Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA D.R./U.P. 84-12 08-20-84  REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY NO. 5 DATE: August 20, 1984 FROM: SlJ~J ECT: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ALAN WARREN, SENIOR PLANNER DESIGN REVIEW, USE PERMIT NO. 84-12 At its August 13, 1984 meeting the Tustin Planning Commission approved the development of a 21 bay automobile repair center on Laguna Road across the street from Tustin High School. The plan features are listed on the Development Review Summary and the plan reductions contained in the attached Planning Commission report. The project will provide 33 onsite parking spaces and the buildings will exhibit tan split face block walls with red tile mansards. RECOI~ENDED ACTIO#: If the Redevelopment Agency concurs with the findings of the Planning Commission that this proposal would add significantly to the enhancement of the immediate area, it is recommended that favorable consideration be given to this project. J Senior Planner AW:do encls. Report to Planning Commission, August 13, 1984 Exhibit "A" (revised) Plan reductions Plans Draft Resolution No. RDA 84-9 1 3 4 5 7 8 10 11 14 16 17 18 10 20 ~5 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 84-9 A RESOLUTION OF THE COI~IIJIIITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF THSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DE$IGM OF A 9660 SQUARE FOOT AUTOMOBILE REPAIR FACILI'rY AT 1122-1192 LAGUMA ROAD Dm PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meettng of Agency held on the 20th day of August, 1984. The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Tusttn, California does hereby approve the use and destgn of the proposed automobfle repair facility to be constructed at 1122-1192 Laguna Road based on the following findings: A. The design and proposed use of the project, subject to conditions of approval, are compatible with the goals and objectives of the Town Center Redevelopment Project Plan. B. The architectural and physical design of this project are compatible and consistent with other architectural styles of buildings within the immediate area. C. That based on the analysis contained in Use Permit 84-12 report to the Planning Commission dated August 13, 1984, the project should be a positive addition to the community. That final development plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to permit issuance. the Community Redevelopment URSULA E. KENNEDY, Mayor ATTEST: MARY E. WYNN, Secretary Commission Planning DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: OWNER: ZONING: EN¥ IRONI~NTAL: Pa~gust 13, 1904 USE PERMIT 84-12 GARRISON MANAGEMENT, INC. 161 FASHION U~NE, ~116 TUb'TIN, CA 92680 112Z-1192 I_~GUNA RO~d) P.D.F. (A GENERAL PARTHERSHIP) 1602 NORTH GRAND AVENUE SANTA ANA, CA 92701 RETAIL COI~ERCIAL (C-1), APPLICATION UNDER COI~I~RCIAL GENERAL - PLANNED L~IT DEVE].OPI~ENT STANDAP. DS IN ANTICIPATION OF APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE 84-2. (SECOND READING APPROVAL BY CITY COUNCIL ON AUGUST 6, 1984) REQUEST FOR A NEGATIVE DECI. ARJ~.TION BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: On July 9, ].983 the Planning Commission voted 'co continue this public hearing to give the applicant an opportunity resolve the staff concerns relating 'co par~,ing accommodations. The applicant has submitted a detailed analysis of other auto repair centers and Planning staff completed a review of repair businesss within the City. The applicant did not have a revised site plan for Planning Commission review at the July 23, 1984 meeting and requested a continuance to this meeting. The revised plan has been modified in the following areas: a) The gross floor area has been reduced from 10,030 square feet to 9,660 square feet; the number of bays from 22 to 21. b) The parking accommodation has been increased from 29 to 33 on-site exterior spaces; or 1.57 spaces per bay. c) Landscape planters for tree plantings have been added to the parking area and rear of the site. The applicant has submitted a detailed analysis of various existing automotive facilities in Orange County. An employee ratio of one employee per two bays appears to be the trend. As a result, the applicant is requesting an allocation of one outside parking space per bay for storage and 1/2 parking space per bay for employees. It would appear the assumption of one employee per bay by staff Community Development Department Planning Commission Report August [3, [984 page two may not reflect the majority of the small auto repair businesses. Staff still believes, however, the one employee per bay may fit the one- and two-bay operations. Of additional concern are the five (5) mature trees along the Laguna Road frontage which should be retained in this site design. The applicant has plotted them and it appears their retention is possible with some minor modification to the driveway locations. Staff analysis of the aspects of the site remain as presented in the report of July 9, 1984. The applicant has been advised of potential freeway widening. FINDINGS AliD COliCLUSIOILS: The parking'demand for automobile service centers for employees should be between one-half to one space per service bay. For small one- or two-bay operations the count would be close to one employee per bay. For larger operations the demand approaches one-half space per bay. [f the Planning Commission believes one-half employee per bay is a reasonable expectation, ]easing of the building should be limited to no more than two businesses per building, a total of six (6).. .The provision of one exterior parking space per bay for vehicle storage appears to be sufficient for a minor repair facility. Major auto repair operations would demand more storage areas. Therefore, staff believes auto body work and painting Operations should not be allowed within this center. A parking ratio of 1.5 spaces per bay is a reasonable request although this provision may not be the ideal ratio. As a result, staff would recommend use restrictions to ensure the businesses operate within the limits of the site. The design layout of the project would visually enhance the area and the view of the work area from public right-of-way should be minimal. 