HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 1 P.C. ACT AGENDA 10-15-84ACI'ION A G E N 0 A
TUSTIN pLANNING COIJdI.SSION
REGULAR REETING
OCTOBER B, 1984.
REPORTS
NO. 1
10-15-84
7:31
All
CALL TO ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGiANCE/I#¥OCAT[O#
ROLL CALL: White, Well, McCarthy, Puckett, Sharp
PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, pLEASE
FILL OUT THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO,
PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
CONSENT CALEND/%R: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS pRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF .OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
Sh/PU 1. Minutes of September 24, 1984.Tract
approved all Consent items. 5-0 -
2. Resolution No. 2184, Use Permit B4-15 and Resolution No. 2185, Tentative
Map 12273, Kahn .
3. Resolution No. 2182, Use Permit B4-16 & Parcel Map 84-1027, Hospital
4. Resolution No. 2181, Use Permit 84-1B, Zappas.
5. Resolution No. 2164, GPA 84-4d.
6. Resolution No. 2165, GPA 84-4c.
7. Resolution No..2186, GPA 84-4a.
cONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS
pu/Sh 8. VARIANCE 84-1
approved as r~~ppltCant' 4-1 Wet1 opposed. 0ames R. Lindsey
Applicant: 653 South "B" Street
Location: Authorization to vary from Section 9495 of the Tustin City Code
Request: to permit one (1) si9n in excess of the maximum area allowed,
and to permit one (1) sign not otherwise allowed by Section
9695.
Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner
Presentation:
Plannin§ Commission Ag
October 8, 1984
page ~wo
~a
PUBLIC HEARINGS
We/Sh 9. USE PERMIT 84-23
to conttnue'~blic hearing to Oct. 22nd on staff's recommendation. 5-0
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Larwin Square Limited on behalf of Home Savings and Loan
Corner of First Street and Newport Avenue
Authorization to construct and operate a 2,418 square foot savings
and loan facility in the Larwin Square shopping center.
Jeff ~avis, Assistant Planner
Presentation:
Pu/Sh 10. USE PERMIT 84-25
to approve s~°n approving the pre-school.
Applicant: Tustin Pre School
Location:
Request:
Presentation:
5-0
14211 Newport Avenue
Authorization to vary from the minimum lot width.
Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
We/Mc 11. ZONE CHANGE 84-6
to continue public hearing t~ 0ct.22 on staff's recommendation.
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Presentati on:
5-0
Mark Fergusen
17432 & 17442 Mitchell Avenue.
Authorization to change the' zone from multiple family residential
{R-3, 2000) to Planned Community Senior Residential
Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
Sh/ge 12. SIGN VARIANCE 84-2
to approve the signs as request~ed. 5-0
Applicant: Tim Zienke on behalf of Drug Emporium
Location: 13581 Redhill Avenue
Request: Authorization to vary from Section 9494 of the Tustin City Code by
requesting one 90 square foot pole sign and one 184 square foot
wall sign.
Presentation: Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner
AD#INISllUkTIVE 14A~ERS
Old Business
Pu/Sh 13. Initia?io.n of~ Pro_c_~n s to Revoke Use Permit 84-2: Windsor Gardens Apartment,
to advert. Condominium Conversion.
a public hearing to revoke UP 80-2 for Oct. 22nd. 5-0
Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
.e/Pu 14. Zonin
'o advertise pu tb ~meting.
Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
Planntng Commission Age
October 8, 1984
page three
14.A pACIFIC BELL PRO~ECT
Added to the agenda for Commission consideration by Donald Lam to clarify Condition
number 6.2 of Resolution #o. 2177. Comdssion clarified that 30~ of the parking
spaces shall be for compact stze cars (8'x16').
New Busines%
None.
STAFF CO#CERNS
15. Re--on Council Actions_~, October 1, 1984.
Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
Received and filed.
16. ~le alB_a.~n~ andFla s: Dan Char Marine/E1 Camino Plaza
Presentation: Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner
Received and filed.
COMMISSION CONCERNS
Net1 questioned staff about the Tustin Automotive Center on Laguna Road and the
taking of I-5 property.
Well suggested the Comdssion study the sign code to revie~ the sign variance
regulations.
Puckett suggested the Comeflsston send a letter to Alan Warren thanking him for his
servtces, etc.
White wanted an update oa the background of the specific plan for the East Tustln
area.
White questioned when they wtll receive the traffic and circulation studY for the
specific plan area for Santa Fe/Edtnger.
ADdOURNM£NT
Sh/Wetl to adjourn to next regularly scheduled meeting. 5-0.
AGENDA
TUSTIN PLANNING COl~41SSION
REGULAR ~ETING
OCTOBER 8, 1984
CALL ll) ORDER: 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers
PLEDGE OF ALLEGiANCE/IN¥OCATION
ROLL CALL: White, Well, McCarthy, Puckett, Sharp
PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda)
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION ON A SUBJECT, PLEASE FILL
OUT ll4E CARDS LOCATED ON ll4E SPEAKER'S TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE GIVE
YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE
VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF'OR
PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/DR REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.)
1. Minutes of September 24, 1984.
2. Resolution No. 2184, Use Permit B4-15 and Resolution No. 2185, Tentative Tract
Map 12273, Kahn
3. Resolution No. 2182, Use Permit 84-16 & Parcel Map 84-1027, Hospital.
4. Resolution No. 2181, Use Permit 84-18, Zappas.
5. Resolution No. 2164, GPA 84-4d.
6. Resolution No. 2165, GPA 84-4c.
7. Resolution No. 2186, GPA 84-4a.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS
8. VARIANCE 84-1
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
James R. Lindsey
653 South "B" Street
Authorization to vary from Section 9495 of the Tusttn City Code
to permit one (1) sign in excess of the maximum area allowed,
and to permit one (1) sign not otherwise allowed by Section
9495.
Presentation:
Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner
Planning Commission Agenda
October 8, [984
page two
PUBLIC H ARI G S
9. USE PERMIT 84-23
Larwin Square Limited on behalf of Nome Savings and Loan
Applicant:
Location: Corner. of First Street and Newport Avenue
Request: Authorization to construct and operate a 2,418 square foot savings
and loan facility in the Larwtn Square shopping center.
Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner
Presentation:
10. USE PERMIT 84-25
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Presentation:
Tusttn Pre School
[42[[ Newport Avenue
Authorization to vary from the mtnimum lot width.
Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
11.
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
ZONE CHANGE 84-6
Presentation:
12.
Mark Fergusen
17432 & 17442 Mitchell Avenue.
Authorization to change the zone from multiple family residential
(R-3, 2000) to Planned Community Senior Residential
Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
SIGN YARIANCE 84-2
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Presentation:
Tim Ztenke on behalf of Drug Emporium
13581 Redhill Avenue
Authorization to vary from Section 9494 of the Tustin City Code by
requesting one 90 square foot pole sign and one 184 square foot
wall sign.
Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner
AO#I#ISII~TI¥£ MATTERS
Old Business
13. initiati~to Revoke Use Permit 84-2: Windsor Gardens~
on.
Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
14. Zon_~Ordinance Amendment B4-2, Dish Antennae/Revie~w-
Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
Planning Commission Agenda
October 8, 1984
page three
New Business
None,
STAFF CONCERNS
15. Report on Council Actions, October 1, 1984.
Presentation: Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community Development
[6. Reoort on ~ne~rs and Flags: Dan Char Marine/E1 Camino Plaza
~/Edinge~.
Presentation: Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner
COI~IISSION CONCERNS
XOaOUeeq£
MINUI~S OF A REGULAR ~ETING
OF THE PLANNING CO)I~ISSION
OF THE CXlY OF llJSTIN, CALIFORNIA
September 24, 1984
The meeting was called to order by Chairman White at 7;30 p.m, in
Council Chamber, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, Califo6nia.
;OLL CAL .
Commi ssi oners
Present:
Ronald White, Chairman
Kathy Wetl, Chairman Pro Tem
Charles Puckett
James Sharp
John J. McCarthy
the
Conmflssioners
Absent:
Also present:
None
Donald O. Lamm, Director of Community 0evelopment
Alan Warren, Senior Planner
Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
Edward M. Knight, Associate Planner
Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner
Suzanne Atkins, Deputy City Attorney
Donna Orr, Administrative Secretary
PLEDGE OF AIl IrGTANC£/INYOCATION
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner McCarthy and the
Invocation was given by Commissioner Puckett.
MINUT1~S
stoner SharD, second b Pucket.t to approve the minutes of
'~~c~ ~n--'~p-t-ember 10, 1984.' 5-0
.Moved by CommisSioner Well, second by Sharp to approve the minutes of the
~lanning Commission meeting September 11, 1984. 5-0.
PUBLIC CONCERNS
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR.
Per Chairman White's request, the Commission considered each Consent
Calendar item s~parately.
1. Resolution No. 84-2177, Pacific Bell Telephone Company.
Moved by Sharp, second by Puckett to approve Resolution 84-2177. 5-0
Planning Commission Minutes
September 24, [984
page 1~o
Real.
2. Temporary Use Permit 84-[; Prescott Firewood storage on [1Camtno
Moved by Sharp, second by Wetl to approve Temporary Use Permit 84-[ and to
make correction to Staff Report [o reflect the wood be removed by March 24,
1985. 5-0
CO~I'I#U~B PUBLIC HEARI#GS
[. VARIAHCE 84-1
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
James R. Lindsey
653 South "B" Street -'
authorization ~o vary from Section 9495 of the Tusttn CitY Code
to permit one ([) sign in excess of the maximum area allowed,
and to permit one ([) stgn not otherwise allowed by .Section
9495.
Presentation: Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner
Jeff Davis presented staff's recommendation as contained in Report to
Planning Commission dated September 24, 1984.
Chairman White opened the public hearing at 7:37 p.m. The following person
spoke in favor of Variance 84-1.
James Lindsey, applicant, explained the reason he is requesting a.
continuance is that they are having trouble getting information from their
sign company. He would like to make a revised submission. _
Seeing no one else wishing to speak, Chairman White closed the public
hearing at 7:39 p.m.
Co,~issioner Sharp moved, Weil second to continue to next regularly
scheduled meeting. 5-0
pUBLIC HEAR[#6S
[. USE PERMIT 84-15 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12273
Applicant: Khan Associates on behalf of Sik Wong .~::
Location: [5582 South "B" Street
Request: authorization to construct six (6) residential condominiums.
Tentative Trace Map No. 11273 has been filed in conjunction
with Use Permit 84-[5 for the purpose of creating a one lot
subdivision for condominium purposes.
Presentation: Jeff Davis, Assistant Planner
Jeff Davis presented staff's recommendation as contained in Report to the
Planning Commission dated September 24, 1984.
Planning Commission Minutes
September 24, 1984
page three -
Chairman White opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m.. Seeing no one
wishing to speak he closed the hearing at 7:46 p.m.
Commissioner Well moved, Sharp second to approve Use Permit 84-[5 and
Tentative Tract Map [2273 with the conditions contained in the staff report
plus the following amendments: 1) the site plan must agree with the
tentative tract map in regard to the location o~ public improvements; and
-2) that the driveway be widened to 25 feet. 5-0
2. USE PERMIT 84-16 AND PARCEL MAP 84-102~
Applicant: Tustin Community Hospital
Location: 14662 Newport Blvd.
Request: _authorization to construct a medical office building of 57,000
square feet in area adjacent to the hospital, after acquiri, ng
-- adjacent property from Tustin Block, Inc. subdivided by Parcel
Map No. 84-1027.
Presentation: Alan Warren, Senior Planner
Alan Warren presented staff's recommendation as contained in Report to
Planning Commission dated September 24, 1984.
Commission discussion ensued concerning the formula for the parking
standards,, revenue generated by the project and potential traffic
generated.
Chairman White opened the public hearing at 8:05 p.m. The following
people spoke in favor of the project:
Brent Jorgeson, Vice President of Operations with Health Care Iht'l, which
owns Tustin Community Hospital, covered three topics: 1) background of
Health Care Iht'l; 2) plans for improvement of the hospital and the
development of the office building; and 3) answer questions from the
Commission. They are trying to create an image as a medical center, not
just a hospital. The office building will have three different types of
uses: 1) physician office space; 2) ambulator~ and community services; and
3) retail (florist, pharmacy and medical supply). The are puchasing the
Tustin Block Co.any property to add parking.
He then discussed the supplemental data in response to the staff report he
distribtted prior to the meeting.
Co,~issioner Puckett questioned the 177 stall difference between the
parking accommodations submittal and staff recommendation.
Larry Stanfteld, architect for the project, explained the difference in
parking ratios being leaseable physician office space, gross retail space
'and medical services and medical office building. They surveyed other
cities requirements and the existing demand.
Planning Commission Minutes
September 24, [984
page four
He further explained that the 23,000 square feet of retail and medical
services is not all use space. Included are corridors~ lobby~ and
mechanical space. At 23,000 x 1 parking space per thousand square feet =
23 spaces. Those combined with the 109 required for hospitals "338. They
are proposing 400 on site parking spaces.
Mark Ainslie, concerned citizen, raised the following points in support of
the -project: during the hospital renovation the bed count will reduce from
170 to 140; there is about 10,000 s.f. on the first floor, for retail which
should fall under the office standards.
Seeing no one further wishing to speak, Chairman White closed the public
hearing at 8:30 a.m.
Commission discussion ensued concerning the reduction of beds. Mr.
jorgeson explained that the facility is licensed for 203 beds. The actual
beds in operation are nearer 170 consisting of 3 beds per room. The
proposal is to change it to semi-private and private rooms. They Could not
agree to reduce below the license capacity for loan purposes. The
practical operating ratio is a reduced number from 170. The biggest
difference between the staff analysis and the architect's is that if you
tie the zoning requirement of 1/1000 s.f. they have log,o00 s.f. That is
where the log came from.
Mr. Stanfteld explained their survey revealed there is daily demand of 220
spaces including staff, visitors, doctors, etc. This medical office
building will be tied to the hospital and there will be overlapping;
doctors don't-need two spaces to park one car.
Commissioner Well moved, McCarthy second approval of Use Permit 84-16 and
Parcel Map 1027 to include square footaue generation factors. 5-0
3. USE PERMIT 84-18
Applicant: William Zappas
Location: E1Camtno Plaza Shopping Center
Request: authorization to construct an additional 11,000 square feet of
retail, commercial and office area.
Presentation: Mary Ann Chamberlain, Associate Planner
Ms. Chamberlain presented staff's recommendation as contained in Report to
Planning Commission dated September 24, 1984
Chairman White opened the public hearing at 8:48 p.m. The following person
spoke in favor of Use Permit 84-18:
William Zappas, owner of the property, commented that parking has never
been a problem for this center.
Planning Commission Minutes
SeptembAr 24, 1984
page five
Seeing no one further wishing to speak, Chairman White closed the public
hearing at 8:52 p.m.
Commission discussion ensued concerning future parking demands.. Chairman
White asked that the flags at the boatyard located in the center be
removed.
Commissioner Sharp moved, Puckett second to approve Use Permit 84-1B. 5-0
4. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84-4A ' LAND U~E ELEMENT AMENDMENT
Applicant: Daniel O'Connor on behalf of Corniche Development Cb.
Location: 1372 Irvtne Blvd.
Request: an amendment to the Tusttn Area General Plan - Land Use
Element, changing portions of the ~roperty's designation from
Public and Institutional to Professional Office (PR).
Presentation: Ed Knight, Associate Planner
Mt. Knight presented staff's recommendation as contained in Report to
Planning Commission dated Septen~er 24, 1984. He added that tonight the
r General Plan Amendment by itself would not allow any entitlement, although
it should be noted that because the land use and zoning would have to be in
conformance, the zone change would have to be changed if a designation is
,:given. If specific controls or requirements are contemplated by the
Commission they are best suited under the zoning action. The real meat of
discussion tonight is that if this use with all the controls and conditions
can be suitable.
Chairman White opened the public hearing at g:O0 p.m. The following person
spoke:
Raymond Drummond, 12961Keith Place, objected to the possible noise level
increase. He requested sound attenuation measures be implemented.
Seeing no one else wishing to speak, Chairman White closed the hearing at
9:02 p.m.
Co,~issioner Sharp moved, McCarthy second to approve GPA 84-4A. 4-0
TPuckett abstained).
5. GENERAL pLAN AMENDMENT 84-4B - LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT
Applicant: Tustin City Council
Request: amending the Land Use Element of the Tustin Area General Plan
for various properties located throughout the City of Tustin.
Presentation: Ed Knight, Associate Planner
Planning Commission Minutes
.September 24, [984
page six
Mr. Knight presented staff's recommendation as contained in Report to
Planning Commission dated September 2¢,[984.
Chairman White-opened the public hearing at 9:06 p.m. Seeing no one
wishing to speak, he closed the hearing at 9:07 p.m.
Commissioner Puckett moved, Sharp second adoption of Resolution 2180..$-~0
6. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84-4C - REVISED OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION
A combined and revised Open Space and Conservation Element that
addresses the conservation, development utilization of natural
resources for the City of Tustin. Programs and plans are proposed that
will conserve, maintain,and assure the continued availability of land
'for the production of food and fiber, for the enjoyment of scenic
beauty, for recreation, and for the use of natural resources.
Don Lamm presented staff's recommendation as contained in Report to
Planning Commission dated September 24, [984.
Chairman White opened the public hearing at 9:12 p.m. Seeing no one
wishing to speak, he closed the hearing at 9:13 p.m. ~
mo : ............. ~ 3-2- Wetl + Puckett opposed
Co,T~issioner Sharp ved Puckett second to adopt GPA 84-4C as, submitted
~nd send it to the Ctty counc~m ~or =pv-v-~-. _ ·
to allow input from Irvtne Company.
7. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84-40 - NEW RECREATION ELEMEN~T
A new optional element of the city General Plan indicating a
co~rehensive system of areas and public sites for recreation.
Programs are opposed that address the community-wide needs and
requirements for' recreational areas.
Royleen White presented staff's recommendation as contained in Report to
Planning Commission dated September 24, 1984.
Commissioner Puckett moved, McCarthy secon~ to adopt GPA 84-40.' 4-__~[, Well
opposed to allow input from 1trine Company.
ADMI#ISll~ATI¥£ MAI'~ERS
OLD BUSINESS
1. Revised Arco Station St~nage Plan.
Presentation: Alan Warren, Senior Planner
Planning Commission Minutes
September. 24, [984
Page' seven
Alan Warren presented staff's recommendation as contained in Report to
Planning .Commission dated September 2¢, [984.
Commissioner Weil moved, Sharp second to approve the Revised Master Sign
Plan and adopt Resolution 2178. 5-__~_0
2. Report on Zoning Ordinance Amendment 84-2 - Dish Antenna
Presentation: Don Lamm, DirecItor
Don Lamm explained that the requested booklet has not arrived.
~~o~n~tio~Uea~' consideration of this item
until the booklet requested by the Commission arrives.
3. Design Review, 2701 Dow Avenue: Industrial Building.
Presentation: -Ed Knight, Associate Planner
Mr. Knight presented staff recommendation as contained in Report to
Planning Commission dated September 24, [984.
Co,~issioner Well moved, Puckett second to receive and file. 5-0.
Be
NEW BUSINESS
1. Report. on Council Actions - September [7, [984
Presentation: Don Lamm, Director of Community Development
2. Buildin~ Department Status Report.
Presentation: Alan Warren, Senior Planner
COlIlI$SIO# CONCERNS
Commissioner Sharp expressed a concern with future signage of Tusttn
Community Hospital.
Chairman White repeated his concern with flags at the boatyard
ADdOURNI~.#T
Commissioner Sharp moved, Wetl second to adjourn at 9:53 p.m. to their next
regularly scheduled meeting October 8, [984, 5-0
~ONALD H. WHITE,
Chairman
OONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
RESOLUTION NO. 2[84
1
2
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, APPROVING USE PERMIT 84-15 AUTHORIZING THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SIX (6) RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS AT
15582 SOUTH "B" STREET
5 The Planntng Commission of the City of Tusttn 'does hereby resolve as
0 follows:
? I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
$ A. That a proper application, (Use Permit 84-15), was filed on
behalf of Sik Wong requesting authorization to construct six (6)
9 residential condominium units at 15582 South "B" Street pursuant
to the City of Tusttn Planned Development District Regulations.
10 B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on
11 said application,.
12 C. That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be
13 detrimental to the health, safety, morals, 'comfort, or general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood
14 of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
15 1. The use is in conformance with the land use element of
the Tusttn Area General Plan and the City of Tustin Zoning
Ordinance as it pertains to the deweIopment of multiple
10 family dwellings.
17 2. The design is in conformance with the provisions of the
18 Planned Development District Regulati.ons.
19 3. That the project conforms with the South Central
Redevelopment Agency Plan.
20 O. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the
2] use applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the
property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject
22 property, nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and
should be granted.
23 E. Proposed development shall be in accordance with the
24 development policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform
Building Codes as administered by the Building Official and the
25 Fire Code administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal, and'
street improvement requirements as administered by the City
26 Engineer.
F. A negative declaration is hereby approved in conformance
with the California Environmental Quality Act.
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2184
October 8, 1984
two
II. The Planning Commission hereby approves Use Permit 84-15 subject to
the conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A":
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on
the day of , 1984.
RONALD H. WHITE
Chairman
DONNA ORR
Recording Secretary
o
10.
11.
EXHIBIT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL/RESOLUTION NO. 2184
USE PER)lIT 84-15
The proposed project shall be developed in accordance with all applicable
Building, Fire, and Health and Safety Codes adopted by the City of Tustin.
A final grading plan based upon benchmark elevation datum as utilized by the
Orange County Surveyor's Office must be submitted and approved prior to issuance
of building permits.
Submittal of street improvement plans and construction of said improvements shall
These improvements will include but not be limited to the
be required.
following:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
f)
h)
i)
street paving;
curb and gutter;
sidewalks;
driveway apron;
water mains/fire hydrants/water service;
sanitary sewer facilities;
storm drain extension across frontage of paved;
marbeltte street lights with underground conduit;
provision for underground cable television service;
j) street trees.
Payment of Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 ~ewer connection fees in the
amount of $250.00 per dwelling unit at the time building permits are issued.
Payment of East 0range County Water District fees in the amount of $500.00 per
dwelling unit at the time building permits are issued.
Submission of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrctions {CC&Rs) to the City
Attorney's Office for approval is required.
Payment of Parkland Dedication Fees in the amount prescribed by City Ordinance
shall be remitted prior to issuance of building permits.
Paynent of New Development Tax in the amount of $2,700.00 shall be remitted prior
to issuance of building permits.
Each residential unit shall be equipped with individual electric water and gas'
meters.
That the location and construction of trash enclosures shall provide for access
to and from the containers at all times for the franchise refuse service. The
common trash container enclsoures shall be constructed of a minimum six-foot {6)
high concrete decorative block wall with solid gates to block visibility of trash
bins.
The CC&R's shall contain restrictions against the conversion of garage spaces to
any other use except the storage of motor vehicles. The City shall be a part of
the CC&R's and any modification of the CC&R's concerning these conditions shall
require approval by the City of Tustin.
Corn munity Development Deparlment
USE PERMIT 84-15
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 1~o
12. Final building elevations which indicate specific construction materials and
color schemas shall be submitted to the Planning Departmant for review and
approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
13. A landscape and irrigation plan incorporating specimen size trees and an
automatic irrigation system shall be submitted to the Planning Deprtment for
review and approval prior to the landscape installation . -This plan shall
include the retention of the trees indicated as 1, 2 + 3 on Exhibit "B" attached,
and shall include at least five (5) 48" box trees to replace the mature trees
displaced by construction. Occupancy of any unit will not be authorized until
approved landscaping is in p.lace.
14. The developer shall comply with all construction requirements of the- Orange
County Fire Marshal's office which includes installation of fire extinguishers
and on-site private fire hydrants-if necessary.
