HomeMy WebLinkAboutRPT 4 G.P. AMEND 84-3D 08-04-84PUBLIC HEARING
NO. 4
8484
SUBJECT: CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF GENERAL PLAN AAIENDHENT 84-3d
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
NANNY AFTERGUT ON BEHALF OF GOLDRICH, KEST & ASSOCIATES
AHEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION AT
1262 BRYAN AVENUE FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
TO MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISCUSSION:
The City Council at its meeting on July 16, 1984, continued consideration of
this subject to permit the City Attorney's office an opportunity ~o review, and
submit its comments. After discussion with City staff an alternative not
previously- proposed is now being submitted for Council consideration.
Essentially, the Council desired assurance that only a senior citizen board and
care project would ultimately be permitted. Since private development
agreements and deed restrictions are not preferred, zoning appears to be the
best alternative.
Nhile staff previously recommended the PD (Planned Development) residential zone
which would require all uses to obtain a use permit, this method cannot totally
assure that only a board and care home many ultimately be constructed. The City
Attorney's Office recommends use of the PC (Planned Community) zone for which
this department agrees. However PC zone designations are normally used for
large acreages of land such as that owned by The Irvine Company to allow for
diversity of land use and building types. PC zone districts permit large scale
planning without restriction by typical zoning ordinance regulations. However,
the Tusttn Zoning Ordinance Planned Community zone does not have a minimum
acreage requirement which therefore would permit it tp be used on the subject
property.
Should Council approve the subject request, the project applicant would apply
for the PC zone designation which would include a development plan and intended
land use, e.g., senior citizen board and cate home. Both the zone change and
site development plan would be subject to public hearing and adopted by
ordinance. Therefore, any deviation from the approved plan would require an
ordinance amendment.
Cfty Council
GPA 84-3d
page t~o
RECOI~tENDATZON:
P~easure of the City Council.
Director of Community Development
DDL:do
,,. Community Development Department
1
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 84-52
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE'ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL
PLAN TO RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE-FAMILY RELATIVE TO THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1262 BRYAN AVENUE
The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. Section 65356.1 of the Government Code of the stmte
of California provides that when it is deemed to be in
the public interest, the legislative body may amend a
part of the General Plan.
B. That in accordance with Section 65356 of the
Government Code of' the state of California, a public
hearing was duly advertised and held on June 11, 1984
on the application of the property owner initiated by
Goldrich, Kest and Associates to consider General Plan
Amendment No. 84-3d to reclassify the property to
Residential Multiple-Family use.
C. That a Negative Declaration has been applied for to
comply with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is hereby approved.
D. That the change in classification would be in the
public interest and not detrimental to the welfare of
the public or the surrounding property owners.
II.
The City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment
No. 84-3d amending the Land Use Element to reclassify
the property at 1262 Bryan Avenue from Single-Family
Residential to Multiple-Family Residential.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City
Council held on the day of , 1984.
ATTEST:
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor