTEAD OF ARTICLE 9 OF THE TUSTIN MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS 3; AND PAGE 6, LINE I CHANGED FOR DEDICATION OF LAND, PAYMENT OF FEES, OR BOTH FOR PARK AND TO I INSTEAD OF 3 AND LINE 17, RECREATIONAL LAND IN SUBDIVISIONS CHANGED TO 1 INSTEAD OF 3. M.O. - That Ordinance No. 921 have first reading by title only. M. O. - That Ordinance No. 921 be introduced. VIII. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION - None IX. OLD BUSINESS STREET SWEEPING SIGNS 1~3 1. PACIFIC STREET PARKING RESTRICTIONS REMAIN BUT TO BE CORRECTED TO Pleasure of the Council. THE RIGHT DAY AND TIME X. NEW BUSINESS APPROVED STAFF 1. PURCHASE OF JOHN DEERE 410B BACKHOE RECO~NI)ATION ~uthortze the purchase of a John Deere 410B backhoe for the Water Division from Eberhard Equipment Company for $24,553.00 as recommended by the Engineering Department. XI. REPORTS RATIFIED EXCEPT FOR USE 1. PERMIT NO. 84-23 GREINKE REQUESTED ltiAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ABBREVIATIONS, APPROVED CONCEPT OF A 2. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - October 22, 1984 All actions of the Planning Co~mission are final unless appealed by the City Council. AGENDAS USE LAST NAMES OF Pt~ANNING CO~ISSIONERS RATHER THAN SLIDE PRESENTATION REGARDING POLICE DOGS THIRD DOG AND HAVE SPECIFIC PLANS PRESENTED LATER. XII. OTHER BUSINESS THE CITY MANAGER REQUESTED A CLOSED SESSION FOR PERSONNEL MA1-FERS. GREINKE COMMENDED ROYLEEN WI4ITE AND JEFF KOLIN FOR THEIR PROFESSIONALISM AJtO REQUESTED ll~AT THEY LOOK [)(TO NEW CONCEPTS OF INDOOR FACILITIES SUCH AS THE YMCA AND YWCA KENNEDY ASKED THAT STAFF LOOK I)~FO PLACES WHERE WE CAN DUMP HAZARDOUS WASTE AND TO BE SURE THAT IT IS NOT DUMPED IN THE SEWERS. 9:54 XIII. ADJOURNMENT - Recessed to a Closed Session for Personnel matters, and thence adjourned to the next regular meeting on November 19, 1984, at 7:00 pm. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA Page 3 11-5-84 ACTION AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF 1}lE llJSTIN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY November 5, [984 7:00 P.M~ 9:54 1. CALL TO ORDER ALL 2. ROLL CALL PRESENT APPROVED 3. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. RDA 84-13 ADOPTED 5. RESOLUTION NO. RDA 84-14 APPROVAL OF MINUTES of October 15, 1984 RESOLUTION NO. RDA ~¢-13 - A Resolution of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING THE DESIGN OF A 20 UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN COMPLEX TO BE LOCATED AT 17432 AND ~7442 MITCHELL AVENUE Adoption of Resolution No. RDA 84-~3 as recon~nended by the Community Development Department. RESOLUTION NO. RDA 84-14 - A Resolution of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE COLUMBUS TUSTIN WELL AND WELL FACILITIES Adoption of Resolution No. RDA 84-14 as reco~nended by the Engineering Department. NONE 6. 9:55 7. OTHER BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT - To the next regular meeting on November 19, 1984 at 7:00 p.m. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION AGENDA Page 1 11-5-84 TO: SUBJECT: LOCATION: PLANNING COI~IISSION BUILDERS EMPORIUM 1100 EDINGER STREET At a recent Planning Commission meeting, Chairman White expressed concern over the excessive amount of temporary signage at the subject property. As a matter of routine procedure, inspections were made and the attached · correspondence was sent. As of this date, all temporary signs, banners and flags are still in place. In order to gain compliance, this matter has been referred to the City Attorney's office. LAURA P I CKLI~, JJ Planning Intern 6/ LP:do Community Development Depart ment October 1, 1984 Department of Community Development Builders Emporium 1100 Edinger Street Tustin, CA. g2680 Subject: VIOLATION OF CITY CODE: Unauthorized Banner Sign Dear Sir: It has been brought to our attention that the subject location Currently displays an unauthorized banner sign. Tustin Si.gn Ordinance No. 684 requires that prior to the placement of banners, flags, or similar advertising or decorating materials~ a Temporary Use Permit must be obtained. Please be advised that unless a Temporar~ Use Permit is obtained within five (5) days, the banner must be removed. The fee for a Temporary Use Permit is $25.00 with an additional refundable bond of $50.00. Your cooperation and compliance is appreciated. 'If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this department. Laura Pickup Community Development Departmen LP/cas CDD:B1:9/84 300 Centennial Way · Tustin, California 92680 · (714) 544-8890 Department of Community Development October 12, 1984 CERTIFIED MAIL Bull ders Emporium 1100 Edinger Street Tustin, CA. 92680 Attn: Store Manager SUBJECT: Violation of Tustin City Code/Sign Ordinance 684 Dear Sir: Please reference our communication dated October 1, 1984, advising you to remove the banner sign at 1100 Edinger St. Tustin, CA. 92680. In view of your failure to comply with said notice, we must hereby notify you that unless the banner sign is removed immediately, the matter will be referred to the City Attorney's Office for legal action. Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any ques- tions in this regard. Sincerely, ~ Laura Pickup Community Development Department LP/cas CDD:B2 10/84 300 Centennial Way · Tustin, California 92680 · (714) 544-8890 P' 94 282 437 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL IN $ ,~t~,N C E v~'O VER A G E PROVIDED-- NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) CERTIFIED FEE SPECIAL DELIVERY ~ S~OW TOW~ 3'* A~2 ~ ~ ~T~ ~L~V~O ~ _ ~UVERY ~ ~ · SENDER: Complete Items 1, 2, 3, and 4. , ~ Add your addm~ In l~e "RETURN TO" , ~ · · ~oaceoN r~verse. ~ ~. ~ '~O~3ULT FO~MA~IT~ FOR FE~) :. ,O~,~ ~ O~ 7~~,-- ~ OAT£: NOVEMBER 5, 1984 Inter-Corn $~jSJ ECT: SUZANNE ATKINS,' DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY LAURA PICKUP, PLANNING INTERN VIOLATION OF SIGN ORDINANCE #684 AND UNAUTHORIZED OUTSIDE STORAGE. BDILDERS EMPORIUM, 1100 EDINGER STREET, TUSTIN A~ of this date the subject signs are still in place, outside sales are still taking place, and the truck trailer is still illegally parked, see enclo§ed correspondence for reference. Please continue with whatever action necessary to gain compliance. LAURA PICKUP Planning Intern en~l s. Inter-Corn TO: FROM: S UBJ ECT: JAHES G. ROURKE, CITX ATTORNEY ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OF LAN~RCHE VIA TELECOPIER An administrative appeal has been filed by employee Michael LaMarche and an administrative hearing will be held in this matter. Certain witnesses need to be subpoenaed to the hearing. It is requested that the Council authorize and direct the issuance of ten subpoenaes for witnesses to appear at this hearing. RECO~ENDED ACTION: That the Council adopt a minute order directing the issuance of ten supboenaes for witnesses to appear at the hearing of the administrative appeal of Michael LaMarche and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized and directed to sign said subpoenaes. JGR:se :D: 11/15/84 (ic) Enclosures cc: WH LEJ ='S~P~A BEFORE THE HEARING OFFICER APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF. COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the Matter of SUBPENA TO APPEAR AT HEARING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF , TO YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR before the hearing officer appointed by the City of concerning the captioned matter at · on at m.,at the hearing, to testify as a witness in this matter. You must appear at t. hat time unless you make a 'special agreement to appear at another time, with: at (Name of Attorney or Party Requesting this Subpena) (Telephone No.) This Subpena is issued pursuant to Government Code Sections 37104, et seq., and failure to honor this Subpena may result in your attachment and required appearance before a Judge of the Superior Court of County, and punishment for contempt. DATED: ATTEST: CITY CLERK, City of MAYOR OF THE CITY OF (TO be completed when the subpena is directed to a California Highway Patrolman, Sheriff, Marshal or Policeman, etc.) This subpenais ~. to a member of I Cert£fy that the fees required by law are deposited with the City Receipt No. Amount Deposited $ - CITY ~.FRK