15. A development plan shall be submitted to City staff, prior to issuance of
building permits to detailing amenities provided within the common recreation
area; i.e. spas, walkways, tot lots.
16. A six foot eight inch {6'8") high, concrete block wall shall be installed along
the property side yards of the project. However, the height of the wall along
the northern property line may be constructed to a height' up to eight feet. (8')
as a sound attenuation wall for the recreation and patio areas if so recommended
by an acoustical engineer.
17. An analysis of the project shall be conducted by an acoustical .engineer verifying
that the project will comply with the City Ordinance No. 828 pertaining to noise.
Included in this analysis will be consideration of impacts of any I-5 freeway
widening project(s).
18. All roof top equipment shall be screened from public view.
19. The Final Tract Map shall be submitted, ready for recordation, prior to the
issuance of building permits. At such time that construction of the units is
complete, and all final inspections have been conducted, the Final Map shall be
reviewed by the City Council for consideration of approval.
20. That the site plan when submitted for structural plan check must show the
location of public improvements in agreement with Tentative Tract Map 12273.
21. That the interior drive-aisle must maintain a clearance of at least 25 feet in
width.
Community Development Department
1
2
3
'4
5
6
7
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
The
25
26
27
RESOLUTION NO. 2185
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING TO THE TUSTIN
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
NO. 12273
Planning Commission of the City of' Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That Tentative Tract Map No. 12273 was submitted to the Planning
Commission on behalf of Sik Wong for consideration of the
creation of a one lot subdivision for condominium ~urposes at
15582 South "B" Street.
B. That a public hearing in conjunction with Use Permit 84-15 was
duly called, noticed and held for said map.
C. That a Negative Declaration for the project is hereby approved
in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act.
D. That the proposed division is in conformance with the Tustin
Area General Plan and the Tustin Zoning Code as it pertains to
the development of multiple family dwellings.
II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council
approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 12273 subject to the following
conditions:
A. That the location of all public improvements shall be as
indicated on the subject maP.
B. That all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution
No. 2184 concerning Use Permit 84-15 are hereby incorporated as
a condition of approval of said map.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on the
day of , 1984.
RONALD H. WHITE,
Chairman
DONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2182
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, AUTHORIZING THE DEVELOPMEHT OF A
57563 MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING'IN THE PUBLIC &
INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT AT 14662 NEWPORT AVENUE
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as ~ollows:
as
That a proper application, {Use Permit No. 84-16), has been
filed on behalf Tustin Community Hospital, to request
authorization to construct a 57,563 four story medical office
building at 14662 Newport Avenue as shown on Exhibit "A".
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
That~ establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of the persons residing or: working in the neighborhood
of such proposed use, evidenced by the following findings:
1. That the hospital use and associated medical office is in
conformance with the land use element of the Tustin Area
General Plan.
D. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property
and tmprovemenlm in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, and should be
granted.
E. Proposed development shall be 4n accordance with the development
policies adopted by the City Council, Uniform Building Codes as
administered by the Buildin§.Official, Fire Code as administered
by the Orange County Fire Marshal and street improvement
requirements as administered by the City Engineer.
F. That a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts is hereby
approved.
G. Final development plans shall require the review and approval of
the Community Development Department.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2182
October 8, 1984
page two
II.
The Plannlng Commission hereby approves Conditional Us~ Permit No.
84-16 to authorize construction of a 57,563 medical office building
with 407 parking spaces as shown on Exhibit "A", subject to the
following conditions:
A. All missing or damaged publtc improvements will be required to
be constructed or replaced. These improvements will include but
not be limited to the following:
Be
a. -curb and gutter
b. sidewalk
c. drive aprons
d. street trees
e. street lights (marbelite standards with underground
conduit) on each street frontage, Newport Avenue and
Sycamore Avenue.
f. domestic water and/or fire service laterals
g. sanitary sewer lateral
Any improvements to be constructed should be shown on the
final site and/or grading plan and referenced with appropriate
City Standard drawing numbers.
A final grading plan will be required for the areas of new
development as they relate to the existing development on the
site, as well as, adjacent properties.
Payment of Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 sewer
connection fees will be required at the time a building permit
is issued. Fee amounts will be $S0.00/1,000 sq.ft, of
additional floor area.
Do
Payment of East Orange County Water District fees will be
required at the time a building permit is issued.
Both the existing parcel and the newly acquired 100 ft. wide
parcel will require annexation to the Orange County Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. All annexation
applications shall be filed with the City of Tustin Engineering
Division.
A striping plan for Newport Avenue shall be submitted to the
Engineering Department for review and approval. The owner shall
reimburse the City for all costs associated with the striping
modifications not to exceed $1,000.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18i
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2182
October 8, 1984
page three
Ge
He
The owner shall provide a "fairshare" portion of the funds
necessary to signalize the intersection of Newport and Sycamore
Avenues of 11.6% of the total cost.
That the southerly one hundred foot (100') parcel, of Parcel
Maps 84-1029, which is to be used as a hospital parking area,
shall be joined to the hospital parcel by the filing of a new
parcel map.
That the owner of the southerly parcel of Parcel Map 84-1029
shall authorize the rezontng of the parcel to the Public and
Institutional District.
That a fire sprinkler system per National Fire Protection
Association Standard No. 13 shall be provided to protect the
entire medical office structure. The sprinkler system shall be
supervised by a U.L. listed control receiving station.
Plans of combined' standpipes and fire sprinklers, medical gas
and fire hydrant systems shall be received and approved by the
Fire Department prior to installatibn of systems.
All building mechanical equipment shall be screened from view in
a manner consistent with the architectural elevations depicted
on Exhibit "A". Ground mounted equipment is preferred.
Continuous 6" concrete curbs shall be provided between landscape
planters and parking spaces and drive atsles.
A master sign plan must be submitted to the Planning Commission
for review and approval prior to the issuance of any sign
permits for the hospital and office'site..
Any existing mature trees which are removed during construction
must be replaced with 36" box specimens. The site drawings
shall indicate those trees to be removed and a planting plan
shall indicate the location of the replacement specimens.
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
I7
18
19
2O
21
22~
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2182
October 8, 1984
page four
P. 'Payment of the New Development Tax is required at the time of
buiiding permit issuance.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on day of , 1984.
RONALD WHITE
Chairman
DONNA ORR
Recording Secretary
1
2
3
4
5
RESOLUTION NO. 2181
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING A USE PERMIT
TO AUTHORIZE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL 5,500
SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND 5,500
SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE WITHIN THE EL CAMINO
SHOPPING CENTER AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF
SIXll4 STREET AND EL CAMINO REAL.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper application, (Use Permit 84-18) was filed by
William Zappas requesting authorization to consturct a ~5;,500
square foot retail commercial building and 5,500 square feet of
at the
office space in the E1 Camtno Plaza Shopping Center
southwesterly corner of Sixth Street and E1Camtno Real.
B. That the project is categorically exempt from the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act, Class I (e).
C. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed ahd held on said
application.
D. That establishment, maintenance and operation of the use applied
for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of such proposed use as evidenced by the following findings:
1. The use is in conformance with the Tustin Area
General Plan and City Code Zoning provisions.
2. The shopping center is an existing development.
E. That that establishment, maintenance and operation of the use
applied for will not be injurious or detrimental to the property
and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property,
nor to the general welfare of the City of Tustin and should be
granted.
ed development shall be in accordance with the
F. The propos ......... , ~,. the City Council, Uniform
dePs°as administered by the Building Official, Fire
Code as administered by the Orange County Fire Marshal and
street improvement requirements as administered by the City
Engineer.
G. Final development plans shall require the review and
approval of the Director of Community Development.
26
27
28
1
2
3
5
6
"7
8
9
~0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
1.9
'~0
21
23
25
26
2"/
28
RESOLUTIO~ ~0 2181
October 8, 1984
page ~o
That the parking variance as applied for shall not constitute a
grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations
upon other properties in the vicinity and district in which the
subject property is situated and that because of special
circumstances applicable to' the subject property, the strict
application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive subject
property of privileges enjoyed -by others in the vicinity and
under identical zone classification as evidenced by the
following findings:
1. Use of existing theatre building remains as a night time
activity as licensed by the License and Permit Board.
2. The new addition will be primarily a day time use.
II. The Planning Commission hereby grants a use permit, as applied for,
to authorize the construction of 5,500 square feet of retail space
and 5,500 square feet of office space addition to E1 Camtno Plaza
subject to the conditions as attached hereto in Exhibit "A".
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a'regualr meeting of the Tusttn Planning Commission
held on the day of 1984.
RONALD H. WHITE, Chairman
DONNA ORR
Recording Secretay
EXHIBIT 'A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SUGGESTED LIST OF CONDITIONS IMPOSED
USE PERMIT NO. 84-18
1. A grading plan should be sumbttted showing all proposed and existing
grades of facilities within the limits of the project.
Any construction within the public right-of-way should be so indicated
with appropriate City Standards on either the final site or grading
plan.
3. Marbeltte street lights with underground conduit may be required.
Contact Ron Rust with the Edison Co. at 973-5455 for design.
4. The domestic water and sewer service should be shown on this plan.
These should be taken from the Sixth Street facilities.
5. Compliance with all Fire Department regulations.
Payment of Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 fees in the amount
of $50/1,000 sq.ft, of floor area will be required at the- time a
building permit is issued.
Payment of East Orange County Water District fees will be required at
the time a building permit is issued. Contact Earl Rowenhorst at
Tustin Water Service for fee amounts.
8. Signs will require approval before permit issuance and shall match the
master sign plan for E1Camino Plaza.
9. Elevations shall match the existing center elevations.
10. All roof top equipment shall be screened from view.
The trash enclosure shall be constructed of masonry material, covered
and secured to prohibit unathortzed dumping which presents a nuisance
to the surrounding community.
12. A lighting plan for the parking lot if necessary.
Community Development Department
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
~,0
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2164
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE
CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF THE REVISED RECREATION
ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That Section 65303d of the Government Code allows the
City to prepare optional General Plan Elements, of which
a Recreation Element is included.
B. That Section 66477 of the Government Code states that
the City may exac~ dedications for recreational purposes
only if the City has adopted a recreational element to
the General Plan.
C. That the Recreation Element has been prepared with
the participation of ~ Citizens Advisory Committee.
D. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and
held on the proposed Recreation Element.
E. That a Negative Declaration has been prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is hereby recommended for
adoption by the City Council.
F. That the adoption of a Recreation Element WOuld be in
the public interest and not detrimental to the welfare
of the public.
G. That the appendix of the Recreation Element shall be
a separate document from the main body of the Element.
II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City
Council adoption of the Recreation Element as submitted.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning
Commission held on the~day of , i984.
RONALD H. WHITE, Chairman
Donna Orr, Recording Secretary
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2165 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE
CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF THE REVISED OPEN SPACE
AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA
GENERAL PLAN
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That Sections 65302d and 65302(e) of the Government
Code require that the Ct%y must have an Open Space and
Conservation Element.
B. That due to similar issues, the City has combined the
Open Space and Conservation Element as one document.
C. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and
held on the proposed Open Space and Conservation
Element.
D. That a Negative Declaration has been prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is hereby recommended for
adoption by the City Council.
E. That the adoption of the Open Space and Conservation
Element would be in the public interest and not
detrimental to the welfare of the public.
F. That the appendix of the Open Space and Conservation
Element shall be a separate document from then mtn body
of the Element.
II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City
Council adoption of the Open Space and Conservation
Element as submitted.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tust!n Planning
Commission held on the day of , 1984.
RONALD H. WHITE, Chairman
Donna Orr, Recording Secretary
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
.10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
9,7
28
RESOLUTION 2186
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL AMEND THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN
AREA GENERAL PLAN FOR THE NORTHWESTERN PORTION OF
1372 IRVINE BLVD., AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT "A".
The Planning Commission of the city of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The PlanningCommission finds and determines as follows:
A. Section 65356.1 of the Government Code of th~ State of
California provides that when it is deemed to be in the public
interest, the legislative body may amend a part of the General
Plan.