3. The building design should include a higher parapet wall for adequate screening of mechanical equipment. The wall should be extended on all sides of each building. 4. A shopping center identification pole sign is limited to 50 square feet, but the Sign Code allows for the consideration of large freeway identification signs for automotive service (Section 9481f). The pole sign, as proposed, would appear to be justified but slightly too large for the area. Staff would 'recommend a sign area of no more than 100 square feet per face. Also, the pole sign should be visible from Laguna Road and therefore the monument sign would not be needed. Approval for the pole sign should be authorized in lieu of any monument sign. No wall signing should be authorized facing the freeway. Community Development Department Planning Commission Report August 13, 1984 page three The site currently is comprised of two parcels with two uses. The nursery school site is to become part of this proposal. Therefore, a parcel map is required to combine the site into -one parcel. Full street improvements are generally required of any subdivision. RECOle4EIJDATIO#: P~easure of the P~anning Commission. ~f the Commission believes ~he parking accommodations are adequate as proposed, then the project should receive favorable consideration with conditions of approval at outlined in Exhibit "A". /ALAN G. WARREN, Senior Planner AGW:jh Attachments: Development Review Summary Exhibit "A" Site & Architectural Designs Plans Report of July g, 1984 Community Development Department ' OEYELOPMFJlT RE¥IEW SUI~IARY Project: ___.______._ AUTO REPAIR CENTER . Location/District: ~D/CG-PUD (TENTATIVE) Action: USE PEP~MIT NO. 84-12 Dt stri ct Requirement, Proposed. Building: Front Setback Si.de Setback Rear Setback Gross Square Footage Hat Floor SqUare Footage Height Number'of Stories Materials/Colors Lot Size Lot Coverage 15L (arterial) 0I' O' 35' 3 (maximum) by Con~nission review 3,000 sq. ft. ~00% less required j~arkino & land~caDino O' O' 9,660 22' 1 split-face block r~d 34,195.7 sq.ft. Parking: Number of Spaces Ratio (space/square footage) Percent of Compact Spaces Type USES: to be determined to be determined 20% commercial 33 plus 21 service bays ~/292 (1/1.57 bays)' (not including bays} 27~ open, at grade auto repair Number of Public Notifications (Owners): Environmental .Status * No Standard 23 S.: Negative Declaration of environmental Tmpacts has been applied for EXH~BZT "A' USE P£RHTT NO. 84-12 CONDZTTON$ OF APPROVAL. A. No outside storage of vehicles within the parking area is allowed after working hours. No storage of vehicles under repair shall be authorized on the public streets. Lease agreements shall contain these restrictions and a copy submitted to the Community Development Department for review. B. An eight-foot-high (8') decorative masonry wall shall be provided along the freeway property line. C. A master sign plan shall be submitted for review and approval' by the Director of Community Development which shall include: 1. One (1) lO0-square-foot (double face) pole sign, not to exceed 27' in height. The sign shall be equipped with a decorative pole cover and the .structure shall conform to design as received by the Planning Commission. 2. Tenant identification wall signs as reviewed by the Planning Commision at 50 square feet per building. 3. No signing, other than the authorized pole sign, shall be permitted facing the freeway. One 32 square foot non illuminated monument sign of material similar to the building wallk is permitted on Laguna Road. D. No more than seven (7)'businesses shall be authorized for the center. E. Final exterior building materials shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval. Exterior materials shall be tan, split-face block (walls) with red Spanish tile mansard roofs. F. The parapet walls shall extend to the height of the mansard roofs on all building elevations. The parapet walls are to be of sufficient height to screen roof top equipment. G. Security gates shall be of decorative material, subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development. H. The five (5) existing trees along the Laguna Road frontage which are not located within the street improvement area shall be retained. Any of these five trees lost due to on-site improvements shall be .replaced with 48" box specimens. Adjustments in the northerly most drive may be approved at staff level to accommodate the retention of the trees. The center planters may be replaced by raised concrete islands. I. Submission of a final grading plan is required for review and approval by City staff. J. Construction of street improvements, as required by the City Engineer shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. curb and gutter; 2. sidewalk; ~ Community Development Department EXHIBIT "A" - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL USE PERMIT NO. 84-12 page two Ko ke 3. driveway aprons; 4. street paving; 5. street trees; 6. street lighting; 7. sanitary sewer lateral; and 8. domestic water service. Payment of Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 connection fees based on $50/1000 s.f. of building area is required at the time a building permit is issued. Payment of East Orange county Water District fees is required at the time a building permit is issued. Annexation of parcel to Lighting District is required. A parcel map shall be required for the combination of Assessors Parcel Nos. '432-064-01 and 432-064-02 for the development of the auto repair center. A separate parcel will then need to be created to divide the animal hospital use. Auto body repair and vehicle painting shall not be authorized uses within the center. No vehicle repair is authorized outside the buildings. Fire hydrants shall be provided as determined by the Orange County Fire Marshal. Community Development Department · i