HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA DESIGN REVIEW 09-04-84 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NO. 5
OATE: September 4, 1984
$ UBJ (CT:
HONORABLE CHAIR#OlqAN AND NENBERS, REDEYELOPNENT AGENCY
COIIqUNITY DEYELOPNENT DEPAR'rNENT
DESIGN REVIEW - 2700 SQUARE FOOT OFI~ICE BUILDING
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
CARNEY & THEODOROU ARCHITECTS
130 S. PROSPECT AVENUE
CENTRAL COI~IERCIAL' (C-2) DISTRICT
BACKGROUND:
The proposed site currently has two vacant structures both of which are in need
of repair and redevelopment. The front building was last used as a
television repair shop which was converted from a single family residence. The
rear structure, which is to remain in this proposal was last used over a'year
ago as a storage facility. The stte is within the Town Center Redevelopment
Agency, requiring a review by the Redevelopment Agency. The site is also within
the Downtown Specific Plan area.
DISCUSSION:
The proposal calls for the removal of the front structure and the remodel and
conversion of the rear structure for use as the applicant's office. The plan
provides for onsite parking accommodatidn in conformance with office standards
and the addition of landscape planters to enhance the property.
The architecture is to be improved by new painted stucco over the existing
concrete block. Painted reveal strips, a wood trellis at the main entry and
decorative windows are to be included in the construction. The architectural
style is not of those reaommended for the area, Victorian and Spanish. Due to
the zero lot line configuration of the existing structure, it would be difficult
to add the features normally exhibited by those styles.
Under Section 324 of the Town Center Redevelopman Plan, development plans shall
be submitted to the Agency for approval and architectural review. This is not a
public hearing for a use permit or variance and, as such, does not require a
discretionary action by the Redevelopment Agency. The Redevelopment Agency can
make any suggestions it feel prudent and justifiable in order that the proposed
Redevelopment Agency Report
130 S. Prospect
Page t~o
plan meets the intent of the Redevelopment Plan. This is mainly limited to
architectural improvements, but can include a suggestion to the applicant that
he work closely with various City departments to improve and upgrade the
proposed project.
RECO~NENDED ACTION:
It is recommended tha't the Redevelopment Agency approve the site and
architectural design of the subject request.
Senior Planner
AW:do
Attachments:
Resolution RDA 84-10
Site Plan
Elevations.
corn munity Development Department
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 84-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVEkOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
DESIGN OF A 2700 SQUARE FOOT PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AT
130 S. PROSPECT AVENUE
The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Tustin,
California does hereby approve the use and design of the proposed
Professional Office to be redeveloped at 130 S. Prospect Avenue
based on the following findings:
Ae
The design and proposed use of the project, subject to
conditions of approval, are compatible with the goals and
objectives of the Town Center Redevelopment Project Plan.
The architectural and physical design of this project are
compatible with other architectural styles of buildings
within the immediate area.
That based on the analysis contained in a report to the
Redevelopment Agency dated September 4, 1984, the project
should be a positive addition to the community.
That final development plans shall be reviewed and approved
by the Director of Community Development prior to permit
issuance.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Community Redevelopment
Agency held onthe __day of , 1984.
URSULA E. KENNEDY,
Chairwoman
ATTEST:
MARY E. WYNN,
Secretary
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SUMMARY
Project: 'ARCHTTFCT'R nFFT£F
Location/District: 130 S- PRflSPF£T./£-?
Action: DESIGN REVIEW
Building:
Front Setback
Side Setback
Rear Setback
Gross Square Footage
Net Floor SqUare Footage
Height
Number'of Stories
Materials/Colors
Lot Size
Lot Coverage
Parking:
Number of Spaces
Ratio (space/square footage)
Percent of Compact Spaces
Type
Uses:
Number of Public Notifications (Owners):
Environmental ,Status
* No Standard
District Requirement
SPECIFIC PLAN
Proposed
om
O'
15'
50'
BY AGENCY REVIEW
2000 SQ. FT. (MIN.)
100% LESS PARKING &
LA)!DSCA?Z)!C
72'
O' (EXISTING)
O' (EXISTING)
2700
19'
1
STUCCO, WOOD TRIH
6,875 SQ. FT.
39%
9
1/3oo
20%
COMMERCIAL VILLAGE
(SPECIFIC PLAN NO.1)
NO REQUIREMENT
EXEMPT
0 FFI CE