B. That in accordance with Section 65356 of the Government Code of
the State of California, a public hearing was duly called,
noticed, and held on the application by Daniel O'Connor on
behalf of Corniche Development to reclassify the land use from
Public & Institutional to Professional for the northwestern
portion of 1372 Irvine Blvd., as shown in Exhibit
C. That a Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with
the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and
is hereby recommended for adoption.
D. That a change in classification would be in the public interest
and not detrimental to the welfare of the public or the
surrounding property owners.
II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that
General Plan Amendment 84-4A be adopted, amending the Land Use
Element for the northwestern portion of 1372 Irvtne Blvd., as shown
in Exhibit "A".
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission
held on the 8th day of October, lg84.
RONALD H. WHITE,
Chairman
DONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
Report to the
Planning commission
DATE:
OCTOBER 8, 1984
SUBdECT:
VARIANCE 84-1
APPLICANT:
dANES R. LINDSEY
653 SOUTH 'B' STREET
TUSTIN, CA 92680
LOCATION:
ZONING:
653 SOUTH 'B' STREET
CENTRAL COI~ERCIAL (C-2) ABSTRACT
ENVIRO#PIENTAL
STATUS: CLASS 11 CATEGORICALLY EXEHPTION
ITE~ NO. 8'
BACKGROUNd:
The subject variance was originally to be considered by the Planning Commission
on August 27, 1984. At the request of the' applicant, the matter was continued
at two consecutive meetings. [t is staff's .understanding that the request for
continuance was submited in light of this department's recommendation, that
Variance 84-1 be denied. The applicant was intending to resubmitt a revised
plan that would have reduced the size of the signs requested.
DISCUSSION:
The applicant has submitted a revised sign plan consistin9 of one 20.70 square
foot wall sign the west elevation ("B" Street side) and one 25.5 square foot
wall sign for the southern elevation {facing the Santa Ana Freeway). This
plan alters the .first submittal in that the freeway oriented sign has been
reduced from the 54.75 square feet orginally requested. Both of these signs are
still in excess of the number and area permitted by the sign code.
The only signs permitted by code for an office use are as follows:
1. One {1) building identification sign, either wall or monument
type, with a maximum area of 12 square feet. This signing is to
indentify a building, not any specific tenant.
2. One (1) tenant identification sign, wall type with a maximum
area of 6 square feet.
Community Development Department
VARIANCE 84-1
October 8, 1984
page two
ANA~YS I S:
The original staff recommendation on the subject variance was to deny the entire
request. Even with the revised plan, the signing for the site is still in
excess of what is permitted, and no justifiable hardship exists to grant the
request as submitted. Therefore, staff is inclined to recommend denial of the
Package under consideration. However, with the additional time allotted by the
continuance, and a further examination of the sign code, staff can support the
approval of the 20.70 square foot wall sign to be displayed on the "B" Street
elevation. The basis of such a recommendation is founded upon section g470 of
the code which allows for sign code exceptions. Under this section the City
Council can approve signs that are not within the purview of the code and that
meet any of the following criteria:
1. A subject property is developed with structural setback more
-than two times the minimum front setback requirement of the
di stri ct.
2. A subject property frontage is at least 75% of the minimum
frontage requirements for like signing.
3. The proposed signing does not exceed more than one in number
nor more than 15% in area of the aggregate size of signs
authorized by the criteria of the district.
4. The proposed signing would be in substantial conformance with
the purposes and intent of this Chapter and would not constitute
a health or safety violation as described in Part 4 of this
Chapter.
As submitted, the project meets each of these criteria and therefore staff would
recommend aproval of the exception. Since, the sign is larger than would
otherwise be allowed, it is still appropriate for the Commission to act upon the
request in this instance. Such an action would not be an encroachment of the
City Council authority.
RECOI~EMDED ACTION:
It is recommended the Commission approve one (1) 20.70 square foot wall sign for
tenant identification at 653 South "B" Street based on the findings, and subject
in Resolution No. 2174.
~j~' DAV I S
Assistant Planner
JD/lg
ATTACHMENTS:
Staff Report of August 27, 1984
Letter of Justification of Applicant
Resolution No. 2174
Corn munity Development Depar'~ment
Report to the
Planning commission
PUBLIC HEARING NO. Z
DATE: August 27, 1984
SUBJEGT:
APPLICANT:
YARIANCE 84-1
JA~ES R. LINDSEY
663 South '8' Street
Tusttn, CA 92680
LOCATI ON
ZONING
663 SOUTH 'B' STRE~
Q~NTRAL COle~RCI-AL (C-2) DISTRICT
ENY IRONNENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
CATEGORICALLY EX.PT
AUTHORIZATION TO YARY FRON SECTION 9495 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE
TO ALLOW TWO TEMAMT IDENTIFICATIOM SIGNS THAT ~ ~T PERNITTED
BY CODE.
DISCUSSION:
Section 9495 of the Tustln City Code sets forth the number and size of signs
that are permitted for professional offices.
'The signs authorized by code for a professional office building are as follows:
identification stun (wall or monument type) not
1. One (1) building or .cen?~r_ .... "C~nter IdJntification Sign" is define, d
to exceed 12 square tee: ~n ~Fea ........
as a sign identifying a center or complex. Said sign shall not contain
Trade marks, Trade Names, Logos, Symbols, or any form of art that can be
construed as the name of any single business in that center.
Staff interprets this definition to also include "Building Identification".
2. One (1) tenant identification sign. (wall or under marquee type) not to
exceed six square feet in area.
The applicant is requesting to vary'from these criteria in that he wishes to
install two tenant identification signs one of which is 54 square feet in area
(south elevation) and one 20.25 square feet si~n (west elevation). Th~ request
is to allow 68 square feet~f sign not otherwise authorized.
, community Developmem Depanmem
¥~rt=nce 84-t
page two
ATthough the Sign Ordinance does provide for a variance procedure, it is quite
specific as-to what conditions or c~tcums~nces ~st ~ present ~fote ~e
Commission can approve such a variance.
These conditions are as follows:
That because of e~cept~onal c~tcumstances ~pp~tcab~e to :he subject
~' ~ct a p~cat~on of ~ts Chapter ~s found ~ depr~ve subject
property, ?e ~ .... Pen~oved by other Properties ~n the v~c~n~ and under
property ot pr~w,=~== d a
similar circums~nces-
2. That the variance shall ~ subject ~ such conditions as will assure that
the adjustmen~ thereby authorized will not constitu~ a g~nt of special
privileges tnconsts~nt with the limitations upon other properties tn ~e
vicinity and district in which the subject proper~ is loca~d.
ANALYSIS:
After reviewing the subject application and inspecting the .site, staff concludes
that there are no exceptional circumstances peculiar to the subject property
that warrant the granting of a variance.
the property is clearly visible from the free~ay and the building is not
obscured by any structures. The mere fact directions to the building are
difficult to follow doe~ not constitute a hardship imposed by the sign code.
Additionally, staff is concerned that approval of the subject variance could be
viewed as a grant of special privilege, and may be a precedent setting action.
Based on these conclusions, staff has no alternative but to recommend denial of
Variance 84-~. It should be noted that upon revte~ of the sign plan the
applicant was informed that staff would not support the variance request.
RECOI~£#DED ACTION: .
Staff recommends the Commission find that "no unusual circumstances exist on the
subject property that warrant the granting of a variance" and that Variance 84-1
be denied by the adoption of Resolution No. 2[74.
Assis~tant Planner
JO:do
-- Community Deve~opmenl Depar~mem
California
Dental
Health
Plan
September 27, 1984
City of Tustin
Planning Department
Tustin, CA 92680
SUBJ: VARIANCE REQUEST
ATTN: MR. JEFF DAVIS
Dear Mr. Davis:
As I mentioned to you in our meeting today (Thursday), I am
putting forth my reasons for requesting the commission to
approve my request ~or a sign variance for my building located
at 653 South B Street.
I request Doth an exception and a variance. The exception,
combining the monum~n~ sign (allowed) and the ~
identification ~iqn into one sign to be placed above the
numbers in the ~ront, west side that reads, "California Dental
Health Plan". The overall size of this sign is within the
total amount allowed for such a combination. The variance is
to place twelve (12") inch letters on the south parapet of the
building, a total of twenty-five feet six inches (25' 6")
long.
I am requesting these changes with the realization that it is
difficult for the city to refuse other requests if one such as
mine is granted. However, this is a circumstance that will
alleviate that problem as the following points disclose:
1. Ours is a unique business. In the entire state of
California, there are only twelve (12) licenses that
allow a plan such as ours to exist. Therefore, it is
extremely unlikely another company, such as ours, would
locate in Tustin and request a variance.
(continued)
P.O. Box 899 · 653 S. "B" Street, Tustin, California 92680 · (714) 731-6133
City of Tustin (continued)
2. Our building is in a commercial zone and is surrounded
by commercial-type businesses. The chance of another
professional business locating on our dead-end street
is also unlikely.
3. The revised request is now in line with the size of
the sign as it relates to the size of the building.
4. Because of our location on a dead-end street in a
commercial zone, our building is difficult to locate.
We require the visibility for the health of our
business. Approximately thirty (30%) percent 'of our
business is "walk-in" by our ~ who are
members, agents, and dentists.
5. Under the state law, we are a licensed health care
plan, which we believe would put us in the catagory
similar to a bank or real estate office, for which
variances have been granted in the past.
6. The present borders of Tustin along I-5 make it highly
unlikely other professional offices would choose such a
location.
Mr. Davis, It is my hope the commission will grant my full
request. I will be in attendance at the next meeting on
October 8, 1984. Thank you for your help and consideration.
Sincerelyj
Chief ~.xecutive Officer
JRL: CL
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2174
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 84-1
AUTHORIZING ONE (1) 20.70 SQUARE FOOT TENANT
IDENTIFICATION SIGN TO BE INSTALLED ON THE WEST
BUILDING ELEVATION OF THE STRUCTURE LOCATED AT
653 S. "B" STREET.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustln finds and determines as
follows:
That a proper application for a variance (Variance No. 84-1) was-
filed by Mr. James Ltndsey requesting authorization to vary with
Tustln City Code Section 9495 by installing one (1) tenant
identification sign of 20.70 square feet on the west buildtng
elevation, and one (1) 20.50 square .foot tenant identification
on the southern building elevation on the structure at 653 S.
"B" Street.
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
That the project is categorically exempt from the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act.
That establishment, maintenance and operation of the use as
applied for is not justified pursuant to Section 9471 of the
Tustin City Code.
That the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use of
only one 20.70 square foot wall sign would not under the
circumstance of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety,
morals, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood as evidenced by the following:
That approval of one tenant identification sign along the
"B" Street frontage is within the intent of the Tusttn Sign
Ordinance;
That the subject site and the 20.70 square foot sign fall
within the criteria required for a sign code exception.
Therefore the approval of Variance 84-1 would not
constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with
other properties in the vicinity, and the district in which
the subject property is located.
That as a result of the location of the building, an
exceptional circumstance peculiar to the site exists since
a monument type sign for building~ identification is not
feasible. Therefore, increased square footage for tenant
identification is justifiable.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 2174
Page ~o
e
The approval of the one 20.70 square foot sign ts
consistent wtth the Tustln Area General Plan and the Tustln
Zoning Ordinance as tt relates to signs.
II. The Planning Commission hereby approves Vartance 84-1 subject to the
following conditions:
A. That the one (1) 20.70 square foot tenant identification sign is
approved for the west building elevation.
B. That all proper sign permits be applied for and issued prior to
the installation of said sign.
C. That no additional business tden~ciftcation signing is permitted
to be installed on the subject site.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on
the day of , 1984.
RONALD H. WHITE,
Chairman
DONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
October 8, 1984
USE PERMIT 84-23
MORREY FRIEDMAN ON BEHALF OF
LAR¥IN SQUARE LTD.
P. O. BOX 6221
ANAHEIM, CA. 92806
LARWIN SQUARE 'SHOPPING CENTER
(SOUTHWEST CORNER .OF NEWPORT AND BRYAN AVENUE)
CENTRAL COMMERCIAL (C-2) DISTRICT
ENVIORNMEWTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS.. BEEN APPLIED FOR IN CONFORMANCE WITH
CEqA.
AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT A 2418 SQUARE FOOT SAVINGS AND LOAN IN
THE LARWIN SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER.
BACKGROUND:
On July 11, 1983, the Planning Commission approved Use Permit 83-13 authorizing
the construction of a 2,400 square foot building to be occupied by Home Federal
Savings & Loan. Subsequently, Use Permit 83-13 was appealed and the approval
was overturned by the City Council. The Council action was without prejudice
therebY allowing the applicant to meet Council concerns and reapply at a later
date. Specific concerns of the council were inadequate parking; the use of
compact spaces to resolve parking problems; traffic circulation patterns; and
traffic and pedestrian hazards. To alleviate the parking space problem, the
Council authorized the removal of the "tot-lot" presently on site.
In an effort to meet the concerns of the Council, the applicant has submitted a
revised plan relocating the proposed savings and loan to the southwest corner of
Newport and Bryan Avenue, and has conducted a traffic analysis of the site. As
submitted, the plan provides the proper number of parking spaces and meets the
other requirements of the C-2 zone.
DISCUSSION:
With relocation of the building and the traffic study, some of the city's
concerns have at least been addressed. However, the site plan submitted does
not reflect an implementation of recommendations of the traffic study and still
community Dcvelopmcm Dcparxmcnt
USE PERMIT 84-23
October 8, 1984
page 2
presents other potential problems on the site. If the applicant intends to
utilize the proposals submitted by their traffic engineer, the'site plan should
reflect such alterations to the project. Until such modifications are made,
the impact on parking space and traffic circulation cannot be properly analyzed
nor can staff submit a recommendation of approval.
Before any decision on this project i$ finalized, it is recommended that the
project proponent meet once again with the staff to discuss and include on the
future submittals the following items:
1. The implementation of "Alternative 1" as recommended by the applicant's
traffic engineer.
2. The modification of drive-aisles that flow into the main traffic lane that
traverses diagonally across the shopping center. This will improve
motorist visibility.
3. The resolution of potential parking problems associated with the use of
the automated teller machine.
4. To ensure that the locatio~ of the new structure, in relation to the
existing buildings', will not present conflicts with the Uniform Building
Code.
RECOI~E#DED ACTION:
Until the issues raised in this report are analyzed, staff cannot give a
recommendation on the project. Therefore, the recommendation is that the
Commission direct staff to accomplish the following:
1. To meet with the applicant to resolve all issues noted in this report.
2. That, at such time a revised plan is ready for re-submittal, a new public
hearing be advertised for consideration of the subject project.
Assistant Planner
OD/cas
ATTACHMENTS:
Site Plan
Traffic Study
Analysis of Traffic Study
, community Development Department
TRAFFIC STUDY
For
LARWIN SQUARE
Prepared For
DANIELSON DESIGN GROUP
RECEIVED
AU G 2 91984
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Prepared By:
BASMAClYAN-DARNELL, INC
TRAFFIC STUDY
FOR
LARWIN SQUARE
City'of Tustin
Prepared For:
Danielson Design Group
31726 Rancho Viejo Road Suite 208
San Juan Capi~trano, CA 92675
Prepared By:
BAS~ACIYAN-DARNELL, INC.
4262 Campus Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
(714)549-9940
August 23, 1984
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DESCRIPTION
PAGE
Introduction ........................................ 1
1
Project Description ................................
Existing Conditions ................................ 1
Traffic to/from the Proposed Project ............... 4
Recommendations .................................... 7
Appendix
TRAFFICSTUDY
OF
LARWIN SQUARE
Introduction
Larwin Square is an active commercial center in the CitY of
Tustin. Figure 1 is a vicinity map depicting the location of
Larwin Square. The center includes a supermarket, a drugstore, a
bank, two restaurants and a variety of small retail shops. This
study has been prepared to analyze the traffic-related impacts of
building a savings and loan in the center. Traffic circulation
within the center and access to/from the center via the
surrounding roadways are of particular concern and will be
addressed.
Project Descriotion
Larwin Square is a roughly triangular site, bounded on the north
by First Street, on the west by Centennial Street and on the
southeast by Newport Avenue. The main entrance to the center is
along Newport Avenue, aligned to form the fourth leg of the
intersection of Newport Avenue and Bryan Avenue. Secondary
accesses are located along First Street and along Centennial
Street.
The proposed project is to be a 2,418 square foot savings andt
loan facility. It is to be constructed adjacent to the main
entrance to Larwin Square on the southerly side, in an area which
is presently landscaped. The facility will also provide an
automated teller machine, separate from the building. It is to
be located in approximately the center of Larwin Square on the
site of an existing drive-up film 'processing facility. Figure 2
presents a site layout of Larwin Square and identifies the
location of the proposed project.
Existinq Conditions
The main entrance to Larwin Square is along Newport Avenue at
Bryan Avenue. The entrance is the fourth leg of the intersection
of Newport Avenue at Bryan Avenue and is controlled by a multi-
phase traffic signal. The entrance to Larwin Square is striped
to provide one lane inbound to the center and one left turn lane,
one through lane, and one right turn lane outbound from the
center.
Twenty-four hour traffic volume counts were conducted on three
consecutive days (Thursday, Friday and Saturday, August 9 through
11) at the entrance to Larwin Square. Daily inbound traffic
volume ranged from 4094 to 5202 with a daily average of 4,595
vehicles. Daily outbound traffic volume ranged from 4,454 to
5,539 with a daily average of 4,926 vehicles.
-1-
Edlnger Avenue
FIGURE
~]~~ VICINITY MAP
BASMAC1YAN-DARNELL, INC.
4:262 C.~mpus Drive, Suite 8-1
Newport ge~ch, Czliforni~ 92660
(714) 549-9940
proposed
He
BASMACIYAN-DARN ELL, INC.
4262 Cam0us Drive, Suite B-1
Newporz BeAch, CAlifornia 92660
(714) 549-9940
,.,p
FIGURE 2
SITE LAYOUT
-3-
Peak traffic conditions in Larwin Square occur between 11:00 A.M.
and 1:00 P.M. daily. An average of 800 vehicles per hour enter
and leave the center during this period.
A second, less intense, peak period occurs daily from 4:00 P.M.
to 6:00 P.M. During this period an average of approximately 690
vehicles per hour enter and leave Larwin Square. The exception
to this is Friday evening' The traffic volume count conducted on
Friday indicated that heavy peak demand is experienced at the
center between 4:00 P.M. and 6:00 P.M. with an average of 1020
vehicles per hour entering and leaving the site.
Additionally, manual traffiC volume turning movement counts were
conducted on two da~s (Thursday, August 16 and Friday, August 17)
during the peak periods at Larwin Square. These counts were
conducted to determine the percentage of traffic entering the
center which continued on the main circulation roadway through
the center of the parking lot, and the percentage which used the
minor circulation roadway which runs in fron~ of the supermarket
and retail shops at the northerly end of the site.
Of traffic entering the site at the main entrance, approximately
70 to 75 percent continue along the main circulation roadway.
Approximately 25 to 30 percent turn to the left upon entering the
site to travel along the minor circulation roadway.
Of vehicles exiting Larwin Square at the main access,
approximately 58 to 60 percent are travelling along the main
circulation roadway and 40 to 42 percent are travelling on the'
minor roadway. Ail trafic volume data sheets have been included
in the Appendix to the report.
Traffic To/From the Proposed Project
To assess the potential impacts of the
traffic circulation within Larwin Square,
made of tripmaking to/from the project.
are based on data presented in the Institute of Traffic Engineers
Trip Generation Manual. Table 1 presents a summary of the trip
generation process.
The proposed savings and loan would be expected to generate 179
trip ends per day with approximately 3 occuring during the
morning peak hour, 22 occuring during the noon hour and 17
occuring during the evening peak hour. A trip end is defined as
a one way movement to or from a land use.
proposed project on~
estimates have been
Trip generation rates
-4-
Land Use
Savings
& Loan
Land Use
S & L
2,418 sf
PM Peak Hour
Average In Out
Daily --
2.s0/ 4.o0/
74/KSF KSF KSF
Table 1
summary of Trip Generation
Trip Generation Rates
AM Peak Hour Noon Hour
out
1.30/ 4.65/ 4.65/
KSF Nom KSF KSF
Estimated Trip Ends.
Average AM Peak Hour Noon Hour PM Peak Hour
Daily. I__qn Out I_p_n Out In Out
179 3 Nom 11 11
7 10
of the trips travelling to/from the proposed savings and
Many ...... ~-=l traffic in the center. In
n woul~ not represent ~uu~
!oa ~ -~ ..... entl~, natronize the center would
man cases, people wnu ~u~ : ~ . ~ ~--- ~^r
relocate their banking business to the new savings an~ ~n ~u
convenience. Also, some people travelling to/from the savings
and loan are likely to combine the trip with other errands in the
center. Therefore, the estimate of tripmaking attributable to
the savings and loan may be conservative, slightly overstating
the amount of additional traffic (by approximately 15 to 20,
percent) which would occur in Larwin Square as a result of
constructing the proposed project.
Of the estimated trip ends to/from the proposed savings and loan
approximately 30 percent or approximately 54 trip ends would be
expected to use the automated teller only.
Based on the traffic volume count data collected for Larwin
Square, an estimated trip distribution pattern was developed for
anticipated traffic to/from the proposed project. Estimated
project-related traffic has been assigned to the internal
roadways and to the main entrance based on this trip distribution
pattern. Figure 3 presents the estimated increment of traffic
which the proposed project is expected to add to existing traffic
volume in Larwin Square.
To obtain an estimat% of the total traffic which might be
expected in Larwin Square with the construction of the proposed
project, the project-related increment has been added to the
existing traffic volumes. This estimate of total Larwin Square
traffic is also depicted on Figure 3.
-5-
"*-(e3)
lift
market and retail shops
restaurant
proposed
home federal bldg.
not to
scale
LEGEND
(XX}-project-related Dally Traffic
XXX-Exietlng plus project-related
Daily Traffic
BASMACIYAN-DARNELL, INC.
,~262 Campus Drive, Suite 6-t
Newgart Be~ctt, C~iifornia 9'2.660
(714) 549-9940
FIGURE 3
EXISTING PLUS PROJECT-RELATED
DALLY TRAFFIC
-6-
Recommendations
The proposed project is expected t°~have only minor impacts on
traffic flow conditions in Larwin Square. However, after field
reviews of existing traffic conditions at the main entrance to
Larwin SqUare, modifications to the on-site circulation patterns
are recommended.
The existing site plan was reviewed based on traffic volume
counts and field reviews conducted by BDI. The existing design of
the main entrance provides a single wide inbound lane, and a left
turn lane, a through lane and a right turn lane outbound. Sixty
feet into Larwin Square is a y-shaped intersecti6n; the southerly
leg is the main circulation roadway through the center and the
northerly leg is a minor roadway providing direct access to the
supermarket and adjacent retail shops (see Figure 2 presented
previously). There is no traffic control along the internal
roadways within the center. As a result there are numerous
conflicting traffic movements occuring between vehicles entering
the center and deciding a path of travel, and vehicles exiting
the center from either of the two internal roadways which con-
verge at the main access.
Although no capacity problems exist at the main entrance to
Larwin Square, the numerous conflicting traffic movements create
an undesirable condition. Two alternative internal circulation
patterns have been reviewed to aileviate the existing problems.
'These alternatives are depicted in Figures 4 and 5.
In Alternative 1, the minor roadway adjacent to the supermarket-
would be terminated at the main entrance. It would continue to
provide circulation to the parking in the area and provide
access to the supermarket and retail shops, but vehicles would
enter and exit via the main circulation roadway only, thereby
eliminating the opportunity for conflict. The area of the closed
roadway segment could be redesigned to provide pedestrian access
to the existing commercial establishments, as well as the pro-
posed project.
