HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 7 S.D. CREEK WTRSHD 9-17-84A m~mmml~ I CONSENT CALENDAR
'Ii I ll Ill NO. 7
FROM- BOB LEDENDECKER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT - SAN DIEGO CREEK/UPPER NEWPORT BAY WATERSHED
RECOMMENDATION:
That the'Tustin City Council, at their meeting of September 17, 1984, authorize
the Mayor to execute the Cooperative Agreement for San Diego Creek/Upper Newport
Bay Watershed on behalf of the City and to designate a Councilperson and an
alternate as a member to the Executive Committee of the San Diego Creek/Upper
Newport Bay Watershed, subject to final review and approval of the Agreement by
the City Attorney's office.
BACKGROUND:
On August 20, 1984, the City Council approved the City's participation in the
Implementation Agreement for in-channel facilities along the San Diego creek. As
a part of this approval, it was suggested that the subject Cooperative Agreement
be amended to include Tustin as a member of the Executive Committee of the San
Diego Creek/Upper Newport Bay Watershed. The original Cooperative Agreement has
been revised by the attached Agreement to include Tustin as a member to the
Executive Committee.
DISCUSSION:
The attached Agreement, as revised, now includes the City of Tustin as an
executive member in addition to the previously designated agencies of the Cities
of Newport Beach and Irvine, the County of Orange, California Department of Fish
and Game and the Irvine Company.
The Executive Committee will provide a forum to evaluate and assess progress
toward implementing the Comprehensive Storm Water Sedimentation Control Plan as
mandated by the Federal 208 Water Quality Planning Program, to formulate project
implementing agreements for the elements of the plan and to evaluate and assess
the effectiveness of the various elements of the plan.
Any amendments to this Agreement will require unanimous approval of all parties.
Each party to the Agreement is required to appoint a member and an alternate to
the Executive Committee. Members from each of the Cities are designated as
Councilpersons.
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT - SAN DIEGO CREEK/UPPER NEWPORT BAY WATERSHED
AUGUST 30, 1984
PAGE 2
The term of this Agreement shall continue until three or more of the parties
withdraw by providing written notice of withdrawal to the other parties of this
Agreement.
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this Agreement.
Bob Ledendecker
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
BL:Jr
Attachment
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
,SAN DIEGO CREEK/UPPER NEWPORT BAY WATERSHED
THIs AGREEMENT i's made and entered into this day of
, 1984, by and between the County of Orange, the City
of Irvine, the City of NewPort Beach, the California Department of Fish
and Game, The Irvine Company and the City of Tustin.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Cities of Newport Beach and Irvine have entered
into a Cooperative Agreement with the Southern California Association of
Governments for'the development of a Comprehensive Storm Water Sedimentation
Control Plan for the San Diego'Creek basin, hereafter referred to as "the
Plan"; and,
WHEREAS, the Plan has been completed; and,
WHEREAS, the primary purpose of the Plan is to reduce sedimentation
of Newport Bay; and,
WHEREAS, the sediment affecting Newport Bay origi~a, tes in natural
open space lands as well as lands disturbed by man for agricultural and
urban uses; and,
WHEREAS, if sedimentation of Newport Bay is not controlled, the
State-owned ecological preserve in upper N~wport Bay may continue to be
degraded and large amounts of sediment may be deposited in lower Newport
Bay, thus impairing the valuable small boat, co,,.ercial and recreational
1 and uses; and,
WHEREAS, Land Management Practices are being implemented as
recommended in the Plan and should reduce erosion of agricultural lands
and construction sites resulting in reduction of sediment deposits in
upper Newport Bay; and,
WHEREAS, the Cities of Irvine and Newport Beach in their agreement
with SCAG have agreed to assist SCAG in obtaining implementation commitments;
and,
WHEREAS, the California Department of Fish and Game is charged with
the responsibility-of maintaining the ecological preserve in upper Newport
Bay; and,
lof6
~HEREAS, the County of Orange has jurisdiction over construction
~ctivities in the unincorporated area of the San Diego Creek basin and is
responsible for maintaining the dedicated portions of the major flood
control channels; and,
WHEREAS, the Cities of Irvine, Tustin, and Newport Beach have
jurisdiction over construction activities within most of the incorporated
area of the San Diego Creek basin; and,
WHEREAS, The Irvine Company is the owner of most. of the agricultural
lands and owns most of the land upon which future' c~nstruction acitivities
will occur and owns the lands on which the majority of the drainage channels
in the San Diego Creek watershed are located; and,
WHEREAS, the parties have limited resources with which to address
the'implementation of the Comprehensive Storm Water Sedimentation Control
Plan and it is recognized that any effective implementation of the Plan will
depend upon availability of funding sources at the regional, state and
federal levels; and,
WHEREAS, it is desirable to provide a forum of interested parties
to.evaluate and asses.s progress toward.implementation of i~be Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties
hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. The Cooperative Agreement dated September 30, 1983,
entered into by all the parties except the City of Tustin for the same.
purposes set forth in this Agreement is hereby terminated.