In Alternative 2, traffic travelling along the minor roadway
adjacent to the supermarket would be permitted to exit only from
the minor roadway to the main access. The landscaped median
which presently exists to define the Y-intersection would require
some design modification to constrict the minor roadway width to
permit only outbound vehicles. A stop sign is recommended on the
minor leg to further reduce the opportunity for conflict. In
addition, it would be necessary to construct a raised median at
the main entrance to separate the inbound and outbound lanes and
eliminate the possiblity of vehicles, upon entering the center,
from turning left onto the minor access road.
Either Alternative 1 or 2 would greatly minimize, if not
eliminate the opportunity for vehicular conflicts at the main
entrance to Larwin Square and thereby improve its safety and
efficiency for both motorists and pedestrians.
-7-
/
II
~-----*.~ proposed
home federal bldg.
nat to
FIGURE 4
ALTERNATIVE 1
RECOMMENDED SITE CIRCULATION
STOP
SiGN
--,proposed
home federal bldg.
market and retail shags
not to
.¢ale
I~ASMAE[YAN-OA~NELL, iNC.
4262 C.~m~us {Drive..~uite B-I
Newoo~ ae~c~, ~tifornia 92660
FIGURE 5
ALTERNATIVE 2
RECOMMENDED SITE CIRCULATION
In addition, several other improvements are recommended for the
main entrance to Larwin Square which would alleviate confusion on
the part of the motorist and therefore reduce the opportunity for
conflict.
The pavement color and texture at the entrace to the center makes
it very difficult for the motorist to see lane markings. Field
observations revealed a high incidence of incorrect lane useage
(eg. left turns being made from through lanes and through traffic
travelling in the left or right turn lanes). The striping on the
outbound leg of the main access is worn and should be restriped.
Additionally, because of the color and texture of the pavement,
porcelain-type pavement markers should be used in conjunction
with paint to delineate lanes.
Secondly, although not optimal, conflict could be reduced in the
existing condition by installing a stop sign on the minor roadway
at its in~tersection with the main access.
-10-
APPENDIX
24 Hour Volume
LOCATION LARWIN SQUARE ENTRANCE @ NEWPORT DATE 8-9-84
BRYAN
TIME
IN OUT TOTAL
12:00
11 12 23
1:oo
8 10 18
2:00
2 4 6
3:00
2 6 8
4:00
3 2 5
5:00
20 19 39
6:00
7:00
115 81 .* 196
8:00
179 123 302
9:00
187 182 369
10:00
338 251 589
11:00
378 339 717
12:00
465 441 906
1:oo
387 406 793
2:00
369 360 729
3:0O
350 342 692
4:00
371 368 739
5:00
359 373 732
6:00
304 299 603
7:00
225 255 480
8:00
176 230 406
9:00
125 188 313
10:00
45 89 134
11:00
26 43 69
12:00
4,487 4,454 8,941
PEAK HOUR
LOCATION LARWIN SQUARE ENTRANCE @ NEWPORT DATE 8-9-84
& BRYAN
IN OUT TOTAL
11:00
72 81 153
95 79
11:15
11:30
89 83 172
11:45
122 96 218
12:00
378 339 717
-7
IN OUT - TOTAL
12:00
138 106 244
12:15
108 114 222
12:30
107 119 226
12:45
112 102 214
1:00 '
465 441 906
24 Hour Volume
.LOCATION LARWIN SQUARE ENTRANCE @ NEWPORT DATE 8-10-84
& BRYAN
TIME
IN OUT TOTAL
12:00
11 8 19
1:oo
7 13 20
2:00
2 3 5
3:00
0 0 0
4:00
3 i 4
8:00
16 36 52
6:00
41 53 94
7:00
119 108 227
8:00
157 137 294
9:00
250 185 435
lO:OO
418 337 755
11:oo
410 410 820
12:O0
500 539 1039
1:00
412 457 869
2:00
423 412 835
~:0o
421 449 870
4:00
469 524 993
5:00
505 541 1046
6:00
315 344 659
7:00
250 304 554
8:00
215 266 481
9:00
161 228 389
lO:OO
69 137 206
11:oo
31 47 78
12:00
5,205 5,539 10,744
PEAK HOUR
LOCATION LARWIN SQUARE ENTRANCE @ NEWPORT
& BRYAN
DATE 8-10-84
IN OUT TOTAL
11:00
73 97 170
11:15
91 109 200
11:30
127 92 219
11:45
119 112 231
12:00
410 410 820
IN OUT TOTAL
5:00
135 129 264
5:15
126 133 259
5:30
147 152 299
5:45
97 127 224
6:00
505 541 1046
24 Hour Volume
LOCATioNLARWIN SQUARE ENTRANCE @ NEWPORT DATE 8-11-84
& BRYAN
TIME
IN OUT TOTAL
12:00
23 2-7 50
1:oo
6 7 13
2:00
5 9 i 4
3:00
4:00
1 6 7
5:00
20 8 28
6:00
29 35 64
7:00
110 73 183
8:00
164 134 298
9:00
248 269 517
lO:OO
327 343 670
11:oo
351 420 771
12:00
371 415 786
1:oo
342 417 759
2:00
353 413 766
3:OO
339 412 751
4:0O
334 401 735
5:00
240 317 557
6:00
235 268 503
7:00
209 258 467
8:00
175 226 401
9:00
133 160 293
lO:OO
47 97 144
11:oo
30 64 94
12:00
4,094 4,786 8,880
PEAK HOUR
LOCATION LARWIN SQUARE ENTRANCE @ NEWPORT
& BRYAN
DATg 8-11-84
IN OUT T~TAL
11:00
89 101 190
11:15
84 113 197
11:30
90 104 194
11:45
88 102 190
12:00
351 420 771
IN OUT TOTAL
12:00
98 102 200
. 107 100 207
12:15
12:30
84 112 196
12:45
82 101 183
1:00
371 415 786
EIB
W/B R
L
Thursday, August 16, 1984
Time
11:00-11:15
11:15-11:30
11:30-11:45
11:45-1 2:00
1 2:00-1 2:15
12:15-12:30
12:30-12:45
NBT
12
19
33
19
28
18
19
WBR
15
26
19
17
21
26
EBL
32
31
34
34
45
43
50
SBL
10
11
18
32
15
18
SBT
12
9
10
16
18
12
18
SBR
32
38
42
27
52
48
62
11:00-11:15
11:15-11:30
11:30-11:45
11:45-1 2:00
12:00-12:15
12:15-12:30
1 2:30-1 2:45
IN
4O
45
62
54
70
66
74
EAST LEG
OUT
26
36
42
31
49
58
49
U
2
2
3
1
1
2
2
IN
19
23
31
18
20
16
20
WEST LEG
out
32
21
20
31
29
18
49
U
2
4
7
5
4
4
7
NIB
!
W/B R -~
E/B L
Friday, August 17, 1984
IN
Time WBR NBT EBL
SBT
out
SBT'
SBR
4:00-4:15 ......'
4:1 5-4:30 26 45 53 11 28 42
4:30-4:45 13 38 54 11 30 50
4:45-5:00 27 32 39 22 21 54
5: 00-5: 1 5 25 46 63 22 22 66
5:15-5:30 10 44 52 22 23 54
5: 30-5: 45 22 45 41 1 4 26 62'
5: 45-6: 00 20 41 57 1 6 23 53
EAST LEG
IN OUT U
IN
WEST LEG
OUT
U
4:00-4:15 .....
4:15-4:30 82 47 2 37 30
4:30-4:45 75 52 3 36 41 4
4:45-5:00 61 51 7 36 42 2
5:00-5:15 97 60 2 36 49 1
5:15-5:30 77 51 1 32 42 5
5:30-5:45 75 69 3 33 40 3
5:45-6:00 85 55 3 31 32 5
OAT~:
September lO, 1984
nter -Corn
$ ~1~ J [CT:
Bob Lendendecker, City Engineer/Director of Public Works
Jim Kawamura, Consulting Traffic E~gineer
TRAFFIC STUDY FOR LARWIN SQUARE (HOME FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN)
The subject traffic study, prepared by Basmaciyan-Darnell, Inc.,
Newport Beach, was reviewed accuracy and thoroughness in addres-
sing potential traffic impacts and mitigation measures associated
with the proposed construction of a Home Federal Savings & Loan
building and satellite automated teller machine within the
existing La-twin Square shopping center.
The analysis and recommended mitigation measures presented in the
study were generally found to be acceptable, with the exception of
addressing the impact of the satellite automated teller machine on
overall shopping center parking and 'internal traffic flow.
Given the proposed location of the automated teller machine on the
main shopping center aisleway and its remoteness from the actual
site of .the proposed savings and loan building, potential
vehicular and pedestrian traffic impacts need to be addressed.
Automated teller machines can ge,nerate a significant amount of
traffic (particularly when isolated from the main building) -
causing not only congestion but safety problems as well.
Questions that7 arise include: a) how is parking to be allocated
and controlled in the proximity of the teller machine?; b) where
-do the walk-up customers (i.e., pedestrians) stand While waiting
~o be serviced?; c) and how many customers will there be
on-average and during peak periods?; and d) what impacts will
there ~e and how are they to be effectively mitigated? Unless
these questions are satisfactorily answered, the proposed auto-
mated teller machine should not be placed in. the location depicted
on the site plan.
.Under the "Recommendations" section of the study report the obser-
vation of traffic movement at the main entrance to Larwin Square
accurately reflects an existi'ng graffic flow and safety problem.
Of the two alternative modifications to on-site circulation
identified in this section o'f the report, Alternative 1 (Figure 4
in the report) would most effectively improve traffic movement and
safety at the main entrance to Larwin Square. This alternative,
along with improvements to the delineation of pavement striping
and markings, should be reflected in the conditions of approval of
the the proposed Home Federal Savings & Loan building,
Planning commission
DA~:
SUBJECT:
APPLICJM~:
OWNERS:
'LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENVIRONMEIITAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
OCTOBER 8, 1984
USE PERMIT 84-25
IUSTI# PRE-SCHOOL
PEARL SCOT[, JANICE SPRAGUE
ROBERT GRAI~R, SHERI MULLEN
14211 NEWPORT'MENUE
RETAIL CORMERCIAL (C-1)
CA~GORICALLY EXEMPT FROM ll~E REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFOR#IA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT _.
AUTHORIZATION TO OPERAI~ A PRE-SCHOOL FOR 42 CHILDREN
'V/L~YING FROM THE ZONING CJ)OE. REQUIRE/~EI~ OF 100 FOOT FRONTAGE
BACKGROUND:
Before annexation to the ¢i:y of Tustin in 1976 this property was known as the
Tuscan Room and the Odyssey Night Club. In 1977 the b6ilding was remodeled and
became the Higgtns Dental Lab.
DICSUSSION:
The new owner is now requesting authorization to operate a pre-school for 42
children while varying from the zoning ordinance requirement of 100 foot
frontage~ The Tusttn Pre-School is presently located at 1122 Laguna Road and is
being displaced by the proposed Tusttn Automotive Repair Center.
The subject property is surrounded on the north and south property lines
by commercially zoned properties, however, the property to the south is
apartments. The property to the west is zoned R-3 (multiple-family residential)
and is a recewntly built (8 unit) apartment complex.
Because the property was recently remodeled, the proposed project conforms with
all existing zoning requirements and development standards for a pre-school
except for the following items.
Walls and Fences.
All outdoor play areas shall be screened from the surrounding properties
by a 6'x8' high solid wall or fence. A block wall is required where a
change of zone occurs.
, community Development Department
USE PERMIT 84-25
page two
1. Minimum Ldt width at property line (100 feet):
The property is 82 feet in width which does not meet the current code
requirements for pre-schools.
The applicants have submitted correspondence with reasons for the variance which
are attached to this report and are as follows:
1.' The depth {190 ft.) of the property is more than ample for the use. The
minimum building site requirement is 10,000 square feet and this property
is 15,580 square feet.
2. There are more parking-spaces than needed, 9 required,-12 provided, with
ample space in the front parking lot for a drop-off area.
3. There is more than ample back yard play area to meet the requirements of
the State Department of Social Services.
4. The inside square footage of the building fits the requirements of the
State.Department of Social Services for 42 students.
$. It is a good (commercially zoned) location for a pre-school.
6. The apartments in the area display the need for a pre-school. (Many of
our parents live in the surrounding area).
The State Department of Social Services has informed staff that application has
been filed for a pre-school of 42 children at 14211 Newport Avenue. The State's
minimum requirements are 35 square feet of building area per child and 75 square
feet of outdoor play area per child. Because of the size of the building (in
excess of 2,000 square feet) and the proposed play area (in excess of 5,000
square feet), this property far exceeds the State's minimum requirements.
The fire department has also checked the property and submitted a report to
staff dated September 21, 1984 which informs the applicant of minor
modifications that must be made prior to a certificate of occupancy.
Staff feels that because of the large size of the property and the availability
of parking with a drop-off area, this property would be a good location for the
Tustin Pre-School.
RECOI~ENDATIO#:
Approve Use Permit 84-25 and direct staff to prepare a resolution of approval
with the conditions as proposed in Exhibit "A".
MARY ANN CHAMBERLAIN,
Associate Planner
MAC:do
Community Development Department
EXHIBIT
CONDITIONS OF APROVAI-
SUGGESTED LIST OF CONDITIONS IMPOSED
USE PERMIT 84-25
1. Compliance With all Fire Department regulations as outlined in Orange County
Fire Department Report dated September 21, 1984.
2. Compliance with all building codes to include a change of occupancy from B-2
to E-3 rating.
3. Hours of operation shall be 6:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and no children shall be
on the play ground before 8:00 a~m.
4. All fences and walls shall be installed as stated in the Zoning Code.
5. Any damaged public right-of-way improvements shall be replaced if necessary.
6. Trees and or tree wells shall be installed along the northerly property line
as per city standards.
Community Development Department
September 12, J984
Dear Council Members,
We request that a vari~.nce be given on the propers? located
at 14£11 Newport Ave. in the City of Tustin. This variance is
needed due to the 82 foot width of this property as opposed to the
100 foot width requirement set by the city.
There a~e numerous reasons for this variance to be granted.
Some of these reasons are:
1. The depth '(190 ft.) of the property is Bore thau
ample for our use.
2. There are more parking spaces than needed.
3. There is more than ~mple back yard play area.
4. The inside square footage of the building fits the
requirements laid down by the state.
5. It is a good (commercially zoned) location for a
pre-school.
6. The apartments in the area display the need for a
pre-school. (~any of our parents live in the sur-
rounding'area).
7. A~ter a two year seazch of the area, we feel it is
the perfect place to relocate our already established
pre-school.
Thank You!
Sincerely,
Robert Gr~mer, Sheri M~ll£n,
Pearl Scott, Janic~ Sprague
Tustin Pre-school
Repor to the
planning commission
ITEM NO. 11
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT/
OWNERS:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
OCTOBER 8, 1984
ZONE CHANGE 84-6
MARK S. FERGUSEN
GILBERT AND ANITA FERGUSEN
BRIAN J. HAWKINS DEVELOPERS, INC.
17432 and 17442 MITCHELL AVENUE
R-3 - 2,000 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR TO CONFOP~ WITH THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3 -
2,000) TO PLANNED COI~UNITY .SENIOR RESIOENTIAL (PC-SR) ANO AOOPT
A DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMITTING CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A
SENIOR CITIZEN COMPLEX.
OISCUSSION:
A development plan was submitted as part of this zone change applicatlon which
proposes ~o build 20 one (1) bedroom apartments for senior citizens. At this
time, the plan is not acceptable to be presented for final consideration.
RECOI~ENDED ACTION:
Continue this pub*lic hearing until October 22, 1984 to consider the zone change
and development plan at the same time.
XARY~fANN CHARBERLAIN,
Associate Planner
MAC:do
,. Community Dev~lopmcn~ Department
Planning Commission
DATE: October 8, 1984
SUBdECT: VARIANCE 84-2
APPLICANT: T.H. ZIFJqKE ON BEHALF OF DRUG E)IPORIUH
16119 BROOKHURST
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA.
LOCATIO#:
ENVlORII~E:NTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
13852 REDHILL AVENUE (FORHERLY ALBERTSONS)
CLASS 11 CATEGORICAL EXE]qPTION
TO RETAIN AN EXISTING NON-CONFORNING POLE SIGN AND TO INSTALL A
184 SQUARE FOOT ~RI.L SIGN...
BACKGROUND:
In May of 1977, the Redhtll Shopping Center was annexed to the city. One of the
conditions included in the annexation agreement was a condition that the signs
on the properties, even though not otherwise permitted by the Tustin Sign
Ordinance, be allowed to remain on the site. For the parcel that i*s the subject
of this variance application, it meant the retention of a free-standing pole
sign, as well as a wall sign that was in excess of the square footage allowed by
code.
To date, the pole sign has been reduced in size, yet still is a non-conforming
sign. Also, the front wall sign was removed upon Albertson's vacating the
premises.
DISCUSSION:
The Tusttn Sign Ordinance provides that a retail tenant, being
shopping center is permitted the following:
part of a
One {1) front wall sign limited to 15% of wall area not to exceed ?5 square
feet.
One (1) side wall and one (1) rear wall sign each limited to 5% of the wall
being served, not to exceed*25 square feet.
A tenant such as Drug Emporium is not permitted free-standing identification.
Community Development Department
Planning Commission Report
October 8, 1984
Page 2_
Variance 84-2 consists of two parts; first the retention of the existing pole
sign (with modifications), and second the installation of a wall sfgn 109 square
feet in excess of current code. The applicant intends to reduce the- overall
height of the pole sign from 27.5 feet to 25 feet; reduce the sign area from 125
square feet to 90 square feet; and has agreed to modify the lighting intensity
of the sign if required to bring the sign into conformance with current sign
code standards. Section 9461 of the city code provides that a non-conforming
sign may be voluntarily altered if such action will result in substandard
reduction in the degree of non-conformity. Staff in the past has interperted
this section to apply to signs that when reduced still identify the same
business. For example, if Albertson's was still, the tenant and requested that
the sign be altered as proposed. However, in recent Planning Commission actions
(i.e. Ralph's Centers on Zrvine Blvd. and 17th Street), free-standing
identification was allowed to remain, even when the tenant changed, so long as
height and/or square footage was reduced.
Therefore, with this precedent set, staff will recommend that the pole sign
identification be approved as submitted, with the condition that a landscape
planner as required by the sign code be installed.
The second portion of Variance 84-2 is a request for authorization to install a
~84 square foot wall sign on the front wall of the subject building. The
applicant indicates that.the building setback of 300 feet from Red Hill, and the
size of the building justify a sign in excess of the 75 square feet allowed by
the sign code. Such a justification for a sign larger than 75 square feet may
have been appropriate if it was to be the only tenant identification. However,
the free-standing sign should give adequate sign exposure to the business.
Therefore, it will be recommended that Drug Emporium only be permitted a 75
square foot wall sign.
RECOI~ENDATION:
It is recommended that Variance 84-2 authorizing a 5 foot x 18 foot pole sign,
with a maximum height of 25 feet above existing grade be approved based on the
findings and subject to the conditions contained in Resolution No. 2183.
Assistant Planner
JO/do
Community Development Department
-- i
PACIFIC DRUG DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
To: Tustin City Planning Commission
From, T.H. Ziemke on behalf of Drug Emporium
Subject: Variance Permit on 13852 Red Hill in Tustin
We have concluded negotiations with the Albertsons Company
on a sublease of their building at 13852 Red Hill. The
lease places the sinage responsibility in our hands which
is the reason for this presentation to the commission.
Our business is that of a large, full-service drug store
with a wide range of health and beauty aids and a substan-
tial pharmacy. We currently operate Drug Emporiums in
Fountain Valley and in Redondo Beach with another facility
'opening in North Hollywood in November. We would like our
Tustin store to be open at the end of October.
Since we are new to the area, advertising and sinage are
our two main vehicles to attract the customers to our store.
The position of the building on the property makes identifi-
cation very difficult without a variance in sina~e. We are
set back over 300 feet from the street (Red Hill), and the
location of the gas station on Laguna and Red Hill blocks
all visibility for east bound traffic on Red Hill.
The variance request is first for the pylon sign which cur-
rently sets back 30 feet from Red Hill and is 27'6" in height
with 125 sq. ft. of sign face. we propose lowering the sign
by 4'6" and reducing the face to 90 sq. ft., a reduction of
nearly 30~. Because of the easement on the frontage, the
30' set back of the sign, and the landscaping,a monument
type sign would not accomplish what the revised pylon would.
Store identifcation on the building also causes some problems
for our customers. The length of our name, "Drug Emporium",
coupled with the 300' building set-back, makes a 75 sq. ft.
complying sign difficult to use. A sign, similar to those
in other locations, would be visible from the street yet
take up less%than 10~ of the building face (well under the
154 allowed by code). The sign with 4' upper case and 30"
lower case is attractive and compliments the building front.
The other sinage in the center is also under consideration
to be altered and made more attractive. The two other pylons
16119 BROOKHURST ST., FOUNTAIN V~ll~:y, CA 92708
PACIFIC DRUG DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
would be used for identification with a series of 6' wide
signs with consistant color background. The shop signs
would be also made consistant in background as the tenant
~ix changed. Together the entire area would be improved
both astheticly and functionally.
16119 BROOKHURST ST., FOUNTAIN V~l l ~, CA 92708
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18~
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2183
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 84-2
AUTHORIZING ONE (1) (POLE TYPE) 90 SQUARE FOOT
TENANT IDENTIFICATION SIGN TO BE RETAINED FOR
DRUG EMPORIUM, LOCATED AT 13582 REDHILL AVENUE
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
Re
That a proper application for a variance (Variance No. 84-2) was
filed by Mr. T.H. Ii,mk, on behalf of Drug Emporium requesting
authorization to vary with Tusttn City, Code Section 9494 by
retaining an existing non-conforming pole sign (to be lowered in
height from 27.5 to 25 feet and to be reduced from 125 to 90
square feet) and installing a 184 square foot wall sign.
Be
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said
application.
C. That the project is categorically exempt from' the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act.
That establishment, maintenance and operation of' the use as
applied for is not justified pursuant to Section 9471 of the
Tustin City Code.
That the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use of
the existing pole slgnwtththe reduction in height to a maximum
of 25 feet and the reduction in square footage in sign area to a
maximum of 90 square feet would not under the circumstanceof
this case, bedetrtmental to the health, safety, morals, comfort
or general welfare of persons residing or working in
the neighborhood as evidenced by the following:
That the reduction in height and squarelfootage of the sign
constttutars a substantial reduction in non-conformity and
therefore meets the intent of the Tusttn Sign Ordinance.
That in recent Commission actions similar approvals have
been granted therefore an approval of Variance 84-2 does
not constitute a grant of special, privilege.
The building setback on the subject site is such that an
exceptional circumstance exists that justifies additional
sign area. This circumstance however, does not justify
variance with the sign code in relation to the requested
wall sign.
The approval of the one 90 square foot pole- sign is
consistent with the Tustin Area General Plan and the Tusttn
Zoning Ordinance as it relates tosigns.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
'27
28
Resolution No. 2183
page two
II. The Planntng Commission hereby, approves Vartance 84-1 subject to the
following conditions:
A. That the pole stgn shall be reduced to a maxtmum of 25 feet tn
height.
B. That the sign area shall consist of a 5 foot by 18 foot sign.
That a landscape planter to be reviewed and approved by the
Community Development Department shall be installed in
co~liance with the Tustin City Code as it pertains to signs.
O. That prior to installation of any sign, sign permits must be
secured from the Community Development Department
PA6SED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on
the day of , 1984.
RONALD H. WHITE,
Chat rman
DONNA ORR,
Recording Secretary
Planning cOmmission
DATE:
SUB,.1ECT:
OCTOBER 8, 1984
INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS TO REVOKE USE PEP~IT 84-2: WINDSOR
GARDENS
DISCUSSION:
For the past two years, staff has worked with CalS tare Deuelopment Company,
owners of the Nindsor Gardens Apartment project at 1651 Mitchell Avenue; in an
attempt to swiftly cause completion of this condominium conversion.