Section 2. Purpose. This Agreement is entered into for the pur-
pose of providing a forum to evaluate and assess progress toward implement-
ing the Comprehensive Storm Water Sedimentation Control Plan prepared for
SCAG by the Cities of Irvine and Newport Beach under the Federal 208 Water
Quality Planning Program, to formulate project implementing agreements for
the elements of the Plan, and to evaluate and assess the effectiveness of
the various elements of the Plan.
Section 3. Additional Parties. It is recognized that there are
other parties within the watershed that have responsibilities for controlling
sediment. These parties include the Cities of Costa Mesa, Orange, and
Santa Ana, the U. S. Department of Defense, and owners of large undeveloped
2of6
parcels of land. In order to expedite implementation of this Agreement,
these other parties have not been included. However, the parties hereto.
agree to request these other parties to implement the Land Management
Practices reco,m~nded in the Plan and in addition, one or more of these
parties may be requested to participate in future project implementing
agreements.
Section 4. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only with
the unanimous approval of all parties.
Section 5. Executive Committee. Each of the parties shall appoint
a member and an alternate to an Executive Committee. The members so
appointed shall elect a chairman to serve a two-year term. The Committee
shall meet from time to time upon the request of the chairman, but at least
every six months. The Executive Committee shall be responsible for review-
ing and reporting to the parties as to whether adequate and reasonable
progress is being made in the implementation of the Plan.
Section 6. The plan consists of the following elements and schedules:
Ae
Be
Elements
Improve agricultural land
management~practices
High erosion areas
Remaining areas
~mprove construction
Land management practices
Schedule
Complete RCPs by 11/83 ..
Implement by 11/84
Complete RCPs by 11/84
Implement by 11/85
Grading Ord. Changes: By 9/84
Training Programs: Begin 1/84
Install and maintain
in-channel basins
Implementing Agreement:
Construction of Basins:
Begin 5/85
Complete by 1988
7/84
Install and maintain basins
in upper Newport Bay
Implementing Agreement:
Construction of Basins:
Begin 5/85
Complete by 1990
7/84
Channel Stabilization
Undeveloped areas:
As condition of develop-
ment
Dedicated channels:
Inventory of deficiencies
Stabilization
1/84
7/84
Begin 7/84
Complete 1988
Fe
Foothill basins
Incorporation into drainage
master plan
Construction
As part of plan development
Concurrent with stabilization
of downstream channels
3of6
Schedule
Elements
G. Monitori-ng
Cooperative agreement 7/84
Bay monitoring
Develop program 1/84
Implement 7/84
The parties hereto agree to use their best efforts to formulate
agreements to implement the Plan.
Section 7. Improve agricultural and construction land management
practices. The Cities of 1trine, Tustin, and Newport Beach and the County
of Orange shall consider adoption of programs and/or enforcement of ordinances
within each agency's jurisdiction sufficient to implement Elements A and B
of the Plan. The intent of these efforts shall be to require use of the
most cost effective measures for the management of sediment that is consis-
tent with preservation of upper Newport Bay, as set forth in the Plan.
Section 8. Project Implementation Agreements. Implementation of
the Plan elements shall be accomplished through Project Implementation
Agreements. These Agreements shall designate a lead agency and shall
provide for funding the anticipated construction and maintenance costs.
The parties to this Agreement as well as other parties in the watershed
may be participants in these Project Implementation Agreements. ..
Section 9. Termination. The term of this Agreement shall
commence upon the date when all parties have executed this document and
shall continue until three or more of the parties have withdrawn as
provided in Section 11 below. In addition, this Agreement shall auto-
matically terminate if after three years the Project Implementation Agreement
for Plan Elements C and D have not been executed.
If this Agreement is terminated, then the parties
hereto agree to consider the formation or designation of an agency to
attempt to carry out the implementation.of the Plan Elements set forth in
Section 5.
Section 1D. Grants. All parties shall use their best efforts
to aid the lead agencies designated in Project Implementation Agreements
to obtain grants to fund construction and maintenance of the various
projects.
-Section 11. Withdrawal of Parties. Any of the parties to this
Agreement may withdraw by giving written notice of withdrawal to the
4of6
other parties to this Agreement. The withdrawing party shall be responsible
for financial obligations hereunder only to the extent incurred and agreed
to by the party prior to the effective date of withdrawal. The balance of
the parties shall continue in the performance of the terms and conditions
of this Agreement unless and until the Agreement is terminated as provided
in Section .9 above.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
the day and year first above written.
COUNTY OF ORANGE,
a political subdivision
of the State of California
Dated: , 1984
SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY
OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED
TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
By
Chairman of their Board of Supervisor~
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ADRIAN KUYPER, COUNTY COUNSEL
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Cl~rk of the Board of Supervisors
of Orange County, California
CITY OF IRVINE
Dated:
ATTEST:
By
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Dated:.
ATTEST:
'City Attorney of Irvine
, 1984 By
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH
AND GAME
Dated: , 1984
CITY OF TUSTIN
Dated:
ATTEST:
, 1984
City Attorney of Newport Beach
By
Director
By
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk
City Attorney of Tustin
5 of 6
THE IRVINE COMPANY
Dated:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
, 1984
By
President
Attorney for The Irvine Company
By
Senior Vice President
6of6