After nearly four years of intermittent construction, the conversion from
apartments to condominiums has yet to be completed.
While the garages and tennis court have'been constructed, on-site landscaping
and interior structural improvements have not been made. However, Ca1 State has
recently offered units for sale in v~olation of the City's condominium
conversion ordinance.
Since the Windsor Gardens condominium conversion project has yet .to be
completed in accordance with approved plans and conditions of Use Permit 80-2,
staff recommends a public hearing be conducted to consider testimony as to
whether said use permit should be revoked.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission instruct staff to advertise a public hearing for
the next available meeting to consider recommending to the City Council
revocation of Use Permit 80-2.
DONALD D. LAMM,
Director of Community Development
DDL:do
, community Development Department
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUB,IECT:
OCTOBER 8, 1984
ZOIIING ORDIIIAIICE /Q~IEIIDI'IENT 84-2; DISH /gi*TEIIliAE REVIEW
D I SCUSS ION:
Followtn9 the last Planntn9 Commission hearing, stafi' received the book "The
Statelllte Earth Station Zoning 8ook" i'rom the Space organization concernln9
city authority to regulate installation oi' the popular dish antennae. A copy oi'
the book was i'orwarded to Commissioner Wetl who recommended that we order this
publication. Stai'f however, has not had the opportunity to thoroughly review
the publication and therei'ore needs an additional l~o or three weeks ~o provide
thePlanntn9 Commission a summa~ oi' this document's contents.
Additionaly, ii' the Commission so deslre~; a Saturday mornin9 field 'trip might
be valuable to review dti'ferent installations of the antennae throughout the
Tusti n area. ..
Director of Community Development
DDL:do
Corn munit¥ Development Department
Planning Commission
October 8, 1984
SUBJECT: REPORT ON COUNCIL ACTIONS - October 1, 1984
Oral presentation to be given' by Donald D. Lamm, Director of Community
Development
do
Attachments:
City Council Action Agenda - October 1, 1984
ii. Community Development Department
rucTION AGENDA OF A REGULAR
OF THE TUST[N CITY COUNCXL
October 1, 1984
7:00 P.M.
7:00
I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
ALL PRESENT II. ROLL CALL
III. PRESENTATION
PRESENTED TI) THE CITY BY 1. PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AWARD BY THE AUTOMOBILE CLUB
Gl[NE ~ilAW, 14M~6[R CALIFORNIA
ACCEPTED BY MIKE CATE * 2. PROCLAMATION FOR FIRE PREVENTION WEEK
OF SOUTHERN
~ORDO# IV. PUBLIC INPUT
I.~£1~E, 17441 LAUEXE LANE, SPOKE IN ~POSITZON TO SENIOR lIED AND C~RE FACILITY ~BIll6 IN /~1
R-1 ZONE. LE1TER TO BE SENT TO THE LEAGUE WITH COPY TO !~. I.NdRENC£.
JOHN DDI~NIC SPOKE Ill OPPOSITION TO O~ WATER I~LICIES. COUNCIL WILL IIlvES'T/6ATE.
V. PUBLIC HEARING
CONTINUED TO 10-15-84 1. ORANGE COUNTY SOLI~ WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Recommended to open the Public Hearing and then continue to
October 15, 1984, meeting.
VI.
APPROVED
,,PROVED
APPROVED STAFF
RECOI~NDAT ION
ADOPTED BESOLUT ION
NO. 84-78
APPROVED S[AFF
RECOWlqENDAT ION
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Sept~er 17, 1984
2. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $110,210.82
APPROVAL OF DEMANDS in the amount of $870,775.06
'3. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC -IMPROVEMENTS - TRACT NO. 11586 (E side of
Holt Avenue, S of Warren Avenue)
Accept the public improvements within Tract No. 11586 and
authorize the release of the followng bonds: Faithful
Performance - K01530227 in the amount of $17,500.00, Labor
and Materials - K01530227 in the amount of $8,750.00 and
Monumentation K01530227 in the amount of $1,250.00 as
recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
4. RESOLUTION NO. 84-78 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tusttn, California, TO ENDORSE PROPOSITION 30, THE
SENIOR CENTER BOND ACT OF 1984
Adoption of Resolution No. 84-78 as recommended by the
Director of Community and Administrative Services.
5. REQUEST FOR RESTRICTED PARKING DURING STREET SWEEPING OPERATIONS
(UTT DRIVE)
Authorize the installation of signing to restrict on-street
parking during street sweeping hours 6:00 a.m. to noon on
Friday on both sides of Utt Drive between Lance Drive and
Bryan Avenue.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA
Page i
10-1-84
REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA 7.
APPROVED STAFF 8.
RECOI~ENDAT ION
APPROVED STAFF 9.
RECOI~ENDAT ION
R~QUEST FOR RESTRICTED PARKING DURI.6 STREET SWEEPING OPERATIONS
(PACIFIC STREET AND CALIFORNIA STREET BETWEEN ~DALLION AVENUE
AND CORLA AVENUE)
Authorize the installation of signing to restrict on-street-
parking during street sweeping hours 6:00 a.m. to noon on
Tuesday on both sides of Pacific Street and California Street
between Medallion 'Avenue and Corla Avenue as recommended by
the Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
PERMISSION TO LEVY RENT INCREASE (1971 Ren Circle)
Authorize Mr. Jeffers to increase the rent for 1971 A Ren
Circle to an amount he-deems appropriate as recommended by
the Community Development Department.
INITIATION OF AN AGREEMENT TO PREPARE A FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT' REPORT (1trine Co.)
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the subject
agreement~ With the Irvine Company and Michael Brandman &
Associates,. Inc. as recommended by the Community Development
Department.
PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES/SITE EVALUATION
FOR TUSTIN SENIOR CENTER
Approve Recreation Systems' proposal to complete subject site
evaluation at standard hourly rates, not to exceed $1,000, as
recommended by the Director of Community and Administrative
Services.
VII.
INTROOUCED ORDINANCE
NO. 919.
ORDINANCES FOR, INTRODUCTION
1. ORDINANCE NO. 919 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City
of Tustin, California, ADOPTING THE 1982 UNIFORM FIRE CODE, WITH
CERTAIN AMENDMENTS
M. O. - That Ordinance No. 919 have first reading by title
only.
M. O. - That Ordinance No. 919 be introduced.
VIII. ORDINANCES FOR ADOFTION - None
IX. OLD BUSINESS
APPROVED STAFF 1.
RECOI~NDATION
APPROVED STAFF 2.
RECO)~ENDATION
PROPOSED MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND BRIDGE FEE PROGRAm4 (M.T. &
B.F.P.) FOR EASTERN/FOOTHILL CORRIDORS
Adopt the three generalized policy statements as contained in
the staff report dated September 20, 1984, subject to the
implementation of the four areas of concern outlined within
subject report as recon~nended by the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer.
COOPERATIVE PROJECT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR THE WIDENING OF
THE INTERSECTION OF BRYAN AVENUE AND MYFORD ROAD
Recommended to appropriate an additional $9,500.00 for
subject intersection widening project as recommended by the
Engineering Department.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA
Page 2 10-1-84
X. NEW BUSINESS
. ,iFF TO HIRE A CONSULTANT 1. COLUMBUS TUSTIN PARK IMPROVEMENTS
FOR ri:SIGN OF PROGRAM AND REPORT BACK ON NOVEI~ER 19TH
XI. REPORTS
APPEALEO U.P.84-16, llJSTIN-1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - September 24, 1984
COld, UNITY HOSPITAL AND U.P.84-18, All actions of the Planning Commission are final
EL CAMINO PLAZA SiiOPPING CENTER appealed by the City Council.
TWO YEAR TERNS WiTH THREE 2.
REAPPOINTED. IN 1986, AND THE
OTHER TWO REAPPOINTED IN 1987
RECEIVED AND FILED 3.
RECEIVED AND FILED
RECEIVED AND FILED
unless
PLANNING COMMISSION TERMS OF OFFICE
Pleasure of the Council.
FIXED DATES TO AMEND THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN
Receive and file.
GENERAL PLAN' ELEMENT AMENDMENTS
Receive and file.
STATUS REPORT CONCERNING CDBG HOME IMPROVEMENT LOAN PROGRAM
Receive and file.
HUSTON ASKED XII. OTHER BUSINESS
FOR CLOSED SESSION FOR ~RSONMEL MAII'ERS FOLLOWING THE REETING.
THANKED THE COI~ITTEE FOR THE PICNIC FOR FINE
THERE WAS CONCERN ABOUT THE COUNTY NOT CONTACTING THE CITY ABOUT THEIR PLAN FOR A REGIONAL
LRK. HUSTON RESPONDED THAT ~ HAVE CONVEYED OUR FEELINGS AND HE SUGGESTED THAT THE COUNCIL
WAIT UNTIL THE RECREATION ELEMENT OF THE PASTER PLAN IS APPROVED BEFORE CONTACTING THE COUNTY.
THE MAYOR SAID A LEITER COULD BE SENT TO SUPERVISOR
(~EINKE WRS CONCERNEO ABOUT ADVERTISING SIGNS IN OTHER cTrIES WHERE THE MAIN PART OF THE SIGN
WAS IR'A FOREIGN LANGUAGE. ROURKE TO SEE IF WE CAN HAVE A RESOLUTION THAT WOULD REQUIRE ANY
SIGNS TO HAVE THE BESSAGE IN ENGLISH BI~,~R TtLRN THE FOREIGN LANGURGE.
THERE WRS CONCERN ABOU[ THE POLITICAL SIGNS STILL UP FROM jUNE. CO.UNITY DEVELOPMENT
OEPARTMERT TO SERO LETTERS.
LEOEROECKER INFORMEO HOESTEREY THAT THE RAZLROAO TRACICS ON WRLNUT AT CHERRYWO00 WOULD BE
REMOVEO BUT ~ HAS NOT SEEN A SCHEOULE.
ICENNEOY REPORTED THAT CRL TR~ IN ~PROVING THE FREEWAYS HAS LEFT HAZAROS BY NOT STRIPING THE
ON ANO OFF P~S ANO THAT THERE IS A BIG HOLE NORTH BOUNG ON I-5 AT BROWNING. LEBENGECKER TO
CONTA~'T CAL. TRANS.
9:39 XII. RECESSED TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THENCE TO A CLOSED SESSION FOR PER-
SONNEL MATTERS, AND THENCE AOJOURNED TO THE NEXT REGULAR hiEETING ON OCTOBER
15, 1984.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA
Page 3 10-1-84
AC1 ,tin AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING
THE TUST[N REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
October 1, 1984
7:00 P.A.
9:39 1. CALL ~0 ORDER
ALL 2.
PRESENT
APPROVED 3.
ROLL CALL .
APPROVAL OF MINUTES of September 17, 1984
CONTINUED 4.
D~SIGN REVIEW, RESOLUTION NO. RDA 84-12 - A Resolution of the Community
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Tustin, California, EL CAMINO PLAZA
ADDITION, USE PERMIT 84-18
Pleasure of the City Council.
APPROVED 5. USE PERMIT 84-15/TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 11273 (15582 "B" STREET)
STAFF RECO~NDATION Approval of subject site plan and elevations of
recommended by the Community Development Department.
the project as
NONE 6. OTHER BUSINESS
9:41 7.
ADJOURNMENT - To the next regular meeting on October 15, 1984.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION AGENDA
Page I
10-1-84
ITEM NO. 16 , "~
Planning Commission
DATE:
LOCATION:
SUBJECT:
OCTOBER 8, 1984
DANCHAR MARINE
674 EL CA)IINO PEAL
WICKES LUHBER,
1100 Edtnger St.
ILLEGAL BANNERS
DISCUSSION:
Inspections were made on the above mentioned establishments, and both were found
to be in violation of the Tustin Sign Ordinance No. 684. Correspondence was
sent to the' owners stating that the illegal signs must be removed or a Temporary
Use Permit obtained. ~_
Further inspections will be conducted to ensure compliance.
LP:do
, Community Development Depar;ment